NYT

SaaSGrass

“One trillion of crypto evaporated” NYT push notification is hilarious but wondering if it’s a buy signal for a good pump and dump

AirportMaterial5917

According to NYT, 1.6% is a “skid”

orangeyougladiator

Pretty sure there were posts here when the JPM and MS execs said there would be a correction and there are liquidity issues. Otherwise just pick any big news outlet like NYT and check the financial stuff a couple times a day; ignore all the other news. Things like the secret walstreet / fed meeting last Saturday was reported there; and the debt financing boom of the last 3 months. Scroll back thru those posts on an outlet and find one that retroactively reported all this and subscribe to them.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT Saudi Public Investment Fund low on cash to invest, with billions tied to bad investments with no return likeky. But I thought we was getting a trilly?!

SerialStrategist

"Trump’s Global Tariffs Curtailed Trade, Data Shows" -NYT Shocker.

quan42069quan

Okay quick crappy comment dd then I'll put the fries in the bag. TLDR; saudis may be cutting a deal with nvda to bailout the US economy Saudi Arabia (SA) is aggressively building cloud/ai infrastructure. from [this ](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html)article from a few weeks ago: >For generations, *Saudi* Arabia exported oil. Now it wants to export one of the digital era’s most coveted resources: computing *power*. >**Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is seizing a chance to turn** ***Saudi*** ***Arabia’s*** **oil wealth into tech influence. Few nations can match the kingdom’s cheap energy, deep pockets and open land — the ingredients that tech firms need to operate the vast,** ***power*****-hungry data centers that run modern A.I**. ... >The kingdom is building three major data center complexes aimed at foreign companies, which could be at least 30 percent cheaper for A.I. work than the United States, *Saudi* executives said. Construction permits are granted in weeks, and undersea cables and fiber-optic networks put roughly four billion people on three continents within reach of the hubs. >To overcome security concerns in the authoritarian state, *Saudi* Arabia is also considering “data embassy” zones, where foreign firms could operate under their own national laws rather than *Saudi* law. SA wants to export compute. Mango is desperate to save markets rn. He's giddy about Mohammed's visit for some reason. All the tech bosses including Jensen are circling. There's a presser tomorrow @ 12, NVDA earnings ah. Everyone and their dog knows NVDA needs game-changing news to keep markets afloat, a simple earnings beat might not do it. The NYT article above talks more about it and here's NVIDIA's blog about sovereign AI: [https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-sovereign-ai/](https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-sovereign-ai/) Part of this visit was the US elevating SA to 'major non-nato ally' status which enables a bunch of tech-sharing, military cooperation. This could mean there's a contract in the works for NVDA (and others?) to provide infrastructure to SA for a sovereign AI. Mohammed has talked about investing 1 trillion in the US and yet markets didn't move much because its unclear where that $ is going or if its a real offer. here's the fries, sorry they're cold

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Breaking per NYT: META did not violate anti-trust laws by acquiring rivals

Tim_Apple_938

? LLMs don’t cannibalize search. AIOverviews monetizing the same as traditional search, overall search revenue growing at double digits consistently since ChatGPT came out in 2022. Some NYT article theorized that in 2022 and everyone just parroted it without using their critical thinking skills.

