COO

CelebrationNo1242

Uber COO also came out and said how expensive AI is And Google internally is pushing their own devs to use Gemini Flash and actually locked Gemini Pro from their own devs to save money lmao They also recently introduced token quotas that refresh every 24 hours

Porcupinesolos

Zuckerberg has no strategy but to waste their FCF to the next FAD. AI is an expensive technology with no ROI for most businesses as Uber COO pointed out today. MAG7 NEED TO CUT CAPEX NOW and put these parasitic memory companies in their place that steal their FCF. Fuck ZUCK

ajibtunes

JUST IN: Uber’s COO says heavy AI spending is getting harder to justify, as higher token usage fails to show a clear payoff in consumer features.

LankyGuitar6528

Amazing timing. I've been training my AI to act like a mini Bloomberg terminal. It's scraping SEC data and 2 seconds before I read your post it fired this to me: **May 18, 2026 three top officers ALL sold simultaneously:** * **Susan Li (CFO):** \~$5.6M across 7 lots at $604-$611 * **Andrew Bosworth (CTO):** \~$4.8M across 8 lots at same price range * **Javier Olivan (COO):** \~$893K across 5 smaller lots **Combined: \~$11M+ in coordinated officer selling on a single day** — and that's just the top three. No buying. Zero insider open-market purchases.

Rich-Kaleidoscope-12

You’re right, it’s a lot of trial and error not just at this level. However look at the company as a whole, I search for companies with a product not an idea, who uses the product, is it tied in to other things? Example: GPUS has bitcoin in its bank, if the value of BTC drops so does their cash at hand. If BTC is 🚀 they will follow, There’s a lot of penny stocks that rely on the big guys to do well specially NVDA. I was in ABAT and shifted over to USEG @ .73 in April sold at 1.23, and waited I’m now back in at .89. I looked at USEG as having a physical product, helium, and contract at hand (5m in the UK) even though their financials were garbage due to them shutting down the oil refinery to expand their helium. Once that plant is done and the contract is executable they should hit target of 1.6-2.0 but it’s speculation. So that’s the risk. I guess what I’m saying is, don’t just research on where the company is now, look at what affects it and where the market could be headed. Also look at their leadership. New CTO new COO? A new board member could be joining to prove something depending on their background. If they come from a big tech they probably got let go, or made enough money to make this their new project. If they came from nowhere or somewhere small they are excellent and want to prove they can grow it OR dad cashed in a favor. Got to do your research. But the volatility of these small stocks is so fast, you got to do it on the fly and sometimes throw it in on black and hope it hits. CXAI is my double 00 right now and killing it, up 30% and climbing. In a nutshell I practice the research by looking at these companies that do well and see what was the factor on why they went up and then look for future ones following those footsteps. lol 😅 I feel like I’m rambling, over caffeinated! Have a good one!

Dev_Im

This post ended up on my feed. So, I'll reply to you. Most of what you said is wrong. How do I know? I've analyzed POET, real fundamentals, instead of suppositions like you did.  First of all, if you're analyzing a company, you should know the products behind it, current dynamics, and targets.  It is true that POET's past performance doesn't give any kind of confidence. But, this time it could be different. 1. I made a post explaining the Marvell case on the official sub of POET. 2. The agreement with Lumilens is a win-win for both companies. It's an EOI designed to be tested in 2026 and launched in 2027. If it works, POET is validated, and Lumilens gets a substantial pie with the warrants. If they don't succeed, that's all. 3. What you're missing is that POET is doing these movements because they are trying to ramp up production. And that means cash. This isn't a dilution to scam investors. 4. POET has a preorder of 5M with a secret integrator for the second half of 2026, for specific optical engines Infintity series(400G-800G). They are testing in Penang facilities (Malaysia) this (stress tests). If this is validated, POET immediately will surge, independently of Lumilens or other deals. 5. POET has reliable partner collaborators. They won awards, and were present at the OFC 2026 Los Angeles. This isn't a scam company, just a risky small cap.  6. They are planning to redomiciliate to the US, and are restructuring the board. They hired a new COO in order to help them ramp up production and more moves, the CFO that made the mistake with the NDA will leave the role in the following months, POET is hiring more engineers and stuff. As I said, this is a small cap, highly volatile, and risky. But the x10 or more is real if they ramp up production. In any case, this isn't a scam company like you supposed.

PigeonManBro

I'm feelin' bullish on COO

Neel_Crashkari

I'm the COO of Dogshit

West_Lavishness6689

damn, COO is down 30%, might be a good time to get better PR manager and fix this tanking bird

jonsnowick

It's COO

SmoothOperator423

Simple DD for tomorrow - Pigeon says “Coo” - Full port $COO -Profit?

