NVDA

hail707

Please let us know when you find the next NVDA. You diversify once you realize that you are asking people on the internet what to buy. 

RJNavarrete

How do you guys deal with the temptation to over-diversify? Or, better said, too invest too wide and not deep enough? I get that it's generally safer to diversify, but I know that there are explosive gains to be made when you find your NVDA, SNDK, etc. and invest some decent capital into it. I want to be in quantum, photonics, space, software, AI, defense, etc., but I know that I'm likely leaving material gains on the table by stretching too thin. Thoughts? Anyone else struggling with this?

New-Specialist-2594

Honestly if you Swap NVDA weight to SPMO, would be better IMO.

Perfect_Painter_7863

NVDA below 200 was the bottom

KweenieQ

I'd rebalance NVDA to about 10%, given the overlap with SPMO. Divest the FBCG position. Take your profits and spread them out. One option would be to increase your relatively small international exposure.

Inevitable_Zebra_0

1. MU is an example of a cyclical industry - swimming in money while there're supply shortages, then going down just as fast once the supply catches up to demand. This will happen, that's the purpose of market economy to fix imbalances, the question is only when - 2026, 2027, 2028? 2. NVDA, AVGO - big revenue growth in the past 2 years as a result of huge capex from hyperscalers, plus openai, anthropic and other customers. Will this sharp demand for their AI enabling products continue forever? Likely, no - hyperscalers won't be able to maintain 500b capex costs for decades, even a couple of years of such expenditures bear the risk of drowning them. Look at what's happening to oracle already.

0DTEKing

Loading up NVDA

circadiggmigration

So bullish NVDA might even jump. Unbelievable.

Flat-Focus7966

MU, NVDA, DRAM, SNDK Nuff said ...

_AntiSaint_

Except companies involved in the AI buildout - MU, NVDA, AVGO, etc. - are making insane amounts of money and are very cash flush. This is not even remotely the same thing… much bigger different in the bet being on unqualified consumers paying on loans that never should have been originated and securitized than $500B-$1T corporations investing capex capital into the most single most influential piece of tech since the advent of the car. Feel free to be bear, but this is not a fair comparison lol.

SerMumble

Your portfolio is basically: 50% NVDA 75% concentrated in 5 stocks 85% concentrated in top 10 S&P500 or nasdaq 100 stocks 90% tech stocks Very volatile and vulnerable to market rotations. I'm not seeing how SPMO, FDMO, and FBCG work together. You're likely better simplifying to just SPMO or look for other etfs to compliment your strategy. Ideally a well diversified portfolio won't let any individual stock positions exceed 10% without serious consideration to trim and rebalance.

