Reddit Posts
An ecosystem of Application specific blockchains
An ecosystem of Application specific blockchains
MCL Fusor NFTs are set to drop today at 6 pm IST - Visit the Jump.trade marketplace to buy yours.
MCL Fusor NFTs are set to drop today at 6 pm IST - Visit the Jump.trade marketplace to buy yours.
An ecosystem of App-chains: a few interesting Cosmos Ecosystem chains (other than ATOM)
Mentions
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by Shippior. > \[Cosmos\](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cosmos-hub) (ATOM) is a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain. It is the center of the Cosmos networks, including Osmosis, Juno, Secret, Evmos and 50+ other independent L1 chains which are all connected, called Gaia. Something that is not known to many people is that the Binance Chain actually uses the same software as Cosmos and is thus in theory compatible with Gaia. However so far Binance has made the design choice not to enable it as to keep their authority over their BNB chain ATOM uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerance as main consensus in it's \[Tendermint consensus\](https://docs.tendermint.com/v0.34/introduction/what-is-tendermint.html). > > The main strongsuit of Cosmos is the use of \[IBC\](https://ibcprotocol.org/) (Inter-Blockchain Communication). It is a protocol that is integrated in the Tendermint Cosmos SDK that is used to trustlessly communicate between chains. This allows new chains using this SDK to quickly integrate into the entire network and make use of all the capabilities of the other chains. Bridges between different networks have shown to be a weak point in architecture with the \[Nomad hack\](https://halborn.com/the-nomad-bridge-hack-a-deeper-dive/) and the \[Wormhole bridge hack\](https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/wormhole-hack-february-2022/) as recent examples. Therefore relying on IBC, which essentially are many bridges is a risk. So far it has been closely monitored. Many IBC connections to LUNC where disabled quickly after the crash to limit the number of funds siphoned from the other networks but serious TVL has been lost through the LUNC crash, NOMAD bridge exploit and Crypto.com crash from the Cosmos networks. The network effect does not only share the good things but unfortunately also the bad events. In October it was even reported that a critical issue in the IBC was found after a \[security audit\](https://cointelegraph.com/news/cosmos-co-founder-says-a-major-security-vulnerability-has-been-uncovered-on-ibc). It was quickly patched but one remains to wonder what happens is a critical exploit in IBC is not caught on time. > > Currently Cosmos has no native stablecoins in the network after the Luna crash took UST with it. The main dominance of stablecoins is from USDC through the Axelar bridge. Therefore the dependence on this Axelar bridge is very large. This has led to the call to have a native stablecoin in the Cosmos network. USDC is said to bring a native USDC version to Cosmos in the beginning of 2023. In the man time there have been popping up stablecoins left and right, most of them algorithmic backed. Examples are \[IST\](https://01node.com/ist-the-new-cosmos-stablecoin-built-on-agoric/), \[CMST\](https://blog.comdex.one/introducing-composite-a-collateralized-stablecoin-for-ibc-bc76e15fa2ec) and \[SILK\](https://scrt.network/blog/shade-protocol-silk-privacy-preserving-stablecoin). However the introduction of this many stablecoins have led to fighting over which one is best and has spread the liquidity of these stablecoins thin which make them vulnerable for depegging. > > Governance is an important part of Cosmos, it tries to enable self-governance and sovereignty. Though with the full Governance abilities that Cosmos brings it also brings a lot of infighting. In the Stargate Upgrade the Gravity Dex was envisioned. This was supposed to be the DEX for ATOM. However it was seen by the community as a sponsored DEX from the community pool that was to compete with the already existing DEXs in the Cosmos Hub like Osmosis and Sifchain. This led to the failure of Gravity Dex, which subsequently rebranded as \[Crescent Network\](https://app.crescent.network/). It currently sits at about $7mill Total volume locked (TVL) compared to $150mill TVL on \[Osmosis\](https://info.osmosis.zone/), the most popular DEX in the Cosmos ecosystem. > > Later on there was a lot of discussion around \[proposal #82\](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/82). As the previous roadmap had ended it was time to come to a new roadmap. ATOM 2.0 was the proposal that was pitched during the \[Cosmoverse\](https://cosmoverse.org/), the