Reddit Posts
17-Nov-22 (NYSE: A) Agilent Technologies, Inc. Valuation
17-Nov-22 Agilent Technologies, Inc. ($A) Valuation
Pioneer Merger Corp. $PACX and Acorns terminate their merger agreement $PACX
Pioneer Merger Corp. $PACX and Acorns terminate their merger agreement. Acorns to pay a $17.5M termination fee. https://t.co/iFepjY2CT1
Zillow killed iBuying? $OPEN this DD up and take notes on your $OPAD (I'm so sorry)
Blue $Owl | Professional Sports Minority Investments Commenced | 2021 AUM: $0.2 billion
Why investors should not be worried about the expansion of the money supply causing inflation in four easy charts.
Why investors should not be worried about the expansion of the money supply leading to inflation in four easy charts.
Why increases in the Money supply do not cause inflation in 4 easy charts.
PACX/Acorns - Infographic - Timeline of Discussions Leading to DA - Info From S-4/A
Mentions
People never realized this. We are living in the delusional american dream. But that's okay as long as I am doing well. Everyone is for themselves. Feel free to read my short writing. Pretty much align to your idea, but add a bit of timing expectation. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT9NlAJEf_8ah1dMr41h8NtMQ4Le6mZu4esWzgLP0lBSWu4jtu_Qjt3KcfBtHd4mCCtwyykHvMs4De0/pub
**Liquidations!** **$PACX** https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1829797/000110465922127381/tm2232812d1_8k.htm **$HCAR** https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1824846/000114036122045687/brhc10045378_ex99-1.htm Thx @SPACspin on Twitter.
**Liquidations!** **$PACX** **$HCAR**
Zillow [publishes this data](https://www.zillow.com/research/data/). For the entire US market it [looks like this](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQBjvUg9r-aZhnrJ6qM2fr1GasBF3zcTXbfsM3ecJNv-3_YzG6zuFxu8CYMeG0BWSj6Q9gHEdbC6V4i/pubhtml). TLDR the market is definitely cooling but isn't even close to pre-pandemic levels, at least as a national average. Im seeing a huge amount of variation on that in different regions though, so you guys might be disagreeing just because your local markets are behaving differently. At the macro scale, change in the M2 money supply has been a good leading indicator for change in the US National Case-Shiller index since QE started in '08 ([chart](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=V83T)) , and typically leads it by about a year. M2SL hasnt even fully stopped expanding yet so I would bet that Case-Shiller wont start falling nationally until like the end of 2023, and thats just the beginning of the fall. Remember that in 2008 the real estate market didnt bottom until after stonks had reached new all time highs, and that was a real estate crisis. RE market is illiquid, prices are sticky, and price action lags years behind the underlying economic drivers. be patient
Hey, I think I found a way to share the file without revealing any personal info. Here it is: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vS0-ilLRHlyB-13945D6Nv7vsWunFXmXuI74B0OPcrc4IgZZdIC1cWt8IYDIiVA0JFFbo49f4nkRVWH/pubhtml#](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vS0-ilLRHlyB-13945D6Nv7vsWunFXmXuI74B0OPcrc4IgZZdIC1cWt8IYDIiVA0JFFbo49f4nkRVWH/pubhtml#) Unfortunately because it is a web file, it doesn't include my notes (sources) contained within the cells. However all of this data can be verified online. I'll update the sheet as new information is released. To anyone who references this, take it with a grain of salt.
