Reddit Posts
Profit taking on NVDA and APPL distort the market today
OPRA is paying a very nice dividend
$OPRA - A.I., Mr Beast partnership, best browser available, $2.5bn market cap, dividend, profitable
What’s the source for Option Chain Data for stocks listed on Nasdaq? Is it Nasdaq itself or OPRA (Option Price Reporting Agency)?
Feb. 27 Pre-market Movers Board: Opera jumped 9% premarket after Q4 adj EPS and sales beats estimate
OPRA - 0.80/ADS Special Dividend and 21% Stock buyback
Is it possible to get real time data for options prices?
Ever wondered what type of trade has taken place? With these OPRA codes you can find out.
Why $OPRA has the chance to be the $AAPL of Web3
Undervalued Ticker Monday: $OPRA— not just a browser company (TikTok & Steam competitor)
OPRA - AMA and Tell me why it is not primed for parabolic move upward
[DD] Why I believe OPRA is overseen by investors— Opera is not just a browser company anymore
Green Crayons, Confirmation Bias, and Rockets - an OPRA love story that no one has heard (YET)
Green Crayons, Confirmation Bias, and Rockets - an OPRA love story that no one has heard (YET)
Question about qualifying for the OPRA real-time quotes
Let's make Opera (ticker: OPRA) a new meme stock
Any Thoughts about Benzinga Pro?
OPRA you get a Lambo! You get a lambo! And you get a Lambo!
Caution-- S-c-h-w-a-b is currently experiencing a problem with their market-data-quotes streams through all of their client-facing interfaces. They claim to be "working" on a fix soon a.s.a.p., but this may impact trading. Please comment if anyone else is experiencing this or confirmed with broker.
Mentions
I subscribe to OPRA and CME datafeeds from DataBento and have some homemade tools for GEX etc but like you said it's up to interpretation on top of already being only a proxy for real dealer exposure. I'm mostly hoping to grab anything quantitative I can to help paint a better picture of market structure, even if it's lagged, but it seems like a lot the stuff isn't accessible to retail on actionable timeframes. Overall I'm just wanting to get better about trading with the market rather than whatever my own thesis is, but reading the room like that is challenging without the required data. Been trying to also follow better people on X, just added Nicholas so thanks. Do you think Bloomberg as a news source, not the terminal, is worth it?
The current backtester prices options synthetically using Black-Scholes with a blended vol estimate derived from 30-day realized returns — it doesn't use real historical option chains. That means no skew, no term structure, and a flat vol surface across all strikes and expirations. For something far-dated and high-delta you're sitting in the steepest part of the skew curve, which is exactly where a flat-vol model diverges most from a tradeable mid. So the gap you're seeing makes sense and isn't surprising. The methodology is intentional for now: real historical option chain data (OPRA-sourced) is expensive and the goal was to get the strategy simulation framework right first. Live data integration is in progress — once that's in, pricing will be based on actual bid/ask mids rather than model estimates, which closes that gap considerably.
this says 670 [https://optioncharts.io/options/SPY/max-pain?expiration\_dates=2026-04-17:m](https://optioncharts.io/options/SPY/max-pain?expiration_dates=2026-04-17:m) why the discrepancy? I find most of this stuff is too up to interpretation to be reliable, you can't reliably infer signage from OPRA feeds
Because I clarified it under the other thread where we were having the conversation (and in case it didn't become obvious from answers to other questions), this is not a vibe-coded platform, but one where experienced full-time senior software developers are exclusively spending their time on :) And we are an official, fully-licensed OPRA data vendor. Nothing like most of these other platforms :)
Only software I have left are non-saas names ala RDDT, RBLX, OPRA - I dont see how the bear cases of main line SAAS apply to those names because their moats and business models are not headcount nor code based but really distribution platforms for users
What, if any, is the relationship between OPRA and PANW’s announcement of their own browser?