Numerous_Ice_4556

>No, it's an advertising platform that's well aware that scared or angry people click on things much more than happy people do. Tomato, tom-ah-to. This whole thread is literally because a person chose to share an article from the most popular news outlet in the country, so you can spew all the euphemisms you like, your point, that somehow because an NYT article made its way to Reddit means it has no merit is no less stupid. >Hence the doomerism about AI we've been hearing for years that has yet to materialize, but this time its real, right? "AI" has been a buzzword for three years, and the doomerism about its risk to the broader economy is a very recent perspective. Since ChatGPT hit the scene the whole sentiment has been about how machines are getting closer to human reasoning than ever and will upend the whole world, so clearly, you haven't been paying attention and prefer to invent narratives to drown out the ones that make you feel uncomfortable. >This article and your technical analysis is solid proof of the future to come? I, and anyone else for that matter, need to be 100% prescient about the future to warn of broader problems and risks, and potential catastrophe? Since I can see in your response you love to equivocate, I'll stop you before you can begin and pretend like that isn't what you're saying, since it is. "So what if there are rain clouds and the forecast is 95% rain, I'm leaving my umbrella at home and wearing a wifebeater because meteorologists aren't right 100% of the time." That's what it's like reading your response. >Well dang then, we should tell people that some guy on Reddit knows the health of the economy better than the people who do this for a living. At the top of the article it says: "By Rebecca Patterson" "Ms. Patterson is an economist who has held senior positions at JPMorgan Chase and Bridgewater Associates." Tell me you haven't read or learned a single fucking thing about AI or the economy without telling me you haven't read or learned a single fucking thing about AI or the economy. We certainly shouldn't listen to anyone dumb enough to say "the guys with the high paying jobs say everything is A-okay, so I don't need to do my own thinking or learn anything", which is a foolish enough sentiment on its own, but is extra idiotic when you realize it's **completely wrong**. >Never said it wasn't a weakness, I'm stating it causing a crash is not as easy as you say it is. You seemingly agree with me on this in your later ramblings here, so 👍. Yes, you absolutely did you lying jerk. As you said "If this was such an achilles heel [**METAPHOR FOR WEAKNESS** we wouldn't need to be reading about it on reddit. Everyone and their grandmother is very aware of the investment being put into AI, if the writing was on the wall that it's a cause for concern people smarter than you and I would probably be selling." The whole point of the comment I responded to was to downplay the risk AI poses by pretending it's just as ordinary as every other market sector, which is not only breathtakingly incorrect, but also begs the question, what are you arguing, exactly? The whole point is AI poses a systemic risk to the broader economy. You don't even know what you're disagreeing with. >Lol. Not sure why you need to make this personal, but ok. It's not "personal" to tell you your take is bad. It's no different than telling you you're wrong. Not sure why you have to get so salty. Don't participate in a public forum if you can't handle being told you're wrong. Trust me, I've shown a lot of restraint when it comes to telling you what your take is really like. >They weren't forgotten. Just because the free market is free to be a free market it does not mean we still allow speculative investments the way we did. Despite my opinion on this stuff clearly and unintentionally hurting your feelings for some reason, this is an objective truth. It was forgotten, and repeating the word "free" until it loses all meaning not only doesn't make the fact that all sorts of speculative investments that pose a risk to the broader economy still exist, largely unregulated, but misses the actual point about what wasn't learned; that when a long, uninterrupted, period of prosperity ends in disaster, there are always people downplaying the canaries in the coal mine, which is what you're doing now. >The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. That's not me speaking, that is very wise old investment advice. It's a bromide you learned on Reddit. It gets parroted here more than anywhere else. It's beyond ironic for you to regurgitate it while saying Reddit can't inform you of something else of importance. The lack of self-awareness you're displaying is startling. >We can stop here, because if you're so confident in your stance here, short the market and get rich. Another reddit bromide. The irony just keeps piling up. It's equally ironic you're complaining about making this personal while telling me what arbitrary behavior I need to display to have conviction, in your mind, as it is that you're full of all of these platitudes but are overlooking the one that follows; about the whole "timing" aspect of shorting. >Otherwise you're just another guy claiming that you know how a recession / depression is coming, when in reality you're shooting in the dark without a crystal ball. Actually, that wasn't the point. But, once again, it's clear you have no interest in learning anything you don't already believe.

Gom_KBull

Isnt the only thing needed for NYT #1 bestseller to be a book?

