CTO

Spitefulnugma

You'd think a guy who was CTO and CEO of Intel would know what he's talking about. I mean clearly not. Wtf?

hyzer_skip

What are you suggesting these other companies do with their engineers who have little to no experience with XLA/TPUs and all the rules and architectural differences that come with it? Just take a couple years to retrain them in this technology? The bottleneck is that you are now forcing your expert engineers to reskill and relying on a 3rd party to fix it when things go wrong. You think this cloud engineering support team will be able to diagnose and fix the inevitable string of errors as these labs experiment with bleeding edge techniques to squeeze the most out of model architecture? We are talking about an entire research lab no longer owning their development end to end because they do not have the experience to fix their own XLA errors, bugs, whatever. You’re suggesting that these labs tell their PhD level researchers to rely on an external engineering department when things go wrong? It’s not armchair CTO, it’s common sense. I’m not even able to really comprehend what it is you’re suggesting these AI labs should do exactly because it doesn’t sound rational unless you have a vested interest in Google getting more cloud deals.

thethiefstheme

Boston dynamics have been pushing out the same dog robot and same humanoid robot for 25 years with almost zero improvements while Chinese robots have eclipsed them. Not sure what this CTO could possibly bring. https://youtu.be/glOL5SD4uKw?si=X5SIYmRaDEQ8PMaE

Infinityy100b

Google Search revenue has dropped from 80% to around 55% of total revenue and is projected to drop to around 40% by 2030 of the total revenue. So I would say they are diversifying. Revenue from Google workspace is still very slim as compared to Microsoft 365 they have not leveraged it to the full potential and I feel it would change after the launch of Android powered windows competitor early next year. Along with that they are becoming the leading player in ai with getting their hands into robotics (hired Boston dynamics former CTO), autonomous driving and many more along with growing margins in their cloud division with the clock growing from 110 billion dollars to 155 billion in just one quarter. YouTube still doesn't have any competitor being the only platform with increasing total playtime gaining market share from other players in the industry. There are many other things Google doing we don't even know while being the only player having the full AI Technology stack.

iMakeGOODinvestmemts

$GOOG winning AI and killing openai. Read 1/ Right now, Nvidia is the "Arms Merchant." They sell the H100s. Everyone pays the tax. Their entire stock price assumes they keep ~75% margins forever. But Google just made a move that changes the physics of the board. They aren't trying to sell chips. They're trying to make chips irrelevant. 2/ The setup is simple: Nvidia makes money by keeping hardware expensive (High Margin). Google makes money on ads/services, so they want compute to be free (High Volume). These goals are incompatible. In Game Theory, this is a "Structural Conflict." 3/ For years, Nvidia had a "Hold-Up" on the industry. You want to do AI? You pay the Nvidia tax because CUDA is the only software that works. It was a monopoly based on fear: "Switching to another chip is too risky. What if the code breaks?" 4/ Enter Gemini 3.0. Google trained it on TPUs. They run it on TPUs. They don't pay the Nvidia tax. This means their internal cost-per-token is structurally ~50% lower than OpenAI's (who has to pay Microsoft, who has to pay Nvidia). 5/ (This is the part that clicked for me) Google creates a "Price Ceiling." If Google sells intelligence for $1, OpenAI can’t sell it for $2 just because they use expensive Nvidia chips. OpenAI must match the price to survive. But they can't. Not while paying Nvidia's margin. 6/ This traps Nvidia’s best customers in a corner. To match Google’s prices, Microsoft and OpenAI are forced to build their own chips (Maia) to stop paying Nvidia. Nvidia’s own pricing power is exactly what is incentivizing its customers to destroy it. 7/ So where does the equilibrium settle? I ran the scenarios. It leads to a split. Zone A: Discovery (Nvidia Wins)Researchers still use Nvidia because speed matters more than cost. Zone B: Utility (Google Wins)Once a model works, you run it on cheap custom chips. 8/ You can see the strategies shifting in real-time right now: Google: Aggressive subsidies ($350k credits) to get startups to rewrite their code off CUDA. Nvidia: Bundling software (NIMs) to make leaving impossible. It's classic "Free Drugs" vs "Golden Handcuffs." 9/ If you are building in AI, here is the "Tripwire" to watch. Ignore the benchmarks. Watch the Token Price. If GPT-5 class pricing drops below $2.00/1M tokens, the "Nvidia Tax" is mathematically dead. The market is fleeing to custom silicon. 10/ The one question to ask your CTO tomorrow: "If we had to switch from Nvidia GPUs to Google TPUs or AWS chips tomorrow, would it take us 1 week or 6 months?" If the answer is 6 months, you are the "sucker" at the table paying the tax. 11/ The takeaway: In a gold rush, it's usually good to sell shovels. Unless your biggest customer decides to invent a steam shovel just to stop paying you

SlfImpr

Google DeepMind has hired Aaron Saunders, the former CTO of Boston Dynamics, to lead its hardware engineering efforts marking a bold step toward building the “Android of robots.” Saunders brings deep robotics expertise from developing Atlas and Spot, and will now help turn Gemini into a universal AI control system for both humanoids and non-humanoids.

SlfImpr

Google DeepMind has hired Aaron Saunders, the former CTO of Boston Dynamics, to lead its hardware engineering efforts marking a bold step toward building the “Android of robots.” Saunders brings deep robotics expertise from developing Atlas and Spot, and will now help turn Gemini into a universal AI control system for both humanoids and non-humanoids.

iMakeGOODinvestmemts

$GOOGL robotics and software division coming. Boston Dynamics CTO to lead robotics venture.

wuhanabe

Both Steve Huffman and Chris Slowes sales were part of a 10b5-1 trading plan. The plan was set up May 2025 and sales were pre determined. I would hardly call a 6% share sale for the CTO significant, as for Huffman he still owns and has rights of conversion for a further 5.4 million shares so an 18,000 share sale is a rounding error. Maybe he needed to pay his private chef. To your other points a low float also describes how the stock may move explosively up if sentiment changes. Reddit Q4 earnings is likely to top $1 EPS based off current margins and forecast revenue. At the current share price forward PE would drop to 46. If we keep that same trajectory into Q1 26 the P/E may drop to 38 or lower.

wuhanabe

Both Steve Huffman and Chris Slowes sales were part of a 10b5-1 trading plan. The plan was set up May 2025 and sales were pre determined. I would hardly call a 6% share sale for the CTO significant, as for Huffman he still owns and has rights of conversion for a further 5.4 million shares so an 18,000 share sale is a rounding error. Maybe he needed to pay his private chef. To your other points a low float also describes how the stock may move explosively up if sentiment changes. Reddit Q4 earnings is likely to top $1 EPS based off current margins and forecast revenue. At the current share price forward PE would drop to 46. If we keep that same trajectory into Q1 26 the P/E may drop to 38 or lower.

cdude

Buddy, a CAO and other low-level C-level positions are just in title, they mean jack shit outside of the CEO and sometimes CTO. This CAO just joined, his entire compensation package is $3 millions which is insignificant. No one cares because in the corporate world this is nothing. Do you get a lot of corporate insights being a 30-year old electrician? You say there's a bubble when laymen talk about stocks, may be we should all take your advice. When trades people discuss investing, do the opposite of what they say.

