AKA

TibbersGoneWild

lol welcome to the HOOD!! AKA Investors/bag holder’s club

sck178

Lol Oracle bulls (AKA complete dumbasses) in shambles

IM_REFUELING

Iran has gone back to "Ol' Reliable," AKA unserious maximalist demands untethered to reality as a delay tactic. Same ol shit that they've done since 1979, except in 2026 it gets them bombed.

InsertUNH

In such situations it doesn't matter if your assets are in cash or stocks, they're both equally worthless. What you're describing requires investments in food storage, water purification, hunting/gathering, and defense of these assets, AKA "prepping". And unless you're going to go full on "underground bunker" status, stocking up on these things probably isn't going to require selling off your whole portfolio. It should be viewed as another form of diversification.

malakim_angel

i've held LCID a long time. I may as well carry these bags till they evaporate or whatever. AKA, since I'm not selling, it is like saying "I would buy the stock at $6 since I bought it at $31. I think their cars are neat and I want to promote competition in the EV space." Like you said, they need to learn financial discipline or they won't survive, they must be drunk on Saudi money. I'm holding my 110 shares forever, you can't have my shares unless you want to pay $420.69.

Fancy-Strain7025

AKA socialism

DiarrheaFartLover

AKA the USA will just claim victory and leave

DiligentRanger007

BAHAHAHAHA. Putting out the fire AKA DCA

fallingdowndizzyvr

That would matter if that's what we have been talking about. It isn't. It's this. "Gold. **Real estate.** Farmland. International equities (but there's nuance there). " -- you "Still, a house is a house is a house." -- you "equities get hit much harder than real estate or REITs" -- you We are talking about real estate AKA a house. Not about a REIT. Which by the way is an equity. The thing you were saying that real estate(a house) was better than for preserving wealth during a downturn.

thehacktivist1

cash gang AKA coward

borrokalaria

QQQ blow-off top today or 666 next week? 666 on Wednesday is my guess, before the war resumes, and the church of devil AKA wall street loves 666, so there is that.

caraleoviado

The Wolf of Wall Street, AKA best movie ever

Junior-Appointment93

Typo on ACE supposed to be AND. As far as CSP. It’s a cash secured puts. Say you want to buy shares of XYZ that is currently trading at $10 a share. You have $1k to buy 100 shares. But you rather buy it at $9 a share or $900 for 100 shares. So you use the $900 in cash hoping the shares go down to $9 a share in 7 days or 7DTE. By doing so you receive a premium of .05 a share or $50 for placing the trade. If the shares don’t get down to $9 a share by the end of the 7 days you get to collect the full $50 in premium you received plus your $900 in collateral gets returned to you. In a nut shell this is a Cash secured puts. AKA CSP. As far as the index’s and Vix. If the vix goes up the index’s goes down. And Vic goes down index goes up. It’s great for 0-1DTE trades. you can also look at the futures market post and pre market to get an idea of what direction the market will go in the morning.

no-thanks-please1

The fact that it's not clicking for you is actually insane. You're assuming that the current era of US exceptionalism is a permanent, immutable law of nature. AKA missing the historical reality that every dominant superpower eventually faces a period of significant regression, and no market is mathematically guaranteed to just go up over every 20-year period forever. The ship hasn't sailed yet but if you really care about your future you need to have international exposure lol

macdelamemes

AKA Two Weeks Man

TheMightySet69

Gonna go hibernate for a while (AKA depression nap) 

ProudestPeasant

do you think part of the reason there's been a decline in movie-going is because we don't idolise and worship movie stars (AKA other humans) as much as we used to? it's like there's no mystique any placing them on a pedestal anymore. As a footnote, I don't think any human should be worshipped. We're flawed. there certainly is less exclusivity and gate-keeping because it seems like anyone can become 'famous' and a 'celebrity' these days.

DuckTalesOohOoh

AKA priced in.

alieistheliars

hahaha, complaining about extortion?  huh? Taxes aren't extortion though, right? How about "civil asset forfeiture" AKA cops STEALING people s property? Dude couldn't be more of a hypocrite.

