Reddit Posts
5 Hot penny stocks to watch with big news this week.
Looking for niche industries with dominant players/brand loyalty.
Samsung Elec to invest $3.1 bn in S.Korean OLED plant
Daily U.S. Stock Market News Flash (Thursday, March 9)
$5 SP to ??? $3EPS in 2025 x "Insert your multiple of choice here" $LWLG
A prediction of META’s mixed reality headset hardware spec in 2030
which of these stocks will best survive a recession?
$KOPN - swing play with a METAVERSE pennystock that will be at CES 2022 this week 1/5-1/7 (price went from $2 to $13 in the 6 weeks following previous CES 2021)
$KOPN - swing play with a METAVERSE company that will be at CES 2022 this week 1/5-1/7 (price went from $2 to $13 in 6 the weeks following last CES 2021)
$KOPN - swing play with a metaverse company that will be at CES 2022 next week 1/5-1/7 (price went from about $2 to $13 in 6 weeks after the last CES 2021)
($LPL) Bullish on LG Display. OLED Shortage in 2022
Analyst: Apple's AR Glasses Will be Just as Powerful as a Mac Computer - ExtremeTech
GME came through on the Switch OLED! I hope this translates into some good Q4 earnings. Doing my bit to help the cause.
Deep Fucking Value in LG Display $LPL
The bottom is in for LG Display. Heavily Undervalued, will easily rally 15% by EOY
Crazy Value in LG Display and Good Expectations for Q4 $LPL
New Pokemon game coming next week, buy NTDOY?
LG display (LPL), severely undervalued company
Is it finally time to look at XTPL@WSE?
$MX Baby Rockets - Magnachip BuyOut Talks - $29 Offer Trading At $21
$HIMX - some DD I did that I thought I'd share...
$MX - Magnachip Semiconductor - Get it in before it takes off
Magnaship Semiconductor Receives Higher Bid $35 a Share
EMAN: Is eMagin a Winner in the OLED industry?
$LPL Granted 15 New Patents Including OLED Tech 🖼🖼🖼 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/time-focus-lg-display-lpl-124112977.html
$EMAN - sole display provider for the awesome Night Vision goggles you're been seeing
EMAN probably announcing 4K x 4K OLED color micro display at SIDS conference next week!
GME, AAPL, TSLA, MVIS - All rolled into one company
From Smart Phone to Smart Glasses
(called it) MX Part 4: DA Announced at $29, 27% gain, but the war is just beginning (92% more upside)
Best OLED/5G Value Play: $MX - Magnachip makes OLED Semiconductors with 100% upside today, (potential) 1000% gains by 2023 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
Why I like the Stonk: $MX Magnachip #1 OLED Semiconductor Co with 100% upside today, (potential) 1000% gains by '23
Best OLED/5G Value Play: $MX - Magnachip makes OLED Semiconductors with 100% upside today, (potential) 1000% gains by 2023 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
$MX Undervalued OLED Semiconductor (Smartphone Display, EV, TV, VR)
Magna chip Expected to Beat Q4 Guidance: Undervalued at 7x EV/EVITDA & Supplies to 5G OLED Phones / Margin Upside
Mentions
Interesting - that is a projection (avatar) of her eyes. That whole full face front OLED display ($$$) is just so you can see her expression. I see how you get to $3499.
> the eyes people see on the wearers headset is actually a second OLED screen facing outwards This is a joke right?
What I keep hearing (and I'm a noon in this) is that it isn't true AR because the glass isn't see-through, instead it's pass-through with cameras projecting images of the outside world onto your inner screen when you want to see it. Funnily enough the eyes people see on the wearers headset is actually a second OLED screen facing outwards, with cameras around the inner lens to capture and project an image of the eyes on the outer screen.
Because OLED tvs were something that had a measurable gain. Better footprint, longevity, and energy use which is a HUGE problem with plasma TVs that were basically the only type in their size available five ten years ago. And plasmas heat up a room. This...this VR stuff is just the land of make believe. I'm not spending 3500 to NOT go out and have a good time.
