LOT
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
-14.29% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
All great points made here. The Dems should never have trotted Biden out there knowing he's not as capable as he's used to be. He did A LOT in 4 years but that's beside the point.
Someone made a **LOT** of money yesterday and today.
hard to know, there will be a LOT of volatility from sunday's japan snap election
I have also been building with them since gpt 3.5 and working with agentic workflows since then. And my experience has actually switched the other way around from yours. I hit a LOT of walls early on and doubted a lot of it. Everywhere I looked devs were trying to do certain things and ClAIM to do certain things that was ultimately just green green green. In starting to see things slowly settle in now. MCP servers was a BIG shift in the right direction. AGI? Uh yea no, that’s not even part of the conversation and it shouldn’t be
Yep. So dumbass people who sells in this dip on STOCK market, which is by far the one with less runup lately. All institutionals are making a LOT of money Shorting BTC. That money will flood stock market. Bad jobs report bullish for rate cuts, AI replacement is on the way so AI is not bubble, also we are not close in a situation where AI will replace all jobs. Last but not less important SC will rule tariffs illegal soon which will make +2% day, new ATH
Just chilling with my bag at this point :( learned A LOT of lessons with this one.
I bought a LOT of Micron, and a fair bit of SNSK, MSFT and AMZN after yesterday's fall. They are all up massively as of now. Also bought some gold miners.
Just remember, the USA is socialism for the rich. And the rich hold A LOT of stocks.
Ok, so, I'm going to let you in on some insider info: We've always had the ability to do that. It's called hiring software developer contractors from the global south and paying them $1.50/hr with no bathroom breaks. Do you know why we don't do that exclusively now? Because the quality of code they put out isn't very good (though, I would argue, it's better than the quality you get out of Claude Code). But big software companies have always had an easy and cheap "force multiplier" at their disposal. If you want to found a startup and make a competitor for one of the major SAAS companies right now, and your plan is to hire a small workforce and tell everyone to use agentic plugins in their IDEs, you can do that. But you're going to run into a brick wall very quickly. The AI might know how to write javascript and CSS, but it doesn't know how to architect a scalable system. It doesn't know about data residency requirements, multi-region deployments, GDPR or SOC2 or PCI compliance. It doesn't know about load testing and security and FedRAMP. It doesn't know about efficient schema design and materialized views and pipelining. It doesn't know about deployment trains and monitoring / observability tools. And then after you write your Salesforce Killer, you're going to have to host it, but as a startup, you're going to be paying a LOT more to AWS than the big SAAS companies are. A company spending eight figures a month at Daddy Bezos' Cloud Emporium is going to be able to negotiate a significant discount, but Barbara's CRM Solutions Inc isn't. And even if you figure all that out, you're going to be left with a product full of mediocre code and a company full of engineers who don't understand the code they're writing. Oh, and here's some more inside baseball: We (people who work in software at big, publicly traded tech companies headquartered in Silicon Valley) are all already using AI. Through my employer, I have a github account with unlimited copilot - any agent, including claude. I am actually encouraged to use AI to help code (it is pretty good at writing unit tests, I'll grant). But, saying that agentic coding is a force multiplier, and then only allowing for applying that to plucky startups that are seeking to dethrone Salesforce is crazy - Salesforce is already using AI as a force multiplier. At best, the plucky startup is moving at the same velocity. They're not faster. And they're only cheaper because they lack feature parity. I swear, all of this "Companies that don't realize AI changes everything have already lost" sounds ... eerily familiar. It almost sounds like "Companies that don't realize the metaverse changes everything have already lost". Or "Companies that don't realize blockchain changes everything have already lost."
I'm HEAVILY concentrated in NVDA, AVGO, AMD, TSM, AMZN, GOOGL... and then META, MSFT, and a few others. So no, I'm down a LOT from the top to now. On the other hand... I know the prices were inflated and the companies I'm invested in are good... namely NVDA which is about 40% of my portfolio and the one I'm most down on at like...2.7 or so(but again, that's the ATH of 212 intraday). I'll live, we'll adjust, it'll come back.
Absolutely. But there are also emails and other files showing JE funded the Bitcoin foundation 2014/2015 when it ran out of money. More emails of him reaching out to A LOT of people in like 2013 to put money into Bitcoin. And even earlier he was emailing Bill Gates about decentralized digital currency. It's the perfect tool for all sorts of lettered agencies and criminals.