Sader325

Ok so, to be clear. The 9D Transdimensional CheckerChess Move supported by the stable genius and orator supreme AKA the progenitor of the "Art of the Deal" is to... Close the Strait of Hormuz ourselves?

SaltyPlantain1503

AKA The limp dick blockade.

TootCannon

The one thing they can't agree to is nuclear. AKA the thing the Obama administration solved until Trump ripped up the agreement out of spite.

winston511

Direct talks failed but indirect talks will continue. AKA the pump failed but the melt up will continue.

StopElectingWealthy

Quantitative easing is what has been different since 08. AKA money printing. AKA accelerating inflation. Value isn’t going up. Money supply is. 

EthanielRain

Only if it's an Official Act. What's an "Official Act"? Ot's open to interpretation AKA is POTUS a fascist moron or a Dem?

Broad-Concert1527

NY Times, AKA CIA propaganda

silver_sofa

They’ve discovered a new reason why poor people shouldn’t have money. AKA they’ve discovered a new way to convert poor people’s assets into rich people assets.

ShootingGuns10

AKA Time to fill the tank ☝️

iamwhiskerbiscuit

AKA Pedodollar

davidbigham

MSFT AKA Moving So Fking Trash.

Significant_Speed854

https://preview.redd.it/qb7okmry96ug1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75a41679f9e1535996fb6e393ea23b0e0235baed AKA MM said 🖕🖕🖕

marawki

Because there is hope on peace talks AKA priced in

WiseDrummer254

Hello. I have two **specific** investment scenarios that I need help comparing. **If anyone is very knowledgeable in Treasuries and high-yield savings accounts, please chime in**. I am not looking for alternative suggestions or investments. Let's keep this very simple where we live in a perfect world and interest rates don't fluctuate. My question starts at this point, that I have a **high yield savings account** and on January 31, 2026, this account offered a variable annual percentage yield (APY) of 3.30%. The monthly interest rate was approximately 0.275% per month. On that same date I had **a balance of $108,646.53 and a monthly interest payment of $419.96.** Comparatively, I have doing some bond laddering with **1-month treasuries**. I put **$25100 once a week in 1 month treasuries.** At the end of five weeks (yes, in order to keep this smooth without a surprise "break" week, due to the Treasury's complicated scheduling I need to do this on a five-week cycle instead of four) I gain a **profit of $356.33.** My common sense tells me this is nuts. Am I actually better off just keeping my money in the savings account? I think part of the reason for this surprise is that Treasuries don't take the full amount we invest, they just pull a part of it and then return the difference as a profit AKA 'Coupon', and that wildly throws off the projections. I did some projecting any way and see that, starting today, it will take a little more than a year for the return on the Treasuries (with reinvestment of the profits) to reach and surpass the return ($419.96) on the savings account. Savings Account: $419.96 X 60 equals 25197.60 at the end of five years. Treasuries: $26456.41 at the end of five years. So my question is, am I looking at this right? Something I am missing?

Zestyclose-Bit271

AKA it’s all fake. shocker

powerboner

AKA let it run for the first 10-30 min then load puts

Direct-Spot-1693

Let it play. The negotiations include nuclear development to continue and for the US to pay for damages to Iran also a full stop to the war on all fronts. Lucifer (AKA Bibi) wants the war to continue and reports show he’s already pressuring commander in chief. You have time. Don’t sell at open and kick yourself twice in 4 days.

DeezCodeNutz

Bulls also get castrated from time-to-time - AKA Ribeye steak

VeryMercurial

Economy doesn’t matter when you got billions AKA not us 🤣

Shot-Ground-9898

Told you pussies. The only way Mango loses is if he folds. He didn’t. US reviewing response. AKA Iran came back with its tail between its legs. I say respond to them at 7:45. Make ‘em swear a bit. Fly 50 jets near their borders at 7:30. Respond by 7:45. Fk put me in these negotiations let me show these clowns how to play these mind games