> Edit: and as to the feature comparison between this and a quest 2, if you can show me a legit unique feature that was shown that the quest lacks, point for you. But I’ll let you know, no one on my team, and yes that includes software devs, could come up with a solid example (Other than the previously stated front display, which is probably why this thing can only last for 2 hours with an externally cabled battery) - visionOS can launch iOS & ipadOS apps right out of the gate. That itself is a bigger draw than many are giving credit and gives more utility out of the box than most headsets have today despite their attempts at an App Store. If your software devs don’t appreciate the undertaking that is or how that appeals to the general consumer, I’m not sure what else to say. Ecosystem familiarity is huge for a new product line. Not to mention can auto create macOS virtual desktops just by looking at the Mac. - All of the other visionOS integrations that provide convenience that aren’t technical marvels but further contribute to legitimate usability for many different use cases. - LIDAR sensor on the front - “Digital Persona” albeit looks a bit creepy to me - Not restricted to a specific boundary that you draw with a controller - I don’t have to use a Facebook/Meta owned product with all of the wonderful privacy concerns that come with that. Big feature. - Continuous & full color depth camera pass through. Worlds different than a grainy monochromatic feed. - Does all of this while pushing >4k in each eye on an OLED instead of an LCD - We won’t *really* know what this list will be until Apple reveals specs and people have it in their hands Iterating on existing lackluster implementations and in a way that consumers can easily understand how it’s useful **beyond** gaming *is* the unique factor. It’s easy to do each item in isolation but integrating them together in a clean & clear way is not. Obviously all of this is pending publicly available specs to back up their claims. Assuming they didn’t fabricate it all, the amount of money they will print from this platform (not from this device specifically) will be astronomical.
Apple probably coulda made this a thousand dollars cheaper if they didn’t put the dumbass OLED screen outward facing, do people really want to see your fake virtual eyes or do you want someone else to know if you can or can’t see
It’s not a video.. it scans and generates a 3D model of the users face and then projects that onto the outer OLED display to match where their eyes would be. It’s doesn’t use a camera recording or anything
Man the A/V market is insane, iv’e seen home theatres upwards of 200K, but even regular Joe blows wanting a top of the line TV from consumer brands such as LG or Samsung, and a 7.1 home theatre system, and that right there your already looking at around 10K. I remember looking at the LG OLED’s at launch in 2015 for 10K+ that we’re selling out, and thought getting one for 6K refurbished in 2017 was a steal. Now they are finally reaching consumer prices on certain models.
Remember that the metric also includes AR & VR outside of gaming as well. Also remember that PSVR sold around 5 Mil units lifetime around a 120Mil console base, so I would say out of the entire gaming market more than 1% but less than 5%. It’s a small market, still a niche, not denying that, but what I am saying is that niches alone can still generate major revenues, rather than products that always cater to the masses. Niche groups are willing to spend more to get more. An example is the high end A/V space, people in 2015 were willing to spend 10K+ for OLED tv that are just now starting to reach consumer prices, or with high end AVR’s and audio equipment. Especially when your market is in the range of 200-250 Bil annually, even snatching 1% of that is a major win for any large corporation. It’s the reason why Microsoft is going so heavily into cloud, they’ve even stated in their earnings that grabbing just 1% more of the market would give them the same revenue impact as the entire purchase of Activision/Blizzard.
**IF** they really pulled this off it’s not actually overpriced because the optics are so advanced. Current AR headsets like HoloLens have absolutely pathetic field of views, like 1/5th of your field of view can have AR. It’s why magic leap failed miserably. Apple is basically saying they’ve made an advanced glass optic that solves this AND they’ve gotten a micro OLED that has over 4K per eye. If that’s true this is years ahead of everyone else. But that kind of tech isn’t cheap to produce so if it genuinely is like their demo video then $3500 is actually a fair price for tech that’s years ahead.
PSVR2 came out a month or two ago. 4k per eye, 120 hz, OLED... ? Seems on par. The pixels per inch metric doesn't make any sense to me though. If it's 4k, it's 4k, so is PSVR2. Where are they getting this PPI figure that's 5 times everyone else without having resolution 5 times greater.
