Reddit Posts
Updates for Getting Payment on the Under Armour $434 million Settlement
Under Armour $434M settlement updates, late claims still open
I just found a payout for Under Armour ($UA) from... 2015? This settlement is huge.
Final days to participate in the Under Armour $434M Settlement
Final days to participate in the Under Armour $434M Settlement
I just found a payout for Under Armour ($UA) from... 2015? This settlement is huge.
I just found a payout for Under Armour ($UA) from... 2015? This settlement is huge.
I just found a payout for Under Armour ($UA) from... 2015? This settlement is huge.
WE MUST PROTECT THIS STONK - Under Armour - UAA & UA ⚔️🛡️⚔️
WE MUST PROTECT THIS STONK - Under Armour - UAA & UA ⚔️🛡️⚔️
WE MUST PROTECT THIS STONK - Under Armour - UAA & UA ⚔️🛡️⚔️
Final days to participate in the Under Armour $434M Settlement
Are you sleeping on Under Armour $UA $UAA?
Are you sleeping on Under Armour $UA $UAA?
In these trying times, all we need is Unity - A Generational Opportunity (reupload)
In these trying times, all we need is Unity - A Generational Opportunity
$UA: Under Armour Secures Raiders Deal — $434M Investor Settlement Still Shadows Brand
$UA: Institutions Add to Stakes as Stock Slides
FASHIONISTA trends - Blue jean stocks
Under Armour's Endless Legal Battles – Will We Ever See a Recovery?
What Happened With Under Armour’s Growth Story and Can People Still Win?
What Happened With Under Armour’s Growth Story and Can People Still Win?
What Went Wrong With Under Armour’s Growth Story — and How People Can Still Win
Gotta hand it to Reddit in Vegas… and, oh yeah, a tasty UA rebound for my fellow regards 🍻📈
Gotta hand it to Reddit in Vegas… and, oh yeah, a tasty UA rebound for my fellow regards 🍻📈
The Next 10x Bagger. Before it Actually Happens
Under Armour Jumps on Brand Hype—But Can It Stick the Landing?
FAQ for Getting Payment in the Under Armour $434M Investor Settlement
Under Armour's Endless Legal Battles – Will We Ever See a Recovery?
Under Armour's Endless Legal Battles – Will We Ever See a Recovery?
Bright Mountain Media, Inc’s Wholly Owned Subsidiary, Wild Sky Media, Announces Deal With Taboola.Com Ltd. (TBLA) A Global Leader In Powering Recommendations For The Open Web
Massive BioNTech spike today despite bad news. Why?
Best Fashion Stocks to Buy Now in 2023: Top Clothing Stocks
Is it time to sell Crocs(CROX) after 165% rally?
JMP Securities issued a positive rating yesterday on Freshworks.
Bucillamine could be a game changing drug in the course of the pandemic
Recycling EV Batteries Is The New Form of Mining with Double Tailwind. Why LICY Seems Finally Ready to Deliver
UA/UAA (Under Armour) in freefall – how come?
Stock in Freefall for a Company Whose Product is 12-24 Months from being Government Mandated
The National Bank of Ukraine Fundraising the Armed Forces
Should I sell stocks and just buy the SPY?
Should I sell my shares and just put it all in the SPY
Weekly gainers: top 5 companies by the growth of job openings over the last week
My 10-week report of auto investing platforms (mostly robo)
$UAA… he was right. I hope you got in. Cashed out my 22s for 4.2k profit.. bought 19s for $UA on Monday , cashed out for 1k. Currently sitting on 25 calls and my 30s are drowning but I will roll tomorrow. For everyone saying that my theory wouldn’t work… it worked Consolidation+Catalyst=good returns
$UAA $UA Short Ratio (Days to cover) 2 days left until earnings with many analysts raising PTs this week.
$UAA short ratio (days to cover) 2 trading days left until earnings
$UAA $UA Short Ratio (Days to Cover)
$UAA $UA short ratio is 59. meaning shorts have 59 days to cover making it extremely difficult to do so. A high short suggests that the stock is rallying and if more people are buying the price will rise. Shorted shares= 307,887,000 Outstanding UAA shares=454,000,000
Google is in the hottest antitrust seat, but Apple and the rest of Big Tech shouldn't breathe easy
AMC Theory.. don’t claim to the smartest guy ever, but I read between the lines well. but would love to farther this conversation with smarter people than myself!