annual Cosmos conferential. The proposal included new tokenomics for ATOM that would increase the inflation on the short term to decrease it further more in the long term. Jae Kwon, one of the founders of Cosmos, called the proposal \[outright theft\](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/11/11/cosmos-founder-jae-kwon-says-he-is-against-proposed-changes-to-atom-token/) from the community. > > However this leaves ATOM still without much value. Currently the main value ATOM provides is a store of value and it is often used as a criteria for receiving airdrops from newly launched chains but it has been passed left and right by chains that offer more utility than ATOM has. As long as there is no consensus about the new roadmap it is going to be difficult to add value to holding ATOM. Looking at it closely shows that it has little to offer that competitors like Ethereum, Polkadot and Avalanche do not also offer. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by Shippior. > \[Cosmos\](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cosmos-hub) (ATOM) is a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain. It is the center of the Cosmos networks, including Osmosis, Juno, Secret, Evmos and 50+ other independent L1 chains which are all connected, called Gaia. Something that is not known to many people is that the Binance Chain actually uses the same software as Cosmos and is thus in theory compatible with Gaia. However so far Binance has made the design choice not to enable it as to keep their authority over their BNB chain ATOM uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerance as main consensus in it's \[Tendermint consensus\](https://docs.tendermint.com/v0.34/introduction/what-is-tendermint.html). > > The main strongsuit of Cosmos is the use of \[IBC\](https://ibcprotocol.org/) (Inter-Blockchain Communication). It is a protocol that is integrated in the Tendermint Cosmos SDK that is used to trustlessly communicate between chains. This allows new chains using this SDK to quickly integrate into the entire network and make use of all the capabilities of the other chains. Bridges between different networks have shown to be a weak point in architecture with the \[Nomad hack\](https://halborn.com/the-nomad-bridge-hack-a-deeper-dive/) and the \[Wormhole bridge hack\](https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/wormhole-hack-february-2022/) as recent examples. Therefore relying on IBC, which essentially are many bridges is a risk. So far it has been closely monitored. Many IBC connections to LUNC where disabled quickly after the crash to limit the number of funds siphoned from the other networks but serious TVL has been lost through the LUNC crash, NOMAD bridge exploit and Crypto.com crash from the Cosmos networks. The network effect does not only share the good things but unfortunately also the bad events. In October it was even reported that a critical issue in the IBC was found after a \[security audit\](https://cointelegraph.com/news/cosmos-co-founder-says-a-major-security-vulnerability-has-been-uncovered-on-ibc). It was quickly patched but one remains to wonder what happens is a critical exploit in IBC is not caught on time. > > Currently Cosmos has no native stablecoins in the network after the Luna crash took UST with it. The main dominance of stablecoins is from USDC through the Axelar bridge. Therefore the dependence on this Axelar bridge is very large. This has led to the call to have a native stablecoin in the Cosmos network. USDC is said to bring a native USDC version to Cosmos in the beginning of 2023. In the man time there have been popping up stablecoins left and right, most of them algorithmic backed. Examples are \[IST\](https://01node.com/ist-the-new-cosmos-stablecoin-built-on-agoric/), \[CMST\](https://blog.comdex.one/introducing-composite-a-collateralized-stablecoin-for-ibc-bc76e15fa2ec) and \[SILK\](https://scrt.network/blog/shade-protocol-silk-privacy-preserving-stablecoin). However the introduction of this many stablecoins have led to fighting over which one is best and has spread the liquidity of these stablecoins thin which make them vulnerable for depegging. > > Governance is an important part of Cosmos, it tries to enable self-governance and sovereignty. Though with the full Governance abilities that Cosmos brings it also brings a lot of infighting. In the Stargate Upgrade the Gravity Dex was envisioned. This was supposed to be the DEX for ATOM. However it was seen by the community as a sponsored DEX from the community pool that was to compete with the already existing DEXs in the Cosmos Hub like Osmosis and Sifchain. This led to the failure of