NVDA

Tamanaxa

One weekly NVDA is more than 200… don’t ask how I know….

Waste-Club8866

Lmao that website it shit. It thinks NVDA is oversold after the insane run up 😂

SerMumble

I'm not very impressed by FNDB's movement since inception for its 0.25% expense ratio. A lot of FNDB's holdings are too similar to the S&P500 so FNDB moves like SWPPX and SPYM with a 0.02% expense but FNDB is more expensive and historically performs worse. VTV is a more affordable value etf with 0.03% expense. It has historically underperformed FNDB but with the lower expense and lower drawdowns VTV better justifies its function in a portfolio as a hedge. Better hedges for US large caps than FNDB and VTV are AVUV for US small cap value, VYMI for international, and SGOV for US treasuries (dry powder). There are other options not listed. A hedge should ideally offer something the threatened core does not have and that can be either tilting a portfolio toward unique defensive holdings or offering a certain liquidity that can be used at an opportune time. SCHD fills a hedge role by tilting toward fewer tech holdings that will crash at a different time from a tech crash and its dividends can be used to buy into a market correction without selling shares. Dividend etfs are not intended to be invincible and dividends are a strength during bear markets. The number of holdings in an etf whether they are 100 or 1,000 do not really matter so long as it is weighted appropriately in a portfolio. Sites like etfdb or other tools can help analyze your portfolio's holdings so you can spot if you've accidentally made something like NVDA 20% weight or something reckless. https://etfdb.com/tool/portfolio-analyzer/?etfs%5Bspym%5D=50&etfs%5Bvymi%5D=50

soclear1700

So if there was an China to buy AMD rumor it would be up 10%, but NVDA I'd down

YourChildhood5762

On the surface, VUG looks like the better hold. But its top 10 holdings are about 63.5% of the portfolio. The number for QQQ is 47%. Both numbers are obscenely high, I'd like to see them at 20%. VUG's 26% in just NVDA and AAPL is a bet that I don't want and those two occupy 10% less in QQQ. VUG has more holdings but is less diverse. On that basis, I'd choose that QQQ.

bearhunter429

#NVDA completely flat. You guys said it was going to pump but it didn't LMAO🤌⛹️

SignificanceLate7002

AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, and META did a lot of the heavy lifting to keep SPY up last week.

laststarfighter2635

What kind of candle is that on NVDA? A Sith staff?

NotaBolivianSpy

NVDA calls for my rent money

fomoandyoloandnogrow

God I wish NVDA would just hit 10 trillion market cap. Then maybe these bulls would be wealthy enough to afford Fiji water like civilized people

NotaBolivianSpy

NVDA making money on overnight, gay bers raped on the streets :shrek: :shrek:

BusyWorkinPete

>Shorting NVDA and MU is probably the worst decision someone can make. Not if his thesis about AI is accurate. >Shorting the chipmakers means you are literally betting against technological advancement and are assuming some kind of world disaster is happening that stops technological progress. It's literally not betting against technological advancement, it's betting against their current valuations. Again, this is all based on his thesis about AI being a bust.

Ocilla

What NVDA news?

Honest_Bee_9549

Shorting NVDA and MU is probably the worst decision someone can make. Regardless of someone's opinion on AI, it's obvious this shit is taking over the world and making massive progress in robotics too as the next step. Shorting the chipmakers means you are literally betting against technological advancement and are assuming some kind of world disaster is happening that stops technological progress.

RevolutionaryPhoto24

Right, well I concur with yr list, esp AVGO & NVDA, and even POET over INTC (I actually made bank on some 2026 10c a few months back and started scaling into a small wild card position for 2029, though don’t consider it a hold.) I was thinking of Sivers (there’s another but I want to finish DD,) and for (somewhat) adjacent, I like ENSI from what I described. Overall, I’d even chose random batteries-as-data-center lottos over INTC (QS, specifically.)

