Reddit Posts
Bright Mountain Media, Inc’s Wholly Owned Subsidiary, Wild Sky Media, Announces Deal With Taboola.Com Ltd. (TBLA) A Global Leader In Powering Recommendations For The Open Web
Massive BioNTech spike today despite bad news. Why?
Best Fashion Stocks to Buy Now in 2023: Top Clothing Stocks
Is it time to sell Crocs(CROX) after 165% rally?
JMP Securities issued a positive rating yesterday on Freshworks.
Bucillamine could be a game changing drug in the course of the pandemic
Recycling EV Batteries Is The New Form of Mining with Double Tailwind. Why LICY Seems Finally Ready to Deliver
UA/UAA (Under Armour) in freefall – how come?
Stock in Freefall for a Company Whose Product is 12-24 Months from being Government Mandated
The National Bank of Ukraine Fundraising the Armed Forces
Should I sell stocks and just buy the SPY?
Should I sell my shares and just put it all in the SPY
Weekly gainers: top 5 companies by the growth of job openings over the last week
My 10-week report of auto investing platforms (mostly robo)
$UAA… he was right. I hope you got in. Cashed out my 22s for 4.2k profit.. bought 19s for $UA on Monday , cashed out for 1k. Currently sitting on 25 calls and my 30s are drowning but I will roll tomorrow. For everyone saying that my theory wouldn’t work… it worked Consolidation+Catalyst=good returns
$UAA $UA Short Ratio (Days to cover) 2 days left until earnings with many analysts raising PTs this week.
$UAA short ratio (days to cover) 2 trading days left until earnings
$UAA $UA Short Ratio (Days to Cover)
$UAA $UA short ratio is 59. meaning shorts have 59 days to cover making it extremely difficult to do so. A high short suggests that the stock is rallying and if more people are buying the price will rise. Shorted shares= 307,887,000 Outstanding UAA shares=454,000,000
Google is in the hottest antitrust seat, but Apple and the rest of Big Tech shouldn't breathe easy
AMC Theory.. don’t claim to the smartest guy ever, but I read between the lines well. but would love to farther this conversation with smarter people than myself!
AMC Theory… don’t claim to be the smartest cookie. But I like this theory. Disprove me if you need too, I don’t have a problem with it at all.
Am I missing something on $T .03 off break even plus dividends apes hungry, $UA, $NOK, are low and read to go right? Help I'm new to options!
Am I missing something? T is .10 cents off break even and .52 cents dividends for a couple Q? That UA and NOK look read for a push? Little advice I'm new to options side.
Mentions
UA Under armor? I like the stock. 10 year low Only way is Up! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
I only implied LULU could become irrelevant like UA and GAP if they continue on the path they're on. Never suggested they were in direct competition with them.
you are not wrong, but these are all totally different companies from LULU i just think LULU is not the "it" brand even in their space and could be headed to where UA is in a few years
It’s a million times better. I’d never buy UA, but have several pairs of lulu
Investing in individual stocks is investing in a company - not the broader economy. I buy companies that consistently increase shareholder value through growth in top line, bottom line, profit, margin, dividend etc. A company can be doing great, but macro issues pull the stock back. But in the end, the great companies always rise. I suppose if you are just playing speculative and hot plays, it may make sense to follow the trend. But 7-18+ years in stocks such as MSFT AMZN NFLX MA V NVDA AVGO and I'll continue to keep adding and holding over time as long as the company continues to perform. It is quite difficult to match those gains trading in and out so many times for a small slice here and there, and needing to be "right" on the majority. I just need to be right twice, when I buy, and when I sell. I am up so much, short of major disaster, being right is almost locked in - even if cut in 50% it's still postive trades. And yes I've had losers along the way that I dumped when outlook went sour - UA is one of them.
Maybe. Signature athletes parted ways with them do to political differences. No one under 40 sees UA as a cool brand. They are mostly Marshalls and Ross buys at this point. There displays are next to brands like Nike, Adidas, and NB which are all more sought after. Not to mention lululemon, gymshark, etc.
Well, UA is taking over JetBlue already.
I doubt it. Southwest is too dominant in most markets to be absorbed by the other Big 3 airlines. It would also not pass antitrust review. They didn't let Spirit and JetBlue merger. You think they will let DL, UA or DL buy out Southwest?
