AMC

spaceneenja

Yeah brother! AMC should be worth 1T if the hedgies weren’t colluding against us!! They/them are holding us down!!!!

NotawoodpeckerOwner

AMC, BB, NOK, GME, BBBY, TLRY, all pump and dumps that aren't really viable companies. GME kind of is now but that took a bunch of shareholder dilution to get there.

ai-moderator

#TLDR --- Ticker: AMC Direction: Up Prognosis: Accumulate shares at $1.75 Fundamental Analysis: The theater near my house has nice architecture Coping Mechanism: 550M share dilution is actually bullish

NotMe357

Oh fuck. Just let it go man. The GameStock and AMC age is over. Better move on than stay there. AMC is already down over 50% this year. Stop try create more bagholders.

IllAd7445

Call me crazy, but do your research and you’ll probably agree now is the best time to start accumulating AMC shares and maybe the safest place to park money right now. $1.75 a pop. You might as well grab a few hundred, right? You regards already throw blasphemous amounts of money on options strategies you don’t even know how to close out. They’ve recently approved the issuance of 550M new shares effectively doubling the share count. They can choose to use these to raise equity for the business, a good thing for the business. Most would say that it’s awful for shareholders dilution this dilution that blah blah blah. Sure, but that’s why you gather shares. So cheap it doesn’t matter what the price goes to. Look at the chart and ATH ever. $393 Imagine every $1.75 share you bought is worth $393 one day. The price doesn’t matter right now. AMC is a fire ass movie theater chain. Like the one by me is beautiful structure/aricherct, in a busy/higher income area, and has an enjoyable movie viewing experience that is above average for most theaters I’d say. Look at the analysts price targets and it’s like $2,3,4 I even seen a website say $20-30 dollar price target from some analyst. Wtf is he smoking I’ll take some of that shit. But that fact that there IS a price target like that? Ya know. TLDR: AMC stock share accumulation is safest place to park money. Under valued. Price targets from analysts are already $2,3,4… 100% increase. ATH of $394 and price of $2 right now. The risk to reward is insanely worth. Peace.

it_snow_problem

It is. Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink obviously reincorporated because of this. Then there’s Coinbase, Dropbox, and Affirm. Dillards and Andreessen Horowitz. So have Madison Square and AMC companies. TripAdvisor, Fidelity National Financial, Roblox, The Trade Desk. That’s about all the major ones I could find. That’s a big list though.

dbpatel219

Anyone know of any positive indicators for AMC? It's on the struggle bus.

That-Estate1298

Had a guy try to talk me out of Tesla when it was down to its lowest a few years back, also tried to talk me out of investing into the AMC and Gamestop short. Tried to say I was a fool and naive to think that someone not on wall street could make money retail investing. Needless to say I’m glad I didn’t listen to him. The GameStop and AMC earnings paid off my 4 year car loan within the first year I financed it.

Eastern-Sign6667

AMC

ThirdAltAccounts

Keep in mind that it could also be a trick by the hedgies In which case…AMC 🚀

goldencityjerusalem

Those 2 comments arent mutually exclusive. But taking care of shareholders is not overrated. Go ask AMC holders.

YamDifferent1805

0dte AMC calls

TheDynamicMolecule

I think people who blindly invest in these pumps and dumps deserve to lose. I remember when I was a fool and invested a large sum of money in AMC way back when. All these pumpers were screaming and yelling how the stock will go up any day. What happened? Smart people liquidated and dumb people got stuck. Think about this for a second. If you know of a stock that is going to jump,m and are good at predicting all that why would you share that info with anyone? Makes no sense. You would only do it to stocks where you think a small group of people will buy up a couple of hundreds of thousands of shares and you can liquidate. At the end of the day it’s your hard earned money and you are gambling by trusting random people on Reddit.

Fluffy_Charity_2732

I tried to summarize all that science word salad into chat gpt and it told me to YOLO into AMC

vermilli21

The more I read stuff in the Buttcorn subreddit, the more they starting to sound like the GME/AMC people....

