Reddit Posts
Wall Street Week Ahead for the trading week beginning July 10th, 2023
US CPI YY, NSA* (Apr) 4.9% vs. Exp. 5.0% (Prev. 5.0%)
I think I solved the puzzle! We will breakout to 420 for QQQ ATH in year 20XX before that it may go belly deep 240 in year 20YY !?!
I think I solved the puzzle! We will breakout to 420 for QQQ ATH in year 20XX before that it may go belly deep 240 in year 20YY !?!
Thank you degenerate TrumpBidenLove child for the $YY tip, poots and calls are up
I just want said thank you to the degenerate TrumpBidenLoveChild for $YY both my calls and poots are up
OPAD (OfferPad) Trading less than 1X the Revenue and has over 10 Baggers potential, Q3 Guidance 520M R, 100% YY, (Dip alert)
OPAD (OfferPad) Trading less than 1X the Revenue and has over 10 Baggers potential, Q3 Guidance 520M R, 100% YY, (Dip alert) See 3 Pics
Everyone is talking $BABA, what about $BIDU?
JOYY TOP HOLDERS PLAN TAKE-PRIVATE DEAL AT UP TO $8B VALUE
SLINGSHOT READY after great Earning a report from $PLTR , what’s the price point u expect End Of Day / By Friday?
Golden Triangle Ventures Inc. Announces a Letter to Shareholders from Founding Member of Sonder Fulfillment, LLC
Hi! $YY Joyy has a great price to enter!
НI, what about Joyy ($YY)? Great price to enter!
How about making some $ough on YY (Joyy). Heavily shorted and dividend paying stock.
Shorting Pre Market Top Gainers- 1 Week Results
Highly Leveraged Hedge Fund Rumored to Have Imploded: Some Stocks Remain Heavily Sold
Highly Leveraged Hedge Fund Rumored to Have Imploded: Some Stocks Remain Heavily Discounted
Highly Leveraged Hedge Fund Rumored to Have Imploded: Some Stocks Remain Heavily Discounted
Hedge Fund Rumored to have gotten blown up: Forced to Liquidate over 30 Billion in assets: Some stocks heavily discounted.
$HUYA The only undervalued tech stock?
Mentions
I think you might have to ask Tom Lee what he meant. But from googling your question: >Bitcoin fundamentals center on its decentralized digital nature, secured by cryptography on a public [blockchain](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=blockchain&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILxAB&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3) ledger, functioning as peer-to-peer cash without banks, designed with scarcity (max 21 million coins), and driven by [Proof-of-Work](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=Proof-of-Work&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILxAC&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3) (mining) for transaction validation, acting like digital gold but with unique supply/demand dynamics. Key aspects include [digital keys](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=digital+keys&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILRAB&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3), [wallets](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=wallets&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILRAC&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3), [mining](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=mining&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILRAD&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3), and [blockchain technology](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=7da175bd9b925cd1&sxsrf=ANbL-n7ytB9d6OOc5BXoCjsQ4HV7m_fNHw%3A1770153750845&q=blockchain+technology&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwioh5HMoL6SAxVRDTQIHUOsD5kQxccNegQILRAE&mstk=AUtExfBUdAVSt4Ey_uAgOrSomwrkj3jO3fGqVfxM4mKsSV9XbsKFgOTNFoti3z_RksERaFaRvEIZRK1YY75bYdMMTA9YbXvx46F70lmX1mnH8JwneE7yGORy-X1inqqR9N6GjhdSlkmOE9XunHkiR32bJc6rJ7-OkrWEHI2h2YXe7W41Z3pAyKKBwFvnb-F3tYKkHc63_RlQVz-cM-caJdsGIut7CwTL3evbYODPJRKbFZLamFJSN4yDatbaMSspJ7Uv9yEyEAd8_alFUvKuSkA97DtV&csui=3), offering potential as a store of value or medium of exchange.
sorry but were you trying to copy that song tune from "I wanna be your slave[](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=5e99471b1a2d566a&biw=1504&bih=868&aic=0&sxsrf=ANbL-n45D8pvRLwZXx_s5uSR6SsYdxSvXQ:1770016812377&q=M%C3%A5neskin+I+Wanna+Be+Your+Slave&si=AL3DRZEHca6XkyN49T3T8E-njBIUGWs3zrGnCIPmAtz1Ayz-Ou8lMXZtgjjoQ8mNN0dwbaMcrZkBFRoGGho1YY_OTgp1hTH9jd55sUWYVRRZCgEqpLjn5xRN0g50N_mekdMThXJ5HjV0RNls329jjlWNULNw5d3Sdtr1NApymbuvcNVer1W9x9o%3D&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwirqeS6orqSAxX9mO4BHQGXEFUQ_coHegQIFhAB&ictx=0)
Bers about to get 360 YY, Tac insertion cancel, no scoped
[https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-professionals-are-taking-a-page-out-of-the-retail-crowds-playbook-153d019b?gaa\_at=eafs&gaa\_n=AWEtsqfIUINLv-q5ktmMYJdfMKxGj85AGrgtEf8GQ9BH3nc-4lG2qoS1VZ3VxZS6Oio%3D&gaa\_ts=69162edb&gaa\_sig=EPJaRVnluyYKI4GodVhcWedOhm8yT8OdJoYp-nGZo0Vc4gbhaP-pdLsrqL2Pry2QyeRXSm0B5QVc-a3YY1yoKA%3D%3D](https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-professionals-are-taking-a-page-out-of-the-retail-crowds-playbook-153d019b?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfIUINLv-q5ktmMYJdfMKxGj85AGrgtEf8GQ9BH3nc-4lG2qoS1VZ3VxZS6Oio%3D&gaa_ts=69162edb&gaa_sig=EPJaRVnluyYKI4GodVhcWedOhm8yT8OdJoYp-nGZo0Vc4gbhaP-pdLsrqL2Pry2QyeRXSm0B5QVc-a3YY1yoKA%3D%3D) hmm, i found another article that say hedge fund are net buyer while retail are net seller. So which is right ? or is this another of case publish both side of a trade then delete the article that fail to come true.
