SMR

roke34442

I made profit on SMR calls this morning even though I was basically trading blind because IBKR sucks.

persua

Scam companies like SMR, OKLO, RGTI are all pumping with big risk on move

adamkru

Nukes up. BE, SMR, OKLO

z3r0demize

What's happening to SMR? Why the pump?

FrankelloHello

Everybody get in here and get some SMR before she pops back to $33

Moist_Discussion6743

I mean I have 60 SMR stocks bought with 12.70$ average, if the stock crashes to 8 like it did earlier this year I have 650$ cash to average down. Then uninstall my app and check on it at the end of the year.

3boobsarenice

I am think SMR reactors

Numerous_Heart_7837

Took profits on these SMR plays long ago and went into geologic subsurface hydrogen exploration. It’s working out well.

HelluvaRun

The $SMR bags are getting HEAVY

stockstomars

If you’re already up +123%, the first thing I’d ask is: why risk giving that back trying to repeat it? Most of the names you listed (ONDS, HUMA, SMR, HIVE, WWR) are basically event-driven plays. They move hard… but only if something specific happens. Otherwise they just bleed slowly. CSU is the only one there that’s more of an actual long-term compounder. The rest are closer to trades than investments. If I had 10k in this market, I wouldn’t go all-in on a single penny/small cap again, especially after a big run. I’d probably: • keep a chunk aside (dry powder) • pick 1–2 high conviction setups (not just “popular tickers”) • and accept that most of these won’t 2–3x The biggest mistake I made in this space was thinking: “I did it once, I can do it again quickly.” Reality is most gains here come from timing + luck + catalyst lining up. Lately I’ve been trying to be more selective and sanity-check entries instead of jumping on whatever is trending. Even using simple tools that give a second opinion (I tried Montbon recently) helped me avoid a few obvious hype trades. Doesn’t mean you’ll catch the next runner… but you’ll probably avoid the -70% ones.

FrankelloHello

SMR going back to 25-30 sooner or later (please god)

Serenaded

NLR, URNM are the safest (ETFs). OKLO, LEU, NNE, SMR , NVTS, LTBR will have higher payoffs if nuclear kicks off (I'm personally in)

FrankelloHello

SMR

FrankelloHello

SMR at $44

zbern

Not sure if by Don you mean the Department of the Navy or the president, but either way, it's a massive indicator of the push to onshore critical infrastructure. BWXT is positioning to bring nuclear enrichment domestically instead of relying on aging European site. They are wanting to make themselves as an indispensable B2B bottleneck on top of providing fuel to the Navy. This also plays perfectly into their growing nuclear medicine division, while their SMR pipeline positions them as an alternative energy source for the upcoming utility grid and data center build-outs.

stockstomars

I’d be careful with that list honestly — most of those are **high-risk, narrative-driven plays**, not really “1–2 year safe bets”. CSU is the only one there that’s more of a proven business. It’s basically a serial acquirer of niche software companies with strong recurring revenue, which is why it’s been such a consistent compounder over time. The others (ONDS, HUMA, SMR, HIVE, WWR…) are more in the category of: * early stage * dependent on catalysts * very sensitive to sentiment Not bad necessarily, but you’re not really “investing”… you’re making bets. If your goal is 1–2 years, I’d actually think more in terms of **setup + catalyst** rather than just picking names. Even on Reddit you’ll see people mentioning that some of these only move if a specific event hits (contracts, approvals, funding, etc.). Personally, if I had 10k: * I wouldn’t put it all in one of these * I’d maybe pick 1 higher-risk play (like SMR or ONDS) * and balance it with something that’s already generating real cash flow What I’ve learned the hard way is that it’s easy to get caught in stories with these stocks — “future of nuclear”, “next-gen drones”, etc. — but execution is everything. Lately I’ve been trying to sanity-check these kinds of picks using tools that give a second opinion instead of just going with the narrative. I tried Montbon — it basically aggregates multiple analyses into a single score. Not something I rely on blindly, but it helped me avoid a couple of entries where I was clearly just chasing hype. If you’re rotating after +123%, the real question isn’t “what stock now?” — it’s: **how much risk are you willing to take to repeat that performance?** Because these names can just as easily cut that in half.

