PLUS

SamLeCoyote_Fix_1

Wrong, may score for $PLUS is 2/10 !!

IllustriousBaker1776

if youre looking at gold juniors check out the Greenland angle too. theres a deposit on the southeast coast with 7M oz gold PLUS 17M oz palladium. the palladium side is actually the bigger story given Russia controls 40% and just got tariffed 132%. different risk profile than Ontario juniors but the resource is legit (NI 43-101)

SeekCapital2020

I’m 64 years old and retired. I live off my Bitcoin savings, Social Security, Company 401k and my trading ability. I enjoy researching the market and I also spend time leverage trading Crypto daily. I’ve been following UI PATH for the past year and haven’t seen a better opportunity to benefit from in quite some time. At $11/share and a 35% drop in the Software Sector, this AI Company with ZERO DEBT and 1.4 BILLION in cash and over 10,000 customers, will easily see $20 by the end of this year and it will all start with their earnings report on MARCH 11 ! I’m in for over 10k in LEAPS for JAN 2027, but also bought 1k of in the money calls expiring on 3/13/26. DYOR and thank me later. Their MAESTRO AI product is being adopted by their clients and will allow them to combine RPA (Robotic Process Automation) currently in place. SOFTWARE PLUS AI = $$$

ICE-FlGHT

Can anyone please tell me what the fuck google did? It was JUST AT 340 PLUS

jsands7

I’m a totally different person way down in the comment section and I have decided… /drum roll please… that you are smart, this was a fancy hedging strategy, and that you deserve both your winnings PLUS additional tips of the hat from the community. Godspeed, good sir.

SimilarTap1419

PALANTIR WILL ROCKET TO 200.00 PLUS PER SHARE ON MONDAY $$$$$$$ PLTR controls the battlefield and is actively eliminating Iranian leadership. So proud to have Palantir in our corner.

EnCroissantEndgame

You're not outperforming though. You're pretending like you get this benefit of a guaranteed 8% per year for little to no cost, just wait right? The cost that you pay for this is immense. You lose all the payments you would have received for those 8 years, PLUS all risk-free return that can be made from short term US treasuries. Explain to me how this is worth it? Show me the math you're doing where it comes out ahead.

Lunar_Excursion

ACHIEVE-3 Orfo 36mg : 9.2% weight loss and 2.2% A1c reduction at 52 weeks Orfo 12mg: 6.7% weight loss and 1.9% A1c reduction at 52 weeks Sema 14mg: 5.3% weight loss and 1.4% A1c reduction at 52 weeks PIONEER PLUS Sema 14mg: 4.7% weight loss and 1.5% A1c reduction at 52 weeks Sema 25mg: 7.3% weight loss and 1.8% A1c reduction at 52 weeks Sema 50mg: 8.5% weight loss and 2.0%A1c reduction at 52 weeks

Haunting_Pilot4844

CTM Castellum PSTV PLUS THERAPEUTICS

SweetVsSavory

lol - so, they also said Trumps Tariffs are illegal. Market rose, why? Well, companies have already raised prices and passed on the costs to consumers. Companies will get “refunds”/ tax breaks, but they will not return the prices to pre tariff pricing, growing profit margins, PLUS, they will get refunds and breaks…

simao_sabrosa

Turn 10k into 300$ last November and I just made it back last Friday PLUS an extra 3k!

Itchy-Solution3726

''A big short term issue is their current obligations coming up, they will HAVE to dilute/offer shares as part of the payment arrangement, no two ways about it, and then refinance their debt, they have a LOT of money coming due soon, and so this indicates about a 15% dilution, PLUS more debt.'' I like the CEO's reaction to this. People tend to worry about the payment obligations, because their recent acquisitions are too succesfull. What do you prefer, a too succesfull acquistion, or a poor acquisition? He prefers the first option (and me too, actually). The market is bearish because of too succesfull acquistions... Sounds ironic.

Better-Specialist479

You carry forward the full amount and apply against total gains PLUS $3k against ordinary income.

Fine-Craft3393

Wouldn’t this mean ~25% combined tariffs on most imports from EU ? 15% negotiated tariffs with EU trade deal PLUS another 10% on top? Hard to see EU not retaliating if this sticks…

Whos_of_Whoville

Or you could charge $10 for services behind the Wendy’s. 10 appointments per day for a five day workweek is $500. PLUS tips are TAX FREE!!

EveryPassage

Assuming 3% inflation, $6M is roughly equally to a little over $3.3M today. At a conservative withdrawal rate of 3% that's $100k a year. PLUS social security, which for a married couple in your shoes is likely at least another $30k a year (even more possibly) Not sure, why that is not enough to live on. That's a very nice income, especially if you have your home paid for.

xandel434

They also changed the sauces and added some dumb items. PLUS they added that stupid AI drive through thing that actually make me upset to order.

TheSmartest_idiot

A big short term issue is their current obligations coming up, they will HAVE to dilute/offer shares as part of the payment arrangement, no two ways about it, and then refinance their debt, they have a LOT of money coming due soon, and so this indicates about a 15% dilution, PLUS more debt. Sure, it is not a bad business, and I own quite a bit, but, thats their current negative. The neutral/uncertainty is also big, they are very reliant on current monetiziation of places, via affiliate links, which may or may not remain profitable long term, they are trying to get away from this, but it is still a big risk of displacement. Their larger growing segments of recurring revenue like optic odds, are "overpriced" many say aswell so it isn't certain those will remain popular long term/that those services will remain necessary forever. I think they're a great cigar butt though, I don't think they will last forever, but if the business can maintain for 10 years, which I do expect, and then slowly taper off, I think it'll do well as an investment, with their debt paid off after only a few years, they will be printing money for a little while.