What is going on with PACX think they lost the acorns deal then silence after so them too
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRzLGWEwdsdPTq05SKXh-v6LsBiz9keARjZVYGVb7OAa9SggqhjMtetQsz_jqMhnjHZ2i5I3yCUfMtj/pubhtml
inhales hopium that PACX will come through for me
Here is the evidence that money tightening is not really bad for stocks. Chart 1: Adjusted M2 (M2-real GDP) vs. SP 500 returns yoy change correlation in concurrent periods R^2 = 0.0005 = No correlation. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRj8d_7G3UwjxbXTPFEZF9-Ne4lwN8qtfQj-F2vl4Su20W7SaeE4GUjiLL88Xff68uHB-PY7Bw9af5Y/pubchart?oid=973058150&format=image Chart 2: Adjusted M2 (M2-real GDP) vs. SP 500 returns yoy change correlation using 2 year moving average R^2 = 0.05 = No correlation. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRj8d_7G3UwjxbXTPFEZF9-Ne4lwN8qtfQj-F2vl4Su20W7SaeE4GUjiLL88Xff68uHB-PY7Bw9af5Y/pubchart?oid=1082165063&format=image Chart 3: Adjusted M2 (M2-real GDP) vs. SP 500 returns yoy change correlation using 8 year moving average R^2 = 0.25 Slightly negatively correlated https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRj8d_7G3UwjxbXTPFEZF9-Ne4lwN8qtfQj-F2vl4Su20W7SaeE4GUjiLL88Xff68uHB-PY7Bw9af5Y/pubchart?oid=457957480&format=image
ehhh i put money into LFTR, IGAC and uhhhhh damn i forget it will come to me uummmm MORE PACX CAUSE I M FREAKING CRAZY
PACX with Acorns was a phenomenal target IMO. It's unfortunate that the deal fell through, but shit happens. It's nobody's fault but maybe Acorns and Putin/wider market.
honestly PACX does have a ton of time left which is why i haven’t sold (and average down once like a moron). if they got acorns they’ll get another one i reckon. i think it’s wildly oversold at 0.19. it’s a cent away from ATL
PACX warrants back below .20….bloody hell. why the heck did i ever buy this bullshit in the first place. i forget who was all about it on here that kept talking about it but they’re down a SHIT TON on these if they held on . i only had a few thousand
talks about buying PRPC cause it’s a good value…doesn’t pull trigger and it shoots up Buys more PACX, continues to plummet classic SNAX…you too damn it
yeah i would say chu is a pretty safe bet. i honestly think PACX is way oversold. they got plenty of time left and Acorns was a pretty decent initial grab
holy shit DNA is on a tear this week. also i sold some positions and bought SNAX AGAIN also bought more PACX cause it’s insanely oversold considering it’s only half way through. gonna keep making moves here. i’m back to spacing. screw it
This is very misleading. See this chart [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ690ylH9cXB2Oqy6b46mGdqlDkz29QAhrBYQxbDFTQWGcMCX0F8LZN2G29HgLW1HXN31t7dWjm4X14/pubchart?oid=2081979134&format=image). The R\^2 between the two is 0.01, meaning the two are completely independent of each other. Secondly, I can count off the top of my head at least a few of these recessions including 2001 and 2008, were caused by events unrelated to the price of oil (911 and the mortgage meltdown.) Also see in the chart there are a number of times in which significant yoy price increases in oil has very little if any affect on GDP. Also, you should supply your data and justify your stance. It is very weasel-like of you to to leave out the data necessary to verify your stance. "Everytime" you mean like 4 or 5 recessions in the last 50 years that can be explained by other events independent of the price of oil?
Does someone keep track of called off deals this or last year? If not, could you comment those that come to mind off of the top of your head. My list so far: TWND, PACX, OCA, LGV, MBAC, AVAH, ASAX [Source](https://twitter.com/spactrack/status/1493231641141157890?s=21)
Hey man PACX and OCA have plenty of time, can’t pool them together with BTAQ
F Praying for my r/SPACs homies who have fallen to warrants. Wall of Shame now includes: PACX, OCA, BTAQ. Which one will be next?
