EPS

MyPostIs

That’s comparing last year height of the pandemic to this year. Not a great comparison. Q3 2019 revenue was 2.75 billion, however EPS was $3 non GAAP

KAW42089

Good amount of cash on hand for the size. Growing EPS. Very low short interest. This is a good looking stock. They do need to spend some of that money and redo their website. That thing looks straight out of the 90's.

BlackFlames01

Thoughts on the upcoming Moderna earnings call? Their EPS is ridiculously high.

Ugli-Fruit

I'm more of a value investor than a YOLO investor. I use sites like [https://www.betterinvesting.org/](https://www.betterinvesting.org/) and [https://simplywall.st/dashboard](https://simplywall.st/dashboard). What I'm looking for are stocks with good growth, good EPS, if they're taking debt its equivalent in capital shows up and they're paying it off well. Both sites have tools to do searches around these attributes. Then I look at the companies management and predict how I think it would grow if it continued down its path. This lets me get a good guess on if I think the company is undervalued, I use Better Investings tool to predict what I think is fair value. If its undervalued then I invest, and as long as my thesis continues on why its undervalued I'll slowly pour more money into it as paychecks go by. I have three exit plans: 1) If the thesis on why I thought it is undervalued gets proven wrong (management leaves, EPS go way down, etc.) then I sell. Likely would DCA out if it is not a huge red flag, or if there is one all at once. 2) Once my profits go up 2x I always ask if I think it will go up more. If I believe so I take out my initial investment, and let the half remaining continue to grow. I believe you have to take profits at some point. 3) Once it reaches roughly the price I predicted its fair value to be when I initially invested I exit.

Narzghal

Revenue growth by almost 100%. EPS went from sub $1 to $10.

3am_Snack

Go figure, CRSR bleeds all year posting growth and profit. Then they announce negative EPS and they're up 6%. haha love this market.

OptionsTrader14

Some trade ideas this fine morning: Decent breakout setups: **XPRO, AR, VET, AXSM, CCSI, FLYW** I've been avoiding **CAR** because its just going straight up and not consolidating. But it seems to have built a very small flag on the 10 day, and has now broken that on earnings premarket. Look at these fantastic numbers: 850% revenue growth, 95% earnings growth, 32% EPS surprise, 13% earnings surprise. This could be a combined breakout/EP setup. [http://earningswhisper.com/epsdetails/car](https://earningswhisper.com/epsdetails/car) The oil sector looks to be flagging. Take a look at **OIL** or the leveraged **NRGU**. Not going to play it since there's plenty of stock opportunities but its something to consider, looks bullish. Another thing to keep an eye on: "Black Rifle Coffee Company, a Rapidly Growing Premium Coffee Company and Lifestyle Brand with a Mission to Better the Lives of Veterans, Active-Duty Military and First Responders, to Go Public via Combination with **SilverBox Engaged Merger Corp I**." Huge volume coming in premarket, going to open above the 500m cap. The public really loves companies like this, seriously. Lot's of opportunities out there today. Good luck everyone!

meta-cognizant

They still missed EPS. Sales were in line with what they guided.

tanrgith

"EPS is 400 - any historical comparisons at hand" So first off, I assume you mean p/e. Because if it was an eps of 400, tesla's cap would be like 20 trillion dollars right now. To answer though, yes, literally any company that's ever gone from not making money, to making money has had a p/e in the thousands or hundreds. Amazon's p/e was in the 1000+ range when it started making money in 2015, now it's 68 or something. In short - Tesla having a high p/e right now is completely normal and happens all the time because that's how p/e works when a company is going from losing money to making money

GigaChadEnergy

>Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR): Q3 Non-GAAP EPS of $0.16 misses by $0.08; GAAP EPS of $0.02 misses by $0.14. >Revenue of $391.1M (-14.4% Y/Y) in-line. Uh oh...

VisualMod

>\*PFIZER RAISES 2021 TOTAL CO. GUIDANCE FOR REV AND ADJUSTED EPS $PFE ^\*Walter ^Bloomberg ^[@DeItaone](http://twitter.com/DeItaone) ^at ^2021-11-02 ^06:45:38 ^EDT-0400

congmingdexigua

I think it comes down to conviciton with these... EPS: Tesla - 392.19 Amazon - 64.88 Microsoft - 36.82 Alphabet - 27.64 Proctor and Gamble - 26.07 Facebook - 23.59 Clearly Tesla will deliver the cure for something soon or discover the secret of transmutation or something. Amazon also seems to be in high confidence terretory - maybe AWS. The rest has become grounded somewhat - MS maybe Azure is peaking out?

