DNA

Imaginary-Fly8439

You missed DNA!

zg44

Cathy's DNA holding is down to $145 million. She paid nearly $1 billion for the 190 million shares... That stock is going to $0.

janoycresovani

Reverse split DNA when???

Tastyfishsticks

Literally as she spent a billion on DNA stock and it is moving as quick as possible to zero.

No_Dig903

And yet none of that matters beyond attenuating problems with subscription fees because investors have been burned by console generation swaps at least twice, and don't like putting money into Nintendo on the extreme long term because of it. Moreover, investors complain about Nintendo having a warchest that can finance the company for 5 years with no income. This is money that isn't making them money, because is effectively a chunk of every share earning treasury rates at best, driving the value of each individual share down. If Nintendo were more aggressive (more American) and churning every dollar they had, then each share would be more valuable individually. The counterargument is that Nintendo's safe financial position allows them to do horseshit like the Wii U and easily survive to try again next generation. The counterargument to that is that the horseshit is exactly why they trade cheaply on the market compared to other media juggernauts, and that if they were lean and safe, they'd get paid more. The counterargument to that is the unmitigated creative churn at the center of the company, horseshit included, is the DNA of Nintendo, and to kill it for short-term gains would kill what you're investing in long-term. This tends not to bother analysts. Next quarter is what matters. In the end, wait for Nintendo to fuck up again, and then buy at a discount. There are some "buts" with the Switch 2 rumors that concern me, and any one of them can get the core gamer demographic they won back for the first time since the GameCube to walk off, reducing the value of their market back to the horde of Wii casuals who, like the Wii went, didn't buy new hardware because what they had was perfectly fine. Casuals don't rush into new consoles.

MurkTwain

How is your DNA investment working out?

Goose506

I've read that the saliva tests are inaccurate with colder climates making roadside testing difficult for police in the winter time, for example. Another legal issue I could potentially see is saliva is a direct DNA sample that the person is giving up without a warrant. I'm no expert, just things I've read or heard over the years with respect to BLO and some of the issues they're trying to tackle with this device.

LookAtMeImInAGang

TSLA is more like we know it's a dog but we're working on something to change dog DNA to duck DNA and it'll be ready next year

baronewu2

Gingko Bioworks. DNA: Synthetic biology Foundry helping companies big and small create amazing new products using A.I. to accelerate discovery. They have been using Deepminds Alpha Fold2 and they have Google backing them now and telling them the have unlimited use of their A.I. computers. Current customers include Novo Nordic, Pfizer, Bayer and many more. Claiming they have more DNA data than any other company in the world. Two weeks ago they held their annual Gingko Bioworks Foundry (find it on YouTube) were they have Current customers talk about their new products and how A.I. helped them get to market. This company is going to do amazing things with A.I. At $1.00 a share everyone should hold a few shares if nothing more then to follow all the companies that are using them and see who the next big thing may be.

Lancerevo012

Dear Bears, You were right. The market was frothy and we didn’t listen. I wish we had taken profits. I wish we had bought puts. But that’s simply not in our DNA, and we own that. Enjoy your well deserved tendies, and we’ll see you in a few months when we start this shit all over again. Signed, PermaBulls everywhere 

MrJohnDutton

I’m sure about it. Short sellers are buying. Moreover she can make a huge offer to keep her reputation (sister YouTube CEO , ex-husband Google co-founder) on the IPO price (10$). Since the IPO the DNA database has grown, more drugs in pipeline. It should be the min price she proposes…

MrJohnDutton

Huge squeeze is coming. Short sellers are buying. Moreover she can make a huge offer to keep her reputation (sister YouTube CEO , ex-husband Google co-founder) on the IPO price (10$). Since the IPO the DNA database has grown, more drugs in pipeline. It should be the min price she proposes…

Wowsersftw1

DNA

baronewu2

You can't predict the future but you can look for trends and see were things are headed. Here are my future trend picks. DNA: Ginkgo Bioworks. Take Synthetic biology, add in a dash of AI., HUGE support from Google, and their claim right now of having the Largest DNA library in the world and customers such as Novo Nordisc, Pfizer, Bayer, the Federal government too. At $0.90 a share this company is going to make a lot of people a lot of money in the next two years. There is a lot more leg work that needs to go into understanding why this a great investment and its not my intention to do a really thorough deep dive on Ginko, my point being A.I. is the next big thing, and I believe that I have found a great company to invest in that should see growth big using A.I. and have some amazing support and very successful customers. There biggest failing right now is they are buying up so many other companies. Yeah I get it they need this grow.

