IONQ

steem99

my list is TSLA PANW PLTR NOW SPCX IONQ GPRO MRNA NBIS

Efficient-Shallot684

Quantum computing, RGTI, IONQ, QNT,

luisg888

The 3 main quantum computing stocks. QBTS, IONQ, RGTI.

Bravadette

IONQ spooking my action from a distance.

Pickled-Cupcakes

IONQ... I'm grabbing it now and on holding it long-term. 💰

Similar_Moment_6103

Interesting news today about IONQ and QCWare/Promethius with Amazon Braket in drug development research. Also, note over 80 satellites have been deployed.

BooDawg908

Apparantly IONQ is gonna be worth millions in like 5-10 years so I’ve been DCA 100$ a month for quite awhile

BooDawg908

Apparantly IONQ is gonna be worth millions in like 5-10 years so I’ve been DCA 100$ a month for quite awhile

Three_of_a_kind3515

5 IONQ 39 puts expiring Sept 18 at an average cost of 2.42. Good luck and happy trading.

WordsHappenedHere

Do some more research because you are just plain wrong. They are meant to replace the GPU. They will initially have highly specialized used cases. Eventually they will work alongside GPUs to make incredible breakthroughs. Even the 10000 qbit machine from IONQ in 2027 can immediately be used for drug discovery and molecular simulation. Also numerous applications in industrial chemistry. In the case of biotech, a pipeline that would traditionally take 15-20 years will be reduced to 1-3. Get long quantum because it’s absolutely going to change the world.

Ridged_ChiPSS

IONQ is up 1000% in the last 4 years and noobs here still think they are "early" on it LOL

WordsHappenedHere

I’ve called out numerous tickers. But people in here are generally retarded so I don’t waste my time anymore. I’ll throw you a bone and give you two. Quantum will big in 2027. Multiple upcoming catalysts. 10,000 qbit commercially viable machine is on the roadmap for 2027. See IONQ. PATH. I’ve been calling thing one out since $10. Pure play agentic AI. The next PLTR. So many others I’ve been building positions in. Again, people here are retarded and not capable of thinking long term. Mostly just 20yo gym bros that think they can “trade” for a job.

CanYouPleaseChill

There are plenty of unprofitable shitcos now with market caps in the billions, e.g. RKLB, ASTS, IONQ, RGTI. Apparently space and quantum are the future. Total comedy.

Low-Side5610

All of them are scams but IONQ is the best house on this awful street 

MtGloomy0420

You should have bought $NVTS…just saying. I still hold $QUBT, $RGTI and $QBTS…never did find the work $IONQ worth an investment but that’s just me!

Any_Carob3372

Too many words for us. I doubt you learned whatever the lesson is here. Personally, I love IONQ but right now I'd rather enter in the 16-20 range. There are so many names like this out there. CLSK is one I got back into today. Names that go hard when they go. Just catch them going the right way, don't get in during the middle of a strong move, it could be the end of the move, amiright? I only need the middle half of moves but what were you expecting in this sector? Wait for another similar name. QBTS, IREN, RIOT there are lots of names in tech that you can watch and then only play the very best. But what I really think is lacking for you is a plan for this trade. What was the plan?

Any_Carob3372

Felt this lackluster earnings and reaction coming and stepped out yesterday for a measly 1-2% profit. Interested in IREN as always, but what if it wants to fill that gap down there around $23? Increasingly I view this one like I do names such as CLSK, QBTS, and IONQ, they go on rampages but absolutely dump hard too. I want those names increasingly only near their lowest plausible prices (yeah I know sounds derpy), and having a basket of them to play with makes it easier to be disciplined and patient with those desirable entries (which makes that prior statement less derpy)

Xdddxddddddxxxdxd

IONQ lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooo

Tonyx90x

I truly believe IONQ and ASTS will reach 1T in market cap by 2035. Also RKLB. VST/BWXT are going to be energy kings. RTX has contracts out the ass for years. And last, PLTR 👑

