PEG

Infurium

187 out of 5,000 is not as many as you think. Just add more screening variables, like PEG.

Corpulos

You probably need more screener. Did you look at things like ROE, gross margin, revenue growth, EPS growth, PEG? If you properly screen for everything, no stovks will come up.

Old_Implement_5135

Does PEG ratio measure how many times during intercourse I let her hit it from the back?

EnginrA

What’s a PEG ratio

IndividualNo7155

MU P/E is 22.45 and PEG is 0.04 holy shit its not the top yet

i_empathetic

Yep, and based on expected growth the PEG ratio is lowest it's ever been. Fundamentally NVDA has never been a better looking value stock.

TheFlyingGyro

I mean selling was for sure your problem in the first place. Selling a stock that has a forward PE under 7 and a PEG ratio of 0.04 is wild. They've clearly been fucking with it to keep it down as of late.

Double_Suggestion385

If you just want to look at metrics like fwd-PE or PEG, they will tell you it's not overvalued. However, I also value each component of the S&P500 individually every day, weight them based on market cap and compare it to the current price that the index is sitting at. The result is a pretty significant undervaluation of the market and that's using very conservative valuation metrics. Whenever someone claims that tge market is overvalued, I always notice they don't actually have a valuation for tge market and they'll (mis)use some silly metric like the 'Buffett' indicator because it confirms their beliefs.

TheFlyingGyro

Buying puts on a stock that has a forward PE under 7, a PEG ratio of 0.04 AFTER it dropped 30% is def a choice.

CassavaCRISPY

Well its definitely got to do with the PEG part

HeyYoChill

What does the E stand for in PE and PEG?

TranzitBusRouteB

yes I am a MUtard… down to less than 7 forward P/E, 0.14 PEG Ratio

CarrierAreArrived

what's the thesis on chips collapsing? AI buildout isn't close to stopping yet. RAM stocks' and NVDA's P/E, forward P/E and PEG are minimal. AVGO's P/E is a bit more expensive but forward P/E and PEG are pretty low, and it's had two big pullbacks.

Malota13

do you have any rules, any lets say decision flow (like some rules) you go through before making any trade like I dunno: \- I do not buy/long option parabollic stocks \- I only buy that growth PEG or P/E \- I only buy hot stocks etc?

zerowaitestate

I do not have a lot of assets, but this is my take for what it's worth. I do think there was a confluence of timing of multiple events that made last week worse than it otherwise would have been. What I saw was definitely rotation, though, and I think other folks are right that beta was a lot of it. I saw a pretty big drop in the price of stuff that was not even AI-related, on no real news. The consistent theme was a big run in the last quarter. I saw an increase in solid stocks with low PEG that have been mostly flat or down last few months. I also think Zuck probably tanked semis for around 2.5% - 3.5% across the board, based on what I saw in adjacent sectors. I dunno if it's going to be a permanent hit to growth, but I would be cautious about stocks surrounding data center construction to see what their exposure is. I think META is an outlier in terms of braindead FOMO at scale, but there will be others.

_freckles__

I think the reason everyone here is regarded is because the regarded people have no filter and can see past all the made up bullshit like PEG, P/S, TAM etc and see if stock make money or not. Probably why people here have 10x to 20x gains etc.

alterego200

PEG ratio.

MarbleMuffin

P/E vs Historical P/E PRICE VS FCF PEG DCF Whether forward indicators are still looking good after a massive drop. Analyze whether the moat still holds while outlook is depressed. Buy into fear and sell into greed https://edition.cnn.com/markets/fear-and-greed Easier said than done, but that's what I do Index funds are nice if you want passive returns but you are capping risk and reward Individual stocks obviously increase risk and will also in crease reward Just a matter of your risk tolerance, and also how much you are willing to research and spend on investing too

