Reddit Posts
Why I bought 4% of Beyond Meat’s shares after it’s crash
Why I bought 1/20 of Beyond Meat’s shares after its crash
Why I’ve bought 1/20 of Beyond Meat’s shares
CLS Holdings USA, Inc. 2023 CEO Address to Shareholders CLSH
CLS Holdings USA, Inc. 2023 CEO Address to Shareholders
Vroom 2.0: The end game and the value this rough market has created.
Patience and temperament beat more math and prediction
Let's Talk About Lemonade: Analysis and Discussion
$ROOT, Win the Marathon not the 100m and Upcoming Catalysts
Please poke as many holes as you possibly can in my thesis
An In Depth Look Into Peloton – Why This Stock Is The Ultimate Long Term Becky Play
I think CMG is overvalued
$NOVC see massive increase in Short Volume. Who would short a penny stock controlled by Fortress parent SoftBank, EJFcap.com + MassMutual Barings & co investors running Board of Directors. ALL shares out outstanding per 2020 10K are owned by these investors + sm count. Yet > 30M shares trade 1.1.21
$NOVC see massive increase in Short Volume. Who would short a penny stock controlled by Fortress parent SoftBank, EJFcap.com + MassMutual Barings & co investors running Board of Directors. ALL shares out outstanding per 2020 10K are owned by these investors + sm count. Yet > 30M shares trade 1.1.21
$NOVC see massive increase in Short Volume. Who would short a penny stock controlled by Fortress parent SoftBank, EJFcap.com + MassMutual Barings & co investors running Board of Directors. ALL shares out outstanding per 2020 10K are owned by these investors + sm count. Yet > 30M shares trade 1.1.21
Mentions
My homie calls him FTA, not SGA
I'd sooner want a ber to win then SGA to win 🤮
Does SGA play in the World Cup, AKA Flop Fest?
and then somehow SGA to shoot free throws
SGA has spent this whole game flopping, bumping, and trying to draw fouls. Fuck that guy
Fwiw I've been having a lot of luck of doing parlays of players scoring at least 1 three. Did it for Wembey, Castle, and SGA last game. $250 for $432 payout. Not bad at all.
SGA even tries to draw fouls on free throws LMAO 🤌.
SGA is a flopping little bitch and data proves it: https://old.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1tklnuh/yahoo_sports_does_shai_gilgeousalexander_really/on9e5gh/
they need to add a O/U on SGA being on the floor
WEMBY fraud or SGA carried by his superteam
Chet & SGA = 🌈🐻 Wemby = 🐂🍆
Jokic was the real MVP.. SGA will never average a triple double
Spy down 0.02? I've had enough, 2 free throws for SGA
AMDs quarter was not that great - read transcripts on yahoo finance Cloud growth double digits only Cloud AI dropped - China out PC client biz expecting soft - supply/mem Competing w ARM Overall sequential growth flat or below This Q $10.3 next $11.2B not even a B more SGA spend more than R&D??? Lisa ever Q cites TAM as her go to awe - it worked several quarters - now ups it to $120B but never says how AMD will get that slice???
Steph about to be SGA's bitch. He about to be Dorted.
my +2000 parlay didnt hit because they subbed out SGA in 3rd and 4th quarter. SMH
Right?!?!!! Just bet on SGA or Doncic to score 25 points a game.
Buying SGA yes for mvp on polymarket as a hedge against the free throw merchant
Stop watching futes. Real ones hatewatching SGA
Yeah I dont trust myself unless I limit it. Otherwise id be betting SGA to get over a certain amount of FTA every game.
12 month - 8.5 legacy impairment rest SGA 3 month it’s all in SGA That’s the extent of a detailed breakdown
And last q without the adjustments which can vary quarter to quarter it was at 38 million. It’s dropping like a rock honestly. They plussed up their SGA a bunch to pay for the revenue increase (new stores, salary increases) This piece was also snuggled in near the end of the bad news: “The Company expects first quarter 2026 revenues to be sequentially down mid-single digits due to continued pricing pressure and seasonality.” Next quarter is going to continue this trend. GTI is not ramped and ready to deploy their cash on fire sales - this recent raise of $50 million is for protection. Their days of being profitable may be ending. Of course they’re still far better protected than all other MSO’s
Tyrese Haliburton getting hurt in G7 of the NBA Finals is one of the worst things to ever happen. Now JDub been talking like he's god & SGA stays as corny as ever. Stupid fucks gonna get beat in the playoffs by the first healthy team to play them.