squirtloaf

This is why I am long holding SMR, even though it's been getting pummeled. https://preview.redd.it/41bi61qkomtg1.jpeg?width=681&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0442e213dd62f1a4eb2fd78e64b21eef9b049827

wienerschnitzle

Actually nuclear engineer here SMR

platoface541

Yeah im down 30% on SMR thanks for the tip

CommonSensei-_

SMR, oklo, will be big winners in the future

Culass31

C'est une sélection audacieuse pour 2026. Tes thèses sont très axées sur le "récit" (storytelling) et les catalyseurs industriels. Pour équilibrer ta confiance, j'ai passé tes choix au crible de mes analyses quantitatives **ValorysTrader**. Voici un retour sans détour, confrontant tes arguments aux chiffres froids du marché en ce début avril 2026. **1. Amaroq Minerals ($AMRQ)** * **Ta thèse :** Transition réussie vers la production, catalyseur Phase 2 au T2 2026. * **Mon avis :** L'outil confirme le virage stratégique et l'optimisme des analystes pour 2026 (+96% de revenus prévus). Techniquement, le titre montre des signes de **survente (RSI 30,62)**, ce qui appuie ton point d'entrée. * **Le bémol :** C'est un dossier **hautement spéculatif**. Les fondamentaux actuels sont encore dans le rouge vif avec une marge nette de **-127,83 %** et des flux de trésorerie négatifs. La "machine à cash" est une projection, pas encore une réalité comptable. **2. Ferrari ($RACE)** * **Ta thèse :** "Hermès de l'automobile", pouvoir de prix imbattable, immunisée contre les taux. * **Mona avis :** C'est le seul **"Quality Compounder" exceptionnel** de ta liste. Les scores de qualité sont au plafond (**97/100**) avec un ROE stratosphérique de **43,22 %**. * **L'opportunité :** Tu as raison de ne pas regarder que le P/E. L'action est actuellement proche de son plus bas sur 52 semaines avec un **RSI de 28,47**. Ce repli technique est une opportunité rare pour une boîte de cette trempe. **3. Aston Martin ($AML)** * **Ta thèse :** Pari de redressement (turnaround), livraison de la Valhalla, valorisation plancher. +1 * **Mon avis :** C'est pile ou face. Si l'aspect spéculatif est là, la santé financière est critique. L'**Altman Z-Score est à 1,5**, ce qui indique une zone de détresse financière. * **Le risque :** Avec des capitaux propres négatifs et une dette élevée, le marché attend plus que des promesses de supercars. L'IA reste **neutre (40/100)** en attendant des preuves de stabilisation du bilan. **4. Fluor ($FLR)** * **Ta thèse :** Contrats dérisqués, acteur du nucléaire/SMR et des centres de données. * **Mon avis :** Le carnet de commandes est solide ($15,5 Md de revenus), mais la rentabilité GAAP peine à suivre (marge nette de **-0,33 %**). * **Le signal :** La situation de trésorerie est saine ($3,77 Md), ce qui valide ta thèse sur le rachat d'actions. C'est un dossier pour les investisseurs "Value" patients, mais attention à l'**incertitude technique à court terme**. **5. L3Harris ($LHX)** * **Ta thèse :** Défense technologique, scission d'actifs pour libérer de la valeur. * **Mon avis :** C'est une valeur mature et fiable (25 ans de hausse du dividende). Cependant, l'outil suggère que tu paies peut-être trop cher aujourd'hui : le **P/E de 41,54** est élevé par rapport aux standards historiques. * **Le conseil IA :** Le momentum s'essouffle avec un **signal de vente MACD**. L'IA recommande d'attendre un repli vers la zone des **310$ - 340$** pour optimiser le ratio risque/rendement. **6. Capital One ($COF)** * **Ta thèse :** Acquisition de Discover, synergies massives, sous-évaluation. * **Mon avis :** Gros potentiel de valeur. Si l'on normalise les bénéfices (en ignorant le creux cyclique actuel), l'action est **fortement sous-évaluée**. * **La solidité :** Contrairement à beaucoup de banques, COF affiche un ratio **Dette/Equity très bas (0,44)**. Malgré un momentum technique baissier, c'est un excellent candidat "Value" pour 2026. **7. NextEra Energy ($NEE)** * **Ta thèse :** Combo gagnant Utility + IA/Data Centers, 10 % de croissance du dividende. * **Mon avis :** Thèse validée par les chiffres. C'est une entreprise de haute qualité avec un **sentiment Bullish (75/100)**. * **La force technique :** C'est l'un des rares titres de ta liste avec un **momentum haussier solide** (prix au-dessus de la SMA 200). Attention toutefois à la sensibilité aux taux d'intérêt vu l'endettement inhérent au secteur. Tes convictions sur **Ferrari** et **NextEra** sont solidement épaulées par la data. Sur **Amaroq** et **Aston Martin**, tu es en plein territoire spéculatif : le timing technique sera tout aussi crucial que la livraison de tes catalyseurs. Si tu veux confronter tes prochaines thèses à ces scores factoriels, tu peux générer **3 analyses gratuitement**. J'en offre **7 supplémentaires** à ceux qui veulent suivre leurs positions de près en laissant leur mail : [**valorystrader.vercel.app**](http://valorystrader.vercel.app)