It's been a bad start to the year for SPACs, but IPOs remain more expensive for the company going public that SPAC mergers, and they have to disclose a lot more information, earlier. The way SPACs work, as long as you bought below ~$10 an abandoned deal is fine, you get most of your money back in the end. You've got all these SPAC trusts with money in them, in a bear market with interest rates going up, that will likely be appealing to many companies who need funding. The market can go up or down, but there is still $10 per share (minus expenses, which are regulated) in the trust. I've been loading up on SPAC warrants, which are way riskier than SPAC shares. This is just a pause. They talk about abandoned deals, but for example on the Acorn deal the PACX stock only went down 20 cents, because of above. They probably realized $2B isn't realistic for that company, and they'd rather not get a deal and let their early investors cash out their shares than have a bad deal that will see investors lose money as it drops to $5 after the first SEC filing. SPACs have been around for over a decade, and gained popularity for real reasons. They got frothy, and it normal to have a pullback during a period of volatility, but they're not going away. SPACs will remain more popular than IPOs up until the government regulates them to require more pre-merger disclosures, like IPOs have, then they will truly drop in popularity.👼
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vT1mx5ecOOeVOC4S9dMa6yKIFv9n2F0RKIYyy8Dw2b94LUgrR5iQNAcmcsuNeujy2z6LlOi2TPnuDJH/pubhtml?gid=0&single=true&widget=true&headers=false Additional Notes: Batch 1: Not Public Yet, Just Finishing It Up -Automated Algorithms + Slight Human Sorting -The Human Sorting Has No Influence On The Stocks Selected Batch 2: - Complete Automation With Additional Reference To Technical Analysis + Bot Judgement -Nothing Has An Influence On The Stocks Selected, Strictly Bot -Better Than Batch 3 Because It Includes Technical Analysis Batch 3: -Complete Automation (Less Advanced Than Batch 2) + Bot Judgement -Nothing Has An Influence On The Stocks Selected, Strictly Bot -Will Only Be Available If Batch 2 Doesn't Sufficiently Update Key: -Pharma companies are very risky. -Meme/Hype stocks are very risky. -Penny stocks are very risky. -Companies that you don't know how they work are very risky. -Follower companies are very risky because they join the hype train (what NKLA is to TSLA). -I have a very low amount in options (less than $500), and I have 100k+ in shares and cash. -When doing options have a lot of collateral, so you don't hit margin call. -Take the "Calls" as very discounted, and "Potentially A Call" as somewhat discounted. -Old money companies are slow. While tech companies are fast-paced. -Only invest in companies that you do know and see potential in. - You don't have to invest every day, only when you see the potential.
i mean i m not selling at these prices, makes no sense at all. i’m 100% pre da warrants besides IPOF in my spacfolio NOW THAT FREAKING PACX FELL APART DAMN IT. now that yelling out burst is over. i still firmly believe that if i hit it lucky i could regains chunk of lost ground with a decent DA. market in the shitter or not. if it’s a good opportunity it’s a good opportunity. all my averages are well under a buck so despite being down 60% i don’t think recovering is unfathomable. that being said. i’m not throwing a single cent more into spacs till this bullshit passes. i’ve averaged down so much im below ground
FPAC warrants 💎-hands gang checking in. I also feel that OCA/PACX were particularly affected by how badly the new-age insurance/fintech companies have been beaten down since those DA'd. To be fair, Coinbase has been getting killed too, but I think it's different considering so much of Bullish's valuation comes from their crypto holdings. Additionally, Bullish has a $300M PIPE so hopefully they'll want to take that. That being said, bring on the FPAC warrant $0.6Xs pricing 😆
shit i forgot all about my PACX debacle
OCA and PACX hit the sub hard. I hope our friends here are staying diversified.
All day yesterday I read about how meeting today was priced in. Narrator: It was not priced in [Think I'll stick to sportsbetting](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRHbp0XpCkAxXYVgEPa_fzW7UZMxU-Fe7lszDsnLMma6LoLk4yBm0GQ-ol6QXOlYEW0bhpdyWPCyPjz/pubhtml)
Has anyone heard plans for PACX now that the seal with Acorns is dead?
After PACX - I want to make sure any pre merger positions that I have like BSGAR / SPAQ+ / PPGHW etc are upto date with filings and not behind. What SEC document do you look at to ascertain the merge is on track?
Klein is taking Byju for 50Bn apparently. These idiots aren't even trying. I was bullish on PACX cause it was actually a good deal unlike 95% of these. And it just goes to show when they say "yeah, we'll go with a higher private valuation" We've gotten screwed 100 times over.
Just sold my remaining BTAQ warrants for a 15-60% loss (bought at two points). You guys are welcome, maybe their spend in Q3 will finally be revealed in form of a DA soon. Held for 9 months or so, quite sad stuff regarding everything from opportunity cost to the actual loss. Thank god it wasn't a huge position, still hate it. BTAQ has until Feb. 28 to find a deal, and can extend for 6 months, but not worth it for me. There has been zero interest in the latest SPAC DAs regarding warrants, some have even lost value on their DA day. Sure there will be deals that people are interested in, but all things regarded it's a stupid gamble at the moment. For many r/spacs favourites this year will be quite interesting, here some deadlines for liquidation: * ETAC: 04.08.2022 * VYGG: 06.10.2022 * IPOD: 14.10.2022 * IPOF: 14.10.2022 * LFTR: 23.10.2022 * BOAC: 27.10.2022 * CRHC: 11.09.2022 * PIPP: 19.11.2022 * PACX: 12.01.2023
Think he went into hiding after the PACX/Acorns deal fell apart
Sorry to hear this PACX gang. My condolences.