Critical_Valuable_19

Here is the AI response to my feeding it the yahoo article on today’s poet news: 1. Lumilens is Accton’s photonics spearhead. Accton invested in Lumilens’ Series B structure in April 2025, initially described as up to $106.5M of Series B preferred, then later a closed tranche of about $9.2M at a roughly $400M post-money valuation.   That makes Lumilens look less like a random startup customer and more like a strategically financed vehicle sitting near Accton’s AI networking roadmap. 2. Ankur Singla is the hinge. Lumilens lists Ankur Singla as CEO/founder, and Accton-related sources show he had Accton board/director involvement, including resignation from one Accton independent director/audit role effective May 23, 2025, then appointment as representative of institutional director Golden Tengis effective June 12, 2025.   That is the “hmm” part: Lumilens’ founder is not merely backed by Accton; he appears embedded in Accton governance orbit. 3. Accton has the exact strategic need. Accton/Edgecore is deep in 800G/1.6T AI switching, and Edgecore recently described 1.6T/open-networking AI infrastructure as central to its offering.   Lumilens’ own site says it is building high-density pluggable, near-packaged, and co-packaged optics for scale-out and scale-up AI architectures.   POET’s interposer pitch slots directly into that bottleneck. 4. The warrant is the smoke. If this were just a vanilla supply deal, why give Lumilens a massive nine-year warrant package? The obvious answer is incentive alignment. The conspiratorial answer: Lumilens becomes both customer and quasi-equity upside vehicle, and because Lumilens is Accton-backed, Accton gets indirect economic exposure to POET’s success without Accton publicly announcing “we are betting on POET.” 5. Timing is suspiciously convenient. POET got smashed after Marvell/Celestial cancelled orders over alleged confidentiality breaches in late April 2026.   Then, within weeks, POET announces a much larger Lumilens framework: $50M initial PO, possible $500M over five years, COO appointment, and manufacturing ramp language.   Red-string interpretation: the “Marvell rug” may have forced POET to reveal or accelerate the Accton/Lumilens track. My best thesis: Accton may be using Lumilens as a semi-independent photonics architecture layer for future AI-networking systems. Lumilens needs optical engines/manufacturing help. POET needs validation, scale, and a post-Marvell credibility reset. The $50M PO plus warrant says: “prove you can build this, and if you do, we all win.” The hidden prize is not just transceivers; it is POET becoming part of an Accton-adjacent 1.6T/NPO/CPO supply chain.

RevolutionaryPhoto24

Well, for a long time they funded R&D through investors with little hope of a return, created amazing tech (optical interposer - another bottleneck for speed of processing,) and now may be actually monetizing it with a new COO to scale operations.

Snoo-90587

Poets new COO “KUMAR” what is that like 5 o and 6 r

Alert_Level7741

This is a Chinese company - US goverment will do not anything with it. Nobody will be chasing them in China 😄 They are having 5 employees: * **Xiao Jian Wang:** Chairman of the Board, President, & CEO * **Zihao Zhao:** Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Secretary, & Director * **Cai Lu:** Chief Operating Officer (COO) * **Shuang Zhang:** Vice President * **Independent Directors:** Lei Zhang, Shuaiheng Zhang, Yun Zhang Just accept that you lost money and move on.

Old-Commission2782

POET COO needs to say something stupid again.

Thebaxxxx

I think if we press hard enough we can collectively push poet into the trillion dollar club. Hear me out. > bulls are itching for something that only goes up but doesnt cost 12,000 a share. To copycat the mu/sandisk rise they missed aka fomo > so far we have nearly 3 weeks of confirmed and constant bollish sentiment. > forget about what they do or what they make. Doesnt matter. Fundamentals havent mattered since covid. Nvda is apparently worth 200 trillion according to goldman sachs, so poet can hit a trillion pre rev no sweat. > if they announce another round of "raising cash" to pay the new COO's sign on bonus who gives a shit? Just hodl. Bers would be absolutely devastated if the stock mooned on such an announcement (and it will) > We take profit daily in the overnight session. China and europeans buy anything that looks really bollish. > imo if you are a spy ber, this is where you can excersise your inner ber by being the inverse on poet. By runnimg up poet to the trillions, we invalidate the whole system and send the rest of the market to rock bottom. > sure the guys running poet make a killing but so do we. Who cares?

TheBigCheese514

Small tidbit. I spoke to the COO via email and they are aware of the retail investors. Jorge Flores got back to me in 45 minutes thanking me for being a small shareholder and that they are working on a full revamp of website and marketing to help investors deeper understand the company.

Thebaxxxx

Everyone welcome sandeep 👳‍♀️ he is new poet COO. His salary is kinda big, so the next time they raise cash might need a lil more this time from share sales 😉

Thebaxxxx

The new poet COO job hops more than me and thats saying something

AMCorBUST2021

Traded the markets for 25 years. I have never seen a company with such a strong insider sales signal. Not just Garcia. It’s the CFO, COO, President Special Product, VP of Accounting.. over the past year 223 Insider sells versus zero buys Valuation doesn’t matter. Finances don’t matter. Insider sells don’t matter. Just get Shaq for a commercial and boom pumpity-dumpity

No_Current3675

I am the only human being in history to understand my org’s business rules. I generated the abstract code that runs a quarter-billion dollar operation. There’s no one else who’s studies this shit for 13 years AND has enough knowledge to write maintainable code AND can act as both CFO and COO. I will be in this job until we run out of money in \~20 years.