ImmodestPolitician

MSFT is the IBM of the 2020s. CTO can't get fired for picking MSFT. I met Balmer once. Funny story I won't tell.

bzl33

Karp is one of the dumbest tech CEOs I've ever heard talk about tech. It feels like he's the figurehead while the CTO runs the show and in the past Thiel ran it.

Cantthinkofacoolnam

NBIS insiders sold ALL THERE SHARES OPEN CEO CFO and CTO purchased millions. Once insiders sell lot their entire position no reason to be bullish in the company. OPEN is a better buy than NBIS.

Peresviet

Literally have a friend that started a company and uses AI to code, he has 15 years of software dev experience and is a CTO for another company. It’s definitely a huge boost in his output. This is the productivity acceleration people are talking about. Devs at my company are using Gemini to create basic apps for marketing purposes, stuff that automates / standardizes marketing visual content 

StickMaleficent2382

Too many coincidences for me. Potential parts of the puzzle falling into place in the last couple of weeks ..... The rumoured $5bn INTC acquisition of sambanova (whos A.I. inference is apparently superior to Nvidia's) Softbank own large stakes in the governments crown jewel INTC and also in sambanova. Softbank raise $5bn by selling shares in direct inference competitor. Reeks of conflict of interest doesn't it. Lipbu serves as exec chair in sambanova. INTC A.I. CTO moved on paving the way for Rodrigo Liang samba chair to replace him.

sailortyx56

Intel's CTO & AI Chief is leaving for an infrastructure role at OpenAI after just 7 months in the position. Intel CTO is a Stanford Prof. lol.

jose_incandenza

Meta is one of the companies that can use current LLMs best. They just have a CTO who is a total disaster in the communication area. I don't thing the current price drop has nothing to do with the tax hit, but with the poor narrative on capex spending.

Ziilot147

Is undervalued. ATH was in October of $140 per shares. Right now were at \~110, jumping between 100 and 120 depeninding on the macro events the past few weeks. There are multiple reasons as to why $110 is undervalued for NBIS. First of all: In Q2 ER they reported \~100% QoQ revenue growth and 625% YoY revenue growth, and on track to keep the momentum in Q3 and well into 2026. To be concise theyre supposed to go from \~500 million in revenue for 2025 to 3 billion in revenue in 2026. In large part to the fact that they signed a 17 billion dollar contract with Microsoft over 5 years. Which is roughly 3.4 Billion just from this deal alone, but companies like Shopify and Cloudflare are also NBIS clients. Secondly: Nebius is not just data centers. Its called 'Nebius Group' for a reason and they have a number of subsidiaries of which the top 3 are Avride, Toloka and 28% of Clickhouse. For example Avride signed a 375 million dollar deal with Uber last month, to deploy a few hundrer autonomous cars in TX Dallas. Clickhouse hinted at an IPO starting at a valuation of 40 billion dollars, placing NBIS 28% stake at 10 billion alone (NBIS current mcap is less than 30 billion). Third and last: They're just a superior company. Nebius very clearly outdoes its competitors like CoreWeave and ex-BTC miners. [They're one of the few companies to achieve the Nvidia exemplar status](https://nebius.com/blog/posts/achieving-nvidia-exemplar-status-on-h200-gpus), as well as they opened their new data center in the UK this week, with a quote from the CTO: “Nebius’s first data center with the first B300s in the UK isn’t coming sometime maybe — it’s live. First customers will start in days.” Side note: NBIS has very high institutional interest. For example JP Morgan added 500k shares just now, and they have over 1.3m in total. DA Davidson just increased their PT to $150. Some analysts like Northland have a PT of $206. After the Microsoft deal was announced, Goldman Sachs increased PT from $77 to $120. TL;DR if NBIS can show \~210m revenue for Q3 2025, I strongly believe this stock will go back to 130-140 range from current \~110.

Ecstatic-Ad-2254

Wallstreetbets should just do a massive CTO on Gen Z Quant. Shit looks bottomed asf. We can make it the next GME except now on the blockchain for the bullrun

Huldenschopf

I initially got in contact following Charles Archer. He has written several Articles and did Interviews with the team. But DYOR, it is a risk play! Readings to start: https://thatstocksguy.substack.com/p/defence-holdings-the-ground-floor https://thatstocksguy.substack.com/p/defence-holdings-fd3 Here a video-interview with the CTO Andy McCartney and the CPO of Whitespace, which is the company, DH has a JV with. The two companies are intertwined (personal wise).

Sensitive-Radish-292

I actually see the bigger picture, but I do see the risks involved. And when this company failed to present results for such a long time, it's questionable if the market needs the product. Hence the entrypoint is too high for me to enter and I consider this company overvalued. This is all based on my knowledge of the sector and experience within this sector as an ex-CTO of a bootstrapped startup.

Solace50

Also, on a side note, not only has the CTO called out the institution targeting them for a live 1:1 meeting. Do you actually think it is coincidence that both this org and Kramer publish news around DVLT on the SAME day? I wish I bought the 1.80 dip but I generally EOD these kinda things. The 2$ entry seems sensible and low risk. At worst maybe it dips to the 1.80 Monday if there is some additional fallout. The company is actively working to respond to the claims according to their social feed and any news over the weekend will be about a 2.50 rebound.

Solace50

A single report does not indicate a "scam", when companies get 150mil in funding even if in crypto waves of it. It is still value to the cause. While the report has some legitimate concerns it contains very little factual evidence with the exception of the sec prosecution from 2021 for the CTO which paid 40k in fines.

Electrical-Fishing44

answered my own question questrade put a CTO on this stock

Big-Safe-2459

There’s a good interview with the CTO on [NTY Interesting Times](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/30/opinion/palantir-shyam-sankar-military.html) this week worth listening to.

Sensitive-Radish-292

I worked as a CTO in a bootstrapped US-based startup in this sector. I think I know what I'm talking about. I myself am not a boomer by definition, I'm a millenial.

Titanium-Marshmallow

I see a few posts here touting NXXT but I don't mind, I think there's a story here. But what happened after the IPO? The CEO/CTO look real. Sell me.

kalakesri

Meta CTO might be more unlikeable than zuck is that why he has the title

dudeatwork77

Hired! New CTO&CFO for cmg

CryptoChartz

Every freakin Time RDDT starts to go up their stupid COO/CTO sell shares and tank it. wtf are they thinking they need to be removed

te7037

Yes, it is but the share price will be higher. The interim CEO sounds like a sensible guy. He's just preparing us for the potential reverse split. Their CTO bought 500,000 shares at 60 cents if I'm not mistaken.

