AMC

primaboy1

AMC bag holders aren’t so lucky after all

TylerBlozak

Yea you’ve got it wrong lol. Silver short squeeze was a thing before GME and AMC. Mods here nerfed any silver discussion and diverted all the attention to the worthless meme stonks. To me that is what is actually shady about the early short squeeze days.

captain_casino

Can't wait for 50 cents of AMC stock or DOGE

kloffinger

Saw a movie at AMC tonight. During the commercials they thanked "their investors" which obviously means "all the AMC bag holding WSB regards" and I chuckled to myself. It was downhill from there. Think I caught five exotic airborne diseases and went blind from the grandma next to me checking her phone on full brightness every five minutes. Bullish

2muchnet42day

Warm-up with 3 sets of refreshing WSB to get the blood pumping, then hit 5 sets of SPY 0DTE calls expiring today (failure mandatory), superset with 4 sets of NVDA weeklies at ATH for pure FOMO hypertrophy, move on to 3 sets of TSLA lotto puts because “it feels toppy,” followed immediately by AMRAP PLTR calls until conviction or account balance gives out, cool down with 2 light sets of AMD sympathy plays, and finish the workout with a brutal drop set of GME/AMC based solely on a single comment that says “something’s brewing,” ending with a protein shake made of cope, screenshots of unrealized gains, and telling yourself tomorrow you’ll size smaller (you won’t).

sylphvanas

Where my AMC apes at? I’m down bad on my calls

ukbeasts

AI advised to go for AMC shares after its "deep analysis". Since then their value has dropped by 75%

Sensitive_Pilot3689

*AMC Entertainment reached an all time low at $1.61* LMAO 🤣

Lord-Lannister

AMC please pump and let the brother unload it’s been years.

Boys4Ever

Pertains same group that buys Bitcoin and rooted for GME and AMC yet couldn’t read a balance sheet quoting YouTubers to sound smart and knowledgeable yet totally clueless.

TheSmokingLamp

Who’s “They”?? Plenty of people make money just fine on the market. Dumbasses that gamble and play 0DTE and think they’re going up “against the corrupt market” get fucked because they are idiots. This post comes off as a BYND/AMC esque “investor”. Throwing away money at nothing and expecting to be rewarded but when they aren’t, theyre so emotional they have to blame anything but themselves for the position they got themselves into and refuse to walk away from

3D_P_BR

WISH? Im still holding AMC :/

unlock0

Yeah I'd say he went long AMC in 2021.

BigCaterpillar8001

AMC

Noobmode

BBB and AMC hodler

Round_Pomegranate_84

AMC and GME moaSS

friendlyzuchinni

This is what ai told me 2021 (~+400%) – Skewed heavily by the GME/AMC short-squeeze period. This represents peak-to-peak meme returns, not sustainable full-year investing. 2022 (~-30%) – Post-mania drawdown as speculative names deflated. 2023 (~+25%) – Recovery year; tech and growth stabilized. 2024 (~+60%) – Strong AI/tech momentum (NVDA, AMD, META, etc.). 2025 (~+76% YTD) – Based on equal-weighted, community-compiled “most-mentioned” lists (HOOD, PLTR, RKLB, TSLA, etc.).

Pendulumswingsfreely

This is what the subreddit summarizes: 1. NVIDIA (NVDA) AI demand surging 2. Tesla (TSLA) Robotaxi optimism high 3. GameStop (GME) Forever short squeeze 4. Micron (MU) Earnings blowout rally 5. Palantir (PLTR) AI software winner 6. Oracle (ORCL) Cloud expansion wins 7. AMC Entertainment (AMC) Meme momentum play 8. Nike (NKE) Dip buy opportunity 9. BlackBerry (BB) Cybersecurity turnaround bet 10. Broadcom (AVGO) Chip infrastructure growth

Metacog_Drivel

Haven't checked in on AMC in a while...my gawd it's just stair stepping into the depths of hell.

Imfuckingconfused80

Because of GME and AMC. People put in their 10k for AMC at $10 and walked away with 50-70k. GME was even more. They all thought it was easy and told all their friends who bought in too late and are now chasing losses. But instead of doing it over time they’re trying to do it in 3 trades lol.

tldamico

Fake meat is the new AMC.

pistachiopias

$AMC? What year is it?