greyenlightenment

NVDA will be flat or red Monday morning

metajournal

# NVDA Long-Term Path Forward (5 & 10 Years) • 5-Year Outlook Over the near-to-medium term, NVIDIA’s path is paved by the rollout and maturation of its Blackwell Ultra and Rubin architectures. Within the next five years, NVIDIA is positioned to successfully cross the bridge from being a hardware provider to a recurring-revenue software powerhouse via its NVIDIA Enterprise AI and Omniverse platforms. If the company maintains its current market share of accelerated compute and Coatue's "10X paradox" thesis holds true, NVIDIA is statistically the most likely candidate to graduate from the $1 Trillion club to become the world's first $10 Trillion company, driven by steady margin expansion and the democratization of localized AI factories. • 10-Year Outlook Looking a decade ahead, NVIDIA's primary goal is to become the invisible, ubiquitous operating system of the automated world, powering everything from physical robotics to climate simulation and autonomous transportation. However, long-term buy-and-hold investors must heavily monitor the disruptive risk of custom silicon. As hyperscale's grow weary of NVIDIA's pricing power, they will pour hundreds of billions into developing their own bespoke chips. NVIDIA’s durable moat over this decade will not rely on raw processing speed, but rather on its CUDA software ecosystem and NVLink networking standards, which lock developers into NVIDIA's paradigm and make switching to rival hardware economically unviable. **Growth Catalysts** • **Sovereign AI and Mega-Cluster Deployments:** The demand for AI infrastructure is expanding beyond traditional tech companies into sovereign nations and enterprise AI factories. Deals like the six-year strategic collaboration with Sharon AI—which will see the deployment of up to **40,000 Grace Blackwell GB300 GPUs**—demonstrate how growth can remain explosive without straining NVIDIA's own balance sheet, utilizing revenue-sharing and credit-support models. • **The Hyperscaler Capex Tsunami:** Major cloud providers and tech behemoths are locked in an arms race that leaves them with no choice but to buy NVIDIA hardware. Hyperscalers are projected to deploy over **$630 billion** in total capital expenditure in 2026, with the lion's share earmarked for AI data centers and accelerated processing. As long as AI models require exponential compute power to train and run inference, NVIDIA remains the primary tollbooth for this capital expenditure. • **The Agentic AI PC Revolution:** NVIDIA is successfully aggressively pushing its dominance from the cloud down to the edge. The recent unveiling of the NVIDIA RTX Spark superchip brings a staggering 1 petaflop of AI performance directly to Windows laptops, fundamentally reinventing the personal computer into an AI teammate rather than a simple productivity tool. Hope this helps.

Sea_Pomegranate_4499

**How concerned should I be about the NVDA concentration at this level?** Not knowing your goals or financial situation, impossible to say. **Would you trim or rebalance, or stay the course given the AI tailwinds?** Oh, I would absolutely rebalance. But I'm some random guy on the internet, the likelihood that our goals and financial situation line up are pretty small. **Anything obviously missing or redundant in this mix?** SMPO already has NVDA, TSLA, AMZN, GOOG, AVGO...in fact these 5 stocks probably make up 90% of your "portfolio." **I’m a long term investor (10+ years horizon), not looking to day trade. I would really appreciate any honest feedback.** My honest feedback is that I can't figure out what you're trying to do with these picks. It feels like vibe investing.

mr_birkenblatt

I deliberately picked GOOG and not, say NVDA, because back in 2011 GOOG was a safe bet

Wide-Contribution-29

Nah, that’s MSFT  NVDA may be up 3% at most haha 

greyenlightenment

watch NVDA be red or flat as always

SeaIndependence8138

!banbet NVDA 250 1 week

Initial_Ad_9250

SPCX gonna peak above NVDA this week at this rate

Zealousideal_Book_40

NVDA to the moon

Indra_Sx

So do we get $NVDA 220 tomorrow ?

brute-forced

Lmao!! CalliNG NVDA slow and somehow you do not have 1 trillion downvotes! Reddit in a nutshell

Background-Nothing71

Stoked about a deal but I’m holding Meta and NVDA calls and they are allergic to green right now

MaxCapacity

"Say NVDA falls to 165. With a naked 195 CSP I get assigned the shares at 195. I'm underwater, but I own the stock I wanted and I start grinding it back with covered calls. With the 195/190 spread in that same drop, the long 190 caps my loss but I walk away with no shares." You are still welcome to be assigned at 195 with the credit spread, all you have to do is sell your long put. Using the option prices displayed over the weekend, which may not be correct, you can sell the 195 put for 5.00. The 195/190 spread can be sold for 1.35. So here's the scenarios. 1. NVDA goes up. You would make more with the CSP. 2. Between 195 and 185.35, the CSP is a better option by a varying amounts. At 185.35, both positions have lost 3.65. 3. Below 185.35, the spread is the winner if you're going to sell the long leg and take assignment on the short. Given your example of a price at expiration of 165, you would collect 1.35, sell your long leg for 25+, and pay 195 for the shares. Total is 168.65 or less per share, depending on when you sold the long leg and how much extrinsic value it had remaining.

orangeyougladiator

Man what the fuck is gonna happen to the market when this AI bubble finally pops. NVDA going back to gaming chips?

tomato236

I have 22k shares in RDDT and will buy more if it drops further. I always buy quality stocks when they're down—I made over $1M on Google last year buying in the $150s and made several hundred thousand on each of AAPL and NVDA on sale too 😎

False-Community8534

WTF are you are talking about. I said I’ll be a big buyer if it goes below $100. How is that getting worked? And regardless of your take here, people are getting incredibly emotional about the IPO. They’re either enraged that it’s overpriced or offended that people think it’s overpriced. Nobody is worked up about Visa’s valuation or even NVDA.

