RR
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock
Mentions (24Hr)
-50.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Looking into Richtech Robotics $RR
My portfolio idea - Going into 2023 betting on supply chains
Anyone checking out $RR?
Anyone looking into Richtech Robotics?
Recharge Resources (RR.c) Secures Drill Permit for Expansion of Pocitos Lithium Brine Project, Advancing Toward a 20,000-tonne-per-year Lithium Extraction Plant
Renforth Resources - Drill Program Concludes Delivering Some Of The Best Visual Mineralization In New Drilling West Of Stripped Area
Small Modular Reactor Stocks may be the next tech trend. Check where to invest.
Focusing on Lithium: RR.c Announces Strategic Transition with Pinchi Lake Nickel Project and Board Addition
Lithium Insights from Digest Publishing Co-Owner + Spotlight on RR.c (up 20% over week)
Mentions
I remember Kraken Robotics from 2021. I even bought some at 0.71 when i was reading the pennystocks sub, but i sold fairly quickly for around the same price. I've also sold my RR stock around the same time. Interesting how things have turned out and how wrong i was.
I am also a big fan of QNC (QNCCF) have 133k shares. Made about $400k on it in my 1 yr. Also check out ZPTA for quantum rally which will pop up. Then you have a couple robotics like RR, ARBE, KRKNF Batteries/Mineral play like: SES, NAK Space/Aerospace: PKE, TAKOF, SIDU Note, I have a slight bias with international, because I like the variation in market response and influence.
You name tesla and spacex, the tax enjoyer companies as successful example? What has this sub become. Wtf. Bro, just buy this shit and stop convincing others that they would buy a solid investment. Yes they look for every way possible to not hold dollars. If they can gamble on their future supply chain they even throw more at it. See you at RR shareholder meeting.
I bought at 7 and sold out at 85. I dont know ehere it is headed now. I am okay being out. RR is not there what it was at 7 or 37.
I'm currently -40% on my RR position.
I'm in RR, SERV, and PATH.
You’re changing definitions mid-argument. You said “asymmetric upside,” then switched to “asymmetric = high R:R,” which isn’t the same thing. Asymmetric upside means limited downside with big upside**.** High delta LEAPS are literally that, max loss is defined, upside is uncapped if the stock runs over time. Your “ITM LEAPS are 1:1 RR” claim is flat out wrong. Condors are usually range/short-vol trades with capped profit, and flies are timing + strike precision bets which lose even when you’re right but early. Saying “2–9:1” without probability/EV doesn’t prove anything. It’s just payoff shape, not “strongest upside expression." You going to change definitions on the fly again? Learning from Wikipedia lol.
You must not understand the definition of asymmetry of risk. Risking a high dollar value on ITM leaps that offer a commensurate dollar payoff only gives you a 1:1 RR, which is not asymmetric upside. The strategies I mentioned offer upside of 2-9:1 RR, which is the very definition of asymmetric upside. You're absolutely incorrect in your assessment.
RR $5 strike, BMNR $40 strike
RR, actual earnings today? Post?
they dont have RR or BMNR on here. This list is missing some real opps to make $$$$$ on earnings. Calls on both BTW!
What’s a dip to you with RR now? Sub 4?
RR Optt GPUS and DVLT …get back above 3$ already
Depends on market cap. TSLA and PLTR are disconnected from reality. PLTR in particular -- never in history had company with $10b+ market cap with >100x price to *sales* ratio Other shorts: RR and SERV are disconnected from reality too
What is your cost basis on RR?
Thank you for acknowledging my initial reply about the difference in scale and why this isn't a valid comparison. OKLO's deployment for META could be going live around the same time RR's SMR could go live as well. I'm trying to understand why you're arguing against RR, yet also acknowledging we are talking about two different markets on a similar timeline, LOL. One final thing I've learned in researching OKLO during this (and as a potential investor): Oklo relies on HALEU fuel, which is currently in a massive supply chain crunch. RR uses standard LEU fuel that the global supply chain already knows how to produce at scale. It’s hard to be a "first mover" when you're waiting in line for fuel that doesn't commercially exist yet. RR is built for the world that exists, Oklo is built for a world they hope will exist by 2030.
