LOT

Next_Stretch_6983

there is no efficiency gain this is a lie. Ai is garbage andnwhat it produces is garbage. if you think you are getting quality output that says A LOT about the quality of your own output. the only good ai is a deleted ai.

spilledonwhite

I am singlehandedly keeping NBIS above 200 with a buy order at 200. It will not fall and fill and I will not go a penny higher. Probably be 300 in a week. I know it is probably a 🌈 "resistance level" BUT I WANT THAT SWEET EVEN-NUMBERED LOT.

Syllabub_Visual

Remember spacex has over 400 employees now worth over $100m so this ipo has created A LOT of 22 year olds worth that much, a lot of 22-23 year olds are about to get VERY rich because of how many centimillionaire employees are being created, something else for you to feel salty about while you complete your shift at Wendy’s…

Spy300

Price it >TRUMP: PROBABLY TALK ABOUT CUTTING RATES WITH WARSH >TRUMP SAID OF WARSH “HE THINKS YOU HAVE TO LOWER INTEREST RATES” >TRUMP SAYS HE THINKS WARSH UNDERSTANDS HE WANTS LOWER RATES, WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN JOB HAD HE SAID HE WANTED TO RAISE RATES >TRUMP: WARSH WILL CUT RATES WITHOUT WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE >TRUMP: WHEN OIL PRICES GO UP, WE MAKE A LOT OF MONEY >TRUMP: FRANKLY, GAS PRICE HASN'T GONE UP AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT >TRUMP: I HAVE THE GREATEST PLAN OF ALL, WON'T REVEAL WHAT IT IS >TRUMP: 'WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET!!! >BESSENT: RATES PEAKED THE DAY BEFORE WARSH WAS SWORN IN >BESSENT: 100% APPROVE OF THE FED GETTING RID OF FORWARD GUIDANCE >DALY SAYS FORWARD GUIDANCE NOT GOOD AT THIS JUNCTURE >WARSH: I DONT BELIEVE IN FORWARD GUIDANCE >WARSH: MY PREFERRED INFLATION MEASURE IS PCE TRIMMED MEAN >TRUMP: “I LOVE THE INFLATION” ✅️

Local-Bench1819

BATL burned a LOT of people. Can't blame anyone for downvoting it on sight, lol. Thanks for the update though.

Spy300

Price it >TRUMP: PROBABLY TALK ABOUT CUTTING RATES WITH WARSH >TRUMP SAID OF WARSH “HE THINKS YOU HAVE TO LOWER INTEREST RATES” >TRUMP SAYS HE THINKS WARSH UNDERSTANDS HE WANTS LOWER RATES, WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN JOB HAD HE SAID HE WANTED TO RAISE RATES >TRUMP: WARSH WILL CUT RATES WITHOUT WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE >TRUMP: WHEN OIL PRICES GO UP, WE MAKE A LOT OF MONEY >TRUMP: FRANKLY, GAS PRICE HASN'T GONE UP AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT >TRUMP: I HAVE THE GREATEST PLAN OF ALL, WON'T REVEAL WHAT IT IS >TRUMP: 'WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET!!! >BESSENT: RATES PEAKED THE DAY BEFORE WARSH WAS SWORN IN >BESSENT: 100% APPROVE OF THE FED GETTING RID OF FORWARD GUIDANCE >DALY SAYS FORWARD GUIDANCE NOT GOOD AT THIS JUNCTURE >WARSH: I DONT BELIEVE IN FORWARD GUIDANCE >WARSH: MY PREFERRED INFLATION MEASURE IS PCE TRIMMED MEAN >TRUMP: “I LOVE THE INFLATION” ✅️

cinciNattyLight

They make A LOT of money. $100 a share would correlate to a PE ratio of at most 3.3.

abriefmomentofsanity

I think everyone with a brain understands we are currently playing musical chairs with the economy and sooner or later the music stops. There's no way this insane growth isn't propped up on falsehoods, fraud, and artificial political pressure. However nobody knows when the music is going to stop. You can try to time the market. Someone somewhere is going to make a LOT of money, largely by being lucky. Assuming this doesn't lead to civilization collapse of course.  You probably can't time the market. There are no safe havens. Not cash. Not gold. Not bonds. Not physical assets. That's another big sign that when this all comes down it's going to be bad. Really bad.  I dunno. I sold out. Paid my debts. Bought a bunch of nice dinners. It may be that I miss out on years of insane growth but the last time this happened it took BoA YEARS to bounce back to where they were pre-crash. I know I can't time the market. I know my dollars are probably going to devalue for the foreseeable future. I also know I really enjoyed treating my wife to lobster.  I have to side eye people who are saying the market is at all time highs and going even higher. That's technically true, but doesn't tell the whole story.  I can't speak to anyone else but besides a few automated etfs I'm out. I'm not trying to guess when the music stops, but I will probably try to guess when it's safe to get back in after the music stops. 

throwaway9gk0k4k569

This is still pretty bad. It's not worse than expected, but this is not good. I still don't know if the FOMC board members will "look through" and hold rates or raise them. The board members have made a LOT of comments lately that it would not be appropriate to "look through" because the recentness of inflation creates increased expectations, and the expectations of inflation causes inflation. I'm 50/50. I just don't know if they are going to raise this year. We know what Good and SMCI thinks. They think they need to grab cash now while the grabbing is good, stock price be damned.

gilligan1050

Dude, that’s A LOT of beef. Maybe just move to Kansas and start a cow farm? All the cattle farmers I have worked for are millionaires. Edit: I’m in Kansas, I’ll buy them for $100.

sad-Fan1010

I would’ve waited till the morning at least.. you can find out a LOT about how a market will play out in the first hour…. We will open red tomorrow and you could’ve gotten better value or cheaper premiums. The market will likely be red tomorrow from anywhere -1% to -2.5%. I hope I’m wrong though!

The_Keg

you are on r/investing The more I spend on reddit, the more I realize there are A LOT of pieces of shit who talk the talks but could never do the task. Just gather engineers and pay them sounds really simple huh?

ThePapaSauce

A little more than $2t, yeah. But two things — 1. That is the total possible estimated addressable market for that sector, and 2. that division had a net revenue of $4b for a $657m operating loss. They are shooting for a valuation of $1.75t, so if they are expecting their launch business to carry any real part of the business, it will have to grow… a LOT.