Actually-Yo-Momma

His campaign was literally no new wars. He’s trolling his idiot followers AKA dumb Americans like yourself 

platinumarks

I posit that 🥭 (PBUH) is our new Jesus Christ and has the right to rain hellfire down upon the sinners and send the markets soaring to Heaven. Hear me out. Look at the parallels: * Jesus came to save mankind; 🥭 came to save men from DEI/wokeness and women from having to labor in the workplace * Jesus sat down with thieves and lepers; 🥭 sits down with the modern day equivalent (Democrat Party members) * Jesus preached the Gospel; 🥭 preaches America First * Jesus was an Israeli Jew; 🥭 has Jewish family members * Jesus healed lepers; 🥭 heals cancer and "COVID" (AKA mass hysteria) * Jesus had wounds on his hands from his holy sacrifice; 🥭 has bruises on his hands from shaking people's hands, a sacrifice he is willing to make * Jesus had the Holy Trinity; 🥭 has the Holy Trinity (Don Jr., Eric, and Barron, Praise Be Upon Them) * Jesus worshiped God; 🥭 worships God and Allah * Jesus was killed by the Jews; 🥭's life was threatened with death by an attempted assassination by Mossad to hide Epstein's crimes This is just the beginning of his mighty and awesome works in today's age, and is why he is guaranteed not to TACO.

2jformay

I don't think so. I think Israel wants him to drop a nuke. But I don't think Trump wants to. I can back up my theory as well. Btw, I'm not a fan of Trump, just an assessment: For 1, this war has been going on a long time before we got involved (with Iran now). Israel is committing genocide against Gaza, Palestine, and Lebanon. Iran helped those 3 countries \^ Btw, I mean Israel is actually slaughtering their neighbors. Bombing hospitals and apartments ALL NIGHT LONG. Israel is Trump's mega donors for his campaign. They 'bought' him. AKA they bought a favor from the US. In order for Israel to stop Iran, they have to attack Iran across several countries that are in between. It's a little difficult. So they call in the US to "send a message". US comes in, drops bombs. Israel says, "Hey drop one here too lmao", and gives us the coordinates to a girl's school. Yeah :| That's 1000000% in line with how Israel acts. They're DISGUSTING. If you ever think the US is terrible, just read what other countries say about Israel. I say this AND I have Israeli family. Anyway, the US is like "Kew, good show, I'm out." Israel does more of their merciless strikes. Then the US has to answer for this 'ongoing' war. And here is why I think Trump does NOT want to be a part of this... look up this video on youtube: "President Trump on Israel and Iran: "They don’t know what the f\*ck they’re doing."" I think Trump knows it'll destroy his approval ratings. The war will make his presidency look bad. The US is already in a weak state. Spending is high AF. Etc etc.

Samjabr

Or people in tech - AKA “customer support”

jrodshoots

You absolutely can beat the index if you're high conviction and don't diversify heaps... But that's scary for most people and they hate the idea of maybe losing more than probably winning. And I agree with most of the general idea you're trying to point out but holy moly your idea of contrarian is not contrarian and devalues everything you're trying to say. A lot of fund managers don't beat the index because they'd lose their job if they underperform it. All they care about is their jobs so they just make sure they can't lose much more than the index and just say it was a bad year... But that means they also will barely beat the index on good years too. It's all a scam to take in fees and say they're actively managing money - AKA performing average. 90% of the gains in the index have come from the mag 7. Why would you buy the 35th worst company on your list instead of just buying more of the best company? I'll never understand it. You absolutely can not beat the index every single year if you're a high conviction investor (which you need to be to beat the market) but long term if you pick the right companies and hold on tight there's plenty of success stories long term. Most people just aren't willing to take that risk.

CursedClownz

Bul is back AKA FED

Elegant_Tech

AKA, who gives a shit what the market is doing or should be doing. If it's moving go make money. Up or down you don't give a shit, go make money.

SmoothOperator423

Spent the weekend doing extensive research on if NIKE is a buy, AKA I stared at peoples feet all weekend.

homero1977

AKA Trump manipulating the market every week

vwboyaf1

White House calls lid, Mango in Chief probably in Situation Room, AKA the shitter.