QuarterCarat

People are way too dramatic. Another commenter says “ask what is the disruptive force that will most likely change the way human lives”, and it’s truly a braindead take. When Apple releases the iPod, do you invest because it’s a “disruptive force” that changes the way people live? Or do you invest because it’s a good product people buy? Same with Meta. Do you invest because the Arab spring in 2011, or because everyone you know has a Facebook account? Look at monster beverage. Is monster energy a “disruptive force”? I guess you could extend that metaphor…but the point stands. You invest in companies with good products that make money, you don’t invest in them because you think they will change the world. You are focused far too much on finding some 1000x unicorn, which is honestly insane. I invested in AMD in 2015. Did I do that because I anticipated AI, crypto, etc? No. It’s because I used their chips and liked their driver support. Very few people, even those using CUDA for years, would have told you Nvidia was about to do what it did. Investing in a company because you want a 1000x return is a recipe for trouble. Thats how you end up putting tons of money into junk, because you’re afraid that Apple won’t 5x, so you put it into some small junk with lofty ideals about disruption because you see that company has room to grow. Meanwhile the guy who put money into amd because he liked their drivers, put money into monster because he liked their drinks, and put money into Apple because he liked the iPod did far better than any institutional investor. Looking for “disruption” is how every novice got screwed in dotcom. As far as worrying about Apple not being able to 5x because their market cap is already bloated, I say this: how many people said the exact same thing about Apple when it hit $1T in 2018? I know I did. What else could they do? Sell more iPhones? Also, calling Google or similar a “utility” is completely braindead of a take. It makes absolutely no sense. Truly. You’re looking for return. This will always, always hurt you. You drop IONQ because you think quantum will be the disruptive force, but I guarantee you couldn’t explain in two sentences how they’re actually going to make money. It’s the same with RKLB, why not invest in SpaceX? How many people said Tesla was already overvalued in 2020, so they put their money in Lucid instead? The Tesla investor didn’t 5x, but he didn’t lose money. Even in 2020 electric cars were “disruptive”, but if I had just put my savings into the third largest company (Apple) because I still liked iPhones, I’d have nearly 4x my investment. I think you’re on the money losing path if you don’t think different (see what I did there?) Stop thinking about what will 1000x because you don’t know. I think IONQ is a scam, but I don’t think quantum is a scam. Also, if druckenmiller says put money into two or three companies, then why ask for a ticker you put 2% of your money into? What company are you actually going to put 20% of money into? Some quantum thing you know nothing about, or the company that makes the products you like? What’s Warren buffetts first rule? Don’t lose money. It’s not “find what will 1000x or else you’re wasting your time”.

WordsHappenedHere

In my opinion IONQ is best in breed. Rgti second. But do your own research. Good luck.

WordsHappenedHere

IONQ is actually the best pure play quantum stock. Best in breed. They have multiple milestones coming in 2027. This idea that it’s all “years away” is wrong. Commercially viable machines that will work in drug discovery and chemistry within 12-18 months are extremely likely. It will literally transform the biotech industry. Start there and just review their 2027 roadmap. Look at what IBM and Google are doing as well. I think IONQ will at the very least be acquired eventually if they don’t become the defacto leader.

FailOk1528

If everyone on Reddit already agrees it’s RKLB, ASTS or IONQ, I’m not sure that’s where the 50x surprise is gonna come from lol

brainfreeze3

Oh god, if you think IONQ is one of the good ones you're falling too easily for hype

Traditional_Garlic49

I wouldn’t do IBM they’re always super late to the game on development. IONQ is a good pick, but more risky than IBM.

WordsHappenedHere

Lots of interesting things to buy. I like quantum for 2027. Lots of upcoming catalysts. I’ve been building a position in IONQ. I’ve posted about PATH since about $12 dollars. It’s at $18 now. Upcoming earnings. I also like solar here FSLR ahead of midterms. WULF also looks interesting if it can clear $17. Many other names. Do some DD, market seems to be shifting to which companies can monetize AI.

