RNG

TarrifJacksonJr

GreenNoddingFrogthinkinghands.gif/RNG

Jaquing-Porneaux

I’m focusing on two sectors: (1) Clean Technology/Infrastructure (capital-intensive buildouts become more feasible); and (2) Biotech (sensitive to the funding environment). My Top Pick for Q4 2025: Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) ($2.73) - this company is the largest provider of Renewable Natural Gas for the transportation sector (heavy-duty trucks and buses). CLNE's growth depends heavily on building out new RNG production facilities (e.g., at dairy farms) and fueling stations. This is incredibly capital-intensive. Lower interest rates directly reduce the cost of financing these projects, allowing them to accelerate expansion and improve future margins. They are already executing well. They beat Q2 2025 expectations and showed strong RNG volume growth. Furthermore, they just broke ground on three new RNG dairy projects in September. Keep an eye on their Q3 earnings report (estimated Nov 5th). If they provide strong forward guidance on their expansion pipeline, citing a more favorable capital environment, the stock could re-rate significantly. The analyst consensus is a "Buy." The average Price Target is around $4.60 (representing ~68% upside), with some targets significantly higher. If the Fed continues to cut as expected, CLNE is perfectly positioned to capitalize on cheaper financing for its infrastructure pipeline. As always with microcaps, do your own DD!

XRuecian

They seem to be hands off when it comes to offline games. But anytime a live-service game is involved, i swear it always gets worse once Tencent buys the studio. Could just be coincidence but that is what i have observed. League of Legends is a good example. Less than a year after Tencent bought Riot Games, things started going downhill. Not really talking about the game design, but more about the quality of everything else. The events stopped being a free experience about making people excited to play and instead about selling event-passes and limited time cosmetics. The launcher stopped being reliable, and they implemented a Kernal-Level anti-cheat that really feels unnecessary. RNG Loot Boxes became more and more the norm, they even attempted to get rid of all the free lootboxes completely but had to backtrack after huge protests from players. Battlepasses got introduced. Everything just got worse. Before Tencent, Riot Games was really all about just making a good game and letting that fact sell itself, they didn't stoop to all these marketing gimmicks until Tencent bought them.

PointSight

This was complete RNG. Please do not lose your money getting into this nonsense.

DN_313

The amount of RNG when it comes to IPO is so frustrating. I only got 1 share each from FIG and FUBO, but I ended up with 11 shares of BLSH. Then 5 with Gemini. I’m considering switching to Webull since it seems like more people there are receiving allocations closer to what they request.

Wowmuchrya

Ah yes, the difference between 96.6 and 99 matters. JOLTS data already confirmed we're fucked. There are more unemployed people than job openings in the US rn so the fed is pretty much forced to say fuck inflation and cut. Now whether that cut is good for the market or not is a question you gota ask, because even if we get the cut companies may not hire due to RNG tariff on/off by orange clown uncertainty.

dansdansy

The biggest thing I think will be quantum encryption seeds. We already have Quantinuum which has a workable prototype for perfectly random RNG (works with MSFT and JPM), which should harden encryption against quantum decryption. Quantum decryption is the big impact quantum computing could feasibly have next 5-10 years. Other practical applications aside from cryptography seem pretty far off and may not be feasible at all outside limited scope in lab environments kept under extreme temps.

timeye13

Because unless Hawaii is planning to pivot its renewable strategy to something like linear generators run on RNG or hydrogen policy in the next 4 years (L-Gens hold one of the only ITCs for “renewable” power generation remaining after OBBB, wind and solar have been slashed), they will be hard pressed to hit their goal by 2045. HE will increase their load capacity to meet Hawaii’s growing power demand where renewables fall short.

greenpride32

I've been a high growth tech investor for over 20 years. While the 48% YoY quarterly revenue growth sounds great, it's not that impressive when the base number is well under $1b. Can't claim to be a shareholder, but I do agree with OP assessment that the risk/reward isn't that great at this point. Then again I would have said the same when the share price was half the current value. It "tanked" to what $75-ish in early April - and I still didn't think it was worth the investment. The way I look at it is I can make just as much gain if not more on other stocks, where I can sleep at night owning them. While I do agree that PLTR has a very unique platform offering, I don't see them (at least not at this point) as some one stop AI/data analytics shop for the corporate and business world. I see the landscape shifting quite a bit in this area with winners TBD, rather than PLTR as some lead innovator. Stocks such as ZM and RNG sprinted ahead during pandemic era and failed to live up to the hype. PLTR situation is of course a bit different - but you see what can happen when valuation runs far ahead of performance.

