Reddit Posts
US continues to sanction Chinese companies, including DJI, the world’s largest producer of drones (80% of the market). Could Plymouth Rock Technologies Inc. benefit? $PRT $PRT.c $PLRTF
US continues to sanction Chinese companies, including DJI, the world’s largest producer of drones (80% of the market), could Plymouth Rock Technologies Inc. benefit?
Feeling that this drone company could be undervalued...
PyroTokens - PRT is live. Low MC. Community Driven. Huge potential
With a Bullish Oil Market, is it Better to Have Company Stocks, Royalty Trusts, or Sector Funds?
$PRT Support.com Short Squeeze?
Speculations on the Drone Sector + my pick
Plymouth Rock Technologies Announces Contract for Drones with AI Monitoring of Endangered Species and Poacher Identification in Madagascar
How to make money with the Suez-Canal debacle or Why I am bullish on PRT Futures
Watch PLRTF Plymouth Rock Technologies
Keep an eye on PLYTF Plymouth Rock Technologies
$PLRTF - NEW POTENTIAL WORLD RECORD FOR A DRONE
Mentions
As long as it’s all within the nations PRT (personal risk tolerance) we’re good
I went in for Sharps (STSS). Prelude therapeutics (prld), Tasha gene (TSHA). Just got out of MGOL at 50% up but that seems to be gaining momentum. SSTS - two sec report filings from investment companies within a week. The ceo bought 5000 shares of stock in Dec at 1.95. It was at .35 earlier PRLD- cfo named as permanent about an hour ago. I expect some updates about PRT3789 and/or PRT773. They also have a few others in the pipeline. TSHA - REVEAL TSHA-102 retts syndrome. There was a filing from Octagon Capital. I only bought a couple shares on the safe side just in case. they are due to update on this but I’m not confident how ppl will react to that investment firm *this is not financial or investment advise*
get ready for 4 years of this shit. what happens when you fire everyone and get rid of agencies in charge. Army helicopter on PRT. what did the DUI hire defsec order it to go pick up?
What a absolute pile of a gift-wrapped turd, spewed with ignorance kind of post is this. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/adjusted-net-savings-per-person?country=DEU~FRA~GBR~MEX~BRA~PRT~COG~DNK~USA US on the way up. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-population-in-extreme-poverty?tab=chart&time=latest&country=CHN~DNK~OWID_WRL~FIN~FRA~DEU~IRL~ITA~JPN~NLD~PRT~ESP~GBR~USA GDP great for US https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison?tab=chart&time=1980..latest&country=OWID_WRL~Western+Europe+%28MPD%29~Eastern+Europe+%28MPD%29~BEL~FIN~DEU~ISL~ISR~IRL~ITA~JPN~LUX~NOR~PRT~POL~ESP~SWE~CHE~GBR~USA GDP growth since 1950 aint amazing for US https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth-since-1950
It's the PRT parking lot shuttle from Heathrow airport
I = PRT 
I'm buying puts on PRT SC buttons.
Yes, just fill out this form and tick the box saying your PRT is above 10bn leverages, then take it to the leverages department down the hall to the left.
Hope everyone’s been practicing good PRT… Personal Risk Tolerance ©️ 😮💨👌💨
You gotta make sure you have your leverage at your PRT, otherwise, what the hell are you doing?
How the fuck did our latest loss porn winner leverage himself enough to lose that much. My broker doesn't even let me set my own PRT
Trim it down. With todays down open you are likely down 100k, what level of research did you do? My PRT is apparently way lower than yours, I wouldn’t even consider buying more than 100 shares. If you had done that you’d be down just over 1,000, that’s not a life changing ammt of money. In this situation if you trim it down to 1,000 shares, you could make your money back if it went back to 200 a share, which is unlikely to happen.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **84,308,520** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
If he can't sleep that means he's leveraged to his personal risk tolerance. And we all know no one ever exceeds their PRT. Ever.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **80,293,830** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **89174820** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **87593270** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **87593270** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
Literally says PRT nowhere in this picture
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **91729620** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: PRT. We don't allow discussion of low market cap (less than 500mm) tickers to prevent pump & dump spam and scammers.
