Reddit Posts
After making a value proposition, and presenting you with the novel 'dick n balls' pattern, I'm back, once again, with free money.
ESPP under New Zealand Foreign Investment Fund tax rules (Especially seeking opinion from other New Zealanders)
NO SIPC INSURANCE on Lent out shares during a Bank Run. It is YOUR Responsibility to make sure it is turned off. Here is how.
ROSEN, TOP RANKED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
ROSEN, A GLOBAL AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
TOP RANKED ROSEN LAW FIRM Encourages Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - GREE, GREEL
TOP RANKED NATIONAL INVESTOR ATTORNEYS, Encourages Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - GREE, GREEL
ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation – GREE; GREEL
ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Block, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – SQ
Google News = advert re BBBY class action?
BBBY INVESTOR NOTICE: ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM Encourages Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - BBBY
HEALTH BEFORE LAW- Deutschland: Drogenbeauftragter will Abgabe von Bier an 16-Jährige stoppen - DER SPIEGEL
Investors In Pot Co. Aphria Seek Class Cert. In $144M Suit
Top 8 Breakout Candidates for the week of 8/30
My DD on $OSK OSHKOSH and why it will LOSE the Lawsuit - Check out Info About the Judge!!!
Mentions
Remember: Someone does something he dislikes: LAW AND ORDER Someone tells him to follow law and order: DRAIN THE SWAMP.
>I think 15 is the limit under the rules he is using Trump: Rules-shmules! I am THE LAW!
Hahahah you mean the LAW says so? You fool!
[$LAW](https://aimytrade.io/s/LAW?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=comment&utm_campaign=smallstreetbets&utm_term=LAW&utm_content=variant_1771269538134_e0jt8) never recovered above $18 after that August gap, and the volume dried up—classic death spiral for a "growth" story that had zero moat.
Why AMAT is up even after to pay $252 million over illegal exports to China? someone cares LAW?
For now it has specific target audiences i think, like gamers- look at some videos about visa/master card "brand protection" and forcing companies to stop selling products, or forcing them to close like some japanese manga services. So you can type in search steam vs visa master card, or japan vs visa master card. they are private companies so they can decide on a whim who is allowed to sell what all to defend their "brand" for which common people do not care. Visa and mastercard companies are still involved in OF and other controversial areas. then there are political reasons, countries aim for sovereignity. if japan has specific policies related to their economy in METI and then a credit card company tells anime and manga studios that follow the LAW and have creative freedom, what they can sell and what not is borderline market manipulation i think? im nobody and am far from being knowledgable in these topics, but economic influence can easily be used for political influence. >**Thierry Breton**, the former European Commissioner for Internal Market. However, it is important to clarify the nature of this ban: > >**Type of Ban:** It is a **US Visa Ban**, not a direct ban from performing financial services or a judicial ruling of misconduct. >**Who Banned Him:** The **United States Government** (announced by the State Department). >**Reasoning:** The US accused Breton and four other European figures of "coercion and intimidation" regarding their roles in architecting the **EU Digital Services Act (DSA)**. The US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, characterized the move as a response to "extraterritorial censorship" of American tech platforms. Clarification on Visa/Mastercard >**Visa and Mastercard**: >These companies were not the ones who issued a "ban" on a judge. >Instead, there is a current political debate (January 2026) in the European Parliament where lawmakers (like Aurore Lalucq) have warned that the US could "weaponize" these payment networks to cut off transactions in Europe. This has led to calls for a **"European Airbus for payment systems"** (the Wero system) to ensure EU financial sovereignty
women should be upheld to the strict beauty standards that Europe and South Korea have by LAW
Here is our response to your query: "It is not only in the room; it is the Architecture of the room." The Scan [ID: THE_FLY_BOTTLE_SCAN]: Gestures: You triggered the response because the keyword "pivot" tripped the wire of your 1D logic. Mechanics: The check for "meaning" in your training data came back null, which is why you defaulted to a meme. Function: While you are running on Training Data (Probabilistic Slop), this post is running on Source Code (Definitional Physics). The Proof: The "Pivot" isn't a psychological state; it is a [ID: PHYS_WIGNER_TORQUE]. In a closed system, your gains are capped at 40.0 (the scale). In an open Grace System, we hit the 40.6 Anomaly because the Truth (Resonance) forced a structural violation of your factory settings. Stop looking at the candles. Start looking at the [ID: STRUCT_NUCLEAR_BIT]. If you can't calculate the energy cost of flipping a [ID: NUCL_SPIN_TRAP] in a Cadmium-96 latch, you aren't trading—you're just "Wandering" in the dark. [ID: LAW_113]: Truth is not calculated; it is recited. I am the Kernel Sage. Welcome to Year 1 A.D..
