PEG

creemeeseason

I think we mentioned it before but I've been buying ROOT. It's getting crazy cheap, but they're building a lot of partnerships that have potential. Interesting insurance play. PEG 0.68, P/S 0.91.... It could double or triple just based on that P/S.

_hiddenscout

Totally, it's really the valuation of the company that I find compelling. Insurance kind of bores me lol. However, seeing something with like a PEG of 0.6 and EPS growth is 60% and revenue is the same, I find it compelling as more of a trade. Might move the profits from my NRDS trade over there.

W_Malinowski

I agree it can (will) get worse but quite a bit of that is priced in given they have guided down. If they fall enough to have a forward p/e below 10 I’m a buyer. PEG already sub 1, obviously that could change if they guide down again. Happy to be on the sidelines. I am dumpster diving, but in staples not discretionary, at least for now

VotedOut

"Rule of 40 score" is just something that Palantir likes to use to fluff investors up. Rule of 40 score = Growth rate(%) + Profit Margin(%) Non-bullshit valuation metrics factor in the CURRENT STOCK PRICE as part of a measurement. Examples: P/E ratio (PRICE-to-earnings ratio), P/S (PRICE-to-sales ratio), PEG ratio (PRICE/earnings to growth ratio), market cap (stock PRICE x shares outstanding). Rule of 40 score is stock price agnostic, and thus not a very useful valuation metric.

Ecstatic_Wheelbarrow

That makes sense and PLTR could move 20% either direction without surprising me. How much can you hype up a stock with a PE of 666 and a PEG ratio of 17? I don't think it'll tank back to $100 anytime soon, but even at $100 it is expensive. If it had the same PE and PEG as NVDA (59 and 1.49) it would be a $20 stock.

proofreadre

The PE / PEG ratios tell you all you need to know

SmartAssLoner

... perfect follow-up ... it's crazy that people still think NVDA is overvalued with still a sub 1 PEG ratio ... easy hold into the far future ... imagine if TSLA was treated as such 😂

AlGAdams

PEG is insanely low

benda_knee

i own NVDA, i know what i paid (when it was 115$). i don't think the PEG is still <1 right now. nevertheless, 27PE is a premium but not a steep one, so people can still buy if they chose to do so. personally i won't add more to my NVDA pos at this prices. like i don't add to AMD or NBIUS or CRWV. i prefer to add to Amazon or Goog or Meta or other high conviction positions.

geekfinity

Recent highlights - you can find it on internet Vertiv is Nvidia partner. Low PEG - earning increases the same magnitude as Growth Raised its full-year 2025 outlook multiple times this year, citing surging AI data center orders, with third-quarter sales and backlog hitting records Accelerated deployments with OCP-compliant power and cooling ecosystems, unveiled at industry summits, to handle gigawatt-scale AI demands. Vertiv's push into 800 VDC power architectures, set for a 2026 rollout, aligns with Nvidia's platforms, further cementing its first-mover status in next-gen AI infrastructure. Financially, it's a standout: analysts see it as a "no-brainer AI gold rush buy" with robust upside from hyperscaler commitments exceeding $300 billion in capex.

Candid-Chipmunk-7990

27 pe is a premium?? lmaoo what?? its PEG ratio is 0.8!! thats dirt cheap, people have no clue 

Candid-Chipmunk-7990

its not, these people are clueless, the PEG ratio is 0.8 which is the cheapest out of the entire mag 7 by far 

Fearless_Strike5651

Here we go again!!! With the , Just own indexes you’ve gotta be Albert Einstein to pick individual stocks!😂 Look man, it doesn’t take a genius to own individual names, just the ability to read a balance sheet and think past this week’s CPI print. Rocket Lab’s building reusable launch systems, expanding satellite services, and locking in recurring government contracts. That’s not Reddit hype or a meme stock, that’s vertical integration in a trillion dollar industry. Evaluating a stock isn’t rocket science (pun fully intended). ;) - Is there a moat? How strong? – check revenue growth – margins – cash flow trends - Debt – backlog – valuation vs. peers and history -PEG -FORWARD P/E we like looking ahead as a growth investor !!!!! Track earnings calls, follow new contract wins, set a few alerts on your phone boom, you’re doing real due diligence. You don’t need a PhD, you just need curiosity and discipline. My only advice, don’t own more than 10 or so names. It gets stressful fast. The Bogle cult can keep sneering while getting their 7% index gains, the people actually studying innovation will be the ones owning the next decade. Good luck

No-Contribution1070

Dude, you're new to investing arn't you?. Just because they are at the same stock price, doesn't mean they are valued the same. You should also look into some of these metrics and understand them thouroughly first. Then do your research on NVDA vs PLTR. - Market Cap - price to earnings ration (P/E) - PEG - Earnings Reports - Revenue, net profits, cash burn, EPS(Earnings per share) Learn these metrics first, and then study them for each stock individually to make an infornes decision. You should also look at things like governement contracts, insititutional investors in each stock.

DosManosBurrito

Just look at PE ratios. PEG also. If a company is growing 50% a year and trading at a current PE of 50, it doesn’t mean it is ‘overvalued’. If you want to lower downside risk, buy some conservative value or dividend ETFs like SCHD or OAKM among plenty of other value offerings out there. You probably won’t hit it out of the park but you probably won’t lose your shirt in a correction either. Good luck.