Straight-Annual8687

TSMC, NVDA, AVGO ---- easy

maschin1982

China allows Baba and Byte to buy NVDA Chips

maschin1982

Alibaba an Byte can buy NVDA Chips

Not_Sure_68

Things are breaking down in equities, but the silly weighting of the S&P and the fact that nobody cares about the russell or dow is making it very easy for people to ignore...as long as a few tech stocks prop up the Qs and SPY. If you look under the hood you'll note rate sensitive S&P stuff rolled over weeks ago. XLU, XLF, and XLRE(utilities, financials, and real estate). Meanwhile NVDA is down as is oracle, but nobody cares because META is up! yay! BTW if you had silver, platinum, or gold in your hand three years ago it has outperformed the S&P. Massively so in the case of silver.

NoCommonDog

Well I keep seeing articles and TV puff pieces stating that NVDA is getting cheaper and cheaper, so if the shares rise on this "vapour news", and then nothing actually comes of it... well: it was bound to trade higher anyhow.

TomatoSpecialist6879

It's good news for NVDA, so -0.3% and flat on Monday

Not_Sure_68

Yeah well someone has to be the sheep that get sheared. Everything interest rate sensitive is already correcting...it's just hidden by the overpriced tech stuff...which is extremely rate sensitive. Perhaps people will care when Meta joins GOOG, NVDA, and especially ORCL which are all well off their highs already. ...nothing to see here folks.

SeaMenCaptain

Winners: • RKLB $115 Call 5/15 — +$2,680 • RKLB $93 Call 5/8 — +$9,350 • COST $1,000 Call 5/8 — at least +$13,500 (one buy row was cut off) • COST $1,060 Put 5/22 — +$10,490 • TSLA $450 Call 5/13 — +$3,922 • HOOD $89 Call 5/29 — +$12,800 • SNDK $1,235 Call 8/7 — about +$8,500 (buy figure was blurry) • COST $960 Call 8/7 — +$6,500 • NVDA $232.5 Call 9/4 — +$2,970 • COST $925 Call 9/18 — +$400 • AAPL $327.5 Call 9/11 — +$5,830 • SNDK $1,800 Call 9/25 — +$1,600 • SNDK $1,730 Call 9/18 — +$1,940 • NVDA $212.5 Put 9/18 — +$4,782 • NVDA $215 Put 9/18 — +$1,000 Losers: • NVDA $222.5 Call 8/5 — -$6,550 • SNDK $1,685 Put 9/11 — -$1,688 Couldn't nail down: SNDK $1,450 Put 5/8 (buy only, no sell shown), COST $1,050 Call 6/12 (sell was canceled), COST $955 Call 8/7 (sell row cut off), and a MRNA swing from Sep 21–22 where the account was up $14,638.26 that day but no per-trade fills were shown. The known trades net out to roughly +$78k, which is in the ballpark of the author's stated YTD realized P/L of +$94,532 — the gap is covered by the trades with cut-off or missing rows. His best single hit was the COST $1,000 Call at +$13,500, and the two losses are small next to the wins.

aliensayshi

it would be AMD again (taking bigger uppies than NVDA based on NVDA's news)

Ambitious_Snow840

Post I just made elsewhere: Honestly, I'm a buy and hold guy, so I don't worry too much about it. I already own quite a bit of shares, but I think it's now time for long-term calls. But here's my thinking: It has consolidated a ton since 2 earnings ago, forward PE is 18 to 20, growing revenue significantly, no greater concentration risk than CRDO, COHR, or even NVDA (really), they're in 3 bottlenecks: Networking, chips, and VMs, and Management is legit. What am I missing? Custom is still the path forward.

Ambitious_Snow840

Honestly, I'm a buy and hold guy, so I don't worry too much about it. I already own quite a bit of shares, but I think it's now time for long-term calls. But here's my thinking: It has consolidated a ton since 2 earnings ago, forward PE is 18 to 20, growing revenue significantly, no greater concentration risk than CRDO, COHR, or even NVDA (really), they're in 3 bottlenecks: Networking, chips, and VMs, and Management is legit. What am I missing? Custom is still the path forward.

