NVDA

Walking72

Joining the Russell 1000 Value benchmark wouldn't trigger a massive runaway rally purely on mechanics, given NVDA's multi-trillion-dollar scale. However, it does provide structural support by opening up forced institutional buying from value-oriented passive capital, giving the stock an extra layer of liquidity and steady baseline demand.

Low-Cartographer-429

Thanks. I feel comfortable with NVDA + TSM (been growing my position to be \~50% of my NVDA holdings) and adding AVGO as the smallest holding of the 3. Will then monitor AVGO going forward to see how to adjust the weighting.

maschin1982

Is it possible that NVDA 250$ this month

Low-Cartographer-429

I love TSM and moved 1K out of NVDA to put into TSM. There's a Sleep Well At Night factor for me in it because no other foundry comes close. And I don't have to bet on which semi company has the most wins.

Low-Cartographer-429

Thanks for this. Yes, looking at GFS because it's not very sexy at the moment. The general dislike in this thread for AVGO actually increases my conviction. I think AVGO will be a good long-term hold as a core position as well as something to do a lesser portion in it of swing trades since everyone loves NVDA too much at the moment; and lot less volatility in NVDA.

Apple2o

It was a no brainer for me. I moved that money into NVDA which kicked off moving to 300k then OKLO took me to \~2.5 million and back Or I would be sitting on the same house right now having lost money and paying interest on it 🧐

Kassdhal88

Look at it on a cash flow basis. The SPX earnings are inflated by the profits from the reevaluation of the participations in SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI. Also on a SPX consolidated basis, MSFT GOOG META AMZN are spending a lot of cash in investments in data centers and amortising it over 5 to 20 years while the profits are being taken upfront on the sale of semiconductors by MU NVDA AVGO… Net the Price / Cash Flow is at its highest in history

ThanksDependent1001

But remember NVDA said while some of you may call this circular financing… they assured us it’s not.