APLD: Bragging non-stop about drawing on their revolving like its a good thing. COGS +344% SGA + 119% Interest +292% PROFITS????????????????????????? WHERE ARE YOU???????
Can't see it, they're playing serious catch up after years of riding high on the retro/resale market. The Skims partnership screams desperation and the fact they have NBA MVP SGA endorsing Converse is another bad decision they failed to capitalize on.
$JSDA Jones just hard their earnings call this morning and gave guidance that Q4 revenue will be up 187% YoY and at an 18 year high. Margins and profitability and increasing and SGA is under control.
SGA the free throw merchant.
Here is the link for Costco distribution: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/the-barcode-group\_retailsuccess-falloutvibes-fromvaulttoviral-activity-7391904510757003266-e0MM?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=member\_desktop&rcm=ACoAACFLX9IB0SgabcvwgRIC13kx9nzE8AQ-QOE](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/the-barcode-group_retailsuccess-falloutvibes-fromvaulttoviral-activity-7391904510757003266-e0MM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACFLX9IB0SgabcvwgRIC13kx9nzE8AQ-QOE) To be honest, the previous CEO was a marketing guys who talked a lot about great ideas but wasn't able to execute. The current CEO (who scaled BRCC in its growth phase) is all about execution. He has narrowed company focus and is set on delivering. My optimism is based on results now, not hype. SGA is down; sales are up. Q3 and Q4 may be double what they were last year. I list reasons why in the original post. If you read their announcements and dig deep into LinkedIn posts, you'll see execution is happening. This will all be plainly stated on the next couple earnings calls, but it's stuff that can be found on the interwebs now.
I hear you. They shed the state-by-state cannabis effort due to high legal complexity/cost and lack of scalability (needed an entire supply chain within each state). They kept the Hemp HD9 portion as it is scalable and less complex. This has led to lower SGA costs and ability for the team to focus on scalable products. What gives me confidence right now is numbers. They have gotten POP Jones in 1,500+ doors in the last 2 quarters, they have gotten Fiest Jones in 1,500+ doors over the last two quarters, for Mary Jones (HD9) they have distribution through major alcohol distributors and have 800 custom coolers in place across the country, they're current rolling out national distribution for Spiked Jones, and most important for me is that they are FINALLY focusing on reduction in sugar and meeting modern consumer demands with healthier options. Also, national Costco distribution coming (confirmed through LinkedIn). None of the above has been true in the past but it is true now. Most all of the revenue from the above momentum is about to be unveiled in Q3 earnings next week and more will hit in Q4. It's already happening, the market just hasn't noticed yet. I'm trying to give everyone the info they need to get in early.
Notes on BYND analysis (by CapybaraStocks on YouTube) as of 2 days ago Technicals: • Earlier this month BYND was trading around $3 with 76 million shares outstanding and a debt of over $1billion. This gave company a valuation of $1.5billion • On Monday it was announced bond holders would cancel over $900million debt in exchange for 316 million shares. Removed previously high risk of bankruptcy, • Enterprise value should have gone up, but issuance of shares was misinterpreted (opinion) as a risk the market would be flooded with shares against low demand. • Why was it interpreted this way? - Rumours of bankruptcy had been rising before debt cancellation. Before conversion, bonds were trading at 25 cents on the dollar - volume was low at these levels. • A portion of bond holders purchased the debt at a big discount that when converted to BYND shares, cost basis was around $0.80. Then immediately cashed out - this is why stock opened at this level following the announcement. • Retail traders perceived this as bearish and went short. • Bond holders loaned out existing shares to them for high premiums. • Cost to borrow BYND shares currently 90% interest per year. • In past week 370 million shares sold short • 400 million shares traded on friday alone • Bond holders that wanted out are long gone. Likely that shorts are retail traders overlooking debt cancellation. • Most bond holders maintained shares (opinion) and loaned them out to market makers due to high cost to borrow - currently 100% per year. Believes this is supported by bond holders having a cost basis of $2.5-$3 and be unlikely to take a loss. • Cost to borrow has gone down from 800% per year to 100% per year - someone is loaning shares out and unlikely to be retail. • they will have