OHto30

NVDA pre-shrekked on China news, MU feeling it too

Difficult_Letter_607

Well after making lots of money with $NVDA and $SNDK, now I am full ported on $SPCE

NixaB345T

I suck at options plays. I started just flipping stocks instead and now I’m up 36% YTD lol. I’m great (so far) at picking a stock and direction but get killed with timing and strike price. It’s also much less work this way. Set it and forget it. I do a 80/20 rule for overall strategy and plays. 80% in SPY/QQQ 20% Risk plays (below) Then if I sell a risk play for a profit, 80/20 the proceeds into the next play. Sometimes I’ll sit on cash waiting for a downward day for a week or 2. $MU $MFST $GME $NVDA $SPCE $RVI Currently all risk play is in $GME, bought in at \~$18.50 about a month or so ago. Sitting pretty about now.

UnfazedBrownie

With the delayed permitting, I would expect less buildout. Can’t imagine this will bode well for some of these DC types of plays, I’m sure NVDA will be fine since there’s a few years worth of backlogs.

Over-Young8392

NVDA

Evening_Raccoon5485

Didn’t you blow up your account gambling on NVDA after multiple ppl told you not to and tried to help you but you argued with them just for them to end up being right and instead of asking them for help you just deleted everything and blocked em?

RevolutionaryPhoto24

No, had OP purchased OTM NVDA weeklies in 2023, they would not now be worth 1000% of the purchase price, but zero, like these contracts. The key distinction is between wasting assets and equity, in yr 2023 example.

Current_Homework_143

Buy & hold is supposed to, but I've been selling CSP on NVDX for the past 1.5 years and I'm beating holding NVDA or NVDX

BusyWorkinPete

Why would you short SPCX if AI is a bust? NVDA and MU gains over the past year are entirely based on AI build out. If your thesis is correct and AI is a bust, shorting them would be the play.

papakong88

>What is your definition of a naked put ? A naked put is an options strategy in which the investor writes, or sells, put options without holding a short position in the underlying security. A naked put strategy is sometimes referred to as an “uncovered put” or a “short put” and the seller of an uncovered put is known as a naked writer.  Ref: [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedput.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nakedput.asp) The writer can use the buying power of his account in place of a short position. The BP required is known as BP required or margin required.  The cash and securities in your account have BP. For this discussion, I will assume that the BP is from cash. In my example, I am comparing selling a Oct 16 NVDA 212.50 CSP for 2.05 vs selling 2x205 puts for a total of 2.06. The CSP requires a collateral of 21,250 while the collateral for the naked 205 put is initially at 9,000 total, but can increase to 11,000 if the puts are ITM.  (That’s why I sell 2 only) So the naked puts have a higher rate of return. The 212.50 put has a delta of 0.20 while the 205 put has a delta of 0.11. Which position is riskier will depend on how the risk assessment is made. I will pick the 205 puts as less risky. There is no correct  answer. 

zztop610

NVDA to the mooooooooon

Potential-March-1384

This is dumb. You’re comparing relative performance of the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 for a period of time in which info tech alone has become \~35% of the total value of the S&P. The biggest company in the Nasdaq 100 is NVDA which makes up 13% of the index, it also makes up 8.2% of the S&P 500. This isn’t the “gotcha” you seem to think it is.

lambofgod0492

MU and NVDA, or wait until Ant and openAI IPOs.

123789dftr

Good you understand diluting vs acquiring shares! So now tell me, even if OpenAI/NBIS/CRWV stock drops 70%, how is NVDA gaining shares of a different company “the same thing” as diluting your own shareholders at the cost of the compute they’re selling (or more)? Interesting to say Americans can hardly write their own name while showing elementary-school reading comprehension. I said he’s “winning because he’s not British.” The latter part is the point: he’s winning by not being British. > I’m not British at all Whether you’re from Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Australia, New Zealand or any other irrelevant country that talks like this, it's the same shit you are British. This is like a Californian saying "I'm not American, I'm Californian" or a Canadian insisting “I’m not American, I’m Canadian." Same shit.