Happy-Champion1661

***January 2027.*** *OpenAI rumors of serious liquidity problems start spreading*. The market initially shrugs it off, then SPY and QQQ finish the week 7% lower. People start asking how much debt is actually sitting behind the AI boom, and nobody seems to have a complete answer. The next week OpenAI goes bust. Investors stop putting money in, lenders refuse to extend more credit, and massive losses are discovered. The company cannot refinance and the whole thing collapses. Anthropic shares get hit immediately. Investors realize that if OpenAI couldn't make the economics work, maybe nobody can. Anthropic drops 25% the next day. The entire AI private-credit complex starts getting repriced. ORCL shares fall 30%. The chip and memory manufacturers also fall 25-30%. Then people start looking at the OpenAI contracts. A huge amount of AI spending was based on future growth, future capacity and future contracts. Some of those contracts suddenly aren't worth what investors thought they were worth. Some disappear completely. Bag 7 earnings estimates get cut. **SPCX will not hit 40T revenue by next year.** Stocks fall again SPY drops 11% in one day. QQQ experiences its worst daily drop in history, -20%. Multiple circuit breakers get activated every day. The US is now the new Korea. The market is in full panic. *Then the first private-credit reports start coming out.* Loans that were supposedly worth par are suddenly being marked down. Software companies are struggling to refinance. Data-center projects are being delayed. AI infrastructure borrowers are missing targets. Private-credit funds are admitting that some of their loans were much riskier than the market understood. Investors try to get their money out. But they can't. Redemption requests explode. Funds already started imposing limits in 2026. Then people discover how interconnected the system actually is. Pension funds, insurance companies and other institutional investors have been buying huge amounts of private debt because they needed yield. Some of the debt financing the AI buildout ended up sitting indirectly inside pension portfolios, insurance balance sheets and long-duration investment vehicles. The problem isn't just that an AI company goes bankrupt. The problem is that the debt doesn't disappear. It gets transferred onto someone else's balance sheet. A pension fund announces that several large private-credit positions have been written down by 30%. Another fund reports a 40% loss on a portfolio of AI-related loans. An insurance company says its capital position has deteriorated. Then another one. Suddenly the market realizes that the AI bubble isn't just an equity bubble. **It's a credit bubble.** And the credit is sitting inside institutions that people assumed were safe. Pension funds begin selling liquid assets to meet their obligations. Insurance companies stop buying risk. Private-credit funds stop making new loans. Banks pull back credit lines. The market falls another 18%. QQQ is now down more than 45% from its high. SPY is down 30%. NVDA is down 35%. The government announces that it is monitoring the situation. Rumors spread that a rescue package is being prepared. Stocks rally 6% on the news. Then the details come out. The government isn't actually willing to guarantee everything. They just can't. The private-credit losses are too large. The pension losses are too large. The insurance losses are too large. The rescue deal collapses. OpenAI is officially declared bankrupt. The market completely loses confidence. QQQ falls another 15%. SPY falls another 9%. NVDA is now down 69%. The market starts pricing in a full-scale AI capex collapse. Companies cancel data centers. All that off-balance sheet debt from META is about to explode. Cloud providers cut spending. Chip orders are cancelled. Construction projects are stopped. Power contracts are renegotiated. Thousands of companies that were depending on AI infrastructure spending suddenly don't have customers anymore. Then the economy starts showing up in the numbers. Hiring collapses. Job losses accelerate. Consumer spending falls. Retail sales weaken. Business fail. The market had spent years assuming that the AI boom was going to create enormous productivity gains. But what if the economy was much weaker underneath all of this? They go back through the growth numbers. They look at corporate investment. They look at data-center construction. They look at semiconductor spending. They look at cloud infrastructure. And they realize how much economic activity was connected to the AI capex cycle. But the capex is gone. Companies are cutting it. QQQ falls below -70%. SPY is now down 47%. NVDA is down more than 80%. The Fed says the financial system is resilient. Officials say the situation is contained. Markets rally again. Then the economic data gets worse. Unemployment jumps. Hiring freezes spread. Consumer spending collapses. Credit-card delinquencies rise. Advertising budgets are slashed. Companies stop spending because nobody knows what demand will look like six months from now. Google and Meta get hit particularly hard. Advertisers don't just move their budgets around anymore. They cut them. Google's revenue projections for next year are cut 35%. Meta's are cut 40%. Their stocks fall another 20%. Then the oil shock arrives. Turns out the Eye-ran war has caused far more damage to global energy supply than anyone expected. Strategic reserves are being drained. Production can't be restored quickly enough. Oil goes to $150. Then $170. Inflation starts rising again. Now the Fed has a nightmare. The economy is collapsing, Unemployment is rising, Markets are crashing. But inflation is accelerating. They can't simply cut rates to zero and flood the system with money without risking another inflation wave. Then the insurance problem gets worse. Insurers are sitting on long-duration assets that were supposed to generate stable returns. Some of those assets are now private loans to companies whose business models depended on the AI boom. The marks keep falling. Capital ratios deteriorate. Some insurers need emergency capital. Pension funds have the same problem. The government announces that it will guarantee several large pension and insurance institutions. The rescue is enormous. Hundreds of billions. Maybe trillions. The best the world has ever seen, nobody does it better! **A big beautiful rescue!** The market realizes that the government isn't just rescuing companies anymore. It's rescuing the financial system behind the AI boom. That becomes the moment when the crisis changes character. This is no longer an AI crash. It is a financial crisis. Oracle announces a massive restructuring. Its debt has become impossible to refinance on normal terms. The company receives emergency financing, but the financing comes with brutal conditions. Eventually Microsoft acquires Oracle for effectively pennies on the dollar. The company that was once one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI infrastructure boom becomes one of its biggest casualties. Then the private-credit losses spread outside technology. Manufacturing. Commercial real estate. Software. Data centers. Energy infrastructure. Everything that was financed on the assumption of permanently high growth starts getting marked down. The pension funds are underwater. The insurers are underwater. Private-credit funds are frozen. Banks are tightening lending. Consumers are scared. Companies aren't investing. Spending is collapsing. Oil is at record highs. Inflation is rising. Unemployment is rising. And the stock market is still falling. And the question on everyone's mind is no longer: "How much was the AI bubble worth?" It's: "**How much of the financial system was built on the assumption that the AI bubble would keep growing**?" Because now everyone is discovering the same thing at the same time. The AI debt wasn't just held by AI companies. It was held by private-credit funds. Private-credit funds were owned by institutional investors. And those institutions were ultimately responsible for people's retirement and insurance obligations. The losses had moved through the system. Nobody knew exactly where they would stop. And for the first time, the market starts seriously asking whether the government can actually rescue everyone. The Fed says it will provide liquidity. The Treasury says the banking system is sound. Officials say the crisis is contained. But stocks don't believe them. And the selloff continues. Finally, when the situation stabilizes, Sburry has become the first multi-trillionaire in the history.

