PGP
PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
🚨🚨🚨Bitcoiin core developer claims to have lost 200+ BTC in hack A Bitcoiin OG and core developer Luke Dashjr claims his PGP key was compromised, resulting in virtually all his Bitcoiin being stolen from him on Dec. 31.
Why I am long Fastly $FSLY ahead of the earnings next week and why it is my favorite growth stock right now
Mentions
yeah, bitcoin transaction still cost money, but throw lighting, its several cents - or absolute maximum is 1 dollar, but thats rare, its mostly several cents... who knows, maybe it will be cheaper or even free in the future. "(good luck trying to get a chargeback if you get scammed with a bitcoin transaction or send money to the wrong place)" - yeah i agree with this actually. Bitcoin have its benefits and its complications. One of the complications is that you need to be carefull, but i think the benefits overcome the complications. yeah, several sources are saying bitcoin is more used then 100k i agree... I remember reading those data years ago and bitcoin grew quite a lot too during those years, so sorry for bad data, i did not expect it would grow this much. Still, I believe that my argument stands. 1 milion users is still smaller then singapour dolar 6 milion users, and also due to a lot of people are using bitcoin as speculation might effect its stability (more speculation = more unstable cost... if more people would use it for normal transactions then it would be more stable). Yes, the average transfer of bitcoin is 50 000 dolars, but take in mind one of the biggest holders of bitcoins are financial institutions, who probably take bigger amount of bitcoin then normal people in one transfer. Yes, I believe it is still decentralazed. 10K accounts owns 50% of bitcoin, but it is still better decentralazition then any other curency. Like, most of dollar is being owned by the wealthiest people, and i will rather own a curency that it value is based on free market demand then on monetary politics of its government... btw fun fact - i am from czech republic, and currency on this land have been changed 7 times in the 100 years. I will rather have decentralazed bitcoin then a government curency that have this history on its land. Also, you never know what the monetary politics of the government is going to be. Trump is a psychopath and who knows how much he will fuck up the dolar or the economy of USA (tho it is true prezident have limited power in field of monetary politics). just bcs USA owns so much bitcoin, doesnt mean i cant use bitcoin to fuck them over. I can buy illegal stuff with it or practice agorism, if you use bitcoin safely (buy usb>install tails>boot it up>tor>buy bitcoin throw paxfull/LBC/bitquick or other anonymous way>using bitcoinfees to send them > use PGP for encripted chatting) and all things are set done. this is how to fuck up the government laws with bitcoin. btw using vpn is absolutly terrible actually. most vpns are actually giving data to police if they are being told to do it. "If there is widespread adoption the price fluctuations will become less aggressive, which defeats the point of it being an investment vehicle." - well, bitcoin will still be deflatiory, so the price should go up... yes, it would probably be used less as an investment, but i think thats a good think. I like bitcoin as a project, not as an investment.
Well even throw thats true, you still can be really anonymous, if you ensure what you are doin \>buy Flash Disk \>put it into laptop \>download linux Tails to the flash disk \>boot up Tails \>download tor \>buy m0ner0/bit c0in, if bit c0in, use LBC, Paxful or BitQuick to buy it \>for sending bit c0in use bit c0infees \>use PGP for encripted messages if needed Then, just follow internet safety tips and some anonymous tips or whatever, and your bit c0in payments are almost untracable. Obviously if you do one mistake you can be fucked but bit c0in is still really good way how to be anonymous if you know how. (obviously, there are a lot more steps, those steps are quite siplified)
Well even throw thats true, you still can be really anonymous, if you ensure you are doin \>buy Flash Disk \>put it into laptop \>download linux Tails to the flash disk \>boot up Tails \>download tor \>buy monero/bitcoin, if bitcoin, use LBC, Paxful or BitQuick to buy it \>for sending bitcoin use bitcoinfees \>use PGP for encripted messages if needed Then, just follow internet safety tips and some anonymous tips or whatever, and your bitcoin payments are almost untracable. Obviously if you do one mistake you can be fucked but bitcoin is still really good way how to be anonymous if you know how. (obviously, there are a lot more steps, those steps are quite siplified)
we're headed back to PGP, authenticated by your local library or post office! Always should have gone this way.