I work in the aerospace industry, and RR is one of my largest customers. My company makes all of the gearboxes and transfer cases for all variants of the M250 & RR300 engine platforms.
RR is a major player in US defense as well. RR Indianapolis makes helicopter engines for the Blackhawk, Seahawk, and Apache airframes, as well as the Bell Kiowa (probably spelled that wrong).
Fair points, but naval reactors and commercial power plants are very different problems. Moving from submarines to the grid isn’t just porting tech… it means new licensing, new economics, new construction, and new customers. That’s why RR’s grid SMRs are still on a 2030s timeline despite decades of naval experience. On timing, OKLO’s value isn’t one giant plant turning on all at once. Their model is modular by design. A dozen or so 75 MW units isn’t a weakness, it’s the feature. You can deploy incrementally, colocate with loads like data centers, and start generating revenue site by site instead of waiting years for a single 470 MW monolith. That’s why hyperscalers care and are willing to pay a premium. RR is built for national grids and state-backed deployment. OKLO is built for fast, repeatable, customer-driven deployment. Different markets, different scaling logic, different risk profiles. The question isn’t who builds the biggest plant, it’s who can meet demand fastest where it actually shows up.
The Meta deal is definitely a win for Oklo, but this is still a very US centered view of a global energy race. Calling Rolls-Royce "not a first mover" because of a few pilot projects ignores the fact that they've been building and operating compact reactors for decades. They’re just moving their proven tech from the ocean to the grid. The timeline argument is also a bit of a shell game. Sure, Oklo is aiming for a pilot in 2027 but their first actual commercial phase for Meta isn’t until 2030, which is when RR is scheduled to go live. Plus, there’s a massive difference in scaling a 15 to 75 MW nuclear battery versus a 470 MW utility grid plant. To match what one RR plant does, Oklo has to build and permit a dozen separate reactors.
2027 is laughable. Rolls Royce has the full support of multiple governments beyond their own and they think between 2030 and 2032 at the earliest. You couldn't pay me to invest with the hope of Trump not fucking it up. Regardless RR will flourish in the world, SMR is just gravy on top of these generational wealth gains.
RR isn’t even in the top 10 domestically right now, strongly disagree based on all available metrics. If you’re interested in European market exposure, then go for it. There’s active deregulation and domestic advanced nuclear is now labeled as Manhattan Project 2.0… strong case to be made that it could be even earlier than expected for initial scale-out.
RR has a huge facility in Indianapolis (the old Allison factory), and has a significant presence with US regulators due to their jet engine business. I think RR targeting 2030 is a more realistic, thought out goal than OKLO claiming 2027.
RR is mentioned often but the upside on their reactor business is somewhat limited. First units aren’t expected until the early-to-mid 2030s, years behind companies like OKLO targeting 2027. Plus, their market focus is largely Europe, not the U.S., where massive data center expansion is driving immediate demand.
Rolls Royce has a long track record and solid projections, no doubt. But delivery speed matters too… their first SMRs aren’t expected until the 2030s, while Oklo targets 2027 with a build-own-operate model, DOE backing, and paying customers like Meta. Proven tech plus faster deployment gives Oklo a real near-term execution edge, even if RR will eventually deliver at larger scale.
Absolutely, Rolls Royce has decades of naval reactor experience and a strong European footprint. But being “first mover” isn’t just legacy… it’s about who can deploy commercially in the near term. OKLO targets 2027 with a build-own-operate model, DOE backing, and paying corporate customers like Meta, which is far faster than RR’s earliest SMRs in the 2030s. Fast, proven deployment and a hyper-scalable model can capture emerging U.S. and global markets before traditional players even start building.
RR projections are realistic… and they’ll actually deliver.