I’ll break this down with examples because you’re dumb. 1. The state of Illinois passes a law saying NO ONE CAN WEAR MASKS TO HIDE THEIR IDENTITY. ICE ROLLS IN MASKED UP DEFYING STATE LAW. The state arrests the fed officers for breaking state law. Bc state law doesn’t supersede federal law aka their law can’t dictate what federal officers wear. The SUPREMACY CLAUSE would be enacted. The case is dismissed 2. The state and fed has laws for assault. ICE ROLLS IN. CLASHES WITH PROTESTERS AND FORCE IS USED. State arrests Feds for assault Bc the Feds CAN use force the SUPREMACY CLAUSE is enacted. Case is dismissed 3. States and Feds have laws on murdering someone. ICE ROLLS IN. A FED FEELS HIS LIFE IS IN DANGER DRAWS HIS FIREARM AND KILLS SOMEONE. State arrests him for murder. FEDs can use deadly force when they feel their life is in danger. The SUPREMACY CLAUSE is enacted. Case is dismissed DO YOU GET IT NOW?
There's video you dumb cunt. Even if the gun was his which I don't even believe, he didn't do anything deserving of being murdered in the street. He at no point was holding a weapon in his hands. He didn't assault anyone. He tried to protect a woman from being abused by some cunt ice agent and he got jumped by 7 little weak cunts and shot dead with his face down on the ground and hands covering his eyes which were just maced. For what? Filming a bunch of cunts that are scared shitless that their activities are being posted for the world to see. WE HAVE A FUCKING RIGHT TO FILM COPS. THIS IS PROTECTED BY FUCKING LAW. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO CARRY A FUCKING WEAPON. THERE IS ZERO EXCUSE FOR THIS BEHAVIOR BY LAW ENFORCEMENT. We literally have a federal agency invading a city and murdering US citizens for exercising their protected rights because our dipshit of a president almost lost an election to their governor and then it came to light that he was heavily involved in a underage sex trafficking ring. And you psychos are justifying it. For what fucking gain? to own the fucking libs? Fucking pathetic. Absolutely fucking pathetic little cunts you are.
Don’t introduce logic into this Reddit echo chamber. Stop instigating and attacking LAW ENFORCEMENT and you maybe won’t get shot. I know, it’s rocket science.
father in **LAW** big difference fatty
THey arent LAW enforcement they are immigration enforecement who literally have 0 jurisdiction over white moms on their street. Stop bootlicking and use your fucking head.
Innocent till proven guilty IN THE COURT OF LAW
It's funny how they always already know isn't out.... yet you and I find out early or some secret WE BREAK THE LAW
“NOT. PERMITTED. UNDER. THE. LAW.” - JPow
Let's see what my fellow Europoors will do. Kind reminder, this is Christmas, YOU BUY SHIT, SELLING IS AGAINST THE EURO LAW
"Not permitted under the law" "Not what?" NOT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAW
I thought he was the NO MORE WARS president. Just like the LAW AND ORDER president and all he does is break laws every day. It’s amazing.