Active_Afternoon665

Thanks. Lets imagine 2 scenarios: 1) its a $30 spread - 116 x MU 420 2/13 and sold -136 x MU 450 C 2/13 PLUS another 20 of the same shorts with 20 x MU 420 3/6. MU has now steadily climbed to $425 ($25 is either far enough away or way too close) up and its approaching my short call strike ($450) and due to the quantity, I dont want to make another very expensive mistake by closing out immediately. 2) MU opens at $460, $10 higher than my short? Bc of qty, I don't make a 5 or 6 digit mistake. Thank you all!

Sagelllini

Because when you "stop playing the game" you tend to lose in the long run, especially when you factor in inflation. [Here are the numbers.](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q_Ws85WaWWbvAgXgc-_RDo99mZjOOx5uBgMWakuAPLA/edit?usp=drivesdk) Start with $20MM, 4.7% return, 4% withdrawal rate, 3% inflation. After 8 years, your portfolio starts to decrease. You run out of money when you are 34 years in. I guess that's OK if you were 70 when you started; 50 not so much. To maintain the economic value of a portfolio, your returns need to be your withdrawal rate PLUS 3% for inflation. At a 4% withdrawal rate, the Mendoza line is 7%. And 4.7% guaranteed ain't 7%.

friendlessghost

>BALANCED BUDGET, PLUS. WOW! Did he turn into the doge meme?

Numerous-Process2981

hahah “BALANCED BUDGET, PLUS. WOW!” hahaha

Cold-Bowl-8480

So tsla offers 0 dte only Fridays And 2 weeks of earnings I do trade based on the pattern of SPY & TSLA PLUS NEWS 9 30 TO 10 00 IDEAL FOR ME After that time, I wait for the move lole 11 30 , 12 30 or 2 pm based on pattern ( trend)

skycake10

If we could make robots in a traditional form factor that had the dexterity of humans we could configure warehouses to suit that. The problem is that reproducing the dexterity of humans in any robot form factor is really hard. Humanoid robots have that problem PLUS the additional problem of locomotion. It's a fundamentally stupid idea that sounds really cool as long as you don't think about it too much, which makes it perfect for Elon Musk. It's also not a given that we'll be able to easily make robots that are actually cheaper to operate in the long run than a $15/hour or whatever human laborer.

salacious_lion

Fuckers are trying to flush RDDT after that massive beat and raise, PLUS buyback

GeoLogic23

Btw it looks like that is a pouch company owned by Turning Point Brands. Turning Point has always been close to the cannabis industry. They own Zig Zag and have had investments in cannabis brands like Old Pal and Marley CBD. Their stock has also been doing great the last couple years. Was Anthony Varrell the TDR guy who was an early investor in PLUS Products? I think I heard one of them was.

PreparationEasy4024

He'll do better. Will spend 30k, PLUS SHIPPING

NoRhubarb2277

SOAR is merging with M2i, a critical earth company that has large copper reserves BASED on the recent large repricing of rare earths, think silver and gold, the copper valuation is largely off on their most recent balance sheet and this make their valuation much greater than what it is, buy if you want; however, it's a great opportunity PLUS what no one is saying is that they turned off their ATM till June SO NO DILUTION

spartanburt

That would be a dumb time to short gold.  Silver is basically that PLUS a supply deficit, and banks having to unwind shorts.  Truly WSB all-star hall of fame type stuff here.

opo113

I strongly suspect that SOFI will have tailwinds during the second half of this year due to changes to federal student loan availability. Graduate PLUS loans will no longer be available starting July 2026. Without Grad PLUS loans, more student borrowers will need to turn to private loans. SOFI's business model targets young high-earning customers, so it is very well situated to offer loans to borrowers who will be able to repay. I have SOFI shares and LEAPS right now. I think I was too early on the LEAPS, down 15% and will probably sell. I'll be selling CCs and accumulating shares until around July, and I might buy more LEAPS after the Grad PLUS changes go into effect.

Goody2Shoes92

Ok guys honestly I've been happy using ChatGPT PLUS (20$ monthly) and the live conversation mode of it... I just got a Pixel and it comes with free Gemini Pro....... Yeah there's no contest. Gemini is 100000% better what the FUCK GOOGL 420c

TheRealDevDev

since late 2022/early 2023 it's gone line this: end of remote work (return to office). 2 rounds of layoffs totaling 30k+ right before the RTO as well (my RTO date was may 2023). from there we shifted from hybrid (3 days in office, 2 remote) to full in office with no remote. then as of 6-ish months ago they pushed a "return to hub" where many/most employees need to move to a hub location (so Seattle/Virginia) by a certain point or lose your job. then the recent news is 2 more rounds of layoffs (around 30k total again) PLUS they released a new internal tool to flag folks who aren't in office by a certain time and/or spending "x" amount of hours in office which has never been a thing for salaried employees at amazon historically speaking. basically at this point i just feel like a cuck if i stay, lol.

Acceptable_Maybe7490

It.would be a tax advantage whether or not your tax rate in retirement is higher/lower. You're thinking of the difference between a 401k contribution or a Roth, as opposed to 401k vs Brokerage. For sake of argument in a simplistic scenario, say OP has an extra $1,000 income to invest for retirement. If he goes with a brokerage, he really only gets to contribute 75-78% (or $780ish dollars) of that now because taxes are due now. But if he goes with a 401k he gets to contribute the full $1,000, which means that the extra $220 will grow and compound for years. So in retirement: Brokerage: Pay taxes on whatever $780 compounds to by retirement (minus $780) 401k: Pay taxes on whatever $780 compounds to PLUS whatever $220 amounts to by retirement. The 401k will have significantly more money.

anonkraken

10 PLUS

kkyonko

"**Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace"** Participation trophy.

kkyonko

“Dear Jonas: **Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace,** although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”

ImpossibleProfit7518

i dont think there is any "think" about it. the stats would back it up. i get 33 days holiday a year PLUS a week for christmas and another for easter. i go on at least 1 foreign holiday a year. and this is with 2 kids. tell me, how many americans get anything like that.