It’s a pyramid scheme, it’s only worth is what the next person is willing to buy it for, it literally has no value except for what the next idiot think it’s worth. The only reason it’s worth this much is because criminals have invested A LOT of money in it to create this fake value which will entice common men into believing it has value. They buy because of fomo, and these criminal enterprises do their pump and dumps to suit their needs to drive the value up and down as they buy and sell.
Datacenters in space allow for lower latency hosting for assets delivered via starlink. Instead of having to downlink to earth and then re uplink to push the data back, it can just communicate to space based nodes for cached content, hosted files, and all sorts of telemetry. At a very basic level, think netflix servers in space. You wanna Blades of Glory in the middle of the ocean, it's sudden a LOT closer. It's a good idea, and opens up TONS of bandwidth that was previously used for transport. Of course everything wont live up there, but if they load up a few satellite data centers with heavy content, it'll be good for all involved except the terrestrial bandwidth sellers.
Tbf 200 billion capex is an insane amount for anything let alone AI. I get it - they’re investing for the future but that is a *LOT* of money with a very unclear return on investment. I understand the uncertainty here.
if anything markets are heading down because a lot of investors are getting out because we are afraid others will get out... since theres suddenly millions of pages of files about how rich people rape and murder kids and may or may not be doing it to sacrifice the children to some middle eastern god that the tribe of israel was supposedly told by their middle eastern god not to worship and the muslims are like yeah weve been saying they switched gods for a while thats why god made us and like all this makes me less exposed. im holding a LOT more treasury bills than bitcoin right now. i sold gold sold TQQQ and sold BTC today. not because the world is run by pedophiles. i always figured the world was run by evil chosen ones and now we just have proof for the rest of the population that didnt eat as much LSD as i did back in 2009 when i decided the world makes a whole lot more sense if israel did 9/11 lol im selling because im stupid enough to think that other pussies will sell and let me get back in at a lower price.
I use Claude code 8 hours a day for my job. It could not do the work alone. It needs a LOT of bay sitting and I use opus for the primary assistant and sonnet for all of the sub agents.
If they can't, it would explain a LOT of things....
Maybe not but boy is he wrong a LOT. Like way more than he is right. Not even close to being right 6 times out of 10 that Peter Lynch talked about
It’s going to get A LOT worse before it gets better. Hold onto your butts.
No bc earnings just tells investors how much they won in the past quarter. Investors only care about how much they’ll earn in the FUTURE. Like cool yea they made a lot of money, but can they keep that momentum going for next quarter? Yes they can, but Google revealed they increased their spending by A LOT, & spending extra money scares investors, so the opted out. Thus resulting in the crazy sell off going on
I don’t know if this is a huge part of it but it’s surely a factor. Europeans hold A LOT of their saving in index funds that have 50-70% US companies, with a big part of that being tech. It’s just anecdotal but most of the people I know (including me) have either sold all their index funds that include US companies or at least stopped holding majority in the US in recent months. Just a trend I’m seeing but if a lot of people start doing it it’s not good for US stocks.
In all fairness to the scammer in chief: data centers in space may make a LOT of sense. There is infinite free electricity, cooling is not an issue saving most of the power and all of the water needs... No need for giant brick buildings filled with piping and stupid shit like floors and ceilings... or security guards... AND you're operating outside the control of any government (especially if you fly a flag like Cayman Islands or Gurnsney or Singapore or Dubai or whoever for your terrestrial tether company). Appealing to an Anarcho-Libertarian type like him or Thiel or Ellison... Or any tech company just tired of "get your data centers out of our community". Modern datacenters may eventually end up like the ancient empty windowless telephone switching buildings in the downtown of many a mid-size city, an anachronism.
The last 3 months have been a series of bear and bull traps. Market cannot make up its mine up or down. It’s been loading up a while, so when it does decide, it could move A LOT
I think SNAP is more emotional for most users. My wife had had it since high school and she has so many memories on there. Phots and videos saved of passed family members. It’s easier to pull out Snapchat to snap a pick or video vs your phone camera sometime. She says she does not care what the subscription is she is going to pay it because she is not losing her memories. I think this will be the case with A LOT of people. Not saying it’s gonna save the day and the company, but if they really start dialing some things in and subscriptions Strat rolling thru. I think it could be a solid play.
