NYT

Fitzaroo

Bessent was quote by the NYT as stating "I never got covid but I sure have yellow fever".

UrethraPlethora

amieson Greer, the United States trade representative, will meet with a Chinese official in Switzerland this week, the first formal trade meeting between the United States and China since President Trump started a trade war with the world’s second-largest economy. NYT

Icommandyou

NYT is slow, indian defense ministry already sent memo they attacked 9 locations

FlatAd768

Gift? NYT is trash And why I need to read an article when the headline is all I need India attacks Pakistan

BertieWilberforce

Fun fact: While people were scrambling after the attack for pay phones to call their loved ones, Lutnick went to the front of a line of some 20 people at a pay phone, took the receive from the person talking and made his call. That’s what kind a person this is. All of this self-reported BTW, in an interview with the the NYT 9/12/01.

Hellmale

The NYT video investigation is mind blowing and uncovered the crime. I will get the subscription back to it

AntoniaFauci

Interesting to see CNBC is changing their reporting to say $1.5 billion instead of the $2.5 billion they were reporting this morning. NYT, Yahoo and others are going with $1.5 billion because of $1 billion in assumed mitigations.

silverfutes

NYT: “How to Say 'I Told You So' in a More Effective Way”. They’re now giving lessons in proper smugness. 😂

rewardz800

Oh ya I read that NYT article as well!

RedFoxinSF

Warren Buffett has announced his planned successor — https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/03/business/berkshire-earnings-warren-buffett.html NYT headline from May 3, 2025: “Warren Buffett Says He Plans to Step Down as Head of Berkshire — Mr. Buffett said at the annual shareholders’ meeting that he wanted to turn over the reins to Greg Abel at the end of the year. Earlier, he criticized Trump’s trade policies.”

jibboo2

The NYT reported April 30 that European summer bookings to the US are down 2% while Asia is up 4%.  So the data for your theory is not there yet.

AwarenessNo5708

I saved this from a NYT article a little while back. Don’t fool yourself into thinking you can bail out of stocks now, then jump back in when the market stabilizes. Gains historically have come in unpredictable spurts, and the biggest advances often come within days of the worst declines. If you missed the 10 best days over the 20 years from 2005 to 2024, you would have reduced your returns by more than 40 percent, according to [J.P. Morgan](https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/retirement-insights/guide-to-retirement/); if you missed 30 of the best days out of the roughly 5,000 trading days during that period, you’d have lost money, after inflation.

Fantastic_Joke4645

Where is the sharp decline? That article presents mixed data and NYT article shows that “sharp decline” as a whopping 1.5% Saw a headline on unemployment this week that stated a surge of unemployment filings, the rate was up 5%. That’s a normal fluctuation. Base your trades on FACTs, not click bait bullshit headlines.

volckerwasright

“An analysis by the New York Times (NYT) found that international arrivals at U.S. airports are down only 1.5% so far this year, and airlines say bookings to Europe from the U.S. are up.” Even the ber porn is like “err, well, calls actually” 😭

son-of-a-mother

> Not paying for people's work destroyed journalism. Nope. NYT, Washington Post, and CNN insisting on 'both sides' reporting (instead of objective reporting) and 'sane washing' an insane clown is what destroyed journalism.

LordRabican

The timing of the impacts are well known = late May through early June, depending on the product. Businesses surged their inventories ahead of the trade war. Inventories are currently at the highest level in 2 years, which will buy some time, but at this point it only provides enough runway for a miraculous crash landing. This has provided buffer for consumers but the game of chicken can’t end fast enough, Port bookings have fallen off a cliff - number of containers at Port of LA will be down 35% next week YoY. Pacific shipping is plummeting, direct-to-consumer delivery by air is getting turned off, orders to manufacturers are grinding to a halt… Per a good NYT article, “Mr. Petersen said that companies that operated container ships had already canceled a quarter of all sailings to the United States from China, and they are rerouting their ships to travel to Southeast Asia and Europe instead. Even if the Trump administration removes its China tariffs and U.S. consumer demand for Chinese products resumes, ships won’t be in the right location immediately to carry the same volume of goods, he said.” And, “many companies say that tariffs above 50 percent on Chinese imports are enough to stop trade entirely. With tariffs now at a minimum of 145 percent, and in some cases much higher, that would mean that the Trump administration may have to drop its China tariffs by at least 100 percentage points to meaningfully restart the flow of goods.”