opalandolive

It wasn't quite life changing, but I bought 10k of $SMR @ 3.50, and managed to sell 50k worth when it was high. Still have 700 shares, in case it runs up again.

Garlamange

Wow they have come back to reality. Same with SMR. Time to keep an eye on them

toocreative

$SMR

FrankelloHello

SMR

lewdacris916

Not me lol, I blew up my robinhood account by going all in on a bio stock a few years ago. Safest bet right now is nuclear UEC, DNN, ASPI, NLR AND SMR

Upset-Motor-2602

OKLO and SMR are down more than 70% from their 52-week highs. Incredible.

winedogsafari

Billions spent and committed to CapEx without planning for the potential of POTUS black swan that could drive oil to $200 a barrel and natural gas prices up accordingly. SMR may still be a decade away and LMR take a decade to build. The costs to run these data centers just increased exponentially. That’s what happened.

brohebus

I'm not against nuclear. It's just long, slow, and expensive to add generating capacity. So a new nuclear plant is great if you need 3-4GW in 10-15 years (last plant expansion started in 2013 and half came online in 2023) and can wade through all the regulatory approvals required. If SMR's can be licensed and deployed at scale quickly, bring it, but I think realistically it's still more theory than commercial products. Currently solar + battery is the cheapest option and easy to deploy in a distributed manner (closer to where it's needed) but it does lack the density of other types of generation.

Different_Being368

SMR :kek:

Icy-Sheepherder-7595

Pump and dump garbage. Too many regulatory hurdles in the places that matter. Exactly 2 SMR's exist currently in the entire world that are operational, in Russia and China. Any other new plans for nuclear power in somewhere like the U.S. would take 15 years to build and that is assuming the regulations are loosened immediately.

CakesRacer522

If you have a 5+ year time horizon, the concept of SMRs makes sense. For the next 5+ years, the stocks will double, halve, jump back up, crater etc on macro sentiment or non-news. Binary outcomes many years into the distance are hard to underwrite, especially “first of a kind” highly complicated technology. It’s somewhat helpful that Oklo and NNE are both looking for potential revenue streams (Atomic Alchemy acquisition, HALEU transportation, consulting) but those are still not yet producing and still very small relative to the potential SMR TAM. I have small positions in those two as part of what I consider as my sidepocket portfolio but am treating them as small 3-5yr bets that I wouldn’t be too surprised if they didn’t pan out. They could even build something that “works” and there are so many unknowns that could preclude them from being commercially successful.