JanetYellenNudes

Nah GME AMC bed bath beyond was 100x

sylphvanas

Someone plz pump my $AMC calls or its long $ROPE time

Key_One2402

Seasonal stats look interesting, but sample size is tiny and AMC is driven more by dilution and sentiment than patterns. I would be careful betting puts purely on seasonality.

Dr_Phil_Has_A_Huge_D

Imagine thinking this sub moves markets. GME, AMC, & BYND...were ALL independent of WSB when popped. While mods watched bots kill this sub. New one, on a different platform, beckons.

Dr_Phil_Has_A_Huge_D

The fact AMC is on the board, even over LW, is proof positive how hard WSB has jumped the shark. Bots, and the complicit mods, completely & utterly killed this sub. Change my mind?

Dr_Phil_Has_A_Huge_D

When AMC is making the board, you know this sub needs a thorough douching

Zuko2001

Question is if AMC owns the land the building are on or are they all leased?

Bowdallen

As a UFC fan that AMC idea sounds so much more fun

IslandExact429

Paramount is genuinely an ego maniac move $1B to buy out AMC, $400M in renovations and you have a sports cess pool or live events theater But nah. $80B for a fucking Harry Potter catalog

smoop86

So it begins. Nature is healing It all started with AMC and GME.

YesterdayShot521

Interesting observation. Seasonal patterns *do* show up sometimes, but AMC is also a heavily retail-driven, event-sensitive name. Year-end weakness could be a mix of tax-loss harvesting, reduced liquidity during holidays, and option positioning unwinds—but with a stock like AMC, idiosyncratic factors (sentiment, dilution news, short-interest dynamics) often dominate.

Ok_Cry7572

AMC plunges to an all-time low 📉

dgrant99

AMC

One_Breakfast8064

AMC is a revolutionary new stock that everyone should buy right now.

One_Breakfast8064

once I get in to AMC at $1.70 then we can start pumping

Sure_Needleworker_13

AMC

imhiLARRYous

Yes , AMC, mOaSs 2026 gUaRanTeEd 🤡 🦍🦧🐒🦍🦍

MonsterGuitarSolo

Me with my AMC shares. It’s not a loss if I don’t sell, right???

Rgraff58

AMC 🙄

JJEdwardsg

They have a pattern when they have to cover its literally the same as the Gamestop short Squeeze , AMC, BBBY, AND BYND MEAT!!!

casey-primozic

There's a new movie out called "Avatar: Fire and Ass". Looks promising. Calls on AMC.

spaceneenja

Yeah brother! AMC should be worth 1T if the hedgies weren’t colluding against us!! They/them are holding us down!!!!

NotawoodpeckerOwner

AMC, BB, NOK, GME, BBBY, TLRY, all pump and dumps that aren't really viable companies. GME kind of is now but that took a bunch of shareholder dilution to get there.

ai-moderator

#TLDR --- Ticker: AMC Direction: Up Prognosis: Accumulate shares at $1.75 Fundamental Analysis: The theater near my house has nice architecture Coping Mechanism: 550M share dilution is actually bullish

NotMe357

Oh fuck. Just let it go man. The GameStock and AMC age is over. Better move on than stay there. AMC is already down over 50% this year. Stop try create more bagholders.

IllAd7445

Call me crazy, but do your research and you’ll probably agree now is the best time to start accumulating AMC shares and maybe the safest place to park money right now. $1.75 a pop. You might as well grab a few hundred, right? You regards already throw blasphemous amounts of money on options strategies you don’t even know how to close out. They’ve recently approved the issuance of 550M new shares effectively doubling the share count. They can choose to use these to raise equity for the business, a good thing for the business. Most would say that it’s awful for shareholders dilution this dilution that blah blah blah. Sure, but that’s why you gather shares. So cheap it doesn’t matter what the price goes to. Look at the chart and ATH ever. $393 Imagine every $1.75 share you bought is worth $393 one day. The price doesn’t matter right now. AMC is a fire ass movie theater chain. Like the one by me is beautiful structure/aricherct, in a busy/higher income area, and has an enjoyable movie viewing experience that is above average for most theaters I’d say. Look at the analysts price targets and it’s like $2,3,4 I even seen a website say $20-30 dollar price target from some analyst. Wtf is he smoking I’ll take some of that shit. But that fact that there IS a price target like that? Ya know. TLDR: AMC stock share accumulation is safest place to park money. Under valued. Price targets from analysts are already $2,3,4… 100% increase. ATH of $394 and price of $2 right now. The risk to reward is insanely worth. Peace.

