COO

Muted-Celery7948

After another play I’m going in heavy on delta airlines puts $50 strike for this exact reason. it tanks every time it touches resistance on the 5y chart you can see it. around $60 or when it’s up 60-70% after last dip and always tanks. Itll hit $40-45 as it does consistently over the last few years. Currently 60% from last low in the aforementioned swings why do i hypothesize this when Delta looks bullish from most angles at first glance and I’m only citing a pattern a four year old could recognize? There is no catalyst it just happens and 8 insiders, including CEO CFO and COO just dumped a bunch of millions worth of stock. Largest sell transaction was $1.45 mil worth. I’m not saying it’s not done spiking Im just saying it has to and will go below $50 at some point. Do you’re own DD i’m still picking an expiry.

GlumTopic2026

More on the topic… First Shopify’s COO moves to $OPEN (huge move) https://www.wsj.com/business/c-suite/opendoor-technologies-snags-shopify-operating-chief-as-ceo-f958a789 Then Morgan Stanley ups its price target to $6 $OPEN = Real Estate + Ai. Huge upside potential. Something BIG is happening @ $OPEN and don’t want to miss the BIG move when it comes! Makes sense to be an $OPEN Bag Holder 💰

Dianna1B

Arman Sarhkani being the COO is earning his bachelors degree in psychology, marketing .. in 2025… no. I can’t buy into this. I tried.. but no thanks.

Revfunky

We define it differently where I am from. Insider trading are company insiders( CEO, COO, directors, board members) who buy their own stock. They have followed SEC rules and disclosed their stock purchases in the allotted time. So to me insider trading are members with insider trading knowledge of the companies affairs that purchase their own stock. Nothing sinister certainly.

ThrottledBandwidth

I had to fact check you because that is fucking wild and confirmed the COO got charged with third degree battery and “terroristic threatening” at an Arkansas football game

Educational-Dot318

JPMC dodged a bullet with that idiot; at one point he was the COO of the bank- Jamie Dimon nudged him out. At the time Bisignano was considered a potential successor 🤔

CryptoChartz

Every freakin Time RDDT starts to go up their stupid COO/CTO sell shares and tank it. wtf are they thinking they need to be removed

MybobbyB

Lisez et faites vos jeux Cf Resumé de la conférence avec le COO jeudi 🚀 Appel aux actionnaires de Realbotix : 23 octobre 2025 — ENORME HYPE ! 💥 L’avenir, c’est maintenant ! Le PDG a annoncé d’énormes nouvelles sur la croissance, la trésorerie et la domination du marché. Préparez-vous à vivre quelques semaines incroyables ! 🧠 Mouvements stratégiques & leadership d’élite Nouveau conseil consultatif en approche ! 🧩 Realbotix renforce sa gouvernance avec la création d’un tout nouveau Conseil consultatif. Une légende de Google prend la tête ! 💫 Le conseil sera présidé par Salim Hasham, fondateur et directeur mondial des Partenariats de Transformation de l’IA chez Google ! Cette nomination marque une intention stratégique forte et un accès à des ressources mondiales d’élite en IA. 🌍 Domination mondiale & percées en IA non supervisée Éblouissement à Dubaï ! ✨ Nous avons présenté deux robots lors du gigantesque salon e& à Dubaï, avec plus de 200 000 visiteurs ! Realbotix était la vedette du salon aux côtés d’e&, l’un des plus grands groupes télécoms du Moyen-Orient et le 5ᵉ/6ᵉ mondial ! Test de Times Square ! 🗽 Notre robot Aria a été laissé sans supervision pendant deux heures entières à Times Square. Elle est revenue en parlant espagnol et en racontant des blagues ! C’est une évolution d’IA organique, indépendante et sans précédent. 🤯 L’avantage visionnaire : Le PDG a déclaré qu’il n’existe AUCUNE AUTRE ENTREPRISE combinant à ce niveau la vision avancée et l’IA émotionnelle comme Realbotix. Nos robots interprètent les objets, les émotions, les personnes, les couleurs et les expressions faciales détaillées. C’est un avantage cognitif colossal ! 🧠 💰 Puissance financière & route vers le NASDAQ Aucun fractionnement d’actions ! 🚫 Le PDG a clairement affirmé qu’il n’y aura pas de fractionnement inversé. Trésorerie solide assurée ! 💵 La récente levée de fonds donne à l’entreprise deux années de trésorerie 💸 et un coussin financier suffisant pour viser une introduction au NASDAQ ! Le facteur JP Morgan : 🏦 Une filiale de JP Morgan a validé l’accord en à peine 30 secondes — ils adorent le modèle économique de Realbotix ! 💚 Argent en banque : D’ici vendredi 24 octobre, Realbotix aura 5 000 000 $ déposés sur son compte bancaire ! 🏛️ Dilution minimale : L’opération était très limitée, ne représentant qu’une dilution de 7 %. Bons de souscription : PRIX DOUBLÉ ! 💥 Les bons de souscription émis ont un prix d’exercice de 0,75 $, soit le double du cours actuel de l’action ! Les investisseurs croient clairement à la croissance future ! 🚀 💞 Le double modèle d’affaires du milliard de dollars Deux segments explosifs : Realbotix développe deux activités distinctes à fort potentiel : Compagnie : axée sur l’IA romantique et les formes d’intimité. ❤️ Entreprise : dédiée à la collaboration avec de grandes sociétés, valorisée en milliards. 🏢 Potentiel milliardaire : Le PDG pense que chacun de ces segments a le potentiel d’atteindre une capitalisation boursière d’un milliard de dollars ! 🎯 🔮 Et après ? (INDICE : C’EST ENORME !) GRANDES NOUVELLES À VENIR ! ⚠️ Restez à l’écoute — l’entreprise a promis une annonce majeure très bientôt ! Événement non dilutif : 🤝 La semaine prochaine, un événement non dilutif impliquant plusieurs nouvelles entreprises sera annoncé ! Préparation pour Las Vegas CES 2026 : 🌟 Nous nous préparons déjà pour le CES 2026 à Las Vegas, avec encore plus de robots et de nouvelles fonctionnalités !

