LOT
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
-16.67% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
I bet he has quite a bit, he’s A LOT older and SHE was HIS boss. 😂
I bought A LOT during COVID when it was $15. I almost got out when it hit $120 a couple weeks ago. Now I'm just gonna ride it out.
When it’s your son daughter mother…. PC kills Fast (6 months) and terribly with the body eaten from inside. Extremely painful and vomiting/incontinence … Getting 2 more months (or more) with loved ones is a LOT. And this is a Wearable device. Not a drug with side effects.
Yeah. Automation and increased productivity are inherently good things, but if they displace a LOT of people at once with no safety nets, it could get ugly.
Great earning but A LOT of debt
Yessir, long is the way to go! There’s A LOT to be excited about moving forward
That’s a LOT for a blue chip stock. It’s not like it’s a potential “up and comer”.. it’s fucking Amazon
There won't be an AI winner. AI is a commodity. All you need is the compute and the expertise (which is widely available) and you can match the top model. In the next year you are going to see a LOT of catch up from Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon, along with many others, including the Chinese.
In your back-and-forth with u/nivek_123k it sounds like you're looking for things to Wheel. But your OP strongly implies that you already hold SCHX & SCHG, so is that correct? Because if so, you can do CCs to your heart's intent. Though SCHG is better for that. But even SCHX, if you sold the 37DTE 29-delta 28C you'd net 0.7% over those 36 days (from tomorrow). That apy's to just 7% if you were able to do that month after month. That's hardly worth the bother though, or the risk of losing your shares (or the bother of rolling the Calls). And if you're looking to accumulate shares (whether starting from scratch, or to add to shares you own), CSP'ing right ATM is the perfect use-case for those. The SCHX 20Feb27P is at a Bid/Ask of 0.05/0.20, with a Last price of 0.15. That's optimistic given that spread, but you'd surely get filled at 0.10. And 0.10/27.00 in 6 trading days (Monday is a holiday) is an apy of 15%. Not bad for something you were going to buy anyway. The SCHG Puts are a LOT juicier though: The 20Feb31P would sell for 0.27. And 0.27/31.00 in 6 trading days gives 0.87% ROI, which converts to an approximate apy of 36%. Do that every week or so if you're DCA'ing into SCHG anyway, and you're starting out with a 36% head start. Or if you don't want that much bother, sell the 20Mar31P for an apy of \~22%. Less return because it's less work. And if you're "pretty new" to options (I read that as "*very* new" because I bet you haven't read a book) read some of this book (it's a pdf): [Options for the Beginner and Beyond,](https://www.r-5.org/files/books/trading/schoolbooks/W_Edward_Olmstead-Options_for_the_Beginner_and_Beyond-EN.pdf) by Professor Olmstead of Northwestern University Chapters 1 through 5, plus 14 for Covered Calls should do it. Ignore all the "strategies" in the book for now (or forever, but do read Chapter 6 about LEAPS Calls when you want to think about using them instead of shares). Cheers.
I heard they need A LOT more sponsors, and it's unconstitutional anyway...Also, wouldn't Trump need to sign this? Either way, meh. But, looking at the current anti-weed discourse from grifters on Twitter, + this bill getting two new sponsors this week, tells me that the prohibitionists are moving. I think we should be seeing *something* new about the rescheduling process soon.
Yes for every 100 shares you can sell 1 option. If it stays under $420, it means you pocket the entire credit for which you sold the options at, because they're going to expire worthless, but since you're the option seller you keep all of that, and all your shares. You will be automatically assigned if it expires Friday market close above $420. Alternatively, you could roll the option for next week, perhaps for $425, and collect another round of credits. You could also just buy back your options for a fraction of the cost as they'd probably be worth jack shit if it's like $420.20 at market close. Yes rolling is typically a new date, say the week. You could also roll to the same week if the stock took a hit say going from 405 to 395, you could roll and change to sell 410s instead since you're confident it won't hit 410 by Friday. There are A LOT of routes you could take to protect your shares. I wouldn't get worried about getting exercised, because you can do the opposite the next week and sell puts instead. I sell options on a weekly basis between calls and puts. Good work watching videos, you should take a week to learn as much as possible while selling calls 5% out. I typically target 2-3% because the deltas are a lot higher and I don't care if I get exercised, I'll just sell the opposite options next week. Good luck!