MrCipollino

*The "always-on" problem is real and underpriced by most retail investors. One thing worth adding: the transmission infrastructure bottleneck is just as critical as generation. You can build a nuclear SMR next to a data center but getting grid interconnection approval in the US takes 5-7 years on average. That's why behind-the-meter deals with Microsoft/Meta are so strategically valuable — they bypass the queue entirely. The gas midstream re-rating makes sense too but watch for the LNG export capacity constraint hitting domestic supply pricing in 2027-2028 as more terminals come online. Nuclear is the cleanest long thesis here if you have a 5+ year horizon and can stomach the regulatory tail risk.*

AudiRick_

My SMR position is down 35%💀

MajesticBread9147

There are like half a dozen companies claiming to be making SMRs. The issue is that there is so much competition. There's the issue of all the other startups, and I don't trust myself to be smart enough to understand literal nuclear physics enough to figure out who has the better technology, especially with none of them profitable. Westinghouse is backed by Brookfield, but every other SMR manufacturer to my knowledge is undiversified. There's also the issue of competition from other power sources, and the availability of fuel. Solar, wind and storage have each consistently gotten cheaper over time. Even Texas, famously protectionary of their O&G industry is building out massive amounts of renewables. We haven't seen this with nuclear. I'm not saying that it will never happen, but it relies on a lot of assumptions. And renewables in America are able to be built faster than even China is able to build nuclear reactors, which means that investors in the power plants themselves see slower ROI for nuclear. People say that the biggest hurdle for nuclear is people scared of radiation, when in reality it's cost and speed.

SlfImpr

I bought some $OKLO and $SMR. They are going to take off big within next 6-9 months because they provide electricity at location! Follow their X accounts for the progress they are making. As yesterday's news shows, our grid doesn't have capacity for traditional power plants: >[https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/ceraweek-constellation-exec-says-grid-operator-told-company-three-mile-island-2026-03-26/](https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/ceraweek-constellation-exec-says-grid-operator-told-company-three-mile-island-2026-03-26/) **Reuters Exclusive: Constellation exec says grid operator told company Three Mile Island can't connect until 2031** March 26, 2026 U.S. grid operator PJM has told Constellation Energy that the former Three Mile ‌Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania likely will not be able to connect to the grid until 2031, four years later than planned. The company will be ready to produce electricity from the plant by its earlier goal (2027), and it is speaking with grid operator PJM Interconnection to reduce the timeline (2031).

FrankelloHello

My typical $777 DCA into SCHD. Roth will be maxed in a couple weeks then I’ll start a VOO / GOOGL / SMR every other week DCA for the rest of the year

Readonly00

Which of these is the bigger loser - SMR or C3.ai ?

dickcheese445

SMR and anything quantum I’m so disgusted

FrankelloHello

I think we can all agree SMR is going to be 100 by the end of the year.

West_Lavishness6689

SMR is just beginning and they plan to get back into narrowbody plane engines market which would be massive

Buddah_Chillz420

$RR only has a P/E of 16 now, why sell? Seems like SMR play is obvious. I also bought a bunch during covid when it was around $1

Dudebobski

$IMSR $IMSRW vs $NUCL $NUCLW — been digging into this trying to understand the discrepancy. IMSR: commons ~$6.22, warrants ~$3.02 NUCL: commons ~$6.77, warrants ~$1.50 Same-ish commons, but warrants priced very differently. From what I can tell, warrants price time + volatility + narrative + structure — not just the stock. IMSRW = pricing near-term upside / hype (SMR, AI-energy demand) NUCLW = pricing longer timeline + execution risk (mining, capex) Feels like probability is a major factor… IMSR = “this could move” NUCL = “prove it first”

FlerD-n-D

SMR bet probably. Bitch got lucky

Nghtmare-Moon

oil expensive? better get in on that NUCLEAR baby ($SMR / $OKLO!)

