See More StocksHome

NYT

New York Times Company

Show Trading View Graph

Mentions (24Hr)

0

-100.00% Today

Reddit Posts

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

$MSOS - Breaking News: FDA scientists have recommended that the federal government remove marijuana from its most restrictive category" NYT

r/investingSee Post

The NYTs is suing Microsoft and I think there is a profitability play on their stocks

r/stocksSee Post

New York Times sues Microsoft and OpenAI for copyright infringement

r/stocksSee Post

2 common misconceptions about Wall Street and gov bail outs

r/investingSee Post

NVDA: The complete re-invention of the computer industry?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

This Place Turned Into A Fucking Dumpster Fire This Week

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

One of us

r/pennystocksSee Post

(NYSE: NYT) Shares Surged

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Ray Dalio influencing EU monetary policy per NY Times

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

CRSP gets FDA panel support for sickle cell treatment.

r/stocksSee Post

NYT: Palantir may be on the brink of a US$590 million contract to overhaul Britain’s NHS

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

What Happens When Wall Street Buys Most of the Homes on Your Block? (NYT Free Article)

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Today I placed $2,000,000 selling Apple short because I have proven its help chat is a primitive chatbot that repeatedly calls itself human.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Rite-Aid going bankrupt!

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Puts on $NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

NYT Sunday crossword is telling me to bet it all on 0DTEs this week

r/stocksSee Post

NYT: People Started Buying Crocs During the Pandemic. They Can’t Stop.

r/stocksSee Post

To all the GOOG haters / gen AI maximalists

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

$RIOT is up 52% since viral response to NYT hit piece

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

Riot Platforms, Inc. ($RIOT) statement: The New York Times’ politically driven attack on bitcoin mining is full of distortions and outright falsehoods.

r/investingSee Post

QT (quantitative tightening) - the less visible Fed elephant in the corner?

r/investingSee Post

Could increasing interest rates be inflationary?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Any opinions on Paul Krugman?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

SPAC $GXII and merger candidate $Niocorp go to DC reg Critical Mineral supply

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

NYT posted about eggs, definitely a recession we all are so fucked 😭😭!!!!

r/StockMarketSee Post

Doubts for the Saudi Buyout of LCID

r/investingSee Post

Paul Krugman reports statistics on inflation may be misleading

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Apparently the NYT opinion section is pushing financial advice now

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Elon Musk's Twitter bans accounts of CNN, NYT, WaPo journalists | CNN Business

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

The Price of Time The Story of Interest by Chancellor part 1-2 of 3.

r/investingSee Post

Latest in the FTX saga - The Parents in the Middle of FTX’s Collapse - NYT

r/investingSee Post

Latest in the FRX saga -The Parents in the Middle of FTX’s Collapse - NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

SBF full NYT interview. Historic fraud in real time

r/StockMarketSee Post

FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried NYT DealBook Interview in a nutshell

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

What do you guys think of SBF's interview with the NYT's ARS about the failure of FTX?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

SBF will be attending the NYT dealbook summit

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

($LVWR) Gay Bears Need Not Apply: Harley-Davidson is moving on from their gay male consumer base and we can make money from it

r/investingSee Post

From the NYT: Don’t Believe Wall Street’s Social Responsibility Hype

r/stocksSee Post

Uber has been hacked and employees at first thought it was a joke

r/stocksSee Post

Uber hacked by someone claiming to be a teen, employees thought it was a joke

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Walmart Ponders Streaming Deal With Paramount, Disney and Comcast

r/WallStreetbetsELITESee Post

Ex-congressman, banker and F.B.I. trainee are charged with insider trading.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Ex-congressman, banker and F.B.I. trainee are charged with insider trading.

r/stocksSee Post

Fed now doing damage control with NYT hit-piece after realizing that JPOW's dovish statement will make inflation fight harder.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Fed now doing damage control with NYT hit-piece after realizing that JPOW's dovish statement will make inflation fight harder.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

On a NYT podcast this morning, they know it's going to be bad

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Sometimes you just need some re-assurance

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Can anyone help me with this crossword clue? (From today’s NYT mini puzzle)

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

JIM CRAMER RETIRING AMIDST PROBE OF ALLEGED MISCONDUCT, INCLUDING DRINKING ON THE JOB - NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

May Update To The Largest Bet In WSB's History!!!

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Twitter in Advanced Talks to Sell Itself to Elon Musk - NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

NYT: Twitter’s Board Is Said To Seriously Consider Elon Musk’s Bid

r/stocksSee Post

Bill Gates has half a billion dollar short position against Tesla

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

What Wall Street Is Reading: March 23, 2022 NY

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

What Wall Street Is Reading: March 23, 2022 NY Morning

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

WHY did markets dip at 2PM then at 2:30PM it rallied on Federal Reserve Day?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Can We Talk About How Greasy This Whole AMC Deal Is? It's Comical

r/stocksSee Post

JUST IN: Russia Blocks Access to Facebook

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

🚨 Russia has declared war against the Ukraine gentlemen, hold onto your butts... 😬

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Time to Get Ridian of Another Overvalued EV Startup

r/ShortsqueezeSee Post

$MGY: Betting on Texas Oil

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Keep Calm and Carry On: A level view of 2022

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

I have become so convinced that META will announce RBKLX acquisition on Tuesday morning, I's going to sell my last kidney to buy calls. ***SHALLOW DIVE***BAN BET***

r/stocksSee Post

Canadian Truckers Against Mandates say we should short publicly traded news outlets that are biased and spread misinformation.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Life of an options trader

r/investingSee Post

Robert Prechter - 230 Year Grand Super Cycle Peak 2022

r/stocksSee Post

Stocks are off to their worst start of a year since 2016.

