Reddit Posts
Mentions
When new terms/usages are being thrown around by influencers, sometimes it's hard to figure out the meat from the potatoes. Times like this, it's good to look to the big builders in the space and figure out where their heads are at. For example, lets look at Coinbase. On the CPD (Coinbase Developer Platform), they have a new product, AgentKit. Its a product that combines the rest of the CDP API, along with LangChain and some warpper/adapter logic around LangChain, to let you plug in your own models. They then have many agents they created (think many tools that the LLMs can use when working) that give it direct access to the CDP. I've been playing around with their quickstart. it takes 3 minutes to set up and plug in my own API keys to my preferred LLM model, along with my Coinbase API keys, and bamn, I have a AI powered wallet. It gives a chat interface and lets me say in plain English things like "How much WETH do I have?", "Send $100 of USDC to worthtip.eth", "Swap 0.1 ETH to USDC and then deposit the USDC into AAVE", and it will manage all these interactions for me. It's rather impressive, and its probably the most user friendly wallet experience I've seen. So from this, we can gather that Coinbase thinks that LLM's controlling wallet operations is a big enough upcoming need that they started building this. They likely think that either this will allow the creation of better user wallet experiences, or perhaps its to go beyond user wallets and allow treasuries (from DAOs, companies or people) to be managed autonomously. It could also be about just creating a building block here that eventually becomes just one feature of a larger product (i.e. USD => USDC minting via Circle/Coinbase, blend the web2/web3 financial worlds in such a way that the differences are fully abstracted from the user). I'm curious what the leading use case will be in 2-3 years. It seems like cool tech, but tech that is still finding its use case.
The answer isn't more -ism's, it's holding the people in power accountable. Otherwise you end up with candidates that are elevated to the same positions by said power structure. They know they'll play the game, so they rig the game in their favor, and end up recruiting more shit heads. Just look at the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), the hoops you have to go through, the money you have to give them ($1M), and if they don't like you they'll deny you **after** you've already done all their requirements... NO refunds, by the way. This happened to Gary Johnson, just as one example to look to. When Capitalism is popular, the power class calls themselves Capitalist. When Socialism is popular, the power class calls themselves Socialists. The axe's handle is made of wood, but that doesn't mean the axe is a friend to trees. Giving power to only one side of the aisle and expecting that to change anything is not only a fool's errand, it's societal suicide. "Jeffrey Epstein & Friends" proves they all go to the same parties, and political partisanship is for suckering peasants and keeping them fighting one another.
Yeah I agree with you for sure, people do love their conspiracy theories lol. I remember when I first saw HSBC's balance sheet when I was doing my CPD years ago, I genuinely couldn't believe that their land and buildings didn't even feature on their balance sheet, was the first time I'd seen anything like it (shows the impact of derivatives, or "bets" as I like to call them). Yeah they'll definitely have exposure to the industry, these guys love to diversify and given the assets they manage, they'd be bonkers not to lol. Not using retail as exit liquidity would make a nice change for once though!
Sometimes I feel like the argument that a node needs to run in a toaster for the decentralisation is a bit bs tbh. It should be a middle ground between the CPD like that some centralised POS require and the 2gb of ram of a BTC node
Morgan, your ability to put yourself out here into this space and try to learn is very admirable. However, instead of being engaging and maybe doing a Google search before asking more questions, you've been extremely disrespectful instead. One look at your website and I know ohioans like myself won't be voting for you. Ohioans want moderates, we want to maintain the ability to protect ourselves (constitutional carry, for all), we want bodily autonomy (no we don't want to be coerced into getting vaccinated or having endless booster shots. This also means we don't want universal Healthcare because it could open the door to being discriminated against via personal heath choices. A Healthcare voucher system or revising the medical and medicinal patent systems would be something to run on), we want better funding for law enforcement (we don't want rising crime like Columbus after having CPD funding cut), we want equality not equity (no, reparations won't fix the wealth gap. Better education will), we want an expanded voucher system to make private school more affordable for poor communities. We want DeFi to go mainstream and some cryptos to be legal tender. We want a lot of things antithetical to what you're running on. By the way, we don't want to "turn up for political power" This sub is very much anti establishment, we will never hand more power to the government; especially to an authoritarian like yourself. I hope we've clarified that for you.