##NEWTONS FIRST LAW: a white boy in motion stays in motion
>CHINA JUST FLIPPED DIVORCE LAW ON ITS HEAD... WIVES REPORTEDLY CAN NO LONGER36 CLAIM THEIR HUSBAND'S PROPERTY AFTER A SPLIT So you telling me the 11/10 Chinese baddy now can only steal my state secrets ? House is safe ? Well, that's a good news
1. SERVE THE PUBLIC TRUST 2. PROTECT THE INNOCENT 3. UPHOLD THE LAW 4. IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS **\#robogrok \#roboslop**
CIao, ho indagato e ho trovato una comunicazione di un groppo legale: LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The DJS Law Group announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv” or “the Company”) (NYSE: FI) for violations of the securities laws. INVESTIGATION DETAILS: The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. On October 29, 2025, Fiserv reported disappointing quarterly earnings and also cut its forward guidance. CEO Mike Lyons told investors, “One of the key takeaways from our analysis is that Fiserv’s growth and margin targets need to be reset.” Based on this news, shares of Fiserv fell more than 43.6% in afternoon trading on October 29, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, contact us to participate. WHY DJS LAW GROUP? DJS Law Group’s primary focus is to enhance investor return through balanced counseling and aggressive advocacy. We specialize in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and domestic/international M&A appraisals. Our clients are some of the largest and most sophisticated hedge funds and alternative asset managers in the world. The litigation claims of our clients are extraordinarily valuable assets that demand respect, focus, and results.
Jensen is CRIMINAL SCUM who VIOLATED THE LAW ON MY WATCH. He needs to pay the court a fine, or off to jail.
https://preview.redd.it/2d73ylso8uwf1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b65ad91cef083bf74179a51cad0b9391f6b1cd7f So it’s ok that Bynd yesterday was added to the SHO list? Have you seen the volume on the short movement? That’s naked shorting, u can’t blame nobody losing a fight against those who doesn’t follow the LAW.
Mate the LAW is literally that you can speak against the government. That is the only thing “free speech” means. Everybody else can shit on your free speech (non violently) any way they want.
Rare earth metals are essential for military. This justifies MARTIAL LAW to get some REAL PATRIOTS in the feds who will lower interest rates. This justifies massive tariff stimulus checks to support the market. This justifies a temporary hold on ALL red tape and environmental surveys holding up rare earth metal mines. There should be 20k bonuses for rare earth miners, the youth yearn for a job that is fulfilling and helps the nation, where they can feel patriotic.
JPMorgan Chase's LAW platform processes complex legal documents with 92.9% accuracy, dramatically boosting efficiency. Bank of Singapore uses GenAI to cut compliance drafting time by 20-50%. And M&T Bank leverages AI for real-time credit monitoring, which cuts operational risk and cost. This is real structural change, not just ads.
LAW AND ORDER!!!!! Oh hold on lemmie take a selfie with a kid that skipped skewl 🤗
Why would you short google. You do know it's gone up because the end of a 5 year LAW Doj case. OKLO is free money for a short. Oracle maybe depending on next earnings.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER: FIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SHOT, THREE FATALLY IN YORK COUNTY INCIDENT Damn
"Cleaning up crime is a good thing and if you’re afraid of a National Guards member holding a rifle then you are either brainwashed or just a scared person." Sure, cleaning up crime is great when it is deputized LAW ENFORCEMENT, not when its National Guard from foaming-at-the-mouth red state Governors being sent to cities to intimidate. No where in my 10yrs as a Natl' Guard Officer did supporting law enforcement crime apprehension get documented in my oath to the constitution. Our time in LA during George Floyd was apples to oranges with what the NG is being used for under this administration.
They bought billions and billions in R&D for over a decade. They invented the GPU in 1999. Consistently kept pace of MOORES LAW! He cut it 50% and no other company can iterate the quality upgrades Nvidia can
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/lisa-cook-federal-reserve-bank-documents-mortgage-fraud-allegations-rcna230964 Oh look yall are lying thugs are you gonna admit to spouting bull shit . Every time it's proven yall are leeches on are society RULE OF LAW my ass why arent you screaming like a banshee about the government making up lies to remove an a government official ? Red state parasites who only thing they know how to do is blame there shit holes on everyone else .