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Why Tesla Soared as Other Automakers Struggled to Make Cars - NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Why I am "bullish" on the Reddit IPO

r/SPACsSee Post

Article about insider trading in DWAC in NYT

r/stocksSee Post

Winc, Inc. DD ($WBEV)

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Winc, Inc. DD

r/investingSee Post

Status of after-tax 401(k) Mega Backdoor Roth in 2022?

r/stocksSee Post

The Metaverse real players

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Will Airbnb and Zillow get left behind as virtual real estate sales in the metaverse soar

r/optionsSee Post

Is it really that easy?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Building the 'Musk Proximity Metric'

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Bloomberg - Evergrande Makes Delayed Interest Payment on Bonds

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Bloomberg - Evergrande Makes Delayed Interest Payment on Bonds

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Evergrande makes coupon payment ahead of deadline -source, NYT

r/stocksSee Post

Trying to figure out approximate value of old stock certificates

r/stocksSee Post

Is anyone positioning for the Infrastructure Bill(s)?

r/stocksSee Post

Company-specific News Alerts

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

A Long Term Hold in IronNet? $IRNT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

NYT stock will go down

r/stocksSee Post

Is it possible to create a sentiment timeline of published articles and stock daily returns to evaluate correlation in Tensorflow?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

NYT Publishes Hit Piece on $SPCE. How Will the Market React?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

USA USA USA TODAY – Your grandma's newspaper is undervalued and ready to pop

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Pfizer is beating Moderna

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

FDA aims to give full approval to Pfizer vaccine on Monday - NYT

r/wallstreetbetsOGsSee Post

Cathie Wood, NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

UPDATE 1-U.S. FDA aims to give full approval to Pfizer vaccine on Monday - NYT

r/stocksSee Post

Anyone hold NYT?

r/stocksSee Post

What do you think of the NYTimes?

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Even though its immensely hated, Robinhood is still a growing company

r/stocksSee Post

WH EV policy explained in NYT

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Get Rich Fast(ly) - $FSLY DD

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

How to cash in on an incoming alien invasion? $RTX FDs of course!

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

Tesla Vs WallStreet - When "They" Are Still Trying To Kill Tesla

r/wallstreetbetsSee Post

$CLOV SMH

Mentions

Its not on Fox main homepage yet. Fox Business has it as a little blurb on side. Not gonna bother looking at NYT or CNN lol. There is still room to pump.

Mentions:#NYT

Just finished listening to the NYT story about DoJ case against AAPL. Ridiculous lawsuit that has no chance of sticking. Calls.

Mentions:#NYT#AAPL

Is the NYT also an AI play?

Mentions:#NYT

In fairness, it is the NYT. Fuck the NYT.

Mentions:#NYT

>According to the NYT, there was no additional severance, and he had to forfeit 14.6M in stock options. However, he keeps the 62M+ in contractually obligated compensation.

Mentions:#NYT

> According to the NYT, there was no additional severance, and he had to forfeit 14.6M in stock options. However, he keeps the 62M+ in contractually obligated compensation.

Mentions:#NYT

According to the NYT, there was no additional severance, and he had to forfeit 14.6M in stock options. However, he keeps the 62M+ in contractually obligated compensation.

Mentions:#NYT

NYT always bash orangeman. doesn't matter.

Mentions:#NYT

Would they get this a Russian attack off the front page of the NYT already? Fuck Russia.

Mentions:#NYT

Thought it was in NYT, but maybe only referenced in Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_World_Acquisition_Corp > DWAC was created with the help of ARC Capital, a Shanghai-based firm specializing in listing Chinese companies on American stock markets that has been a target of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigations for misrepresenting shell corporations.[3][4][5] Some investors were surprised to learn that their investment money was being used to finance a Trump company.[6] In 2021, the DWAC Trump venture was linked with another company, China Yunhong Holdings, based in Wuhan, Hubei,[7][8] until its lead banker who was running the merger promised to sever ties with China in December 2021, stating that Yunhong was to "dissolve and liquidate".[9][10] In February 2022, Reuters reported that the connection between Shanghai-based ARC Capital and Digital World was more extensive than thought, with ARC having offered money to get the SPAC off the ground.[10]

Mentions:#NYT#DWAC#ARC

NYT confirming

Mentions:#NYT

News just dropped on NYT

Mentions:#NYT

NYT reports Apple has an "iPhone" monopoly. No fucking shit. They are the only ones that can make iPhones. Morons

Mentions:#NYT

No one ever claimed otherwise, I’m just pointing out how unAmerican NYT/Reddit are

Mentions:#NYT

Exactly my point, it’s not a success and neither is the NYT Go woke go broke, RDDT has to plummet

Mentions:#NYT

> They’re admitting that suppressing speech is the goal and a success, banning/deleting/censoring is successful - suppressing opinions and slanting propaganda is successful? My brother in Christ, NYT is literally a part of that

Mentions:#NYT

From the NYT: "Reddit has also built out a data licensing business, selling information on its users’ discussions and trends across the site to hedge funds and Wall Street firms, which use the information to gain an edge in trading. " Hedge funds getting insights from WSB on how to trade?

Mentions:#NYT

Articles from the NYT tomorrow : “Is the US economy *too* strong? Click here and find our opinions”

Mentions:#NYT

$#!+ will plummet, NYT Best Seller, by SnooDingos3776

Mentions:#NYT

I think the WSJ piece was an isolated case where the headline read pessimism towards re-scheduling, leading to the FUD sell-off. This NYPost is just a non-sensical editorial (point of view) so market will completely ignore it . Also WSJ, NYT, WP for example carry more sway than these smaller outlets. When one of the big outlets reports something, "market will shoot first/act Qs later...

