MATH

KTRyan30

I have a stop loss at 7 cents, ideally with a play like this if the share price increases instead of having a stop loss for all of my shares at 7 cents I'll breaking my holdings into groups with multiple stop losses and/or trailing stop losses. The last shady play like this I made was metalpha technology ($MATH), which I rode from $1 to $4 selling at various points in the $2-$4 range on the way back down. My total return on that was around 55%. I think this can be an amplified version of that play. Or it might tank tomorrow, such is the nature of gambles like this.

Jammer7648

Ran the math on this, came out pretty interesting, only need 385m in buys to trigger GME level short squeeze: used claude for assistance # Full Math on the "Save Wendy's" Squeeze — Here's Exactly What It Would Take to Get a GME-Style Move in $WEN **Disclaimer up top: not financial advice, not a call to action, no positions. This is the math of whether a GME-style squeeze is even possible in WEN, using real public numbers as of mid-July 2026. Coordinating trades to push a price is market manipulation territory — this post is analysis, period.** # SECTION 1: THE RAW NUMBERS (all real, all sourced) |Metric|Value|Source/Date| |:-|:-|:-| |Share price|\~$7.45|July 11, 2026| |Shares outstanding|190.48M|Latest filings| |Float (freely tradable)|\~135.8M shares|Derived: 51.67M short ÷ 38.04%| |Market cap|\~$1.42B|July 2026| |**Shares sold short**|**51,668,925**|NASDAQ report, June 15, 2026| |**Short % of float**|**38.04%**|Same report (ORTEX: \~34%; S3: \~23% — vendors differ, all high)| |**Days to cover**|**6.58**|June 15 report| |Borrow utilization|\~80% of lendable shares already on loan|ORTEX, late June 2026| |Normal daily volume|\~5–7M shares (\~$40–50M)|Pre-meme 3-month average| |Analyst median target|\~$8.00, consensus "Hold"|14 analysts, last 6 months| And the live experiment we already ran: **June 24, 2026** — the "Save Wendy's" post hits WSB overnight, stock opens hot, spikes **+42% intraday** (halted), closes **+25.64% at $7.87** on **202 million shares** — \~15x the float's normal daily churn, \~1,483% above average volume. Two days later, most of it had faded. # SECTION 2: THE MATH, LAID OUT STEP BY STEP # 2.1 — What the entire playing field costs Float: 135.8M shares Price: $7.45 Entire float value: 135.8M × $7.45 ≈ $1.01 BILLION Shorts' buyback bill: 51.7M × $7.45 ≈ $385 MILLION (at current price) Every $1 the price rises adds **\~$52M** to the shorts' collective paper loss (51.7M shares × $1). |If WEN goes to...|Shorts' mark-to-market loss (vs $7.45 entry basis)| |:-|:-| |$10|\~$132M| |$15|\~$390M| |$20|\~$649M| |$30|\~$1.17B| For scale: Melvin Capital lost **$6.8B in one month** on GME and needed a $2.75B bailout. A total WEN short loss of a few hundred million spread across many funds is painful, not fatal. Nobody's getting margin-called into oblivion at $15. # 2.2 — What buying pressure actually moves the price June 24 gave us a real price-impact data point: * \~202M shares of gross volume → +25.6% close * But gross volume ≠ net buying. Most of that was day traders hot-potato-ing shares. The *net* new money that stuck was a small fraction — and the price round-tripped back to the mid-$7s within days. The variable that matters is **shares bought AND HELD off the market**, because that's what makes borrow scarce. Rough tiers (price impact makes these grow as you go): Absorb 25% of float: ~34M shares → ~$250–350M held Absorb 50% of float: ~68M shares → ~$500–700M+ held (price runs on you) Absorb 75% of float: ~102M shares → realistically $1B+ held And the sellers are right there waiting: institutions own most of the float and demonstrably sell into strength — AQR dumped 8.6M shares (−73% of its stake) in Q1 2026, Harris Associates dumped 4M. Every leg up gets supplied. # 2.3 — The shorts' escape hatch Days to cover = 6.58 at *normal* volume. But squeezes create their own liquidity: on a 202M-share day, all 51.7M short shares could theoretically be covered **four times over**. High-volume spike days are a covering gift. Short interest actually *rose 2.79%* into mid-June — shorts weren't fleeing, they were adding at better prices. # SECTION 3: WHAT MADE GME "GME" — AND THE CHECKLIST WEN WOULD HAVE TO HIT GameStop January 2021 wasn't just "high short interest + Reddit." It was a five-condition perfect storm. Here's each condition, and where WEN stands: # Condition 1: Short interest OVER 100% of float * **GME: \~140% of float.** More shares were short than existed to trade. Covering was musical chairs with negative chairs — *someone* had to pay any price. * **WEN: 23–38% of float.