Cantgetfooledagain1

It is revenue growth and EPS growth - Tsla sympathy if I were to put a % on it is (imo) 15-20%

XchrisZ

We all know the EPS isn't going to be near the estimates and smart people like me know it's going to be $0.135 not $0.24 like they expect.

FSD2021

Back of napkin: 2025 tesla sells 5M cars at 45k ASP at 35% margin is 78.75B of profit and the company is still growing. So thats $78 EPS 2025, in a business thats still growing and with that margin lets say the PE mutiple is 40x. So thats a 3150 2025 share price in 2025, and you wont pay 1200 for that today?

gammaradiation2

That shit is going to scrub if the corpo debt default dominos begin to fall. I like my stocks flush with cash and either positive EPS or reasonable EPS trajectory. I cried a little bit when I checked on a few of the tickers I've nay sayed over the years but if I am being honest with myself I usually don't have an exit strategy so I like the stairs over the elevator.

GoBeaversOSU

!ticker word EPS

LivingstonGoeland

I'm not sure whether or not this deserve a whole thread because I might have spotten something usefull but I need you guys opinion on INVA, if this has the potential to be a short squeeze. But If it is useful and you make a DD thread about please give me some credit. Has been trending up consistantly over a year. The average volume is like 800k/day The debt to equity ratio is low The EPS has been positive for the last 4 quarter They have like 300M$ in positive cash flow The only thing I cant find is the institutional holding But most importantly it has a short ratio over 35% Even in the case that we would be to attempt and fail a short squeeze, I feel like this could be a pretty good thing to hold. What do you guys think? And please respond fast before my roomate need my laptop to have cybersex with my wife, the whole night again.

conndor84

The setup before Feb to Sept this year is VERY different to the setup now. End of 2020 saw stock split, S&P inclusion, shaking out all the shorts and if money incorporating to some extent into their benchmarks (most kept underweight). Now we see data showing stronger EV adoption than anticipated, industry leading margins (without ZEV credits), clear pathway to growth with new factories, improved confidence in 4680 and new product lines with CT (late 2022) and $25k car (late 2023). Combine this with big money bring up to equal weight in the benchmarks (they become more protective of gains), analysts starting to understand the narrative (average EPS is in line with current price when Jan SP had got well ahead), and bulls in control of stocks as they’re the only ones interested in buying at these prices. Until the underlying thesis has changed, I’m confident we don’t another downside big swing like we did earlier this year. Personally only downsides I see are ST shocks with Fed tapering this month and interest rates late next year. Market could throw a temper tantrum for a week or two or it could investors could welcome it to help quell hot inflation concerns. Either way, it won’t be unexpected (which was a big concern at start of year) Personally I’m holding all my calls and shares through. Only one I’m paying attention to is a Jan 2022 $600 call which I want to hold until mid-late December to try and get the factory opening, EV credits and 2022 EPS updates

nemodigital

Big EPS miss > Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI): Q3 Non-GAAP EPS of $0.30 misses by $0.28;

Theta-Maximus

People are stupid, you got that right! But housing prices peaked 3 months ago. Demand is pulling back beyond seasonal effects. New housing starts down, new permits down, new originations down, new refis down. EPS this quarter will be down, but still outsized. The trend is now down, down, down. Fed Funds are pricing in the beginning of rate hikes in less than 12 months, and the market will begin reacting to that at least 6 months in advance. RKT EPS are at cycle peak highs. The real question is what "normalized" or mid-cycle looks like and what the bottom of the cycle looks like. As with all cyclicals, they look cheap that the top and expensive at the bottom.

TvnaSammv

They expected EPS for upcoming earnings is pretty high too: high enough to make me concerned about my position. I have a put spread opened at 310/305 so I'm hoping it's a positive earnings. If the slightly bad but not really bad news ranked the price this morning, I might have to roll out come earnings.