RogueStargun

Sir, this is a casino. You can ride this turd straight to heaven or straight into hell. It's a matter of whether you think DNA from 13 million people is going to be useful in increasing the probability of success!

gg562ggud485

And there goes the DNA of millions of people into private hands…

baronewu2

DNA Ginkgo Bioworks - Synthetic Biology Foundry. Partners such as Pfizer, Moderna, Bayer. Unique A.I. system partner with Google and have unlimited access to their A.I. computers. Claim they have more DNA data to work on than anyone else in the world. Been on a huge buying binge buying up lots of small Bio start-ups. TMC The Metals Company - $16 Trillion dollars worth of Battery Metals waiting to be Vacuumed up off the Pacific's ocean floor. Years worth of research and work come down to a vote by the UNs ISA "International Sea bed Authority " This coming July. Everything seems to be on track for them to begin harvesting next year. There test run they were able to vacuum up 3000 tons of Nodules with a value of between $200 - $400 million

WherestheMoeNay

Gotta think about that everytime I look at my "Daily Return" bleeding out and be grateful all of my DNA tests came back positive.

These-Speech687

Electric DNA - sounds like some Covid shit

Starks-Technology

Don’t forget the DNA molecules!

dreqf

$DNA Calls, and strike/date. It doesn’t matter, you will lose money regardless

janoycresovani

the $DNA scam finally under a dollar. took a while.

IvoTailefer

Gingko DNA

Democrazy_

Humans will never ever stop fighting until we are extinct. It's in our DNA

superbilliam

Those are in my YOLO speculation portfolio. In my main one I have a good bit of PFE at 27 cost basis and about 30 shares of BMY. Been debating on LLY or another for my next one. However, EDIT and DNA are in a portfolio worth about 4% of my main one all told. I'm not too worried, but I do agree. Rational picks are more established potential value plays.

superbilliam

I'm hoping biotech. So many options. I got a few hundred in DNA and EDIT. But as others said trying to pick "the winner" is difficult.

Peterd90

I am betting on space (RKLB), Gene editing, (DNA,MRNA), quantum (IONQ,MSF,HON)and hydrogen (HDRO)

bessie1945

DNA is a legit (albiet unprofitable) company with a 2b marketcap that could be a long term hold if you believe in them. Many (most) penny stocks are not. They are pump and dump schemes. I think you would have just as much fun investing in midcaps and lose less money.

oknowwhat6

DNA on sale

SuuuushiCat

I'm Asian. Built into my DNA to do just basic math. I'm a failure in every other regards if you ask my parents.

lcb011

No Lack of ideas here, but has anyone looked at DNA to squeeeze? Solid company, good balance sheet, huge growth potential, running between 16% and 18% of the float as SHORT. I noticed Fidelity keeps "borrowing" my shares to lend to people shorting the stock. If anyone wants to jump on board let's rally some DNA DNA DNA

Guido01

You realize Obama was the first president to put the cages in at the border right? Also, Trump instilled the "End Child Trafficking Now Act" which required immigrants to undergo a DNA test if they were coming in with children to help reduce the human trafficking. Of course the media spins it as "family separation". Doesn't really matter I guess since Biden got rid of that one.

zetia2

Also allergic to raid spray. You wouldn't believe how many people have spider DNA, I'ved sprayed drozens of people in the face with raid and they usually act like I just sprayed them with mace.

allways_be

She could be full of babies that have the DNA of other men

Fine_Magician_790

Just wait until the insurance industry, AI, and the DNA strand that was pulled from your 23 and Me sample you sent in a few years ago. Did you read the small print on their website about selling data to third-party vendors? Understand all the DNA vendors stockpiled millions of sequences to be sold to the highest bidder. Did you really think they made their money on the $99.95 fee that you sent to learn about your family's history? Wake up.