Welc to MrJayOTP, We Help Bypass 📳 Ur Vic 2fa OTP 🎯 Features included: 🔸 24/7 Support 🔸 Automated Payment System 🔸 Live Panel Feeling 🔸 12+ Pre-made Modes 🔸 Customizable Caller ID / Spoofing 🔸 99.99% Up-time 🔸 Customizable Scripts 🔸 Customizable Panel Actions 🔸 International Support 🔸 Multilingual Support (60+ Voices) 🔸 PGP / Conference Calls 🔸 Live DTMF 🔸 Call Streaming - Listen to call in Real-Time Channel📲: https://t.me/MJOTP1 BOT🐝: https://t.me/mrjay2fabot CHAT💬: https://t.me/MJOTPCHAT Vouch📮: https://t.me/MJOTPvo
You are bold. I’ve never heard someone with this opinion before and am curious why you have it You don’t believe ECDSA and/or RSA will be broken with quantum? Or you don’t consider the past 20+ years of crypto-systems being compromised a “game-changer”? To clarify, I don’t mean “game-changer” from an investment/money-making perspective. I believe there will be prime factorization algorithms in quantum at some point and consider the ability to decrypt archived PGP messages to be “game-changing”. But I’m old fashioned
This looks like a PGP signature.
My kids name? `begin PGP key`
Counterpoint: This is priced in and nobody is going to break PGP in our lifetime :\^)
Oui pas de taxation des plus values mobilières, mais y'a bien un prelevement à la source sur les dividendes européens et ça, même si des actions européennes sont dans ton PEA. source 1: [https://prosper-conseil.fr/placements/fiscalite-du-pea/](https://prosper-conseil.fr/placements/fiscalite-du-pea/) "Si l’épargnant souhaite **investir dans des actions de sociétés étrangères versant des dividendes** (par exemple Allianz, BASF, Enel, Iberdrola, Deutsche Post, etc.), **alors ces dividendes seront généralement soumis à une retenue à la source** prélevée par le pays en question. Par exemple, si vous investissez dans des actions Allianz, BASF ou Deutsche Post, 3 entreprises allemandes servant des dividendes plutôt généreux, en tant qu’investisseur individuel résidant en France, vous supporterez un précompte sur les dividendes dont le taux est de 26,375 % (taux fixé et collecté par l’administration allemande). Ce précompte ne sera pas récupérable si vous investissez via un PEA." source2: [https://bofip.impots.gouv.fr/bofip/1560-PGP.html/identifiant%3DBOI-RPPM-RCM-40-50-30-20240730](https://bofip.impots.gouv.fr/bofip/1560-PGP.html/identifiant%3DBOI-RPPM-RCM-40-50-30-20240730)