HSL

"At $1,209 $TSLA still very cheap at 64x 2023 EPS, with 55% forward 5-year EPS growth (1.15x 2023 PEG). No megacap stock is that cheap on 2023 PEG except $FB. EV adoption really starting to accelerate (2021 6%, 2022 10%). " -Gary Black There you have it, hedge fund manager says Tesla still cheap at $1209. Time to all in

CalmSticks

It’s a fair point - if a business ends up seriously overvalued then perhaps a bubble could bankrupt a shareholder with tax liabilities exceeding capital? Maybe it would have to be tied to EPS or something to make it more representative of the actual value of the asset? No idea

PositiveWestern

No offense bro by why do you even write that much just to say "EPS will grow by 33% because I feel like it."

Cristian888

Bruh, they had a 1,000% EPS miss last year lmao Are you like 12 or something? Your anectodal example is completely retarded

SecretFunnel

I'll give it a shot. The standard approach seems to be to compare TSLA market cap, deliveries, etc. to legacy autos like F and GM, but instead let's just focus on TSLA earnings. Q3 EPS 1.88. Q4 EPS estimate right now sits at 1.91. Unless supply chain shortages are worse in Q4 than Q3, TSLA will come in well above this for a few reasons. 1) They did not deliver as many S and X in Q3 due to a production refresh. Increased S and X deliveries will improve margins. 2) Overall increase in production improves margin, and they continue to producer more cars each quarter even out of existing factories like Shanghai. I estimate EPS will be closer to 2.50 in Q4, which annualizes at 10.00 EPS. 2022 should see continued growth, but I could see Q1-Q2 earnings drop -- or at least not jump as much while they have higher expenses to ramp Giga Austin and Giga Berlin. I don't expect full production until Q4 2022, but they should be able to hit 5.00 EPS. If you annualize this to 20.00 EPS then you need to determine what multiple does TSLA deserve if they grow revenue at >50% and earnings >50%? The only similar growth trajectory I've seen was AMZN in the past, which traded at 100x forward earnings for quite some time. 100x 20.00EPS would be 2000 stock price, or close to 2T market cap. If they ramp Austin and Berlin faster, advance FSD quicker, figure out 4680 production quicker, etc, then perhaps you move your multiple higher. Conversely, if it takes them a while to ramp and/or there are unforeseen challenges to the business, then maybe it deserves a lower multiple. Important to note that multiples are all about what people are willing to pay. I'm fine to pay 100x in this case, you might feel better at 20x, and my neighbor might be OK buying at 200x.

MadManMorbo

How much do you think its going to impact their EPS in the call tomorrow?

Rand_alThor__

Big EPS miss. EPS growth is the only reason people but amzn.

PresterJohnsKingdom

Nice! I sold some of them on Friday, have 5 contracts left. May exercise one of them. Their earnings call on Thursday, their guidance was pretty ballsy. Shooting for $6 EPS by 2023. Their CEO is committed to delivering a "double double" - double digit growth/margin.

VisualMod

I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: BGFV SPWH EPS. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.

congmingdexigua

This smells fishy. I brought stock like this before and still have reminders in my portfolio. EPS are hit and miss ... Yahoo finace reads like all of there "3 days for shorts to cover" (4 days ago) - so I guess they covered. Are you John from Yahoo finace?

mkrofdrms

Disclosure, I work in Biotech but this doesn't make more smart than any of you idiots out there, having said that, since I have idea Amgen has been working with this kind of drugs, first EPO and now Aranesp, the applications although yes anemia is more broad as old cancer treatments deplete the red cells, thus cancer patients with chemo treatment require this kind of booster treatment, now would they take the market just like that, nope, takes a long time for doctors to do the switch, still rather interesting due to the stock price, a calculated risk barring the other indicators are good, pipeline, EPS etc. I will keep them in my radar for sure.

Desmater

Smart move by Apple is how they are trying to grow services. That way they don't have these cycles with hardware like the iPhone. If you notice the total revenue is growing for services. Like apple music, apple tv, etc. Services are also higher margin. Another thing is if they really make an apple car or someone else makes a car and uses Apple's ip/services. That will make another revenue stream. Apple healthcare maybe a thing in the future as well. Plenty of growth. Also people are mixed on buybacks. Saying it is not real organic growth since they are just sinking the float. But to me that smart. Shrinking the float reduces employee stock options from ballooning the float. Reduces dividends paid out. Increases EPS. Not like the big tech can do big M&A now that Europe and US are on this anti trust/tax.

