DNP
DNP Select Income Closed Fund
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Photronics (PLAB). A great Picks and Shovels play during the AI and Data Center Boom
Japanese Value and AI Infra: Dai Nippon Printing ($7912.T, $DNPLY on OTCM, $DNP.F on FWB2)
CluCoin Founder DNP3 Gambles Away Everyone's Money
Hit Attempt on Revlon ($REV) Results in Deep Value Play
$MITI The Good Clinic™ and InstyMeds Team Up to Help Improve Pharmacy Access in Underserved Northeast Neighborhood
Mentions
May i introduce you to the humble DNP
It always trades around $10. When the market flips out, you can often pick it up around $9, occasionally under. When interest rates were nearly 0%, DNP was trading up towards $12/share. People were willing to over pay for the yield.
I like a fund called DNP. Pays 7.29%.
they just started packaging the 2mm xD I assume that the huge investment is sign things might be going well. I was wondering if its good timing for DNP but got no budget for it anyway \~
water fast or take DNP and hope you don't overdose and die.
Not at all—PL7737 isn’t a DNP‑style uncoupler but a selective MC4R agonist that works centrally to curb appetite and modestly boost energy expenditure, rather than indiscriminately “cooking” cells. It has cleared IND‑enabling toxicology with no red‑flag safety signals reported and the FDA even granted it orphan drug status for LEPR‑deficiency obesity. Human trials kick off after the planned Q4 ’25 IND submission, so misuse risk will be tightly managed under clinical protocols [prnewswire.com](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/palatin-announces-positive-preclinical-efficacy-data-for-oral-mc4r-agonist-pl7737-in-animal-model-of-obesity-302505219.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com). DNP’s uncontrolled mitochondrial uncoupling is a completely different—and far more dangerous—mechanism.
DNP, and you don't want none.
There's this thing called DNP..
I was getting these stupid $7 dividend checks every month in college, so I called my dad’s broker and said- I don’t want these checks every month - what can I do? My broker said- “dividend reinvestment.” I said fine! Every time I get any kind of dividend invest it in DNP Select because they send the checks. I was 18. I didn’t review any of this for 10 years until I wanted to buy a house. By then it was $30k- I think I tripled my money after my dad’s $10k gift. I hadn’t noticed any of it.
You can do it in 5 days with DNP
Taking DNP and eating nuggies is some Dwayne Elizondo level shit.
Guys I just ate chicken nuggets on DNP. I forgot about the carb rule. Pray for Mojo.
Buy DNP (income fund) they give you a monthly dividend which equates to ~7%+ annually. The beauty of this is when you turn on dividend reinvestment & start to have the money compound. This stock doesn’t fluctuate too much and if you get in around the $8/9 mark you will have some upside on the stock price as well. You can review the charts yourself & see the consistency & continual dividend payout. For context I have this stock for the last 6 years not once have they missed a dividend payout.
ETF’s ..not really a stock but… Spy Scad DNP sgov And some stupid stock I’ll buy for a quick win that will go down and I hold forever
>... planning on putting around 100k into Edison motors and want 200-300k more of higher risk moonshot sort of investments the rest in stocks. Ah, to win the lottery and give it all away... Put 250k into $DNP. You're welcome.
how much of your portfolio is in DNP?
Invest the $400k in DNP they give a monthly dividend, at 400k you would get roughly $2600-2700 monthly. If you can wait for the price to drop to the low 8$ vs the current price in the mid $9. Otherwise it’s a solid stock, I’ve had it for 6 years they never missed a dividend payout. In my case I have dividend reinvestment turned on so the money can compound. Hope this helps.
I would say there's also an issue of issuing institutions changing their own degrees to doctorates...I am not one, but DNP and DPT come to mind. Plenty of these are amazing, but it was not a thing 10-20 years ago.
They just need to lobby their way to legalize DNP /s
They should rename it to DNP for Do Not Profit. Why would you voluntary throw your profitable contract away? Can't afford to hold short shares of QQQ? Maybe you shouldn't be holding options through expiration in the first place, then?