Panthera__Tigris

Here is why: \- There was an oversupply of oil before the war. \- Half of the Strait traffic is now being routed through pipelines by both the Saudis and UAE to bypass the Strait. UAE is also working on another pipeline which is [halfway done.](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/new-uae-pipeline-bypassing-hormuz-now-50-complete-adnoc-ceo-says-2026-05-20/) Even Iraq is planning routing through Jordan and Syria. [Saudi jet fuel supply to Europe higher than before Hormuz closure, data shows](https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/saudi-jet-fuel-supply-europe-higher-than-before-hormuz-closure-data-shows-2026-06-09/) \- There are still some tankers crossing the Strait. It's only 10% of before but it adds up to the rest. \- More Russian oil is flowing now than before. Thats a lot of barrels being added. The sanction waiver expired, but it doesn't look like US/ EU are enforcing it now. \- Venezuelan oil is also starting to trickle. Almost 1.25 million barrels now with most going to US and India. [India ramps up Venezuelan oil imports amid gulf crisis](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/india-ramps-up-venezuelan-oil-imports-amid-gulf-crisis/) \- China's economy has still not recovered so demand is low. Plus they are also doing quite well with EVs. [China Oil Imports Fall to Eight-Year Low](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-09/china-s-oil-imports-plunge-to-eight-year-low-on-war-disruptions). Even other countries are cutting back on oil usage by instituting work from home and stuff like that. \- Oil is already 50% higher than before the war. While the disruption is just around \~10% of global supply (would have been 20% without the pipelines). 50% is already a LOT. \- And lastly, everyone knows the situation will eventually ease for oil. This is why December futures are lower than spot (aka backwardation).

Icreatedthisforyou

A lot of this is recovery. But even ignoring the first several years as recovery you can ask this question more broadly, why do Democrats have the vast majority of jobs created since WWII and why has every conservative president except Reagan has presided over unemployment increases, while no Democrat has (the worst was Carter who saw it flatline). The answer to this is conservative policies are absolutely dog shit for the economy. Tax breaks to the wealthy has consistently demonstrate a lack of return in the economy. While programs like SNAP, housing assistance, and energy programs to assist the lower income individuals have consistently demonstrate substantial economic return. Slashing government funding and SERVICES means that you lose out on infrastructure improvements and jobs. You lose out on services small businesses rely on to start up and run, in particular in rural communities. You lose out on education programs that help people transition to new emerging field. You lose out on programs that support family farmers and feed poor people by buying food to support food banks. A lot of these services ARE NOT DIRECTLY PROFITABLE. Which means the private sector won't do them when they are gone. And that means every place that relies on these services is hit and doors start closing and consolidation to fewer larger companies occur. The end result is from a societal stand point these services pay for themselves but SOMEONE has to take the hit in the unprofitable part. We only have 14 presidencies worth of data to look at. There is a stark difference between the economic results of conservative presidents and Democrats. More than twice the job growth under Democrats, reduction in unemployment under Democrats, faster wage growth under Democrats, lower inflation under Democrats, higher stock market returns under Democrats, larger GDP growth under Democrats, slower national debt growth under Democrats. Most recessions start in conservative presidencies, and 3/4 of the quarters the US has been in recession since WWII we have been while conservatives have the presidency. It honestly isn't complex. Think about your local community. What could be done to improve it? And ask yourself if it isn't being done now by the private sector then who will do it? The answer is... GOVERNMENT. Local, state, federal doesn't matter that is where those projects funding and support comes from. Taxes fund those things and as a result stimulate the economy. Also blue states disproportionately fund the federal government and blue cities disproportionately fund state governments. Democrats are much more likely to support infrastructure and projects in rural areas that benefit rural areas than Republicans are. The alternative is you cut a wealthy person's taxes and their hoard grows a little larger. Maybe the buy another mansion, yacht, jet, or half a dozen politicians. So yeah turns out it isn't hard to create jobs when you look and go "this money could sit in a billionaires stock/yacht/mansion/supreme court justice vacation....or we could use the same money to literally create thousands of jobs" Like you take $1b from each of the 10 wealthiest people in the US, you have $10b and all of them have lost LESS than 1% of their wealth. A LOT less in many cases. Median individual income in the US is $45k you can literally directly pay 200,000 people a salary for a year off of that. And those 200k people will love all over the place, they spend money on housing, on food, mechanics, cars, health care. In the US we have about 200 auto mechanics per 100k people. So those 200k jobs also helped support and creat 400 mechanic jobs. 740 electricians. 300 plumbers. 500 doctors and 2500 nurses. 120 dentists. 2400 teachers, 500 police officers, etc...you get the point. I just listed a few jobs and we are already at what 7500 jobs and well paying jobs that are supporting those 200k jobs. Those are mostly the higher paid service jobs which there are far fewer of compared to the lower paid service jobs like restaurants and retail. That support not just those 200k jobs but those other jobs that were mentioned.

quantumlyregarded

Oh I have faith. That's plan Z and a LOT of things will have to fail before that plan executes. But I will say that with the pain my body is already in from breaking my back to make the rich richer I'm going to be pissed if I live to be 100. 

PossibleSecretary524

i believe the issue is there were A LOT of early buyers, because Figma is an amazing company, CEO is great etc etc, and there was a lot of to-the-moon sentiment. while the price naturally found its valuation plus the insider sales are unlocked now people who brought FIG 50+ hate the stock, while there is clearly nothing wrong with business and the moat, which is the design workflow. they own data on how everybody make their design and collaborate, replicate this...

JeanSneaux

When random people who don't typically follow stocks are interested in a stock because they've seen it hyped, that's usually a pretty good signal to stay away from it. Could be completely wrong, but there's a LOT about this IPO that seems very fishy (NASDAQ changing inclusion rules, Elon folding the dumpster fire that is X into the company, the shorter-than-usual exclusion period before investors can sell)

Scribble_Box

Hopefully they have Wendy's in SK. They're gonna need A LOT of them.

Emilio___Molestevez

$NBIS has A LOT of buyers at these prices short-term I feel sorry for them tbh imagine bidding a stock +10% two mornings in a row just to watch it get immediately eviscerated

No_Fig_7835

nice now I'm only down a LOT and not a TON

DeeDee_Z

> there will be plenty of people panic selling after a while Not just panic selling, either. There will be a **LOT** of people -- "insiders" -- just trying to UNLOAD shares they haven't been able to yet. LOTS of shares coming on the market from those wanting to cash out.