emerging-tub

Kinda weird considering their CEO and COO have been selling

rpez89

Results on Monday, both CEO and COO presenting at Needham next day on Tuesday, imo you wouldn't put your head above the parapet to current and potential investors at a conference if you had just reported shitty news, fingers crossed they announce something exciting, it's long overdue - there has been progress over the last weeks re ordinance approvals, etc. but tbh I think most of this run is sector hype, BTC / general tech equity market tracking, and pre results anticipation. I have options and shares, shares I'm holding, options I'm taking partial risk off the table given this week's rally, just to hedge against disappointment come Monday

saulbenacerraf

And I’ll provide a less-technical analysis here as a supplement: it’s funny because XRX is also straight ass of a company that I almost want to pull for the shorts to send it into the abyss, but alas with recent years of renovations I’m not surprised this is due for something monumental, especially since their now CEO used to be the COO when things were in the gutter and saw the carnage during COVID. They owned thousands and thousands of printing patents before selling them back in October. Their last CEO was an archaic fossil that had no idea what to do with the company as it plummeted 90%, and this unfortunately was a result of failing to capitalize on digital technologies in the 90s. They had too many white elephants for them to handle, and they couldn’t progress without seeing how far away they really were. It was truly a death by a thousand cuts. With a pivot towards AI, it could do wonders for a resurgence. It’s only a small step forward, but the revenue flip could prove big

A-Money1994

That creature COO they have keeps selling

Pete26l96

I just discovered the reddit COO is being paid $100M a year, 50x more than the average COO in a company with $20B-$40B market cap Twice as much as Jensen Huang LOL

cramers_asshole

I’ve just had an interview and the startup COO showed up last. Good sign?

HistorianWestern7870

Mawson potential fair value (execution-dependent; high-risk/high-reward transformation story): As traditional BTC miner (130–150 MW): $100M–$150M (aligns with lower-end peer BTC-only multiples; current market cap reflects discount due to size, liquidity, and transition uncertainty). Partial AI/HPC transition: $150M–$300M (reflects early re-rating as some peers trade at $7M–$10M+/MW with AI pipeline). Successful full AI/HPC pivot at scale (or merger/integration with Big Digital Energy (BDE) → ~250 MW combined company): $300M–$500M+ (or materially higher if large customers/contracts secured). Small-cap BTC miner / infrastructure owner (~$27–33M market cap at ~$5–6/share); 5.49M shares outstanding; public float ~2.47M (effectively ~1.5–2M tradable after insiders/long-term holders). Core asset: 130–150 MW grid-connected power infrastructure, primarily used for Bitcoin mining today; viewed as primary value driver for potential AI/HPC pivot. Recent changes: Activist-led restructuring by Endeavor Investor Group (includes Big Digital Energy / BDE); full board/management overhaul; strategic shift toward AI/HPC colocation evaluation. Leadership: Executive Chairman Joshua Kilgore (Endeavor Blockchain founder, majority BDE owner; ~25–30% MIGI ownership / ~1.5M shares; background in BTC mining, AI/HPC infra, large-scale deals). CEO Phil Stanley (capital markets/finance). COO Cody Smith (BDE-linked; cybersecurity/ops). Board brings energy infra, AI/HPC, finance, and strategy experience. BDE relationship: BDE holds 100 MW+ infrastructure; shared leadership/ownership creates potential for JV, asset contributions, or integration (no formal merger announced yet). AI/HPC status: Early-stage; GPU testing ongoing (delayed by supply chain); no confirmed large-scale customers or meaningful AI revenue yet. Peer trading levels ($/MW enterprise value for current/contracted capacity, 2026 data): Pure-play BTC miners: ~$3.6M–$12M per MW (examples: MARA ~$3.6M, HUT ~$5.2M, CIFR ~$9.8M, WULF up to $12M; peer average often cited ~$7M/MW for those with AI optionality). AI/HPC-pivoted or colocation miners: $9M–$15M+ per MW (e.g., WULF ~$15.1M contracted MW; AI-ready build costs ~$8M–$15M/MW vs. BTC infra ~$0.7M–$1M/MW; hyperscaler deals drive premium valuations). At AI/HPC peer levels ($8M–$15M/MW), a 250 MW entity could theoretically support $2B+ EV in optimistic scenarios with contracted revenue, though realistic near-term fair value remains in the $300M–$500M range given execution, capital needs, and customer acquisition risks. Overall thesis: High-risk, high-upside play centered on real power assets + activist-led pivot to AI/HPC (with BDE synergy potential). Success hinges on execution, GPU supply resolution, customer wins, capital access, and any formal BDE integration. Tight market structure amplifies upside volatility on positive catalysts.

insbordnat

Which is also wrong. Maybe "most" employees numbers wise sell their shares (subject to blackout etc.) but insiders/section 16 officers/etc. where the majority of the shares are parked typically don't sell (at least immediately). That'd be a huge red flag if CEO/CFO/COO directors are unloading shares as soon as they vest and the stock would react accordingly. More likely they'll have a 10b-5 plan where they gradually pare down holdings over a period of time, but they'll keep the majority

Icy_Technology_4607

Here are my criteria for gaining an advantage: 1. Open market purchase only - transaction code P, no option exercises, no awards. 2. No 10b5-1 plan - must be discretionary, not pre-scheduled. 3. C-suite or significant insider - CEO, CFO, COO, President, Chairman preferred. 4. Minimum purchase value - $500K for large cap, $200K for mid cap, $50K for small cap. 5. Cluster of 2+ insiders - multiple people buying the same stock within 30 days. 6. Stock near 52-week low - within 20% of the bottom, buying into weakness. 7. Recent negative catalyst - bad news, market selloff, or sector rotation (not company fraud). 8. Purchase represents more than 1% of insider’s estimated net worth. 9. Healthy fundamentals - positive cash flow, stable revenue, D/E below 3x, Big 4 auditor. 10. No SEC investigation (clean regulatory status). 11. Act within 24 hours, signal decays fast after filing date. 12. Hard stop at −15%, non-negotiable exit if thesis fails. The three most important criteria are: no 10b5-1 plan, cluster of 2+ insiders, and stock near 52-week low. Everything else is confirmation.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

OilBerta

From Bobby. Employee of the month. Son of the late COO Hank Hill.