No-Negotiation-3128

Thank you very much for your comment, Let's get the party started, it's about getting naked, why not to add some excitement 😉🍾 You are right they are different brand, but quite Similar name i couldn't find suitable visual content to add in the video to keep it exiting and not boring. I thought many will not recognize it, but it seems you have sharp eays 👏👏 However the information in the video is about Naked brand group, and correct. In terms of length of video, specially at the beginning and at end , there are useful informations . Also you are right because it's too loud people may miss those information. For me is always important to see what individual think of product and company , which located at the end of the video. At beginning of the video also is useful information. But all of the video is useful. IF they sign an agreement with this new partner in the field of clean energy which they referred to, it might begin a new chapter fir company. as they believe it . I'm not sure what how their business plan change but as long as they manage to generate revenue and positive EPS, it's good. Not like bendon which hurted the company and caused this massive loss. i believe 200% is a realistic gain by end of 2022 if agreement goes through and management mange to reduce expenses. Covid effect will vanish during the time. Online businesses boomed during the Covid but not necessarily all kind of them. It depends on many variants. Unfortunately the company is not publishing enough data so i can't provide a good answer for this question. But I'm living in Germany and my wife recognized the brand, she mentioned she has their product and she is satisfied with them also ordered online. Since they existed bendon this year, we must wait and see financial report of this year. As i understand one of the huge part of their losses was because of Bendon. However managment strategies should show it self fully in next year results. That's why i mentioned in the video that shareholders must be prepare for one bad more earning result. I believe 2022 will be a good year for them

F_Dingo

That 10 cent boost to EPS in Q3 won't appear out of thin air!

KaiserSwiss93

- photo n1. I have € 100 of debt. 1 year later, I am in debt with € 300. This is + 200% on an annual basis. am I bankrupt? They sure are not. Too many years with -20 / -40% before this + 60% to be afraid of the%. It would be better to find nominal values. the% do not represent anything if there is no nominal basis. - pic2, "real earnings" are "real earnings" or EPS + dividends? I am investing, not looking for dividends or EPS. If not, where is this turbo bullrun on S & P500? We are at 65% inflation to get -1 % of "real earnings"? I am buying Apple stock because I can sell these shares tomorrow at a higher price. I am not only interested in their EPS if I can still find a huge amount of investors who automatically invest every day without worrying about prices. We buy and sell names, not company balance sheets. I buy t-bonds if I think they are safe and profitable. today Apple does the same thing and does it better, it follows inflation. T-bonds throttle me during inflation. - pic3, Does the calculation of GDP versus capitalization make sense? I think it is not. "Do we have a lot more money in the stock markets than money in the economy?" Nice… many of us have a much higher asset value and no one can bring money to the graveyard. So where is the problem? spend today, spend tomorrow or pay your taxes when you die. spend in any case. evidently the market does not offer something that those who have money want to buy. it means that there is a demand for something that the market can undertake to provide. that's how the market works.

SniXSniPe

HIMX earnings reported pre-market hours Thursday, November 4th Cumulative EPS is @ about $1.00 Expected Q3 EPS is about .75 to .81. The dividend yield and dividend is going to be incredibly juicy in June/July. Q4 guidance will be announced, thats the big thing. Load up on cheap shares for a $1.8 - $2.xx per share payout. That's close to a 20% yield right now. Solid for a semiconductor company. CON: Taiwanese Co. (Pls don't invade China)

topdangle

It's from the tweet that you literally posted. For a guy that claims nobody knows what they're talking about, you sure don't know what you're talking about, and don't even seem to remember what you just posted a few hours ago lol. Jesus christ. Seems like all of your ranting is based on a misread of Amazon's spike in PE a decade ago, which was caused by an EPS drop, not speculation. They've been beating the market and compounding, absolutely nothing like tesla destroying the market.

RoadDelicious7288

So you need to consider if you want to hedge against inflation or outperform against inflation rates? There may be traditional stocks like yiu mentioned which will just pass on the costs of inflation to their consumer and so hedge against it. But some high growth stocks will grow at much faster rates in terms of revenue and EPS against inflation. So over the long term high growth stocks may be a better bet.