General_Wealth_5177

I have got a bad feeling that Baal AKA Molock is going to sacrifice Christian nationalist and Persian Aryan Muslims for Easter.   A true burnt offering.

thesword62

AKA War Crimes

RPO777

AKA "I have dementia." Or possibly late-stage syphillis.

MIT_Engineer

> Holy defensive batman. Holy dishonest argument, batman. > I can tell you're like giga triggered for absolutely no reason. No reason, lol. You constructed a strawman and when you got called out on it you insisted that it was somehow both just "a misunderstanding" but also still something that strengthened your argument. How does your misunderstanding strengthen your argument? Run that by me one more time, huh? Weasel. > I admit to misunderstanding about what I thought you implied But *also* continued to claim said misunderstanding strengthened your argument. > and you come back saying "no you're doing that on purpose to hurt my feelings". Oh look, *another strawman argument!* Did I mention a single word about my *feelings*? Quote me where I mentioned that. Just keep doubling down on being an absolute weasel. > This statement in context implies that you believe that the US is somewhat insulated from the economic consequences of the war. Oh, we're *tripling down* now? It says no such thing. And if you're still confused, I stated such *explicitly*. > NOW LISTEN Why, are you getting ready to quadruple down on being dishonest? > I understand that you just thought "no it doesn't". Correctamundo! And I think that because it's completely true, and the obvious response to your lie. > That's fine, I thought it did and I admitted that I misunderstood what you meant by that. While simultaneously claiming that your misunderstanding *strengthened your argument.* And then you followed that up with another strawman about how my feelings were hurt? > You can continue to frame me as a person who is openly and maliciously lying on purpose Will do! > and also someone who is admitting they misunderstood you if you want. But that seems like a contradiction to me. That's right, you *did* contradict yourself! You tried to both *justify the strawman argument without retraction* while *also* claiming you retracted it! If you've noticed the contradiction, congrats! You're now caught up with what I already told you in the previous comment. Now all you have to do is admit you created a *second* strawman to defend your previous strawman and you'll be caught up with *this* comment. > The statement that you're claiming is a strawman not only isn't, it can't be. It's a misunderstanding, but it also *isn't*! Seems a little contradictory! > Because it isn't even a statement about you or your position. Right, it's a statement, not connected to me or my position, that you invented to argue with. Hence, a strawman. > You told me that using scare quotes around the word insulated weakens my position. It wasn't *my* position. And you just admitted as much. So whose position was it, if not yours? It's *your* strawman. > My position was that the US cannot insulate itself fully from the economic consequences from the war. A position you took up in opposition to a strawman *you created*. > Indicating in a comparative statement where I use the word insulated that I don't mean totally insulated does not weaken that point. Right, it's an attack on your other, contradictory position. Which again, isn't my position, it's yours. You invented it out of whole cloth, it's a strawman. > It's literally not even a statement about you or your position AKA a strawman. > it's about the internal logic of the statement "So you're putting scare quotes around your own claim". You put the quotes around it. And it's your claim. It's not my claim, after all. So whose is it? It's the strawman you created. Lemme know when you start to understand that internal logic. > A second-order effect is not "by definition" smaller than a first-order one. This one is definitionally smaller. > So your response to this literally amounts to "nuh-uh". Yes, it's as if you said 30 > 3 and I said, "Nuh uh." > A stronger dollar and increased purchasing power does not inherently compensate for across the board increased prices on all imported goods. It does, given that the underlying reason is an improvement in U.S. terms of trade. Your effect is strictly smaller. > Yeah, that's why the statement you're responding to says *I*. Yep. *Your* misunderstanding. > Let me know if you need this explained to you. Why would I need it explained to me, you just said my statement was correct. > I don't know why you responded one sentence at a time instead of responding to the point as a whole. Let me know if you need this explained to you. > I wonder if it's the projection of that whole "outright dishonest" thing. Sounds like yet another of your many "misunderstandings." This one's logic is "he's responding to me sentence by sentence, he must be dishonest!" Do I even need to debunk that? > *At best*, it would be a wash. Incorrect, there would be a net benefit left