LongevitySpinach

Yep, mostly agree. The valuations for Mag 7 are historically a bit on the low side right now, but the market won't believe until they see ROIC on for all that capex. Agree with the multi-agent architectures. Apple is sold out on MacMinis for running OpenClaw. I'm not entirely sold that SMR's are going to result in the cost savings needed to keep up with solar, wind & batteries, which are already cheaper and scaling exponentially. A little visualization I created with Gemini: [https://gemini.google.com/share/35c9a2efc70c](https://gemini.google.com/share/35c9a2efc70c)

spacetreefrog

I agree. Im deep on nuclear. Takening a beating recently, but still way up since i started in 2024. UEC, URA, SMR, UUUU, LTBR.

nickman23

I am not going to invest in the SMR companies because there is already a lot of competition. The demand will come from the need for supply of uranium - “yellow cake”. I would focus all your attention on the active producers.

2015camaro2ss

OP what are your thoughts on $SMR?

KingJulianThe13th

70 million revenue and losing money with a 35 billion market cap, anything can go up in the short term. SMR was at 50 and is now 10, I’ll stick to company’s that make money

CommonSensei-_

DCA slowly with under valued stocks that I already have a position in. ( mostly) Tsco, UPS, AMT, Some tech stocks that are speculative. Oklo, SMR, circ, Mara, And sitting on a larger pile of cash to buy a crash if it happens ( I’d buy in JEPI , SPYI, or a total us market index fund)

Rock_or_Rol

It’s hard to say. Macro winds are super super shifty right now it seems Longer term, I’m against the grain on semiconductors and data centers. We may have just hit the top. The only thing that will rejuvenate LLMs from the current plateau is they can complete the self training loop or reach novel logic imo. Otherwise, they’re about as smart as they’re going to get for a while.. that is, it’ll take long enough for money to exit. Other bearish winds, we’re seeing energy costs spike and this might just be the beginning. On top of that, there are new models like Deepseek v4 that supposedly cost like 2% of what openAI does to train. We also might be going directly into a recession… I think mag7 will be more and more rewarded for words like “efficiency,” and cutting many of their data center projects There’s also a pretty sizable saturation with LLMs. Idk, I think mag7 are headed down too (I do like that AMZN is pivoting to a more general manufacturing direction by taking advantage of automation/robotics.. something desperately needed in the US). Amazon’s pivot also signals to me that LLMs *might* have hit a ceiling. HPE, dell etc for data centers. They had a nice pump after SMCI dumped I am cautiously bullish on SMRs though. During 🥭 state of the union, I was surprised and impressed he said data center developers/operators will have to produce their own energy… then I remembered what sort of guy he is. He’s either full of shit and that will never happen OR it’s a vaguely corrupt scheme and we’ll start subsidizing SMR development. I think there’s a very very good chance for the latter considering how many mag7 companies have their hands in SMR companies

ResponsibleOpinion95

Good for you. Lots of SMR stock news this week. X-Energy is going to IPO working on a deal with Talen for PJM grid region. I started a sub for all the SMR companies if you're interested r/SMRs

Easy_Winter2911

SMR

Quiet_Foundation6218

These alt names ENPH SEDG..all good today off crude.. I am trying SMR OKLO IMSR and next ones to move

Legitimate-Pickle752

Assuming everyone agrees this fund is squarely in the very high risk / reward bucket, real question for the skeptics: Do you consider the likes of MSTR, COIN, DDOG,PLTR, SMR... to be safer, less speculative bets more appropriate for retail?

Nghtmare-Moon

I hear OKLO and SMR gonna be green bigly starting tomorrow

DegenBagholder_

!banbet SMR 30 30d (i'll do the same bet)

FrankelloHello

So is SMR a scam or am I gonna make money some day?