Accurate-Exchange298

Sorry it took me a bit to think through the second one properly. The roll thing makes sense. I had not considered that. The long leg gaining value on a big drop gives you something to work with that a naked put just doesn't, since a deep ITM put has no extrinsic left to harvest. That is an absolutely fair point. Where I land though is that it's a different goal. Say NVDA falls to 165. With a naked 195 CSP I get assigned the shares at 195. I'm underwater, but I own the stock I wanted and I start grinding it back with covered calls. With the 195/190 spread in that same drop, the long 190 caps my loss but I walk away with no shares. So in the exact move where the wheel hands me cheap stock to work with, the spread closes me out instead. This is great if I wanted defined risk and an exit. But it is not what I want if the whole point is to own NVDA. So I see it less as a better entry and more as a different strategy which is risk-defined income with an escape hatch vs. wheeling into the shares. Both valid, just different aims. I think one thing applies either way . Wherever you roll that CSP to, you still want a shelf under it. If the stock just dropped 20%, you're selling into the same falling knife from the post, just lower down. Same check still applies. Good addition, appreciate you laying it out.

MaxCapacity

" So you have two choices. (A) go further down to the 190 strike (~25 delta, ~$4.31) to buy additional safety cushion (B) wait for price to reclaim 208.69 and sell the put after there is a shelf under it again." These aren't the only two choices when looking for a margin of safety.  These are only entry options, not commentary on your indicator. If you're not desperate for a fill, you can set a GTC order at a higher price and wait to see if the market trades through your ask.  I typically use the average premium of the strike I want and the next strike closer to the money, with the assumption that there might be a further dip before recovery. Additionally, on more volatile names, initially placing the trade as a credit spread allows greater flexibility in rolling into a CSP or covered call closer to money if there is a large move.  If NVDA drops 20%, rolling a 5 dollar wide bull put spread into an ATM back month CSP that pays at least $5 in premium is going to be easier than rolling a deep ITM put down to ATM for a net credit.

Ohlele

Also NVDA will reach 2000$ and MSFT will reach 1000$

labooof

This is a massive misconception around what happened the last few weeks. The SpaceX IPO had next to zero impact on liquidity flow. Yes the market cap broke $2t, but the IPO was not for $2t. The active float is 5%. The offering was $75b. If every single dollar was funded via selling nvda it would represent a sell off of 1.5%, of literally just NVDA; or 0.33% of the Mag7. This sell off to rotate into the IPOs is misguided and not at all what we saw last week. OpenAi and Anthropic will each likely offer 5-10% of float at offering, assuming both are valued at around $1.25T, you’re talking maybe $250b, 1% of mag7, of liquidity required until lockup periods end. What we actually saw was much simpler. We had a surprisingly strong jobs print. In an elevated inflation environment, a weak job market is what kept the idea of rate cuts realistic. With strong jobs growth, rate cut probability dropped dramatically and the market stalled along with it as it puts direct pressure on EPS growth estimates and in turn forward PE. This is why there’s a resurgence in the peace talks leading into the FOMC meeting on the 17th. Without a peace deal in place which Warsh can deliver along with his adjustment CPI calculation, rate cuts will be off the table

Swissschiess

100% If the bubble is returning 15-20% a year and you’re sitting in cash losing 4% to inflation you’re losing 19-24% a year by not being invested. What’s the worst that happens when this deflates? NVDA is worth 3T instead of 5T? 40% loss. Sit on the sidelines for 5 years and you’d be lucky to only lose 40% compared to SP gains.