ChefBoyRD-92

FWRG down 35% YTD. News of COO departure to be announced before open Monday.

Amazing-Topic2827

There is no tweet from the USA CEO or COO that can change this now. I’m not sure what you all don’t get.

elgrandorado

COO selling 3% is immaterial. CTO is exercising his shares and selling. Sold more than 20%, but we have no clue as to why he's selling. He's a cofounder in the company and there's many reasons as to why he might want to sell.

reaper527

> You point me to when Huffman sold 20% of his shares, if we're comparing CEOs. no, we're comparing executives. you brought up karp in response to a comment about reddit's CTO and COO offloading a bunch of shares after the company dropped 50-60%.

reaper527

> Holy god RDDT. what an absolute disastrous crash over no news. just because you didn't see the news doesn't mean there is no news. the CTO sold 20% of his reddit shares (and the COO sold 3%). large insider sales aren't exactly a good omen.

reaper527

> If I had more dry powder, now would be the day I would double down on RDDT. their executives would be me than happy to sell it to you. their COO and CTO unloaded a bunch of shares in the last few weeks.

pyro383

Bed Bath & Beyond. So much backdoor bs. Like the COO falling out a 25story window. Failure to sell BuyBuyBaby. Cohen and Sue in bed.

Dapper_Zombie7874

Abitibi Metals Corp - AMQ.CN Found them here while holding Foran Mining (FOM.to). Once the COO left Foran to join here, I decided to finally take the plunge.

MCSharkStudios

> The CEO has a background in material science I'd consider this statement extremely deceptive. She has a *fore*ground in materials science, as in she started attending college for it AFTER become Hydrograph's COO. A bit of a red flag IMO, as much as I want to love this stock.

Pickpockets_warning

I'm watching this one. To be fair the "portfolio manager" title is something I've seen with other people who worked in advertising and it means something different than portfolio manager on finance. So it's possible that this is why in the prospectus she put digital advertiser. The Omada COO vs consultant discrepancy I don't have an explanation. But overall, while I see potential for their product, I don't know enough about the science behind it, and it reminds me a bit of IBRX which also had a recent run up and also is very focused on one guy who came up with something that they are marketing. Different industry but similar online sentiments. I'm also cautious about what the CEO said that their clients don't want the public to know that they are buying this product. I can see why some might want an NDA if it's military or something but having *all* the clients be confidential is giving me a pause. That and what happened with GMG. I just don't know about this one. Could be wrong though, and maybe they will do really well. Who knows.

lozinja

Errrrrrrrr........wtf? I asked gemini and it came up with: # 2. Qualifications and Technical Background Her qualifications have been a point of debate among investors, specifically regarding the *timing* of her education versus her role: * **Education:** She holds a **Master of Science (MSc) in Materials Science and Engineering** from Arizona State University (ASU). * **The "Experience" Gap:** Critics often point out that when she was hired as HydroGraph’s first employee and COO in 2020, her primary degree was a **BSc in Political Science**. She completed her technical Master’s degree *while* serving as an executive at the company. This suggests her early value to the company was in **business development and strategy** rather than deep-bench engineering. * **Professional Experience:** Prior to HydroGraph, her experience was largely in the Canadian startup space, specializing in **emerging technologies** like machine learning, blockchain, and data analytics (working with firms like Theorem Synthetic Intelligence and Omada Technologies).

Level2Capital

Its more than that but its WSB after-all.. my bet is on their COO who spent 20 years on Amazon. Amazon needs to put in a bid and stop the bullshit…. My humble and probably wrong opinion

Tony_Cheese_

Fuggin hilarious they even show their faces in Fayetteville anymore. Former Beyond Meat COO Doug Ramsey was arrested in September 2022 for biting a man’s nose and ripping the flesh during a road rage incident in a parking garage near Donald W. Reynolds Razorback Stadium in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The altercation followed an Arkansas Razorbacks football game. Ramsey later pleaded guilty to charges.

DJ_Rex_Number1Fan

CEO, CFO, COO, VP, etc, etc

Competitive-Ant2876

Why? Cause their grow facility in FL is back online? I bet they will see inventory ballon q over q. Their new COO seems clueless.

dwhiz

The “thank you for your attention to this matter” pisses me off every time. My last company COO said this at the end of every monthly (probably AI generated) email update he would send about the company, before disappearing doing whatever until the next month.

Impressive_Reality11

Look into Auto loan delinquencies. Cvna basically has the most net exposure to subprime auto loans aka 2008 2.0. Delinquencies on 60 day loans hit ath today. Legal issues with books. 10-12% used car loans vs 3-4% new vehicles. Used vehicle demand issues. Early February insider sales COO & CFO. Send it to zero with haste.