AMC Theory… don’t claim to be the smartest cookie. But I like this theory. Disprove me if you need too, I don’t have a problem with it at all.
Am I missing something on $T .03 off break even plus dividends apes hungry, $UA, $NOK, are low and read to go right? Help I'm new to options!
Am I missing something? T is .10 cents off break even and .52 cents dividends for a couple Q? That UA and NOK look read for a push? Little advice I'm new to options side.
Mentions
I just can't imagine a scenario where NKE has a high chance of outperforming the S&P. Brutal, brutal sector. Fast changing trends, changing tastes, competition getting better. Not just about Adidas & Hoka & NB anymore (even UA shoes are improving - I know cause I wear UA to gym). Now formerly joke *Chinese* brands are getting big. Curry signed with Li-Ning.
Similar size and scale reached as you point out. Half of it isn’t a different order of magnitude. Beyond the point anyway. UA played around, in and out of DtC for years. It’s a conundrum for the business, push sales or push price? No moat, so it’s easy to get stuck in the middle. About the inventory, just opened the site and every item in the store is marked down 25% to 50%. I’ve never seen a thriving retailer giving out a discount on all of its items.
Nike was higher in August of 2014. He could Be holding a lot longer than 5 years. And UA? lolz
My point is LULU is UA with a delay. Not because it’ll play out the same but because they are going thru the same things within an ultra competitive business where it’s next to impossible to have a moat. Nike’s moat, for decades, before they fumbled it, meant a better op margin compared to peers by few % points. UA was a fad, Lulu was a fad. Others are more trendy these days. It’s done.
I said it before. I lived it with UA 12 years ago. LULU is going down the same path: \- International growth is not there, as in: it’s not what you think. Brand is relatively unknown (Im Europe based) and consumers have too many fashion options to overpay for an unknown brand (same happened with UA). Costs will outpace revenue growth. \- No moat, no margins. Inventory is destined to be sold at discounted prices. It’s already happening. Once the wheel is in motion, consumers will never see premium value in your product again. Nobody is buying UA t-shirt for 45€ knowing they can get them discounted at 10€. Lulu is done. Maybe a great company, great products. As a compounder story? Forget about it!
Why not in companies he likes and knows do he stays motivated? I'm not basing these necessarily because I think the stocks are good, but companies like : Hasbro, mattel, Nike, Starbucks, UA (might be the best if you want cheap), Nintendo, Capcom (another good one if you want cheap).
Oversight/mistakes happen. Besides UA/RU. The whole world is still pretty newbish on drone interception.
Russia didn't do forced mobilization. They only have volunteers serving in UA. Slow and steady wins the race
Unlike RU/UA, this would be a major disruption in world trade. You'd have many more sorrows than the wellbeing of your TSMC share price. Western trade with CN would almost certainly cease almost instantly. CN wouldn't survive such for a very long time. And I reckon they know that.
Yea, they are UA drones with USA label - 5xmore expensive but hey, its USA drone :D
UA long range drones have longer range than any European missile currently in production. Missiles win because of the heavier payloads. Missiles lose because of the high costs. The game changers in UA war are long range drones.
