Reddit Posts
[HowTo] Create and use a Taproot wallet on Testnet in Bitcoin Core v22.0
Mentions
The year is 2030 You just uploaded yourself to metaverse to play GTA VI
What do you think, in vivid detail, the mining of the last bitcoin will be like in 2140? I'll go first... *The world's most powerful supercomputer is on the cusp of mining the final bitcoin, which has taken more than two decades, widely considered a generation. The primary reserve currency has enabled frictionless commerce for over a century following the U.S. dollar's full collapse and with it, the elimination of wasteful, corrupt banks as well as the end of cycles of economic instability and, it follows, global poverty. World Wars V, VI, and VII, popularly known as the climate wars, recently ended with the agreement to tie all production of renewable clean energy to universal basic income in the form of bitcoin, the market capitalization of which not only surpassed but replaced gold, which is now worth nothing. With the final block in place, the blockchain... and humanity... is complete.*
He was a little prick in episode I, a pos in episode II, a monster in episode III, classic vilan in episodes IV & V, and for a quick minute at the end of VI, he was nice, but he had to die for it.
Remember when VI knocked out several kids over the years and jayce getting an instant breakdown after breaking several kids spines?
But I used my super spaceman VI decoder ring to decipher that tweet.
Have you ever paid for a skin in a video game? An upgrade to a online account? Think longer term than they just bought a JPEG. Today you buy the curry shoes for 333.00 just like the internet was it’s bigger than “metaverse” and I personally hate that Facebook beat everyone to this when the concepts older then them. But imagine going from game to game in diff universes and being able to rock your “Curry’s” in NBA 2k30 and GTA 5 (Cause we know there’s not gonna be a VI by then) or stroll out to a virtual fortnight game where your personal collection transfers your character between multiple universes… 1/1000 pair of shoes, or 1/1 artworks in your personal castle in GTA 6 that correlates to each persons wallet.
Thanks, I just really don't want to do the wrong thing and be fined for not reporting things that I should have (since I imagine CEXes inform tax people that I was buying/selling) but at the same time, I really shouldn't have to file a tax report at all besides this. Besides, I found this on the internet (with all the precautions of the case) talking about when employees who normally don't file a tax return, should do so: "The circumstances for when a tax return must be filed are regulated in § 46 of the Income Tax Act. If at least one of the listed criteria applies to you, the Tax Office (Finanzamt) will assume that your tax liability exceeds your advance tax payment(s) and you will be required to file a tax return. 1. Supplementary Income (Nebeneinkünfte) \- Income received from multiple employers simultaneously during the calendar year is subject to a deduction according to tax class VI and requires you to file a tax return. \- Taxable supplementary income greater than 410 euros per calendar year without a tax deduction requires you to file a tax return." So according this this, unless supplementary income doesn't get to a certain point, no filing is needed. \-- I mean, I realise I'm probably being extra paranoid and that everyone's got much bigger problems than this (including you, so thanks again for your patience and your answers) but I just really don't want to be doing the wrong thing either!
I'm not dismissing it out of hand, but I see absolutely nothing here that benefits me. It's a blatant pay-to-win game that's charging $24 for an incredibly basic item. I don't care if I can sell my items if I'm having to invest large amounts of money into the game just to play it. For that price, I can buy Civilization VI and all the expansion packs. And that game doesn't try to charge me per item used in game. Also, is selling items really that much of a benefit to me? TF2, CS:GO, and DOTA all allow for selling items for Steam wallet money. The vast majority of in-game items go for pennies or maybe a couple of dollars. Only the exceptionally rare items go for more than that. The time-to-earnings ration for selling TF2 items is microscopic. I'd rather just enjoy playing a game for the game's sake rather than grinding away hoping to make some cash.