NVDAismyg0d

Literally every single CEO, COO and CRO 

pink_ego_box

The President and COO said publicly that they've been selling Uranium way above spot prices for a while now

Rare-ish_Birb

Fwiw, when SEC reports CEO or CFO or COO or CLO of a meme stock selling ~30% of their stock, it means they want to sell 100% of their overbought company, but legal counsel said no way to do it without spooking retail investors.

Regular_Hawk8513

They just named new COO

LisaSu92

I do that with BPTRX. If you own $40,000 in any Baron fund you get invited to their nyc conference and they treat you like a celebrity. Elon musk routinely speaks on stage, along with the CEO’s of their biggest positions. I heard the CEO’s of red rock resorts, cloud shoe company, COO of SpaceX, executive from Shopify, and countless others talk on stage. They give you some killer breakfast, lunch, along with surprise famous singers and comedians (Seinfeld’s been there for example) and a super famous surprise performance that is supposed to be the banger to end the conference (last year it was pink and the year before that Michael Buble). And then at the end, they hand out free bags and shirts made by Figs (one of their positions they own) and free ice cream by one of Ron barons ice cream companies he owns. BPTRX also has a 30% holding in spacex so easy mutual fund to own even without the free conference

Contraversy7

I’ve been speculating this since they published an important patent for mRNA therapy on 9/4/26. The writing is on the wall here, this pass Wednesday the COO resigned which is common in late stage acquisitions because that position is usually filled by the acquiring company. The 8k disclosing his resignation didn’t give a reason or a replacement standard NDA type of 8K. The CEO is 73 years old and has a golden parachute of 14M in a change of control. He sold his first company in 2004. The stock trades at 5.8M market cap disconnected from its true value which is common in acquisitions also. The company has been silent over 100 days which is typical in late stage deals. Industry standard is 3-5 times revenue which is 115-190M without including the “remarkable” oncology pipeline and its generic drug network not to mention their US expansion potential. Once the announcement is made shorts will be forced to buy on the open market, this will be one of the biggest plays of the entire year IMO. NFA all speculation until it’s not

Competitive-Ant2876

They are over leveraged in Florida, that’s a fact. As far as rolling back rec programs, I don’t see it happening either but I feel like it should be talking about since three states are trying to start the process to do so. Look at their store count, look at their peers store count, and then look at trulieves store count in FL v other states. Let’s not even get into the declining new med card applicants, that’s been going on for 2 years. There was a small pop around rec vote, but other than that it’s declining. If there’s no new customers coming into stores, they will try to off set that by increasing basket size. To do that they’ll will drop prices, which will hurt margins and then also potentially start a price war. Trulieve would feel it on their top line the most out of msos in the state. Verano should worry about consistency through out the states, and also their ballooning inventory. Their new COO seems clueless.

BarbellPadawan

I know what you mean, but that’s not true at the level I’m trying to convey. This was a whole other universe of talk-around snake oil salesman bullshit. If a c suite level exec can’t explain what his/her company does, that’s a huge problem. And edit: it was the COO, not CFO.

Ok_Cartoonist6749

MIST Zacks #1 buy in commercial stage. RMTI ZACKS #2 buy ER on line n new COO N SIGNIFICANT improvement in clients. ALT got Institutual dilution will go up after feb/Mar rite now accumulate zone. VOYG pull back defence+space+NASA

West-Candidate8991

It's funny that Reddit even has a COO that oversees business strategy. Like wtf does she even do, this site rarely ever changes and seems, as it has been for many years, entirely dependent on its popularity to continue

vassman86

It shows in SEC filings. Jennifer Wong COO sold about 19%, and I believe she sold another portion last Tuesday too. Christopher Slowe (CTO) sold 7.71%

phx13225

I think the COO just sold 8.8 mil worth of stocks. Right before earnings so the market is probably reacting to that.

no_simpsons

I have an hourly job with a lot of responsibility. Should be salaried. Feel like such a cuck when I forget to clock in and need to ask the COO to fix my time sheet. They let me do what I want though, which is day trade at home.

Affectionate-Day2743

CEO, CFO and COO also made large ***sells*** in the last week.

BreadCoLLC

Sounds like a logistics and manufacturing risk. How has the company fixed this since then? Also, that sounds more like a COO issue -- has the COO changed? Typically when a CEO changes, they bring in their team. Not for nothing, in my experience, the CEO typically is more of a sales-type than operating type. I could be wrong, but that's certainly been my experience

FreedominMaine

So you're investing in a science project? Why did D-wave get denied by DARPA? Why did Rigetti fail stage B? Why did the Trump administration not led D-Wave bid on the missile defense initiative? Why has the CEO sold millions of shares alongside the CFO and COO? Why does the company not allow consumers to use the Advantage 2 system? Why is D-Wave even looking for a US bailout via funding if they're Canadian? Why is it ok for losers like you to pump 300 P/S stocks and have no shame?

BigFatBazza

The current tariff the UK has does not seem to be done like this.  We have seen bills our customers have received from carriers, and the COO is applied for all the individual HS codes, and there is then a blanket 10% added. Royal Mail does the same thing with their new mandatory DDP shipping service - a flat 10% is added for US customs regardless of the data you input about the products.