NoCommonDog

I did that with $IONQ. Through sheer luck I bought in and it doubled in about 6 weeks. I have absolutely no conviction about the company. I just decided to buy something (anything) related to Quantum Computing to have it in my portfolio as a reminder to watch the segment. I expect it will be the next bubble in the 2030s and the best way to remember to keep an eye on it is to have some skin in the game.

Salt_Contract342

Ok, well IONQ is also up, and IBM is into quantum, and is also up. Your thesis is just dead wrong Bro

InfiniteNerve1384

Love it. I’m in IONQ puts all year (took profits several times). The sector is dog shit.

Kindly_Town5378

Quantum is Ai 5 years ago, also own NUCG nuclear energy fund. Small punts on stocks from each sector, IONQ and Oklo.

OwnCaramel1434

Still early to call, but everything everyone has name are good calls so far. I just have my toes dipped in with a few buys in IONQ, Rigetti, QTUM and just watching for now. I'll buy later once things pick up.

steem99

IONQ looks putty at this price considering +40% in 6 months and 100+ P/E. It is already down 3% premarket, but I think it can drop further considering it was +8% last trading session

quantumkerfuffle

INFQ & IONQ - mooning.

Salt_Contract342

Also, IF you buy into IONQ which is purely a quantum play, why wouldn't you fw IBM who has a leg up in the field? Legit question

Salt_Contract342

For an actual bag? NOK IONQ INFQ And as gey at is sounds, even IBM has been paying off since the 25% dip Pretty much inverse everything here

Salt_Contract342

I think you will be good on that. And you should have held your position on IONQ btw

Catatafish

Id rather bet on IREN & IONQ

sirauron14

IONQ is my play. Already 3x my money I can’t wait till it gets higher

Ok_Entrepreneur_dbl

After holding INFQ, QBTS, IONQ ARQQ, I held WQTM for a bit just to hold some exposure to quantum computing. Later switched to QTUM. The nice part about WQTM and QTUM is the run similar where QTUM slightly edges out. The quantum space is clearly volatile and the ETFs smooth out the volatility. With QTUM around 60% for the past year. QBTS and IONQ peaked last year with QBTS up 200% in a few months but ended the year still up 37%. IONQ was up over 100% at the same time but now sit around 20% up for the year. At this stage I monitor these stocks with a watch list for 8 companies and two ETFs. After researching those companies I have gotten out since they are predicting 3-5 years for broader commercial use. There is a lot of testing of quantum solutions that may lead to early adoption.

SupremeGobbler1996

IONQ and QNT. IONQ has a vertically integrated US supply chain and do have revenue from selling compute right now with products they make. QNT is a spinoff of Honeywell. Honeywell owns like 85% still but spun them off to let them do what investing they need to do. 

snatbcn

I have QBTS and IONQ. During last year I have read hundreds of comments saying it is a scam and bad idea. In my case I have 180% benefits from QBTS and 35% IONQ, so some people were obviously wrong. I agree currently it is not an active technology, but it has already been profitable for people who believed in it months ago. And I think once technology becomes more useful/active, it will be a complete change for technology in general. Also, it will take time, but it will be sooner than expected. Who remember posts about AI a few years ago?

RZDirInvest

I have no edge on quantum so I spread out IBM, IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, RGTI, INFQ. The first three have higher weights. All are optimized for high volatility.

chillguy89_vn

I started buying IONQ when it was under $7, and that investment is now up around 5x, peak at 10x. I still think quantum computing has a highest chance to become one of those technologies that changes everything, after chip, AI. But problem is I have no idea which technology will win, trapped ion or superconducting or something else. Like chips or AI, whoever gets the technology right first could end up taking a huge part of the market. For most of us, trying to pick the winning technology feels more like guessing. So instead of going all-in on one approach, I think we should spread the investment across several quantum companies using different technologies. Less upside, but also less risk betting on wrong tech.

Daremightythings2025

IONQ been holding since single digits. They’re the one.

