Reddit Posts
Drill Results Breakdown: Outcrop Silver (OCG.v OCGSF) Intercepts 358 g/t AgEq with 671 g/t AgEq Segment in Step-Out Drilling at Los Mangos Vein, 8km from Nearest Resource Area at Santa Ana Project in Colombia
I see you all don’t miss here big buys here let’s keep the buying pressure up 🔥🔥🔥🚀🚀🚀 $DH 2 da moon 🌝 🌚
$DH - YOLO shares & options we pushing this shit to $120 let’s make this #1 trending on shortsqueeze🔥🔥🔥 💨💨💨 burn those shorts 🤣🤣🤣
$DH see you at $120 screenshot this & thank me later
Marksmen Energy Inc. (TSXV: MAH) is pleased to announce the following drilling program update:
It's a bloodbath, but I'm gonna DH's all the way to my f'kin grave
Champion Gaming: The Sports Betting Pick and Shovel Play
Mentions
obviously nothing worth reporting when CNBC mentions KPOP DH 7 times in the last hour -
I didn't read it as a direct equity swap. He also added other positions in Lamar, DH Horton and Lennar and others. Yes it said he was trimming AAPL and BOA but I don't see anything that specifies the amounts of those sales.
https://x.com/GovPressOffice?t=ZlRNZgbQRNoGzXIQ0DH6pg&s=09
I misstated a concept from above. that DH - C = 0 is independent of the presence of VRP. It is a statement of the effectiveness of the hedge, and only a statement on the effectiveness of the hedge. VRP is the difference between implied volatility and realized volatility. The paper you cited states: >Figure 4 reports the paper s key results for long-run average option risk premia. It includes results for three different periods: the full sample available for synthetic returns (1926-2022), the full sample available for both synthetic and traded returns (1987-2022), and the 1987-2005 sample used by Broadie, Chernov, and Johannes (BCJ; 2009), who report an extensive analysis of the performance of traded options. In all cases, the figure gives results for put options. This is the Broadie, Chernov and Johannes paper: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN\_ID1946412\_code1671431.pdf?abstractid=1946412&mirid=1](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1946412_code1671431.pdf?abstractid=1946412&mirid=1) It states: >Straddle returns are related to the wedge between expected volatility under the Q measure and realized volatility under the P measure. In our sample, realized monthly volatility is approximately 15% (annualized) and ATM implied volatility 17%. They have clearly found 2% VRP over the time period. They also show consistent negative returns for long puts. Finally directly to your point: >This article examines the profitability of volatility trading on S&P 500 equity index options in time-varying market conditions, with a particular focus on evaluating the authenticity of risk-adjusted returns. While significant profits are available on strategies that involve writing put options, our findings cast doubt on whether these profits can be genuinely attained in practice. After bid-ask spreads are included, we find that the profitability is significantly reduced. Furthermore, the implementation of the trades is generally difficult owing to margin requirements as investors have to set aside a large proportion of their [wealth](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economics-econometrics-and-finance/wealth) into margin accounts and also [face](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/face) a high likelihood of margin calls. Overall, the profitability of volatility trading tends to hinge on the capability of investors to capture the volatility risk premium and to wisely time its trades. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1059056017305191](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1059056017305191) I agree with these authors. There are profits, they are difficult to capture, and they cannot be captured through randomly selling options. They must be captured with a robust analysis of market conditions as is described here: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract\_id=889947](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=889947)
>I understand that you then agree with my conclusions regarding the futility of options writing strategies and the misinformation regarding "income strategies" promulgated in forums and in the financial media. Randomly entering into short options positions will underperform being long the index. Randomly entering into income strategies, like covered calls will underperform the index. The key word here is randomly. There are times where writing options is a great idea. There times where having directional exposure is a great idea. Notwithstanding the vast majority of the time, short options will outperform long options. Being net short volatility earns positive raw but not geometric returns. >The long straddle strategy per one of the charts that I posted would have made money in the last ca. 20 years, and more money than selling the straddle (which lost money), but like you say, that may be idiosyncratic to the time period chosen, and to argue anything specific we would need to specify the setup and how we measure returns and risk-adjusted returns. This is completely false. There is no extended period of time where long straddles outperform short straddles. The butterfly index is evidence. A butterfly is simply a hedged short straddle. If straddles were printing butterflies would not have positive returns. Because I'm not getting across in words I will use equations **let DH = a replicating portfolio for Option C.** **Let P = the cost or premium for an instrument.** **DH - C = 0** We should agree on this. The equation says, if you are short an option and long delta hedging you should expect 0 return. Your return actually comes from the cost difference between DH and C. So let the cost be X and: X = P(DH) - P(C) if X > DH - C than the transaction is profitable because X > DH - C Now let's be very clear, the paper you are referencing is saying that DH - C is converging to 0. That is the claim your paper makes. With no VRP DH - C = 0 >Over the last 15 years, returns on traded options have converged to those on synthetic options -- with the variance risk premium shrinking towards zero Your paper is saying synthetic options (DH) are earning returns that are converging to zero. This is not to say there is no volatility risk premium. This is to say that volatility risk premium for option writers using a replicating portfolio (which is a synthetic option, and is also DH) is shrinking. And it isn't earning a return competitive with other things that can be done with the capital. But we don't expect it to earn a return as high as the index, because a delta hedged portfolio has less risk than the index. The return on a short option should be the equivalent of a bond, because it's essentially the lending of capital. This means if you are short an option, and you delta hedge it, you will make a small positive return, which CONFIRMS the presence of VRP. The paper repeats this on p. 17: >In the periods of overlap between synthetic and traded options, traded options always have lower average returns than synthetic. It couldn't be more clear. -- continuing in another post because of character limits.
