RR
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Looking into Richtech Robotics $RR
My portfolio idea - Going into 2023 betting on supply chains
Anyone checking out $RR?
Anyone looking into Richtech Robotics?
Recharge Resources (RR.c) Secures Drill Permit for Expansion of Pocitos Lithium Brine Project, Advancing Toward a 20,000-tonne-per-year Lithium Extraction Plant
Renforth Resources - Drill Program Concludes Delivering Some Of The Best Visual Mineralization In New Drilling West Of Stripped Area
Small Modular Reactor Stocks may be the next tech trend. Check where to invest.
Focusing on Lithium: RR.c Announces Strategic Transition with Pinchi Lake Nickel Project and Board Addition
Lithium Insights from Digest Publishing Co-Owner + Spotlight on RR.c (up 20% over week)
Mentions
Buying $HIMS and $RR heavily. Both extremely oversold and have massive upside
Lol right. All these fresh accounts pushing the thread and then OP himself "finds" the article online. Lol 😂RR appears to be known for the P&Ds.. New cycle beginning ?
Definitely not. RR is mentioned often but the upside on their reactor business is somewhat limited. First units aren’t expected until the early-to-mid 2030s, years behind companies like OKLO targeting 2027. Plus, their market focus is largely Europe, not the U.S., where massive data center expansion is driving immediate demand. Rolls Royce isn’t even in the top 10 amongst domestic players, and not a first mover.
This is HUGE. People need to know about this! $RR is legit. Hunterbrook are the frauds
I shoot for $6 contracts, I exit at $10 or better and cut at $4, as long as I can maintain a 2:1 RR I just need to be right better than 33% I’m positive EV
You do you, I won’t be investing in Oklo for the medium potential they have. I’m not buying RR just for SMR conviction, they are a long backed fundamental company and I’ll hold their stocks for my children’s children. You invest and I wish you well fella. Hope it takes you to the moon.
Factor in data centers are expected to be finished around 2030, prime time for RR nuclear reactor delivery, it aligns too perfectly. They won't choose 15megawatts.
Check the stats, they might be first. Oklo are developing 15 megawatt SMRs. Cute. RR are developing 0.5GW. Considering these data centers will be around 1-2GW in power, guess who has the competitive edge. RR are also one of the only tarif free companies between the USA and the UK. Search this headline posted recently. US ‘disappointed’ that Rolls-Royce will build UK’s first small modular reactors | Nuclear power | The Guardian
Definitely not. RR is mentioned often but the upside on their reactor business is somewhat limited. First units aren’t expected until the early-to-mid 2030s, years behind companies like OKLO targeting 2027. Plus, their market focus is largely Europe, not the U.S., where massive data center expansion is driving immediate demand. Rolls Royce isn’t even in the top 10 amongst domestic players, and not a first mover.
Yeah, I mean, I can't speak to FX impact and how that would affect returns. But, its unwise to judge the macroinvestability of a market given two months of returns. YTD has been bad for the US markets because software/tech has taken a beating. But consider: Google, as an example,has a P/E of 28. Barclays is \~25, Rolls-Royce is \~20; very similar (FYI: I would imagine virtually all of RR's recent growth has come from building turbines for American-funded data center deployments. The global economy ***is*** the US economy; there's no way to escape it). Many people see the massive growth in the US stock market throughout 2024-2025 and think that these companies are overbought, but broadly speaking the evidence to support this conclusion just isn't that strong, beyond a few percentage points of normal variability. The money these companies make is **obscene**; it's far beyond normal human ability to look at and make sense of. They're the best in the world at it. Here's another data point in the private sector: It was just publicly stated by an investor that Anthropic was in **six weeks** able to double the revenue of a billion dollar product (Claude Code) to \~$2.5B USD. Rolls-Royce, in comparison, increased their revenue by \~the same amount in the full year between 2024 and 2025 (which is absolutely a european success story! RR is one of Europe's best companies. Every quarter, Google spends almost twice as much money as RR makes in a full year. In 2026, one year, Google spend more money on data centers than RR has made in total during its entire corporate history. Google will do this, and they will still have an amount of money left in their bank account that would take RR thirty years to earn in profit. This is the scale of difference we're talking about. Its, sadly, not close.