W... what? First of all, Ukraine has disrupted oil and gas flows more than Iran did. Brent peaked far higher during early UA than Iran. Secondly, both respective superpowers have used around 50% of their respective arsenals, in terms of the gear that matters in such conflicts: Air defense interceptors, cruise missiles and precision missiles. 13 countries have been intentionally bombed as a result. Not one but TWO naval blockades in the most trafficked maritime economic corridor in the world at the same time. And that's just the US. RU has used far more. Lost over a million men, 50% of its tank fleet, 15% of its war planes and helicopters etc. Both superpowers are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at their enemies. You're just not recognizing then as 'massive wars' because we haven't reached the level of casualties of WW2. But you're failing to recognize that we never will, and that the very nature of war has altered dramatically with the dawn of modern military tech. WW2 was a time when leaders (I don't just mean the commanders in chief cause you can replace an individual easily - see Maduro, but the entire leadership structure) were essentially immortal by today's standards. If you wanted to kill Hitler, you either had to send spies and assassins (there was **A LOT** of emphasis on counter-espionage and counter-terrorism at the time, and Hitler lived in bunkers and armored trains), which was tried and never worked, or literally invade Germany. There was just no other option. The US, in the first few days, killed 250 senior Iranian politicians, including 28 cabinet-level named executives. Including, you know, their Supreme Leader and most of his family, their Speaker of Parliament, their Commander in Chief of the IRGC, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Minister of Intelligence, Minister of Defense, etc. It's the equivalent of the Allies assassinating Hitler, Eva Braun, Himmler, Goebels, Goering, Keitel, von Manstein and Guderian all within days. Unfathomable at the time. I'll conclude in the same way: We've normalized war so much that we've become oblivious to its horrors. The concept of Trump, Melania, Rubio, Hegseth, JD Vance, and Thune getting assassinated by Iran at the same time, then some guy in, idk, New Zealand or Ghana going 'It's not a "massive" war by any stretch.' is hilarious to envision.
It would be way too long of a post to run through the whole list of negative experiences I had with Spirit, but, iirc I flew them for two round trips … and the amount of service failures across those 4 flights was more than I’ve had in hundreds of flights on AA, UA, DL, and B6. I’m honestly in a state of surprise whenever I see anyone singing their praises. My mom, as an example, always used to sing their praises… and then every time she flew them would complain about how terrible every aspect of the airport experience and flight was… and then a week later would say she loved spirit. rinse and repeat for years. I suspect they were okay If you didn’t need to check a bag, or only checked a small bag that was very durable.
You’re getting a ton of downvotes, but honestly I agree. I’ve taken spirit a few times because they happened to have nonstop routes that would have been convenient for me in theory. In reality, my experience on Spirit was so bad that I’d rather have a connection on AA, UA, or DL. The staff seemed to delightfully try to make the experience as unpleasant as possible, at every step of the journey on the handful of times i flew them. And, as far as price goes… once you start paying for the upgrades like an assigned “extra space” seat or whatever they called it … compared to what I’d pay on another airline, the value prop disappeared. I’d assume the airline algorithms for AA, DL, UA do consider each other as peers … and to some extent JetBlue, Alaska, and Hawaiian. But spirit and the like were probably mostly seen as pests who were not competing in any sort of sustainable, fair, or rational way… and assumed passengers would either opt in to Spirit and just not be mainline customers… or opt out and never consider them either way.
That's never gonna happen. I'm pretty sure Scott Kirby himself is leaking the "internal UA memos" on the subject specifically to troll the media just so he can turn around and say hey this JetBlue thing seems pretty normal now by comparison.
True. I am a die hard UA adherent going back to my military days but 10-15 years ago they tried to cut corners everywhere. I buy socks there’s holes in them after 3 weeks. They wised up and started issuing high end stuff again at higher price points but the damage was done. In dept stores they sell uninspired stuff on racks next to Champion
UA is a white dwarf about to go supernova for its last time. Dead brand. Was more popular outside the US but not anymore. Private Equity ownership coming soon.
Yes, exactly my thought. So much insider buying from GME, Nike, now UA. Everyone’s going AI and this is how the bubble bursts
So now Witkoff, after having so much success with RU-UA war, will now be handling Iran talks? SPY 800
They will prop up a corpse of an airline to say competition when approving the AA/UA merger.
UA CEO is framing the merger as great for customers. Yeah, that’s what mergers are about.
You phone but this was basically what UA tried to do 10 years ago.
My dad imparted some logic on me. I think it’s excessive but it has helped me a lot. “If you had the amount your stock is worth in cash, would you buy the stock at its current price?” Now, if I took this to heart 100% of the time I’d be poorer than today, but it has helped me quite a bit regarding when to sell. I personally also incorporate some other logic like weighing why I purchased the stock and if it still applies, as well as what bin of money I used to purchase the stock. If it’s house money, I’m much more flexible. One example was PLTR, purchased at ~$7. I sold my initial investment worth at $40 because I would no longer buy them at that level, and rode the rest to $60-100 because it was house money. I sold because they’re a POS company and my initial reasoning (NATO integration following UA success) became less likely. If I kept holding I’d be richer but you never go broke selling at a profit.