No_Yogurtcloset_2547

First off all, an enzyme is a protein. Secondly, gene editing works fine in the lab, but is extremely difficult to bring to the clinics; similarly to how quantum computing works fine under laboratory conditions but is almost useless when applied to everyday problems: it is the error rate that is problematic. Yes, you could undo errors in the DNA of your cells, but the error rate - aka the gene editing that is done by accident - needs to be in the ballpark of the error rate of a typical mammalian DNA polyermase (10\^-6 to 10\^-4). Otherwise you risk introducing bystander mutations that may foster/cause cancer or other diseases. Depending on the genetic condition, this editing needs to be done in either specific cells or all cells of the body. One aspect to consider to this regard is also the current issues with tissue tropism of e.g. mRNA vaccines, meaning there is no definitive way to just edit stem cells or cells of a specific organ/tissue, because mRNA vaccines you apply will distribute randomly throughout your body. The next question is the degree of penetrance, in other words, how many of your somatic or stem cells will finally be edited via a certain therapy and "cured" for that matter. Depending on the disease, this is a more or less important parameter, e.g. for cancer, even 10 cells in the entire tumor that are not "repaired/fixed" would be enough to cause a relapse of the disease within a medium-to-short timeframe. Then, this tumor could be of different genetic makeup and even resistant to the initial gene editing therapy. These and many other aspects aside, the pre-clinical data and safety trials in humans will take quite a long time. We talk in the ballpark of 10 years+. Although some work has already been done. The main problem I see with this whole technology is the question of TAM (in the economic sense, total addressable market). In theory, every cancer patient wants to be gene edited to "reverse" cancer. But it is most likely not possible, because editing genetic code, metaphorically speaking while the car is driving 70mph, is not always possible. You cannot edit every single base pair; you cannot edit away specific mutations that cause cancer. You can edit some part of our genome, but not every single base pair. It will be much easier to bring back missing or non-functional proteins than to edit some "gain of function" protein. I mean...okay you could delete the genomic locus of the gain of function mutation entirely and re-add the normal (aka wildtype) version again. But this is very, very advanced stuff that takes 10 years of research just to get you to the date required to say if it is even possible. Then you start clinical trials, 10 year+ before you can even apply with the FDA. So 20 years before you even sold one single therapy. And honestly, gene editing in the clinics will require 10, 20, 30 year follow ups to determine complete safety. Likely, you will not even be able to 100% determine safety. This leaves us with the most realistic outcome: this technology will mostly be used for severe diseases where inducing e.g. off-target (unwanted) gene-editing leading to bad things like cancer in the long run will still be better than alternative therapy options for the disease itself. Best example, epidermolysis bullosa. So, the question comes down to the TAM, which comes down to the amount of diseases that can be realistically cured via gene editing and that are so horrible that you dont need 100% safety of the therapy itself. And many of these diseases we are talking about here can be to the most degree prevented by sequencing the parents DNA before making babies. My personal strategy here would be to wait. IF they can pull it off much faster than I assume, with a broad spectrum of diseases they can cure. Then I would think about investing, even though the stocks may have pumped already. It is similar to GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., Ozempic). Yes, you could have bought Novo Nordisk as the GLP-1 story unfolded before our eyes, step by step. But you could also have just bought them after it was clear this thing would rock and still make quite a return.

One-Finding2975

People have been telling stories about men slaying dragons and getting the girl for millions of years. Who though there was a market do stories about women slaying dragons? Those archetypes are so deep in our DNA. These executive ladies are so obsessed with sticking it to men. They don't know anything about evolutionary biology. Female action heros creat dissonance in the subconscious...and of course five years later all the kids are confused and want to cut off their genitals. The worse part is ..there are interesting stories about strong women...but they are strong in there own way. You can't just give the girl the sword and make the man helpless and call yourself a progressive storytelling genius. These people make our world suck and they confuse the shit out of our kids.

Teembeau

>Now all of a sudden Apple is going to pivot, become the leader in AI, and somehow monetize it? I doubt it. It's not in Apple's DNA. You get down to the nuts and bolts of Apple, it's about making very user-friendly computers. So, it comes in a nice box. It has a nice case. The UI is really friendly. You can go to a shop for help. That's what they've always been good at. To me, the best AI play is going to be Google. AI is basically data analysis. That's what Google do. That's all that Google have been doing since they started. Look at how much every Google service like maps or voice recognition beats Apple.