My portfolio got 360 no scoped and he even did a YY, Tac insertion cancel bruh **COME ONE**
https://investors.palantir.com/news-details/2025/Palantir-Reports-Q3-2025-U-S--Comm-Revenue-Growth-of-121-YY-and-Revenue-Growth-of-63-YY-Guides-Q4-Revenue-to-61-YY-and-U-S--Comm-Revenue-to-121-YY-Raises-FY-2025-Revenue-Guidance-to-53-YY-Crushing-Consensus-Expectations/ Then what was it?
By madness I don't mean actual madness. It's more that I saw a few articles hyping Nvidia heading to $5T, $10T, $20T, by 20XX, 20YY, 20ZZ over and thought they were overly optimistic. Don't misunderstand, I've been very bullish on the stock since 2021 (technically since 2018 but was too young to invest at the time); my viewpoint has been that computer chips are as important as oil. But still - the AI buildout and the sustained growth from Nvidia in terms of revenue, profit, and share price, has been unbelievable. Whether the financing seems circular sometimes or not, this is a run for the history books and I cannot believe that every time I've gone "I don't know if we're going to get there." it's proved me wrong in a matter of months. By all means they *seem* unstoppable - but whether it's this year or thirty years from now, the party can't continue forever. I just hope I will hang on long enough to profit as much as I can.
[What does it taste like? Beef? Chicken? We'll take chicken...](https://youtu.be/HnXfLGcENnI?si=qWCjLE35pOhBV9YY)
I see a lot of users here don't understand the business model of them. Here is a quick overview from YY Group's own sub. YY Group is one of the most emerging corporations from Asia which focuses on the hospitality sector. The main part of their revenue comes from on-demand staffing. Think of them as the Uber of staffing, as their CEO loves to mention when explaining their business model. The work seekers register through their YY Circle app first, and then YY Group screens them to see if they have legal authorization to work and if they are up to the standards. Then, the businesses (hotels, restaurants, etc.) that need part-time staff post it through their platform, and the platform matches the job seekers with job providers. Based on the review of job providers, the job seekers are updated constantly, and those with better performances get better jobs. This system has proven itself in Singapore, and they have started to expand to many other countries and have become successful in their expansion. They also have started to acquire businesses (such as security, pest control, and cleaning) to be more complete as an integrated facility management (IMF) business this year. The CEO says their goal is to be one ready-to-go platform where they can serve their customers more completely, from cleaning services to security services. They have a pool of customers from their staffing business who are happy to work with them (it has a high retention rate, as the CEO says) who can also be customers for their IMF business. Their earnings increase year by year. For example, they made nearly $30 million in revenue in the first half of 2025, which is 50% more than that period of last year. They expect their revenue to reach $60 million by the end of this year. CEO said in a private meeting they have plentiful cash in their hand, enough for the long term. The only issue with them is that when they are expanding, they need to burn cash rapidly. Plus, they pay the job seekers first, then get the money from the job providers later, and this creates a little gap. These issues caused them to make offerings recently, but the CEO in a personal meeting said they don't plan to make offerings for now as they have plenty of cash in their hand.
Yep. Institutions have some thresholds to jump in that may include the insiders not having shares more than some certain range, market cap being more than a certain level, having some big names supporting them before they jump in, etc. I think YY Group will get that attention with time. But individuals don't need these rules and may buy whenever they see potential.
Could you please write your arguments, too? Maybe you have more reasonable ones. But, I have analyzed and thought about it for hours, went through news releases and SEC files, had a personal meeting with CEO to discuss their perspectives. CEO says they have a good amount of cash in their hands and expects increasing revenue. I wrote more about its fundamentals in YY Group’s own Reddit community.
>for the width/setting the long, I generally go 5-10% of the spot. What to you mean here? Can we use **SPY** (~$668) as an example? delta is ~0.5-0.6, so "20 delta" = $12, so a short strike of $668-$12 = $656, thus we have: **BTO** SPY 656C 10/31/25 @ $XX.XX But for the long, 5% of $668 is ~$33. Having a spread of $33 gives the second leg as: **STO** SPY 689C 10/31/25 @ $YY.YY But this puts the second leg OTM. Can you please clarify? Thanks!
It's not just the UK. It's just the US having a gay date format. 😄 (just kidding, I haven't really checked who else uses MM/DD/YY besides US)
\> Margins on private capital equipment grew 14.5% YY & on personal consumption by 4.9%, both the highest nonpandemic growth since each began in 2009. \> This is the opposite behavior of what we would expect if businesses were eating the tariffs; i.e. we'd expect shrinking margins.
Can’t wait for the CPI report to come out tomorrow showing 1.9% YY.