You are correct that the US can't be a super power forever. You are incorrect on the first paragraph. No one boycotted the US 20 years ago. I'm not sure what you are talking about. If you are referring to the fact that in 2000 most countries bought primarily from the US and now most countries buy primarily from China (https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/how-china-overtook-u-s-in-global-trade-dominance-2000-2024/) this was not due to some sort of global boycott. This was simply due to various market factors - China's industrialization, China's plan to be a manufacturing super power, China offering cheap labor that US companies were happy to utilize vs expensive domestic labor, NAFTA, and on and on. Almost all countries were involved with the GWOT, and frankly those that withdrew (like France) drew backlash for not supporting it (although the economic impact of the backlash was minimal, if anything. It was all PR bs). Its not like <insert random latin American country>one day decided "man what the US is doing is terrible, lets go buy from China", no. What occurred was that China offered them cheaper products made quicker, and those countries were happy to buy more from them than the US over time. No one is boycotting Trump. Again, I don't know what you are talking about. The US manufactures very little in the grand scheme of things. We export a LOT of petroleum products, medical equipment, a LOT of food products (soy, corn, beef), defense and aerospace products. We certainly do not export consumer electronics, toys, light bulbs...ya know...the stuff that drives the middle class economy - this is China's business and will be for the foreseeable future. That aside, exports have been trending up for some time now.
Only if you stick to the same strategy and focus on dividends etf, indices or stocks cause one bad decision can set you back BY A LOT… oh and STAY AWAY FROM OPTIONS 🙄
At the end of Q4, '24 they had $67m. They are now at $116m. Yes. That includes Motif acquisition but even when we look closer from the previous quarter it's moved up in several key areas. WIP Dried: $53m up from $31m Flower and Trim: $7.5m up from $3.5m We can downplay it if you'd like but that's a LOT of cash to tie up in inventory. Especially when it's an agricultural product which degrades over time and not some widget you can throw on the shelf. In addition, non-restricted cash is down to $7m so you have to ask yourself.... why are they still building inventory when it seems like it would be more advantageous to sell out of inventory to generate more cash? To my eye that speaks to operational inefficiencies. A long tail supply chain which inherently requires more inventory "in progress" in order to accommodate increased top line sales
1:2 ratio or 30% gain/60% loss for automatic stop losses. The idea is you lock in on volatility in options as they swing A LOT and you can't go up or down 30% in value and it could stop you out and you just lose money but 60% loss input can give you time to at least take a bite out of a sandwich before stopping it yourself. Pretty much option value moves a lot in 20 seconds if your trading shorter term and that gives you a safe ish spread if you don't lose every trade especially if you gain and are only trading 3-5% of your portfolio. If you maintain a 40% win rate you'll still slowly gain in practice. Weird math but it works out if you look into it
I think you greatly underestimate the instrinc value of gambling and international black market transactions. Bitcoin is both an incredible tool both to gamble with and gamble on. Yes gambling without an edge is inherently unproftiable, but it provides incredible behavioural reinforcing utility and people are willing to pay A LOT for that. Look at the lottery, look at las vegas, look at all the sports bookies and their conglomerates based on providing this vice. This provides a much higher floor for anything but the absolute worst of times. Then in the absolute worst of times, maybe the qualities the BTC fanatics preach will come into play? (probabily not , but Im not an expert).
no, you should give examples of major companys that are NOT still around. you know, you said there are A LOT of, and i'm in a bias. lots of words you allready wrote, instead of giving some examples and showing how wrong i am.
Oh I think this is true, I think they’re trying to bait the administration into letting them sell discounted drugs - trumprx launched the other day and I think there is a LOT of momentum to make these drugs available affordably.