I hate credit spreads The RR is absolutely ridiculous to me Risking 250k for 25k This works until it doesn’t then it goes south reallllll quick Good luck tho
Good feedback, , interestingly my US stocks were performing so well at the end of last year and now They’re all down, whereas in general, my UK portfolio is all up, RR, Barclays, gsk almost doubled in a year , that’s an insane return compared to the US, also the FX impact is killing me, I bought with a pretty high US exchange rate vs GBP ,
RR and Soun for sure, what’s the strike?
$RR oversold and will squeeze again any day now
You need the stock to come up to like $2.67 to get out with a tiny profit. [https://optionstrat.com/build/long-call/RR/.RR260320C3](https://optionstrat.com/build/long-call/RR/.RR260320C3)
RR is the ticker on LSE so I usually use it, I believe on the US exchange it's RYCEY
Oh you meant Rolls Royce 🤣, RR is Richtech Robotics
I guess you mean Rolls Royce, RR is a tech firm
Bought RR at 2, sold at 6 👌
This whole sub sleeping on RR / RYCEY Most insane covid comeback of all time
Premarket Watchlist: **$KLTO** **$CURX** **$MEHA** Mid term: **$AZTR** : Mar-2/3 Catalyst: https://finviz.com/news/315522/azitra-inc-to-present-at-bio-investment-growth-summit **$RR** , **$SERV** : Mar-10 catalyst : https://www.tipranks.com/news/the-fly/u-s-government-to-meet-with-robot-makers-semafor-reports-
How heavy are your bags because what RR did was absolutely fraud and you’re a clown if you think otherwise. They literally pumped the stock by falsely claiming to have partnered with MSFT and immediately diluted the shareholders afterwards. MSFT even came out to clarify they had no partnership with RR. It’s pretty clear cut this was fraud and only a bag holding dummy couldn’t see this
$RR Richtech robotics looks like it’s about to short squeeze again
Stocks that can double: RR & SG
Dopamine? Eh, not really but you can still (almost) 2x whatever money you throw in with the right ones. RR is great though. Roughly $1 max loss to $1 and you're green for both the direction you choose *and* sideways (worse for put credits though...) You only need to be right a bit over 50% of the time. I've been opening iron condors, but opening each leg at different times of day (call credits when high, put credits when low) - right now I've got a \~$6 price range on SPY where I'm green (688-693) and if it goes outside of that the options mostly hedge each other. Can be a lot of risk before before opening the second leg (you may not get a good chance to), but fuck has sideways = green made a huge difference lately.
I fear this 23.5 RR trade may not work
If it's for long-term holds it's not a big deal unless you happen to be adding right before a big long downturn (and nobody is good at calling absolute tops, or bottoms for that matter), but if you're doing it for very high risk high reward very short-term trades, you're essentially adding to losers and probably not holding winners long enough either. It's just making your losses bigger and bigger on your entries that were clearly incorrect (where you should be cutting losses quickly, because you can always find a better entry). It means your losers are going to end up being far bigger than your winners on average, which will destroy your RR and make it highly unlikely you're profitable in the long run. The times where it works out in your favor are reinforcing a very bad habit that will lead to bigger losers than winners in the long run, because you need to be correct more often than not on your entries and exits, relative to how big your gains are vs how much you're risking.
I’m in the same boat with RR, down 80% with March 20 exp. Most likely a goner
Tell me more about your RR move
I am comparing it to GE even RR is right at RTX's butt.
Serv bought out some company that makes a robot chipotle uses to mix guac but that's bout it ( personally think their delivery idea is terrible as it can't cover anything but ideal terrain) Rr lawsuit is more in line with any shareholder lawsuit that is small potatoes like I seen those same ones on rklb and asts back when they were under 10. That said not sure RR will make it but I bought 2k share at like 50 cents and it worked out for me. I think that industry is a bit tough though as there are so many established locations setup to use cheap labor that getting places to convert to an automated setup will be slow and not worth the risk/reward to mass convert even if a good solution came out. That said what I have seen of RR is their robot sorta works in that setting as a novelty. It's a fun thing to serve drinks etc but doesn't have to replace a full kitchen. They could leverage that for more ..but I agree I think it is just as likely they go belly up with little warning one day.
They are undervalued, if you wish to bet in big returns in a few years those are good. $RR if AI is a success robotics will be the next thing that would be needed and they certainly deliver. $BULL profitable stock, it is severely undervalued. If you want something a little more realistic go with the comment below and stack on AMD and TSMC.