I keep going back and forth on if I should increase or decrease software exposure lol - currently holding OPRA, VEEV, DT, RDDT, and RBRK. Opera and Reddit are really not the same concern as other SAAS at all. DT is 100% consumption based and I think stands to benefit from more code/software. VEEV is specific vertical software with pharma kicker potential and RBRK is cybersec leaning.
Next time OPRA pumps I should just sell it all, geez it can never hold its ups on great news
There's a difference between "possible" and "done." It's not a "couple" hundred it's a multiple 5 figure commitment because I signed a 12 month contract. The data licensing alone (OPRA compliance, exchange agreements, monthly reporting, pro/non-pro tracking) is a significant barrier. It's not just spinning up an API key. You're paying ThetaData for their options data spending more per month than a subscription here costs but aren't complaining that ThetaData is using data anyone can "technically" access. Which in reality they can't because it's a huge capital commitment. The whole point is that not everyone wants to build and maintain their own infrastructure for this. Some people just want to open a tab and trade. That said, I gave a free month to everyone in this thread and offered 6 months free to people who DM. If the tool is useful, great. If not, it cost nothing to find out.
If you're distributing data you need to sign contracts directly with OPRA, pay direct exchange fees to OPRA, pay per user fees directly to opra, report monthly compliance audits to opra, and do everything I stated above regardless if you're using a third party data vendor or not.
Sure if you want you can go ahead and pay the minimum $2,000 a month + $1,500 a month direct integration fee to OPRA to get direct access to the data.
You're getting the Time and Sales direct from OPRA as a Vendor yourselves? Not going through another Vendor?
Here we go. OPRA is a giant bull flag. Now rug it algos 😂
I reckon if I say OPRA one more time the stock will rug 😂
Might short OPRA since they had a blowout earnings and because I’m mentioning it here.
OPRA is buying 16% of the maximum supply of CELOs tokens.
Depends on how fresh you want your data. Polygon 15m delayed data can be had for less than 100 bucks. OPRA live data package starts with 1200. That’s just to get you started. All the naive gex subs out there that says they only update their gamma chart four times a day, now you know why. Also like many said, even live data doesn’t give me full dealer positioning. You have to figure out in your own
You're right mate, all the signs are there. At the same time, it's a matter of the narrative. Narrative goes backwards to price action. People come up with all sorts of excuses why OPRA can't make it in hidsight, because it's not some cool AI company. The business keeps proving.
Strange options volume: someone bought 778 $17 calls yesterday and share buying has been pretty heavy(huge orders for OPRA). I think it’s safe to say someone expects OPRA to go to $17+
Dont see why OPRA cant keep going up from here, 20% float buyback in place now, 10x fwd pe, growing double digits - growth fears have surrounded it for a long time and yet management keeps beating and raising q after q
Jesus Joseph and doggystyle Mary. OPRA fucking ripping.
$OPRA is a sleeper pick after yesterday's killer earnings and $300M announced share buyback. Very low float. Can move fast.
Very nice! Similar story for me with OPRA lol
If corn bottom, might need to cover my OPRA short since it tracks corn 😂
Update: OPRA short is going well.
OPRA is 100% going back to the $20 range in a few weeks
OPRA holy shit. Fucking 🚀
OPRA: ‘we are announcing and unprecedented buyback while offering a dividend and buying back 25% of market cap as of this morning’ (over the next 2 years, should add a solid floor) Their PE is like 13-15 lmao. Sounds like they want to aim for a 5-10b market cap.
Remember kids, sell NVDA calls and short OPRA.
OPRA: $300m buyback Earnings up. Guidance up Number of users up Fuckers going to dump.
OPRA earnings is 2/26 premarket
OPRA approaching the deep fucking value of tech stock pricing.
I've built the GammaWins Calculator which is similar in functionality to OptionStrat. It does calculate net Greeks and if you used it and they were wrong, I would love to know and fix that. https://www.gammawins.com/calc The data is only 15-minutes delayed so not real-time, live OPRA feeds with a redistribution license is quite expensive. I'll add that alongside a paid plan once I have enough users.