Agreeable_Ice_4774

Steve's DNA is alive and well at AAPL.

towncenter4134

Cris and DNA!!!

paulalexanderxo

I’m sorry you’ve had to pay such an expensive tuition to come to the point of only having scratch ticket $ leftover. I’ve been in those same shoes. Mine was on INO in 2020. Had $250k in shares and watched it disappear that summer after the CEO basically admitted to providing fraudulent data on their DNA vaccine. I got out with $30k or so but man…that loss put me off trading for a while and I went down the path of “how do I ascertain and trust what companies are worth $250k of my funds”.

mb996

It is in our DNA, you will be back in a very near future.

RealWICheese

First time on the internet I’ve seen GUTS get mentioned. IMHO, the short thesis is probably bigger here - GLP1 render their first procedure worthless. Their viral DNA procedure is the bigger call option though several years away.

Ready2gambleboomer

*New School = DNA test your kids.* *Old School= He looks a lot like the mailman.*

Teembeau

" We need to see some sort of hype and the market needs to be convinced that that the next iphone will be a must-have due its new AI features. " This is Apple's weakness. The DNA of Apple is that they are a computer UX company for girls. That's what they're great at. The hardware feels nice, comes in a nice cardboard box, with a nice UI and anything goes wrong you can easily talk to a human at the Genius Bar who tells you it'll cost $500 to repair. They're not going to beat Google at this because Google's DNA is data analysis. Taking a load of data and making some sense of it. And AI is just a form of data analysis.

IvoTailefer

she keeps buying trash like DNA. no way

FFnFinanceAcct

It's illegal to paternity test kids for DNA in France.  That's how pro chaos they are. 

Fantastic_Tiger_9000

#Pro Tip Always get your kids DNA tested. Friend just found out his 4 year old isnt his.

THICC_DICC_PRICC

As far as market size sure, but there’s certainly the same kind of vibe going with both. Not sure what to call it, but their design philosophy, UX, and type of people they attract share a lot of DNA.

Any_Sea2021

Developers often talk about losing a project during environmental site assessments. Some things cant be 'cleared', the crypts, tombs and caves have high importance themselves and can't be transported. All that can be done is a removal of artifacts and sometimes ths is seen as historical vandalism. I understand you have no idea of who your ancestors are, dismissing everyones ancestry as a huge collective 'we all share' if someone is European. Well, that idea is false, many people do know who their ancestors are going back thousands of years thanks to multiple DNA sites and geneological research.

Auquaholic

DNA.

Relevant_Ganache8851

DNA

RockasaurusRex

They're trying to fire me for drug use but that's discrimination. And I can prove it. I took one of those DNA tests and it says, right here, that I'm 50% Dutch and 50% cocaine.

530rich

Yeah, it’s not like having the worlds largest DNA database during an AI boom will be helpful in finding a cure for cancer. How is ME the worst pick in here? It has the most upside by far. Data is gold and 23 and Me has an unmatched data set to work with or sell. Not to mention the consumer facing side generates some income to slow the cash burn. I’m holding. Very little downside and a lot on the upside

leoplaw

For starters, the lipid nano particle that the mRNA is wrapped in is synthetic, made from petrochemical oil. The body does not know how to break it down and dispose of it, hence they are accumulating in various organs. The emergency use authorization was granted for the production processes used in the clinical trials, NOT the scaled up industrial processes to produce the vaccine at scale. The process is the product. It has been demonstrated that the quality control at mass production was very poor, leading to contamination of the vaccines with bacterial membranes and DNA fragments. Contrary to what we were told, reverse transcription, gene modification does happen. There is no what to know or control what genes are affected. It has been proven in multiple studies that vaccine does cross various membranes, as the placenta and also pass into breast milk. The vaccine is not approved for children younger than six months. No testing was done for the effects on pregnancy. There are NO long term studies, because, of the emergency use authorization. The vaccine roll out IS the long term study. The vaccine causes cells to produce spike protein, which is a toxin. It is this toxin in the Corona virus that makes you sick in the first place. The vaccine and boosters keep priming cells to produce short term immune responses. This sets up a race condition with long term immune response, leading to autoimmune conditions. If you want more, I can provide you with documentation and references.