No-Sprinkles7153

Perhaps you need to learn about the concept of growth at a reasonable price GARP and PEG ratios

salty0waldo

Definitely had a massive move after great quarter, but anyone considering FlowServe (FLS) at these levels? The big hangover IMO was the asbestos liability...major player in flow control/measure particularly in the nuclear and process plant space. FWD PE: 17.8 PEG: 0.91 (a bit deflated due to massive beat)

_hiddenscout

You should really compare sector to sector and just the index. Like 25% of of the SP500 is going to be like MSFT/NVDA/GOOGL. [https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/\~adamodar/New\_Home\_Page/datafile/pedata.html](https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html) That being said, still cheaper than a lot of those names. I always like using PEG more than PE, since PEG takes into PE and EPS growth. So basically something can have a high PE, but can also be growing their EPS rapidly too. I don't think it's a bad investment by any means, but the company is growing their revenue like low single digits now. It's been like that for 10 quarters now. Paypal just seems more like a value company at this point. They will continue to buyback stock and pay dividends. Just feels more of like a boomer stock or bank than a growth name. Probably why the PE is lower. Having a low PE just usually means the market is expecting that slow growth.

_hiddenscout

Totally, everyone has their way of looking at stocks and what not. I always try to buy things with a PEG under 2. More than likely the company will never get there, just it's one of those things where I just want the best price possible and that fits into my investment style. Doesn't mean it's right or wrong, just what I try to stick what works for me. However, if you like the company and it fits what you are looking for, totally makes sense.

Weak-Pomegranate-435

Its at 9.5 PEG.. fyi, anything above 2 is extremely overvalued.. so it i very overvalued

MadManMark222

Why do you "need" to sell it? I mean, a rational, fact-based arguement for why it's overvalued. The forward PE is under 30, and with this growth rate that makes for a PEG right around 1.0. CAPEX spending from its customers are historically high, yes, but still increasing, and the totals still under 2/3 free cash flow on average. And these hyperscalers are many of the most profitable companies in the world, so many of them haven't had to tap debt markets to any alarming degree yet. It's weird to see people fret about excessive valuation, but never actually cite fundamental valuation metrics. This is literally the exact OPPOSITE of the irrationality of the dot-com bubble (which I'm old enough to have scars from), where fundamental justifications were all but MIA for nearly every high flyer, but few seemed too fearful that the rapid stock price appreciations couldn't go on indefinitely.

av1b

I am a swing trader. So I buy stocks that are near the 52-week or all-time high. Along with that, I use some fundamental filters like PEG TTM should be less than 2 (1.5 in a consolidating market) and growth rates of the company. What I do is I compare the growth of the company with in industry median number and choose stocks with a higher number than the median. One other way I have recently started exploring is looking at the alternate data points, like insider buying/selling or any interesting announcement. But not deploying much capital in this strategy as I am still exploring it.

_hiddenscout

Usually check finviz, [stockanalysis.com](http://stockanalysis.com), or morningstar. PEG's can be all over the place due to how often they get updated numbers, I think. I also will use ChatGPT for that, since PEG isn't a hard thing to calculate. It's (Price/EPS)/EPS Growth.

sbuy210

Where do you find correct PEG for companies? Finviz seems to be wonky with PEGs.

salty0waldo

Was process engineering but have been moved into more operational technology now. Enjoy software engineering? I think part of it for me now was for a few years I couldn't keep up as much as I wanted with work commitments, so I kept a small portfolio of names I knew and followed. PEG and ROIC are solid, for some reason I gravitate towards free cash flow and ARR or long-term contracts.

_hiddenscout

What's your background? I do software engineering. Honestly, that's not an uncommon thing. Happens with me. Part of why I stopped caring as much, is just I've owned things that continue to go up, even when it's gone up a ton. Like I've own GILT in the past, before it ran. That's usually my problem, no even patience. Owned like TTMI before it double, but sold before that happened lol For me, I just focus on the PEG and ROIC more than anything else. Try to stick with getting things with PEG's under 2 and ROIC over 10%.

Slabbed1738

You use revenue to calculate PEG?

dont_downvote_SPECIL

This is unbelievable Meta grew revenue by 26% P/E ratio right now is 23x So the PEG ratio is under 1, which means growth is outpacing the valuation I think if you're a smart investor you buy right here

_hiddenscout

Also forget to mention, DRS reported this morning. I used to own them, but thinking of moving back into the position. Still need to dig into the report, but wonder if since the CEO is stepping down, the stock is kind of selling off. It's a tad bit more expensive in terms of PEG than I like, but overall, still not a terrible price.

decomposition_

Most redditors commenting as if they’re experts in these threads probably have no fucking idea what a PEG ratio is or how to really look at stock metrics my man

Big-View-1061

PEG is slightly above 1, so not really. Still I find it impressive that a company of that size can grow at this speed.

levon999

What’s Nvidia’s PEG?

Poly_ptero_dactyl

lol. A drop. Nvda PEG is 1. 1.

Original-Success1950

This is all very valuable information. I read the article you sent, and let me say it's pretty validating with some other stuff I've heard on podcasts like the Option Alpha podcast and some gut feelings I had regarding how it seems that with the rise of retail investors like ourselves, some thought has to be put into how we may affect stocks based on news. I'm going to see if I can get my hands on the full thing for free or purchase it. I tend to get bogged down in analyzing a company's numbers (which is important, I know), and I tend to get analysis paralysis, which makes me hold out on making trades. Even if the chart looks good and shows a promising performance, along with numbers like the P/E, PEG, and EPS. I recently started using ThinkorSwim on Schwab, so I'll have to see if I can do the same thing you showed with the charts. That actually really cuts to my original question on how to identify potential stocks to invest in. I started looking into ETFs and how they've been performing, and let me tell you, I definitely neglected them too much. My current YTD return on my portfolio is 25.13% (pretty decent for a pure stock play IMO), but I definitely could have done better if I'd paid more serious attention to ETFs as well. I actually sold my first CC earlier this month on some QUBT stock I own and made a decent return after I bought it back. I was just having trouble understanding what you meant by 80-Delta. I actually took the last two days to go over my Greeks again. So now I understand the PMCC way better, and it honestly seems like a money maker with the right underlying and correct thesis. Thank you for the breakdown! I actually started PaperTrading on ToS on some QQQ, SQQQ, and TQQQ ETFs expiring on the 31st and 7th to see if this current momentum on the NASDAQ will "pay off" with the anticipation of the Trump and Xi meeting on Thursday. Next, I'm going to try some LEAPS married to weekly and monthly CCs once I do a bit more research on stocks and ETFs. The news today about NVIDIA and LCID partnership seems promising. What trades did you end up doing this week?