Never heard of this prop firm, but reading their site shows me some red flags. Did you see this info on their site? Market data provided by TickSage, a licensed redistributor of NASDAQ and OPRA data. Live trading executed on our company's TastyTrade brokerage account (a FINRA-registered broker-dealer). 30 N Gould St Ste R, Sheridan, WY 82801 Wyoming is like the wild west for corporations, it gives Delaware serious competition.
these questions are too softball 😆 UW, CheddarFlow, et al are mostly noise I am always shocked to see how many people still think that aggressor tagging is legitimately going to give you reliable information over time. But then, after all, the "Options Price Reporting Authority" itself (OPRA) labels trades as bought/sold via aggressor tagging, which must seem misleading coming from an "authority" For those that don't know- the labeling usually is a function of assuming that customers have to sell near our bid in order to get filled, and buy near the offer. But we have to keep markets very tight these days- and the price discovery happens across different vectors. I saw it smartly referred to as "predictive alpha" - which is basically a fancy way of saying "know your customer's flows well enough to make the right price in the right size for the right counterparty at the right time" Half the time you see massive equity overwrites trade they'll go up at the offer because MMs have electronically kept the vols low until the real selling flow hits- and they pay up for it knowing that the streaming prices are "massaged" - to be clear, there's risk in doing this. But it's commonplace and the tradeoff the industry has to be willing to accept when markets are required to be so tight. You pay your pound of flesh elsewhere but yes - the info from these inferences and assumptions is 60/40 at best, and at times you're adversely selected into misrepresenting the most important flows. Regarding Captain condor - yes! been following that flow for a long time and it fascinated me the hubris. Anyways, I supported much of the work out there with my data and view - I was referenced in the MarketWatch article and I eventually just wrote a series myself detailing it. You can find the whole thing here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/daniel-roos-50849236\_to-kill-a-martingale-a-deep-dive-into-captain-ugcPost-7422966036347482112-4Wk8?
!banbet OPRA $17 1M
Polygon highest tier option plan has it. Databento has it. Or skip the middle man and go straight to OPRA.
By analyzing every trade flow, which is expensive since you need quote data. OPRA real time flow runs 1200USD per month
Hey OP. I’m unaware of your context but Bloomberg’s tick-by-tick is probably an overkill (and expensive) for most 0DTE setups unless you’re running a legit HFT desk. PapaCharlie9 gave you useful alternative, but in case you prefer to outsource this problem, you can check out ORATS. They have a live data API that runs with <10 seconds of market delay, which for 0DTE mm is more than fast enough unless you’re competing with Citadel’s colos. Just beware, is not “cheap”. Pricing-wise, the intraday recurring data is around $199/mo. Not cheap, not Bloomberg-expensive. For me the data quality on the IV surface is genuinely better than what you’ll get from most retail-facing providers because they’re fitting a parameterized curve (slope + derivative) rather than just spitting out raw mid-market IVs. For the real pros that need sub-second updates you’re probably looking at OPRA feed direct or through a vendor like LiveVol/CBOE DataShop. What’s your actual latency requirement? That’ll narrow it down fast.
In terms of semi derisked tech names both OPRA and RBRK are at 52 week lows but pre-announced beats in releases. So long as guidance isnt abysmal those are gonna bounce here I think hard
Best part about OPRA? If it doesn’t moon I can use the dividends to buy more 😂
OPRA (fintech w/ a kick ass browser) actually doing decent today. Glad I averaged down.
OPRA getting slammed by shorts. Roughly 70% of volume the last couple days was shorting.
I swear to god. OPRA might be actual fucking garbage. Therefore I shall buy more shares.
If you need true intraday historical options data, there really isn’t a good free option. Most people doing serious modeling use specialized vendors like Cboe’s historical OPRA data, ORATS, IVolatility, or TickData, which provide minute-level or tick-level prices, Greeks, and volumes across contracts. These datasets are far more complete than what Bloomberg exposes, but they come at a cost because of exchange licensing. For a class project, a limited paid trial or a short-term dataset from one of these providers is usually the most practical route.
NGL, I regret my OPRA buy.