Magikarp_to_Gyarados

>Could someone actually explain what Elon does for Tesla or ever has done? I've been a TSLA shareholder since 2011. I've also voted **against** the new compensation deal. Elon Musk was important in Tesla's early days. When he initially joined Tesla as board chairman in 2003, his main contribution to the business was employee recruitment. Musk hired Tesla's first CTO, J.B. Straubel (now a Tesla board member), and many of Tesla's other early top leadership and engineering staff. This is detailed in both Ashlee Vance's 2015 biography of Musk, and Walter Isaacson's 2023 book. Musk was also heavily involved in product design during the 2000s and 2010s. Even in a non-executive role as board chair, Musk demanded dozens of changes to the original Roadster. He reviewed every iteration of the car and often infuriated designers and engineers with his demands. In the 2010s, he worked closely with Franz von Holzhausen on designs that became Model S, X, and 3. Employee recruitment and vision for product development. Basically the same as Steve Jobs at Apple. Mr. Musk appears to have always been somewhat mentally unstable, but he clearly went off the rails in 2022 with Twitter. Being an absentee CEO, while also destroying the reputation of the company, are IMO offenses that warrant immediate termination from the company. Tesla's board should have fired Musk in 2022.

RWLLRWLL

Alright this is my last post about scwo for this week, just my point of view of what will happen next week or next 2 week. Yes they filled requesting of authorization for reverse split last friday, but not that they are gonna use it, its their safety net and last option just in case everything goes wrong, same thing happened with like dfli, nuai, dvlt. And the price for all those stocks dump -15 to -20% as well, but rebound in the next week after they send some catalyst. They r just seeking for authorization not that they WILL 100% do it, its like i buy extra tire for my car, not that im gonna use it tomorrow for sure, but for just in case worse scenario happen. And judging by everything we had so far, the ceo is getting paid 1$ and 4.5m vested shares, CTO granted 500k shares at 0.6 price and each board member has to buy 50k $ worth in shares which they done already, so really reverse split would be their last option. Also the filling is a good filling in my opinion, ppl just overreacted seeing the word “reverse split” without reading the context, they also claimed that they have done atm at 7m$ which is enough cash till q2 2026, and this is not my statement, its the ceo’s, also the most important thing is the CEO bold statement ,” we are focus on maintaining to regain compliance without rs”, i dont think he will say that if they dont have anything up their sleeve. Most of the stock that does RS is either they dont have catalyst or cash, which, scwo has both, so judging by other potential stock like dfli, dvlt and nuai, they did the same filling and send some PR after that and the price recover, i think Scwo will send some Pr this week, no idea what or when, lets see

TheGreatValleyOak

Where does it say that? Yong Meng is the CTO and Dr. Milan Begliarbekov is the COO

unil79

Yeah, CEO is also the COO and CTO of the company, sounds like a scam.

RWLLRWLL

Scwo has till january 2026 to regain compliance, and for me , they wont do reverse split, it will be suicide and very unwise, why? the ceo get paid 1$ and 4.5m vested shares, and the new policy that each board member has to buy 50k$ each in shares, not including what they already had, and the CTO granted 500k shares in 0.6 price, so, by doing reverse split, they r killing themselves, and i notice most stock who did reverse split is like pharmacy stock, every stock that has real potential tend to use catalyst to pump the price organicly like dvlt, nuai, dfli. Now imo scwo will give 1 or 2 major PR before nov 12 which is their earning report day which the ceo claimed as “strengthened balance sheet”. Good luck.

KLYNW6055

No no the original CEO did, about a year or so ago. (Nagar) Was let go for trying to dilute shares when they were already non compliant for trading. The picture here is the CTO, he's still on board. https://preview.redd.it/yhj026xcj3xf1.jpeg?width=1440&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2d6eb7bedf255942b1dbb4961bb424be376928d7

te7037

CTO got sacked?

KLYNW6055

Looks like the CTO is trying to absorb Nagar's liquidation of his 10% stake he got from his severance. 500k isn't a lot by any means ownership wise but when insiders BUY, that's a very, very good sign.

te7037

CTO bought 500,000 shares at 60 cents on 9 October 2025. https://preview.redd.it/05gup5out2xf1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=7af0a5ec94fd70c4f6bed2185f34865f01413749

RWLLRWLL

SCWO when ceo get paid 1$ in salary and vested 4.5m shares, each board member has to bought 50k$ in shares, CTO got shares in 0.6 average, u know they confident af and something is coming.

FarrisAT

Switching? No. My leadership isn’t switching. But they did just ask the CTO if new cloud business is possible with alternative providers.

TheTideRider

Nvidia selling to China makes China more dependent on American products! It gives us more leverage if we want to cut them off the cutting edge chips. Palantir CTO does not understand basic logic.

Suitable_Air_2686

Part of admitting the “problem” is also being pragmatic and sensible about it. It’s about admitting that a decoupling from China would require a total rearrangement of global supply chains. These are the things you prepare for in the background not the things you make noise about and then take a 20% cut. Also, the Palantir CTO is simply talking his book. They literally stand to gain from more people being “China Hawks” as they are major defence contractor.

MarioMartinsen

Learn about investing first without watching stock news. Find the Niche first, dig in and out. Monitor every company, their CEO, CTO etc you are interested in on all platforms. Know and understand what you own. If you want to make money long term, study : Howard Marks, Peter Lynch, Mohnish Pabrai, Guy Spier etc But if you want to trade and lose money just fallow random youtubers and us here on Reddit 😂

DLCW

Yes, just in, Oracle and KFC Partner to Launch "BucketGPT" “AI is the future,” said Larry Ellison, Oracle CTO and Founder, while inexplicably dressed as a chicken nugget. “But what if the future also tasted like chicken?” Oracle’s stock (ticker: ORCL) jumped by more than 50 % on the news, and Jefferies raised its price target from 320USD to 550 USD, citing the 'once in a generation opportunity for transformation'.

atwilightworld

It's gonna be ok... I'm mainly looking at low cap with high potential at the moment. Market might fluctuate, but important to believe in something IMO. This is the one I'm looking at the most at the moment. # Aurora Innovation ($AUR) - Company Overview **Company Background** Aurora was founded in 2017 by three autonomous vehicle industry veterans: Chris Urmson (former CTO of Google's self-driving team/Waymo), Sterling Anderson (former head of Tesla Autopilot), and Drew Bagnell (former head of Uber's autonomy and perception team). The company is focused on developing the Aurora Driver, a self-driving system for both commercial trucking and passenger vehicles. **Uber Investment & Backing** Uber is a major backer and investor in Aurora. In December 2020, Aurora acquired Uber's self-driving unit (Advanced Technologies Group or ATG), and as part of the deal, Uber invested $400 million in Aurora and took a 26% ownership stake in the company Aurora Innovation. Uber has continued to increase its stake, including a $75 million stake in July 2023, bringing Uber's total investment to approximately $802 million. As of 2023, Uber owns about 22.4% of Aurora Buying and selling in autonomous trucking developer Aurora Innovation. **NVIDIA Partnership** Aurora has a significant partnership with NVIDIA. In January 2025, Aurora, Continental, and NVIDIA announced a long-term strategic partnership to deploy driverless trucks at scale, powered by NVIDIA's next-generation DRIVE Thor system-on-a-chip. Continental plans to mass-manufacture the Aurora Driver integrated with NVIDIA technology starting in 2027. When this partnership was announced, Aurora's stock surged about 30% in a single day. **Technology & Partnerships** Aurora has developed its own long-range lidar system called FirstLight and uses Verifiable AI to help the Aurora Driver adapt to new operating domains while being validated through their Safety Case The recent NVIDIA and Continental partnerships position them for scalable manufacturing. **Strong Balance Sheet** As of the September 2024 quarter, Aurora had $1.248 billion in cash on hand with no debt, giving it a very strong current ratio. NFA/DYOR Who else is tracking this?