That's also in California...and it's an average. They don't start at that. I'm studying for my DNP and know plenty of physicians and roughly their salary. Unless you're in a high-paying specialty (like radiology or others) and in an inpatient situation, you aren't getting paid nearly what people believe you're getting paid. The only exception is if you start a highly successful private practice, but many surprisingly fail.
SCHB - Schwab US Broad Market SCHO - Schwab Short Term US Treasury SCYB - Schwab US High Yield Bond VEMY - Virtus Emerging Market Bond DNP - A CEF invested in Utilities, Infrastructure and MLPs
I’d allocate 60k to DNP (income fund) which gives you a monthly dividends ($~400+) in passive income monthly. (Have DRIP turned on so your money will compound). Take 15k and invest it in blue chip stocks (Apple, Amazon, Nvidia, Microsoft ) Take 5k and invest it in ETFS you like. Take 10k and invest it in something like a Fundrise Venture fund or DXYZ (both hold pre-IPO companies) Lastly take your initial 10k out and pay off any large debts, reinvest it (rinse and repeat), or keep it in a high yield savings account for whenever this market crashes again.
I think interest rates are high so you could lock in for a little while I'm sure. DNP has preformed well this year of your into dividend etfs. DYOR
Even through capital one you can get 4.25 interest in HYS... so take Coinbase with USDC they offer 5.2% jeeze. It is low. One fund you could look at is energies eft dividend payment apr right now 7.2% DNP fairly consistent since 2009. High yield savings though he could be doing a little better just looking at his personal bank. Financial advisor just taking their cut.
Can you explain how this would affect knee replacements, for example? I honestly doubt that our obesity problem would be fully solved through a single drug. Weight loss is a lot more complex than reducing appetite itself. Otherwise, every Adderall user for example would be thin, which is not the case. I've even had a friend who took a highly toxic "weight loss drug" (DNP) which raises your metabolism significantly basically by frying your organs, but he didn't lose a significant amount of weight. But, if it WERE a silver bullet, then I suppose a large number of healthcare concerns would lose prevalence.
Biden/DNP policies are more forward thinking and far more stable. Trump/GOP policies are based on... power and hate?... and far less stable. If you can't tell that a Biden administration is stronger not only for domestic policy but also foreign policy, then good luck with your choices.
There is a magic pill, it's called DNP.
That's good. I actually did a little research on the drug after your comment. It appears to be a an appetite suppressant. The study that they did had people do exercise and eat less. So basically you work out in the gym and at the end, you dont feel starving and dont eat, resulting in weight loss. Doesnt seem like such a miracle drug to me. DNP is the miracle weight loss drug. All you gotta do with dnp is take a pill and you'll lose weight fast. But who knows. Obviously I wish everyone the best.
I haven't really read much about LLYs weight loss drug, but good weight loss drugs have a tendency to be made illegal. The most powerful weight loss drug on the planet is DNP. That shit will burn fat right off your body. A second powerful weight loss drug is Clenbuterol. Also illegal. If you're actor, chances are you'd be using clen or dnp. Don't know much about LLYs "miracle" drug yet to dispute it.
Unless it's a medical emergency weight loss drugs are not a long term plan they will never replace learning to diet and workout. As soon as you stop taking them and you don't learn that you will gain weight back. Plus I don't think anything messing with your energy and how your body uses it is a great idea long-term. We have already had amphetamines for weight loss DNP and other things they do work but they come with health hazards. Everyone wants a magical pill but doesn't want to do any work and I think that's a bad mentality.
North America: GOOG, TSLA, MSFT Europe: [EVO.ST](https://EVO.ST) (Evolution Gaming), DNP.WA (Dino Polska), [MC.PA](https://MC.PA) (LVMH) & ASML
US/Canada: CSU.TO, KNSL, MEDP Other countries: EVO.ST, DNP.WA, PAC
Dr Karen DNP bsc acls bsc Microsoft office certified spelling bee winner in 2nd grade also has letters next her name
I've been looking at Dino Polska (DNOPF/DNP.WA) and Topicus (TOITF/TOI.V). Also, Teqnion (TEQ.ST).