larryburns2000

Breaking news: US job growth remained strong in April. From the NYT (u know they hated reporting that)

Realanise1

If you're following r/H5N1_AvianFlu , then you know how close we really are to a human H5N1 pandemic. The US government response to avian flu right now literally almost couldn't be worse. Teams of scientists who are crucial to detecting avian flu spread fired, no public news briefing on bird flu since January, eliminating funding for programs at the Food and Agriculture Organization that detect bird flu in 49 countries, scientists who were investigating the epidemic of raw pet food fatally infecting cats fired... it goes on and on.There's a new NYT article that does an excellent job of summing up the current situation at [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/health/bird-flu-farms-usda.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/health/bird-flu-farms-usda.html). Since we're in r/stocks, all I'll say is that the economic consequences of a human avian flu pandemic would be devastating.

Throwawayamanager

I wish I could agree with you, but his base has been willing to excuse anything and everything for him. Sexual assault? No biggie. Horrific mishandling of covid to the tune of the most deaths of any developed nation, while *still* crashing the economy? Vote him back into office. Egg prices are still high despite it being Biden's fault? Yeah, who cares. I don't know how we got to this or what the solution is, but it seems fairly indisputable that some people are truly brain-dead zombies who worship him more than Jesus himself (obviously), will excuse anything, and support anything, even when it inevitably causes them pain. Fuck, NYT just did a series of interviews on whether his supporters regret voting for him and the overwhelming answer is "no". I don't know how it got to this but he's not exactly misreading his support.

lovescienceglobal

This information is not true! This is what is going on with the Trade wars. “UPS will cut 20,000 jobs this year, about 4% of its global workforce, the company said Tuesday. But UPS added that the decision is unrelated to tariffs and is instead due to increased use of technology and a previously announced plan to trim its Amazon business.” Let’s roll on to Paragraph 10 of the NYT story and get to the heart of the matter: “In a research report on Tuesday, Nomura Securities said that if Chinese exports to the United States were to drop 50%, 5.7 million people in China could lose their jobs immediately. That number could grow to 15.8 million workers once the long-term effects rippled through the economy.” The NYT is not concerned about 20,000 UPS workers. The thought of the nearly 16 million workers and slaves the communists may have to lay off has the NYT sweating. “This is a re-ordering of global trade that has not happened since the end of World War II and is long overdue. When the net result of the global trading system is that all the manufacturing goes to Asia and other places, that’s the system you have to replace.” We needed to do this decades ago. Red China is run by pretty clever men who figured out a way to make the USA dependent on them. But, in trying to chain the U.S. economy to them, the communists also chained themselves to the U.S. economy. You don’t need an abacus to determine which number is bigger, 20,000 or 16,000,000. CBS reported, “At the Port of Los Angeles, which, along with the Port of Long Beach, receives roughly 40% of all imports from Asia, shipments last week were down 10% compared with the same period one year earlier. That number is expected to keep falling.” If the 10% drop is Red China’s loss, then using Nomura Securities’ math, that is more than a million jobs lost in Red China. * **Core GDP grew at a robust 3.0%.** This signals strong underlying economic momentum that occurred after President Trump’s inauguration. * **Gross domestic investment soared by 22%.** This is the highest in four years and comes as businesses and consumers, bolstered by rising take-home pay, fuel an economic boom. * **Monthly indicators, which capture growth trends at a much higher frequency, all point to accelerating growth AFTER President Trump took office.** Private employment gains, consumer spending, capital investment, and aggregate hours worked have all accelerated since January, while inflation has decelerated. * **An unprecedented surge in imports due to tariff frontrunning contributed to most of the decline.** * **The forward-looking indicators highlight the momentum that has occurred in anticipation of President Trump’s economic agenda.** Exports still rose at a healthy 1.8% rate, implying no major disruption to the flow of U.S. goods and services to our trading partners abroad. The propaganda press says no one wins a trade war. Bull.