SugarDaddyVA

The reason why I think it will be good next year is because the company is already doing one of those things and likely will do the second within the next six months. They quietly closed on a DirecTV sale in August to a private equity firm, and I’d put a good bet on the dividend being slashed next year. They’re not done selling off assets, I believe DirecTV is just the start. They are also starting to beat EPS estimates and their P/E is low. The battleship is being turned, and I think investors start to reward them in 2022.

jmHomeOffice

Valuation looks crazier with P/E Ratio formula for intrinsic value. I got $2879.65 Of course this is highly speculative. I think next year EV market will be impacted by Ford, GM, Rivian and other automotive companies going after Tesla's market share. \*P/E Ratio Formula: Trailing P/E ratio is calculated by dividing the current price of stock by the total of its 12-months trailing earnings (trailing EPS). To calculate the current intrinsic value of stock, multiply trailing P/E ratio by the projected earnings per share (forward EPS). Current Price of Stock / Trailing EPS = Trailing P/E Ratio Trailing P/E Ratio \* Forward EPS = Intrinsic Value This formula is more speculative since Forward EPS is used and not applicable to all industries. Ex: Banks. Data and formulas from: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/company-360/id1464857130

msnf

TSLA has experienced extraordinary growth over the last two years, but what I find remarkable about them is their fundamentals actually look cheaper now than they did before the start of the bull run. Let's imagine TSLA was producing the same earnings and sales but at a January 2020 valuation. TSLA | Current Price | Jan 2020 Price |-|-|-| |Market Cap|$1073B|$87B| |P/E|361|25| |Forward P/E|143.4|11.6| |PEG|4.95|0.40| |P/S|22.9|1.86| |P/B|43.6|3.5| TSLA was around an $87B company at the start of 2020. I look at these numbers and think, despite the popular sentiment at the time, that TSLA was an absolute bargain at its 2020 prices. TSLA's projected 5-year EPS growth is actually higher now (73% per year) than it was at the start of 2020 (around 50%). To me the lesson is if you think the market has fundamentally mispriced something, have some humility and consider the market may know something you don't.

MinimumCat123

Well if Winnebago is any indication, their August ER beat EPS and Revenue estimates and still dropped. But, Camping World saw what looked to be sympathetic price movement so there may be a chance that its already priced in.

minipectoralis

I thought I had a good entry but SDC keeps shitting on my bed. I don’t even know if revenue or EPS beats will move this. I hope they have really good guidance in order for institutions to start pouring in

Bob-Zimmerman

Watch that PE come down every single quarter. EPS will double within 2 years and grow from there

AnyAd7461

Oh boy amc, i wonder how positive the EPS will be

Scion2A

Dude, it is nowhere near preCovid. And pre-Covid it has been negative EPS annually since 2017. If you go you will see there are about 3 showings a day for most films. AMC is going to collapse sooner or later.

Ehralur

That's a very good point that I did not take into account in this analysis. I do expect stock based compensation to dilute shares slighty, but it's probably quite negligible in the greater picture for this analysis. I don't expect Tesla to raise money ever again, and if they do I doubt it would be more than 1-2%. They have around $20B in reserves, while they've just built 2 gigantic factories and are already spending money as fast as they (say they) can, yet are still increasing net income every quarter. So yeah, perhaps I could compensate for this by reducing EPS by a few percent in the worst case scenario, but it wouldn't make a huge difference for the conclusion.

Redditor45643335

What does earnings per share actually mean for a company? Like if company A makes $10 per share and company B makes $15 per share, is company B straight up more valuable than company A? Or is it not that simple? Reason I ask is cos Coinbase EPS $10 and is valued at $67b but Microsoft EPS is $9 and is valued at $2.4t.

TheEnd187

crypto hitting ATH every week along with these dog coins will make it moon, then again last ER they smashed EPS and tanked.

Tao-Lee

Yeah they definitely crushed the EPS this time around. Assy Jassy bruh. Down 69% on my calls.