OPRA preannounced great #s, still getting crushed. Not sure I can bring myself to keep buying but the valuation just makes no sense to me while they are growing so well
Is OPRA getting acquired?
Hell I might even buy OPRA shares. Fuckers even pay a decent dividend.
OPRA calls anyone? Had a nice dip today after they said they are expecting higher growth to be reported this earnings.
IMO KASPI and OPRA are better fintechs to buy if one don't mind emerging markets.
OPRA options flow. You can get those feeds from optionstrat/unusual whales/tradeviz etc.
OPRA might be an interesting one to watch, raised guidance today and it fell 9% from the intraday high.
OPRA getting acquired?
Damn, those OPRA shares I got on a whim are going crazy.
OPRA up 19% due to some PR released saying they are going to beat at earnings.
OPRA is moving. Hottttttt damn.
OPRA +18% on pretty good prelim beat, I think it should be way higher still tbh
Bought LEAP calls before OPRA earnings, bought shares today. Hope these fuckers dump.
Picked up 100 OPRA shares. Fuck it. It’s basically Norwegian Google.
OPRA looks like a decent AI/Web browser play.
[https://marketapex.com](https://marketapex.com) \- we just went live about a month ago so there's still plenty of bugs, and sometimes the live refreshing messes up because OPRA pricing makes it basically impossible to get high-quality data at a reasonable price (so we have to use all these filterting techniques). Anyway, I think we've got a really interesting take on how to look at options data and hopefully you find it somewhat useful!
I will copy paste a reply i gave another user: >You definitely know the space, data costs are usually the biggest barrier to entry for projects like this. >To give you the background: When this was just a personal tool running on my console, I was paying out of pocket for the Polygon (now Massive) Options Advanced plan (\~$199/mo) just for my own use. >When I decided to open this up to the public, I negotiated a custom, ad-hoc redistribution deal with one of the newer providers in the field. The commercial value is indeed around that $550/mo mark you mentioned. Because of the specific nature of the agreement (we are essentially growing with them), I can't disclose the specific partner publicly right now. >I also want to mention this is one of the reasons the data is not updated in "real time" but has that 10 minute refresh with a bit of delay. The other reason is OPRA compliance: the moment we show real time tick data, things would get a lot more complicated. In anyway, I believe that for running the wheel and doing research, this should be enough. >Regarding the $5.99 price point: I meant it when I said I wanted to make this accessible. The platform currently runs just a touch above break-even. I’m not trying to run a high-margin SaaS here; I’m trying to cover the server/data costs while offering a tool that retail traders can actually afford.
I will copy paste a reply i gave another user: >You definitely know the space, data costs are usually the biggest barrier to entry for projects like this. >To give you the background: When this was just a personal tool running on my console, I was paying out of pocket for the Polygon (now Massive) Options Advanced plan (\~$199/mo) just for my own use. >When I decided to open this up to the public, I negotiated a custom, ad-hoc redistribution deal with one of the newer providers in the field. The commercial value is indeed around that $550/mo mark you mentioned. Because of the specific nature of the agreement (we are essentially growing with them), I can't disclose the specific partner publicly right now. >I also want to mention this is one of the reasons the data is not updated in "real time" but has that 10 minute refresh with a bit of delay. The other reason is OPRA compliance: the moment we show real time tick data, things would get a lot more complicated. In anyway, I believe that for running the wheel and doing research, this should be enough. >Regarding the $5.99 price point: I meant it when I said I wanted to make this accessible. The platform currently runs just a touch above break-even. I’m not trying to run a high-margin SaaS here; I’m trying to cover the server/data costs while offering a tool that retail traders can actually afford.
