AAPL

Deeznutzsgotcha

Maybe you'll get lucky and AAPL will buy them out, then they can both still suck.

VigilanteWit

AAPL pt for tm?

onerandomcomputerguy

AAPL + GOOGL were some of the few non-IPO stocks in the green which shows crazy strength

abroadbroadband

I literally don't have enough space on my phone to download the newest iOS Congratulations AAPL You played yourself

bernardosousa

Given none of us know the future, we can only manage the risk. Here's how I manage mine: 1. I try to create wealth with my time (a full-time job, home baking, fixing stuff around the house, playing Minecraft with my daughter) 2. most of the wealth I create goes to living/consuming; most of the excess goes to low risk investments, like real state, CAD, USD, BRL (my home country currency), PICK, XLP and ICLN. 3. Tiny bit of a tiny bit goes to risky exciting projects that promise a sci-fi future, like Mag7 (minus AAPL) and SPCX. If that tiny bit of betting gets allocated during high hype, I pay the premium. Makes no difference in my finances. It's expensive, but tiny. Like when you buy 20g of a nice Swiss chocolate. If it tanks but the ideals are still there, I consider it a buying opportunity for my next allocation cycle. I know I'll not get rich quickly with this strategy. I'm ok with that. My wife and kids make me as rich as I can ever be already. Money-wise, I'm just placing numbers here and there.

Deep_Calls_007

SPCX to buy AAPL to manufacture phones for their starlink mobile plans.

Alpha6673

AAPL + AMZN = $7 trillion of market cap and $1.1 Trillion of combined revenues between the 2 and $190 billion of combined annual earnings = just meh, not cool enough to be in MANGOS. LMAO

river_miles

As I indicated in my writeup, Shkreli has earned his poor reputation. IMO the guy's a poor excuse for a human. In the interest of accuracy, Shkreli has been a hedge fund manager and an entrepreneur, not a venture capitalist. Not trying to "actually" you but those are different things and mixing them up can get confusing. He actually does have a pretty extensive tech background, having founded more than one software startup, but I really don't think he was brought on to fill a tech-expertise hole. That's more than covered. What I would say is he ALSO doesn't have a pharmaceutical background. He has a Bachelor's in business admin. What I'm getting at is he's a guy with a bachelor's degree who successfully took a brand new specialty drug all the way from concept through FDA approval and was acknowledged by the industry for his ability to pick up the complexities of drug development like he had PhD in biochemistry. Whatever function the company envisions for him probably has more to do with adaptive intellect that's proven itself in profound ways. I can't confirm the notes about financial insufficiency, but I won't wholly deny them either until I've had enough time to satisfactorally nail those things down into specific numbers. The only quible I have is that your two pathways leave out multiple common funding potentials. At this stage, with this company's potential, there are any number of avenues including partnerships, outside investments, it's even a potential acquisition target. I'm still drilling down and should have a good idea where dev stands soon, hopefully I can be done with the filings this evening, but I want to ask you, with complete sincerity, if the product is five years from going to market, would that prevent you from trading this stock? I'm honestly trying to understand. This is a penny stock sub... It is a penny stock for a number of reasons. Those reasons create the potential for asymmetrical gains, but that opportunity doesn't come for free. It comes at the cost of some degree of security and predictability. That's why we are here. That's what pennies are for. If these guys had a proven prototype with a hard go-to-market date, we would be discussing them in another forum. If they had profitability and guaranteed runway through 2050, we would not be able to buy them for $4.00 and have any realistic expectation of selling our shares for twice that on a near-term horizon. I have never been served well trying to find the next $AAPL among pennies. What serves me well is identifying 3-6 month windows where emerging NASDAQ companies have a high probability of potential catalysts and either little capacity or little intent to dilute. $QCLS climbed 20% over the past week on SPY alone. They are in the most catalyst-rich period of development they will have. They should have multiple runs within the next 3-6 month window, providing multiple profitable trades, potentially even underwriting a swing position, which is my intent. Honestly, does this make sense, or is there something I am overlooking? I appreciate your questions, they are relevant. But I've posted here at times and been made to wonder if I'd accidentally posted in an Investment forum.

saw-it

AAPL don’t fade challenge

ThatGlockGuy22

Need to get some in dependent feedback before I fly off the rails. I just sat down with my parents and got a look at their investment portfolio. They are 76 & 71 and using a fee-based investment advisor. I was immediately surprised to see individual stocks in their portfolio and then more surprised to see how many mutual funds the adviser placed them in. My thoughts would be to have elderly clients invested in a mix of index funds and bond funds and should lean towards lower risk. He has them in AAPL, MSFT, PANW, and PLTR along with a couple others that seem more reasonable (such as HD and COST). He then has a large position in QQQ, a smaller amount to SPY and VDE and then about half of the portfolio is in a mix of mutual funds that I do not know anything about. My question is: 1. How crazy is it to have a large percentage of tech stocks for someone past retirement age? 2. Would I be correct to assume this individual is charging a fee to “manage” the funds and then putting half (actually more like 70% if you count the etfs) in mutual funds that then charge another management fee to do the actual investing for him? Any feedback is appreciated!