Sounds like a joke but UA already did this. HOVR bluetooth shoes. They just missed the boat on talking up how much AI is involved.
Fair question, but no. Almost perfectly coinciding with the Iran war, Ukraine has heavily targeted Russian export facilities in order to reduce the profits RU gets from skyrocketing oil prices. Traditionally, UA goes for refineries but they switched to focus on export capacity recently and have bumble-fucked their port facilities with drones, all fairy recently. Reuters has a few articles on it.
UA and AA can afford to spread around much larger campaign donations.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf7ROU2\_8UA](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf7ROU2_8UA) you're welcome.
You would be right, if it was just hormuz. But its not. USD status as reserve currency is already doing quite poorly. https://www.reddit.com/r/EconomyCharts/s/UA9C0sQf2z
But why take the island in the first place. All you have to do is park few ships in the gulf of Oman and stop any ship you see loaded from the island. ? As people have mentioned before, Iran need to hit one boat for the strait to be closed, while any force need to keep it open every day. To put it into perspective, the most narrow spot is 33km, and the drones used in UA have a range of 40.
I like Under Armour for my gym & running stuff and now even their shoes - previously HORRID - are getting better. But I know many dislike UA and see it as middle aged conservative Dad brand. Lulu used to be on fire now it seems to stuggle. On Cloud emergence, Hoka, Adidas with the Kanye drama, now apparently Chinese shoe brands are improving a lot. I can't believe it's *this* bad with Nike though. I never bought shares (bought DECK instead) but will confess I thought about backing up the truck because "c'mon it's the swoosh, not going anywhere".
Pray for me I'm buying UA
Doesn't the UA CEO have his lips firmly around 🥭 dong? I guess he has it in his ass now too...
I think this is about as good of a take as any. > Here is the main reason of this stupid War. Chevron & Exxon said NO in January to Capex in Venezuela With $60 Oil. But just 24h after Iran War and especially with Oil at $100 a Long Queue of Big Oils is ready to please POTUS. The Plan is to endures Iran War at least for 1 year...The time needed for having Capex deployed in Venezuela. > EU like during RU-UA will now have no alternative to buy A LOT of Dollars to pay Oil from USA. Fix US Trade Balance via IR War. trump not worried about dollar going doing and he said "I can make the dollar go up and down like a yo-yo." And yesterday announced no intentions of oil export restrictions. If high oil prices were a concern they would be limiting exports like other countries. But they are not. They want higher oil prices and to export to countries affected by this war.
I think this is about as good of a take as any. > Here is the main reason of this stupid War. Chevron & Exxon said NO in January to Capex in Venezuela With $60 Oil. But just 24h after Iran War and especially with Oil at $100 a Long Queue of Big Oils is ready to please POTUS. The Plan is to endures Iran War at least for 1 year...The time needed for having Capex deployed in Venezuela. > EU like during RU-UA will now have no alternative to buy A LOT of Dollars to pay Oil from USA. Fix US Trade Balance via IR War. > trump not worried about dollar going doing and he said "I can make the dollar go up and down like a yo-yo."
yeah if US cant employ lessons from UA
It’s crazy how fast that hype cycle shifted! The lawsuit claims that while we were all wearing the gear in high school, UA was hiding the fact that demand was actually dropping by 'pulling forward' orders from future quarters to hit their numbers. When the truth came out, the stock took a massive hit.
I don’t think you quite understand how powerful the Russian Navy is. Their warships can become submarines (albeit with a little help from UA). Now no one can beat their stealthiness underwater, until a sailor decides to go out for a smoke. /s
$UA all day erry day all night.
They've changed their ticker symbols: it went from $UARM at IPO to $UA and then in 2016 to $UAA (Class A shares) and $UA (Class C shares). The split was to do the voting/non-voting shares thing -- which is a good sign it's time to get out of a stock.
JBLU had a rough day but I think its going to get absorbed by United this year. UA said no last year- but they have started working in getting JBLU customer used to using their platform. Also orange removing anti trust peeps. JBLU C5 2027. JBLU shares.