Any Europeans use Dino Polska (DNP.WA)? The numbers look amazing, but I have never been to one.
This is actually a good question. The main reason is that people don't know how to shop for these opportunities so it is relatively impossible for them to do so at all. Buying a stock for it's dividend != buying a stock that happens to have a dividend, so many people buy quarterly paying stocks that have expensive prices and very low returns. The simply do not know how to buy a dollar. I did a mention of $DNP but it actually is a good income fund. It pays $.065/share on a monthly basis which would mean that if you did put in 6 figures, at the current price of $9.21, you would get a return of 10,857 whole shares which translates to $705/mo. (or $8,469/yr every year) The model has been in place for over 20 years. The company is not failing. The price is relatively stable so you don't have to worry about a sudden collapse either as you can set and forget an exit outside of the volatility channel. There are actually a lot of companies that do exactly what you're talking about. But in defense of not doing this the main source of most people's income is active work and while having an offset of any amount to living expenses is great most want an upfront risk and return rather than a deferred risk and return. This method that you're talking about creates an imaginary river between the cashflows which can be unsettling if one really *does* have a gambling addiction. You'll gamble the earned income *and* the dividends. In that sense it is almost better to not have access to the dividends or to create a cashflow specifically with the intent to destroy it as that means it is effectively worth $0. One key thing to remember is that the price of $DNP does not change much so it is an *atrocious* store of value. You cannot buy it with the intent to see the money grow much. It's a very much so present-facing type of investment rather than a future-facing one. It's a better "savings account" than it is "retirement fund" type of deal.
Okay, I am at a proper computer and not my phone so I can do this now. Let's look at [DNP](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/DNP/history?period1=538185600&period2=1697587200&interval=capitalGain%7Cdiv%7Csplit&filter=div&frequency=1d&includeAdjustedClose=true). So first a few assumptions on my part: 1. I am assuming you know what the Time Value of Money is. 2. I am assuming you know what an Internal Rate of Return is and the Working Cost of Capital is and why you would use both. 3. I am assuming you know how to, and why, you would weight separate cashflows and what a Net Present Value is and how to combine these weights coherently. 4. I am assuming you understand the theory of the Discounted Cash Flow and thus how to price a security. Now two concessions on my part: . 1. I am not going to calculate DNP throughout it's entire timeline since 1987's data (and it is older than that but YH Finance maxed out on me) I am going to use a model that is *purposefully* incorrect; I am going to "force" the model to .065 as the dividend, in a monthly fashion, since inception even though this is historically inaccurate with the dividend being paid out monthly only since DEC 1989 and the .065 being established then as well. 2. I am going to do an extremely simplified walkthrough of a single cashflow at inception but I am not going to verify various factors such as the exact interest rate at the time. This is for illustrative purposes to show that you are actually losing money with the DRIP into the stock due to a lack of capital appreciation. So we begin our journey on Nov 2, 1989 and we have committed to a DRIP function, every month, until Sept 29, 2023. and we have an ROI of just a mere 1% above cost of capital which at that time was [9%](https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/pay-administration/fact-sheets/irs-interest-rates-archive-list.pdf) and a steady dividend stream of .065 per share with a share price of 8.125, the low for the day, so we bought at the best point. We will buy $100 worth. So, first we have an immediate hurdle which is that the $100 has a cost of $9 at that time so our dividend and capital gains must amount to $9 as of today in order to have covered that. Without adjusting for inflation or any other complication including taxes and frictions let's do the simple math. The number of dividend payments was 431 so 431 \* .065 = 28.02. So just assuming inflation is flat and