over. U.S. terms of trade improved. > That would require several policy changes that to my understanding no one has even seriously proposed yet. So propose them? You're the one who doesn't like high gas prices. I'm the one who cares about the climate. Trump would very happily repeal gas taxes. > As well as the assumption that the tax revenue increases That isn't an assumption, that's how *existing* tax law works. > Which is a pretty big assumption. No, it's literally how the current system, with no changes, currently works. > I don't know why you're positioning yourself as opposed to me on this Because you want to keep gas prices low. > I literally agreed with you in my last response about it. Not in practical terms, no, since your complaint is about higher prices on fossil fuels. > What nuclear, solar, hydro, and wind capacity do you think that China just has sitting offline that they're not already utilizing? They would build *more* capacity. Wild concept, right? > Even if you're talking about building new facilities you're not just talking about replacing power-generation generally, but base-load generation. Base load generation like coal. > That's what gas turbines are. And they won't get to run those without the fuel. Tragic for them, great for the climate. > Solar and wind capacity, which could be built on the order of a year or two, cannot easily serve base-load power demand. Coal's not great at it either. > The two that could, hydro and nuclear, each take a decade plus to add new capacity. So... So what? Coal plants aren't peaker plants either. > Oh, you mean the plants that came online because they were already being constructed prior to the fuel shortage? Oh, you have a quibble with the time span I used? *No problem* sweetheart. 1970-1990: 2500% increase. > So what do you think they're going to do in the short-term to replace that lost electricity supply. Reduce usage and suffer an economic downturn, same as happened in the U.S. Wanna know how much U.S. electric generation went up from 1971 to 1972? 138 billion kWh. Wanna know how much U.S. electric generation went up from 1973-1974? 6 billion kWh. The U.S. has huge coal reserves too. > Gee, they're probably going to burn the huge coal resources they have in all of the already existing *and new* coal plants they're already building. "They'll build more plants," yeah, but somehow they can't do *that* with solar or wind or hydro or nuclear because, well, those aren't peaker plants! Even though coal plants aren't peaker plants either... > They're going to reserve specific products for use in specific cases that can only be run on those specific products. Yeah, you're gonna have to be a little more specific than that. I ask again: are they gonna burn coal in their cars? > let me know if you need that explained to you. Explain away then. *Are they gonna burn coal in their cars?* > Notice how we were talking about China, and you chose to stop talking about China here. We're talking about something you claim is happening in both the US. and China, and now you wanna forget about the U.S. Why is that? > That's because China's electricity generation capacity has more than doubled in the last 20 years. Which undercuts your argument that Chinese electricity generation has been increasing because of an AI tech race. LLMs didn't exist 20 years ago. > It has gone up by 20% in just the last 5 years. Right, but you just debunked this: their power increases predate AI, and aren't related to it. > US power-generation is at an all time high That's a very weak statement. > and has risen 13% in the last 5 years. [**It hasn't.**](https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php) It's grown less than half that, and that's ignoring the fact that you've cherry-picked your window to start at the low point of the pandemic. **Oops! You got caught lying again!** > This is where the wishful thinking part is. Funny, because this *isn't* where you claimed the wishful thinking part was last time. > They're going to fight the economic downturn with everything that they have, just like everyone else. The U.S. had large coal reserves in the 1970's; what, did they just not fight hard enough? > This will almost certainly result in the increased burning of dirtier fuels to make up lost supply. They gonna toss coal in their car gas tanks? Still no answer on that one from you. > Even if there is a net reduction in total fossil fuel usage that is going to be countered by the fact that the makeup of that usage is now much dirtier. Sounds like wishful thinking on your part. You're gonna wish that coal right into those gas tanks, aintcha? > Also just on a like a decency note, like relax. On a decency note, you're a weasel. Stop that? > You're literally crying Says the guy lecturing me on 'decency.' > I mean you literally complain that I don't "engage with those reasons" In response to a statement you made claiming I hadn't given any reasoning for you to engage with, nice try weasel. Perfect example of your bad faith nonsense.