DH: Careful, you idiot! I said, "across her nose," not "up it." Cross-eyed gunner: Sorry, sir. I'm doing my best. DH: Who made that man a gunner? Cross-eyed officer: I did, sir. He's my cousin. DH: Who is he? Colonel Sandurz: He's an asshole, sir. DH: I know that! What's his name? Colonel Sandurz: That is his name, sir. Asshole... Major Asshole. DH: And his cousin? Colonel Sandurz: He's an asshole too, sir. Gunner's Mate First Class Phillip Asshole. DH: How many assholes we got on this ship anyhow?
Exactly, an opaque market that under normal situations, the wealthy compete over who gets to invest, now all of a sudden they’re so desperate, they want small 401k retirement money. [Sure, what could go wrong?](https://youtu.be/Y3AM00DH0Zo?si=WqzL6UzoHsoa8s24)
["How come the Penguins don't wear suits?"](https://www.threads.com/@greg.lecig/post/DH_6x2YpHea/media)
[https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zrphf1DH6Nw](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zrphf1DH6Nw) GOOGL CALLS
Any damage those two DH's can do to each other is great news.
Trumps a DH. EVERY business passes costs on the consumers. Maybe dont start a fight you cant win. Bozo
[call holder pov at open monday](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH7M_juyKVd/?igsh=aTJoNWh1bGRjY2Nu)
Moody’s downgrade —-> WATCH this - especially all you muppets born after 1990 … [https://youtu.be/9xZx1lf2tvs?si=1OJpAxo\_nu\_DH-WW](https://youtu.be/9xZx1lf2tvs?si=1OJpAxo_nu_DH-WW) The Big Short 1 minute clip, please watch or just join the other muppets in the short squeeze coming - cheers
Within blink of an eye another Chyna app has shot up to near the top of the Murican App Store. 2025 is just that of a year huh. Don't think DH will be the last one either.
🥭singing https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH3koDPuHfa/?igsh=MTVpOTlob2VyamUz
Are we still buying the earshot story? [https://www.threads.net/@godlessgardener/post/DH4tEHds\_ij?xmt=AQGz-7fx5kkQMN8\_a2U2lEijgKgXtjzBKtodpENPbosuWw](https://www.threads.net/@godlessgardener/post/DH4tEHds_ij?xmt=AQGz-7fx5kkQMN8_a2U2lEijgKgXtjzBKtodpENPbosuWw)
I did my part today! Ordered a couple things on DH Gate instead of Amazon. Ended up being way cheaper than the amazon equivalent and its honestly probably the same thing just not drop shipped
Hope my DH Gate order from last night goes through o_O
In the same Book DH, Same Taleb's advise to novices are first read Nathenberg's Book. Then intermediate books, and at last DH, DH book is very advanced in kind of exotic options and Statistics Math that a regular retail still don't need it to trade. My advice is If You want to become a Proffesional options trader You need to open a paper account and fail a lot while start to read the easy books like Nathenberg's. Beware that there is no single.strategy that always work all of the time, all strategies if done bad can decimates accounts, whenever You found a strategy that works be caoutios and ask Your self if is pure random, what matter the most here is what kind of trader You want to be, hedger, volatility trader, arb trader, market maker or just a gambler that want to shoot at the stars. Also there is another good book called The business of options by Martin O'conell, is a fantastic book for intermediates traders that goes straight to the technichals and ask You what kind of trader You wanted to be.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_94gnutnI/?igsh=Z2pvcWFnMzF0NHow The US citizens didnt agree and she was spot on
The poster retracted that post and corrected "I have deleted my posts about the Trump tariffs corresponding to internet top level domains. The reason they’re broken down like that is that both internet TLDs and the Trump tariffs are listed by ISO Country/Territory, like the trade data here; census.gov/forei… However... it’s still obvious that they just applied a simple blanket formula to every entry in that list without any real thought or understanding, hence the tariffs on penguins & military bases." [https://www.threads.net/@vfxgordon/post/DH_nMICSjAj](https://www.threads.net/@vfxgordon/post/DH_nMICSjAj)