No fucking way she wins the nomination. Terrible candidate. Dems can do A LOT better.
Yes but for there to be a burst there has to be a bubble. And if we get a bubble, tech stocks are going a LOT higher.
What could these moves in metals imply? I can't even think of anything beyond manipulation. But thats a LOT of capital, nobody has that. Right? But there's no information either that would cause "the masses" to move the price. Anyone got a theory?
I'm guessing this sounded A LOT better in your head. LMAOOOOO
Europe just signed some bullshit that allows Indians easier access to work and live in Europe. There are so many Indians and A LOT of countries are looking at Indians as the saving grace for their significant projected population decline.
I see a LOT of bottoms on here and I'm not talking charts.
A LOT of red on screen today!
Buddy, $50,000 is a LOT of money to have saved up. That puts you in a minority of people your age. If you haven't already, please talk to somebody in the mortgage and real estate space to see what sort of mortgages are available for first time home buyers. There are plenty of options out there and $50K is going to get you in the game for homes that start with a $3 handle. Do that before you get despondent and then report back. Please know that my first home purchase had an interest rate of 7%. They weren't just handing out houses in 2001 (though it did get crazy in 2004-2007 before the crash, which led to major mortgage lending reform). My first house was TINY and needed a ton of work, so I learned how to do as much as I could to fix it up and failed on numerous projects along the way, but that's part of leaning. I got better as I learned. Not everyone who is older had things just gifted to them on a platter. Yes, home prices weren't absurd nation wide but rates were higher and entry level jobs weren't paying what they pay now. Unemployment rates back then were worse too in many areas of the country. The amount of jobs in high tech were much smaller than today. Focus on the good things you have and talk to some professionals in the housing market who can guide you. Good luck.
.01 EPS annualized results in them being priced currently at 500x earnings. It could drop A LOT more.
Of course not. But this is how capitalism works. Now let's say we do this anyway, essentially America will have to become an emerging market to compete. This means salaries will have to fall by a LOT, not rise, since the latter would be inflationary.
Buy a LOT (relative) of shares of companies whose product you personally use. Do you use AMZN regularly? What about AAPL, MCD? Dabble in CGC? How about PLBY? If none of the above then by the real winners of 2026, BE, WMT, BWXT and VXUS. You’re welcome.
There's actually A LOT of crying in casinos
Also look into NexGen energy, it’s gonna be one of the largest and highest quality deposits on earth. They are looking for approval this month, and given the indications from prime minister Carney and his nuclear agreements with China and India, he’s going to 100% fast track the mine into operation. There’s a LOT of potential upside on this play. Check ticker, NXE.
Sell at the next HOOD spike BEFORE earnings. Could go up on 02/10, sure, but it’s like a 25% chance imo. 75k is A LOT of money mate
Also investing a LOT in recreating, well, YouTube. Video podcasts with comments sections costs a lot to build, maintain, support.
> People thought google would die last summer and instead it gained 78% for the year I think the higher a stocks valuation, the harder it is for it to pop 50 percent. Stocks like Google and Nvidia are in the 3/4 trillion club and for them to pop 50 percent, they'd have to jump 1.5 to 2 trillion in valuation. That's asking A LOT. I know that Google has damn near doubled since April 2025 or whatever, but that was mostly because Google was tremendously undervalued at that time due to ChatGPT fears and it had to go up tremendously just to get to where it should have been all along.
want to start a religion? We would probably get pretty good tax breaks and a LOT of money.
It's that too. I've seen a LOT of posts by people who are AI skeptics who refuse to believe that AI is a serious threat to SAAS (best example is Adobe with Photoshop). The fact that AI can now generate very good images AND now you can have it edit specific parts of the image itself instead of creating a totally new image is game changing. I am interested in FIG though, design is more granular than just needing roughly good images. Maybe FIG is ok but even that I don't know.
The guy has 3 years left of his presidency. A LOT can happen between now and January 2029
Venmo and their web pay pro options. A LOT of tools use PayPal behind the scenes for payment processing online.