RecommendationNo3531

Patience my dear. The key to making money with Tesla is patience. FSD is near perfect with the new end-end neural network model. Robotaxi and humanoid robot news is going to be released one fine day, and the entire sub’s attitude towards Tesla is going to change. Regards on WSB will always be chasing and not want to lead. It’s just in their DNA.

Dextrofunk

DNA I think AI will bring a lot to the biotech area in the next 10-20 years.

Plutuserix

If the whole DNA of a multitrillion dollar company is about locking out competition, they have failed to adapt to their status and size properly and it's right governments are taking action. The things they do and did might have been OK for a small company, not one that has a massive market share by now. Not every point in this case is that of a massive problem, but there are certainly thighs Apple has to change.

istockusername

This is funny because what they are blaming Apple for is their whole DNA. Being able to use the ecosystem frictionless is what they have been about for a minute that’s why the DOJ has "proof" dating back to Steve Jobs.

Master_Engineer_5077

I use apple because it's a walled garden. It's security and privacy protections are in its DNA. If the "government" steps into this technology they will only fuck it up to enrich themselves. It's not a matter of if, but when.

Bull_Bear2024

Ouch..!! The phrase "A, T, C & G rather than zeros & ones" came from a podcast, I think from Jason Kelly the CEO of Gingko Bioworks, I suspect in an effort to explain mRNA to the great percentage of the planet's population that aren't actually nucleic acid researchers! In that same podcast \[Moderna: "The software of life - Business breakdown Ep.13" (1hr8min\], other phrases I liked included ... **Moderna's competitive advantage is that once you think of DNA as code, whoever has got the most wins**.. **Moderna has “data assets”, in that every time they do something they learn how to do it better**.. This **data compounds over time & this coupled with capital intensity has them well ahead of potential competitors, making it extremely difficult to catch up**.. The t**ranslatability of technical success is high**. Say considering the rare diseases vertical or looking to produce missing proteins once you’ve de-risked 1- 2 drugs in that silo, the rate of technical success could be quite high in those verticals. \- *You see, a lot of my information comes from podcasts, generally from senior people in the industry rather than from, I think you said Freddy Krueger!* Joking aside, you've known this stock far longer than me & it sounds like you work in the industry, share your knowledge with your fellow Moderna investors, I for one am up for improving my knowledge.

Bull_Bear2024

I agree, I imagine all Pharma are utilizing it to a greater/lesser extent. Not mentioned in my post is a lot of what I think of as soft stuff, like their Artificial Intelligence (AI) Academy back in 2021 & their Moderna Chat (originating from GPT-4), however even this is apparently having a big impact. It's their AI interfaces for drug design (08Nov23 Digital Investor event p29) that leave me bamboozled...... mRNA Backtranslation, mRNA Design, Protein Generation, IBM Quantum Computing, Antibody Humanization, IBM Chemical Generation, DNA Template Design, MHC Affinity Prediction, Rapid Formulation Design ???

IHadTacosYesterday

good looking? win the DNA lottery. Charismatic? You can probably learn this, but it will take a lot of practice and you'll have to get over your fear of looking like an idiot