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_mxGVq1ME/?igsh=Z2podDV6cW8zbWFi
It’s embarrassing. I can’t believe these tariffs will stick for very long as economists will continue to eviscerate Trump and his cronies over them. Eventually Trump’s defenders will have to tap out after failing trying to explain how they are reciprocal. This guy explains it very well: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_frOQRi2o/?igsh=ZW8wbXBoNm1ncWY3
These tariffs have nothing to do with being reciprocal. They are mixed up thinking and I can’t fathom how the US got to this place. It’s embarrassing. I can’t believe these will stick for very long as economists will continue to eviscerate Trump and his cronies over them. Eventually Trump’s defenders will have to tap out after failing trying to explain how they are reciprocal. This guy explains it very well: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_frOQRi2o/?igsh=ZW8wbXBoNm1ncWY3
These tariffs have nothing to do with being reciprocal. They are mixed up thinking and I can’t fathom how the US got to this place. It’s embarrassing. I can’t believe these will stick for very long as economists will continue to eviscerate Trump and his cronies over them. Eventually Trump’s defenders will have to tap out after failing trying to explain how they are reciprocal. This guy explains it very well: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_frOQRi2o/?igsh=ZW8wbXBoNm1ncWY3
Please don’t call it Reciprocal tariffs. Just call them Trump BS tariffs since have nothing to do with being reciprocal. This guy explains it very well. I’m glad I found it. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_frOQRi2o/?igsh=ZW8wbXBoNm1ncWY3
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH_uiTbR3OP/?igsh=MWppMHFlOHlpa28wbw== Trump asked ChatGPT. Nice
[Two Options Accounts - P&L from the Last 30 Days (IG Post)](https://www.instagram.com/p/DH-O8FXMmPr/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==) Hey everyone, I’m pretty new to options trading and just wanted to share my recent results from two separate accounts over the last month. I posted these on Instagram for motivation and tracking. • Account 1 (black dot): Realized profit: $4,443.00 Return: +36.46% • Account 2 (white dot): Realized profit: $4,623.00 Return: +18.16% Trades were done on Robinhood. I’m not going for home runs—just building consistency. Curious to hear what more experienced traders think about these numbers. Is this kind of P&L normal for options trading in a strong market month? Any feedback or advice is appreciated! Thanks in advance. #OptionsTrading #Robinhood #Webull
Oh you need some feel good music - [FeelBetterMusic from YouTube](https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ) If you want to know what it feels like check out this SouthPark gem (2m 5sec) - [https://youtu.be/Y3AM00DH0Zo](https://youtu.be/Y3AM00DH0Zo)
See: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CW1C5H3T?ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_8D6DKV48DH68VGF2MPQA
Saw some ppl mention DH, earnings better than expected, but price dropped by 30%. Any thoughts?
It Says $5 in the subs description DH
I’m not an expert, but my husband works in a steel industry. One thing I’d like to add to the conversation is that certain exemptions that existed in Trump’s first term are now being removed. Sadly, DH’s company relied on that exemption.
Could even enjoy my Sunday going to the Super Bowel without talk of this DH.
they have this strategic partnerships and initiatives, like collaborating with Thermo Fisher Scientific and ensuring Nasdaq compliance, positioning it for potential growth. As for me I am DH on this stock
great but had you tried the other stocks like OPTT and MYNZ? i'm DH on MYNZ standin 649k shares
What are people’s thoughts now on DH. He has had many calls wrong and some right but he has been changing the goal posts lately.