didnt sell any pre da warrants im losing my ass on. gotta wait for these DA’s. i think bottom is finally here though. the PACX cancellation was the final step to it for me
I still own a few SPACS. Was hoping to get $10 for PACX. Is there any way I can get the $10 back? I’m with Ameritrade and they told me there is no tender offer from the SPAC. Or do I just either have to wait for another merger Or do I just have to sell on the open market? It’s pretty close to $10. But I’d rather not lose $100.
PACX has another year til liquidation/extension. It's a really good team and a 1/3 warrant so no point to sell at these prices. I'm angry because I specifically asked Acorns a few weeks back and they emailed me back saying they are working to get the merger completed with Pioneer and the SEC. Lied to me straight up.
I haven't been paying attention to PACX / Acorns. Was this expected & why?
Acorns is terminating their merger with SPAC $PACX and paying a $17.5 million termination fee, indicating they will raise capital in the private markets and pursue a traditional IPO (can get a higher valuation from VCs) unsurprising
PACX x Acorns deal is dead. Warrants at -12% in PM
>\*INVESTING APP ACORNS, PIONEER SPAC SCRAP $2.2B MERGER DEAL $PACX ^\*Walter ^Bloomberg ^[@DeItaone](http://twitter.com/DeItaone) ^at ^2022-01-18 ^08:31:05 ^EST-0500
So what happens to PACX, go looking for another target?
FWIW: Almost 1 million PACX shares bought in the past 3 days. Avg volume is 100k
PACX has 3 days to close their merger before either party is allowed to terminate and there is no vote date set ...
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSPYTxL9co7JzR\_XdoS\_mTZWlgmAE-A6Y38XeZA1S9VeOjLHQemlOU9z3GbMrrUrhZn2DeWovmkLOHU/pub
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSPYTxL9co7JzR\_XdoS\_mTZWlgmAE-A6Y38XeZA1S9VeOjLHQemlOU9z3GbMrrUrhZn2DeWovmkLOHU/pub
/u/mazrim00 You asked about PACX - They're opening the app up with its services to allow direct stock trading and to compete with Robinhood directly. Surprising move imo but definitely bullish
I did some backtesting comparing SPY ITM LEAPS to purchasing SPY shares and was impressed by how consistently well LEAPS outperform shares. Average return was 92% vs 24%! Here’s my spreadsheet with the numbers, if anybody’s interested: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vT64fYIzPVoisooATTA-aHNlff-M3sHgob6oXRwHheYSGjnw_e21AvWYDDRxa26pasz5nVhAVMilmvR/pubhtml?gid=0&single=true
I actually ran the numbers comparing ITM SPY LEAPS vs buying the shares outright. The LEAPS significantly outperformed the shares. Here are my numbers if you’re curious: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vT64fYIzPVoisooATTA-aHNlff-M3sHgob6oXRwHheYSGjnw_e21AvWYDDRxa26pasz5nVhAVMilmvR/pubhtml?gid=0&single=true
I recently did some backtesting of LEAPS vs buying SPY and was impressed at how much higher the LEAPS returns were. Here’s the spreadsheet I made if you want to see the numbers: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vT64fYIzPVoisooATTA-aHNlff-M3sHgob6oXRwHheYSGjnw_e21AvWYDDRxa26pasz5nVhAVMilmvR/pubhtml?gid=0&single=true
warrants AVAN CSTA FSNB GPAC PACX PTIC oh and AMZN. the only non spac stock i hold lol
deep breath…. all these were up over 4% today. easy to have a big swing up when a few cents per warrant is a big deal (ex PTIC) GPAC and CSTA did have a good hike up. AVAN CSTA FSNB GPAC PACX PTIC
VELO has a 1/3 split and a similar deadline but a weaker team and it settled around $0.5 so I am thinking PACX would settle somewhere around $0.55 but who knows.
If the PACX deal falls through I expect the warrants to go below $0.6 as they aren't from a serial sponsor and from a 1/3 split.
