NVDA

Otherwise_Banana82

NVDA 195 next week because I bought puts

CarbonGTI_Mk7

I'm a dip buyer/swing trader myself and made a good amount of money (at least what I consider a good amount for me) but in reality if I would've just kept and held SMCI, NVDA, META, QQQ from 2022 I'd have 4-5X my profits that's sitting in my account.

unpaid-astroturfer

Lost money on NVDA and now Reddit's algo keeps pushing me towards incel and mens rights subreddits Buying RDDT calls tomorrow

Inevitable_Pin7755

Honestly this is a very aggressive but coherent portfolio. You clearly rode high beta names at the right time, especially space and AI, so 100% growth makes sense. The risk now is concentration and regime change rather than stock picking skill disappearing overnight. RKLB and ASTS are solid long term moonshots but I would not let both stay oversized. One big space bet is enough. Same with NVDA and RTX exposure to defense and AI adjacent is fine but trimming strength to fund steadier compounders is smart. CRCL, CRWV, GLXY and EOSE all fall into the high volatility narrative bucket. Great when momentum is on, brutal when it is not. If you want to beat indexes through 2028, the biggest upgrade here is mixing in boring cash machines. From your watchlist, Google and Costco make the most sense as core anchors. They smooth drawdowns and give you optionality to keep swinging at higher risk names. LULU is fine but more cyclical. HOOD and RDDT are pure sentiment trades right now so position size matters a lot. NVT and Kratos fit well with your existing themes. Oklo is interesting but still very speculative. Weekly DCA is the right move. I would DCA into 2 or 3 high conviction names max and avoid constantly adding new tickers. Too many positions quietly turns into an index with extra risk. Overall you are doing well. The main improvement now is risk management, not finding the next rocket.

Upstairs_Whole_580

You're goddamn right I do and I don't think it's anywhere NEAR the top. I've watched this stock for 8 years now since I first invested. 2,000 shares in at 136 I believe in 2019 and another 1000 at in early '23. NVDA is cheap right now and I realize there are some ugly Macro conditions...which is why I went a year out. They're going to come in around 70B in Q4 and that's assuming no revenue from China(and I think there will be some) and I think their Q2 F'27 earnings will be \~90B, net revenue of \~50B). I think the whole "The AI bubble has popped," story is nonsense and the next cycle of earnings will prove this. Hell, I think THIS cycle has proven it's not a bubble, it was just due a little bit of a correction, but I think AVGO going from \~425 after hours during the earnings to 325 is a gross overreaction to them beating across the board. Even Oracle had a decent earnings and it's down... what, 30%(I don't have a position in ORCL). I read the comments of the designer of Ironwood regarding the sell-off of NVDA after rumors they may sell their TPUs(no different than when META was on the verge of their own big breakthrough in '22 and '24 or AMZN every year) about the NVDA selloff and how clueless the market is about hardware and the demand. Cloud service is supply constrained and I think NVDA will hit 275 end of calendar 2026. That's my belief and that's where I'm putting my money, but I think saying "the top is in," on Nvidia at \~180 or whatever it is exactly, is... not accurate. I we're going to see several million H200's sold to China this year and AI CapEx shows... absolutely no sign of slowing. 500B in backlogged sales through the end of Fiscal '27 without OpenAI and without China. 200 contracts, bought last week when it was trading at about 172 cost me about \~215K I should probably be hedging given my position, but... I'm not going to. I could sell right now and take a... little 10K win, but I think this stock just pulled back, corrected and it's getting ready for another run. Maybe not until after next earnings. I think it'll likely trade mostly sideways until we get more clarity on China, but I think it'll sail past a 5T market cap to 6T in 2026. I'm primarily an investor and I just picked up another 7500 shares of AMZN... which I think is the safest of the large caps next year ahead of only TSM, but I liked the pullback. If I lose the entire \~220, I'm fine. If it goes the way I think it will... I'll be out by March and re-evaluating. It's just play money. My retirement is in Vanguard, my Roth in Fidelity. My cash is in a separate fidelity account. Only other thing I may do is buy 5-6 more BTC, but... I'm holding off.