Im genuinely optimistic in RR and their energy div. I want to hold but obvious reasons not to
Wow, talk about a US only take. Calling Rolls Royce "not a first mover" is silly. RR has been building nuclear reactors for the Royal Navy since the 1950s. Calling them late to the party is like saying Boeing doesn't understand aviation because a new drone company power point. LOL Besides, Oklo is aiming for 2027 but they’re still working through red tape. RR's SMR is already in the final stage of UK regulatory approval and has been selected for the Czech Republic’s nuclear plants. There’s also a massive difference in scale. Oklo is building a nuclear battery for individual data centers. Rolls-Royce is building plants for national grids and massive industrial hubs. Their approach is literally designed to produce these at scale. You seem to assume the market is just US data centers. Rolls is already positioning to dominate the UK and Europe. The world is bigger than just us here in America. Besides, I'm quite pleased with my $3 cost basis in $RYCEY and my 500% gain.
Well at this point I’m not betting on America for anything significantly progressive. I’m also VERY comfortable with their timeline. It’s definitely not realistic to think it will happen sooner. $SMR is a small holding for me, hopefully they beat the RR timeline but, being realistic, RR has experience here, they don’t.
Check out KRKNF, ARBE, RR, and...PATH, if haven't.
I bought a CBR1000RR yesterday, an eggregiously fast bike. No TC or ABS, cause it's no fun. brought it to my uncle's so he could try it. Used to ride, but some time ago. Well... Guess we know what happened. Luckily he 'just' dislocated his shoulder, sucks, feel so bad.
RR as in Rolls Royce?
Robotics is the next speculative run. RR and FANUY
You need to get on BW another comeback story just like RR
Jesus Christ, is this the resurrection of RR? One to track over the next few weeks, and a few OOM calls a month or more out are warranted, imo. Definitely have experienced robot makers there.
RR Richtech Robotics Inc
RR $5 leaps for Jan 2027 at $1.60 only off $1 from strike is pretty much free money dont ya think?
$RR Richtech Robotics yolo 🔥
By only going with VOO and VTI you are not getting international exposure. Boeing, Airbus, and Embraer dominate the global aircraft industry. Ge aerospace, P&W, RR, and Safran dominate the aircraft engine industry. By going for only us stocks you do make a choice that the US companies will be the only ones that you are exposed to. Granted if you had to choose one market I would choose the US one. Personally I like investing and rebalancing my portfolio. I basically do an S&P 500 blend and then add in international non-financial companies as they would be if they were part of the S&P 500. This is a lot more work than just doing SP500.
Jesus, RR can't run even during a conference in which they are/have debuted their new robot, Dex. Playing with fire on this one, and it feels like it might retreat or get nailed in place.
Around 63 holdings. Those are my top three in terms of % gains. If in pure money returns it would be around 32%, TSMC, RR, and VUAG.
Loaded up on RR and POET leaps, hoping for some hail mary announcement during CES
Bought RR leaps. Could be retarded. Could be not retarded. We'll see, but nothing worse than me buying 20k of lulu leaps.
Check the Boston Dynamics video, it's instane. And yes, RR is a scam
Did you see RR's demo? It's so trash lmao, I am convinced this is a company that is essentially a scam behind an incredibly shitty product
I timed the dip on CTM and RR perfectly today.
Yeah, they seem like a legit company thats what interested me. I’m rotating out of some risk plays and looking for some more stable value stocks in the next month or two. I gotta look into it more but I’m thinking about picking up a bag and just holding onto it. Same with RR.
My sofi and RR burning my whole account. They are dumping on no news. Gotta love the manipulation
Just got back to the desk and my short was fucking bottom tick stopped out at the literal highest point today and is currently 6RR past my TP holy shit im pissed
Let's go RR. Show them what you got at the conference today 🤞🚀
SERV and RR for me I think, then some bigger cap names.
ACHR. RR. MBOT. HIVE all undervalued and overlooked.
RR can get fucked by a beheamoth black cock. has never paid out any of the 15 times i bought calls
RR could you please calm the fuck down??? how the fuck am I supposed to buy cheap ?
Why RR and SERV? Can you go into depth on your thesis for their success?
RR definitely seems like a buy at current price. If all goes well tomorrow - it's probably a quick 10% profit for swing traders.
I like RR, seems to swing between $3-$6 as of late, I only have one $3 call for 2028 but see it having some real potential in the coming years
I like $RR and $SERV. RR is currently more diverse but Serv robotics will see real revenue in 2026 and its balance sheet is strong, $200m cash, no debt and deals with Uber Eats and DoorDash. Plus it just got a $26 price target the other day.