atwilightworld

# Aurora Innovation ($AUR) - Company Overview **Company Background** Aurora was founded in 2017 by three autonomous vehicle industry veterans: Chris Urmson (former CTO of Google's self-driving team/Waymo), Sterling Anderson (former head of Tesla Autopilot), and Drew Bagnell (former head of Uber's autonomy and perception team). The company is focused on developing the Aurora Driver, a self-driving system for both commercial trucking and passenger vehicles. **Uber Investment & Backing** Uber is a major backer and investor in Aurora. In December 2020, Aurora acquired Uber's self-driving unit (Advanced Technologies Group or ATG), and as part of the deal, Uber invested $400 million in Aurora and took a 26% ownership stake in the company Aurora Innovation. Uber has continued to increase its stake, including a $75 million stake in July 2023, bringing Uber's total investment to approximately $802 million. As of 2023, Uber owns about 22.4% of Aurora Buying and selling in autonomous trucking developer Aurora Innovation. **NVIDIA Partnership** Aurora has a significant partnership with NVIDIA. In January 2025, Aurora, Continental, and NVIDIA announced a long-term strategic partnership to deploy driverless trucks at scale, powered by NVIDIA's next-generation DRIVE Thor system-on-a-chip. Continental plans to mass-manufacture the Aurora Driver integrated with NVIDIA technology starting in 2027. When this partnership was announced, Aurora's stock surged about 30% in a single day. **Technology & Partnerships** Aurora has developed its own long-range lidar system called FirstLight and uses Verifiable AI to help the Aurora Driver adapt to new operating domains while being validated through their Safety Case The recent NVIDIA and Continental partnerships position them for scalable manufacturing. **Strong Balance Sheet** As of the September 2024 quarter, Aurora had $1.248 billion in cash on hand with no debt, giving it a very strong current ratio. NFA/DYOR Who else is tracking this?

Nameless11911

I work in ML space and I see my C-suite bosses working around the clock and going to all the seminars conferences etc trying to get on this AI train but they have zero idea.. they don’t know anything about pros and cons.. they are spending huge amounts of $$ on software and upper level management positions rather than hiring IB to the teams.. we’re struggling trying to do all the cool AI stuff they need but after a couple of weeks projects are dropped or the goal post moves.. bulk of $$ wasted ! Absolutely wasted !! They keep buying softwares and most of these do the same thing.. no one wants to code or people who think they can code are crap!! So everyone is playing with these no code/low code SW but what’s the real ROO here?? Nothing?! They (CEO,CTO, CFOs, VPs) want to tell the world that they are using AI and are with the trend but this adds no value to the company.. to be honest the bubble may have popped already or can burst anytime soon..

OmgJosh925

If this fails let’s CTO and open a vegan food chain with beds to take naps in and call it Bite Break and Beyond Bankruptcy

TheCollegeIntern

I agree. What people fail to realize is most AI applications offered by tech companies and start ups are chat gpt wrappers right now. I’m sure it will improve but it won’t be enough to justify the cost. Sure Hollywood and big market entertainment can benefit from AI. AI can probably cut production time in half for anime if used as a tool but wallstreet seems to think we’re getting movie fiction levels of AI and AI will be so smart aided by elons robots and all that other bullshit when 90% of companies are seeking you ChatGPT wrappers or whatever flavor of ai text based agent out there. I see AI for networking. Tens of billions of dollars is going to result on AI that can’t survey a network. Assess physical limitations and complex topologies? Yeah good luck explaining that to the CTO. It’ll improve in the future but replacing? Yeah good luck. Ai is so bad right now while impressive at the same time given the fact that AI acts like that arrogant know it all coworker. Even if they don’t have an answer they will bs one in real time just to entertain you.

One-Repeat5990

Yeah bro so a report on the internet says it so it’s true. It’s been rebuttaled long ago by the CTO with his proof. But my point is who cares, that business is literally dead and it was a tiny tiny fraction of the company’s revenue. Their main ads are not part of this acquisition and does 1.5billion in revenue a quarter at 800m in net profit. But have fun with your puts buddy, good luck 👍

ethereal3xp

Yes sir >Infleqtion's CTO, Pranav Gokhale, is recognized as a leading genius in the quantum computing field.

10sjester69

I’m no expert here but…. You do realize that the CEO and CTO are former Global Foundries execs? And you do realize that Global Foundries came from an AMD spinoff of their fab operations years ago. Not saying I know anything here but global foundries is one of the leaders in optoelectronic IC fabrication. Pure speculation but that’s not a stretch. Many of the patents read like fab process technologies which would fit well in any foundry portfolio or via licensing. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/poet-technologies-inc?page=2

YummyBatteries

I'm enthusiastic about Graphene Manufacturing Group. They produce graphene from methane using a plasma. Their graphene-aluminum batteries are a few years out, but they have non-dilutive funding from Rio Tinto on that (much more to say about that). Right now, their oil additive for diesel truck fleets is just hitting the market, as is their ThermalXR product, which is a cooling coating for AC units (personal to industrial size), possibly electronics, and many applications. The products have been tested for years, and are JUST NOW about to hit the market. CEO is from Shell, and Bob Galyen, former CTO of battery giant CATL is an advisor.

MineRich4234

And also the bigger question you should be asking is, why are you so interested in the whole Freyr thing? Its just only thing shorts found to be attacked at this deal. Intel Asia CTO, boardmember of GRRR was at the latest fire chat telling about this deal. [https://www.gsma.com/about-us/regions/asia-pacific/gsma\_people/thomas-sennhauser/](https://www.gsma.com/about-us/regions/asia-pacific/gsma_people/thomas-sennhauser/) Why would he scam, or why would GRRR file 6-K of the deal. This whole discussion is just short noice. You should trust what you want and do your own DD anyway.