BankSyskills

Trump wants Greenland because his ego was damaged from not getting a Nobel peace prize!? Stop trying to make it intellectual. This is his reasoning: Dear Jonas, Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a "right of ownership" anyway? There are no written documents, it's only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT

Overall-Fold-9720

>Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace LMFAOO, he didn't really say that, right ?

hey-coffee-eyes

Considering my children decided not to give me the \#1 Dad mug for Christmas for having driven them to 8 soccer games PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of parenting, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for my fantasy football league

portfoliorating

Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided **not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize** for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. **I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States.** **The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.** Thank you! Pr.DJT MAN, JUST GIVE THE MAN THE NOBEL PRIZE...OMG... WHAT DOES IT COST????

GuyWithNoEffingClue

Since Wall Street didn't give me MILLIONS OF DOLLARS despite having invested 8 PLUS times, I no longer feel an obligation to play by the rules. The world is not secure unless you GIVE ME THE MONEY. Thank you!

Gardenrosethorn

jaw dropping: Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only a boat that landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT

jerrydontplay

"Dear Santa, I DESERVE an Xbox for Christmas because I did so good in school. I got straight C's PLUS my parents are the WORST. Anyway, Billy has an Xbox and I'm way better at video games. My life will be RUINED if I don't get it. Thank you! President DTJ"

lexi_con

Let me begin by quoting, in full, a letter that the president of the United States of America sent yesterday to the prime minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Støre. The text was forwarded by the White House National Security Council to ambassadors in Washington, and was clearly intended to be widely shared. Here it is: Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only a boat that landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT

Illustrious_Job1951

"Considering you counrry did not give m the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS,” Trump wrote in the text message, according to Støre. “I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

BosSF82

“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT” You can’t price in this insanity. Especially when he’s surrounded by bloodthirsty acolytes who can’t tell him No.

Maleficent-Forever-3

And then there's the news of his recent letter (from forbes): According to both [Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-19/trump-links-greenland-threats-to-nobel-peace-prize-snub?srnd=homepage-asia) and [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-tells-norway-he-no-longer-feels-obligation-think-only-peace-2026-01-19/), in his letter to the Norwegian leader, Trump wrote: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace.”

pink_ego_box

The letter from 🥭 to the PM of Norway: “Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT” Is that late stage neurosyphilis?

mr_stupid_face

🥭: “Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.” “Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. “I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”

DanTheManMachine

This 🥭letter to Norway is the most deranged shit you could imagine, even by his standards, for a certified retard. Over the weekend, Trump sent a letter to Norway’s prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre telling him that “considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace.”

Galaxy_AI

**Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace.** What a prick orange turd is really. This is fukin embarrassing.

CheekyPooh

"Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a "right of ownership" anyway? There are no written documents, it's only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT" I can't stop reading it...it's just so retarded. 

Redraft5k

You are 100% accurate here. IDK why you are getting downvotes. NO ONE not even NATO has gone in to defend Ukraine from Russia. Trump sees this and knows that no one is going to do shit PLUS, WE essentially ARE NATO. All those countries would be useless in war w/o us. Otherwise why can't they do Ukraines bidding w/o us there?

whomakesthetendies

*From Bloomberg News* Donald Trump linked his claims on Greenland to not being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in a letter the US president sent to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store. “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace,” Trump says in the letter obtained by Bloomberg. “Although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.” The Nobel Peace Prize isn’t decided by the Norwegian government but is awarded by an independent committee.

thinkmoreharder

Dramatic inflation acceleration since 2002. Banks continued creating ~$3T/yr to lend. PLUS, The Govt borrowed $8T during Bush, $11T during Obama, $10T “for CVD” + $3T or so other debt, split about equally 2019-2020 & 2021-2024. All administrations. All Congresses. Different politics. Same amounts of deficit spending.

Accomplished-Exit822

It’s more than just sending pics and messaging. They have Snap Map, which is very popular and they’re just about to monetize as well. They have Spotlight, which is like TikTok. They have Memories, which is cloud storage. They have Lenses, and they are the #1 AR company in the world by far. Let’s not forget all the data and access to 1 billion users. I mean, they just got paid $400 million by Perplexity and it’s not exclusive. Evan said he wanted to sign more deals with more AI companies. 17 million subscribers @ $750mm ARR, PLUS $6 billion in ad revenue. The numbers are no joke and they aren’t a 1-trick pony.

M_from_Vegas

Yeah I should have phrased it differently We need AT LEAST a Volkner PLUS an administration that will support the austerity measures and coming shocks Instead we have the current administration kicking out the one guy that was okay with riding the shocks out for a soft landing as he has been doing The writing is on the wall... at this point the only real hope is to follow the money... so we see fun stuff like the spike in metals because you cannot beat the whales and Good Ol Boys, you just ride the wave and hope for the best

The_Hosp75

Do you guys remember that Powell is under suspicion for misleading Congress on the…$2.5 billion PLUS renovation on the White House? Let’s get this straight. That’s more than it costs to build an AEGIS equipped Arleigh Burke class Destroyer. That’s how much to build a Super Bowl stadium like the AT&T arena in Dallas. This is just a remodel and Powell is thought to have lied and mislead Congress. Trump didn’t file charges. Please read news before getting so upset. Context: Republican lawmaker referral: :Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna} referred Powell to the DOJ for perjury charges, citing discrepancies between Powell's testimony and the actual project plans.

AgentMX7

No doubt you’ve heard all about “loopholes and tax credits”. Care to list any??? I’m willing to bet you can’t, because they’re just buzzwords people use without any understanding of the US tax code. The way the US tax system works is that it’s a progressive tax, which means people on the low income scale pay a lower percentage, and people on the higher end pay a higher percentage. PLUS deductions and tax credits are REDUCED or ELIMINATED once you reach certain income thresholds. ALSO, new taxes kick in over certain income levels (such as ObamaCare net investment tax). You sound like a very young adult that doesn’t make any money nor do his own taxes and is repeating things he doesn’t understand. Comparing one particular year of any individual, totally out of context, means absolutely ZILCH. Ignorant people love to find a year where a wealthy person, who paid millions in taxes every year for a decade, suffered a huge loss and paid no tax one year. They point to it and say “Look! I pay more than this rich guy! The system is rigged!”