FeverTreeCloud

TIL Cramer has a new book out and it's #1 bestseller on NYT. Who is buying these books? Can't be anyone here since most of us can't read anything other than TLDR

Pleasant_Interaction

This is because the administration is keeping the lid closed to the public on the issues with the China deal. Investors are waiting for concrete action before they stop trusting the government’s word. This initially happened last week when these started to rise on the NYT & Reuters reporting the new raised controls on tungsten, silver, and antimony (Sb controls are down again), and the continuation of the April controls on samarium, gadolinium, terbium, yttrium, scandium, lutetium, and dysprosium. Prices corrected again after Trump sent a tweet calling the NYT fake news, but now Bessent seems to be confirming that the deal wasn’t finalized, contrary to what the administration claimed on November 1st. Keep your eyes peeled for Thanksgiving https://fortune.com/2025/11/16/china-us-soybean-purchases-trump-xi-jinping-trade-deal/ https://www.politico.com/newsletters/weekly-trade/2025/11/17/rare-earths-still-bedevil-us-china-talks-00653969

Numerous_Ice_4556

>If this was such an achilles heel we wouldn't need to be reading about it on reddit. This is one of the most ridiculous comments I've ever read. Reddit's just a content aggregator, the source is the NYT, which is exactly the type of place you would read about something like this, as if that actually matters in regards to the merit of the underlying argument. > Everyone and their grandmother is very aware of the investment being put into AI, if the writing was on the wall that it's a cause for concern people smarter than you and I would probably be selling. I take back my earlier remark; *this* is the most ridiculous remark I've ever seen. The same "smart" people that have missed every other catastrophe in human history don't sense an impending one, so it must not be real. If we hadn't elected an imbecilic conman, twice, I'd be wondering how anyone could be so basic and delusional in their thinking. It's a cause for concern for the very obvious reasons pointed out in the article; it's basically driving the entire economy, pushing up index valuations, increasing the net worth of households invested, supporting the K-shaped consumer spending driving economic growth, along with the actual AI investment itself. If that pulls back, which is a strong possibility due to the lofty expectations attached, the house of cards, the jenga tower, the dominos, whatever game metaphor you want to use, comes tumbling down. >Also true for housing, Oil & Gas, automotives, alcohol, and many, many other international industries. There's 100 million things that could cause disaster in the markets tomorrow, AI is only one of them. So, there are other systemic weaknesses in the economy, and to you that means AI isn't one? I swear, each take you offer gets worse than the last. Yeah, housing is a problem, but it isn't driving economic growth and supporting the economy to the extent AI is, as I explained above. Yes, there are plenty of things that could cause disaster in the economy, but AI growth is a far more profound and likely cause than any other. >Many regulations were put in place because of 2008. Could it happen again? Of course, anything can happen. But nobody forgot about it Plenty of people forgot about it, because toothless regulation from decades ago have nothing to do with the same irrational exuberance occurring yet again. Anything *could* happen, but only an ignoramus thinks we're either in the midst of disaster or everything is A-okay. Risk of disaster can fluctuate highly, and disaster occurs when that risk is overlooked and misunderstood, which is what's happening now because of people like you who don't understand what's going on. >and it's peak Reddit to cite 2008 and an impending apocalypse day after day, when an extremely resilient economy has faced considerable challenges since with nothing but growth. It's peak Reddit to brush off the lessons of 2008 while pretending like they weren't forgotten, just like it's peak willful ignorance, yet again, to pretend nothing's wrong just because your 401K isn't in the toilet, yet. >The house of cards will come down again someday but I can basically guarantee you won't be reading about it on reddit beforehand. I can guarantee when it does you'll be shitting yourself wondering why your life has been ruined because you clearly understand nothing about economic headwinds or when and how warnings about them will occur. Following your logic, Reddit certainly isn't the sort of place anyone would learn everything is all good, and you're doing all you can to prove that correct. A guarantee from you is a good impetus to believe the exact opposite.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Jper NYT fed judge says justice dept may have committed misconduct in Comey investigation. No way! Not this highly regarded non-partisan justice dept!

mrbrambles

I think you are gullible if you think she is a darling. Look at what she got into NYT a few years ago: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/business/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-interview.html If you don’t think she can try to buy a narrative to try to trick people into believe she has more support than she has, just try to read that article without gagging.

callsonreddit

Some people just never retire \-- Jeff Bezos to co-lead AI startup in first operational role since Amazon, NYT reports [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeff-bezos-co-lead-ai-114843797.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeff-bezos-co-lead-ai-114843797.html)

KittyLover-7

Tariffs on select goods from Ecuador, Argentina, Guatemala, and El Salvador to be removed by the US, per NYT

BigBoysenberry7987

The NYT reported it, so def more than a rumor.