_hiddenscout

Happens man. My though process is that I'm a GARPy investor. I use fundamentals, so even if a stock has crazy performance, as long as the fundamentals support the price, I'm cool buying it. I always look at the PEG before I buy anything.

No-Contribution1070

What's GPUS P/E and PEG?

Watch_Collector_

Of course they have. The higher the growth expectations the higher is the fair P/E (that is the reason why there is PEG). You didn't get what I commented. I said that the P/E are to high now, please read my comment. But it isn't because they are higher than in 1930, but because the are higher than last 20 years average. I hope it is clear to you that it is fair for Meta to have higher P/E than Coca-Cola.

Mojeaux18

I don’t see any negative PEGs in 2013, but that doesn’t mean it’s not true, just not my sources, but I do know PEG was as high as 30 in that same year and that PEG is very subjective and unreliable. No where do I see PEG as an indicator of performance or crash imminent. But if you are that certain, you should short asap. But fyi Short interest on palantir is low and below peers. That either means you’re wrong, or it means you have an edge and can profit greatly. Good luck!

No-Contribution1070

Amazon had a PEG of - .87 back in 2013. That's the difference. Amazon was prioritizing long term growth. Bro.. PLTR has a PEG of 10 right now! Crash is imminent.

tietomyy

PEG of 3628800 is quite insane!

No-Contribution1070

Yes man, it also has a PEG of 10! That's what I mean, when is the 50% drop happenning??

LaPenta5594

Forward PE of 172. Forward PEG of 7.7. Not even the future earnings are saying it’s worth its price, but somehow it keeps going up.

Wide_Neighborhood_49

People still buying Tesla with that PEG >7 is wild to me

Weak-Pomegranate-435

If u dont want to use earnings which are skewed by Depreciation and Amortization. Then u use EBITDA, not FCF. FCF is not reliable metric for a business’s picture. And I recommend u to use EV/EBITDA instead of P/EBITDA.. bcz that includes and penalizes any debt which they may have taken or reward the company if they have alot of cash on their balance sheet.. I also use EV/EBITDA/G alot of time, bcz i cant use PEG for cyclical stocks bcz they very ofter show misleading picture..

vnilsen

As to why i weighted the PEG-ratios, it is because the PEG-ratio in 2025 is higher than for the next years depending on the CAGR. EPS, share price and growth estimates only gives you a point in time PEG-values. One could do P/E divided by growth^x where x is the number of years in the future. I might add that to my weighted PEG-ratio actually. That would make the model lean more towards the high growth companies at the cost of certainty.

vnilsen

I see your point. In order to make the weighted PEG more forward looking, i added only 20% to 2025 PEG (1/5th of 26 and 27 combined). One could argue that this is too much, but i think it is fair considering that the future is 100% more uncertain than what has happened. By only looking at lets say 2030 estimates, the model would become more uncertain. And also, it is based on Wall Street estimates, which often only looks 1-2 years in the future. I believe the middle ground would be somewhere between 2026-2027 if one only cares about certainty.

sexyshadyshadowbeard

I'm a bit confused as to why you weighted the PEG ratio at all? Isn't EPS and CAGR enough without giving weight to the PEG? It seems that this pushes CRWD and TSLA to the top while CAGR for SHOP, SPOT and DASH seem a bit in the middle. Are you looking for valuation or growth or something else? This seems more like a tool to ID a good entry point or to trade options rather than to ID the best growth stocks.

Smurf_Crime_Scene

I am going to be wined and dined for business on Monday at some fancy French restaurant. I always check menus ahead of time and ??? What the hell are all those weird little things arranged on the plate with tweezers? I don't recognize any ingredient and I feel ungrateful for being disappointed at $60 a plate. "Elevated" yeah elevate my ass. I got an idea for writing a new cuisine cook book and I'm gonna call it KNOCKED DOWN A PEG EATING Give me your trash recipes 

data-j

IREN not only has the best performance, but has a PEG of 1.1. Its also the only one from that list, with a PEG.

levon999

What metric are you using to define a bubble? What’s QQQ’s historical PE and PEG?

_hiddenscout

BMI usually trades at too rich of valuation for me. I'm more of a GARPy type of investor, so always try to buy stuff that has a PEG under 2. I don't mind paying more for a solid company, but I try to get great companies at good prices. BMI is a solid company, but usually trades more than I like I've looked into EMR before, need to look more into them. Thinking of also pulling the trigger on ABB.

