NYT

jonneh

> 🥭 and Schumer move toward possible deal to avert shutdown – NYT # Bers in shambles yet again 🤣🤣

jazzgrackle

Investing subs, WSB can be good, but keep in mind it’s a few intelligent people and then lots of degen gamblers, and both will pretend to be the other. I read the news, WSJ, NYT, and The Economist; you can get ideas about major announcements that could affect the market. Look at index funds, and you can see which companies are pulling things in one direction or another.

unhandyandy

There was an article in the NYT about subreddits going anti-Trump

chris_ut

I think NYT did a whole breakdown on them back when it happened

FeistyGate8784

One of the interviews with a Republican voter from NYT had this quote “the president could tell me to screw myself and I would say thank you sir!” There is no getting to people like that

captain_ahabb

Let's start with the media. Regime allies control Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. They just took control of TikTok as well. Fox and all of the RW satellites are pro-regime of course. They just took control of CBS and are trying to take control of CNN as well. The government is openly threatening the parent company of ABC. Most local stations are regime-aligned through Sinclair. Regime allies own the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, the LA Times, Axios and Politico. The government has filed a lawsuit against the NYT to intimidate them into more favorable coverage. They also just raided the Washington Post and stole a reporter's phone, computer, and hard drives. As for the political opponents: They've taken direct legal action against Letitia James, Lisa Cook, Jerome Powell, Jack Smith, Sen. Mark Kelly, Rep. Monica McIver, Gov. Tim Walz, Mayor Jacob Frey, labor organizer David Huerta, and dozens of protestors. They also used the threat of legal action to blackmail former NY mayor Eric Adams, and violently arrested Sen. Alex Padilla. They have threatened legal action against Gov. Gavin Newsom, Gov. JB Pritzker, mayor Zohran Mamdani (when he was running for office), mayor Karen Bass, Sen. Elissa Slotnick, Reps. Crow, Deluzio, Goodlander, Houlahan and Omar. They are attempting to take legal action against liberal political organizations like ActBlue, Indivisible, the DSA, and immigrant rights groups under the deranged idea that these organizations are sponsoring terrorism. Ken Klippenstein just reported today that ICE is collecting a facial recognition database of everyone who protests against them. They have also repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act and suspect the writ of habeas corpus, which would enable mass indefinite detention of political opponents. Executed opponents so far the list is only Renee Good, but the administration and their foot soldiers have made it clear that they think they can repeat the Good killing at any time without consequences. Cory Robin in the NYT described what the administration is doing as the "Blue Scare" and I agree with that characterization. They are adopting the position that ordinary liberalism (an ideology held by 70 million Americans) is a dangerous, criminal ideology that the government can suppress by force.

dickrichardson6969

Jay Powell under criminal investigation for not lowering interest rates NYT being sued for publishing bad poll numbers Jamie Dimon being sued for not contributing to golden ballroom Normal stuff happening in America.

kaybloc

No, conservatives do not own most of the major mainstream media companies in the U.S. The ownership landscape is dominated by large publicly traded corporations, family-controlled entities, and billionaires with varied (often centrist, liberal-leaning, or business-oriented) political affiliations. While some high-profile conservative or Trump-aligned figures have gained influence in specific outlets—particularly through recent deals—the majority of “mainstream” media (e.g., CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, NYT, Washington Post) remains under owners not aligned with conservative politics.

DISAPPOINTING_FAIRY

lmaooooo the NYT breaking news banner for "concept of a framework of a deal" came in at 3:05pm. trading without insider info is impossible at this point

Arbiter2562

Thought you were done? Everyone has braindead followers….everyone. This isnt an argument. We’re not invading Greenland. I am unaware of how bombing Islamists in Nigeria is bad but ok. And yes, we can seize money whether its Russia, Iran or Venezuela. And the Iraq War syndrome is over dude. Its been twenty years. I mean everything told by CNN, CBS, NBC, NYT, NPR, ABC, Hollywood, reddit/tik tok algorithms, etc etc has been all about how he’s deranged. And I dont believe that. So by your logic, Im not the victim here….. Oh here’s a classic. AIPAC. The lobbying group that isnt anywhere close to being the top donors to government is controlling it. The jeeeeeewwwwssss! Vetoed what cease fire? I dont see Israeli troops in Gaza. Or fighting in Pakistan, Armenia, Thailand, etc. I mean you will bother again because you dont like when people disagree with you sooo

TheFutureIsAFriend

Hypothetical NYT Headline: "Is Jerome Powell gonna have to smack a bitch?" How do you stop the madness and bring things back to a natural normal flow in the markets?