** Genuinely crowded, top-of-market crowded — but every short can mathematically exit. There is no negative-chairs endgame. * **What would have to happen:** short interest would need to roughly **quadruple** while the float shrank. Shorts would have to keep pressing a position that's already at \~80% borrow utilization with rising borrow fees. Possible if the stock rallied hard and shorts doubled down — but nothing in 2026's post-GME risk management suggests funds will ever let themselves get to 140% again. Prime brokers watch this number now. # Condition 2: The float gets locked up by diamond hands * **GME:** retail + insiders (Ryan Cohen's 12.9%) + index funds effectively froze most of the tradable supply. Borrow fees exploded; utilization hit 100%. * **WEN:** utilization is high (\~80%) but institutions holding \~136M shares are *sellers* into every rally, constantly resupplying the borrow pool. * **What would have to happen:** roughly **$500M–$1B+ of retail money buying and holding through 40% drawdowns**, without paper-handing the first 30% pop. June 24 proved the crowd shows up for a day; the position was mostly unwound within 48 hours. A squeeze needs weeks of held supply, not one halted morning. # Condition 3: A gamma squeeze amplifier (partially available) * **GME:** cheap far-OTM weekly calls were bought en masse → market makers delta-hedged by buying stock → price up → more hedging → feedback loop. This did as much work as short covering. * **WEN:** the options chain is liquid and cheap (unusual options activity was flagged June 29–July 2), so the *mechanism* exists. But WEN's options open interest is a rounding error next to GME 2021's, and market makers now charge much fatter premiums on meme names the moment volatility spikes — the ammo gets expensive exactly when you need it. * **What would have to happen:** sustained, massive OTM call buying across multiple weeks of expiries, forcing dealers net-short gamma. Order of magnitude: tens of millions of dollars a week in premium, burned repeatedly, most of it expiring worthless if the stock stalls. # Condition 4: A trapped, oversized single victim * **GME:** Melvin Capital had a huge, publicly-known short and became the raid target. Its forced unwind was the detonation. * **WEN:** the short is distributed across many funds (plus merger-arb/dividend-capture-style shorts). Distributed shorts cover calmly; there's no single whale to break. * **What would have to happen:** disclosure that one fund holds a massive concentrated WEN short. No such disclosure exists. # Condition 5: A catalyst + narrative that survives contact with earnings * **GME:** Ryan Cohen joining the board, console-cycle turnaround story, DFV's yearlong DD — the narrative had *bull-case fundamentals* attached. * **WEN:** the fundamentals are the bear case: Q4 2025 US same-store sales **−11.3%**, Q1 2026 same-restaurant sales −8% with net income −42%, \~200 stores already closed and 300–350 more closing through 2026, \~$4B net debt, management calling 2026 a "rebuilding year." Next earnings: **August 7, 2026**, consensus expects another down quarter. * **What would have to happen:** a genuine bull catalyst — a blowout quarter, a buyout bid (Nelson Peltz/Trian chatter exists but nothing announced), or a Cohen-style activist with a credible plan. Absent that, every earnings date is a scheduled bomb under the rally. **Scorecard: WEN hits 0 of 5 GME conditions outright.** What it does have — 38% SI, 6.6 days to cover, 80% utilization, cheap stock, famous brand — is enough for what we already saw: violent 25–42% one-day spikes that hurt shorts' P&L and then fade. That's a squeeze *trade*, not a GME *event*. # SECTION 4: THE PART THAT BREAKS THE WHOLE "SAVE WENDY'S" PREMISE Even if everything above happened and WEN went to $50: 1. **Wendy's receives $0.** Open-market buying pays the *seller* of the shares, not the company. The corporate treasury doesn't move whether the ticker says $6 or $60. 2. Wendy's actual problems — falling traffic, −11.3% comps, $4B of net debt, 500+ closures — are fixed by **revenue**, not by share price. 3. The only bridge from "meme rally" to "company gets money" is the **AMC playbook**: the company issues NEW shares into the inflated price. AMC raised \~$2.2B this way in 2021 and genuinely dodged bankruptcy. But note the built-in self-destruct: issuing shares floods the market with exactly the supply that kills the squeeze and dilutes the people who pumped it. Wendy's has announced no offering — and honestly doesn't need one; it still generated \~$222M of free cash flow and pays a 7.5% dividend. 4. If the sub actually wants to save Wendy's: **the load-bearing transaction is a Baconator, not a limit order.** # SECTION 5: BOTTOM LINE * Mechanically possible squeeze *trade*? Yes — the June 24 tape proves \~$100–200M of aggressive net buying can rip this thing 25–42% in hours. * GME-style 25x event? The math says no: shorts are at 38% of float, not 140%; they can cover; institutions resupply every rally; there's no gamma engine at scale, no trapped whale, no bull catalyst; and earnings on Aug 7 is a live grenade. * Total capital to even attempt float-lock conditions: **high hundreds of millions to $1B+, held for weeks**, against sellers who own the float and shorts who used the last spike as an entry. * And the punchline stands: none of that money reaches Wendy's.