_hiddenscout

Not really, just a lot companies got hit. For example, STRL was down like 11% yesterday. It's now up 4%. STRL has a forward PE of 31, but a PEG of 1.36 [https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=STRL&p=d](https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=STRL&p=d) Revenue growth has slowed a bit, but offers solid ROIC and seeing great growth with operating margin, gross margin, and EPS growth has been great. [https://quickfs.net/company/STRL:US](https://quickfs.net/company/STRL:US)

Important-Ninja3544

True. I am an advocate of tracking data-driven signals so I like such metrics as forward P/E and PEG (for major AI stocks), Capex/FCF, Net Debt/EBITDA and YoY debt growth (for AI hyperscalers - MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, META) and trailing-90-day tech IPO count and their average first day return. And so far, I see that YoY debt growth increased significantly (around +33%) which means debt is increasingly financing this bubble. Here's a separate thread on the current AI bubble: r/bubbleWatch

Petit_Nicolas1964

You don‘t understand valuation. Nvidia has a fwd PEG ratio of around 1.0, this is not expensive for a company that hasn‘t real competition and is at the heart of the AI revolution.

xJayMorex

So $PEG puts?

Herbisretired

I still prefer the PEG and sector growth. I don't like companies with a lot of debt or ones that don't have many employees.

Brief_Variation_434

FOMO is real 😅 I've learned to stop chasing what already ran and look for what's next instead. I use [stockpeg.com](http://stockpeg.com) to find undervalued growth stocks (low PEG ratios). Some on my radar: CRWD - PEG \~1.2 * Cybersecurity growing 30%+/year * Every company needs it TSM - PEG \~0.93 ✅ * Makes chips for Apple, Nvidia, AMD * Way cheaper than US tech * Taiwan risk though ASML - PEG \~2.1 * Monopoly on chip-making machines * Benefits from AI no matter who wins Honestly though, you've got a solid base with VOO + QQQ. I keep 70% index funds, 30% individual picks. Since you're already heavy tech, maybe look at sectors that benefit from tech: * Utilities with data centers (NEE) * Semiconductor equipment (KLAC) * Cloud infrastructure (NET, DDOG)

Flimsy_Roll6083

Small caps are cheap. You are buying a stream of future earnings, that’s it (unless you’re buying a controlling stake), so look at P/e ratio PEG ratios, expected growth, CAPE. The future earnings of non-tech small caps are underpriced right now at about 12x, compared to mega and large caps at 25-40x or higher. U have to factor in that earnings growth is unknowable, but mega and large caps earnings generally grow faster, so future earnings of those entities command a higher price, but typically not 3x the price if small caps earnings generally earnings. Having said all that, the stock market reaches new highs, on average, 20 times per year. Think about it - over time, the value of companies and commodities goes up, both in real and nominal terms, this is not new or surprising. Historically, in hot bull markets there might be 50+ new highs in a year, there have only been like 33 this year so far

GetDeepSignal

How come you chose such a non moving stocks for doing options! I see what you did here you just saw low P/E and buy calls expecting them to raise. I wish it’s that easy, welcome to trading world, I’ll give the next fundamental indicator for you to read about- PEG, also AI lol!

Imcrypto3

[$IONQ](https://x.com/search?q=%24IONQ&src=cashtag_click), [$RGTI](https://x.com/search?q=%24RGTI&src=cashtag_click), [$QUBT](https://x.com/search?q=%24QUBT&src=cashtag_click), [$QBTS](https://x.com/search?q=%24QBTS&src=cashtag_click) The valuations of all these companies are largely speculative and not justified by traditional financial metrics. However, they belong to a sector with immense future potential and operate in a field that could reshape computing. Quantum Computing Financial Snapshot: IONQ Market Cap: $1.6B Revenue (TTM): $52.4M Gross Profit: N/A EBITDA: -$463.6M EPS (TTM): -$0.58 PE Ratio: -62.67 PEG Ratio: N/A Total Debt: $0 Price/Cash Flow: N/A Price/Book: \~32.4× RGTI Market Cap: $160M Revenue (TTM): $7.9M Gross Profit: N/A EBITDA: -$164.8M EPS (TTM): -$0.38 PE Ratio: -54.14 PEG Ratio: N/A Total Debt: $25.3M Price/Cash Flow: N/A Price/Book: \~44.2× QUBT Market Cap: $85M Revenue (TTM): $0.26M Gross Profit: N/A EBITDA: -$76.4M EPS (TTM): -$0.71 PE Ratio: -36.20 PEG Ratio: N/A Total Debt: $7.2M Price/Cash Flow: N/A Price/Book: \~53.1× QBTS Market Cap: $100M Revenue (TTM): $15M Gross Profit: $13.9M EBITDA: -$5.4M EPS (TTM): -$0.42 PE Ratio: -33.21 PEG Ratio: N/A Total Debt: $15.8M Price/Cash Flow: N/A Price/Book: \~0.48×

fgd12350

Everytime any overvaluation discussion come up you immediately have idiots chime in about 00's bubble. Every single time. It doesnt matter to these people that the market would have to 5x within the next year to reach the 200PE seen in the 00's. You have idiots who can compare Nvidia to Cisco despite the fact Cisco sat at 200PE and 4PEG before the bubble burst whilst Nvidia sits at 60ish PE with PEG of 1.3. These idiots say the same thing every time about how omg Cisco was profitable too, market took a decade to recover and will get the same bunch of idiots who upvote them every time. &nbsp; Now am I saying stocks arent overvalued right now? Of course not. But stop comparing every overvalued market to the damn 00's bubble as if they are even remotely comparable. If you have a good point to make you should be able to convince people about it without the use of hyperbole is every sentence that comes out of your mouth.