This is way better than all of those things. It has better than 4k OLED built in, and actual 3D sound plus the features from a phone and so much more. Seriously watch the keynote it’s insane
For 3500 I could buy an OLED, surround sound, and a top of the line phone and year plan. The 2nd gen has to cut the price in half and triple the battery life.
yeah I think of this as a 1st gen OLED smart tv. people are literally going to be selling their other devices for this thing. slowly then all at once. some corporations are going to have their employees using them. then their friends will use it. then recreationally all while the price drops until first its $700 used on craigslist in 2026, and then the new version MSRPs at $600 in lite mode or some shit yeah I can see it
Yea I’d have to see the 3D videos in person to really know how useful they’d be, I’d also have to see the actual image quality in person before I’d say for sure people wouldn’t get this over an OLED TV for those use cases. Sorry about your mom, best of luck to you!
Maybe one day but it's impossible right now. The challenge with full pass through AR like looking through glasses is that a camera is needed to see where you're looking to project the AR accurately. Without that you can only display overlay data, not immersive in the world content. The challenge is that camera needs to be physically in the same place as where your eyes are blocking your eyes. So there are three solutions: 1) What Apple did: A VR headset with display pass through. You're looking at a computer monitor OLED, not the actual world. 2) A transparent camera, so like a lens that prisms light out into two locations, one your eye and the other the camera. 3) A whole butt ton of cameras around the eyes that are doing clever math to triangulate where everything is accurately, and cameras pointing at your eyes to identify exactly where you're looking. A true passthrough AR is theoretically possible, but no one has been able to pull it off.
Or a kick-ass ultra wide gaming monitor. They now have ultra wide OLED gaming monitors.
Anybody think AAPL is just coasting off the Steve Job's legacy? This VR announcement would have Jobs rolling in his grave. There's nothing ground breaking or revolutionary about the headset that isn't already done by its competitors. Steve Jobs would've came out with a 8k/120hz super OLED headset with insane eye tracking tech that makes you think you're in the matrix.
But see Apple has never discounted products the way OLED TVs have fallen in the past 5 years
You are not the target audience yet. The big boys will buy it now, you will want it later. Just like you want a nice OLED tv now and people were buying them at huge markups years ago.
I have been deep in the VR scene since its inception with the Virtual Boy for the Nintendo. This headset is absolutely insane if the specs that are being written in the news articles are correct. It has a 4K screen resolution per display per Eye. It is Micro-OLED which is the pinnacle of display technology especially important in VR headsets. It reached up to 5000 nits and has a 4000Pixels per Inch (PPI). These specs are absolutely groundbreaking to say the least. This headset is at least 5 years ahead of its competition. It is also costs 8x more.
You wonder who’s actually going to pay $3500 for this headset. Why don’t I just spend maybe half that for a nice huge OLED tv?
What’s that about console sales being down? PS5s available whenever, Switch OLED selling like hotcakes. Am I missing something?
Why am I a bear trying to apply logic... Should withdraw my remaining funds from gamble portfolio and buy a nice OLED with it instead.
Imagine not working on an OLED screen.
Bought a LG and Sony OLED cause I was conflicted
Which OLED TV should I buy between Sony Bravia and LG ?
I have 75 inch lg OLED and I love it
Tryna get the best OLED. LG or SONY ?
I still rent DVDs from Netflix. Blu-ray on my OLED looks amazing.
Yeah LG OLED is the top right now - and they are cheaper than Sony. Go on WOOT for great TV deals
The big screen definitely does have it's advantages, but if you just want a big screen porn TV, I'd recommend just getting a cheap 4k TV. Kinda depends on the porn you watch though. OLED is really good for deep blacks...
Honestly it's overrated. I have a cheap 1080p laptop that I use for porn. Easier to have a keyboard at your fingertips. Sometimes I'll put porn on the TV when I'm with a girl who's into that, but it's more just in the background. Having a huge OLED for movies, sports, and video games on the other hand...not gonna lie, that shit is fucking amazing.