0DTEKing

TRACO ADMINISTRATION PREPARES TARIFF EXEMPTIONS IN BID TO LOWER FOOD PRICES -NYT I thought there was no inflation 🤔

PlasticHot5834

Jeffery Epstein said in newly released emails: "I know how dirty Donald is," per NYT: LOL

Comfortable-Gap-9775

Per NYT "Congressional Budget Office estimated that the government shutdown could cause the country’s economic growth to decline in the fourth quarter by at least two percentage points" Believe it or not bullish

daviddjg0033

Did you read the NYT weekender article about the kid that died? He had a "relationship" with character.ai - this was leased by Google: Google does not like naming AI (Amazon has Alexis, Apple has Siri.) I am not sure if they have a case.

RedStag1905

Common misconception--it's actually Michael Barbaro, host of that NYT podcast, "The Daily". The problem here is that it's a conflict of interest--I mean, he can singlehandedly drive the market with his platform to make it do whatever he wants.

Charming_Raccoon4361

dont celebrate yet more bad news just came in befor the belt "Republicans have just rejected the Democrats offer to end the shutdown, per CBS" "Treasury Secretary Bessent has said some sectors of U.S. economy already in recession, per NYT"

OpenBarTrading

Even more interesting is the circular nature of their business. From a NYT article on it a week ago: "Many of the deals OpenAI has struck — with chipmakers, cloud computing companies and others — are strangely circular. OpenAI receives billions from tech companies before sending those billions back to the same companies to pay for computing power and other services."

Tunedfinance

Why does the NYT writer feels the need to add she was demonized?? How does that help the reader understand her announcement?

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT: U.S. to Cut 10% of Air Traffic at 40 Airports Over Government Shutdown

youbenchbro

NYT: The outcome of the case, **which could be decided within weeks or months**, has immense economic and political implications for U.S. businesses, consumers and the president’s trade policy.

Salty-Bid1597

I know most of you guys can't read good but for those that do, you ever read a terrible book then looked at Amazon and it had thousands of 5 star reviews? It shakes your confidence that you're actually living in reality. Like, did these people actually read this book or did they just parrot what the NYT review said? Are they all just astroturfing by the publishers? Or is just that most people are not that bright?

mcs5280

>How To Self-Suck The PP To $1 Trillion Valuation: A NYT Bestseller by Sam Altman

happy_snowy_owl

Dude, it's used by doctors. Look at the responses from doctors to this NYT click bait article: https://www.reddit.com/r/medicine/s/h7mGlBmEqn They universally believe that BMI is useful in assessing health. >Also 30 BMI isn’t that bad haha 40% of women in the US have a BMI above 30. Yes, we have an obesity epidemic that is making health care costs skyrocket.

sailortyx56

Fed governor Stephen Miran: Defends his 50bps cut dissent. Central bank risks a recession if it did not swiftly lower rates. -NYT Lol.

Standard-Potential-6

Their margins are very low, so it’s still relatively worthwhile, unfortunately. GM sold data for “pennies” per person, per the NYT. Every company is also hoping right now that they can feed AI their data to produce new insights and profits.

Splurch

> Weirdly enough Google seems to do alright by its employees for such a big corporation tbh They treat their contract workers poorly from what I've read and years ago the NYT revealed they have more contract/temo/etc workers then people on their payroll. So no, not really.

ryan1826

NYT sells lies

SavingsDimensions74

I’m kinda seeing (correctly or incorrectly) articles in the NYT and other publications that seem suspiciously like ChatGBT (with some editing). That said, for some of my projects (drones, AI, solar) where I’m not a particular subject matter expert, I can achieve a roadmap, by myself, in hours, that would take a team of highly qualified, experienced and expensive humans weeks or months to blueprint.

hemmingwayshotgun

I don’t care how stupid it is. Even if it dies in court it erodes public trust. This company is trash and a book (no more tears) written by a NYT journalist exposes decades of fraud, deception, strong arming, and hiding, and doing it with an army of lawyers has allowed this company to have the general public trust for far to long. This isn’t some right wing conspiracy, as I mentioned the book was written by a Times journalist and their deceit goes far beyond baby powder.