SERV is more focused on delivery so not really what I'm looking for. And RR does not have good fundamentals and is facing lawsuits. Was hoping for something more promising but you are at the same conclusion as me about what's out there. Thanks for sharing
Only one I know of at all close to it are RR and SERV...id say RR is better but both could be 0 in a few years
I am an executive chef and have opened and managed many restaurants in my career. I believe that automation is the future of restaurants and was looking into companies to invest in that are doing that. It looks like Richtech Robotics (RR) is the only publicly traded company that's doing the type of thing I want to invest in. That being said, the company has a lot of issues including lawsuits they're facing. Does anyone here have thoughts on this company or any other companies to suggest that are working in this space? SERV isn't really what I'm looking for because that's mostly delivery.
>Rolls-Royce Holdings (RR.L), opens new tab is expected to announce alongside its annual results this week that it will launch a fresh share buyback worth as much as 1.5 billion pounds ($2 billion), Sky News reported on Sunday. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/rolls-royce-return-more-than-1-billion-pounds-shareholders-buyback-sky-news-2026-02-22/
Yes- META, also broke ground in September on Aurora and were awarded three of the eleven total Reactor Pilot Program projects by DOE to fast-track deployment. Their 2027/2028 FOAK commercialization target is far ahead of IMSR, RR and SMR which are all mid-2030s and they have like $2.5B cash with a strong balance sheet and proven tech.
Yep it overweights it well. I like that part of it. I’ve seen Ben Felix say in one of his RR episodes that he weights it almost 30% but that might be a bit much 😅
Yeah, I think so bro. I’m about to rotate into longer term investments cause this gets too stressful. RR and RDDT and RZLV are about to be my only holds starting next month
$RR and $HIMS both extremely oversold w tremendous upside
$RR $HIMS $ABR just buy aggressively and hold patiently. All 3 oversold like crazy.
Just buy $3 and $4 calls on $RR and you will #10x
I would have agreed that it’s extremely optimistic before the creation of the DOE’s Reactor Pilot Program (to which RR is not a part of.) DOE has unilateral authority to fast-track the build and initial operation- Oklo started construction back in September and is on track towards that target, could even happen slightly sooner. Regardless, we’re talking like 8 years ahead of RR in a region with more demand- it’s not even close.
First Aurora from Oklo is expected to generate commercial power by late 2027 / early 2028, Rolls Royce is expected to by mid-2030s and isn’t even on the top-10 list domestically here in the U.S., much more limited to European market. Also, Oklo has a build/own/operate model which is hyper scalable and allows them to project finance debt through PPAs by selling power, whereas RR just sells the equipment. Given the first mover advantage, business model and domestic data center demand, it’s apples and oranges IMO.
That fake 50% pump on RR was insane. Garbage company lying about a deal with MSFT. Sold off even harder than before the announcement to punish them.
That’s alright bro 17% isn’t much. That’s one week of well executed 1:2RR trades making 15-20%
$RR and $HIMS both extremely oversold and will see massive upside from current prices
Yep. Power generation, whatever the thermal source, needs turbines. I bought RR and Mitsubishi for the same reason.
RR rich tech looking super cheap right now
GE (alone) doesn't make a *single* currently in production engine for single aisle commercial aircraft. They have a partnership (I wanna say 50/50 but it might be slightly off) with SAFRAN in France for the production and sale of the (single most popular aircraft engine in history if I'm not mistaken) in the CFM56/CFM-LEAP engines. All GE branded commercial aviation turbofans currently in production go on *nothing* smaller than a twin aisle 767(which is currently only sold as a Freighter or Military derivative variant), and soon the smallest will be the 787. Rolls Royce on the other hand (aviation wise) basically exclusively commercially powers twin aisle Airbus planes. Their last single aisle partnership was the (admittedly still in production but in only one new built aircraft, the military KC-390 transporter) IAE V-2500. Both make and sell private and military powerplants as well. Either way, GE & RR are*THE* industry leaders. They have an effective duopoly on the large commercial aircraft & long-range private aircraft turbofan market, among other similar sectors.
nope RR is rolls royce on the LON, you guys really need to get ibkr and stop paying OTC/international fees to your brokers and banks.