Old_Homework8339

I sold at $69. You should how they think a squeeze is coming. Tradingview comments on the AMC side are ridiculous

OopsRdiditAgain

"affordability chrisis" = negotiate at the table before signing but it's a shakedown. I still don't think they belong in the growth sector, these bots better be awesome & i hope the bots have to pay taxes and earn a living wage. If not social security is tits up. With all the uncertainty I'm not leveraging myself for an overpriced conveyance. I don't even want the maintenance. Thank you driver. (Drop my gloves in the mailbox please, and thank you.) I'm always dropping my gloves. I knew this economy was happening but now what? We all invest in luxury gyms? Love the recliners at AMC & can't wait for Thursday. Anyone find a way to serve good cheap burgers with shoe string fries again yet?

hemmingwayshotgun

Speak for yourself I’ve got plenty of Jan 2027 dollar calls. They are dirt cheap and there are so many bagholders I would be shocked if there isn’t another meme mini-pump and I’m giving myself a year plus to be right. I didn’t even know there was a sub but yeah it’s probably just another version of the GME/AMC ones—a bunch of people who are convinced they are up against the entire financial world and only they can see this extremely convoluted and corrupt scheme that is all centered around a mid company….okay sure whatever. Just keep building the hype so I can make some money the next time it trends on twitter

zxced90

AMC,GME,BYND and BBBY have their own cult

stellarfury

Investing in AMC in 2025 is like investing in Blockbuster in 2010.

Different-Bill7499

AMC call options. All of it.

DeadSol

Crypto/GME/AMC is my guess.

huehuehuehero

AMC genuinely turned into a cult for some people.

Imaginary_Air_2514

All the evidence was there for AMC and I got screwed

raisedeyebrow4891

Wait… AMC at $141????!!?? What the actual fuck?

zitrored

Same questions people asked during the GameStop and AMC bubbles, and we all know how that ended.

timtam_z28

Not me. I use to be an index only guy. Got bored during COVID. It was just too obvious to not buy the biggest dips. I sold VOO and went like 70% in on VBK (small cap) because they took a bigger hit. IIRC it gained more than VOO as well. Then I bought VDE (Energy) dip. Then I bought AMC meme just for fun, only $500 worth unfortunately. Then I sold VBK in 2021 for NVDA, PLTR, COST, AXP, MSFT. Imagine if I had listened to Reddit advice...

timtam_z28

Same. It was just too obvious to not buy the biggest dips. I sold VOO and went like 70% in on VBK (small cap) because they took a bigger hit. IIRC it gained more than VOO as well. Then I bought VDE (Energy) dip. Then I bought AMC meme just for fun, only $500 worth unfortunately. Then I sold VBK in 2021 for NVDA, PLTR, COST, AXP, MSFT Imagine if I had listened to Reddit advice...

Wood_Ring

Don’t fall into the trap of conflating volatility risk premia with ‘income’, and don’t focus on the nominal premium received for selling volatility to the exclusion of considering whether you’re selling vol at a higher than fair value; the important thing is whether the premium is likely to be more than adequate compensation for the risk you’re assuming. That said, I don’t hate the AMC position if you were to do something like a buy-write with the Jan 16 $2 call as a standalone trade. I would never just hold the shares to write covered calls mechanically though; that’s not a good use of capital.  If you’re trying to grow the account quickly then you don’t really want to approach it like an investor. Investors are typically looking for somewhere to park their money to let it compound over time through things like earnings growth, shareholder yield, and multiple expansion. All of those usually take a relatively long time to occur. By contrast, you would probably want to be more in the mindset of advantage players, arbitrageurs, relative value traders, etc., who try to identify angles/edges that can be exploited quickly (and, ideally, repeatedly) before they disappear.

Supertramp81

Im a first time investor. Brand new out of the box and AMC is the first company ive put money in. How much do people genrally put in to make any kind of profit? I started with £80 and it's barely moved today. Would you experienced investors put alot more in on investments like AMC?

Ok_Guidance4571

Yes I did go with Higher volatile companies. I do think GME at 22 a share when they have warrants out there for $32 dollars next October makes i a little safer. And I am on the call side so I am selling the covered calls if they get exercised im good with it. I do Believe that BBAI is going places probably in the 10-15 dollar range in the next year or 2(pending how they handle dilution, and if the get government contracts while the Department of War is in office hehe). AMC yes I have a cost basis of 3.40 so getting hammered on that one. And I do have other accounts that are stable. goal for me here is to be able to start spending some of my gains...