SuperBrazilNuts

I misinterpreted Soros' Alchemy of Finance book and bought a $8k 0DTE on NVDA open with this psychotic belief it was going to break ATH. I was up $5k but held then panicked realized I was seconds away from total ruin so I sold it for $700 profit and took the whole day and weekend off saying wtf was I doing

Spirited_Spell_6063

Yeah like taking 3k of fairy dust margin and placing it in NVDA. Like thats my portfolio net. If anything else drops like another 5 bucks, im out. But I think the phrase is "fuck it, we ball"

Informal_Weekend9503

You get over by learning from it. I don't think anyone can become successful at INVESTING (keyword) until they learn, the HARD WAY, like you, and most of us, that the gambling aspect of the market is not the way to go. Options and daytrading are gambling. Become an investor. You will make back your money. You just have to wait a few years, HOLD during corrections, and try to buy during them, too. Yes, I agree that day and swing trading is also fun and exciting, so I do it SOMETIMES and with just a few stocks that I've followed for years and understand very well how they trade. That vast majority of my portfolios are LONG positions. That is how I own shares of NVDA at $19, for example. You buy good companies, they go up, their stock splits, you take some profits here and there. That's the way and you stick to it. No excuses.

A55BAG

This is a very bullish post for NVDA 😂 MRVL right now is just way too expensive and slow growth compared to NVDA and AVGO. Like they only had GAAP EPS of $0.33 on a+200$ stock and they only guide to grow +40% next year?? That is way slower than their competitors, so they are losing marketshare.

foolbull

Would you do a swap with NVDA shares? If Pump Daddy Pump is in, I'm in.

SwordfishLopsided

Well, why don't you just long QQQ and short that portion of NVDA?

__Vampyre__

The new Astra model is incredibly impressive. And there is a rumor that Anthropic might have solved a millennium problem. This makes me want to rotate out of a total market fund to be NVDA heavy. The economy is going to look a lot different in five years.

Odd_Albatross_5385

You forget to factor in the fact that if Anthropic performs well, say doubles, then in that time period the likelihood is that big tech will also preform extremely well. So yes, in terms of pure anthropic play googl might only gain ~2.5%, but googl would probably go up 30% during a bull run for anthropic. Now let's use AMZN instead. Amzn owns 20% of anthropic approx. Amzn market cap 3T. So AMZN owns 200b in ANTH. Now say anthropic doubles from 1T to 2T. Amzn gains 200B. Thats a 6.66% increase just from ANTH. Now factor in the gains from AMZN itself during the ANTH bull run. Also: suppose 10% of my portfolio is in AMZN. Valuing ANTH at 2T, that gives me 0.66% exposure to ANTH. Now if another 10% of my portfolio is in GOOGL, and another 10 in MSFT/NVDA, I probably have around 1.75% exposure to anthropic already. For me personally, thats already good enough. 

DinnerDecent5161

NVDA is a solid hold and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

DeepHouseBear

Been DCAing into NVDA for the past 6 years and I don't think I'll ever stop.. theyre also invested in the startup I work for through Nventures (pls ipo)

tequilamigo

NVDA diversifying for you mate

FlowMonkeyHQ

fair point on universe, so i reran it on just the 100 names with the most option volume on our own tape (SPY QQQ NVDA TSLA META etc — 86 had enough history). same result, still perfectly monotone: tightest decile median 5d move 3.4%, loudest 5.1%, and P(>=5% move) climbs 31% -> 51% straight through the deciles. quiet-stays-quiet is strongest exactly in the liquid names. agree with you on execution though — the study is about the underlying's range; whether the chain is tradable enough to express it is its own filter

Bulldoze_Dat_Cash

Don’t make it complicated… AVGO is 40% off its ATH and reported a solid double beat quarter with the growth narrative still intact and *Wall* St. analysts bullishly projecting to meet and exceed their ATH. For NVDA to grow 50% the market would have to find and allocate NVDA another 2.75 trillion.