Tojo6619

SLB calls sold at 34 lucky me, more like RNG

notalwayswright

Puts on RNG

Party_Sundae_5304

RNG

Budget-Ocelots

I requested 250, and only got 2. RNG is RNG.

CotolettaAllaMilanes

You said you don't want to gamble and then say you just like these companies and that you don't know shit. You can't just RNG this and hope for the best. As others have said RKLB and ASTS are speculative and you shouldn't just blindly invest in them. If you want to invest and "forget" then you go with S&P500 and VOO.

Critical-Future-292

$FTHM way better fundamentals for a fintech RE than $OPEN, about to turn profitable even under bad market conditions for RE. Avg. analyst target price is $12 $NVX better than $WWR on the graphite play already has binding off take major customers for its synthetic graphite plant in TN. About to start full production in the their 1st plant, already prepping phase 1 of their 2nd plant in TN. Australian part makes a hedge against further dollar slide and American plants are tariff free. $GEVO 45Z credits extended in the BBB, strengthened their balance sheet by sale of low margin assets and refinancing their bonds stand to make a nice run for their high margin renewable jet fuel. Will have tailwinds from money rotation out of solar and wind and into RNG

GoodLuckCum

If you’re trading on patterns sure, pattern trading is retarded and speculative at best. The patterns show up in an RNG simulation of market buy and sell with basic market mechanics, no psychology; no absurd market maker influence. If you trade based on catalyst events like index rebalancing, or fed news; interest rate cuts, etc; or clearly succeeding companies that are proving themselves over and over (rare but happens), mergers/acquisitions, and a number of other events you’re statistically more likely to have better outcomes because you’re not just arbitrarily betting on “line probably go up because it went up yesterday”. Last week I made about 2.2k profit (I didn’t win every trade obviously) but I only had 4 day trades total (more than usual). All of my decisions were informed and put to action on events/companies I had researched thoroughly and had a reasonably high confidence in backed by press releases/filings/financials/etc. Certain of success? No way — maybe 60-70%, and over the last 3 years I’ve netted +9200 or more each year post-tax (one exception was a lucky acquisition call option and made 36k, that was lucky timing I thought I was gonna be OTM because I didn’t buy before Friday bell). Generally this isn’t a ton but I only do it on and off throughout the months — maybe doing 6-7 trades a month. I need to upload the spreadsheet but my win rate is ~63%* of the time, and that take home after tax generally beats most peoples returns from the S&P500. If you’re just treating like a slot machine and don’t understand what you’re doing / don’t have a lot of capital to work with to begin with & don’t know how to protect your downside or when to make boxed plays… your gains are going to be small (if any) and the risk:reward ratio will be low because you can’t put more capital to work. Point is: what you’re saying is a bit copium. it’s good stuff, feels nice and for the average bloke — ye you right, but it’s not reality for people who put in lots of time picking their potential winners (which is what this sub used to be like, legitimate attempts at dd and not the gamestop bag chasing retards trying to sound smart but just using chatgpt). You can make money more than lose if you’re not belligerent and unrealistic about your abilities/not speculating. Also helps if you don’t use dogshit brokers (not you in particular ofc). But who needs this information. Don’t be paper hands and hodl 🦍 *corrected from spreadsheet