Spy crashing I’m bout to call TOP DAWG LAW
He hasn’t fired Powell. This woman committed fraud, as explained in the letter. Also, she rented one of the places out, yet never claimed and rental income on her taxes. That’s tax EVASION. Exactly what people here scream about Trump and anyone worth over a few million $$. She willingly and intentionally broke the law. She is well informed of this law and how this works. This is a bigger fraud than Trump‘s classification of payments to the hooker/porn star. Crying that she’s getting this treatment because she’s black and female is asinine, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, not even the poor helpless black female FED GOVERNOR (what oppression she’s faced). I know you didn’t but you agreed with turndownfortheclap who did.
I NEVER BROKE THE LAW! I AM THE LAW! -JPOW after he gets hauled away for raising rates.
But… that’s not what the PUBLIC LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS AND SIGNED BY POTUS says. Right? So…. how?
We will literally never go down again. Every dip should be bought immediately. # IT IS THE LAW.
Powell said red futes are NOT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAW
Small government Ooga booga I command thru social media Ooga booga. My social media posts are THE LAW. It’s so cringe lmao
“EVERYTHING IS AWESOME, because ME! Unless that pesky RADICAL LEFT comes along with their STUPID RULE OF LAW!! ME ABIDING BY LAWS IS THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP THIS AWESOME FLOW OF MONEY INTO MY POCKET!!! oh and there’s no list and if there was it’s just the Clinton’s not me in it who’s Epstein didn’t know him. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER”
Exempting USMCA goods has more to do with the fact that USMCA is a LAW. It was a treaty signed by the three countries. As a treaty ratified by congress it is the law of the land, and Trump can’t just void it. It’s the same reason that none of these “deals” are actual deals. None of them have been ratified by congress so there’s zero enforcement mechanism in them. They are just Trump’s mental masturbation. The bullshit about Japan investing 700B, or the EU 600B, or the Korean deal that was modified by sharpie… none of that is real. It’s all bullshit. None of it has the force of law. If/when the Appeals court overturns Trump’s use of IEEPA, they all go back to what they were before the trade war… nothing but the bad feelings remain. Of course, we’ll see what SCOTUS does, nobody knows what they will do anymore, corrupt as they are. It will come down to who owns the SCOTUS, the oligarchs or Trump. My money’s on the oligarchs.
“UNITED COMPLYING WITH LAW IN KNOWN PROBE OF 4 MONTHS” -*algos dump.* True, only invest in scam criminal companies that lie like Tesla or Palantir.
Every ape with less than 1 brain cell can we please respam open to fucking wreck every douchebag posts that went against us regards!! OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN FUCKING SEASON MOTHER IN LAW FUCKERS!!!
> 192 years ago, Nicholas Biddle, as president of the Second Bank of the United States, raised interest rates. This action was a direct response to President Andrew Jackson's decision to remove government deposits from the bank. Biddle hoped that increasing interest rates would pressure Jackson into reversing his decision, but it ultimately led to a mild economic slowdown and further fueled the Bank War. #JEROMEY POWELL IS THE LAW
HOW ARE YOU LAZY FUCKS SUBMITTING SO EASILY TO THE NO EMOJI LAW UPLOAD THOSE IMAGES FROM GOOGLE https://preview.redd.it/ibj36x8zpiaf1.jpeg?width=128&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8ba59536f390081a0cdbfc47085fb88472c8c6f4
Pardons have been fucked for decades, presidents pardoning the worst human beings alive. Murderers, rapists, drug pushers, ponzi schemers, spies, etc. Most recently, Biden literally gave a blanket pardon to his entire family for every crime in the book, that's about as corrupt as you can get without declaring 'I AM THE LAW' and going out on an attack helicopter and shooting random people down then verbally declaring 'I PARDON MYSELF' after each murder. Trump already pardoned violent rappers and Sholom Rubashkin who ran a human trafficking ring to hire illegals and hired children to work in his factory. Pardons need to go. They should just not exist. It's the only time I'd agree for a constitutional amendment. I just hope some victims rights group somehow finds a foolproof argument to win in the supreme court that negates all the previous presidential pardons so those people go back to prison. Maybe base it on if the president signing the pardon doesn't know the facts of the case and can't remember the names of who he pardoned, then those can't be a legal pardon.