Special_K_2012

Is apple down cuz that NYT article? More reason to make a Chyna deal

DocPhilMcGraw

No it actually isn’t. The deal doesn’t include security guarantees and as the NYT notes: “Despite the fanfare, the deal will have little significance if fighting between Ukraine and Russia persists.”

DurrutiRunner

NYT lol. It's not popular, economic, or logical to deport people. We end up with politicians who always oppose left wing policy because we live in an orwellian capitalist dystopia. Humanity moves leftward. Always has, always will. It's basic economics.

Any_Veterinarian_407

Also, I see NYT is now reporting on this too: [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/business/trump-science-funding-cuts-economy.html?unlocked\_article\_code=1.Dk8.0GqK.eLW9NGiR7fpT&smid=bs-share](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/business/trump-science-funding-cuts-economy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Dk8.0GqK.eLW9NGiR7fpT&smid=bs-share) Appropriations is happening in congress this week

f8worksbothways

NYT: Trump says he *could* free wrongly deported man, but won’t lmaooooo

raupster

Now Amazon is saying this was just an idea and was never approved/going to happen… so let’s cool it with the positive PR spin for Amazon. They haven’t yet had the change of heart they are being credited with… [NYT GIFT ARTICLE LINK](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/29/us/politics/trump-amazon-tariffs-prices.html?unlocked_article_code=1.DU8.X9m4.0z_VCk1LmHI6&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare)

TouristProof1411

I can’t express how much I believe in TMC I heard about this first back in 2022 on a NYT podcast on deep sea mining (now referred to as deep sea harvesting (DSH)) and I fell in love with it. The idea that you could collect critical metals that will be used for the green transition in a clean and humane way was everything I needed to hear to invest. I didn’t have too much to invest but it did make up 100% of my investing account. Over time I’ve rode the ups and downs and bought more shares and warrants. Currently sitting on \~3250 shares and 15k warrants plus some options. I convinced my parents and cousins to buy in heavy last week and they’re already seeing large gains. But this is going to go parabolic and I feel blessed to be along for the ride. https://preview.redd.it/7vjrbcttprxe1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=98a5da1da0c064475b66aedd38a349b17e0ae897

AcidicQueef

Not only referencing NYT but also a hard paywall. I hope you lose everything

Thats_So_Ravenous

NYT “going by s_nes, he operated the world’s first sexploitation travel brokerage at a substantial loss, seemingly insisting that exploiting the Thai people WAS the point.”

Visible-Plankton-806

Will announce deal with India, ignoring today and yesterday’s escalating of tensions with Pakistan that the Western News (BBC, WSJ, NYT, WaPo) has inexplicably ignored. https://www.newsweek.com/pakistan-fears-imminent-indian-attack-warns-nuclear-response-2065132

Wise_Concentrate_182

Exactly what would happen tp any functional company at the top of its game. If you invest based on bbc or NYT or msnbc headlines, you’re the numpty.

Annual-Access4987

The way Kristi Noem or DJT Jr. had NYT best sellers.

FamiliarJudgment2961

It took 2/3rds rambling on about the NYT/Obama/Biden, but we got to the softest criticism of Putin possible in "maybe" he's a bad guy.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Can't wait to hear him tell us NYT staff are a bunch of "loosers"

psychonautilus777

"The Senate has voted to convict in the impeachment..." --NYT

dtyler86

No.. that’s how many days the news has stirred up fears and speculated a heightened idea of the world being divided. But hey NYT, that’s what they do best! Sell misery for ad revenues. The tariffs themselves and the effects from them have not even set in. Computer algorithms detecting downward, candles triggering cell offs for hedge funds is what is triggering normal people to sell their stocks instead of holding them like they should and buying the dip

95Daphne

Nah, if the WSJ (or NYT, I'm not sure which one) has an idea here, it was both Bessent and Lutnick cornering Trump. Supposedly Lutnick in real life=\=Lutnick in media, where he speaks a ton of gibberish. Dude's mic 100% should be taken away.