Scumda909

lol, Tesla grew like 50 percent over the past 3 years, and NVDA grew like 420% 😅

GrumpyScroogy

Its very simple, you just live your life and keep a high interest in stuff. I found NVDA in \~2010 because i was a gamer I found Tesla in \~2016 because it was the new car my boss came in with I found bitcoin in \~2012 because i was reading tech forums I found CSGO investing in \~2014 because i played the game since forever I found google in \~2010 because i was doing youtube You live your life, and do stuff, than invest in your circle of competence. People who are online the whole day looking for stocks are absolute idiots imho.

PapaCharlie9

I don't trade long-dated anything, but I can still point out some issues. What is the delta of the 180c? If you are attempting to do a stock replacement type of trade, that generally requires a delta north of 80. Otherwise you're giving up too much in gains on a dollar for dollar move. How much of the premium is time value? With a 2029 expiration, I'd expect around half or a bit less to be time value, which is a very high premium to pay for the intrinsic value you are getting. All of the time value will be subject to time decay. One of the reasons north of 80 delta is desirable is to minimize the amount of time value you have to pay for. Unfortunately, NVDA being a volatile stock will jack up the time value even at high deltas. You can get higher delta for less time value by bringing in your expiration to 2028. NVDA has not been anywhere near 267 in the last 52-weeks. The 52-week high is 236. So it's quite the bullish gamble to target a breakeven at that price. Unless you don't have any intention of holding to expiration. You'll enter at whatever the lowest price is that you can get. Start at the bid, wait 15 seconds, if filled you're done. If not filled, keep canceling and re-entering your order at higher and and higher prices until you get a fill. With luck, that fill price will be below the mid price.

papakong88

Continue what you are doing. Instead of selling CSP you can sell naked puts to be more efficient in using capital or to reduce risk. * Higher rate of return For example, Oct 20 NVDA 212.50 CSP requires 21,250 in BP but a naked put requires 4,375. Therefore, the naked put has a higher rate of return.  * Lower risk The 212.50 put has a delta of 0.20 and is $2.05. A 205 put has a delta of 0.11 and is $1.03. So So one can sell 2 x 205 put to get the same dollar amount but at a lower risk.

PxddyWxn

NVDA

Spins13

It’s just a trash company. End of the party will be extremely brutal for them after the semis cycle tops. You should better own a real quality company like NVDA if you want exposure

Acceptable-Leek1546

APPL overvalued. NVDA still cheap. That’s the crazy part.

IsThereAnythingLeft-

NVDA buying a stake at a massively inflated valuation is the same thing mate

maschin1982

Massive NVDA buys in the last 20min looks positive for the next weeks

OptionWheelStart

I don’t think there is one “ideal” Wheel setup, but the framework I’ve settled on is fairly simple. I usually look at **30–45 DTE puts** and around **0.15–0.25 delta**. I also want the stock to be in a reasonably bullish trend — ideally above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with both averages trending upward. I personally don’t target a fixed premium percentage first. I choose the company, expiration and strike based on risk, and then look at whether the premium is worth taking. If you start with “I need X% per month,” it becomes very easy to move closer to ATM or start selling puts on higher-IV names just to hit the number. The biggest rule for me is still: **only sell the put if I’m genuinely fine owning 100 shares at that strike.** The premium is limited, while the downside after assignment can obviously be much larger. So your thinking with AMZN, NVDA and GOOG makes sense from that perspective if those are companies you actually want to hold long term. The only thing I’d keep in mind is that all three give you pretty heavy exposure to the same broad tech/AI theme. If the whole sector gets hit, several Wheel positions can get challenged at the same time. If I get assigned, I’m fine moving to the second half of the Wheel and selling covered calls rather than treating assignment as a failed trade. My current approach is roughly the same **30–45 DTE** range on the call side as well. For me, stock selection and position sizing matter much more than squeezing an extra few tenths of a percent out of the premium. I’d rather make less premium on something I’m comfortable holding than get a great premium on something I’ll panic about owning after a 20% drop.