You have things like tesla and nvidia that continued to reach new highs. There were a many of "tops" you could have bought of both and made A LOT of money
No, but I suspect a LOT of billionaires got there because of luck or family than being actually brilliant people that pull themselves up by the bootstraps.
Measure it against the currency decline. Suddenly gets a LOT less impressive. Turns out it's easy to make money when you print it.
JP looking to get a LOT of people wrecked. They are running out of lawsuits to lose, I guess.
anyone can nominate themselves, but the "awardees" that get into the article have a LOT of support and momentum, and get chosen for that reason. not just for being submitted.
My two cents: 1) techinical analysis less than 1 minute are probably irrelevant to you. You will need better hardware for that. At this time range you are competing with bots and you will lose. 2) technical analysis covering durations between 1minute - 1hr is probably still relevant and alive. You will be competing with bots and day-traders. 3) Any longer data is probably larger in quantity and there is a LOT of noise and uncertainty, you fall into the educated gambling part. Don't be fooled that technical analysis is ineffective because market is efficient. It is not efficient enough and smarter people will find good analysis to exploit inefficiencies.
Shares outstanding are in the billions... so just a little move would take a LOT. Even worse though? You want to buy even 1 share, that's a $50 foreign settlement fee. I totally get wanting to pump this because of the price but maybe pick something else with some actual value and no $50 fee just to buy in.
Played earnings last time and won big, but it's run up a LOT since. I could see perhaps $350 before a drawback to $310.
This stock will make a TON of money! Any broker collecting the $50 settlement fee from you FOMOers is gonna make out like a bandit today! If you buy into this for a small amount, watch your profits dissolve into the settlement fee. If you spend a LOT of money, LOL, good luck!
It was a LOT redder in the wee hours.
The etf won’t trade until tomorrow morning and based on silver futures it’s going to gap down like A LOT 😭
I’m here to bump this thread, since now in February 2026 it’s seemingly a LOT more relevant. There’s the news out about Oracle and other situations revolving around data center construction and funding falling out from the bottom on several fronts.
Buddy boy, microsoft paused A LOT of DC construction projects in theEU/APAC officially to focus back on the us , bit they didn't increase output in the us (they paused Wisconsin, ohio) Good luck
if everything *really* goes south, there’s a helluva LOT more lead in the world than gold
Tons of stocks dropped massively in 2020. If you bought, say, Carnival Cruise stock at $15 in July of 2020 then sold it around June 2021 or August 2025 you would have doubled your money on it as it got up to around $30 per share. Sure, that's only $15 per share, but buy a thousand shares and you've made 15 grand off that one alone in a short amount of time, especially if sold in 2021. Carnival isn't the best example I guess since that one was pretty risky during the time, but the fact remains that if you can afford to buy when everyone else is selling and can pick the right ones (or spread it enough so it doesn't matter as much) then you come out ahead. Same thing happened during the Great Depression. People were selling what they could for what they could get, so a property that WAS worth a good bit could now be bought for, say, a fifth of the price or even less. Hold onto it, pay crap for taxes and use accounting magic to show that poor widdle old you is losing money on it, then sell it when some big company/investor wants it later for a LOT more than you paid. Using property there because stocks were riskier but the same principle applies.
I heard A LOT of laughing. I didn’t know it was going to be a comedy film
in other news, buy novo nodisk. A LOT of people are about to start going on the pill form of GLP-1s
I mean if you aren't day trading it is still up this month and definitely up in the last 5 years by A LOT
We're either of them found on the island with trumpy? I bet a LOT of investments are going to go wild with public perception of the owners getting absolutely decimated if they are found to have been in association with the released files or the yet to be released videos and photos Stormy eaters can be profitable but until the full files are released it's all up for speculation as to which companies will be affected by the said public perception.
I’m watching it. Purely anecdotally I see a LOT of older people using it lately, like 45 yr old parents of teens who send a lot of photos and have group chats on it. I think that might be the underappreciated variable, that it’s not just teenagers but a lot of their parents as well.
Exactly this. The market for gold is far too large for a pump and dump scheme. This was the impact of a rise in gold that was rapidly accelerated by the entrance of a LOT of speculative investment. Speculators are the most easily spooked and plenty of them cashed out today.