Party-Inspection-763

Why has the CFO, CTO and Head Autopilot, Head Optimus person left????????? They were making 1.05 in earnings per quarter in 2022-2023 now they make half of that BEFORE the BBB credits take into affect. At 400 per share this is the time to sell dont be a bag holder. This stock has gone form 400--> 100 in the past

TonyBrooks40

This is anecdotal, but I bartend. A guy came in, said he worked for a local credit union in their IT department, and said that we have no idea how much AI is going to replace. From financials & bookkeeping, to services and programming, etc. Again, he was younger and definitely not a CTO level, but it made me think that its coming, and will likely revolutionize things. I'd say similar to smartphones in 2008, or the web in 95, PC's in the early/mid 80s

DapperSpell652

I own both $IREN and $NBIS, among these if $NBIS goes down 30% I will increase my position by same amount. I have a stop loss on $IREN.. Reason is super simple, $NBIS has a 500+ core engineering team that has been working a decade building Russian Google/Uber/Ubereats, and being a nuisance for American Tech firms. By sheer luck, this team decided to flee Russia due to war and its billionaire mathematician owner (Sergey Brin raised by wolves) decided to invest 95% of his wealth into this unknow company called Nebuis with the goal of becoming “AWS of Neo Cloud” in 2023!!! Crypto Miner bro s were too busy pumping alt coins back then… This is an opportunity like Palantir/Tesla, please check some interviews made recently with top guys in the executive team. They are hiring all these heavy hitters from top firms. One example of the top of my head, CTO from Shopify left to join Toloka AI … Now Toloka AI is one of 3 subsidiaries that NOONE knows about, it is essentially Scale AI that Amazon is investing 700m USD into. (Nebius still has majority ownership) Now check how much did Meta pay for Scale AI… The more you research this company more you will want to invest, their background and capabilities and timing is one of a kind… Set a reminder for 12 months, This stock will triple.. Obviously do your own Due Diligence! This is not investment advice! Heck, I hope you do not invest and raise the price so I can buy more before the next earnings call!

nomadichedgehog

Yes, we're aware. If you look at my comments from last week I said I had noticed a restructuring of Qumulus on LinkedIn - former CEO became VP of Capital Markets, while a board advisor became CTO. So it was clear for about a week a new CEO was coming. This kind of restructuring tends to happen when companies go or are about to go public. Former IBM VP of strategy is now CMO also. I think this play still has huge potential/upside, my only concern is the stock split ratio and the lag between the RSS vote and the RTO vote. In other words, this stock may still have some way to go down before it finally rips.

pedro380085

I would add Oracle and Microsoft to the list as well, with their powerful data centers, using open sourced models that are the same as the ones from Open AI. The CTO from our company said today they have been using OpenRouter on the auto function (whatever is the cheapest model at the time works) and the results have been the same across the board.

xynix_ie

I've seen this in real time and the company's CTO was showing real time stats on his devs. He showed them using AI tools up until July and then he says, "that's weird, it looks like they've really slowed down on using AI tools." The next slide showed hands on keyboards activity increases in late July going to August. This was for an AI type company showcasing them using AI. Rework!!!! All the errors the several months of ramping AI use. Now the devs had to go back and fix all that code. This company is now months behind where they should be. Tada!

Mapleess

Not OP but this seems to be coming down from the higher ups. They think AI is able to replace them and they reduce budgets to hire new people, leading to heads of departments to heavily rely on AI. It's deemed unsustainable by people a few steps above me, whom are still a few levels below CTO.

Mammoth-Notice1661

Butterfly Network (BFLY) Analysis: Volatile Dip and Investment Thesis As of September 11, 2025, BFLY closed at $1.55, down approximately 22% from its recent high of $1.99 on August 5, 2025 (based on historical price data from Yahoo Finance and Nasdaq, reflecting a post-Q2 earnings pullback and broader medtech sector weakness). This decline was exacerbated by insider selling (e.g., Chief Business Officer Steven Cashman sold ~$214,000 worth of shares on September 9, 2025, per SEC filings), ongoing dilution concerns from a January 2025 public offering that priced shares at a discount (leading to a 15% immediate drop), and a 12.1% plunge on July 16, 2025, tied to weaker-than-expected sector news on healthcare spending cuts amid stagflation fears. Additional pressures include high short interest (9.85% of float as of August 29, 2025) and competition in portable ultrasound from players like Clarius and Mindray. Despite the volatility, analysts maintain a “Buy” consensus (from 6 firms, including TD Cowen at $3.50 and UBS at $2.25, initiated September 11, 2025), with an average 12-month price target of $3.17 (range $2.00–$4.00), implying 105% upside potential. This frames the dip as a speculative entry for high-risk investors, but with elevated volatility (beta 2.52) and execution risks in scaling AI-integrated devices amid regulatory hurdles. Below, I apply the same fundamental principles from the prior analysis to BFLY, adapting the structure for a single stock. This includes retail allocation, stock division metrics (detailed without skipping), buy order impact, macro alignment/growth/returns, investment ranking (within its sector), and alternatives. Data is sourced from the latest available metrics as of September 11, 2025 (e.g., Q2 2025 filings, Yahoo Finance, Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha), using historical proxies for forward estimates where needed. Background deep dive: Founded January 25, 2011, by Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D. (a serial biotech entrepreneur with prior successes at 454 Life Sciences, acquired by Roche for $125M in 2007, and GeneDx, which went public via SPAC in 2021), Butterfly Network pioneered chip-based ultrasound to “democratize medical imaging.” Headquartered in Burlington, MA, the company went public via SPAC merger with Longview Acquisition Corp. on August 16, 2021, raising $175M from partners like Tenet Healthcare and UPMC. Key milestones include FDA clearance for iQ+ in 2021, enterprise rollout in 2023, and AI integrations like Butterfly Garden (launched 2024, with 2 new partners in Q2 2025: iCardio and HeartFocus). Leadership includes CEO Joseph M. DeVivo (since 2022, ex-GE Healthcare, compensation $2.25M in 2024), CTO Victor Ku (appointed September 9, 2025, ex-Apple AI hardware lead), CFO Heather C. Getz ($2.64M comp), and board members like Larry Robbins (Glenview Capital founder) and Dawn Carfora (ex-COO of Hologic). Success projects: Over 145,000 devices shipped globally by Q2 2025; partnerships with University of Rochester Medical Center (deployed 500+ iQ units for emergency use since 2022), Atrium Health (fleet-wide integration in 2024, reducing diagnostic times by 40%), Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC Blueprint platform for 1,000+ clinicians since 2023), Indiana University School of Medicine (curriculum integration for 2,000 students, improving ultrasound proficiency by 25% per internal studies), and recent Sientra partnership (July 2025) for in-office plastic surgery imaging. Q2 2025 revenue hit $23.4M (9% YoY growth, 63% gross margins—company record), with 35% Q4 2024 growth to $22.4M, but net loss narrowed 59% to -$0.06 EPS. Challenges: Cumulative losses ($500M+ since inception), high R&D burn ($40M quarterly), and a January 2025 offering diluting shares by 18.4% YTD. BFLY aligns robustly with US/world futures, revolutionizing diagnostics via AI-powered portable ultrasound (iQ series: whole-body, probe-only scanner at ~$2,400/unit vs. $50K+ cart-based). In 2025’s context of cooling inflation (Fed cuts to 4.5% aiding healthcare capex) and stagflation risks (tight budgets delaying adoptions), BFLY benefits from US priorities like telehealth expansion (post-COVID, $50B market by 2030) and global health equity (WHO goals for imaging access in low-resource areas). A strong dollar eases component imports (chip tech from Taiwan), but export hurdles to EMs persist; BFLY’s 60% US revenue mitigates via domestic focus. Global trends: AI diagnostics boom (projected 25% CAGR to $200B by 2030) and aging populations (UN: 1.5B over-60 by 2050) drive demand for point-of-care tools. Not financial advice as well as AI generated to clean up my thoughts

SunflowerGreens

how much should we worry about insider selling with CTO and CFO?