It's even worse.. even if PACX deal breaks, they will have a year to find another deal. The average warrant price of a warrant for a deal that broke with around 1 year remaining is $0.72 (excluding FST/WS because for some reason its trading at $3.95 as a broken deal).
PACX just needs to launch automatic tax loss harvesting and Honda will be no trouble.
I'm delusional on PACX. Market says it's over. I still have visions of Invest with PayPal and CNBC pumps. I hope they are buying time to get some good news out before merger to prop it up. The Invest with PayPal team on LinkedIn is only two people. So how could they do it without a broker dealer like Acorns? They could still work with Acorns without them going public. But it should be a win-win for both to continue with the deal. Why don't I just buy things other people like too? 😩
damn who turned on the buy button for warrants? holy shit except for PACX. screw you pacx
The big thing to note: Almost no SEC filings by TPGY. There was no attempt even of them trying to move forward with the deal. Compare them with PACX for instance who are putting out amended S-4's and 10-Q's to meet every concern the SEC has with them / SPACs.
i know this won’t last so i don’t give a fuggg about a jinx, but wow a lot of green to start the DA on my warrants PACX i know it’s only 2k volume but that’s some nice hopium to see. thanks to the hero who slapped the shit out of the ask
Mutha F'ers. Warrants are down over 50% from Nov. 19th, but some curious 10X volume down days between the 19th and the "oopsie" amended filing. First we tell our friends, then we tell our lawyers, then we tell the public.... --- From the Nov.19th PACX 10-Q filing: **PART II - OTHER INFORMATION** **Item 1A. Risk Factors** Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in this report include the risk factors described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2021 and our final prospectus for our Initial Public Offering filed with the SEC. Any of those factors could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Additional risk factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business or results of operations. As of the date of this report, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2021, and our final prospectus for our Initial Public Offering. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC. --- From the amended 10-Q/A PACX filed on Dec. 20th (bold and italics that follow not mine - actually in the filing): **PART II - OTHER INFORMATION** **Item 1A. Risk Factors** Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in this report include the risk factors described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 24, 2021 and our final prospectus for our Initial Public Offering filed with the SEC. Any of those factors could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Additional risk factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business or results of operations. As of the date of this report, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2021, and our final prospectus for our Initial Public Offering, except for the below risk factors. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC. We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, related to the accounting of complex financial instruments. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. ***We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for complex financial instruments, including for warrants we issued in our Initial Public Offering. Additionally, our management re-evaluated our application of ASC 480-10-S99-3A to our accounting classification of public shares. Our management and our audit committee concluded that it was appropriate to restate previously issued financial statements for the Affected Periods, respectively, to classify all public shares subject to possible redemption in temporary equity.*** As a result, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for complex financial instruments was not effective for the Affected Periods. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of our warrant liabilities, change in fair value of warrant liabilities, additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit, change in the reclassification of public shares and related financial disclosures for the Affected Periods. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. We continue to evaluate steps to remediate the material weakness. These remediation measures may be time consuming and costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. ***We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting of complex financial instruments.*** As a result of such material weakness, the change in accounting for our warrants, the accounting of complex financial instruments and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC, we face potential for litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements. As of the date of this proxy statement/consent solicitation statement/prospectus, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or our ability to complete a Business Combination.
If anyone's been wondering why PACXW has been eating shit lately, the reason is because either side can terminate the merger if it isn't complete by January 15th (and it won't be). There's still going to be a lot of time on the clock for PACX and, who knows, Acorns might even waive the condition, but that's probably why the warrants have cooled off so much.
PACX will be closing in on that at this rate
So the amended 10-Q that deals with the new classification of warrants that PACX filed yesterday... DCRN filed theirs about 4 weeks ago and obviously announced their merger date today Just poking around
[https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-21-151756/](https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-21-151756/) PACX filed an amended quarterly report - doesn't seem to be anything too noteworthy but still chugging along with all necessary paperwork with no signs of danger with their merger
Some DA warrants are making me worried. Like PACX and others down below $.7 makes like good of da pops unlikely.
If you're talking about PACX, as long as the merger goes through the warrants will appreciate due to how the fair value fraction is calculated which is bueno
PPGH, PACX, BARK, DMYS, GENI. PPGH by far the biggest. Santa plz give everyone in Asia a grand new Gogoro
25k buy order just went through on PACX >50% of today's volume
https://imgur.com/a/RCOnX1X The past month's graph for PACX Commons. No large sell orders. Yes, the warrants are getting destroyed but it's on small trades. The big buyers are still in their positions. Just my 2 cents.