Oh yeah forgot about that lol, def learn about PGP, it’s pretty good ;)
This. Tails on a USB or mininum a virtual machine. Get some xmr, resd the dnm Bible and figure out how to use PGP. Easy as dog shit.
13 Nov 2024 12:45 UTC -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- wcFMA3OYJVu+B2GjAQ//bgja0LlfgFxOE8FiWMe3h9nGz/3zBuBtayjC9AjxSPhY g4JNl3rBO/Uj33Z4VbRpKPm5tPsp1ZsgT4VoMNNfku51JS4Zr1ZZJmprLHRmtAZ+ Wd+9m8qrtzWyYA9t2OOYXLjBfvuUN1E79MNUcI3ICKHlvhtBRWI0x0nhHZ5FOWKG wtQTiss4smCsw6dNFbeMQXZCt8IzQvedP21cto2wKZShSnosKV4z+P//OnScGpAi DavnoQSvsZg6ZdHNJxS2fP1Ej8NEZNlL70RASsY36AYtPH2jfZqZlQ6j3s5wQFaD vKHL425zXcDYSEVdGoW3F9VwpTnWkYDKXhJt2LkKsWot2mnx+k7Cqn9/lQflZdo+ ONAR5sPmvOxfrNrkpUGYahAdO/mHMQpWw+anYIuBb+KIVJ4X+VFryRebUU9zIbUK 4Yh1YR2CqN5w2dRnHuKkAG8Zn2fgOCcFb7YCs/0Vx4rxQZ/+0hnATAsI9v6FFgUj MUz8brv97t9uLbPM2eMxxTdwGVJsvKVrr/PPu+2IwtKv8TfdNdsk0cdsLM5z8hZF pINI4Q4CEbtV9G49/NSZjWNMWPgCViOQ0SacUvxyZSFmdHTUOdKMKgRoJumBM8cb XqygiA+QLbISdfexA52E9n1ncMqmlt0KnJG1gcthBmRnqoPABIi91JyLpwukZV7S weABBs6LBfRRtS7fCwuCktt/ZFc977nilblj/urmvvHGuNA5Ume4Fae+OzbPbr5k 6jlGF8W5P9tq33DjUFNTedeuz4HbYHxfLPPaHxz1QK9T97ly0Pzu8wX2/g5J8aez vsPN1Pbv6hxOiyKhJhnvPNBW4AQq+/GAqUyA/nA3NLcZpCLDe9WGnDjOlI4UIMPI 4A+E4Q2LIiLkIFB+Oo/w9gGF43AjL6tpZ/BAcKykHCSopn/GNPddZM4TynQp+VSJ thAs1KnIG8/Qn3Bl78HNWRxAdvMgmCvq4Uw/T8aqG/ALsDh0hXwZB8AdJ7r6j+9N VTk4twGEGMBnWzJyK8XgjnvcCEvJ4jH/Gh7SJ0DLAqeQ9Il90knk9K09wnNWCEV0 sPquA/oDCxnp8fu8sus0hJgTSTruzaak+pt+rqCI8E5JQ5aajCZWAelFhfRlUCMg 7sEU3mcsVJnUqp7/D6eAwxjlfSFUh9SwOUkYgjsujwj4qOjNZwWVbjNnjsCxrLzw lwKkyz+CDFYZeQUCsEZg2zwcZruML5BhIhonGLCiuD6cal1UCenwvsbjVVRtQAm/ YPiZsYiKdMXdTowx+F6U68Pnz9L7RVIM9SC5/rET9g3CS58j1KBYfX59o5m7OSq9 tW2m9MqiwfLO5B8Jmw6b8qWh+JKefKlYjmJhGh8A4nRAoT5XdMe5ssSvPEdVi2C1 faGON6gb8ww5HE3oJMymR5IkuoQrQJytkv/1WSVM6kJy1td5jT2iqjt4WJ4kNlUt TeKyEXZ03QPMozrswQk8A8o4ikN7hQ+ejKo+osKJ3n6zjr07VpP7EU8qFmPIvWiD vxqORBKbCKoyDUph8fC7SuK88pXU2W58PFtcX/xuVBRCKx2g5QrcuEir0wT30NX9 /HI= =/BK2 -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
Mail cannot be e2ee as long as Apple is serving as your hosting provider. Well, not easily. On a technical level, if they’re running the server, they would have the ability to see & log incoming and outgoing mail. Even if the message itself is E2EE (eg PGP encoded message), the email address and such comes across as clear text. It would be possible to build a system to strip out/anonymize all that logging, but I don’t think it’s really worth the effort for them.