Total-Use6220

AVGO has a forward PE of 19 and NVDA has a forward PE of 22

Count-to-3

I would just stay in NVDA or go MU/other memory. AVGO>MRVL though. MRVL has already priced in the next 2 years of growth.

Low-Cartographer-429

Who can growth faster, NVDA or MRVL?

Traditional_Ad_2348

Don’t do it. NVDA and MRVL are both in uptrends. AVGO had a killer year last year but now appears to be in a downtrend.

te7037

$PENG is another favourite. $NVDA partner

Ketamine-Cuisine

NVDA is gonna moon. On Astra

thepoisonpoodle

Yes there is plenty of liquidity in the market. Just by 99% of next NVDA and you're safe.

Federal-Watch

I’m basing it on the fact they expect $3.15 EPS next year, they just signed a $1.5bn deal with NVDA with prepayments to increase AI packaging and testing capacity in the US. And they’re expected to take 50-60% of Vera CPU advanced packaging.

Odd_Albatross_5385

Lol? GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, NVDA own about 40% of anthropic. So by simply owning these companies, you already have really high exposure to ANTH. 

Federal-Watch

Their guidance was flat, but think they nerfed it. They’re partnered with NVDA so any increase in NVDA guidance has to benefit AMKR

TheNplus1

OpenAI and Anthropic are by far the biggest and most advanced ones. If these fail, I honestly don’t see how the other AI chatbots can turn profitable. The thing is, the whole buildup is hype driven: people think AI is going to be big, but nobody has a clue how big (between a better search engine to AGI overlord). Since all tech companies fear being left behind (although it’s pretty much common knowledge at this point that there won’t be a “winner takes all” scenario and no AGI either) they spend first and think about the business model after. The problem is not that OpenAI or Anthropic exist, the problem is exactly the data center buildup which is going way too fast and is way way way too big for the whole business model to work. You shouldn’t be happy that companies are spending if the spend makes no sense. Even if AI turns out to be useful and transformative, it is at the very least inefficient in the trillions it will take to reach that transformative point. That’s why stocks don’t make new ATH, the market understands that the investments are insane for gradual improvements of a bunch of LLM models that will go into price wars. So the available compute has value as long as it’s used for this very specific task it was created for. It’s probably even worse than fiber optic buildup because those NVDA chips are not useful for anything else and they become obsolete in a few years at best.

Embarrassed-Jump-212

Got assigned 1000 NVDA shares Friday because I’m dumb and forgot to close it my ITM calls. Stupid RH exercised it. 🤡 Watch it tank into Tuesday

Public-Today5101

NVDA next week? Attempting $240??

Bulldoze_Dat_Cash

Recent yrs. reality is that NVDA and TSM do move with quite a high degree of correlation, which I guess makes sense on the basis of NVDA’s leadership and size, but, as TSMC grows and services more and more chip makers I would think that correlation should weaken, but it hasn’t much. But if you’re looking to move $ from NVDA to TSMC, now could be as good a time as any. NDVA is \~3% off its all time high, while TSMC is 12% off its all time high and has appreciated +5% in the last wk. (so last week would perhaps have been better, but whatever). TSMC will grind higher. It will in tandem with NVDA, but it will also move on their own earnings and revenue growth, it will respond to AVGO, it also responds to their own monthly reporting of net sales and yoy growth. It also delivers a 1% div. yield which is about 1.5x NVDA’s, 0.42%,m. Neither are much, but if you’re holding for a few years, it’s better than a kick in the head. But… it’s also worth considering this: Broadcom (AVGO) just delivered strong earnings. Their growth rate remains intact, yet AVGO is about 40% off its all time high. There’s clearly a mean reversion rerating in the pipeline in Q4/2027 and if they eventually meet and exceed their ATH, there’s 50%+ upside. (For NVDA to achieve that the market would have to find $2.75 trillion. I’d call that pretty unlikely).