BrodaNoel

u/LadyArrianeDirenni glad you removed your comment. EPS is Price over Earnings. Price is always positive in stock market (only negative in few times in futures. Like oil 1 year ago)

LadyArrianeDirenni

We’re talking about EPS not stock price.

okt27

I don’t want to say good things about RLX when I say this, but the PE doesn’t matter on companies like this one. When a company has been negative and just starts to make profits, it’s normal to see a 1000x PE. New companies are growth companies. I invested in companies with no PE (meaning they had negative earnings at that point) and still made a lot of money. If RLX has something like 0.01 EPS, then ofc the PE will be high, but in 3 years the company could have a 1$ EPS that (by current valuations) will give them a PE of 5. Not saying this will happen but PE alone is not an indicative of value

edddyeee

Love this pick. I'm not as familiar with the tech but based on financials I'd put my money on Intel hands down. Intel looks undervalued and AMD looks ridiculously overvalued. True that AMD had some explosive growth in past couple years compared to Intel but imo this may just be a blip. Intel is running a much tighter ship with much higher efficiency. Considerably higher gross margins and lower MG&A than AMD. Intel spends $13B on annual capex r&d compared to AMD's $2B. This should pay off in the long run when it comes to the better tech. IMO there's no reason their market caps should be hovering at the same levels when Intel EPS is currently more than double that of AMD.

highquaIity

I noticed this yesterday too. I contacted webull about it and they said they’d check and get back to me. I believe this could be some sort of a privately negotiated share repurchase/buyback. It offsets the dilutive impact that a merger/acquisition can have. It can also improve EPS since it reduces the amount of outstanding shares. This is assuming that this isn’t a glitch of course 😅. I also think that they may have an incentive to do this so suddenly. Biden has proposed a tax on stock buybacks which Wall Street wasn’t so happy with. They could be trying to get theirs in before the tax is enforced.

my_fun_lil_alt

Since going public they've made about $1 per share and paid out $0.20 per share. Annually they are pacing to pay somewhere around 15-20% of EPS.

Timewarp859

Not rich enough for NVDA (not enough for good gains to the risk) anyway. I do like them though, they seem solid and once the shortage is over they will provide over the EPS

RaqRaq00

I wouldn’t reduce now. Still growing on a 20%+ EPS GROWTH trend. Biggest threat to their business is failure to maintain/grow AWS margins and market share. From a macro standpoint, we are shifting into the mid/late part of market cycle. Here, investors pay up for growth stocks as the economy cools. Hold onto your FAANG+whatever stocks. They’re going to outperform next 9-18 months. Then look to defensive. Then we go into recession and start over b buying materials, industrials, reits, and other cyclicals. Yay

RumHam1

Big short interest is not usually a good thing. 17B market cap on 470 million yearly earnings. Negative EPS this year and next year. I haven't done any DD on them so I'm not saying they won't be big, but that valuation is not attractive.

DavidAg02

Holy S... Chevron beat EPS by 35%!

Significant_Wing_878

They are going to be dishing out serious cash each quarter for their acquisitions. EPS will have a positive outlook concerning operations over the next 12 months, but will be a disaster unless they can get over 100m a q

WestmontOG07

These numbers don't do the company justice --- frankly. They didn't miss on the EPS because of a lack of execution --- they missed, specifically, because of: wage increases, doubling down on fulfillment, supply constraints, etc... Beyond that, Advertising revenue continued to grow (around $8.1 Billion for the quarter) and AWS continues to be a market leader, with around 41% share of the global cloud business. Prime Video continues to show signs of solid adoption as well. Bottom line on the Q3 earnings, from my perspective: Yes, it was a miss on EPS, no question, but the company is executing on all fronts --- the out of control items (wage increases, supply constraints, trucker shortages) those will be resolved with time, and when they are, Amazon will be positioned phenomenally well for the future as they are re-investing now. NOTE: In the 4th quarter guidance, the company is anticipating spending about $4-6 Billion (Around $11.50 per share) on wage increases, fulfillment, delivery and delivery expansion. If you figure that the company, on average, has spent --- since covid began --- about $2-4 billion per quarter, over six quarters, to position themselves for the future --- that is about $23 EPS on the low end and $46 EPS on the high end that the company has reinvested into itself rather than the bottom line (not including the $4-6 billion they are expecting to reinvest into themselves in Q4 2021). Where I am going with this comment is that this is where you cannot miss the forest for the trees with Amazon. They could have easily focused on EPS, which would have certainly grown share price in the short term, rather than reinvesting and taking some pain now to position themselves and their stock growth for the long term! Facts don't lie --- eventually they will get thru the pandemic issues and related costs and the profit spicket will be turned on.... MY view doesn't change, for the long term, in that Amazon and Google should absolutely be a central part of everyone's portfolio, in my opinion. I see nothing that is going to change my mind! Good luck investing to all.