Negative_Song_6362

You're right that institutions are probably front running the central bank buying and probably caused an unreasonable spike in gold prices (AKA priced in). But central banks buy slowly and consistently, so there's a constant bid in the price action.

Sryzon

We're in a unicorn job market. Most companies are looking for someone to fill a specialized role and require no training to do so. It's a mixture of Boomer retirements, almost a decade of a tight labor market, and leaner operations caused by Covid. Most employees are already doing the jobs of two people. There's no spare resources to train someone. Thus, companies are desperate for "good" help. AKA someone that requires no training. Problem is, all those people are already employed and being paid well because they're so critical to their company's operation.

1M-to-Zero

VIX is 30+. Premiums are so expensive. How are you finding plays? AKA, how to find setups with less expensive and room to make money.

illicit_FROG

AKA, we already lost the jobs, we just aren't ready to talk about it yet.

Stickywickydicky

“Weeks” AKA 2350 weeks.

ExplosiveDlarrhea69

Why are you investing in facebook, AKA "the site for grandpappies to get radicalized on Jewish cabals and AI grannies baking their own 163rd birthday cakes"?

BarbellPadawan

You see the amputee? Sad. But she seems to be pretty positive and can twerk better than anyone I’ve ever seen despite being status-post AKA

Tim_Apple_938

> the United States is losing Define losing And define winning On surface level it seems like Iran has lost their entire military and navy and just have some drones / rocket launchers on a straight where massive flammable explosive ships go past AKA incredibly easy target which is not indicative of any sort of actual power And all their gulf neighbors hate them and will attack them (such as Saudi Arabia)

fatheadlifter

Advertising is best done with AI direction. Basically targeting ads at you with modelling and statistics isn't good enough anymore, the most ideal scenario for advertising is a realtime model that can know/learn things about you and narrowly target ads at your current moods, thoughts and feelings. AKA a brain. AKA, AI. If you think this is fantasy it's what they're doing already. Google, Amazon, Meta, they all aggregate huge amounts of data about you but they're trying to guide it more based on realtime patterns. That in turn converts to eyeballs and clicks, that in turn generates more revenue. Even if AI directed advertising is only 10% better, that's a 10% increase in revenue. This is how they grow the company. And any large company not doing it is gonna get left behind, not make as much money, and lose out on critical metrics and sales.

x992607

Ah yes, robot humanoid AKA META Virtual Fantasy World. Same stupid idea, same stupid fantasy, the same stupid end.

Ok-Air515

Iran and US agree to ceasefire so both can save face and trade can continue, they both continue to fund their proxies AKA Israel and Hezbollah and both just say it has nothing to do with them, it’s all the proxies initiatives, same as status quo from before.

f0xinaround

AKA were gonna keep bleeding the country dry.

Maximum-Counter-4904

you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about bro i’m tired of seeing people like you AKA the self proclaimed and overnight stock market experts attempt to explain how the markets work🤣🤣. you are trying to make yourself sound smart but the truth is you and nobody else have any clue whatsoever about what the market is going to do

Frozen_Shades

[I won't name names but this Redditor, not the sharpest tool in the shed. AKA big dumb. ](https://www.reddit.com/user/me/)

iShitBloodandCumShit

“I’ll let the 🥭 talk about that at a different time” AKA “He hasn’t secured his position yet.”

