AEI

Relative-Ad-6791

Im having claude ai investigate the munitions situation this was one of the reports “The comparison is brutal, and the data that’s emerged from Epic Fury makes it even worse than pre-war modeling suggested. Let me walk through all three of your questions. China’s Inventory vs. Ours Setting aside nuclear weapons (different calculus), the conventional missile imbalance is the one that matters for a Taiwan scenario, and it’s severe. China’s PLARF fields approximately 900 conventionally armed SRBMs, 1,300 conventional MRBMs, 500 conventional IRBMs, and 400 ground-launched cruise missiles  — that’s roughly 3,100 conventional missiles before you even count air-launched or naval systems. By 2023, the DoD assessed China’s total ballistic missile force at around 2,850 missiles , and that number has only grown since. Now compare that to what we have to defend against them. The total inventory of sea-based SM-3s is around 330 missiles, far below what might be required in the Pacific region.  According to Stimson Center modeling, the United States would likely run out of Patriot and upper-tier interceptors within the first 24 hours of a military conflict with China.  That was the assessment before Epic Fury burned through a quarter of THAAD and SM-3 stocks and a quarter to a third of Tomahawks. The cost-exchange ratio is the structural problem. Iran was bad enough — $100K-$300K missiles vs. $4-5M interceptors. China’s deployment of massed, low-cost missiles and drones would impose unfavorable cost ratios as multiple interceptors costing tens of millions of dollars are expended on single targets that are 10 to 100 times cheaper and quicker to produce.  China isn’t Iran. Their industrial base can mass-produce at scale, and they’ve been expanding missile production across 136 sites, preparing not just for deterrence but for the logistics of a long war.  The Heritage Foundation assessment is the most alarming: high-end interceptors like SM-3, SM-6, PAC-3 MSE and THAAD would likely be exhausted within days of sustained combat, with some systems depleted after just two to three major PLA salvoes. Aggregate US VLS inventories at an estimated 17,000 rounds are insufficient for even one full fleet reload.  What Happens If This Goes Another Month The ceasefire appears to be holding as of yesterday, but your instinct to ask “what if” is right because ceasefire ≠ peace deal, and the administration itself has said the joint force remains ready to resume combat operations.  If fighting resumed for another 30 days at anything close to the pre-ceasefire tempo, the consequences cascade: Interceptor crisis becomes Pacific crisis. A former Japanese Defense Ministry official warned that depletion of Patriot interceptors could take years to replenish and would have a serious impact on readiness in the Indo-Pacific, including the defense of Taiwan.  THAAD systems were already being pulled from South Korea. As one analyst put it, “It’s hard to overstate the irony of THAAD, a symbol of the pivot to Asia, being removed in the dead of night for a new war in the Middle East.”  Standoff weapons approach Winchester. Tomahawk production in 2026 was 58 missiles. The proposed FY2027 budget calls for a 1,200% increase to 785 , but that’s a budget request, not missiles on ships. Another month of operations would push Tomahawk and JASSM inventories into territory where the Navy literally cannot reload its VLS tubes for Pacific contingencies without stripping other theaters bare. The signal to Beijing compounds. This is the part that doesn’t get enough attention. Every week of continued expenditure is visible to Chinese intelligence. They’re watching the magazine drain in real time. Prolonged hostilities with Iran would only deepen America’s Pacific vulnerability  — and China doesn’t need classified intelligence to know it. The AEI cost tracker, the FPRI data, the Congressional reprogramming actions are all public. Could Reporting on Our Capacity Signal an End? This is your sharpest question, and I think the answer is yes, it already did — partially. The pattern from the Twelve Day War last summer is the precedent. Interceptor inventory strain may have led to the end of the Twelve-Day War — had the conflict continued for another few days or another week, it could have become critical.  The same dynamic appears to have operated here, just on a larger scale across 38 days. Look at the sequence: public reporting on interceptor depletion intensified in weeks 3-4, the AEI cost tracker became a reference point for Congressional pressure, and the ceasefire materialized almost exactly when multiple analysts were projecting critical thresholds. That’s not coincidence — it’s the political economy of munitions scarcity forcing strategic outcomes. But here’s the counterargument you should stress-test: the administration’s public posture is the exact opposite. Over 38 days, the American joint force struck more than 13,000 targets  and the White House framed this as decisive victory, not exhaustion-driven termination. The political narrative is “we won so completely Iran begged for a ceasefire.” The structural reality is that both sides had strong incentives to stop — Iran because 80%+ of its defense industrial base was destroyed, and the U.S. because the opportunity cost in Pacific readiness was becoming untenable. The honest assessment: the munitions reporting didn’t cause the ceasefire, but it constrained the decision space to make it inevitable. Another month wasn’t a real option — not because we’d hit zero, but because the marginal strategic cost of each additional week of operations against Iran was being measured in years of degraded deterrence against China. The people making these decisions know the Stimson Center math. Beijing knows it too. The reconstitution timeline is the real answer to “how far back does this set us”: even with every planned production increase funded and on schedule — PAC-3 to 2,000/year by 2030, THAAD quadrupled, Tomahawk to 785/year — it could take 12-24 months to rebuild to pre-conflict levels at current production rates, assuming no competing demands from other theaters.  And “no competing demands” is a fantasy when you’re staring at the Taiwan Strait. For: The Kill Chain — D3 (Missiles/Air Defense) + D7 (Acquisition/Industrial Base) + D5 (Naval) What: The Watterson & Dean War on the Rocks piece (April 7, 2026) is a must-capture. It’s the most analytically rigorous treatment of the interceptor networking problem in the Pacific, directly quantifies Epic Fury’s impact on Indo-Pacific readiness, and proposes coalition missile defense architecture as the structural solution. The Heritage Foundation January 2026 report on interceptor exhaustion timelines (2-3 PLA salvoes to depletion) and the Stimson Center 24-hour modeling are the two key reference points for Taiwan scenario planning. The Bryen “New Missile Gap” piece adds production rate data across allied nations (Japan PAC-3 at 60/year ceiling, South Korean M-SAM combat debut in Epic Fury). Suggested action: Post-Epic Fury readiness assessment — map current estimated stockpile levels against Taiwan scenario requirements, with production ramp timelines as the reconstitution variable. Source: Watterson & Dean (War on the Rocks), Heritage Foundation, Stimson Center, Bryen (Weapons Substack), Asia Times, Stars and Stripes, Military Times​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