teh_herper

# DAMN KOREANS, I GUESS ALL THAT TIME AT MATH COMPETITIONS DIDN'T TEACH Y'ALL HOW NOT TO BE PAPER-HANDED BIH's I SEE

jijitalk

That’s my QUANT. MY QUANTITATIVE, my MATH specialist, look at him. His name is (whatever your name is) and he won a regard competition in the market and he’s not even acoustic!

BeginMethionine

MY QUANTITATIVE! MY MATH SPECIALIST! Look at her, you notice anything different about her? Look at her face. …That's pretty racist. Look at her skin, I'll give you a hint, her name is Laquisha. She won a national twerking competition in Atlanta! She doesn’t even know what Bollinger Bands are! Yeah I'm sure of the math. …Actually, my name's Sarah… and I do know what Bollinger Bands are. Jared likes to say I don't because he thinks it makes me seem more authentic. And I got second in that national twerking competition.

Qwelfr

Hey that’s where the real MATH is.

Successful-Night9263

He won a MATH competition in *CHINA*

zxc123zxc123

This is art. Still waiting for someone to do this but with Tom Lee screaming at a bunch of Asian guys with Mark Newton in the room. Tom Lee: "Look at him, that's my tech." Asian Baum: "Your what?" Tom Lee: "My TECHNICALS. My swiggly lines specialist. Look at him, you notice anything different about him? Look at his face!" Asian Baum: "That's pretty racist." Tom Lee: "Look at his eyes, I'll give you a hint, his name is Marcus-Aurelius. He won a national art competition in Greece! HE DOESN'T EVEN SPEAK MATH! Yeah I'm sure of the candles."

beerstearns

My financial advisor (who gets no pussy) wants me to use my employer’s 401k but I don’t take stock tips from MATH NERDS

tachyonvelocity

"Whether it’s 1%, 5%, or whatever the maths the same." "To actually almost 5x? And that math DOESNT sound wrong to you?" "But we are talking long term buy and hold which, believe it or not, does include bear markets" There has literally been 2 bear markets since 2020 for QQQ. What it sounds like is you refuse to do or understand maths and just go with what "sounds" correct because it's safe to assume what everyone else thinks is correct. Classic sheep behavior. What you and almost everyone miss is "volatility decay" is not a set number, it's a range dependent on volatility, no the math isn't the same. Here's the MATH and not what "sounds" correct: **100** \- **90** \- **99** is -10% +10%, total -1%. For a 3x LETF, that's **100** \- **70** \- **91**, total -9%. That's a **"decay" of \~ -6%** because the expected 3x return is -3%. If you go down -1% for 10 days so that the unleveraged QQQ or index falls 10% total and then go up 1% multiple days what you get is: **100** \- 100\*0.99\^10 or **90.44** \- 90.44\*1.01\^10 or **99.9**, total -0.1%. For a 3x LETF, that's **100** \- 100\*0.97\^10 or **73.74** \- 73.74\*1.03\^10 or **99.1**, total -0.9%. That's a **"decay" of -0.6%** **over 20 days** because the expected 3x return is -0.3%. See how the MATH on volatility decay completely changes dependent on volatility? "Volatility decay" is a range from almost zero if the index moves \~1% per day, to somewhat high if index moves over 10%. **How much do you think the QQQ index moves on average, closer to 1% per day or 10% per day**? Now what happens when there is a bull market? Multiple days of +1% moves like the previous example shows this: if we move +1% for 10 straight days, **100** \- 100\*1.01\^10 or **110.46,** that's 10.46% due to compounding. For a 3x LETF? **100** \- 100\*1.03\^10 or **134.39**, that's 34.39% due to compounding. You see how the "expectation" for 3x LETF is 10.46% x 3 or 31.38%, BUT due to "leveraged compounding," the actual return is 34.39%, a realized leverage of 3.3x? The MATH you are missing is "volatility decay" isn't the whole story. If you don't include "leveraged compounding," you completely misunderstood the actual results.

ARAKAPABE

you can only lose 100%! but you can gain 1000% THE MATH MEANS WE CAN ONLY WIN !

DeltaVx_

UPDATE: DID THE MATH. I should be good until intel hits about 92.50, then my balance goes to zero.

New-Performance-7047

Exactly the opposite! Selling options can give you a winning average and a losing account. Buying options (and using stop limits) keeps your wins and account balanced. It’s MATH. Buying options also gives the opportunity to roll your winners and it’s possible to roll enough times to be in a free trade. Not possible selling and way riskier selling if you try! Learning to identify and follow uptrends when entering and downtrends to exit is the hardest part of buying calls. That and setting a risk tolerance level. Buying calls let’s you save time and make money with less risk.

jsands7

Allbirds went AI and went from $2 to $20. THEREFORE, when Nike announces AI it will go from $45 to $450. ITS JUST BASIC MATH.

Blade3colorado

Wrong . . . That's this morning so far. DO THE MATH.

No_Turn5018

MATH. For fuck sakes man do you not have an 8th grade education? Do you not know how averages work?

QTpieme

WHY IS QBTS AND RGTI MARKET CAP THE SAME AS SMCI!!??? SOMEONE… the MATH IS NOT MATHINGGGGGG. SMCI HAS REAL REVENUE, products INCOME !!!!

Lord_Raza

Alright, deep breath. I’m bullish on HGRAF too, but this post reads like it was written after someone snorted a line of investor deck powder and decided they now have a PhD in materials science. A few things for the room before everyone mortgages their house: 1. “Only company in the world” This is where the alarm bells start ringing. HydroGraph’s detonation graphene is interesting. Turbostratic structure is good. High SP2 bonding is good. But claiming no one else can make comparable graphene is straight-up marketing language. There are multiple CVD, plasma, flash joule, and exfoliation groups producing high-quality graphene. The real question is cost and scalability, not some anime-style “one true graphene.” 2. Turbostratic ≠ magic fairy dust Yes, turbostratic graphene reduces restacking. That’s good for dispersion. But saying it “cannot agglomerate” is nonsense. Every nanopowder on earth agglomerates depending on processing, surface chemistry, and mixing conditions. Anyone who has ever tried dispersing carbon black, CNTs, or graphene into polymers knows this. 3. The economics you quoted are… optimistic The $250k/ton number floating around is basically high-grade lab graphene pricing, not guaranteed industrial contract pricing. Industrial customers buying hundreds or thousands of tons do not pay boutique lab prices. If they did, every tire company on earth would already be using graphene. Margins also shrink fast when you scale production, build plants, hire staff, run QA, and deal with logistics. 4. The “1000 ton customer” narrative People keep repeating this like it’s already signed. As far as anyone can publicly verify, HydroGraph is still in the qualification / testing phase with customers. That’s normal for advanced materials. But jumping straight to “$200M cash flow” is fantasy until actual supply contracts exist. 5. Regulatory approvals are good — but not magic TSCA and REACH registrations are important. They basically mean regulators allow the material to be sold under certain conditions. But they do not guarantee demand. Plenty of materials have approvals and still never get adopted commercially. Now, all that said: HydroGraph does have interesting tech. The modular reactor concept is clever. If they can produce consistent quality graphene at scale and actually get it into real applications (composites, batteries, coatings, concrete, etc.), then yeah — the upside could be huge. But this post reads like a cult recruitment pamphlet. If HGRAF succeeds, it won’t be because someone screamed “DO THE MATH IDIOTS” on Reddit. It will be because: • manufacturers adopt it • supply contracts get signed • production scales • and the economics actually work Until then, everyone should probably dial the IQ back up above room temperature before declaring graphene the second coming of electricity.