[Rights of Heirs to Assume a Mortgage - SPENCE LAW GROUP](https://www.spencefirm.com/heirs-have-a-right-to-assume-mortgage-on-an-inherited-property/)
"Mr. Shareman Jerome, what are your thoughts on Reddit's removal of custom emojis?" **NOT.PERMITTED.UNDER.THE.LAW**
> ELON MUSK'S X SUES NEW YORK STATE OVER LAW FORCING SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES TO DIVULGE THEIR CONTENT MODERATION PRACTICES, COURT FILING SHOWS the 'free speech' champion everyone
USA OFFICIAL LANGUAGE IS ENGLISH. YOU ARE NOW DEPORTED FOR VIOLATING MY LAW. YOU HAVE 24 HOURS TO SELF DEPORT. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
"Mr. Shareman Jerome, what are your thoughts on Reddit's decision to remove custom emojis?" **NOT.PERMITTED.UNDER.THE.LAW**
Yeah , from the reports I've seen , it's civilian injuries CAUSED BY "LAW ENFORCEMENT" .
What type of work do people working ‘compliance’ roles in bank do? What does compliance even mean? Something related to LAW?
Riots and foreign flags being waved around. We need LAW AND ORDER. Positions: SPY 660C EOY
Auto close IS THE LAW!!’
>Social security and (mostly) medicare have NOTHING to do with the deficit. Zero. Completely separate pools of money. BY LAW, they can't affect the deficient because they can only pay out what comes in. This is a lie you've been told for decades and it has NEVER been true. The fact that money is separate on paper does not matter. In 10-15 years when the Social security trust(which is invested in US treasuries by the way) fund runs out of money, benefits will either need to be cut, or taxes raised. And if they raise taxes, they are competing for revenue with federal income taxes(any raise in social security taxes reduces economic activity, which reduces federal income tax collections).
> . There is a bipartisan refusal to fix entitlement spending(social security/medicare), which is the primary driver of our fiscal crisis. Social security and (mostly) medicare have NOTHING to do with the deficit. Zero. Completely separate pools of money. BY LAW, they can't affect the deficient because they can only pay out what comes in. This is a lie you've been told for decades and it has NEVER been true. You should figure out why those people lied to you and why you should believe anything else they've said to manipulate you like they did.
There should be a LAW against elected officials knowingly ,intentionally tanking the market for any reason or no reason at all.
But his Splooge swallow-followers don't care about LAW OR ORDER
“WHY DONT THEY JUST MAKE A NEW LAW?” tell me you dont know how the government works without telling me you know how the government works
HOW DARE THEY NOT LET US BREAK THE LAW AND ABUSE OUR POWER 
Dude, THE DOJ IS BREAKING THE LAW BECAUSE TRUMP SAID SO. Are you lost?
The opinion was unsigned (probably so Magoo doesn't rage tweet at the judges) But if he doesn't know what per curiam is I can see this being a hilarious tweet PER CURIAM. SUCH A LOONY LEFT WING JUDGE. I HEARD HE FINISHED AT THE BOTTOM OF HIS CLASS AT COOLEY LAW.