Yogurt_Up_My_Nose

well your wife is a COO, so I guess she can make that decision you dumbass LOL

pixelatedCorgi

My wife is the COO of a fashion/lifestyle brand and last time I checked we live thousands of miles away from NYC

TheBigFreezer

She ran the books too, she was effectively the first COO

linux_lynx

PELI Links Acquisition Shell: https://pelicanacq.com/ "PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION is a blank check company established with the primary purpose of facilitating a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or any other form of business combination with one or more businesses. The company's objective is to identify and engage in strategic partnerships or acquisitions that align with its vision of creating long-term value. PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION’s efforts to identify a suitable target business are not restricted to any particular industry or geographic region, allowing for a broad and diverse range of potential opportunities. This flexibility enables PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION to pursue high-potential ventures across various sectors and locations, ensuring a diverse and dynamic approach to its acquisition strategy." Acquisition Target: https://marchgl.com/ Drilling: https://stampededrilling.com/ Engineering: https://www.iptwellsolutions.com/ Logistics: https://www.halliburton.com/ Jan 12 8K with video link https://archive.fast-edgar.com/20260112/APZ2Q22CN222W2Z2222C2CZZMQ82O25SA282/ https://vimeo.com/1129242924?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci video features: Neel Duncan, Petrol Engineer; IPT Well Solutions (https://www.iptwellsolutions.com/neel-duncan-managing-direct/) Karim Rammal, Managing Director; Global Corporate Advisory, Think Equity (https://www.think-equity.com/team/karim-rammal) Charles Odom; Director of Global Logistics, Halliburton(https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-odom-78402a1b/) (Left Halliburton to advise on logistics for the venture) Nick Steinsberger; Petroleum Engineer, https://www.pge.utexas.edu/alumnus/nick ("Nick was promoted to completion manager for the Barnett Shale in 1995 and was responsible for the first slick-water stimulation in the Barnett in 1997, which is referred to as the first modern shale frac.") Robert Price; March GL - Greenland Energy Company (Acquisition target) https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-b-price-5999032a/ Casper Jansen, Greenland Logisitcs, Heavy Equipment Operations (This guy is unfindable on the internet) Jason Foreman, NA regional manager, Project Management, Halliburton, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jsforeman/ Terry Kuiper, COO of Stampede Drilling, https://stampededrilling.com/management-team/

TheBayWeigh

Some DD on Dexcom via [Magic Signal](https://magicsignal.app/) Key Highlights: Q4 2025 preliminary revenue reported at $1.26B, up 13% year-over-year (YoY), with international segment growth outpacing domestic performance 2026 guidance reflects 11-13% expected revenue growth and notable margin expansion expectations Barclays downgraded the stock to underweight, setting a $71 price target, contrasting with the broader bullish Street consensus Insider buying (COO acquisition of 18,200 shares) signals executive confidence Analyst sentiment remains broadly positive despite pockets of caution; average price target $86.30, with majority Buy/Outperform ratings Valuation perspectives remain mixed, with upside in Street consensus but lower DCF estimates creating ambiguity Put/Call Ratio: 0.57 (Bullish skew) Options Volume: Call volume up 122%, Put volume up 34% versus average—heavy bullish options activity Open Interest (OI): Call OI (59.1% of total) remains robust despite slight decrease, Put/Call OI ratio 0.69 supports bullish stance Implied Volatility: 30-day IV at 59.8% (about mid-range), suggesting moderately elevated expectations for price movement Key Technical Interpretations: Momentum indicators (MACD, price above 20-day SMA) support a bullish bias RSI near 70 signals approaching overbought levels, raising short-term caution for potential pullbacks or consolidation Options market positioning and increased call volume reflect heightened market optimism and potential near-term catalysts Market Analysis: Healthcare sector remains resilient: CGM adoption is expected to accelerate globally, driven by increased diabetes prevalence and digital health integration International growth outpaces U.S. market: International revenues rose 18% YoY, positioning DXCM for market share gains abroad Mixed analyst sentiment aggregates to a positive bias: Despite a recent underweight call from Barclays, the consensus target ($86.30) implies material upside Valuation discrepancies: Gap between Street price targets and DCF models introduces some risk of volatility in the event of macro- or sector-driven corrections Investment Outlook: Short-term (1-3 months): BULLISH | Confidence: 65% Supported by strong technical momentum, options market bullishness, and recent earnings beats Potential catalyst: Upcoming J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference and positive post-earnings revisions Risks: RSI near overbought and Barclays downgrade could trigger short-term profit-taking Medium-term (3-12 months): BULLISH | Confidence: 75% Guidance for margin expansion and international growth, combined with continuous product enhancements, bode well for medium-term appreciation Street consensus and executive insider buying reinforce the positive outlook Risks: Valuation divergence and sector rotation could moderate gains Risk Assessment: Valuation uncertainty: Major discrepancy between DCF-based fair value ($53.26) and Street consensus ($86.30) increases risk of volatility if expectations reset Analyst downgrade overhang: Barclays’ underweight rating and conservative price target may temper broader market enthusiasm in the near term Margin pressure risk: Despite guided improvements, DXCM must execute cost controls amid competitive pressure to deliver on margin expansion Regulatory or product setback: Any adverse clinical, regulatory, or product quality events (especially with new product launches like G7) could impact near-term revenue and sentiment Sector volatility: Healthcare sector is sensitive to changes in reimbursement policies, macroeconomic shocks, and competitive disruption

nbusiness1990

Are you regarded. Thats gotta be some of the most regarded stuff ive ever read. Kaz was COO, not crowned king. He took an actual CEO role with board control instead of waiting indefinitely. You can hate Opendoor’s model all you want, but pretending this was about him not understanding math is just cope, not analysis.