The Trent (RR) is operated in wide bodies, the GEs are mainly for single aile.
I often look at comments like this at someone in the industry and realise how little I know about others. Every airline is planning to transit to GE over the next gen ac. RR has been unreliable and expensive over the past few years
RR is Richtech Robotics. That's the RR I hold. Rolls Royce is RYCEF.
I’ve been holding 200 shares of RR for a year now.
Jerome: The Last Adult in the Room A movie directed by Christopher Nolan on the book written by George RR Martin Jerome portrayed by Denzel Washington Score by Hans Zimmer
RR is dumb. They offer high-capex luxuries to low-capital, low-margins industries in a field that competes directly with Tesla. They should either invent a *practical* robot for everyday consumers (my preference) or select 'advisors' with defence contacts, because the barista shtick isn't going to work out. Similar story with BBAI. I got a lot out of them (put it all in TMC and Zijin Mining). They're a serious company and they're an old company, so they're doing something right. But they're competing with Palantir, Securitas, Wisekey, Anduril, etc. That's just not viable long-term. So either they develop niche offerings or get out of the defence pool entirely.
Ooh, RR. The one that's down 26% in the last month?
Stop running after pump and dumps, you wanna get rich, invest in real companies penny stocks. RR, RZLV, BBAI.. this is make you rich not shitty P&D
Matters a lot bc institutional money doesn’t wanna touch stocks w low liquidity bc the price goes up a lot when u buy and goes down a lot when u sell and u can’t really get in or out without over paying in and price collapsing on ur exit so only retail money will touch it. $RR has healthy volume and institutional holders and interest
Too little daily volume of shares and down too much over the years - not enough liquidity and bad bet. $RR way better play and much stronger balance sheet
$HIMS $RR $ABR buying all 3 heavily at massive discounts and will #HODL these #multibaggers for years 🤑
$RR and $ONDS getting crushed. Small caps decimated. When big drop?
I appreciate your insight, it's helped manage the FOMO after watching the price action over the last couple of months. I'm glad to know that some of my fears weren't as ambiguous as I thought they were. I'm eager to see what the next couple of months entails for PLSR, the concept of helium-3 on its own has been a very fun rabbit hole to delve into, I had no idea about it's significance until I saw your comment about PLSR and looked a bit closer, especially with the R&D momentum that RR SMRs have built up over the last 5 years. ☺️
Next week tickers CAN GPUS RR
#Stupid Crypto Talking Point #2 (Number go up) "**NuMb3r g0 Up!!!**" / "**Best performing asset of the decade!**" / "**Everyone who bought is "up" right now**" 1. Whether the "price of crypto" goes up, has absolutely no bearing on whether it's.. a) A long term store of value b) Holds any intrinsic value or utility c) Or will return any value in the future One of the most important tenets of investing is the simple principal: ***Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.*** People in crypto seem willfully ignorant of this basic concept. 2. At best, the price of crypto is a function of *popularity*, not actual value or material utility. And this ["popularity" has been waning for years.](https://news.gallup.com/poll/692777/cryptocurrency-limited-main-street-appeal.aspx) Also [transactions per block for bitcoin have stalled since 2023](https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transactions_per_block). For more on how and why crypto makes a much worse investment than almost anything else, see this [article](https://ioradio.org/i/value/). 3. The "price of crypto" is a heavily [manipulated](https://www.npr.org/2025/09/17/nx-s1-5543415/the-crypto-market-is-hot-but-is-it-an-illusion) figure published by shady, [unregulated crypto exchanges](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apklQgMauK4) that have systematically been caught [manipulating the market](https://open.spotify.com/episode/3D0dmTUCxLuQEJ39uyMFOP) from [then](https://www.investopedia.com/news/bots-drove-bitcoins-150to1000-rise-2013-paper/) to [now](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21). A [new 2025 Cornell study](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01686) shows **fewer than 500 people control $3.2T of artificial crypto trading!** 4. Crypto bros love to harp about "inflation" in the fiat system, yet ironically they measure the "value" of their "fiat alternative" in fiat? It makes absolutely no sense, unless you assume they haven't thought 2 seconds ahead from what comes out of their mouths. 5. It's the height of hypocrisy for crypto people to champion token deflation (and increased prices) while ignoring that there's over $160+ Billion in unsecured stablecoins being used to [**inflate** the value of their tokens in the crypto marketplace](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). The "code is law" and "don't trust - verify" people seem perfectly willing to take companies like [Tether](https://www.newsweek.com/bitcoin-bitfinex-tether-cryptocurrency-market-manipulation-historic-value-fraud-1469640) and Circle, at face value, that they're telling the truth about asset reserves [when there's very little actual evidence](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8450-21), but there is lots of evidence of [market manipulation](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). 