Mentions:#NYT

Even though it’s an op-ed piece . . . Further proof that NY Post is biased, right leaning newspaper and we still have a ways to go to get one party to catch up with other party that is much more cannabis friendly. NYT and WAPO more left-leaning. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

Mentions:#NYT

[The FAA found staff at Boeing's supplier using liquid Dawn soap as lubricant for a 737 Max door seal: NYT](https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-boeing-spirit-aerosystems-dawn-soap-door-seal-737-max-2024-3) still time for $BA poots?

Mentions:#NYT#BA

[NYT on psychedelic companies](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/05/health/ibogaine-psychedelic-opioid-addiction.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb)

Mentions:#NYT

That's a popular talking point, but I am not so sure it is true. For example, although NYT is perceived to have a strong liberal bias, it has done very well financially in recent years. People are happy to pay for it. On the other hand, local newspapers all across the country, regardless of political alignment or lack thereof, are in decline. Many of these organizations are just selling local news, not "opinion," but people are still unwilling to pay for them. People have replaced this with social media, where it's hard to tell who is behind the information being propagated or what their motivations are.

Mentions:#NYT

quick google showed this from NYT. "How would a ban work, and what would it mean for TikTok users? If the bill passes the Senate and is signed into law by the president, it would impose civil penalties on app stores, like those operated by Apple and Google, if they distributed or updated TikTok." I don't see Apple keeping it if its banned, however.

Mentions:#NYT

I don't know that they're going to business with him and his company so much as they have agreed to test his product. I think they have some good theory, but they haven't revealed any tangible product. The CEO's flair, going to Davos and pontificating about how AI and LLM isn't the right approach is fine, but it doesn't translate to a product. Why would you take out an ad in the NYT when if you had something good as you claim, you probably wouldn't even want to share it with OpenAI.

Mentions:#NYT

This seems more steeped in conspiracy than the simple fact that the “drug enforcement agency” might actually have some veteran agents that are anti-cannabis. You really think the WSJ is conspiring to take down cannabis? The WSJ is actually a respectable news source. It may have a right bias, but no more than the NYT has a left bias. 

Mentions:#NYT

I would not do this if I were in your position. You're already over leveraged in tech. Sure, it might go up, but look at things like SNOW or Intuit, who had good prior earnings quarters but projected lower guidance and instantly fell -20%. The market around things directly tied to semiconductors is just too hot rn for that level of risk - a 20-40% rapid AF pullback on basically half your retirement savings is not worth the stress. The semiconductor boom cannot occur in a silo. It requires energy, metals, etc. I'm not recommending it specifically, but something like VIS allows you to take advantage of the AI craze whilst not being as directly exposed - the NYT wrote in October something to the effect of AI chips are projected to consume enough power as some countries. In nvda's last earnings call, they referenced how their chips were being used in cars, healthcare, sales, etc. AI is being adapted by industries all over. You don't need the sexiest new growth stock - diversification will still get you gains as the tech catches on and is utilized by companies all down the s&p 500 to cut costs and raise profits.

Mentions:#SNOW#VIS#NYT

No. NYT, CBS News, WSJ all have polls showing Trump leading

Mentions:#NYT

Joe is gonna propose raising corporate taxes per NYT ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4267)![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)![img](emote|t5_2th52|18632)

Mentions:#NYT

You'll see a resurgence of nuclear power in the near to medium term. There was a good article in either NYT or on Bloomberg about a push for new reactor construction. The fact we haven't devoted more to new nuclear plants is kinda nuts when one considers the alternatives.

Mentions:#NYT

The closest thing to your analysis would be a president who is pro-deregulation and lowering of corporate taxes - both of which Trump is more likely to do. However, the president doesn't have that power, instead, it's done by bills such as the tax reform ([https://www.investopedia.com/taxes/trumps-tax-reform-plan-explained/](https://www.investopedia.com/taxes/trumps-tax-reform-plan-explained/) ). Studies have shown a lot of different data over the years. NYT, a more progressive news source, claims it "[didn't pay for itself](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/04/us/politics/trump-corporate-tax-cut.html)", another study from a university said that while publicly [traded companies benefited, small businesses were hurt](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4082335). There are long-standing ripple effects going forward as the gov't is struggling to find money to pay down national debt, which can result in lowering our credit rating by some institutions which then can hurt investment. Then there's pressures from trade, wars, political climate, demand, and so forth. Macro-economics are very complex because it's like explaining why a group of cars are going in one specific direction - you can get into road planning, sociology, or the physics part of it and never get a satisfactory answer.

Mentions:#NYT

I got an alert from the NYT 20 minutes ago

Mentions:#NYT

Yeah, well in May 2012 people were having the same panic attacks about Romney, the NYT had him up by 3 and Rasmussen had him at 50% (+8%), and we all know how that turned out https://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/CBSNYTPoll_051412.pdf

Mentions:#NYT

I honestly think the NYT just wants to push a horse race for the clicks. Reason to not take early polls that seriously: https://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/05/romney-leads-obama-46-43-in-new-nyt-cbs-poll-123441 Reason to not take this specific polls seriously: https://thedashfiles.substack.com/p/new-york-times-latest-poll-is-a-pile Anyways, it's unlikely that the admin is going to panic and release something because of some poll in March.