Subject-Chest-8343

Yes. That is more money than most people realize. It seems small relative to the 1.75T valuation, but this valuation exists because at the margin, there are enough suckers to pay 75B$ for 4% of the company. But that 75B$ is more than the entire profit of NVidia made in the past 3 months. And it could possibly get to 150B$ by the end of next week... That is a LOT of liquidity in a short time frame

Redcrux

I don't know of any podcasts that handle that in detail because it's a lot of numbers which are difficult to understand verbally. I just went through a lot of information myself about that topic and the conclusion I came to is that the majority of FIRE information online is geared towards the first part of starting saving and investing, but not so much on withdrawal strategies which are the most important to get right. The withdraw strategies depend on what type of accounts you contributed to in the "boring middle" part of FIRE which hardly anyone talks about. Your best bet is a mixture of googling to find forums that talk about it in detail and discussing it with an AI chat bot to answer your questions. The gist of it: There's a super important 5 year gap that must be covered between retirement age and year 5 of retirement when your Roth conversions become available for withdrawal. The best way to cover the 5 year gap is with the contributions you made while working and possibly supplementing with taxable accounts. You pay 0% LTCG tax if you keep your income within the limits. If you do it right you can withdraw a LOT of money tax free using those loopholes and the standard deduction. If your taxable account and roth contributions run out before the 5 years then you look into 72T withdrawals. The rule of 55 can also come into play if you retire at 55 or older. The next most important thing is making sure you continue or even increase Roth conversions past the gap, possibly filling up your 10% or 12% tax brackets. This will save you millions in the long run in taxes because if you get to age 75 with money left in your traditional IRA account you will have to take RMDs and get hit with a huge tax bill late in life. Once you roll it all into Roth you're set for life with minimal taxes. Hardly anyone in the FIRE community talks about these late stage tax strategies.

hikeonpast

Don’t underestimate the scope of the pro-Elon propaganda machine on social media. A LOT of money is spent on bots and trolls in an effort to make him look good, which then sweeps up some volunteer fanboys to help find a good fight. These are not good faith actors.

Effective_End8731

That's revenue but what's the fixed cost + variable cost per MW look like and whats the % vacancy they can tolerate on that server space when you consider the equipment will become outdated whether it is used or not? I look at it as digital real estate except that digital performance suffers from two things that land doesn't. A full-replacement reinvestment rate at 5-7 years, maybe faster if AI evolves so fast that this years hardware is insufficient for models designed 2 years from now. A home on physical land has a reinvestment rate of about 30 years to do full replacement (some of those parts will replace multiple times). The next thing I see is digital real estate can expand upwards exponentially fast, meaning I can fit 10 tenants next year where I previously fit 1. This seems like a good thing until you consider how much data center competition there will be in 5-10 years but how models will become more time and energy efficient as chips become more efficient and the model only needs to be "so good" to answer the general persons questions and the average business problem - not every one of these data centers will be hosting the Anthropic latest model, a LOT of data center rental space is going to be used for second tier and third tier lower power and custom developed models. So you have a long term problem where the more data centers the more price competition (I see this happening within 2 to 3 years) but the demand for data centers will go down as chip technology increases leading to renters needing less and less space. I see data center business being strong for about 3-5 years and then possibly getting cut throat competitive and a large number of these companies putting massive investment in, will be barely profitable 5-10 years out as the first generation of full hardware replacement comes due. The revenues look incredible but also count the Staff, Water, and Electricity that these massive structures need and how the price of these utilities is inflating at a wild pace.

music_is_gud

Her looking at me A LOT whenever we are across? Like she looks at me while I'm with my friends and what not, and I catch her looking at me almost always...

Effective_End8731

You are absolutely right, I am more focused on OPs question about the long term. Semiconductors tend to repeat the same cycle though Boom, Oversupply, Price Crash, Recovery Versus the steady platform style companies that have held steady growth trajectories. You are not wrong, they will be around forever. From OPs question of long term where is most of the value created? I still personally think we hit the boom part already and a lot of expansion is already priced in that these companies now need to deliver results to maintain. At \~40x P/E (I think last I looked at MU)- these companies have a lot of room to grow to catch up to their pricing. If their pricing too far outpaces the rate at which they can increase capacity or our ability to supply the rare metals to make them creates a choke point - they will halt growth and possibly backpedal. 40 P/E isn't much in a bull economy, but it is asking a lot in a non-bull economy. It's been a while since we've had a true recessive pull back impacting tech, covid did not do that to the tech sector because work from home fueled a whole new demand for computing power and budding AI created new demand for new chip architecture. There will be growth in all of these across the board. Not a position to exit, but there are many other sub components to the equation that have yet to realize their associated growth as well. As another comment noted too - we are producing almost 30% more etfs this year than the normal expected growth rate. There is a LOT of artificial demand in the market from yield hungry investors dumping funds into new ETFs, and high density of thematic ETFs has usually been a precursor to a major correction. Just trying to cover all the points. Semis aren't necessarily the point of largest gain in my opinion at this point.

Spy300

Imagine thinking its rate hikes when its really remove all guidance, redefine inflation, and cut rates >TRUMP: PROBABLY TALK ABOUT CUTTING RATES WITH WARSH >TRUMP SAID OF WARSH “HE THINKS YOU HAVE TO LOWER INTEREST RATES” >TRUMP SAYS HE THINKS WARSH UNDERSTANDS HE WANTS LOWER RATES, WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN JOB HAD HE SAID HE WANTED TO RAISE RATES >TRUMP: WARSH WILL CUT RATES WITHOUT WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE >TRUMP: WHEN OIL PRICES GO UP, WE MAKE A LOT OF MONEY >TRUMP: FRANKLY, GAS PRICE HASN'T GONE UP AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT >TRUMP: I HAVE THE GREATEST PLAN OF ALL, WON'T REVEAL WHAT IT IS >TRUMP: 'WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET!!! >BESSENT: RATES PEAKED THE DAY BEFORE WARSH WAS SWORN IN >BESSENT: 100% APPROVE OF THE FED GETTING RID OF FORWARD GUIDANCE >DALY SAYS FORWARD GUIDANCE NOT GOOD AT THIS JUNCTURE >WARSH: I DONT BELIEVE IN FORWARD GUIDANCE >WARSH: MY PREFERRED INFLATION MEASURE IS PCE TRIMMED MEAN

Throwaway-4593

This is exactly right, the biggest indicator of an AI bubble would be mag7 capex decreasing. And Google wanted more cash BECAUSE they are increasing capex, not vice versa. Not to mention this fed chair is trying to justify decreasing rates more. This market is going to continue to fly at the cost of high inflation. That said, you simply can’t afford to not be heavily invested right now or you are leaving A LOT on the table.