I honestly don't think DH is going to be around forever it's going to go the way of Hornes.... There is only one Hornes left on 17 in Virginia when during it's heyday there were 300
Check out [r/LETFS](https://www.reddit.com/r/LETFS), [r/HFEA](https://www.reddit.com/r/HFEA), [r/TrueHFEA](https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueHFEA) and [u/modern_football](https://www.reddit.com/u/modern_football) and [https://www.optimizedportfolio.com/hedgefundie-adventure/](Optimized Portfolio HFEA summary) It's not free money for sure... Hedging with LTT (long term treasuries) significantly reduces volatility and drawdowns. The classic Hedgefungies Excellent Adventures (HFEA) portfolio is 55/45 UPRO/TMF at 3x leverage, but small tweaks have been made (60/40 instead, 2x leverage, adding gold, ZROZ for the bonds part, TQQQ instead of UPRO...). [unhedged backtest](https://testfol.io/?d=eJytj0FLxDAQhf%2FLnIO0u%2BihIF7EkwfBk8hSxmZS42aTOhm7LqX%2F3VkrKqJSdHPK8B7ve2%2BANqQ7DFfIuMlQDZAFWWqLQlABGKBoP12T2mOAqiz0GUD7UPvoAopPESqHIZOBBvO9C2kLVfFx1I7pUXNuCDnsNI1TCD629dZHu%2FeeFKOBLrG4FHzSOrcDRNzs2ctn9fvYU5Zz33urtVQXflIYky7A2NDFl3zxzZp4ypn%2Bql53O%2BGzy9OlGjrihqK8jhlXBixjq5VH885dHB1%2FS37b%2BTe0hs6DH3z0Yha3%2FGH0f8jlzM3l4cm%2FcFfjC6yf%2F4g%3D) [hedged backtest](https://testfol.io/?d=eJy1kl1LwzAUhv%2FKOBdeFYmb86IgIszhxZDqejNklGNzWqNZMtOsU0r%2Fu6dE2PCLCi5XCXnyvs%2BBNFBq%2B4A6QYerCuIGKo%2FOZxI9QQwQARm5dwq3NWqITwSvCFA%2BZcoUGr2yBuICdUUR5Fg9FtpuIRa7Q1Y4euGcBaHTb5zmrNbKlNlWGdmxZ6KNYG2dL6xWlnXuGzC46rpHr4Pr6dUlP1KmpspPVK0kuzHk3YYbHfEYaHKahpLbDZtS6PEqfyYX8sKegXmySO8uZucjBtbkcjI%2BGOwx6Sz9ypyKdhmBdFjydB3%2BoTg8Hh9MkrN7aH6ifhQ9nGYfyZ6K86NkMBaiv%2BWNNfQnQf7B37f%2Ff%2FUvtcv2HYpxJB8%3D)
Check out r/LETFS, r/HFEA, r/TrueHFEA and u/modern_football and [https://www.optimizedportfolio.com/hedgefundie-adventure/](Optimized Portfolio HFEA summary) It's not free money for sure... Hedging with LTT (long term treasuries) significantly reduces volatility and drawdowns. The classic Hedgefungies Excellent Adventures (HFEA) portfolio is 55/45 UPRO/TMF at 3x leverage, but small tweaks have been made (60/40 instead, 2x leverage, adding gold, ZROZ for the bonds part, TQQQ instead of UPRO...). [unhedged backtest](https://testfol.io/?d=eJytj0FLxDAQhf%2FLnIO0u%2BihIF7EkwfBk8hSxmZS42aTOhm7LqX%2F3VkrKqJSdHPK8B7ve2%2BANqQ7DFfIuMlQDZAFWWqLQlABGKBoP12T2mOAqiz0GUD7UPvoAopPESqHIZOBBvO9C2kLVfFx1I7pUXNuCDnsNI1TCD629dZHu%2FeeFKOBLrG4FHzSOrcDRNzs2ctn9fvYU5Zz33urtVQXflIYky7A2NDFl3zxzZp4ypn%2Bql53O%2BGzy9OlGjrihqK8jhlXBixjq5VH885dHB1%2FS37b%2BTe0hs6DH3z0Yha3%2FGH0f8jlzM3l4cm%2FcFfjC6yf%2F4g%3D) [hedged backtest](https://testfol.io/?d=eJy1kl1LwzAUhv%2FKOBdeFYmb86IgIszhxZDqejNklGNzWqNZMtOsU0r%2Fu6dE2PCLCi5XCXnyvs%2BBNFBq%2B4A6QYerCuIGKo%2FOZxI9QQwQARm5dwq3NWqITwSvCFA%2BZcoUGr2yBuICdUUR5Fg9FtpuIRa7Q1Y4euGcBaHTb5zmrNbKlNlWGdmxZ6KNYG2dL6xWlnXuGzC46rpHr4Pr6dUlP1KmpspPVK0kuzHk3YYbHfEYaHKahpLbDZtS6PEqfyYX8sKegXmySO8uZucjBtbkcjI%2BGOwx6Sz9ypyKdhmBdFjydB3%2BoTg8Hh9MkrN7aH6ifhQ9nGYfyZ6K86NkMBaiv%2BWNNfQnQf7B37f%2Ff%2FUvtcv2HYpxJB8%3D)
You can buy half their products on DH Gate for 25% of what they charge. They have so much overhead it’s ridiculous. They need to go through Corporate and start slashing. Puts on Nike.
https://youtu.be/DH_gPGl5FF4?si=3flZlQA1oMl8tIB-
Mine were green, and the landscape looked perfect to exit for a 10 percent gain. I am holing the 547p still in the mistaken belief buys from AH, would not translate to DH ...