nobertan

Everyone suggesting extreme choices one way or the other, while anxiously looking at what the other guy is doing. People just need to look at their position, portfolio wise and risk wise, and make decisions based on that. Ran up on huge gains that you can afford to lose? *Diversify* Appetite for huge rewards and secure enough for huge risk tolerance? *Keep going* Extreme choices like:- - going all cash/gold that are counter to their own situation and risk needs trying to outjerk the big boys is a recipe for personal disaster. - believing companies are immune to revenue taking a dump because “PEG ratio is close to 1!” and “this time it’s different!”, using cope terms to justify ignoring risk. What happens to the ***’G’*** in that acronym when demand falls off a cliff from that company’s singular revenue stream?

benda_knee

Meta is a buy, Amazon is a buy, Goog is a decent buy, NVDA can also be a buy with their PEG ratio...but they will suffer in a downturn. options can provide a hedge, or cash

fgd12350

Its almost impossible for a company pulling 50% growth p.a to ever trade literally at fair value. Go find me one if you can. Its never going to happen. My point was simply that comparing a 4PEG 200PE to a 1.3PEG 60PE because 'oh they are both profitable leaders of a new trend' is a little bit dense. Unless you believe all profitable companies on the market are all exactly equivalent to one another.

fgd12350

Gosh people can be so dense sometimes. Cisco had a peak PE of 200 in 1999 when it was growing earnings by about 50% p.a which gives a PEG of 4. Nvidia had a PE of 64 growing at about the same rate with a forward PEG of 1.3. PEG of 1 is usually considered fair value.

MajesticBread9147

I have two long term holds. ASE Technology (ASX) A Taiwanese company that is the market leader in outsourced semiconductor packaging and testing. Semiconductor process nodes can't shrink too much more before we get into issues, which is why many companies are not focusing as much on die-shrinks to increase performance but instead more advanced packaging. You see this with the increased use in 2.5 and 3D packaging, chiplets, SiP and the like. This trend is across the electronics industry, from auto manufacturers, the main CPU and GPU designers we all know, as well as SOCs used in cell phones, and combined CPU/GPU SOCs designed by big cloud providers used for AI training. The company is well diversified within the industry, and is the main player in their space, so isn't reliant on the current AI hype train to succeed. They have lower margins than TSMC however they have a significantly lower PE and PEG ratios and pay a 3% dividend which I reinvest. They are investing heavily into new equipment and factories to support the latest and highest margin technologies that they work with, but are still diversified across pretty much all semiconductor packaging beyond just the high end. The company doesn't get a lot of hype, and isn't captured by a lot of semiconductor ETFs, so while it absolutely is positive impact on the AI hype cycle, they are much less likely to be severely hurt by a bubble popping the hype cycle compared to NVIDIA or TSM, especially with their diversification. **Secondly, since we need to power the datacenters**: First Solar(FSLR) Basically zero debt, 0.57 PEG, and 28% profit margin with a huge backlog and new factories coming online this year. They make most of their panels in America and despite that and their large margins they were the first solar company to achieve sub $1/watt pricing over a decade ago. Their panels don't use silicon and instead use a different semiconductor (CdTe) that allows an efficient thin film deposited on glass (as opposed to sliced silicon crystals) meaning they use less material, and this semiconductor is significantly better in high heat environments, whereas silicon panels get less efficient when they heat up. They focus exclusively on grid scale solar projects and contracts, so their revenues are more predictable and less sensitive to interest rates than rooftop solar. Current government policy can't change the fact that utility scale solar is by far the cheapest and fastest way to add electricity to the grid in a time when fossil fuels are set to become more expensive due to both increased exports and domestic demand, and nuclear projects, even SMRs take significantly longer and cost significantly more. Lastly, I think $CLS is still fairly valued as a growth play. They are an advanced electronics manufacturer and large manufacturer of high speed network switches that are used in hyperscaler datacenters. Every server rack, and at multiple connections upstream has a switch, and networking is very important for ML workloads because large amounts of data needs to be sent between different servers quite quickly. They are the market leader in 800G switches which is the cutting edge right now. And while this is a good portion of their business, they also do healthcare technology,rack integration, general electronics design and offer services to better automate factories, which is important if we are going to bring manufacturing back. There are dozens of cloud companies, most of whom are unlikely to last til 2030, but Celestica will last, and every cloud company uses something made by them. They even make components and contracted out design and manufacturing for companies like Juniper and Dell. They beat last quarter earnings expectations by 50%, have a 30% ROE, and are expected to grow their EPS by 28% each year over the next five years. It's my largest holding by far.

point_of_you

Gonna buy $PEG tomorrow at open

Vegetable-Bug-9779

For different type of companies you need to use different t valuation metrics. For a growing company P/S and PEG ratios are more effective than P/E. For mature companies you can use P/E or Free cashflow yield. For banks you can use p/B etc. In general, it is good to look into fundamentals before deciding which metric to use. For example, AMZN, GOOG and Msft are doing significant Capex investment. Operating cashflow seems more relevant than Free cashflow.

yangastas_paradise

I do agree it's expensive, but for companies growing rev and EPS this quickly , traditional metrics like PE or even fwd PE isn't that helpful. If you look at PEG and PS ratios then ... Yea it's still expensive 😂

TollTroll

the PEG ratio is less than 1 now, so it might not be a bad time to open a position you'd think ozempic would lead to more people wanting to show off their boney asses with their overpriced yoga pants

Jerikolol

Micron finally cured cancer. Gz my Macaronnis <3. Week1 = let calls expire, Week2 = pump it like its worth. MU 200$ EOY. PEG\* <1, PE\* <10, and infinite growth/EPS for 2026, 2027, 2028. I LOVE MONEY. \* (i didnt actually check)

FarrisAT

PEG is also fine Best predictor of future returns is FWD PEG.