Centigonal

NVDA and TSLA will have to pull some rabbits out of hats over the next few years to justify their valuations. The others just have to not mess up too bad and hope that the tech sector continues to dominate global economic growth.

ImUrHuckleberrryy

I’m long on $AMD $PLTR $NVDA

Yo_Biff

>How do you spot “future giants” early (NVDA/Amazon-type winners) without pure luck? You don't. There is an element of luck involved with investing. You can do all the research in the world and have a very strong thesis as to why a company's stock price will be higher in the future, but you cannot with any consistent accuracy predict by how much or when. >I’m trying to understand the process people use to catch smaller companies before they become massive (like NVDA early days, AMZN early days, etc.). We develop a thesis around a company by reading annual and quarterly reports, listening to earnings calls, researching the competition. Then they start a position and often hold it for many years. >What makes you buy and hold through volatility? Conviction in the research and thesis. It requires more guts than any astounding special intellect. However, we have to be wary of false belief here. Holding because we "just know it'll go up" leads to a lot of loss. We have to base our conviction on rationality and data. > Any red flags that would have saved you from “false future giants”? Loss of competitive advantages. Kodak when digital cameras came out. Blockbuster when direct mail video rental and later streaming emerged. Companies without a strong advantage or unmanageable debt. >Would appreciate specific examples and what you saw at the time. My best personal example is META when the market dumped the stock to $90ish. I started buying at $230 down to around $150. Candidly, ran out of money and my conviction wasn't strong enough at the time to dump other positions to free up more cash.

Apprehensive_Two1528

~58–59% annual growth, compounded every year for 5 years NVDA was 68%   Google ~28.3 % per year (total return CAGR last five year  OP is in his dreams

Strange-Ad420

NVDA

Key_Variety_6287

AVGO, NVDA ang Google in that order, in my opinion

RealWooWhee

Try make a new parameter, like % increase in mentions compared to yesterday/last week/month, that’s how you’ll really see anything meaningful. Otherwise you’ll just get SPY, NVDA QQQ TSLA etc.

ConsiderationKey1658

!banbet NVDA 200 11d

ConsiderationKey1658

NVDA 200 eoy

bobbyd121

!banbet NVDA $195 12/31

teckel

I don't believe people understand how bad a tech crash can be. I was investing back then, and the NASDAQ has a 83% drawdown. That's NVDA dropping to $31. But, it took 15 years to recover not 18, but your point is still valid.

UpstreamRedteam

I just had my 10 NVDA $30 calls expire 😅

thinkneo

ETFs are the easy way to own both without overthinking the split. SMH gives you the whole semi stack. Actually, good point on the asymmetry - NVDA can run without AMD, but AMD rallies usually need NVDA leading. The tide lifts AMD, not the other way around

Background_Tax4626

Your Enron example left out the fact it was a shell corporation, NVDA isn't. I'm not suggesting your analysis is incorrect, however.

cjspoe

I like how they tell you you’re trades are smart. Mine all say NVDA dumb

Intelligent_Film_97

Op confirmed puts on NVDA

fakehalo

My XLK/SMH holdings cover both enough, I prefer it NVDA weighted though. I can envision a world where NVDA gets another leg up without AMD, and not the other way around.

quuxquxbazbarfoo

NVDA will be $10+ trillion cap by 2030 as they continue with 50+% YoY earnings growth..

quuxquxbazbarfoo

* ASTS satellite rollout in 2026. * RKLB Neutron maiden flight * NVDA Blackwell sales and Rubin rollout

Brochoa

TSM, NVDA, MU, AVGO, and AMD. Enterprise and AI will continue to boom Q1 and Q2

bobonuts

Bought 20 Puts on NVDA at 175 on Friday.    Your calls are basically now guaranteed to print monday. Total regard move. Thank me later.  

vermilli21

Could have just simplified it by saying it closed under its 18 SMA…semiconductor etf and NVDA are under there SMA. Will drag the market down tomorrow

quuxquxbazbarfoo

Expecting me to lay out my entire investment history in a single reddit comment? I've been a growth investor for 20 years. NVDA was just a recent obvious example I could easily give where I've used forward projections to justify that their valuation was still sane as it sextupled over 2 years. While everyone else decried how they were overvalued or priced for perfection I was saying they were undervalued the whole time. Still have the same opinion - still undervalued. It's literally the opposite of saying past performance is a prediction of the future. If I was basing off of their past performance like everyone else in 2023 I would have sold during the run-up. Investing based on future predictions is exactly what growth investing is all about. I take it you're not a growth investor.