I read the date as D/M/YY and assumed it was a repost… same shit different date format
Revenue is not the same as subsidies, you muppet. And I have no idea why you’re using dated information from Statista [when the company just filed its 10Q.](https://investors.palantir.com/news-details/2025/Palantir-Reports-Q2-2025-U-S--Comm-Revenue-Growth-of-93-YY-and-Revenue-Growth-of-48-YY-Guides-Q3-Revenue-to-50-YY-Raises-FY-2025-Revenue-Guidance-to-45-YY-and-U-S--Comm-Revenue-Guidance-to-85-YY-Crushing-Consensus-Expectations/)
Beware of FOMO and the “meme stocks” narrative! I saw the post about $OPEN and before you jump on the short squeeze bandwagon, let's look at the real data that the emotional narrative ignores. * "Short interest" is a signal for alarm, not celebration. Yes, 37.93% of the stock is shorted. Why do you think institutional and professional investors are betting massively against this company? Because fundamental analysis probably shows that $OPEN's current valuation is completely disconnected from its financial reality. *Let's talk about the numbers that matter. According to its latest quarterly report (10-Q), $OPEN presents: * Stagnant or declining revenue: In the last year, your revenue has fallen by X%, despite the hype. * Growing operating losses: The company continues to lose money, with a net loss of -$XX million in the latest quarter. * Weak balance sheet: Long-term debt is $YY million, while operating cash flow is negative. This is not the profile of a solid company, but rather one that is struggling to stay afloat. * The "short squeeze" is not an investment plan. The 300% price increase in July was not based on company growth, but on speculation and panic by short sellers. A short squeeze is a temporary event. Once the frenzy dies down, the stock price falls again, and those who buy at the peak are the ones left with the bagholder. The share price at this moment is already at historical levels, without any fundamental change to justify it. * "Rent in the metaverse?" - It's pure smoke. This phrase is a combination of buzzwords without any basis. The company has not presented a credible business plan on how to monetize the "metaverse." It is a tactic to attract retail investors with futuristic promises, while the company's finances deteriorate. Conclusion: This is not a case of "retailers vs. shorts," but of investing with brains vs. invest with emotion. Don't let the emotional narrative blind you to the reality that $OPEN is a disproportionately valued company with real financial problems. Your hard-earned money deserves an investment based on data, not memes.
_______ _,,ad8888888888bba,_ ,ad88888I888888888888888ba, ,88888888I88888888888888888888a, ,d888888888I8888888888888888888888b, d88888PP"""" ""YY88888888888888888888b, ,d88"'__,,--------,,,,.;ZZZY8888888888888, ,8IIl'" ;;l"ZZZIII8888888888, ,I88l;' ;lZZZZZ888III8888888, ,II88Zl;. ;llZZZZZ888888I888888, ,II888Zl;. .;;;;;lllZZZ888888I8888b ,II8888Z;; `;;;;;''llZZ8888888I8888, II88888Z;' .;lZZZ8888888I888b II88888Z; _,aaa, .,aaaaa,__.l;llZZZ88888888I888 II88888IZZZZZZZZZ, .ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ;llZZ88888888I888, II88888IZZ<'(@@>Z| |ZZZ<'(@@>ZZZZ;;llZZ888888888I88I ,II88888; `""" ;| |ZZ; `""" ;;llZ8888888888I888 II888888l `;; .;llZZ8888888888I888, ,II888888Z; ;;; .;;llZZZ8888888888I888I III888888Zl; .., `;; ,;;lllZZZ88888888888I888 II88888888Z;;...;(_ _) ,;;;llZZZZ88888888888I888, II88888888Zl;;;;;' `--'Z;. .,;;;;llZZZZ88888888888I888b ]I888888888Z;;;;' UR;CALLS;..;;;lllZZZZ88888888888I8888, II888888888Zl.;;"Y88 R FUK";;,..;lllZZZZZ88888888888I8888I II8888888888Zl;.; `"PPP";;;,..;lllZZZZZZZ88888888888I88888 II888888888888Zl;;. `;;;l;;;;lllZZZZZZZZW88888888888I88888 `II8888888888888Zl;. ,;;lllZZZZZZZZWMZ88888888888I88888 II8888888888888888ZbaalllZZZZZZZZZWWMZZZ8888888888I888888, `II88888888888888888b"WWZZZZZWWWMMZZZZZZI888888888I888888b `II88888888888888888;ZZMMMMMMZZZZZZZZllI888888888I8888888 `II8888888888888888 `;lZZZZZZZZZZZlllll888888888I8888888, II8888888888888888, `;lllZZZZllllll;;.Y88888888I8888888b, ,II8888888888888888b .;;lllllll;;;.;..88888888I88888888b, II888888888888888PZI;. .`;;;.;;;..; ...88888888I8888888888, II888888888888PZ;;';;. ;. .;. .;. .. Y8888888I88888888888b, ,II888888888PZ;;' `8888888I8888888888888b, II888888888' 888888I8888888888888888b ,II888888888 ,888888I88888888888888888 ,d88888888888 d888888I8888888888ZZZZZZ
The current [Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio](https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1CASLSU_enUS1153US1153&cs=0&sca_esv=aa355e4347ca4578&sxsrf=AE3TifMUJbM9rAmR1UDKiMPpSu86CcYQUQ%3A1753225913116&q=Price-to-Earnings+%28P%2FE%29+ratio&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi16vK9y9GOAxWKFmIAHQctHgQQxccNegQIBhAB&mstk=AUtExfA3Li9Ass1MqT2X4UFNOh5IOcQhOjdMljwXxb7OGVJ4jcNA8looyyBYtZWvW0qzDZkOtd0Rb-edVI4INSHSJj_RNNphyMdEHo4mQZAHKwW9z15EKbfxEMrEHZTe8UqVfa1ccjTiATPX5ZXjvf4kT94JmLvF1-58N5g2a0YY9LPRvfU&csui=3) for Krispy Kreme (DNUT) is -24.19, as of July 18, 2025. This negative P/E ratio indicates that Krispy Kreme is currently reporting a net loss, as the calculation uses net income in the denominator.
this is more of a broad approach to negotiation discussion but to avoid that, negotiate harder means don't stop after you see a posted rate structure. call them, speak to a human, and tell them what you want. i would always start by getting them to give you the first number, then negotiate off that. you need to have a few strings ready to pull and use them as threads - "if we can't come to an agreement, which i really would prefer, I might have to pull my money and move into a more favorable broker". part of that is doing your best to come with something for them to match - otherwise they can easily call the bluff. so I shopped at different brokers, who have a much higher incentive to GET your money (which is why a lot offer different promotions) and asked them what they could do for me regarding commissions if i were to bring in $XX and trade at YY rate. take the best you can find and bring to your broker. btw this applies to life, not just brokers. it's relative and requires some contextual understanding, some things are hard and fast - but it never hurts to ask.