>This is the reason why A LOT of people's electricity bills are skyrocketing by 300%, 400% etc in the US. Wonder where you pulled that wild one from lo
Friendly reminder that what the wannabe Tech oligarchs are calling AI is not AI. What they're calling AI is actually LLMs and LLMs are not the pathway to AGI. LLMs to give you a visual is the snake eating its own tail and due to the enormous cost in powering these models the juice might not be worth the squeeze. This is the reason why A LOT of people's electricity bills are skyrocketing by 300%, 400% etc in the US. The reason why they're calling it AI, is because of the free built in marketing that comes with it. All of us have grown up in a world with Sci-Fi, and calling it AI (when it's not) brings in all sorts of free marketing. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
Actually as long as Bitcoin stays up we'll have risk-on sentiment. Judging based on MSTR's 2-hour earnings call (btw it was their most viewed earnings call in history) Mr. SAYLOR attracted a LOT of investor attention. Wall Street knows this. We're about to see a huge rally. Don't forget, the Trump family LOVES crypto.
Gold up over 80% since Jan 20, 2025. One or two more rate cuts and increased spending this year and we'll likely see 6k. President is not the primary driver of rise, but definitely not helping. Swiss Francs are up 12+% in the same time frame which is A LOT for Francs. True bagholder was always going to be the winner of the 2024 election. GW Bush learned this in his second term. Like Hoover in '29 or GH Bush in '91.
While this is a deep analysis, I have to raise you an important observation... post-covid the market LOVES to trade on sentiment. Look at GME or TSLA or a heck of a lot of other meme stocks. I hate to say it but fundamentals are being thrown out the window post-covid, once everyone got a trading app on their phones! My new strategy has been to predict behavior rather than find good value ones. It's more work, but it's where things have basically landed. RDDT is definitely influenced by a LOT of retail traders.
You need to do A LOT of research before jumping into options trading. Either that or be very cautious. If you dont understand something... don't mess with it. People have become rich and others have lost it all. This isn't a game.
All great points made here. The Dems should never have trotted Biden out there knowing he's not as capable as he's used to be. He did A LOT in 4 years but that's beside the point.
Someone made a **LOT** of money yesterday and today.
hard to know, there will be a LOT of volatility from sunday's japan snap election
I have also been building with them since gpt 3.5 and working with agentic workflows since then. And my experience has actually switched the other way around from yours. I hit a LOT of walls early on and doubted a lot of it. Everywhere I looked devs were trying to do certain things and ClAIM to do certain things that was ultimately just green green green. In starting to see things slowly settle in now. MCP servers was a BIG shift in the right direction. AGI? Uh yea no, that’s not even part of the conversation and it shouldn’t be
Yep. So dumbass people who sells in this dip on STOCK market, which is by far the one with less runup lately. All institutionals are making a LOT of money Shorting BTC. That money will flood stock market. Bad jobs report bullish for rate cuts, AI replacement is on the way so AI is not bubble, also we are not close in a situation where AI will replace all jobs. Last but not less important SC will rule tariffs illegal soon which will make +2% day, new ATH
Just chilling with my bag at this point :( learned A LOT of lessons with this one.
I bought a LOT of Micron, and a fair bit of SNSK, MSFT and AMZN after yesterday's fall. They are all up massively as of now. Also bought some gold miners.
Just remember, the USA is socialism for the rich. And the rich hold A LOT of stocks.