Any-Presentation5438

NVDA to $500

thinkneo

That's basically where I landed - 70/30 split. You get the leader and keep exposure to the challenger. Good point on NVDA's $168-170 support. That level has held multiple tests - clear floor for now. AMD doesn't have that kind of defined support, hence the extra volatility.

quuxquxbazbarfoo

Guidance and future market outlook is a full on joke in the investing world? That's a weird take. Forward P/E is definitely a metric that growth investors look at. I've been tracking NVDA's forward P/E since their bull run started in 2023. If you don't believe what their guidance is saying, then I guess it can just be a full on joke to you.

FlipZip69

'Forward' P/E. That is near a full on joke in the investing word. COST could maintain their sales with zero growth and increase margins by 2%, and they would have a P/E ratio of 10. NVDA would need to increase sales by 100% and increase margins by 25% to achieve that forward P/E ratio. Tell me what is more likely? To tell the truth, what is more likely is NVDA maintaining about the same level.

arcanition

"Diversification" means spreading out your investments between more companies/sectors. VFAIX (and other S&P500 funds) are already diversified between the hundreds of companies in the S&P500. Adding VGT or something similar wouldn't change much, for example you can look at the top holdings of both FXAIX (NVDA, APPL, MSFT, AMZN, & AVGO) and compare it to VGT (NVDA, APPL, MSFT, AVGO, & PLTR) and you'll see a lot of similarities... so it wouldn't add any diversification.

VictorDanville

NVDA. Once the AI bubble pops, the metaverse bubble begins. Their GPUs will be drawing the metaverse. They're also working on anti-matter energy production to power the grid.

ACROB062

NVDA

AskAskim

Good to know. So you are saying that my Roth IRA, holding my percentage of international funds, might as well be the only account with international funds seeing as how everything is better in a RIRA unless you plan to use the money soon? I’ll be honest, I have some individual stocks in my traditional taxable account because my intention was to grow it fast over a year or two, then use that money to help purchase a new automobile. So GOOGL & NVDA have made me much higher returns than VOO in my Roth, but I wanted to use that money like, next year, yet it’s also going to be super taxed as fuck if I don’t keep it there at least a year for “long term” taxation, on top of the fact it’s traditional so I already paid taxes on that money. Fuck I’m tired. This is exhausting but I’m trying so hard to figure it all out.

RealCathieWoods

Optionistics.com is your friend.. Just play a round with historical option prices. You'll see how wide of swing they take... 100% moves up and down are common place. All you have to do as a trader is buy at the right time (i.e. a blue chip stock that has been beaten down for whatever reason)... NVDA when it dropped to 100... META when they changed their name and dropped to 200's... Tesla is another good one with wide swings. Ive tried it with TQQQ... I think basically a boomer buy and hold strategy could be made with TQQQ with far OTM and deep time options but I havent tried it yet.... Basically the idea is that rather than buying SPY every paycheck - buy LEAPS on TQQQ as far out as a time horizon as possible... if spy and the QQQ gain ~10% per year. The same should be said about the leveraged indexes? The difference is you'd have to be a little choosy about when you buy - due to the decay on leveraged indexes.

LordFaquaad

if reddit hates it, i buy it. E.g. RDDT, NVDA, TSLA, etc.