DistributionBroad173

I would work on doing due diligence. You should pick one stock and treat it as your foundation. A solid company. Gamestop, BigBear, and AMC theatre are NOT solid companies. KO is a solid company. PG is a solid company. They are boring, but solid. MSFT, GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN, WMT are solid companies, growth stocks. Not as boring as KO and PG. You are working on the going for a grand slam on each and every trade.

stockstar2024

Thought on AMC? Will it recover soon?

iDontLikeItHere00

I made so much money on amc just after gamestop. I managed to buy $15/16 calls dates 2 weeks out the day before it ran from $11 to $40. Sold half near that top. Next day it ran up to 70. I closed everything around $65. My first ever experience with a large options position. I used a little over have of the after tax gains to put 20% down on a house. Locked in a 2.6% interest rates a year before mortgage rates got jacked up. The remainder became my seed capital. I got burned and learned lessons on super short dated options, now I *mostly* only buy options 30 - 90 dte. I made more on options this year than I did my real job. Thank you AMC.

Ok-Association-4933

Zoom out , my fiends , AMC is better for everyone . The missing ingredient 👨‍🍳 is a CEO to innovate . Bye. Bye . Adam.

blu_id

“Put the financials aside” This is an investment sub talking about what to invest in. And even if you want to put them aside, AMC is competing with absolute giant companies. Disney & Netflix, primarily. And those companies now own the studios that produce the movies AMC needs but they can just stream them straight to their services and cut AMC out. So AMC will have to pay an obscene amount just to get movies moving forward.

bullishSOB

Anyone else get in to AMC Robotics?

SolidReporter8229

FLWS next AMC type squeeze

weakObserver

What about AMC?

ThirdRepliesSuck

Gold is money and silver apparently is now used in a new kind of battery that’s better than our current tech. Platinum could be the AMC of the other two’s movement but I wouldn’t bet on it based on rarity. 

RebelWithoutaPause10

They still caged up in AMC?

mechanicalcontrols

Question. How much did you lose on GME, AMC and/or BBBY?

OutlandishnessUsed24

Let me be very direct here: **"Different hedge funds / cannibalistic"** Good. Multiple funds competing for 600K available shares to cover 527K in FTDs = bidding war. That helps, not hurts. **"Can't trade faster than systems"** Speed doesn't matter when the constraint is PHYSICAL SHARES. HFTs can't algo their way into shares that don't exist. This isn't a momentum play - it's a delivery obligation. **"Moonshots get shot down"** HOW did they get shot down? I'll tell you: * GME: Company diluted via S-3 * AMC: Company issued 400M+ shares * BYND: Bondholders converted $202M **Every single "shot down" had a MECHANISM.** FLWS has no S-3, no ATM, no convertible bonds. What's the mechanism here? **"Crime" / "spewing a lot"** To be clear: I'm sharing publicly available SEC filings, FINRA data, and statistical analysis. All sources cited. All verifiable. That's not "spewing" - that's due diligence. If you're suggesting hedge funds will commit crime to escape - name the specific mechanism. "Crime" as a vague concept doesn't settle FTDs. **"Bigger fish already cashed in"** Then why is short interest STILL 104% of float? If they cashed in, where's the exit? I've cited filings and data. You've cited vibes. Read the DD.