Inevitable_Tea_5841

I'm honestly not sure what your point is? Is it that you don't think AI progress is happening? Or something else. Because all *my* point is, is that the models have gotten much better in the last 3-6 months - meanwhile people are acting as if they plateaued. To address some of what you said directly > Progress is one thing, but what you and some others in here have been saying is that the rest of us are stupid for being skeptical of the masturbatory way AI is talked about by companies like Nvidia and OpenAI. Straw man: I never said it like this. I call people stupid who put their heads in the sand and are unwilling to update their views. I'm not a hype-bro/tech-bro who thinks AI is going to do what OpenAI/NVIDIA says it's going to do. > The github repo is from an OpenAI person AKA of course they're going to be on the hype train; it's their fucking train. Classic genetic fallacy. It's a toy example, but its a real repo. Its open-source code; you can literally run the repo and see the results. Dismissing a tool because of the author is kinda sad. > I went to an Ivy for grad school and I'm telling you there's a lot of just academic BS that turns into an academy-to-firm BS pipeline. So your argument is: "I went to an Ivy League school, so I can ignore research from Ivy League experts." LMAO... > not gonna spend an hour listening to him talk about a meeting that he could prib summarize in a paragraph "I'm not going to watch the evidence, therefore it isn't evidence." Did you know that you can literally use AI to summarize the video for you then? Anyways, I can see changing your (and other people's) view is hopeless and pointless. Overall, it's just so obvious to us who are in the trenches using these tools that things are getting better. When you go from coding by hand a year ago, using AI as advanced google, to now barely coding at all, just letting the agents do the work, it's become clear this tech is getting better. That's literally all I'm saying

VariousScenes

Why would we trust the Iran AKA the TERRORIST REGIME ENEMY and not our beloved SUPREME LEADER??? THE LEADER SAID WE WON AND ITS OVER. PEACE ACHIEVED. MARKETS MUST RISE.

Wildernaess

The github repo is from an OpenAI person AKA of course they're going to be on the hype train; it's their fucking train. The podcaster is a professor but also a podcaster. Maybe that would be a revolutionary video but I'm not gonna spend an hour listening to him talk about a meeting that he could prib summarize in a paragraph. Progress is one thing, but what you and some others in here have been saying is that the rest of us are stupid for being skeptical of the masturbatory way AI is talked about by companies like Nvidia and OpenAI. Look, both those people from your links are Ivy League -- I went to an Ivy for grad school and I'm telling you there's a lot of just academic BS that turns into an academy-to-firm BS pipeline. It's fine if AI is ruining the fake white-collar jobs you're referring to like marketing or mid coding or if a mathematician uses it or whatever. But since most people don't do that, and most people like paycheck to paycheck, then you'll have to forgive me if I find these transformative claims a bit fucking stupid

KeyboardSynthStudio

I think when people say the markets react to trump, its normally like sub 5%, AKA noise in the eyes of actual investors and not swing traders or gamblers

powerboner

Just saw that I’m pre-approved for a 200K personal loan… AKA casino money. I wish I never saw that. But if I could just take it and make a quick 20%… 👀🫣

Charlierg50

AKA: King Kon 🙊

foreverpeppered

“Soar” AKA up 1.6% after being down 1.6% over 5 days.

janenotdaria

AKA Big Oil tapped his shoulder and he’s surrendering.

philbar

“I knew he was lying the whole time, I was just reacting to the people who believe it.” AKA greater fool theory

BFLO-Retail

In the word’s of Billy Bob Thornton AKA Pandman “Get in and get out.”

rideveryday

The best troll since the Iraqi Minister of Information AKA Baghdad Bob AKA Comical Ali: "There are no American infidels in Baghdad. Never!'"

powerboner

Date with a nurse tonight. AKA she’s gonna lie the whole time, claim to be on a “healing journey” and then say “I usually don’t do this” when doing the double handed texas twister with F5 pressure.

MrMoussab

AKA we want more data

Putrid_Leg_1474

Here's two that might bump us enough to go back on track... 1. Polish savings accounts ( AKA, tax returns). AKA, poors like me getting money they loaned the government back and thinking its a paycheck and blowing g it on bigscreens, booze, and cars we can't afford. 2. 401k matches in a month. Lots of money injections into securities. Outside of that, spread your cheeks and buy some put spreads

Mychelly360

Nice. Takes shares to do CCs anyhow, would have to be done in the account holding shares. Also wash sales are cross account, and most brokers don't track cross account wash sales. And the big kicker, say you do what OP did, then you wait 31 days to get rid of the wash sales, but on day 15 of the 31 days you purchased SPY in your Roth ira. So sold spy for wash sales in taxed account -> bought spy in his Roth ira 10 days later. The above scenario creates a -permanent- wash sale. AKA you can never claim it. This is the real thing to be afraid of. Easiest way to avoid that issue, is to not trade the same tickers across multiple accounts.