VanguardDeezNuts

Wtf is he babbling about? Just jumping from healthcare to borders to healthcare to the NYT and now murderers...

lovemyshittyBMer

MSTR, read the NYT article about them this week. This company is cooked AF.

Billybob8777

This is the most Reddit response I've ever read. The Information, NYT, Tom's Hardware, DB, tons of tech and finance publications etc. Let's hear why you think the quoted financial analysts are flawed in their analysis.

Stocks_N_Bondage

CNN, MSNBC, NYT, mostly bash...

AntoniaFauci

Thank you NYT for saying the thing many of us have been trying to tell people for nearly a year.

BackgroundOstrich488

In the NYT this morning. Maybe 1 or 2 more R senators will give him a little more resistance: What We’re Covering Today Greenland: President Trump said one reason behind his push to acquire Greenland is that he didn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize, according to a message he sent to Norway’s prime minister. Jonas Gahr Store, Norway’s leader, received the text message on Sunday, three European officials familiar with the matter said on Monday. Read more ›

Ok_Environment_3618

EUROPEAN OFFICIALS LEAN TOWARDS NEGOTIATING, NOT RETALIATING, OVER TRUMP THREAT-NYT 🥭 will 🌮 soon.

Michigan-Magic

Completely different stakes. For Venezuela, the US telegraphed that for months, transparently built up forces in the region and then acted once no one complained. Maduro had no support, particularly from existing US allies. In contrast, Greenland has EU support; however tepid it may be right now. There is a non-zero risk that attempting to simply seize Greenland breaks NATO permanently, which would be counterproductive to the US' attempts to counter China. The reality is - as laid out in the articles below - is that only with alliances can the West out manufacture China. Manufacturing output is critical to maintaining military superiority. Is there a chance that Trump moves forward despite this because he is persuaded that nothing will happen after his Venezuelan excursion? Yes, there is. At the same time, Trump is also obsessed with his public perception. At this point, very few people support this in the US. Latest polling shows less than 25% support annexation. The Senate, including the Republican party, are against seizing Greenland precisely because of the risk of breaking NATO, as well (see the Hill article). Feels like a low probability outcome at this point. Also, prepared to be completely wrong too. NYT Articles: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/12/13/opinion/editorials/trump-us-military-alliances-spending.html www.nytimes.com/2025/09/07/opinion/us-trump-china-allies.html https://archive.ph/u9syr The Hill https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5689820-senate-republicans-block-trump-greenland/

Late_Exercise8462

Sorry trying to find it. It was NPR, NYT, Economist or someone who said that if non-voters voted, they would've likely voted for Trump.

tiberisus

You can watch something without being invested in it 100%. Just because you read the NYT doesn't mean you're liberal boomer.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Holy shit I wish i could buy puts on boeing right now. NYT just released that boeing knew about flaw on plane that crashed in louisville and decided it wouldnt effect flight safety

Raidion

This is like saying the NBA should identify the best LA fitness basketball players. If you're actually good at this stuff you're either an actual journalist or a finance professional. If knowledge is worth something, than the exclusivity of that knowledge is worth something and throwing out professional takes to reddit is like feeding NY strip steaks to a pack of cayotes. You pay for the signal to noise ratio to be lower via NYT or Bloomberg or substack, you come on reddit FOR the noise.

BobLoblaw_BirdLaw

Let’s be real. NYT and WSJ are not the big league anymore. Redditors have more insight and accurate reporting than these places nowadays. I’ve seen their reporting, they’re better than others, but still wreak of errors, bias, and laziness. 99.9% of Redditor comments are worse but for every story out there a Redditor has the most accurate and truthful story that not even these papers have access to. That’s where Reddits business model needs to highlight more. These experts that can outclass those legacy has beens.

iMakeGOODinvestmemts

[$META](https://x.com/search?q=%24META&src=cashtag_click) will cut 10% of staff at Reality Labs, per the NYT. At the same time, the company is ramping datacenter investment while trimming headcount in non-core orgs to help offset rising CapEx. The question is whether this is the early shape of a hyperscaler strategy like [$GOOGL](https://x.com/search?q=%24GOOGL&src=cashtag_click) GCP, [$AMZN](https://x.com/search?q=%24AMZN&src=cashtag_click) AWS, or [$MSFT](https://x.com/search?q=%24MSFT&src=cashtag_click) Azure, or simply a buildout to support Meta’s own in-house workloads.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT: E.P.A. to Stop Considering Lives Saved When Setting Rules on Air Pollution In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show.