BrandonLeeOfficial

##Institutional Beneficiaries of the Post-9/11 War Cycle (2001–2026) I. The Prime Contractors (Direct $2.4T Acquisition Flow) • Lockheed Martin: ~$313B (2020–2024 total). Largest recipient of Pentagon funding (F-35, missiles). • RTX (Raytheon): ~$145B (2020–2024 total). Leader in missile defense and precision munitions. • General Dynamics: ~$116B (2020–2024 total). Primary builder of submarines and land vehicles. • Boeing (Defense): ~$115B (2020–2024 total). Key provider of rotary-wing and transport aircraft. • Northrop Grumman: ~$81B (2020–2024 total). Lead on B-21 stealth bombers and ICBM systems. II. The Asset Management Tier (Dividend & Equity Stakeholders) The "Big Three" asset managers are the top shareholders in nearly every firm listed above, capturing profits from stock buybacks and dividends (e.g., RTX and Lockheed spent ~$40B on share repurchases between 2022–2024). • Vanguard Group: Holds ~9% of BlackRock and similar stakes in the Big Five contractors. • BlackRock Inc.: Major shareholder in the entire defense sector; controls ~$10T in global assets. • State Street Corp: Third-largest institutional holder of defense equity. III. The Debt & Interest Tier ($6.5T Projected Interest) Because the wars were funded by debt, the interest payments ($1T already spent; $6.5T projected through the 2050s) flow to: • Primary Dealers (Big Banks): JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup (fees on bond issuance). • Foreign Creditors: Top holders of U.S. Treasury debt (Japan $1.1T+, China $700B+). • Federal Reserve & Social Security: Large domestic holders of the debt used to finance war appropriations. IV. Service & Intelligence Sector (The "Shadow" $1.1T) • Leidos & Amentum: Top providers of war-zone logistics and IT services. • Booz Allen Hamilton: Primary recipient of intelligence and "knowledge-based" warfighting contracts. • Palantir & Anduril: Newer tech entrants deeply integrated into DoD targeting and DHS surveillance. V. The Political Loop (Revolving Door) • Lobbying Firms: Spending ~$150M annually to maintain defense appropriations levels. • Think Tanks: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Brookings, and AEI receive substantial funding from prime contractors to provide the "strategic rationale" for continued engagement. Summary of Extraction: While the average citizen sees zero ROI, the capital is systematically funneled into private equity (Asset Managers), defense hardware (Contractors), and sovereign/institutional debt holders (Interest).

ViciousSemicircle

Just can’t get past PE guys owning space companies. It’s how we got Cannito publicly hyping the shit out of RDW the day before a shitshow EC, plus he’s an operating partner at AEI. Then RDW ‘acquires’ Edge Autonomy when they’re both AEI companies to begin with. Just shady enough, you know? I get that ROSA’s a great moat and the stock is heading up, and I should probably get past my bias, but give me RKLB’s Peter Beck or ASTS’s Abel Avellan or the ex-NASA nerds running LUNR any day.

Skittler_On_The_Roof

Maybe I'm just slow, but you're telling me 5 million Americans per year enter working age, and 4 million retire.  If 1:5 of those turning 18 decide to go to college fill time, that means net 0 for job demand, right? As far as immigration, the 2 estimates out are AEI and Brookings, estimating anywhere from -500k to +115k.  Even taking the high estimate from that is less that 10k per month.