Thoughts on UA looking like a short squeeze prospect?
It is 100% to skirt sanctions and to sell Nvidia Jetson boards to Russia for use in their Geran suicide drones. UA has already published countless instances of finding Jetsons in the wreckage of Russian suicide drones.
Hold! Once the UA govt reopens you should be in a much better spot
https://preview.redd.it/wanf8xo6ikyf1.jpeg?width=4000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8d6b70edb6e9de5f47e58252922052532e966071 Do they literally have a photo of them training Amazon employees about their tech right in front of our faces on their website?!? Holy hell. [https://youtu.be/h-PRYKTifoQ?si=4zOb5Dqz6u3UA2dW&t=82](https://youtu.be/h-PRYKTifoQ?si=4zOb5Dqz6u3UA2dW&t=82)
I’ve been adding a small bit to my portfolio every time I deposit. I think UA is an amazing brand, very popular where I am from. Think their active wear is the best around, maybe not their shoes. I believe it’s a big company that will bounce back.
UA and forget about it for a few months
Sell now & buy UA and forget about it for a few months lol you will make your money back!!!
I probably wouldn't believe it because it likely doesn't represent facts overall. In general, from a number of metrics, the war is going much better for Ukraine than it was a year to 18 months ago. I expect artillery ammunition to reach parity sometime in mid-2026 and that's probably about the clock running out on Russia's ability to conduct offensives. Is it likely to stalemate from there? That's pretty likely, yes, but UA has shown some resilience. It's awful that the cost in men is so high.
There's a lot of subsurface corruption in the US as well. The question isn't waste but growth and potential. Investing in UA areas that might have growth when others view it as risky... I'd do it. I'd also treat it as a gift and a gamble and not expect that money back.
Ive won many predictions about global macro processes with my professors when I was studying. For me predicting that, until 2025 russia will invade UA with conventional forces and get stuck, done that for me, weirdly. Motivation is to help manage my, wife's, and other families money in markets, because they fear to do something and I dont want for them to pay to some middle man (banks&other shitheads). So people trusting me makes me make good and more risk averse decisions not only for me but others. It is pretty much above market constantly. I just choose industries, not exactly individual stocks per se, based on global processes, real value. Buying shit before it gets cool, hyped, normies start talking about it, etc. .
Gold has been going up like this since 2022. I basically full ported into gold and natural gas as soon as UA war started and after they confiscated Russia's foreign accounts. I'm still DCAing gold as of this month. Easy 10% to run to mirror any continued dollar weakness.
>u/Ok-Psychology7619 >Isn't "they" used to refer to multiple people? Hazardous is only one person they /T͟Hā/ *pronoun* 1. used to refer to two or more people or things previously mentioned or easily identified. "the two men could get life sentences if they are convicted" 2. used to refer to a person of [unspecified](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=edf73f0f6f15f888&rlz=1C1ONGR_enUS1082US1083&sxsrf=AE3TifNVgZLdxjOiNkN8cnnIYlXDZaGUow:1759336067410&q=unspecified&si=AMgyJEuOnAWW0Co4MNdoFOPUEMGAhKXKoMTVZVsMD6PkKUxmRJjyVR6FuzjZM62rJhi3RaCSXEh4Ge6MIsuq9siSculAfM-UA1wAXLp80qjtwx2yNcFoBpE%3D&expnd=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwiws9rKtYOQAxUv48kDHaq8AGwQyecJegQINBAW) gender. "ask someone if they could help"
It popped up on my scanner I also have $WEN , $UA , $DC $UTI some bangers $RR too 🌊🌊 I’ve done plenty research the deals between these 3 companies man is wild https://preview.redd.it/n79xaftq87sf1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cc7597613d4deb69ad7844102c65bc80ff31c772
It's collapsing Wed with government shutdown. One man has the record for longest UA govv shutdown. One man wanted tariffs and crashed the market in March. One man wants to fire thousands of government employees before the holidays. No social security check or health care for you.
I used to know the marketing team at UA and did some high profile events with them. They would spend money with absolute abandon, like it just didn’t matter. Telling vendors to “pick a number” when they would express that it was going to be difficult to do what they wanted. The bizarre thing was that some of the top people had worked together previously at a cell phone / telecoms brand that also effectively west bust and they’d reminisce about this heady days of unbridled spending (aka partying). If they haven’t completely changed culturally, I have zero hope for that company.