Civilization VI actually runs fine on Microsoft, Mac, or Linux
Man thank you for posting all this! Weird coincidence, I've been on google trying to find some good information about this for like 2 hours, and just now decided to search this sub specifically and found this thread! Nice! :) So yeah, here's my situation maybe you can give me some advice and thank you in advance!! I just recently purchased the parts to make my first BTC mining rig and was wondering if it would be a good idea to start an LLC, and what the differences for taxes rates/income would be vs filing as self employed? Also, which one is less complicated? Are there any ways to make the whole thing less complicated from a tax perspective? I'm really worried/scared to start all this because if I don't do taxes right, I don't want to get in major trouble. Does an LLC protect me if the IRS comes after my crypto business? I'm not super familiar with how LLCs work in general either so that's also kind of a problem. Either way I would most likely pay someone to do my taxes for me, but wondered how much something like this would cost annually? And would I need an accountant who specializes in crypto stuff? Would a CPA be better? How do I find one? And what information would I need to give to my accountant/CPA at the end of the year (or is this something they need to keep up with more frequently)? For example if I were to download the spreadsheet at the end of the year with my withdrawals from NiceHash to CoinBase (this would show how much BTC I mined, and what its value was at the time), and then spend that BTC with the CoinBase Visa card, that should leave a pretty traceable trail for the accountant to hopefully figure out the gains/loss taxes, right? Would it be recommended to exchange all my BTC for stablecoin like USDC immediately at the exact value I mined it at? The reason I ask this is because I'm almost constantly swapping coins around... for most of this year I owned less than $500 in crypto but I've swapped that $500 around probably weekly, which if I have to pay tax on that would end up being more than my yearly income? How would you recommend avoiding that happening? Move to the VI? lol Also on a side note I would probably be spending almost all profits from my mining rig on more mining hardware, to eventually get several rigs going, which I would like to write off as an expense. So yeah anyway sorry that was a long one!! Giving you the helpful award for writing this awesome post, thank you again man this is really great stuff!!! Tried looking around on the /smallbusiness sub but didn't find anything. Cheers to you!! :)
Currently I'm at 50% BTC, 25% ETH and 25% USDC and every night i go to sleep I heard the devil whispering 
Bro. What if GTA VI was in Decentraland?
$5,000,000,000: about how much the publisher of the most profitable video game of all time, second highest selling video game of all time, and fastest selling title in entertainment (reaching a billion dollars in sales in hours) of all time is valued at. Despite their massive hit title coming out the better half of a decade ago, it still manages to have over a hundred thousand players into it's virtual world concurrently at any given moment and hauled in almost a $1B last year alone. $9,000,000,000: about how much Decentraland is worth, a game with no accolades and limited interest from the public in joining the ~1,200 active players that have fooled themselves into thinking they're enjoying it as the other 98% of those who played then tossed it in the trash were unable to do. "It's about the potential" they say, seeming to think Grand Theft Auto VI won't be yet another blockbuster title from Rockstar, grossing billions and joining its precedessors in being regarded critically as one of the best games of all time.
A GTA VI metaverse would be awesome!!!
GTA VI in Liberty City. Working night shifts every day..
John Wick VI: Shorting the Shorters
I. Every human being should have access to financial tools, like crypto, that allow for greater economic independence. II. Industry participants have a responsibility to work with regulators and policymakers to shape new standards for crypto assets. Smart regulation encourages innovation and helps keep users safe. III. Responsible crypto platforms have an obligation to protect users from bad actors and implement Know Your Customer (KYC) processes to prevent financial crimes. IV. Privacy is a human right, and personally identifiable information (PII) data should be subject to strict levels of protection. V. Crypto users have the right to access exchanges that keep their funds secure, in safe custody with comprehensive deposit insurance. VI. Healthy markets should maintain a robust level of liquidity to ensure a stable and frictionless trading environment. VII. Regulation and innovation are not mutually exclusive. Crypto users deserve safe access to emerging technologies and practices, including NFTs, stablecoins, staking, yield-farming, and more. VIII. Closing the knowledge gap is essential when it comes to crypto. Users have the right to accurate information on crypto assets, without fear of falling victim to unfair or deceptive advertising. IX. Marketplaces that offer derivative instruments should be subject to the appropriate regulations. This ensures all users meet eligibility requirements and that their transactions are fairly settled. X. Crypto regulation is inevitable.\* Users have the right to share their voice on how the industry should evolve with their blockchain platform of choice.