TimujinTheTrader

A recent NYT/Sienna poll found that self-proclaimed stock market "bears" view the term "gaped" 7 times more positively than "bulls" do. 

tanrgith

Because Apple is a stagnant company with leadership that is tailored for only one thing really - maintaining the existing business Outside of that the current leadership at Apple is completely inept After Apple gave up on their car project there was an investigative article by I believe NYT, that described the inside story of how the project was handled, and it was just a fucking mess. Conflicting visions by different executives and Tim Cook barely being involved and mostly just coming by once in a while for an update

Bright-Blacksmith-67

The Streisand effect will ensure this ad gets way more attention than the original ad buy. Trump loves to launch baseless suits that crumble when they get to court. His NYT and WSJ suits are close to be being dismissed without trial. I would expect that Trump will you his usual extortion tricks and demand some payment to Reagan foundation in return for restarting trade talks. If Carney pays that will only prove the Trump remains the most corrupt scumbag ever to hold office in the US.

Trix_Are_4_90Kids

that actually makes sense. He hated Reagan. He took out a full six figure ad in the NYT back in the 80s excoriating Reagan and America. He's never liked this country; U.S. sued him, you know. Sued him and his daddy.

WickedSensitiveCrew

Bloomberg and NYT both reported. Just posted the non-paywalled or non limited views article instead https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-22/warner-bros-to-begin-sharing-financial-data-with-bidders https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/22/business/dealbook/paramounts-secret-bids-warner-bros-discovery.html

Internal_Field5970

Barron Trumps DayZ Discord chats leaked and he sold his IonQ puts after the NYT hit piece he planted and just bought calls

imtoowhiteandnerdy

Just a little over two months ago it was reported by the New York Times that Zuckerberg offered some AI engineer a $125M stock and cash bonus package to join Meta's "superintelligence" group: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/technology/ai-researchers-nba-stars.html And now just a short time later we're seeing RIFs, although it's not clear if this is part of the same team as reported in the NYT article. It seems to me that Meta burns through capex funds like a drunken sailor on leave.

Wayne_Kurr_1

what does this meen? BREAKING: Amazon, $AMZN, the second largest employer in the U.S., aims to replace more than half a million jobs with robots, per NYT

CarrierAreArrived

yes but all that's factored into the math. There's a good calculator by NYT that factors in everything. If you don't have a subscription, you can use either GPT-5 Thinking or Gemini 2.5 Pro to do the analysis for you. Or just Google "average rent vs average monthly payment of owning a home (including mortgage/property tax/insurance/etc.) in "(insert location)". Then do the rough math yourself. In almost every instance renting and investing what would've gone into down payment/monthly home payments wins by a large margin. Again - this doesn't mean it's "wrong" to buy a house. I buy tons of things that weren't financially optimal just because I wanted them.

DukeCanada

The NYT just covered this in a recent episode of The Daily. Basically, the underlying fundamentals are not as bad as you think and vibes do not make an economy bad. That said, the economy is starting to look like it’s cooling down and that’s a cause for concern.

xeuropa

🌮wants $230 million from DOJ for investigating him: NYT🤣

YaBoiJim777

The Daily by the NYT released an episode answering exactly this question today [Why The Stock Market Just Keeps Going Up](https://open.spotify.com/episode/0gjH3nZkXMgazlOTZlLgrV?si=8Eitr-TyRZKY2YPzoCVr7A)

UltraSPARC

You should actually listen to today’s The Daily (NYT podcast). They talk about exactly this.