Mentions:#NYT

That is absolutely not what everyone thought of Meta, at the time it was one of the biggest in tech history with a peak market cap of $104b. There was certainly skepticism and disagreement over the ad model, but the NYT predicted it would overcome difficulties in advertising and become “‘must own” and JPMC called it the “next great blue-chip”. No one is making that claim for Reddit. Sure, it could explode and prove me wrong, but I don’t see it. Just my opinion

Mentions:#NYT

NYT? 🤮

Mentions:#NYT

Never done an option call, I’d like to do my first with NYT 47$ call April 19. Is this a good play or no? Just gonna buy 1 contract to see how it works and everything maybe it will cash idk

Mentions:#NYT

Let's see how high their costs go up after these lawsuits go through the courts (NYT, etc). Scraping data and using that with no recourse in their LLMs. They will need to settle or just pay up. Cost go up for OpenAI. So yes sales growth looks impressive now, but I'm not sold on margins down the line and profitability

Mentions:#NYT

Unexpected meaning... expectedly 180 degrees opposite from propaganda? Inflation has not come down. My grocery bill is 25% higher than last year. Insurance 50% higher. Taxes - up. Medical costs -up. The job market is not strong. All the companies I work with including my own are laying workers off and downsizing. We're in a severe recession heading toward a depression. The only element of chance is exactly when Reuters, NYT, WSJ, and the rest will be permitted to admit as much.

Mentions:#NYT

Interesting article from NYT [Nvidia’s Big Tech Rivals Put Their Own A.I. Chips on the Table](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/29/technology/ai-chips-nvidia-amazon-google-microsoft-meta.html)

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

Well according to a NYT article they’re seeking a 5 billion dollar valuation. I think they’re definitely worth more than 5B so the price will go up as the market attempts to price them efficiently…. Source. Trust me bro

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

Not really. Video game subreddits, local towns/sports teams, new apps and new physical devices (phones, consoles, etc) have all drastically changed since Reddit started. There's a subreddit for the NYT Connections game which has grown in popularity exponentially since it's release in June of last year. Pretty much nothing popular today was popular in 2010 and if it's "popular", it's likely due to monopoly or has fallen off but has no alternative (see r/youtube).

Mentions:#NYT

Imo this is politics related - legacies are going hard on hybrids right now because they don't really have a better hedged bet. Trump and the Republicans have always been largely against EVs, albeit friendly to Musk, and Biden and the Democrats need the UAW votes this year as a quid pro quo for last year, but neither November outcome spells great news for the EV sector alone. This article from the NYT last week is quite telling imo: Biden Administration Is Said to Slow Early Stage of Shift to Electric Cars https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/17/climate/biden-epa-auto-emissions.html?smid=nytcore-android-share Your FSD point is interesting, and I do agree that whoever wins that race is going to generate immense wealth, but yet again I see the government as a potential impediment in the US market. Regulation is still lagging too far behind and even with L4-esque vehicles on the road today, I have my personal doubts that NHTSA and Congress will move at anything but a glacial pace - perhaps lobbying $ from TSLA can influence it. With that said, in the interest of full disclosure, my above stated opinion is absolutely driven by financial interest and my personal research. I hold the following: - TSLA 150P OCT24 - TSLA 175P DEC24 - TSLA 140P DEC24

As soon as it disappeared from the front page of the NYT I shoulda bought puts ![img](emote|t5_2th52|31225)

Mentions:#NYT

Verses AI. Partnered with Analog AI (Backed by G42) for smart city infrastructure in UAE. Also currently doing beta testing with NASA, Nalantis, Volvo, Cortical Labs, CVS etc. Only AI company that has a straight forward path to achieving AGI. They also took out a full page ad in the NYT calling out Sam Altman stating they have goods on true AGI. They have also been deemed by the IEEE to have the only system that can be governed. Thus company will ve huge.

The NYT noted this was the best day for the SP500 in over a year….and I bought puts…………again

Mentions:#NYT

They got that sweet full business article in the NYT this past Sunday. Just happened to be reading it now

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

> CNBC is running a $NVDA earnings countdown like it’s New Year’s Eve. Yesterday in the WSJ, article; 'Meet the Everyday Investors Along for Nvidia’s Wild Stock-Market Ride By some metrics, the graphics-chip maker has become even more popular than Tesla' Any time that the WSJ or NYT or whoever profiles "average, everyday people" who are heavily focused on/bullish about (fill in hot investment name/theme that has already been hot for a year or more and that everyone knows/loves) it may not be a top but it's never a great sign. And I say that as someone who remains long (mildly less, but still long) NVDA.

Mentions:#NVDA#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

There are many companies which are currently undervalued that would need to be invested in further in order to cause such a market crash, because the various industries or sectors that were destroyed for the sake of tech companies or technological claims like AI would need to be where people put the money that gets inevitably pulled out of those inflated equities. For example, Meta (whose main business is Facebook/Instagram aka digital advertising) destroyed the value of newspapers which were local advertising, including the likes of NYT or GCI which used FB ads and Google to expand their reach, while ultimately losing a grip on whatever their main business was. Therefore, if you wanted to see Meta collapse, and enough people could prove out the future speculative benefit of NYT or even just local news in general (like all the small businesses which helped eviscerate local news ads) including some charismatic media personality to be on television advocating for it, you could see half a Trillion dollars shed off of Meta without having the entire stock market collapse, while then investing approximately 10% of that back into GCI or NYT which are both terrible companies right now but for the sake of argument, that would add $50B in valuation to those companies whose combined current valuation is only about $8B. For those shareholders currently in the news business that would demonstrate a 4x increase in value while also making it possible for those stocks to rise. There are other traditional or linear media companies which were destroyed or nearly destroyed by Meta and their cohort, like radio, etc. who could also see gains from such a situation. Eventually people would need alteration in their general concept of what is really valuable on this planet, because we have been conditioned to reiterate lies like "Google knows us better than we know ourselves," or "data is the most valuable commodity on Earth" which were fed to us by these companies which eventually would need to go.