Thick_Pudding_3618

. T1 Energy | $TE With nuclear still 5+ years away, US will need quick clean energy. Built in US, by the US. Trump loves that. Clean energy creates more jobs than any other source energy — Trump wants more jobs in the US right? The overall vibe of T1 gives PLTR/Anduril for me personally and the fact that they use PLTRs software is great. Their website design is top notch and overall it feels early in the journey (PLTR,NBIS,NVDA) before it went mainstream. Nuclear won’t be ready until the 2030s and data enters will need energy now. Think of it like the picks and shovels in the AI gold rush. As much as people hate solar, I think TE will solve that issue. At 700 million MC a 5x isn’t out of the question let alone a 10x. If they eventually sign contracts I truly believe this company will take off. The only other competitor has a market cap of 27x TE’s at the time of this writing. If $TE market cap reaches 0.4x the production capacity of $FSLR I’ll let you do the math on that. $FSLR — $27 Billion MC 26 GW of production capacity $TE — $600 Million MC 10 GW of production capacity Keep in mind, I wrote this a couple weeks back and now it’s sitting at 1.37 billion MC at the time of this writing. Still early…

quuxquxbazbarfoo

You said P/E but then you gave P/R. NVDA has lower P/E ratios than COST in both trailing and forward. PE (trailing): \* COST - 45.8 \* NVDA - 44.8 PE (forward): \* COST - 42 \* NVDA - 24

Happy_Discussion_536

They were about NVDA but most people I know are convinced its a crash and cashed out, bearish on it.

notseelen

by how much? if everyone stops buying GPU/AI chips at once, it'll be because something better came along this means you'd have to believe NVDA does not have any R&D working on that better thing and it will pass them by completely. Is that consistent with the history of the company, or with Jensen's leadership?

Lanaloki

Dot com was about loose listing standards (which have since been outlawed) for tiny companies with bad fundamentals. Lots of public firms went bust completely like a domino. It was bad. GFC was about housing speculation + insane leverage levels (that have since been outlawed), along with opaque securitization that was basically fraud (also outlawed). Totally a one off and not really a risk of repeating. AI is different since the firms that are most exposed are also already hugely profitable and financially sound. Yes there is speculation and likely overvaluation. But GOOG, NVDA, MSFT are not going to buckle and go bankrupt even if AI implodes, and there is zero indication of fraud (though they do invest in one another, but that is transparent and basic risk hedging behavior). If there is a downturn, it will just be a standard correction, not a global catastrophe.

thinkneo

Thanks. NVDA back to $200+ seems reasonable if AI spend stays strong. AMD's the wilder ride but that's the tradeoff for higher potential upside. Owning both makes sense.

thefrogmeister23

It’s not just investors — NVDA’s large customers desperately want a challenger, which is even more durable. The big question is whether this second place challenger will be AMD or Broadcom.

Tricky-Pizza-7564

Solid analysis. I’m holding both. NVDA should have no issue surpassing 200 in H12026 while AMD has always been volatile and harder to predict.

Zulumus

129%, NVDA, GOOG, APLD and EDIT my big gainers. Some options on a few of these

Sea_Rest2636

NVDA and META are good solid companies but not at any price. They may be proced for perfection

Happy_Discussion_536

Buy leaps on out of favor money printers like META, NVDA or just SPY.

cloudnine538

Why did you get rid of your individual stock portfolio? I actually took time this week to buy individual stocks (NVDA down 20% from the highs)

lurker165473

So can NVDA realistically retake 200 in January or are my 190c fuk?

thinkneo

Solid pick. Benefits from the custom silicon trend - Google TPU, Apple chips all run through Broadcom. Different bet than NVDA/AMD but plays the same AI theme.

Weak-Pomegranate-435

Yes, NVDA has better MOAT. But it’s easier for AMD to beat their estimates. So I always go with the rule “ I don’t know what I don’t know”. So I would rather go with both than just one of them. There’s no limit on how many stocks you can hold in your portfolio.

thinkneo

True. AMD doubling from here is a lot easier than NVDA doubling from $4.5T. That's the AMD bull case in a nutshell - more upside if they execute.

greyenlightenment

or maybe media has no clue. NVDA earning's have surged since 2023 to justify its high valuation back then.

thinkneo

Fair. Past fundamentals don't guarantee future dominance. That said - NVDA has the current moat (CUDA, 80%+ market share) and is actually monetizing AI now. AMD is betting on future share gains. Both could win, but NVDA's not just "analyzing the past" - they're printing money in the present too. What's your take on who monetizes AI best going forward?