Props to the guy who posted about UA a month or so ago, I sold too early but it's running
2000s $UA toxicwear GOATed
if you never dry humped in the original microplastic $UA lax shorts I don't even fucking know how to tell you bro
I see your AI Slop and raise you with my AI Slop AIRE Analysis 🌍 United States 💼 reAlpha Tech Corp. • Real Estate • Real Estate Services ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 SCORE: +0.263 (95% confidence) ⚪ SLIGHTLY BULLISH 💰 Yahoo Finance: • Price: $0.31 • Market Cap: $40.7M • 📊 Volume: 975.5K • Day: 📈 +0.42% • Week: 📉 -4.51% • Month: 📉 -28.76% • Float: 95M • 52w Range: $0.14 - $2.08 🔻 DEEP DISCOUNT (-85% off high) - bargain or garbage? 📊 Historical: ATH $575.41 (-100%) | ATL $0.14 | Age 2.3y | (IPO 2023-10-23) • Analysts: 2 covering | 🔴 NONE 🎯 Target: $1.30 (+318% upside) 💰 Debt/Equity: 0.05x (HEALTHY) 📊 Profit Margin: 0.0% (BREAKEVEN (barely)) • Short Interest: 📊 5.8% of float | 1.2 days to cover • Institutional: 📊 4.2% Top 3: Vanguard Group Inc (1.5%), Blackrock Inc. (0.8%), UBS Group AG (0.8%) 👔 Insider Trading (90d): Buys: 0 | Sells: 0 | Grants: 7 Recent Transactions: 🎁 2026-01-30: GRANT 14,778 shares ANGELIS DIMITRIOS J (D) - Director (23.0% of holdings) 🎁 2026-01-30: GRANT 414,230 shares DEVANUR GIRI (D) - Officer, Director and ... (1.4% of holdings) 🎁 2026-01-30: GRANT 14,778 shares COLE BRIAN D (D) - Director (3.9% of holdings) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📈 CHART ANALYSIS: 🔴 BEARISH Score: -35 pts • 🚨 Falling knife (down 93% from high) • 💀 Volume dying (0.1x) • 📉 Losing momentum (-29% in 30d) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📋 THESIS HEALTH: 🟠 WEAKENED (53/100) ⚠️ Dilution: Shares +126% 🟢 Good News: reAlpha (Nasdaq: AIRE) Announces Na... (Dec-30-25 05:00PM) reAlpha (Nasdaq: AIRE) Signs Defini... (Dec-22-25 04:30PM) 🏛️ SEC: 🟠 WARNING (45/100) • IPO: 2y 10m old ⚠️ Shelf registration active (filed 2025-05... ⚠️ Serial diluter: 9 offerings in 1 year ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📱 REDDIT SENTIMENT (2 posts, 7 days) Social media speculation - trust at your own risk 📄 Reference Posts: 1. a real retail turnaround - UAA & UA 🟢 today by u/investor57347 2. $AIRE - reAlpha Tech is reinventing real estate... 🟢 today by u/One-Dingo1220 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📋 TRADING SUMMARY 🟡 MODERATE RISK (low discussion volume, minimal institutional backing) Strong slightly bullish signal showing strong losses (-28.8% this month) . Key factors: deep discount (-85% off high - value play OR dead money). ⚠️ Risk factors: minimal buzz (2 posts - ghost town, nobody cares), very low institutional (4% - smart money said fuck this). 💼 TRADE SETUP & STRATEGY Key Bullish Factors: • Strong positive sentiment Key Bearish Factors: • Very low institutional (4% - smart money wants nothing to do with this shit) • Minimal buzz (2 posts - nobody gives a fuck) • -85% off highs (cheap for a reason - it's garbage) Recommendation: 🔴 AVOID - Late stage pump. You're the exit liquidity. GTFO. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> ...them to lower the security... Disingenuous nonsense. Imagine pretending their standards are even remotely close to safe. > ...UA standards only care for people inside the vehicle... That is a lie. UA standards are also designed to protect pedestrians, cyclists, and occupants of other vehicles.
