RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Beware of smart beta ETFs. 9.75 year review. After taking into account fees and dividends, they kind of suck.
420 Compound – Gold Pave Rose RPV 27/1 🍀🔞
Generating income whilst trying to minimize volatility in these uncertain times
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Announces Issuance of U.S. Patent for TNX-801 Smallpox and Monkeypox Vaccine and Recombinant Pox Virus (RPV) Platform Technology
Not investment advice but we have a double whammy here TNXP CHECK THE NEWS 15 MINUTES AGO
Mentions
Straight SPY market weight capped is, in its own way, already incorporating momentum, as the fastest growing companies/stocks will take up more and more of the index. The argument to go equal weight is to increase diversification, not to increase gains. They also aren’t all the same baskets of stocks. MTUM and QUAL aren’t S&P, they are MSCI USA which includes medium caps. Also, they do not hold all 500 S&P companies, they hold the ones that align with whatever their goal is. ie: if RPV doesn’t believe MSFT is value, it may not hold any MSFT.
I found out a 25% drop in my tech ETFs was enough to pull the plug. I reorganized into AVUV/AVLV/RPV. Might add FTEC as a broader solution after a while.
Yes, it signals a self-sustaining fission reaction within the RPV. Reaching criticality requires the reactor to be fully built, fueled and operational.
Really just ETFs... VTV, IVE, VLUE. RPV is sort of an "aggressive" deeper value fund. I just looked and I was SO heavy in tech and felt it was time to pull back. I had a ton of my 401k in SMH and S&P 500 market weighted ETFs - and they did very well (SMH in particular) , but I am thinking we may be looking at a pull back in tech and others. I still want to be in the market, but I have more downside risk with Value.
401k is just VOO, VEA, VWO. IRA is FXAIX/FZILX/AVUV/RPV/AVDV/DFIV
Yes it means load up on more calls cause its regard price value (RPV) is $200
https://www.youtube.com/live/K8W8mFbLsHw?si=YfaM4Hwni5RPV8b1 Link to conference. 2 mins
QQQ and NASDAQ is low risk. High risk is like AVUV or RPV
Need some advice on spicing up my investment strategy! So here’s my setup - I’m maxing out my employer match on my Roth 401k (they match on the Traditional side, using Fidelity with BrokerageLink). Recently came into some extra cash in 401k and trying to figure out the smartest play. Current portfolio: - 50% in LifePath Index 2060 A (playing it safe-ish) - Other 50% equally split between AVUV, RPV, VOO, VTI, VWO, and VXUS (trying to diversify). Two things keeping me up at night: - What’s the move with this extra cash? Been hearing whispers about Mega Backdoor Roth - worth exploring or nah? - Looking to add more growth potential to my portfolio (ETFs/Index funds only, not trying to pick individual stocks). Any recommendations that would pair well with my current mix? Thanks in advance! And yes, I’ve read the wiki but would love some real-world perspectives.
I have 6 that have a value and small cap weight overall, with world market cap allocations based on US, International, and Emerging Markets. Historically weighting towards small caps and value provide the best return, whether that holds up is anyone’s guess… anyway these are my 6 that I think are tilted as aggressively as possible and give me the best change for the highest risk adjusted return without going overboard and doing something wild like 100% small caps. This is 65/35 us to international weighted, and 8% is emerging value. Small cap to med/large cap is around 1:1. AVUV-32.5% RPV-32% AVDV-14% DFIV-13.5% DGS-4-% AVES-4% Edit: There are no bonds here since you are in your 20s. Personally I am 100% stocks because I have diamond hands and don’t sell and don’t get emotional no matter how bad things get…I also have a pension when I retire which replaces the need for bonds for me
I have 6 that have a value and small cap weight overall, with world market cap allocations based on US, International, and Emerging Markets. Historically weighting towards small caps and value provide the best return, whether that holds up is anyone’s guess… anyway these are my 6 that I think are tilted as aggressively as possible and give me the best change for the highest risk adjusted return without going overboard and doing something wild like 100% small caps. This is 65/35 us to international weighted, and 8% is emerging value. Small cap to med/large cap is around 1:1. AVUV-32.5% RPV-32% AVDV-14% DFIV-13.5% DGS-4-% AVES-4%
You ever play some stupid strategy or RPV game were you spent ridiculous amounts of time grinding and acquiring? Only to have the game end for whatever reason and you’re like, “Well fuck, I didn’t do 90% of what I was trying to accomplish with all that work.” That’s an excellent metaphor for life.
Ugh, damn this is all me right now betting on RPV
[https://paulmerriman.com/4-fund-portfolios/](https://paulmerriman.com/4-fund-portfolios/) According to this there are some variations. The simplist being 25% each AVUS/RPV/IJR/AVUV for just US equity. The 5 other variations include international or bonds.
It's not a terrible idea but in a downtrend, small cap will often feel it harder. I think a fair comparison for AVUV is not S&P500 but something like RPV (S&P value). Here AVUV fell -17.1%. RPV is down -12.8% YTD.
20 years out generally pick an ETF with a strategy you believe in to automate it. Some examples: Highly diversified value : AVLV/ AVUV / DFAT / RPV etc. Concentrated Value : QVAL Concentrated Momentum: QMOM Highly diversified Momentum: VFMO Pretty diversified trend following: GMOM / VMOT etc.