PharmDinvestor

NVDA to $300

thinkneo

Agreed. Both are solid long-term, but NVDA's the safer bet at current prices.

IWant2FIRE

Up 44%, even after taking a $110K paper loss dump on MSTR (down 56%). Thank you PLTR, NVDA, ASTS and RTX. Now I just need to figure out what to do with MSTR...

thinkneo

Good point. PEG normalizes for growth, and if they're similar there, the "value" argument comes down to which growth rate you believe more. NVDA's growth is more proven, AMD's is more aspirational. Similar PEG, different risk profiles.

thinkneo

That's a solid way to play it. AMD moves more on sentiment - "Nvidia killer" headlines create spikes, disappointments create dips. More volatility = more opportunity if you're trading it. NVDA is the steadier hold, AMD is the more tradeable one. Both approaches work depending on your style.

thinkneo

Good points - already corrected the P/E in another comment, you're right the GAAP number is misleading due to Xilinx amortization. Your 2030 math is compelling. If AMD executes on revenue growth and the market keeps it at 30x, $600 isn't crazy. The OpenAI deal is real validation. On NVDA needing to stay perfect - fair criticism. They've had a free run for a decade. Competition is real now (AMD, custom silicon from hyperscalers). The question is whether CUDA lock-in holds or erodes. I'd argue NVDA has more margin of safety at current prices, but your AMD thesis is solid. Appreciate the detailed take.

thinkneo

Fair callout on the numbers - post was based on data from earlier, market's moved since. AMD's pulled back more, so the YTD figure is dated. The core comparison still holds though: NVDA is the dominant player at a reasonable valuation, AMD is the growth challenger at a premium. Happy to hear your take on where the value is.

TheRighteousMind

Just did some trades in my portfolio. Putting some faith in CEG. VEA and CIBR were the others. But I’m trying to diversify, so I didn’t touch things like SPY and NVDA. ETIHX also did great for me YTD.

thinkneo

The bear case exists for sure. Though 50% downside would put NVDA around 15x forward earnings - hasn't traded that low since before the AI boom. What's your valuation baseline?

Icy-Butterscotch-206

105 p/e is just straight up incorrect. It currently trades at a 40 p/e with respect to the Xilinx acquisition and amortization. Looking forward, projected revenue growth will drop p/e down into the single digits through 2030. What that means is the share price will appreciate into the 600 range in the base case through 2030, because AMD will never trade with single digits p/e. The share price will adjust to keep it in the 30 range. NVDA has less desirable risk/ reward these days. They need to remain perfect otherwise growth will stagnate, now that they’re facing fierce competition for the first time in a decade. AMD has traded at $190 per share within the last couple weeks so I’m not sure why you didn’t get aggressive there. It’s a bargain getting anything below 225/share currently.

thinkneo

Fair point - you're right that the GAAP P/E is inflated by Xilinx amortization. Adjusted P/E closer to 40x is a better comparison. That actually strengthens the AMD case a bit - 40x vs 25x is a smaller gap than 105x vs 25x. Thanks for the correction. Still think NVDA has better risk/reward at current prices, but AMD's valuation is more reasonable than the GAAP number suggests.

elcaballo250

Absolutely. It seems like people are completely missing this, and to me, it's the least risky mag 7 stock by far for this very reason. Using forward PE as a valuation metric, it's the cheapest of the big tech stocks. No other company this mature has growth in the 50%-60% range, not even close. Broadcom has a forward PE double that of NVDA.

Key_One2402

Solid list already. I’d personally stick heavy on GOOG and AMZN, maybe add MSFT or NVDA for quality growth, and keep the ETF as your anchor so you don’t overtrade again.