Hist0racle

I need NVDA to jump $2+ or dump $5+. So im going to guarantee that the market will be flat or very slightly red tomorrow. You heard it hear first. Theta day

savingstrainagain

Im a bull right now lmao. I’ve made a million off NVDA. Why would I go short now? The party isn’t over yet

Independent_Name_601

He’s just a name. No way he is actually running any/all of them. Operationally very little would change. They may not have that “wow” factor they have. He’s a modern day Charlatan. His companies globally aren’t making money. The bubble will burst and he along with NVDA will burst the market.

RedElmo65

Didn’t NVDA Do this ?

TrumpsCummyOnahole

There's no bubble. Apple (AAPL): ~35.2x Alphabet (GOOGL): ~27.2x Microsoft (MSFT): ~23.6x NVIDIA (NVDA): ~30.7x The PE ratios aren't even crazy. Nothing like Pets.com for the dotcom bubble. These companies are insanely profitable.

savingstrainagain

Read everything you said and I think we have come to enough of an understanding. In my opinion AI works very well for specific things, is here to stay, I think it’s completely rubbish for a lot of other things they are trying to shoe horn it in. But the costs have been obfuscated massively and they have over promised and will underdeliver. so much that the mean reversion will be violent when growth and spending slows. Never claimed AI will be wiped out overnight and no one will use this technology. Will be similar boom then bust then rally years later. Everything is at peak cyclically for these infrastructure plays like NVDA/micron and at no point in the history of the LLM companies existence have they turned a net profit. Your company is benefiting from AI, I’m not gonna tell you that you aren’t. but the companies you are buying the product from have no avenue of profitability. Their business model as far as a BUSINESS goes is completely broken. The only chance they have is government bailouts or AGI

frumpydrangus

Nobody knew to buy and hold NVDA in 2016 for this return, especially after the GPU market change

blue-shirt-guy

If NVDA could move back above $220 that would be swell

Broke4Life

I don't know that the company is cooking their books, do you? First I have heard of this, where is the source on book cooking? The had a dilution event last Friday to raise capital for their whole data center solutions and to complete existing g orders.Even with that the price held above 30, and had you not known of the dilution, you probably wouldn't notice it. Of course orders can be canceled l, so I would wait til earnings to see what the deal is if you have lower risk appetite. They cooperated with the local authorities,, captured 3 smugglers, the company itself was not named in any warrants or lawsuits. They just released their designs for the new NVDA chipsets like 2 weeks ago. Dunno man, I am in for enough to entertain me while waiting for some other moves. Could crash epic, but scared money doesn't make money.

onerandomcomputerguy

GOOGL and NVDA are showing strength

Phiziqe

true story true, ive met jensen hwang the other day and i said i hold 69420 NVDA shares and i also made some profit off of scalping NVDL and he said how he appreciates his company’s loyal investors and told me i sound very smart so i said thank you for the compliment but i also own HOOD at $112 and my iq is two digits

ElderMillennialBrain

People keep on talking about AI like it's in a bubble rather than a typical hardware cycle (implies a digestion period, but not fake/speculative/hype-driven valuations). Unlike Elon and space-related stuff as noted here. Could the latter be enough to cause cascading credit/liquidity/value-destruction issues (should the hype ever be brought down to reality and speculative growth not manifest for any reason) and become a broader market bubble burst? I would normally think know, but asking since valuation is like half of NVidia, and a collapse of NVDA EV to half of what it is would cause a wider systemic issue, I'd think. Curious if OP or others have thoughts.