Anonn39

Me personally I do read the earnings report but I don't read every info, just focus on the info that I use to value the company. For the semi stocks I hold like BESI and ASML I look for their reported EPS, their revenue, their profit margins, their statements on order backlogs etc, and calculate the growth rate of the company quarter over quarter and YoY (usually the brokers already did this for me). And then I look for their guidance and statement on the general market. Then I calculate the PEG to see if the stock is expensive or cheap, and look at the rate of changes. Most of the time the conclusion for the position is that I just need to keep holding the stock. Not sure if this is an optimal "strategy" but I try to do what I know best.

casperbro2

Since no one is really answering your question directly: You want to check the P/E ratio and trailing and forward P/E ratios as well as the PEG ratios. I’d also want to see trending positive and increasing metrics like revenues, net income, EBIDTA etc It’s always a good idea to compare these metrics vs competitors in a particularly industry.

Knight_Arno

Just go with a broad market index fund and relax. If you must pick stocks, focus on PEG under 1.5 or P/E below sector average. The rest is just noise.

ChokaMoka1

The only PEG happening is from your goth girlfriend. 

clearthinkers

Can I PEG you?

Mobile-Bar7732

Actually PEG. P/E doesn't account for growth.

Calflyer

PEG ratio is a good place to start

MaximumDiscipline843

your fundamentals aren't wrong, but i think you're answering "is the business great" when the market is actually pricing "can they execute and convert it to cash". those are different questions. the thing your PEG framing skips is free cash flow. Q1 2026 operating profit was up but operating FCF was actually negative (around -€285M) because of huge upfront payments, inventory buildup and working capital. so earnings are growing fast, cash isn't keeping up yet. that's a big reason the multiple looks "cheap" — the market is discounting execution risk, not doubting the growth. and execution risk is real and recent: the stock dropped \~18% in a single day last week on reports germany is scrapping the F126 frigate program rheinmetall was lead contractor on. it's already down \~30% from january highs on exactly this fear — that the spending headlines won't fully convert into signed, delivered, paid contracts. so the bear case isn't really "defense slows down", it's "the backlog is real but turning €73B of backlog into recognized revenue and actual cash is slower and messier than the EPS curve implies". worth noting the flip side though — an entity tied to the CEO bought \~€4M of stock at these levels in june, which is at least a signal insiders think it's oversold. you're not missing the growth. you might be underweighting how much the market cares about cash conversion and procurement execution vs reported EPS

Oatmeal_Raisin_

That the yield of $PEG is ideal and that you want to go long

takedown2021

**PEG Ratio** (PE divided by growth rate) = 56x PE ÷ 100% EPS growth = **PEG of 0.56**

MikeMiller8888

You’re crazy. AI drove the $5 in earnings last quarter, and if you expect that to continue they need to keep dominating search with AI enhancement. For every user that doesn’t like AI on their search, ten others are using it more. You can’t stay ahead on AI if you aren’t willing to spend the money needed for the infrastructure. Yeah, it’s gonna cost a quarter trillion dollars. Lucky us, Alphabet has it and can raise it. The capex lawsuit against softee isn’t going to go anywhere, and neither will one against Alphabet. The undervalued shares will go gangbusters once people realize $5 in earnings per quarter wasn’t a one off, because the PE is under 17 if you use $20.50 per share as their annual earnings. The PEG ratio is substantially under 1 as well with 30% growth. Companies can raise cash for valid corporate purposes. Period. How do you think Saylor keeps buying all that bitcoin? And you’re here talking lawsuits about less than 2% share dilution lmfao 🤪

Fancy_Cattle_5914

I mean I was looking at a lot of these great companies down 40-60% from highs and figured that there is still plenty room to fall, but I just have to get in at some point. Getting in, then watching PLTR immediately tank another 30% in just 3 sessions, ORCL 20%, etc. sucks bad, and maybe they fall another 20%, but I am in now. These valuations make no sense. CRM's forward PE is half the S&Ps average, PLTR is growing at 85%, expected 95% this Q, has a PEG of 1.2.... These companies will probably be fine at some point, but fuck look at what was lost in just one week, I am wishing I just stayed in my cozy ETFs.

zbern

Such a cool company and the financials look really good. PEG less than 1, D/E less than 1, and P/FCF around 9. Assuming you have a position, congrats! Also, really nice layout on this post. It's pleasing lol.