FnnKnn

Read the breakdown of their CTO. What the issue was they rerouted all meta glasses inside the building to a dev server. The thing they forgot was how many people from the audience would also bring their glasses. That is what caused them to overload their dev server.

nomadichedgehog

An update for everyone still in this stock - TLDR we might be in trouble and I have trimmed my position. I hadn't realised that when it comes to an RSS vote and similar matters, a definitive proxy statement stating the time and details of the meeting *must* follow the proxy statement, provided that the SEC has no comments (which it has 10 calendar days to do so). Today is the 10th calendar day and nothing has been filed on EDGAR, although apparently there is a 20-day lag on EDGAR if indeed the SEC and a company are messaging back-and-forth. In other words, the latest we will have any kind of update on what might be happening is 29th September, at which point we would see a filing from the SEC on EDGAR (this outcome would be disastrous). The earliest we could have an update regarding the date of the vote would have been tomorrow, but tomorrow falls on a weekend - so Monday 22nd September we will hopefully see a definitive proxy statement filed on EDGAR. In the definitive proxy statement, the company has to give shareholders at least 10 calendar days’ notice before holding the meeting. That would put the shareholder vote on the RSS at 2nd of October at the absolute earliest. The company would then have 4 business days to file the results of that vote, with a 1-2 day lag. That gives us a preliminary date range of 6th to 10th of October for the announcement of the RSS. This timeline is right up against the Oct 11 deadline on their bridge financing. So the timing here is razor-thin, and i would expect choppy waters for the stock price during this time. After the RSS has been voted on, the company would still need to file another proxy statement regarding the vote on the RTO, meaning this whole 25-30 day timeline starts again, putting us well outside the bridge-financing period. This timeline is not at all encouraging. We would have to hope quite a few things fall into place - RSS vote takes place before 11th October, the result is positive and the bridge financing company agrees to some kind of extension. Another relevant update to mention here is that there seems to be some kind of restructuring at Qumulus. Their CEO is now SVP of Capital Markets, while one of their board advisors is now CTO. I initially thought this was very positive news as it may have signalled the RSS getting through, but given what I've since discovered about timelines I realise this kind of update can cut both ways. It's possible Qumulus see this deal falling through with the timeline left so razor thin and are now looking at other ways to go public - hence the CEO pivoting in his role to Capital Markets. I just cut my position by 60% and will likely reduce it by another 20% if no definitive proxy statement is filed by end of play Monday. Good luck to all.

nomadichedgehog

An update for everyone still in this stock - TLDR we might be in trouble and I have trimmed my position. I hadn't realised that when it comes to an RSS vote and similar matters, a definitive proxy statement stating the time and details of the meeting *must* follow the proxy statement, provided that the SEC has no comments (which it has 10 calendar days to do so). Today is the 10th calendar day and nothing has been filed on EDGAR, although apparently there is a 20-day lag on EDGAR if indeed the SEC and a company are messaging back-and-forth. In other words, the latest we will have any kind of update on what might be happening is 29th September, at which point we would see a filing from the SEC on EDGAR (this outcome would be disastrous). The earliest we could have an update regarding the date of the vote would have been tomorrow, but tomorrow falls on a weekend - so Monday 22nd September we will hopefully see a definitive proxy statement filed on EDGAR. In the definitive proxy statement, the company has to give shareholders at least 10 calendar days’ notice before holding the meeting. That would put the shareholder vote on the RSS at 2nd of October at the absolute earliest. The company would then have 4 business days to file the results of that vote, with a 1-2 day lag. That gives us a preliminary date range of 6th to 10th of October for the announcement of the RSS. This timeline is right up against the Oct 11 deadline on their bridge financing. So the timing here is razor-thin, and i would expect choppy waters for the stock price during this time. After the RSS has been voted on, the company would still need to file another proxy statement regarding the vote on the RTO, meaning this whole 25-30 day timeline starts again, putting us well outside the bridge-financing period. This timeline is not at all encouraging. We would have to hope quite a few things fall into place - RSS vote takes place before 11th October, the result is positive and the bridge financing company agrees to some kind of extension. Another relevant update to mention here is that there seems to be some kind of restructuring at Qumulus. Their CEO is now SVP of Capital Markets, while one of their board advisors is now CTO. I initially thought this was very positive news as it may have signalled the RSS getting through, but given what I've since discovered about timelines I realise this kind of update can cut both ways. It's possible Qumulus see this deal falling through with the timeline left so razor thin and are now looking at other ways to go public - hence the CEO pivoting in his role to Capital Markets. I just cut my position by 60% and will likely reduce it by another 20% if no definitive proxy statement is filed by end of play Monday. Good luck to all, and if you bought the day I made this post you will have at least still made a 20-30% gain.

nomadichedgehog

An update for everyone still in this stock - TLDR we might be in trouble and I have trimmed my position. I hadn't realised that when it comes to an RSS vote and similar matters, a definitive proxy statement stating the time and details of the meeting *must* follow the proxy statement, provided that the SEC has no comments (which it has 10 calendar days to do so). Today is the 10th calendar day and nothing has been filed on EDGAR, although apparently there is a 20-day lag on EDGAR if indeed the SEC and a company are messaging back-and-forth. In other words, the latest we will have any kind of update on what might be happening is 29th September, at which point we would see a filing from the SEC on EDGAR (this outcome would be disastrous). The earliest we could have an update regarding the date of the vote would have been tomorrow, but tomorrow falls on a weekend - so Monday 22nd September we will hopefully see a definitive proxy statement filed on EDGAR. In the definitive proxy statement, the company has to give shareholders at least 10 calendar days’ notice before holding the meeting. That would put the shareholder vote on the RSS at 2nd of October at the absolute earliest. The company would then have 4 business days to file the results of that vote, with a 1-2 day lag. That gives us a preliminary date range of 6th to 10th of October for the announcement of the RSS. This timeline is right up against the Oct 11 deadline on their bridge financing. So the timing here is razor-thin, and i would expect choppy waters for the stock price during this time. After the RSS has been voted on, the company would still need to file another proxy statement regarding the vote on the RTO, meaning this whole 25-30 day timeline starts again, putting us well outside the bridge-financing period. This timeline is not at all encouraging. We would have to hope quite a few things fall into place - RSS vote takes place before 11th October, the result is positive and the bridge financing company agrees to some kind of extension. Another relevant update to mention here is that there seems to be some kind of restructuring at Qumulus. Their CEO is now SVP of Capital Markets, while one of their board advisors is now CTO. I initially thought this was very positive news as it may have signalled the RSS getting through, but given what I've since discovered about timelines I realise this kind of update can cut both ways. It's possible Qumulus see this deal falling through with the timeline left so razor thin and are now looking at other ways to go public - hence the CEO pivoting in his role to Capital Markets. I just cut my position by 60% and will likely reduce it by another 20% if no definitive proxy statement is filed by end of play Monday. Good luck to all, and if you bought the day I made this post you will have at least still made a 20-30% gain.