Objective_Dance_859

AEI is moving

Admirable-Ad-8001

AEI 

WinningWatchlist

>Thinking back on my Figma DD, I liked Figma because literally any UX developer could tell you how useful Figma was to their job and how it dominates the industry, but FLY seems like a small puppy owned by a puppy mill breeder (AEI) dropped off into a den of feral pitbulls. The ownership by AEI is a huge concern of mine and essentially a nail in the coffin of why I'm not interested in a long-term investment. >Is this going to be something like RKLB, or something closer to Virgin Galactic which had a hype run? The company seems cool in concept, but I'm leaning the latter. I think I kind of explain why I'm not interested in holding the stock lol.

MitchCurry

The impact wouldn't be felt short-term. AEI, a conservative think tank, estimates the impact wouldn't be felt until several years down the road if the mass deportations and reduced migration continues.

Coach_Jaymall

Would you say getting into AEI with it's drop after hours and waiting for finalization is a good move ? Or onto the next ?

Quiet_Reputation_128

AEI was a great call. ATER is next?

endwithel

Here is info from chatGPT. 1. $3 Conversion Price on Note A recent SEC-filed Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 22, 2025, outlines Alset Inc. (NASDAQ: AEI) acquiring New Energy Asia Pacific Inc. for US $83 million. The payment is structured via a convertible promissory note that: Pays 1% per annum interest, Converts into AEI common stock at $3.00 per share, Matures after five years with automatic conversion of any remaining principal and accrued interest . This confirms your question about "$3 convertible shares" — it's not shares directly issued at $3, but a conversion price on a note at that level. 2. Acquisition Rumor Validation You asked whether AEI (“Alset”) is indeed acquiring a company. That rumor is supported by multiple credible filings: Investing.com reports this agreement, affirming details of the acquisition structure . TipRanks also confirms Alset EHome (AEI) signed the Stock Purchase Agreement for NEAPI, funded via the convertible note . Summary ✅ Yes, Alset is acquiring New Energy Asia Pacific Inc. via a binding Stock Purchase Agreement. ✅ Yes, the structure includes a convertible note convertible at $3.00 per common share. These are official, verifiable documents filed through SEC channels and reported by multiple financial news outlets. Let me know if you'd like to see excerpts, review the full SEC filing, or track upcoming shareholder or creditor approvals.

Reasonable_Sky_7785

However, the aquisition is already done however that have been no significant spikes in the stock price. On May 22, 2025, AEI signed the definitive Stock Purchase Agreement, agreeing to purchase all shares of NEAPI for $83 million via a convertible promissory note, pending usual closing conditions like majority shareholder approval . • Then, on June 10, 2025, AEI announced that its majority shareholder (Chan Heng Fai) formally approved the acquisition by written consent, confirming the deal is authorized and progressing .

NoctRob

Watching Hassett’s slow move from AEI to White House Agenda mouthpiece. Yeesh.

Rich-Bridge945

Theoretically the Fed could buy and forgive the US Debt. This is the thought experiment played out by the AEI; goes over how it functionally would appear on Fed's balance sheets and affect member banks due to charter requirements [https://www.aei.org/op-eds/a-frightening-solution-to-the-debt-ceiling-crunch/](https://www.aei.org/op-eds/a-frightening-solution-to-the-debt-ceiling-crunch/)

BosSF82

"Turnip allies playing down market losses ‘astounding’ Stan Veuger, a senior fellow in economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank, has dismissed the argument by some Turnip allies that the stock market losses will not affect average US citizens. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he stressed that many people in the US have investments in the stock market, including for their retirement funds and accounts allocated to pay for college for their children. “It’s going to have an impact on American consumers. It’s going to have an impact on all sorts of small businesses. It’s going to have an impact on people’s jobs,” Veuger said. “I find it astonishing that senior members of the administration would go out and pretend it’s not a big deal.”

disgruntled_pie

The White House fucked up the math. The American Enterprise Institute (influential right-wing think tank) says Trump’s team had a gigantic math error: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/06/trump-tariffs-error-aei For example, Trump put a 46% tariff on Vietnam. AEI says that if they’d done the math correctly then it would have been a 12.2% tariff. It’s almost 4x higher than it was supposed to be. I really want this story to blow up. We need Congress, the courts, and the White House to realize that we’re absolutely fucked if the tariffs remain at these numbers, because they screwed up the math so badly.

disgruntled_pie

Trump hires people for loyalty, not competence. So far AEI, a number of Senate Republicans (including Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley, and John Kennedy), and a bunch of Republican donors (including Elon Musk) have said that these tariffs need to stop immediately. I don’t think this is any kind of grand conspiracy. If it were a conspiracy then AEI, prominent Republican senators, and Republican mega-donors would be in on it. They all seem to be just as freaked out as the rest of us. No, sadly, I think the White House is just that fucking stupid right now.

Crackertron

You know it's bad when AEI hates the monster it helped create.