Mentions:#NYT#GCI

"The U.S. semiconductor industry could face a shortage of about 70,000 to 90,000 workers over the next few years, [according to a Deloitte report](https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/us-tmt-global-semiconductor-shortage-pov-v3.pdf). McKinsey has also [projected a shortfall](https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/semiconductors/our-insights/how-semiconductor-makers-can-turn-a-talent-challenge-into-a-competitive-advantage) of about 300,000 engineers and 90,000 skilled technicians in the United States by 2030." You can read more from NYT ... [https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/19/us/politics/semiconductor-worker-shortage.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/19/us/politics/semiconductor-worker-shortage.html)

Mentions:#NYT

Plenty of people rent a home with their family and it's the right decision for them. I always recommend prospective home buyers to use a rent vs buy calculator (NYT has an excellent one) which is the most complete picture of cost and opportunity cost of homeownership. You can also map out different scenarios of down payment sizes to help you set a savings goal

Mentions:#NYT

Elon is already inviting Chinese suppliers to his Mexican plant which is a work around for the EV credits. Biden is trying to delay this. So Elon goes to Trump and the cesspool that is Twitter/X will back him with AI bots. I read Bloomberg, WSJ, NYT and Barron’s daily. I want macro information from every perspective.

Mentions:#NYT

From the NYT “In a concession to automakers and labor unions, the Biden administration intends to relax elements of one of its most ambitious strategies to combat climate change, limits on tailpipe emissions that are designed to get Americans to switch from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles, according to three people familiar with the plan.”

Mentions:#NYT

Thought provoking question. Also, what happens to professional photographers who to family portraits? Will they be needed in the future? AI has to be trained. The New York Times recently threatened to sue AI content creators who used the NYT as a training source because they view their work as proprietary. Even though the AI output is "original", it is based on the style of content from the NYT. If AI picture creators used Getty or Shutterstock in order to train their AI, they might also get sued.

Mentions:#NYT

You're missing leverage. Houses are highly leveraged investments with high expense rations and transaction costs. The NYT had an awesome rent vs. own calculator, but they didn't update it after the Trump tax changes so it's not very accurate any more. It's still an interesting tool to play with the comparison though and very thorough: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/upshot/buy-rent-calculator.html Nerd wallet also has a tool, but it's not as nice IMO: https://www.nerdwallet.com/mortgages/rent-vs-buy-calculator

Mentions:#NYT

Bu…bu…but the NYT told me for 13 months straight that rents were down and the Fed needs to cut rates?!?!?

Mentions:#NYT

NYT talking about a Goldilocks bull run lmfao. Tops in boys

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

I've been running the NYT buy/rent calculator for NYC for as long as it's been around and I've never found things to be in favor of buying, and the overwhelming reason for that is all the fees you mention. If you've got a $1m mortgage, what would've been some 4k a month, you're also adding on to that another 1500+ in fees and taxes every month, money which is not equity and is completely unrecoverable. It's easy to say "it makes sense to pay a $4k mortgage over 3k in rent for the same space," but when than 4k mortgage becomes 6k with fees then not so much.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

The graphic is real, and was publicly shared by abc a few years ago as part of their new diversity and inclusion program. It was all over the news and the literal catalyst that’s set off Disney being viewed as “woke.” https://www.tvinsider.com/951874/abc-inclusion-standards-rules/ Disney has never officially stated these rules govern their content outside of abc, but as others have pointed out, a quick spot check of Disney content and creation teams in 2023 shows they conform to the same standards. Iger himself had an interview with the NYT a few weeks ago where he touched on his distain for a lot of the ideology shifts in the writer’s room as one of the many challenges he’s now facing.

Mentions:#NYT

Per NYT's Ben Casselman: >Well THAT is a surprise. U.S. employers added a whopping 353,000 jobs in January, far more than forecasters were expecting. Estimates for November and December were also revised up, by a combined 126,000 jobs.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

From NYT >The growth in January was all the more impressive on top of upward revisions to the prior two months, which brought the monthly average job gain in 2023 to 255,000. **Professional and business services accelerated to pile on 74,000 jobs, while health care added 70,000. The only major sector to lose jobs was mining and logging.** >The bumper crop of added jobs, nearly twice what forecasters had expected, mirrors the similarly surprising strength in gross domestic product measurements for the fourth quarter of 2023. >The new year dawned on what has been an exceptionally good economy for many workers, with the number of open jobs still exceeding the stock of people looking for positions, even as new immigrants and women have joined or rejoined the work force in unexpected numbers. Wages have been growing faster than their historical rates, and a strong increase in productivity has helped keep those fatter paychecks from fueling price increases. >**Over the past year, most gains have been powered by sectors that either took longer to recover from the pandemic — including hotels, restaurants and local governments — or have outsize momentum because of structural factors, like aging demographics and pent-up demand for housing.** >**Other categories that experienced supersized growth during 2021 and 2022, including transportation, warehousing and information technology, have been falling back to their prepandemic trends. Another handful of sectors, such as retail, have been largely flat.** >In the coming months, economists had expected the labor market to become even more like its prepandemic self, without the giant job growth that followed the pandemic lockdowns. The latest numbers may call that assessment into question. >**Even manufacturing, which has been in a mild recession for about a year, added 23,000 positions. That reflects optimism in the latest purchasing managers index for manufacturing, which jumped unexpectedly last month.** Timothy Fiore, the chair of the Institute for Supply Management committee that oversees the survey, said it seemed like the beginning of a turnaround, even if a slow one. >“Now we’re starting to gain altitude,” Mr. Fiore said. “It’s not a fighter pilot gain; it’s a cargo plane gain.”