Consider the below interaction. Is that really a “stochastic parrot”? I get what you’re saying - I took the same lame “natural language processing” class - that was legit stupid. This is not that. Even with the below results I can ask it WHY it did something a particular way or ask it to do it differently and it changes according to my instructions. I can say, I don’t like the chip you chose, pick a different one, and it will and will create it all over again with the change implemented. > I want to build a device that measures the strength of the WiFi signal in various areas of my office complex. How should I do that? Building a device to measure the strength of the WiFi signal in various areas of your office complex can be a fun and informative project. Here is a basic guide to get you started: 1. **Hardware Selection**: First, you will need a microcontroller with WiFi capabilities. A popular choice is the ESP8266 or ESP32. These are low-cost, versatile, and widely supported devices. You'll also need a display to visualize the WiFi signal strength; an OLED display is a common choice. 2. **Software**: You'll need to program your microcontroller to connect to the available WiFi networks and measure their signal strength. This is typically measured in dBm (decibel milliwatts). In general, the closer this value is to 0, the stronger the signal. ESP8266/ESP32 can be programmed using the Arduino IDE, which uses a simplified version of C++. Here is a very simplified version of what the code might look like: ```c++ #include <ESP8266WiFi.h> // or <WiFi.h> for ESP32 #include <Wire.h> #include <Adafruit_GFX.h> #include <Adafruit_SSD1306.h> // Setup for the OLED display (using its I2C address) Adafruit_SSD1306 display(128, 64, &Wire, -1); void setup() { WiFi.mode(WIFI_STA); WiFi.disconnect(); delay(100); display.begin(SSD1306_SWITCHCAPVCC, 0x3C); // initialize with the I2C address display.clearDisplay(); display.setTextSize(1); display.setTextColor(WHITE); } void loop() { display.clearDisplay(); display.setCursor(0,0); int n = WiFi.scanNetworks(); for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { String ssid = WiFi.SSID(i); int rssi = WiFi.RSSI(i); display.println(ssid + ": " + String(rssi) + " dBm"); } display.display(); delay(2000); } ``` 3. **Prototyping**: After writing the code, you can start by prototyping your device on a breadboard, connecting the ESP8266/ESP32 and the OLED display together. 4. **Testing**: Upload your code to the microcontroller using the Arduino IDE. Now, you should be able to see the WiFi signal strengths displayed on the OLED screen. Walk around your office complex and observe the readings. 5. **Final Product**: Once you're satisfied with your prototype, you can design a PCB or use a more permanent soldering breadboard, along with a suitable power supply (like a battery pack), and mount it in a case. Remember, the values you get are relative to your device and its antenna, and they are not absolute measurements of signal strength. Also, keep in mind that you'll need to be aware of any legal or privacy considerations around scanning for WiFi networks in your location and within your organization.
Don't let your bias blind you. But yeah Nintendo is a great brand despite being held back by terrible management. Mediocre hardware for their console, shitty business practices and unnecessary strict copyright. I wonder of the 120 million console users how many truly care about the Nintendo games though. Competition in handheld is only going to increase after Steam entered the market. Personally, I cannot play on the switch anymore. I was hoping for Nintendo to release an improved Switch earlier but all we got was an OLED screen.
Is the OG Switch and OLED version basically the same console, one just has a better screen? Lol
U can get a Zelda limited edition OLED switch for an extra $20 net a bunch of those sold too!
I’m so tempted atm. Do I buy the OLED or chance my luck at a new console in the year
Puts on your input sources. OLED has much stronger blacks giving a lot more depth.
OLED is better for darker room or at least rooms without windows. so you are already a stoopid.
Imagine thinking OLED TVs are better. I literally can't tell a difference
Yeah, that’s a nice TV, I usually get the top of the line OLED, but my other LG OLED looked like crap in my new home which has a shit ton of windows a long sliding glass doors. OLED looks terrible in bright homes.