swenau01

Jan 7, 2026 Katie Rogers of the NYT: “You've promised $2,000 checks to Americans based off of your tariff revenues. When can they expect those?” 🥭: “I did do that? When did I do that?”

hcth63g6g75g5

US Prosecutors Open (obviously false) Criminal Probe Into Fed’s Powell, NYT Says

WracknRuin88

"The U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, over the central bank’s renovation of its Washington headquarters and whether Mr. Powell lied to Congress about the scope of the project, according to officials briefed on the situation." That was a quote from the NYT, I believe.

PinCushionPete314

Nope the NYT is reporting on it.

9tacos

Federal prosecutors open criminal investigation into Fed Chair Powell - NYT 🤡 🔫🤡 🔫🤡

swenau01

Federal prosectors in Washington, D.C. have opened a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, per the NYT.

jnas_19

Federal prosecutors open inquiry into Fed Chair Powell: NYT

Known_Palpitation805

I see. Because Murdoch owns Fox, WSJ and the Post that overwhelmingly means right wing bias. Gotcha. So CNN, WaPo and the NYT (just as one for one counters) do not nullify your positions. Who owns those entities? And who cares. Ownership doesn’t equate to bias.

Spiritual-Dog3000

I am currently paying college tuition. The COA is the minimum. Their costs such as transportation are usually grossly under what it actually costs. There was an article about it in the NYT in the last 5 years, basically talking about how kids who are on full need elite school scholarships still have expenses that are not covered and they usually have to work and cannot do the things their classmates do like going home for breaks and it is a struggle. It goes without saying they cannot afford Greek life which is a big part of some schools. I know a number of people who pay insurance. I would if it was my last kid in college. Not everyone has a great health plan or a low cost employer option, the college plans are usually excellent although I am not familiar with either school personally. If a kid went to work from high school there is a chance their HI would be covered so this is a legitimate expense. Also, most ACA family plans do not cover anything other than emergences out of starte. I know more than one person that had insurance whether employer or ACA that covered their kids in state and were compelled by their out of state college to buy insurance. Colleges do an annual insurance check where they make sure your kid has insurance that is ACCEPTATBLE TO THEM. It is not your decision although you can appeal I do not know anyone who is living at home and going to college unless they go to a commuter school or they have substantial need that cannot be met by the colleges they applied to or they attend, or have some other unusual situation at home such a parent with a disability who needs them

Massive_Plantain3949

Did you not read the NYT article? Tim Cook has already started to reduce his workload. From now on, he does not give a s\*it about AI or even rotten $AAPL. He moved to $NKE!

8thSt

*”We told the President the videos on social media were unclear”* That’s some grade-A journalism there, NYT.

Other-Figure-1493

So what's the truth? Please tell me. I just watched the video without commentary and saw the driver in the SUV driving towards the officer while at gunpoint and obviously told to stop and leave the car. I don't get it. Also in the NYT clips you can clearly see that the officer is in front of the SUV when it accelerates and happens to get on the left front side during the acceleration, saving himself from getting run over.

jnas_19

Trump: Going to hit Iran 'hard' if they kill rioters. Trump says only his “own morality” limits U.S. power. Trump on US-Russia nuclear treaty: 'If it expires, it expires'. Trump says he doesn't need international law: NYT Trump: Cuba is in trouble and is hanging by a thread Trump on Fed chair pick tells New York Times "I have in my mind a decision” Bessent: I think Trump will decide on Fed chair in January Vance on Greenland: Advice to European leaders is to take Trump seriously U.S. considers paying Greenlanders $10,000–$100,000 each to support secession from Denmark

leeuwvanvlaanderen

Video analysis on the NYT clearly shows the car didn’t even touch him and she was clearly turning away lol

efstajas

Exactly. NYT literally reported the CIA had a mole close to Maduro reporting his moves.

Non-mon-xiety

The operation already leaked to NYT and (I think?) WAPO but they sat on the story

basar_auqat

The Washington Post ( and I think the NYT ) knew about the operation of Friday as well, but didn't disclose, supposedly journalism ethics and to avoid outing American lives at risk.