6. ***Not Your Fiat, Not Your Value*** - Just because you think the "value of your crypto portfolio" is worth $$$ *does not make that true.* It's well known there's inadequate liquidity in this market, and most people will never be able to get their money out. So UNLESS/UNTIL you can actually liquidate your crypto for actual real money, you have no idea what you have. You're "down" until you cash out. Bernie Madoff's clients got monthly statements saying they were "making money" too. 7. Just because it's possible (though highly improbable) to make money speculating on crypto, this doesn't mean it's an **ethical** or reliable technique to amass wealth. At its core, the notion that buying and holding crypto will generate reliable returns is [a de-facto ponzi scheme](https://ioradio.org/i/ponzi/). **It's mathematically impossible for even a stastically-significant percentage of crypto holders to have any notable ROI.** The rare exception of those who might profit in this market, do so while providing cover for everything from [cyber terrorism](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3026.html) to [human trafficking](https://humantraffickingfront.org/cryptocurrency-use-in-the-online-sexual-exploitation-of-children/). 8. It's also not true that anybody who bought crypto when it was low is guaranteed to make a lot of money. There are thousands of ways people can lose their crypto or be defrauded along the way. And there's no guarantee just because your portfolio is "up", that you could easily cash out. 9. While crypto suggests itself as an alternative to "TradFi", the [most respected and successful people](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/warren-buffett-predicts-bad-ending-bitcoin-it-doomed-investment) in traditional finance who have proven track records of good investing/returns [do not think crypto is a reliable store of value](https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/article/cryptocurrencies-and-vanguard-what-we-think). 10. Want to see a better asset (that actually has utility) that's consistently out-performed Bitcoin? [Here you go](https://www.polygon.com/2021/1/27/22253079/magic-the-gathering-black-lotus-auction-price-2021). However, this may be another [best performing asset](https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/declaration-of-financial-independence/). 11. When crypto-critics make reference to, or mock crypto price predictions, it's not because we think price is a meaningful metric. Instead, we are amused that to you, that's all that's important, and we can't help but note how often wrong you are in your predictions. The intrinsic value of crypto basically never changes, but it is interesting to see how hype and propaganda affects the extrinsic value. In a totally logical world, those would both be equalized to zero, but we're not there yet, and nobody knows when/if that will happen because it's an irrational market.
>In case you don’t know what I’m talking about look up the bitcoin halving cycle. It’s what drew me to bitcoin in the first place. Imagine if, every 4 years like clockwork, half the world’s gold mines disappeared from the planet. This is essentially how bitcoin works, and it’s the most powerful and predictable price driving mechanism that has ever existed imo. I'm very well aware of what you're talking about. That "halving cycle" is bullshit. Suffice to say, if you have a critical mass of greater fools you and easily corruptable media, you can put forth any narrative you want. That doesn't make it true though. The whole notion of "price" in crypto is soft. The entire market is heavily manipulated. #Stupid Crypto Talking Point #2 (Number go up) "**NuMb3r g0 Up!!!**" / "**Best performing asset of the decade!**" / "**Everyone who bought is "up" right now**" 1. Whether the "price of crypto" goes up, has absolutely no bearing on whether it's.. a) A long term store of value b) Holds any intrinsic value or utility c) Or will return any value in the future One of the most important tenets of investing is the simple principal: ***Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.*** People in crypto seem willfully ignorant of this basic concept. 2. At best, the price of crypto is a function of *popularity*, not actual value or material utility. And this ["popularity" has been waning for years.](https://news.gallup.com/poll/692777/cryptocurrency-limited-main-street-appeal.aspx) Also [transactions per block for bitcoin have stalled since 2023](https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transactions_per_block). For more on how and why crypto makes a much worse investment than almost anything else, see this [article](https://ioradio.org/i/value/). 3. The "price of crypto" is a heavily [manipulated](https://www.npr.org/2025/09/17/nx-s1-5543415/the-crypto-market-is-hot-but-is-it-an-illusion) figure published by shady, [unregulated crypto exchanges](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apklQgMauK4) that have systematically been caught [manipulating the market](https://open.spotify.com/episode/3D0dmTUCxLuQEJ39uyMFOP) from [then](https://www.investopedia.com/news/bots-drove-bitcoins-150to1000-rise-2013-paper/) to [now](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8369-21). A [new 2025 Cornell study](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01686) shows **fewer than 500 people control $3.2T of artificial crypto trading!