CuteHand

“DO THE MATH IDIOTS on that revenue potential” I would love to talk to my clients like this when convincing them to spend money!

zxc123zxc123

>She is, thats why she is married to a men, duh. Sounds logical to me. I don't get why folks don't understand such simple #MATH: * porn with 2 guys sexing = gay * porn with 10 guys sexing 1 girl = Literally a convenient excuse to watch a bunch of naked dudes wank their dicks with 1 girl that just happens to be there. Bisexual or closeted gay * porn with 1 guy and 1 girl or any other 1:1 ratio = Straight. Just like the bible or whatever other flying spaghetti monster book you believe in taught you. * porn with 1 guy sexing 10 girls = Fewer guys. More girls. Less sausagefest and more tacoparty. * porn with 1 girl with a dick sexing 10 girls = More straight than normal straight that the prior one because you can't even have 1 full guy. It's only 1/2 a guy at best. * porn with 2 girls, 0:1 gender ratio, and/or Les/Yuri porn = **MAXIMUM STRAIGHTNESS**. For men so straight they'll lose their boner at even the sight of any male body part. Truly the ultimate straight man's choice

TheDrummerMB

criticizing a LANGUAGE model for not being good at MATH makes YOU the idiot in this situation.

RepresentativeBarber

THE WHOLE WORLD HAS BEEN TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE VERY STUPIDLY GENEROUS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION. MY MATH SKILLS ARE POOR AND MY BUTT IS HURT. I WILL THEREFORE IMPOSE A 1500% ON THE UNIVERSE. AMERICA WILL NOT BE THE LAUGHINGSTOCK ANYMORE!! ARE WE GREAT AGAIN YET??? (I hope so). THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!!

Winter-Parfait-4822

Holy shit bro did the MATH

skilliard7

> Wrong, I’ve already calculated. If you invested $120k in SPY in 2000 at average prices you’d have principal of about $1M and a dividend yield of 5.13%. This isn’t difficult to do. It’s MATH. You are wrong. 5.13% of $120k, not 5.13% of $1 Million Ok I realized you are a troll and will stop engaging, nicely done

Tallwhitedude123

Wrong, I’ve already calculated. If you invested $120k in SPY in 2000 at average prices you’d have principal of about $1M and a dividend yield of 5.13%. This isn’t difficult to do. It’s MATH. You are wrong.

ASUS_USUS_WEALLSUS

MATH

noanswer165

About The HYMC This HYMC 55 Call is a low-probability bet: The stock is ~34.6 and your strike is 55 → it needs about +59% in ~40 days. IV ~162% means the option is expensive (premium inflated). Theta -0.072 means you lose about $7.20 per day per contract from time decay. Conclusion: The math is against you. Time decay will keep bleeding you. When to EXIT vs HOLD (rules) EXIT (SELL) if ANY of these happen: Stock breaks below 30.00 (hard stop) Option price breaks below 1.80 (hard stop) If you don’t get a strong breakout soon: Sell within the next 3–5 trading days (time decay accelerates) ONLY HOLD if ALL of these happen: Stock closes above 39.00 with a strong bullish candle (close near the high) Option price reclaims ≥ 3.30 If that doesn’t happen, holding is just paying theta. Profit-taking (if you get a bounce) Take profit / reduce if option hits 3.30–3.50 Exit fully if stock rejects around 45–46 (likely resistance) Execution Command: Sell on the next pop. Do not average down. SLV: THE MATH (John Hull Logic) Your 125C is very far OTM (SLV ~70 vs strike 125). It needs a massive move to win. Theta = -0.038 → you’re bleeding about $3.8/day per contract (100 multiplier). IV ~88% → expensive premium; if IV drops, you can lose even if price doesn’t move much. Delta ~0.205 → weak sensitivity; small stock moves won’t help enough. 2. THE CHART (Brooks & Wyckoff) After a big run-up, SLV had a sharp selloff (distribution/markdown). Current bounce is not a strong bullish trigger yet. 3. THE EXECUTION COMMAND SELL now (or on the next pop). Do not average down. If you insist on a last rule-based hold: exit if SLV breaks ~67 (hard stop).