Ok, so, I'm going to let you in on some insider info: We've always had the ability to do that. It's called hiring software developer contractors from the global south and paying them $1.50/hr with no bathroom breaks. Do you know why we don't do that exclusively now? Because the quality of code they put out isn't very good (though, I would argue, it's better than the quality you get out of Claude Code). But big software companies have always had an easy and cheap "force multiplier" at their disposal. If you want to found a startup and make a competitor for one of the major SAAS companies right now, and your plan is to hire a small workforce and tell everyone to use agentic plugins in their IDEs, you can do that. But you're going to run into a brick wall very quickly. The AI might know how to write javascript and CSS, but it doesn't know how to architect a scalable system. It doesn't know about data residency requirements, multi-region deployments, GDPR or SOC2 or PCI compliance. It doesn't know about load testing and security and FedRAMP. It doesn't know about efficient schema design and materialized views and pipelining. It doesn't know about deployment trains and monitoring / observability tools. And then after you write your Salesforce Killer, you're going to have to host it, but as a startup, you're going to be paying a LOT more to AWS than the big SAAS companies are. A company spending eight figures a month at Daddy Bezos' Cloud Emporium is going to be able to negotiate a significant discount, but Barbara's CRM Solutions Inc isn't. And even if you figure all that out, you're going to be left with a product full of mediocre code and a company full of engineers who don't understand the code they're writing. Oh, and here's some more inside baseball: We (people who work in software at big, publicly traded tech companies headquartered in Silicon Valley) are all already using AI. Through my employer, I have a github account with unlimited copilot - any agent, including claude. I am actually encouraged to use AI to help code (it is pretty good at writing unit tests, I'll grant). But, saying that agentic coding is a force multiplier, and then only allowing for applying that to plucky startups that are seeking to dethrone Salesforce is crazy - Salesforce is already using AI as a force multiplier. At best, the plucky startup is moving at the same velocity. They're not faster. And they're only cheaper because they lack feature parity. I swear, all of this "Companies that don't realize AI changes everything have already lost" sounds ... eerily familiar. It almost sounds like "Companies that don't realize the metaverse changes everything have already lost". Or "Companies that don't realize blockchain changes everything have already lost."
I'm HEAVILY concentrated in NVDA, AVGO, AMD, TSM, AMZN, GOOGL... and then META, MSFT, and a few others. So no, I'm down a LOT from the top to now. On the other hand... I know the prices were inflated and the companies I'm invested in are good... namely NVDA which is about 40% of my portfolio and the one I'm most down on at like...2.7 or so(but again, that's the ATH of 212 intraday). I'll live, we'll adjust, it'll come back.
Absolutely. But there are also emails and other files showing JE funded the Bitcoin foundation 2014/2015 when it ran out of money. More emails of him reaching out to A LOT of people in like 2013 to put money into Bitcoin. And even earlier he was emailing Bill Gates about decentralized digital currency. It's the perfect tool for all sorts of lettered agencies and criminals.
It’s a pyramid scheme, it’s only worth is what the next person is willing to buy it for, it literally has no value except for what the next idiot think it’s worth. The only reason it’s worth this much is because criminals have invested A LOT of money in it to create this fake value which will entice common men into believing it has value. They buy because of fomo, and these criminal enterprises do their pump and dumps to suit their needs to drive the value up and down as they buy and sell.
Datacenters in space allow for lower latency hosting for assets delivered via starlink. Instead of having to downlink to earth and then re uplink to push the data back, it can just communicate to space based nodes for cached content, hosted files, and all sorts of telemetry. At a very basic level, think netflix servers in space. You wanna Blades of Glory in the middle of the ocean, it's sudden a LOT closer. It's a good idea, and opens up TONS of bandwidth that was previously used for transport. Of course everything wont live up there, but if they load up a few satellite data centers with heavy content, it'll be good for all involved except the terrestrial bandwidth sellers.
Tbf 200 billion capex is an insane amount for anything let alone AI. I get it - they’re investing for the future but that is a *LOT* of money with a very unclear return on investment. I understand the uncertainty here.
if anything markets are heading down because a lot of investors are getting out because we are afraid others will get out... since theres suddenly millions of pages of files about how rich people rape and murder kids and may or may not be doing it to sacrifice the children to some middle eastern god that the tribe of israel was supposedly told by their middle eastern god not to worship and the muslims are like yeah weve been saying they switched gods for a while thats why god made us and like all this makes me less exposed. im holding a LOT more treasury bills than bitcoin right now. i sold gold sold TQQQ and sold BTC today. not because the world is run by pedophiles. i always figured the world was run by evil chosen ones and now we just have proof for the rest of the population that didnt eat as much LSD as i did back in 2009 when i decided the world makes a whole lot more sense if israel did 9/11 lol im selling because im stupid enough to think that other pussies will sell and let me get back in at a lower price.
I use Claude code 8 hours a day for my job. It could not do the work alone. It needs a LOT of bay sitting and I use opus for the primary assistant and sonnet for all of the sub agents.