Thoughts on Under Armour $UA? I like the 1M chart
I am confused, why do you want them to lower the security standards to US level ? To cut costs ? US standards are very low, it's why they can't be sold out of the country. To be precise, UA standards only care for people inside the vehicle, so for this purpose they are at the same level as others. But they are typically extremely dangerous for pedestrians, and other cars. On the list of forbidden stuff, the hard "protections" in the front. Those do nothing to protect anyone, but since they are not pliable, getting hit by them will cause massive injury. The fronts is often too high / large, risking much worse injury. Lack of pliability means others cars might take more damage in lateral shock.
I sold all my UA at 7.50 yesterday. I've never timed anything that well
#TLDR --- **Ticker:** UAA / UA **Direction:** Up 🚀 **Catalyst:** "Canada's Warren Buffett" (Prem Watsa) aggressively acquired 22% of the float + Kevin Plank returned as CEO. **Vibe:** Founder Mode ⚔️🛡️ **Prognosis:** Long Shares & LEAPS (Turnaround play with shrinking float)
My UA calls are ripping
Without a fucking doubt. They fell for three bullshit reasons 1. Short Reports that predicted money laundering and fraud. LOL 2. Google Project Genie. APP literally divested their games business. If anything, if it’s easier to make content then they benefit because the proliferation of new content means you need help with UA to get your content out there. If development is cheaper then you have more money to spend on ads 3. CloudX entrance APP has too strong of a lock in effect with publishers due to MAX. You need to mediate with them to use Ad ROAS campaigns and their whole flywheel effect is due to them having a closed data loop. This stock is so oversold it’s crazy
I've been buying UA it's going to 10
ONs and Hoka. Those are cute. How many athletes use those and are sponsored by again? Remember when UA was suppose to knock Nike off the throne. That lasted how long? Does ON and Hoka even have soccer shoes? Or basketball shoes? Business wise Nike will be Coca-cola/ McDonald's while everyone else is Pepsi / Burger King. However that doesn't mean Nike is the best share to own. Due to how many Saturated water down stocks in the open market for Nike. Nike be wise to do a buy back.
Which soccer team wears Hoka? College football 1st time in over a decade a Nike school didn't win. Funny want UA an growing brand and was suppose to take down Nike. How that work out?
PLTR calls, CMG puts, GOOG calls, MSTR puts, UA puts !remindme 1 week
I’m not upset, I just called out 2 points that were off the mark. I didn’t mention anything about Nike losing market share to competition — you’re somehow confusing what I actually said. What I said was: the 2 points raised were wildly off the mark: 1) Under Armor as competition or “eating market share”, and 2) Nike not making good quality products. On 1): Under Armor has lost a ton of market share, and is closing stores very quickly. They’re in disaster mode. Their brand deals with athletes are falling apart. They are not “creeping” into markets Nike dominated, they are creeping into oblivion and likely bankruptcy. UA has become a diffused discount outlet brand at this point, one step removed from being obsolete. On 2):Just because others also make good quality products and there is competition does not mean Nike makes poor quality products. That’s a logical fallacy. It just means others also make good products and there are other choices. Nike makes great running gear. Whether people want to pay the premium or not is another topic (I did), but that doesn’t mean it isn’t quality. Conflating two concepts and coming up with a single half baked conclusion is what I took issue with. Lastly, your post reads like AI slop. Please tell me you didn’t run my comment through ChatGPT for pointers.
this is such a dumb post and the reason why people should not come here asking for advice. Did you really just mention Under Armour? UA will be lucky to survive the next 3 years. They will probably get bought by private equity or a bigger player for pennies on the dollar.
2k in AAL, 2k in DIS, 2k in PYPL, 2k in BBWI, and 2k in UA. Thank me later 😂
Interesting timing, owners of UA are heavily buying the stock recently I track insider activity closely, but how does the company do in terms of its financials?
Interesting timing, owners of UA are heavily buying the stock recently I track insider activity closely, but how does the company do in terms of its financials?
I bought a few shares of Netflix so buy UA
Chart seems decent. Debating if I wanna go into UA or NFLX.
It’s a as well known brand. We can argue about the quality but its brand equity and high level of awareness is among the top in the industry. Also, gross margin is very high (higher than that of Nike). So from this perspective UA has a lot of optionality: capable management can easily turn it around. From the valuation POV, 4/share required just a very little growth and margin improvement. I thought it was very doable considering coming back of the founder, cost cutting, interesting new commercial, and pipeline of new product. TLDR: cheap with a ton of optionality.