IanCurtis640

WHERE IS THE MATH

Electrical_Yam_2243

You're going to get the same thing you always get. You shouldn't magically start to expect anything different. Our economy is a joke.  12 year olds write programs now that do all of this stuff for investors.  Ai can tell you when it's optimal to  Buy property Sell property Buy stock Sell stock Buy Gold Sell Gold All based on... goofy made up inflation rates based on emotions.  The best thing we can do is ask someone smarter to be transparent and do it all for us. Like God, or the closest thing we have - semiconductors and software.  Interest rates requires connect data that is accurate (backed by a trusted blockchain and not a centralized server ran by Trump) AND MATH Anyone else is full on retar..

Anxious_Comparison77

trading setups? and blaming tuesday. I'm sorry as this will come off as rude. You still haven't learned. the market is MATH, sales revenue, new tech and profits is what moves the price up. Nothing else. No line or day of the week will every change that.

im_burning_cookies

Everything is MATH!!!!

Otherwise-Ask7900

MATH!

OutlandishnessUsed24

**What happens as retail REMOVES supply:** RETAIL BUYS SUPPLY LEFT RATIO PRICE TARGET & HOLDS THIS WEEK ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── 0 (now) 1,600K 3.0x $4-5 ░░ 250K 1,350K 2.6x $5-6 ▓░░ 500K 1,100K 2.1x $6-8 ▓▓░░ 750K 850K 1.6x $8-10 ▓▓▓░░ 1,000K 600K 1.1x $10-15 ▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,250K 350K 0.66x $15-25 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,500K 100K 0.19x $25-50+ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 2,000K+ DEFICIT ~0x ∞ 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 **THE NUCLEAR MATH:** Actually available to trade: **\~2.89M shares** (After removing McCann's 50.84% + locked institutions) To lock the float entirely: RETAIL TRADERS EACH BUYS TOTAL CAPITAL ────────────────────────────────────────────── 10,000 ~$1,257 $12.57M 25,000 ~$503 $12.57M 50,000 ~$251 $12.57M **$12.57M locks the entire float. That's one viral post.** **WHY IT ACCELERATES:** Retail buys → Supply drops → Price rises ↓ ┌──────────────────┴───────────────────┐ ↓ ↓ ↓ FOMO kicks in Shorts panic $5/$6 calls go ITM ↓ ↓ ↓ More buying More buying MM gamma hedging ↓ ↓ ↓ └──────────────────┴───────────────────┘ ↓ Supply drops MORE ↓ REPEAT **Econ 101:** Price rises until supply = demand. If supply = 0 and demand is mandatory... there is no ceiling.

OutlandishnessUsed24

**What happens as retail REMOVES supply:** RETAIL BUYS SUPPLY LEFT RATIO PRICE TARGET & HOLDS THIS WEEK ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── 0 (now) 1,600K 3.0x $4-5 ░░ 250K 1,350K 2.6x $5-6 ▓░░ 500K 1,100K 2.1x $6-8 ▓▓░░ 750K 850K 1.6x $8-10 ▓▓▓░░ 1,000K 600K 1.1x $10-15 ▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,250K 350K 0.66x $15-25 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,500K 100K 0.19x $25-50+ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 2,000K+ DEFICIT ~0x ∞ 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 **THE NUCLEAR MATH:** Actually available to trade: **\~2.89M shares** (After removing McCann's 50.84% + locked institutions) To lock the float entirely: RETAIL TRADERS EACH BUYS TOTAL CAPITAL ────────────────────────────────────────────── 10,000 ~$1,257 $12.57M 25,000 ~$503 $12.57M 50,000 ~$251 $12.57M **$12.57M locks the entire float. That's one viral post.** **WHY IT ACCELERATES:** Retail buys → Supply drops → Price rises ↓ ┌──────────────────┴───────────────────┐ ↓ ↓ ↓ FOMO kicks in Shorts panic $5/$6 calls go ITM ↓ ↓ ↓ More buying More buying MM gamma hedging ↓ ↓ ↓ └──────────────────┴───────────────────┘ ↓ Supply drops MORE ↓ REPEAT **Econ 101:** Price rises until supply = demand. If supply = 0 and demand is mandatory... there is no ceiling.

OutlandishnessUsed24

**What happens as retail REMOVES supply:** RETAIL BUYS SUPPLY LEFT RATIO PRICE TARGET & HOLDS THIS WEEK ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── 0 (now) 1,600K 3.0x $4-5 ░░ 250K 1,350K 2.6x $5-6 ▓░░ 500K 1,100K 2.1x $6-8 ▓▓░░ 750K 850K 1.6x $8-10 ▓▓▓░░ 1,000K 600K 1.1x $10-15 ▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,250K 350K 0.66x $15-25 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 1,500K 100K 0.19x $25-50+ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ 2,000K+ DEFICIT ~0x ∞ 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 **THE NUCLEAR MATH:** Actually available to trade: **\~2.89M shares** (After removing McCann's 50.84% + locked institutions) To lock the float entirely: RETAIL TRADERS EACH BUYS TOTAL CAPITAL ────────────────────────────────────────────── 10,000 ~$1,257 $12.57M 25,000 ~$503 $12.57M 50,000 ~$251 $12.57M **$12.57M locks the entire float. That's one viral post.** **WHY IT ACCELERATES:** Retail buys → Supply drops → Price rises ↓ ┌──────────────────┴───────────────────┐ ↓ ↓ ↓ FOMO kicks in Shorts panic $5/$6 calls go ITM ↓ ↓ ↓ More buying More buying MM gamma hedging ↓ ↓ ↓ └──────────────────┴───────────────────┘ ↓ Supply drops MORE ↓ REPEAT **Econ 101:** Price rises until supply = demand. If supply = 0 and demand is mandatory... there is no ceiling.