Gravity Dex, which subsequently rebranded as \[Crescent Network\](https://app.crescent.network/). It currently sits at about $7mill Total volume locked (TVL) compared to $150mill TVL on \[Osmosis\](https://info.osmosis.zone/), the most popular DEX in the Cosmos ecosystem. > > Later on there was a lot of discussion around \[proposal #82\](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/82). As the previous roadmap had ended it was time to come to a new roadmap. ATOM 2.0 was the proposal that was pitched during the \[Cosmoverse\](https://cosmoverse.org/), the annual Cosmos conferential. The proposal included new tokenomics for ATOM that would increase the inflation on the short term to decrease it further more in the long term. Jae Kwon, one of the founders of Cosmos, called the proposal \[outright theft\](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/11/11/cosmos-founder-jae-kwon-says-he-is-against-proposed-changes-to-atom-token/) from the community. > > However this leaves ATOM still without much value. Currently the main value ATOM provides is a store of value and it is often used as a criteria for receiving airdrops from newly launched chains but it has been passed left and right by chains that offer more utility than ATOM has. As long as there is no consensus about the new roadmap it is going to be difficult to add value to holding ATOM. Looking at it closely shows that it has little to offer that competitors like Ethereum, Polkadot and Avalanche do not also offer. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by Shippior. > \[Cosmos\](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cosmos-hub) (ATOM) is a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain. It is the center of the Cosmos networks, including Osmosis, Juno, Secret, Evmos and 50+ other independent L1 chains which are all connected, called Gaia. Something that is not known to many people is that the Binance Chain actually uses the same software as Cosmos and is thus in theory compatible with Gaia. However so far Binance has made the design choice not to enable it as to keep their authority over their BNB chain ATOM uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerance as main consensus in it's \[Tendermint consensus\](https://docs.tendermint.com/v0.34/introduction/what-is-tendermint.html). > > The main strongsuit of Cosmos is the use of \[IBC\](https://ibcprotocol.org/) (Inter-Blockchain Communication). It is a protocol that is integrated in the Tendermint Cosmos SDK that is used to trustlessly communicate between chains. This allows new chains using this SDK to quickly integrate into the entire network and make use of all the capabilities of the other chains. Bridges between different networks have shown to be a weak point in architecture with the \[Nomad hack\](https://halborn.com/the-nomad-bridge-hack-a-deeper-dive/) and the \[Wormhole bridge hack\](https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/wormhole-hack-february-2022/) as recent examples. Therefore relying on IBC, which essentially are many bridges is a risk. So far it has been closely monitored. Many IBC connections to LUNC where disabled quickly after the crash to limit the number of funds siphoned from the other networks but serious TVL has been lost through the LUNC crash, NOMAD bridge exploit and Crypto.com crash from the Cosmos networks. The network effect does not only share the good things but unfortunately also the bad events. In October it was even reported that a critical issue in the IBC was found after a \[security audit\](https://cointelegraph.com/news/cosmos-co-founder-says-a-major-security-vulnerability-has-been-uncovered-on-ibc). It was quickly patched but one remains to wonder what happens is a critical exploit in IBC is not caught on time. > > Currently Cosmos has no native stablecoins in the network after the Luna crash took UST with it. The main dominance of stablecoins is from USDC through the Axelar bridge. Therefore the dependence on this Axelar bridge is very large. This has led to the call to have a native stablecoin in the Cosmos network. USDC is said to bring a native USDC version to Cosmos in the beginning of 2023. In the man time there have been popping up stablecoins left and right, most of them algorithmic backed. Examples are \[IST\](https://01node.com/ist-the-new-cosmos-stablecoin-built-on-agoric/), \[CMST\](https://blog.comdex.one/introducing-composite-a-collateralized-stablecoin-for-ibc-bc76e15fa2ec) and \[SILK\](https://scrt.network/blog/shade-protocol-silk-privacy-preserving-stablecoin). However the introduction of this many stablecoins have led to fighting over which one is best and has spread the liquidity of these stablecoins