Betteridge's Law of Headlines. UA is a Walmart brand.
I think the bigger issue is that Under Armour's marketing department was woefully not up to the task. After the Dubs 2022 title and the USA olympics win last summer, it took UA forever to bring stuff to market. When a Nike player wins something, that shit is in the stores in 15 minutes.
Bad bets on some endorsements, Cam Newton and that ballerina??? No new designs, their brand lacked a story, 90% of their merch is just a massive UA logo. Nike just copied their branding and out muscled them with bigger marketing budget. UA needs to stay niche, give up competing with Nike and Adidas, try to compete against No Bull, ON and Hoka.
There was a huge Under armor sale a couple of years ago, and I stocked up. I thought I was cool AF with a whole UA wardrobe. My GF told me UA was lame. Nowadays, I've noticed that many immigrants and older people wear Under Armour at the gym; it's a boomer brand now, she was right =(. PS: I'm a minority, I'm not trying to be racist, most immigrants just aren't hip/trendy
Kevin plank is the problem. Is he still under investigation by the fbi for fraud? This dude has ruined UA and turned it into a meme. At one point, nikes biggest competition to the biggest let down. Who knew you could fuck up a clothing and shoe company this bad.
I bought their shoes religiously for working out the last pair lasted only 6 months finally moved to ON… I still wear a ton of UA gear though but def agree its been sort of a lost decade for them
I do. Nike is for uh..more urban people, Addidas is for Europoors and soccer players. Reebock is a joke. UA just fits me well and looks good IMO
Disagree but only because I love my UA socks. 🧦
I’m decked out in UA gear /sadface
Solid analysis. Brand perception is everything in retail, and Lululemon risks falling into the UA trap of losing its cool factor. Nike's consistent brand reinvention and cultural relevance keeps them strong. Lulu needs to innovate and stay connected to consumer trends or risk becoming another forgotten athleisure brand.
For Lulu tariff is also an issue. You're right Lulu can end up like UA. Hence limiting to 1K in each play. SNAP has a large user base and at 12 B is a cheap price. Someone trying to get a chat app can buy it.
Under Armour is higher quality and more affordable and has way more market share. Lululemon was a fad. UA makes everything from sneakers to baseball battling gloves and catchers pads to football cleats/golf/basketball/running shoes. You’re not gonna see pro sports teams with Lulu logos on TV but you’re absolutely going to see Under Armour products everywhere.
I don’t think LULU is UA. UA absolutely got crushed by their own mistakes. That said, LULU is now facing competition from every angle at a time when consumers are stretched and their pricing, already too high, is being impacted by tariffs (and budgets). I don’t see enough to be a big buyer here, but I don’t see the company crumbling like UA has.
UA is terrible, it’s always at clearance prices cause no one wants it, it’s in no way comparable to Lululemon who people want but can’t afford.
UA really has nothing in common with Lululemon
I get what you’re saying. Fads die out. Wouldn’t be the first retail clothing company to hit the skids. However, LULU is not UA. LULU actually makes quality clothes. It’s entirely possible they don’t reclaim their peak valuation but they’re not going away just yet.
Exactly OPs point - UA was huge in the mid 2000s and 2010s. It was considered premium wear for guys and then all of a sudden their product was all over TJ Maxx and the rest is history.
UA operates on a different model than Lulu. They are mass market.
I think the problem is that you’re comparing it to Nike when you should be comparing it to Alo or Vuori. UA and Nike are a tier below I’d say, but I would also say LULU has been trending in that direction when it used to be with Alo and Vuori.
You ever been to a UA store or bought UA products? Not the same type of company my guy. Lulu and UA are not in the same league, not even close
Where did you get the idea that LULU is the next UA? People still shop at LULU, in the US and abroad. Also, the general perception of their brand has stayed the same. They have competitors, yes, but those competitors can’t match LULU’s brand power at all.
I will buy eventually. Lulu is still popular and the stores are packed. Here in Boston then are opening up a brand new 2 story store downtown (in a space formerly occupied by UA). I have no idea why the stock continues to tumble but I can't wait to buy in at 2018 prices.