Specialist_Fig9458

NYT isn’t even mentioning India Pakistan 

JohnPaulDavyJones

That’s because the large majority of the brunt keeps being pushed off. On 4/9, there was a 90-day pause was announced on all new tariffs above the 10% base, pending negotiations, on all non-Chinese imports. The de minimis exemption will also be removed, but that doesn’t hit until next week (all small imports will have a baseline tariff with a $75 minimum), which is a *huge* blow to Chinese exports to America. Similarly, [a large swathe of the tariffs on Mexico and Canada was walked back in March](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna195110), but the reduced version of those tariffs did hit on 3/4. We’re still seeing those costs trickle down the supply lines, as many vendors at every level of the supply chain have been front-loading their inputs for months. My firm (insurance, so we’re mainly focused on auto repairs) is forecasting that the big hits to auto cost are going to hit right around the same time as the annual uptick in auto repairs that we see every summer. Folks want to get the car fixed up before trips, and there are always a *ton* of A/C units that go out in the summer because folks don’t check their fluids and give their systems time to spin up on hot days. Massive increase in wear patterns. The NYT has a terrific article on the timeline of the tariff chaos to date. We’ve already started to see a lot of losses in the small business sector because they had the least means to front-load inputs to hedge against market unpredictability, but the tariff effects are just barely creeping into our middle market customers so far. Cost trends are going to be wild this summer, especially as cat season hits for us. Our chief actuary said in our EOQ1 call that they’re increasing our reserving volume to 150% of standard cat season reserves. And we exited Florida, Louisiana, and California years ago.

Illustrious-Smoke509

Okay, here's a faster rendition: "At realDonaldTrump: Deal with Russia/Ukraine? Best ever, but NYT badmouth it. Liddle' Peter Baker, biased, says Ukraine get back Crimea, crazy requests, stop killing, worse than WWII. Why not say Obama let Russia steal Crimea? Baker wrote fawning Obama bio, joke! Never criticized Obama Crimea? No, just Trump. Nothing to do with war, gave Ukraine Javelins, Obama gave sheets. Biden's war, loser from day one. Wouldn't happen if I was President. Cleaning up Obama/Biden's mess. Putin shooting civilians, no reason. He tapping me along, needs banking/sanctions, too many dying!" It's still long.

FairyOrchid125

I’m waiting to see how the NYT and WaPo cover this.

hypsignathus

oh great NYT front page is gonna make trump full port tariffs 

d33p7r0ubl3

I looked it up. NYT followed up and reported it as true. Poor Brin lost shares in the divorce and now his ex is a billionaire lmao

PatchyWhiskers

I cancelled my NYT subscription in disgust.

reddorickt

I mean it's just the title of a NYT article

Beatnik77

Have you ever seen a NYT headline positive toward anything related to Trump or his supporters? They are mostly activists nowadays, zero influence.

hypsignathus

Top three NYT headlines: # China Has an Army of Robots on Its Side in the Tariff War # Trump’s Trade War With China Puts Japan in a Tight Spot # Elon Musk Warns Rare Earth Magnet Shortage May Delay Tesla’s Robots and we pumped. Honestly forget the Wendy's. Take this market out behind the barn.

deltaalternate

Brother on Sunday I was on my last guess and it was 50/50 patch or watch. If I lost my streak after learn/catch/hatch/match/batch, I would've gone to the NYT office and made Charlie Hebdo look like a fucking picnic

ZgBlues

NYT had a podcast episode recently, they talked to some union members at big car companies in Detroit. One woman said that she voted for Trump because he wants to "bring back" jobs, but added that even if he doesn't she won't blame him, because "at least he's trying." And another guy said that he doesn't mind tariffs, that he is a "survivalist" and that basically he is willing to take the pain if it brings something positive in the long term. He even said that tariffs are good because it increases government revenue, and that's good for the country. (He forgot the part that the increased revenue is going to come out of his pocket.) So there you go, Trump's voter base is reality-proof, he can shit the bed all day every day and it still wouldn't matter because "at least he's trying." And even if they get laid off, that doesn't matter because it's for the "greater good."