>Because, don't you know.. You pay the ceo more money and the company can't afford to form a monopoly.. Simple Jack, tell that to Loblaws who pays their CEO outrageous amounts and still owns almost the entire supply chain from start to finish. They are a complete Monopoly that control food prices in Canada possibly Global. Governments do nothing. Look at all the Sugar Companies they own. The Canadian branch of the Weston family currently owns or controls over 200 companies. They have Family Branches in the USA, Ireland, and the UK. How many companies do they own?? The list of Loblaws companies seems to keep growing: PC FINANCIAL Choice Properties Real-estate Investment Trust (REIT) Chains: Atlantic Cash & Carry Atlantic Superstore Atlantic SuperValu Axep C Shop Cannabis Dominion Entrepôts Presto / Club Entrepôt Extra Foods Fortinos Freshmart Holy Smokes Tabacconist L'intermarché Loblaws/Loblaw Great Food Lucky Dollar Foods Maxi/Maxi & Cie NG Cash & Carry No Frills Osaka Market Pharmaprix Provigo T&T The Real Canadian Superstore/Loblaw The Mobile Shop Theodore & Pringle Opticians Superstore Real Canadian Liquorstore Real Canadian Wholesale Club Red & White Food Stores SaveEasy (formerly Atlantic SaveEasy) Shop Easy Foods Shoppers Drug Mart/Shoppers SuperValu Valu-mart Your Independent Grocer Zehrs, operating under the Zehrs Markets, Zehrs Food Plus and Zehrs Great Food banners Brands: President's Choice No Name Exact Blue Menu Joe Fresh J± (electronics) Teddy's Choice PC Splendido Bella Tavola PC Premium Black Label Joe Pet Catz & Dawgz PC Organic The Health Clinic by Shoppers Life Labs Life @ Home ---London Branch--- Allinson Argo Corn Starch Aladino Peanut Butter Burgen Blue Dragon Capullo Dorset Cereals Dromedary cake mixes Elephant Atta Fleischmann's Yeast High5 Jordans cereals Lucky Boat Noodles Karo corn syrup Kingsford's Corn Starch (North America) Kingsmill bread Mazola corn oil Ovaltine (except in the United States, where Nestlé owns the brand) Patak's Pride Ryvita Silver Spoon Sunblest Thai Lotus Pastes Tolly Boy Rice Twinings Subsidiaries AB Agri Ltd AB Enzymes - an ABFI Company AB Sugar AB Mauri, bakery ingredients Abitec Corporation - an ABFI Company Abitec Ltd ACH Food Companies (AC HUMKO from 1995 to 2000), an American subsidiary of Associated British Foods, previously part of Kraft Foods from 1952 to 1995. ACH Food México Allied Bakeries - a division of ABF Grain Products Ltd Allied Mills British Sugar Frontier Agriculture (50% joint venture with Cargill) George Weston Foods G Costa: sauces and specialty foods Illovo Sugar Zambia Sugar OHLY - an ABFI Company PGP International, Inc. - an ABFI Company Primark – known as Penneys in the Republic of Ireland SPI Pharma, Inc. - an ABFI Company Stratas Foods LLC, a 50/50 joint venture between ABF's American subsidiary ACH and fellow American food corporation Archer Daniels Midland Wander AG Westmill Foods
The SEC website is having a very weird problem, they have been filing 8-K reports all day, which have a file size of zero bytes. Not sure, but looks like the SEC uses some type of encryption, like PGP, and the key isn't valid. Here's an example, JWAC filed the 8-K with the press release for the Chijet Deal this afternoon: [https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1883799/000149315223019818/0001493152-23-019818-index.htm](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1883799/000149315223019818/0001493152-23-019818-index.htm) The "form8-k.htm" is 0 bytes. If you look at the "Complete Submission" text file, looks like some kind of encrypted text for the main body. Anyway ... JWAC also filed a form 25-NSE, so the ticker change should be tomorrow.
PGP says I’ve verified this data as being the original. But it says fuck all about its accuracy or when it was created. For biosecurity we need that information
Because that wouldn’t provide a temporal proof of when a document was created and that it hasn’t been falsified since. Without trusting someone and the integrity of the PGP signatures, with blochcian we can prove when a rabies or hendra vaccine was produced, by whom, with everything and it’s locked in time, without needing to trust the time keep. I like how I’ve been downvoted but it’s legit why we’re able to prove something so easily, yet give vets confidence in some virus that has a 50% mortality rate.
Why can’t the originators of that medical data just attach PGP signatures to their data?
I get banned so much when I get a minute I think I need to add PGP signature to my bio prove who I am.
[Bellheads vs Netheads](https://www.wired.com/1996/10/atm-3/) - people believed IBM's proprietary internet would beat open packet protocols [The Secret is Out](https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15520984-100-the-secret-is-out/) - US gov tried to contain open PGP encryption Bill Gates explaining the [internet](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gipL_CEw-fk) on Late Night ETF's are [weapons](https://www.google.com/search?q=etfs+weapons+of+mass+destruction) of mass financial destruction [Why The Web Won't Be Nirvana](https://www.newsweek.com/clifford-stoll-why-web-wont-be-nirvana-185306) [WWW, Google, iPhone, Facebook](https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1478996075843231745) will fail [Apple](https://imgur.com/a/PWvzKvv) stock banned as too risky [Internet phone](https://twitter.com/LilMoonLambo/status/1487415521150701572) will get banned [Bitcoin Is Dead](https://www.bitcoinisdead.org/)
But by now there are plenty of encrypted text messaging/IM apps that work cross-platform on phones, and desktop. I agree you shouldn't be sending especially confidential/sensitive info using a phone. But overall, the point is any encryption becoming standardized & seamless brings a massive security boost to everyone. Pretty soon all text messages will be encrypted by default everywhere, just like https for all websites has become. And PGP still isn't even close to that, and the overall desire to make it happen still isn't there because there's so much work to be done to make it so. For now at least... It's dead in the water. (The worst part is it has the capability be integrated as a seamless experience, across every major email service. But nobody else seems to care.)