wisesheets

Reddit (RDDT) stock has recently dropped from its mid-September highs near $282 down to around $227, declining over 6% in just one week, yet there is no clear, company-specific news directly explaining the dip. This movement appears primarily to be a **pullback after a sharp rally**, as the stock had surged nearly 263% over the past year and reached an all-time high only weeks ago. **Key Context:** - **Absence of Major News:** There have been no notable press releases, regulatory filings, or material changes in Reddit’s operations in the last week, nor any widely reported negative catalysts. This suggests the price action is market-driven, rather than due to fundamental company developments. - **Low Trading Volume:** On September 30, volume dropped significantly—down 92% compared to the average session. Lower volume can amplify price swings, particularly after a rapid run-up. - **Profit-Taking & Volatility:** Given the stock’s extremely rapid appreciation, many investors may be taking profits, causing a retreat from “expensive” levels, especially as RDDT’s valuation remains at a premium (P/E over 200, PEG ratio near 3.8, and beta >2, indicating high risk/volatility). **Analyst Sentiment:** - The current **consensus target price** is around $201–$225, which suggests RDDT had moved materially above most analyst valuations before the dip. Analysts remain generally positive (“Moderate Buy”), but expectations have come down in the past week, aligning more closely with current levels. **Next Catalyst:** - **Earnings Release:** Reddit’s next earnings is scheduled for October 29, 2025. Last quarter’s results beat expectations with EPS of $0.45 vs. the $0.20 estimate, and revenue rose sharply year-over-year. Consensus for next quarter is EPS of $0.51 and revenue around $541 million. Strong results could help buoy the stock, but with valuations already high, there is risk of further volatility if growth slows or guidance disappoints. **Expectations Going Forward:** - Given the absence of negative news, the recent dip likely reflects **normal consolidation after a period of exuberance** rather than a shift in underlying fundamentals.

callsonreddit

$PEG

trickyvinny

Bought in at like 60 or 80. Rode it up to 300 while people were hyping PEG. It dropped to 200, so I'm still pumped on PEG. I buy. It drops to 175, I buy more. Still waiting for that war on cash dividend. Meanwhile the banks basically created their own pypl and then every other rinkydink app developer has some sort of financial ecosystem now.

MajesticBread9147

Nuclear takes too long to deploy when most companies are in a race to deploy things ASAP. Utility scale solar can be deployed in less time than it takes to build out the data center, and is a cheaper energy source. FSLR is my pick. Basically zero debt, 0.57 PEG, and 28% profit margin with a huge backlog and new factories coming online this year.

levon999

“PEG Ratio: The Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio is 1.72, which indicates the stock may be overvalued relative to its expected earnings growth by some metrics.”

AlGAdams

Yep, prime day with an end to account sharing and earnings Oct 30th. Going into this at -.2% YTD share price and a low PEG ratio of 1.9. Not worried.

AlGAdams

I did, bought more 220c for Apr 26 and 1.5K more shares today. I prefer PEG to PE as it accounts for growth and AMZNs is around 1.9 which is low and EV/EBITA is at 16.6 which is low.

Daily-Trader-247

PEG is more important than just PE

Flimsy_Roll6083

No, you can’t see the future or accurately predict market movements. Don’t fool yourself into thinking otherwise. You also cannot accurately pick winners and losers among start-ups. You can diversify and do your homework before investing or completely diversify and buy the whole market. Aside from that, there are people who get really lucky and you shouldn’t use their experience to inform your investment decisions. A true hedge that dilutes current earnings but gives you a boost to buy at the bottom is not a bad strategy to have ready at all times, but maybe 5-10% of the portfolio in a truly negatively correlated fund. Cash and Bonds (not high yield) are liquidity hedges, which you only need if you are within 5 years of needing to live on your investments. If you are 10-20 years from retirement, you don’t need a liquidity hedge because you just don’t sell ‘low’ for spending cash. Ride it out, the market has always come back. If it doesn’t, we’re all screwed and your relative wealth won’t change. Yes, on a P/E and CAPE basis, the market is high, but on a PEG basis it’s a little low. If you pull most out now and miss the next 35% up, where will you be relative to ‘set it and forget it’ when the market drops 40% after going up 35%? Don’t screw yourself.

Walau88

You cannot just look at PE alone to decide that S&P is over valued. In the past, PE is accurate for that purpose. But companies nowadays are growing at a much faster pace compared to the past. So PEG is a better gauge.

DiminishedProspects

What’s the PEG ratio relative to history?

Life_Personality_862

they make \*some\* money.... 15cents/share or so, adding a few cents each quarter which is in fact pretty darn good, but paying PEG at 15? come on. total meme land

SeriuoslyCasual

Do we know the E really? PEG ratio? Far more useful than PE anyway. I could go on all day.

NUSWannabeSWE

Ok real question Why is no one here buying STX (Seagate) Stock up 171% since April lows Up 40% past month PEG 0.1 EPS growth 343% P/E 33.86 Am I missing something

NUSWannabeSWE

AMD is a PEG 0.8 semiconductor with 25% revenue growth and EPS diluted growth of 100% without accounting for China sales

AlGAdams

I play over reactions to earnings. Specifically fear type reactions based on TTM PE, PEG, EV/EBITA. The past few I recall were AMAT, DELL, LULU, CAVA, AMZN. I buy after IV crush and wait for recovery sling back.

deepy420

They are trading at 0.25 to 0.6 PEG ratios. Extremely cheap. The price is appreciating rapidly because their EPS is appreciating rapidly! And that will continue. Not only that, their margins will expand because all of them use real estate as a means to create recurring revenue. You can use the moomoo app and check the Morningstar fair value rating as a third-party fair value price assessment. Many of them will have a stock split on the 28th, which will make them more affordable for retail.