OutlandishnessUsed24

THIS IS PURE MATH! THE CIELING IS WHEN SHAREHOLDERS DECIDE TO SELL! And if we dont get in the only other shareholders are the family and employees and they have SPECIFIC RULES and are HEAVILY investing in this turn around

NOMADGRUBS

She said GIRL MATH so I covered her mouth and shoved her head under water and said GIRL BATH 🛀 we’re both having fun now

I3emis

MATH

Initial_Ad_9250

Why tf is MATH on the board?

Pleasant_Gold_3634

Idk what MATH is but I do know this shit ain’t mathin

Tropicalfisher

He won an internal MATH COMPETITION. In CHYYNAAHH

ajohns74

DO THE MATH

RaLaZa

Which ticker is MATH?

BackgroundArtist9883

"prices are coming down 400%, 200%, 600%" thats not how MATH WORKS!!! Were fucked

Secure-Fly6213

It's just the fucking set questions. WHY ARE THERE PARAGRAPHS IN MY MATH QUESTIONS 😭

showyerbewbs

> It said DOGE actions saved me $995, over the course of my lifetime Time for my favorite activity, NAPKIN MATH. Suppose you get your first job at 18 and you work until you're 65. That's 47 years. If you do the division 995/47 you get 21.17. Per year. PER FUCKING YEAR. That's not even a tank of gas on a standard 10 or 11 gallon gas tank. It's always these big numbers thrown around that look big in the moment but once you scale them out it looks like they just got out of the pool on a November evening.

Popular-Today2511

I'm aware of the complex MATH behind it which is exactly why it's fucken idiotic thinking you can out performed the computing power of the elite's machines that are reading all the shares and options activity in the time it takes you to type in a ticker. What moves the needle is already in place, bought in and sold for tomorrow while you're trying to "analyze" your next move today. But hey go right ahead buddy, I'm sure you will keep getting it right in a Bull market lmfao just remember this exchange when it turns into a Bear market and you start blaming everything else instead of realizing your entire method was complete luck in a rising market

Many_Easy

Being patient doesn’t negate that “few weeks” comment, whether a “promise” or not was not kept. We are now at day 32 days which is **not a few weeks** by any measure unless you’re doing **MAGA MATH.** I get that that the poor math interpretation could be a result of Tang’s attack by his Department of Education on schools and universities.

Myrajes

Hell yeah MATH

JohnGuy1980

This reminds me of these MATH type people that can never play poker well. I'm serious, there is an type. Eventually you learn it's not all about probabilities or maybe it is all about probabilities but it's not about raw calculation because you can't know if your opponent is representing an better hand then you have or not. In probability terms. (There is no way to calculate it because of randomness) Knowing the probability that your hand will improve with the turn and river still to be dealt can only help you so much, and if you over rely on that information it makes you easy to beat.

CEOofBeanz

#The replacement for the quant guy who replaced the quant guy has been fired by my quant. MY QUANTA-TA-TIVE. MY MATH SPECIALIST

Thanosmiss234

What happen you don't like the MATH, now? The more expensive things become the less you can afford, regards of your credit and income amount.

cinJESUS

27g gold card costs 100,000 points ($1,000) 36g gold card costs 850,000 points ($8,500) MATH IS NOT MATHING

BeardedWall

What my colleague nicely said.. get that NERD shit out of here.  Like MATH has anything to do with options

Immediate-Sky9959

Executive Order coming soon to change the old math to TRUMP MATH. In his world, he can cut the price on anything by over 100% and then it is affordable to everyone. What is fascinating is that not one of his DUMB ASS buddies has said a word about the New Math.

palindromic

robots that can WIN money on So Tou Think You Can Dance - YOU DO THE MATH.. or ask Grok to

ValshaunValerii

SMCI, MU, NVTS, ON, STNE. Extremely Speculative: a wild penny stock (MATH). Also watching MODV after a big drop.

cum-bucket-daddy

Ok. Except it’s not. Not even close. I’m suuuuuper fucking retarded but this is just throwing shit at the wall. Please prove me wrong. Show me the ~~money~~ MATH why you think this makes sense. No hate, bro. I do stupid shit all the time too. But those puts are long dead for literally every reason why RKLB is killing it and has been for years. I have LITERALLY never seen a single retard ever profit off RKLB put. Ever.

edwinthepig

How much did a candy bar cost when your grandparents were kids. 5 cents? What is it now? $3? A candy bar has inflated 60x in price over the years because the dollar has no limit to how much it can be debased, but a useful asset that can’t be debased, priced in that same infinite currency, can’t hit $[insert high price here] why? Because every government in the world will start becoming fiscally responsible and stop printing more money by the trillions? Don’t take my word for it. Just DO THE MATH.

flat_top

Yes, the 5.75% sales charge goes to paying your advisor for the "advice" >$6113 is being invested? The other $886 goes to them? MATH: (7000 * 12.6%) No, you don't add percentages together. You put $3500 into 2 funds with 5.75% sales charges each, that's $402. There are thousands of no load mutual funds and even more ETFs available. There is no need to use an advisor unless you value their advice. In which case you need to pay them one way or another.