Investor1964

What about EPS and adjusted EBITDA? I cant find it anywhere...

GhostHin

Making your investment, not trading, calls based on EPS misses are useless. Intel been beating it by 20-50% in the last 5 quarters and their price still tanked. So what's your point?

Zachjsrf

I wanna get my face ripped off today, that EPS is nuts considering their stock price.

EskettiMySpaghetti

1% miss on revenue is barely a miss, and EPS wasn’t terrible considering that the feds have really cut back on QE in the past few months. I think too many people are overreacting to their earnings.

ShotgunSquitters

Revenue per quarter in 2021 so far has been $189M and $174M in Q1 and Q2 respectively. EPS has increased from -$0.25 to -$0.14 for the same quarters. The latest financial report shows Q2 year to date revenue increase from $304M to $374, an increase of 23%. It was sitting around $10/share this time last year and they are growing and earnings are improving. Even if the short squeeze isn't in play, it seems like a good investment in a growing company.

curiousprovisions

I have no idea how they'll report on EPS, but I'm confident they'll boost their forward guidance since Amazon, Walmart, Target and American Airlines are all on board now. They have to.

VisualMod

I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: EPS. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.

only_gainz_abc123

If amazon missed EPS and revenue, wish probably did too

wearahat03

Amazon is the most inconsistent in terms of EPS out of the big tech. Their AWS is amazingly consistent in terms of profits and growth. Probably worth 1TN alone. Their e-commerce is unreliable. Any small uptick in costs turn profits into losses because of their razor thin margins.

Butterscotch-Apart

Apple is down on supply chain issues after earnings. Could be a good time to get in as a long term investment. The chip situation will get figured out eventually and the demand is still very high for Apple products. They beat EPS despite the shortage so their margins are good and likely to get even better.

wadesh

So, im old as crap and was around in the late 1990's when Amazon was just starting to grow. (and no, I don't have stock from then...I'd be on my private island, not Reddit). I remember hearing the same things when they had like 5 years of revenue and EPS misses. everyone was down on Amazon. But behind the scenes, they were making huge investments for future growth and prioritizing these investments over EPS. Lately I have seen how aggressive they are in building distribution centers, buying planes, building their own global logistics network, investing in automation, continuing to innovate in Cloud and AI. I guess all Im saying is if you believe in the strategy of their near term investments for future growth, it could be a hold that could pay off very nicely 5-10 years down the road. I personally am not betting against them.

Shatter_

I think for newer investors it would be a lot easier to understand if we changed the headlines to, "analysts missed revenue and EPS guesses".

oystrodoom

We gonna limit down tomorrow because Amazon missed EPS. That's how fragile this price point is.

oldmanraplife

I'm pretty jazzed over amzn beating EPS on a REV miss. It's like putting on bigger turbos and getting more horsepower with less gas. When supply chain clear she'll be able to use all the new boost.

gehau

Whirlpool earnings this morning. Beat on revenue and EPS but margins are down a few percents. Tempur Pedic good some ok results. Let's hope this quarter they were running all their 8 machines at full capacity. I'll probably but some long Jan 15p to limit the losses.