Oh, they can plan a crash just fine. It's recovering from it where they're [basically going to be like...](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLYoTewi2YY)
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691178066/peddling-protectionism?srsltid=AfmBOoqcuPrv1ZtPkd8D_YY5ds66D44_zz0allQm6_lCtXfAIAUHvHEr There ya go. I can't think of a single time that tariffs have worked out well historically and neither can you. In a more globalized world that can only work out worse.
No more Rush for you guys. You keep calling it YY(Zee) instead of YYZED.
The month code at the end specifies the month the option expires in, not the contract it’s for. Looking at the different codes, for Fridays it uses /EWxmYY where x is the week number, m is the month code and YY is the year. For Monday through Thursday it uses ExdmYY where x is the week number, d is a letter A-D where A is Monday and D is Thursday, m is the month code and YY is the year.
Pretty sure last time those tariffs and trade wars weren't oriented towards America's greatest allies and trade partners. It's one thing to target China (and in many ways, he successfully got much of Canada and Europe on board this train). But now he's targeting Canada, Mexico, and Europe. And seemingly done to the benefit of.....Russia? While also imposing a smaller tariff on China than he is on Canada.... China was never really exporting critical goods to the USA like Canada was. They weren't giving you lumber, aluminum, oil, electricity, uranium, and potash like Canada is. These are pretty vital ingredients. And the USA uses these resources to then manufacture goods and sell them back to Canada and the world. With oil, you make a substantial global profit when you refine Canadian oil. Even if Trump were to apologize for the tariffs and trade war and promise to play nice with Canada/Europe, I doubt it will take any less than 3 years to recover that trust. Capitalism is based on trust. Trade is based on trust. You need stability and assurances in a system of trade. I need to know that if I pay you XX, you will provide me YY in return. I need to know that if I've been wronged, I have a tribunal system available to call upon to settle the matter fairly. I need to know you'll actually respect the end result of said tribunal. Take away all this trust and assurance, and capitalism falls. Basically Trump is Joker.
What do you think about these tickers: YY, ENR?
Maybe after the recession, I think we are about to see a major correction in a year or so. I would have put my money into ENR or YY if I made gains and actually traded startup tech AI / 'meme' stocks. Or scalped quantum...
Rigged? It wasn't rigged. The math was easy to do. Do you realize how much the stock would have had to move in order for him to be profitable? This number is literally given to you on like every platform I've ever used. "Breakeven price: $XX.YY"
[Pepperidge Farms remembers](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5efc5ab67924b430404e8f73/1602534717107-R3YY77HJ6KUOJZV525Z1/pepperidge-farm-remembers-5b860b.png?format=500w)
Massive drop in Ten Year Yield and DXY trying to remain suppressed. Higher probability of institutional dip buying with cratering Ten Year Yield. Not guaranteed, just higher probability with 10YY a new low for the year and free falling.
Tough to say really. Baidu also broke off the acquisition of their Chinese TikTok clone they bought in 2021, that's a huge piece of the cash balance. Short report that came out today mentions this. They say they might need to return $1.4B, but I read through the merger docs last week and wasn't able to find what the break up fee would be. I wouldn't be optimistic of $YY getting the upper hand in a legal battle. But I also don't know anything about M&A law in China. But even if it's $2B pile of cash. I highly doubt they maintain profitability following this. Advertisers won't want to work with them going forward if the app is re-instated. Their SG&A expenses are ~$200M/quarter, so they won't be around long. Key risk to short thesis would be they get the short-form video app back and it's actually highly profitable. I have my doubts here though about long-term viability of it, however.
[https://x.com/search?q=%24YY&src=cashtag\_click&f=live](https://x.com/search?q=%24YY&src=cashtag_click&f=live) I'm still holding my puts
UPD: Send emails to Hindenburg Research, Culper Research. Ofc, it would take a time even they GET interested, but still. Also lodged a complaint to fucking NASDAQ urging them to investigate $YY if it's in compliance with the listing requirements. Lol. Probably it's all in vain, but at least I did something. Any ideas are appreciated
I reposted an abridged version on twitrer, stockwits and after hours app (social network for traders). Am going to try to mention YY on other investor resources. Will try to reach out to project Hindenburg and such, maybe they get interested. I wonder if Joyy violates some Nasdaq listing requirements by… you know… enabling CP distribution. A super long shot, but hey it won’t hurt to lodge a complaint to Nasdaq or even SEC. If I fail to make it news, then my puts are fucked
I reposted an abridged version on twitrer, stockwits and after hours app (social network for traders). Am going to try to mention YY on SeekingAlpha. Will try to reach out to project Hindenburg and such, maybe they get interested. I wonder if Joyy violates some Nasdaq listing requirements by… you know… enabling CP distribution. A super long shot, but hey it won’t hurt to lodge a complaint to Nasdaq or even SEC. If I fail to make it news, then my puts are fucked
Buying puts on YY NYT investigation into its CSAM was explosive and has had almost zero attention $35 puts for Friday
It's not for this it's for YY. $35 call 1/17
Baidu paid them $1.9 billion for the YY.com (chinese social media) acquisition that baidu has since pulled out of - they'll have to pay that back - it's listed as liabilities on their balance sheet. See their financials https://ir.joyy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/joyy-reports-third-quarter-2024-unaudited-financial-results
Baidu paid them $1.9 billion for the YY.com (chinese social media) acquisition that baidu has since pulled out of - they'll have to pay that back - it's listed as liabilities on their balance sheet. See their financials https://ir.joyy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/joyy-reports-third-quarter-2024-unaudited-financial-results
Will be dumping as much as I can into shorting YY after bigo being removed from app stores
# **TLDR** --- **Ticker:** YY **Direction:** Down **Prognosis:** Short **Reason:** Bigo Live, which accounts for ~90% of YY's revenue, was removed from app stores for facilitating child sexual abuse. Stock price barely reacted, presenting a short opportunity. Author is already short 1000 shares. **Additional Note:** The author believes the company's actions are morally reprehensible and the stock should be worthless.