Meh-itwillbeok

bought IONQ and QBTS last year when they were running up, sold before they crashed, made some money on them, just started to dip my toe back in with INFQ, not a big position, everyone I talk to that has any idea about quantum says it’s years if not decades away from doing anything worthwhile, INFQ has a bit of momentum so looks like it could run a bit here, I am not in it for long term, hoping for a decent pop and I can move on to something else

VortexLeon

I have worked on some things that are related to quantum and I'm quite bullish. The stuff actually works and it's quite easy to test for yourself. I don't understand people that don't believe in the physics. Sadly we're far away from commercialization. Many things still have to be developed (like an equivalent ro RAM) to make it work efficiently and it's unclear how big the real use cases will be but GPUs were the same before AI. It's a long waiting game but more and more research will be done on the subject. I have a small position in IONQ. It's known in the industry that they have insane backing. With the latest acquisition of SkyWater IMO they are in a unique position.

Educational-War-4879

Yea quantum gets shit on but doesn’t deserve it. Most people have no clue what they are talking about, I have maybe a half understanding. What I do understand however, is that this tech is gonna go under the radar for quite a while until it explodes in popularity. This is real deal shit from sci fi movies. Whether it works or not is a different story, but I suggest you look into all the thesis if you haven’t already. They range from simple computer calculations all the way to time travel, and what’s funny is most of them theoretically work based off of the equation and current understanding of physics. For me, I have invested in INFQ and IONQ heavily. Their methods of approach are quite the opposite, but both I do believe have a chance of being market leaders. Another thing you hear is that the first company to get it right will be the only one, I also don’t buy that shit. It’s volatile and uncertain right now, but if you can swing the risk I’d be betting on it. NFA

SupremeMatty

Buy IONQ, QBTS, IQM and IBM. Then wait 1-2 decades

122113M

QBTS RGTI and IONQ are fun to swing trade. It’s gambling though.

Sufficient_Habit5091

In my heart I want IONQ to succeed because I want to live in a future where quantum computing is real. But I feel like if I had to choose OKLO is more likely to succeed.

UnObtainium17

I think OKLO has a bigger odds of being worth more 5 years from now... But IONQ has the bigger odds of being a 10 bagger 5 years from now. like does that make sense? Basically IONQ is either a strikeout looking or a grand slam homerun at bottom of the ninth.

Salt_Contract342

IONQ is "supposed" to be the better play, but INFQ has the benefit of recent IPO with room to run, and decent GOV contracts. Have shares, am happy

FitDaikon2001

Not concerned about the returns timeline.. Gun to your head, you have to decide between the two for a spec stock play.... Having to pick between the two, do you choose IONQ or OKLO and why?

Bravadette

Who fuckex up ths IONQ gamma train?

Bravadette

IONQ has been so fun to trade today

WordsHappenedHere

TSLA IONQ FSLR OKLO WULF All going to be September runners. Load calls.

Caeden27

IONQ

WordsHappenedHere

Lots of things look good. I posted numerous times about many software names. I was in MSFT since $370. Some I am in now. IONQ - quantum will be hot in 2027. Multiple upcoming catalysts. And one of the major use cases for quantum is drug discovery, PATH - been in this since $10. Pure play Agentic AI. Zero debt. Billions in cash. Way off IPO high. Next PLTR. Honorable mentions: NET - it’s a $600 stock. Will double next year. WULF - easy double. It will run in the lead up to Anthropic IPO I throw out winners here all the time and most are too stupid too follow. I’m retired and do this shit for fun.

UnObtainium17

That is the reason why I have a really tiny position on IONQ, MRNA and CRSP. Right at the very bottom of my list if i sorted my stocks by %. I'd be lucky if even one of those turned into a homerun.

WordsHappenedHere

NBIS RIOT and WULF will all run hard post labor day. Load calls for free money. Add in IONQ for the icing on the cake. All of these doubled last year after the hedge fund pricks got back from the Hamptons after Labor Day.