HAND__EGG

This.. Theres A LOT of bad actor bots like this

Astronaut100

I never said they lose money. The problem is their evangelical, cult like promotion of VT. With VT, you won’t lose money long term, but you’re also leaving a LOT of money on the table because that exposure to every halfwit company on the planet will drag down the small percentage of winners. No one needs exposure to 10,000 stocks; it’s just absurd.

Emilio___Molestevez

it's A LOT more than $100k

Debrispoboy

I lost A LOT of money trading futures. I've bet on sports for 20 years and lost 1/10th what I have in one year of trading futures. I recommend everyone stay away until they've paper traded for a while and have a solid plan.

iamtracefree

They have approx 270m shs out. To uplist you need at least $4, which would mean a mkt cap of over $1B...that is A LOT. This industry trades at 4-5X sales...meaning CHUC would need to be doing $250m in sales. You dont find too many otcqb stocks generating that type of revenue.

Old_Culture_3825

That's one heck of a bias not supported by facts. FOMO's operate on both sides and rarely win. Risk mitigators tend to miss upside but miss a LOT of downside. Risk takers rarely take it off the table. Go to Vegas and sit at a few tables. The only alternative to my POV is buy and hold for decades. proven strategy. I'm just suggesting unless you are Buffet or 23 years old investing now and with strong supportive, financially educated parents (shout out to: multi-gen wealthy parents - wish I had some when I was young!), either buy and hold for 35 years or, if you have supportive folks to coach you when to walk away and stay out you can make even more. There is no third approach. You aren't looking for the 'biggest rally" (which is often followed by another significant drop - have a look). If you could walked from Dow around 13.5k in 2007 and then back in around 8,000 anytime around Jan-Apr 2009 the gains you made were significantly higher than buy and hold. And that is exactly what I did. I didn't buy at the bottom and sell at the top - impossible. But I did hit it close enough. I learned from the shit show of Internet 1.0 and then studied the history of disaster (versus flash crash stuff not related to fundamentals). Did it again in Covid, albeit much shorter lived, really enjoyed grabbing JPMC on sale around $75. This one about to hit is going to produce a lot of profits for the bold. And, hopefully, my kids when I die. YMMV. You do you. No passion here. But I'm comfortable in my decisions and thinking here, as well. This one could be generational wealth if you buy anywhere near the lows - AI is the real deal. But there will be pain first.

tortu995

Once people realize that oracle basically did what Saylor hoped to do with microstrategy, stock will be way way higher. Ellison took on cheap and massive debt to secure loads of compute which now is very scarce and can bank A LOT. $orcl

HAND__EGG

Whatever reddit says loudly and obnoxiously is the opposite of what will actually happen. So yeah. Its not crashing and will make a lot and i mean A LOT of angry people here on this website.. The ceo has them by the collective balls in their heads lol

SoggyCrab

Lol it's going to dip when some folks take out their shares. Will it absolutely tank? I highly doubt it. What most people don't realize is America has tied itself to SpaceX as their horse in the new race to monetize space and control it. There is A LOT of money going into space mining, both on the moon AND asteroids. Think of it this way. Do you jump ship early or do you wait for the company (which, mind you, is directly supported by the United States government) to grow into a titan like Amazon where your shares aren't worth 100$ but 1000$. Google just announced they are paying 900mil A MONTH for AI computing capacity. Is the way they are trying to push this IPO sketchy as hell? Omg yes. But they are doing it to build investment in SpaceX so they can then use that money to fund their dominance in the field before anyone else can.

hudson701

Yeah.... Vietnam/Thailand, that's a LOT of money

Level10Retard

It's one of those that's obvious in hindsight. (Give me all the "didn't read, happy for you or sorry it happened" comments) - Look at the public push, it's insane. In my social circle, a bunch of financially uneducated people are waiting for it. They will not buy in the first hour or even the first day. They'll see how it's going and if it goes up they'll FOMO and if it goes down they'll be afraid to go in. It needs to steadily go up in the beginning for most people to not be afraid. The institutions know this, obviously. - Yes, the valuation is crazy, doesn't connect to the fundamentals at all. But a huge part of the retail genuinely don't even know what's a market cap or p/e ratio. - There's a bunch of Elon Musk knuckleheads. They might even counteract the dump part of the pump and dump. - And this point will be hated by the terminally online autists (I'm talking about you retards). Elon (his teams) have done quite some incredible things. Tesla, SpaceX, neurolink, even on Twitter he has cut down the costs significantly, like really significantly. All these companies are the leaders, by quite big margins as well, in their industries and were the first ones to do their thing. Accelerating these fields years, maybe even like 10, into the future. Tesla not anymore compared to China but anything in the western world - easily. The robots will not take over our chores anytime soon, but damn they'll be amazing factory workers soon™. His timelines are complete nonsense, but he does achieve the things he says he will. Sometimes it might be decades off (Mars) but still years ahead of the competition. - xAI has A LOT of GPU compute, you don't think about xAI when you hear "hyperscalers" but it definitely is. xAI build a huge data center in half a year, where other hyperscalers take 3 - 4 years to build an equivalent one. You can't deny this shit, when compute is all the hype. Even if LLMs fail, they'll be the king until the next thing comes and it'll require compute anyways. We have *always* needed more and more compute and it's not changing. He managed to build a data center in record time when data centers are one of the most constrained resources currently.

Inevitable_Flan_2912

One of the smartest, most apt lines I ever remember seeing, tho' I forget the source and who came up with it in tje 1st place ... "born in the right year." I live in a tourist city (the go-to port for cruises to Alaska) with a pervasive (and growing) drugs and street people problem, and I see it every day — as I step over street people sleeping on the pavement. There is a LOT of money out there, all those cruise-ships passengers (1500-3000 people per ship) wearing brand new clothes and looking as if they haven't missed too many meals — and they're virtually ALL the same age. Boomers of a certain cohort. Yes, there's a lot of truth to the line "born in the right year," though not many of them would care to admit it.