AskAskim

That makes sense. I suppose I just always imagined it as: the low risk / slow burn more “guaranteed” growth like S&P stuff, goes into the retirement account that I never touch. For some reason I thought having more liquid, high risk, but also high return investments in my traditional account made sense but I guess not. I have NVDA and GOOGL making me a lot of money, but not in the Roth IRA so I guess I’m going to be paying a lot of taxes if I don’t move some things around?

ben6141990

Only OTM Those NVDA 170$ puts were close

ben6141990

Not just NVDA I sold options this year on NVDA, AMZN, PLTR, INTL, SOFI, ASTS, RKLB, UNH 83% winners, 10% losers, 7% assigned

OptionsMenace

Puts are way more expensive and require more capital. For most people, just buying straight up puts especially with stocks at high IVs will fuck them right off the bat. A couple green days and they are done I run credit spreads all the time and while you’re right there is a smaller premium, there is a defined risk. Some stocks are almost guaranteed win. Some weeks you get wrecked but NVDA for example, I run call credit spreads all the time and I’ve lost only 18% of trades Again, I don’t do any regarded moves and sell 100s but if I had bought just straight puts, I’d have made way less money

DocHolidayPhD

Fundamentals of NVDA have been strong throughout... Even the fed has stated as much.

LavishlyRitzyy

NVDA set for a big 2025 finish

tugrulthelol

MU is probably gonna have an NVDA-like run throughout 2026, and in hindsight its gonna look so obvious

ZaDripo

BTC alright it just dropped but NVDA leaps ? You expect a second bull run when it’s already at the top ?

Money_Do_2

She... bought NVDA leaps. Grab a backtester and check some. Deep ITM, NVDA calls like 2 years out. The results are insane. Even more if you exercise and keep the shares and keep buying them. Congress is corrupt for sure. But shes not slangin stuff on news that breaks monthly...

Uisce-beatha

She is 10th for this year and in terms of total gain, Trump is outpacing everyone considering he raking in billions and ain't a damn bit of that is clean. None of the retards in here can explain what insider trading is nor could point towards a single example of a trade that was made where she was privy to information her colleagues were not. Most of money comes from long dated calls on tech, especially on NVDA. Just pull up a chart on NVDA over the last 10-15 years and it's easy to see how her returns are so high. Going all in on tech during the largest bull run mostly driven on tech tends to yield crazy returns.

mserek2

When NVDA 189?

No_Feeling920

Why would they? It's just binding more of one's capital and NVDA does not pay any significant dividend.

Academic_Lock_1699

HXGBY, releasing a robot 2026 and partnered with NVDA & MSFT. Getting overlooked completely imo. Apart from that RKLB, could easily x2 or x3

enzymez

!banbet NVDA +18% 200d

aguyonahill

2 ways Old way. Buy and hold stocks that everyone knows about but has hidden upside. NVDA 3 years ago. Bought and only recently sold some. New way. I heard about RKLB 2 years ago here on WSB. Bought some. Did research. Space was going to be big. Watched interviews. Kept accumulating.  I've invested around 125k. Just hit 500k yesterday. Haven't sold a single share. Bought my first at 6. Bought some more at 50. I was in Tesla waaaaay early and sold after 100% increase. I learned if you have the one in 20 year company, you HOLD. Most of my investments are in s&p 500 so even if rocket lab failed I'd be fine. 10% of my portfolio was (since its way more now) for risky bets like rklb.

sirzoop

Why would you want to invest in what Reddit is doing? These are the people who were shorting NVDA PLTR and META in 2022. You want to do the opposite of whatever is trending on reddit.

Even-Square-6246

Someone do an NVDA banbet

Independent_Case5078

NVDA has built a software moat and it’s called CUDA, hundreds of accelerated Libraries, an entire ecosystem. Add to that - GPU developed AI Models are just getting started. You think developers who are invested are jumping ship? No. Go to a GTC. One of many they hold yearly worldwide.

AppropriateGoat7039

Broadcom was kind of expensive before the drop. AVGO’s Fwd PE was mid 40x’s while NVDA’s was in the low 20x’s.