GoodLuckCum

If you’re trading on patterns sure, pattern trading is retarded and speculative at best. The patterns show up in an RNG simulation of market buy and sell with basic market mechanics, no psychology; no absurd market maker influence. If you trade based on catalyst events like index rebalancing, or fed news; interest rate cuts, etc; or clearly succeeding companies that are proving themselves over and over (rare but happens), mergers/acquisitions, and a number of other events you’re statistically more likely to have better outcomes because you’re not just arbitrarily betting on “line probably go up because it went up yesterday”. Last week I made about 2.2k profit (I didn’t win every trade obviously) but I only had 4 day trades total (more than usual). All of my decisions were informed and put to action on events/companies I had researched thoroughly and had a reasonably high confidence in backed by press releases/filings/financials/etc. Certain of success? No way — maybe 60-70%, and over the last 3 years I’ve netted +9200 or more each year post-tax (one exception was a lucky acquisition call option and made 36k, that was lucky timing I thought I was gonna be OTM because I didn’t buy before Friday bell). Generally this isn’t a ton but I only do it on and off throughout the months — maybe doing 6-7 trades a month. I need to upload the spreadsheet but my win rate is ~65%* of the time, and that take home after tax generally beats most peoples returns from the S&P500. The 65% is the avg of the last 5 year(s); some years better than others. 2025 is already looking to be a better one because of the volatility due to obvious catalysts and win rate so far since March (26 day trades total) I’m at ~70% pulling some sort of gain out. It’ll probably drop as earnings come out in August and I make an “educated” but speculative move and get fucked, but there is no 100% win — you can clearly increase your odds by being a bit more diligent. If you’re just treating like a slot machine and don’t understand what you’re doing / don’t have a lot of capital to work with to begin with & don’t know how to protect your downside or when to make boxed plays… your gains are going to be small (if any) and the risk:reward ratio will be low because you can’t put more capital to work. Point is: what you’re saying is a bit copium. it’s good stuff, feels nice and for the average bloke — ye you right, but it’s not reality for people who put in lots of time picking their potential winners (which is what this sub used to be like, legitimate attempts at dd and not the gamestop bag chasing retards trying to sound smart but just using chatgpt). You can make money more than lose if you’re not belligerent and unrealistic about your abilities/not speculating. Also helps if you don’t use dogshit brokers (not you in particular ofc). But who needs this information. Don’t be paper hands and hodl 🦍 *corrected from spreadsheet

GoodLuckCum

If you’re trading on patterns sure. Those show up in an RNG simulation of market buy in sell with basic mechanics, no psychology. If you trade based on catalyst events like index rebalancing, or fed news; interest rate cuts, etc; or clearly succeeding companies that are proving themselves over and over (rare but happens), mergers/acquisitions, and a number of other events you’re statistically more likely to have better outcomes because you’re not just arbitrarily betting on “line probably go up because it went up yesterday”. Last week I made about 2.2k profit (I didn’t win every trade obviously) but I only had 4 day trades total (more than usual). All of my decisions were informed and put to action on events/companies I had researched thoroughly and had a reasonably high confidence in backed by press releases/filings/financials/etc. Certain of success? No way — maybe 60-70%, and over the last 3 years I’ve netted +9200 or more each year, which isn’t a ton but I only do it on and off throughout the months — maybe doing 6-7 trades a month. I need to upload the spreadsheet but my win rate is ~70% of the time. If you’re just treating like a slot machine and don’t understand what you’re doing / don’t have a lot of capital to work with to begin with & don’t know how to protect your downside or when to make boxed plays… your gains are going to be small (if any) and the risk:reward ratio will be low because you can’t put more capital to work. Point is: what you’re saying is a bit copium. it’s good stuff, feels nice and for the average bloke — ye you right, but it’s not reality for people who put in lots of time picking their potential winners. You can make money more than lose if you’re not belligerent and unrealistic about your abilities/not speculating. Also helps if you don’t use dogshit brokers (not you in particular ofc). But who needs this information. Don’t be paper hands and hodl 🦍

Reasonable_Roger

Regarded? Don't know what to do? SPY has a green day about 55% of the time. Just [1-100 RNG](https://numbergenerator.org/randomnumbergenerator/1-100) and if the number is 55 or below, calls. Above 55, poots. Let's be honest, it's going to yield better results than you using your brain.

HolidayReality6641

Yes, I’m very highly regarded with some OKTA and PGE that I bought today and RNG that I bought yesterday.

enc-nyc

business idea. just make a website which does just that (algorhytm purely on RNG of course), charge everyone 20.99 a months and you'll have money for FDs for the rest of your life.

AppleTree98

In this day and age I wonder how this is still not real-time and stable. How do they come up with the initial number and publish it and then two months later say, we made a mistake that over estimated by 35%. Please adjust. The following month we also over estimated by 17%. Is somebody just using a RNG and using an absolute number so no matter what the number is positive for the first report?

Baozicriollothroaway

The first put play was somewhat predictable with all the bad news from the previous day but the call was absolutely RNG. I honestly can only see these 0DTE directional plays being profitable when there are major events Happening, beyond that is a coin flip

Mean-Evidence-4056

The sad part is that we are at almost all time highs and more than half of my holdings are -70%+ down BIGC,SPCE,RNG,VMEO,LSPD 