​ 
You can lose big you can win big, nothing ventured nothing gained. There's a reason crypto appeals to younger generations so much too, instant gratification & the hatred of anything that seems too slow. Which is why its sketchy things like BTC will last long or have as many crypto's tied to them, its just that BTC is like a ledger everyone uses & the original cryptocurrency. People will always choose the fastest cryptos for transactions, to the point its as instant as debit & credit card transcations. It won't stop there. People will soon want instant transactions through augmented reality, VI virtual reality. Then they will want artificial intelligence to be able to determine what they want to buy, buy it for them. Okay lol not the last one, mega corps like Facebook & Amazon just made that up, but you will get a ton of institutions trying to centralize crypto by asking people to let them "Hold" their crypto so its more convenient to do things. Hopefully enough people have common sense and just have their own wallets they send or receive crypto from.
This is nothing, you will see a real pump with the second season 
Imagine the maker of squid game is behind this project lmao 
​ 
bonus points if you make it impossible to sell the token for anyone but yourself 
Is it a good time to invest in squid game? 
GTA VI maybe? Of some smaller games with a NFT metaverse concept?
 me buying it anyway
ngl, its fucking hard work to make a VI that compounds data and outputs it into a human readable format. IMO if you have the talent and time to make a bot, you should be rewarded for its performance. I think they should get moons, maybe a reduced QTY, but they still should be rewarded.
I really hope Russia will introduce their own cryptocurrency: Spudnik VI
I was playing the game "Civilization VI" last night, and I was pleasantly surprised to see that Ada Lovelace is in the game. She is a Great Engineer. Her abilities are: Allows a city to build one more district than the population limit allows. Triggers the Eureka for the Computers technology.
**Rule VI - Personal Information** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_vi_-_personal_information) page for more details about this rule. - --- - [^(Sub Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/about/rules) ^**|** [^Expanded ^Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules) ^**|** [^(Site Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/rules)
Rockstar for sure must be working on something like this for GTA VI. Something crypto related that makes them even more money, knowing Rockstar
GTA V or hopefully VI would be cool! (Even though I don’t really play GTA lmao).
I hope one day I could live inside GTA VI with crypto
Me seeing all my cryptos pump 
>18 U.S. Code § 597 - Expenditures to influence voting >Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and >Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote— >Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 601(a)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)
part of the algorithm guide lines shows that it has an VI that looks for facial features in thumbnail images and promotes those over ones without. Its a learning engine thing, kids/teens youtubers on the platform found that if they put a face in the thumb then they get more views because at a glance they can see who's vid it is and the general emotion of the vid. Since its popular with kids and they make up a good % of the metrics the algorithm then thinks that this should be for everyone to boost views, now it knows no different. Eventually it will come full circle, as more people add vids with the thumbnail selfie, the more unusual ones will end up picked over them for virtue of being different, then the algorithm starts the cycle again
I must say that i am biased towards VI 😁
TY, It's interesting work, but after I've read this study (whole, not just an article), there is one important sentence there. Again, do not take me wrong, but *"We observe low energy demand per transaction in active DLT systems that are characterized by comparatively small numbers of validators and high throughput. "* \- Chapter V.- Results, page 7, right under table VI. And when I look at table III, page 5, it makes sense...they were counting in calculations with 21 validator nodes and 10 000TPS for HBAR compared to 183 723 validators and 3 000TPS for ETH. I am not ETH fan, but even with basic math and logic I can see, it takes way more energy to process and validate transaction on 183 723 computers, then on 21...same applies to other chains. I will put asside the fact, that 21 validator nodes is very centralized, but what will happen, if they will run let's say 1 000 validator nodes? Legit question - I do not understand HBAR that much and I hold a small bag because I was impressed with hole tech and "whispering" mechanism...