Another big buy in PACX. For those concerned about PACXW and the merger. I've bought some more warrants today
PACXW close to all time low. Is it just cause fintech/small cap getting hammered or is there something specific to PACX/Acorn that I missed?
PACX supposed to be convening their board very soon and completing the merger. The price is ridiculously low and is definitely a great buy, especially the warrant stock.
Has anyone heard updates about the PACX/Acorns merger?
Someone bought 5k PACX warrants at +14% today lol
So for PACX All the largest orders I've seen go through have been buy orders including a 150k buy today that's 70% of daily volume. Seems to me that the big investors still are big on Acorns (and the merger going through) while the warrants have died on below average daily volume due to margin calls, panic from eToro, or general market conditions via retail investors. But I'm down to hear any reason why I might be mistaken.
sold hera cause i have minimal loss and it’s previously ATL was in the 0.70s. decent chance it goes lower haven’t sold PACX cause well, shit i hope this is the bottom but fear it’s not
bought a little VT before JPOWs talk in case it rockets up. i figure if there’s a safe bet it’s the entire world market lol i also nibbled on low ball bids with BMAQ LNFA GPAC PNTM warrants. sold out of TEKK cause that rumor is a pure shit company and debating cutting losses in PACX and HERA warrants
Lol I don't have a Twitter silly But I will say this: there's been some nice order sizes on PACX Commons which is what the institutions would be in. Warrants are 100% retail movement I have no concerns over the deal going through and that will make these warrants just fine in the end The one thing I'm crossing my fingers for is that we get a discounted deal where they renegotiate down from 1.8 to maybe 1.6 given market conditions. But that's hopium
Been seeing a lot of post DA warrants get slammed this week. Definitely not much interest in RCLF for now, really surprised by PACX but still think it will pop big on merger of it happens
Yeah, pretty shocked that both of these are this low. I suspect people are thinking PACX deal is off. RCLF just no noteriety possibly?
not even other young companies but shit, there’s so many other motorcycle manufacturers that make more sense to do this. granted i say this has no moat and my dumbass has PACX warrants
PACX has had an interesting day. PACXW down in the dumpsters on 200k volume. Meanwhile PACX commons had a 110,000 buy order come through. Making 110/117k of the total volume (still under avg. daily volume) Just seems to me if any insiders had any concerns about the deal, we'd see a lot of volume and a lot of selling pressure. Instead it's flat for the day and is now even above other post-DA SPACs like DCRN.
PACX is fine but it looks like PACXW fell off a cliff cause of a large seller probably cause of eToro. Since PACX is the one that would be held by institutions and has no volume... Doesn't seem like the story has changed at all and one seller caused a huge drop versus "someone knows something we don't"
It’s weird eh? The merger date must be around the corner as well, so, all it points to to me is a massive buying opportunity. With the kind of backers and connections PACX has, it would seem like a triple play waiting to happen.
just made more in IMPXWS than i did PRPBWS and CHRCWS…go figure what the hell is going on with PACX
It's interesting PACX is actually going up through the day. 9.92 -> 9.94 and basically no volume and warrants have about 100k volume. Imo that means someone had a big position they wanted to get out of. But seeing as the Commons which is what's owned by institutions have no volume and aren't selling off, there's really no difference today versus Friday
Wtf is up with PACX, warrants dumping and over 100k volume already
Not the greatest day today but from now on I’m going to let you guys know when I buy PACX warrants. You will assuredly get a better price then when I buy them. Happens every time with that one.
bought TEKK again at 0.81 a couple days ago and missed being able to sell at 0.93 damn it. but hey atleast it’s green compared to my recent PACX purchase. woof.
the EV bombardment has split the interest. Just stick with proven companies that have sound financials like PACX or SBEA (if you can get it cheap).
Picked up 10k PACX. Should announce new board any day now.
It's crazy to me that people are getting the wrong number. This is, like, the prereq stuff for investing 101. The answer is 0.13%, guys. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQbN_O-g19H1uXeYi_B9VK45u_iRrWHrN52HcTAvVHjExCsXiOJDcNpXdmSQoZD_bmXW3lruaClWH5i/pubhtml