Information_Solid

My brother in Christ, why was NVDA ever a sell? Like some folks here said.  Stick to SPY and stay out of reddit. Did Jensen suddenly lose his jacket during the last earnings?  It was a stellar report.

EuphoricWizard

Sold some CCs on NVDA and it finished below the strike price at expiration but some regard here actually exercised a few of them???

MrBleubols

Didn't hit to my all-time high today but was close. I brought home 48% in my ROTH buying tech on the dips, RKLB and ASTS. 16% of my taxable brokerage account is w/ NVDA. There a safe ride w/ a lot growth still to go. I don't believe they will go below $170 again. I bought at $41. I don't DCA, I just buy on the dip in chunks (not a really great strategy but it has worked

FlipZip69

I do not think RIVN is the worst bet. But I would not bet my life wealth on it. I could see putting 50 thousand in it and hoping it does a tesla thing. But it would be money I would be willing to lose. NVDA is a semi sound investment and likely a lower risk less than RIVN. But no one will be making massive gains there anymore. Both companies are a fully different strategy. But if someone with future knowledge were to say one company will do 500 percent, I would absolutely say it would be RIVN. The alternate also goes. If someone said one will be out of business, I would also say it was RIVN. I would also say you got in RIVN at the right time.

Upstairs_Whole_580

Yeah... Vanguard put margin on my account. Vanguard is my "don't fuck around with" money. It's my retirement but not my "retire at 45" retirement. I have about 500 in Fidelity and then a couple hundred in Hood that I use to get retarded at times and it won't cost me... everything. I'm not even sure what to do right now though, so I just bought a lot of BTC and some 226 NVDA leaps for next December.

originalrocket

Total including my cash generating 17%. Best asset, NVDA, Best ETF VGT. Worst: TNDM.... for now, give it 2 more months!

FlipZip69

Not really. Bought oil and gas when the price of oil and gas companies a few months after the price went below zero during COVID. Waited till knew the companies had no cash flow problems and sold when oil prices were back up again like it always happens. Did this around 2000 in a small level, did it again in 2008 I think it was in a bigger way and during the COVID oil price crash in a much bigger way. And I got decent dividends as well all during but the big gain was when the price matched their fundamentals. It is kind of my thing. Now mostly in boring bank type companies but they pay good dividends and are safe. I seen too many people so late to the bus. Anyone buying NVDA now is way too late but there is a possibility of making 20 or 30 percent. But most people trying to reach that high often continue to hold thinking they will get another 20 or 30 percent and end up holding it way down. But ya at one time they had wealth on paper. Tesla is the same thing. Directors will come out smiling though.

dr302

bro that was the time to buy, if u were going to sell at all shouldve been when all the billionaires were selling NVDA, that was kind of sign that the ai bubble would burst. ur just emotional trading at this point

ConsiderationKey1658

NVDA 200 eoy

FullCopy

Next week NVDA’s gonna remind everyone it does believe in gravity. Bols will call it a “healthy pullback,” bers will call it “I told you so,” and WSB will call it “buying the dip” for the 7th time. Yes. I’m from the future. At a soup line, to be very specific.

FullCopy

Goddamn. Playing NVDA 0DTES 10 at a time was hecheva thrilling ride.

FlipZip69

A 20-25% gain is fantastic in a year. That is increasing your wealth but it certainly is not making you life changing wealthy. I made close to 3 million on a solid investment a few years back. That did a great deal to my wealth but I did it with the fundamentals indicating it could hold that capitalization level. And I sold when I felt it was at a point it was near or maybe above what the fundamentals would really allow for growth. You are right. A stock could hit a grazzillian dollars and be worth more than the world. But unless someone sells some shares, it is not worth that. At the end of the day for NVDA to achieve massive growth like the majority of people here suggest, it would have to have a capitalization that simply does not exist. If you look at the volume over a year, most companies, NVDA included will move a high percentage of that capitalization. And that means a high percentage of that capitalization is 'real' money that has to exist and it can not just be people 'holding' till it has a ridicules capitalization. Good luck with that.