Bull_Bear2024

Nice, I too reckon this could be huge as well. For whatever reason, Moderna doesn't talk about this much and frankly I don't understand it that well, but they're pretty heavily involved already via their Moderna Genomics division. 22Mar23 “Founder Stories: Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna” (17mins) pod.. at13.00 Think 3-5yrs, what are the big Moderna leaps coming..... at15.15 **I believe we're going to become the biggest genomics company on the planet**, because we're **going to leapfrog the "Crispr cas9" companies** because we now have huge investment in gene editing we're looking at 3rd & 4th generation of gene editing enzymes that we code with our mRNA technology (rather than using mRNA to code for a protein)....Once we get the right enzymes you're going to see this company flying, we're going go from zero gene editing programmes to 40. 31May22 "111 Extraordinary leaps need solid foundations part 2 - Stephane Bancel" (38mins) pod..at34.00 **Our goal is to vastly improve gene editing techniques**.. we think there is a lot of ways to improve gene editing technology to basically go & cut your DNA inside your body to put in a better piece of DNA to make you healthier or to cure a disease. That will take a bit longer, but it might have a much more profound impact on life. 04Jan23 They **bought Japan based OriCiro Genomics which is now called Moderna Enzymatics**..... That technology will enable us to reduce manufacturing cycle times and improve quality by obtaining "best-in-class tools for cell-free synthesis & amplification of plasmid DNA, a key building block in mRNA manufacturing”. Moderna is **working with Metagenomi** (a 02Nov21 Fiercebiotech article is a good read) **& with Life Edit Therapeutics** using there "Proprietary gene editing technologies".

e0m1

I guess I just disagree, you bring up some good points. Some of that is not my expierence though, so I guess its my bias. You've never had compatibility problems with docx? xlsx ? ever try to move any of those documents out of a MS format into something like GSuite? Trying to make a fully replicating functional file used with those formats is a nightmare. Microsoft engages in practices that create barriers and restrict competition all the time. For example, they imposed egress fees, essentially charging customers to access their own data stored in Azure/O365, (recently announced they were going to cancel) which is the definition of lock-in. Microsoft's restrictions on full MDM/AAD controls to non-Intune customers a strategy to push users towards their own Intune platform, limiting choice and potentially hindering interoperability with other services. Microsoft's own applications and services have an advantage when connecting to Microsoft services. I work in tech, do you know how much time I spend removing Microsoft Edge Browser settings because Microsoft forces them in hundreds of locations? Leveraging their market dominance to maintain control and limit competition is in their DNA. They wrote how to manifestos on how to destroy Linux, how to force customers to move their SharePoint/Exchange into Azure, and how they can charge customers moving Microsoft operating systems into AWS vs. Azure.

Bull_Bear2024

I think it's possibly both firms, but definitely Moderna's!!! .... 3 different summaries of Moderna's process \[13Sep23 Pod "curing cancer"\]..at6.50 Today when we have cancer you don't have 1 or 2 mutations you have 100,000's of mutations on the 3GB of letters of our DNA. What we're trying to do with our system is to learn from what we are observing in the clinic that is working. So basically we pick 34 mutations, but what we will be able to look at through our AI system is which ones are working or not working, so we can update the software and get a product that is going to get stronger & stronger. I believe the current 44% improvement we are talking about will get better. ...... \[BB: Interestingly he was correct, on 08Jan24 the 2yr 44% moved to 3yr 49% (reduction in the risk of recurrence or death)\] 23Jun23 BostonGlobe.. Doctors who treat melanoma patients will send biopsies of their tumours to Moderna. The company will use a process called “whole-exome sequencing” to analyse cell mutations & build a computer algorithm to find proteins that generate the best immune response.. It’s an individualized therapy, we manufacture that \[therapy\], and we send it back to the patient who had that biopsy. \[13Jan23 pod\].. at3.00 We read all 3GB of letters of their DNA of the cancer cell, we do the same thing for the blood draw of a healthy cell. We send both to the cloud & compare letter by letter to see where the mutations are. We now know what to do at the mechanistic level inside your cells.. we do this one patient at a time, currently via 9 injections, but we think 3-4 might be enough.

Puzzled_Bath_984

Reddit warns... they have to disclose foreseeable tragedies for the company (material facts) You have a few possibilities: Facebook earns more advertising dollars per user Facebook spends less on operations per advertising dollar I think both of these are likely true. Bottom line, it's mostly that Facebook is way better at getting money for ads. There are tens of thousands of highly skilled people working on ads at Facebook. It's built in to the DNA of the company, every engineer there knows the tools that make it possible to incrementally grow advertising dollars, and everyone's job depends on making it happen.