Gom_KBull

guess i had shit RNG

davida_usa

I like a few tiny stocks with tremendous growth potential: \* CLNE: Vertically integrated producer and largest North American retailer of Renewable Natural Gas as a fuel. French oil company Total owns about 1/3 outstanding shares and Amazon has an option to purchase shares at $12 -- it's currently selling at under $2. Trucking literature is full of reports that RNG is replacing diesel as a fuel for long haul trucking. All the major truck manufacturers are just starting to sell RNG powered trucks. Long haul trucks buy $40 billion of fuel every year and CLNE is now trading at a market cap of $413 million. The House bill includes a credit that will balloon CLNE's revenue if it becomes law. \* SLDP: Makes electrolyte for solid state batteries targeted for the electric vehicle market. Investors include BMW and Ford. Also has partnership with Hyundai. Last week, BMW issued a press release stating they have built a demo to test SLDP's battery. Their executives have stated the battery's light weight and charging capabilities offer 600 miles per charge and recharging in minutes. Currently trading at market cap of $271 million. \* FLGT: Two lines of business. Their main line of business is clinical testing and diagnostics (they were the gold standard Covid test and made a boatload during the pandemic, but have now returned to breakeven on their testing business). The other business -- and here's where a home run investment is possible -- is they have proprietary technology in Phase II clinical trials which uses nanotechnology to delivery chemotherapy directly to cancer cells. With over $1 billion in assets and few liabilities, currently trades at a market cap of $618 million.

EliasFilis1


platinumarks

Algos just running on RNG at this point

Redbeard_Greenthumb

I trust RNG pulling names out of a hat more than Cramer.

sigmoia

Are you in tech? QRNG will solve the issue of lower entropy in RNG. As we keep making a shit ton of random numbers to generate UUIDs, base for cryptography that keeps your sites and logging safe, we hit the limitation of low entropy, which means our random generators aren’t so random and can be guessed. But we aren’t in a catastrophic situation here, and there are other solid solutions without going quantum. So even if this company succeeds, their growth won’t be stratospheric. Google’s been working on the same problem for years. So yeah, you invested in something without fully understanding the business prospect and the product. Value investing 101. If you don’t have the patience or expertise to learn and analyze individual companies, then indexing is your friend. Most retailers never beat the market anyway and mostly here to be the suckers Wall Street loves to make fun of.

furrypurpledinosaur

Goog ripped on good earnings but then it sold off immediately. Msft and meta moon on good earnings. Amazon and Apple drop on good earnings. It seems like this market is complete RNG, there doesn't seem to be any logic of fundamentals.

Blacxwidow

DMN looks very scary. It's pretty much RNG, 50/50 right now, right?

darkchocolate789

*Facts.* *TSLA isn’t even trading on NASDAQ — it’s in a separate server instance called* ***‘Musk Fantasy XIV.’*** *Normal stocks roll dice, TSLA just hacks the RNG table mid-fight.* *You short it? Congrats, you’re now the Fry Guy at Wendy’s, +2 agility, -1000 net worth."* 🍟🚀*Facts.*

Full-Passage4412

Size and risk management. I've been buying longer dated things a bit OTM, waiting and taking profits at certain intervals to not lose my principle amount. Lower gains, almost no risk. Things will swing back and forth. I agree though, this market does feel a lot more RNG

GideonWainright

He'll get heat on surrendering to China and do more mean talk. Mean talk-happy talk-mean talk-happy talk has pretty much been the story of this market, along with RNG tariff rates.

colbyshores

they are just using an RNG at this point

Careful_Pension_2453

The entire market is RNG now.

mrstupid1945

Tired of this RNG

TheAngryGoat

Yeah awfully presented and easily misinterpreted numbers. Still. it paints a clear picture of free-falling confidence in the near future economy, and it's only really just starting. If anything will reverse the trend of falling unemployment it's mass firing of government employees and putting businesses at risk with daily RNG tariffs.

rheactx

If only. I feel like an RNG as a pres would do better

Blacxwidow

I mean, you can make a good profit out of them, unless you went in both of them at very high price. I already did 50% profit from NWTG this week. Just choose a better a ticker, don’t expect them to have a big PUMP, that’s just literally RNG.

scoh-chan

Next tariff retaliation Mengu is going to use a RNG 

murray1337

RNG gonna RNG 😂

azuraith4

what does "non-retaliating" mean, because most of the countries he claimed had tariffs he was responding to, didn't... so this means nothing he just makes shit up no one has any logic or reason to back their decisions in response to what he says or does, because it's always random the put tariffs, on a country, that is an island, which has no buildings, no people, and no economy, only penguins. and said it was because they had tariffs on him... WTF IS HE EVEN SAYING he's actually delusional so... that "BREAKING NEWS" means nothing Singapore had their prime minister (basically a president) do a speech about all these tariffs, he said it made no sense because they have no tariffs and have a trade surplus with the US. So accordingly to TRUMPS OWN PLAN AND "MATH FORMULA" which isn't even a formula, they shouldn't have tariffs so why did he put them? because it's RNG and he doesn't know wtf is going on