Nintendo has pretty much confirmed that even if they come out with an upgraded Switch, it's not going to be a Switch Pro type deal capable of 4k. It'll just slightly improve handheld battery life. This console will continue to be supported for long enough that you shouldn't wait for the next gen. You can get the Lite if you only want to play handheld and you can save some money, you can splurge and get the OLED (the screen is nice but it's only worth it if you're gonna use handheld mode a lot and don't mind the extra cost), or you can just get the regular one. The console is really good, the game library is great, and it's the best and cheapest way to play so many games on the go. Even if you just play on a TV, it's got so many good titles. Only reason not to go for it is if you wanna play Madden, Call of Duty, etc.
Get the special edition Zelda one it’s like 10 or 20 bucks more but omg that thing is a fucking flex. I am seriously considering getting it because I don’t have an OLED one and I like the look of it so much
Have to throw out a 70 inch 4K OLED TV because the remote broke
> I don’t think OP gets the gravity of what (%hypebuzzword%) are going to do to the workforce Where %hypebuzzword% inciudes: blockchain, staking, zen rooms, cryptto, cold fusion, 3D printers, Nikola trucks, soylent green, raytracing, adaptive whatever, 5G, foldable screens, the thumb ball mouse, Tidal music, OLED, Kinect, 3D printed homes, 3D printed food, 3D printed organs, 3D printed tires, asteroid mining, crystals, Microsoft Vista, hydrogen powered axles, DIVX, microdosing, Quibi, Wii controller, Segway scooters. But hey, maybe generic comment language generators are finally the thing that will live up to their hype.
So I found a brand new OLED Switch on Facebook marketplace for $340. I sent a lowball offer because it had been on there for days. Seller said yes and sold it for $250. Claimed she had won it in a contest so it didn’t matter to her. I thought it was scammy but sure enough it was all true and I just hit an awesome lick 
Yes. OLED is a screen technology. You can plug a regular switch into and OLED tv and get the full benefits of the screen since it primarily relates to darker blacks and other color reproduction stuff, not anything software or system related. The OLED switch only matters if you play in portable mode. When docked they are literally identical.
OLED is the display technology integrated into the device. If you direct the output to the TV, the integrated OLED display is not used and the TV screen is used instead. The TV screen itself can be OLED or a regular panel, but you will notice absolutely no difference whatsoever compared to the original Nintendo Switch when not using the integrated display.
Honestly, I was sort of kidding but also kind of a legitimate question. If Swith's upgrade was an OLED output, but you don't have a TV with OLED display, then are you really capturing the full output of the Switch?
But what if you don't have an OLED television? Then is it even actually OLED?
Their upgrade version is “OLED” which is such a gimmick. Yeah colors pop out and black look more black… wow.. such an upgrade!
Is the OLED switch screen worth upgrading to from my old one or nah?
#Just bought a Nintendo Switch OLED 🤌🏻 https://imgur.com/a/uXONRLv Best, ✍🏻 Tren
Their TVs have lots of ads you can't disable (which is possible in LG etc). Their TVs *constantly send back data on what you watch* to make sure ads are targeted to your demographic (political ads during election?). Their Leds are alright but their Qled has pretty poor picture quality, OLED is miles ahead in every aspect of picture quality/HDR. And while Samsung has started making big Oled they're still far behind the competition. So sure, a cheap led is alright but there are still better options in every price class
Chill man. Not everyone is trying to decieve you. Here's my tv. I have an LG OLED tv, but still doesn't show ultra hd like yours.Now I'm even more curious https://preview.redd.it/k9plx5h6qpwa1.jpeg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=4932eda0699941926705fb43e222f8f12cca2955
Sounds like Google found s practical option.... While Meta Platform wants you to wear a CRT monitor on your face Wait. It's not CRT. Just their metaverse graphics are terrible. Nintendo Wii has better quality graphics lol Game systems created since the Wii retired: Wii U 3DS 2DS Switch Switch Lite Switch OLED Wow! The Wii is such old tech. How can the Wii harvest better graphics than Meta Platform "metaverse"?