I'm going to leave a comment here about information literacy and then be done with this thread. ​ Your first "Source" isn't a scholarly publication by Nature, its a magazine. The magazine's "source" is a environmental "think tank". That think tank's source is another article by that same think tank with a broken link. If I look for the actual article, it doesn't actually have a source with data. So...to be clear, the sources you linked do not actually explain what a fossil fuel subsidy is, or how they add up and count those subsidies. They are a source of nothing. ​ If I dig into the second "Source", and actually look at the things they are calling "direct subsidies", it becomes obvious that they are just making up numbers. The IMF doesn't actually list a source for where their data is coming from, include a methodology, or really give any clue as to how they are calculating "explicit subsidies". ​ If you look at the IMFs "database" (which is it's "source data") its full of nonsense. Let's look at the US for example: [https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Topics/Environment/energy-subsidies/fuel-subsidies-template-2022.ashx](https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Topics/Environment/energy-subsidies/fuel-subsidies-template-2022.ashx) ​ For the US, the IMF is saying that the US has an implicit subsidy on Gasoline. They come up with that because there is a difference between the average cost of gasoline and an arbitrary "Efficient Price" that they have determined. However, they have US gasoline taxes actually omitted from their calculations. Additionally, the IMF is just making up the "Efficient Price" number. How the IMF comes up with that "Efficient Price" is never stated, but it is lower for countries that don't appear to be subsidizing fuel explicitly and higher for countries that are. This "Efficient Price" appears to be punishing countries who are better at producing oil and refining petroleum products cheaply. If this were published in an actual journal in this manner it would be rejected as data manipulation as the methodology is never listed, linked, or explained. ​ For the US, the IMF was not able to find a dollar value for any actual specific subsidies for Gasoline, Diesel, Kerosene, Coal, or Electricity (they list the subsidy a whopping $0.00). If you actually were to list the explicity subsidies, they would be huge negative numbers because of gasoline taxes. However, that "0$" is somehow turned into a 3% GDP expenditure on subsidies through the magic of making things up. Let's forget for a second that the ​ Let's look at a more reputable source that actually came up with numbers for subsides based on what country's tax codes say. The OECD did that: [https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=FFS\_GBR](https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=FFS_GBR) ​ Let's pick on the UK here. In the UK the PRT is a special extra tax (most countries call them royalties) on the production of oil and gas. However, the first little bit of oil produced by a well didn't used to be taxed extra with the PRT. After the first few barrels were produced, the tax kicked in. Even though this "subsidy" expired in 2016, the OECD still lists it as a subsidy for oil production. To be clear, lack of a punishing extra tax is not generally considered to be a subsidy in economics or buisness. However, this lack of an additional tax is still considered to be a "subsidy" by the OECD even though it has been expired for 8 years. ​ The biggest "Subsidy" that the UK has on fuel is that they do not charge a additional "Climate Change Levy" on fuel that isn't used with in the UK. ​ Let me be clear about what this means for your argument. To claim that fossil fuels are "subsidized" we make a logic leap that says that because taxes could be higher in theory, they are therefore subsidized. Moreover, the extra tax burden placed on fossil fuels is considered to be a subsidy because that tax burden is sometimes lowered for some types of activity. **IN NO OTHER INDUSTY IS AN ADDITIONAL TAX ON AN INDUSTY'S BUISNESS ACTIVY CONSIDERED TO BE A SUBSIDY.** If you apply this logic to every other industry, the "Subsidies" you come up with are greater then the entire wealth of all the nations.