there are no taxes or anything for 36 years you have a return on those dividends over cost in 1987 dollars of 3x. That's pretty good sounding! The SPY since 1987 returned 35x? But whatever. So in that vaccum we have that 28.02 and then we take the price on 9/30/23, the high because that's optimistic, and subtract the purchase price and get 9.73 - 8.125 = $1.605. We won't weight these and just say they're addable for now and get ourselves a return of $29.625 for holding for 36 years. Sounds good. Now I'm certain at this point most people can stop reading; it's obvious how this is not going to turn out great once we involve inflation and time but for posterity: [Using the BLS calculator](https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=100&year1=198711&year2=202309) $100 in November 1987 was the same as $266.71 in 2023. So you have total erosion of 266.71 and a net nominal gain, without taxes or frictions, of $29.625. Cool. We're already way under water. So this is where we start with the harder part; we're going to say that we want to know what .065 (which the calculator rounds to .07) is worth in 2023 which is .17. In order to have been a net neutral investment over the course of time the current dividend would be .17 and be increasing, month over month, but some amount to offset inflation which would be in micro-dollars but still round at some point. There's 36 years of this not present in the investment. If you ran an NPV of this investment with this horizon you would absolutely get the most negative number you could imagine. It's not even close to breakeven. But here's the rub; this is a DRIP so in order to break even on our stock holdings we need that 8.125 to reflect in 2023 dollars which is $21.67 per share but it was only $9.73 so we've been buying a stock that for 36 years that has not appreciated in value meaning that we're throwing good money after bad; the opportunity cost of those dollars is obviously something you could benchmark away but if we ignore that because the cost of taxation is *not* relative to inflation rate and is flat that 20% is not "flat" over time. Of the 29 28.02 assuming a regular rate of 20% you've paid in taxes $5.604 *unadjusted for inflation.* This is usually where it is safe to stop because the point is made; you're going to pay taxes on dividends that are literally worth less. To correct in reverse here's how that actually plays out; the dividend walked backwards to Nov 1987 is equal to $.02. The nominal tax on .065 is .013 so your real valued outcome is .007 and guess what? We're going to put transaction costs back. It's gone. It's negative. It keeps going down. You can hold it for 50 years if you want to see real negative numbers. Actual negative dividends. And when you weight them because you're multiplying a negative outcome your ROI gets worse over time *because* of the Dividends which expound both the DRIP value, the fact that you're burning dollars on buying junk stock and overpaying for the cashflow *and* the underwater cashflow itself. Obviously every cashflow has to be calculated separately so this simplified version looks at cashflow alpha and does skip a few core steps perhaps aggregating more than it should but it is to prove a genera point. If you do a full cashflow you may be underwater a little less because you'll buy some stock but the stock prices will likely be more than the initial purchase price (as per historical average of the stock price across this time) so the IRR will never get satisfied. There's also something else that isn't discussed here. Taxes are not "within" portfolio DRIPs meaning that it is an out-of-pocket cost in these models which is rarely mentioned but has a lot of real implications. If the portfolio contains it's own taxes that changes the direction of the portfolio model pretty severely as you can imagine with manager's fees and such do the same. So this external value (i.e. the $5.604) actually has a greater eroding effect because expenses worsen over time (inflation) and relative expenses are toxic to portfolios because they grow as you grow. So I'm done, and I doubt anyone read it, and I highly doubt I'll get a response more than, "OMG U SUCK!" or "I DON'T UNDERSTAND!" or my favorite, "YOU TOTALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!" with no explanations. Yes, there are shortcuts. I'm totally admitting to that. Moving models through time is time intensive and this is Reddit and as I said, I'm not tutoring anyone.