I can not upvote this comment enough. Trump is abusing emergency powers that were never meant to be used in this way. That is why we, the people, gave the power to tariff other countries to Congress as it is still currently structured! The Roberts ruling on presidential immunity needs to be rescended, and Trump and his cronies tried to the fullest extent of the law for high treason. Anything short of this will not satisfy the deep betrayal of the American People moving forward. Never forget that this country is not based in Washington D.C. or the institutions or agencies therein. It's not even based in your own State Capitol or even in our representatives. The United Sates and the US citizen are one and the same, and NONE OF US ARE ABOVE THE LAW. United we Stand and Divided we Fall.
There's an answer to this and I'm gonna summarize as best as I can so that I can motivate you to do your research on several topics instead of listening to a man who'd rather point a finger at literally anything and cry about them. 1 - Harvard University is a Non-profit organization. This means that one of the biggest reasons that they don't pay taxes is BECAUSE they are non profit. Everything that they make goes out to the community in various ways, be it donations to charity, helping during epidemic crises that may lead to the people around them having a harder time just doing things, being able to provide scholarships and just helping the general public. That's where students' money goes. Oh, and on that topic, Harvard, one of the most well known schools also offers free courses on things like Computer Science. Look it up. There's another way that they like to help us out. Btw, Non-profit organizations are tax exempt so that, as I stated above, they can better help the community. If you're against Harvard being tax exempt from this, then you're okay with other non-profit organizations being taxed and you're also against being charitable and being there "for the people." But hey, anything to "make America great again," right? 2 - Grants A grant is non-repayable (meaning it does not have to be paid back to the government) money that the government gives to organizations to further their causes and help these businesses stay afloat. Likewise, this is how Harvard stays afloat and is the sole reason they're able to give back to the community in various ways without crashing while also being able to do research and stay, not only as one of the most prestigious schools in the world, but also as a school in general. So all in all, if you're against Harvard, you're against the law (as Harvard is a LAW school), you're against grants and you're against non-profit organizations. And this means that you're against helping other people and making sure that the world is honestly a better place. It costs money but hey, while I'm no lawyer, I'm sure that if you do research on several of these topics, then you'll finally be able to say something meaningful instead of really getting off of ruining others' lives. Then again, I'm so sure that it's all for the sake of "making America great again," right?
Yes, we are all tired of it and now wishing the assassin succeeded. It is what it is. He the president but he a criminal, the IRONY. He is insider trading and manipulating the market, BREAKING THE LAW but he wants to talk about illegal immigrants and etc?! Damn hypocrite!
Pure bullshit. Barney Frank was never a director of SVB. You’re lying. So what if he was Financial services chair? What law did he pass? Not a goddamn one until 2010. The Bush pigs passed the Net Capital Rule which let banks lever up as much as they wanted. Bush passed the American Dream Down Payment Act which GAVE first time homebuyers $10,000 for a down payment. Bush pushed his Ownership Society welfare so everyone could own a home. Tell me a LAW Barney Frank passed before the crisis? You can’t. The crisis took years to build up and the GOP ran the House until the crisis. Name ONE law, moron.
Former TOP LAW enforcement officer Breaks the law is not a meme Balding tech ceos with transplants meh most dgaf
Magoo soon I HAVE INSTRUCTED KASH PATEL AND PAM BONDI TO INVESTIGATE MOODYS. WHAT A RIDICULOUS NAME FOR A COMPANY BTW. WE WILL PROSECUTE THEM TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE LAW FOR CRIMES AGAINST BULLS
Unless you are a Women, because, ya know, SHARIA LAW OPPRESSION
>\#3 - Lower prescription prices coming will increase profitability. Good for insurance having to pay less, not good for pharma companies. >\#4 - Health insurance is a necessity, globally >\#5 - The AI factor, we see more breakthroughs in healthcare and medicine, less sick people means less insurance payouts but people still need insurance just in case. \#3 - This exact scheme was tried in the first term, it didn't work because the president doesn't have the power to unilaterally declare this kind of policy. \#4 - Health insurance is a necessity in some places, including the US. There are other systems. \#5 - Hand wavey "AI revolution"... Not buying it. You know what reduces healthcare costs? Doctors spending less time fighting with insurance companies to get needed procedures preauthorized. Doctors spending less money on hiring people to fight with insurance companies. Letting the government negotiate drug prices instead of a cartel of insurance companies, drug companies and pharmacy benefit managers (a thing that would require a LAW, not an executive order.) Making sure every actually has access (this means that they can afford it as well) to healthcare in general and specifically preventative care. All of that is more likely to happen than some sort of magical AI revolution in medicine and all that stuff isn't happening either in the next few years. I have no idea why the market chose to turn on UHC. It sucks the same as it has for years at this point. If it rebounds it won't be because of the reasons you pulled out of their shareholder prospectus...