Ok_Entrepreneur_dbl

NVDA was another that I swing traded over and over. Often missing big gains. Eventually moved to other equities. Year later realized that just holding would have been smarted. I have been holding NVDA for 6 years now.

instantcrackpot

Because it is luck. If it is true skill then it is replicable. TSLA only went up 45% in the past 5 years and that is with a favorable admin. It underperformed SP500 with 70%. GOOG did 130%, NVDA did 900%, MU did 1300%. Why didn't your "research" tell you that?

AFGummy

Dram is another good balanced option. I just love MRVLs major integration with the biggest players. Demand should continue to grow and the forward PE is similar to NVDA when it exploded to $1T. They could be a 500B market cap company by mid 2027

TheNplus1

Again, all hyperscaler growth comes from LLM companies. Take away OpenAI or Anthropic and Google, Microsoft, NVDA, etc. have little to no growth. The buildout lasts as long as people finance unprofitable LLM companies - the pure definition of a bubble. And the utilities companies can’t reach new ATH either, for the same reasons NVDA can’t.

Kantmzk

Just need MSFT to hit 600 - 700, MU to hit 1300 - 1500, and NVDA to hit 330 between a ceasefire, rates going down, etc.

Jumpy-Imagination-81

>I just don’t have the stomach to buy individual stocks. How are people so comfortable gambling with their life savings? If you think investing in individual stocks is "gambling" of course you wouldn't understand. Read *One Up On Wall Street* by Peter Lynch, the legendary former manager of the Fidelity Magellan Fund. Lynch firmly believes average investors can beat the pros by looking for investment opportunities right in front of them. >America’s most successful money manager tells how average investors can beat the pros by using what they know. According to Lynch, investment opportunities are everywhere. From the supermarket to the workplace, we encounter products and services all day long. By paying attention to the best ones, we can find companies in which to invest before the professional analysts discover them. When investors get in early, they can find the “ten-baggers,” the stocks that appreciate tenfold from the initial investment. A few ten-baggers will turn an average stock portfolio into a star performer. Go back 10 years to 2016. Back in 2016, were you and your family and friends buying things from Amazon? Were you using Google and YouTube all the time back in 2016? Did you or a family member have a Netflix subscription in 2016? Since 2016 AMZN is up +569%, NFLX is up +703%, and GOOGL is up +757%. Those companies were right there in front of everyone. Meanwhile, VOO is up +317%. https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/compare/amzn-vs-nflx-vs-googl-vs-voo/ It wasn't "gambling" to invest in the individual stocks of those companies that everyone was spending money on back in 2016. You didn't have to be one of those "professional fund managers who fail to beat index funds 90% of time" to see what was right in front of your face. Just open your eyes. Back in the late 1990s and early 2000s when I built gaming PCs I always used NVIDIA graphics cards. Always. I thought they were the best and NVIDIA was a top notch company. In the mid-2010s I went shopping for a graphics card for my son's computer so of course I only wanted an NVIDIA graphics card. I was surprised to discover they were hard to find and expensive because people were using them to mine "Bitcoin", whatever that was. When I sold almost all of my S&P 500 index fund and started investing in individual stocks in 2017 I read articles saying NVIDIA was going to be a leader in something called "artificial intelligence", which at that time mostly had to do with self-driving cars. Oh yeah, NVIDIA, I always liked that company. I looked into NVIDIA and found they were a successful and growing company, so I invested $5,600 in NVDA stock between 2017 and 2020. That $5,600 investment is currently worth $277,583, up +4,856%. That's not a ten-bagger, that's a 49-bagger. There is nothing wrong with playing it safe and investing only in boring, plain vanilla index funds. I made a lot of money doing that. And yes, avoid investing in penny stocks and unprofitable, money losing companies like SpaceX until they become consistently profitable. But it is silly to think that investing in the individual stocks of some of the largest and most successful companies in the world, companies whose products and services are used by millions of people around the world, including you and your family and friends is "gambling".