Reposting my older comment: > Good afternoon /r/stocks. Today I'd like to talk about the Japanese stock market and why I'm growing optimistic about the coming decade. [I'll borrow material from this Unhedged article](https://www.ft.com/content/aa7579d8-48ab-46e7-ba21-e1aaabf67a8d) and this [older Unhedged one](https://www.ft.com/content/6073ee6a-ff96-41bf-82a5-b14dc81a3823). And [this one on activist pressures](https://www.ft.com/content/fc3064ce-a1d3-4f92-91af-ca288f6a4401). > > What's odd about Japanese corporations is that despite [decent profitability](https://i.imgur.com/BotfhZu.png), albeit generally [lower than that of the S&P 500](https://i.imgur.com/B6PKElP.png), they don't reward shareholders with that profitability. As a consequence, "The average Topix company has a staggeringly high 50 per cent equity-to-assets ratio, according to JPMorgan." Japanese companies [hold on to an enormous amount of cash](https://i.imgur.com/1FI9Ih9.png), broken down into nominal figures [here](https://i.imgur.com/JYqHQ7l.png). They have been earnings [large interest income](https://i.imgur.com/zxnFJBD.png) as a consequence: "2022’s second quarter was three times the recent quarterly average, or roughly 35 per cent (!) of operating income." They hold levels of cash at about 13 times their operating income. [I would greatly appreciate someone providing the equivalent facts for US stocks--so we can see just how extreme these figures are] > > > Ethan Wu (Unhedged author) puts it this way: > > > From a US shareholder value perspective, Japanese companies are in the peculiar position of having done the hard stuff, such as raising underlying profitability, but struggling with the easy stuff, like returning those profits to shareholders > > > The valuations are therefore depressed, with around half of the companies under a Price/Book ratio of 1. This is what you'd expect from coal companies or depressed banks. Even the growth stocks are cheap: > > > Matt Brett manages the Baillie Gifford Japan Trust, which has returned 300 per cent investing in Japanese equities (in pounds) over the past 10 years. He says that recently Japanese growth stocks, in which the Trust specialises, have followed US techs down, with the difference that “the Japanese growth stocks never went up”. Growth companies are trading at 1.3 times sales, he reckons, a “tiny premium” to the Topix at 1.1. Meanwhile, the yield on the stocks in the trust is 2.4 per cent. “As stock pickers, we are quite excited,” he says. > > As the first/third article demonstrates, change is coming: activist shareholders from the West are coming in to pressure companies to do share buybacks and trim the fat. The Tokyo Stock Exchange is planning on requiring its 'prime tier' companies to maintain a P/B ratio above 1 or at least move in that direction. > > In the US, we have this negative perception of buybacks as temporary, inefficient measures used to juice up EPS or raise executive compensation. But in theory, buybacks are just a way of returning capital to shareholders when you don't have much productive to do with it: we want capital going to where it is most productive, and sometimes that isn't with the firm. Each remaining share is now worth a bigger chunk of the business. > > In Japan, that cash is just sitting around doing nothing. It's not being re-invested where its more productive, and the companies don't really have much high ROI options to use that cash for. It's an extreme example of where there is enormous potential to implement share buybacks but it just isn't being done. What happens when activists get involved? > > > In late 2022, as US activist fund Elliott Management was quietly building a large stake in Dai Nippon Printing, the family-run Japanese conglomerate was searching for a new business plan bold enough to lift a stock price that had been stagnant for two decades. > > > Just two months later, DNP announced it would undertake the biggest share buyback in its 147-year history and set a return on equity target of 10 per cent. The company’s shares have risen more than 40 per cent since January 24, when the Financial Times first revealed that Elliott had accumulated a stake of just under 5 per cent. > > Interestingly, policy-makers are seeing reason to support these changes: > > > There is now this interesting alignment between shareholders and policymakers. [Japan’s national pension plan] needs to get better returns on its national assets, because [Japanese government bonds], where they historically parked all the pension assets, are generating negative returns. They’ve got to get it from earnings and [better] ROE. > > > Japanese investors have been burnt for decades. This is a contrarian but long-term trade, hinging on whether Japanese corporations are ready to reform. >