I will copy paste a reply i gave another user: >You definitely know the space, data costs are usually the biggest barrier to entry for projects like this. >To give you the background: When this was just a personal tool running on my console, I was paying out of pocket for the Polygon (now Massive) Options Advanced plan (\~$199/mo) just for my own use. >When I decided to open this up to the public, I negotiated a custom, ad-hoc redistribution deal with one of the newer providers in the field. The commercial value is indeed around that $550/mo mark you mentioned. Because of the specific nature of the agreement (we are essentially growing with them), I can't disclose the specific partner publicly right now. >I also want to mention this is one of the reasons the data is not updated in "real time" but has that 10 minute refresh with a bit of delay. The other reason is OPRA compliance: the moment we show real time tick data, things would get a lot more complicated. In anyway, I believe that for running the wheel and doing research, this should be enough. >Regarding the $5.99 price point: I meant it when I said I wanted to make this accessible. The platform currently runs just a touch above break-even. I’m not trying to run a high-margin SaaS here; I’m trying to cover the server/data costs while offering a tool that retail traders can actually afford.
You definitely know the space, data costs are usually the biggest barrier to entry for projects like this. To give you the background: When this was just a personal tool running on my console, I was paying out of pocket for the Polygon (now Massive) Options Advanced plan (\~$199/mo) just for my own use. When I decided to open this up to the public, I negotiated a custom, ad-hoc redistribution deal with one of the newer providers in the field. The commercial value is indeed around that $550/mo mark you mentioned. Because of the specific nature of the agreement (we are essentially growing with them), I can't disclose the specific partner publicly right now. I also want to mention this is one of the reasons the data is not updated in "real time" but has that 10 minute refresh with a bit of delay. The other reason is OPRA compliance: the moment we show real time tick data, things would get a lot more complicated. In anyway, I believe that for running the wheel and doing research, this should be enough. Regarding the $5.99 price point: I meant it when I said I wanted to make this accessible. The platform currently runs just a touch above break-even. I’m not trying to run a high-margin SaaS here; I’m trying to cover the server/data costs while offering a tool that retail traders can actually afford.
Just a heads up if you go the direct route: The OPRA feed is a beast. We ingest about \~3TB per day of just quote data (compressed). The storage, hardware, and egress fees alone can be a nasty surprise for folks looking to go direct to save money. It’s definitely doable, but the infrastructure overhead is.. massive (ha). Feel free to reach out if you want to know more about what we're running.
Oh I am aware. I am planning on eventually going straight to nasdaq and OPRA for the data and perphaps become a API provider similar to the data providers I use.
So far dumping almost all my software names Jan 1 has been a good call... I think anti-software sentiment could be a lasting theme of 2026 tbh... I still do hold a few though but much less than I did (GTLB, DDOG, OKTA, and OPRA only)
Seems like most viable paths point back to OPRA-based vendors or exchange/academic access. The real constraint looks less like availability and more like cost and licensing.
Anyone using IBKR suscription to see option prices OPRA Top of Book (L1)? Is it worth it?
You have to pay for CBOE data they won’t just give it out and it’s expensive. Hence why there are services/platforms that pay for it via OPRA then organize the data to be utilized in analyses
OPRA just went ex-div today for 40 cents, cant wait for my 2g cash div on Jan 14th!!