to buy back in the market to close the shorts. • Newly issued shares to bond holders were not registered with SEC - only trade OTC and accessed through market makers • If shorts are not hedges and are net shorts, means very few shares for sale at least until bond holders are at recovery prices. • Key to understand what cost basis bond holders have - $900 million debt wiped for 316 million shares - $3 per share (do the math to check this) • Also received convertible notes for $200 million. Will convert at just under $1, due in 2030. Means immediate cost basis is $3 and can go down over time to $2.25 • Shares available for sale until $3 very limited, buy pressure to close out shorts is sky high (might not even be satisfied if bond holders decided to sell out at breakeven - unlikely) • Perfect storm where shorts need to buy to close, paying 100% interest per year until they do. Selling pressure at these prices near to zero. • 80% of the shares not SEC registered and not joined the float • between $2.5-$3 will close very quickly • High media interest, social media buzz, 400 millions shares on friday - entering meme stock territory. Could unlock further gains with strong buying pressure. • Must check volume this week to evaluate worthiness of entry price (currently insane volume) Fundamentals: • Pioneer in plant based meats • Well recognised brand • Went public in COVID and valuation skyrocketed (over $11 billion - investors such as Bill Gates) • Sales since gone down from peak of $500 million per year to $300 million per year • Many customers already gone through curiosity phase • Still has strong brand and loyal following • Positive gross profit margins and improved health benefits of its product • Gross profits of $40 million per year but have $120 million in SGA expenses • Company has vowed to reduce SGA expenses (no specifics mentioned) • Management has hinted to expanding product line to include healthy food whilst leveraging existing distribution and logistics • Currently has $103 million cash +$50 million raised through ATM and warrants at around $3 per share • $200 million in receivables, inventory and pre-paid manufacturing expenses • 3 manufacturing facilities valued around $500 million • Total assets around $850 million and liabilities around $150 million (vendor payments and leases) • Equity value around $700million on liquidational basis - not accounting for its brand or business • Divided by sharecount, around 1.75 per share on liquidation value, not taking into account brand value, patents and distribution business • $1.75 is the minimum BYND can trade is assigning a value of zero to brand value, patents and distribution Thesis Summary: • Fundamentally misunderstood conversion event • Technical setup leading up to potential short squeeze • Strong balance sheet and book value post conversion Sorry for any formatting issues, I’m on mobile
Using my wife’s account (her boyfriend let me) Notes on BYND analysis (by CapybaraStocks on YouTube) as of 2 days ago Technicals: • Earlier this month BYND was trading around $3 with 76 million shares outstanding and a debt of over $1billion. This gave company a valuation of $1.5billion • On Monday it was announced bond holders would cancel over $900million debt in exchange for 316 million shares. Removed previously high risk of bankruptcy, • Enterprise value should have gone up, but issuance of shares was misinterpreted (opinion) as a risk the market would be flooded with shares against low demand. • Why was it interpreted this way? - Rumours of bankruptcy had been rising before debt cancellation. Before conversion, bonds were trading at 25 cents on the dollar - volume was low at these levels. • A portion of bond holders purchased the debt at a big discount that when converted to BYND shares, cost basis was around $0.80. Then immediately cashed out - this is why stock opened at this level following the announcement. • Retail traders perceived this as bearish and went short. • Bond holders loaned out existing shares to them for high premiums. • Cost to borrow BYND shares currently 90% interest per year. • In past week 370 million shares sold short • 400 million shares traded on friday alone • Bond holders that wanted out are long gone. Likely that shorts are retail traders overlooking debt cancellation. • Most bond holders maintained shares (opinion) and loaned them out to market makers due to high cost to borrow - currently 100% per year. Believes this is supported by bond holders having a cost basis of $2.5-$3 and be unlikely to take a loss. • Cost to borrow has gone down from 800% per year to 100% per year - someone is loaning shares out and unlikely to be retail. • they will have to buy back in the market to close the shorts. • Newly issued shares to bond holders were not registered with SEC - only