ThatUsernameIsTaekin

The buzz lately is that it is going private because of private equity activist investors. They promoted their COO to CEO instead of looking outside. That’s shocking considering it had 20 straight months of decline. Instead of shaking it up, they are staying the course which implies they are going private. Or maybe acquired by Amazon or someone else as a long shot. Either way, that’s the biggest reason the stock is up besides it being a decent value play. The K-shape economy is killing their numbers and they aren’t going to rebound quickly, it will take time.

-IQ200

Blame it on the COO. 😉

route8888

GORO’s problem was the guy running the silver/gold mine didn’t manage it well. Equipment and production circuit fell into disrepair. The new COO knows what he is doing. He has turn the ship around. The 3 sisters increased ore resources by 800%. The legacy veins are still producing good ore. GORO has 66,000 hectares in Mexico and with the increased cash flow they are starting to explore there again. They have already re-opened the Alta Gracia mine which was closed in 2001 because of COVID. That two week report of production from the 3 Sisters was when silver was $42 an ounce. This stock is going to go bananas when the company reports 4th quarter numbers. The Back Forty net present value at least $one billion.

Internal_Jacket_6742

$High Roller Technologies, Inc. (NYSE American) – Insider Buying + Low Float iGaming Play (Watching Closely) Sharing a ticker I’m currently watching: $ROLR (High Roller Technologies). Why it’s on my radar: Recent insider buying: CEO, CFO, and COO have all added shares (Form 4 filings) Current range: ~$2.50–$3.00 Prior high: ~$6.91 (shows potential upside window if momentum returns) Low-float microcap, which can mean higher volatility iGaming exposure, which could benefit from sector tailwinds Levels (not advice): Possible entry zone discussed: $2.55–$2.60 Near-term resistance: $3.00 Extension potential if volume follows: $3.50$High Roller Technologies, Inc.

BigPPGang0116

I read an article about the COO planning on selling 100,000 shares of stock on Monday, so there might be a dip before that happens. (https://ts2.tech/en/rocket-lab-stock-jumps-then-insider-sale-plan-emerges-what-to-know-before-monday/)

uj7895

Yeah I really don’t get the hate. From what I see material markers have legit future and these guys seem to be at the head of the column. Excluding slavery products like gold and diamonds from markets, proving COO, and accountability for sources of products are all getting to be in demand. I get they just opened a huge credit card, but it’s decent terms and they are looking for capital to grow services, not buy their way out of a hole.

ConsumeFudge

Really we can speculate all we want but the most true thing you've said is the Elon valuation multiple, if we're all being honest with ourselves lmao. Genuinely if Shotwell is still COO at/when IPO I'll throw some money in the game. Lady is a fantastic businesswoman making things happen while Elon is...doing whatever he's doing

PublicCOO

Happy to chat more about Public (I'm the COO) if you're interested in learning more! Can also introduce you to our Developer Advocate and our API Sales team who can help get you onboarded smoothly. DMs open!

PeaceForMost_NotAll

Agreed. 1. Growing user base of 600M+ 2. A platform that is one of a kind and users love 3. Huge room for increased ad revenue. Pinterest average revenue per user is around $7 vs $9 for Reddit 4. Experienced tech executives (COO of PayPal and Venmo lead it) I’ve 1000 shares locked in

NVDAismyg0d

My dad has millions of dollars. He’s COO of a company 

No_Assistance5652

A quick look tells me, There are several tranches of convertible notes at different price levels. This means future dilution. They have more than 2 bil cash at hand but as they are still in the growth phase, they may require further debt. I think that's why that investor got out, mostly they did not see the risk-reward from now. Insiders like COO usually sell to taxes or diversification. If you can sit on the stock for some years, I think it has a huge potential.

C130J_Darkstar

Yeah not from that source for sure. I did see that with the last raise they have something like $2B cash which is crazy… also the COO had said they are essentially done diluting given the cab project finance debt going forward. https://preview.redd.it/5u4igbvm369g1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1c5970972c6a5031e3b51c6e06e53748e4af970c

MattJend

I bought in at .69. Phase 3, excellent safety data, 2026 Q4 topline data, COO & CEO have stated they are entertaining partnership discussions, MS huge M cap, warrants expire Dec 31st and whales have purchased. Yeah, I'm in for this lottery ticket. https://preview.redd.it/aqr7pumjjy8g1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a31c151ddf246a9501f388f74acac5e7f03f3567

asagi_lumina

funny you posted this, i actually took a small position (20k in MIST) right after the crash post fda approval until i know better about the company. so far, looks ok: not great, not bad. the main drug though is good. the issue is the leadership team seems inexperienced in commercialization (COO looks ok though). the entry price is good enough to make it asymmetric so far i much prefer $HRTX (cheaper, more opportunities to get acquire, great ceo) main issues are the poorly priced options. sorry rambled but will dig more into it, thanks for the suggestions

MybobbyB

If all the ingredients and catalysts come together, $5 will be a formality. $5 is $500 million. Realbotix already sells humanoid robots, has marketing worthy of Tesla's early days, and FigureAi, which admittedly makes more advanced humanoids targeting manufacturing, is valued at $39.5 billion for zero humanoids sold, my friend! $39.5 billion vs. $500 million, lol. Would $5 be overvalued or unrealistic? Let's be serious. The COO confirmed to us that it's going to the Nasdaq, and that's that. $15 on the Nasdaq, the opening is certain. We're buying the future, that's all.