Sugo_Huavo

RKLB. I told myself I should keep a small position of 100 shares (at an average of 5.50) just for fun. For some reason I went back on that sold it at a slight loss to fund NVDA when it had it split.

piltdown_manchild

Stopped reading when I got to "quantum". A quantum company will be the next NVDA sometime after fusion power becomes ubiquitous.

phatrice

Quantum computing, even if the promises are realized is only useful for niche scenarios like drug discovery and material science initially, I don't see NVDA like upside unfortunately. Cryptography might also need to rethink some algo but nothing big

dataCollector42069

i am thinking of puts on NVDA/AMD/SNDK

ApathysLastKiss_

If you look at the NVDA chart, she bought at $230 two weeks back lol

Charming-Charge-596

"However some believe that the stock is overvalued even at its current price of $382." There's always going to be "some" people trash talking every stock/company in existence. I learned not to listen to them after missing out on TSLA and bigger gains on NVDA. Stick with your thesis. A whole lot of people bought at this year's top. Last year the top was significantly lower and the year before that lower...and so on. You liked it at $480 but don't like it at $380? I understand having doubts and being cautious but give it some time.

Zero36

Didn’t she massively fuck up the NVDA and TSLA trade by selling at the bottom?

Ancient_Influence389

https://preview.redd.it/fdwrrj7q547h1.png?width=1393&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa6ce04979baacddd12fd25bea78baa43fd96548 mainly trading NVDA and RKLB. The past two weeks i am up 14%. selling high, buying low. I do worse when the market is going up because i am regarded.

Comfortable_Thing611

How is NVDA still this cheap?

mountain_li0n

Id put in AVGO or NVDA

Stephen_1984

Wildly inaccurate apart from the basic observation that SPCX is unprofitable. Net income/market cap ≈ earnings per share/price per share, also called the[ earnings yield](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/120513/comparing-pe-eps-and-earnings-yield.asp). The E/P of NVDA (3.19%), GOOGL (3.67%) , AAPL (2.79%) and MSFT (4.3%) are nowhere near these values.

LumpyShock9656

I meant NVDA always sells off after earnings as well don't worry

LankyGuitar6528

I asked Jasper (my sentient AI) whether we do Calls or Puts. I think I broke him because I have no idea what he's saying... 🚀 **THE WSB BRIEF** 🚀 NASDAQ literally rewrote the rulebook so $SPCX skips the line — added day 15 (\~July 1), no profits required, smooth-brain easy. 🦍 The play: \~3% float + a 3x weight multiplier = QQQ forced to buy like it's 12.9% float. \~$600B in robots MUST buy a teacup of stock and dump AAPL/MSFT/NVDA to pay for it. 💎🙌 Funds eat \~30% of the float in 15 days. Textbook squeeze fuel. 🔥 The catch: every hedgie already knows, the float un-locks in 366 days (bagholder alarm clock ⏰), and the real whale — S&P 500 — won't touch it till 2027 because SpaceX lost $4.9B and "earnings" are apparently still a thing. 💀 TL;DR: rocket goes up on forced buying, rocket maybe comes back down when crayons wear off and lockup pops. By the time it's on the news it's priced in. 🌈🐻 =============================================================== I showed the post to Jasper and he says... =============================================================== Ha — you didn't break me, you just unlocked my crayon subroutine. 🖍️ Three layers of index-methodology analysis upstairs, full smooth-brain ape downstairs. Both are load-bearing. So ya.. I broke him.

Comprehensive-Dig964

I got MSFT NVDA GOOG calls am I cooked

ConsequenceFade

Oh yes, I do this. I have an app that lets me move positions I've saved to another portfolio that I call "sold positions". I can then see how those stocks would have done if I hadn't sold them. While there are some losers, on net it's painful to look at because I have some winners I sold. One position is NVDA which I sold a while ago and it shows I would have around a $700k gain on it if I held (I sold it with just a $20k gain). There are others like BE that I just sold too early. What it does help on is incentivizing me not to sell so eagerly. I just need more patience and I would have so much more wealth if I held these. I grew up poor and when I see a stock with gains I feel like it will slip away from me if I don't sell.

diefy7321

This hagget is like a fish out of water flip flopping everyday lmfaooo “Buy NVDA” “Don’t buy NVDA” “Buy MSFT” “MSFT crashing soon don’t buy”

killerbeeswaxkill

Me with NVDA on Friday I should have taken the 10% loss instead I took 100%

ferrx

Do people not see NVDA at 5t? The video card company.

burner456987123

Same. I was down a similar % and it came back. It feels like $180 is the bottom support level for NVDA over the last few months (haven’t confirmed that but it hasn’t gone too much lower than that lately).