I WISH I had the balls or the money to put 10k into gold puts while it was doubling every few weeks. This wasn't just about the play, it was also about a LOT of luck with the timing.
tesla got that retard strength...as in a LOT of retards buy it
I closed most of my positions. I think SPY chops around from here in this range. Didn’t make it out with 100% wins today since I was holding 690 SPY puts from 330pm yesterday purchased as it continued its 12 dollar recovery. But I closed them at the (current) bottom for a slight loss and made out on everything else. Left a LOT of money on the table , but I’m up on the day.
Contracts mean nothing if one of the companies goes out of business. Which is what will happen to openai if they can't come up with a LOT of revenue in the next few years.
Just imagine him naked saying this crap. It explains a LOT.
4. Is the most important one. In normal conditions 15% a year is great growth on account. Because options are capable of giving 100-10,000% gains under the right conditions, regards chase 10 baggers to their doom. 15-50% gains is a LOT by investment standards. Learn to take profit early and often and enter plays with a short time frame in mind. 1 and 7 are good too. It’s all about using rules and following them. Emotional trading will always fuck you up. Euphoria as well as despair. Some of my absolutely dumbest moves have been after a solid fire winning streak. Also, cut your losses. I don’t set stop-losses, I usually place orders to sell to close with my target price, so if a trade isn’t going the way I thought it would, I’ll close it out and take a small loss. If it’s a strong conviction play with enough time to expire to wait, I will, but sometimes it’s best to just walk.
A LOT of people I know got 17s this year. The product was actually worth an upgrade and the deals carriers put out were amazing. I can see that kind of demand
what do you think about tungsten or uranium? conflicts about to kick up and i have a gut feeling that the DiB is about to spend a LOT of money mining those two ores.
No, but they had a LOT of rules what they were allowed to invest in
I’m just now remembering that Elon wanted the model names to be S,E,X,&Y to spell SEXY because he is the biggest loser dork on the planet. Luckily, Ford already owned the rights to “Model E”, so he had to go with 3, spelling out S3XY in fucking leet speak. THIS IS THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD, BY A LOT!
Even if they did, the humanoid robot market is A LOT smaller than the electric car market
I'd always liked Starbucks as an idea of business. But lately... if you go to our local Starbucks they're not clean, and teen baristas seem to not even xare to be there. Besides... I see A LOT of new cafés that embraced the initial idea of Starbucks and made it at good prices. Not to be that guy but how is Starbucks gonna keep growing when local places do the same or even better, at, less than half the price. In my city a café Latte costs like... 2,50 at most. 3 bucks at high end places. The same in Starbucks is 7 bucks.
It's a fast race to the bottom, though. I'm still not sure that trigger should be pulled, given what's at stake with the whole global reserve status and what not. Sanctioning that behavior and convincing the majority of voters to do the same is the only shot at maintaining normalcy going forward. If you have Trump v Trump then every 4 years down the line you'll have another "revenge tour", then again, then again, until you have politicians drone striking each other and the electorate purely for teh memes. With no reserve status and a like 40% interest rate the government would last weeks before running out of power totally. Then it just becomes a free for all for the oligarchs. He should have done something horrific with his legal immunity.. but I really don't know what that'd need to be to make SCOTUS reneg? I'm not sure it wouldn't just serve to lower the standard for the next guy coming in after him. The next president is going to have a LOT of power to dictate what the next 50+ years looks like, even just based on their decorum. Straight down the toilet or shall we swirl around a bit instead? I don't know if I'm personally ready for just how quickly things can all turn to shit. Are things already irreversably fucked? Were they when Biden was in office? What should he have done about that? It'd be a really tough decision to pull the trigger.
I will remember that until the day I die. Had A LOT of Dec 16 QQQ calls that day. Hurt my feelings.
Heed this warning OP. Go listen to the cleared hot podcast with the founder of deliver fund, there is a LOT of child sexual exploitation that goes on there. You should absolutely not let your kids within a country mile of that shit.