it_snow_problem

It is. Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink obviously reincorporated because of this. Then there’s Coinbase, Dropbox, and Affirm. Dillards and Andreessen Horowitz. So have Madison Square and AMC companies. TripAdvisor, Fidelity National Financial, Roblox, The Trade Desk. That’s about all the major ones I could find. That’s a big list though.

dbpatel219

Anyone know of any positive indicators for AMC? It's on the struggle bus.

That-Estate1298

Had a guy try to talk me out of Tesla when it was down to its lowest a few years back, also tried to talk me out of investing into the AMC and Gamestop short. Tried to say I was a fool and naive to think that someone not on wall street could make money retail investing. Needless to say I’m glad I didn’t listen to him. The GameStop and AMC earnings paid off my 4 year car loan within the first year I financed it.

Eastern-Sign6667

AMC

ThirdAltAccounts

Keep in mind that it could also be a trick by the hedgies In which case…AMC 🚀

goldencityjerusalem

Those 2 comments arent mutually exclusive. But taking care of shareholders is not overrated. Go ask AMC holders.

YamDifferent1805

0dte AMC calls

TheDynamicMolecule

I think people who blindly invest in these pumps and dumps deserve to lose. I remember when I was a fool and invested a large sum of money in AMC way back when. All these pumpers were screaming and yelling how the stock will go up any day. What happened? Smart people liquidated and dumb people got stuck. Think about this for a second. If you know of a stock that is going to jump,m and are good at predicting all that why would you share that info with anyone? Makes no sense. You would only do it to stocks where you think a small group of people will buy up a couple of hundreds of thousands of shares and you can liquidate. At the end of the day it’s your hard earned money and you are gambling by trusting random people on Reddit.

Fluffy_Charity_2732

I tried to summarize all that science word salad into chat gpt and it told me to YOLO into AMC

vermilli21

The more I read stuff in the Buttcorn subreddit, the more they starting to sound like the GME/AMC people....

Old_Homework8339

I sold at $69. You should how they think a squeeze is coming. Tradingview comments on the AMC side are ridiculous

OopsRdiditAgain

"affordability chrisis" = negotiate at the table before signing but it's a shakedown. I still don't think they belong in the growth sector, these bots better be awesome & i hope the bots have to pay taxes and earn a living wage. If not social security is tits up. With all the uncertainty I'm not leveraging myself for an overpriced conveyance. I don't even want the maintenance. Thank you driver. (Drop my gloves in the mailbox please, and thank you.) I'm always dropping my gloves. I knew this economy was happening but now what? We all invest in luxury gyms? Love the recliners at AMC & can't wait for Thursday. Anyone find a way to serve good cheap burgers with shoe string fries again yet?

hemmingwayshotgun

Speak for yourself I’ve got plenty of Jan 2027 dollar calls. They are dirt cheap and there are so many bagholders I would be shocked if there isn’t another meme mini-pump and I’m giving myself a year plus to be right. I didn’t even know there was a sub but yeah it’s probably just another version of the GME/AMC ones—a bunch of people who are convinced they are up against the entire financial world and only they can see this extremely convoluted and corrupt scheme that is all centered around a mid company….okay sure whatever. Just keep building the hype so I can make some money the next time it trends on twitter

zxced90

AMC,GME,BYND and BBBY have their own cult

stellarfury

Investing in AMC in 2025 is like investing in Blockbuster in 2010.

Different-Bill7499

AMC call options. All of it.

DeadSol

Crypto/GME/AMC is my guess.

huehuehuehero

AMC genuinely turned into a cult for some people.