OutlandishnessUsed24

You're actually describing HOW we got here, not why it doesn't matter. **Naked shorting and rehypothecation create FTDs.** That's not a counterargument - that's literally the thesis. They DID rehypothecate. They DID naked short. And now 527K of those chickens come home to roost this week via T+35 settlement. **Those FTDs are LOCKED:** * Nov 11 fail → Dec 16 due * Nov 12 fail → Dec 17 due * Nov 13 fail → Dec 18 due Can they naked short MORE today? Sure. But that creates JANUARY FTDs. It doesn't change what's due THIS WEEK. The T+35 calendar is set. **"Where's the lock and key?"** It's the ESCAPE ROUTES: * GME escaped via S-3 dilution → **FLWS has no S-3** * AMC escaped via share issuance → **FLWS has no ATM program** * BYND escaped via bondholder conversion → **FLWS has zero convertible bonds** * All three had insider lending → **McCann Class B auto-converts if transferred** * Options rollover trick? **Used Oct 23. OI is tapped.** Yes, I followed those tickers. I watched the escapes. **That's why I'm here** \- because the escapes don't exist. Dig the hole deeper for January? Sure. Escape December? No mechanism exists.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Respectfully, you're thinking about this wrong - and this is all in my DD if you'd read it. **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Appreciate the detailed response - you clearly know mechanics. Let me address this in the context of THIS specific setup: **1-2. Gamma initiates, but what sustains it?** Agreed gamma drives price discovery. But in GME/AMC, supply eventually arrived (dilution). In FLWS: no S-3 filed, no convertible bonds, McCanns can't lend without losing voting control. Gamma gets price there. Blocked exits keep it there. **3-4. "FTDs are back-office, gamma comes first"** Usually true. But FLWS has 527K shares due THIS WEEK with 600K available. Coverage ratio: 0.87x. This isn't theoretical future stress - it's 48 hours away. Gamma would accelerate something already in motion. **5-6. "High IV doesn't reduce delta/gamma"** Technically correct for dealer mechanics. But at 200% IV, retail's $1,000 buys fewer contracts = less TOTAL gamma retail can bring. And on shares having "no follow-through" - in a normal float, agreed. In a float where 94% is short and 527K must be delivered from 600K available? Every share removed IS follow-through. **7. "Options initiate, shares sustain"** This is where we AGREE. You said it yourself. My actual strategy: * Buy calls on dips * Sell calls when IV spikes * Convert premium to shares * Never sell the shares Options = initiation leverage Shares = sustained scarcity **The synthesis:** Gamma INITIATES (you're right). FTDs FORCE buying regardless (unique here). Blocked exits SUSTAIN it (no dilution). Shares COMPOUND it (constrained float). We're saying the same thing from different angles. You're focused on how squeezes start. I'm focused on why THIS one can't be unwound. Both matter :)

Buy_Sell_Hold

$AMC I keep buying every single dip like a loyal soldier, but these dips have dips now. When will it end?

TheSmokingLamp

AI slop from a pissed off uneducated retail “investor” who wants to blame the market being rigged for the reason his AMC/BYND/BBBY plays have lost him money

magicjohnson89

BYND lesson learned. In at AMC @ 4 and sold @ 7. Nearly made 10k GBP. REALISED. FINALLY.

primaboy1

AMC ape wants to be, going to zero 0️⃣

Dry_Celebration_5483

Careful man, next for you is AMC

hi5ves

Nobody is talking about AMC.

Jongjong998

are you talking about AMC? if not I have no idea what you're on about.

OutlandishnessUsed24

You built python scripts and screeners to find a stock that someone was able to find on a publicly available fin screener, filtering for unusual volume. \--Incorrect, you have no idea what I and people like me have been able to build in the last 60 days inparticular with VS addins like Cline and the new anthropic models. I can tell by the way youre still stuck in the past on your assumptions here. The last 60 days changes in anthropic models inparticular changes all of this. You then spammed the same ChatGPT produced excerpt several dozen times in several subreddits, and claim that you believe in this stock. \--10000% incorrect. I have spent weeks feeding data and saving very large paraquet files (something I could not do 60 days ago) to build the same quant level analysis that used to be impossible by people like us You can’t believe in a stock if the goal is to pump and dump it. You may have called BYND early, but so did a lot of people, and your posts about “WHOS STILL HOLDING BYND?!” suggests you ended up being a bagholder in that call. \---incorrect, I didnt put a thesis to BYND I just predicted the mechanical short squeeze that went to $7 and i took a lot of that data to feed into my models for FLWS. FWLS is different than BYND, GME, AMC, and whatever other meme stock you want to mention and my thesis mentions this but you have refused to read it by the fact you havent rebuted any of it yet. If you’re still holding onto GME because you called it and believe in it, then you certainly aren’t the person to back for stock picks. \---I'm not holding GME, again, i just used that as my first experience building databases and modeling on what happened there. Especially when your supposed self built python scripts are finding you stocks that have been peddled by bots in this subreddit for nearly a month now. \---u think i built a sentiment scrapper? that is the easiest thing to do, not to mention free already, no need to build that. Just use Chart Exchange below which is ironically caputering us talking about FLWS right now.... my DD is an attempt to show up in other peoples sentiment screeners so they can look deeper here actually..... this is a 4D chess move, with real squeeze mechanics, and real value long term; similar to GME when it was though of as a bankrupt company but still very different. Any challenge to the thesis yet or just my character that is all theoritcal because you dont know me?