They have pretty good prices on appliances. And they’re protection plan is one of the only plans that covers burn on on OLED TV’s so I got both my TV’s from there as well
Gotta love this market. Short seller comes out with a damning report on $OLED. Market’s reaction? “Lulz, whatever. Bers r fuk. Keep buying” 🤷🏾♂️
My 8k OLED from 1955 was bout tree fiddy
>I think the market has been waiting on what Nintendo plans on doing after the Switch before making big decisions. Personally, I took the small gains I had when Valve announced the Steam Deck and Nintendo only had the OLED Switch announced, but I'm keeping an eye on the situation and might jump back in. In terms of what might happen after the Switch: I think the market has always historically valued Nintendo as a cyclical company that completely revamps its consoles each and every generation. This is the primary reason they trade a lower multiple than its competitors - investors aren’t willing to risk the downside that could occur if they flopped and created another Wii-U. However, I see it differently - I believe Nintendo is now building its platform and digital sales by sticking with what works instead of trying to reinvent the wheel as they have in past generations. By sticking with the Switch–a console they know works and that consumers love–and releasing more powerful hardware, they fill the existing supply gap for AAA games on their platforms while also allowing for further technological innovation with their main proprietary franchises like Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon. The main reason we don’t see more AAA-quality games on the Nintendo Switch is the hardware’s technical limitations. The Nintendo Switch’s technical limitations stem from its aged Nvidia Tegra X1 chip (2015), which has hindered AAA game publishers from fully embracing the platform. I believe that the next Nintendo Switch hardware device, which will likely arrive in late 2023 or early '24, will solve this, with the device likely using the newer and more powerful Tegra239 system on a chip that could support PS4, or even PS4 Pro-level graphics and performance, with potential for added upscaling technology and raytracing support. Once Nintendo is able to support AAA games like COD Warzone and Elden Ring and list them on their E-shop, they will tap into a whole other realm of pure profit with no variable cost, which would help widen margins and trigger a multiple re-rating. Even if the market has priced in a more powerful Switch, I do not believe they have considered the immense multiple re-rating that will occur when Nintendo’s revenue mix continues to be dominated by software sales (it currently 50/50 hardware and software, but it's growing rapidly towards software) as a result of their growing digital store that will only continue growing with the new and more capable Switch.
I think the market has been waiting on what Nintendo plans on doing after the Switch before making big decisions. Personally, I took the small gains I had when Valve announced the Steam Deck and Nintendo only had the OLED Switch announced, but I'm keeping an eye on the situation and might jump back in.
The main issue is content conformity of specs between headsets and the video/content you are consuming. They haven't nailed automatic settings to make the image/file you view to not be seamless without diving into settings and configurations to make the content look correct. takes a lot of tinkering to get the videos looking correct and headsets on the low end don't do well with automatic IPD (distance between eyes) or wide view angles . Some of the high end headsets are starting to come out with better tech (OLED screens, wider view angles, less weight/heat) but it still has a way to go.
Yea those may be on 30 hertz which is actually kinda bad. 60 isn’t awful but then 120 is really nice I’ve been looking for a 120 hertz big tv like 55 inch to replace my desktop monitors. Perusing marketplace to see if i can score a used OLED or something I’ll link you to this Costco one, i love it and i own 3 lol https://www.costco.com/lg-ultragear-32%22-class-qhd-gaming-monitor.product.100793191.html I googled and this is actually 500 at Best Buy, so Costco is saving 200 bucks
I still got my 2018 max book pro, and I expect to be using it until the OLED Mac book air comes out. Still works for the stuff that I need, which it not all that demanding
China all up in Taiwan down goes US Just snagged the OLED new Pokémon switch console 
Well they don’t even sell an OLED in exactly 80” size so I know you’re lying.
You're right, OLED panels are definitely the way to go if you want the best picture quality and power efficiency. However, I still think plasma TVs have their place – they offer great image quality at a more affordable price point.
Only downside was the insane power consumption and burn in risk. They only recently have been outdone by current gen OLED.
QLED is a poor man's OLED
Haha yeah I was just reading about it. OLED, 4k output, but there's a rumor that it wouldn't be backwards compatible. I find that hard to believe though.