TFinancialMillennial

Given the smaller starting capital though, Option spreads may be the best consideration on higher cost stocks. I.e. Sell Put/Buy Put or Sell Call/Buy Call spreads on TSLA, GOOG, NVDA etc.. with 7-14 days DTE at lower deltas of 0.15 +/- 0.05 range. The only thing is it'd be wise to use lower deltas so you don't get called/put. You'd be mainly taking the financial loss if the contract goes against you give the spread cap so you'd never be forced assigned or forced to buy the shares in the contract in the end.

MagnoliaRoofConsult

The thinking that does people in or misses gains is thinking it can’t go any lower or higher. Textbook example of people selling BTC on 2x gains for $20/coin. Selling NVDA at 300b market cap, etc. It can always go lower, especially an unprofitable company with no stable history of a price floor. Look at pricing since IPO, no floor, no stability. The business is unprofitable with no forseeable path to profit, and we are headed for unprecedented rates not seen since like pre ‘08. It can and will go lower, IMO.

Informal-Lime6396

Might want to consider SOXX or SOXQ. SMH is top heavy because it let its winners run, whereas the other 2 rebalance. Most of SMH's gains come from NVDA which is priced in for perfection now, not much room for it to moon anymore.

Wolf_Faust_

 Oh man the misclick OP I’m with you , I’m doing a 10/30 option on NVDA call

PoppaBurgundy3

NVDA to $230.36 on Monday. Thesis: vibes

I_like_code

It be cool if NVDA went up to 300.

Vast_Cricket

My portfolio: Meta (156% return) 0.3% total portfolio started from day one. Largest and oldest holding FCNTX ( +236% rtn) is actually a mf. 0.32% of total porfolio. NVDA +275% rtn since 2010. 0.23% of total portfolio. Only AMD and AAPL have >1000%. Negligible portfolio for 2 decades at least.

BriackYOLO

I am less worried about NVDA than Trump getting bored this weekend

pethebi

You’re super focused on the price, but what about TSLA made you buy it? Was their financials? Products that they’re making? Things in their pipeline? For example, I invested in NVDA and AMD because I was interested in AI/ML work since 2018. I understood that NVDA was the best chip maker because I used them. I also understood AMD was a close second and was rapidly catching up because I built computers as a hobby, and was learning how they’re quickly becoming the face of AI. I thought NVDA was a huge buying opportunity and DCA in 2019/2020 during the whole bitcoin discussion because of AI/ML. What were your reasons for buying the stocks beyond their price? That might be one of the reasons you didn’t do well, and /or had weak conviction, leading you to buy high and sell low. My biggest learning is to buy only industries I’m well versed in, and diversify with a broad market index fund.

Plus_Seesaw2023

This is NKE... [https://finviz.com/stock?t=NKE&ty=c&ta=0&p=m](https://finviz.com/stock?t=NKE&ty=c&ta=0&p=m) What was the problem with NKE ? Everyone seemed to love them between 2008 and 2021. And everyone was buying NKE as a rock-solid dividend stock. Here, everyone only wants to talk about SPCX, AMD, INTC, NVDA, AAPL, etc. That’s only to be expected ; we only ever talk about the winners, as if by chance.

Plus_Seesaw2023

Indeed, and unfortunately, the friends, colleagues or influencers who make the most noise are those who have made huge profits on a single share and are boasting about it loud and clear everywhere... Unfortunately, this accounts for just 0.1 per cent of investors – the lucky few. Those who put everything into SPY or a global ETF have outperformed 90 per cent of the other investors who tried to beat the markets. My biggest regret is that if I’d put everything into SGOV, I’d be much wealthier today… It really is a shame! NB. The proof of this is that today everyone ; absolutely everyone ; is talking about nothing but Intel, AMD, NVDA or TSLA. Whereas at some point over the last five years, everyone was slating them.