After_Club6421

I’m embarrassed to admit I work in the asset management business and I still trade like a mad man thinking IONQ or BB will one day buy me the yacht I always needed. In truth I opened a small model with a friend who was an Advisor to help him out, nothing fancy, just an allocation of low cost ETFs. I don’t check the balance hourly, daily, or really ever and it just kind of chugs along while I read Reddit threads and Seeking Alpha. I really have to sell it all and just put it in the model. Reduce stress, be more productive at home and work. Trading stocks has become akin to a gambling addiction

Salt_Contract342

Did okish on the IBM dip, scalped some MU, and held my INFQ instead of the IONQ that you advised on. All in all, a better month than most here. And you?

Ocilla

The comments are hilarious…half of them say that you missed the boat years ago, and the other half say quantum is 5-10 years away. I think now is a good time to invest, especially considering our government is passing legislation to accelerate quantum computing research. I’m invested heavily into IONQ and have smaller positions in QBTS and INFQ. IONQ is the leader in this sector.

PickleRickleTV

I mean… RGTI, IONQ, QBTS. Look at 5 year charts. RGTI was $1 in fall 2024 and I think peaked around $54. IONQ was $7 and QBTS was a couple dollars, I think. If that’s not exploded idk what is.

Additional_Jelly_978

How are we feeling about IONQ sleeper pick

Large-Mountain6320

I actually have 10k cash and I'm about to go all in something. I need a double. I'm thinking INFQ or IONQ

Lil_Hater112

Ionq buys companies to grow with the funds received, infq has organic in house grown tech. I also like Matt the CEO a lot more than IONQ s board and also seen some sketchy stuff about IONQ cant remember where.

Agitated_Trash203

On top of what other commenters have mentioned, I’ll add that I am particularly convinced by the technology. IONQ uses trapped-ion quantum vs. the traditionally used superconducting quantum (think IBM or GOOG). You’ll have to do your own research to because - as you’d expect - the technology and their differences are very complex. I’ll highlight a few points from my learning I think are key: \- Trapped-ion technology utilizes specific isotopes (ytterbium in IONQ’s case) as qubits. Because they are perfectly identical, it leads to higher gate fidelities so less energy and resources have to be spent on error correction. Something that I believe will prove to be more scalable than traditional superconducting. \- The structure of trapped-ion qubit lattices (whereby they exchange information via lasers (or now electronic communications)) allows for any qubit to relay information to any other qubit. Superconducting qubit lattice structures have to perform what’s called SWAP functions to pass information beyond qubits that are not adjacent to one another, creating more room for error and thus the need for more error correction. Again, presenting a potential scale issue. \- Lastly, helium. For superconducting quantum to work, it needs to operate at like 10 millikelvin, or essentially absolute zero. The only substance that can create this environment is liquid helium. There’s already a bad shortage worldwide for helium (exacerbated by the Middle East BS), and it’s a non-renewable resource anyhow. It’s only going to get more scarce. Also, there’s a specific isotopes, helium-3 which is required at parts of a superconducting system, and this is even rarer. Trapped-ion doesn’t require this sort of environment and actually operate at room temperature. Now I fully expect most of these issues to be much improved in the years to come with superconducting systems. You have IBM and GOOG (and other smaller players) working on this, so yes strides will be made. I own both of these companies too - IBM specifically as a quantum bet (GOOG for everything else they do that’s not quantum, lol). GOOG actually published a paper last year I think detailing that gate fidelity actually increases with scale because there’s more horsepower to perform error correction. This may have diminishing returns as they scale into 1000+ qubit systems, but it shows progress is being made. Similarly, helium reclamation systems are pretty efficient, so they don’t go through helium that fast, but there will always be some loss, and again, helium is already scarce and will only get more so. TL;DR IONQ’s trapped-ion technology likely has less hurdles to get over once quantum systems need to operate at large scale and they have a lot of intrinsic physics-based advantages on their side IMO

WordsHappenedHere

Pick something with momentum. IONQ or WULF look good.