trade OTC and accessed through market makers • If shorts are not hedges and are net shorts, means very few shares for sale at least until bond holders are at recovery prices. • Key to understand what cost basis bond holders have - $900 million debt wiped for 316 million shares - $3 per share (do the math to check this) • Also received convertible notes for $200 million. Will convert at just under $1, due in 2030. Means immediate cost basis is $3 and can go down over time to $2.25 • Shares available for sale until $3 very limited, buy pressure to close out shorts is sky high (might not even be satisfied if bond holders decided to sell out at breakeven - unlikely) • Perfect storm where shorts need to buy to close, paying 100% interest per year until they do. Selling pressure at these prices near to zero. • 80% of the shares not SEC registered and not joined the float • between $2.5-$3 will close very quickly • High media interest, social media buzz, 400 millions shares on friday - entering meme stock territory. Could unlock further gains with strong buying pressure. • Must check volume this week to evaluate worthiness of entry price (currently insane volume) Fundamentals: • Pioneer in plant based meats • Well recognised brand • Went public in COVID and valuation skyrocketed (over $11 billion - investors such as Bill Gates) • Sales since gone down from peak of $500 million per year to $300 million per year • Many customers already gone through curiosity phase • Still has strong brand and loyal following • Positive gross profit margins and improved health benefits of its product • Gross profits of $40 million per year but have $120 million in SGA expenses • Company has vowed to reduce SGA expenses (no specifics mentioned) • Management has hinted to expanding product line to include healthy food whilst leveraging existing distribution and logistics • Currently has $103 million cash +$50 million raised through ATM and warrants at around $3 per share • $200 million in receivables, inventory and pre-paid manufacturing expenses • 3 manufacturing facilities valued around $500 million • Total assets around $850 million and liabilities around $150 million (vendor payments and leases) • Equity value around $700million on liquidational basis - not accounting for its brand or business • Divided by sharecount, around 1.75 per share on liquidation value, not taking into account brand value, patents and distribution business • $1.75 is the minimum BYND can trade is assigning a value of zero to brand value, patents and distribution Thesis Summary: • Fundamentally misunderstood conversion event • Technical setup leading up to potential short squeeze • Strong balance sheet and book value post conversion Sorry for any typos, I’m on mobile
TTM revenue being $6B means literally nothing when Snap’s operating costs for the year are *over $6B.* Nearly 2/3 of Snap’s entire budget goes towards R&D and SGA (Selling, General, Administrative) duties, every year. Snap has never operated in profit, and has basically operated at a loss since its inception. In fact, they came into the 2nd quarter of 2025 with over $250M in losses.
48,000 shares keep adding 3$ in 3 weeks 🚀 Beyond Meat Is Cooking Again – The Next Impossible Rally 🍔🔥 When the People Move Together, Nothing Can Stop the Grill 🔥🌱 Beyond Meat (BYND) is a well-known company for its production and sale of plant-based meat. Back in COVID times, this got the hot prospect, that pioneered the category, a market cap of over $10 billion amidst one of the fastest stock rises registered during that period. Fast forward 5 years and sales have gone from $500mln to $300mln per year, gross profit shrunk to $35mln per year compared to SGA expenses of $120mln per year. This lack of growth and even a 20% sales decline last year has led to its market cap being absolutely obliterated to just about $200mln last week. This led the stock to being the most shorted stock on the market, with CostToBorrow at 800% per year and a short level of over 50%. The reason? A possible bankruptcy in 2027 due to a $1.2 billion debt repayment on a convertible note issued at its high. On Monday, this all changed. And we’re gonna start accumulating at the bottom! Beyond Meat converted $900mln of its debt to equity at a $3 per share conversion price and issued new convertible notes of $200mln to its creditors with $1 conversion prices. All in, Beyond Meat got rid of its debt for around $2.3 per share. Now, the company has $150mln in cash (about a year’s runway), a clean balance sheet and about $600mln in assets (manufacturing facility, equipment, land) at it’s disposal so about $600mln in shareholder equity. At the current price of $0.8 per share, that gives a market cap of $300mln fully diluted, for a company that just last week traded at $1.4b in enterprise value and has $600m in equity on it’s book even if you value the brand at 0. That might have been enough to take a position. Here’s the kicker. These shares that were issued, are not going to be registered with the SEC until mid-December, given that BYND will need to file an S-1 in mid-November which will take about a month to clear. So that dilution everyone misunderstood to be happening right now, won’t be there to alleviate the massive short pressure on this stock. My price target here is 3$-4$ with 2-3 weeks if all plays out according to known variables. Not financial advice and you should follow and do your own DD at your own risk. 💎🤲 When the People Move Together, Nothing Can Stop the Grill 🔥🌱