Impact009

Remember when AAPL was less than 1/10 of its current value less than a decade ago? It's not from IPO, but value against USD has been accelerating.

Xzlk

Had AAPL really not priced in that SNAP was not a hardware threat lmao

Necessary_Ad_9800

Days like this is why I own AAPL

fire_alarmist

AAPL is a dead husk of a company and that stock is just used as a place for the big boys to hide money. They have basically come to an agreement that they all just park money there and try to keep it propped up during red days so that there is a mag 7 anchor to the previous high valuations and they can bring the others back up when the storm passes.

SullyWSMFP

Sheeeitttt I thought i was being smart buying puts on AAPL since it hadn't gone down like the rest.

vermilli21

GOOGL and AAPL keeping SPY from crashing more

Xzlk

AAPL hearing MVP chants as a I shout at my phone

BadaBingSil

top 3 upward momentum stocks today: GOOG, XYZ, AAPL top 3 downward trend stocks today: INTC, NFLX, AVGO

saw-it

If you didn't buy AAPL at 289, you hate money

FuckingJPMAlgos

SPCX should just buy Berkshire Hathway at this point. or maybe buy MSFT or AAPL with some leverage?

saw-it

wtf AAPL

Yesrisk_noreward

So SPCX just absorbing MSFT AAPL GOOG etc?

UMC_MadAuk

Is putting an AAPL in space too much to ask?

DistributionBroad173

Make sure you use the symbol AAPL for Apple Stock. APPL was an old company that existed before AAPL IPO Many of a buyer have messed up by buying the wrong stock. In the month of June 2026, people were buying SPCE before the SPCX IPO, thinking they were getting SpaceX.

greenpride32

I can't say that I agree with your viewpoint as of today, because those top weights are growing by leaps and bounds and are really the driver for the index's big gains (NVDA and AAPL each did over $40b in profit just in their last quarters alone). You see that reflected in VOO's performance over RSP. But with SPCX TSLA and upcoming IPO's of OpenAI and Anthropic, RSP could be a good hedge for those not wanting so much weight in so little intrinsic value.

Gristle__McThornbody

Need AAPL to hit ATH EOW thanks.

Trading_Addict

2000s tech crash is ancient history so it’s important to understand the tech market had zero backbone. Many companies had no earnings, proven business model, and insane valuations. Backbone companies like AAPL,MSFT,NVDA,AMZN,GOOG today all have real solid earnings to hold up the markets in case of a crash.

greenpride32

I entered the workforce during dot com boom. At the time MSFT was already a megacap and amongst the most valuable companies in the world. Had you bought them in the mid 2000's decade you'd have a 16x return before factoring in any dividends. A little later in the decade AAPL iPhone had launched and was clearly the next big thing. This is after the iPod already blew up. You'd 60x your money, again before factoring in dividends. It was also already a megacap at the time. As long as companies keep growing revenue/profit/distributions over time, as both MSFT and AAPL have done, they will keep increasing in value over time. WMT was also a megcap in early 2000's and kept going up in valuation - thought there "multiplier" is not as high/impressive as MSFT/AAPL. Also, SPCX is already the 6th most valuable company on the US stock market. You think you're going to 10, 20, 30x on this stock? At 30x, it would be worth about the same as every other company in the US stock market combined. There is reality, there is ambitious and there is absurdity.