SolidImpression7062

Apparently everyone and their mom knew. Well everyone except congress. NYT WaPo both had the story.

ButtExterminator

Maduro plans leaked to NYT and WP before the operation, who chose not to publish it to “protect the troops”, so now we know who placed those Polymarket bets. 

OpinionsRdumb

Do people not understand that this was largely driven by Rubio. This actually goes against Heritage Foundation ideology as they are much more "america first". This whole Venezuela is purely coming from Rubio's stance on Latin America and his plans for Cuba. The NYT has reported extensively on this already.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Lol NYT just sent me a push notification about Teslas sales dropping 9% this year and being overtaken by BYD and then it immediately V'd.

AMCorBUST2021

[NYT robotaxis big on wall street but not on actual street](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/25/business/tesla-robotaxis-austin-waymo.html?searchResultPosition=1)

AMCorBUST2021

I’ve seen the short edited promo videos. When NYT and my sister tell me it’s happening I’ll believe it. Currently Level 2.. wake me when you get Level 4.

AMCorBUST2021

My sister lives there and confirms the NYT report. Barely any, no one’s riding. All have safety monitors. The possibility is not zero, but the chance democrats take the house and pass the Stay in Your Lane bill. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/senator-targets-tesla-fsd-bill-aims-to-tell-elon-musk-company-to-stay-in-your-lane/ar-AA1SDnya

sailortyx56

Larry Page and Peter Thiel are making moves to leave California by the end of the year to avoid a possible billionaires tax that could hit them where it hurts.-NYT [Link](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/26/technology/california-wealth-tax-page-thiel.html) lol

youstillhavehope

NYT. Movers: settlement with OpenAi returns multi-year revenues, multi-membership plan lets them kill password sharing and increase revs and, long shot, their exceptionally good digital team becomes a full online news channel. Longer shot, they buy CNN in the Warner Bros. fall-out for pennies on the dollar, leveraging upscale advertisers, huge sub base and skilled reporting to move it to the front of news coverage.

Beanzear

How long is NYT going to be failing??

Same-Temperature9472

I have to admit, I read it a few times and I'm still not sure who is enjoying their last christmas. At first I thought he was saying that to the NYT, but, it's really not addressed to them, so you have to move all the way to the top: >To all, including... So I guess everyone?

vanishing_grad

"A Defense Department official said that the Pentagon had worked in tandem with the Nigerian government to carry out the strikes, which the official said were approved by that government." NYT article. I mean they could be lying I suppose 😂

IAmAnthem

Crazy, NYT article today on the topic. 

AntoniaFauci

> mean, NPR and AP and multiple outlets reported that it was a Reddit comment that helped authorities identify the shooter. Uh, that’s my whole point. Lazy and corrupt media sources just copy and paste the original lie with zero research or fact checking. Worse, they embellish it. Then there’s a circle where NYT says NPR said it, so who cares it’s a lie. And AP says, we don’t care it’s a lie, NYT said it. And so on. It all comes full circle when the Reddit lie comes back to reddit and we have people touting a hero Redditor who never was.

OkGo_Go_Guy

> According to the Guardian by Israels own (!) leaked classified documents 83% (!!) of those killed were civilians. False. The guardian, in an absolute disgrace of journalism, noted that 17% of Palestinians killed were IN DATABASES TAGGED AS TERRORISTS. That absolutely does not mean that 83% of those killed were not terrorists, just that they were not pretagged. You think some random grunt shooting a RPG at a tank is a civilian just because they weren't pre-identified as a terrorist? The guardian then packaged that piece of media illiteracy up for absolute morons as Israel is killing 83% civilians. Because clowns like yourself can't be bothered to actually use your noodle and instead listen to antisemitic rags that release things like Israel bombs a hospital and kills 500 (before retracting once it was proven the PIJ bombed a hospital parking lot by accident and killed 20). Next, give me an article with a picture of a kid with MS, crop out his fully fed brother right next to him, and sell it to me as a famine like the NYT. Maybe you can even run a sob story about a kid's life in Gaza wo is him (then retract once you realize his parents are literally part of hamas) like the BBC! You don't hate journalists NEARLY enough for absolutely blinding your ability to actual think critically.

invincible_change

Here’s his bazillion dollar law suit… NYT

Adventurous-Goal478

It's a legit archive site that bypasses the paywall bc it's an NYT article.