I took profits when I was up 25%. It went up like 500% then. But next day was red. Trailing loss wouldn't have saved me because it was options but everyone needs to know their PRT
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: PRT. Message /u/zjz if they're above 500 million-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
Look at the 4 hour on $PRTY it’s about to get squeezed right before Jerome powell calms the meme stocks 
PRT Y??? 'Cause I GOTTTAAA
So I had a look, and according to the [International Labour Organization's 2017 data](https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer48/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=PSE_TPSE_GOV_NB_A&ref_area=AUT+CZE+DNK+EST+DEU+GRC+HUN+ICE+IRL+LVA+LTU+LUX+NOR+POL+PRT+SVK+SVN+ESP+SWE+CHE+GBR+USA&classif1=GOV_LVL_PSE+GOV_LVL_GG+GOV_LVL_GGCENTRAL+GOV_LVL_GGREGION+GOV_LVL_GGLOCAL+GOV_LVL_GGSS+GOV_LVL_PUBCORP+GOV_LVL_PRV+GOV_LVL_X+GOV_LVL_TOTAL&timefrom=2017&timeto=2017) Spain had slightly over 3 million people working in the public sector. Spain's population at that time was about 46.6 million (https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/spain-population/); so not far off what you quoted. That means about 6.5% of the Spanish population is employed by the government. > Name some European countries with a higher proportion. How about Austria (8.5%), Czechia (9.7%), Denmark (15.3%), Greece (7.6%), Ireland (8.3%), Norway (15.8%), Switzerland (9.0%), or Sweden (14.6%)? Ok, but they are all quite a bit smaller than Spain, what some of the other large countries in Europe? Well, the UK had a public sector workforce of 5.5 million from a population of 66.7 million (8.2%). Germany's public sector was 6.3 million from a population of 82.7 million (7.6%). Poland's was nearly 3.4 million from a population of about 38 million (8.9%). In fact, of all 21 European countries I looked at, Spain had the lowest proportion of the population working in the public sector; the only country that came close was Portugal, at about 6.9%. For those interested, the US data for 2017 was about 24.7 million employed in the public sector, from a population of about 325 million; so about 7.6%. So wherever this idea that Spain has a large public workforce comes from, it is not grounded in fact.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, PRT. The market cap of PRT is **123117200** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad phrases or a bad crop with news about cryptocoins, for example. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that. Yell at /u/zjz if it's above 1 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
that's not relevant to PRT. it's that variance drag *drags* on portfolio return
I can’t find good quantitative data on it, but having experience in the PRT space, I can tell you that any pension we looked at had COLA.
EjMileman- I don’t think you are missing but you seem to be a Growth investor, where I’m an Income investor. My paid investment group recommended it’s members add SLVO so I added a block in Sept 2021 at $5.06. I am not concerned about it’s relative price which was as high as 5.55 in Nov 21 and low right now at 4.66. What has been consistent is it’s high monthly dividend. I track all stock and crypto with AI support to help make decisions. If you are focusing on long term growth SLVO and other high income assets may not be for you. My list of 25 high dividend income stocks are in self directed retirement accounts that yield 10% (average) which I reinvest. Other Income assets to consider include MAIN, ABR, NRZ, SSSS, PMCO, RYLD, USA, PRT, etc. Ate you an Income investor or a Growth investor? Are you close to retirement or is it far off? Lots to consider.
So if I leveraged $87T on a $1000 wallet, I’d get margin called on a 0.00000115% drop. If I bought BRK-A and it dropped $0.01, 0.0000021%, I’d be on the hook for $180k. Overall it’s within my PRT.
Buy up the publicly traded Royalties. $PVL $PRT - Both are in the Permian Basin.
Not even *just* leverage lmao. This mf figured out an infinite leverage glitch in robinhood and leveraged himself like 20x or something ridiculous. To his personal risk tolerance, or PRT in the financial world.
I think im one of the few who owns PermRock Royalty Trust $PRT and Permianville Royalty trust $PVL. Its very low cap under 500m. But they both sound like great opportunities and also buy out potential by bigger Royalty companies like $VNOM or $BSM.