Extra_Code_7556

The bear case you buried at the bottom is the real question: defense procurement cycles are notoriously lumpy, and a peace deal or budget freeze can crater near-term earnings fast enough to make a 0.5 PEG look a lot less cheap in hindsight.

Far_Version9387

PEG ratio of 9😬

zbern

Didn't realize whom I was responding to lol. Nice job with profits. Sucks watching 20% dwindle down to 5ish. Not exactly sure what timeframe you normally hold but TTEK looks good besides the PEG ratio. Kinda similar but they focus on water on a global scale. They seem to be in a show me state currently. Also PLUS looks solid as a digital infrastructure play. They recently announced a new business avenue on memory advisory services with all the shortages going on. I've been early on all 3 lol. Just can't get the timing down.

_hiddenscout

Which company and how you are valuating. Looking at SIVE: [https://stockanalysis.com/quote/sto/SIVE/statistics/](https://stockanalysis.com/quote/sto/SIVE/statistics/) PS ratio is 100 and the company makes no money. This is speculation in my opinion and not investing. Not saying you can't make money, but think about this as an abstract. You are buying a company that loses money and the asset has gone up over 2000% in 1 year. Just seems bad imo lol. With AAOI  [https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/aaoi/statistics/](https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/aaoi/statistics/) [https://finviz.com/stock?t=AAOI&p=d](https://finviz.com/stock?t=AAOI&p=d) Same situation. Company is losing money. PS is still pretty high and it's hard to look at the PEG or P/FCF since it's losing money. What fundamentally looks sound in either in these names?

SundayAMFN

damn bro, sorry to have upset you so much You're certainly right that PEG doesn't explicitly forecast future earnings via extrapolation. It does only use a single growth metric that averages over some historical growth or future projections and turns that into a linear YoY growth number. Dividing a P/E ratio by a linear percentage growth does not really yield a good metric. It is a lot better to look at P/E and growth separately then to contrive a metric that can put them into a single number.

Cav829

This. Like any investment can go both ways, but it went right from a break-out zone around $109 to going down in a straight line almost ever since. It's coming into tons of support all the way to about $66-$68. You'd expect something of a bounce. Forward P/E, PEG, and EV/EBITDA all look good. We've fully retraced the Fall 2024 breakout at this point. I think it's worth at least a nibble at this area.

scotpunkcat

Lol PEG is insane...why does it matter?

xcramer

I would just add that companies that invest a reasonable portion of free cash flow back into Capx have consitently lower volotility and better (lower) risk factors than those that rely on highly  leveraged debt, which may not be apparent in a quick PEG search.

xcramer

you are conflating PEG with forward guidance , which may or may not provide superior selection criteria.  both pe and peg are backward looking.  while it is true that historici growth is a valuable metric, ( PEG) it does not address research driven by analysis of current competion, current debt, future cash flows, interest rates., etc.  etc.  Is is better?  not really.

maverick_quant

While P/E is imperfect, PEG is far worse because of all the cases like MU where growth is unsustainable.

kepteasy

The market is all growth, GARP, YOLO, meme, low float gapper, moon rocket 🚀 shit Buffet is old news old school, value is dead, not even bank and fund guys care about value, only the odd advisor working with old slow safe money does I prefer value but its so out of favor and the unshiny dull thing PE seems meaningless in a tech Ai driven massive multiple chase revenue growth and each sector has its own baseline of what PE or PEG is overpriced These value plays with 8% revenue growth, growing net income, profitable companies with favorable PE or PEG are just dead to the market, many are in multi year drawdown yet are actually growing revenues and net income, while unprofitable money losing companies with 30%+ revvies growth anf ballooning losses are skyrocketing Its crazy 🤪 I agree tho PEG is better.