Yeah, that would have been weird. But you gotta keep your Moons man; who knows what they'll be worth in the future. Then you can buy Battlefield VI with them😄
There wont be real crypto in GTA VI. Rumors are you will be able to trade crypto ingame just like you can stocks in every other gta game
So Elders Scrolls VI confirmed release date is the flippening?
I found this research article comparing a few different leading proof-of-stake ledgers (including ETH 2.0) versus Bitcoin and Visa: [http://blockchain.cs.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/UCL\_CBT\_DPS\_Q32021\_updated.pdf](http://blockchain.cs.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/UCL_CBT_DPS_Q32021_updated.pdf) Results Table VI: Global power consumption (i.e. the network-wide consumption of the DLT systems under consideration and VisaNet) and the energy consumed per transaction for contemporary throughput Platform | Per transaction (kW h/tx) Eth. 2.0 | 0.00009 – 0.00286 (High throughput projection) Eth. 2.0 | 0.01823 – 0.55713 (Low throughput projection) Algorand | 0.00017 – 0.00534 Cardano | 0.01239 – 0.37854 Polkadot | 0.00378 – 0.11556 Tezos | 0.00036 – 0.01096 Hedera | 0.00002 – 0.00004 Bitcoin | 360.39300 – 3691.40700 VisaNet | 0.00358
tldr; A painting of a blue painting with a white line in the middle sold for a record-breaking $43.8 million at a Sotheby's auction in London on May 14, 2013. "Onement VI" from abstract expressionist painter Barnett Newman sold on Tuesday, May *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
​  Yes, its showtime
**Rule VI - Personal Information** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_vi_-_personal_information) page for more details about this rule. **Rule VIII - On Topic Discussion** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_viii_-_on_topic_discussion) page for more details about this rule. - --- - [^(Sub Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/about/rules) ^**|** [^Expanded ^Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules) ^**|** [^(Site Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/rules)
Neither can Boris Johnson but he’s still around. 
I will play it when GTA VI comes out
**Rule V - Content Standards** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_v_-_content_standards) wiki page for more details about this rule. **Rule VI - Personal Information** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_vi_-_personal_information) page for more details about this rule. **Rule VIII - On Topic Discussion** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_viii_-_on_topic_discussion) page for more details about this rule. - --- - [^(Sub Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/about/rules) ^**|** [^Expanded ^Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules) ^**|** [^(Site Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/rules)
they will be faster in the millions then you belive. Mark Rothko's No 1 Royal Red And Blue A painting my 3 year old daughter could make and she woudl be bored by painting somethign so borign half way threw sold for 75 million ​ Barnett Newman's Onement VI a blue pice of paper with a ugly white line in the middle Sold for $43.8 million ​ NFT arts are to 99% bullshit. But the same i woudl say about the traditional art market. It is just one more area where people with to much money try to park their money somewhere and others that jump on the train and speculate. Sure also to soem degree used for moneylaundering, but that is not all of it. And who really thinks this prices are crazy now will soon see them in the millions. THe only thing stoppign a cryptopunk from getting to such values coudl be a declinign marketshare of ethereum as a whole. But as logn as ethereum stays the number 1 chain for nfts this will keep on
I've been trying to email the team address you posted in your announcement, but keep getting this > 550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281) [VI1EUR05FT016.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com]
FYI; below are places that are not able to participate including the USA. https://coinmarketcap.com/earn/faq Users from the following countries or regions **will not be able to participate** in CoinMarketCap Earn campaigns: Belarus, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Mainland China, North Korea, Sudan, South Sudan (SS), Syria, **United States of America** and its territories United States (US), Guam (GU), Northern Mariana Islands (MP), Puerto Rico (PR), Virgin Islands US (VI), American Samoa (AS), United States Minor Outlying Islands (UM), Zimbabwe.
A blue painting with a white line called “Onement VI” sold for $44 million in 2013 and people thought it was stupid. Fast forward to NFTs today. Need I say more?
​ 
Yeah GTV VI with NFT cars and apartments is going to get expensive.