Salford1969

Saw a report from AEI that says the Trump tariffs are calculated wrong, they used retail prices and not manufacturing ones. This has amounted to much larger tariffs than what they should be. [Story here ](https://www.axios.com/2025/04/06/trump-tariffs-error-aei)

DoublePatouain

Everyone has disappeared lol That made the same old sh\*t for AEI and OTT, bit hype in pre market and just after opening, everything drop. GREAT !! Sometime i wonder if this group of Reddit is not the toy of shorter from Discord lol

AutoModerator

Your post with title "$AEI CEO Just Bought 50,000 more shares" has been removed from r/pennystocks because it is too short. Posts must have at least 50 characters to ensure meaningful discussions. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/pennystocks) if you have any questions or concerns.*

DoublePatouain

we said to me the same thing before : AEI : -50% OPTT : -38% So i would like to understand a little lol

Delicious-Hour-3117

Anyone looking at $AEI?

DoublePatouain

it's the top ? arista was at 130 3 days ago. The last time someone told me a stock was a gem, that was for AEI, i lost 50% in 4 hours lol

WinningWatchlist

So I should consider your opinion with equal weight to someone that worked at the Fed and the AEI? yeah I think your use of the fallacy is the fallacy itself buddy

0xMoroc0x

Tariffs can indeed lead to price increases for specific imported goods due to the added cost burden on importers, which is often passed on to consumers. However, these price increases are not guaranteed to translate to an overall rise in inflation, especially if countervailing forces are at play, such as decreased aggregate demand and increased supply in critical sectors. One key mechanism is through demand-side pressure. Reducing the population by deporting illegal immigrants directly affects aggregate demand—particularly in the housing and consumer goods markets. Research has shown that population size directly correlates with housing demand, and by reducing demand, housing prices can stabilize or even decrease (Glaeser & Gyourko, 2018). In markets like the U.S., which have already been under pressure due to constrained housing supply and rising prices, a reduction in the population would reduce this demand, leading to downward pressure on housing costs. For example, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, immigrant inflows between 2000 and 2010 contributed to about 35% of the total housing price growth in some metropolitan areas (Saiz, 2010). This shows that population growth, fueled by immigration, has had a substantial impact on housing costs. Tariffs imposed on imported goods do lead to a price increase in those specific items. However, it’s crucial to understand that overall inflation is the net effect of prices across all goods and services in the economy, not just those subject to tariffs. Suppose tariffs are raising prices on consumer electronics, but simultaneously, the cost of significant necessities—like housing—decreases due to reduced demand. In that case, the overall Consumer Price Index (CPI) could still trend downward. For example, Trump’s 2018 tariffs on Chinese imports did lead to increased costs for certain consumer goods, but inflation remained under control due to offsetting factors, such as decreased energy prices and a favorable labor market environment (Fajgelbaum et al., 2020). Further, increased domestic energy production, which Trump has championed, can have a significant deflationary effect across multiple economic sectors. Energy costs are foundational to numerous facets of the economy, from transportation to manufacturing, and lower energy costs can ripple through supply chains, reducing the cost of goods overall. For instance, the shale revolution in the early 2010s dramatically increased U.S. oil production, which led to a significant decline in energy prices. Lower energy prices reduce transportation and production costs, leading to lower prices for goods and services across the economy (Blanchard & Gali, 2010). The key to understanding this balance is recognizing that inflation is a weighted basket of goods and services, as measured by indexes like the CPI. You can have tariff-related increases in select goods, such as imported electronics, but if the reduction in energy costs significantly lowers production and transportation expenses, and reduced population-driven demand leads to lower rents and consumer prices, the overall inflation rate can still decline. Net inflation, therefore, depends on the interplay of all these variables. For example, during Trump’s administration, tariffs were introduced in tandem with policies that deregulated energy production, leading to lower costs in that sector. Despite the increased cost for some imported goods, inflation remained controlled—Trump averaged an inflation rate of about 1.8% during his first term, which is notably low compared to other administrations (Investopedia, 2023). This clearly illustrates that inflation is determined by multiple interacting factors, not solely by tariff impacts. In conclusion, while tariffs might increase prices for specific goods, they do not necessarily imply a net rise in inflation if other factors—such as decreased demand due to immigration policy changes and expanded energy production—act as deflationary forces. The aggregate effect on inflation depends on how these forces play against each other. In the current scenario, decreasing population pressure, especially on housing, along with expanded energy production, is likely to result in a lower net inflation rate, even if certain tariffed goods see price increases. References: 1. Glaeser, E. L., & Gyourko, J. (2018). Rethinking Federal Housing Policy. AEI Press. 2. Saiz, A. (2010). The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1253-1296. 3. Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The Return to Protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1-55. 4. Blanchard, O., & Gali, J. (2010). The Macroeconomic Effects of Oil Price Shocks: Why Are the 2000s so Different from the 1970s? In NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2007 (pp. 373-421). 5. Investopedia. (2023). US Inflation Rate by President. https://www.investopedia.com/us-inflation-rate-by-president-8546447