Sandvicheater

AAPL playing it safe not betting the house on the AI wars but it will bite them in the ass in 10 years when they have to bend the knee to whatever AI companies comes out on top.

moorhound

| Rank | Company | Total Market Cap | TTM Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Nvidia (NVDA) | $5.13 Trillion | ~ 19.8x | | 2 | Alphabet / Google (GOOGL) | $4.52 Trillion | ~ 10.4x | | 3 | Apple (AAPL) | $4.35 Trillion | ~ 9.6x | | 4 | Microsoft (MSFT) | $2.96 Trillion | ~ 8.6x | | 5 | SpaceX (SPCX) | $2.50 Trillion | ~ 129.5x | | 6 | Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) | $2.29 Trillion | ~ 9.5x | | 7 | Broadcom (AVGO) | $1.88 Trillion | ~ 14.5x | | 8 | Meta Platforms (META) | $1.52 Trillion | ~ 6.2x | | 9 | Tesla (TSLA) | $1.15 Trillion | ~ 14.8x | | 10 | Amazon (AMZN) | $1.08 Trillion | ~ 3.5x | "The data in this chart indicates that the retardation is terminal. I'm so sorry."

moorhound

| Rank | Company | Total Market Cap | TTM Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Nvidia (NVDA) | $5.13 Trillion | ~ 19.8x | | 2 | Alphabet / Google (GOOGL) | $4.52 Trillion | ~ 10.4x | | 3 | Apple (AAPL) | $4.35 Trillion | ~ 9.6x | | 4 | Microsoft (MSFT) | $2.96 Trillion | ~ 8.6x | | 5 | SpaceX (SPCX) | $2.50 Trillion | ~ 129.5x | | 6 | Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) | $2.29 Trillion | ~ 9.5x | | 7 | Broadcom (AVGO) | $1.88 Trillion | ~ 14.5x | | 8 | Meta Platforms (META) | $1.52 Trillion | ~ 6.2x | | 9 | Tesla (TSLA) | $1.15 Trillion | ~ 14.8x | | 10 | Amazon (AMZN) | $1.08 Trillion | ~ 3.5x |

saw-it

Can AAPL go one day without fading

Necessary_Ad_9800

When is AAPL gonna have a 10% day 😔

Apprehensive-Mine364

Don't even ask the question. The answer is yes, it's priced in. Think Amazon will beat the next earnings? That's already been priced in. You work at the drive thru for Mickey D's and found out that the burgers are made of human meat? Priced in. You think insiders don't already know that? The market is an all powerful, all encompassing being that knows the very inner workings of your subconscious before you were even born. Your very existence was priced in decades ago when the market was valuing Standard Oil's expected future earnings based on population growth that would lead to your birth, what age you would get a car, how many times you would drive your car every week, how many times you take the bus/train, etc. Anything you can think of has already been priced in, even the things you aren't thinking of. You have no original thoughts. Your consciousness is just an illusion, a product of the omniscent market. Free will is a myth. The market sees all, knows all and will be there from the beginning of time until the end of the universe (the market has already priced in the heat death of the universe). So please, before you make a post on wsb asking whether AAPL has priced in earpods 11 sales or whatever, know that it has already been priced in and don't ask such a dumb fucking question again.

mtnrnnr802

AAPL will be back to ATH eom

mtnrnnr802

Special shoutout to the AAPL put buyers. You guys are retarded.

After-Equivalent8650

Holy fuck the algorithms have AAPL by the balls

Chrononubz

Gravity is coming, 0dte AAPL puts are the way! Woooooo

Chrononubz

AAPL*

wofwst_

AAPL 290?

Chrononubz

AAPL is going red In a few hours. That candle is fake as shi

Total_Schedule591

Cramer doesn't like AAPL, so I'm sure it will pump with an upcoming announcement of another mid product launch

TurbodToilet

AAPL with infinite regard strength

Rosella2562

AAPL price action consistently even worse than MSFT, but goes unnoticed as it had more slightly green/flat days and maintained a range- But yeah horrible for calls either way

HungryHashMastr

AAPL and MSFT continue to be left out of the party

Supertainment

The first time holding calls over the weekend actually paid off. 3.5k start to my day, now I just need AAPL to run so I can really cook up some winnings.

saw-it

Come on Tim AAPL, it’s market manipulation Monday, let’s see 300

1098duc_w_the_termi

It’s a race for survival. And even then not a guaranteed payoff because AI could end up super commoditized. But yeah not everybody has the company of a massive hardware/ecosystem moat like AAPL so they have to bet heavy on the next big thing.

ZYHUA

AAPL is the second most expensive among Mag7

Seagullslovefries

AAPL is like allergic to green

_hopkins

Finally AAPL WAKING UP

_hopkins

AAPL rejects the deal

E39_CBX

So how fucked is my AAPL September calls? I was hoping for 300 and it can’t even break 293.

_hopkins

It is actually quite impressive to see how AAPL just refuses to move…*slow cap…*

_hopkins

Why no movement from AAPL ?