TheRightEdger

Sorry for the late reply. I did reply a few days ago, but reddit was kicking up internal server errors that day. So, looks like the reply was not posted. As I said in the post, "...Not expecting any significant rally (getting well over 3.00) until the next earnings report which will be in FEB26." Thus, my advice is to write covered calls (above your buy price) on the positions you hold while AMC treads water until the next earnings. Note, there are a couple big names in the meme and short selling space that are going to be active about GME on TwitterX starting on SUN 14DEC25. Some of the GME euphoria may spill over to AMC. So, wait until late MON to commit to any covered calls on AMC.

SignificanceLate7002

AMCI - AMC Robotics Corp De-SPAC squeeze play. Previously ATMV. Merger closed Tuesday and new ticker name effective Wednesday. Low float at 1.44 million. CTB is 700%. Pre-merger price was $14. This one could be explosive Monday. The merger close and new ticker name happened rather quickly with very little PR. Some brokers failed to update until Friday so little attention was paid to this one. Shorts used this to their advantage on Friday and drove rather price down about over %60 to $2.70 on low volume. About 350k volume during market hours. AH things turned around quickly and probably caught shorts by surprise gaining back most of the losses and closing out at $4.50 with over 1 million in trades during the AH. This is a US based robotics company that has been in the warehouse automation sector for a long time with a new autonomous robot security patrol line. Here's a link to their website to check them out. https://www.amcx.ai/

Fluffy_Charity_2732

That’ll teach her to respect your time. And to never make fun of you for buying AMC

thesutterking

This time 5 years ago?... GME then AMC then Shiba... id have been a millionaire if i reinvested those three in that order

9tacos

AMC apes getting diluted so hard 🤣

brucekeller

Sony's best performing movie release this year was an anime lol. AMC should have just bought up anime studios when they diluted.

slagmunch

I just want to inform everyone on the coming AMC dilution Thank you for your attention. You may now proceed to point and laugh

AirNovel78350

warrants are not in OS nor free float. Free float Ortex uses come from S&P and if its not updated well there might be some errors. Besides, in my experience short interest isnt that bad from ortex estimation. so i believe that SI actually dropped alot. I think what you mean is that Ortex doesnt reflect darkpools? i dont mind because in my experienxe over 100% of darkpool SI on AMC 2022 didnt do anything. So i really dont believe darkpool. I just see it as how active shorters are rather than how many are there.

AirNovel78350

interesting point im not really into darkpool since AMC 2022 had serious SI on darkpool but stock tanked the whole time. It had a big community as well. Nothing helped. but i clearly get your point and its surely interesting. Ill also keep eyes on it hope it goes well for you!

ThrowawayAl2018

Buying and selling has a lot of psychological factors involved, so technical analysis fails from time to time. Using indicators is not foolproof too as each has its own flaws, mix and match indicators only compounds the flaws. A good historical example is Gamespot, during its meme run, it fails technical analysis, same with AMC stock. tldr; market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent

AshingiiAshuaa

AMC isn't too high, historically speaking. If you're talking high relative to value then it's a couple of bucks more than it should be... XD

Waterknight94

Fuck you AMC everything else i have is green now.

PritchettsClosets

Adding. This is going to fly. Reminds me of AMC.

Due-Papaya-6217

AMCI (AMC robotics) is another deSPAC in the red. This will be a long term play for me but best time to get in is now whilst it's in the red. Not all platforms can trade it yet so one to watch

SeahawksWin43-8

That’s fair. I would say it’s become a lot more mainstream and well known since investing in general has as well. I didn’t mean to sound rude or anything but it’s unfortunately been a thing for a while and it’s fun but a lot of people, myself included, have lost a lot of money on the shenanigans. I was an AMC loser in 2020 lol

SPAC_Time

[AlphaVest Acquisition Corp and AMC Corporation Announce Closing of Business Combination](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/12/09/3202792/0/en/AlphaVest-Acquisition-Corp-and-AMC-Corporation-Announce-Closing-of-Business-Combination.html) \- ATMV ATMVR/10 -> AMCI on or about Wednesday, December 10, 2025

PritchettsClosets

Of course it's risky. That's why it's shorted still at all time lows lol AMC was way larger a float, with WAY larger opportunity for dilution. This seriously has that level of potential.