Pomosen

What the f*ck are you on about? There's literally an NYT article with inarguable evidence that the white house antisemitism task force literally and in every conceivable way authorized the letter to be sent and then turned around and said it was a mistake: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/18/business/trump-harvard-letter-mistake.html?partner=slack&smid=sl-share. FYI Josh Gruenbaum is ON the white house antisemitism task force... Maybe you need to go to primary school again to learn to read

Pomosen

What the f*ck are you on about? There's literally an NYT article with direct and inarguable evidence that the white house literally and in any conceivable way authorized the letter to be sent and then turned around and said it was a mistake: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/18/business/trump-harvard-letter-mistake.html?partner=slack&smid=sl-share

AntisocialTomcat

\> Wall Street Bulls want to think DOGE is the problem From the NYT piece, "Some investors and analysts have recently called on Mr. Musk to spend more time managing Tesla and limit or end his work for the Trump administration.". While the absence of quotes makes this assertion quite weak, if true, WS Bulls also want him to spend \*more\* time at Tesla. Like he didn't do enough damage already, and like he didn't piss off half the planet (and potential future customers) with his right hand and confused mindset.

Dr_Dick_Dastardly

Here's some recent NYT pieces on [Navarro](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/20/business/economy/peter-navarro-trump-tariffs.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Bk8.BcIx.zZzW1g7rx1At&smid=url-share) and [Miller](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/16/us/politics/stephen-miller-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Bk8.klFH.9ET9V3_dteWf&smid=url-share). I did gift articles so they should be free. Navarro and Millar are not pundits or really from that group. They're closer to policy wonks. Navarro was a professor of public policy and economics at UC Irvine for like 20 years. His big focus was on protectionist trade policies and going after China. Stephen Miller attempted to get into the far-right punditry in high school and at Duke, but he was an asshole and people didn't like him. Instead, he went to Congress and worked for a few representatives and was the communications director for Jeff Sessions. While both of them are true believers in Trump, they also recognize that Trump is the means to means to achieve ideas they've long promoted but that most of the public considered to be crackpot. Navarro is the leading voice behind the insane tariff policy, and Miller is the voice behind all of the insane immigration ideas (like locking people up in Guantanamo Bay and El Salvador). Trump also likes and promotes them because they didn't abandon him after he lost in 2020.

bonelish-us

>Trump was favored to win by almost all polling outlets. Revisionist history. All the mainstream media was overwhelmingly predicting a Kamala victory, and that's why people like James Carville and Allan Lichtman lost their minds after election day. [NYT: Despite a pretty accurate year, the pre-election polls once again underestimated support for Donald Trump.](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/30/us/elections/2024-polls-grades.html) [What the Mainstream Media Got Wrong about the 2024 Election](https://magazine.columbia.edu/article/what-mainstream-media-got-wrong-about-2024-election) I could go on.

AugusteToulmouche

>BREAKING: SPY UP ON NEWS THAT ICE “WILL NOT BE DEPORTING BIG BOOTY LATINAS” - NYT LETS GOOOOO 

AugusteToulmouche

>BREAKING: YE, FORMERLY KNOWN AS KANYE WEST, ELECTED AS THE NEW POPE - NYT Holy Shit 

Distended_Scrotum

The NYT accepted the word, and there wasn’t a G that day. Real puzzle and screenshot. For actual answer lookup the 4/15/25 answer.