Mentions:#NYT

John Schroyer reposted a tweet by Ashley Southall which said >Yes, I've heard Q1 as well. According to her Twitter page she is a reporter at The New York Times and NYT Metro. She covers 'cannabis, carnival, and policing'.

Mentions:#NYT

NYT didn't count on friends from gov...

Mentions:#NYT

Today: Powell: Alright I’m going to be stern and hawkish NYT Thot: Are you confident? Powell: Fuck yeah I’m the most confident SPY +.75% NYT Thot: Thank you Powell: You are so precious and very welcome, next? Anyone else: Mr. Fed Chair how do you… Powell: Fuck your and your stupid shit I’m not confident

Mentions:#NYT#SPY

NYT is cringe level journalism. Bunch of woke idiots smelling their own farts.

Mentions:#NYT

MY 488 0DE CALLS PRINTING WOOO thank you NYT

Mentions:#DE#NYT

this lady singlehandedly killed my puts. fuck the NYT

Mentions:#NYT

Jpow goes right to the hottie from NYT

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

I know the odds of me finding the next tesla are pretty slim. But what I am more curious about how to even hear/read about such companies. Up until recently, I feel like a lot of this information was much better consolidated into newspapers (like NYT) and what not in the business section. I generally just find myself googling specific companies and skimming some articles. I guess what I am getting at is I'm not looking for the next big hit. I want to read about the new companies with public stock though. I have been really been struggling to find a reliable source for such information that I feel trustworthy with. I bought Nvidia stock back when it was low, but I was only triggered to invest by watching one of those stupid investing tiktoks. I did do my due diligence on the stock then of course, but I was hoping to come across companies through more reputable means.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

NY Post has a better track record than NYT, WaPo, HuffPost, MSnbc combined. News guard certified

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

NY Post is legit the NYT is the grain of salt trash.

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

>Kinda weird that **Bidens done the fewest interviews or press conferences of any** ***recent*** **president**....especially since we are in the age of media. thats my point. I know the NYT had to desperately try to salvage things for their mental by mentioning the R-Dawg....but yea, media during the Regan years isnt near what it's been for the last 3 presidents. Lets focus on that instead of desperately scrambling and mentioning 100 years ago and other nonsense like that. What is your personal opinion for why Biden has done less than half the amount of pressers than Trump, and less than 40% (ive read it's close to 30%) of the pressers Obama did? We are in the most tumultuous times in probably the last 20-30 years militarily, economy is acting nuts, social unrest is at all time highs.....does Biden have nothing to talk about? Or why is it he has had such little availability to the people, as a president for the people?

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

> Define "soon". Because I have toured apartments every 1-2 years for the last decade and almost never see any chargers. And I'm always looking at pretty expensive, nice apartment buildings. I just toured a brand new building last year that had about a hundred units. They had two EV chargers and they were first-come, first-serve on a day-to-day basis, so absolutely not a solution. Like I said, infrastructure always follows demand. If there are currently 2 chargers, that means there's probably demand for max 5 chargers. Next year that will be 8, the year after it'll be 14, and the amount of chargers will grow with it. So far EV adoption growth has been slow. Even here in The Netherlands, with over 20% EV sales, only 3.5% of all cars on the road are EVs. But it's growing by 100 basis points per year, compared to 25 basis points just 4 years ago. We are now starting to see chargers appear everywhere, and the US is only a few years behind us. > I think your experience as a European might not be very applicable to the United States. Our EV charging infrastructure is way behind most of Europe, and hasn't shown much sign of improving recently. Have you seen this NYT article about EV charging problems in Chicago this winter? (gift link by the way so you can actually read it). It's interesting that you point that that particular news article, as this reporting has been thoroughly debunked and is the only example of trouble with EVs in cold weather maybe ever. Naturally range declines somewhat in cold weather, especially for shitty EVs, but in general people in Canada and Scandinavia have no issues with EVs in the winter whatsoever. This particular issue was simply an oversight from Tesla with the chargers, not expecting these extreme temperatures in that particular location. It was fixed overnight, only affected outdated chargers and had nothing to do with the cars themselves, but was massively misportrayed by the media. Most probably because they're out to get Musk after he bought Twitter. > And when it does, I'll consider an EV. But it seems we are still a pretty long way away from the conditions I need to own one. My main requirement is that I have at least a level two charger in the spot I park my car regularly that is solely mine to use whenever I want to. That's understandable, but when you're looking at the broader market it's important to consider that you're just one of many people who wants and EV but is waiting, and the more people make the change the more others will follow. The most important question is how many people want a cheaper, safer and more comfortable car to drive, and the answer I think is at least 99%. Everything else will simply follow demand, even if it's true that it may slow adoption rate somewhat.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

> Chargers will soon be like internet, people won't rent an apartment if it doesn't have charging. Define "soon". Because I have toured apartments every 1-2 years for the last decade and almost never see any chargers. And I'm always looking at pretty expensive, nice apartment buildings. I just toured a brand new building last year that had about a hundred units. They had two EV chargers and they were first-come, first-serve on a day-to-day basis, so absolutely not a solution. > I used to live in a condo here in Europe I think your experience as a European might not be very applicable to the United States. Our EV charging infrastructure is **way** behind most of Europe, and hasn't shown much sign of improving recently. Have you seen [this NYT article about EV charging problems in Chicago this winter](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/17/business/tesla-charging-chicago-cold-weather.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QU0.xXsr.yxvQylPGSWFY&smid=url-share)? (gift link by the way so you can actually read it). > Of course infrastructure always follows demand, not vice versa, but it will catch up. And when it does, I'll consider an EV. But it seems we are still a pretty long way away from the conditions I need to own one. My main requirement is that I have at least a level two charger in the spot I park my car regularly that is solely mine to use whenever I want to. > most people can charge their car at work as well I work from home, so that doesn't help me.