I can attest to this. RuneScape, 2005, I was merely 7 years old. Camelot bank trying to have a “B-sale” when I see a gentleman saying, “selling whip 2m ” And then another gentleman saying, “buying whip for full Dharok”. I just so happened to have the 2m, and my young mind saw the opportunity for arbitrage! A quick 2.5m to be made: pay 2m for whip, sell whip to man for full DH. (Whip was only 1m at the time more or less). I buy the whip, trade the other fella for his DH…. And they both logged. Scammed for 1m in that transaction. Never again.
DH wanted a Cybertruck. He cancelled his order.
No, not really. DH is very light on math, it’s much more practical than that.
Somehow everything I DH is shit. Everything I PH turns to gold.
All correct, yes. I'm not gonna repeat myself... Idk how many times I need to say this. It does NOT matter IRL. Literally doesn't matter. Nobody looks at the chain and thinks about interest pricing adjustments in DH theory. Cuz it's irrelevant. You ever seen those changes in pricing in aggregate? Me neither. I would never change my position based on this, nor should anybody. You understand??
> Theoretical models price in interest before Dynamic hedging is even talked about. It's not all about dynamic hedging. While interest is a part of it, it's not a huge one. The main point of DH is continuous delta neutrality. And what happens in dynamic hedging here. Do you understand that in dynamic hedging, one shorts the underlying and get the risk-free rate to hedge a long call, and one borrows at the risk-free rate to buy the underlying to hedge a long put? You see the risk-free rate there? That's what happens in the option price. Whenever you sell puts, **you are paying the risk-free rate because the puts are priced lower**. Understand?
Theoretical models price in interest before Dynamic hedging is even talked about. It's not all about dynamic hedging. While interest is a part of it, it's not a huge one. The main point of DH is continuous delta neutrality. Because dynamic hedging is not pretty and honestly irrelevant for most retailers. Does it help to know it? Sure. Do I blame Tasty? No. Other channels on YouTube probably explain it if someone was interested. IMO Retailers should focus on finding successful risk-controlled strategies, not DH. You can be successful without it. That's MY point. Why not be helpful instead of all this smugness?
MLB owners would not approve a super rich guy like him buying the A’s. It would be great and he could build a new stadium with no public financing, but the other owners don’t like that shit. Jensen would invent an AI DH who posts a 20 WAR every year and that not good for the competition.
People abuse them 
Euan Sinclair’s books are a great place to start, but I still refer to DH today after first reading in more than 20 years ago.
Yes Yes Yes. Most likely we will see $507\~$508. Best case Scenario 511 DH. 
Link : https://twitter.com/SenFettermanPA/status/1776344203959644436?t=I43bkPwCPuATDcp2DH30Gw&s=19
Looks like people are discovering DH Gate. Once the Chinese start minting perfect retro Jordans this company is done.
Wait until people learn about DH Gate
Calls on DH Gate and puts on Nike
They want $90 for a sweatshirt. You can buy 60% of their merch on DH Gate for 10% of their price. Counterfeit Jordans are even getting good. Nike is done. $40’s over the next few years.
Something like this https://youtu.be/Y3AM00DH0Zo?si=eb-B6r5U9WWQ5Slg
DH8D is the ICAO identifier for the Q400, designed by dehavilland Canada (DHC). The ICAO identifier being DH doesn't imply I think DHC = DH. You literally have no idea what you're even taking about, and are probably panic googling what ICAO even is right now. Jfc people like you are the problem with the internet.
You must be American to think DHC and DH are the same company...
ICAO identifier for their most popular plane is DH8D. For De Havilland. Sure Bombardier bought them but it's still called the De Havilland dash 8. Or the Q400 if you'd prefer. Bitch.