thin which make them vulnerable for depegging. > > Governance is an important part of Cosmos, it tries to enable self-governance and sovereignty. Though with the full Governance abilities that Cosmos brings it also brings a lot of infighting. In the Stargate Upgrade the Gravity Dex was envisioned. This was supposed to be the DEX for ATOM. However it was seen by the community as a sponsored DEX from the community pool that was to compete with the already existing DEXs in the Cosmos Hub like Osmosis and Sifchain. This led to the failure of Gravity Dex, which subsequently rebranded as \[Crescent Network\](https://app.crescent.network/). It currently sits at about $7mill Total volume locked (TVL) compared to $150mill TVL on \[Osmosis\](https://info.osmosis.zone/), the most popular DEX in the Cosmos ecosystem. > > Later on there was a lot of discussion around \[proposal #82\](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/82). As the previous roadmap had ended it was time to come to a new roadmap. ATOM 2.0 was the proposal that was pitched during the \[Cosmoverse\](https://cosmoverse.org/), the annual Cosmos conferential. The proposal included new tokenomics for ATOM that would increase the inflation on the short term to decrease it further more in the long term. Jae Kwon, one of the founders of Cosmos, called the proposal \[outright theft\](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/11/11/cosmos-founder-jae-kwon-says-he-is-against-proposed-changes-to-atom-token/) from the community. > > However this leaves ATOM still without much value. Currently the main value ATOM provides is a store of value and it is often used as a criteria for receiving airdrops from newly launched chains but it has been passed left and right by chains that offer more utility than ATOM has. As long as there is no consensus about the new roadmap it is going to be difficult to add value to holding ATOM. Looking at it closely shows that it has little to offer that competitors like Ethereum, Polkadot and Avalanche do not also offer. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
TLDR: The Cosmos Ecosystem consists of interconnected sovereign blockchains using the IBC protocol. It contains several exciting projects within the ecosystem, including Osmosis (interchain AMM), Neutron (smart contracting platform), Nomic (Bitcoin bridge), Babylon (Bitcoin security enhancement), Juno (first Cosmwasm smart contract platform), Agoric/IST (JavaScript smart contracts), Sommelier (automated asset trading), Akash (decentralized cloud storage), and Archway (interoperable smart contracts).
Es bleiben im Raum, EZB, FED, Biden, Lagarde..... DER ANGRIFF INFLATIONSBREMSE IST NICHT ERFOLGT .... Jahrelang haben Sie auf Universitäten studiert um zu lernen wie man den Leitzins stabil hält !
Est explanation so far I will spread it like an IST..
We have multiple decentralized stables ATM, that are over collateralized. IST, USK, Harbor, and more are being worked on. They aren’t as popular yet, because market liquidity in Cosmos is still fairly low, but once the economies of various chains start to go, these stables will become as important or more important than USDC.
The Cosmos Ecosystem is a network of sovereign blockchains connected through the IBC protocol. Some interesting IBC connected projects include Archway, an interoperable smart contracting platform; Osmosis, an interchain AMM app chain; Neutron, a Cosmwasm enabled smart contracting platform; Nomic, a Bitcoin bridge bringing BTC to the Cosmos ecosystem; Babylon, bringing Bitcoin security to Cosmos through timestamping transactions; Juno, the first Cosmwasm smart contracting platform; Agoric/IST, a JavaScript smart contracting platform with an over collateralized stable token; Sommelier, a multi-chain automated asset trading platform; and Akash, a decentralized cloud storage project.
tldr; Apr 26, 2023 IST2 Min(s) Read Apr 26, 2023 IST6 Min(s) Read Apr 26, 2023 IST3 Min(s) Read Apr 26, 2023 IST3 Min(s) Read *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Apr 25, 2023 IST4 Min(s) Read Apr 25, 2023 IST4 Min(s) Read Apr 25, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read Apr 24, 2023 IST7 Min(s) Read *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Apr 25, 2023 IST4 Min(s) Read Apr 25, 2023 IST4 Min(s) Read Apr 25, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read Apr 24, 2023 IST7 Min(s) Read *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Apr 21, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read Apr 21, 2023 IST4 Min(s) Read Apr 21, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read Apr 21, 2023 IST5 Min(s) Read *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*