I used Yahoo Finance's screener to find some that seem to have decent dividend stability + growth. You may want to do a deeper dive to find out if some of these match your investment objectives: Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.MI) Esprinet S.p.A. (PRT.MI) I didn't want to spend more than about 5 minutes, but I did find those. A dividend paying company is more likely to be a mature company that isn't going to grow at the same rate as a smaller growth company would. But as long as their growth outpaces inflation, they're a good option.
Thanks. Will be operating within my PRT so all good.
Buy 88 Energy 🔝🔝🔝8️⃣8️⃣ Energy A14PRT
Buy 88 Energy 🔝🔝🔝8️⃣8️⃣ Energy A14PRT
Buy 88 Energy 🔝🔝🔝8️⃣8️⃣ Energy A14PRT
Buy 88 Energy 🔝🔝🔝8️⃣8️⃣ Energy A14PRT
I don't actually talk investing with people IRL. So a cousin I grew up with who didn't know about my wsb life mentioned yesterday how he thought we could have recession and he sold all his stocks in non-retirement account. It occurred to me how when I had the same recession fears, most I did was decrease my leverage to be 100%. Life must be really simple when your PRT is like my cousin. \*PRT - personal risk tolerance
I’ll remind you today when I sold.. 12% in 2 days.. do that ROI for me... I=PRT Let me know what that return is
Not quite my friend, happy to try again but please don't put words in my mouth As above, natural immunity is key as cell-mediated immunity develops to all the components of the virus including core proteins which can be recognised on MHC-I of infected cells by T-cells -we also get IgA production This way even when the spike mutates infection is still relatively quickly recognised even if antibodies are less effective at preventing it taking hold There will also be multiple antibodies to different sections of spike so again older vaccine isn't usually completely useless Omicron \*but\* when you combine the spike change with the fact that vaccine doesn't really produce much IgA or any core immunity we get exactly the picture we're seeing -huge Omicron infection rates but little severe illness Look to Sweden to see how amazing herd+vaccine is vs lockdown+vaccine alone -frankly it has been a bloodbath in Europe [European ICU Occupancy](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&minPopulationFilter=1000000&time=2021-07-01..latest&facet=none&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=ICU+patients&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=EuropeanUnion~SWE~DNK~NOR~FIN~GBR~ISL~IRL~PRT~ESP~BEL~DEU~AUT~CZE)
Thats fine thats within my PRT
Always puts min of 3 weeks out on 5%+ spikes according to PRT fam. Thank me later
Got it, yeah I read the same stuff. I think you might just have a higher PRT than I do
They’re called trailing stops with large enough percentages to not get shaken out by mild/minor corrections and prudent portfolio mgmt: rebalancing/adjusting position concentration with a healthy leaning to cash as things start exceeding your risk tolerance. I’m over 50% cash across my accounts, but still holding aggressive growth positions on the part that is invested. Also, SPY poots 20%-35% OTM (again based on PRT), with decent time on them, make for great insurance if you’re like me and hate trading stops. If they’re blood red, you know it’s working as designed. GL
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: PRT. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
I use ThinkOrSwim. When you say ES are you talking about E-Mini SP500 Futures? If so, those are very expensive as well relative to SPY. What am I missing? As far as liquidity, I trade SPY because I can get a fill immediately every single time no matter the market conditions. Am I missing something? I bet SPX is just as liquid if not more but too expensive for my PRT.
Lol, I got that one. I told him his proposal wasn't risky enough for my PRT.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: SPRT SPRT PRT. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC/SPACs.
S PRT is fucking crazy. Its over 1 billion so I should be able to mention it but I'm not taking any chances.
I’ll be gambling everything. Within my PRT of course, which is set at 10billion.