Dming and merching. DMs were 50/50 DH
Not like DH consumers have a choice though
**Yes, Ernie Varitimos, or ‘Coach Ernie’, from 0-DTE is a scam artist who has hurt countless people.** He is not a profitable trader. I also don’t believe he’s ever worked on Wall Street. **Basically, his entire life has been a giant lie.** He’s been lying and using the same scam since \~2016 (only this time he has better marketing): **Promise huge profits with little risk and lie about your success and employment history.** Except...**Ernie Varitimos was recently sued for losing $1.2 MILLION of client’s money.** [Complaint - Theis vs. Varitimos.pdf](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BUH0J0Peozx6ugJj0tLUJzZa_DLHAWEk/view?usp=sharing) He told the client to expect huge gains and only small losses **(yet the client lost over $1 MILLION)**. **Ernie couldn’t even afford a lawyer!** Then he lied to his entire email list about how well he was doing. Finally, a man who is 60+, who claims to have been a highly successful trader on Wall Street **DECLARES BANKRUPTCY because he has no money!** [Ernie Bankruptcy Filing.pdf](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1naKbJ7EoFnY6jAvAqDcHrJLMVcrs0IuP/view?usp=sharing) If you want to be lied to and lose all your money, then follow Ernie Varitimos from 0DTE Strategy [ErnieVaritimos Scam.png](https://drive.google.com/file/d/16w0-Rr-V9cggVStwfnjUGSgAGeQiTaCf/view) Read the FULL lawsuit against Ernie Varitimos where he lost over $1MM of his client’s money, and then lied to everyone here: [Lawsuit filed against Ernie Varitimos from 0-DTE 0-20-cv-60220-JIC](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12Ak_BtyLwhDiFL7DH_GwmtfzSueTJE1P?usp=sharing)
So far today, since I was kinda bored with the market closed, I've reevaluated my trading strategy (again), cashed out all my ibonds, filed federal, state and local taxes, dropped a load of stuff off at the thrift store, did the grocery shopping, and am now eating for the first time today. Gonna troll the internet to keep me amused for another hour or so until DH gets home and I can bug him.
Once more people discover DH Gate they will lay off 65% of their people
Buffett sold all his DH Horton shares last quarter.
First off, any amount you save is better than nothing. DH and I gave each child some investments as UGTM. But MOST of the money we saved was in our name. Two reasons: 1) Currently, FAFSA calculations an expect a person to spend all their money on their own education, but only a portion of the parents is considered "available" for tuition. 2) You child may not be making good choices at 18 or 21. And a pile of money may seem like a fortune that can sustain them forever. We decided that we wanted to have that control over the money. So if they had a few immature years but decided to go to college or open a business later, the money would still be available to the.
Basically I wrote that it is now a lottery, with all range of options from even bigger problems to full recovery after trading update is published, providing some publicity available facts to support it, like recent layoffs, selling of deliveroo shares and continued, but seemingly not so successful attempts to sell part of APAC business (for me a clear sign that company desperately needs money), but then decided to “unpost” because I’m also a DH employee, and even though I did not give out anything “inside” (I’m not even on that level to know anything serious) I don’t really want to have the slightest chance of getting in trouble with our lawyers. But in the end - fck it 😅 for me current events are clear “start looking for a new job” signal anyways.
Given events during recent decline and finally yesterday’s crash - massive layoff just before Christmas, selling Deliveroo stocks at loss and jeopardised sale negotiations of part of Foodpanda APAC business, and suspecting that those moves are done because company desperately needs money, and knowing that trade report is coming in mid February… This is a “lottery” signal - stocks might either grow back if trading report is good enough for investors, or the company might actually end up insolvent, or anything in between. But for me personally as an DH employer this is a clear “this is your last warning, start looking for a new job now” signal. Disclaimer: none of information I provided here is “insider” - everything is publicly available and easily findable on internet.
Yeah it’s called DH Gate
Everyone buys on DH Gate now. I get retro J’s that look real for $45.
[I can foresee no problems.](https://youtu.be/Vmn8Pr3_6uY?si=VtmA-DH17y_Cd5MR&t=39)
3 hours and not a single regard could be bothered to Google it for you so you don't have to do it yourself? [The audacity!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3AM00DH0Zo)
This one? https://youtu.be/QO2DH1Dl1M8?si=6syWrn4xbPwMeMFM
“Tax implications” Those are the only two words needed. Wealthy retirees are fucking bombarding by 1099-B from brokers, about 25% of them are missing before tax day, then they have to sort them in to schedule D, 1099-Div, 1099-DH a 544 and god only knows what else the IRS wants. They don’t hate crypto, they hate what the IRS does if the own crypto. They got enough paper work for stable low risk long term investments. A risky investment is for the young kids.
https://preview.redd.it/zur8pxsi7opb1.jpeg?width=2694&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2a09ff1e097fc31f620641dfb62fb63fe031fe9f DH DB
Have to curate the content I expose myself to. I like the Dales Report on YouTube and DH Taylor.
