ZZZ

HunterHunted

Looked it up on CoinGecko and apparently it exists, called GoSleep ZZZ lol

mackoa12

ZZZ?

PrestigiousDay9535

Gaming on blockchain means pay to win. No serious gamer will ever be interested in a gambling game where you can buy power through crypto and play games with extremely poor gameplay. Even AAA games with slight pay to win elements are heavily criticised. Now imagine a ZZZ boring game with pay to win. Not gonna happen.

zebraChief

Ahhh okay that makes sense. So new example >Suppose we have the SleepCoin: ZZZ and the 3 X leveraged SleepCoin Futures position: XXXZZZ. ZZZ is worth $100 a share, and the XXXZZZ costs $100 and trades on 3x that value. > >Day 1: ZZZ +10% ($110) XXXZZZ +10% ($300 to $330), +$30 on the contract > >Day 2: ZZZ -20% ($88) XXXZZZ -20% ($330 to $264), -$36 on the contract > >Day 3: ZZZ +10% ($96.8) XXXZZZ +30% ($264 to $290.40), -$9.60 on the contract Is my understanding here correct? And the liquidation price would be is SleepCoin dropped just past 33.33% from the original price, at which point the future contract would be worth less than the original value ($300) minus your collateral ($100)

bailtail

DCA is the same as “scaling in” on investment terms. “DCA out” is a more sub-friendly way of saying “scaling out”, which is absolutely a thing in investing and something that people should absolutely be doing because you can’t time tops any more reliably than you can time bottoms. Profits are NOT just determined by exit strategy. Profits = sell price - cost basis. Entry price is half the profit equation. What I’ve been saying is you need to have an entry plan where you start AND stop DCAing each cycle. Otherwise, you’re always buying and if you’re buying while also taking profit you’re at least partially offsetting those sells. You don’t want to be buying all the way back up and then all the way back down. Apply the plan I just laid out to every single cycle we’ve had. That plan works for every single one. Personally, I have a greater understanding of market cycles and TA and so I can actually let the market tell me when to accumulate — the idea you can’t time it is kinda BS, you can absolutely get roughly in the ballpark, and a more “pure” DCA is more for those who don’t know how to read the market signals — but the plan I laid out conservatively front-runs drawdown trends from previous cycles which have been decreasing in magnitude and for which the plan I stated accounts for. That plan should be good for the next cycle, but I would need to see how this cycle plays before endorsing it beyond next cycle. Invetopedia definition of Dollar Cost Average is “investing the same amount of money in a target security at regular intervals *over a certain period of time*, regardless of price.” The part in italics is important. There needs to be a period over which you invest, be it time based or based on “as long as the price is below $XX,XXX”. Additionally, when you look under the “Who Should Use Dollar-Cost Averaging?” Section of the Investopedia article, the final section states: > “However, dollar-cost averaging isn’t for everyone. It isn’t necessarily appropriate for those investing in time periods when prices are trending steadily in one direction or the other.” https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dollarcostaveraging.asp Translation: DCA isn’t something to use when there is a clear trend up or down because if price is going up steadily you’re likelier to be buying tops and the risk:reward isn’t there and yo you don’t want to buy a steady downtrend as that’s just knife-catching. Dollar cost average is appropriate and wise to employ when the market is in a consolidative phase (sideways price after significant drawdown), which is precisely what I’ve been advocating. “DCA” is NOT an entry plan. Unless you are truly advocating to forever be DCAing, which really isn’t a plan at all and honestly at least needs to be suspended when you’re in ranges where your exit plan is telling you to sell. The plan I’m stating is essentially a way to buy somewhere remotely in the ballpark of a bottom. It is a DCA as it’s not throwing a lump sum down in one spot where I think bottom is, but saying “I’m happy to invest $XXX every Y# of days so long as price is below $ZZ,ZZZ because, while I don’t know where exact bottom will be, I’m confident that it will occur below that price and I’m very confident I’ll be able to sell at prices above $ZZ,ZZZ.” And with the exception of HODLers who aren’t even looking to sell, is that not what we’re all looking to do?

mohamadelhout

Doing my part introducing Moons to the public https://youtu.be/Y5QvPYnftb8?si=4RdQhm704seDY1hJ Any feedback is welcome as I'm a beginner 🫡 P.s. sorry about the accent. It's been a struggle getting over it.. and I can't speak loud because the kids room is nearby ZZZ.

und3adb33f

> The thing with Amazon is they lump all the products from various sellers together. They comingle the inventory. This. I worked for a manufacturing company that made, let's call it "Product ZZZ", that used Amazon as one of their main sales outlets. They were regularly getting counterfeits sent back to them by their customers because Amazon dumps every reseller's "Product ZZZ" into the same bin, in direct violation of Amazon's contractual obligations, whether that reseller is the original manufacturer of "Product ZZZ" or is some shitty AliExpress/Wish.com Chineseum counterfeits-seller dumping fake "ZZZ" on the market. So, some lucky Chineseum buyers got genuine products that the manufacturer had supplied to Amazon, and a lot of unlucky customers who bought "directly from the manufacturer via Amazon fulfillment" got crap that didn't work.