Loose_Stool_12

Nice. I'm firing off a spike now. AKA dookie

Master_protato

AKA, it was a vengeful act after Iran killed Satanyahu. Death is confirmed here!

hoppinjohncandy

Chik fil a somehow discovered if you train, treat and pay employees well and sprinkle in upward mobility combined with quality food for a cheaper than average price customers never leave your drive thru. Odd. My old career was managing a semi-upscale restaurant ($50~ a plate kind of bullshit). We had a front of house crisis once and my coworker and I decided to talk to some chik-fil-a employees about "opportunities." AKA We poached them. They were the single best employees I have ever had. When they told me of their training structure it blew me away. Yes, they were young Christian go-hards who had to be kept at a distance from the back of house but, man, they were impressive.

Foulwinde

This is your deposit on a new shed for your parent's backyard, AKA your new home.

Stunning-Dig-8916

AKA gulf war 4.0

JakeSal10

Get used to it buddy, this is Vietnam 3.0, (AKA Iraq 2.0)

masterburn123

that's not what is happening though. It's not putting up 30k to make 600. It's collecting 600 while I'd buy it at 300 no matter what. It's an investment. You're only looking at premiums collected. I'm looking at owning the underlying asset at my desired price. so I keep collecting 600 until it hits 300 AKA free money, I'd buy it at 300 anyways even with 0 premium

ntsh_robot

\#1, The Market is a hedge against Inflation...AKA Dollar devaluation \#2, The Market tells us where investors are going: Risk or Safety Check you Costco, COST and you'll see it's recent accumulation since January.

Nice-Truck8806

the president backing down wasn't a completely unpredictable black swan, you were just wrong. made some bad assumptions and were wrong as a result. it's serious michael burry vibes. you're not wrong, just completely misjudged market and political conditions (AKA wrong).

zendayastoothbrush

Im hearing USA has waived the white flag AKA surrender? IRAN overpowered USA hahaha pretty typical stuff.

ohgodthehorror95

Mod Edition, AKA: mods are gaybears I guess?

Spaceisveryhard

Thanks for the recs. I hang out in combat footage so I've seen a lot of these guys on Twitter but a few I haven't. I watch perun regularly and I do take mcbeth as I take any source, with a dose of pragmatic skepticism. Mcbeth has a job to self promote AKA act on the news and his predictions or takes on things get it wrong sometimes but overall he's a decent guy who tries his best. The same for the other guys I mention, always do your due diligence haha. But when everyone is saying the situation in the straits is rough and immediate help is not on the horizon unless Iran surrenders or they actually manage to get serious about massive naval convoys I don't see it getting better.

Mrbustanut

Liberation day, AKA make america unaffordable again day.

dontlikeyacutG

alright time to light some ganja and watch the markets, AKA pure brainrot

RedParaglider

AKA Israel will be buying bombs with the 300 billion inflation adjusted dollars they have grifted from the U.S. since 1950.

Exact-Writing-8561

Lmao insider trading >my dad and some people in his circle tipped me off last February about what they thought was a good opportunity AKA “my dad and his finance friends saw the 20% crash on one of the safest investment choices and told me to invest in it”

DelphiTsar

>growing at a healthy rate You are projecting future growth based off of previous growth. I am a Google fanboy but to give perspective. The recent surge in google's net income is -Cost cutting through firing 12,000 employees.(Non replicateable) -Making their operation more efficient.(Non replicateable) -Claiming unrealized gains on equity securities AKA AI companies they invested in increasing in value. This is around ~50% of the increase alone. (AI Bubble) -~30% was from cloud growth/advertising increases. While this is good/real growth, it's susceptible to market declines and the idea they can replicate the growth is iffy. When the market loses faith in AI the 50% of their net profit that was from AI companies they invested in growing in value not only doesn't repeat, it goes the other way. Triggers a recession and hits their advertising revenue. They already cost cut, it's unlikely they have much wiggle room. I am also an AI fan, but the valuations aren't real.