ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
While SOXX and ARTY ETFs are inflating, Nvidia is deflating. These ETFs are overheating.
New Robinhood account to save for car in 2029 November
Mentions
I love me some SPCX. I thought about SMH, but I went with BOTT & ARTY instead.
I like the ARTY ETF. It has a lot of promising companies
UiPath and ARTY you’ll think me later
Bet on AI: \### 🧠 Core AI, Software & Robotics \* \*\*AIQ\*\* — Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF \* \*\*ARTY\*\* — iShares Future AI & Tech ETF \* \*\*BOTZ\*\* — Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF \### 🏢 Digital Infrastructure & Security \* \*\*DTCR\*\* — Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF \* \*\*HACK\*\* — Amplify Cybersecurity ETF \### ⚡ Power & Energy Layer \* \*\*XLU\*\* — Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund \* \*\*URA\*\* — Global X Uranium ETF
Rate my portfolio: AI powerplay Based on the portfolio image you provided, here are your 7 current exchange-traded fund (ETF) holdings, broken down by their function in your AI ecosystem thesis: \### 🧠 Core AI, Software & Robotics \* \*\*AIQ\*\* — Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF \* \*\*ARTY\*\* — iShares Future AI & Tech ETF \* \*\*BOTZ\*\* — Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF \### 🏢 Digital Infrastructure & Security \* \*\*DTCR\*\* — Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF \* \*\*HACK\*\* — Amplify Cybersecurity ETF \### ⚡ Power & Energy Layer \* \*\*XLU\*\* — Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund \* \*\*URA\*\* — Global X Uranium ETF
“Michael Burry says…”, “Michael Burry says….” It stays on repeat for a couple of years until at some point it happens and then “there you go, he predicted it”. Last year when he said there’s an AI bubble, I loaded up on GOOGL and ARTY - best thing I did.
Did the SOXX and ARTY ETFs perhaps overreact in mid-April? A pendulum swing in sight?
got deep ITM leaps on ARTY (35 cc expiring September). obviously regarded but maybe…
Seems you like tech, just invest in QQQM or BAI (active)/ARTY (passive).
I was also looking at ARTY, QTUM, BOTZ, AIQ, CHAT. Anyone have any thoughts on those or others? There are some overlaps in the holdings, but each has their own mix.
TLDR Math first: $300/week for 4 years = **$62,400 contributed** With reasonable historical returns (~7–9% blended), you’d likely end up around $70k–$75k, not $100k $100k by Nov 2029? Very unlikely without: • Much higher contributions (≈ $400/week), or • Extremely high sustained returns (~24%/yr, unrealistic). Portfolio issues: • Overlap (VUG + VONG do the same thing; VNQ + REET overlap). • Too aggressive for a 4-year, must-have-cash goal (heavy equities, thematic risk). • Fine for long-term investing, not ideal for a car purchase timeline. • More realistic expectation: • $70k–$80k is a reasonable target at $300/week. • $100k requires either more savings or more time. Better approach for this goal: • Simplify (1 broad stock ETF + bonds). • Increase bonds/cash as 2029 approaches. • Prioritize capital preservation over growth. ⸻ Weekly ETF Investment Plan: Can It Reach $100K by November 2029? This plan assumes investing $300 per week starting in November 2025 and continuing for four years, or roughly 48 months, with no withdrawals and full dividend reinvestment. Over that period, total contributions would equal approximately $62,400. The portfolio is spread across eight ETFs covering U.S. growth stocks, high-dividend equities, emerging-market bonds, real estate, natural resources, and a thematic AI/technology fund. The weekly allocation breaks down to $50 each into VUG, VONG, VYM, and VWOB, and $25 each into ARTY, GNR, REET, and VNQ. This results in roughly two-thirds of the portfolio being equity-based, with the remainder split between bonds and real-asset exposures. Dividends are assumed to be reinvested, so all return estimates reflect total return rather than price appreciation alone. To project future outcomes, historical total returns for each ETF were reviewed and normalized to conservative forward assumptions rather than peak historical performance. ARTY has delivered roughly 11–12% annualized returns since inception but with high volatility, so a 10% forward assumption is used. VUG and VONG have produced long-term returns in the low-to-mid teens, but given concentration risk and market cycles, a 10% assumption for both is reasonable. VYM has historically returned about 9% annually when dividends are included. VWOB has produced lower but steadier returns in the 3–4% range historically, though current yields justify assuming closer to 5%. GNR has been cyclical, averaging under 5% long-term but higher in the last decade, so an 8% assumption is used. REET has returned roughly 4% long-term and VNQ around 6–7%, so forward assumptions of 5% and 6% respectively are used. When these assumptions are weighted by allocation size, the blended expected return for the entire portfolio comes out to approximately 8% per year. This is an optimistic but reasonable estimate based on long-run averages, not a forecast of guaranteed performance. Using that return assumption and weekly contributions, the projected portfolio value after one year would be roughly $16,200 on $15,600 contributed. After two years, contributions would total about $31,200 with a projected value near $33,800. After three years, contributions would reach approximately $46,800 with a projected value around $52,800. By November 2029, total contributions of $62,400 would be expected to grow to roughly $73,000 to $74,000, assuming steady markets and full dividend reinvestment. That result is materially short of the $100,000 target. To reach $100,000 in four years on $300 per week would require an average annual return of roughly 24% sustained for the entire period. That level of performance is far beyond historical norms for diversified ETF portfolios and would require unusually favorable market conditions every year. Alternatively, keeping the assumed 8% return and solving for contributions shows that weekly investments would need to increase to roughly $400 per week to reach $100,000 by November 2029. It is also important to recognize that even the $73,000 projection is not guaranteed. Markets over a four-year window can underperform historical averages, particularly for equity-heavy portfolios. While a strong bull market could improve outcomes, relying on exceptional returns introduces significant risk, especially when the funds are needed on a specific timeline. Because this is a four-year goal, such as saving for a car or other near-term purchase, the portfolio’s risk profile deserves scrutiny. The current allocation is diversified but aggressive for the timeframe. There is meaningful overlap between VUG and VONG, both of which target large-cap U.S. growth stocks. VNQ and REET both provide real estate exposure, which has been volatile and interest-rate-sensitive in recent years. Sector-specific funds like ARTY and GNR add volatility that may be appropriate for long-term investing but can work against a fixed-date goal. For a four-year horizon, a more balanced or simplified approach would typically improve reliability, even if it slightly reduces expected returns. Increasing exposure to high-quality bonds, short-term Treasuries, or a conservative allocation ETF would reduce downside risk as the target date approaches. Broad market equity funds can replace overlapping growth ETFs without sacrificing diversification, while limiting niche and thematic exposure reduces the chance of large drawdowns at the wrong time. In summary, investing $300 per week for four years is a strong savings habit, but under realistic assumptions it is unlikely to reach $100,000 by November 2029. A more defensible expectation is a final value in the $70,000 to $80,000 range. Reaching $100,000 would require higher contributions, a longer timeframe, or accepting substantially more risk with no guarantee of success. For short-term goals, preserving capital and reducing volatility often matters more than maximizing growth, and adjusting expectations or strategy early improves the odds of a successful outcome.