Good afternoon /r/stocks. Today I'd like to talk about the Japanese stock market and why I'm growing optimistic about the coming decade. [I'll borrow material from this Unhedged article](https://www.ft.com/content/aa7579d8-48ab-46e7-ba21-e1aaabf67a8d) and this [older Unhedged one](https://www.ft.com/content/6073ee6a-ff96-41bf-82a5-b14dc81a3823). And [this one on activist pressures](https://www.ft.com/content/fc3064ce-a1d3-4f92-91af-ca288f6a4401). What's odd about Japanese corporations is that despite [decent profitability](https://i.imgur.com/BotfhZu.png), albeit generally [lower than that of the S&P 500](https://i.imgur.com/B6PKElP.png), they don't reward shareholders with that profitability. As a consequence, "The average Topix company has a staggeringly high 50 per cent equity-to-assets ratio, according to JPMorgan." Japanese companies [hold on to an enormous amount of cash](https://i.imgur.com/1FI9Ih9.png), broken down into nominal figures [here](https://i.imgur.com/JYqHQ7l.png). They have been earnings [large interest income](https://i.imgur.com/zxnFJBD.png) as a consequence: "2022’s second quarter was three times the recent quarterly average, or roughly 35 per cent (!) of operating income." They hold levels of cash at about 13 times their operating income. [I would greatly appreciate someone providing the equivalent facts for US stocks--so we can see just how extreme these figures are] The valuations are therefore depressed, with around half of the companies under a Price/Book ratio of 1. This is what you'd expect from coal companies or depressed banks. > Matt Brett manages the Baillie Gifford Japan Trust, which has returned 300 per cent investing in Japanese equities (in pounds) over the past 10 years. He says that recently Japanese growth stocks, in which the Trust specialises, have followed US techs down, with the difference that “the Japanese growth stocks never went up”. Growth companies are trading at 1.3 times sales, he reckons, a “tiny premium” to the Topix at 1.1. Meanwhile, the yield on the stocks in the trust is 2.4 per cent. “As stock pickers, we are quite excited,” he says. As the first article argues, change is coming: activist shareholders from the West are coming in to pressure companies to do share buybacks and trim the fat. The Tokyo Stock Exchange is planning on requiring its 'prime tier' companies to maintain a P/B ratio above 1 or at least move in that direction. Ethan Wu puts it this way: > From a US shareholder value perspective, Japanese companies are in the peculiar position of having done the hard stuff, such as raising underlying profitability, but struggling with the easy stuff, like returning those profits to shareholders In the US, we have this negative perception of buybacks as temporary measures used to temporarily juice up EPS or raise executive compensation. But in theory, buybacks are just a way of returning capital to shareholders when you don't have much productive to do with it: we want capital going to where it is most productive, and sometimes that isn't with the firm. Each remaining share is now worth a bigger chunk of the business. In Japan, that cash is just sitting around doing nothing. It's not being re-invested where its more productive, and the companies don't really have much high ROI options to use that cash for. It's an extreme example of where there is enormous potential to implement share buybacks but it just isn't being done. What happens when activists get involved? > In late 2022, as US activist fund Elliott Management was quietly building a large stake in Dai Nippon Printing, the family-run Japanese conglomerate was searching for a new business plan bold enough to lift a stock price that had been stagnant for two decades. > Just two months later, DNP announced it would undertake the biggest share buyback in its 147-year history and set a return on equity target of 10 per cent. The company’s shares have risen more than 40 per cent since January 24, when the Financial Times first revealed that Elliott had accumulated a stake of just under 5 per cent. Japanese investors have been burnt for decades. This is a contrarian but long-term trade, hinging on whether Japanese corporations are ready to reform.
I’m already on Tren, T3, and DNP
Just finished my Chick-Fil-A cheat meal Gonna take my DNP and T3 dose now. Best, ✍🏻 Tren
Damn you’re on DNP? You compete or is this just for personal aesthetics?