There's plenty of great companies out there that are traded at sub $100, that you can sell options on and wheel. It sounds like what u/breakyourteethnow is saying, is just wheels (so SELL csp's and if/when assigned, toggle to selling CCs... then when those are called away, back to CSP's... rinse and repeat), then use that generated premium to purchase LEAPs at the .75-ish delta. Those are just going to be somewhat deep-ish in-the-money. Just kind of depends on what the various strike spreads are and what not. But ultiamtely by going deep ITM, you're purchasing more of the underlying, and paying less "extrinsic" value (which is the portion you're basically paying to your insurance guy... their commission if you will for offering that contract). Taking the Ford example (F), if you looked at their options chain at the time of writing this, they're trading at $13.85. Their 15 JAN 27 (1 year out) has the next closes ITM call strike at $11.85. It's literally the first strike away from the current market value, yet it's at a .75 delta. So buy that one and let'er ride. 1 contract (100 shares) would require you pay \~$270 in premium. So how do I come up with that $270? Well... sell enough contracts to make that. Taking F yet again, you'd need to SELL enough contracts to generate that much. You could aim for weeklies (maybe target 7ish days out) and sell a bunch at-the-money, but you'd need likely around 25 or so contracts, which would require a lot of capital (probably $33,000 or so if doing cash-secured). But you can sell contracts further out, say the 30-45 expiration to generate more premium with less contracts... requiring less capital upfront. If you targeted Mar 6 (38 days out), you'd need only to sell \~7 contracts and yield enough premium to buy a single leap. But now since only selling 7, you need a LOT less capital (7 \* 13.50 \* 100) = $9450. If you're doing large cap companies... take GOOG for example, you're going to need a LOT of fodder to come up with the amount of premium to be able to buy a single leap. Alternatively... can also just work a job and save money, and buy a LEAP that way too. It doesn't "have" to strictly come from premium... although mentally it's nice. :)
A LOT of these people have been burned by PYPL in the last few years. People want to see it go lower cause they couldn’t stomach to see it go up without them in it, and their PTSD wont allow them to consider jumping in again
LLMs look like they're in a bubble. They hit the wall, scaling law only went a few iterations, and died. The broad field of Machine Learning, which is still accelerating, might be a LOT more local, i.e. not super-duper data centers but industries of machines and etc., generating a data tsunami that's processed locally by LOTS of locally generated inference models.
2x would make it almost the most valuable company in the world. They would need to recruit a LOT more idiot investors!
I've been buying NEXT (Next Decade) every time it dips below $5. They're building a huge LNG export facility near Brownsville, Texas. If you believe in LNG exports, it's a solid play if you're willing to be patient as they're still under construction. Let's start with the obvious negatives. You're getting no revenue until late 2027 at best, so a long time for no money to come in and they have a LOT of debt. Any sort of construction/regulatory delay is a risk. Given we're so far out from revenue, there's obviously a decent risk for dilution of existing shares which would obviously not be fun. Now, for the positives, they are currently building 3 trains on site, they've got 2 more with financing lined up and work will be starting on those as well. They have room for 10 total, making them a massive LNG export hub. So far, the construction has been financed against future revenue, not by selling additional shares, so that's helpful about the dilution concern. Bechtel is building the facility on a turnkey contract, they're the best in the world at building LNG infrastructure and are incentivized to complete it on time. They're currently ahead of schedule. There's been a relatively healthy amount of insider buying at the current prices, both by individuals and by their partners. That's always reassuring. They've also secured their financing on 20 year contracts, so the money IS coming, it's a question of when. Check out Cheniere Energy ($LNG). That's who NEXT is trying to copy. Cheniere currently exports 47 million tonnes per annum of LNG, NEXT's new facility is aiming for 50 when they're done. So there's plenty of profit and, eventually, a fat dividend, assuming they execute correctly. I think the market is still pricing this as a construction project and I think we're past the worst of that now which is why I'm happy to load up now. I think with their next earnings, if we see construction remaining ahead of schedule we'll start to see the stock rerate well above $5. Most analysts have a 1 year target in the $9-$10 range if you value that at all. That being said, I'm not sticking a ton of money in there, I've got about $5k right now. But I'm happy to let it sit for 2-3 years and see what happens. Should things go well and all trains come online, I think the eventual dividend will payout every year more than what I've bought my shares for now. And even a middling result should see some solid profit.
Someone was telling me this dude is 5'2" ... this explains a LOT. His custom gear looks like some generic totalitarian mid boss henchmen from Far Cry.