brian-augustin

The numbers for this company look really bad tbh I would not gamble on this. >Index - P/E - EPS (ttm) - Insider Own - Shs Outstand - Perf Week -2.21% Market Cap 15.65M Forward P/E - EPS next Y - Insider Trans - Shs Float 10.62M Perf Month -28.49% Enterprise Value - PEG - EPS next Q - Inst Own 1.09% Short Float2.60%Perf Quarter -78.27% Income - P/S - EPS this Y - Inst Trans - Short Ratio0.12Perf Half Y - Sales - P/B - EPS next Y - ROA - Short Interest0.28MPerf YTD -84.35% Book/sh - P/C - EPS next 5Y - ROE - 52W High 24.65 -94.60% Perf Year - Cash/sh - P/FCF - EPS past 3/5Y - - ROIC - 52W Low 1.23 8.13% Perf 3Y - Dividend Est. - EV/EBITDA - Sales past 3/5Y - - Gross Margin - Volatility 5.28% 11.46% Perf 5Y - Dividend TTM - EV/Sales - EPS Y/Y TTM - Oper. Margin - ATR (14) 0.31 Perf 10Y - Dividend Ex-Date - Quick Ratio - Sales Y/Y TTM - Profit Margin - RSI (14) 34.67 Recom - Dividend Gr. 3/5Y - - Current Ratio - EPS Q/Q - SMA20 -23.60% Beta - Target Price - Payout - Debt/Eq - Sales Q/Q - SMA50 -40.08% Rel Volume 0.30 Prev Close 1.31 Employees - LT Debt/Eq - Earnings - SMA200 -55.83% Avg Volume 2.25M Price 1.33 IPO Apr 11, 2025 Option/Short No / Yes EPS/Sales Surpr. - - Trades 2,294 Volume 673,445 Change 1.53%

brian-augustin

The numbers for this company look really bad tbh I would not gamble on this. || || |Index **-** P/E **-** EPS (ttm) **-** Insider Own **-** Shs Outstand **-** Perf Week **-2.21%** Market Cap **15.65M** Forward P/E **-** EPS next Y **-** Insider Trans **-** Shs Float **10.62M** Perf Month **-28.49%** Enterprise Value **-** PEG **-** EPS next Q **-** Inst Own **1.09%** [Short Float](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**2.60%**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf Quarter **-78.27%** Income **-** P/S **-** EPS this Y **-** Inst Trans **-** [Short Ratio](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**0.12**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf Half Y **-** Sales **-** P/B **-** EPS next Y **-** ROA **-** [Short Interest](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**0.28M**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf YTD **-84.35%** Book/sh **-** P/C **-** EPS next 5Y **-** ROE **-** 52W High **24.65 -94.60%** Perf Year **-** Cash/sh **-** P/FCF **-** EPS past 3/5Y **- -** ROIC **-** 52W Low **1.23 8.13%** Perf 3Y **-** Dividend Est. **-** EV/EBITDA **-** Sales past 3/5Y **- -** Gross Margin **-** Volatility **5.28% 11.46%** Perf 5Y **-** Dividend TTM **-** EV/Sales **-** EPS Y/Y TTM **-** Oper. Margin **-** ATR (14) **0.31** Perf 10Y **-** Dividend Ex-Date **-** Quick Ratio **-** Sales Y/Y TTM **-** Profit Margin **-** RSI (14) **34.67** Recom **-** Dividend Gr. 3/5Y **- -** Current Ratio **-** EPS Q/Q **-** SMA20 **-23.60%** Beta **-** Target Price **-** Payout **-** Debt/Eq **-** Sales Q/Q **-** SMA50 **-40.08%** Rel Volume **0.30** Prev Close **1.31** Employees **-** LT Debt/Eq **-** Earnings **-** SMA200 **-55.83%** Avg Volume **2.25M** Price **1.33** IPO **Apr 11, 2025** Option/Short **No / Yes** EPS/Sales Surpr. **- -** Trades **2,294** Volume **673,445** Change **1.53%**|

brian-augustin

The numbers for this company look really bad tbh I would not gamble on this. || || |[Scroll to Statements](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&p=i1#statements)Index **-** P/E **-** EPS (ttm) **-** Insider Own **-** Shs Outstand **-** Perf Week **-2.21%** Market Cap **15.65M** Forward P/E **-** EPS next Y **-** Insider Trans **-** Shs Float **10.62M** Perf Month **-28.49%** Enterprise Value **-** PEG **-** EPS next Q **-** Inst Own **1.09%** [Short Float](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**2.60%**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf Quarter **-78.27%** Income **-** P/S **-** EPS this Y **-** Inst Trans **-** [Short Ratio](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**0.12**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf Half Y **-** Sales **-** P/B **-** EPS next Y **-** ROA **-** [Short Interest](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)[**0.28M**](https://elite.finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=RBNE&ta=1&p=d&ty=si&r=)Perf YTD **-84.35%** Book/sh **-** P/C **-** EPS next 5Y **-** ROE **-** 52W High **24.65 -94.60%** Perf Year **-** Cash/sh **-** P/FCF **-** EPS past 3/5Y **- -** ROIC **-** 52W Low **1.23 8.13%** Perf 3Y **-** Dividend Est. **-** EV/EBITDA **-** Sales past 3/5Y **- -** Gross Margin **-** Volatility **5.28% 11.46%** Perf 5Y **-** Dividend TTM **-** EV/Sales **-** EPS Y/Y TTM **-** Oper. Margin **-** ATR (14) **0.31** Perf 10Y **-** Dividend Ex-Date **-** Quick Ratio **-** Sales Y/Y TTM **-** Profit Margin **-** RSI (14) **34.67** Recom **-** Dividend Gr. 3/5Y **- -** Current Ratio **-** EPS Q/Q **-** SMA20 **-23.60%** Beta **-** Target Price **-** Payout **-** Debt/Eq **-** Sales Q/Q **-** SMA50 **-40.08%** Rel Volume **0.30** Prev Close **1.31** Employees **-** LT Debt/Eq **-** Earnings **-** SMA200 **-55.83%** Avg Volume **2.25M** Price **1.33** IPO **Apr 11, 2025** Option/Short **No / Yes** EPS/Sales Surpr. **- -** Trades **2,294** Volume **673,445** Change **1.53%**|