TBF, even the inventor of PGP [doesn't use PGP](https://www-vice-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vice.com/amp/en/article/vvbw9a/even-the-inventor-of-pgp-doesnt-use-pgp?amp_js_v=a6&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16562362948869&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vice.com%2Fen%2Farticle%2Fvvbw9a%2Feven-the-inventor-of-pgp-doesnt-use-pgp) to encrypt his emails. A big problem is was never that popular to begin with, then smartphones hit their boom. It had the capability to have other softwares built on top of it that simplified using it into a near-seamless experience, but that never happened. The tools to use it stayed hard to use, so it never reached mass adoption. So no real effort was made to bring PGP to android or iOS. And without the ability to read encrypted emails on your phone, it's definitely never going to take off.
There’s tons of ways to securely store data in a distributed way. I can sign a document with PGP and it’s just as good as an entry on the blockchain. Bitcoin and blockchain aren’t databases, they’re an extremely expensive consensus protocol to avoid the double spend problem. Looking past the hype it has little to no value outside of financial transactions.
Strong PGP encryption so the address is between you and your dealer. It's potentially snooping authorities like banks and credit card companies you don't want involved. You can get it sent under any name to any address. And you can claim that someone else must've used yours.
RSA/IDEA was never cracked. Hardly a coincidence that the current version of PGP doesn't use it
I don’t believe it. Plus they’ve talked about FBI CIA having back doors. Even way back they speculated they had back doors to PGP.
>the days of usenet, irc, the web...even email (w PGP)...were amazing. centralizing discovery and identity into corporations really damaged the internet. I realize I'm partially to blame, and regret it. What does he mean by centralizing discovery? is it like Twitter's recommendations? also by "identity", does he mean identity politics?
Okay, but I wasn't talking about research science... I was talking about a practical/logical situation and in that case my statements stands. I can prove I have access to this wallet because I can push a txn with my PGP key on it. Name any alphanumeric code and that will be the signature I write. I can never prove to you that I don't have access to that wallet, even if I did at one point have access and burned the piece of paper with the keys on it in front of you, you can never be sure that I didn't make a copy.
Made moving money internationally easier Achieved widespread adoption of easy-to-use public key infrastructure on a much greater scale than was available before (remember PGP web-of-trust?). Metamask is very widespread, as are other mEth wallets, and there's also infrastructure around these keys such as ENS, attestations (proofofhumanity, POAP, etc), and people are talking about using it as an alternative scheme for logging into traditional web services. Fully decentralized messengers that are easy-to-use (eg. Status is slowly getting there). This requires buttchains in two places: ENS for persistent usernames, and eventually for sybil-resistance/anti-spam mechanisms Funded the zero-knowledge proof space, which has all sorts of industrial applications even far beyond buttchains Made it easier for people in countries with weak financial systems to hold dollar-equivalents (eg. DAI, USDC) Allowed organizations to control funds securely with multisig wallets (actual-money finance has much weaker and more inconsistent support for this) Some of the world's best and easiest-to-use prediction markets Easy access for everyone to get a loan againts their collateral Easy access for everyone to earn yield on stable usd equivalent coins ​ But don't judge the tech by todays use cases. Ethereum has only existed for 6 years now and has had to overcome significant scaling challenges that are only now coming together. How much use cases did the internet have in 1989?