Specialist_Fig9458

I will give NYT credit they were super skeptical of this number (and rightfully so)

Affectionate-Idea690

Democrats question if Lutnick profits from AI data centers: NYT lmao bitches no one is profitting mkay

capitol_cavier

You should work for the NYT with this headline! lol

Blitzdog416

NYT summary: * The president’s speech featured repeated rants about Democrats and particularly his predecessor, President Biden, whom he blamed for a litany of issues. * The speech, delivered at a blistering pace, featured a string of misleading claims and mathematical impossibilities, and boasted of gains and windfalls that many Americans have said they are not experiencing amid growing cost-of-living concerns.

TippyTippyTippyTop

_Markets Crater From All Time High_ - NYT, probably

Negative_Win_5117

Now NYT and WSJ getting in on the “AI bubble” racket now. Fake and gay status confirmed.

figuring_ItOut12

WaPo lost its cred years ago. It may as well be the National Enquirer at this point. NYT seems also to be speed failing.

Many_Easy

Very few people recognize Axios as most people have never heard of them. CBS along with NBC and ABC are still considered the gold standard as are The NYT and The WSJ. WaPo, still very good, has lost a lot of credibility lately since Bezos started kissing the pinky ring of DJT. CBS will be much weaker and more right-leaning with Bari Weiss running it and being owned by Paramount/David Ellison - both Trumpers. However, their news organization has not changed that much SO FAR.

molinasnecktat

Lmao this lady from the NYT clearly bet him to say NYT and he didn’t. I’m betting jpow knows the words.

newyolker

I don't even watch the FOMC Press anymore after Jeanna Smialek got promoted to some other role in NYT.

SnooWalruses5479

How is this not inciting one of his crazy supporters to do violence to the NYT?

Bobba-Luna

It feels fake because it is. NYT today is downplaying the bubble, most likely b/c they realize it’s a bubble and the coming crash is going to be devastating. It’s just a handful of AI related companies propping up the market now. What could go wrong?

CapitalBias

The dominant class in media, which controls the dominant ideology, is absolutely upper-middle educated coastal progressives from the academic pipeline (which is fair, where else would you get into journalism). NYT, WaPo, Atlantic, CNN, MSNBC, every source on the reddit front page, etc

Yogurt_Up_My_Nose

just look at that retards post history. he's definitely not NYT

Venice_LA

Source? I made it up -NYT

gkdjsl

Where's the full video, I've only seen clips on the NYT site

TopKekBoi69

Who else saw that NYT interview with Alex Karp GEEKED out of his fuckin mind? We thinking meth, coke, or adderall?

Odd-Adagio7080

You’re asking on Reddit for that kind of economic data??? But yes, most of it the stimulus money was spent. If you can’t see how this is the case, search articles from the NYT, Washington Post, or WSJ, where financial reporters likely have looked into this and have laid it out in writing. In fact, I might just do that myself if/when I feel motivated to do a little research project, (Econ degree here). I’d ask the Fed for their numbers but I don’t trust this administration as far as I can spit. Here’s how I figure it fwiw—if asked, most people would not say, “yeah, I still have that stimulus money in my bank account”. Mainly because a frighteningly large portion of the population live paycheck to paycheck when they DO have a job. When they were laid off with no income, that stimulus money went to pay rent and put food in their bellies. That’s what a stimulus is supposed to do—stimulate the economy. And we were at a fucking standstill. Those people are not investing in the market, even if they are now making more now than they were. Because things are at least 15% more expensive than they were in 2020-21. The fact that inflation was so very rampant (and real wages have grown at a much lower rate), supports the argument that this money was spent. I put my stimulus checks in my Fidelity account and left it there, (and as I recall, it wasn’t that much—maybe I got less because I was able to keep working ?) Anyway, it was a mere drop in the bucket. And when I take money out of my brokerage account, it doesn’t usually sit on the sidelines waiting for a dip—I spend it on a larger ticket item for myself. I think maybe there IS a lot of money on the sidelines, but that’s certainly not from stimulus checks. It’s upper-middle/upper-class people who have been taking out profits from the crazy gains we’ve seen in big tech, etc. And I’d argue much of the money that was driving up the prices of big tech stocks didn’t come from these stimulus checks, or even from peoples’ savings, but rather from money that had been invested for quite awhile in blue chip companies and the like listed on the DJI. Just look at the numbers the S&P has put up over the past three years compared to the Dow. The money driving those gains was coming from somewhere, and it wasn’t stimulus checks.