OccasionalXerophile

SMR companies like Rolls Royce will do well from this. Also Ceres, with their fuel cell technology, will be providing the power for these data centers.

guccicupcake69

In SMR, but nuclear energy stocks in general - energy consumption/demand is going up a lot in the us, it’s going to be nuclear power to fill that demand imo

Not-a-Cat_69

imo - SMR is an easy 10x in 2-3 years. buy the fucking dip! AI needs nuclear energy. this one is on the fast track with NRC approval already on their modular reactor designs. Nuclear is the future of energy. SMR's are the future of nuclear.

TheLegendOfSteven

You don’t understand what that means lol More money expended with an increasing cash reserve = more research, more funding, etc = more prospective hyperscalar investors and big tech investors If cash supply slows and they begin expending cash at a substantially slower rate, that would mean they are expending less on SMR research which gives less approval for near term reactor capacity

Dudebobski

Regarding Eagle Nuclear (NUCL & NUCLW) Anyone noticing the slow bleed in commons + warrants post-uplist? Not a dump… just steady weakness. Feels like market wants execution, not story. This is pretty binary IMO: -Long timelines = bleed continues -Govt support / acceleration = this rips Macro is there (U.S. needs domestic uranium badly), but this trade hinges on speed. Also interesting (purely anecdotal/public): Spring Valley guys (Sorrells/Kaplan) (also took $SMR public) were liking Eagle posts pre-close… stopped after ticker change. Now seem focused on $SVAC / next deal. Maybe nothing, but SPAC breadcrumbs matter. Gut: comes down to whether the Eagle Nuclear CEO can actually pull forward timelines. Yes = big upside No = slow bleed Thoughts?

Cool_Cartographer_39

Just scattershot into OKLO, SMR, RYCEY, GEV...

The_Albertino

There was also news today that their subsidiary received approval to handle radioactive material but that they’re still waiting for approval for production of the 2028 SMR. Idk

MooseyGoosey69

their SMR project got approved

Vegetable_Push6542

I think we really are in a bear market. My logic is that fraudulent stocks like Quantum (QBTS RGTI etc) and Nuclear (SMR OKLO) are finally selling off nonstop. Market has lost its appetite for a lot of pump and dumps (although I do believe CRCL will dump hard at some point since it's literally just a bank wrapped in "blockchain").

cultoftheclave

it will take SMR down with it, as physically impossible as it seems. Probably kneecap MVST again for good measure too.

hallett21

Remember when SMR was like $50 lol

Afraid_Contest_6769

And SMR. At a technical standpoint, these two names are undeniable. Some of the best charts I’ve ever seen.

Vegetable_Push6542

SMR and OKLO are going to 0 by 2030 if not sooner

C130J_Darkstar

This is an uninformed take, the fact is that unlike $SMR, $OKLO has: - actual demand (18GW) including META - first mover (2027) criticality by 7/4 - a massive balance sheet ($2.5B) - proven gen-IV SFR tech (EBR-II) - 6 DOE projects (3 RPP, 3 Fuel) - a hyper scalable model (sell power) - project financing / no further dilution - multiple revenue verticals - vertical integration through recycling - tier 1 partners w/ Kiewet & Siemens - deep ties to DoD and current admin - leadership team of nuclear MIT grads

Hungry-Brain-3287

The fact that SMR (who has designs approved) is trading at $11 and Oklo (not approved designs) is trading at $60 is crazy. IMSR, who is probably going to be both of them, trades at $6. None of it makes sense.

WormsEatShit

I’m long term on pulsar, a bit more info for you, we all know about the race for SMR nuclear reactors to come into cycle, but how many of you know that Helium 3 fused with Deuterium is a far cleaner alternative (no nuclear waste to deal with). One company “Helion” has already signed up with Microsoft to be producing 50MW of electricity to grid by 2028 by using a H3-Deuterium fusion reactor.