Imaginary_Air_2514

All the evidence was there for AMC and I got screwed

raisedeyebrow4891

Wait… AMC at $141????!!?? What the actual fuck?

zitrored

Same questions people asked during the GameStop and AMC bubbles, and we all know how that ended.

timtam_z28

Not me. I use to be an index only guy. Got bored during COVID. It was just too obvious to not buy the biggest dips. I sold VOO and went like 70% in on VBK (small cap) because they took a bigger hit. IIRC it gained more than VOO as well. Then I bought VDE (Energy) dip. Then I bought AMC meme just for fun, only $500 worth unfortunately. Then I sold VBK in 2021 for NVDA, PLTR, COST, AXP, MSFT. Imagine if I had listened to Reddit advice...

timtam_z28

Same. It was just too obvious to not buy the biggest dips. I sold VOO and went like 70% in on VBK (small cap) because they took a bigger hit. IIRC it gained more than VOO as well. Then I bought VDE (Energy) dip. Then I bought AMC meme just for fun, only $500 worth unfortunately. Then I sold VBK in 2021 for NVDA, PLTR, COST, AXP, MSFT Imagine if I had listened to Reddit advice...

Wood_Ring

Don’t fall into the trap of conflating volatility risk premia with ‘income’, and don’t focus on the nominal premium received for selling volatility to the exclusion of considering whether you’re selling vol at a higher than fair value; the important thing is whether the premium is likely to be more than adequate compensation for the risk you’re assuming. That said, I don’t hate the AMC position if you were to do something like a buy-write with the Jan 16 $2 call as a standalone trade. I would never just hold the shares to write covered calls mechanically though; that’s not a good use of capital.  If you’re trying to grow the account quickly then you don’t really want to approach it like an investor. Investors are typically looking for somewhere to park their money to let it compound over time through things like earnings growth, shareholder yield, and multiple expansion. All of those usually take a relatively long time to occur. By contrast, you would probably want to be more in the mindset of advantage players, arbitrageurs, relative value traders, etc., who try to identify angles/edges that can be exploited quickly (and, ideally, repeatedly) before they disappear.

Supertramp81

Im a first time investor. Brand new out of the box and AMC is the first company ive put money in. How much do people genrally put in to make any kind of profit? I started with £80 and it's barely moved today. Would you experienced investors put alot more in on investments like AMC?

Ok_Guidance4571

Yes I did go with Higher volatile companies. I do think GME at 22 a share when they have warrants out there for $32 dollars next October makes i a little safer. And I am on the call side so I am selling the covered calls if they get exercised im good with it. I do Believe that BBAI is going places probably in the 10-15 dollar range in the next year or 2(pending how they handle dilution, and if the get government contracts while the Department of War is in office hehe). AMC yes I have a cost basis of 3.40 so getting hammered on that one. And I do have other accounts that are stable. goal for me here is to be able to start spending some of my gains...

DistributionBroad173

I would work on doing due diligence. You should pick one stock and treat it as your foundation. A solid company. Gamestop, BigBear, and AMC theatre are NOT solid companies. KO is a solid company. PG is a solid company. They are boring, but solid. MSFT, GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN, WMT are solid companies, growth stocks. Not as boring as KO and PG. You are working on the going for a grand slam on each and every trade.

stockstar2024

Thought on AMC? Will it recover soon?

iDontLikeItHere00

I made so much money on amc just after gamestop. I managed to buy $15/16 calls dates 2 weeks out the day before it ran from $11 to $40. Sold half near that top. Next day it ran up to 70. I closed everything around $65. My first ever experience with a large options position. I used a little over have of the after tax gains to put 20% down on a house. Locked in a 2.6% interest rates a year before mortgage rates got jacked up. The remainder became my seed capital. I got burned and learned lessons on super short dated options, now I *mostly* only buy options 30 - 90 dte. I made more on options this year than I did my real job. Thank you AMC.

Ok-Association-4933

Zoom out , my fiends , AMC is better for everyone . The missing ingredient 👨‍🍳 is a CEO to innovate . Bye. Bye . Adam.

blu_id

“Put the financials aside” This is an investment sub talking about what to invest in. And even if you want to put them aside, AMC is competing with absolute giant companies. Disney & Netflix, primarily. And those companies now own the studios that produce the movies AMC needs but they can just stream them straight to their services and cut AMC out. So AMC will have to pay an obscene amount just to get movies moving forward.

bullishSOB

Anyone else get in to AMC Robotics?