Gloomy_MTTime420

I suspect you’ll be entertaining in those conversations. You always are 😉 I’m on a different thesis - companies embracing crypto as their company treasury, something $NVVE seems to be embracing. After that $SBET unfurling and one of the most impressive runs I’ve seen in a long time, still a bit salty my limit order of 150 shares for $2.67 didn’t execute the morning the run started. Damn slow fill times and slippage. F$ck! 🤣 But anyways, convinced we are on the precipice of a financial shift and even though those changes are volatile, fraught with unknowns and so plenty of pundits and naysayers, but that’s not how progress occurs. $SBET is a curious play now they are the largest institutional holder of $ETH, and in the gaming/entertainment industry, $NVVE, $KULR, and others like $MATH or $DFDV. Oh, and an OTC ticker I have my eye on is $MTWO - look into its merger with $SOAR. https://preview.redd.it/ek7uck3iz97f1.jpeg?width=1098&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=628de1b307c0b072a6250b594916f028ef144968

Valuable_Example1689

Engineer A likes to pleasure women? THE MATH AINT MATHING

VolatilityVandel

Negative. It’s basic math. There are NO assumptions. The math tells me the best strike based on the current spot price, and the Delta, Gamma and Theta of all the strikes in the chain. It calculates and scores each strike and outputs the strike with the best score for calls and the best score for puts. The MATH tells me the best strikes. Nothing else.

crazywidget

lol wut They don't send an issue-specific notice unless um, the MATH says that there might be a discrepancy. So yes, that's how it works esp for stuff on a 1099-XYZ ...stuff is reported, matched, and eventually - when it doesn't add up - a notice is triggered. Or a correspondence audit. Or a full audit. Or you're picked up in the a random sampling - either the national research program - in which case it's not math about you. Just remember [the IRS has no time limit if they can decide to consider it fraud - either criminal or civil.](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/business-law-today/2017-august/irs-can-audit-for-three-years/)

Match_MC

Sir we don’t do MATH in here, that was debunked on Jan 20th

KimGeuniAI

Love watching the capitalism fucking himself to death slowly. Its the destiny of capitalism. Death spiral. It's insane how stupid people are. People want an infinite amount of dolls at a less than zero dollars price. Well, ok. Among those monkeys, Trump, as a true capitalist, is among the only one figuring out that capitalism is actually not sustainable ... how funny is this. Guys, it's MATH !

Reventlov123

This is the ideal mindset to have. Don't worry about trying to "make more money," just reliably make money and don't choose to lose money (have a long-term mindset and wait out dips). You are not Warren Buffett. You are probably no better than average at picking stocks... and average, even for professionals, sucks. You probably aren't going to be lucky. Just think and do math. Know the difference between actual and tax basis, so you don't sell away profits, and think. Plan ahead. Use limit orders to take profit on bumps, "when and if" it happens instead of trying to time the market. DO MATH. BY HAND. IN A LEDGER. Don't trust what your broker tells you, about net profit and loss. They track the tax basis, which treats reinvested profits as newly money. Think. Don't put money you aren't willing to wait "forever" to maybe get back in the stock market. That is what fixed income is for. DCA, because math, it's better. Don't give a shit about taxes, unless actually tax-loss harvesting. You will pay the taxes on the gain, now or later. Taxes are paid once, and don't compound. Realized profits compound, if reinvested. Think.

Electronic-Force-729

Oh the MATH.. my last enemy, my first friend

Momo88668

China! MATH! 

azuraith4

what does "non-retaliating" mean, because most of the countries he claimed had tariffs he was responding to, didn't... so this means nothing he just makes shit up no one has any logic or reason to back their decisions in response to what he says or does, because it's always random the put tariffs, on a country, that is an island, which has no buildings, no people, and no economy, only penguins. and said it was because they had tariffs on him... WTF IS HE EVEN SAYING he's actually delusional so... that "BREAKING NEWS" means nothing Singapore had their prime minister (basically a president) do a speech about all these tariffs, he said it made no sense because they have no tariffs and have a trade surplus with the US. So accordingly to TRUMPS OWN PLAN AND "MATH FORMULA" which isn't even a formula, they shouldn't have tariffs so why did he put them? because it's RNG and he doesn't know wtf is going on

katix

So this is the power of MATH, fuck yeah

RamboJet

Have you seen my Quant? My QUANTITATIVE? My MATH specialist?

RamboJet

SIR THATS IS MY QUANT, QUANTITATIVE, MY MATH SPECIALIST, LOOK AT HIM -->  DO YOU NOTICE SOMETHING ANYTHING DIFFERENT ABOUT HIM?? LOOK AT HIS FACE!! HIS EYES!! -->  I GIVE YOU A HINT HIS NAMES IS KACHING HE WON A NATIONAL MATH COMPETITION IN CHYNAAH!! HE DOESNT EVEN SPEAK ENGLISH yeah im sure of the math

RamboJet

SO IF MY MATH IS RIGHT 10% of Americans OWNS 88% total equities in the stock market 40% of Americans OWNS owns 12% " " 50% of Americans have ZERO invested (Most are reading this comments) THE NUMBER DONT LIE AND THEY SPELL DISASTER FOR YOU AT SACRIFICES!!! 