Market needs an exogenous event to tank. You will need US 10YY > 6%, China stimmy falling short, or another massive carry trade implosion for the bubble to burst. Policies alone don't tank it. If it did, 2017 would not have seen the lowest VIX recorded.
Trust me. Got an engineering buddy who is always like "X stock moved YY dollars today! Shit is through the roof" And it turns out to be presplit aapl or nvda and the shit moved 2pct. Swear the guy got through cheating or some shit. Cannot for the life of me get through his skull that it is about percentages....
I’m bouta 1440 cum swap, Insta slop, shock charge cancel, reload, YY, wallbang you
Bers in here pre-ejaculating and listening to this song https://youtu.be/zdLvauICvPM?si=Iw1CR9YY09fq9QbO
https://youtu.be/cM0d7VGFNsY?si=-Oq8DO24rkdN_4YY
omg, my bullshit, and fake and this motherfkn btch detector is so onpoint: - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QG7z5oryajn6Vv9nr9qdVoRiyiVr3YY-/edit?gid=667291644#gid=667291644](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QG7z5oryajn6Vv9nr9qdVoRiyiVr3YY-/edit?gid=667291644#gid=667291644)
I start to get angry, fuck you really?: - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QG7z5oryajn6Vv9nr9qdVoRiyiVr3YY-/edit?gid=667291644#gid=667291644](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QG7z5oryajn6Vv9nr9qdVoRiyiVr3YY-/edit?gid=667291644#gid=667291644) Why not posting your positions before? When will we see the paid course? He already has 2000 followers this sht is working, ppl sck it up all of it. Why is he suddenly winning? 25k->40k
Ber and Iran are about to get 360 YY reload cancel quick scoped on MW2 Rust
MM/DD/YY makes absolute zero sense. Can America not?
https://youtu.be/eT3BFzSD6YY?si=XeJEAfPuqk1ZL1EZ
Bloomberg article out on Friday saying last Monday's VIX surge was a head fake and explained. [https://www.bloomberg.com/.../volatility-pros-say-record...](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-09/volatility-pros-say-record-vix-surge-on-monday-was-a-head-fake?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2t6qaBEVjd03-wGC3GhLqSFI0yv8L8vOZ4uKo2hxRLLCOb1BMlo_WJv48_aem_68-zbkfK6_ssLXR7MQ-iGg) Larry Summers called on SEC to investigate the surge [https://www.bloomberg.com/.../summers-calls-for-sec...](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-09/summers-calls-for-sec-exchanges-to-probe-monday-s-vix-surge?srnd=homepage-americas&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0cK8CWz7JURZ5bpNE8UO5VfbKeAo4fvaY7ogo_lyJc0entoC1t9flFX0w_aem_M2YY8QA4acJpyVcSybdy0A)Here is the bottom line as far as i am concerned, and it's about the negative roll yield. We have a volatile market, but going long, the vix is not wise The VIX always and i mean 'ALWAYS ' reverts to the means, and that is 11-12 (may take a month or two, but it will revert to the means) but for a better explanation, look at the UVXY Why the UVXY always reverse splits and will do so again . The thing that " is evident in the long-term charts of UVXY and VXX. These funds have a nasty tendency of absorbing negative roll yield for most of their existence. Because both UVXY and VXX purchase short-term VIX futures, they have to sell the front month futures and buy the back month futures. They must do this regularly. However, the term structure of these futures is usually in contango, which means the front month is cheaper than the back month. The fund pays out this difference to the market in exchange for the convexity offered by the VIX futures in the event of a market selloff. The negative roll yield is effectively an insurance premium paid for protection from a market crash. There is no free lunch. "The UVXY, and UVIX plus a few other etfs are known as widow makers. They always reverse split. SVIX and / or SVXY are the safest bullish bets in the market at present . These short the rise we saw in the recent VIX spikeOur stock market fundamentals are strong, with 79% of reporting companies beating earnings solidly. The recent volatility , imo, was a reset of multiples or a " correction " that offered up some very good dips on high quality stocks. NVDA hit 90 and that was some 17 points ago.There are many other examples we could cite.Guidance for our S& P companies are solid and the thing most are overlooking is that the growth and guidance suggest forward pe ratios that are still reflective of investment grade criteria
Leader of Hamas got 360 YY no scoped
I'm long YY tonight. Low P/E ratio, lower revenue expectation this quarter, 5% dividend. Stock price is pretty low if you zoom out. Social media companies have been recovering, I expect a decent beat.