** 4. Crypto bros love to harp about "inflation" in the fiat system, yet ironically they measure the "value" of their "fiat alternative" in fiat? It makes absolutely no sense, unless you assume they haven't thought 2 seconds ahead from what comes out of their mouths. 5. It's the height of hypocrisy for crypto people to champion token deflation (and increased prices) while ignoring that there's over $160+ Billion in unsecured stablecoins being used to [**inflate** the value of their tokens in the crypto marketplace](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). The "code is law" and "don't trust - verify" people seem perfectly willing to take companies like [Tether](https://www.newsweek.com/bitcoin-bitfinex-tether-cryptocurrency-market-manipulation-historic-value-fraud-1469640) and Circle, at face value, that they're telling the truth about asset reserves [when there's very little actual evidence](https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8450-21), but there is lots of evidence of [market manipulation](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195066). 6. ***Not Your Fiat, Not Your Value*** - Just because you think the "value of your crypto portfolio" is worth $$$ *does not make that true.* It's well known there's inadequate liquidity in this market, and most people will never be able to get their money out. So UNLESS/UNTIL you can actually liquidate your crypto for actual real money, you have no idea what you have. You're "down" until you cash out. Bernie Madoff's clients got monthly statements saying they were "making money" too. 7. Just because it's possible (though highly improbable) to make money speculating on crypto, this doesn't mean it's an **ethical** or reliable technique to amass wealth. At its core, the notion that buying and holding crypto will generate reliable returns is [a de-facto ponzi scheme](https://ioradio.org/i/ponzi/). **It's mathematically impossible for even a stastically-significant percentage of crypto holders to have any notable ROI.** The rare exception of those who might profit in this market, do so while providing cover for everything from [cyber terrorism](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3026.html) to [human trafficking](https://humantraffickingfront.org/cryptocurrency-use-in-the-online-sexual-exploitation-of-children/). 8. It's also not true that anybody who bought crypto when it was low is guaranteed to make a lot of money. There are thousands of ways people can lose their crypto or be defrauded along the way. And there's no guarantee just because your portfolio is "up", that you could easily cash out. 9. While crypto suggests itself as an alternative to "TradFi", the [most respected and successful people](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/warren-buffett-predicts-bad-ending-bitcoin-it-doomed-investment) in traditional finance who have proven track records of good investing/returns [do not think crypto is a reliable store of value](https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/article/cryptocurrencies-and-vanguard-what-we-think). 10. Want to see a better asset (that actually has utility) that's consistently out-performed Bitcoin? [Here you go](https://www.polygon.com/2021/1/27/22253079/magic-the-gathering-black-lotus-auction-price-2021). However, this may be another [best performing asset](https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/declaration-of-financial-independence/). 11. When crypto-critics make reference to, or mock crypto price predictions, it's not because we think price is a meaningful metric. Instead, we are amused that to you, that's all that's important, and we can't help but note how often wrong you are in your predictions. The intrinsic value of crypto basically never changes, but it is interesting to see how hype and propaganda affects the extrinsic value. In a totally logical world, those would both be equalized to zero, but we're not there yet, and nobody knows when/if that will happen because it's an irrational market.
Please be careful with this company . There’s lots of companies that have much better tech. RR got a nice pump last summer with all the other robotics / tech companies . Fair value is like $150m market cap
Agree on everything. Would add space stocks like ASTS / RKLB. Those companies are great but have no earnings. Market showed that even best earnings for best companies recently give 1-5 min pump and it goes down. All stocks with no p/e like ONDS/RCAT, SOUN,BBAI, RR etc started to go down during ATH and didn’t bottom at 200 EMA/VWA Same goes for PLTR. It was no brainer buy all that time recently not since that fold from 205 AH from previous ideal ER. This ER was 2x better than previous and that shit did fold like crazy. Also everyone laughs and say but the dip, trump will not make market go down etc. this makes me think bottom is not in. Looks like there gonna be relief rally’s which will fill like we out of the woods but those who thinks for a living know we ain’t out of the woods from October 10. Also BTC was good first indicator that there is no money for premium non existent currency. Can be V reversal anyway…
I like RR in general. Cool company and big growth potential (maybe explosive).