Dealer_Existing

Mehh not entirely true. The brain and intelligence is trainable. That’s why education makes you smarter, university learns you how to apply critical thinking and apply research. However if you just decide to freewheel stuff without putting in effort to learn and think that your years of experience has to be sufficient to become a master option trader then yeah, you’ll have an edge with a higher IQ or life experience. There’s a reason rookie traders on Wallstreet lose money and you have to grow and learn into the profession. There is a LOT of learning involved. Buying and selling short term options based on gut and feeling is just gambling lmao

Ok-Equipment8303

That's literally not true. While addictive personality disorder does seem to run in families, there is a LOT people can do about it.

alfred250

Reminds me A LOT of the Bill Hwang ViacomCBS dump. Our boy might be pulling strings behind bars.

YourChildhood5762

I was joking but there seems to be a lot (A LOT, A LOT) of talk lately about how the SpaceX IPO is going to be good for everyone's retirement accounts. /s Frankly Scarlet, I'm unconcerned.

No-Government-195

I like this A LOT! I was down $1 MM at end of 25 and am almost back even after today. $MSOX if you really have conviction. I would rotate Trulieve into GTII in about 2 weeks. Let Kim cook on NYSE then scalp her for what Ben has planned. Never seen an easier 3x in my entire lifetime. 

CallsOrPutsYES

A little yes, bought A LOT of shares throughout today too

everyeargiants

I did that last year lumping in A LOT right before liberation day. Sucked big time. It’ll recover.

bearhunter429

#This is the WORST market crash in history and it's only starting. It will get A LOT worse. LMAO🤌

circadiggmigration

I really think it's going to break 60k in a few weeks and I'll get at least a few hundred thousand. Max gain is just under a million but no chance. I wanted to short MSTER but the premiums were so high. At least last week A LOT of people are shorting master. Almost no one was shorting IBIT last week. I think I practically made the market.

xxxMarilee

Technology Sector includes a LOT of stocks. They aren't all going to be red, just as they weren't all red today.

circadiggmigration

I believe you. The premiums were insane though. A LOT of people are shorting MSTR. The premiums on IBIT were much more attractive.

AllCapNoBrake

Bro, I was telling this place to go short back on 10/2. You left a LOT of money on the table, but glad you finally pulled your head out of your ass.

WhitePantherXP

The point he was making is that most of the people complaining are in HCOL areas and demand those prices to go down. There are a LOT of affordable areas in the country, I moved to one 3 years ago to save money (from SoCal). I will be moving back because I can't stand this TN weather but it's definitely doable if you want to buy a home.

Willing-Angle-2203

for anyone keeping track, we've officially entered the "wait, this is too expensive" era of AI Copilot moving to token-based billing since June 1st is already making A LOT of companies reduce AI usage. My firm is having meetings as we speak about the limits, which are burning out faaaast. I'm expecting a lot of "realism" over the next months as ROI questions about AI become center stage. Pretty sure the "iNSAtiAbLe DeMAnD" for compute narrative will die

Thomas_Pizza

I just started investing less than 2 months ago, and not a huge investment at all (I am going to add to it monthly though), but Micron is my first "one bagger" I guess? It's genuinely not anything to brag about, it's not like I researched and discovered some highly underrated stock that nobody was really watching and it took off. More like the opposite -- everybody has been watching and buying Micron. I bought on April 15 at about $448/share, having obviously missed the insane exponential growth, but it was still VERY strongly recommended by analysts who I consider trustworthy and objective (I did a LOT of reading and research before making any investments), and it's my best-performing stock so far, up 141%. I also bought into about 10 other companies, as well as putting a big chunk into an S&P 500 fund. And like I said it wasn't a huge investment, I only bought 350 shares of MU---just kidding. I purchased 1 (one) share. And I'm extremely aware that Micron and any other individual stocks I own could drop very far very fast. I did not set up a stop loss on it or any of my holdings, because I look at them daily and sometimes buy and sell a bit, even before my monthly deposit. I don't have stop-losses but I do have notifications on many/most of my stocks to text me if they drop X% in a day, so I can decide whether or not to sell.

reddorickt

Some people do get lucky or make a lifetime pick. Does happen, but is rare relative to the number of people who invest. What you are missing is that: * There are a LOT of scammers on this website. Anything tied to financial gains will be loaded with them. Scammers use big gains or promises or FOMO as a primary tactic. * There are LOT of people who lie on this website. Either for karma, or for their own insecurity, or a number of reasons. * People are far less inclined to post their losses because it shows they made a mistake or did something very stupid. They are ashamed, or discouraged, or have realized their errors and want to disconnect from the scene. So the voluntary response bias strongly favors big gains.

falkonx24

A LOT, like, and it’s a lot of old people that don’t understand. They think it’s like getting in the ground floor of apple stock.

julian_jakobi

Historically they did best when they leave the selling of their amazing tech to partners. POOPH became a blockbuster success. (before their partner stopped paying). Now they have partnered with a Global leader in clean water tech - AQUATECH that installed thousands of water systems in 60 different countries. They are implementing BLGO PFAS remediation tech into their huge water systems- 7 Bids are out already. Clyra Medical partnered with Al -Hikma the leading medical distribution company in the Middle East. Additionally one of the global top 4 medical companies will release a cobranded product at scale later this year. The engineers just signed a $1.2 Million contract - they almost doubled revenues last year and will likely double this year also. A relaunch of a Pet product seems likely in 2026 also. I am a long term investor and all of the above are things I was waiting for for years. Obviously others lost their patience. BUT I am 100% confident this longterm investment will reward all shareholders plenty. We know what is coming and at a $35 million market cap A LOT of money can be made IMHO 😉 mom and dad companies run out of a garage without any revenue have a higher market cap than that. The reevaluation will be pretty and we know it will happen. Best of luck! Do your Own DD!