If they can't, it would explain a LOT of things....
Maybe not but boy is he wrong a LOT. Like way more than he is right. Not even close to being right 6 times out of 10 that Peter Lynch talked about
It’s going to get A LOT worse before it gets better. Hold onto your butts.
No bc earnings just tells investors how much they won in the past quarter. Investors only care about how much they’ll earn in the FUTURE. Like cool yea they made a lot of money, but can they keep that momentum going for next quarter? Yes they can, but Google revealed they increased their spending by A LOT, & spending extra money scares investors, so the opted out. Thus resulting in the crazy sell off going on
I don’t know if this is a huge part of it but it’s surely a factor. Europeans hold A LOT of their saving in index funds that have 50-70% US companies, with a big part of that being tech. It’s just anecdotal but most of the people I know (including me) have either sold all their index funds that include US companies or at least stopped holding majority in the US in recent months. Just a trend I’m seeing but if a lot of people start doing it it’s not good for US stocks.
In all fairness to the scammer in chief: data centers in space may make a LOT of sense. There is infinite free electricity, cooling is not an issue saving most of the power and all of the water needs... No need for giant brick buildings filled with piping and stupid shit like floors and ceilings... or security guards... AND you're operating outside the control of any government (especially if you fly a flag like Cayman Islands or Gurnsney or Singapore or Dubai or whoever for your terrestrial tether company). Appealing to an Anarcho-Libertarian type like him or Thiel or Ellison... Or any tech company just tired of "get your data centers out of our community". Modern datacenters may eventually end up like the ancient empty windowless telephone switching buildings in the downtown of many a mid-size city, an anachronism.
The last 3 months have been a series of bear and bull traps. Market cannot make up its mine up or down. It’s been loading up a while, so when it does decide, it could move A LOT
I think SNAP is more emotional for most users. My wife had had it since high school and she has so many memories on there. Phots and videos saved of passed family members. It’s easier to pull out Snapchat to snap a pick or video vs your phone camera sometime. She says she does not care what the subscription is she is going to pay it because she is not losing her memories. I think this will be the case with A LOT of people. Not saying it’s gonna save the day and the company, but if they really start dialing some things in and subscriptions Strat rolling thru. I think it could be a solid play.
No fucking way she wins the nomination. Terrible candidate. Dems can do A LOT better.
Yes but for there to be a burst there has to be a bubble. And if we get a bubble, tech stocks are going a LOT higher.
What could these moves in metals imply? I can't even think of anything beyond manipulation. But thats a LOT of capital, nobody has that. Right? But there's no information either that would cause "the masses" to move the price. Anyone got a theory?
I'm guessing this sounded A LOT better in your head. LMAOOOOO
Europe just signed some bullshit that allows Indians easier access to work and live in Europe. There are so many Indians and A LOT of countries are looking at Indians as the saving grace for their significant projected population decline.
I see a LOT of bottoms on here and I'm not talking charts.
A LOT of red on screen today!
Buddy, $50,000 is a LOT of money to have saved up. That puts you in a minority of people your age. If you haven't already, please talk to somebody in the mortgage and real estate space to see what sort of mortgages are available for first time home buyers. There are plenty of options out there and $50K is going to get you in the game for homes that start with a $3 handle. Do that before you get despondent and then report back. Please know that my first home purchase had an interest rate of 7%. They weren't just handing out houses in 2001 (though it did get crazy in 2004-2007 before the crash, which led to major mortgage lending reform). My first house was TINY and needed a ton of work, so I learned how to do as much as I could to fix it up and failed on numerous projects along the way, but that's part of leaning. I got better as I learned. Not everyone who is older had things just gifted to them on a platter. Yes, home prices weren't absurd nation wide but rates were higher and entry level jobs weren't paying what they pay now. Unemployment rates back then were worse too in many areas of the country. The amount of jobs in high tech were much smaller than today. Focus on the good things you have and talk to some professionals in the housing market who can guide you. Good luck.
.01 EPS annualized results in them being priced currently at 500x earnings. It could drop A LOT more.