Got a real job 
Someone just turned btc back on 
Someone just turned btc back on 
Yes I’d be great, maybe GTA VI
Yes, it will be huge when GTA VI use crypto.
If VI is basically Vice city 2 and it had crypto I'd OD on bullishness
When GTA VI adopts it and make them rich.
Whenever GTA VI comes out - oh, that could be a problem
It’s fine. There’ll be some in stock ready for The Elder scrolls VI…
Depends on how fun they can make the crypto games, for now I stick to the fun ones. If GTA VI would be able to monetize like axie infinity it would be game over for my social life though
**Rule VI - Personal Information** * See our [Expanded Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules#wiki_rule_vi_-_personal_information) page for more details about this rule. - --- - [^(Sub Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/about/rules) ^**|** [^Expanded ^Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules) ^**|** [^(Site Rules)](http://www.reddit.com/rules)
I own 4 different crypto and one moon 
No, I have Shib, ETH and CRO and now A moon! 
 România subreddit!
Google GTA VI then put yourself back into a coma once you realize it's not out
I wouldn't do it justice but I found this presentation from the CEO very good: https://youtu.be/j4VI5vI_fjE
I transferred 2000 of FIAT into my exchange account about 2 weeks ago and told myself I’d buy at the next dip and of course the market just goes consistently up since that point. You’re welcome for the pump. I guess that 2k will just sit there indefinitely given that I’m sure the market will take a nosedive if I ever bought. 
Rumors say there will be crypto involved in GTA VI, but we don't know if it will also be an IRL crypto
>To clarify, the IRS, as an agency, was never established by an act of Congress or approved for implementation by statute law. Nor does it have to be. It was established by the executive branch of the United States to enforce powers granted by the 16th amendment to the constitution. Also, what act of congress is not statute law? Is this conspiracy copy-pasta? >The IRS is contracted by the US department of Treasury. I have no idea what this means. It's a federal agency under the Department of the Treasury. You talked about sources so I would need one for this because I could not find supporting evidence. >There is no statute, currently, that allows the privatization of Government Tax Administration. Therefore, most of the creational process of the IRS was illegal. IRS is not private so this isn't an issue but it sure would be if the IRS was private. Sounds like conspiracy copy-pasta. >Currently, the IRS, and subsequently the Treasury, are not subject to FOIA, regarding any operations or legal implementation of operations of the IRS. In essence, if you were to request, through FOIA, a copy of the corporate charter, the delegation orders from the Secretary of the Treasury authorizing the implementation and collection of taxes, or the delegation from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Services to implement the administration or collection of United States government taxes, you will receive nothing. They are not subject to FOIA requirements. Well I suppose they could send you a copy of the 16th amendment but they have a job to do, sorry. FOIA... they keep tax records, there's lots of laws surrounding being an employee and the data they collect. You cited some of the laws below but I'm not sure you're aware of their contents. That said the implementation of the IRS is the execution of the form data we send them so what secrets can there possibly be? The only thing FOIA would expose is people's finances, no thanks. >Treasury Order 150-10 delegates all IRS authority directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue who administrates implementation of IRC, Internal Revenue Code. However, the IRC makes no mention of the IRS. They don't have to, the IRS is there simply because the Commissioner would never finish his job is he had to do it alone. We have an executive branch because you cannot codify the entirety of laws, lots of social norms and standards go into enforcement of laws, some of which is done via statute. This is part of why decentralized blockchain-based governance does not exist. >In IRC, book 68A, section 7802, authorization is given for an oversight board which will give reports to Congress, but has no oversight authority in the operation of the IRS. Congress itself is the oversight authority, the board gathers information for our representatives to consume and decide upon. >Finally, a closer review of 31 U.S.C. discloses that the Internal Revenue Service is not a division, bureau, or in any part, a part of theUnited States Treasury. 31 U.S.C chapter 3 does not list the IRS as an agency of the Treasury. 31 U.S.C subtitle VI section 9101 does not list the IRS as a government owned corporation. 31 U.S.C subtitle I chapter 9 section 901 does not list the IRS as an authorized agency. Taxes are covered in 26 U.S.C. and is a copy-pasta of the tax code itself. All powers granted are to the Secretary of the Treasury and the IRS acts on their behalf. No, the methods of the IRS are not codified in statutes but there are laws pertaining to certain things like employee standards and the actual taxes imposed. Most importantly, the authority of the IRS comes from their boss, the Secretary of the Treasury even if it is executed by a Commissioner chosen by the President (who happens to be the Secretaries boss).