Mammoth-Notice1661

Butterfly Network (BFLY) Analysis: Volatile Dip and Investment Thesis As of September 11, 2025, BFLY closed at $1.55, down approximately 22% from its recent high of $1.99 on August 5, 2025 (based on historical price data from Yahoo Finance and Nasdaq, reflecting a post-Q2 earnings pullback and broader medtech sector weakness). This decline was exacerbated by insider selling (e.g., Chief Business Officer Steven Cashman sold ~$214,000 worth of shares on September 9, 2025, per SEC filings), ongoing dilution concerns from a January 2025 public offering that priced shares at a discount (leading to a 15% immediate drop), and a 12.1% plunge on July 16, 2025, tied to weaker-than-expected sector news on healthcare spending cuts amid stagflation fears. Additional pressures include high short interest (9.85% of float as of August 29, 2025) and competition in portable ultrasound from players like Clarius and Mindray. Despite the volatility, analysts maintain a “Buy” consensus (from 6 firms, including TD Cowen at $3.50 and UBS at $2.25, initiated September 11, 2025), with an average 12-month price target of $3.17 (range $2.00–$4.00), implying 105% upside potential. This frames the dip as a speculative entry for high-risk investors, but with elevated volatility (beta 2.52) and execution risks in scaling AI-integrated devices amid regulatory hurdles. Below, I apply the same fundamental principles from the prior analysis to BFLY, adapting the structure for a single stock. This includes retail allocation, stock division metrics (detailed without skipping), buy order impact, macro alignment/growth/returns, investment ranking (within its sector), and alternatives. Data is sourced from the latest available metrics as of September 11, 2025 (e.g., Q2 2025 filings, Yahoo Finance, Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha), using historical proxies for forward estimates where needed. Background deep dive: Founded January 25, 2011, by Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D. (a serial biotech entrepreneur with prior successes at 454 Life Sciences, acquired by Roche for $125M in 2007, and GeneDx, which went public via SPAC in 2021), Butterfly Network pioneered chip-based ultrasound to “democratize medical imaging.” Headquartered in Burlington, MA, the company went public via SPAC merger with Longview Acquisition Corp. on August 16, 2021, raising $175M from partners like Tenet Healthcare and UPMC. Key milestones include FDA clearance for iQ+ in 2021, enterprise rollout in 2023, and AI integrations like Butterfly Garden (launched 2024, with 2 new partners in Q2 2025: iCardio and HeartFocus). Leadership includes CEO Joseph M. DeVivo (since 2022, ex-GE Healthcare, compensation $2.25M in 2024), CTO Victor Ku (appointed September 9, 2025, ex-Apple AI hardware lead), CFO Heather C. Getz ($2.64M comp), and board members like Larry Robbins (Glenview Capital founder) and Dawn Carfora (ex-COO of Hologic). Success projects: Over 145,000 devices shipped globally by Q2 2025; partnerships with University of Rochester Medical Center (deployed 500+ iQ units for emergency use since 2022), Atrium Health (fleet-wide integration in 2024, reducing diagnostic times by 40%), Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC Blueprint platform for 1,000+ clinicians since 2023), Indiana University School of Medicine (curriculum integration for 2,000 students, improving ultrasound proficiency by 25% per internal studies), and recent Sientra partnership (July 2025) for in-office plastic surgery imaging. Q2 2025 revenue hit $23.4M (9% YoY growth, 63% gross margins—company record), with 35% Q4 2024 growth to $22.4M, but net loss narrowed 59% to -$0.06 EPS. Challenges: Cumulative losses ($500M+ since inception), high R&D burn ($40M quarterly), and a January 2025 offering diluting shares by 18.4% YTD. BFLY aligns robustly with US/world futures, revolutionizing diagnostics via AI-powered portable ultrasound (iQ series: whole-body, probe-only scanner at ~$2,400/unit vs. $50K+ cart-based). In 2025’s context of cooling inflation (Fed cuts to 4.5% aiding healthcare capex) and stagflation risks (tight budgets delaying adoptions), BFLY benefits from US priorities like telehealth expansion (post-COVID, $50B market by 2030) and global health equity (WHO goals for imaging access in low-resource areas). A strong dollar eases component imports (chip tech from Taiwan), but export hurdles to EMs persist; BFLY’s 60% US revenue mitigates via domestic focus. Global trends: AI diagnostics boom (projected 25% CAGR to $200B by 2030) and aging populations (UN: 1.5B over-60 by 2050) drive demand for point-of-care tools. Not financial advice as well as AI generated to clean up my thoughts

k-mcm

Applying Y2K patches.  Hanging out in the office with my boss and the CTO, getting free snacks and internet.  Saving up money.  There was not much work to do because business contracts were being signed without the details needed to take action.  Only investors thought the tech sector was healthy. I could have been rich if I had any money left to invest by the time recovery started. That one almost took longer than I could ride out.

thistooshallpasslp

100% agree with you, skin in the game is great, but soul in the game is 100x more than skin in the game. Following is not a financial advice: Two companies come to my mind right now: I think CEO of Backblaze is like that, humble person who has soul in the game to make most affordable cloud backup and storage. Their former CTO is still super active on backblaze reddit replying on various technical questions. Same goes to all the management teams of Nebius related companies and Nebius itself - teams want to prove themselves far from their motherland.

nomadichedgehog

Another update to this - Ryan Dirocco has gone from advisor to CTO. Both these moves are consistent with a company restructuring, almost certainly from the result of the RTO going through. I expect a new name to be brought in as CEO.

Excellent-Season-370

If I got a dollar every time someone said the CEO/CFO/CTO was dumping shares when I was holding PLTR at USD 11.xx, my net worth would’ve crossed nine digits. And check your facts again, Grab IS profitable.

0XNemesis777

Position in crypto? Your CTO indicates a Rolls Royce position at $13. Show us your positions instead, right?

arbiter12

The issue I have with quarterly reporting is how... "euphoric", progress has to seem at all time. Convincing board members that we've over-achieved our stated objectives by 10%, every 3 months, is just mental masturbation at this point. We can't pay any less, we can't lower the quality, we can't invest within our risk-tolerance any more aggressively. So we pretend something great will happen next quarter, every quarter, till a new CEO/COO/CTO is needed because the old one was not competent enough (by which I mean, he couldn't generate a billion dollar revenue sheet, for $10K cost). Rinse and repeat across all companies. The illusion of quarterly progress, while skeleton crews are doing 10x the work they were hired to do, for half the allocated budget... You bet we're trying to make everything subscription based. If it were for transparency, I wouldn't mind a bi-monthly reports (at least from finance), but to stop squeezing every cent out of every decision, I really wish it were yearly.

rabbonat

Charlie Kirk was their CTO apparently, they're gonna have to delay the IPO

Moist_Inevitable738

What do you use AI for? I use it for programming daily and it provides enough value to warrant spending $200/month. I am also a CTO/cofounder and pay for my whole development team to use it. We have seen a velocity increase such that the bottleneck in our process is now design not development.

wallstchicken

CTO - chief tits officer CAO - chief ass officer CMO - chief mommy officer you had so many options and you went with “fashion”…. C’mon mate

urakozz

They definitely weren't in Russia. And I definitely wasn't a CTO there

asking_for_1_friend

You might not cash out even pennies if you keep posting ;) Requested 1 share but if ex-CTO says it's a shit show circus company I might cancel it. Didn't know Klarna was in Russia.