ReadStoriesAndStuff

Kills me how often is asking about taking a debit extending a trade out that bled theta dry with an underlying that went completely opposite against them. Like there is a magic fix. Hell no you should not pay to roll it. For OP, JFC man, this is a terrible idea. You have a position that in 7 days expires. It has a lot of intrinsic value though - it’s deep in the money, literally the only thing on your siE. Sell the damn thing entirely before it bleeds more and get your ~32k and get back to an account size you can do something with. This thing has a Delta of damn near 1. There is no mathematical way this thing can expand in value beyond the movement QBTS makes itself this deep with that little DTE. You have no uncertainty, nearly no time, no volume at that strike, and a ticker that has been in free-fall. There is Open Interest but with the volume that low you are going to have to take a scalping on the fill to sell. But the same will be true 2/20 - your 32 contracts is a lot to dump into the market, and then you get scalped on both sides of the roll - you end up filling twice and have to make a sacrifice to the Marker Makers to unload this thing then do it again to get the Feb 20. There is no upside here. Rolling it doesn’t change that. The delta out there is the same - it’s still effectively 1 that deep. It’s just moving in near exact proportion with the underlying. You just pay 4 grand more to watch that happen for a month and lose more sleep. Your debit to reposition will evaporate into Theta decay to the seller. You have terrible TA on an overextended story stock that suggests this currently has more chance of falling than increasing. At this delta if you roll it has to make a full move back to where you started PLUS the additional debit PLUS all the other times you may have done this on it already to get to even. Do you honestly think QBTS has a snowball’s chance in hell of running back up WELL ABOVE where you opened this in 42 Days. Because if you, your broker has some more options to sell you. You need to stop being a fucking dumbass about accepting the loss, and save your damn portfolio. At best, you hold this until Thursday and close it if you want to see if it gains a sliver more from a QBTS surge. But I would try to just chunk out the sells a bit hoping they fill a little above bid as other positions unwind. Do not this expire or roll it. You are FAR sleeping with some money reclaimed before you decide what you are going to do after emotionally resetting.

TWSTrader

**If it’s good enough to screenshot, it’s good enough to sell.** I spent 14 years as an institutional Portfolio Manager, and we had a strict rule for outliers like this: **"Feed the ducks while they are quacking."** You are up 650% in roughly 6 trading sessions. That is a 3-Sigma event. The market is handing you a year's worth of P&L on a silver platter. If you hold this hoping for 700% or 800%, you are no longer trading—you are gambling on greed. **The "Free Roll" Management Strategy** You don't have to sell everything, but you *must* remove your risk. Here is how a Pro Desk manages a "Runner": 1. **The "House Money" Rule:** Sell enough contracts immediately to cover your **entire initial investment** PLUS a guaranteed 100% profit. (At 650%, this likely means selling only \~20% of your position). 2. **The "Cash Register" Rule:** Personally? I would sell **80% of the position** right now. Bank the 650% win on the bulk of the trade. 3. **The "Moon Bag":** Keep the remaining 20% of contracts as "Runners." * If ONDS keeps ripping? You still participate. * If ONDS crashes to zero tomorrow? You simply do not care, because you already banked a massive win. **The Lesson:** Paper profits are vanity. Realized profits are sanity. Don't let a 650% winner turn into a "I should have sold" story. Lock it in. If you want to learn how to structure exits systematically so you never have to guess, check out how we run the desk:[www.stockoptionstradingcommunity.com](https://www.stockoptionstradingcommunity.com)

ThaddeusJP

Sofi and other private loan lenders are going to see more business in about 7-10 months due to the elimination of the Graduate PLUS loan, its not about selling the ones already on the books with the US Government.

constructiontimeagnn

LOVE $CMPS , THEY HAD THEIR COMMERCIALIZATION WEBCAST TODAY, PLUS FDA APPROVAL FOR PTSD INDICATION, TOPLINE PHASE THREE DUE IN Q1 OF 2026 , MORE HERE: [https://x.com/ravagelaserbeak/status/2008965697968472188?s=20](https://x.com/ravagelaserbeak/status/2008965697968472188?s=20)

NutzNBoltz369

If China wants to put a "measured response" on display, taking Taiwan is not it. Plus, no smartphones and AI? That might be a PLUS for Humanity.

One_Opportunity9167

1. High fees: A lot of the money that should go to cash value in the first several years goes to the salesman's commission 2. Poor investment choices: Your IRA and 401k have various funds you can invest in; the life insurance policy has some internal investments. Your brokerage account (outside of tax-advantaged IRA/401k) has a \*ton\* of choices. 3. Opaque investment: The projection the salesman gives you at an assumed rate of return somehow doesn't actually happen, whether interest rates in general rise or fall. How would you even calculate your return when it's not tied to something you can track via a web site (or newspaper a couple decades ago) 4. Complexity. If you buy term and invest the amount that term saves you over whole/universal life insurance, you have both life insurance and investments that you can understand and access. Access might have consequences (taxes, penalty if IRA/401k), but the insurance may not allow it at all or have surrender charges. The cash value in the insurance is not really accessible if you want it, plus even when it is, the taxes on it can be complex 5. Hidden "drains": For example, if you have your cash value tied to the SP500 return, it's based off the index. But, if you owned a fund of that index, you'd be earning that PLUS the dividends it generates. That can be a 1.6% to 1.8% loss every year that's not obvious. EVERYTHING I've been able to figure out has shown that life insurance investments are suboptimal for everyone except the high income person who has maxxed out his 401k (not just the maximum match but the maximum contribution in 2025 of $23,500 unless age 50 or older \[additional catch-up contribution of $7,500\]) PLUS maxxed out a Roth. Then it MIGHT be worth the additional complexity and fees to save a bit on taxes. NOTE: This doesn't mean to avoid insurance. Make sure to protect those who depend on your income via term life insurance, but everything I see shows that it's better to separate your investments from that.