gokipper

Throw it all into NVDA

Due-Freedom-5968

Well first I only invest in things I understand, and I do my research and due diligence to ensure that the company I'm putting my money in really has the potential I think it does. I prefer hardware as a predictable revenue driver - easier to observe and predict demand. It gets easier once you've had your first 10x or 20x investment, I've been 'lucky' with some positions, $TSLA in 2016 was a no brainer - the media narrative was so bad, but the growth was so insane that it wasn't actually much of a gamble - that position would have been opened at a price of about $15 and closed at $480. It closed because the growth potential evaporated. Anything beyond today is gambling on vapourware and it was time to get out. Likewise $NVDA - wasn't clear how big it was going to be, but demand was clearly outstripping supply long in to the future so a position opened at $20 5 years ago sits at \~$200 today. You've just got to pay attention to the world, spot the opportunities, and then keep checking the thesis still stands. Sometimes you get it right, sometimes you get it wrong. I'll usually start off putting $10k into something which is a pretty small proportion of my portfolio, but can still have a big impact if it performs like the above and I'll be ok with losing that if it goes tits up. If things start to accelerate as predicted, I'll double down and add more opportunistically. Sometimes things don't go to plan and you close a position 50% down, realising you got it wrong. But for every one of those you have they're offset by the mega-gains like above.

IntrepidToday0

You’re conflating AI application companies with the companies actually monetizing the AI buildout. My point wasn’t that every LLM company is going to be wildly profitable. The opportunity is in the infrastructure being built to support AI: compute, networking, memory, power, cooling, data centers, etc. where companies are already generating real revenue and earnings. And “NVDA/memory stocks haven’t made new ATHs, therefore the top is in” isn’t much of an argument. Stocks consolidate and multiples compress even while earnings continue growing. If earnings keep catching up to prices, valuations actually become more attractive without the stocks needing to make new highs every quarter.

IntergalacticPodcast

OP gave his money to a guy who showed up at his door and asked for cash to invest in NVDA on Monday.

roke34442

I have no idea, but I own SPCX, MRVL and NVDA and many others so I hope for pump.

Shoty6966-_-

Me analyzing if I should buy 0dte NVDA or QQQ calls

verified-trader

**BanBet Lost** — /u/Electrical-Heart-833 (0W - 1L, 0%) | Ticker | Entry → Target | Move | Time | Result | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NVDA** ▼ | $228.47 → $220.00 | -3.7% | 1d | Lost |

verified-trader

**BanBet Lost** — /u/69Dipsniper (1W - 1L, 50%) | Ticker | Entry → Target | Move | Time | Result | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NVDA** ▼ | $228.47 → $225.00 | -1.5% | 1d | Lost |

usobeta1000

Edge AI is great for latency/privacy, but it doesn't train frontier models. NVDA/AMD capex is mostly hyperscalers (AMZN, MSFT, GOOGL) doing training + big inference.

swingtradingteacher

NVDA, NBIS, OUST will win big.

Affectionate-Idea690

Sir, this is a Wendy’s, and the Speaker of the House does not look at your 0DTE loss porn. You’re asking how the undisputed Queen of the Option Chain prints tendies with NVIDIA (NVDA) and never gets a knock from the SEC? It’s simple: She isn't breaking the rules; she is the rules... How she got away with it ..take notes regards. 1. She states he did it. First of all, Nancy constantly reminds everyone she doesn't actually own or trade individual stocks. Paul Pelosi does. 2.Back in 2012, Congress passed the STOCK Act, which supposedly made insider trading illegal for politicians. But there's a massive loophole: it doesn't actually stop them from trading. It just says they have to fill out a form disclosing their trades within 30 to 45 days.  And the fuking kicker is.  The Penalty: If a politician "forgets" to report a trade on time? The fine is usually a flat $200.That's not a fine; that’s just the cost of doing business. You pay more in options premium commissions than they pay for violating federal transparency laws 3. "Public Information" is a Multi-Dimensional Spectrum...too much to say on this area. The biggget head twisted area ready...numba 4.  4. The Regulators Answer to Them. 😂 Who polices this? The Department of Justice, the SEC, and the House Ethics Committee. Who controls the budget, the funding, and the oversight hearings for the DOJ and the SEC? Congress. TL;DR: You trade on Reddit rumors; she trades on the future trajectory of the United States GDP. There are retail traders, there are institutional hedge funds, and then there is the Congressional Alpha Tier. Buy the index fund or follow her tickers on a copy-trading app. 🚀🏛️💸 Just fuking do it and follow the vibes 😂 😂 😂 😂 fuk 

