Reddit Posts
Mentions
Personally, even though not invested myself (yet), I do find them compelling. Most of the negative comments listed here were highly emotive & lacking in any actual fundamentals. They have the ultimate moat. No one is even remotely close to what they can achieve. Starship, Starlink, Terafab, GW coming online, XAI, EWS & orbital data centres are highly compelling & worth reviewing further if you're new to the stock.
Yeah, my issue is less “is SpaceX overvalued?” and more “what would even tell us if it was?” If this were anchored to some metric — forward revenue, EV/revenue, EBITDA, FCF, Starlink subs, launch cadence, cost per kg, whatever — then at least you could draw a map. You could say: at this multiple, it needs this much revenue; at that multiple, it needs this much margin. But at $2.5T, it feels like it has moved past any way to say "ok, now it's grown into its valuation". It’s not aerospace, and even if you tried to treat it like AI infrastructure / ElonWS / CoreWeave, the implied scale required is enormous. So then the question becomes: why is $2.5T the right number? Why not $250B? Why not $25T? Once the valuation is detached from measurable business metrics, it becomes almost impossible to reason about the future stock price. I’m not saying the story is wrong - and i believe wholeheartedly in the vision of transforming humanity (with SpaceX)/demolishing telecoms industry (with StarLink)/more competition for Compute (with EWS). I actually buy the “railroads to space” too! I just don’t know how to invest other than "Elon historically makes stocks go up."
What? I never said I am projecting to 2014. I stated the performance is ran FROM 2014 to last trading day (01/20/2026). 2025 was a great year for EX-US stocks, but still not enough to make up for the phenomenal returns being in the U.S. market would offer even from 2023 through 2025. If you want a longer example here is the comparison of EWS vs SPY. This is tracked from 1995 to last trading day (01/20/2026). EWS- Total Return: 89.06% Annualized Return: 2.16% If invested $10k the ending investment would be $18,914.69 SPY- Total Return: 1,089.77% Annualized Return: 8.66% If invested $10k the ending investment would be $119,060.16 So if we zoom out further, over 30 years, the US market has still dominated the return of EX US stocks. Now I am globally invested. With about 70% of my investments being in the U.S. Market. To say let’s bet against the U.S. market is just foolish at this point. Especially with companies being more global than ever.
I honestly cannot tell if you’re being sarcastic or just lying. I just compared the CAGR of everything you mentioned to look into. Most of them only have tracking back to 2014. So if we start from 2014 to current here are the returns: AIA: 116.8% IZZ: 4.21% IEU: 44.74% EWS: -0.07% SPY: 247.5% I don’t think you can say a 22 year time period is irrelevant especially with how much more the U.S. Market has outperformed what you mentioned.
Plenty of market will be outperforming, and has, the US in the next few years as economic and political interest aligns. Look into IAA, IZZ, IEU, EWS
AIA and FXI ETFs are having a great run. Blend of asian exposure. Also worth looking at EWS Singapore.
"Inaccurate LIBERAL LIE job numbers -- FAKE N EWS-- only off by 900k. Trying once again to besmirch our great country and economy. THey won't matter once we fire the people who make those reports. Tariffs are working! Prices are down! Crime is out of control (in select cities only). It's a great time to invest -- DON'T BE A LOSER. I don't know what selling calls means, nor Theta, though she probably is sub par in many ways. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Yes, definitely add global. My combo above was for baseline US exposure. For global, I have VXUS for broad capture, with additional focus on certain sectors/regions like SHLD, AIA, EWS, EWG, and some others.
apologies if I should’ve posted this under another sub but in defense of old people…i’m 75. and just in case i live another decade or two🤞… I am *still* 60% equities (a mix of everything from VOO & EWS to ABVE & GME— although mostly AAPL&GOOG); 10% commodities (GLD, SCCO); 20% T bills (in brokerage) and bonds (in IRA) and 10% HYSA— which I consider to be cash. and I have never worked a day in finance. so, it can be done.
YTD the S&P is up about 5%. I moved out of S&P on Feb 17th (the Monday after Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference) and into European defense contractors as well as VGK, ILF, EWS and FNORX. My YTD return is about 13.5%. No matter what US stocks do, I’m not coming back until this administration is in the rearview.