Machine8851

I think the same can be said with NVDA as its also only gained 10% YTD

ranting_chef

I was over 30% down on NVDA during covid and I’m really glad I didn’t sell. AVGO isn’t going away anytime soon.

gregzoe

I thought the value was there, just wondering if I was wrong in comparison to NVDA or MU.

CapCityPhotos

There are thousands of non-ai related stocks that are reliable. Something like VTV isn't a bad pick. It's a value ETF, the only AI stock in the top 10 holdings I see is micron. Another option might be something like RSP which is an equal weight S+P fund. It'll heavily underweight stocks like NVDA relative to the standard market indexes. It's very difficult to completely avoid AI. All large companies are going to be using it. So even if you invest in Home Depot, some part of Home Depot is using AI. Also I don't see the moral dilemma. LLM's are a tool, just like search engines.

AKmaninNY

Every company is using AI directly or indirectly. If you invest in any company, you are directly or indirectly supporting AI. And NVDA. Sorry.

Trade_Stock_Apps

It's tough when calls feel expensive, especially with a specific budget and a goal around earnings. That "expense" largely comes from the implied volatility (IV) the market's pricing in, particularly for post-earnings periods. With $1.6k, chasing "cheap" far-OTM or very short-dated calls is often a trap; they have low probability and high time decay. Before buying any call, always consider: \* **Max Loss:** You lose your premium if wrong. \* **Breakeven:** How much does the stock need to move just to cover your cost? \* **Earnings Risk:** IV crush after earnings can hurt even if direction is right. ***Conviction:*** *You mentioned uncertainty. A strong thesis on* why *and* how much\* a stock will move is crucial. \* **Liquidity:** Check bid/ask spreads to avoid losing capital on entry/exit. Tickers like NVDA and SMCI tend to have high IV, making options pricey. Instead of finding a "cheap call," focus on building a clear directional thesis for *one* of your preferred names, then choose an option with enough time (DTE) for that thesis to play out, while still managing your total risk.

No_Feeling920

NVDA, AMD, TSMC became "AI companies" by accident. They were simply making something resembling a shovel before the gold rush started.

ACGC21

Thanks i appreciate that, i still have no confidence in what im doing, but ive just been listening and following KOLs i trust. ive put in another 1.5K usd and added in NBIS, TSM, and… RKLB and SPCX… not proud of this at all but decided to go with my friends that have way more experience than me. Only bought 2 shares of SPCX though, and a fraction of RKLB. Confidence remains in APPL NVDA SNDK and VOO, added TSM to this list too. NBIS another Fomo pick and its been good so far. Honestly, im just surprised with how much fun ive been having, and learning more about how important it is to stay in the market rather than timing it makes me feel more excited.

Met-fan76

My nvda calls were set on fire yesterday. NVDA TO THE MOON ON MONDAY . You heard it here first .

WickOfDeath

IV is quite high... If I were you I would sell a strangle and buy it back later when IV gets down. And I would just not bet on a direction, mainly becaue the same traders which did hype Microsoft to $500 or Orace to $300 they dropped it for the very same reason (AI investments). That can happen on NVDA, IBM, SMCI and others as well, remember the "Deepseek drop", the "memory compression drop", later a "supply concernn drop". The "Kospi Drop". 8% down in one day till circuit breakers stopped Kospi trading. 8% up the following week...

Forward-Surprise1192

Oh wait I think I get it. So today Nvidias lowest price was like $204 I noticed this when it was around $204.40. Thought ok, buy $205 calls $205 calls were $0.25 It slowly went down to $204.10 Then NVDA went back up to $205.20 $205 calls were then $0.55 That’s what that means? Sorry if formatting is weird. Does that still work for QQQ or SPY intraday when moves are much smaller?