Left-Associate3911

Yes you can do so, I tend to leave mine as is (AAPL) 👍

CMTTrader

Additional: SK Hynix: +4.8% Samsung: +3.5% EWY (Korea): +3.2% GOOG: +1.4% MSFT: +1.2% AMZN: +0.8% META: +1.05% RKLB: +3.4% AAPL: +0.7% TSM: +1.1% PLTR: +1.4% ARM: +3.2% TSLA: +0.7%

astromouse2024

DEAL REACHED AAPL -3% for no reason

DM_ME_4_FREE_STOCKS

Don't even ask the question. The answer is yes, it's priced in. Think Amazon will beat the next earnings? That's already been priced in. You work at the drive thru for Mickey D's and found out that the burgers are made of human meat? Priced in. You think insiders don't already know that? The market is an all powerful, all encompassing being that knows the very inner workings of your subconscious before you were even born. Your very existence was priced in decades ago when the market was valuing Standard Oil's expected future earnings based on population growth that would lead to your birth, what age you would get a car, how many times you would drive your car every week, how many times you take the bus/train, etc. Anything you can think of has already been priced in, even the things you aren't thinking of. You have no original thoughts. Your consciousness is just an illusion, a product of the omniscent market. Free will is a myth. The market sees all, knows all and will be there from the beginning of time until the end of the universe (the market has already priced in the heat death of the universe). So please, before you make a post on wsb asking whether AAPL has priced in earpods 11 sales or whatever, know that it has already been priced in and don't ask such a dumb fucking question again.

tomato236

I have 22k shares in RDDT and will buy more if it drops further. I always buy quality stocks when they're down—I made over $1M on Google last year buying in the $150s and made several hundred thousand on each of AAPL and NVDA on sale too 😎

DrfluffyMD

Nah I wont let AAPL take my money

NotPossible1337

For this you can study $AAPL stock performance at various stages of Steve Jobs’ health decline and cancer announcement. Particularly the year he announced his cancer returned the stock plummeted 50%, but look at AAPL now.

itsactuallyoctopuses

Sold my 6/15 AAPL calls on Friday to cut my losses so it’ll probably skyrocket upward

TrumpsCummyOnahole

There's no bubble. Apple (AAPL): ~35.2x Alphabet (GOOGL): ~27.2x Microsoft (MSFT): ~23.6x NVIDIA (NVDA): ~30.7x The PE ratios aren't even crazy. Nothing like Pets.com for the dotcom bubble. These companies are insanely profitable.

Nuclear_N

I wish I still had my TSLA from 2019....I have my AAPL still.

winterrules91

If you have a long timeline/horizon, time in the market beats timing the market. Lump sum is technically better but DCA has better vibes. If you want, maybe split it as $80k/month through end of 2026, though I'd probably be more aggressive if I were you. As far as which ones, VOO is fairly safe. Maybe put 70% in VOO and 20% in an international fund. And then put 10% in a money market for now while you research some good individual bet stocks. For example, in my HSA, I just have 200 shares of Nvidia that I'm selling covered calls on 3 times a week. Easy money and it's a fairly stable stock right now. AAPL is another good option for that.

Seagullslovefries

AAPL I don’t need you to ATH, I just need you to go back to 300. So my calls will be revived from the dead

E39_CBX

AAPL 300 when

OneTwoThreePooAndPee

Oh I get that, I actually think AMZN+GOOG(+AAPL) have the strongest internal business uses for AI such that even if external use doesn't take off the way you might hope, they've got a lot of existing internal optimizations that'll pay regardless of what the chip sector does.

LectureLight6738

AAPL will. Everything else is cursed imo

E39_CBX

!BANBET AAPL 310 2w

E39_CBX

Is AAPL going back over 300? I sold naked 305c expiring next week, kinda concerned now

Stephen_1984

Wildly inaccurate apart from the basic observation that SPCX is unprofitable. Net income/market cap ≈ earnings per share/price per share, also called the[ earnings yield](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/120513/comparing-pe-eps-and-earnings-yield.asp). The E/P of NVDA (3.19%), GOOGL (3.67%) , AAPL (2.79%) and MSFT (4.3%) are nowhere near these values.