SolidReporter8229

FLWS next AMC type squeeze

weakObserver

What about AMC?

ThirdRepliesSuck

Gold is money and silver apparently is now used in a new kind of battery that’s better than our current tech. Platinum could be the AMC of the other two’s movement but I wouldn’t bet on it based on rarity. 

RebelWithoutaPause10

They still caged up in AMC?

mechanicalcontrols

Question. How much did you lose on GME, AMC and/or BBBY?

OutlandishnessUsed24

Let me be very direct here: **"Different hedge funds / cannibalistic"** Good. Multiple funds competing for 600K available shares to cover 527K in FTDs = bidding war. That helps, not hurts. **"Can't trade faster than systems"** Speed doesn't matter when the constraint is PHYSICAL SHARES. HFTs can't algo their way into shares that don't exist. This isn't a momentum play - it's a delivery obligation. **"Moonshots get shot down"** HOW did they get shot down? I'll tell you: * GME: Company diluted via S-3 * AMC: Company issued 400M+ shares * BYND: Bondholders converted $202M **Every single "shot down" had a MECHANISM.** FLWS has no S-3, no ATM, no convertible bonds. What's the mechanism here? **"Crime" / "spewing a lot"** To be clear: I'm sharing publicly available SEC filings, FINRA data, and statistical analysis. All sources cited. All verifiable. That's not "spewing" - that's due diligence. If you're suggesting hedge funds will commit crime to escape - name the specific mechanism. "Crime" as a vague concept doesn't settle FTDs. **"Bigger fish already cashed in"** Then why is short interest STILL 104% of float? If they cashed in, where's the exit? I've cited filings and data. You've cited vibes. Read the DD.

OutlandishnessUsed24

You're actually describing HOW we got here, not why it doesn't matter. **Naked shorting and rehypothecation create FTDs.** That's not a counterargument - that's literally the thesis. They DID rehypothecate. They DID naked short. And now 527K of those chickens come home to roost this week via T+35 settlement. **Those FTDs are LOCKED:** * Nov 11 fail → Dec 16 due * Nov 12 fail → Dec 17 due * Nov 13 fail → Dec 18 due Can they naked short MORE today? Sure. But that creates JANUARY FTDs. It doesn't change what's due THIS WEEK. The T+35 calendar is set. **"Where's the lock and key?"** It's the ESCAPE ROUTES: * GME escaped via S-3 dilution → **FLWS has no S-3** * AMC escaped via share issuance → **FLWS has no ATM program** * BYND escaped via bondholder conversion → **FLWS has zero convertible bonds** * All three had insider lending → **McCann Class B auto-converts if transferred** * Options rollover trick? **Used Oct 23. OI is tapped.** Yes, I followed those tickers. I watched the escapes. **That's why I'm here** \- because the escapes don't exist. Dig the hole deeper for January? Sure. Escape December? No mechanism exists.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Common response to the below: **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| || |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Respectfully, you're thinking about this wrong - and this is all in my DD if you'd read it. **"Wake me up when borrow fee hits triple digits"** You're anchoring to GME/AMC. But FLWS has NEVER had triple-digit fees. Its all-time max is 5.44%. You're waiting for a signal that doesn't exist for this ticker. **I pulled 18 months of data (52,240 observations):** |Metric|Value| |:-|:-| |Mean fee (18 months)|1.25%| |Max fee EVER|5.44%| |**Current fee**|**3.21%**| |Percentile|**Top 12% of ALL readings**| The current 3.21% is higher than 87.7% of every reading in 18 months. That's not "chump change" - that's a breakout. **Why the CHANGE matters:** The fee was pinned at 2.8-3.1% for weeks with a std dev of 0.078%. Today it broke to 3.21% - a **3.76 sigma event** (<0.02% chance of random noise). If a heart rate is 60-62 BPM for hours and hits 72, you don't say "wake me at 200." You recognize something changed. **When fees hit triple digits, you've already missed it.** By the time GME hit 100%+ CTB, the squeeze was running. The signal is the BREAK from normal, not some arbitrary peak. This is literally in my DD - the statistical analysis, the 18-month data, the sigma calculation. All there. The canary doesn't need to explode. It just needs to stop singing.