SignificanceLate7002

Not a pennystock but something is going on with ATMV. Up 50% overnight with high volume and no news that I can find. It's a SPAC in a merger agreement with AMC Corp(not the AMC you're thinking of) to form AMC Robotics Corp and be relisted as AMCI. It's another low float so might just be riding that wave or maybe someone knows the merger is about to be completed. I don't know but I grabbed a few shares.

DonDiabloTheGreat

AMC, you don’t want to know the price

REEMFMetalHead

RIP, overleveraged hedge fund manager that's been trying to short CETX since Friday, in order to keep from losing $millions. This should be a lesson to all of the other MMs out there, who are absurdly short on various other stocks. (Looking at you, AMC).

homeworkburgler

AMC and fisker. At one time I was collectively up over $140,000. Now barely worth anything and fisker is bankrupt

Platti_J

I'm holding at $11. I don't get it because people are going back to the movie theaters, and there is also Avatar 3 coming out which will probably make a billion dollars. Get shit together, AMC!

EnlightenedPotato69

Tinfoil time, AMC hype was even more regarded than GME but it also seemed timed perfectly in order to disrupt the regards

PritchettsClosets

At a minimum AMC level

Sea_Understanding770

AMC

CreamyBehemoth

If you ever feel regarded, or hopeless, or stupid. Just remember there are people out there still holding AMC shares from 2020 hoping it will squeeze

Qkalife

AMC LICY NIO and anything electric from the Biden administration

theoldme3

Good ole AMC...Saving that baby for a nice tax harvesting. The CEO is the biggest pos

cannythecat

I wonder how many people buy Marvell thinking it makes the avengers movies when there were buying AMC thinking it was the same company that made the walking dead and breaking bad

SushiRollFried

well it actually went from 5 to 490 at its peak then AMC at 255

seven__out

I found AMC for 6% and DISH for 7% I dunno if they’ll make bond holders whole despite first in line

REEMFMetalHead

My best advice to you is, "don't trade BURU". You're literally better off trading anything else. I'll trade AMC before I trade BURU. And I do. Actively.

daviddjg0033

Two stocks that are permanently diluting shares: MSTR AMC Are there any other ones? I would like to be leveraged long in other asset classes besides cryptocurrency.

ohgodthehorror95

I'll be totally honest, I don't see this thing ever squeezing. The market cap is too high and it's shares are pretty liquid. And there's nothing flashy or relatable about an LNG company, compared to say AMC or GME, companies which most people are at least vaguely familiar with. And NFE is very very deep in debt. Drowning in it. Like, this new revenue would barely put a dent in their interest payments, let alone actually paying off their debt. If the share price ever spiked for any reason, you better believe the company will likely dilute because they really need the cash.

Zestyclose-Ring6884

It really has. An amazing CC play for sure. I milked the shit out of AMC for a while too before the big drop. HTB was insane so I ran it by just rolling puts for the additional extrinsic vs shares and calls

South-Situation1489

You all in AMC?

LowWind7998

Someone probably gonna buy AMC , I’m thinking of loading up. Like assets alone have to make there stock like $5 a share , right?

Mossad_psyop

AMC stock holders especially rekt

Present_Sock_8633

I've held through GME and AMC, these diamond hands aren't going anywhere

Financial_Memory5183

so when does netflilx buy out AMC ???

MonsterDrumSolo

Lmao take a look at my AMC shares.

Collarbones33

People pumping a ticker doesn’t make the the cost to borrow got from 200 to 500 and the shares available to short drop to 0. I’ve seen this pattern over and over preceding a catalyst. It’s my opinion that these numbers combined with a shit ton of positive news is creating this. With the exception of AMC & GME, the concept that retail buys up the float and drives a squeeze is bullshit. https://preview.redd.it/azyes7diag5g1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8aa916db2c44cb5b48c488a90ba3ad9708864c63 [https://stockstotrade.com/news/smx-security-matters-public-limited-company-smx-news-2025\_12\_04-2/](https://stockstotrade.com/news/smx-security-matters-public-limited-company-smx-news-2025_12_04-2/)

Collarbones33

I don’t think these are rare as people think, they follow a similar pattern. I think there’s a huge misconception that retail can control a stocks float and drive a squeeze. That may have been the case 5yrs ago with AMC & GME, but I see patterns like this all the time. From what I’ve seen the data usually precedes the catalyst, whatever that may be. CYN was a good example of this, there’s was a spike in CTB and the shares available to short prior to the announcement of a partnership with nvidia. It ran for like 700% in a day.