Jumpy-Imagination-81

When you sold your winners and added to your losers you cut your flowers and watered your weeds. You ended up with a garden full of weeds. > Meanwhile, what was I doing with the stocks that were down? >I was buying more. You were trying to *catch a falling knife*. https://bullishbears.com/catch-a-falling-knife/ > Then finally it would rebound and I'd be up 20% or so. >And I'd sell. If I had sold NVDA after I was up +20% I never would have had the chance to be up +4,748% as I am today. Hold or add to your winners, not your losers. Let your winners run *unless whatever made the company a winner changes*. >“The most successful investors that I worked with, those that made the most money, all had one thing in common: the presence of a couple of big winners in their portfolios.” >Freeman-Shor’s conclusion is very similar to something Gavin Baker once wrote: “Selling winners too early has been a persistent problem for me. No matter how much I tell myself that I am going to learn and let them run - I still begin trimming my winners way too early. **Letting winners run is the most common shared trait amongst great investors**.” >https://thescienceofhitting.com/p/letting-winners-run

maschin1982

Big Volume NVDA 🚀

Spac55

It’s not Fed hike every time even many members keep making noise. Long term bonds so low, after 19 years. $BND $TLT not meme ETF the way Algo treated everyday to $SNDK $NVDA $MU $AMD $META $QQQ & others with 0DTE. Too many Option Algo & 0DTE, rig the stock market & treasury.

liquidtv78

NVDA due for a rip up to 230 :pray:

Fit-Frosting-7144

NVDA 0dte 222.5p shits gonna get slapped

Cyril818

Starbucks will suffer for a very long time in the K-shaped economy, where 10Y rates keep rising. It's forward PE is 32x while NVDA's forward PE is 12x. BTW, Walmart is trading at 40x forward PE, but Walmart is applying AI to their business.

fuhhhahhhhoptions

NVDA ai thingy on monday then whole market reaches ATH on monday trust

laststarfighter2635

NVDA Squeezzzzzzzeeeee

DisgrunltedDan

SMCI pump Supermicro $SMCI says it’s moving “full speed ahead” with SpaceXAI on a gigawatt-scale AI data center buildout powered by Nvidia $NVDA GB300 systems. The company also teased a “surprise Christmas gift” before year-end. - Reuters

laststarfighter2635

Can we vote? Will NVDA squeeze up?

WhoDoYouKnowHereB

Yeah just checked NVDA as it’s been a while and not a single downgrade in sight lmao

Weak_Emu3659

Top analyst price target downgrades: SNDK MU NVDA NBIS

NoJaguar3961

I’m considering buying 1 NVDA Jan 19, 2029 $180 call. NVDA is around $225 right now, and the option is around $85.60 mid / $86.70 ask, so roughly $8.5–8.7k for one contract. I specifically want a deep-ish ITM LEAPS rather than an OTM lottery ticket. Breakeven at expiration is around $267. Do you think the $180 strike is a reasonable balance between probability and upside, or would you go deeper ITM ($160/$170) or higher ($190/$200)? Also, would you enter around the midpoint with a limit order, or wait for a better setup? Interested in hearing from people who actually trade long-dated NVDA options.

maschin1982

waiting of the big NVDA move in the Power hours 🚀🚀🚀

RlckAndSnorty

i am literally bleeding cash every time i look at my portfolio this week. bought the dip on NVDA thinking i was smart, got absolutely destroyed when it reversed on zero volume. then tried to play the earnings lottery with AMD and got wiped out instantly. paper hands don't even describe it, i have tissue paper fingers that dissolve under pressure. blaming the algos, blaming the fed, blaming my own inability to hold anything longer than five minutes. maybe i'm just destined to be exit liquidity for guys who actually know what they're doing. whatever, selling everything tomorrow and going back to working at the gym. at least the weights don't change price mid-set.

prana_fish

$NVDA is so tied to the price action of the 10/30 year bond yields lmao. Nothing fundamental buying/selling going on here. Some algos immediately pump and dump something high liquidity to balance perceived rIsK. Meaning $AAPL continues to just retard pump uncorrelated from anything.

ahhhhhh12343tyhyghh

I've been 100% NVDA since 2018. Worked out well for me

Reply_Stunning

BREAKING: Iran to invest $5 trillion in NVDA and SNDK as part of second Memorandum of Understanding