Last-One_Standing

Larry is the Executive Chairman, largest shareholder, CTO and the CEO herself reports to him. 

Silver_Star86

There is no hope for OPEN. Look at the debt. Also, They cant even unload their existing inventory and do not want to change their business model. Why arent they putting the house up for rent and generating revenue via there? They hire new CEO and her strategic move is to buy shares. Dude was a CTO of legalzoom, who, we all know how they made money. Dump and exit before Negg saga repeats.

Magikarp_to_Gyarados

It is true that Elon Musk wasn't part of Tesla's original incorporation back in 2003. It's also true that Tesla was literally 3 guys, Martin Eberhard, Marc Tarpenning, and Ian Wright, working out of a rundown building near Palo Alto. * Tesla at that point had practically nothing of value: there were no manufacturing facilities. The motors and electronics designs were owned by AC Propulsion. Tesla had no battery pack, no support infrastructure, and no charging network. Mr. Musk did play a critical role in building the organization that Tesla is today. He recruited key early employees like JB Straubel, Tesla's first CTO. It's important to acknowledge that the reality is more complex than who signed the original legal documents or not.

imadogg

I been wondering why no one is mentioning it I bought a million penny stocks during the 2021 gold rush. I have lost 10s of thousands of dollars on them but suddenly this one is back from the dead. I had 0 idea why, but this is a chatGPT summary (look away if you hate AI) - February 2025 – Filed Form 10-12g with the SEC First big step toward becoming a fully reporting company under SEC rules. - March 2025 – Engaged Alpine Securities Corporation Signed an agreement with an investment bank to support capital raising and market access. - March 20, 2025 – Cease Trade Order (CTO) Lifted Alberta Securities Commission revoked a 10-year-old trading ban, removing a huge overhang on the stock. - April 25, 2025 – Responded to SEC Comment Letter Addressed SEC concerns on the Form 10 filing, moving closer to compliance. - April 29, 2025 – FINRA Recognized F-Reorganization Redomicile from Nevada to Texas approved; new CUSIP assignment confirmed. - April 30, 2025 – Corporate Action Took Market Effect Restructuring changes formally reflected in the market and trading systems. - Mid–2025 (Ongoing) – Mine Operating Plan & BLM Leases Advancing Arizona State Land Dept. mine plan and updating California BLM leases; positioning for joint-venture deals. They've been active on twitter all year and posted this today: https://x.com/Mineralrite/status/1961044682831438075 I dropped in $1000 for 625k shares at $0.0016 which was worth nothing for a while... now I'm just holding on just in case

Bob_the_peasant

Calls on American Airlines When the CTO is secretly outsourcing the software dudes to his own company in India, you know they are locked in to make money no matter how bad the optics

Bob_the_peasant

Lmao at American Airlines CTO, owning the company in India he is outsourcing their software development to 🤡 I bet Isom didn’t even know

evhan55

I used to work there and we once asked the CTO what keeps Satya up at night and he said "how to get revenue/returns to be higher than last time". That's when I realized the system is probably not healthy ...

BumHand

Snowflakes customer retention rate (not revenue retention) is well below 100% so companies are in fact migrating to other providers - Fortune companies included. Customers migrate for many reasons such as cost per DBU consumed, open source capabilities, ML capabilities, and wanting to move to more capable data warehousing models. You can search of stories of companies migrating and there is no shortage of CTO/CIOs championing about their switch. >I'm just not seeing anything with substance here, just words Are you looking for data to support SNOW as being bullish or data to support Databricks growth?

eyerollingsex

My boss brought in a CTO to “be my boss” and this motherfucker is slow as fuck and no help at all. Dumbass

Cagliari77

High end super yachts sell for like $100-150 million ;) Only the CEO, CTO, and the President can buy one with those amounts I see in the table. Still nice villas in Napa Valley/Hawaii or Italy/France though for the CLO and CFO ;)

Ambitious-Maybe-3386

Why didn’t the CEO, CIO, CTO and others buy too?

moule_a_cake

It is all the "C"s, CEO, CFO, CTO etc.

spyputs1

The CTO sold the most shares, what does he know that the rest don’t? 💀

Ok-Grocery7508

**CEO had an interview beginning of this year, and laid out a lot of the positivity:** [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvB6npPy4ho](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvB6npPy4ho) **Jason Shapiro their partnership guy has a great interview here:** [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxMyBuOClvo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxMyBuOClvo) **Old podcast, but has their CTO talking about a lot of the machine learning behind the scenes, and data analysis, can only imagine what they are doing nowadays.** [https://podcast.notunreasonable.com/126848/episodes/4974230-actuaries-and-data-scientists-at-root](https://podcast.notunreasonable.com/126848/episodes/4974230-actuaries-and-data-scientists-at-root)

Ok-Grocery7508

Love the idea. **Similar owner of \~10,000 shares**. Like the company and all my DD has been impressive, listened to the podcasts from the company, they have a former Citadel HFT trader as their CTO, been killing it in partnerships, went through layoffs and are re-staffing back up. If they can continue to get a foothold they are off to the races.

remic_0726

takes physical ETFs in different countries. There is a site to choose from, easyetf it seems to me, you select what you want. If you have a CTO, you can take ETC gold, crypto bitcoin or etherium.

Outrageous_Cloud5179

Their CTO retiring fucked up a good earnings report pump 

Scquwer

Looking at VIPZ over the past year, you can see a company executing in clear, deliberate steps. • Nov 2024: Signed a multi-year sportsbook partnership with Kambi, giving them a proven backend and industry credibility. • Dec 2024: Added a new CTO and secured West Virginia market access, setting up their first regulatory foothold. • Feb 2025: Selected White Hat’s PAM platform to power their US sports betting and iGaming expansion. • Mar–Apr 2025: Uplisted to OTCQB and obtained interim West Virginia gaming licenses, improving investor visibility and operational readiness. • May 2025: Launched the VIP Play betting app in Tennessee and renewed their Tennessee operator license, showing they can launch and sustain a regulated product. • Jun–Jul 2025: Strengthened leadership with a new CEO, a senior product design leader, and a revenue strategist to drive growth. • Aug 2025: Announced AI partnerships with Decentral AI and Vokol, signaling a push into next-gen sports entertainment technology. They have gone from partnerships, to building the technology foundation, to securing licenses, to launching products, and now to building out a leadership team and innovation pipeline. OTC stocks are always high risk and high reward, so it is discretionary money only. That said, VIPZ is showing the kind of step-by-step delivery you want to see from a company aiming to scale.