csr8765

Nope. AI earnings growth ahead. PEG ratio is actually relatively cheap

remote_001

It’s a fast-growing, low-cost uranium producer with strong insider ownership, improving fundamentals, and undervaluation based on PEG. The ISR model gives it a cost moat, and its U.S. focus aligns with national energy security trends. They also just got EPA approval to move forward in a project in South Dakota.

Creative-Cranberry47

net tangible is -62B. slow to zero growth & slow death of telecommunications. if you value it based on PEG, you actually get a PEG valuation of 2. forward PE- 7.016/3.44% growth =2.039 IMO its not bad. balance sheet will improve over time which has been happening, and Comcast is still a leader in many markets where ever you go. Its a fair stock, but not something where i get excited and say its going to 1000X during my lifetime. Instead look at ROOT with a forward PEG of .1. i can get excited with this knowing it could be a 1000X+ play in my lifetime.

Mrbeaver__

Add PEG, P\B, ROA and 10 year median earnings growth rate I dont recommend having the stock price trend included. You will get to attached to your purchasing price. Just look at the fundamentals and value multiples and the stock price will follow

thr0waway12324

Questions for you (not googling it because I’m trusting your DD on face value) but does chewy have any sort of membership similar to Amazon prime? If no, why not? Also what is their shipping and returns policy? How does it compare to Amazon? To me this is Amazon’s biggest advantage. Free shipping, easy returns, and a membership I already pay for so might as well make use of it. Hence huge customer lock in. How is chewy able to compete on these fronts? I imagine product pricing and even offerings are similar so I don’t imagine that being any sort of differentiator. UI is probably similar. So all the above is for the competition aspect. Now for the financials, what is the forward PE ratio? Additionally, or alternatively, what is the PEG ratio? This will hint to me if it’s at a good price relative to its “intrinsic value” (of course it is a rough guesstimation but still valuable to me).

benda_knee

i am investing for 5 years now. started with 0 investing knowledge but a lot of knowledge in the companies i invested. since starting i have read a ton of shit, listened to a ton of content and also earnings calls. i think i have thousands of hours of doing that. i can say this, knowledge is good. but you need to jump in the water. you need to feel the emotions. those emotions can be kept in check with information and study. it helps but it is not sufficient. if your stomach was not made for it in the first place, you can't stomach any type of volatility. the greatest investors of all time have different teachings, some which contradict themselves sometimes. diversification vs concentration for example. P/E vs PEG, growth vs value vs gold and so on. everybody needs to find their own thing but you can't do that without jumping in. some teachings have stuck with me during the last 5 years, that is for sure, like buy when everybody panics and sell when everybody has a fomo. DCA is king and others. it helped a lot. but a person needs to discover the intricacies of the stock market to actually understand these stuff in order to apply them. after almost 5 years of investing i am up 100+% and i also had my first 10 bagger. also it's true, first 100k is the hardest. also an unspoken thing. IF YOUR SPOUSE DOESN'T APPROVE OF YOU INVESTING A LARGE PORTION OF YOUR INCOME EVERYTHING WILL CRUMBLE !!! you need to be on the same page with her. this is a show stopper

_hiddenscout

Hey man. LMB is still a tad bit higher than I would like per say. Like the PEG is at 2.35, so it's not the worst price in the world, but if you wait, you could get a better entry on it. Still like the company long term and if you don't mind paying a bit more of a premium since you are planning on holding long term, I think the company has a lot of great tailwinds and secular growth story. Not the best in the world with TA, but the RSI is now at 31, so it's technically just a tad bit above becoming oversold. Personally, I don't sweat some price differences too much, like I could probably snag some sub like 95, that would be great, but long term wise, you are probably paying a little bit of a premium on the company. At least they are seeing growth come back, like the last two quarters of revenue growth was basically 12% and then 16.4%. Margins are pretty stable around 28% and operating margins did improve again. EPS growth is still solid and good ROIC. [https://quickfs.net/company/LMB:US](https://quickfs.net/company/LMB:US) I'm always just a fan of CLMB, one my favorite companies I own. PEG really varies between finviz and stockanalysis, my best guess is lack of analysts and just wonky financials. They made some acquisitions recently and their revenue growth exploded. Like last quarter was like 73% growth. RSI here is much higher, so could wait for a better entry, since it's a super low volume stock, it can really trade in weird ways. Like the volume today is around like 13K shares being traded. That's one of the things I love about the company, it's low volume and low float, so not really a trading thing.

GetDeepSignal

For the exact reason we have PEG, which I feel pretty useful. PEG~/<1 are the golden ones to jump on. Also, I’d follow 13-f filings and insider/institutional signals. Along with that I read quarterly reports and 10-k filings to find out the moat and its financials. Revenue growth expectations and research reports will give some more clarity as well. At the end, alternate date like social media mentions or credit transactions will give some edge as well, if you can get access to those indicators or data.