LULU is NOT the next UA. UA became a former shell of itself due to many things such as failed marketing, poor quality, lagging trends, and poor decisions on not to sign athletes. I may be bearish on LULU however to call them the next UA is like calling Microsoft the next IBM.
10 years ago was an outlier, UA rose mostly because of steph carry and to a lesser extent, because of The Rock
Fashion brands is such a brutal industry. So hard to know what brands get hot. My GF told me a few years ago about Abercrombie getting hot again and I was like "uh the brand huge with middle schoolers in the 90s? Yeah okay..." Oddly I really like UA from the ankle up (shoes still need a looooot of work). Almost all my gym/running gear is UA and looks good and holds up, but I get your point. Sorta going against my own skepticism because I did buy 230 shares of DECK. Their fundamentals are really good and Hoka is everywhere near me. Definitely don't feel fully confident in that investment though.
Today, yes. How about UA 10 years ago? Genuine q
There’s a pretty big traffic difference between a LULU store and a UA store.
I think they are primed for an upswing. This is purely a small experience but I went to some outlets near by my place and Nike and adidas were fairly empty but UA was packed. The deals were better, better quality stuff, and people were loading up on stuff. Could just be a sale or a one time thing but good enough for me to buy a small stake.
UA was in a very different position at the time, though, right? Much smaller company with a bit of a spotty record on earnings & a fair bit of debt.
I bought UA on a “dip” several years ago. Still waiting for something good to happen. Seems to be in a perpetual downtrend and gives me similar concerns with LULU. With that said, I do have some interest at this price, but might consider NVO or UNH instead for a beaten down stock position to initiate.
My problem with Lulu is they don’t offer anything exclusive or innovative. Its polyester fitness wear that anyone can copy for a fraction of the price. Their only recourse is litigation for anything that steps too close to their marketing. Witness Under Armor. They’re just another athliesure manufacturer who happens to have their finger on the pulse of the market for now. But that will change. Long term, bad investment IMO. Full disclosure: I have Lululemon clothing but also lots of UA, Nike, ASRV and others.
Who would have ever thought of UA to become a penny stock
No, but pretty much whatever he wants from Ukraine. Even Zelenskyy is softening up to land swaps to keep from losing any more land. Putin wins this round, and it’s not some chamberlain style capitulation. It’s stopping a war from continuing on and more land being lost. Not some “we will invade if you don’t give it to us” it’s “we have invaded, conquered this land. We will continue the killing HAPPILY for another 3 years if you don’t call it ours.” IMO: Europe has realized that it cannot just arm the shit out of UA. They have to arm themselves also. Stopping forward progress is worth freezing lines and calling the other side Russia.
Underarmor had 12+% lower margins its entire existance. It's issue is it massively cheapened the brand by selling it at places like Walmart or Target. Lulu will never do that. So they keep a huge portion of their sales as earnings, UA doesn't. NKE is literally copying the LULU model now.
at this point BOTH war and peace in UA is priced in
Friday night after BlackHat was peak degenerate networking — cocktails, chaos, and enough inside jokes to make the SEC blush. Shoutout to everyone who pulled up… you absolute legends. Anyway, since this *is* WallStreetBets and not r/travel, here’s your market alpha: **UA** is flexing harder than a bro on his 3rd pre-workout. Rebound is looking spicy, and I’m just casually tossing this nugget to the pit. Not financial advice… unless it works, then I’ll take credit. 🚀🦍 https://preview.redd.it/2gjmwjn7n8jf1.png?width=3390&format=png&auto=webp&s=33dc57c5064483315fdbfa2620ae8e6e6c544c41
lol even my UA calls are gonna print
I sell stocks that are no longer performing (financially), so my losers tend to drift out. My biggest past loser is probably UA - or at least that's the one I can think of. Also, I don't DCA a tanking stock just to make my cost average and and paper losses "look" better. If the company is headed in the wrong direction, either because of themselves or competitors, I liquidate. I bought CELH on one of it's big dips. For some amount of time it dipped lower and I was underwater for quite some time. But now it's back to green. I don't buy stocks with non-existent financials, and I buy those with growing top and bottom line. If that holds true, usually these stocks won't be a loser over the long run. I have TTD. It's down close to 60% from highs. But I invested in it so long ago, Im still up by multiple factors. The topic of this post was "which IPO to invest in". People just chasing those big one or few days gains are just gambling and have no concept of valuation.