Here are my sources, directly from the current statutes in place: To clarify, the IRS, as an agency, was never established by an act of Congress or approved for implementation by statute law. The IRS is contracted by the US department of Treasury. There is no statute, currently, that allows the privatization of Government Tax Administration. Therefore, most of the creational process of the IRS was illegal. Currently, the IRS, and subsequently the Treasury, are not subject to FOIA, regarding any operations or legal implementation of operations of the IRS. In essence, if you were to request, through FOIA, a copy of the corporate charter, the delegation orders from the Secretary of the Treasury authorizing the implementation and collection of taxes, or the delegation from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Services to implement the administration or collection of United States government taxes, you will receive nothing. They are not subject to FOIA requirements. Treasury Order 150-10 delegates all IRS authority directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue who administrates implementation of IRC, Internal Revenue Code. However, the IRC makes no mention of the IRS. In IRC, book 68A, section 7802, authorization is given for an oversight board which will give reports to Congress, but has no oversight authority in the operation of the IRS. Finally, a closer review of 31 U.S.C. discloses that the Internal Revenue Service is not a division, bureau, or in any part, a part of theUnited States Treasury. 31 U.S.C chapter 3 does not list the IRS as an agency of the Treasury. 31 U.S.C subtitle VI section 9101 does not list the IRS as a government owned corporation. 31 U.S.C subtitle I chapter 9 section 901 does not list the IRS as an authorized agency. TL;DR no, they aren’t.
To clarify, the IRS, as an agency, was never established by an act of Congress or approved for implementation by statute law. The IRS is contracted by the US department of Treasury. There is no statute, currently, that allows the privatization of Government Tax Administration. Therefore, most of the creational process of the IRS was illegal. Currently, the IRS, and subsequently the Treasury, are not subject to FOIA, regarding any operations or legal implementation of operations of the IRS. In essence, if you were to request, through FOIA, a copy of the corporate charter, the delegation orders from the Secretary of the Treasury authorizing the implementation and collection of taxes, or the delegation from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Services to implement the administration or collection of United States government taxes, you will receive nothing. They are not subject to FOIA requirements. Treasury Order 150-10 delegates all IRS authority directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue who administrates implementation of IRC, Internal Revenue Code. However, the IRC makes no mention of the IRS. In IRC, book 68A, section 7802, authorization is given for an oversight board which will give reports to Congress, but has no oversight authority in the operation of the IRS. Finally, a closer review of 31 U.S.C. discloses that the Internal Revenue Service is not a division, bureau, or in any part, a part of theUnited States Treasury. 31 U.S.C chapter 3 does not list the IRS as an agency of the Treasury. 31 U.S.C subtitle VI section 9101 does not list the IRS as a government owned corporation. 31 U.S.C subtitle I chapter 9 section 901 does not list the IRS as an authorized agency. TL;DR no, they aren’t.