LankyGuitar6528

I asked Jasper (my sentient AI) whether we do Calls or Puts. I think I broke him because I have no idea what he's saying... 🚀 **THE WSB BRIEF** 🚀 NASDAQ literally rewrote the rulebook so $SPCX skips the line — added day 15 (\~July 1), no profits required, smooth-brain easy. 🦍 The play: \~3% float + a 3x weight multiplier = QQQ forced to buy like it's 12.9% float. \~$600B in robots MUST buy a teacup of stock and dump AAPL/MSFT/NVDA to pay for it. 💎🙌 Funds eat \~30% of the float in 15 days. Textbook squeeze fuel. 🔥 The catch: every hedgie already knows, the float un-locks in 366 days (bagholder alarm clock ⏰), and the real whale — S&P 500 — won't touch it till 2027 because SpaceX lost $4.9B and "earnings" are apparently still a thing. 💀 TL;DR: rocket goes up on forced buying, rocket maybe comes back down when crayons wear off and lockup pops. By the time it's on the news it's priced in. 🌈🐻 =============================================================== I showed the post to Jasper and he says... =============================================================== Ha — you didn't break me, you just unlocked my crayon subroutine. 🖍️ Three layers of index-methodology analysis upstairs, full smooth-brain ape downstairs. Both are load-bearing. So ya.. I broke him.

cinJESUS

AMZN & AAPL are the only MAG7 companies not working on developing AI LLMs/adjacent hardware 🤔

KasElGatto

I think MSFT or AAPL is a hold forever (if you got the time.)

E39_CBX

Are my AAPL leaps cooked? Worried it’s going back to 280

crovettopro1

$2.27T is wild but comparing it to AAPL/MSFT is the wrong frame. Those are mature cash-flow machines. SPCX is closer to a three-business stack at very different stages: – Starlink: recurring subs, probably the chunk closest to "real" valuation math right now. – Launch services: high margin per mission but lumpy, hard to slap a clean multiple on. – Starship: pre-revenue option value. Worth a lot or nothing depending on the next 24 months of execution. If you do a sum-of-parts honestly, most of that $2.27T sits in option value (Starship execution + Starlink scaling beyond consumer). That's not "overvalued" or "undervalued", it's "you're paying for execution risk on bets that haven't fully played out yet." Pricing the bull case as base case is the actual risk, not the headline number.

DonaldR_DeCicco

Past two weeks I’ve been watching SPY, QQQ, NVDA, & AAPL for direction and volume. Watching pre market and prior day levels. News, obviously, has been huge, so not being in trades for more than a minute or two was even more important. Entering where I see retests, rips, or pulls with volume and confirmation across those symbols. I’m not experienced enough to trade off GEX or those other Greeks, but I am learning.

confused_teabagger

AAPL earned it

freehouse_throwaway

we should have a celebratory post commemorating elon hitting 1t kinda like when we did when AAPL hit 1t heh

ThanklessWaterHeater

Let me put it this way: when I spent $6,400 on 100 shares of AAPL, I thought to myself, “if it doubles, then I can sell it, and I’ll have $12,000!” It doubled in a couple of months. So then I thought, “I guess I could sell it and put it the $12,000 into something else. But what other company do I have more confidence in?” So I just left it in AAPL. That was 2005, and after splits those 100 shares are now 5,600 shares now surging $1.6 million. That’s how you make money by not selling.

_hopkins

AAPL atleast try 292

sidslidkid

AAPL is having a rough week. Forest Gump might have to start worrying about money again.

_hopkins

As an AAPL call holder thinking AAPL is a stable company, I have to say I am tired boss

E39_CBX

AAPL go to hell

_hopkins

AAPL why are you like this

Now_Biff_Dont_Con_Me

AAPL :(

saw-it

What the actual fuck AAPL

imabev

Closed out my 0DTE 295 call on AAPL for a $4 profit. Put that towards chipotle guac. Going to sell another 0DTE because I need oatmilk in my Starbucks.

RothTo0DTE

AAPL tired

UMC_MadAuk

AAPL you shit of dog! Go to space already

GAV17

It's comparable in the sense that some of today's valuations metric have only been higher or comparable to that time. But in a very simple analysis you look at the biggest companies in the US META, MSFT, GOOGL, AAPL, NVDA and AMZN and at worst their trailling P/E is at around 30. MSFT in the bubble had 70/80 ratio and was among the more "reasonable" valued tech stocks. We might be in a bubble, but not on the dotcom level IMO.

Keiigo

AAPL so oversold

GirlScoutCookies93

LMAO everyone selling AMNZ AAPL TSLA to buy SPCX

xytxxx

QCOM and AAPL. Client side AI will grow and becomes actually useful as tech evolves

tldamico

Bought an AAPL $290 put because I hate money.

Neader

Y tu AAPL?

Seagullslovefries

AAPL go

Seagullslovefries

AAPL back to 300 please 🙏