I’m on DNP and Tren bro. I’m burning through cals
I don’t take trenbalone and DNP like kingcucktren
LOL if i do 2lbs/week, i risk losing muscle weight too. Where do you get DNP from ? I bet theyre fucking expensive
1 lb a week ROFL Stop being a vagene and use DNP bro
Imagine not using DNP 🤌
Imagine using Ozempic to lose weight when there’s DNP, T3, and Ephedrine. Fat tubby bastards 🐳🐋🐳🐋🐳🐋
I’m using DNP bro lol
Damn bro you must’ve been heavy? Is this your first time doing Keto? You realize a lot of that is water loss. Not even DNP would make you drop 30 of fat lbs that fast… well maybe lol depends how fat the person was
I lost 36lbs in less than a month doing keto. You’re not going to drop as quickly as DNP, but it’s way easier on your body. I’ve done both and would never touch DNP again.
Keto is like taking Creatine and DNP is like taking roids
Waking up with your sheets absolutely drenched 10x per night and being so depleted you feel like you can’t do anything is fucking brutal. Plus, the rebound binge got me both times when I was younger. I’d do a keto diet over DNP any day.
That's legit a little scary. DNP is no joke
DNP is the most miserable substance known to man.
I have some DNP tabs but some of them are 100 mg and the other ones are 200 mg and idk which ones are which. Fuck it. If I die, I die with a shredded hairless tummy 🫡
My cut is only gonna be 6 weeks and I’m using DNP, T3, ECA, all the big guns 
It's a god damn furnace too. Especially if you take DNP lol
If you just want in+out to get a dividend for free, try a monthly 7-8% yield, like $DNP or $ALTY or $HYLB
Buy DNP. Hold for 1 year. That will teach you everything you will want to know.
>SAMSUNG ENGINEERING: TO ACQUIRE 55 BLN WON WORTH OF SHARES IN VIETNAM'S DNP WATER JOINT STOCK COMPANY ^First ^Squawk ^[@FirstSquawk](http://twitter.com/FirstSquawk) ^at ^2022-11-27 ^18:25:43 ^EST-0500
Not really once all the BS drama settles down he’ll have a great platform for whomever or whatever he intends to promote. Look at how that AH Zuckerberg dominated FB with DNP BS.. social media can be a powerful tool and in a few months everyone won’t care Elon owns Twitter.
DNP is muscle sparing, it only attacks the mitochondria in fat cells. It's not like other fat burners, that's what makes it so great....that and it doesn't mess with your heart like stims. Besides they don't have any muscles to begin with 🤣 Nothing special, PSMF is protein sparing modified fast....pretty much don't eat shit but protein it's only good for rapid weight loss, like being on a DNP run, it's not something sustainable. Don't even bulk dude, lean looks so much better and if you're on gear you don't even need to do a "bulk" you will gain muscle regardless, you're not a bodybuilder it's all for looks right? I can't tell you how many times girls have told me "you're too big", like my sisters, my cousins, my aunts....people who are honest and they're right I've gotten to the point where I look like a sideshow and the shit doesn't look good. Girls you're fucking won't tell you that, if you had a dildo hanging from your forehead the girls you fuck around with will say it looks good....because you're fucking them and also because they don't want you fucking anyone else. Stay lean and add some good calories, you don't have to do yo-yo'ing that makes your body look like shit in the long run, messes with your skin, messes with your adrenals, your CNS, your metabolism.....not good for your body in general.
DNP without a steroid would burn away any poor muscle those tubby bastards may have. Never heard of the second one? What is it? My bulk will begin November 2nd and end February 2nd. So im gonna order some DNP and other shit to have it ready to go.
Month 3 lmaooooooo. You could just use steroids and DNP and lose 20 lbs in 3 weeks
4 days on DNP and I’m starting to feel warm all the time. I just showered, it’s 68 degrees but I feel all hot. Bye bye fat Inshallah 🫡
It’s called Trenbolone and r/DNP
Went to the gym like an hour ago. Was pretty packed for a Saturday night… I just saw a bunch of people slogging their way through cardio. Yeah like doing 20 mins of cardio is gonna make up for the 2,000 calories you eat in a single sitting at McDonalds…. I just felt sad for them. Like they don’t know about T3, DNP, ECA, GW-50, Phentermine and how fast and easy to lose weight. They’re forever stuck being fats.