Icy_Bookkeeper_208

NYT podcast "Y da fuk stonks still going up?" Bolish?

TimeInTheMarketWins

Bloomberg live, specifically the radio version since I like a lot of the host a lot more, WSJ and Barron’s both in print although I have online as well. A couple YouTubers/subs here. Morning brew has a good newsletter and I enjoy checking in with NYT and other non business publications to see what bus news has made it to the regular world.

kirrim

NYT article from 2018: https://archive.ph/fxMAt Graphic from that article: https://i.imgur.com/2RMQbSD.jpeg

InquisitorCOC

This whole Venezuela things feels too much like a spectacle If Trump really wants to conduct convert ops against Maduro, he will not tell the whole world about it, and certainly not NYT For example, when he bombed Iran back in June, it absolutely came as a total surprise

GneissFrog

this was going around earlier today: >TRUMP TO MAKE IVF PROPOSAL THURSDAY AT WHITE HOUSE - NYT

josuejonesy

Hes talking about ivf (per NYT)

RayzinBran18

President Trump plans to announce a policy proposal to make in vitro fertilization more accessible, per NYT

Ok-Analysis4121

Don't get your hopes up guys. The 3pm announcement is just about IVF according to the NYT

Equivalent-Stop7266

> *TRUMP TO MAKE IVF PROPOSAL THURSDAY AT WHITE HOUSE: NYT If this is his big announcement me might be good

RedStag1905

NYT games are truly the one good thing holding families and the social fabric together in these troubling times..

Reasonable_Roger

Every morning I call my mom and we play NYT Connections over the phone together <3

jnas_19

Trump Admin Authorized Covert CIA Action In Venezuela: NYT NYT Cites US Officials On CIA Action In Venezuela

Medical-Analysis-554

If the Wordle some day is OPNAI imagine what that would do to NYT stock What a collab

kindernoise

I went digging in the NYT archives around 1999-2000 specifically to see whether there was a similar level of self-awareness. There was, starting up a year and a half beforehand, then with increasing frequency, until in the six months leading up to it there was at least one “we are in a bubble this shit is going down” article or op-ed every month. They really are that predictable. People are at a level of regardation that is simply incomprehensible to the sentient.

ReggieLab

A quote from a recent [$NYT](https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nyt) article describing defense technologies: "The recent conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have accelerated the push for operational laser systems, with some clients urgently seeking immediate solutions to their defense needs."

Nosemyfart

My only problem with doomers is that they can derail logical conversation. For example, when I was preaching buying index funds during the tariff meltdown, I was being downvoted and called a conservative by the doomers. Who knows how many new investors got burned during this meltdown due to doomers. I'm not entirely sure how that is productive in a subreddit dedicated to discussing finances and the stock market. Also, yes it's a NYT article, they also stand to generate income from worried clicks. Like any other media platform

CarrierAreArrived

no I'm talking about a mortgage payment vs. renting in a comparable cost of living area. Say your mortgage is $4k/month and rent is $3k/month. Renting for 3k and putting the 1k that you would've paid to the mortgage in SPY vastly outperforms taking out the mortgage on the home in the long run. There's a really good NYT calculator that demonstrates this, just google it.

unhappyreach_

>The new rules would require businesses that make most chips to get an export license to sell them anywhere in the world. That means they could apply to companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, which makes most of the world’s advanced logic chips, and SK Hynix and Samsung, the South Korean makers of memory chips. - NYT

Successful_City3111

It was either the NYT or the WAPO this morning. I can't remember which.