Indeed. DH is a grifter that won’t show his investments/results history. He sells hope to folks that want to believe.
Remember those DH bulls. TP but don’t sell too early. Sit on yer gadem hands if you have to
AAPL is about 17% of my portfolio but it’s among a dozen others that generate dividend. Definitely one of the lead off batters but the DH is SPY for me. I mean, are we too heavy with Apple? Yeh, kinda but it’s a solid company with a solid sheet. The tons of cash it has really helps in this economic climate. The main problem I have with Apple is how it pulls me into complacency. I never thought about it until I read your post LOL. That said, I’m not as tech heavy as you with NVDA. I’ve diversified into consumer cyclicals, some banking and some telecom.
Big Age difference let Elon get a DH for Zuck for it to be fair lots of DHs would love to pop the alien head of Zuckerberg
[Aaaaaand it's gone](https://youtu.be/Y3AM00DH0Zo)
then you are obviously rich and dont need more money.... but still can help the moass by buying calls or shares and DH those
I worked for home Depot for 8 years and finally left after I got my CDL. Let me tell you. The Home Depot management philosophy is fucked. They DO NOT want, managers or department heads on the floor unless they are solving customer issues. They want the DH doing inventory/price updating or other random shit. I finally got promoted to DH and was told I have to delegate work, because they told me "managers don't do floor work" so when they caught me working on the floor and cleaning my aisles up I was doing my job wrong. It's really impressive how they went from being a good store years ago to being the Walmart of home improvement.
Don't spend one Euro until you gain a greater education on investing. In the meantime, put your money in a high interest savings account. Next get free library app Libby, may have a different name in your country. Or you can always install Amazon Kindle app and pay a small subscription fee for the Unlimited feature which allows for the reading of many books for that fee. Or, go to an old fashioned library, and learn the basics about investing. Investing is not easy. It takes a lottttttttt of time to learn. Reddit and other social media are hard to resist, but YOU and ONLY YOU must be in control of your research before putting your money in harm's way. Watch this short, funny video to show you what can happen to those who think the market is easy: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3AM00DH0Zo&t=44s&ab\_channel=SouthParkStudios](https://www.google.com/search?q=cartoon+skit+about+investing+money+disappearing&oq=cartoon+skit+about+investing+money+disappearing&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160.17456j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:1bd79d8d,vid:Y3AM00DH0Zo)
Just reminding everyone to not get your expectations or hopes up today. As DH Taylor says it’s a process and it’ll take months and years to play out; Although I would always welcome a nice rally, even a small one.
Listening is okay, but following their picks NEVER. There is some good value listening to CEO interviews over time to understand their management style and strategy. Also, some good info on cannabis politics, scheduling, what millennials are thinking, and state news. I do verify everything I hear. I ignore all projections, but lately I found Elliot Lane to be a good source of daily news with a positive attitude and no hype and DH Taylor for his metrics and economic opinions. I sometimes watch the “HEXO kid” for laughs. Nobody seems to know anything enough to give me an “edge” so I am buy and hold and focused on fundamentals. When I say nobody, even Tim Seymour doesn’t seem to have any better street information than we have - otherwise his CNBS would be performing better.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcTFvjxVfxU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcTFvjxVfxU) First time hearing DH taylor say he thinks this is the bottom. Interesting video
So far.........BBBY .I was 380% up at one point. "Diamond handed" overnight, lost 50% over that night, continued to DH and now I'm 99% down 🤣🎉
>UAE: DH42,000 FINE ANNOUNCED FOR COMPANIES NOT MEETING HALF-YEARLY EMIRATISATION TARGET ^First ^Squawk ^[@FirstSquawk](http://twitter.com/FirstSquawk) ^at ^2023-04-26 ^04:11:55 ^EDT-0400
>No, I'm well aware that the EVs are using brushless motors. Those fail too just FYI. Sounds like you never had a car before, blower motor on the AC dies... Starters die in every car (especially today with the start stop). It's weird that you brought up brushed motors at all then, just trying to scaremonger people that don't know the difference in their expected time to failure? You also keep comparing them to starter motors, which again, are brushed motors and will wear out much faster than brushless. So if you're aware... then I can't figure out why you're drawing such bad comparisons. And in the blowing air regime: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qoPTTZt6AY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qoPTTZt6AY) The costlier units may go more brushless, 20,000 hours claimed. Marelli claims brushed and brushless motors are used in vehicle AC air units, with brushless being preferred more recently and having much longer