VotedOut

Relying on PEG ratio for a cyclical company like Micron also isn't a good idea, as seen by their historical net income here: https://preview.redd.it/71whhugrnz8h1.jpeg?width=591&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=63e5c69974ce9699aab85dd41adeacee17ee0929

Darhhaall

Thats what PEG is for.

AsstronaughtToUranus

A large PEG corresponds to a large GAAP. Doesn’t matter what E you use. If you have to use an E, just put it at the end of the GAAP.

HesitantInvestor0

It's a good metric to follow, but it adds another layer of uncertainty to an already uncertain formula. In general the more factors compiled within one metric, the higher the degree of error is possible. PEG can look fantastic, but if growth stalls or takes a backward step, it could drastically change the value proposition.

macronotice

That’s why you should never make money. Cause then they can PEG you.

SundayAMFN

i was being generous and using projected growth from this past year to next \~25%, and current P/E of \~300. To be fair i didn't look the exact numbers up because precision wasn't really necessary to make the point. PEG does not necessarily correlate better with future earnings than P/E. It simply attempts to.

tomsrobots

PEG gets thrown around a lot before a bubble pops.

ptexpat

What E do you use? GAAP or non-GAAP? Can make a huge difference in the PE / PEG you compute.

version-two

It’s a bit different. For PEG you divide forward P/E by projected growth rate. If PEG < 1 the stock is undervalued. Soooo F-P/E / forecasted growth = PEG \~9.8/ .41 = .23 (cheap af) TLDR; $MU cheap. $MU long term PT $4000 is not a meme.

Maximum-Side-9391

What Tesla earnings growth are you using? Doesn't appear you are calculating correctly. Also space stocks are no longer soaring. P/E ratio is most certainly worse than using PEG ratio. Always exceptions but it's much more accurate than valuing based on P/E ratio

Maximum-Side-9391

You can't have a PEG ratio unless you make money regard

_Clit-Commander_

Always choose to be pegged I mean PEG.

SundayAMFN

This is a really dumb opinion. PEG extrapolates the last 12 months of growth linearly and just assumes that's exactly what will keep happening. TTM PE is historically better correlated with future earnings than PEG or even forward PE (which is embarrassing). What drives stock prices is speculation in what's cool about a company. Tesla's PEG is fucking 12. Lots of space stocks have negative PEGs and they're still soaring in market price. It's fine to think PE is oversimplified, it is, but PEG is worse.

Maximum-Side-9391

Haha I think I've posted 3 times tonight alone I'll care about MU price more when PEG ratio gets over 1 when industry is 0.96 MU is still cheap

Direct-Dingo-6651

PEG is already step up from raw P/E, but yeah ROIC is the piece most retail guys skip entirely. Hard to blame them though, marginal return on invested capital takes a bit more digging than just punching numbers in calculator.

Fantastic_Smoke9501

I like that OP tried to make some sense but everyone else is interested in the PEG action. Bro take this serious unwarranted speech to r/valueinvesting. We don’t do that here lmao 🤌🤌.

Cav829

Most people here don't know what PEG is, but they do know what pegging is.

Locke_____Lamora

Your mom can PEG me.

Maximum-Side-9391

Yes I would until PEG reaches 1 currently at 0.56 after close today....I wouldn't buy Sandisk here but MU I would keep buying if it goes down after earnings

Maximum-Side-9391

Until PEG gets above 1.00 it will keep going up most likely not saying there won't be dips along the way but those will just be buying opportunities since PEG is +/- 0.50 at the moment

ryzetard

yes, bag7 to forward p/e 10, CAGR to 40 and PEG to 0.5, shitty unprofitable companies with no moats at all. thats the rational multiples!