Smooothoperat0r

Since Reddit is filled with know-it-all lefties who read the NYT exclusively, they cannot possibly understand what you said. This is both countries fighting for their own.

jetRink

Both deals were negotiated by Steve Witkoff reportedly at the very same meeting aboard Sheikh Tahnoon's yacht. The Witkoff and Trump families own and operate World Liberty Financial together. Witkoff is also Trump's AI and crypto czar, and his Middle East envoy. So these deals (probably really one deal) were not only good for his boss, but he personally benefited. [NYT's reporting](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/politics/trump-uae-chips-witkoff-world-liberty.html?unlocked_article_code=1.sE8.1zj0.x4U5O2iy6igy&smid=url-share)

West-Manufacture30

I sign up for the failing NYTimes every 6 months for $1. I sometimes like to read the sports but skip the rest of the partisan content. My $1 ran out 4 days ago but I still have full access. I used a prepaid card with $1.49 to sign up. I don't get it. Puts NYT.

peterpeer9

# BREAKING NEWS: NEW SAM ALTMAN INTERVIEW: "A DAY IN THE LIFE" > I wake up in the morning at 5AM thanks to my Apple watch (AAPL:+7%) and then I'm out the door (HD:+18%). My assistant brings my coffee (SBUX:+12%) and then I do deep work for 2-3 hours writing code (MSFT:+4%). During my lunch I usually have something cultural catered to office (CMG:+23%) and browse the paper (NYT:+5%), I like keeping up with what's going on in the world. Later I work more and head home (TSLA:+17%)

GneissFrog

No one is talking about bitcoin? Bloomberg, MSNBC, FT, Reuters, CNN, NYT, WSJ... every outlet talks about it every single day. Not sure if you've been living under a rock, but regular segments on crypto are now part of every major broadcast and publication. I don't think your play is all that stupid, but your justification for it certainly is. Good luck though.

Hagridsbuttcrack66

I had a friend who claimed he couldn't decide who to vote for for president. I actually liked and respected this guy. He said he votes about the economy, and the weird part is that he actually knew that Democrats are better for it! Like he knew that it gets worse under Republicans. So this bill comes up and I send him the NYT article breaking it down. Like I look at this adding to this deficit you supposedly care about (and can we talk about that too...like most people who say they care about that are so full of shit). And this dude still wouldn't say anything bad about the bill other than "I do hate spending money". Like what the fuck do you even do with that. This guy has never said anything racist and I just do not understand where at all his head is at. Other than - I don't care - 401K go up. I stopped hanging out with him solo because I just can't with these fucking people anymore. Like either you're an idiot, an asshole, or both.

breakonthrough65

No its not. But its 50/50 whether the market goes down in a gov shutdown. And in all previous shutdowns where it went down, the market eventually recovered within weeks or a couple of months. NYT failed to mention any of this.

breakonthrough65

I read the NYT as well. One of their recent articles is a case in point for what I'm talking about [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/business/dealbook/federal-shutdown-economic-stakes.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/business/dealbook/federal-shutdown-economic-stakes.html) They did not bother to mention that in the previous gov shutdown at the end of 2018, the stock market actually went higher.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT coverage of speech to generals: There does not seem to be a clear point or purpose in President Trump’s address to military generals today. It’s a garden variety tear; he’s talking about tariffs, Joe Biden and the autopen, the southern border, CNN, his personal feelings about President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and his anxieties that he won’t be given a Nobel Peace Prize he feels he deserves. These are things he talks about almost every day regardless of audience or setting. Every so often he throws in a statistic or observation he has about the military. “I think we should maybe start thinking about battleships by the way” he said at one point in the middle of a riff about tariffs. “I used to watch Victory at Sea. I love Victory at Sea.”

CCWaterBug

Msnbc ,cnn, npr, NYT, all the unbiased organizations 

Many_Easy

What major media networks has it been picked up on already? I haven’t seen anything yet on Fox, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WSJ yet. Please share since you said they have already.

ieatair

he cant even write coherently so he resorts to NYT-AI type pictures to help convey his message Real diaper child in a 80 year old body

xploeris

Can't believe people still think Epstein is relevant. They could publish those files in the NYT and nothing would happen to him.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT military leaders from around the world have been summoned, even those in active combat zones.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Breaking per NYT: Hegseth urgently summons military leaders to Virginia and no one knows why. Highly unusual and is causing anxiety amongst the brass