thealighthouse

I’m not saying you are, I’m saying that’s seems to be the group consensus. Just because Israel called everything anti-semitism and watered down the word doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. There seems to be an idea that if someone is Jewish they’re trying to bring about Jewish Hegemony around the world. Scroll down you’ll see someone say “look up the pornhub ceo and check early life” as if that means anything, PLUS he’s the ceo but Pornhub board is owned by a private equity firm of 5 white guys. Seems like stupid people conflate Israel with all jewish people, when in reality it’s a class thing and weirdly enough a lot of people with connections. Like out of all of our presidents, only 3 were not Protestant, but we don’t make an assumption that America is owned by a secret kabal of Protestants because then a lot of people even in this sub wouldn’t be able to go through that cognitive dissonance of not hearing a hive mind in their heads. It’s all just about using your brain, the same way you are an independent individual, some random Jewish kid is the same. That’s my opinion

cfaatwork

You don’t need SCHD at your age, your focus should be on total return, i.e., dividends PLUS capital growth. You’re unnecessarily omitting non-dividend paying stocks. Look at VTI/SCHB to capture the broader market. SCHD may make more sense if/when you may actually need to rely on dividends in 30+ years. You’re also heavy in US-only stocks. This is always a debate but I believe you should have some weighting in developed/emerging markets, like VEA & VWO. This year is a good example of international outperformance relative to domestic.

Tangentkoala

So what youre doing. You made a bet saying Silver is going to be higher than 45$ at the year end Jan 16 2026. If by January 16 2026 comes and silver reaches say 75$ You can buy silver at 45$ per every share owned. 1 contract is worth 100 shares. Granted your brram even point f you hold would be 45$ +21$ (which is what im assuming was the premum you bought it at.) = 67$ The odds of it hitting there is unlikely to me. Secondly say it hits 40$ and youre what we call out of the money. You still have an OPTION to excercise this. Albeit you'll be dumber than a sack of potatoes because you'd he paying 45$ for a share thats only 40$. Your third option is to let it expire. What this means is youre not obligated to pay for the shares. But your premium. (The 21$ you bought per share) will expire useless and you'll be out your entire investment. Now be extra careful on what options you do! Some options will Keep you ON THE HOOK. For the 21$ premium PLUS whatever the strike value is the stock price. SELLING calls or puts on margin is where a lot of theee degenerates here fuck up because they dont realize theyll be on the hook for there total investment. Robinhood generally allows 2X buying power to be used on margin. So people with 50K liquidity are able to buy 100K worth of calls and puts. When robinhood comes to collect theyll be in debt. Now the real stupid degenerates who use TD or other stock trading markets. They can do what we call Naked calls and Puts. This is where you can lose hundreds of thousands by being an idiot and not knowing the rules. Some trading sites dont have safeguards to limit naked calls and puts and your loss potential is literally infinite.

Netghod

Pay it off. If you want numbers logic to justify this recommendation, here you go: At a bare minimum you have to cover the interest with investment profits to ‘break even’. But that’s not 100% true. Inflation is approximately 4% per year (on average, some higher, some lower, but this is a slightly high estimate - the historical average from 1975-2025 is 3.6%). That means to have the ‘same’ spending power you need to grow your money by the inflation rate to have the same spending power. So, that means an investment, to truly ‘break even’ would have to cover the interest on your loan PLUS the 4% inflation rate. That means an investment would have to make a minimum of 10.8% every year to cover to the 6.8% interest on the loan not lose buying power. That means pay it off is the smart way to go, because you’re losing money (spending power) unless you can guarantee a return greater than 10.8% year over year. If your interest rate was from just before COVID in the 1.75-3.25% range it might be different. HYSAs can cover that interest pretty easily, and even with inflation rolled in, you’re looking at 5.75-8.25% increase in your investment to cover the interest costs - and if you can get a consistent 10-11% increase the market, you’re doing better to invest because you’re beating the interest+inflation. But if you have a down year on your investments, that might be problematic to cover the difference even in that ‘better’ case scenario. Note: This is grossly oversimplified but meant to provide a general idea of concerns regarding paying off your mortgage vs. investing. There are holes in this I’m sure, but it’s meant to be a generalized overview of some things to consider.

dj_is_here

Yes Groq founders created TPUs when they worked at Google but they "have" TPUs, that's still owned by Google. My point was Google isn't dependent on Nvidia as they have their own working alternatives to Nvidia's chips PLUS every other product they sell across multiple industries. 