They shorted at 0.8$ to recover cash on bonds, likely through market makers and once their shares are transferable, they’ll just close out the new short with them. That having been said the previous short amount remains and they do need to buy back in cash. That gap would have needed to be filled as the amount cash wise was really low to get there. Their SGA is lowering quarter after quarter and their gross profit actually rising, so that will cross over at some point. They diluted shareholders meaningfully only once. The business is generating $40m a year in gross profit before SGA expenses, these will go down and margins will likely expand. Yes the revenue went down, but it was worth 20x what it is today when it was up. Size wise, it’s actually just 1.3% post dilution, but that sounds worse)) Previous investments - RUN, MP, SBET, BDTX
SGA is rapidly going down. This thing is going to reach breakeven
Much of its cost is SGA that’s quickly going down around running the company. Because they are still in a start up mentality.
If that hadn’t happened price would have been completely different. It’s doubtful the category will go away. Keep in mind the current business is generating $40mln per year on an owned facility. The SGA as to how to grow it of $120m per year are kind of killing it, but in an acquisition that goes away
Part of their assets is the manufacturing facility which they own. SGA costs are about $120mln now. Gross profit from operations about $40mln. But these can be cut and if the brand is sold at a 10x multiple of gross profit, that’s a 400mln valuation, 600mln in equipment so about a billion valuation seems reasonable which is what it was last week
^ This! Each line item is a part of the overall story of the company. Revenue up/down Why? SGA up/down Why? Answer enough of the “Why’s” and you begin to learn the story.
If they can sustain their SGA, they may actually be fairly valued.
Don't shoot me. I'm not an ape. I don't own any shares. But game company might actually be undervalued if they can sustain their current SGA levels. They also grew net sales an insane amount. I'm genuinely curious how. With bond income, their current earnings suggest it is worth $10B-$11B now. Which is what it's trading at now. Add in a little premium for the meme status and it might be FV or cheap.
Don't shoot me. I'm not an ape. I don't own any shares. But game company might actually be undervalued if they cannot sustain their current SGA levels.
Don't shoot me. I'm not an ape. I don't own any shares. But GME might actually be undervalued if they cannot sustain their current SGA.
retailer.. uncertainty around consumer demand as well as them stating that their SGA increased. I think it’ll rebound (hopefully not as im in puts) but there are issues with it
ROOT did drop like 25 or so points from the year before, so the trend is there. with economy of scale, it would require less SGA per policy. Revenue will grow faster than expenses, and if we assume a long term expense ratio mimicking Geico, then we can see a CR closer to 75%. sure, i might be ambitious, so we can call it 80%, but the thesis is the same. ROOT's ai/automation tech stack removes many of the back-end staff increasing efficiency. Also, i've always noticed that founder led companies are always more efficient on running the company, and thats because they understand their company inside and out. Current Insiders own north of 10% of the company, and these guys are in their 30's. if you want to see efficiency , ROOT will show it. many of these blue chips have been so poorly run that they over-hire staff and have no clue how to be disciplined on expenses, and so you'll see a ton of inefficiencies. ROOT won't have that problem as they are building from the ground up leveraging AI & automation. The end result, you'll ultimately see a tech forward company beating legacy on every metric.
Would really depend where the cuts from. Cogs? Probably bad. But SGA might be super bloated. Despite working in finance, I think its healthy for companies to trim GA HC every few years, bloat just leads to slowef bureaucratic mess.