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

Consider NYT instead

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

Biggest single issue right now is Bob Iger. He was interviewed by the NYT a month ago and in the nicest way possible, makes it very clear that the company is down the tubes and he has no idea how to right the ship. He’s set a hard retirement date for 2026 and doesn’t seem interested in any drastic moves till then other than just making sure they don’t fail. This is a shell of the Bob Iger we had a decade ago, and until he’s gone I don’t think shareholders are going to be willing to give the company a rich multiple.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

Oh I guess I don't even read op-eds/opinion pieces anymore. Otherwise yeah I'm sure there are a ton of them on the NYT/WaPo. I was more so talking about the main papers. Like WSJ/FT/Bloomberg front pages will be like '100% chance of recession in blow to Biden' or 'Why economists are still worried', etc. Twitter/TikTok definitely tilts negative.

Mentions:#NYT#FT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

While there will be litigation on this data (see NYT) I think you right. I don’t think the source material of all this data mining is all that valuable it terms of market cap 🤷‍♂️

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

...and CNN, CBS, ABC, and NBC are reputable? Or NYT and Jeff Bezos' WaPo? i too would like some of the crack you're smoking because clearly whatever you're getting behind the wendys is good

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

ATH on the front page of the NYT means we dump soon

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

So, I guess the AI large language models trained on all the free years of www data (Reddit, NYT, WSJ, Google emails, etc) do ok in real conversation, and can replace basic call center responses, write resumes, and summary market synopses, etc.. But they're having a huge problem taking smaller sample data (like proprietary communications at law firms, NIH, consultancies) and sounding like they went to high school, let alone replacing an associate. The best they can do rn is meeting/scheduling emails.

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

All economic news is very bearish rn except for the regards at NYT

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

Right, right. He’s just making “discussion points” on Twitter… for some reason. I mean, how do we even know the board has seen these tweets? Sure, he said “Unless that is the case, I would prefer to build products outside of Tesla,” which would seem to indicate he’s making his continued participation in AI development under Tesla conditional on his 25% equity dema… er, “discussion point,” *IF* he were saying these things to the board. But as it stands he’s simply tweeting these thoughts out into the universe for no apparent reason at all except to let us all know about the thoughts that are in his head. He might just as easily said, “I think I’ll have poached eggs this morning,” or “does this mole look okay?” It just happens that, in this instance, the NYT for some reason decided to seize on Musk tweeting out his stream-of-consciousness thoughts about how much equity he would prefer to have at Tesla if he’s going to continue developing an important new technology for them. When you’re right, you’re right. I concede the point.

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

Ah, I see. So NYT is not allowing for the likelihood that Elon Musk is just saying things that he doesn’t mean. I have to admit you have a good point. Musk, in fact, does this all the time. Fair enough.

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

Whole lotta Musk Derangement Syndrome in these comments. Read an actual article instead of just the headline (not this article, it’s NYT). He requested a higher voting share. Y’all also act like he hasn’t led the creation of some of the lost valuable companies in the world.

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

NYT and associated pressed called it for the orange man

Mentions:#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

Yeah, for all we know Jaeger's "some suspect" is sourcing me, and other /r/weedstocks bagholders lol. But also it's very plausible imo. Moreso than NYT "within months" (though that could technically mean tomorrow too)

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

No mate, I'm not gonna watch it, I have better things to do with my time. Did the guy who wrote the NYT just make things up and NYT said "hey let's publish that!!"? Nothing going on with me. Lately I have been off Reddit because of this type of stuff, but it just so happened that today I felt like calling people out on their BS. I have studied China pretty extensively, lots of issues with China, but that doesn't give anyone the right to make stuff up. Well, you can do whatever you want, but I'm gonna call you out on it lol.

Mentions:#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

This is what I imagined based on the way you have worded everything: it's sensationalist, biased, and not entirely factual. I can imagine that Chinese companies have done this - that doesn't mean that all of them do it. The fact that it happens in the US, too, may indicate that it's not a "China" problem but rather a "people" / capital markets problem. Here's a piece of one review of the film: "There are other reasons to be wary of this documentary, and its built-in slippery slope—sliding all too fast from questioning specific frauds, to making all of China look like a bastion of fraud. Yet, somebody is definitely building all those city-scapes in China, all the new skyscrapers and malls; someone is building all those new airports; some people must be manufacturing all those goods that the US and the world are importing; and, somewhere there must be real energy companies powering those factories. However this film goes too far in its final minutes, making it all seem like a fake. A similar move would be to research the US economy by reducing it to the operations of a handful of crooked used car dealers—while never mentioning that the US built Ford, GMC, Chrysler, and so forth. It would be like saying that in terms of communications technology, what the US has to offer is a bunch of ham radio operators and CB enthusiasts who drive trucks—while never mentioning IBM, Microsoft, Apple, Silicon Valley." [https://zeroanthropology.net/2018/05/03/documentary-review-the-china-hustle-is-a-problematic-cautionary-tale/](https://zeroanthropology.net/2018/05/03/documentary-review-the-china-hustle-is-a-problematic-cautionary-tale/) There's also an NYT review that I couldn't see because of the Paywall, but I asked [perplexity.ai](https://perplexity.ai) to summarize it for me: "The New York Times review of "The China Hustle" suggests that the documentary, directed by Jed Rothstein, may not be the most effective way to present its complex and detailed exposé. The review criticizes the film for its rapidly paced barrage of talking heads and TV clips, indicating that the subject matter might be more suitable for detailed news reporting. While the review acknowledges the film's compelling sequences, it raises concerns about the documentary's delivery mechanism and its ability to provide a balanced and in-depth exploration of the issues it addresses." [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/29/movies/the-china-hustle-review.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/29/movies/the-china-hustle-review.html) I also couldn't find any objective, conclusive proof that Alibaba steals from American investors. If you have any, I'm all ears. I've seen this a lot - someone sees a sensationalist documentary about a hot issue and suddenly they understand everything and everyone else just isn't educated. Usually, it's a little more complex than that. Just my 2 cents.

