SER

BstardSun

I was thinking a # SER8 Mini PC, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS(4nm, 8C/16T) up to 4.9GHz, Mini Computer 24GB DDR5 RAM 8TB M.2 NVME & # WiFi6/BT5.2/2.5Gbps NORMAL Ryzen with upgraded storage, do you think this would be straight for3 to 4 years? Thank you.

BradleyRettler

There are three concerns here: oligarchy, bitcoin distribution, hashrate distribution. Let’s take them in turn. First, is the bitcoin network oligarchic? That is, do a small group of people have control over the network? There I think we can confidently answer “no”. The bitcoin network is run by over a hundred thousand nodes, and each node chooses the version of the bitcoin software they want to run. We can look to the Bitcoin Cash hard fork to see that when a small group of wealthy powerful individuals attempted to exert control over the network, they failed. So, the network isn’t oligarchic. But bitcoin the asset might be. And it would be, if the majority of holdings were centralized in a small percentage of holders. But that’s not the case. Bitcoin is the most decentralized cryptocurrency in terms of holders. We can see this from two measures. First, the Supply Equity Ratio, which is the ratio of supply held by addresses with less than one ten-millionth of the current supply of native units to the supply held by the top one percent of addresses.” Even among the most widely distributed coins, Bitcoin has a SER around 50% higher than ethereum and 200% higher than litecoin. The second measure is the Network Distribution Factor, which is the ratio of supply held by addresses with at least one ten-thousandth of the current supply of native units to the current supply. Here, lower is better, and bitcoin has half the NDF of Ethereum and Litecoin. (Given the number of cryptocurrencies and the length of the book, we couldn’t compare many, but check out your favored cryptocurrency’s numbers and compare them to bitcoin.) Finally, is mining centralized? Here again the answer seems to be “no”. The largest miners are pools, containing hundreds or thousands of individuals who can choose to come and go at any time. If a pool’s hash rate is getting high enough to be worrisome, miners can direct their hashrate to another pool. So, I don’t think that bitcoin is oligarchic at the network, asset, or mining level.

beerbaron105

Speak for yourself SER

spid3rfly

I wonder what the difference is between the two. They're listed the exact same way except the ticker is different. I'm also curious about the ARKC. It has EA SER TR ARK 21SHARES ACTIVE ON-CHA next to it. I know that says on chain but I wonder if that's bitcoin related or something else altogether.

Liarus_

Vertcoin 100Day ventures Cubo Vapor Nodes Yield Nodes Freeway (kinda but not really dead) SER Token Peew

reed5point0

[SER](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/537e0722e4b0c3338dfc5521/1407011482913-NPBFV8J3Z2ZF5GQGXYBP/question-31842991.jpeg)

Liarus_

My time to shill $SER

Nearby_You_313

Because he died well before it became a big thing. It's really not that mysterious. Why don't you know about that one loner guy who just created the next star wars-type universe that'll get popular in ten years but got in a car accident this morning? HOW DO YOU NOT KNOW, SER?

KAX1107

Correct, because until 2008 we never had money that could not be [debased](https://www.tcd.ie/Economics/assets/pdf/SER/1997/Catherine_Downey.pdf) or [counterfeited](https://twitter.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1633717502332084228). When someone talks about inflation, they're only talking about monetary inflation which only the [man with the printer](https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/11rtheu/theres_an_infinite_amount_of_cash_at_the_weimar/) is capable of effecting. ["Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon"](https://twitter.com/banthebbc/status/1636337314744922112)

xmlify

Your question defines the term, Bitcoin **Dust**, and the problem so tiny not worth the tranaction fee to spend/move. There are two problems which historically folks have worried about in regard to dust: (1) dusting attacks, where someone, without asking, sends one of your addresses a miniscule amount to try to perhaps track you by distrupting or eroding privacy, (2) too many tiny transactions clogging network throughput, this problem is currently addressed by a dust limit in the Bitcoin core software (however there's been some debate,discussion to remove the dust limit) Here's the code snipit, ` bool IsDust(int64_t nMinRelayTxFee) const { // "Dust" is defined in terms of CTransaction::nMinRelayTxFee, // which has units satoshis-per-kilobyte. // If you'd pay more than 1/3 in fees // to spend something, then we consider it dust. // A typical txout is 34 bytes big, and will // need a CTxIn of at least 148 bytes to spend, // so dust is a txout less than 54 uBTC // (5460 satoshis) with default nMinRelayTxFee return ((nValue*1000)/(3*((int)GetSerializeSize(SER_DISK,0)+148)) < nMinRelayTxFee); } `

lucidvein

Overreaction due to fear and ties to Alameda/FTX & the SER token. Ecosystem is still about 1/6th as large as ETH.. about 1/2 of the transactions.. and at 1/100th of the price. It's not a broken algo coin. Google will run its validators as well. Solana is a buy here (at least vs other cryptos) you can remind me in a year.

IWillKillPutin2022

Lmao! SER

Effsy

EXCUSE ME, SER, WHERE CC TG PLZ??? &#x200B; thankyou :\]

LightninHooker

This is crypto dude. 1% up PUMP WHY PUMP SER 1% down WHY DUMP SER RUG PULL WEN PUMP