SGA just signed the biggest contract in NBA history, about $71 million a year
actually there are multiple insurers with a 75% CR. i made a list a while back but KNSL for one has a 75% CR for the long term. you have to understand that ROOT isn't your ordinary insurer. It is doing things that no other insurer has done before, and thats underwriting risk correctly, and getting the best loss ratios from it. Secondly they are bringing down SGA expenses drastically due to their tech stack, ai and automation. No insurer is doing what ROOT is doing in terms of efficiency, and when you get that type of combination, you'll get results like a 75% CR in the long term. ROOT is doing everything better than Geico other than size. i only threw Geico in there to give you an idea, but ROOT will be more efficient than Geico. Geico overhired, and when you build the company from the bottom like ROOT, management can easily maintain efficiencies, without deadweights. When ROOT can cherry pick policies due to risk, thats where ROOT comes in very similar to specialty insurers who are putting forth 75% CRs. its not your typical auto insurer. What ROOT is doing is what TSLA did to the auto industry by removing the middleman and making it more profit efficient. it deserves a valuation multiple, just like how TSLA trades at 30X GM, F but yet has less revenue. No one is comparing TSLA to legacy automakers, when legacy automakers are slowly dying. thats also the exact reason why you shouldn't be comparing ROOT to legacy insurers who are losing customers/growing at single digits. ROOT will be 2-5X more profit efficient than their legacy counterparts, and should deserve a valuation multiple due to profit efficiency, growth, and tech. The perfect example is Tsla versus legacy automakers or even HOOD versus legacy brokerages. No insurer is going to do embedded insurance like how ROOT does it. Look at the list of partners that are lining up here. Legacy insurers can't build embedded platforms period. No other insurer is going to be able to cross-sell like how ROOT does it, significantly increasing LTV of customers & margins because of it. as for cross-selling, according to JD Power, if a policy is bundled, the customer will hold the policy for about 30% longer, and it opens the market up by another 37% for customers who only shop for bundled policies. Why that is important? thats because with the 1.4Bish cash that ROOT may receive from CVNA warrants, that could potentially be used to acquire another product front loading growth, and potentially doubling revenue growth. legacy insurers have nothing against ROOT. It will only take a small amount of PIF growth, to bring in strong NI. you're simply not bullish enough.
fun finals watching SGA at the free throw line for 7 games
NBA is just unwatchable man. I thought they stopped James Harden but he has been reincarnated as SGA
SGA decided he wanted to be one of the best players on the planet AFTER he left the college that I root for
These are the kind of moves I like. OKC parlay with SGA over the points. And then ASTS July 3rd Puts.
Need SGA to come through tonight or I’m fucked
fuck SGA. fake mvp free throw merchant mfer
SGA or Tyrese? Who’s coming out on top boys, I need ways to lose money
I see OKC winning here, SGA + Chet/Hartenstein will pop off
Better hope SGA, the flopper, has the refs on his side
BREAKING NEWS PER MULTIPLE SOURCES: Israel launching missiles on Iranian anti-air defenses - possibly to prepare for US bombing. SGA to the free throw line, Haliburton executed as center court.
The Pacers just got hella depth, Siakam, Haliburton, Nembhard, Toppin (all on average solid) OKC got depth too but whenever SGA tanks the team is toast, Jalen can't carry that squad
SGA is a fraud, pacers in 7 is free money
SGA is the MVP of the NBA. OP is just salty bc their contracts are down. Shoulda cashed out when it was at 92%
# I tune in to the NBA finals and it's SGA on the free throw line again
SGA’s boyfriend is actually pretty cute. No cap.
Well, the return on investment is pocketing the insurance company's money after you've earned your original investment back over time and the interest you earn along the way (if you're using a GLWB, not annuitization). I've personally earned over 23% return on my FIA in a given year, and I locked that interest in. If you spread your investment among several insurance carriers, you spread the risk with the SGA. There have been more banks and credit unions that have closed than insurance companies. Major insurance companies (not small mom and pop companies) becoming insolvent is very rare. Just reminding you of 2008. Most insurance companies flourished while banks and credit unions almost collapsed. So, it's not a stretch. Any person who says there's a downside in general is wrong for saying that because you lose a good chunk of the upside potential, and that is a downside, BUT, you are protected from a stock market crash. Hell, you're not even in the market at all. The insurance companies use the indexes as a "measuring stick" to determine how much or how little interest you earn. You are correct, Most consumers are intelligent, and you have to tell them the entire story. My advisors know and communicate to their clients more about the cons than the pros, so whenever someone decides to buy an annuity, they know all the cons, and frankly, less about the pros. And let me be clear, annuities aren't for everyone, but the misinformation or opinions here seem to stem from misinformation or taking advice from bad apples.