Vlisa

Ahh missed that it wasn't showing. NVDA

SurpiseCurrencyDebas

Cramer said to buy NVDA...bad things bout to happen

Ketamine-Cuisine

No I sold it a week ago to buy more NVDA 🤣🤞

dizzymon247

At 18 may think about AI in terms of phases, I think the infrastructure is still being built out so I would still buy NVDA but less of the others. Then the next thing is look for AI software companies who will stay on top. My guess is Google and Microsoft. I don't own microsoft and I just got back into Google. Over the years if I did nothing but buy google I'd be in the green but stupid me jumped around for decades, luckily landed on NVDA. So yes I'm really heavy on AI. Diversifying is a lie, don't listen to others, even college professors preached the same. Find the few companies, handful you love, use, and others use it. Then buy those companies until you make enough to transition over to an ETF like VOO, VTI or something similar. I'm playing catch up. Wish I had enough years to buy ETF to retire on. So I'm just riding the wave until I retire.

ddffj89

NVDA 🚀🚀🚀

dizzymon247

Bought NVDA at $300, bought more at $150, it did a 10 to 1 split, sold 300 of those 10 to 1 split. well gave away a car.. still holding onto the rest.

TheNplus1

Do we really have to do this again? Obliterated what, the circular financing fuelled by way too low interest rates (especially in Japan with the carry trade) and lack of regulation ? In case you missed it, none of the LLMs companies are profitable and will probably never be, given that new ones constantly appear and low key they go straight into a price war. The top is definitely in given that neither NVDA nor the memory makers (the only companies actually making money from all this) are unable to reach ATH no matter how much they beat earnings. The music has stopped playing for a while now.

Queasy_Soil9646

Office retard asking why SNDK pumps more than NVDA and MU despite SNDK having bigger stock price. Market cap? Retard??

Gunk_Olgidar

Principally: No different than the auto-makers' financing arms writing loans to the rental car Co's and operating retail dealer floor plans. Support your customer base, leverage production volume economies of scale and increase market share by using your own cash to finance your own customers. Structurally: Different because the auto-makers have separate finance companies to eat the risk when the deals eventually go tids up. They learned their lessons decades ago. NVDA needs to spin off their "financing" arm before 2029.

Unserious-One-8448

NVDA

Clackamas_river

Trading NVDA shares I got for like $6 and buying leaps with the money to leverage hard. Smacked it out of the park.

itsalwayscalls

And GDP basically excludes a massive portion of US company production, e.g. NVDA chips. AMD chips. So much off shored since 2000. But most people don't know this and just grab stuff they think is naughty.

dark_bravery

many of them but here's two: Everyone thought NVDA was going to shit last year. Right before earnings. I bought $2000 of call options. Earnings was a blow out. Easiest $10k i ever made. Lesson: everyone on Reddit (and everywhere else) is usually wrong. Liberation Day: I bought $QQQ and lots of it. I got prices around $400-440. They have almost doubled now. there were probably better things that I could have bought, but the lesson is not to sell in that kind of situation. I've been doing this for 2 decades on and off now. I feel like it's finally getting easier, but I know so much more than I used to. If you like always learning and have a good source of income for more... training credits, then it works. Finally you should buy a good ETF and hold that. That's your benchmark to aim for (and to beat). It should also be most of your holdings for when you get things wrong, because you will get things wrong.

Callec254

Was doing Forex awhile back, scalping on the 5 minute chart. Thought I was doing great, I was up 60% in the first month. Then, in the second month, on a five minute chart, I managed to go long at the exact point of a multi-year reversal, and never recovered. I didn't use stop losses because every time I did, I would get stopped out, and then the price would go back up to where I said. Except this time. Oh, and then I owned 200 shares of NVDA back in the early 2000s at about 7$. Watched it do absolutely nothing for a couple years, got bored and sold it.