Yes but there are not so many in the range as this one I don't think. Oregon and Nike are 35 mil and Notre Dame and UA are 30 mil, then Texas at 25 mil with Nike followed by Tennessee and Adidas. One of the top four biggest contracts right now
I won’t ever buy retail stocks again after getting taken to the woodshed with UA years ago.
Has there ever been a clothing company that successfully entered the shoe biz in a big way? UA tried hard but seems most of those shoes ended up selling through discount stores.
They seemed to fail at the shoe game, reminds me of UA and I am terrified lol
UA is a long term hold, VFC is a Turn around bet.
Huge potential now. And Kevin B (owns 18 million shares) believes it’s fair value today is $80 USD / share. https://x.com/bambroughkevin/status/1953152565509800047?s=46&t=UA6S9-IqGPEehYkWfjo-gA
Data Center includes DCPU. That stands for data center CPU which is where the $$ is. Newest GPU is MI355X. MI300X adoption is why AMD dropped in 2024 due to lackluster sales. Adoption has been mostly long standing AMD partners. The narrative is changing due to MI400x which will be the first rack scalable solution due to UA-Link. Otherwise latency is too poor for large models (currently competitive only for smaller-midsize models).
Do you realize the CPU market share AMD has gobbled up in the last 5 years. Yes a big part of their market cap is based on DCPU share surpassing intel by 2027. AI gpu story won’t be accounted for until UA-link due to frontier models.
$RKLB $UA (under armour)
$RKLB $UA (under armour)
Up 47% on Nke shares and 40% on UA. The same time I’m only up 11% on Tgt. It’s next to rip. Pt $160 after earnings 🤷♂️
Why pay 50bucks for a cheaply made thin fabric when you can get the same at for 10bucks from UA? It's that simple. That's goes for most Nike products. The premium it had is lost. Why? Because it made cheaply. Consumers have other options for cheap goods
The niche they had they lost. They are UA. UA made great products with high quality, not cheap plastic shirts and shorts. Nothing of quality exists. I dont dare pay premium for UA or Nike or any other brand. The only exception is my running shoe and it's normally brooks or merrell. Even those I buy only when on sale. Although, merrell quality too has gone down significantly past 5yrs.
Bla bla bla usual Trump. Nothing will change in UA...
yea but the timing is just not right for clothing and their foot print is surprisingly tiny … like net income in single digit millions compared to Nike with 5 billion. margins are about the same, and UA is saying increased income … I dunno 8 bucks by August
Nothing about a ceasefire on Live UA Map. War is still on in my book
NO way. Not a chance. They are the new UA. They have/had a trendy material/look just like UA did at first. But first, there are cheap knockoffs. Then other name brands get into it and make stuff that is indiscernible. This is exactly what happened to UA. Remember, they tried to ride the popularity of their initial products to glory... then boom. It wasn't something everyone else couldn't replicate. I am from DC/Maryland where UA is from and was most popular, and even there we saw the tide turn just like it will with Lulu.
Bupe and methadone can easily be detectable for weeks lmao. What are you talking about? Cocaine metabolites can also be detectable for 1+ week. Where are you getting this inaccurate info from? Fent can be detectable for 2-4 weeks. Source: I work at a methadone clinic and am the UA nurse. Quit making shit up.
He paid $1M to have someone pee in the UA cup.
Synth5 works wonders unless they test for synthetic urine. Used to use it all the time for UA’s. Forever reefer head and never popped positive once.
Exactly interesting timing. He could have easily passed this UA w/ some advanced notice. Means nothing when you’re a billionaire not to mention he should have used an independent lab like LabCorp or Quest. These labs use lower thresholds and typically used by healthcare professionals (like PM docs) where CII meds are typically Rx to cover their ass/license. If this was a hair test or saliva not so ready to beat. Should have been randomly administered too. Not to mention he could get dip sticks or a panel for all of these substances to make sure he was clean.
Guess US gets as much help as they gave to UA... so "Why would Israel simply not give up, and make peace ?", "Its Israel fault, they are nazis" and such ;)
Yes. Dont you remember how he ended UA war in one day?