I’m in Virginia Beach, VA. Go to the oceanfront and ask around for Moe. It won’t take you long to find me. Better yet, just let me know on here when you’re down there and I’ll swing through. I can give you that Nintendo Switch that your wife asked me for last month. She said you really wanted the new OLED model.
Organic LED is OLED like flexible screens used in phones, TVs, computers etc.
You are right. It’s also dangerous because it enables people to buy WAY more stuff than they they would if they saw their checking account drop by 3 grand a whack. I’m looking at getting a 77 inch OLED tv… I can spread the payment across 18 months at 0% interest but does that just encourage me to buy more shit I a don’t need and slowly erode my disposable income? If I see my bank account drop by $3K I am less likely to buy a $2K sound system for the TV. But let’s be real. I’m gonna buy both anyways because fuck it
Yeah I finally wanted to get a OLED so I got the 13 Last year, no regrets as it was cheaper than the 12 (at the storage I wanted) and the 14 isn’t really an upgrade.
Returnal just got ported to PC, it looks rlly good on OLED with HDR. Has ray tracing etc.
Even if you do (it would be very minimum) pixel latency/response time is way lower on OLED and will make for a much better picture due to less artifacts like smearing/ghosting/overshoot.
No kids in all honesty just bought a 75" OLED and a fleshlight
Right? I got a QD OLED so I go out of my way to watch the highest fidelity content I can unless I'm watching something for nostalgia
The switch is 6 years old? Are you kidding me? I just paid $450 for the OLED model cause I thought it was Nintendo’s newest console thing competing with ps5 wtf
I liked it, but I’m waiting for the wide release because I’d rather watch it at home on the OLED to really enjoy the fine details. It’s eye candy with a decent story.
Also I can't read good unless I can drag my finger under the words and this gets Cheeto dust on my OLED.
“Uuhhh you know, i thought people would really buy the same phone, i mean we made it so the OLED stays on… and it’s now got a lil pill island instead of a notch. Really thought that would bring in a profit 🤡”
Early adopters always pay the highest price. You pay a premium for having something new first. That happens all the time with TVs for example. I paid $4,000 for an LG OLED a few years ago and just bought another one for $2,500. It is what it is.
Interesting. I have an LG OLED TV, all of the other major steaming platforms seam to support Dolby Vision/Dolby Atmos or HDR10, so I incorrectly made the assumption Paramount+ would have HDR/Atmos support on it as well. Thanks for the info.
Could've decked out my man cave with a new desk and OLED but no I had to play options instead.
Great write up. There are only 38 million shares available. If you watched the recent run you'd see the spread was wide but those that wanted in were forced to buy the ask. Not only are their limited shares outstanding there are limited sellers. Most retail investors and traders have never seen an opportunity like this because 99.9% of the time a company like POET would be privately funded and then go public for retail to buy at a huge premium. If that was the case with POET they would IPO, easily, at a $1 billion market cap. Then retail would be allowed to take a position at elevated share price. That's why this is such a huge opportunity. Retail is in first and tutes will have to buy from retail. Very rare, see Universal Display Corp (OLED).
Ha, I had burn in, but probably had 40k hours out of my plasma and still fetched some on resell. Have had OLED hooked to Windows 10 for north of five years without an issue, but it is a constant worry.
Did you replace with OLED?
Plasma was the best with great refresh rates and contrast. OLED is all that comes close.
Except displays, they fucking up everything on it. Firmware bad pixels and marketing gimmicks to sell QLED as OLED
Have you ever seen a movie in 4k HDR 10+ on an OLED 65 inch TV. If not, you’re missing out.
LG OLED's are pretty beautiful color-wise.
The best screen Apple put in an iPhone was the OLED screen of the iPhone X. All the „liquid retina“ marketing speak is BS. I know they are calibrated and from Samsung or LG anyways, but I don’t trust Apple because they WILL cut corners to save 2$ per phone. Whatever the screen feature name might be, it will be “the best screen we ever built”. Don’t care. It means, wait 6 months after release and read the comments about it. PS: The flaky thin aluminum is already horrible.