Of course not. But this is how capitalism works. Now let's say we do this anyway, essentially America will have to become an emerging market to compete. This means salaries will have to fall by a LOT, not rise, since the latter would be inflationary.
Buy a LOT (relative) of shares of companies whose product you personally use. Do you use AMZN regularly? What about AAPL, MCD? Dabble in CGC? How about PLBY? If none of the above then by the real winners of 2026, BE, WMT, BWXT and VXUS. You’re welcome.
There's actually A LOT of crying in casinos
Also look into NexGen energy, it’s gonna be one of the largest and highest quality deposits on earth. They are looking for approval this month, and given the indications from prime minister Carney and his nuclear agreements with China and India, he’s going to 100% fast track the mine into operation. There’s a LOT of potential upside on this play. Check ticker, NXE.
Sell at the next HOOD spike BEFORE earnings. Could go up on 02/10, sure, but it’s like a 25% chance imo. 75k is A LOT of money mate
Also investing a LOT in recreating, well, YouTube. Video podcasts with comments sections costs a lot to build, maintain, support.
> People thought google would die last summer and instead it gained 78% for the year I think the higher a stocks valuation, the harder it is for it to pop 50 percent. Stocks like Google and Nvidia are in the 3/4 trillion club and for them to pop 50 percent, they'd have to jump 1.5 to 2 trillion in valuation. That's asking A LOT. I know that Google has damn near doubled since April 2025 or whatever, but that was mostly because Google was tremendously undervalued at that time due to ChatGPT fears and it had to go up tremendously just to get to where it should have been all along.
want to start a religion? We would probably get pretty good tax breaks and a LOT of money.
It's that too. I've seen a LOT of posts by people who are AI skeptics who refuse to believe that AI is a serious threat to SAAS (best example is Adobe with Photoshop). The fact that AI can now generate very good images AND now you can have it edit specific parts of the image itself instead of creating a totally new image is game changing. I am interested in FIG though, design is more granular than just needing roughly good images. Maybe FIG is ok but even that I don't know.
The guy has 3 years left of his presidency. A LOT can happen between now and January 2029
Venmo and their web pay pro options. A LOT of tools use PayPal behind the scenes for payment processing online.
You have things like tesla and nvidia that continued to reach new highs. There were a many of "tops" you could have bought of both and made A LOT of money
No, but I suspect a LOT of billionaires got there because of luck or family than being actually brilliant people that pull themselves up by the bootstraps.
Measure it against the currency decline. Suddenly gets a LOT less impressive. Turns out it's easy to make money when you print it.
JP looking to get a LOT of people wrecked. They are running out of lawsuits to lose, I guess.
anyone can nominate themselves, but the "awardees" that get into the article have a LOT of support and momentum, and get chosen for that reason. not just for being submitted.
My two cents: 1) techinical analysis less than 1 minute are probably irrelevant to you. You will need better hardware for that. At this time range you are competing with bots and you will lose. 2) technical analysis covering durations between 1minute - 1hr is probably still relevant and alive. You will be competing with bots and day-traders. 3) Any longer data is probably larger in quantity and there is a LOT of noise and uncertainty, you fall into the educated gambling part. Don't be fooled that technical analysis is ineffective because market is efficient. It is not efficient enough and smarter people will find good analysis to exploit inefficiencies.
Shares outstanding are in the billions... so just a little move would take a LOT. Even worse though? You want to buy even 1 share, that's a $50 foreign settlement fee. I totally get wanting to pump this because of the price but maybe pick something else with some actual value and no $50 fee just to buy in.
Played earnings last time and won big, but it's run up a LOT since. I could see perhaps $350 before a drawback to $310.
This stock will make a TON of money! Any broker collecting the $50 settlement fee from you FOMOers is gonna make out like a bandit today! If you buy into this for a small amount, watch your profits dissolve into the settlement fee. If you spend a LOT of money, LOL, good luck!
It was a LOT redder in the wee hours.
The etf won’t trade until tomorrow morning and based on silver futures it’s going to gap down like A LOT 😭
I’m here to bump this thread, since now in February 2026 it’s seemingly a LOT more relevant. There’s the news out about Oracle and other situations revolving around data center construction and funding falling out from the bottom on several fronts.