Microsoft put out a PR stating there's no commercial deal between them and RR. RR is super volatile, anything could happen but there's no deal.
Buying a lot of $HIMS $ABR and $RR today
Capex fight to the death is modern day Game of Thrones, George RR Martin is writing earnings calls 🤣
I can't believe I didn't exit my RR 6 calls at 5.85.. noooo there will be another break past 6 I told myself. I did sell my shares though, for a loss at 4.57 lol.
There are two accounts I've seen on various subs and even another site, pumping RR. It's probably one user, since the comments are the same and even screenshots. It's hilarious to me.
Who have I hated on? I'm generally quite positive and supportive of people on here unless they are being snarky snowflakes like you appear to be. All I am saying; just seems super suspect that you signed up for Reddit a day after the Lawsuit against RR was filed, and all you have done is post in its defense? Seems like something a desperate small corporation might do to keep it's stock from plummeting even further or have the Reddit masses shorting it. I'll be happy to pass along your handle to the FTC so they can look into it though. Cheers
Ok. Follow the herd. Go buy $BTC at $120k then freak out when it’s $73k. No vision. $RR is the future
More research and this popped up... Microsoft Collaboration Disputed By Hunterbrook Report Hunterbrook says Microsoft described Richtech's role as a standard AI Co-Innovation Lab customer engagement with "no commercial element," contradicting Richtech's earlier claim of a "close collaboration." The report argues that excitement over the announcement lifted Richtech's market value by more than $370 million before the company revealed a $38.7 million private placement the next morning, fueling concern investors overestimated the tie-up. # Filing Delay Weighs On Sentiment The report also highlights Richtech's delayed 10-K filing, warning it could complicate fundraising and potentially invite Nasdaq deficiency notices. The filing shows fiscal 2025 revenue of about $5 million against a net loss near $15.8 million, underscoring heavy cash burn and dependence on issuing new shares. Hunterbrook's critique also follows earlier claims from short seller **Capybara Research**, which previously labeled Richtech a "China Hustle" and alleged rebranded robots and fabricated partnerships. **Hunterbrook Capital**, an affiliate of Hunterbrook Media, disclosed a short position in RR, further pressuring the stock. **RR Price Action:** Richtech Robotics shares were down 2.26% at $3.92 at the time of publication on Friday, according to Benzinga Pro data.
Incorrect. This is public info. Microsoft praises their collaboration with $RR on Microsoft official website
Ha, the first thing that came up when I searched for "RR" stock is a class action lawsuit alleging potential violations of the Securities Exchange Act. [https://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2026/02/04/10327230.htm](https://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2026/02/04/10327230.htm)
>Exactly! The market doesn’t understand this yet about $RR and when they do it’ll #10x 🚀 Did you just respond to yourself?
Exactly! The market doesn’t understand this yet about $RR and when they do it’ll #10x 🚀
Take a look. Yes humanoid very expensive but u don’t need humanoid to make a coffee or a drink. $RR perfect solution for low cost labor, mass deployment
Steering clear of AI stocks while the dust settles. I think robots are the next phase of it, but the capex disillusionment phase is just beginning, and robots are extremely expensive to build. Good luck though, you might be right. Haven’t heard much about RR outside of investor circles, and I work in robotics.
I’m selling massive $RR $3 puts w massive premiums right now 🚀
Why wtf are all these gay ass tech companies spending so much on this trash anyways? Why not just buy everyone a BMW s1000RR and the productivity gains from everyone getting around so much quicker would be a much better return on investment than this garbo. Like can we make these dunces do something useful with their money, I swear to god they would rather just light it on fire than give poor people a dime LOL
US debt is like 120k per person, literally 4 BMW s1000rr M editions. I dont even have one Bmw s1000rr M edition, what a fucked up deal. The US government should at least give me a BMW s1000RR for my part in this sham.