Dazzling-Ad7012

Pegged by the PEG

FarSolid7870

Trailing earnings alone is not the way to look at SNs valuation. PEG, FCF, Price to sales are better indicators. SN isn’t operating as a mature business yet so operating margins and earnings do not reflect what future cash flow will look like

ItsAllPuts

If you save up your money and invest at the very height of every stock market bubble since 1970, you'd still average about 8% per annum provided that you stay invested. [https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market-timer/](https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market-timer/) Keep around enough money to do what you need to do and stay invested. You should be fine. If you are comfortable picking individual stocks, there's always undervalued stocks in the market and it doesn't even need to be niche. For example META forward p/e is around 17-19x and PEG less than 1.

Confident_Bee_6242

That PE and PEG is still too high for me. Let see if the 52 week low provides support at around $75.

JordieTiana

Whatever PEG 1.0 equals. It’s a moving target

JordieTiana

? WDC has a PEG ratio below 0.5

Additional-Name-3211

Well, normally when you look at P/E and it's really high it can be either because the company is really overvalued or because it's experiencing a significant growth period and investors are overpaying considering its current profit for the promise of future growth. PEG helps distinguish between both cases, Amazon was a textbook case of the latter.

Additional-Name-3211

This is why the PEG ratio is also crucial

ShootsnLadders

I wouldn’t consider them a traditional munitions maker though, which would be more impacted by those conflicts ending. In fact, as those end more of the defense budget can be spent on modernization and high tech deterrence, which is more their wheelhouse. Evidenced by the $2.7B contract they received in May. I mean it’s trading at a sub-10 Forward PE, PEG of like .92, they have a $48B backlog, just did 14% EBITDA in Q1, what’s not to like? Low growth I guess.

Left-Signature-5250

meanwhile NVA PEG 0.37

Anonn39

even if AMD hits 1 trillion market cap it's still actually undervalue lmao, its PEG is still below 1

_hiddenscout

Not a chart guy, but can just look at the company fundamentals. [https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/meta/statistics/](https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/meta/statistics/) PEG is 0.84, P/FCF is 30, Forward PE is 17 and ROIC is like 30%. All while the company is growing revenue like over 20% every quarter, with the last quarter growing 33% QoQ. You are buying arguably one of the best companies in the world in terms of financials and it's actually sitting at a place where it's undervalued. The thing going against it is they are burning all their FCF, but they still generate a ton of FCF. Like last year, META made 46.1B in FCF.

_hiddenscout

Not really my bag of tea, but man there is some interesting software names out there that seem so cheap. Was looking at RELY this morning: [https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/rely/statistics/](https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/rely/statistics/) PEG is 0.2, P/FCF is 13, Foward PE is 13, ROIC is 31% with a quick ratio of 2.2 Also seeing 3 quarters of growth at like 25%. Pretty wild how cheap some names have become. Will need to dig more into them over the weekend. Here's what they do: >Remitly Global, Inc., a cross-border payment company engages in the provision of digital financial services in the United States, Canada, and internationally. >It offers cross-border remittances and complementary financial services through mobile application and website. Latest Investor Presentation Slides [https://ir.remitly.com/static-files/5e8b2bdb-0614-4b22-946d-76261a0a5e0e](https://ir.remitly.com/static-files/5e8b2bdb-0614-4b22-946d-76261a0a5e0e)

Mobile-Bar7732

> Real investors price stocks on forward earnings or revenue not historical There was a peroid of time period, probably before you were born, where the market was filled a lot of tech companies that made little to no profit but also had big promises of generating a lot of money. Let's just say it didn't end well. PEG ratio is a good metric but anything over 2 is not worth investing in. As with anything foreward earnings is a made up number.