Jealous-Hedgehog-734

False bottom, it's not just the reason your girlfriend wants you to take her on holiday to Brazil, it's people who've been burned at the top clinging to any bit of dubious news or tweet on the way down. You will frequently see relief rallies during a selloff. However only when the market capitulates and we get back to valuations that make sense in a business environment with RNG tariffs will we actually get market stability in my view.

stock_dude9

One thing I didn’t learn in my economics courses in college is that when a government wants to apply tariffs they use Google RNG to pick a number between 1 and 100

Tremolat

Since the market went all digital, I've been convinced each share price is frequently adjusted by a Random Number Generator (RNG). The market is little different than a casino and our financial fates are determined by the blessings of the RNGesus.

z-z

While what you are saying is true, there is no rule in the universe that says: "just because you have one dentist in your town, they have to be shitty". Dental school is demanding and just by virtue of graduating, they are probably gonna be OK. The rest is probably RNG. They probably will be greedy. But when competition is hot, the form of greed becomes malignant (this is the purpose of my original point). Instead of upping their prices, instead of doing poor work (which would cost them customers) they instead increase their number of procedures. Then the fault becomes yours, you are the culpable one. They are only trying to help you with the "necessary" procedure. Its quite the accusation and never one I would make in person. I'm not sure if private equity is a concern in Canada where I'm at, there is definitely not the possibility of interests to cross over from healthcare into dental like there is in the US. I suppose that only makes it worse if there is top down pressure for profit, which strengthens my argument.

WappieK

Can you program? Otherwise make a small program that with an integer value of for example 1000. Every step it either goes up 1 or down 1 using RNG. Try out your tight stop loss tactics (but with a small cost for every buy or sell action like in the real world). You will quickly discover that you loose money. A random movement is a random movement.

SF_Nick

4 more years of trump RNG

Foreign-Coconut3500

thats the nature of the markets. "rigged" to go up over time. however, individual companies may fall. bankruptcies are real. no matter what the size of the company. safest bet is indexes whether domestic or foreign but when it comes to 0DTE, just use RNG to figure it out

GreatRip4045

The NYSE should just do a RNG at random 24 hours a day and just be open 6 of them completely at random, in 20 minute intervals and unannounced

nanocapinvestor

GEVO's partnership with Axens for sustainable aviation fuel is actually huge - they're combining Axens' proven Jetanol tech with GEVO's process systems to make SAF that competes with regular jet fuel prices. Marine and aviation sectors are desperate for this stuff since batteries are too heavy for planes and ships. The ethanol-to-jet tech they're developing is gonna make them bank when SAF demand skyrockets. Their RNG facility is already the biggest dairy-based one in the US, and now they're adding carbon capture to the mix. Not even touching the fact they just bought Net-Zero North to boost production. Straight up this is gonna print money when SAF regulations kick in hard.

Helmsw0rd

It said "Ask again"...the power of RNG

Foreign-Coconut3500

every morning, you can use RNG to determine if you will buy calls or puts. keep it simple boys!