ArcNeo

Do you guys that always say this stuff actually read these newspapers? I’m not worried about Trump despite reading mainstream media, I’m worried because I read it. The NYT ran a bunch of pieces during the election about the horrible things Trump would do and they’re all coming true. I learned about Project 2025 thanks to the Daily podcast like 2-3 years ago, before it was even close to becoming a household issue. The Atlantic, New Yorker, Economist, have all similarly been putting out really good reporting and analysis that doesn’t sane wash things at all and have been full of explicit warnings about Trump and his cronies. Every week they’re bringing on experts from every field Trump is destroying to tell us how bad it is. The Atlantic started endorsing candidates in 2016 specifically because they were worried about Trump— they’ve only done so a couple of times since the Civil War. You can actually read their endorsement of Abraham Lincoln, and to me the tone is surprisingly similar to most mainstream reporting/opinions about Trump. I’m legitimately curious because this whole narrative is so disconnected from my experience that it feels like the start of a MAGA-esque paranoid disinformation wave in the left wing circles I’m supposed to fit into. What do you people actually want from the media that they’re not giving us? You’re acting like the average reader of the NYT is buying MAGA propaganda, when the people who drank the koolaid haven’t been part of the readership for these papers for a decade.

Shoddy_Consequence78

Was in the NYT a couple days ago.

tsunake

Democrats have been the actual *conserv*ative party since Nixon, as far as I can tell. Aggressive Republican radicalism is pretty obviously bad for the books, if you start from a more objective viewpoint than cultural mythos. There's probably a decent debate about the value of Nixon's reforms (petrobuck has been a strength but we'd have collectively made more money if the ME developed into liberalized advanced economies and not the backwards totalitarian shit the CIA wrought), but America's *definitely* been declining since Reagan in spite of Democratic stability because their fundamentally conservative worldview never adapted to the malicious radicalism of the Republicans and is incapable of responding to the gaslighting of extremist right-wing media like the NYT.

OrdinaryMix4013

Putin ordered the hit on the Pope and had his assistant DJT and JD carry out the operation - NYT

Texas_Sam2002

Well, the other legacy corporate media have a habit of prevaricating, "both-sides-ing", and sanewashing Trump's craziness. So, outlets like the NYT and WaPo aren't far removed from FOX and Newsmax.

lostinspacs

JD Vance called the Pope’s passing the day after Easter Sunday bittersweet. “He’s with God now, but he never got a chance to say thank you” — NYT

LikesBlueberriesALot

Straight out of the NYT Best Seller “Rich Dad, Fuck you”.

loudtones

I already explained why there is a shortage, along with an in depth NYT article which explains it further. It seems like you're more interested in arguing in circles with yourself 

Same-Brilliant2014

Yea NYT

exitpursuedbybear

Apparently Bessent according to NYT convinced him that they had just narrowly missing causing a second Great Depression.

xpxf69

The name of that wife? Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. >NEW: U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared details about strikes in Yemen in a 2nd Signal group chat that included his wife - NYT

95Daphne

Err, he won the first power play involving tariffs, and from all that I've seen, and what the NYT apparently recently dropped, he's trying to deescalate. Heck, LUTNICK is trying to deescalate privately himself even though publicly, he really needs to be benched from media appearances because he speaks just as much gibberish as Trump does.

30PercentIRR

Between the NYT article and the lack of tweets it almost seems like the president has been scared into sense... If he keeps his mouth shut another day then we might open hard green...

OrdinaryMix4013

#sources say Jpow is aware his days as chair are counted- NYT

starcityguy

NYT is reporting that Trump won’t move against Powell because he’s afraid of what might happen in the markets.

weasler7

In the NYT Daily podcast they interviewed some autoworker about tariffs and the person said they would endure being reduced to eating rats for Trump. This is the kind of fanaticism you are dealing with.

BlackExcellence216

My news feed makes no sense… NYT: “trade wars put 🥭 bromance with Xi beyond reach” ABC: “🥭 says US and China are discussing deal”

pigglesthepup

I don't know. NYT is now reporting that Trump's advisors have talked him down about firing Powell. This is gonna be an interesting few years.