AuckoTaco

SpaceX **price-to-sales**: Reuters pegged it at about **93.7x trailing sales** at $1.75T. That is extreme; the stock would need either massive Starlink/xAI/data-center monetization or a much lower entry price to make PEG-style valuation look normal.

sbuy210

Thank you. I have been eyeing on CSTM, AER, GILT, ALNT which look fundamentally cheap P/S, PEG wise.

zbern

Been holding BWXT since November of last year. PEG is high but it's a solid company that had great earnings recently and their latest acquisition increases their exposure to thermal management. Also has nuclear medicine in their portfolio. If you like the nuclear route, check out MIR. Just start a position today, should have waited till now since it's under $16/share which I didn't think would happen. More growth oriented than anything, but they have a huge moat on safety sensors for nuclear everything pretty much.

kumaratein

Okay yes but if we're talking honestly about Elon driven hype, Tesla is one of the most mature companies in the world, has been in the top market cap for years. There is no growth that realistically delivers PEG that is reasonable compared to peers. It is purely a brand loyalty/irrational exuberance model. IMO if you're being honest about SpaceX it's largely a play on Elon shifting around money to always make his company values go up. If he wasn't involved, would all the same things be true of their business model?

NoobOnTour

SAP PEG ratio almost hitting 1 which is extremely cheap. The software selloff is completely overdone.

xghtai737

Depends on the valuation metric. If you're talking about something like ttm PE, then almost certainly, yes. If you're talking about forward PE or forward PEG, then maybe not. The forward PE of the S&P 500 is 20.3. For NVIDIA it's 16.7. For Palantir it's 63.5. The PEG ratio for the S&P 500 is 0.91. For NVIDIA it's 0.37. For Palantir it's 1.06.

i_empathetic

PEG ratio is 0.47, the lowest it's been I think ever, at least the last decade. If they actually beat/raise guidance (as they've been doing the entire time) the stock has fundamentally never been cheaper, based on earnings growth anyway. Too many other stocks with crazy performance (memory, photonics, HPC datacenters, space, etc) have been stealing the spotlight and stock investment inflows IMO.

Healthy-Matter-4218

**Campine NV — tiny Belgian antimony recycler at \~6x earnings** I’ve been digging into Campine NV recently. It’s a small, illiquid Belgian recycler focused on metals like lead and antimony (and tin, gold and silver recently) The numbers look cheap: P/E around 6 P/S around 0.6 EV/EBITDA around 6 €10/share gross dividend, ex-date June 12 The dividend is not the main point. The real thesis is that Campine may be more than a cyclical recycler. To me it seems like an urban mining company with a big fat moat (onöy company in the world that is able to recycle antimony from waste streams) They have a niche position in antimony recycling, which is interesting because antimony is strategically important and supply is concentrated. They are also investing in third-generation antimony recycling technology, expected around mid-2027. If that works, it should increase capacity and improve margins. They recently integrated Ecobat France and could do more acquisitions. If management keeps allocating capital well without major dilution or excessive debt, I think the current valuation is too low. The obvious risk is that 2025 may have been an unusually strong year because of antimony prices. So I wouldn’t take the current PEG of \~0.04 at face value. But even with more normalized assumptions, the stock still looks cheap to me. Main risks: commodity exposure, illiquidity, execution risk, and low analyst coverage. Annual report: [https://www.campine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/25-jaar-eng.pdf](https://www.campine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/25-jaar-eng.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com) Not financial advice. Just think this is an interesting small-cap that doesn’t get much attention

NedwieFlanders

The P/E and PEG ratios are insane for this valuation. I wouldn't be surprised if the stock doubles again by the end of the year

EPPAnalyze

Guarda, hai scovato dei numeri ottimi ma con le utility il trucco sta dietro le quinte. Quel PEG sotto l'1 e la crescita dell'EPS al 20% sono pazzeschi perché Constellation ha in mano la più grande flotta nucleare americana, che oggi significa l'unica energia pulita e costante capace di alimentare i data center per l'intelligenza artificiale. I colossi tech fanno a gara per fare contratti diretti con loro e questo garantisce fiumi di denaro per i prossimi anni. Il rischio vero non è nei bilanci, ma nella politica e nelle regole: quei margini dipendono dai sussidi governativi per l'energia verde e dai regolatori che devono approvare i contratti esclusivi con le Big Tech senza sfasciare la rete pubblica. Se Washington cambia idea, le stime crollano. Detto ciò, dopo il calo dai massimi il prezzo è diventato molto interessante. L'azienda è un carrarmato, quindi se vuoi entrare a lungo termine ci sta alla grande, magari scaglionando gli acquisti per non beccarti la volatilità politica.