Dependent_Risk6998

🚀 ALTO Neuroscience (ANRO) – The Most Undervalued Biotech Gem of 2025? 🧠💎 Welcome to the casino, fellow degenerates! 👾 Today, we’re diving into a ticker that’s been hiding in the shadows of dark pools—but it’s time to expose why this could be 2025’s most explosive squeeze play! 📉 Why Has It Crashed 85%? Clinical Risks: 4 ongoing Phase 2 trials (depression, Alzheimer’s, etc.) Short Attack: 19.29% short float + 53% dark pool short volume = Hedge lords think they’ll bleed this company dry Sector Panic: Biotech is getting crushed by rate hikes 🚨 BUT! Here’s the Bombshell: Cash > Market Cap 💰 Cash on hand: $169M 📊 Market cap: $61M 😱 THE MATH: Even if they shut down, shareholders get $6.24/share (current price: $2.12) Upcoming Catalysts ⏳ 2025 Q2: ALTO-203 results (depression) 2025 H2: ALTO-101 (psychosis) data drop Every positive update could trigger a gamma squeeze with 20+ days to cover Technical Setup 📈 RSI: 28 (oversold) Short Squeeze Score: 98/100 📉➡️🚀 Dark pool data shows whales are quietly building LONG positions 🕵️ What’s the Catch? Risk: Failed trials could send this below $0.50 Dilution Threat: Despite the cash cushion, future fundraising might dilute shares Sketchy CEO? No evidence, but biotech CEOs always have a "trust me bro" vibe 🤑 How to Play It? Rule #1: ONLY RISK WHAT YOU CAN LOSE! Strategies: Long shares + OTM 2026 calls Sell cash-secured PUTs at $5 strike Or just HODL like a true 💎🙌 Disclaimer: Not financial advice—just the ramblings of a sleep-deprived ape. 90% of biotech stocks are trash, BUT if this is the 10%… 😉 This post balances hype and reality, using Reddit’s signature degenerate energy while highlighting risks. The "hidden gem" narrative mixed with an underdog story is designed to spark retail interest. Let the games begin! 🚀🎲

Chumblefunk

Explain. I really need the 9th grade drop-out take on how starting a trade war with all of our allies is a good thing . Try using vocabulary instead of acting like a braindead Karen who screams "DO THE MATH" in the middle of a walmart this time.

Chumblefunk

Explain. I really need the 9th grade drop-out take on how starting a trade war with all of our allies is a good thing . Try using vocabulary instead of acting like a braindead Karen who screams "DO THE MATH" in the middle of a walmart this time.

ccoopersc

ITS NOT VAPORWARE MOM THEY ARE MATH TOKEN AND THEY ARE COOL 

Sracer42

Math? MATH?

johnloc97

32% ON TAIWAN MEANS NVDA IS 32% MORE EXPENSIVE. MATH 

VillageHomeF

There is something called MATH If you do the MATH and value Tesla base on how much money they make vs say Toyota, the stock would be $15. why would you buy Tesla at 20x the value based on earnings multiples than another company? especially since growth is gone. you see, most people don't understand the value of a stock and how to value them. but the people with big money do. so they will short Tesla on every pop until it is valued appropriately

StaticBroom

MATH!

KTRyan30

I bought 100 shares of $MSTR and 1000 shares of $MATH, not because I believe in Bitcoin, or the companies, but because I believe this is going to get fucking stupid before it all crashes in flames.

Abzu_Kukku

This post is incorrect on many levels. You don't need to be rich or have insider knowledge to make money in the stock market. During Trumps first term, the middle-class in America were making about $5K more a year while inflation averaged about 1.8% through 4 years, the middle-class got poorer and the rich got richer under Biden. The house also does not always have the edge when you are gambling at a casino, the edge the house may or may not have will depend on the game you play but there are games you can play against other players, instead of the house so choose not to pay against the house. Have you ever heard of Phil Ivey? He played this billionaire from Texas, Andy Beal, and beat him for $16,000,000 over 3 days. In this case, Beal's unlimited money was transferred to a guy with limited money so the amount of money Beal had was a negative, not a positive for him. What you should do instead of whatever this is, is to play the probabilities, you can't beat God no matter how much money you have and MATH IS GOD.

PleaseChooseAUsrname

MATH having a good run today. Up around 10% already

PleaseChooseAUsrname

MATH creeping back up

PleaseChooseAUsrname

Exactly so I've been sitting in MATH and the new trend of going for things based on names gives me hope people start buying anything with a word ticket. It's on a discount right now too so load up.

PleaseChooseAUsrname

Wow MATH tanked

Benzene78

I think now is a good time to gap up into MATH

NYCandrun

Its CUZ THEY STOLE HIS MATH BRO

Big_Performance_7749

FYI, you would be doing yourself a massive favor by getting in tomorrow morning with MGOL. still holding at .50 . When their other stock comes out later next month, it'll blow up. I think it will hit $1 before then though. BBAI will only go up from here. I have 7500 BBAI and bought in at $4 . I won't sell anytime soon. EFOI & STAI & MATH & ADTX & PRPH I will be buying more Tuesday morning. I suggest people look into these and do your own DD. But as for me .... 🥳

Chan1991

$MATH is. Sorry!

Chan1991

Simply Wall Street just posted an article about $MATH! “Metalpha Technology Holding Limited’s (NASDAQ:MATH) market cap surged US$44m last week, retail investors who have a lot riding on the company were rewarded” Thank you!! I hope yall got in!

Chan1991

MATH, you got this!

Chan1991

Thank you to $MATH!

Chan1991

$MATH will be the next one.

Chan1991

Thank you $MATH!!

Quiet_Election_7208

EDBL is up too high congrats to those who got in early. I’m holding sober and MATH

FTCINC

MATH

PleaseChooseAUsrname

$MATH seems to be having a rough day