From chatGPT: Ukraine is using both commercial drones and military-grade drones developed by Ukrainian defense contractors in its war effort. Here’s how that breaks down: --- 🛒 Commercial or Civilian-Adapted Drones These are off-the-shelf drones or agricultural/mapping drones that are modified for combat roles: ✅ Examples: DJI Mavic & Matrice series (used early in the war) Modified agricultural drones (like the “Baba Yaga”) FPV drones (built from hobbyist racing drone parts, often 3D-printed frames + GoPro-style cameras) 🔧 Roles: Kamikaze (loitering) drones Reconnaissance and artillery spotting Bomb-dropping platforms 🚀 Why used: Cheap Easily sourced Modifiable for explosive payloads Great for short-range tactical operations --- 🏭 Drones Developed by Ukrainian Defense Contractors These are custom-designed UAVs made in Ukraine for specific military roles, often with advanced features like long range, GPS navigation, or AI targeting. ✅ Key Players & Examples: 1. UA Dynamics Punisher drone: Small, stealthy, fixed-wing precision strike drone. 2. Terminal Autonomy AQ-400 Scythe: Mass-produced, long-range loitering munition. 3. Aerorozvidka R18 drone: Octocopter used for night strikes and battlefield intel. 4. Ukrjet UJ-22 Airborne, UJ-25 Skyline: Fixed-wing drones with high-altitude and long-range strike capability. 🚀 Advantages: Longer range (hundreds of km) Larger payloads More secure comms and guidance systems Built for military durability and survivability --- 🔄 Hybrid Models Some Ukrainian military projects use commercial components (motors, batteries, frames) but assemble and program them domestically to serve specific combat needs—blurring the line between military and consumer tech. --- 📦 In Summary: Type Source Use Commercial drones Off-the-shelf, modified Recon, bomb drops, kamikaze Defense contractor drones Ukrainian-made Long-range strikes, surveillance, loitering munitions Hybrid builds DIY + local assembly Tactical kamikaze missions, swarms --- Would you like recommendations or examples of specific drone strike videos, contractor profiles, or how they train operators?
Seems the last couple of major apparell stocks were pretty decent earnings, UA and ANF. A buyout and decent earnings shoukld be decent for FL, no?
I feel like this UFL endeavor UA is in on is actually pretty good. The games are absolutely entertaining.
https://youtu.be/bQSHAfzU5ks?si=kI6zLp32UA1X8M5V
Forgot to mention UA for clothes and Skerchers for shoes, OP. The problem with Nike is the Made in China "quality " paying the high price only for the brand name !!
This feels like UA story arc. They could have literally seen how it plays out.
on my list rn, FMCC, FNMA, M, PINS, NIKE, UA, AMZN. I think they have upward potential.
You think rock stars and pro-athletes serve time? Regardless, a UA judge ruled that trump didn't have to serve time, and as far as the Canadian government is concerned that's the end of it. US citizen, US crime, US trial, US conviction, US sentence. It's done. Could you imagine if the Canadian government could review everyone's record and decide whether or not they liked the judgement rendered and pass its own judgement accordingly? You think border guards are bad now...
1. AI chips ban lifted - a threeway deal with NVDA, AMD and UA 2. they're keeping the oil price low - so low that their US investment is probably going to roll up all of the small oil producers into 1 saudi backed entity. then they'll drop overall production again. 3. lots of grifts and kickbacks in all directions
all it'll take is a failure to make a decent trade deal with china /eu aka back to 100+ % tariff, china/eu retaliation Q2 earnings will all take a hit from the tariff nonsense so far as during march & april there was so little shipping from CN to the US - so empty shelves and (temporary) inflation will still hit. the loss of goodwill across the world is still real, de-dollarization is still going all of the 'major investment' deals that he's announced - nvda (consequence of chips act, bribery to remove limitations on selling to UA etc), ua investment (will probably end up decimating the small oil producers in the US), etc etc to be seen how those actually pan out / how much jobs those create and how much those offset all the doge firings, mom & pop shops blowing up under tariffs etc in short - i'm bearish. even though the market is going up and will probably get a new ATH on some trump news
Not China, not Japan, not UA 😢