TheInkDon1

Hi, great observations and questions! Yes, LEAPS Calls just outside 1-year. And yes, I take profit by rolling them UP in the same expiration, resetting them back to 80-delta. That cash can then be put back into more LEAPS Calls. But what I generally do with it is *buy Calls just 100-120DTE*, but still at 80-delta. That's riskier, of course, but it gives more leverage. And it's "house money," so if I lose some of it it's not a huge deal. And when the LEAPS Calls approach 365DTE I'll use some of their excess Delta to roll them OUT to the next expiration. Thus I always keep my LEAPS Calls >1y. And I do the same for the 100-120DTE Calls, always keeping them >100 days. Then whenever I have new cash from the outside (not internal profits, but deposits), it goes into LEAPS Calls. Dry powder: no, but that would definitely have been nice after Liberation (from your money) Day. I stay fully invested, because I'm trying to keep every dollar at work. And yes, that's riskier than holding shares. But I think I mitigate that to a large extent by: 1) Using ETFs vs. individual companies ("single issue" risk). 2) By monitoring daily. You don't have to watch daily--weekly would be enough--but I can't help myself, and I love the markets anyway. So I'm always making those little rolls to take out profit, etc. Another 2008 recession event: I'll ask you to read through my reply above again. It took *9 months* for the S&P to lose the first 20%. Nine MONTHS. Not long ago I said to someone I email with about this stuff that if we kept our heads down, monitored our positions, took them off when they flattened out, and screened for new ETFs to replace them, never looking at SPY or the Naz or Dow, we might not even know there *was* a bear market building in. Because the thing is, something is ALWAYS going up. I can't prove that, but I feel it in my bones. Take the SPDR sector ETFs like gold, technology, financials, industrials, T-bills, healthcare, developed world ex-US, communications, energy, emerging markets, consumer staples, utilities. Some of those you'll recognize as 'defensive' sectors, so they'll probably hold or go up a little. And I already showed in my post above what gold did during 2008. PLUS there's the inverse-index funds (not the leveraged ones, just inverse, -1) like SH, PSQ, SPDN, RWM, & DOG. When I sort by past 3-month performance (or 1-month, if I sense it's happening), those will start trickling to the top of the list. So I can buy them and be short the market, making money on the way down. As for doubling, the S&P has done 16-17% CAGR over the past 5 years. The Rule of 72 says we can divide 16% into 72 and that'll tell us how long to double: 4.5 years. Sounds like you like Nvidia: add in names like that and if you do well maybe you're doubling in 3 years? Now take my XBI example from above: 55% in 2 months = 27% per month. Divide that into 72 and see what you get. It's too stupid for me to even name, and I'm not claiming that. But to give you an idea of the power of LEAPS Calls at 80-delta, plus the 100-120DTE 80-delta Calls I buy with profits, I did [this in 3 months](https://imgur.com/a/schwab-account-statement-11oct25-BLwTnhq) this year, almost exclusively trading GLD. No new money, just aggressively plowing profits into 100-day Calls. And granted, that's not all LEAPS Calls, but to me it proved the viability of the strategy. Take care, Mike

miata_only

$TSLA will be at interstellar💫 levels by the end of January. Melon🍉 is playing his 420-dimensional chess♟ and everyone that's bearish🐻 is stuck in their plain old X, Y, and Z Cartesian coordinate system. We're about to see the new Giga Venezuela factory🏭 cranking out Cybertrucks faster than a Starship rocket could launch your mom into geosynchronous orbit🚀🚀. ALSO rumor has it battery day 🔋 in March is going to unveil a new plaid edition LiPo powered dildo that charges⚡ in 69 seconds AND comes with FSD (Full Self Dildoing) 🍆 and Cheetah mode. PLUS unlike companies in Gyna...cough cough BYD(eez nuts) 🥜...Easy E-Muskrat knows best how to run a capitalist business (aka cook the books 👨‍🍳📚).

zxc123zxc123

Probably this. If OP is still so scared then go 90/10, 80/20, 60/40, etcetcetc. If OP is still so scared after that then look into adding some alts as well either IRL (PMs) or via portfolio (energy/utes/momentum/downsideprotected/anti-vol). If OP is still so scared after even that then they should look to Ray Dalio's all weather portfolio and reconstruct it even more defensively. If OP is horrified despite all that then they could the things above and then also invest in themselves via skills/education, stockpile physical gold/pms or cold storaged crypto, make sure they are healthy, invest their mental health with therapy, pay down bad debts, built up better credit, maybe hold a bunch of physical currencies of non-US denominations (assuming they are in the US already holding USD), and invest in better human relationships. If OP is still uncomfortable with the state of the world then then they should do all of the above but also train their bodies to peak human physical condition in case society collapses back to the stone age, stockpile tons of toilet paper, then also have food/water/spirits/medicine/entertainment/necessities, have both a rural farm PLUS a private island equipped with a bunker stocked with those things, learn both the way of the sword as well as the mentality of the warrior plus mandatory firearms training, stockpile enough guns/rifles/canons/ammo/drones to outfit a small army, running should always be an option so make sure to have multiple passports/identities in case America collapses, traveling is important so they must also have a car/plane/yacht in case of escape, learn to DIY most things as well as self-medicating, develop a mental state where you can withstand extreme loneliness in case you are the only survivor left, and keep good human relationships but never tell them the truth about what you're doing in case they become dead weight in a zombie apocolyse type scenario.

HeezyB

I can’t think why any company would want to overtake Amazon? They’d need to build an entire shipping infrastructure, warehouses, airplanes, essentially an entire FedEx++ PLUS an online store front, and beat Amazon on price and experience. I can’t see why any company would try. It took them over 25 years of not being profitable to even make it work, while everyone 10-15 years ago called them Amazon.scam lol “non profitable company is going to fail”

HeezyB

I can’t think why any company would want to overtake Amazon? They’d need to build an entire shipping infrastructure, warehouses, airplanes, essentially an entire FedEx++ PLUS an online store front, and beat Amazon on price and experience. I can’t see why any company would try. It took them over 25 years of not being profitable to even make it work, while everyone 10-15 years ago called them Amazon.scam lol “non profitable company is going to fail”

PennyStonkingtonIII

For those of us who are not finance professionals, Peter Lynch said “Invest in what you know”. If you work in telecommunications, for example, you might have insight beyond the average investor in telecom stocks. When I do think I have an opportunity, what lets me hold is this personal belief PLUS having an appropriate size position. You should always be prepared to be wrong and size accordingly.

AnchezSanchez

RKLB. Successful Neutron launch in 2026 PLUS a huge SpaceX IPO will likely buoy this stock further than ever before. I first bought in at like $3.70 and have been adding ever since.

captain_flak

Yeah, I once cut a check to the IRS for $150K. Not fun. Even more not fun: They wrote me a few months later saying they had miscalculated something and I owed another $5K PLUS interest…for their mistake.