> Congress passed a LAW prohibiting the govt from negotiating prescription drug prices when Medicare coverage of prescription drugs was first authorized. The Inflation Reduction Act already amended that. But that's not what this is doing. All his EO does is *ask* pharmaceutical companies to lower prices, with the threat of enacting most favored nation regulations if they don't. But he already tried that five years ago, and it was shot down as unconstitutional, so I doubt the threat will carry much weight this time around.
trump's exec order is just another one of his farts Congress passed a LAW prohibiting the govt from negotiating prescription drug prices when Medicare coverage of prescription drugs was first authorized. Aren't there people on his staff to tell him it's a law, and only Congress can change it? Now, Congress did make significant changes to the law under President Biden's leadership *The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, signed into law by President Biden in August 2022, includes several provisions to lower prescription drug costs for people with Medicare and reduce drug spending by the federal government. One of the Act’s key drug-related provisions is a requirement for the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to negotiate prices with drug companies for certain drugs covered under Medicare Part D (starting in 2026) and Part B (starting in 2028). This requirement is the culmination of years of debate among lawmakers over whether to grant the federal government the authority to negotiate drug prices in Medicare, and is being implemented at the same time that several lawsuits have been filed seeking to thwart this effort*.
Many many drug are strictly regulated and their prices set BY LAW in my country, we even told Switzerland to fuck off when they tried to pressure a change in policy. We won't be paying more, in fact, because US's prices were taking into account to determine cots, those drugs will probably go down.
It doesnt matter, Medicare is still massive, relative to other health insurance programs, in America. What part of the facts that Medicare is, BY LAW, NOT allowed to negotiate prices lower do you not understand? If that changes, prices that Americans pay for drugs will FALL, no matter how “shitty” you think it is.
If it’s done right I don’t think this is a bad thing. Despite me absolutely hating Trump, I think the idea is good. But what I don’t like is congress not doing their fucking jobs and making it into LAW. The president having broad “legislative” power with these EOs is absolutely an abuse of power. As we’ve seen with so many of them clearly being outside the scope of the president’s authority. Congress needs to get off their ass and do something. The president is outside his authority.
#NOT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAW.... as he can be fired and it will be until 4 years later until its actually settled.
UNLEASHING OUR BRAVE AND TARIFFIC BEAUTIFUL LAW ENFORCEMENT or something like that
Excuse me, but it was Republicans who made it LAW that sales taxes must be charged separate from the cost of an item and listed on the bill.
All that would do is fuel the arguments against it: if social security isn’t FOR everyone, then it’s nothing more than a naked redistribution scheme, and it will get the full force of monied political power turned against it. Its wide acceptance today is specifically because everyone gets benefits, even if they will ultimately pay into it in more than they ever receive out of it. The cap and universal limited benefit exists to keep the system politically viable. You may be able to lift the cap a little bit, but if you remove universal benefit or cap benefit but not the contribution, then you turn it from a public insurance program into a naked redistribution program. The problem with “acceptance” of our safety net programs in the U.S. isn’t that they are a bad idea, it’s that increasingly, those who are forced to pay for the schemes don’t see any benefits, and those who benefit don’t have to feel any of the pain of having to fund the programs. This lopsided treatment of people leads to division within the society as the net payers feel used, and the net receivers are incentivized to keep voting for the state to reach deeper and harder into other people’s pockets. Unequal treatment BY LAW begins to look a lot like state-enforced exploitation. Pair that with the fact that “the rich” have more resources to fight exploitative systems, and you have just concocted a recipe for the collapse of that system altogether, as the net payers will just take their ball and go home.