InsideRun4270

Still in the process of figuring out the lesson, besides that I am a f retard. Started with \~280k, maid it to \~400k in a month, then put everything on MU 1100 18SEP calls right before NVDA earnings. Relatively ok idea. But this didn't work, for many reasons. Walsh made this speech + there was leak from white house about new semis sanctions. I was thinking we are now entering a sideways market until Fed meeting and who knows what will happen then, so I sold it. Which left me with 195K. Less then I started with. Now MU is mooning I am just watching it. I don't know what is the lesson. Probably the lesson was to wait until Walsh speech and not to size up this much. Also I completely missed this Politico leak about semis, it came out 2 hours before market open and I could've exited better, but I was chilling. I think overall lesson is that I was so laser focused on analyzing a particular trade and stock, that I completely shut off myself from the big picture, market conditions. Should have realized that market will be in convulsions at least until rate question is resolved. Walsh made this comment market down, another Fed person made a better comment - market up. There is 0 chance to know all that and that is very sad.

maschin1982

If NVDA 250$ eom. I can buy Something to eat

verified-trader

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NVDA** ▲ | $237.55 (above) | $224.10 | $230.21 | +6.0% | Sep 10, 9:10 AM | | **Record** | 1W - 0L | 100% | - | - | - |

maschin1982

$NVDA

maschin1982

NVDA come on .11 Cent to go with 230$ in the Weekend 🙏🏼

maschin1982

!Banbet NVDA 250 eom

maschin1982

!Banbet NVDA 500 eom

andytobbles

Holy shit is NVDA about to close above 230 and go positive gamma

miss_L_fire

Wow NVDA, couldn’t even hold 230 🫩

tldamico

Starting to look like they don't want NVDA above 230.

EnigmaSpore

NVDA glued to 230 today. until 3:30 when the poors are shaken out their 0dte

Medium-Equipment-262

sold NVDA early and spent way too long treating every green day afterward like proof I screwed up. In reality the decision made sense with what I knew then. Now I keep short term opinions on Moon so I dont start messing with an investment every time the chart gets loud.

Aggravating_Fig6288

Blew all daily gains thanks to NVDA, fuck you I hope 🥭 tariffs you 50000%

Ceyenne18

lmfao! MMs pinning NVDA to 230.50 :)

hughsless69

NVDA and QQQ dump please

Tay_Tay86

Sure But if w company is spending 100% cash flow and borrowing money to afford capex then NVDA forecasting another 100% revenue growth next year makes no sense. There's only so much juice

Ceyenne18

why buy puts on NVDA when entire semi is rallying ...

loop_loop_

Semis massively undervalued NVDA MU … Buy Buy Buy before the price catches up …

InspectorDabbit_

My wife will never forgive me if NVDA doesn't go sub 230 I can always get a new one but that isn't the point

InspectorDabbit_

I really need NVDA to flush already I dunno who is fucking holding it above 230

Trustable_lad

I am a regard betting away my paycheque on NVDA calls, its either homeless or Italy vacation

GurHot8359

sell both NVDA stays at 330

tldamico

If you were to 0DTE now on NVDA, would you choose $230 calls or $230 puts?

tldamico

If you were to 0DTE now on NVDA, would you choose $300 calls or $300 puts?

AdIcy3141

lmao i bought calls at the top for NVDA today ands puts at the bottom lol

AdIcy3141

SPY, NVDA and QQQ puts and APPL calls locked in exp Wed

Hot-Measurement-119

Can NVDA take another leg down so my calls go to zero, i swear someone always knows my moves and shoves it in my ass. I guess i like it in the ass

Thisispaartaaa

After a couple earnings seasons under our belt with AI being at the forefront. People are starting to realize that this is real, and it's creating vast amounts of wealth for many companies. The next leg up is coming, there is no more denying that AI is here to stay, and it's making a FUCK TON OF MONEY for everybody involved.....NVDA, AVGO, SNDK, MU, COHR, CRWV, SMCI, I COULD DO THIS ALL DAY......stocks are going to reprice over the next couple quarters....as in PAMP IT!!!

nosebeerz420

Looking like NVDA is trying to get pinned at 231 is the levee gonna break?

AcrobaticConfusion95

I believe in you NVDA

Aggravating_Fig6288

I’m going to be the only person to lose money on NVDA calls today fuck

AwakenedBeast616

Is NVDA the only semiconductor stock tanking?

Bravadette

What is that massive order on NVDA lol