EPPAnalyze

Analizzare Constellation Energy basandosi solo sui classici moltiplicatori da manuale può trarre molto in inganno, ed è il motivo per cui a prima vista, con un PEG sotto l'1 e una crescita degli utili stimata oltre il 20%, sembra un affare colossale. Il settore delle utility, specialmente quelle legate al nucleare commerciale, oggi non vende solo energia, ma vende una cosa molto più preziosa: la capacità di generazione costante e a zero emissioni (baseload) di cui hanno un disperato bisogno i data center per l'intelligenza artificiale. La flotta nucleare di CEG è il vero gioiello della corona, ed è ciò che giustifica l'ottimismo sulla crescita dei prossimi anni. Gli accordi di fornitura diretta con i colossi del tech per alimentare i supercomputer garantiscono flussi di cassa enormi, prevedibili e a prezzi premium rispetto alle tariffe di mercato standard. Se le stime di crescita degli utili del 20-25% dovessero concretizzarsi, comprare un leader di questo calibro a 18 volte gli utili futuri sarebbe una scelta eccezionale. Tuttavia, bisogna scavare dentro la natura di questa crescita per capire dove sta il rischio. Quel tasso di crescita dell'EPS così alto non è garantito dalla normale espansione del mercato, ma dipende pesantemente da fattori regolatori e politici. Il business model attuale è blindato dai sussidi governativi legati alla transizione energetica e dai crediti d'imposta per la produzione di energia pulita. Qualsiasi cambio di rotta a livello politico a Washington potrebbe ridimensionare questi incentivi, impattando direttamente sui margini. Inoltre, vendere energia ai data center bypassando la rete elettrica tradizionale sta iniziando a sollevare parecchie polemiche da parte delle autorità di regolamentazione e delle altre utility, preoccupate per la stabilità della rete pubblica e per il potenziale aumento dei costi per i cittadini comuni. Se i regolatori dovessero iniziare a mettere i bastoni tra le ruote a questi contratti bilaterali esclusivi, le stime di crescita di Constellation subirebbero una bella frenata. In sintesi, l'azienda è un carro armato industriale con un vantaggio competitivo enorme, e il crollo recente dal massimo storico ha ripulito parecchia euforia dal titolo, rendendo il punto d'ingresso decisamente più attraente. Se decidi di entrare a lungo termine, tieni solo a mente che non stai comprando un'azione tecnologica pura, ma un'infrastruttura strategica i cui destini sono legati a doppio filo alla regolamentazione statale. Avviare la posizione con entrate scaglionate potrebbe essere la mossa più saggia per proteggersi dalla volatilità di questo specifico settore.

RNutt

P/E is not the best ratio for evaluating banks. I'd look at P/B, ROE, net interest margin(how much profit do they make on their core business), and credit quality. Then P/E if the other ratios made sense. A bank is a balance sheet business. The primary value of a bank is how efficiently it can borrow money from depositors and lenders, then turn that into profitable loans. Here's a few rules of thumb: ROE: 10% - 15% is good. Above 15% is excellent P/B: 1x is average. Less than that can be undervalued or just a weak bank. Above 1 usually mean stronger, but it could also mean you're paying a lot. Net interest margin: this is the profit margin you're making on the bank's money. For a big emerging market bank like NU, it should be at least 5%. 10-15% is strong. Above 15% nad you might be running too hot. For comparison purposes, a big U.S. bank would probably have a 2-3% net interest margin. Credit quality: If the percentage of credit losses/non-performing loans are steady or going down from quarter to quarter, that's good. For a big bank American bank, it should be no more than 4%, meaning $4 out of every $100 in loans is in real trouble. 1-2% is normal, and less than 1% is great. For a fast growing emerging market bank, more than 10% is probably dangerous. 3-6% might be normal. Less than that is really strong. P/E: under 10x is cheap. 10-15x is average. 15x is expensive. Since one of the most attractive things about NU is the growth, I'd look at PEG. Under 1: you're buying earnings cheaply. That's a good thing. 2-3: average 3+: expensive You could get more granular and look at trailing P/E versus forward P/E. You could look at Tier 1 capital and loan loss reserves. Interest rates of course(generally, the higher the better for a bank). All of these are rules of thumb. You have to know the context behind all the numbers. That's why you gotta read the filings. That's how you learn why something is happening. My simple analysis based on cursory research is that this is a good business given the tremendous growth. I would really watch the credit quality though because rapid expansion usually leads to worse quality.