life. -- [https://www.marelli-corporation.com/en/assets/pdf/innovation/technical-review/vol12/p6-8.pdf](https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwiYq4WBkcH-AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marelli-corporation.com%2Fen%2Fassets%2Fpdf%2Finnovation%2Ftechnical-review%2Fvol12%2Fp6-8.pdf&psig=AOvVaw2WK3M47sran2gEKva-J7DH&ust=1682378113023578) I've never had an AC air motor failure, nor observed one in the vehicle of any friend or family member. I assume they happen, but they don't seem to be rampant. I used to see lots of vehicle listings with no AC working, but that could be for many other causes as well. Also, many of those vehicles would have been older and been using brushed motors. I do have a car, a reliable Toyota, and no, I haven't had any motor trouble at all driving it 8 years in one of the hottest places on the planet. Of course things can fail, but ideally failure is infrequent. Did have a battery go so bad that power steering didn't work, was worried about the alternator but it turned out to indeed be just the battery. >If you have a pool pump it fails too.... stator is a reverse electric motor (as is a alternator) and those also fail.... It's hard for them to run more than say 2000 hours. My impression of pool pumps is that the typically don't fail because of direct wear under normal operating conditions. It's very common for a more minor part to fail that leads to them running dry, which is often not what they are designed for, leading to vastly accelerated failure. Some common causes: [http://parkerpumps.com.au/common-causes-of-damage-to-swimming-pool-pumps.html](http://parkerpumps.com.au/common-causes-of-damage-to-swimming-pool-pumps.html) >EVs aren't immune to these problems either. They have the same motor failures and from what I've seen with the people I know who bought Teslas; they mostly have ran into the same problems... This has affected everyone who I know who has bought a performance model and raced it. That could be a design problem, I haven't looked into it, but it wouldn't be the first time an engine has run dry under certain acceleration in certain directions. It also may be overheating under those conditions. >Gas engines don't wear out in the same way and last much longer. Citation? It doesn't seem that likely considering how many of them seem to fail before 100,000 miles. >Also the parts to build gas engines are standardized and as such there are always parts available, even from the aftermarket. Well, again, the brushed vs. brushless context makes a big difference when we're talking about how much faster an engine wears out? Are you thinking electric motors have a mean time to failure of 2,000 hours, or 20,000 hours? Because brushless motors are often in the later category. For highway driving at 70 miles per hour, you could expect to put 1.4 million miles as the mean engine failure point for a good brushless motor that is well maintained under expected operating conditions (we can expect sooner failure for consumer vehicles, but I suspect they're often still better than internal combustion engines on average). People will have theirs fail sooner, especially if they're pushing their vehicle to the extreme. Those failures may be from faulty initial construction, so they may skew early while if it makes it to 100k it will probably make it 300k. Some engine designs will be better than others. This guy gathered some data on Tesla engine failures in particular: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNT5k2zIKIs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNT5k2zIKIs) Note that one model appears to fail much more frequently than the others (and is actually an induction motor I think, not brushless DC). They don't seem to be particularly bad overall rates, but I don't have an ICE engine source on tap to compare with just at the moment. The one guy going through 5 engines though, LMAO, he definitely has something else wrong beside just the engine. Acorn cites a longer time (not an EV motor though), 30,000-40,000 hours, and points out steps that can be taken to prevent early wear: [https://www.acorn-ind.co.uk/insight/five-causes-of-motor-failure/](https://www.acorn-ind.co.uk/insight/five-causes-of-motor-failure/) When it comes to more industrial electric motors, the most common cause of failure by far are bearings [https://www.dukeelectric.com/electric-motor-failure/](https://www.dukeelectric.com/electric-motor-failure/) As if ICE engines don't fail because of bearings: [https://www.hyundaiengineinfo.ca/](https://www.hyundaiengineinfo.ca/) Also, gas engine parts are not standardized, who made that claim? The parts in my boxer engine will be useless for a Mazda rotary engine. What standardization there is tends to exist only between models from the large automakers because duplicating parts saves them costs. A 3rd party component may fit, but may not actually be up to spec. I don't think the people I've seen reforging pistons and machining their own parts are doing it purely for fun when there's a cheap standard replacement.
Yeah, I’ve seen discounted cash flow analysis done by DH Taylor on YouTube. And my take on that is that it involves setting a lot of assumptions and then projecting what might happen in year 2345 and so on. Almost all of his analyses show that cannabis stocks are currently worth about 10% of what a discounted cash flow model would argue.