Acceptable-Two5692

Wtf is wrong with NVDA

croissant_and_cafe

I keep about 30 stocks at any given time. I sell them if the momentum is in a downtrend (bearish cross) AND if something has materially changed with the company and/or industry. For example I sold NFLX this year after having the stock for 3 years, because their Warmer acquisition was a bad move and AI is changing the entertainment industry. I held on to NVDA this year even though it entered a bearish cross because it’s still at the top of its industry (to keep it simple)

Valkorion335786

*Calls.* *Weekly calls.* *0DTE calls.* *Calls purchased at open.* *Calls purchased after the first dip.* *Calls purchased after the second dip because the first dip was apparently fraudulent.* *SPY calls.* *QQQ calls.* *NVDA calls.* *MU calls.* *Calls slightly out of the money.* *Calls irresponsibly out of the money.* *Calls so far out of the money that their delta is essentially a clerical error.*

artbystorms

Considering that some people here have half their portfolio in NVDA or GOOG I guess it depends on how much risk you want to take on and how much you trust the AI runup to not collapse.

FuckleUp

NVDA needs to announce SI chips 🚀

davidbigham

NVDA and AVGO performance is worst than bonds 🤷‍♂️

greenpride32

Well I personally do. But individual stock picking is not for everyone. I guess a more direct answer is it's easy to say in hindsight you should have invested in MSFT AAPL NVDA AMZN META GOOGL AVGO BRKB years ago. But years ago a lot of people would look at the stock price in real time and say, it's already up so much, how much more can it go up, maybe I should buy something else. You see a ton of comments like that about NVDA today. The the real stock pickers don't look at price chart, they look at financial trajectory. I do suggest for people who don't do financials based DD to stick to the index. I own 6 of those tickers for a very long time (would be 7 but I liquidated META before the Muse runup :( ) I also own SP500 and NAS100.

Different_Goat3444

Thanks NVDA, I knew you’d fuck me today

FLRugDealer

NVDA so lame these days

verified-trader

**BanBet Lost** — /u/maschin1982 (1W - 2L, 33%) | Ticker | Entry → Target | Move | Time | Result | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NVDA** ▲ | $229.28 → $240.74 | +5.0% | 3d | Lost |

i_empathetic

Me with 30% of port in NVDA the past year 😑

DiamondTeddy

If your platform allows, try to chart the specific strike you are looking to buy. So instead of just looking at the underlying chart… you send let’s say NVDA 225C to a chart, it will show you the H&L of that strike and you will see when price is above or below 9ema and where it can run to as a potential price target. I find that helps to not enter too early to exit too soon. Disclaimer: not financial advice

Acceptable-Two5692

Please NVDA go to 230 today

maschin1982

NVDA is 26,7% under fair value, but the market was what else

Glittering_Dig3798

why is NVDA like this

fomoandyoloandnogrow

NVDA has heavy SI

miss_L_fire

Been holding since $115.23 . It’s funny, my husband isn’t into stocks or trading at ALL, but I mentioned buying NVDA to him and he said “oh you should get some AMD, they’re getting to be a competitor to NVDA and I like their stuff” I’ll forever be grateful haha

itsalwayscalls

I'm not BUYING NVDA, AMD or MU any more. I do own AMD and MU. Owned NVDA until 2025 and sold in spring 2025. In the AI space I'm buying MRVL, AVGO.. I don't see how hyperscalers ever buy off the shelf going forward. They do it because software builders can easily build on it. E.g. NVDA. But big money and permanence is custom chips up and down the stack. 50% the cost, 125% the efficiency? No debate. COHR, LITE, CRDO are good too. Also HBM4 is basically custom silicon as well, but I already own so much MU I can't but more.

IntrepidToday0

The fact that WMT has a higher PE ratio than NVDA is hilarious. When the re-rating happens, it’s gonna be violent

Flimsy_Outside_5508

!banbet NVDA 150 6m

Flimsy_Outside_5508

I am loaded up on NVDA put leaps and my balls tingle