Mentions:#CB#IBM#NYT
r/stocksSee Comment

Well the situation in El Salvador was that 85% of people there didn't have bank accounts so BTC enabled everyone to have money regardless. I will let you search the Internet to see how it's going, there are good and bad reports of the adoption. It was in a bad place before and whilst Bitcoin has made the country much richer, from my limited reading it hasn't fixed everything, how could it? The president of El Salvador is thrilled that he grew their GDP significantly by buying BTC after taking a lot of criticism for two years when it tanked about 50%. He wrote an impassioned tweet on the matter recently. Check it out: https://twitter.com/nayibbukele/status/1731653743668572498?t=1F80fva39bxw2LgI_Q5h7Q&s=19. His sentiment is one of frustration at all the naysayers. His point is the tone of the media has been against Bitcoin and his move since the beginning. For example the FT and NYT have written scores if not hundreds of ignorant articles about bitcoin for many years, stopping to employ people who understood it only in the last few years. The Financial Times literally published an article saying Bitcoin "had no use case" AFTER it had been adopted as a currency in two countries. To say their articles were ignorant is completely fair, article after article of genuine nonsense was written. The burden of proof is being placed on it, like you do on me, to explain its worth. The problem is, if you learn the fundamentals about bitcoin, all the different things if it can do, then you would probably understand how naive you sound wondering out loud about how "you and your buddies" don't come across BTC in the day to day. Do you come across Gold much day to day? I get it, you've been brainwashed by lazy journalists, most of the older generations have been sadly. Younger people don't tend to read the broadsheets and are naturally better at fact checking. I'm not some conspiratorialist who thinks the establishment was against BTC. But it was certainly a scary thing to bankers and governments, initially seen as something that could be A. Used to dodge tax and B. Render banks obsolete. As most people breathing are aware Banks and Government are powerful. In fact it takes both to start a currency. If you know much history you will know that to start a currency usually involves an army, a revolution or a war. That's usually how you need to start one, and when you do it you want to have control of that currency so you can govern how you wish. You know who doesn't have a history of starting currencies? Some nerd in their basement coding. So when you have the sheer audacity to ask why BTC hadn't achieved more in 15 years when it was created for free on a computer and has had absolutely no backing whatsoever yet is already legal tender all around, the best store of value we have (Gold is all over the universe), the best way to have monetary sovereignty, it does make me wonder how much you have learnt about this world and it's history in your life. The sun has risen already my friend, you better get some sun cream.

Mentions:#FT#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

Nothing has changed in terms of the actual scheduling decision, but a lot has changed in terms of the exposure this news received. This wasn't some niche announcement on Twitter or weed investor newsletter- CNN and NYT had huge coverage. That is almost definitely going to bring new people into the fold who don't want to miss the run, whenever that may actually be

Mentions:#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

NYT and CNN both covering it this time, that’s a lot more eyeballs

Mentions:#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

From the CNN article: "The DEA will have the final authority to make any changes to marijuana’s scheduling, and it will go through a rulemaking process that includes a period for the public to provide comments before any scheduling action is finalized." So maybe the DEA will do a proposed rule "very soon", and then do the public commentary (for show, basically), and the whole thing will be done by the "within months" mentioned by the NYT.

Mentions:#DEA#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

So the NYT times article on the HHS letter seemed to speculate that any proposed rule change would be subject to a public comment period. Which is my base assumption as well, as opposed to a final rule/AG letter drop. If so, I hope everyone is preparing their letters for submission.

Mentions:#NYT#HHS#AG
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

On the topic of aftermarket price, I searched up some big players, and was confused why none of them moved, than I realized that all the NYT and CNN articles came out one and half hour after aftermarket trading has finished

Mentions:#NYT
r/wallstreetbetsSee Comment

I read the NYT article last night, I just think it’s laughable that after many years of scientific experiments, the fantastic and brilliant scientists has finally decided that perhaps marijuana might not be as dangerous as meth or heroine, smh

Mentions:#NYT
r/investingSee Comment

There was a stat in the Wall Street Journal or NYT that 50% of people will enter retirement with no significant $$ savings. Zip. Nada.

Mentions:#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

Do you honestly think the NYT is in the know? Doubt it. They don’t know when its coming and they are just stating what you are saying, “within months”. This still leaves it open for an intro next week, next month or in April. Who da fuck knows.

Mentions:#NYT
r/weedstocksSee Comment

Folks, you know you're tempting the weedstocks gods when you downvote information just because you don't like it, right? lol. I mean I said earlier that I think it's plausible that soon could be like Tuesday, but it's also worth acknowledging that the NYT is stating something that seems different

Mentions:#NYT