Kection

Is it a NYT best seller?

Thisispaartaaa

an hour ago he was ranting about some NYT reporter, calling her ugly, among other things. He wonder's why he gets sued so much

SaaSGrass

“One trillion of crypto evaporated” NYT push notification is hilarious but wondering if it’s a buy signal for a good pump and dump

AirportMaterial5917

According to NYT, 1.6% is a “skid”

orangeyougladiator

Pretty sure there were posts here when the JPM and MS execs said there would be a correction and there are liquidity issues. Otherwise just pick any big news outlet like NYT and check the financial stuff a couple times a day; ignore all the other news. Things like the secret walstreet / fed meeting last Saturday was reported there; and the debt financing boom of the last 3 months. Scroll back thru those posts on an outlet and find one that retroactively reported all this and subscribe to them.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Per NYT Saudi Public Investment Fund low on cash to invest, with billions tied to bad investments with no return likeky. But I thought we was getting a trilly?!

SerialStrategist

"Trump’s Global Tariffs Curtailed Trade, Data Shows" -NYT Shocker.

quan42069quan

Okay quick crappy comment dd then I'll put the fries in the bag. TLDR; saudis may be cutting a deal with nvda to bailout the US economy Saudi Arabia (SA) is aggressively building cloud/ai infrastructure. from [this ](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html)article from a few weeks ago: >For generations, *Saudi* Arabia exported oil. Now it wants to export one of the digital era’s most coveted resources: computing *power*. >**Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is seizing a chance to turn** ***Saudi*** ***Arabia’s*** **oil wealth into tech influence. Few nations can match the kingdom’s cheap energy, deep pockets and open land — the ingredients that tech firms need to operate the vast,** ***power*****-hungry data centers that run modern A.I**. ... >The kingdom is building three major data center complexes aimed at foreign companies, which could be at least 30 percent cheaper for A.I. work than the United States, *Saudi* executives said. Construction permits are granted in weeks, and undersea cables and fiber-optic networks put roughly four billion people on three continents within reach of the hubs. >To overcome security concerns in the authoritarian state, *Saudi* Arabia is also considering “data embassy” zones, where foreign firms could operate under their own national laws rather than *Saudi* law. SA wants to export compute. Mango is desperate to save markets rn. He's giddy about Mohammed's visit for some reason. All the tech bosses including Jensen are circling. There's a presser tomorrow @ 12, NVDA earnings ah. Everyone and their dog knows NVDA needs game-changing news to keep markets afloat, a simple earnings beat might not do it. The NYT article above talks more about it and here's NVIDIA's blog about sovereign AI: [https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-sovereign-ai/](https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/what-is-sovereign-ai/) Part of this visit was the US elevating SA to 'major non-nato ally' status which enables a bunch of tech-sharing, military cooperation. This could mean there's a contract in the works for NVDA (and others?) to provide infrastructure to SA for a sovereign AI. Mohammed has talked about investing 1 trillion in the US and yet markets didn't move much because its unclear where that $ is going or if its a real offer. here's the fries, sorry they're cold

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Breaking per NYT: META did not violate anti-trust laws by acquiring rivals

Tim_Apple_938

? LLMs don’t cannibalize search. AIOverviews monetizing the same as traditional search, overall search revenue growing at double digits consistently since ChatGPT came out in 2022. Some NYT article theorized that in 2022 and everyone just parroted it without using their critical thinking skills.