Three days after JD Vance’s speech in Munich I sold all my VOO and bought European defense companies, VGK, FNORX, ILF and EWS. I don’t want any part of the American or Chinese economies. I wish them/us well, but I’m not putting any more there than I have to.
Focus on Chex sensitive banks and banks that pull EWS ( biggest business account bonuses usually are EWS accounts) then go ham on the non Chex sensitive ones. Dr of credit has a lot of information This is less of investing and more of a side hustle so be ready to put in the work
OP will be on EWS soon well played
🅱️REAKING 🅱️EWS ur bad at trading 
Most likely OP did something that earned him a mark on LexusNexus/EWS/ChexSystems and thats whats happening.
I assume you are referring to EWS. What's wrong with that ETF? Singpore's market capitalization is not that big so there's not going to be much interest for an investment manager to develop a fund that's specific to the country.
GNSS is looking like a decent long term play. Just got approved to build EWS's in 35+ dams in Puerto Rico and is fully funded by FEMA. This gives them easily 60-70 million in revenue alone through the end of production which is late 2025 I think. Which is almost double what their rev is now. High institutional holding, low debt, it doesn't look like a bad stock at all.
zelle is owned by a bunch of banks together, under EWS
>Yes, it is like Zelle, very prone to theft, crooks and fraud. What the heck are you talking about? That's a ridiculous comment. Zelle is product of EWS which is company owned by Bank of America, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, etc. It was founded by banks to compete with payment systems from competitors like Paypal's Venmo and systems from payment processors like Fiserv, FIS, and Jack Henry. Most of the fraud were due to end-users who fall victim to social engineering attacks. Or banks that didn't offer payment fraud counter-measures.
Why not use it everywhere? If there are street lights, then we got a way of talking to cars. Car manufacturers pay government to use the system, much like SATNAV companies pay to use the system in space...so the cost would be for manufacturers of cars that wish to have EWS or even 'self driving'. Mapping data is not real-time, having an on-site realtime system connected to the local network si far superior AND opens the door for every manufacturer to use the system the best way they can with software, kinda like SATNAV systems vary based on software using the data it is receiving. Dirt Roads and private roads...surely someone would be hands-on at this point, but, once onto 'the grid'...we got options. It ADDS but I do not know how it SUBTRACTS. ​ In short, I think self-driving development has been too much about the individual companies finding an all-encompassing solution @ high cost for consumers, who end up as test dummies - when it could be a cost apportioned to manufacturers at a fraction of the cost for the largest amount of brute force calculation. If all the cars talked to one another via these street-light-logic systems, we got a far better situation than needing to rely upon a myriad of competing systems. It's a fallacious position, and consumers simply do not trust manufacturers to 'get it right' and also, it lessens the need for so much development if there is a common standard in the streets, ready and willing, using opensource transceiver systems to relay infomation across the tarmac to vehicles. It would greatly assist traffic systems, too. Cheaper than digging tunnels underneath roads...
I'm often obsessed with AI and 'driving bots' with different systems all vying for attention, when, I think the future could be as simple as this: Fit all street lights with transceivers that can talk to cars and allow information to flow between these systems and ALL cars on the road. A sort of "Automotive MIDI" that, regardless of the manufacturer, the car will be in permanent communication with an EWS, and, to make sure the car understands where it is in position to everything else. This would do the brunt on the work, with the cars themselves doing the final leg work in terms of speed, position, spatial acuity etc. This would LESSEN the requirements of the AI on board the car, and, provide better generalised information. ​ In other words, the insistence by car manufacturers to have an 'all-singing-and-dancing' solution is the result of their NOT being sufficient information on the road for the cars to use. ​ Human beings need TRAFFIC LIGHTS to know when it is 'safe'. What does AI need to know; and can it be provided in the streets through simply attaching a device to each and every street lamp? It would not impact pedestrians, it would not need a new 'pole' to be dug. Just a 'magic box', probably the size of a smartphone (and using similar tech!) to be attached to the street lights. Street lights are also at a consistent distance, too. ​ Just a thought, someone surely would have a system in place in a theoretical government proposal somewhere? ​ The tech exists to do it, but I doubt car manufacturers would support something in such a competitive industry...yet, we do have SATNAV systems, so, my hopes are high. ​ Just a short opinion whilst I read your post.♥
A fifth of those companies are Zelle-EWS consortium. Although they compete against each other on the surface, what would happen if any of them failed? Do the others with easy reporting and information access from within that consortium get easier dibs on the liquidatable assets before it goes to member banks, other banks, and then general buyers of big debt?