ZYHUA

if you stubborn and keep thinking logically you will miss out on a lot of money. I mean A LOT

Spiritual_Review_754

You are conflating two different things here. His lie refers to the fact that he unequivocally stated that he and Vlad did not have any contact during the event, which email exchanges show to be false. The real question is whether or not that exchange constitutes collusion and insider corruption, which another testimonial judged not to be the case. In other words, his email exchanges were not enough to constitute outright collusion according to the courts. There is a fair argument to say that it’s perfectly normal for there to be frenzied exchanges in a situation like this. This was a big fucking problem for a LOT of people. So then why lie about it? Why not just say something like, « yeah of course we had to talk about the massive financial disaster that was taking place, we have an obligation to work in the interests of shareholders and address massive financial problems just like this, it would frankly be weird if we *didn’t* talk about it » We parrot this talking point about Ken Griffin lying to congress because Ken Griffin lied to congress. I understand why someone would look at the situation and say « well it was a small lie, and another hearing determined the exchanges to not be significant anyway so it doesn’t matter » but a small, silly lie is still a lie. So I reiterate: Ken Griffin lied to congress to make himself, his firm and Vlad and Vlad’s firm not look quite as bad during a moment of extreme scrutiny and pressure.

Trashlify

what time did you purchase these and are you still holding them? Timing matters A LOT for options.

bedgecheatures

I am also going to be jerking off a LOT between now and Oct.

EmergencyTaco

One of the main things the Trump era has revealed is that there is a LOT of terrible shit that was never officially codified as illegal because it was assumed nobody would ever actually try something so brazen. That approach has significant flaws.

No-Assistant-1519

Guys I’m from the future. Whatever you do: DON’T buy $SPCE calls after June 1, 2026 at 10:30AM. You’re gonna lose A LOT of money if you do. Btw I’m so gay, I can’t even think straight.

Monster_Grundle

Implied volatility (IV) is a premium that is part of the option price. When a stock is volatile, the expected move is huge, so the pricing reflects the likelihood that SPCE at 7.5 could go to 10 or 4 in a few days. Thus, there is a bunch of extra premium charged. When you buy a 6p for $2, it is accounting for that possible extra move so the stock needs to move a LOT in order to overcome that price. Then, when it does drop like it did because of dilution, that takes a huge amount of wind out of the sails and now people don’t expect it to move as much. So now the IV “crushes,” and the portion extra you paid earlier evaporates and despite the stock moving in the right direction, the price of the put stays flat. Conversely, if you bought puts before IV exploded, you could have seen the stock go up significantly and still seen the price of your puts increase.

Gorm_the_Old

Not sure that that's the case. Source: [https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/how-spacexs-tiered-lockup-aims-help-post-ipo-trading](https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/how-spacexs-tiered-lockup-aims-help-post-ipo-trading) >As outlined in the company’s IPO prospectus, SpaceX investors will be able to sell up to 20% of their stock starting on the second full day of trading after the company releases its first earnings report after the end of the second quarter. There’s also a performance-based trigger; investors can sell an additional 10% if the stock trades 30% above its IPO price for at least five of the 10 trading days after earnings are released. If the stock soars immediately following IPO - and with such a limited float, that's a very real possibility - expect a LOT of shares to get dumped on the market even just a few weeks after the IPO.

corruptbytes

bro has been in A LOT of VC meetings about all these things - he constantly says everyone is all talk but no build i personally don't believe him, and constantly try to nudge him back, but i think he's mentally checked out after spending years in New Mexico

SnooDoggos5226

ITT: OP trusted financial advice from people on a platform that has a LOT of D pics posted daily

Luke-HW

I’m worried that the RAM shortage has convinced people that it’s a good thing for a company to run out of inventory. This only worked out for Micron because they have single digit competitors. There are a LOT of enterprise computer manufacturers though; a shortage from one of them just means that consumers will turn to another company. It also means that gains will be pretty evenly distributed.

Knowledge_1

There was a LOT of insider buys a couple of months back. That was the signal

SilverPrivateer

22 days ago, I posted this warning. The bitcoiners didn't listen. Now they suffer the consequences. "Dear Bitcoiners, Hope you're enjoying the pump! Just remember - you would be at 35k without us. Did you read the latest Saylor tweet? "Buy more bitcoin than you sell..." That's right. If you allow our stock to dip below 1.2xMNAV, it now becomes accretive to shareholders to sell BTC to buy MSTR. That's right. Your precious coins will get a big, stinky dump. This is a threat. The MSTR army is kind. But we will not tolerate betrayal. You scratch our back, we scratch yours. You support our chart... we support yours. But if you lets us fall, we're taking you with us. We stink on you and all MSTR holders get bitcoin gain from the sale. That's right. We gain bitcoin, you get agony. Your final warning, from the MSTRer army. So let's keep this pump going... it would be a shame if the music suddenly... stopped" I warned you. Now it's time for you to feel the wrath of the MSTaRmy. There's plenty of us, and we have a LOT of bitcoin which is going onto the open market if you don't play nice. This sell was a warning shot. The real playtime starts now.

WizardOfCommerce

Difference is... ZOOM ticker looks a LOT like what you'd expdct Zoom to have as a ticket. SPCE though? I just don't see it.

Bluetimewalk

All the stocks that have been going up in the last 15 years were mainly tech, which young people favored. Millennials who bought tech definitely minted millions. All the high flyers in the last 15 years were fan favorites for that generation, tons of people are now bragging on reddit breaking millionaire status in their 20-30s, some even multi-millions. There were a LOT of people who suddenly made millions, all the brokerage data supports it. Just being in any of the high flyers such as MAG 7 or any semis got you there. Its not surprising there are a record number of posts from random accounts bragging and showing off their portfolios considered we just had an insane run. There were tons of people in WSB making millions from tesla / nvda / mu / sndk / amd the last few years.

Apost8Joe

MechCADdie is correct, referring to intrinsic business value. Sure buybacks juice earnings per share and can move the stock price, but nothing happened within the enterprise itself, nothing was created, produced or sold. Stock buybacks were considered manipulation (because they clearly are) and illegal until 1982. A lot of shit got done in the 80s that allowed this late stage capitalism tech circle jerk we're seeing today. When corporate tax rates were really high, nobody actually paid them, the company would instead pay employees, pay more dividends, reinvest in the company or make an acquisition etc. But now they can merely pass all gains to an increasingly small group of shareholders and call it a day. I'm a capitalist who spent decades on Wall St, left to found my own company, paid A LOT of taxes telling you this. Our system is fundamentally broken.