AnxiousSeason

I learned the same lesson. I was basically 50/50 into 2 stocks, and in 90 days both went down more than 50%. I also learned preservation of capital -- I had NO BUSINESS riding it down. Zero. I should have sold when I was 10-15% down. But I kept buying in, thinking I'd caught the bottom and was about to make buckets of money ...and the stocks BOTH just kept going down. PLUS I was heavy in margin (because they were dividend paying stocks) - so my perfect plans all crumbled down, and I made a lot of mistakes. So now that Ive lost a bunch, my new plan is to diversify fund types, diversify sectors, and lean more heavily into bigger blue chip type companies (GOOG, AMZN, TZLA, etc) and Im still investing in BTC too. And they also say that the only real mistake we make are the ones we dont learn from. So I see good things for your future. :) And mine I hope! ;)

lostsailorlivefree

Whenever you see these things it’s not about the logic or business aspects of the deal: it’s about the Management and Administrative Fees paid and those are paid to different sets of people in different tranches. So an “Evaluation Team” will get a fixed rate of say $2.5m to examine pros and cons and do some basic Accounting. The “Sheppard Team” will do Legal for virtually uncapped hours and rates by a Law Firm. Same for other Consulting firms including things like Personnel Eval, Real Estate etc. Some will be bites of the apple both as selling entity and buying entity (yeah- not neutral of NDAd lol). Many of these “consultants” will be insiders with little to no experience in M&A and the grift is circular because they also get the rights for the NEXT sale/merger etc. PLUS- stock insider info. The grift is somewhat risk free as no one asks to “show the work” because they’re all in on it

MerryRunaround

You are ignoring the fact that by selling the 100 strike the premium you collected included extrinsic value PLUS $993 of intrinsic value, so you did not lose any "appreciation". If stock drops to $99.99 then you can do it again. The downside risk you carry is the same downside risk you carry for owning any shares.

Aim-for-greatn3ss

GOOD obsession will make the stock go up PLUS my value and earnings will increase. I could care less of what the company is doing, Im in it until I see 500 and im selling. Then wait for the next worthy dip!

Crazy_Donkies

Instructions unclear.  Going to reduce your penis by PLUS 20%.

OutlandishnessUsed24

They're **partially correct** on mechanics, but **missing key context** for THIS specific situation. Here's my take: **Where they're RIGHT:** * Delta hedging mechanics are accurate * Gamma does amplify buying pressure as price rises * MMs hedge price risk first, not borrow availability * Near-dated ATM calls do have high gamma * This IS how GME's gamma squeeze worked **Where they're WRONG or incomplete for FLWS specifically:** **1. IV makes the math different here** IV is 170-200%+. That $1,000 doesn't buy what it normally would. Normal IV stock: $1,000 = maybe 10 ATM contracts FLWS right now: $1,000 = maybe 3-4 ATM contracts The leverage advantage they're describing is **already priced in.** You're paying a massive premium for that gamma exposure. **2. Theta is brutal at this IV** Someone in another thread: "Up 221% today, still down 65% overall." If the squeeze doesn't happen THIS WEEK, those calls go to zero. Shares don't have an expiration date. You can be early and still win with shares. Be early with weekly options and you lose everything. **3. Options create TEMPORARY pressure. Shares create PERMANENT scarcity.** When your call expires or you sell it, the MM unwinds the hedge. That buying pressure disappears. Shares you hold = shares shorts can't use to deliver. Ever. Until YOU decide to sell. For the FTD settlement thesis, shorts need ACTUAL shares to deliver. Not synthetic hedges. SEC Rule 204 requires real delivery. **4. This thesis is FTD-driven, not purely gamma-driven** GME was gamma-driven - retail piled into calls, MMs hedged, price exploded. FLWS has that dynamic PLUS mandatory FTD settlement. 527K shares MUST be delivered this week regardless of options activity. That's regulatory, not optional. Gamma is additive here. But the base case works on FTD mechanics alone. **5. The specific recommendation is risky** "Buy this week's $5 and $6 calls for maximum pressure" The $5s are barely ATM. The $6s are OTM. Both expire in 4 days. If the squeeze is Wednesday/Thursday, great. If it's delayed to next week, **those go to zero.** **6. For the NUCLEAR scenario specifically** The post above this was about the infinity squeeze - what happens if shorts literally cannot find shares. That requires SHARE SCARCITY, not hedging flows. MMs can hedge synthetically. But shorts can't deliver synthetic shares to satisfy FTDs.

FarrisAT

$40bn of treasury purchases by Fed PLUS $15bn more of bill purchases due to MBS rolloff. The Fed debt financing QE has begun! Buy assets or be left impoverished.

Vanthrowaway512

QE didn’t really exist in 1999, so we have the final melt up PLUS massive inflows to go yet.

Jackrabbit099

With the PACCAR presentation and the AABC convention, PLUS the news, DFLI has to pop soon

Available_Captain844

So you're thinking about a cash-out refi or HELOC to buy a rental property? I see this all the time.. people sitting on equity wanting to make it work for them. The thing is, you'd be looking at probably 80% LTV max on a cash-out refi, so that's $160k minus your current mortgage balance if you have one. HELOCs can go up to 90% sometimes but the rates are variable which is risky for investment properties. here's what most people don't think about - your debt-to-income ratio is gonna take a hit when you pull that equity out. You'll have a bigger payment on your primary residence PLUS you need to qualify for the rental property loan too. Banks usually only count 75% of rental income toward qualifying, and that's if you have landlord experience. Without it they might not count any rental income at all for qualification purposes. The rental market is tough right now too.. interest rates are still high so your cash flow might be negative for a while, especially after factoring in vacancy, repairs, property management if you use it. I've seen people pull equity thinking they'll make easy money on rentals but then they're stuck with two mortgages and a tenant who stops paying. Not trying to scare you but make sure you have reserves - like 6 months of payments for BOTH properties minimum before you even think about this