Why is everyone suddenly buying calls on UA
UA is a dying brand and company. Good luck
UA calls are actually working out... for now
Bro wtf... UA is up 35% in last month. What is this 2015?
Bro wtf... UA is up 35% in last month. What is this 2015?
Delta has kinda gone to shit. AA, UA, and DL have never been more of a commodity.
They have different quality tiers with different distribution end points. The highest quality goes to sponsored athletes and the “official” UA stores and maybe some higher end sporting goods stores. Then a tier for the large sporting goods franchises which might have a blend of the high end stuff and another tier which is the UA outlet stores and the discount stores (inc. TJX companies) which used to be overstock but now a mix of ordered and overstocked. Anywhere in the states with an outlet mall that is still alive; you’ll find a similar model from those brands that seem to be at every outlet (Gap, North Face, Nike, Columbia, etc)
UA is what the troops wear under their uniforms
Anyone interested by large amounts of insider buying within NAVAN and UA?
Hummm. Better close that soon. UA is shit and will remain shot because their products suck, their management suck and it will continue to dip. It dead-cat bounced, I would take the profit now. Maybe you get another big move tomorrow if tariffs are struck down. I’ll take profit. If you want a Clothing Apparel turnaround, $GAP is my favorite play. They have been turning around the brand over the past 6 quarters, management is very solid and they should deliver great returns this year while being valued <12x PE with no debt. Nike is most likely a good play as well.
V Prem Watsa (ceo of fairfax financial holdings) bought $138 million worth of shares a couple weeks ago, probably a pretty safe play source: https://financhle.com/company/UA/employees insider trade history section
That and their main supplier is bogged down in UA.
Yes, UA grad…used to see Julio/Ingram every day
Buy buy buy Just compare all fundamentals to its competitors its undervalued Buy UA also
Wait…what’s going on with UA? Any deals announced
Some of it was just growth. Some of my big winners are UA, I was into that stock really early on. I’ve had MSFT since around $30. Shopify was also a big gainer for me. Didn’t start out with a huge amount in any of them. Wished I would’ve put more in them. But they grew to be big parts of my portfolio. Except for UA. I sold that one at a good time and put it into Shopify.
UA Under armor? I like the stock. 10 year low Only way is Up! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
I only implied LULU could become irrelevant like UA and GAP if they continue on the path they're on. Never suggested they were in direct competition with them.
you are not wrong, but these are all totally different companies from LULU i just think LULU is not the "it" brand even in their space and could be headed to where UA is in a few years
It’s a million times better. I’d never buy UA, but have several pairs of lulu
Investing in individual stocks is investing in a company - not the broader economy. I buy companies that consistently increase shareholder value through growth in top line, bottom line, profit, margin, dividend etc. A company can be doing great, but macro issues pull the stock back. But in the end, the great companies always rise. I suppose if you are just playing speculative and hot plays, it may make sense to follow the trend. But 7-18+ years in stocks such as MSFT AMZN NFLX MA V NVDA AVGO and I'll continue to keep adding and holding over time as long as the company continues to perform. It is quite difficult to match those gains trading in and out so many times for a small slice here and there, and needing to be "right" on the majority. I just need to be right twice, when I buy, and when I sell. I am up so much, short of major disaster, being right is almost locked in - even if cut in 50% it's still postive trades. And yes I've had losers along the way that I dumped when outlook went sour - UA is one of them.
Maybe. Signature athletes parted ways with them do to political differences. No one under 40 sees UA as a cool brand. They are mostly Marshalls and Ross buys at this point. There displays are next to brands like Nike, Adidas, and NB which are all more sought after. Not to mention lululemon, gymshark, etc.
Well, UA is taking over JetBlue already.
I doubt it. Southwest is too dominant in most markets to be absorbed by the other Big 3 airlines. It would also not pass antitrust review. They didn't let Spirit and JetBlue merger. You think they will let DL, UA or DL buy out Southwest?
Thoughts on UA looking like a short squeeze prospect?