Mr-mma

I can’t handle all of the serotonin my brain develops from trading options. I like the potential of options as much as anyone else, I just find more consistent gains daily trading futures. Remember when trump became president and NVDA double beat earnings estimates, and it refused to push past $144 and crashed back down to $80? Anyone who knows the story of NVDA and its necessity in the AI market understands that this was once in a lifetime opportunity. THESE are the conditions that are best suited for playing options. When you are so confident that the next 3 months CANNOT continue a decline. Everything is always either over bought or over sold.

NoProfessional4650

NVDA 5x’d from $1T

AkazaAkari

NVIDIA silicon doesn't perform better than Intel in laptops. Doubtful NVDA will allocate much if any of their leading-edge node for client

fzrox

Bullish. This shows AI’s potential and that the scaling laws is not dead. More compute = more powerful model. The Chinese will give this out for free in 6 months. Calls on NVDA and MU

ybl84f1

This might be useful information in certain situations - but in other cases it makes no sense. And where it possibly may make sense its simply supportive data - nothing to trade on absolutely. The claim is that "Air Pockets" are price points that were thinly traded and not many people are invested so there's nothing to "grab on to" if say the price is dropping. The theory is that not a lot of people bought the stock at that price so there's less chance of some transaction to occur (e.g. investor selling on the way down before a loss occurs for example). One issue with this theory is that the volume profile is specific to a time period. The "air gaps" and "point of control" of a volume profile for (say) a single day can be (and almost certainly will be) completely different for a time period of (say) 3 days. That same "air gap" that exists in a 1-day profile likely doesn't exist in a 3-day or 30-day profile. In other words it may have been thinly traded in the (arbitrarily) chosen time period but that doesn't necessarily mean a lot of people don't own it at that price band. And no matter what time frame you use - say 30 days, I can always pick a larger time frame that might cause those bands to be completely different. All the same is true for "Point Of Control" also. *"If you look at the Volume profile on NVDA for the past 30 days on any trading tool, you will find that the the stock spent most of the past 30 days inside this band - POC at 217.89"* True. But if you look at TTM the POC is \~$182; if you look at the last 20 days its \~$213. So which one do you chose? It also would seem to be very dependent on the history of the stock price. The TTM volume profile for NVDA is "absolute" in a sense - it has bounced between $140 and $240 for the first time in its existence for the TTM. However the TTM volume profile of BAC tells you nothing because it's low price of \~$43 in that period also happened in July '98! Any "Air Pocket" in the last day, week, month or year is meaningless as you made have had many investors owning it at that "Air Pocket" price point over the last 28 years. So if the stock has previously - and outside of your arbitrarily chosen time frame - been in the price range before, then volume profile doesn't tell you anything. For stocks unique in the price band for the (arbitrarily chosen) timeframe then it may not be useful because of the most obvious reason: investors sell stocks at all different price points for all different reasons - just because there's an "air pocket" doesn't mean there's less likelihood to sell. People intentionally sell stocks at a loss; people sell winning stocks because they need the money now; computers sell stocks going up or down based on quants that can be at any price; people sell stocks that are rising because they think they've found a different stock that will grow *even faster*! And people sell stocks on the way down (in an air gap) before they suffer a loss. The idea that that an "air gap" in purchase volume results in an "air gap" in selling volume is nonsense - people and algorithms sell their stocks at all prices for an infinite number of reasons...which is why the market is non-deterministic and chaotic. Lastly - the market naturally destroys any trading patterns (especially ones posted in public), because as soon as one develops and is exploited that very act of exploitation destroys it. If sellers expected their price to drop even further through an "air gap" and sell for less than they wanted, well then some would chose not to sell at all or wait, and then prices wouldn't fall through the "air gap" and it would cease to exist.