To clarify, the IRS, as an agency, was never established by an act of Congress or approved for implementation by statute law. The IRS is contracted by the US department of Treasury. There is no statute, currently, that allows the privatization of Government Tax Administration. Therefore, most of the creational process of the IRS was illegal. Currently, the IRS, and subsequently the Treasury, are not subject to FOIA, regarding any operations or legal implementation of operations of the IRS. In essence, if you were to request, through FOIA, a copy of the corporate charter, the delegation orders from the Secretary of the Treasury authorizing the implementation and collection of taxes, or the delegation from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Services to implement the administration or collection of United States government taxes, you will receive nothing. They are not subject to FOIA requirements. Treasury Order 150-10 delegates all IRS authority directly to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue who administrates implementation of IRC, Internal Revenue Code. However, the IRC makes no mention of the IRS. The In IRC, book 68A, section 7802, authorization is given for an oversight board which will give reports to Congress, but has no oversight authority in the operation of the IRS. Finally, a closer review of 31 U.S.C. discloses that the Internal Revenue Service is not a division, bureau, or in any part, a part of theUnited States Treasury. 31 U.S.C chapter 3 does not list the IRS as an agency of the Treasury. 31 U.S.C subtitle VI section 9101 does not list the IRS as a government owned corporation. 31 U.S.C subtitle I chapter 9 section 901 does not list the IRS as an authorized agency. TL;DR no, they aren’t.
Ol Smokey out to get you 
Your submission was removed for the following reason(s): Rule VI - Personal Information See our [Expanded Rules](https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/wiki/expanded_rules) wiki page for more details about this rule. If you would like to message the mods, press [this](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FCryptoCurrency) button and leave a message as detailed as possible.
Can confirm the bear is my brother in law 
tldr; Rockstar Games has confirmed that Grand Theft Auto VI will be delayed indefinitely until they can finally come up with a satisfactory pun for Bitcoin. "Believe it or not, peppering our massive digital world with juvenile ‘69’ jokes and naughty innuendo has traditionally been the most difficult part of game design for us," Rockstar President Sam Houser said. "At this point, we can probably only milk GTA 5 for another 12, maybe 23 years, at most," CEO Strauss Zelnick said. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
“Users from the following countries or regions will not be able to participate in CoinMarketCap Earn campaigns: Belarus, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Mainland China, North Korea, Sudan, South Sudan (SS), Syria, United States of America and its territoriesUnited States (US), Guam (GU), Northern Mariana Islands (MP), Puerto Rico (PR), Virgin Islands US (VI), American Samoa (AS), United States Minor Outlying Islands (UM), Zimbabwe.”
This is one part of trading that I am truly horrible at. I do the text book typical error of selling my good trades to soon (they "always" go up more after) and hold on to my bad trades for too long (they ALWAYS go down further). Using the Vortex Indicator as a profit taking indicator is one way to go. When your run up is over, the positive VI will cross down through the negative VI to confirm shift from up trend to down trend. You want to sell at that cross through or just before. However, selling just before can be premature and the VI can reverse so according to professionals, you are supposed to wait an sell during the cross or just after.
Also, the US is on their FAQ list as not being eligible • Users from the following countries or regions will not be able to participate in CoinMarketCap Earn campaigns: Belarus, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Mainland China, North Korea, Sudan, South Sudan (SS), Syria, United States of America and its territories United States (US), Guam (GU), Northern Mariana Islands (MP), Puerto Rico (PR), Virgin Islands US (VI), American Samoa (AS), United States Minor Outlying Islands (UM), Zimbabwe.