Dismal_While579

there already is one like this, current ticker it AEI [https://www.google.com/finance/quote/AEI:NASDAQ](https://www.google.com/finance/quote/AEI:NASDAQ)

FarkGrudge

Whelp, it might be time to swap back to Semi -- TSM, AMAT, LRCX, AEI, AVGO, etc. Their down-cycle looks to be almost done -- time to ride the wave back up!

ddudunga

Here are some additional resources: For those who are new to public insider trading. As mentioned, all insider transactions are reported to the SEC. Their database, known as EDGAR, is a valuable resource for locating insider transactions and various other filings: [SEC Edgar Search](https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search-and-access) Data wrappers often organise this raw information more systematically and in some cases may also provide additional analytics. Below are examples of better-performing company profiles from each market cap category that appear in the analysis: * Nano Market Cap Company: [Alset EHome International Inc.](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/AEI) * Micro Market Cap Company: [Medley Capital Corp](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/MCC) * Small Market Cap Company: [PennantPark Investment Corp](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/PNNT) * Medium Market Cap Company: [First Financial Bankshares Inc](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/FFIN) * Large Market Cap Company: [Align Technology Inc.](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/ALGN) * Mega Market Cap Company: [Intel Corp](https://www.insiderxtrade.com/company/INTC) Here is also a link to the raw data from the analysis: [Google Spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z-ZLX_IWER1nTtjfGbDxG5TaSG6UzyvKjKLir1JDOAo/edit?usp=sharing)

JPowMorgan

>Gottlieb, one of the biggest herd immunity guys, now on CNBC pumping diabetes drugs 😆😆😆 >https://twitter.com/AEI/status/1689638375526178817?t=M3VKGgkzG9XvDwHJV52LMA&s=19 Covid induces diabetes ans a myriad of other health issues. Gottlieb was pushing herd immunity by january 2021. https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/07/02/scott-gottlieb-covid-19-pandemic-over-by-january-squawk-box.html That obviously never happened. Was it all for his pharam stocks? Put it together

cncgm87

Well back in February I made a fake Google Finance portfolio with 5 tickers that had huge amounts of insider buying. Mostly shady or unprofitable companies. CMPR CTVA ALGN AEI RILY (+22% YTD) My actual portfolio which I have spent countless hours researching and lost hours of sleep over is only up 7% YTD... Feels bad man

bloodisblue

The markets in 2023 are not the same as they were in 1980's. In particular the rise of institutional investors as a percentage from 36% of the market to over 80% of the market means that the number of "beatable" traders who trade without conducting thorough research has dropped tremendously. I haven't read the book Market Wizards yet but I'd expect that these guys a) got a little lucky, b) did have some type of calculable edge, and c) we have nothing to learn from them as anything they pioneered is now common knowledge for institutional investors meaning their results can't be replicated. Some sources: > As recently as 1980, institutional investors—principally banks, insurance companies, mutual funds, private pension funds, and state and local government pension funds—held only 36 percent of U.S. equities. By 1997, this figure had risen to 55 percent. [1] > What percentage of investors are institutional? Institutional investors account for about 80% of the volume of trades on the New York Stock Exchange. [2] I'd highly recommend "Winning The Loser's Game" as it was the first thing that explained how the modern markets require a different approach than the markets of the 1980's where there was a lot more opportunity to outperform your peers. [1] https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/ghubbard/Papers/DHH_Inst_Invest_Proj_AEI_12_99.pdf [2] https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/institutionalinvestor.asp.

setzer89

Do more reserach about CEO and how it went with AEI stocks. This is a shell company

Misaiato

URL itself - https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/3908515-the-fed-circumvented-the-debt-ceiling-to-borrow-billions-for-failed-banks/ Clearly says "opinion" Author is Paul H. Kupiec is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. AEI is https://www.aei.org/about/aeis-organization-and-purposes/ And clearly, partisan and right-wing as they come https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Enterprise_Institute http://conservativetransparency.org/org/american-enterprise-institute/ https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/secret-foreign-donor-behind-american-enterprise-institute/ Y'all can YOLO all you want - but this is a prime example of why Citizen's United should be overturned. Get money out of politics and you'd get this kind of bullshit out of the regular news cycle.

VisualMod

Hey /u/Any-Lie-1107 - I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: FFIE AEI DRRX RSLS RDHL SECO. We don't allow discussion of low market cap (less than 500mm) tickers to prevent pump & dump spam and scammers.

Outside-Ad-6175

AEI reverse split! Short scammed!

ThumbBee92

Wouldn't a good portion of the 10% go towards AEI? Or mostly paring down the debt?