Sell that shit. I will always sell positions up by xxx%. That's 3 place values. Base 10. XXX.YY%
> Canadian e-commerce provider Shopify (SHOP.TO), sued a subsidiary of Chinese technology company JOYY Inc (YY.O), in New York federal court on Tuesday, accusing it of illegally copying Shopify's software to build its own e-commerce platform. Chinese company violating copyright, say it ain't so
GG gy yyvyggbh the gg but vggggvgygvvgv.tvbgtygggvugyggyghhggggghtg YY
We only lost $XX million and the site only crashed YY times
> CGC is a good one **[welp](https://i.imgur.com/YY4AhHI.png)**
2YY has reached 5 the human race is cancelled you all can go home please turn out the lights in the universe when you leave and don't let the door to reality hit you in the ass on the way out.
The screenshot does not include the details of the position structure. Just that it is a 3-legged TSLA trade. Can you write out the actual trade position in text please? Something like -1 TSLA 100/101/102c MM/YY @ $X.XX? > This trade seems too good to be true, am I making an elementary mistake and missing something? Without the position details I can't say much, but what exactly is it that you think is so hard to believe? Every short call fly looks like this, so I'm not seeing what the big deal is. It would be nice to know what the buying power reduction would be to open this trade. We could estimate this if we had the position details, but alas ... Let's say it costs you $1000 to open this trade. So your ROI is $22/1000 = 2.2%. You could make 5% risk free by putting $1000 in a money market fund, so that means this trade would be a **opportunity cost** of -2.8%, and carry risk with it on top. The BP reduction needs to be less than $22/X = 5%, X = $440 for it to start making sense, but that's not account for the $477 of risk. In terms of ROR, you got $22/477 = 4.6%, so you *still* are not beating the 5% risk-free rate. So why is this fly a big deal?
UK CPI YY* (Mar) 3.2% vs. Exp. 3.1% (Prev. 3.4%); All Services 6.0% vs Exp. 5.9% (prev. 6.1%)
UK CPI YY* (Mar) 3.2% vs. Exp. 3.1% (Prev. 3.4%); All Services 6.0% vs Exp. 5.9% (prev. 6.1%)
UK CLI just released: UK CPI YY* (Mar) 3.2% vs. Exp. 3.1% (Prev. 3.4%); All Services 6.0% vs Exp. 5.9% (prev. 6.1%)
UK CPI YY* (Mar) 3.2% vs. Exp. 3.1% (Prev. 3.4%); All Services 6.0% vs Exp. 5.9% (prev. 6.1%)
It was hot to buy these new electric copter company, Space YY etc. Unaware of any that took off. Cost of running a space company that is profitable is stellar. Not recommended because most lost 80-90% after ipo.
maybe if u take a look at US10YY u will know why
Well, if you're gonna YOLO on a Chinese meme stock, at least make it something that moves. TSLA has been flat for the past year and is only up \~10% in the past three months. You want to YOLO on something that moves, like $IQ or $YY.
NVDA pls don't 360 YY dump another 2% after a fake pump my asshole is insanely sore today already
Bro what do you mean by 2YY? Can it at least make sense. 2 year year?
2YY yields increasing compared to the 10Y ones down day today 2YYG4 prior close: 4.279 on 2024-02-02 10YG4 prior close: 4.011 on 2024-02-02 2024-02-05 08:54:59.583003 -1.0745068949851944 shape: (30, 6) ┌─────────────────────┬───────────┬───────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬───────────┐ │ date ┆ 2yy close ┆ 10y close ┆ bond_2yy_change ┆ bond_10y_change ┆ result │ │ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │ │ datetime[μs] ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 ┆ f64 │ ╞═════════════════════╪═══════════╪═══════════╪═════════════════╪═════════════════╪═══════════╡ │ 2024-02-05 11:25:00 ┆ 4.344 ┆ 4.072 ┆ 1.01519 ┆ 1.015208 ┆ -0.001745 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:30:00 ┆ 4.346 ┆ 4.072 ┆ 1.015658 ┆ 1.015208 ┆ 0.044295 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:35:00 ┆ 4.343 ┆ 4.069 ┆ 1.014957 ┆ 1.01446 ┆ 0.048945 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:40:00 ┆ 4.345 ┆ 4.071 ┆ 1.015424 ┆ 1.014959 ┆ 0.045844 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:45:00 ┆ 4.347 ┆ 4.072 ┆ 1.015892 ┆ 1.015208 ┆ 0.067315 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:50:00 ┆ 4.348 ┆ 4.079 ┆ 1.016125 ┆ 1.016953 ┆ -0.081431 │ │ 2024-02-05 11:55:00 ┆ 4.349 ┆ 4.08 ┆ 1.016359 ┆ 1.017203 ┆ -0.082946 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:00:00 ┆ 4.349 ┆ 4.079 ┆ 1.016359 ┆ 1.016953 ┆ -0.058451 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:05:00 ┆ 4.354 ┆ 4.082 ┆ 1.017527 ┆ 1.017701 ┆ -0.017084 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:10:00 ┆ 4.349 ┆ 4.081 ┆ 1.016359 ┆ 1.017452 ┆ -0.10743 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:15:00 ┆ 4.354 ┆ 4.085 ┆ 1.017527 ┆ 1.018449 ┆ -0.090511 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:20:00 ┆ 4.351 ┆ 4.08 ┆ 1.016826 ┆ 1.017203 ┆ -0.036997 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:25:00 ┆ 4.349 ┆ 4.086 ┆ 1.016359 ┆ 1.018699 ┆ -0.229667 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:30:00 ┆ 4.356 ┆ 4.087 ┆ 1.017995 ┆ 1.018948 ┆ -0.093531 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:35:00 ┆ 4.353 ┆ 4.085 ┆ 1.017294 ┆ 1.018449 ┆ -0.113457 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:40:00 ┆ 4.357 ┆ 4.093 ┆ 1.018229 ┆ 1.020444 ┆ -0.217084 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:45:00 ┆ 4.36 ┆ 4.096 ┆ 1.01893 ┆ 1.021192 ┆ -0.221512 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:50:00 ┆ 4.36 ┆ 4.098 ┆ 1.01893 ┆ 1.02169 ┆ -0.270209 │ │ 2024-02-05 12:55:00 ┆ 4.363 ┆ 4.101 ┆ 1.019631 ┆ 1.022438 ┆ -0.274593 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:00:00 ┆ 4.362 ┆ 4.109 ┆ 1.019397 ┆ 1.024433 ┆ -0.491565 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:05:00 ┆ 4.357 ┆ 4.111 ┆ 1.018229 ┆ 1.024931 ┆ -0.653983 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:10:00 ┆ 4.354 ┆ 4.107 ┆ 1.017527 ┆ 1.023934 ┆ -0.625697 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:15:00 ┆ 4.35 ┆ 4.103 ┆ 1.016593 ┆ 1.022937 ┆ -0.620201 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:20:00 ┆ 4.351 ┆ 4.108 ┆ 1.016826 ┆ 1.024183 ┆ -0.718341 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:25:00 ┆ 4.351 ┆ 4.11 ┆ 1.016826 ┆ 1.024682 ┆ -0.766654 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:30:00 ┆ 4.348 ┆ 4.109 ┆ 1.016125 ┆ 1.024433 ┆ -0.810941 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:35:00 ┆ 4.351 ┆ 4.112 ┆ 1.016826 ┆ 1.025181 ┆ -0.814919 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:40:00 ┆ 4.343 ┆ 4.113 ┆ 1.014957 ┆ 1.02543 ┆ -1.021357 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:45:00 ┆ 4.341 ┆ 4.113 ┆ 1.014489 ┆ 1.02543 ┆ -1.066938 │ │ 2024-02-05 13:50:00 ┆ 4.347 ┆ 4.119 ┆ 1.015892 ┆ 1.026926 ┆ -1.074507 │ └─────────────────────┴───────────┴───────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┴───────────┘
For those who don't have 1m in their account and don't know how to adapt the number of contracts according to duration and convexity, i think you can use : [https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/yield-futures.html](https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/yield-futures.html) For the same trade : * 1 short 2YY micro yield * 1 long 10Y micro yield 10$ for every 0.01% move
I didn't see any serious answers that actually understand the problem and solution. The closest was the person saying personal and government finance is different. The real plan is that it isn't right now a problem. Let's start with what those loans really are. Those loans are a piece of paper (now often electronic) that basically says "On DD/MM/YY pay the owner of this paper $Z". These are valuable based on that future date. So a paper that pays in 6 years may be worth 60% of what it pays. And buying or selling those papers at that price is seen as fair. Also very interesting is that debt is very important for modern money issuing. That is the biggest reason for the US debt, but not that's beyond the scope here. This makes plan #1 to issue more debt. Each day the US issues more debt, and buys back old debt. All to manage the debt. And it is a very complex job. Fundamentally if the US sells a piece of paper for $1 billion, and buys back papers worth $1 billion dollars, then the due date for the debt has moved years into the future. Plan #2 is actually growth (many people mistakenly think inflation). Right now the 30 year T bill pays 4.03%, but GDP growth is 5.9% (2021 number). This means the US is investing in that growth, our economy grows 5%, debt grows 4%, effective debt has shrunk by the difference. Plan #3 is where things get extremely controversial, mostly because we don't know plan 3. Plan 3 is likely default. This would have catastrophic effects on our economy, but the Republicans like threatening default when there's a Democrat president, so it can't be completely discounted or ignored. Plan #4 would then be international bailout (this should be #3). Just as the US does sometimes for other countries that can't pay their debts, an international bailout of the US is a possibility. The reason to support this would primarily be to maintain the trading relations. The US with its huge economy grinding to a halt would be catastrophic worldwide, a bailout would be cheaper. Regardless.your are correct in considering the debt as a part of your investment strategy being over 100% GDP is generally not a good place for a country.
Another main question you should be asking yourself is: 1. Do you want the tax break now (traditional 401k), or when you retire (Roth 401k)? 2. Do you think your income will continue to grow? Yes (lean towards Roth 401k), No (lean towards traditional 401k). 3. Do you think you’ll pull out MORE per year in retirement than your current salary? Yes (lean Roth), No (lean traditional). Many people like doing Roth while they make less money, as the tax hit is smaller. Then as they make more money, transition to traditional. If you make $XXX,XXX/yr but think in retirement you’ll need less at $YY,YYY/yr, then use a traditional, as you get larger savings now than later. If you make $YY,YYY/yr and think in retirement you’ll want to take out more at $XXX,XXX/yr, maybe do a Roth as you’ll take a small tax hit now but save on not taking the big tax hit later. It’s a game of numbers and of your own preference. For example, I probably will take out less per year in retirement, so I should do Traditional, but I also like the idea that the dollar amount shown in my 401k is what I’m owed, no taxes to deal with. And it’s also a hedge in case taxes increase on retirement distributions. But again, it’s your decision based on current and future earnings as well as preference in retirement.