"Evil Wall Street" (let's call it 'EWS' lol) sees companies like Berkshire Hathaway as the 'Old Guard' and want a more Wild West kind of capitalism like they have been used to for the last six to ten years or so. Ergo the negative cash flow tech vacuum companies like certain unlovable discount brokers we know of "boo" at the old folks who aren't gearing up to play their version of "Blackwater: Oligarch Edition" where laws and regulations are for the poors and honest. There's a reason so many companies are talking about the "opportunities" in "emerging markets" (ie, Axis-aligned nations or those too poor to put up a fight against MNC exploitation).
Eh good idea, I do Singapore for the same reason, EWS. Ill get some Vietnam as well.
Trade ideas for rest of Q4. Any thoughts or comments highly appreciated: Put spread on Blackrock (BLK) Put spread on Caterpillar (CAT) Leaps on India ETF (INDA) Long EWS
Time for action and make money. Eg, buy etfs which are denominated in weak currency. Eg EWS
>Singapore is 65% East Asia/Pacific and a big investment hub with a long track record. The one thing to keep in mind is what the holdings of an ETF are though, and if that reflects what you are looking for (i.e. EWS, the primary Singapore ETF available in the US, is almost 35% concentrated in 3 bank stocks, and almost 65% financial + local REITs). If you're looking at individual ETF's with holdings concentrated on these regions, you need to be careful about this as they can get very concentrated.
I would start looking at the individual country ETF's from ISHARES like EWS, EWT, Etc.
ITM Put Credit Spreads mostly... a lot of them so sometimes you just get tagged. Today's early assignments for example. Assigned 1 EZU 2022-02-18 54 Puts Assigned 1 EWS 2022-02-18 24 Puts https://imgur.com/a/qtJsEks
Join the AMC Only discord at https://discord.gg/s7EWS4zVB8 We have a dedicated DD channel utilizing the all new Threads feature for discussions. A great team of moderators working hard to keep fud and shills out. And bingo every Friday to de-stress after a week of trading! Come on in!
Remember to join the AMC Only discord: https://discord.com/invite/s7EWS4zVB8 We have a dedicated DD channel utilizing the all new Threads feature to help discuss DD. We have a dedicated group of volunteer Moderators and Enforcers who make sure everyone is following the Rules of the server. And we play bingo every Friday night to help relieve tension from the previous week! So come on over and join the greatest AMC Only discord!
Join the AMC Only discord server for all the latest DD and info! https://discord.gg/s7EWS4zVB8
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, EWS. This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad phrases or a bad crop with news about cryptocoins, for example. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that. Yell at /u/zjz if it's above 1.25 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC/SPACs.
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, EWS. This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad phrases or a bad crop with news about cryptocoins, for example. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that. Yell at /u/zjz if it's above 1.25 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC/SPACs.
IMO the best risk/return options right now at current prices are ABBV, BABA, EWS, EWU, KMI, PINS, and WISH. Some of these would add more diversification to your existing portfolio than others, of course. Some are also very speculative, especially WISH. Just opinions, not investment advice, good luck! 😊
Value stock maybe ambiguous, in my definition is actually company like microsoft, as opposed to SQ or ICLN. In terms of gains, prior to 2020, I typically earn in average 10% per year. Last year, Jan-Dec I earned 40% and half of my investment is in things like SPY, EWS, stable etf with low gain. My point is, it’s normal to earn around 10%, 2020 was not normal
I like VTI as the core position. IMO You could consider 10-15% international (non-US) exposure given relative underperformance in recent years. Some of these are likely to mean revert and also be less correlated to the rest of your portfolio. For example, iShares EWS, EWU, etc. I’d avoid all ARK funds. That’s played out, they are too large and now unmanageable for outperformance. And a lot of downside risk in the next two years. I’d consider something like the Baron Opportunity Fund instead.
EWS, the singapore stock market ETF went \~800% in two days back in may