My cutting stack https://imgur.com/a/pujf34n (DNP caps not shown)
Started DNP today. My cut ends October 17th. 1,000 calorie deficit until then. Then the last week it’s gonna be protein only and a carton of cigarettes every day. Maybe I’ll join Coolio in gangsters paradise. Space cowboys 🫡
Yea you're probably right, and if I didn't know what caps were dosed in, I wouldn't take it either. DNP in the winter is pretty solid though, you save a ton on the heating bill lol
Well you’re gonna feel flat. It’s just how cuts go, especially low carbing. Doesn’t mean T3 is wasting your muscle. DNP puts a strain on all your other organs lol. I was gonna use it but don’t like being sweaty all day. Also forget if my caps are dosed at 100 or 200
I am on gear, I think my dosage was just high at the time. Since then, I've switched to just using DNP, as it doesn't put any strain on your heart - though the night sweats are a bitch
tren doesn't even work. DNP is the real one.
This is a joke? Fine, put 40% of this in DNP for capital protection. I don't know if you trade options but if you do then sell OTM cash-secured puts on AAPL or MSFT with 40% of the money since they will persist for the next 20 years and likely retail will collapse eventually under it's own weight in the future. MSFT is the safer of the two in my opinion because AAPL requires a very dedicated base whilst MSFT is literally in every country's business infrastructure in the world. Sell them long-dated (a literal year or more) rather than short-dated because you do *not* want to get assigned but it also works as an "instant dividend" since you collect theta and do so with little risk of assignment upfront. With the proceeds give that to your parents for a vacation or put them into more stocks that bear some kind of dividend like O. None of this is tax friendly but you don't need it; with the last 20% throw it in muni-bonds if you can. This will just grow quietly for them for a decade or something and is completely tax free in most cases. But seriously, asking the internet ... really?
ec stack mannn why do tren just do DNP
I’ll fuck with anabolics but I wouldn’t touch DNP with a twelve foot pole
Ok 200mg caffeine, 5mg albuterol to make me jittery as fuck and 100mg DNP to induce the sweats. Now I'm ready for the casino to open
Starting DNP in June, going to sweat through everything
415 x 100 = 41,500. $DNP \~ 11.30 w/ monthly dividend of .065 @ 27+ years steady even through pandemic and no history of splits etc. 41,500 / 11.3 = 3,672 shares x .065 = 238.68 per month x 12 = 2,864.16 / 41,500 = .069% return. All with significantly less risk (because conversions are not actually risk free; they are susceptible to credit risk (dividends) and interest rate risk (which people might be realizing now)), significantly fewer moving parts, and a much better return. TL;DR: Make certain whatever strategy you use beats a relatively simple buy/hold, buy/collect version otherwise there's no point.
It's too fucking hot to start taking DNP
Just guzzles 40 oz water. I’m parched. Feeling hot too. Good thing DNP ends tomorrow. Currently sitting outside in just short shorts bc I felt so warm
We’ve talked before. I know who you are and have seen you make a lot of terrible choices with little foresight (more than most here). Talking about DNP like it’s cool is a new level of dumbassery
What is DNP? That's a new one to me
Dude you realize that DNP is actively ruining your cellular metabolic processes, resulting in a shitty electron transport chain that can fuck you up irreparably, right?
Little bit of DNP, some T3, calorie deficit, low carbs, cardio, core workouts, and some Tren to preserve muscle = Godly fat loss Never stood a chance. Like bears with puts today.
Weighed myself today. Lost another 4 lbs in a week. After 4 weeks, I’m down from 204 to 184. Magic of T3, ECA, DNP 🤠
>The DNP increase in body temp sucks man. You trying to kill yourself? That shit is dangerous as fuck.
The DNP increase in body temp sucks man. I just showered and I’m about to sit outside in my towel just to cool off.
2 lb a week fat loss is a myth. Especially on DNP 🫠