basketballisforme

I'm not saying you're wrong or anything but re-rating of what? Their P/E is high and EV/EBITDA is high. P/S I'd consider on the higher end, but PEG is looking alright.

robotlasagna

forward P/E is 32-40 and PEG is somewhere around 1. The current situation is that they are growing revenue every quarter so the expectation is the PE will continue to compress. You can certainly make the case that people shouldn't be buying in at high PE multiples but you can make that same argument for a whole bunch of tech stocks.

mindfungus

P/E ratio, PEG, profit margin, debt, earnings forecast vs realized are my go tos

MattKozFF

When it has a PEG like Micron

John_the_IG

The last thing I’d pay attention to is Reddit hype. Worthless, IMO. The things I pay immediate attention to - sort of a screening process - are forward and trailing P/E ratio and PEG ratio. Those two factors are why I bought Micron in September 25 at $170. On the other hand I started buying NVDA in October 2018 and don’t remember even looking at those factors. My process changed over time.

demi9od

TSMC is irreplaceable. The only thing holding it back is China invasion fears. Otherwise it's very cheap on forward PEG. MU and SK Hynix are even cheaper on forward PEG but a breakthrough in algorithms so LLMs need half the memory cuts their growth substantially.

Amdvoiceofreason

UiPath is incredibly undervalued rn and I make pretty good passive income selling 15-20 delta calls against it. They consistently beat earnings, they're profitable. Forward PE Ratio is 14 PEG ratio is between .44 and .66 If they hit their growth expectations, I can't imagine this stock not doubling in value. Not advice....I just another regard

PrestigiousAccess765

I bought at a PE of 6. but generally I look at Forward PE and PEG because that is more important. 

PrestigiousAccess765

I‘m holding a lot since months. So I‘m fine.  But honestly you should look ag PEG as well and not only PE

_hiddenscout

I haven't look at the valuations in a minute, the problem is a lot of these names have been on a tear for a bit. I always try to be as transparent as possible here, so stuff like CW, I've owned for years. Like this post is about DRS and CW from 2 years ago: [https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1gbq8o7/comment/ltq0wmh/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1gbq8o7/comment/ltq0wmh/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) > Totally, yeah I'm less invested in pure naval ships, but companies that deal with components of it. One of them is $CW. It's also two fold, since they do both Naval and Nuclear, part of the reason why I think the company should have some nice tailwinds in the future. >[https://www.curtisswright.com/markets/defense/naval-defense](https://www.curtisswright.com/markets/defense/naval-defense) >The other is also DRS. Same idea. >[https://www.leonardodrs.com/what-we-do/domains/sea/](https://www.leonardodrs.com/what-we-do/domains/sea/) Last time I checked, APH still seems like it trades a decent valuation. That's always my thing, I'm jsut a GARPy invesor, so I care about stuff like DCF and fundamentals around a business before I buy them. MOG.A and CTS are also pretty interseting. MOG.A PEG is a bit higher than I like, but it's a great name to buy on pullbacks.

PrestigiousAccess765

It is nowhere near 50. especially their PEG ratio is ultra low