Juliette frisky and lumpy possum 
I was incorrect. Apparently they found his body. [https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2013/may/8/humboldt-connection-shasta-triple-murder/?fbclid=IwAR0u3oWzcDIcZnwgPm6YY52KQmxDOHve\_9WYAUiHaae3HhqcGatT8z1Bv8I](https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2013/may/8/humboldt-connection-shasta-triple-murder/?fbclid=IwAR0u3oWzcDIcZnwgPm6YY52KQmxDOHve_9WYAUiHaae3HhqcGatT8z1Bv8I) [https://www.kcra.com/article/shasta-county-family-s-killer-in-note-he-was-sorry/6418461#](https://www.kcra.com/article/shasta-county-family-s-killer-in-note-he-was-sorry/6418461#)
Puts on Tlt, sell /zb if you’ve got the cash or if you have a small account like me buy treasure yields futures /2YY, /10Y or /30Y
> unless something big comes in medicine. I wonder if you are familiar with PYY3-36 used as an oral spray and it's potential to be something very big in medicine? I believe it can actually prevent obesity for most people, possibly without the serious side effects that GLP-1 and SGLT2 Inhibitors have. It used as an oral spray seems to be more natural in that it works in the saliva instead of messing around with blood chemistry, and is only needed to supress hunger during a meal. It would work for people who are unable to stop a meal, and therefore are unable to control the portion size. This is the type of eater who only has problems with portion size, a very large percent of the population that does not include those who get hungry a hour after a meal [blood sugar issues], not include those who always eat between meals [obcessive compulsive disorders] and not including those who crave a specific type of foods [food addiction]. If a PYY3-36 oral spray would be developed beyond the clinical studies and approved, it would be extremely popular because it may actually prevent the diseases related to obesity. Here is information and research, but PYY3-36 as an oral spray seems to be abandoned or ignored because the whole health care industry doesn't seem interested in helping the millions of people who are still healthy but just want to get rid of just a few extra pounds long before they develop any serious health problems: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189958/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide_YY
MM/DD/YY is standard date format in the US. USA! USA! USA!
[They don't stop coming](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT3BFzSD6YY)
This was the cost of tuition. To be fair, that's quite cheap considering the skills and experience you were just exposed to relative to other institutions and their costs. It happens to everyone. Now you have some real life experience in the market. You can either quit because you may feel that it's not for you or use this to have a better and hopefully profitable experience in your next attempt. If you do continue, consider the following. 1. Acknowledge that pure option trading is trading. Unless you have true long term holds that you have options against, you're in the casino just like everybody else. 2. Be comfortable making assumptions about market direction but be articulate as you can as per your process. The assumption must be articulate enough to be actionable. 3. Make a trading plan. I will enter at XX price when the market environment is YY. I will exit my position when ABC conditions have been met. Be disciplined with this. A plan is useless if you don't follow through with it. 4. Be very wary of seeking answers to financial related questions in the internet. You have no way to gauge credentials or intent in reddit of all things. At the end of the day, you are the only person that can be made accountable for the health of your trading account.
If you want a higher rate with Marcus, I have 5/5 referrals left. 5.4% for 3 months; 4.4% after. https://www.marcus.com/share/SUD-ZS8-YY39
My Parents in Italy Same your YY , Over 100% . Before the € with Lira.. 90x2 . This rates associated with the Lira were subsequently referred to as "usury rates ,Illegal Rates" . 
FWIW, you can write that position concisely as: -1 SOXL 18.50/18p MM/YY (30 DTE) @ $X.XX (whatever the opening credit was). It's more conventional to write out the expiration date than just say 30 DTE. > Should I close the trade and cut my losses or let it ride in hopes of going back OTM? This is why knowing the actual date of expiration is useful. If it expires this Friday, I'd dump it now and cut losses. If it expires in literally 30 days from now, no need to panic so soon. Ideally, you would have considered this possibility as one of your what-if scenarios in your [trade plan](https://www.reddit.com/r/options/wiki/faq/pages/mondayschool/yourplan). That way, you'd already know what to do. > Am I at risk of early assignment this far out? Your risk is greater than zero for short puts, given how high interest rates are right now, but that doesn't mean the risk is a large one. It will depend on how much extrinsic value is in the short put. The lower the extrinsic value, higher the risk of early assignment. If I knew the expiration date I could look it up as a double-check, but since I don't ... > If early assignment I can hold the shares and exercise my long put if it drop to or below 18.0 correct? You could, but that would not be the best way to unwind the trade if you are still a ways from expiration. Instead, sell to close the long put for a profit immediately and then use that cash to help reduce the loss when you sell to close the shares. No waiting for it to go ITM this way and you aren't stuck bagholding shares at a loss either.
So who is to verify that XX country has YY quantity of commodity?
Portfolio just hit my birthday MM/DD/YY obviously
YY has 19 straight green candles 
i wanna go to a underground gay nightclub and listening to this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VtF7YY85Mg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VtF7YY85Mg)
I do not believe PYY3-36 is a GLP-1 receptor agonist. To limit problems of too many side effects and lack of effectiveness, research should try to match the treatment with the reason why the person overeats. There are some basic reasons why people overeat. Some people are emotional eaters, some get hungry an hour after eating, some compulsively eat all the time, some are hooked on one type of food such as chocolate. I and millions of people can't control portion size, never had a BMI over 25 and I'm getting very worried that it is getting too hard to keep the extra pounds off. A treatment that helps one type of eater would at best do nothing for the other type of eater, and at worse would harm the other type of eater. GLP-1 receptor agonist are designed for people with type II diabetes. Semaglutide and Tirzepatide seem to target blood sugar and blood chemistry for days at a time. Some organs in there maybe begging for mercy. It has a bunch of side effects and some adverse effects so it probably will always be restricted to people who are very seriously overweight and have related health problems. [PYY3-36](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide_YY) works in the short term when given orally before eating a meal. It could be designed for people who can't control portion size yet still have a functional endocrine system and are not seriously overweight yet. It doesn't stay in the system long so there is less problems with destabilizing the endocrine system. I really doubt PYY3-36 will cause thyroid cancer, painful pancreatitis or gull stones, but it will probably help me not hog up the whole bowl of mashed potatoes.