SPGP has always struck me as an interesting ETF. I’ve always seen it as a weird in-between of the ETFs RPV and RPG. That being said, I think you should look at the white paper for the index on S&P Global’s website. It’s transparent and tells you exactly how the index is constructed. I’m personally not convinced that such simplistic quantitative methods gives you adequate GARP measures, but you can make your own judgement. Either way, I don’t think it’s a bad ETF, only decent. And I would use it only as a tilt. Have the majority of your portfolio still in market-cap weighted indexes. This should be a supplement if you choose to implement it. The obvious main benefit to SPGP is as you said and that you get a lot of growth companies that aren’t in tech. Look at its current sector weights and it’s overweight financials. What other ETF has that wildcard quality? Up to you if you want that in your portfolio.
Obviously not financial advice; AVUV/AVDV for small caps specifically RPV/IVLU for large cap value side QVAL/IVAL if someone wants a concentrated fund cap-agnostic (more expensive relative to the other funds above) All have extremely low overlap with VBR. VBR neither captures small nor Value effectively unfortunately. QMOM and IMOM worth looking into for anyone that believes specifically in Momentum and not just Value. Usually held at weighting of 60 Value: 40 Momentum. Pairs well with the above too. Tool for testing overlap https://www.etfrc.com/funds/overlap.php
QQQ and forget it. The top 100 tech minus financials. Stop trying to pick winners. If you want value stonks (oil) VTV. VOO for the S&P 500. Feeling like small cap value is due to run? Avuv or RPV. SMH and soxx for the semis. Try and stick to a few classes of ETFs that you can buy and sell at different times depending on interest rates and inflation. XME and XLE for beating inflation. If you don’t want to trade just stick to VOO and tilt your portfolio towards QQQ if you think tech will start to outperform.
I got RPV. Might be a sign.
Interestingly if you look at deep value like RPV (S+P 500 pure value) it has outperformed the S+P 500 over the last 3 months. But a regular large value fund like VTV has been trailing the S+P 500. And Small value is also ahead of S+P 500 over the last 3 months too.
Poor guy, ocean view from his RPV estate getting blocked. I say that with love & envy. 😉
Rivian has: - 10,000+ employees - Several billion cash on hand even before the IPO - A fully functional plant - Backed by Amazon, Ford, and SoftBank - 100,000 RPV orders - 50,000 R1T orders - Is ramping production. It’s not a new company, it’s a stable company that is growing in a huge market.
>It's a failing, inefficient, dying industry. Haha yes, and that's exactly why nobody wants to own them. I'd bet very few investors are aware that Macy's stock price more than quadrupled over the last year (and they paid a dividend too). Most people think about whether they'd like to own a company, rather than whether they're paying too much to own it. One of the central lessons of investing is that you're rewarded for doing that which others dislike or are unable to do. Buying more shares when the market has fallen by 30% would be terrifying to many, but that's when the risk premium is maximized. Everyone wants to partake in technological revolutions like the internet in the '90s, and that's exactly why most of those companies [deliver so poorly](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEwwtjDo1dU&t=709s&ab_channel=TheRationalReminderPodcast) for their investors. Currently the Avantis value funds are arguably the best. Invesco also has excellent US value funds with high exposure to the value and profitability factors: RZV, RFV, and RPV. Because Avantis doesn't have a US mid cap value fund yet, RFV is my top choice for that market. I put together a table with funds from the largest asset managers [here](https://github.com/investindex/Fund/blob/main/README.md#summary). Regardless of which value funds you choose, the companies they hold will be superficially undesirable. Investors who can resist the popular temptation to put everything in the S&P 500 -- because people know those companies and think that's good -- will be rewarded in the long run.
As others have said, small cap value has higher expected return than a pure small cap fund. See [here](https://github.com/investindex/Portfolio) for why this is true. Funds managed by Avantis are great, although Invesco also offers funds with very high exposure to value and profitability (RZV, RFV, RPV).
A conservative way to beat the market I have established a universe of 53 ETF's that approximately replicate the global market (sectors, indexes, regions and fixed income) and hold 5 positions at all times. \---- There is almost no time that at least 1/3 of these tickers are not positive \---- I assess the momentum of RSI and % p/l over the past 4 months weekly, and enter/exit only on Mondays based entirely on RSI and % performance momentum \--- I enter using short puts normally, but occasionally buy stock and immediately sell covered calls \--- I have preestablished exits in place for every position \--- My only mid week trades are when an exit triggers \--- I do not trade bearish except for covered calls for cash flow or when I elect to exit a position \--- Current holds AMLP, OIH, EWZ, XLF and RPV \--- ON the average, I exit about one holding a week. I have been doing this for about 12 months with a portion of my investable assets with the result beating SPY by about 20% (for periods SPY is up 8%, these holding would be up 9.6%) . One of the major down periods was the sector rotation that occurred last week.
buying RPV, short squeeze to $20!
AVUS, RPV, IJR, AVUV, EFV, AVDV, AVEM. I'm always in the market!
I got exposure to the oracle of Omaha through my ultimate boomer play - RPV
Pick up some RPV - this etf is a boomer's wet dream
A little contrarian: Here’s an end-of-the-world-is-coming-but-still-want-to-be-invested. I have EYLD at 45% of my portfolio. EM value, tobacco, telecom, and utilities is the way. EYLD - Cambria Emerging High Yield SPHD - Invesco US High Dividend Low Volatility RPV - Invesco US Pure Value AVDV - Avantis Foreign Small Cap Value FYLD - Cambria Foreign High Yield