OutlandishnessUsed24

Appreciate the detailed response - you clearly know mechanics. Let me address this in the context of THIS specific setup: **1-2. Gamma initiates, but what sustains it?** Agreed gamma drives price discovery. But in GME/AMC, supply eventually arrived (dilution). In FLWS: no S-3 filed, no convertible bonds, McCanns can't lend without losing voting control. Gamma gets price there. Blocked exits keep it there. **3-4. "FTDs are back-office, gamma comes first"** Usually true. But FLWS has 527K shares due THIS WEEK with 600K available. Coverage ratio: 0.87x. This isn't theoretical future stress - it's 48 hours away. Gamma would accelerate something already in motion. **5-6. "High IV doesn't reduce delta/gamma"** Technically correct for dealer mechanics. But at 200% IV, retail's $1,000 buys fewer contracts = less TOTAL gamma retail can bring. And on shares having "no follow-through" - in a normal float, agreed. In a float where 94% is short and 527K must be delivered from 600K available? Every share removed IS follow-through. **7. "Options initiate, shares sustain"** This is where we AGREE. You said it yourself. My actual strategy: * Buy calls on dips * Sell calls when IV spikes * Convert premium to shares * Never sell the shares Options = initiation leverage Shares = sustained scarcity **The synthesis:** Gamma INITIATES (you're right). FTDs FORCE buying regardless (unique here). Blocked exits SUSTAIN it (no dilution). Shares COMPOUND it (constrained float). We're saying the same thing from different angles. You're focused on how squeezes start. I'm focused on why THIS one can't be unwound. Both matter :)

Buy_Sell_Hold

$AMC I keep buying every single dip like a loyal soldier, but these dips have dips now. When will it end?

TheSmokingLamp

AI slop from a pissed off uneducated retail “investor” who wants to blame the market being rigged for the reason his AMC/BYND/BBBY plays have lost him money

magicjohnson89

BYND lesson learned. In at AMC @ 4 and sold @ 7. Nearly made 10k GBP. REALISED. FINALLY.

primaboy1

AMC ape wants to be, going to zero 0️⃣

Dry_Celebration_5483

Careful man, next for you is AMC

hi5ves

Nobody is talking about AMC.

Jongjong998

are you talking about AMC? if not I have no idea what you're on about.

OutlandishnessUsed24

You built python scripts and screeners to find a stock that someone was able to find on a publicly available fin screener, filtering for unusual volume. \--Incorrect, you have no idea what I and people like me have been able to build in the last 60 days inparticular with VS addins like Cline and the new anthropic models. I can tell by the way youre still stuck in the past on your assumptions here. The last 60 days changes in anthropic models inparticular changes all of this. You then spammed the same ChatGPT produced excerpt several dozen times in several subreddits, and claim that you believe in this stock. \--10000% incorrect. I have spent weeks feeding data and saving very large paraquet files (something I could not do 60 days ago) to build the same quant level analysis that used to be impossible by people like us You can’t believe in a stock if the goal is to pump and dump it. You may have called BYND early, but so did a lot of people, and your posts about “WHOS STILL HOLDING BYND?!” suggests you ended up being a bagholder in that call. \---incorrect, I didnt put a thesis to BYND I just predicted the mechanical short squeeze that went to $7 and i took a lot of that data to feed into my models for FLWS. FWLS is different than BYND, GME, AMC, and whatever other meme stock you want to mention and my thesis mentions this but you have refused to read it by the fact you havent rebuted any of it yet. If you’re still holding onto GME because you called it and believe in it, then you certainly aren’t the person to back for stock picks. \---I'm not holding GME, again, i just used that as my first experience building databases and modeling on what happened there. Especially when your supposed self built python scripts are finding you stocks that have been peddled by bots in this subreddit for nearly a month now. \---u think i built a sentiment scrapper? that is the easiest thing to do, not to mention free already, no need to build that. Just use Chart Exchange below which is ironically caputering us talking about FLWS right now.... my DD is an attempt to show up in other peoples sentiment screeners so they can look deeper here actually..... this is a 4D chess move, with real squeeze mechanics, and real value long term; similar to GME when it was though of as a bankrupt company but still very different. Any challenge to the thesis yet or just my character that is all theoritcal because you dont know me?