Reasonable_Roger

[When it's 12:40 and I've already wasted NYT Connections for the day](https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExbTIyNWUwYWJuMnp0YzJpdmdlZm1kdzJoM3d5dTRkN3kyNXFqMHF1ZSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/Cx5xXCBlQatVvgqcEQ/giphy.gif)

MrNovember13

LLY, AAPL, CHWY, NYT, GPZ, STZ, BRK-B Lots of y’all are skipping LLY, or something similar, and since this is Reddit, I know y’all gots the ADHD, lol

Happy_Discussion_536

What? This book was NYT bestseller 2 decades ago. Everyone was reading it.

dalooooongway

of course, its NYT

BosSF82

"Per NYT, the “BAG OF CASH” $50,000 cash payment Homan took from undercover FBI agents was inside a bag from Cava." Calls on Cava?

Strict-Comfort-1337

I just learned NYT is publicly traded…

ReggieLab

AERG Topic discussed in NYT * Several countries, including Israel and Ukraine, have already deployed laser air defense systems in combat situations, showcasing their effectiveness. * A NATO member in Europe is set to acquire a powerful air defense laser from an Australian firm, marking a significant development in the global weapons market. * The Australian laser, called 'Apollo', can reportedly take down 20 drones per minute at a cost of less than 10 cents per shot, making it a highly efficient option. * The recent conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have accelerated the push for operational laser systems, with some clients urgently seeking immediate solutions to their defense needs.

ReggieLab

AERG Topic discussed in NYT * Several countries, including Israel and Ukraine, have already deployed laser air defense systems in combat situations, showcasing their effectiveness. * A NATO member in Europe is set to acquire a powerful air defense laser from an Australian firm, marking a significant development in the global weapons market. * The Australian laser, called 'Apollo', can reportedly take down 20 drones per minute at a cost of less than 10 cents per shot, making it a highly efficient option. * The recent conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have accelerated the push for operational laser systems, with some clients urgently seeking immediate solutions to their defense needs.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Dissenting voices are being silenced. The head of the FCC wrote a chapter in Project 2025. The NYT is under attack. Power is being consolidated right before our eyes, and we voted for it. Most in here don't care because the markets are up, but we should be paying attention.

TheoryInttro

It's 7 AM, NYT. Shouldn't there be a fake pre-market pump on Tesler by now?

ReggieLab

AERG Topic discussed in NYT * Several countries, including Israel and Ukraine, have already deployed laser air defense systems in combat situations, showcasing their effectiveness. * A NATO member in Europe is set to acquire a powerful air defense laser from an Australian firm, marking a significant development in the global weapons market. * The Australian laser, called 'Apollo', can reportedly take down 20 drones per minute at a cost of less than 10 cents per shot, making it a highly efficient option. * The recent conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have accelerated the push for operational laser systems, with some clients urgently seeking immediate solutions to their defense needs.

Smokinondatgas

“Sinclair says Kimmel suspension is not enough and is demanding a death by stoning” NYT reports.

DaddyButterSwirl

There was a NYT essay a out this recently that had this quote that jumped out at me. “In the 2020s, however, the growing ranks of the affluent presented a profit source that could not be ignored. According to Datos Insights, in 1992 there were 88,000 households worth $20 million or more in 2022 dollars; by 2022, there were 644,000. Those who could pay almost anything for a vacation were becoming their own mass market.

bewbaholic

Colby Smith from NYT is hot

Inner_Web_3964

Good time to remind everyone why El Crapo is suing the NYT China ain't greasing the palms enough https://archive.ph/yn8mG Anatomy of Two Giant Deals: The U.A.E. Got Chips. The Turmp Team Got Crypto Riches. A lucrative transaction involving the Turmp family’s cryptocurrency firm and an agreement giving the Emiratis access to A.I. chips were connected in ways that have not been previously reported.

shasta747

They have to sell to have fund to buy back bad loans, CEO's dad is playing this scheme since the 'turnover' a few years ago. He's very deep connected though, the 44th US VP sits on CVNA board. There was a piece from Fortune or NYT I don't remember detailing this relationship.