Numerous_Ice_4556

>No, it's an advertising platform that's well aware that scared or angry people click on things much more than happy people do. Tomato, tom-ah-to. This whole thread is literally because a person chose to share an article from the most popular news outlet in the country, so you can spew all the euphemisms you like, your point, that somehow because an NYT article made its way to Reddit means it has no merit is no less stupid. >Hence the doomerism about AI we've been hearing for years that has yet to materialize, but this time its real, right? "AI" has been a buzzword for three years, and the doomerism about its risk to the broader economy is a very recent perspective. Since ChatGPT hit the scene the whole sentiment has been about how machines are getting closer to human reasoning than ever and will upend the whole world, so clearly, you haven't been paying attention and prefer to invent narratives to drown out the ones that make you feel uncomfortable. >This article and your technical analysis is solid proof of the future to come? I, and anyone else for that matter, need to be 100% prescient about the future to warn of broader problems and risks, and potential catastrophe? Since I can see in your response you love to equivocate, I'll stop you before you can begin and pretend like that isn't what you're saying, since it is. "So what if there are rain clouds and the forecast is 95% rain, I'm leaving my umbrella at home and wearing a wifebeater because meteorologists aren't right 100% of the time." That's what it's like reading your response. >Well dang then, we should tell people that some guy on Reddit knows the health of the economy better than the people who do this for a living. At the top of the article it says: "By Rebecca Patterson" "Ms. Patterson is an economist who has held senior positions at JPMorgan Chase and Bridgewater Associates." Tell me you haven't read or learned a single fucking thing about AI or the economy without telling me you haven't read or learned a single fucking thing about AI or the economy. We certainly shouldn't listen to anyone dumb enough to say "the guys with the high paying jobs say everything is A-okay, so I don't need to do my own thinking or learn anything", which is a foolish enough sentiment on its own, but is extra idiotic when you realize it's **completely wrong**. >Never said it wasn't a weakness, I'm stating it causing a crash is not as easy as you say it is. You seemingly agree with me on this in your later ramblings here, so 👍. Yes, you absolutely did you lying jerk. As you said "If this was such an achilles heel [**METAPHOR FOR WEAKNESS** we wouldn't need to be reading about it on reddit. Everyone and their grandmother is very aware of the investment being put into AI, if the writing was on the wall that it's a cause for concern people smarter than you and I would probably be selling." The whole point of the comment I responded to was to downplay the risk AI poses by pretending it's just as ordinary as every other market sector, which is not only breathtakingly incorrect, but also begs the question, what are you arguing, exactly? The whole point is AI poses a systemic risk to the broader economy. You don't even know what you're disagreeing with. >Lol. Not sure why you need to make this personal, but ok. It's not "personal" to tell you your take is bad. It's no different than telling you you're wrong. Not sure why you have to get so salty. Don't participate in a public forum if you can't handle being told you're wrong. Trust me, I've shown a lot of restraint when it comes to telling you what your take is really like. >They weren't forgotten. Just because the free market is free to be a free market it does not mean we still allow speculative investments the way we did. Despite my opinion on this stuff clearly and unintentionally hurting your feelings for some reason, this is an objective truth. It was forgotten, and repeating the word "free" until it loses all meaning not only doesn't make the fact that all sorts of speculative investments that pose a risk to the broader economy still exist, largely unregulated, but misses the actual point about what wasn't learned; that when a long, uninterrupted, period of prosperity ends in disaster, there are always people downplaying the canaries in the coal mine, which is what you're doing now. >The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. That's not me speaking, that is very wise old investment advice. It's a bromide you learned on Reddit. It gets parroted here more than anywhere else. It's beyond ironic for you to regurgitate it while saying Reddit can't inform you of something else of importance. The lack of self-awareness you're displaying is startling. >We can stop here, because if you're so confident in your stance here, short the market and get rich. Another reddit bromide. The irony just keeps piling up. It's equally ironic you're complaining about making this personal while telling me what arbitrary behavior I need to display to have conviction, in your mind, as it is that you're full of all of these platitudes but are overlooking the one that follows; about the whole "timing" aspect of shorting. >Otherwise you're just another guy claiming that you know how a recession / depression is coming, when in reality you're shooting in the dark without a crystal ball. Actually, that wasn't the point. But, once again, it's clear you have no interest in learning anything you don't already believe.

Gom_KBull

Isnt the only thing needed for NYT #1 bestseller to be a book?

FeverTreeCloud

TIL Cramer has a new book out and it's #1 bestseller on NYT. Who is buying these books? Can't be anyone here since most of us can't read anything other than TLDR

Pleasant_Interaction

This is because the administration is keeping the lid closed to the public on the issues with the China deal. Investors are waiting for concrete action before they stop trusting the government’s word. This initially happened last week when these started to rise on the NYT & Reuters reporting the new raised controls on tungsten, silver, and antimony (Sb controls are down again), and the continuation of the April controls on samarium, gadolinium, terbium, yttrium, scandium, lutetium, and dysprosium. Prices corrected again after Trump sent a tweet calling the NYT fake news, but now Bessent seems to be confirming that the deal wasn’t finalized, contrary to what the administration claimed on November 1st. Keep your eyes peeled for Thanksgiving https://fortune.com/2025/11/16/china-us-soybean-purchases-trump-xi-jinping-trade-deal/ https://www.politico.com/newsletters/weekly-trade/2025/11/17/rare-earths-still-bedevil-us-china-talks-00653969