LabyrinthLayers

As an SMR baggie tired of being beat down- OKLO, I’m begging you for a good report FLY & BABA calls for the love of the game

creekdoggy

The fact that they’re probably the best set up to win with SMR’s compared to startups like SMR, NNE, and OKLO, AND have the diversification, makes it feel like a safe dip buy rn

Due_Contact_8271

SMR

Sanuli60

I’ve 125 shares of SMR @$26.50. Should I hold long term??😕

Nghtmare-Moon

Can’t stop nuclear SMR / OKLO 🤑🤑

Former-Stop805

If you're betting on critical minerals, take a look at **Blue Sky Uranium**. (BSK.V) They control one of the largest uranium-vanadium projects in Argentina (Amarillo Grande) right as nuclear energy is moving back to the center of global energy policy. Uranium supply remains tight while demand keeps rising from SMR rollouts and energy security initiatives. High leverage to rising uranium prices + strategic location = strong asymmetric upside. Small market cap, major potential. Worth a look.

Jynx91

Can someone mention nuclear at the G7 meet so SMR pumps. 🥺

Jynx91

SMR?

Jynx91

SMR delayed rebound after this oil spike? 😅

sibalbyonshin

These OKLO bulls are delusional. GAS IS UP SMR IS THE WAY. They have 0 revenue and 0 running reactors lmao

Nghtmare-Moon

I hear OKLO and SMR gonna be mooning

EvolvingDior

Which one of you clowns was pushing SMR this week? LMAO.

Hungry-Brain-3287

What's your thought on SMR? They going to be able to execute and dig out of this whole? Im long nuclear and have been for a few years now.

092Casey

They're all good- SMR is at support, NKE could fall to 54 bc of strait of hormuz/China export fears, but 57-58 is great entry, ENVX is close to support, but could hit low 4s.  I'd add OKLO but it's being manipulated. These are far from my favorite stocks, but neutrally, they're all no brainers.

092Casey

NKE, SMR, ENVX- buy the dip. Shit's gonna rip once they bottom out, which they may already have. 

Nghtmare-Moon

I was told SMR and OKLO would be up bigly with nuclear news

Rush_Is_Right

I'm big on nuclear. Solar and wind take a huge footprint and are not as environmentally friendly as people would think. SMR is the most logical thing for data centers.

C130J_Darkstar

advanced nuclear/ SMR

Matteoish

SMR Nuscale

FrankelloHello

I put every dollar I have into SMR. My family took away my sports betting so this is the only way to scratch my degenerate gambling itch. ITS GONNA HIT 50 again it’s just GOTTA

dawes700

I increase stake 10% I'm cautious because Trump can't bomb Iran into submission using 100 F35s as bombers 50% increase in oil costs won't kill Korea, us and Australia supply LNG. . Korea may build some SMR nuclear fast and convert to EVsl The Texas chip plant delays are because they are attempting to achieve a 2 NM "node" using taxpayer $$s. China is angry at Trumps Venezuela and Iran oil grab, they supplied 25% of China oil. Trump has also been stopping Russia dark fleet sending oil to China. I expect China to attack Taiwan by 2029. If so Korea stocks should increase 50% ? It's a long play.

PencilsDownNow

Today. White House meeting with tech CEOs (OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, xAI, Oracle) for "Ratepayer Protection Pledge" for datacenter energy. Bull or bear on OKLO, SMR, NNE, VST, COHR, CEG, TLN, LITE, or BE? Reasoning?

PencilsDownNow

Today. White House meeting with tech CEOs (OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, xAI, Oracle) for "Ratepayer Protection Pledge" for datacenter energy. Bull or bear on OKLO, SMR, NNE, or VST? Reasoning?

Nghtmare-Moon

I’m waiting on the headline “SMR and OKLO selected by the mango admin to lead new Iran nuclear stuff and to make all the nuclear everywhere”

econ_dev_dude

Anyone else have their eyes on the nuclear stocks? They've really taken a beating the last month plus. LEU, NNE, SMR, OKLO. What am I missing?