Some south american cokehead got yoinked and your here moaning about it like it matters. Who's the emotional one? Bro this is an options trading forum. I made $80,000 USD last year trading. Not enough to brag about, but 2026 is so far off to an amazing start!!! Watch this video and get hyped for the greatest free market for innovation that has ever existed!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gvf547kGOXs LFG!!! PLTR TSLA GOOG ONDS LMT POET RR KSCP RKLB
Why does it have to be humanoid. A machine might as well look like spider or a snake (mining ops), but if it fits the purpose, the customer doesn't care how it looks. SYM, RR are obvious plays. Or just look at ETF holdings of a robotics fund.
Just need RR to pull off CES
> RR Would like to add that this is most likely Richtech Robotics Inc that's listed in the NASDAQ, not Rolls Royce that's listed in the LSE. There was some confusion a month or two ago and the Redditor didn't realise people were on about Rolls Royce.
I believe RR and SYM would be up your alley
I am waiting to see if RR can execute not losing so much money! Revenues down and expenses up!? I like SERV as well.
RR is reskinned robots from overseas. Look into their current.
I was in RR for a while. Ran with my gains at $7. Robots look/run like junk.
Agreed - what I like about RR though is the varied robotics for a lot of different sectors. Checkout their website, they have robots with use cases for commercial, industrial and data. SERV looks like it should show its revenue potential a lot sooner though but long term RR could be massive.
You’re right about CES being a hype catalyst for robotics. RR looks interesting with the Nvidia partnership but you’ll want to watch execution and cash burn. SERV feels more focused and delivery automation could scale if cities continue to allow it.
Mine mostly consists of MAG7, RR, RKLB, Gold and Silver with a couple other defence stocks. Might transition more into energy as that’s what feels like will be next for the AI boom but I’ve yet to read too much into it.
> It is 100% an investment, just look at the performance since inception. #Stupid Crypto Talking Point #2 (Number go up) "**NuMb3r g0 Up!!!**" / "**Best performing asset of the decade!**" / "**Everyone who bought is "up" right now**" 1. Whether the "price of crypto" goes up, has absolutely no bearing on whether it's.. a) A long term store of value b) Holds any intrinsic value or utility c) Or will return any value in the future One of the most important tenets of investing is the simple principal: ***Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.*** People in crypto seem willfully ignorant of this basic concept. 2. At best, the price of crypto is a function of *popularity*, not actual value or material utility. And this ["popularity" has been waning for years.](https://news.gallup.com/poll/692777/cryptocurrency-limited-main-street-appeal.aspx) For more on how and why crypto makes a much worse investment than almost anything else, see this [article](https://ioradio.org/i/value/). 3. The "price of crypto" is a heavily [manipulated](https://www.npr.org/2025/09/17/nx-s1-5543415/the-crypto-market-is-hot-but-is-it-an-illusion) figure published by shady, [unregulated crypto exchanges](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apklQgMauK4) that have systematically been caught [manipulating the market](https://open.spotify.com/episode/3D0dmTUCxLuQEJ39uyMFOP) from [then](https://www.investopedia.com/news/bots-drove-bitcoins-150to1000-rise-2013-paper/) to [now](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21). A [new 2025 Cornell study](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01686) shows **fewer than 500 people control $3.2T of artificial crypto trading!** 4. Crypto bros love to harp about "inflation" in the fiat system, yet ironically they measure the "value" of their "fiat alternative" in fiat? It makes absolutely no sense, unless you assume they haven't thought 2 seconds ahead from what comes out of their mouths. 5. It's the height of hypocrisy for crypto people to champion token deflation (and increased prices) while ignoring that there's over $160+ Billion in unsecured stablecoins being used to [**inflate** the value of their tokens in the crypto marketplace](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). The "code is law" and "don't trust - verify" people seem perfectly willing to take companies like [Tether](https://www.newsweek.com/bitcoin-bitfinex-tether-cryptocurrency-market-manipulation-historic-value-fraud-1469640) and Circle, at face value, that they're telling the truth about asset reserves [when there's very little actual evidence](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8450-21), but there is lots of evidence of [market manipulation](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). 