GeX_64_

Define A LOT. Look, I get why it feels like a massive crowd is printing millions right now. When you look at r/TQQQ or the face-melting run semiconductors have had, it’s easy to think half the population made life changing money. But we need to be honest about what A LOT actually means here. Confusing a loud group of people with a large percentage of people is exactly how everyday investors get baited into taking stupid risks. >There’s people over on [r/TQQQ](https://www.reddit.com/r/TQQQ/) making several million in a few weeks when it took them many years to build up their first millions. To make millions in a few weeks, even on a 3x leveraged fund, you had to *already* have millions on the line. The market didn't make an average guy rich; it took someone who was already a multi-millionaire and made them wealthier. >Then there’s all the people who don’t post or don’t have a Reddit account just out in the wild that we don’t know about. Sure, plenty of people don't post on Reddit but math is math. Hard brokerage data shows the median account balance for normal people is under $10,000. The silent majority out in the wild made a few hundred or a few thousand bucks, not lifestyle-changing money. You are absolutely right about that employees at the companies mentioned are pulling massive bonuses. That is separate from investing. It just comes down to mixing up a massive crowd with a massive percentage. Because the market is global, you can easily point to 50,000 people who made a fortune on leverage or tech bonuses, and by raw volume, that looks like a lot but out of hundreds of millions of participants, they are still a microscopic fraction at the absolute apex of the financial world. The original post is still fundamentally correct. the overwhelming majority of everyday investors didn't make life-changing money because they simply didn't have the starting capital.

Fun-Sundae4060

Whew. A LOT of people. There’s people over on r/TQQQ making several million in a few weeks when it took them many years to build up their first millions. Then there’s all the people who don’t post or don’t have a Reddit account just out in the wild that we don’t know about. People who were heavy on semiconductors really made it big, much more than even TQQQ. People working for SK Hynix, Samsung, TSMC, chip factories got enormous bonuses too.

Spy300

**SEND IT** >TRUMP: PROBABLY TALK ABOUT CUTTING RATES WITH WARSH >TRUMP SAID OF WARSH “HE THINKS YOU HAVE TO LOWER INTEREST RATES” >TRUMP SAYS HE THINKS WARSH UNDERSTANDS HE WANTS LOWER RATES, WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN JOB HAD HE SAID HE WANTED TO RAISE RATES >TRUMP: WARSH WILL CUT RATES WITHOUT WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE >TRUMP: WHEN OIL PRICES GO UP, WE MAKE A LOT OF MONEY >TRUMP: FRANKLY, GAS PRICE HASN'T GONE UP AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT >TRUMP: I HAVE THE GREATEST PLAN OF ALL, WON'T REVEAL WHAT IT IS >TRUMP: 'WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET!!! President DJT' >BESSENT: RATES PEAKED THE DAY BEFORE WARSH WAS SWORN IN >BESSENT: 100% APPROVE OF THE FED GETTING RID OF FORWARD GUIDANCE >TRUMP: WE HAVE SOME DEBT WE WANT TO TAKE CARE OF >US DEBT CRISIS WORSENS: EMERGING MARKETS DUMP US TREASURIES AT RECORD SPEED — $86 BILLION GONE IN MARCH >FOREIGN CENTRAL BANK HOLDINGS OF US TREASURIES FALL TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1990s >WEALTHY FAMILIES CUT U.S. DOLLAR EXPOSURE AMID DEBT WORRIES: UBS SURVEY

Spy300

**DO IT** >TRUMP: PROBABLY TALK ABOUT CUTTING RATES WITH WARSH >TRUMP SAID OF WARSH “HE THINKS YOU HAVE TO LOWER INTEREST RATES” >TRUMP SAYS HE THINKS WARSH UNDERSTANDS HE WANTS LOWER RATES, WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN JOB HAD HE SAID HE WANTED TO RAISE RATES >TRUMP: WARSH WILL CUT RATES WITHOUT WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE >TRUMP: WHEN OIL PRICES GO UP, WE MAKE A LOT OF MONEY >TRUMP: FRANKLY, GAS PRICE HASN'T GONE UP AS MUCH AS I THOUGHT >TRUMP: I HAVE THE GREATEST PLAN OF ALL, WON'T REVEAL WHAT IT IS >Trump: 'WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET!!! President DJT' >US DEBT CRISIS WORSENS: EMERGING MARKETS DUMP US TREASURIES AT RECORD SPEED — $86 BILLION GONE IN MARCH >WEALTHY FAMILIES CUT U.S. DOLLAR EXPOSURE AMID DEBT WORRIES: UBS SURVEY >US Treasury Secretary Bessent: 100% approve of the Fed getting rid of forward guidance. >FOREIGN CENTRAL BANK HOLDINGS OF US TREASURIES FALL TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1990s >TRUMP: WE HAVE SOME DEBT WE WANT TO TAKE CARE OF

pegasusCK

I just tossed in 40k in calls on VRDN was waiting for stock to come back close to 17. I like it A LOT. Wife and I are both doctors. I do research at UofM. Proof: https://preview.redd.it/r0jxb7pz3q4h1.png?width=1303&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e51800a1f4df9046dc020bb425955e1ecb3fe6f

22Arkantos

ETFs aren't the big prize. Target date mutual funds that 401(k)s and other retirement accounts are usually invested in are- they have a LOT of money in the indices.

DatBoiii4

This article from Ben Thompson’s Stratechery got me thinking. https://stratechery.com/2026/the-spacex-ipo-and-data-centers-in-space/ Ok so if each rack satellite is like 3000 kg by the time you add the radiators and solar panels and whatever There's 3000 racks in Colossus 1 so that's 9000 tons of stuff Falcon 9 is like $2,720/kg right now which would be $24.5B just for the rockets (Jesus lol) Starship is supposed to get to $100/kg eventually but realistically near term it's like $500/kg so call it \~$4.5B Even at the dream Starship number which is HIGHLY presumptuous ($100/kg) you're at $900M which is basically what Colossus cost to build on the ground So like the only way the math works is if Starship actually hits its target AND people block enough data centers on earth that you literally have to go to space Regardless the launch alone costs more than the data center itself at current rates Starship works out to like 1.5x the terrestrial build cost JUST for the rocket rides, before you've built a single satellite Not considering the fact that if you managed to get Colossus 1 into space it would be 9,000 tons of stuff in space. The total mass of stuff currently in orbit is 11,000 metric tons so you’d almost be doubling the entirety of spaceflight mass Also every single one of these racks (per Thompsons numbers) at 200sq meters would need to be 3x more thermally efficient than the ISS radiator. So you’d have to build 3 THOUSAND radiators that are approximately half the size of the ISS radiator and 3x more efficient This last bit is the largest assumption by a light year These are fucking jaw dropping, brain exploding, skull busting numbers I am not saying it’s IMPOSSIBLE, this is just what you’re up against that makes it extremely unlikely. Truly you would be better off building these in Antarctica or something. That said the last 5 years we have seen a LOT of jaw dropping numbers and extremely unlikely things SO idk