BAI and ARTY are AI-themed ETFs
ARTY iShares Future... BOTZ Global X Roboti... HUMN Roundhill Huma... BOTT Themes Human.... AIQ Global X Funds... KOID KraneShares Tr...
Yes I would certainly do it. Maybe you could do a put on a fund. Nvda would be a good bet but that could still go on but some of the services further on could go kaput. Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ): A passive fund that tracks an index of global companies across the AI value chain, known for broad diversification. More information is available on the Global X ETFs website. TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD): An actively managed fund that selects 30 to 50 global companies believed to benefit from the AI transformation. ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (ROBO): Focuses on companies with businesses related to the evolution of AI and big data analytics. iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY): Seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. companies contributing to AI technologies, including generative AI and infrastructure. ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ): An actively managed fund focusing on autonomous technology, robotics, and other disruptive innovations.
This stuff only works out great for short term bull markets. ARTY would be in the red if you brought at the peak of early 2021. ARKK would be red over 5 years and I'm red on my 5 year ARKG hold. XLK is great, SMH is good for exposure but VONG isn't giving the growth you'd want with the mega caps dominating. Future can't be determined, but most would do VOO over VONG.
The simple sucessful ETF portfolio I had used in the past is below. It's over- weight in tech, but thats where the returns have been the last couple of years. You can add other EFTs for other sectors to target, Xbi-biotech. I use the VOO/VEA combination before for non-US stocks and emerging markets. I like having a Cathy Wood's active managed ARK fund to boost returns, ARKK, ARKG or others. 1. VONG 80% 2. SOXX or SMH 5% 3. XLK %5 4. ARTY 5% 5. ARKK 5% I like VONG, 1000 Large cap growth over the plain VOO, S&P-500. I'm retired now with more time on my hands and have migrated over from hold & forget ETFs to pure stocks. Good luck.
I’m in APLD, WULF, BITF, GLXY, and HIVE. Also ARTY and AIQ for AI etfs that cover some of the others
Already up $200, mainly from ARTY
Anyone else holding part of their port in ARTY? Seems like a solid ETF for the AI pump.
QTUM - Quantum Computing ETF BOTZ, ARTY - AI ARKQ - Robotics
QTUM - Quantum Computing ETF BOTZ, ARTY - AI ARKQ - Robotics
What are the thoughts on ARTY? Is that a long-term stock and are the dividends gonna be worth it? I picked it up because of long-term growth of all the tech stocks.
I’m buying some $ weekly, split as: - SPY 60% - RDDT, UBER, META, GOOG, NFLX, ARTY, ARNB, SHOP, SPOT, TTD 4% each My long term hypotheses: RDDT - solid user growth, low ad fill rate, valuation down a decent amount lately UBER - autonomous car long term play, Waymo etc. don’t want to build ride share network and will pipe into uber / Lyft META - massive ads moat after apply fucked over the ads ecosystem, only competition is google GOOG - their search is going to get impacted, but upside from cloud / AI revenue, Waymo, YouTube; recent lower valuation NFLX - diversified global production supply chain, better positioned vs unionized big production cos ARTY - index that has AI infra stocks; spend on AI infra will go up irrespective of real AI business impact SHOP - more layoffs, more AI making it easier to start businesses, lot more small bizs in the future SPOT - solid moat especially with podcasts TTD - only independent ads demand side platform, they’re sorta the anti-GOOG for the display ads ecosystem Open to counter arguments on any of these. Nevertheless, my portfolio is >80% SPY and I don’t think I’m smart enough to beat the market long with my picks.
I'd recommend looking through the holdings of ARTY, BOTZ and IROB.
I’m in my early 40s and already have VTI but I’d like to add more direct exposure to AI. So far In my research I’ve found VGT and ARTY (previously IRBO). I feel like I like ARTY more but has a much higher expense of almost .50% compared to VGT”s .1%. Any thoughts? Any other funds I should check out? I like both of these because they contain NVDA and PLTR, that’s what started this search. Thoughts??