Numerous_Ice_4556

>If this was such an achilles heel we wouldn't need to be reading about it on reddit. This is one of the most ridiculous comments I've ever read. Reddit's just a content aggregator, the source is the NYT, which is exactly the type of place you would read about something like this, as if that actually matters in regards to the merit of the underlying argument. > Everyone and their grandmother is very aware of the investment being put into AI, if the writing was on the wall that it's a cause for concern people smarter than you and I would probably be selling. I take back my earlier remark; *this* is the most ridiculous remark I've ever seen. The same "smart" people that have missed every other catastrophe in human history don't sense an impending one, so it must not be real. If we hadn't elected an imbecilic conman, twice, I'd be wondering how anyone could be so basic and delusional in their thinking. It's a cause for concern for the very obvious reasons pointed out in the article; it's basically driving the entire economy, pushing up index valuations, increasing the net worth of households invested, supporting the K-shaped consumer spending driving economic growth, along with the actual AI investment itself. If that pulls back, which is a strong possibility due to the lofty expectations attached, the house of cards, the jenga tower, the dominos, whatever game metaphor you want to use, comes tumbling down. >Also true for housing, Oil & Gas, automotives, alcohol, and many, many other international industries. There's 100 million things that could cause disaster in the markets tomorrow, AI is only one of them. So, there are other systemic weaknesses in the economy, and to you that means AI isn't one? I swear, each take you offer gets worse than the last. Yeah, housing is a problem, but it isn't driving economic growth and supporting the economy to the extent AI is, as I explained above. Yes, there are plenty of things that could cause disaster in the economy, but AI growth is a far more profound and likely cause than any other. >Many regulations were put in place because of 2008. Could it happen again? Of course, anything can happen. But nobody forgot about it Plenty of people forgot about it, because toothless regulation from decades ago have nothing to do with the same irrational exuberance occurring yet again. Anything *could* happen, but only an ignoramus thinks we're either in the midst of disaster or everything is A-okay. Risk of disaster can fluctuate highly, and disaster occurs when that risk is overlooked and misunderstood, which is what's happening now because of people like you who don't understand what's going on. >and it's peak Reddit to cite 2008 and an impending apocalypse day after day, when an extremely resilient economy has faced considerable challenges since with nothing but growth. It's peak Reddit to brush off the lessons of 2008 while pretending like they weren't forgotten, just like it's peak willful ignorance, yet again, to pretend nothing's wrong just because your 401K isn't in the toilet, yet. >The house of cards will come down again someday but I can basically guarantee you won't be reading about it on reddit beforehand. I can guarantee when it does you'll be shitting yourself wondering why your life has been ruined because you clearly understand nothing about economic headwinds or when and how warnings about them will occur. Following your logic, Reddit certainly isn't the sort of place anyone would learn everything is all good, and you're doing all you can to prove that correct. A guarantee from you is a good impetus to believe the exact opposite.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

Jper NYT fed judge says justice dept may have committed misconduct in Comey investigation. No way! Not this highly regarded non-partisan justice dept!

mrbrambles

I think you are gullible if you think she is a darling. Look at what she got into NYT a few years ago: https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/07/business/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-interview.html If you don’t think she can try to buy a narrative to try to trick people into believe she has more support than she has, just try to read that article without gagging.

callsonreddit

Some people just never retire \-- Jeff Bezos to co-lead AI startup in first operational role since Amazon, NYT reports [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeff-bezos-co-lead-ai-114843797.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeff-bezos-co-lead-ai-114843797.html)

KittyLover-7

Tariffs on select goods from Ecuador, Argentina, Guatemala, and El Salvador to be removed by the US, per NYT

BigBoysenberry7987

The NYT reported it, so def more than a rumor.

0DTEKing

TRACO ADMINISTRATION PREPARES TARIFF EXEMPTIONS IN BID TO LOWER FOOD PRICES -NYT I thought there was no inflation 🤔

PlasticHot5834

Jeffery Epstein said in newly released emails: "I know how dirty Donald is," per NYT: LOL