pkyang

Guy who invests and thinks an aggressive RNG dictates the stock price

pkyang

Guy who invests and thinks a RNG dictates the stock price lol

The_Fibonacci_Spiral

Trump is a RNG. It could be any given minute. Lolz

iikra

I will give you many counterpoints even though I am not really into BTC but more into crypto broadly. BTC deserves some criticism, but yours are just not good. History of demand for BTC Geek Money: At first, it was geek money; the intrinsic value was mainly the cost of electricity to mine it. 1/Early Exchanges: It was technically complex to mine. People who liked the idea and wanted more were willing to buy with dollars. The first exchanges were created; they were not official and were just people doing OTC. 2/Drugs: You could have some drugs on the black market in your mailbox. Good or bad, I let you judge, but it created demand—you can't deny it. I want to add that it was the main use with gambling in the first few years because authorities did not have the knowledge to track the transactions. It is absolutely not the same today, and now it is only a minor activity of crypto. 3/Gambling: You could gamble your coins, and as it was very easy to do a website with a simple RNG, competition got fierce, so the house edge got tiny. You could gamble with way better odds than traditional gambling. Bad or good, again I let you judge, but it created demand. 4/Cyprus 2013: The government restricted bank accounts, especially for international transfers. Some people found a way to convert their money into BTC, escaping the seizure. 5/Remittances: Even though not ideal back then due to the volatility of BTC (solved with stablecoins today), you could send money to the other part of the world without paying huge fees to Western Union, for example. It created demand. 6/Tokens: You can invest in a share of a company without any broker or other middlemen. The transfer of value is 100% efficient compared to the traditional system. Your company does not need to wait to become a multi-billion dollar company to have tradable shares. Tokens are forced to be equal to shares, but technically it is very easy. If it is not yet widespread, it is only due to regulation. 7/DeFi: If you think DeFi is useless, then the NYSE is useless. With DeFi, you can trade 24h/365 days anywhere in the world with minimal cost. Again, no more middlemen, just users pooling capital to provide liquidity; everything is transparent. Want to trade NVDA on Saturday? No, you can't; it's 2025, but the stock market needs to rest... You can do FX currencies at a minimal cost again. There are many other very good reasons why DeFi is important and that creates demand. 8/NFTs: Maybe the most controversial. NFT is great but has been poorly presented; putting a JPEG associated with an NFT was a bad idea. However, an NFT can be an IP for a new medical drug. People crowdfund research; the NFT is the IP of the research. The interest is that it removes a lot of friction for the funding and the liquidity of the IP. All these create demand, so the store of value is a fair point, which creates even higher demand.

Ukrpharm

AI had monetizable chatGPT as a catalyst, quantum has practically useless ultra fast RNG circuit. I believe this is like retail mania 2021, when stuff like 3d printing was mooning.

DynoJoe27

Thank you RNG for the $500 scalp!

Fauster

Unlike humans, the algos responsible for most trades don't tend to make money by not actively trading. The almost instant lurches aren't fun to watch in real time, at least when the beat and raise doesn't beat the RNG "whisper number." I tend to look at revenue growth, which I was expected to be linear sequentially, because it has been statistically linear, and this time it was above that previous high-r^2 best-fit line. I'm happy with it. Vehicle revenue growth, which they clarified was related to AI, not infotainment, was accelerating.

FreedomFighter6999

I am starting to beliee tat tis is a simulation wit te RNG slider turned oto mte max

symplton

Google announced in their last earnings call that something like 25% of the code created in quarter was AI-generated. It's an actual economic game changer, and so early to even begin to understand long-term downstream impacts. But, to use this analogy - the BTTF one - I'd strongly advise focusing on crypto, which: \-As it increases in value, is more sought after, generating more complexity in model, requires more electricity and compute cycles, for something that could be RNG'd by a lottery authority w/o a need for the proof of work, saving the cloud compute world 15-30% and we, the consumer of said services, as well. \-The intrinsic value of crypto is very seat of the pants musical chairs and not tied to anything other than investor sentiment which adds to the volatility \-It's unregulated and uncontrolled, and as we try to regulate/control it, the fallacy of the model represents itself. How does that impact the average consumer? Netflix is more expensive. Peacock. iCloud. Oh - and crypto miners? During the freeze in Texas? Had the audacity to tell the news that they'd reduce their cycles of lottery ticket gathering to help reduce power use, while some area residents had thermostats force locked at 65 F. Microsoft is looking to re-start 3 Mile Island for the sole purpose of AI compute. Apparently we the species don't learn well - even from lessons as recently as Fukushima.

unwanted_hair

RNG is ripping finally.

Muted_Ad_5314

Well there is that green act that was signed and kicks in 2030. So with GEVO finally starting to produce larger amounts of RNG and their Sustainable Aviation Fuel facilities get closer to completion/operation and patent that LG is using. It’s gonna be up there with shell,ConocoPhillips and others if it’s not bought or sold. I’m thinking the 125 shares I bought the other day at $1.50ps is worth forgetting about then remember in5yrs to see it be $7500

My_G_Alt

UCaaS industry too - ZM, FIVN, RNG, EGHT

thespeeeed

It really is all just RNG. I’m cool with that.

anthearose

wut is regard RNG? Oh. That ticker? Then I steer then to better decisions like LLY.