FIToptionstrader

NRDY - Chairman buying heaps of his own company stock & Ex Amazon executive now New COO = chief operating officer specialist in online marketing & distribution

TheVishual2113

It's good when the CPO and COO dump 30 percent stakes right?

MybobbyB

UAMY I don't like the COO's spirit at all Isn’t it rather in Mexico that they have their foundry? No the only real one is PPTA and Nova minerals will be its little sister but hey if you want your UAMY will also have its chances but their spirit is shit NOVA is Australian and Australia is the 3rd largest gold producer in the world, Nova the COO is a very well known Goat and he took part in ADG ADELONG Antimony and gold in AU and Pionner Lithium also in short good luck with UAMY friend

reddfoxx5800

One of the biggest complaints at an immigration law firm I used to work at was lack of communication. As AI was coming out, the COO asks if we can let go of people and use AI agents instead to talk to the clients, couldn't believe it.

MitchCurry

I still can't believe they went with an insider when replacing the CEO. The current c-suite, including the CEO née COO, have bungled so many things since COVID. They were primed for some fresh, outsider views. I don't see how it isn't more of the same with Fiddelke.

Fantastic-Bug-6509

COO of Theta Data here, our most expensive plan is [$160/month](https://www.thetadata.net/subscribe) (or $128/month when you pay for a year up-front) vs Databento's [$199/month](https://databento.com/pricing#opra)

Dumbest_Degenerate

Ugh. I tried this. Thought it would be fun to deposit money into the bull app and do a yolo on it. They debited the wrong account. Idk how. They don’t even know how. Spent months trying to figure it out and 10 different people gave me 15 different answers. If you think Robinhood is a joke, webull is the clown that couldn’t even make it. It’s so bad. It only has meme potential. Sure “it’s only gotten better” but it’s definitely not a “premium sophisticated trading platform”. Absolutely not. It’s a crapshoot. This isn’t some gambling app, it’s a regulated financial brokerage and I think it’s a matter of time until a massive scandal breaks it. Look at their board. The two independents are Walter Bishop, who was the COO of Deutsche bank during GFC, their Russian money laundering operations, etc, and William Houlihan, if Chammath is the SPAC king, Billy boy is the SPAC prince wanna be.

Gloomy-Tumbleweed344

I've been holding shares for a while now. Although the price action is good lately and the analyst sentiment is also high with some targeting share prices of $100+, many insiders including the President, CFO and COO have sold millions in shares over the last couple weeks. What do you all make of this?

Striking-Block5985

wrong the fee fro an optiuon contract is the fee period ist has nothing to do with PFOF that is coimpletely seprate fee some exchanges \[prfovccccce to push the tarde to teir exchange and the trader does not see that. The fact you are trying to claim this nonsense indicates you are scam and also unregulated off shore broker , and also if you were legit you would not be on Reddit Public COO indeed what a freaking criminal you are

imcguyver

I'm loading up on $CHGG on Friday. Here is why... - Chegg replaced their CEO with Dan Rosensweig - Dan Rosensweig left Chegg 2-ish years ago and is now back to resume CEO duties - The now ex-ceo Nathan was just a regular guy in SF who rose the ranks to become CEO. The point is Nathan is being replaced by someone who has a proven track record. - Dan Rosensweig is a who's who of the tech industry. Ex, Sheryl Sandberg used to work for Dan. After Dan turned down the role of COO at FB, he recommended her to Zuck. - If Dan Rosensweig is coming out of retirement then I'll back whatever it is. In this case you got a floudering tech company that Dan knows a lot about and has the connections to fix.

dont_downvote_SPECIL

I recommended to the COO to fire people before Christmas so the severance doesn't have to show up in our 2026 financials

PublicCOO

Hey everyone, I’m the COO of Public. Happy to answer any questions. And to be clear, you _get paid_ $0.06 per contract (which is ~$0.02 net when considering regulatory fees) — and that’s the minimum. It goes up to $0.18 per contract (net ~$0.14) based on volumes.

Muted-Celery7948

After another play I’m going in heavy on delta airlines puts $50 strike for this exact reason. it tanks every time it touches resistance on the 5y chart you can see it. around $60 or when it’s up 60-70% after last dip and always tanks. Itll hit $40-45 as it does consistently over the last few years. Currently 60% from last low in the aforementioned swings why do i hypothesize this when Delta looks bullish from most angles at first glance and I’m only citing a pattern a four year old could recognize? There is no catalyst it just happens and 8 insiders, including CEO CFO and COO just dumped a bunch of millions worth of stock. Largest sell transaction was $1.45 mil worth. I’m not saying it’s not done spiking Im just saying it has to and will go below $50 at some point. Do you’re own DD i’m still picking an expiry.