6. ***Not Your Fiat, Not Your Value*** - Just because you think the "value of your crypto portfolio" is worth $$$ *does not make that true.* It's well known there's inadequate liquidity in this market, and most people will never be able to get their money out. So UNLESS/UNTIL you can actually liquidate your crypto for actual real money, you have no idea what you have. You're "down" until you cash out. Bernie Madoff's clients got monthly statements saying they were "making money" too. 7. Just because it's possible (though highly improbable) to make money speculating on crypto, this doesn't mean it's an **ethical** or reliable technique to amass wealth. At its core, the notion that buying and holding crypto will generate reliable returns is [a de-facto ponzi scheme](https://ioradio.org/i/ponzi/). **It's mathematically impossible for even a stastically-significant percentage of crypto holders to have any notable ROI.** The rare exception of those who might profit in this market, do so while providing cover for everything from [cyber terrorism](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3026.html) to [human trafficking](https://humantraffickingfront.org/cryptocurrency-use-in-the-online-sexual-exploitation-of-children/). 8. It's also not true that anybody who bought crypto when it was low is guaranteed to make a lot of money. There are thousands of ways people can lose their crypto or be defrauded along the way. And there's no guarantee just because your portfolio is "up", that you could easily cash out. 9. While crypto suggests itself as an alternative to "TradFi", the [most respected and successful people](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/warren-buffett-predicts-bad-ending-bitcoin-it-doomed-investment) in traditional finance who have proven track records of good investing/returns [do not think crypto is a reliable store of value](https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/article/cryptocurrencies-and-vanguard-what-we-think). 10. Want to see a better asset (that actually has utility) that's consistently out-performed Bitcoin? [Here you go](https://www.polygon.com/2021/1/27/22253079/magic-the-gathering-black-lotus-auction-price-2021). However, this may be another [best performing asset](https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/declaration-of-financial-independence/). 11. When crypto-critics make reference to, or mock crypto price predictions, it's not because we think price is a meaningful metric. Instead, we are amused that to you, that's all that's important, and we can't help but note how often wrong you are in your predictions. The intrinsic value of crypto basically never changes, but it is interesting to see how hype and propaganda affects the extrinsic value. In a totally logical world, those would both be equalized to zero, but we're not there yet, and nobody knows when/if that will happen because it's an irrational market.
Contrarian trades have better RR than crowded ones. Just set a stop loss
RR has been hurting me lately :(
Fisv, ttd, MVST, RR,AND CCCX are on my radar. Ill be taking a position shortly.
Are those numbers real? Something i doubt max loss $70 and max profit $730? Like who wouldn't do that, RR of 1:10?? How is that possible
Entirely fun money port. Let me know what y'think of these micro-caps. Don't worry - the "core portfolio" is legit, mostly QQQ etc. - SATL (ignored space play) - KVUE (only till merger) - IMSR (smhow have faith in this) - LENZ (smartphone addiction story; insiders purchased) - RR (too cheap to ignore)
I am hugely into oil and I like rick rule but he even says he is an old fart. I think if we are at the bottom, we should speculate a bit more like he did. Canadian oil is awesome but I think you could do better. XOM is undervalued and the small to mid caps are fairly valued to slightly undervalued AT CURRENT prices. At much higher prices though, XOM might not have as much torque. RR likes to take the easy wins and sell early. Also he likes to talk his book and hype things up while he sells it to you but at least not at these levels
Doing to opposite you twats and been a pleasure!!! Thank you for the “RR DD” (Roughly regarded Deranged Diligence) hats off to you! Keep up the hard work! Algo’s read and process this info fast for me. To any one reading this BUY INTEL!! Your welcome. 47 strike may 17th. Your welcome!
Looking at SIDU, NUAI, SLS, OMER, RR, ONDS tomorrow.
Zeta, Meta, Asts, Nbis More speculative Poet, RR, Onds. I think Smci is going to make another run up to 50-60 sometime in the next 6 months as well