CosmosMasterMan

Nintendo is crushing, IONQ is up, ELMT is crushing it, another green day for me :)

omarmatar99

What specifically made you change your mind on IONQ? The technology itself or their growth potential?

SeniorSimpizen

IONQ. I realized they are going to be a very very large part of the near future

WordsHappenedHere

You need to take your time to build it. Maybe you will get lucky chasing something. But more than likely you’ll win some lose some and keep breaking even. The best thing you can do is to average into something like SPY over 10-20 years. Yes I know it’s boring af. Put 90% of your money into index funds and the other 10% form gambling. I’m 40 and started with nothing. I didn’t even start investing really until my early 30s. I’m a millionaire now. And most of it really is just time in market. And during big sell offs I buy a lot more than I normally would. That said in terms of spec plays. I like these through mid October OKLO IONQ PATH I started building positions in these in May. All of them doubled last summer from about August to mid October. Good luck.

Martijnv1

Go ALL IN in IONQ for the coming two weeks, you'll be back again, no leverage above 10x though....

Etherius

Out of curiosity why INFQ and not IONQ

Shoddy-Carob

WTF! I am afraid to touch regular MU or BE. I only sell CSP these days on IREN, NBIS. And IONQ, APLD as covered calls. What is your account size to take this risk? 10 million? Coz feels like 40k is change for you.

mapoftasmania

Damn. IONQ round-tripped. A lot of people got screwed at 10am.

WordsHappenedHere

OKLO and IONQ pumping. Both doubled last summer from mid August to early October.

CosmosMasterMan

QNT and IONQ are already shipping to the military, they get to front run private enterprise.

wafflepiezz

Getting fucked in the ass by IONQ because I bought calls at local top

Salt_Contract342

I am going to hold them for a few years, small port % wise. IONQ looks good too, but I have made my choice

wafflepiezz

You are so wrong especially for companies like IONQ lol they’re about to print quantum chips like what semis do for memory

music_is_gud

I mean shorter term. There is also position trading, which I do on my more "fundamentals stocks". Anyways, I track the 21 EMA and even IONQ seems to respect it pretty nicely during medium term trends

wafflepiezz

My fav is INFQ but IONQ is one of the main leaders since they have their own factory

wafflepiezz

Anybody here holding IONQ with me?

wafflepiezz

!banbet IONQ 46 1w

wafflepiezz

Quantum stocks are back babyyyyy IONQ go to $60+ plz

Super-Activity-4675

I would add that they bring in more revenue than any quantum company other than IONQ at a fraction of the market cap. They're a good investment period. 12% is a pretty low short percentage IMHO, and the big thing holding them back is insiders who are now unlocked after they de-SPACed. It's a good company.

CosmosMasterMan

Keep an eye on IONQ.

wafflepiezz

Gonna need IONQ to shrek cock to $50+ please

WordsHappenedHere

IONQ and PATH. Big winners over the next 12 months.

Salt_Contract342

Tf you talking about? IONQ is +2% today, +4% 5D and 30% 6mo

wafflepiezz

GOOGL getting absolutely fucked in the ass And so am I in IONQ

FidelityHelpMePlease

Jesus GOOGL is dying In other news, IONQ shrekking power hour right now 👀

FidelityHelpMePlease

The moment I full ported into $IONQ, it started tanking lol Can't make this shit up FUCK you MMs.

FidelityHelpMePlease

I'm done being logical I'm going to go full regard and port into IONQ

WordsHappenedHere

Buy the move BEFORE it happens. IONQ has a 2027 roadmap that targets 10,000 physical and 800 logical qubits. If they achieve this it would be one of the most important milestones in quantum computing history. It means actual functioning quantum computers with real use cases. $120 will come quickly.

Specialist_Goat_8682

IONQ

Specialist_Goat_8682

Get into IONQ before it hits 1000 next year

Salt_Contract342

Lol I have IONQ and INFQ on my maybe list, but haven't pulled the trigger yet because of these regards. Buying some this week meow to sit long just because of this