Low_Resource_1267

Ginkgo Bioworks, DNA. Just because. Buy it don't buy it it doesn't matter to me.

dvdmovie1

I bought the IPO for this and did well but it has really run into issues in recent years. Haven't looked at it in a while, can't believe that it's below the IPO price. The colon cancer screening is ''most effective in finding later stage'' - ''The Shield test was much less effective in detecting the earliest signs of colorectal cancer, when it’s most treatable. The test only found 13% percent of earlier stage polyps. That makes sense, considering that the test works by detecting tumor DNA. Precancerous polyps don't release such DNA. It could be a sticking point for doctors. "Do I really want to tell a patient that, if this test is positive, I’ll be able to for sure detect a more advanced cancer, but I’m not so sure how well it does for precursor polyps or early cancer?" said Shaukat. "Those are the lesions that we’re really looking for where we can actually make a difference."' https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/colon-cancer-screening-blood-test-coming-approval-rcna143066

spirited_redemption

This is why the continent is an open-air museum, because of ass lickers like this guy. Zero innovation in anything since they just depends on the US and China (to a lesser extent), a myriad of regulations and parasitic bureaucrats, no innovation or competition, yet this guy is loving it. Being Uncle Sam's pawn is in his DNA.

iamexercised

> You mean in the next life then, my actions in this one will be evaluated and I'll be assigned a good or bad fate in the next? You will settle all your debts in this life. What happens in the afterlife is uncertain and not for us to speculate >What criteria will the universe use to judge me against? The universe decides your judgment based on the amount of pain and pleasure you have inflicted to your fellow creature. If you have inflicted a certain amount of pain, you will get similar in turn one way or the other. Similarly if you have provided good and pleasure to the world, you will get similar back to you. All things will be balanced and all actions will be cancelled out before you leave this world. >Are non humans evaluated too? Only entities with agency are evaluated. So no, most animals will not be evaluated. >Will the universe grade the lion poorly for eating the wildebeest? No, wild animals are not evaluated >The cat for killing a mouse for amusement? No, the cats behavior is instinctual and ingrained within it's DNA and cannot be subject to change. What makes us human is out ability to change and that is why we are judged.

MilkshakeBoy78

DNA sequencing is much much cheaper compared to 20 years ago. and the human genome wasn't sequenced back then.

jekksy

DNA

dkran

Seriously, with that capability they could probably harvest asteroids or other objects with far more value than a bunch of twisted up DNA.

MojoDohDoh

obligatory DNA plug

BakaYellow

Come pick up my DNA bags. SPAC trash

Creative_Ad_8338

That's ridiculous. The rate of acceleration in biotech, DNA sequencing and synthesis, is exceeding Moore's law. AI and robotics is debottlenecking an industry which requires massively parallel experiments to succeed. Robotics automation and CRISPR was the first massive unlocker but AI applied to DOE (design of experiment) is another 100x multiplier in throughput . Biotech is the next revolution. Reductive biomanufacturing will be the future.

onoudi

Google's joint AI effort with *Ginkgo Bioworks* (Ticker:DNA) seems promising.

randompersonx

I don’t know about “strong likelihood”, but this stuff is not simple. Also factor that he has a lot of powerful friends and access to a lot of money and potentially excellent attorneys. And the jury is not necessarily going to have any kind of understanding of crypto. OJ got off because the jury didn’t understand the DNA evidence, which, at the time, was very new technology.

zxc123zxc123

And here I thought "spiral power" was humanity's true power >an accumulation of humanity's millions of years of biological evolution, breakthroughs in intelligence/technology/AI, continued evolution via innovation, collective nature, and unbreakable wills to move forward: evolving DNA from one generation to the next, improving on our technology on upon the last's, breaking past every barrier to setting our dreams towards the heavens, one generation's unyielding will carried to the next, 天元突破グレンラガン, etcetc But turns out it's just [spice, oil, and diamond monopolies.](https://64.media.tumblr.com/c1a31fe3fddd3a1046d42276463926bd/tumblr_mz4bm0NjKa1s5f9ado3_500.gif)