Buddy boy, microsoft paused A LOT of DC construction projects in theEU/APAC officially to focus back on the us , bit they didn't increase output in the us (they paused Wisconsin, ohio) Good luck
if everything *really* goes south, there’s a helluva LOT more lead in the world than gold
Tons of stocks dropped massively in 2020. If you bought, say, Carnival Cruise stock at $15 in July of 2020 then sold it around June 2021 or August 2025 you would have doubled your money on it as it got up to around $30 per share. Sure, that's only $15 per share, but buy a thousand shares and you've made 15 grand off that one alone in a short amount of time, especially if sold in 2021. Carnival isn't the best example I guess since that one was pretty risky during the time, but the fact remains that if you can afford to buy when everyone else is selling and can pick the right ones (or spread it enough so it doesn't matter as much) then you come out ahead. Same thing happened during the Great Depression. People were selling what they could for what they could get, so a property that WAS worth a good bit could now be bought for, say, a fifth of the price or even less. Hold onto it, pay crap for taxes and use accounting magic to show that poor widdle old you is losing money on it, then sell it when some big company/investor wants it later for a LOT more than you paid. Using property there because stocks were riskier but the same principle applies.
I heard A LOT of laughing. I didn’t know it was going to be a comedy film
in other news, buy novo nodisk. A LOT of people are about to start going on the pill form of GLP-1s
I mean if you aren't day trading it is still up this month and definitely up in the last 5 years by A LOT
We're either of them found on the island with trumpy? I bet a LOT of investments are going to go wild with public perception of the owners getting absolutely decimated if they are found to have been in association with the released files or the yet to be released videos and photos Stormy eaters can be profitable but until the full files are released it's all up for speculation as to which companies will be affected by the said public perception.
I’m watching it. Purely anecdotally I see a LOT of older people using it lately, like 45 yr old parents of teens who send a lot of photos and have group chats on it. I think that might be the underappreciated variable, that it’s not just teenagers but a lot of their parents as well.
Exactly this. The market for gold is far too large for a pump and dump scheme. This was the impact of a rise in gold that was rapidly accelerated by the entrance of a LOT of speculative investment. Speculators are the most easily spooked and plenty of them cashed out today.
I WISH I had the balls or the money to put 10k into gold puts while it was doubling every few weeks. This wasn't just about the play, it was also about a LOT of luck with the timing.
tesla got that retard strength...as in a LOT of retards buy it
I closed most of my positions. I think SPY chops around from here in this range. Didn’t make it out with 100% wins today since I was holding 690 SPY puts from 330pm yesterday purchased as it continued its 12 dollar recovery. But I closed them at the (current) bottom for a slight loss and made out on everything else. Left a LOT of money on the table , but I’m up on the day.
Contracts mean nothing if one of the companies goes out of business. Which is what will happen to openai if they can't come up with a LOT of revenue in the next few years.
Just imagine him naked saying this crap. It explains a LOT.
4. Is the most important one. In normal conditions 15% a year is great growth on account. Because options are capable of giving 100-10,000% gains under the right conditions, regards chase 10 baggers to their doom. 15-50% gains is a LOT by investment standards. Learn to take profit early and often and enter plays with a short time frame in mind. 1 and 7 are good too. It’s all about using rules and following them. Emotional trading will always fuck you up. Euphoria as well as despair. Some of my absolutely dumbest moves have been after a solid fire winning streak. Also, cut your losses. I don’t set stop-losses, I usually place orders to sell to close with my target price, so if a trade isn’t going the way I thought it would, I’ll close it out and take a small loss. If it’s a strong conviction play with enough time to expire to wait, I will, but sometimes it’s best to just walk.
A LOT of people I know got 17s this year. The product was actually worth an upgrade and the deals carriers put out were amazing. I can see that kind of demand
what do you think about tungsten or uranium? conflicts about to kick up and i have a gut feeling that the DiB is about to spend a LOT of money mining those two ores.
No, but they had a LOT of rules what they were allowed to invest in