NBA going to have lowest views in history when SGA is the biggest superstar
SGA cannot possibly be someone’s MVP
SGA probably gasps and whimpers when he cums on his own chest
SGA over 27.5 pts is a lock
Turner 10+ pts, SGA under double double, Chet 10+ pts
SPY flopping harder than SGA here
SGA deserves a statue if they win the series
Going to be game 7, buzzer beater by SGA win.
mango needs to deport SGA
SGA, PGA, GPA, GTA, pacers in 6
I want them to, but the league loves SGA and hes no slouch either. Good luck my dude
Thunder in 6. Thunders length and physicality will bother Haliburton too much. Pacers guards won't get the easy runs to the bucket they got against the Knicks and their fast paced offense won't bother OKC. That said, the Pacers will be sending different looks at SGA to try to slow him down and he'll be forced to play defense at a faster pace so we'll see how he holds up. Pacers take game 1 and 5
"As long as revenue increase faster than cost the company eventually turns profitable" yeah that's the thing. I'm not sure that's even the case here. Their financials are all fubar so it shard to tell, but the "cost" of running their servers is built into "Operating Expense" not "Cost of Revenue". Their SGA line is very small already. As their revenue has incrased over time, their Normalized Income has gotten more and more red. I would say there's no path to profitability for this company, but digital ocean is profitable, so what gives?? I think they are a loss leader in a field that will never have sticky customers. They're selling shovels in a gold rush at a loss to gain market share.
Bollinger Bands on SGA flops. Conclusion: he's due for a good game next time.
SGA eating himself some Denver Nuggiez
k I'm ngl guys I'm down bad for this SGA Lucy girl
Most of their product sourcing is from India, Vietnam and Latin America which is a 10% tarriff or a 3% net impact on costs of goods sold. The China products is the shoes and accessories part of the business and that is not their core business revenue source. As for SEO you are right it is not the way to win back marketshare but if that improves along with the stores being fixed up then you have a consumer that is willing to spend a bit more than they currently have. Even if it is 10 more people a month per month per store that is a 10\*12\*495\*30 is a few million in revenue growth just by optimizing a local seo page which costs a few thousan dollars. As for cost cutting the SGA as a % of revenues is the lowest it has been in 15 years and it will continue to drop as a % of revenues or stay the same but with higher revenues (more profit). An example of this is how they spend $9 million in warehouse space rent when they could expand their Distribution center and not have to pay rent. So it will cost 20mm to expand and in 3 years pay it off which is savings right back to shareholders.
Put a 104% tariff on SGA free throws in the playoffs
I want Jokic but SGA prob win it since Joker already got a ring and 3 mvps
Good bet once that Canadian immigrant SGA is deported
Nobody is shutting down SGA with modern nba rules you’re delusional as fuck. Dudes going to shoot more free throws than Dwayne wade in the 2006 nba finals
Jimmy Butler & Draymond can shut down anybody & SGA's 'wins above expected' (or whatever) for the Thunder is 20! 20 fucking games! OKC is a middling 50-win western conference playoff team without SGA & Butler is one of those dudes who can just take him away.
Yeah this is complete fantasy. Dort can lock up Jimmy no problem. Curry will get his, but he won't be able to outgun SGA and Chet. Draymond is a literal non factor in playoff ball.
okay but why do I feel like dad dick Curry & Butler are going to ramp it up in the playoffs and find a way to take out OKC in round 2? If Curry & Butler are healthy, it's literally not fair. Both guys take just take a series over. Butler & Draymond will find a way to keep SGA in jail while elite PnR just destroys them on the other side of the ball. These guys got that old man 2nd wind energy.
SGA 40+ pts & KD 36.5+ ASTS/REB/PTS
No magic, simple businesss logic - decrease headcount and SGA expenses, purchase hardware to replace inefficient humans with assets that depreciate (tax write-off).
SGA mvp this season ngl he’s goated 
Apparently SGA was insanely profitable, according to Joe Flannigan.