BelovedBug27

$LIDR AEye Inc. \_\_Analyst PT $14.5 \*10/25/21 Roth Capital Initiates Coverage On Buy $15 \*9/23/21 Guggenheim Initiates Coverage On Buy $14 \_\_Recent SPAC deal by CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III SPAC in $2B \_\_Cash-Loaded, Technology-Rich, Low-Expense, Abundant-Partnership, Future-Unlimited.... \_\_EPS -0.2 i.e. $27M/year \_\_Current PARTNERSHIPS: Ref. http://www.aeye.ai \*TuSimple Holdings Inc $TSP \*Continental $CTTAY \*GM Ventures $GM \*Intel Capital $INTC \*Aisin Corporation \*LG Electronics \*Taiwania \*Subaru-SBI \*Airbus Ventures \*Kleiner Perkins \*SK Hynix

DrWorstCaseScenario

“ Gilead Sciences (GILD) ) late Thursday reported Q3 adjusted EPS of $2.65, rising from $2.11 a year earlier, and surpassing analyst estimate of $1.78 in a Capital IQ poll. Revenue grew 13% to $7.4 billion from a year ago, also topping the $6.34 billion estimate. For the full-year 2021, the drug maker said it now expects total product sales of $26.0 billion to $26.3 billion, versus $24.4 billion to $25 billion previously, and adjusted EPS of $7.90 to $8.10, against $6.90 to $7.25 previously. The Street estimate was for an adjusted earnings of $7.25 per share. “ Bought another 100 shares of gilead. Now holding 200 shares and 5x 10/29 strike 68 calls. I really expect good things… but maybe I’ll just be bag holding… but remdesivir is the main drug we have for covid hospitalized patients and I don’t see sales decreasing anytime soon.

ihavenipplefocker

I’m not disputing that, but More of of what have you done for me lately. If Amazon breaks out so be it, but given this and the previous quarter I’m not sure how/when that will happen while Google is growing their top line by 40% and smoking EPS.

SexySPACsMan

EPS 30% miss

gch454

their guidance was stupid & they barely beat EPS estimates.

Franc000

Sooo, a miss of 1% on the revenue? Am I reading this right? Should that be really be what people are looking at? I mean even the EPS, but if it was compared to a once a century event, I think whomever came with the forecast smoked something.

Zonz4332

??? Revenue miss was just over 1%, which has nothing to do with demand and only supply constraints. They still hit their EPS. Considering they haven’t provided guidance in over a year I think it’s incredible it was that close over or under. Overall revenue is still up 30%, which is pretty ridiculous.

VindicoAtrum

>higher costs expected due to labor Everyone is subject to this. >EPS miss, revenue miss, This shit is all analyst guess work. Don't pay it any attention. Either you believe in AMZN as a global cloud computing and ecommerce for the future or you don't. Buy or sell on those terms, not analysts who's job it is to churn out garbage at high rates.

fledermaus23

Hah, it always tanks on earnings. Last year they beat the highest EPS estimate by $1 and it still tanked 6%. Since then I only do credit call spreads

Brads-Brew-Lab

EPS 1.24 vs 1.25 estimate Rev 83.36 vs 84.85 estimate Slight miss, see what the forward guidance brings

animositisomina35

Apple Q4 21 Earning Results : - EPS: $1.24 (est $1.24) - Revenue: $83.36Bln (est $84.689Bln) - Q4 iPhone Revenue $38.87b, Est. $41.60b A miss on revenue.

iMnotrichh

Apple beat eps but missed revenue. EPS is 1.24 vs 1.23 expected. Revenue is 83.36B vs 84.85 B Expected

needadvice881

EARNINGS: Apple Q4 EPS $1.24 vs. $1.24 Est.; Q4 Revs. $83.36B vs. $84.85B Est

areyoumentalll

Yeah, and last earnings they actually beat on EPS.

vanilla44028

Google and teladoc didn’t miss EPS that bad. I think it’s bleeds tomorrow. It’s too slow to keep you money sitting all year to get a 2% gain.

sirajgb

Maybe amazon will announce a name change and stock split to make up for the $2 dollar EPS miss. If futures look bad expect Congress to suddenly pass the bill overnight. Sorry for cynicism but the past two weeks just made me gave up on market having any rationale for at least a day

Not_a_bot01100111

Ooof that's a big miss by Amazon on Q3 EPS: 6.12 vs 8.92 est.

ShitFeeder

Damn amazon earnings. Look at that EPS just falling because of supply chain issues.

BrokeDayTrader

Damn AMZN missed on both EPS and Rev

Kitkatcandykid

AMZN > 6.12 EPS vs 8.91 expected > 110.8b revenue 111.62b expected Here lies Amazon, it got fucking butchered

freehouse_throwaway

> Q3 EPS $6.12, consensus $8.92 excellent. mother fucker heh