Ok_Entrepreneur3893

What if ur kid gets regard RNG

SF_Nick

there is no success. life is entirely a game of RNG. just be lucky we didn't die when we were at an elementary school from a shooting

Vincent_Merle

It might not, but surely there is a reason behind it. In 2021 I came across ticker $RNG, Ring Central, our company also happened to use it back then. It had been falling for 8 straight months when it got my attention and was half way through the 9th month, also red. So I said to myself, there must be an end for this, so why don't I buy a bunch of LEAPs? It should eventually bounce back, right? I bought $50 calls, I held through October or maybe November, does not matter. Looking at the chart today it is ugliest chart I have ever seen... Some things don't make any sense, but just to us. There is always a reason why this sort of things happen. It is important to keep your hand on a pulse all the time. $RNG will be my reminder for many years, I hope no other precedent will take its place in my memory closet, lol.

Ghostpants101

One of the most interesting documentaries was about wall street and whether all the successful people within it are actually just the probable outcome of the masses who didn't. (think the doc was 2000s sometime but from the 90s) It touched on the introduction of all those trading pads they then started to integrate, and all the older gens basically put it down to guts and an almost knowing. Which I found super interesting, as in reality even if you just had a competition of tossing a coin forever, eventually you will always thin the crowd; and more importantly there will always be that outlier. I had great fun picking stocks, but if someone doing it 9/5 can't do better, why would I somehow magically be better? RNG. And I have never liked relying on that. Cathie Woods was a great example, her whole thing has been fascinating to watch.

Gold-Island-4558

So these stock prices are just RNG right?

Riverdragon32

The reactions to BMBL, UPWK, and FSLY are crazy over reactions IMO. I'll probably buy all 3 tomorrow. It's funny when people talk about a tech/AI bubble when small/mid cap tech companies are practically in deep value territory. I also own RNG and TDOC. My watchlist of possible buys also has ZI and TWLO.

Ordinary-Broccoli-41

I'm pretty sure that federal inflation indicators just use RNG. Rent quintuples month over month? Ramen $500/brick? That's a 2.1% inflation, just barely over target, stocks can be happy

SeliciousSedicious

So futures is when you can actually see for sure what will happen tomorrow and can trade based on it. It’s like a Time Machine for the market and is an ez money cheat code. Not everyone can see it and it only gets RNG’ed to a select few periodically as a gift.  If you see it ALWAYS take advantage cause it’s like a free money drop off from the MM’s.

John_Bot

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/s/BMfeq19RNG It's not me 🙃

KiertheGuard

Timing the bottom on this is pure RNG... especially since you are buying calls

Fun_Reporter9086

It doesn't happen that often but unreal RNG.

TheDevilintheDark

I loved that game at first but the RNG drove me nuts. I quit because of that fucking owlbear cub haha.

baz8771

He thinks it’s RNG lel

POPnotSODA_

You just have to RNG into reading it on the right day for the 1/20 right pick lol.

dabay7788

Sorry man, I think we all really did think they'd print, I mean they even did well on earnings, wasnt enough for RNG gods I guess

Ratherbeeatingpizza

I was heavy in tech stocks and hung on way too long. Most of those stocks came back, but I had to cut my losses in some like RNG, UPST, TDOC. Also, I held the bag too long in some Covid plays like MRNA, PFE and BNTX. I underestimated the impact of rates in the market and learned the painful lesson that “buying the dip” doesn’t save you when 8 out of 10 sectors sell off pretty much every day for a year lol I did pivot halfway through the year to oil stocks and made some of it back, but the damage was done. I’m back now to where I was 2 1/2 years ago. I cope by reminding myself that before 2022 I was making about 30% on these investments. The bigger they are the harder they fall :) And I look at it as I got an Ivy League education in investing for about the cost of an Ivy League education lol.

Chad__Tyrone

This is a casino 🎰. That random number generator (RNG).. never know which stock you're going to pick each week 

SpiteCompetitive7452

Open up a RNG and generate a number 1-5 (mon-fri) and another number 1-2 (bear, bull), then take that position on 0dte. A 3,2 would be Wednesday bull and 5,1 would be Friday bear. Easy!

Random_Name532890

You can use my comment as input for your RNG.

ohkioh

Started working for RingCentral (RNG) when the stock was $17 a share. Was getting a shit ton of RSU’s every year and would always sell them as soon as they vested. COVID came and the stock shot up to $450. Bought an AMG that quarter but the amount of stocks I farted away prior to that would have been astronomical had I held everything.