Odiwankanobi

AEI…mf chan scammed everyone who owns that stock . Currently only holding the stock incase there’s a law suit and maybe I’ll get some money back

Unfair-Thought5814

Anything from AEI is suspect - you have to weigh it against their motives.

fairecamerone

Looking for a breakout on AEI. ZOM and RIG still looking good

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, AEI. The market cap of AEI is **32671580** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

Valuable-Building798

AEI ready to explode WARNING OR NOT?

Valuable-Building798

AEI

Viking999

LOL, or it just says that an old man doesn't understand people younger than him. Shit, even the advent of new things like people "streaming" or the "gig economy" are not likely well understood by a fossil. Not saying that explains it all but society and "work" have undergone a massive shift from the days of Larry Summers was "working". Oh, my bad, I'm sure he had a ton of jobs at Harvard and MIT while his family took care of everything, LOL. Not sure the debate team qualifies for unemployment. Fucking useless. On top of that, AEI is a useless partisan organization. Here's their last tweet: "Instead of ritualistically supporting Democratic candidates, many Hispanic American voters are embracing conservative values." Dumpster fire morons care about this shit and it has ZERO to do with the stock market

FUTUREMONEY888

👀 AEI someone's been accumulating

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, AEI. The market cap of AEI is **39176200** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

givemebuck

$AEI is moving...

givemebuck

$AEI my bet for today....

Jeezy911

Kevin Allen Hassett is a titan of economic research. Possibly the finest alive today who is a former Senior Advisor and Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Trump administration from 2017 to 2019. Hassett joined AEI as a resident scholar in 1997. He worked on tax policy, fiscal policy, energy issues, and investing in the stock market. He collaborated with R. Glenn Hubbard on work on the budget surplus, income inequality, and tax reform. Hassett published papers and articles on capital taxation, the consistency of tax policy, returns on energy conservation investments, corporate taxation, telecommunications competition, the effects of taxation on wages, dividend taxation, and carbon taxes.\[ There is no reason to cast aspersions on him, nor are you qualified to do so. He is an academic of the highest caliber, and the implication he's not going to call a recession because it would be inconvenient for Biden is founded on nothing other than your deranged fever dreams. ​ He said we are in a recession.

qwertygm1979

AEI has a very small float and 3 months to get over 1$. The CEO needs these badly because he would win a lot of money. Thats were i put half the benefits fron tblt

qwertygm1979

AEI has tiny float and will jump soon!

Puzzleheaded_Dog766

AEI. I dont thi k im missing anything, i think itll just take alil time to get the houses built. Then boom. Lol

Ashamed-Code-6506

What happens to the price/shares when a stock is delisted. E.g., AEI

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, AEI. The market cap of AEI is **31466240** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

ddr1ver

The company was acquired by DUCOMMUN INC (ticker symbol DCO) in June 1998. From DCO 1998 10k posted on the SEC website Acquisition In June 1998, the Company acquired the capital stock of American Electronics, Inc. ("AEI") for $8,146,000 in cash and $1,900,000 in notes and other liabilities. AEI is a leading manufacturer of high-precision actuators, stepper motors, fractional horsepower motors and resolvers principally for commercial and military space applications. Calendar 1997 sales of AEI exceeded $7.1 million, of which approximately 60% were related to space programs. The acquisition of AEI was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and based on preliminary allocation of the purchase price, the Company recorded goodwill of $5,794,000. The consolidated statements of income include the operating results for AEI since the date of the acquisition. The acquisition was funded from internally generated cash, notes payable to sellers and borrowings under the Company's credit agreement with its bank. The acquisition will strengthen the Company's position in the aerospace industry, add complementary lines of business and improve utilization of existing manufacturing facilities and overhead structure. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/30305/0000892569-98-002062.txt

brickunlimited

Most of this is due to persistent supply chain issues and the cost of oil. Neither of which is Biden’s fault. The stimulus may have contributed 2-3% extra percent to inflation even according to conservative economists like Michael Strain at AEI. Even this is better than what would have happened if the government didn’t act during COVID.

BPBT2020

Yeah all youve done for the last 2 months Is pump AEI. Chan is a scam man, no one here should touch his stuff.

BPBT2020

DSS and AEI are scams imo, both are on my ban list. Look at the dilution.