ModernTexasMan

There’s a psyop happening that’s promoting the winning investments. If you get to a point where you recognize what’s real vs. what’s noise there is A LOT of money to be made. How do you tell which is which? Look for incredibly high si AND a very active social media presence. Look for a contrived story that paints one side as the downtrodden, and the other as stealing / lying / cheating. From there you will develop a gut feeling that will takeover and get you where you need to be!”. From my perspective this is being used to redistribute wealth (balance things out), and prepare ppl “financially” to live fruitful / prosperous lives in an ai ran world.

NYGiants181

Some people are about to lose A LOT of money

PrestigiousPrompt293

Think or swim genuinely fucked me. I went to sell my SPCE calls and my MSFT calls up a LOT In SPCE and up a bit in MSFT, and it crashed... by the time I could get back in, my orders didn't go through, it was all deeply red... now SPCE got halted. My portfolio went from being up 5% to down 4%.

civilrunner

> I don't know how we've spent billions on this and nothing has happened. Our land use regulations and permitting process for right of ways allows every single land owner the right of way goes through to effectively veto the entire project especially with our environmental review process which requires that the applicant prove that any complaint isn't valid or is addressed even if the complaint has no proof or alternatives are more harmful (i.e. driving is worse for the environment than a high speed rail). This permitting process and grant writing is mandating a bunch of additional requirements and delays that altogether explode the cost of the project. Trying to appease every single person has exploded the budget and had forced the train to go from nowhere to nowhere through nowhere. Of course all of this combined attempted to appease every single small interest group and land owner has made it so the vast majority now views if the project as an abject failure and well it has chosen destinations and a path that will kill ridership and therefore the rail itself. Of course that may be the entire goal of the wealthy that don't want high speed rail. On top of that our rail codes are really out of date and our administrative oversight is rather poorly organized for who has jurisdiction on regulations. We need massive permitting and regulatory reforms. Newsom started this with some CEQRA reforms and more, but A LOT of work is still needed on regulatory and permitting reforms if we're ever going to build out a national high speed rail system. Of course there are many wealthy interest groups that view this broken system as a feature rather than a bug and are trying their best to maintain it so that we need to continue to rely on cars and airplanes and such for transportation while not being able to build anything.

Leveraged_Lots

Kos will probably stay one of my best trades ever, I bought A LOT of KOS shares almost at the day of the bottom, made +200% in less than three months and yes I know people make that on Micron and Nvidia on any given Tuesday, but I'm an oil bull, I usually make the opposite.

PrestigiousPrompt293

Think or swim genuinely fucked me. I went to sell my SPCE calls and my MSFT calls up a LOT In SPCE and up a bit in MSFT, and it crashed... by the time I could get back in, my orders didn't go through, it was all deeply red... now SPCE got halted. My portfolio went from being up 5% to down 4%.

Boston-Bets

Na, dump is already happening now. Touched $8, and now headed back down to $3 by tomorrow. There's going to be a LOT of bagholders by Wed.

No-Reach-2485

Definitely think there is a lot of value to be made in the Australian stock market, particularly there is a company called Australian Ethical Investments Limited who has a LOT of upside. Its FUM grew exponentially year on year and is a great value option.

the_one2

I haven't found that copilot saves me much time with this. The wait time before suggestions is inconsistent and before I would have just done a find/replace with regex that would have taken the same amount of time but would have felt more engaging than sitting and waiting to press tab. With other, more complex code I feel like it gets in the way more than it helps, on average. A couple of times, some bugs have slipped through that cost A LOT more time to fix than writing the code myself.

MarginallyClever

Okay I feel bad. Backstory is, a week or two ago, a few Redditors got the idea about buying SPCE (Virgin Galactic, zero relationship to SpaceX) under the assumption that confused people - such as yourself, frankly - would buy SPCE thinking it was SPCX, which is the SpaceX ticker. A LOT of people thought this was funny and everyone started buying this shit low-cost SPCE stock. It became part short squeeze, part meme, and a lot of momentum. The stock went up a lot. You profited, good job. SpaceX (SPCX) will IPO on June 12. The question nobody knows the answer to is whether the joke is done and everyone knows what's going on (and people sell off, plummeting SPCE before the IPO) or whether there's still juice to squeeze and the real SpaceX IPO will further rocket the stock up. I bought a bunch, sold some in case it has already peaked, and will hold the rest probably until June 12 to see what happens.

davidkalinex

Agreed, but most models project that populations in a LOT of developed countries will shrink by 80% in less than 3 generations. This is not sustainable, unless people start consuming entire asteroids as part of their family wealth.

RadiantReason2063

I work in machine learning, and had it build some custom cura kernels with guidance for specific uses  The amount of times it tries to xfail unit tests or to convince me that a bug on the branch is passed over from main is still TOO HIGH I understand using agentic workflows for building a web page, sure. But for complex tasks, you end up wasting A LOT more time if you YOLO instead of babysitting 4.7 every step.

MCKlassik

OP would’ve had a LOT more profit if they held for a few months longer.

AirForceDocta

Coming back to see this. I sold a LOT last June 2025 and sold the final 80k when I posted this. I decided to keep 80k in the stock.

vwin90

On the other hand, it’s rare when wsb has this ubiquitous of meme. There are a LOT of people here and idiotically, it’s actually enough to fuck up the actual market

Payman11

And I have thousand examples more of it being correct. It’s gambling if I trust 100% every answer, which I’m not. If I get even 70% correct answer rate, and know when to take out the bad ones for the 30%, that’s still a massive win for me. Not gambling but risk management, that’s how business works. If the value I get is more than the risk of me having wrong answers, then it’s useful. Which I can first hand attest to, it outweighs it by A LOT.

luv2block

I mean, there's a ton of stocks that are down a LOT. So if you're making bank it kind of is your own doing.