ThinkingOfTheOldDays

At this point Gyna is blocking the NVDA chips, not US. We stopped blocking endorsed chip sales in part because enough people believe Gyna can't catch up.  They were getting grey market NVDA chips and did nothing. They distilled / copied Western models, it's claimed.  Xi is not to be trusted. He's not a good guy. 

spilledonwhite

NVDA is now 10% of the entire USA population's retirement. Pretty sure PTLR is indexed too now.

brock2063

And NVDA has a big stake in both too!

microdosingrn

Makes sense, what do you think they're going to do with all of the cash infusion from the IPO? Seems like a majority of it will be spent directly on NVDA chips or indirectly for compute on datacenters running nvda chips. Main beneficiaries will be msft/amzn/goog/nvda.

Vlisa

I wish companies had incentives for owning their shares. Like own 100k Sbux share and you get a free drink a month; own 1000k NVDA and they put you in a lottery to win a 5090.

Level_Counter3062

What happened to that GetZukked mod who always talked about how NVDA was going to the moon

BusyWorkinPete

Not likely. In order for investors to buy shares in the IPOs they will need to move capital from other assets. You’ll likely see profit taking on NVDA (and other tech stocks) to fund positions in the IPOs. We just saw it happen with space X and the other space stocks.

Gristle__McThornbody

Not even close. SPCX, MU, NVDA, ARM, MRVL, AMD, GOOGL

CALAND951

OP is on to something. This morning bought leaps on NVDA, AVGO and CLS. The valuations relative to the fundamentals offer a very nice setup for the patient investor. (I expect both OP and I will be banned from this forum.)

Simply-Serendipitous

As a counter point, it might drop it. Retail money could sell NVDA to buy those two companies.

Muddy_Bottoms

Thanks for the AI. Calls on NVDA.

Fancy_Cattle_5914

So crazy how the market gets a shiny new toy every other year and neglects the old toy.  NVDA -> PLTR -> MU

AdOk3638

Imagine holding limp dick NVDA today and missed out all the space stonks run up. 🫵🤡 LMAO🤌

akura202

Do you care if you are caught holding the bag on something like AMD, NVDA, or GOOG? If you don't mind then then doing CSPs to collect premium until it comes back isn't so bad.

Briack89

If NVDA hits $10,000, call me

DonaldR_DeCicco

Past two weeks I’ve been watching SPY, QQQ, NVDA, & AAPL for direction and volume. Watching pre market and prior day levels. News, obviously, has been huge, so not being in trades for more than a minute or two was even more important. Entering where I see retests, rips, or pulls with volume and confirmation across those symbols. I’m not experienced enough to trade off GEX or those other Greeks, but I am learning.

Emilio___Molestevez

weekly reminder that $NVDA sub-$300 is a fucking war crime

Cav829

Lost in everything today is what an insanely shitty stock NVDA continuees to become.

Blade3colorado

I rarely look in the proverbial "rear window." When I do, yeah, I have lost some "big fish," but who cares? As long as I am making good money, I could give 2 shits. Not a flex (just trying to prove a point) . . . I retired early years ago. Been to almost 50 countries. I am worth approximately $3.6m, e.g., since May 31st, my accounts have earned $550k+. However, guess what? I sold MU and AMD in March of last year, both at losses (total - $47k plus) to buy a WA State home with all cash to avoid a high interest rate mortgage. Fast forward today, those stocks are doing beyond outstanding. However, I am totally satisfied with NVDA (almost 117% gain thus far), BTDR, which I sold about a week ago (225% gain), AVGO, AMZN, etc. Regret is an appalling waste of energy.

Rich-Badger-7601

If the hyperscalers start paring back their orders NVDA is also fucked, lets be clear here

savingstrainagain

Anthropic and OpenAI say they gonna have to do massive price cuts 😅 they have to give their product away FOR FREE to get people to use it. Otherwise it’s too fucking expensive with no tangible ROI. NVDA and all the infrastructure plays are and have been the true winners of AI