Dear sweet, sweet regards NFE (LNG infrastructure company) has over like 33% of its float shorted last I checked. Decent news in January for debt restructuring and a new contract to keep cash flow buoyant. They went from line $60 in 2022 to $1 this last month but swept $2 last night after news they won’t ded in the next few months. Nice rally but still a LOT of upswing. Beautiful short squeeze opportunity. Calls are beyond juicy too. Pulling back on their rally now. Hoping we don’t lose that momentum 🤞
A few years from now you will be losing A LOT more, and will think fondly of this moment. Might even laugh over a beer with your boys about it
This is appropriate for a FIRE sub. You might be familiar with Strategy’s Pref’s. I’d consider a barbell approach where you pull some out into STRC for “cash that isn’t totally trash”, pull some out into STRK for longer term growth only if you still believe in BTC & then you can keep playing with the third pile but you can afford to de-risk A LOT & leave the day job; focus on the finer parts of life. With ~$5M in STRC/STRK you’ll bring in $500k in ROC dividends so you’re financially secure even if things get a little sideways sometime in the future. Hell, tell everyone you manage a portfolio for a single client if you need to 😉
They won’t balance the budget. When I say they have no choice I partly mean this: If the government decided to balance the budget and cut military, social security benefits etc, then a LOT of Americans (who vote) will lose their jobs. The main source of income for the government is taxes. Less jobs = lower taxes = lower income for the government. Which means they will be back in the same position unable to pay off their debt.
If you want to use SoFi for banking then that's fine but for investments I prefer Fidelity, although Schwab is also a great option but harder for DCA because you can't really buy fractional shares, only 'Schwab Slices". Just don't fall into the Robinhood trap. If you're using SoFi for strictly ETF based long-term tax-deferred investing in a Roth IRA then you should be fine but if you want to eventually get into short-term trading or dipping your toes into a taxable brokerage, then go with a more reputable broker. There are a LOT of stock options on Fidelity, Schwab, etc. that aren't available through SoFi (especially penny stocks and OTC). Also, SoFi has a slower trade execution speed compared to the top-tier brokers. I also found out the hard way that when I transferred my assets to Fidelity from SoFi, SoFi charged me a $100 transfer fee. **If you're transferring $25k+ then Fidelity will reimburse you**
Can I ask how you did this?? I somewhat nuked my account but I’m 22 and still a student and only had roughly 8k from a ~3k basis and blew it to $500 with 0DTE spy options on days where trump and Jensen Huang said something. Since EOY 24’ I’ve started paying more attention and since being back “in the game” I have ~+200% in the last month. Mostly from a biopharma call after ~90% dip and SOFI calls. Very interested to hear from your experience as I learned a LOT from my 0DTE roulette experience🤣. Good luck and god speed. 👊🏽
The good news is… it will DEFINITELY be 10x higher next week - because they will be reverse splitting 10:1 Bad news is… it will then continue to shrink. In August it was $24.5, so don’t think “It’s $2, how much lower can it go?” It can go a LOT lower.
Pretty much the whole constitution is being reduced to just vibes since there’s a LOT of 4th amendment rights being violated. It’s disgusting
If you carry a weapon and then proceed to resist arrest/apprehension/detention by ice the odds of you being shot increase by A LOT.
I think its worth discussion. American's will not believe this, but you have to look at the facts. Some big European pension funds are selling, the retail investors have not only started moving funds out of the US but are boycotting the actual products. Trump is strangling the US economy. There's threats of the EU pulling the nuclear finance bomb on the US if they continue to threaten the EU and NATO. That's before you get into the fact that the entire of the US stock is propped up by an AI bubble. If you want any indicator of how strong the anti-US sentiment is right now, just look at the German FA tabling the idea of boycott the World Cup. I can't stress enough that Europeans boycotting a world cup would take a LOT to even discuss. I'm not suggesting people en masse dump US stock tomorrow. But I think we're way past the point of laughing off the idea that its a riskier proposition than its ever been. Just put it all in the S&P and it will definitely go up over X amount of years I think is about to stop being true. If the US follow the trajectory they are on, they will lose all the things that allows the S&P to be so strong. Attacking your allies is a monumentally idiotic idea. If you attack your allies, what do you think your enemies are doing. Then we also have to factor they're a bad day away from a civil war, another ICE shooting today. How many deaths before they fight back? The US is too risky for me, I moved to the EU/UK a while ago. Ethically I also think its the right thing to do, I don't want my money funding the US.