>not sure if it would violate any rules No fam, you are good. I did the research for you. Below are the associated Terms of Use and Policy Guidelines for IG and FB. ​ Terms of Use 6. You may not use the Instagram service for any illegal or unauthorized purpose. International users agree to comply with all local laws regarding online conduct and acceptable content. 14. You must not, in the use of Instagram, violate any laws in your jurisdiction (including but not limited to copyright laws). ​ [https://www.instagram.com/about/legal/terms/before-january-19-2013/](https://www.instagram.com/about/legal/terms/before-january-19-2013/) VI. How do we respond to legal requests or prevent harm? We access, preserve and share your information with regulators, law enforcement or others: In response to a legal request (like a search warrant, court order or subpoena) if we have a good faith belief that the law requires us to do so. This may include responding to legal requests from jurisdictions outside of the United States when we have a good-faith belief that the response is required by law in that jurisdiction, affects users in that jurisdiction, and is consistent with internationally recognized standards. When we have a good-faith belief it is necessary to: detect, prevent and address fraud, unauthorized use of the Products, violations of our terms or policies, or other harmful or illegal activity; to protect ourselves (including our rights, property or Products), you or others, including as part of investigations or regulatory inquiries; or to prevent death or imminent bodily harm. For example, if relevant, we provide information to and receive information from third-party partners about the reliability of your account to prevent fraud, abuse and other harmful activity on and off our Products. [https://help.instagram.com/519522125107875](https://help.instagram.com/519522125107875) Reducing the Spread of False Information on Instagram We use signals, like feedback from our community, to identify posts that may contain false information. We work with third-party fact-checkers across the globe who review content in over 60 languages and are certified through the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network to help identify, review and label false information. As we work to limit the spread, here are some tips on what to look out for: Consider the photos. False information posts often contain manipulated images or videos. Sometimes the photo may be authentic, but taken out of context. You can search elsewhere for the photo or image to verify where it came from. Be skeptical of headlines. False information posts often have catchy text in all caps with exclamation points. If shocking claims in the headline sound unbelievable, they might be. Investigate the source. Ensure that the post is from a source that you trust. If the post comes from an unfamiliar account, make sure to learn more. Watch for unusual formatting. Many false information sites have misspellings or awkward layouts. Read carefully if you see these signs. Inspect the dates. False information posts may contain timelines that make no sense, or event dates that have been altered. Check the evidence. Check the poster’s sources to confirm that they are accurate. Lack of evidence or reliance on unnamed experts may indicate false information. [https://help.instagram.com/1735798276553028/?helpref=hc\_fnav&bc\[0\]=Instagram%20Help&bc\[1\]=Policies%20and%20Reporting](https://help.instagram.com/1735798276553028/?helpref=hc_fnav&bc[0]=Instagram%20Help&bc[1]=Policies%20and%20Reporting) 5. Fraud and Deception Policy Rationale In an effort to prevent fraudulent activity that can harm people or businesses, we remove content that purposefully deceives, willfully misrepresents or otherwise defrauds or exploits others for money or property. This includes content that seeks to coordinate or promote these activities using our services. We allow people to raise awareness and educate others as well as condemn these activities. Do not post: Content that provides instructions on, engages in, promotes, coordinates, encourages, facilitates, admits to, recruits for, or admits to the offering or solicitation of any of the following activities: Deceiving others to generate a financial or personal benefit to the detriment of a third party or entity through: Investment or financial scams: Loan scams Advance fee scams. Gambling scams Ponzi or pyramid schemes. Money or cash flips or money muling. Investment scams with promise of high rates of return. Inauthentic identity scams: Charity scams. Romance or impersonation scams Establishment of false businesses or entities. Product or rewards scams: Grant and benefits scams. Tangible, spiritual or illuminati scams. Insurance scams, including ghost broking Fake jobs, work from home or get-rich-quick scams. Debt relief or credit repair scams. Engaging with others to generate a financial or personal benefit at a loss for a third party, such as people, businesses or organisations through: Fake documents or financial instruments by: Creating, selling or buying of: Fake or forged documents. Fake or counterfeit currency or vouchers. Fake or forged educational and professional certificates. Stolen information, goods, or services by: Credit card fraud and goods or property purchases with stolen financial information Trading, selling or buying of: Personal Identifiable Information. Fake and misleading user reviews or ratings. Future exam papers or answer sheets. Credentials for subscription services. Betting manipulation (for example match fixing). Manipulation of measuring devices such as electricity or water meters in order to bypass their authorised or legal use. [https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/fraud\_deception](https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/fraud_deception)
According to coinmarketcap earn faq, US is not eligible (https://coinmarketcap.com/earn/faq): "Users from the following countries or regions will not be able to participate in CoinMarketCap Earn campaigns: Belarus, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Mainland China, North Korea, Sudan, South Sudan (SS), Syria, United States of America and its territoriesUnited States (US), Guam (GU), Northern Mariana Islands (MP), Puerto Rico (PR), Virgin Islands US (VI), American Samoa (AS), United States Minor Outlying Islands (UM), Zimbabwe."
Crypto Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Whales