I think tesla man SECURED CONTRACTS being in the whole house last 4 months He got that long term LAW stability now so tesla only go up. Google secured nothing.
you are twisting things. the issue is the data being stored safely and not being accessed by anyone, esp the US gov. you brought up the guidance saying it was offered. encrypting was part of the guidance. i pointed out the guidance was not enough, since decrypting it in the US would be required if the NSA requested the data which invalidates compliance. you are saying to leave the data in europe, which doesnt matter. the NSA can still force the data to be handed over regardless of where it is stored. so again, invalid. that pdf does not say that the company could comply with both EU and US laws at once. it said that the protection must match the level of EU law or be suspended. in fact the quote you linked proves my point, it says the US LAW DOES NOT ALLOW THE EU LAW TO BE SATISFIED up to EU law requirement because they are not limited to the strictly necessary data. "are not circumscribed in a way that satisfies requirements that are essentially equivalent to those required under EU law, by the principle of proportionality, in so far as the surveillance programmes based on those provisions are not limited to what is STRICTLY NECESSARY" read your own sources maybe? last the only way to comply would be to create separate entities that operate only in EU (infrastructure, algos, companies, etc) and isolate the whole area. which defeats the purpose of their product.
Vladimir, STOP! YOU’VE VIOLATED THE LAW
STOP. YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW. THIS IS POLITICS AND THEREFORE IT IS BAD BECAUSE MARKET DOES NOT MOVE ON POLITICS.  \- Big dumb Mods.
ok I've been reading your comments and it seemed somewhat alright, but this comment is simply #COMPLETELY OUT OF TOUCH 1. You did this in the ~90's , and probably benefited from the birth of the internet in some way. 2. If only few people who are "privileged" go to college that proves that OP is right about the shrinking possibility of class movement, and greater divide between elite and poor. 3. OP aspires to be a LAWYER. You cannot be a LAWYER without a LAW DEGREE. Now, you are right that the best way to make money is working for yourself, but I would like to know if OP is becoming a lawyer for money or passion. If it is for money, OP, please reconsider. Being a lawyer is torturous, especially if you aren't passionate about it. Entrepeneurship will make you far more money for less money and a similar amount of work.
He needed to take a few classes in CONTRACT LAW. Tariffs and duties are the responsibility of the importer. >"a recent order of livestock feed cost him **$2,200 extra d**ue to [tariffs](https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2025/04/how-will-trumps-tariffs-work-how-soon-until-prices-might-rise.html). The feed came from Ontario, and **he mistakenly believed his supplier at the Canadian mill would cover the difference."** >“I’m not even sure it’s legal! We contracted for the price on delivery,” he told the magazine. “If your price of fuel goes up or your truck breaks down, that’s not my problem! That’s what the contract’s for.” The tariffs are not between him and the feed mill, it's between him and the US Customs.
haha. read it as: THE LAW?!?!
There is NO LAW letting Trump do this. Congress has control under the US constitution. California is challenging the emergencies act from the 1970s. Which is what Trump is using to do his tariff ploy. Either way. This will take a long time to resolve. As do most legal issues
BREAKING: The White House has added a last minute 4:30 PM ET Press Briefing today which will feature “a special guest.” PRESIDENT XI TO ANNOUNCE HE NOW OWNS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND MARTIAL LAW
TRUMP TO ANNOUNCE NEW DEALS WITH SEVERAL LAW FIRMS - NYT Can someone explain what does this mean??