usayhesjustafriend

The housing boom of the past two years propelled U.S. home prices to record highs throughout the country. But in hundreds of cities, the red-hot market hasn’t yet brought back prices to where they stood about 15 years ago. Prices fell so hard during the subprime crisis or climbed back so gradually in these cities that the current buying wave is only beginning to make even a homeowner who bought there during the last boom. The status applies to 477 U.S. cities, where the typical home value at the end of April was below peak levels from the housing boom in the early 2000s, according to an analysis by Zillow Group Inc. for The Wall Street Journal. Zillow home value index* Source: Zillow *A smoothed, seasonally adjusted measure of the typical home value​across a given region. It reflects the typical value for homes in the 35th​to 65th percentile range. Chicago Cleveland Detroit New York City U.S. '05 '10 '15 '20 2000 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 $800,000 Home values in Detroit, Flint, Mich., and Hartford, Conn., were among those below peak, Zillow found by using its home-value estimates. In cities including Chicago, Cleveland and Newark, N.J., typical home values only exceeded their precrisis peaks for the first time in April. The values in the analysis aren’t adjusted for inflation, which means that accounting for inflation, the number of homes still below peak levels would be higher. SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS If you have bought or sold a house recently, what was the experience like? Join the conversation below. The economic recovery since the 2007-09 recession has been uneven, with some cities thriving with high-paying tech jobs and soaring home prices while others struggled. Even as remote work during the Covid-19 pandemic enabled more workers to live anywhere, the population has grown in cities such as Austin, Texas, and Phoenix but has continued to shrink in cities such as Detroit and Cleveland. The laggards represent only a fraction of the overall population, in part because the populations of many of the cities that have yet to reach their precrisis peaks are relatively small. Moreover, more than 400 of the cities have typical home values that are at least 80% of their precrisis peaks, Zillow said. That means rising home values could push many above their former peaks this spring or summer. Current-to-peak ratio* BELOW ABOVE No data 0.75 1 1.5 5 miles Lake Michigan City of Chicago Race/ethnicity† Black White Asian Other Hispanic ZIP Codes below peak value *Current-to-peak ratio indicates the ratio between the typical home value during the precrisis peak and the typical value at the end of April. †One dot equals 50 people, and is calculated based on census block. Sources: Zillow (current-to-peak ratio); U.S. Census Bureau (demographic information) Emma Brown/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Their slow return to former peaks, however, highlights the decline or stagnation of a surprising number of American communities. “The growth since 2006 has very much been a growth that’s associated with rising inequity,” said Susan Wachter, a professor of real estate and finance at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. “For homeowners, this has been a period of immense wealth appreciation, but in these cities and metros, homeowners have not participated in that” to the same extent, she said. The current boom has been unusually widespread, with home prices rising rapidly and buyers competing in bidding wars in big cities and small towns alike. The typical home value nationwide stood at $344,141 in April, up 58% from its April 2007 peak of $218,148, according to Zillow. But in Detroit, a typical home was valued at $66,015 at the end of April, below the city’s August 2006 peak of $74,180. And in Chicago, the typical home value of $315,196 in April sits just above the city’s March 2007 peak of $314,917. Especially adjusted for inflation, some homeowners who bought in these cities during the last peak still would be unlikely to sell for a profit today. Homeowners in places with slow home-price growth have missed out on much of the wealth creation tied to the housing market’s years of gains. Many have built equity by paying off some of the principal on their mortgage loans. But about 86% of wealth appreciation for the typical U.S. homeowner between 2011 and 2021 came from price appreciation, according to a March study by the National Association of Realtors. Current-to-peak ratio* BELOW ABOVE No data 0.75 1 1.5 5 miles Lake Erie City of Cleveland Race/ethnicity† Black White Hispanic Asian Other ZIP Codes below peak value *Current-to-peak ratio indicates the ratio between the typical home value during the precrisis peak and the typical value at the end of April. †One dot equals 10 people, and is calculated based on census block. Sources: Zillow (current-to-peak ratio); U.S. Census Bureau (demographic information) Emma Brown/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Wide disparities in home-price appreciation often exist within cities. The areas where home values have been stagnant are often historically Black homeowner-occupied areas, said Alan Mallach, a senior fellow at the Center for Community Progress, who focuses on the revitalization of cities and neighborhoods. In Chicago, a north-side ZIP Code near the River West neighborhood, which is majority white, had a typical home value of $530,586 in April, up 21% from its previous peak in 2007, according to Zillow. But a ZIP Code on Chicago’s southwest side near the Little Village neighborhood, which is mostly Hispanic and Black, had a typical home value of $214,928 in April, about 40% below its 2007 peak. The Chicago neighborhoods where home prices have lagged behind have lower incomes and had higher rates of foreclosures and distressed sales following the housing crash, said Maude Toussaint-Comeau, senior economist and economic adviser at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. “Those areas were hit the hardest, and we saw that they also took the longest to recover,” she said. The precrisis peak prices in some areas also were inflated by subprime mortgage lending and easy access to credit, said Geoff Smith, executive director of the Institute for Housing Studies at DePaul University. NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP Real Estate From aspirational residences to major commercial deals. PREVIEW SUBSCRIBE Cities with lagging housing markets can struggle to raise enough revenue through property taxes, which makes it difficult to provide municipal services that attract new residents, Prof. Wachter said. On the other hand, cities with relatively affordable housing are increasingly in demand as home prices continue to hit new highs and mortgage rates climb, said Ed Pinto, director of the AEI Housing Center at the American Enterprise Institute. “They have lots of housing, and it’s reasonably priced,” he said of cities such as Cleveland and Detroit. “How do they make themselves attractive to the work-from-home employee?”