>Copilot’s answer My highest‑conviction sub‑$50B pick for 2026: GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ: GFS) Thesis (one‑liner): A specialty semiconductor foundry with improving margins, strong cash generation, and multi‑year U.S./EU capacity build‑outs that directly benefit from re‑shoring and AI/automotive demand—yet the stock is still down year‑over‑year and well below prior highs. >Deepseek’s answer: 🎯 Two Analyst-Picked Small-Cap Ideas for 2026 1. Opera Limited (OPRA) · Market Cap: ~$1.28 billion · Thesis: The Norway-based browser company is seen as well-positioned for long-term secular growth in digital advertising. Analyst Eric Sheridan notes it has "sustained double-digit % growth" potential, driven by product innovation in AI, commerce, and gaming. Despite strong fundamentals, the stock was down 20% year-to-date at the time of the report due to investor preference for larger companies, presenting a potential opportunity. · Recent Performance: The stock had underperformed, creating what the analyst called an "asymmetric idea". 2. ACV Auctions (ACVA) · Market Cap: ~$1.42 billion · Thesis: This online wholesale vehicle marketplace is leveraged to the long-term shift of auto sales from offline to digital. Goldman's thesis highlights ACV's potential for territory expansion, increasing customer wallet share, and product innovation driven by AI. The stock faced short-term headwinds, with its price down significantly for the year. · Recent Performance: The stock declined following a reduction in its annual revenue guidance. >grok’s answer Lululemon Athletica (LULU) stands as my highest conviction stock pick under $50B market cap for 2026 that hasn't run up yet. Market Cap — ~$25 billion (as of late 2025 data). 2025 Performance — The stock dropped about 50% due to temporary headwinds: product missteps, softer North American sales, and a CEO transition. It lagged the broader market rally, which focused on AI and large-cap tech. >qwen’s answer conclusion:%20Highest%20Conviction%20%3C50B%20Pick%20for%202026**%0A%0A**Arcellx%20(ACLX)**%20uniquely%20checks%20every%20box%3A%0A%E2%9C%85%20%3C$50B%20market%20cap%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20%3C50%25%20YOY%20gain%20in%202025%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20Clear,%20high-impact%202026%20catalyst%20(PDUFA)%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20Best-in-class%20technology%20with%20a%20wide%20moat%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20Massive%20TAM%20expansion%20beyond%20myeloma%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20Strong%20balance%20sheet%20&%20management%20%20%0A%E2%9C%85%20Asymmetric%20risk/reward%0A%0AIf%20you%E2%80%99re%20looking%20for%20a%20**catalyst-driven,%20under-the-radar%20biotech**%20with%20blockbuster%20potential%20that%20*hasn%E2%80%99t*%20been%20bid%20up%20by%20momentum%20traders,%20**ACLX%20is%20the%20highest-conviction%20idea**%20for%202026.
Au/trbodeez Thanks! I wrote a few scanners that use AI agents, statistical inference engines and news and gossip sentiment. This one specifically logs in every night after the OPRA files are available and then makes API calls against Alpaca's brokerage (best balance between cost and value). It gets a history of purchased call contracts to establish an average call volume and then it looks at yesterday's call volume. If yesterday's call volume is 200% higher than the average and higher than each of the five trading days, it makes the screen. The report builds graphs from the screen. https://preview.redd.it/nqbm5hi2xdbg1.jpeg?width=2340&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2578602959bb5ac88da0d2c3b4214558ab191d68 I'll continue in next response will only let me include one picture. This is sample output from my saturday 1:30 AM run.
u/trbodeez DAMMIT! I just made a profit on long calls for COP and cashed out.. lol.. I did see the premiums. I was thinking there would be a short term surge (like Monday) on CVX. I went through the call spikes and they've been going on for a week. This one missed my screener. I hand wrote a screener that crawls OPRA feed looking for surges, nightly. I wonder how people are finding it faster than that... Insider information seems unlikely.. I mean Pelosi isn't there yet.. lol..
We launched OPRA data back in 2023: [https://databento.com/catalog/opra/OPRA.PILLAR](https://databento.com/catalog/opra/OPRA.PILLAR)
Live option pricing is OPRA data, so… your brokerage? Or Bloomberg @ 20k/mo, or Massive @ 200/mo, I don’t know if Databento has OPRA data yet.
OPRA, FOUR, SE, NOW, FTNT would be a start to dig around in
OPRA finally turning around, been an annoying one but I have added in the trough
If you just buy shares, you will change your overall delta position. You will make money as TSLA goes up and lose as it falls. If you trade the deep option with the stock, this won't be the case. Say you are a professional trader and have multiple positions on in TSLA but are delta neutral and your position includes short stock. You might be short puts, long calls, etc to balance out the short stock. You may be paying 25 basis points for a short stock fee. You make a trade where you buy TSLA and sell the 5 calls. This is a neutral position, but now you are no longer short stock. You do it at a price that saves you money and is favorable to the person who took the other side. Here are the tags that appear on time and sales, see pages 24 and 25 [OPRA\_Pillar\_Input\_Specification.pdf](https://cdn.opraplan.com/documents/OPRA_Pillar_Input_Specification.pdf) My execution platform, WEX, will list these.