Law-of-Poe

Just listened to the NYT daily this morning where a Trump supporter who is an autoworker and *was just laid off due to the tariffs* said she still supported him and hoped that this was all a part of the plan. Another auto worker interviewed, when asked about the prospects of a Trump tariff fueled recession said he was ready to weather the storm and that he would, I quote, “eat rats and cockroaches” if he had to survive but that it’d be worth it in the end. Republcian voters are out of their fucking minds.

habfranco

First story on NYT as well, shit about to hit the fan (or not)

alanwazoo

NYT gift article **If You Care About Your Savings, Pay Attention to Trump’s Attack on The Fed** [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/18/opinion/federal-reserve-powell-trump.html?unlocked\_article\_code=1.Ak8.PUnY.uTg6Rb105SMB&smid=url-share](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/18/opinion/federal-reserve-powell-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Ak8.PUnY.uTg6Rb105SMB&smid=url-share)

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Read a NYT article today in which they sat down with about a dozen Mongo voters for in depth interviews about their perception of the last few months. About half were disillusioned for various reasons, with the other half still staunchly on board with everything. Unequivocally, they all stated if they could go back in time they would not vote for Harris. I don't think much will have changed.

error9348

>In China, one of many nicknames for 🥭 is Chuan Jianguo. It literally translates as “🥭 the Nation Builder.” My best translation is “Comrade 🥭.” The joke is that Mr. 🥭 is a patriotic son of China who is diligently advancing Chinese interests by causing chaos in the United States. - NYT 

NoMorning5015

NYT: >Google Is a Monopolist in Online Advertising Tech, Judge Says >The ruling was the second time in a year that a federal court had found that Google had acted illegally to maintain its dominance.

CoolWerewolf

President Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, and Pete Hegseth stepped in to HALT an Israeli airstrike on Iranian nuclear sites in favor of negotions, per NYT

Robj2

Screw the WSJ. They helped elect this orange madman. So they can take a f\*\*\* at a rolling donut, which they started rolling. This would have been helpful in August or September, not now after their Orange Chimp has screwed the US and the free world. CNN can go to hell with them, and the NYT and WaPo. All of them. I kept asking myself before the election, "Where are the articles on tariffs? Where are the experts on what a tariff war will do." Instead it was Old Joe is clearly senile. The articles on Rump's sentility started coming out in dribs 10 days before the election. Yes, Trump is a senile malignant narcissist. No, WaPo, the NYT, and WSJ and CNN didn't "cover this." Screw them and the ship they rode in on.

gyozafish

I have some bad news for you about MSNBC, NBC, CNN, NPR, PBS, NYT, BBC, ABC, CBS, etc…

chillermane

Literally all main stream media is purely propaganda. NYT, CNN, MSNBC, doesn’t matter. I’m right wing and I admit whole heartedly fox news is propaganda, but every other main stream network is just as bad. So it’s foolish to point out one or the other as being overly biased when they’re all like that and you just shouldn’t view them as credible sources of information.

shiroandae

Umm ok great way to admit that you were wrong. But hey i spent two more seconds on google: „Ocasio-Cortez: Socialism is ‚part of what I am, not all of what I am‘“ https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/ocasio-cortez-socialism-is-part-of-what-i-am-not-all-of-what-i-am-1267955267646 She is also called a socialist by positive news coverage https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/23/aoc-mainstream-democrat-dnc-00175955 And about Bernie: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/us/politics/bernie-sanders-socialism.html There’s so many others, if you google it it’s every single item you find. And now go ahead and tell me NBC and NYT are not journalism….

Volvemi

[China suspends exports of certain rare earth minerals and magnets, NYT reports](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-suspends-exports-certain-rare-143601081.html) [Why Rare-Earth Stocks Are Soaring Today](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-rare-earth-stocks-soaring-144931014.html)

Law-of-Poe

NYT is the only news I pay for. I was really confused to see the 245% tariff all over Reddit but nothing about it today on the NYT

Boomshtick414

This is taking long-standing existing duties and applying the new tariffs on top of them. It is not 245% for everything. It is *up to* 145% (new tariffs) + 100% (existing rates) for *some* product categories. Note that the only category NYT identified as 245% were syringes and needles (there may be more, but the salient detail is that it's not 245% across all categories (well, not yet at least...)). [https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html](https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html) Nothing has changed in the last couple days. These are the same tariffs that were getting charged last week.