----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE---- wh4t548as4f3w0rd ----END PGP MESSAGE----
Ok so I said monero is not taintable and for almost all use cases that's true, but there are some special cases where that's only *sort of* true, but in modern cryptography it's all about being *sort of* true. Let me explain. When you secure something using modern cryptography, it's not perfect and the people who created it knew that, there is technically perfect security but its requirements are not suitable for modern communication. It requires a truly random pre-shared private key communicated outside the environment that is at least as long as the message to be encrypted. So perfect security is out, Enter semantic security. Semantic security revolves around being good *enough*. If security is good enough that an attacker would need 10 supercomputers with computing power we won't see for 50 years, 100 years of computing time to break it, we can consider that good *enough*. You may have heard of PGP encryption, it literally stands for "Pretty Good Privacy." That "untaintability" property on Monero is called "fungibility" by math nerds, it's the same property that it doesn't matter what 5$ bill you gave me, all 5$ bills are mutually interchangeable. But here's the kicker, just like perfect security is unattainable, perfect fungibility also takes massive amounts of resources or a trusted 3rd party. So Monero isn't *perfectly* Fungible, but it's semantically Fungible. It uses something called ring signatures. Here we get mathy: Ring signatures work like this, you want to send money to someone, but you don't want an attacker to know you sent it. So you use a ring signature, where you bundle up some other inputs that have occurred recently called "decoys" or "mixins", and you can use some cool cryptography where it's mathematically proveably *one of* the inputs in this ring signature signed the transaction, but *we don't know which one*. Further your transaction is locked and your outputs are used as decoys by other ring signatures, called "churns", further obfuscating who sent what to where. But there's one big flaw. When you combine inputs to send to someone (someone sent you 1 monero, another person sent you 2 monero, and you send those 3 monero to an exchange). Those previous ring signatures and trees of possible payment channels created by the rings and lock time have to be combined somehow. Basically each spend makes a tree of possible spends and combining inputs requires you to use one of the spend leafs from each tree. The problem is if an attacker, let's say the NSA knows someone sells illegal goods, like online drugs, they can send multiple inputs to a known drug vendor wallet. Each individual input turns into this big tree of possible outputs, one of which is the "real" one ( there's also a lot of other transactions going on in the tree). Now if the drug vendor combines inputs and sends to an exchange who colludes with the NSA they can begin to build up a probability that this person depositing funds is the same person as the drug vendor. This is because to send such an output the drug vendor combines two outputs from those previously mentioned trees of possible outputs. Now an innocent 3rd party could have combined outputs from those trees as well, so it's all probabilities and plausible deniability whether or not this person depositing funds is indeed the online drug vendor. Soooooo, Monero isn't *perfectly* Fungible, there are ways to attack it, with this attack being the most cryptographically devastating by some orders of magnitude. A solution that exponentially decreases this attack vector from working is increasing the ring size, that's being worked on as we speak, but we need to use this new algorithm called tryptch so that it doesn't increase fees a lot with increasing ring size. I know it's really only an issue for someone doing illegal things and a government staring and colluding with exchanges and actively sending money and following it, but the fact that *any* entity could *ever* violate privacy is a big big big deal over in r/monero. And sure this is useable by illegal drug vendors, but what about foreign dissidents trying to sell illegal bibles in countries where they're banned? What about a person trying to help uighurs flee China? They should be protected by default in such a way that no entity could *ever* figure out who they are. In crypto, the whole original point and the one thing it should do at any and all costs is protect against every possible case of potential surveillance. And this is currently the largest flaw in the best privacy coin on the market.
Dark net TOR Bittcoin PGP encryptionn
Dark net TOR bitcorn PGP encryption
In the event you are retarded and end up marrying a young thot without a prenup, make damn sure to learn how to use PGP. You'll need it when the situation eventually goes south and you have to hire a cleaning service.
I use darkweb and Monero is the way. Bitcoin isn't private. Darkweb is quick to adopt new privacy tech, so using bitcoin will soon be seen as a bad practice, like not using PGP encryption to message vendors.
The site I have linked to is an open-source collection of evidence. Most of the links are archived on archive.is in order to preserve them, hence the broken graphics. As far as substance goes, the site I have linked mostly talks about documents submitted during court processes, pointing out specific untruths or about instances where math/cryptography can be used to show that what he was claiming was false (PGP sigs or the fake key signing). The core issue here is that it takes very little effort for the OP to post his astroturfing submission here, whereas its systematic refutation would take much longer. While the OP is pretending to be neutral and 'only interested in the truth', it is clear from his post history that he is anything but that.