Opera is a profitable browser company. OPay is a payments tool and one of the fastest-growing unicorns in Africa. OPay is going public, and Opera (OPRA) owns 10% of the company.
OPRA is a super weird name for a few reasons, I own it to be clear, but Chinese ownership of a Norwegian HQ company + Google contract renewal + concerns over browsing/ai worries all throw up flak and odd moves
$OPRA has tanked under a 15 PE with a 6% divvy to boot. What gives?
You’re right✅for a small Canadian account, the win is mechanics + data, and IBKR Canada (with paper trading) is the practical pick; Questrade’s per-ticket fee hurts small legs. Actionable flow: grab options history from Cboe DataShop (OPRA day files) or Polygon, store chains in Parquet/DuckDB, then compute IV rank/percentile by tenor/moneyness and expected move from the straddle. Filter for liquid names (OI > 500, spread < 10% of premium), simulate cash‑secured puts (15–25 delta, 30–45 DTE, 50% take‑profit) and defined‑risk verticals; include commissions, half‑spread slippage, and assignment risk. For execution, use mid with a 1–2 tick nudge and skip weeklies with wide spreads. Track implementation shortfall and only keep setups that survive it. I’ve used Snowflake for storage and Prefect for scheduling, and DreamFactory to expose the same features as REST to backtests and a lightweight dashboard.
i second tradingview. can compare many different charts including options. although you may need a data subscription to OPRA as they’re delayed without it. might be able to use your brokerage’s if you connect it like he said
is it 650/month pay to OPRA for redistribution?
You don't want to sell the stuff but pay for a redistribution license? For example, it's a $1,500/month flat fee charged by OPRA to anyone who redistributes their data, https://assets.website-files.com/5ba40927ac854d8c97bc92d7/5bf2f4661faec762fa07826a_OPRA_Fee_Schedule.pdf You don't work much with data of you think they are good with data ;)
why the fuck does OPRA pricing fuck up every time theres volatility?
OPRA had a good Remington and guidance, surprised at how it responded flat.
EXLS and OPRA both had good quarters and are both down, doing some buying here
EXLS and OPRA both had good quarters and are both down, doing some buying
CBOE is just an exchange that an order may be filled on and almost all trades here will be filled electronically, not on the floor. Floor trades occur here mainly in the SPX and VIX products. There is a specific tag that tells you what type of order it is (unfortunately some brokers time and sales information may not pass on this tag) You can see a list of the tags here, [OPRA\_Pillar\_Input\_Specification.pdf](https://cdn.opraplan.com/documents/OPRA_Pillar_Input_Specification.pdf) starting on page 26.
I went through time and sales for you. Your order was filled at 9:30:43 pt and the bust was posted at 10:58:37 pt. When your order was filled, it seems the CBOE was having issues. There was a failure from OPRA (Option price reporting authority on that day which caused a lot of issues, not only with the CBOE but other exchanges as well). At the time your trade occurred, quotes were all over the place, including no quotes, no offers and prices that varied a lot. Under pre approved rules, the CBOE can bust a trade if it is an "obvious error" There are steps and time limits involved. They will then notify RH. These type of busts happen more than you might think. It sucks that you, the customer has to suffer vs the exchange, OPRA, or other parties involved, You did nothing wrong. Your complaint here which I think you will get the best result, is the length of time it took them to notify you. If the bust was posted in time and sales at 10:58 pt, you should have been notified long before the close of trading. Either the CBOE notified RH late or RH notified you late. If you file a complaint with FINRA, you should reference this time lag.
The answer is both yes and no. 3 separate 1 lots traded at 5555, 5555 and 5555.50 at 12:30.43 et, But the trade was busted (if you look at time and sales you will see the trades cancelled) at 1:50.34 et. Likely done before this but this is when it was posted to time and sales. There were data issues today, OPRA was having problems, so this may have been the cause of a bad trade price. Hard to say, but there is no way a price like this would be allowed to stand.
AWS & OPRA fucking up in the same week wthelly