Boomshtick414

REGARDING 245%. This is taking long-standing existing duties and applying the new tariffs on top of them. It is not 245% for everything. It is *up to* 145% (new tariffs) + 100% (existing rates) for *some* product categories. Note that the only category NYT identified as 245% were syringes and needles (there may be more, but the salient detail is that it's not 245% across all categories (well, not yet at least...)). [https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html](https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html)

dragonilly

I mean tango didn't specify which products are subject to 245%tariffs in his EO. The list with syringes is a NYT best guess at the most impacted imports. It could be worse.

fullintentionalahole

I believe this is misinformed? Afaik, there was no escalation, just an NYT article explaining how *when previous tariffs were included*, certain goods went up to 245%. Trump's contribution to the tariffs is still only at 145%.

AskAlarming8637

Anyone else not reading this as tariffs jumping to 245%? It sounds like they are just saying they CAN go that high for certain commodities based on the executive orders he recently signed. The NYT posted an article the other day noting syringes and needles from China would have a 245% tariff rate with all applicable tariffs baked in - but that doesn’t mean all commodities would be like this. Perhaps that is what this White House sheet is referencing?

alaxens

Businesses could do that, but that is illegal. The Daily podcast by the NYT had a great episode with a small business that was selling a product made in China. The company owner even said they thought of doing that, except for the whole prison thing. 245% today, what will tomorrow bring? 🤷‍♂️

Boomshtick414

REGARDING 245%. This is taking long-standing existing duties and applying the new tariffs on top of them. It is not 245% for everything. It is *up to* 145% (new tariffs) + 100% (existing rates) for *some* product categories. Note that the only category NYT identified as 245% were syringes and needles (there may be more, but the salient detail is that it's not 245% across all categories (well, not yet at least...)). [https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html](https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/12/business/economy/china-tariff-product-costs.html)

noname_SU

Reuters, NYT, Washington Post all reporting it

Dangerous-Retard

NYT: The I.R.S. had about 100,000 employees before President Trump took office. Between resignations and layoffs, the I.R.S. is on track to lose about a third of its staff this year. Imagine filing income taxes in this regulatory environment.

grackychan

Depending on the margin of the product sold in the US, it might? Interesting NYT article about how a Chinese cooking appliance company [says the 125% tariff doesn't really matter](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/09/business/economy/guangzhou-china-exports-tariffs.html) because US retailers sell his product for 8-10x the cost. A commenter made a good example, a lot of goods that are sold here for $10 may cost $1 to make, so a 125% Tariff on the cost of the import raises the COGS to $2.25, not compressing the margin as much as you might think. So a 500% tariff actually hurts way, way more than a 125% one.

galeforce_whinge

There's a great NYT podcast episode out a comple days ago about a small Midwest business that was manufacturing baby products in China. A very successful start up that had been expanding and selling loads of products and had millions of dollars worth of stock waiting for export to the US. After the tariff they decided it wasn't feasible to import their product for sale, and they ran through the numbers and found it would be even more expensive than paying the tariffs to set up manufacturing in the US, if they could even find the expertise. So all said, a completely no-win situation. And she had no warning. She did expect 30 per cent tariffs - not 145 per cent! But she was given no time to pivot the business around the tariffs so she's paid to manufacture her latest back of stock that's now sitting in a warehouse, unsellable. The whole business was leveraged against the owner's house, so this is likely a house of cards. The owner said she's gonna pivot to trying to sell the goods globally. Now imagine this scenario playing out across a population of 350 million. This is what's going to collapse the economy. Little 1 per cent moves up and down on the stock market a week after the tariffs came into place isn't the main game here.

leshake

FT and the economist are the best things you can read for a broad overview. WSJ is not bad, but it does lean right and is US centric. NYT has good business reporting, but it doesn't really go into enough detail for me. If you want to understand how investing works generally I'd recommend you spend a lot of time on Investopedia.