Happy_Discussion_536

>Please quote me where I said differently that you loon. What I have been saying this entire time is QE = reserves PLUS long duration asset purchases with intent to ease financial conditions not just reserves. u/tquinn35 Since you hide all your posts it was hard to find but here it is: >The floor/ample reserves system isn’t “easy money,” it’s stability. Maintaining ample reserves is not the same as executing QE. Maintaining "ample reserves" is targeting reserves. They will print money to target higher reserves next year. Ok you are getting way too emotional. Let's see if we can find common ground on and clarify what we agree on. * They will turn on money printer next year, without a crisis. I think this is established. * Targeting reserves is QE as per St Louis Fed. * Next year they will begin the process of targeting higher reserves to ease conditions and they hinted they will do over a long duration as the economy grows. Which meets your definition of QE. Hence they will do QE next year.

tquinn35

Please quote me where I said that you loon. What I have been saying this entire time is QE = reserves PLUS long duration asset purchases with intent to ease financial conditions not just reserves. >FYI here is where QE was first coined: >[https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340476/1/Translation\_Werner\_QE\_Nikkei\_Sep\_1995\_final1.pdf](https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340476/1/Translation_Werner_QE_Nikkei_Sep_1995_final1.pdf) >But it has evolved to what I quoted. It's reserve targeting with asset buying and that's exactly what Fed will do. What does this have to do with anything? Did I question the provenance of the QE? No I didnt. I am quite aware where it came from. https://preview.redd.it/735audnvy75g1.png?width=1394&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec4c82c86b0c5e719fdd3f12baac13488dd1f493 Since you're not editing and deleting what you said let me add this screenshot for posterity. You said it had no formal definition. I said the Fed maintains a pretty strong definition as presented by the st. lous fed. While the definition has changed since Warner introduced it, it is still defined. Also you clearly cant read cause the entire point of the fortune article is that Warner is criticizing the modern use of QE and suggests that it should be not good for the economy to keep using that way. How does that support your idea that we will continue using QE? >Personally I think you've dug in your heels way too deep with an obsession on semantics to think objectively about what is going on here. Please tell what semantics I have dug in on. You have provide zero actual factual evidence backing up any of your claims. And apparent from above, have often times presented contradictory facts to your arguments

TheInkDon1

*That* kind of synthetic (shares + Put + 4%)? Or the buy-an-ATM-Call and sell-an-ATM-Put kind of synthetic stock position? For u/foragingfish, isn't the advantage of the LEAPS Call the far-less capital invested? 100 shares PLUS paying for a protective Put is a whole lot of money compared to buying say, an 80-delta Call a year out. And from that less capital you get leverage. Thoughts? And for the synthetic long stock position that moves 1:1 with the stock, with no defined Max Loss, while the cash outlay will typically be less, the margin requirement will probably be more than the cost of an 80-delta Call a year out. At least on the few tickers I checked on OptionStrat. No theta-decay with that, granted, but the unlimited loss is a bit scary. Thoughts on that, if that's the synthetic you meant? Thanks.

Fitzcablammo

You can exchange your kid's Trump Account for right now for 50% of its value in Trump Crypto Coins! You don't have to wait! Access that beautiful Trump money right now, PLUS! receive a 5% off discount when you spend your Trump Coins at the Trump Fan Store.

Leading_Repair_4534

GAS PLUS, bought because a guy provided quite a bit of info about a deal that would make their stock spike up and it actually did, so I sold at 3.6 after building at 2.5 and I was pretty happy. Today it's at 7.

WholeSpectrumABA

It’s not a self fulfilling prophecy as much as it is a Ponzi scheme PLUS a lack of alternatives of where to place “money” for most people. If you put away a certain percentage of your money it is likely to little to buy hard assets (real estate etc) so this is the only game in town and everyone keeps buying in and so on. It will only stop once something big paradigm shift happens to the economy or some other option comes to exist.

optimaleverage

9.1% is accounted with 3%YoY inflation? It's inflation PLUS tariff taxes PLUS the retailer's take for bothering with the tariff taxes. Plus maybe a percent of actual increased business. Biggest takeaway for me here is the tariffs aren't killing demand.

Haunting_Pilot4844

No! CTM Castellum BURU NUBURU PSTV PLUS THERAPEUTICS

Haunting_Pilot4844

PSTV PLUS THERAPEUTICS CTM Castellum NUBURU BURU

Lunar_Excursion

are you serious? do you think that an FDA indication changes the pharmacological activity of a drug? do you think wegovy 25mg is something other than a higher dose Rybelsus? let's talk some facts: in the the ACHIEVE-3 trial we see orfo 12mg with 6.7% weight loss and 36mg with 9.2% weight loss vs sema 7mg with 3.7% and 14mg with 5.3%... this data is relevant as it was a head to head trial. now i know people will want to compare the 36mg to the new 25mg but it wasn't in the trial so there is no concrete data. however... in the PIONEER PLUS trial, we see sema 14mg with 4.7%, sema 25mg with 7.2%, and sema 50mg with 8.4%... we can't compare across trials, but if you want to extrapolate a rough guess, orfo 36mg is likely going to beat 25mg and be slightly less than the 50mg... the next question to ask is whether this kind of weight loss will be seen in non-diabetics, or does orfo have something that uniquely makes it better for diabetics? i guess we'll see when they come out... sounds like you're not very knowledgeable about the company you're bagholding.... which would explain why you're bagholding lol...

miata_only

$TSLA will be at interstellar💫 levels by the end of December. Melon🍉 is playing his 420-dimensional chess♟ and everyone that's bearish🐻 is stuck in their plain old X, Y, and Z cartesian coordinate system. We're about to see the new Giga Venezuela factory🏭 cranking out Cybertrucks faster than a Starship rocket could launch your mom into geosynchronous orbit🚀🚀. ALSO rumor has it battery day 🔋 in January is going to unveil a new plaid edition LiPo powered dildo that charges⚡ in 69 seconds AND comes with FSD (Full Self Dildoing) 🍆 and Cheetah mode. PLUS unlike companies in Gyna...cough cough BYD(eez nuts) 🥜...Easy E-Muskrat knows best how to run a capitalist business (aka cook the books 👨‍🍳📚).