TheOnlyLamb

are you joking? why would it be a simple bipolar answer of “doesn’t make sense”. Of course it makes sense, NFLX was literally priced to have an earnings that would cure cancer, and they didnt do that, instead they crushed but decided to not disclose sub count in the future etc which made the stock which fucking priced up 100 dollars pre pump alone go down 50 dollars which is REASONABLE. TSLA is also priced to the extreme but in an opposite way, people also invest in elon not tesla, and fsd does have potential, they have best margins in the industry, they have data, they have ai, etc ,and tsla is a meme stock anyways. Ur argument of “earnings and share price having no correlation” is just wrong. Of course there can be manipulation, but please don’t default to that argument and stop convincing yourself that not seeing a certain logic means its done through RNG sources.

Ichweisenichtdeutsch

is this after you close and re-open the app? or when you restart the 'shuffle' with the app open. I wonder if they re-seed the RNG with the same seed upon first opening the app

FaZaCon

Now I understand why these Matadors are always so thin. Need to keep that target as small as possible. Too bad this bulls' RNG game was dead center.

PapaRL

My initial reaction to it was, “wow this is regarded, you think all of the big players don’t already know this?” But then I saw the comments and every single comment said exactly that. And almost every time I read a post that I thought was idiotic, and every comment was calling OP an idiot, the dude totally called it and was right. Meanwhile, every single time someone makes a DD post that sounds probable, every person in the comments agrees and says op is a genius, stock does absolutely nothing. I’ve started to inverse comments/sentiment when it’s widespread and it’s worked out really well. Could be 100% luck and/or RNG but every single time I make a play that everyone agrees is easy money, I lose money. Even DJT, when the comments started saying “oh premium is too expensive. It’s too late. Everyone missed the boat.” I hopped in and got a 5 bagger.

Humungusminimaglight

I had completely missed this: “The Delta RNG project will immediately contribute incremental cash flow and profitability to Village Farms.” Noice. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/village-farms-international-announces-start-110000000.html

ss99ww

But almost no one has more than 1 device using this website. The numbers are just made up, lets face it. Try creating a new sub without telling anyone and watch the number of visitors :). It's just an RNG

Mr_Snow___

Can automod RNG from a pool of responses?

Jeff__Skilling

Both tickers have acquired the leaders in two separate spaces in the last 12 months (CVX + REGI (RNG) and XOM + DEN (CCS/CCUS)).....having a hard time seeing how traditional energy companies - using assets already in place / capex dollars already spent - are going to be beat out by less mature clean energy pureplays, especially when you consider items like sensitivity to interest rates, having a built in / natural hedge against illiquid and volatile clean energy commodity markets (go look at how LCFS and RIN prices have been trending of the last 24ish months.....), and attracting outside money that would otherwise pass due to technology risk that's embedded into most of these clean energy pureplay share prices that XOM / CVX / whomever can say "we're able to take risks on emerging energy industries and technology since our near term cash flow and leverage profile is supported by our traditional energy business" Don't believe me? Just look at how the share price of, say, VLO or OXY has moved over the LTM vs a clean energy pureplay they'd compete with (let's use VTNR as a comp for VLO in the renewable fuels space and ACC-NO as a comp for OXY in the carbon capture space) and let us know what you find...

Jeff__Skilling

> Oil companies and oil stocks are for oil profits. Leave the renewable energy to the smaller companies to sort out and prove This is hilariously misguided and completely wrong Why wouldn't current energy companies - most of which are leaders in the clean energy space, regardless of which subvertical you pick between CCS / CCUS, H2, RD / SAF, RNG. Go to EIA and look to see who **actually** has up-and-running renewable diesel facilities....or Tier IV pore space permits already secured from the federal government....or CO2 / NH3 pipelines already operating under the ground..... I'm sure you'll do none of that independent research, since it would appear you're more concerned with punishing Big Oil than...you know....actually giving a shit about taking steps to reduce carbon emissions / remove carbon from the atmosphere

Jeff__Skilling

A big piece of those returns to WM are from their renewable fuels arm (RNG, RD), of which RIN and LCFS curves were sky-fucking-high during COVID......but they're currently in the shitter, with LCFS trading sub-$100 and D6 RINs trading sub-$0.50.....

Tech_Fox

I understand your point and it’s a good one. But I do know at least enough to know better than to expect that. Personally I see it as a slightly smarter way to gamble and in my opinion more fun since you are actually involved in your decisions and plays rather than straight up RNG. I can’t be sitting here tossing several bands at premium costs like a lot of you but a dart toss with a 20 here or a 50 there on some insanely low cost calls or puts would be pretty fun to lose and learn from, maybe even get lucky a time or two who knows. It just seems like you could research this shit for years and still not fully grasp how it works and y’all are leaps and bounds above my IQ. Either way, I still see your point as a warning and I appreciate it.