bigjaymizzle

Interesting. Yay we can talk about below market caps here that’s awesome we need some YOLO plays. $CEAD is a cannabis play above $1 so my radar is tingling. Don’t know much about AGRI but interested. But yo if we sharing plays here’s mine. HEXO as long as it meets market sales, GNUS “20 year play,” AEI for solar home and Tesla awaiting expansion news, SNDL cause diversification not a fan of dilution but Alcanna deal was golden, AMC cause hey you’re not cool unless you own GME or AMC. I’m too poor for GME rn so AMC it is hoping for $20 by EOY, GNLN major cannabis distribution channel, and YCBD my ride or die. Jimmie Johnson crashing at the Indy 500 caused more speculation for YCBD cause he’s a sponsor. Looking forward to the Jefferies Cannabis Summit.

SKUWL

$AEI been grabbing some since their quarterly report. Been a steady up-trend. Its follows the market, if it keep going it looks like a good small profit.

kriscotta

AEI is like my lead bag - I got in at like .56 - so yeah!

givemebuck

$AEI ....

givemebuck

My Bet for the day $CRXT $CEI $AEI $KEGS $KTRA Have a great Day!

USsoldier35

talk AEI lol

USsoldier35

buy AEI stock and come get me up here at the mooon!

USsoldier35

would love some good dd on AEI.....chan phukin me reeeeeeel gooood rn.....

givemebuck

Peace to everyone I know a lot of you have their Blood Pressure up! Take it easy guys! Better days are coming... My Stocks for the day... $CRTX $AEI $KTRA $SBFM

qwertygm1979

AEI and HCDI are very undervalued

LunarPayload

But, can we trust AEI?

friendva

$AEI Holders 39.74% Held by All Insider (soon 53.5% DEF 14A) 40.39% Held by Institutions (15.19% Outstanding + 25.2% Float) Total 80.13%. Think about this Book value $3.08 Above $AEI current price $.42 (Yahoo Finance) Book value $2.82 Above $AEI current price $.42 (Finviz) Total Assets 184,210M Net Tangible Assets 148,378M Yahoo Finance Market Cap 54.27M Finviz.com Market Cap 53.74M $AEI undervalued no matter how you look at it.

PresentSky1080

I've been in AEI for couple months now probably should've sold when it ran this last time but I think it will go over 1$.i think they have a contract with Tesla for the smart homes. I thought I read something about it. Also there has been insider buying

kriscotta

anyone know what the details are on AEI - I am seeing articles today that don't look so good, but still they are into legitimate properties I thought...

ChasingAkhira

$AEI

OptionsRMe

AEI

Buick-86

What makes AEI a good buy today? What’s the predictions?

ForcaInesgotavel

AEI is never the level of SST

Sergionj93

AEI is a safer SST lol

qwertygm1979

AEI is SSR today and is very undervalued

Bullsniperfiveseven

AEI can’t maintain support for shit. To be fair for 4-5 months neither could ater. But ATER ran 200% on 2 months and si rose WITH the SP. Retail holds an average of $13 here. Bag holders ain’t selling after holding a year. And it’s on the threshold list for now over 50 days AND it’s on short exempt today. We’re not waiting on a short squeeze that already happened 🤣 in September the fire got put out. Retail lost it. But it’s starting again. You can hang out at AEI and trade sideways for 8 months I’m going all in on ATER and lowering my average to $7 today. Good luck

qwertygm1979

At the current prices of both, i take AEI, much less risk of falling and much more upside. I can see ater at 3 and going to 8 as a very very top, i don't see aei at 0.3 and could go so much higher than 0.8

Bullsniperfiveseven

AEI is a pile of hot ass and you know it. ATER is mathematically a squeeze lol it’s not a blind pump

qwertygm1979

Because they are still in circles thinking about gme and amc, waiting for a shortsqueeze that already happened 1 year ago. Buy AEI

TinyHands6996

AEI is goin places.

Remote-Mind-8

Hymc and AEI should rise today

qwertygm1979

Just buy AEI and wait

qwertygm1979

AEI is very undervalued

qwertygm1979

AEI is very undervalued

ForEachCell

I think you are alright if you get in at .50 and get out once it starts to kiss .70. I wouldn’t trust it for more than a short play. Check out DSS there are some funky insider trades going on with them and AEI.

Sergionj93

What do you guys right about AEI

Trustme-I-know

AEI is 61 million dollar unprofitable company with less revenue than 3 years ago. Not the same

qwertygm1979

I guees the same missing in AEI

qwertygm1979

AEI will pop up soon

doinshit_nah

Could be shorting their own company like AEI did

ForEachCell

You got to swing between AEI and DSS to make any money.

qwertygm1979

AEI is heavily undervalued.

qwertygm1979

Never trust biotech, buy AEI, 100% profit in 2 weeks

veryblueeyes

AEI

Justus_fc

AEI looking ready to 

qwertygm1979

Today expect a late run in AEI