Your post with title "$CNSX: PRT$ Plymouth Rock Technologies Announces Contract for Drones with AI Monitoring of Endangered Species and Poacher Identification in Madagascar" has been automatically removed from r/PennyStocks for being low-effort/spam. (Low word count) probably by u/automod *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/pennystocks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Either a tremendous amount of money or nothing. This sub is for big swinging PRT
time for a [S](https://support.com)PRT/GREE YOLO. Let's GO apes!
It turns out that proximity to women exceeds his PRT.
This is a straight personal decision. PRT and time to build portfolio are to be considered. This is a Wendy’s.
Those are all valid questions: No; relatively comparable as it will not be pilot same as heli/plane pilots; comparable. Eventually. Spac-ey I will not discuss it, because I know you can easily trample me with good economic arguments. I am not saying it will be easy or that eVTOL is guaranteed success, but I believe eVTOLs are only thing that can be a remedy for many to bypass traffic jams in big aglomerations and currently only space above ground is not being used to transport people in those areas. Well PRT is thing as well, but it doesn't seem like it's happening. IMHO it all depends on how reliable eVTOLs will be in the first place. I believe if done properly it will revolutionize personal transport, not like Sageways or e-scooters. You know - disruptive :) Feel free to call me lunatic dreamer in this case. Maybe I watched Jetsons too many times when I was kid. Of course if eVTOLs are to be same as helicopters but electric, needing same effort to pilot it, then it's probably absolute waste of time.
when i was in the military i straight flexed during the PRT (biannual physical readiness test) and pumped out 100 in 2 minutes. since i started working out again i can probably do that now
When your PRT runs on the high end of the spectrum...
Great DD king. Clearly you have a science background haha... keep it up bro you’ll be a whale when MVST=$100. Disclosure: 10,500 warrants and 1,000 shares. My PRT is high AF
> Finally, there is nothing dishonorable about taking risk, provided it's your own money n u only harm yoself. You can use leverage as long as it's within you PRT tho.
WKN:A14PRT I can order it from Germany with TradeRepublic
let a lotto run but yea i wouldn’t go all in.. but maybe your PRT is way bigger than mine lmao
PRT is obviously the most important measure. 😆
Ok so the big boys took in some retards as clients. These tards do long short strats with leverages that would rival some of our PRT despite being legit entities. They went GUH like the rest of us. The massive green candles? Do you know that people only buy when the price is going up and sell when the price is going down
Personal Risk Tolerance* It absolutely killed me that he capitalized it like it was an established concept and he had calculated his 25x PRT based on something lmao
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: SPRT PRT. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.25 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC/SPACs.
Yup that’s why I’m all in. I have a high PRT and can afford to YOLO
But i have a lot of leftover margin power. I have 50K in the account and have borrowed 30K, so that's like a PRT of 0.6 . I will be shorting more seaworls later of it goes up a bit.
PRT-Person Requiring Treatment for mental illness
I sold some 175s for $1.15 earlier this week. That was the last I sold. Friday’s I am guessing as I got caught up selling July calendar spreads on redacted yesterday for over $100. That’s something to look into, if it’s in your PRT.
I will join you on this one, I need to. PRT coming up.
You've seriously underestimated both my PRT and access to cheap capital
I know fam, but I'm trading within my PRT. And VXX spreads are literally free money right now.
Always make sure it’s working your PRT^TM
A14PRT is it for Frankfurt
WKN A14PRT - Frankfurt
WKN: A14PRT ISIN: AU00000088E2 Ticker-Symbol: POQ
WKN: A14PRT ISIN: AU00000088E2 Ticker-Symbol: POQ
WKN: A14PRT ISIN: AU00000088E2 Ticker-Symbol: POQ
WKN: A14PRT ISIN: AU00000088E2 Ticker-Symbol: POQ
Determining future son-in-law's PRT, guh.
I only leverage right up to my PRT GUH
Today showed me that despite thinking I was happy with my portfolio balance, my reaction to that open tells me SPAC positions are definitely overextended beyond my PRT. Probably time to trim and put that cash to work in my primary holdings.
AAPL calls are within my PRT right now