Live-Law-5146

Yikes is my thought Big fan of Volvo and when Polestar went on IPO, I also was quite excited to see it spinout like that - especially because the Volvo DNA is clearly there. The interest rate turned, and Tesla started dumping prices - what everyone really has realized is that Tesla has a lot of strength in their margins. Dumping prices like they've done have made it very hard for other automakers to stay profitable or even generate a profit - this includes Polestar. Having driven both Polestars and Teslas, there is a lot they need to catch up on in terms of software - the build quality and car is great, definitely more premium, but their software is really lacking behind compared to Tesla. Yes 3D parking is great, but then you don't get the blinker camera when turning (what the hell, so convenient and easy to implement), the screen is tiny and hard to operate and generally slow software. Long-term I am sure the company will survive and grow, but from a stock investment perspective, I think you don't need to look very hard to find other opportunities that can provide great returns. From a fan perspective, do grab some shares for supporting but don't expect much

EZduzIT_311

$DNA

janoycresovani

$DNA all time lows, took a while.

ShaggyDogLives

Holy shit these bers are finally evolving! Congratulations 🌈🐻! If you’re able, you should mate to keep this evolved DNA in the ber population

sld126

If you don’t think your healthcare data is already weaponized against you, go share your DNA results with your insurance company.

ProjectManagerAMA

This prompted me to get a DNA test. Bloody hell, 100% indian. I had no clue!

Spiritual_Cow565

I'm not counting BA out... I'm timing when to buy... BA is part of America's corp / military DNA... it ain't goin anyplace.

eldamien

Literally what lol No one (meaning the market) cares about Apple Vision or Apple Fission or Apple Fishing or whatever they come up with next. Apple lives and dies on iphone and, in a distant but increasingly important second, services. Everything else is supplementary. Of Apple's 394bn in profit in FY22, 205bn of it came from those boring little aluminium and glass rectangles. On top of that Apple has $74bn COH, a >> 42% increase << year on year. They literally cannot spend money fast enough not to refill their coffers every year, because Steve Jobs was a maniac who, when Apple was literally one week away from missing payroll, said "fuck that, never again", and instilled it in Apple's DNA to ALWAYS have not just "fuck you and you specifically" cash but "fuck anyone Apple pleases whenever forever" cash. So Vision could be a complete flop, Apple Car can be vaporware, they can keep adding shit to the Watch until it does your dishes and tucks you in at night, charge $2,999 for it and sell only six of them, no one cares as long as people keep swapping their SIMs to the new iPhone every couple of years.

BackThatThangUp

These DNA results are kind of nuts there is nowhere in Europe I’m *not* from. North, south, east, west, the whole fucking map is colored in. My ancestors were a bunch of skanks and skeezers 😂 

Auquaholic

DNA. It's got a lot of big players' attention. Could be a bit before it pays off, or not, but it's cheap. So, I'm up to 500 shares.

BackThatThangUp

I have Neanderthal DNA AMA

Mysterious-Creme-442

After that 2022 GWR genomic sequence technique for the fastest DNA sequencing, healthcare is the next move. Then and only then Jensen will truly fulfill his dream. To download his chip making brain into a Tesla bot. buy a call on that degens.

McKoijion

> Colorado’s Star DNA Analyst Intentionally Manipulated Data, Investigation Finds Jfc

jaskeil_113

Tiktok is part of the DNA of an entire generation of people and how people use to market their business. It's amazing for marketing btw. Dorks on reddit think it's the worst thing to happen but it's actually a great tool for search. The way I've used is like Google but for videos. Way better results than YouTube, YT is a bunch of clickbait garbage now.

VariationAgreeable29

Write them off at your peril. These bleak periods are part of the company's DNA. Apple thrives when they've been written off, ignored, and forgotten. Meanwhile, they've got arguably the world's best cash machine and a massive glass building filled with incredibly ambitious people desperate to make their mark in a company full of iconic products. Holding long since 1997 and yeah it's a massive bag.

Mr_Finn_da_Kitty

Come to DNA to make some money back 🤷🏼‍♂️

Life-Cancel-5795

Is DNA good?

sandwichaisle

I don’t think it’s in their DNA. it’s the fucked up culture that causes it. Have you listened to most rap? it’s a crime anthem. they think robbery is cool and drug dealing is a legitimate career. it’s insane

Deesco5

Who is the company making those mammoths? Out of Jurassic park ass DNA

EthereumJesusBro

Why do I hear "so you wanna learn to options trade on webull, here’s how" coming from my sisters room, degeneracy in the DNA spiral