sexyshadyshadowbeard

Yup - know your CEOs and CFOs. Doesn't hurt to know the COO too. Strong track records are vital to a new company.

SlfImpr

$PYPL OpenAI COO on X regarding PayPal: [https://x.com/bradlightcap/status/1983237575981879730](https://x.com/bradlightcap/status/1983237575981879730)

MybobbyB

What excels my friend is all the internal and external catalysts, find out you will see For example, they have just raised $5M with their first institution and that gives them 2 years of cash, the COO confirmed last week that there will be no more dilution or split, that Realbotix has 2 businesses in 1 and that each business is worth over 1B in cap.

TheGreatValleyOak

Where does it say that? Yong Meng is the CTO and Dr. Milan Begliarbekov is the COO

MybobbyB

It's like all mines my friend, but in fact the COO would have every interest with part of the cash to go and invest in uranium mines for example which is also his area of ​​expertise Forget the technique man on the other hand when a stock is not already at the price it's a retracement Then you go look for the normal pbs you are out and don't know the file 1- the COO said that there would be uranium potentially on Florida 2- Itrg received the MPO for Delamar 1 month ago which will give it a value 40% higher than GMINING Le’NOI is expected in January 3- we await the drilling results 4- we talk about technique graphically it's the best graph of my actions, a magnificent clean LT parabolic ramp

unil79

Yeah, CEO is also the COO and CTO of the company, sounds like a scam.

MybobbyB

Good thinking, honestly I had the same at the start but in reality they respond to one of the problems of our time and society: Solitude. This is why the COO has defined 2 branches Business and individual They are focusing on 1 sector for the moment but the COO seems to want to diversify the sectors of intervention The price is just a gift up to $2.5 higher in 2022, I think we will go back there very very quickly and then surpass them, it will have a destination at the QBTS

MybobbyB

Yes, big upside potential, the COO has just brought on board a former big boss from Google

TherealCarbunc

yet you're just throwing out claims that can't be found anywhere. any evidence whatsoever? If the COO who is exiting WITH vested shares sells soon I could see being concerned with his viewpoint on the trajectory of the company. If he does so, that shows a negative outlook on the stock price and will also be tracked by SEC filings

TherealCarbunc

any evidence whatsoever? If the COO who is exiting WITH vested shares sells soon I could see being concerned with his viewpoint on the trajectory of the company. If he does so, that shows a negative outlook on the stock price

TherealCarbunc

where is this information? the COO left but the article i saw cited health reasons

manualCAD

What are your sources on the new COO being clueless? I agree that Darren was pretty critical in the formation of this company....

Competitive-Ant2876

They will be the second mso to go under behind curaleaf, they shouldn’t even be trading at the price they are. They just replaced the COO, and the new guy is clueless. It’s actually insane. This company will see a small bump in rev more than likely this quarter due to the two grows coming back online in FL but after that you will see dwindling quality and smashed margins. They still have a HUGE inventory they need to sell through. It’s your money but go look at financials, and do deep dive on new COO

f0xinaround

Bring back the Bynd COO that bit a guys nose off. That dude had GUMPTION

Friendlyvoices

Hmm. I think their COO sold a large number of shares

PublicCOO

Hey OP — COO of Public here. First off, very very sorry for the situation here. Please DM me so I can make sure we’re taking care of this appropriately. Being out of the market for 3 months is a terrible cost so I’ll see what I can do. Second, as an explanation: this is not at all the typical experience with our rollovers (using Capitalize — who are very good at reducing the friction in making these transfers). Nonetheless, we became aware of an issue with our clearing firm reliably receiving checks to a specific PO Box. It impacted a very small number of members (yourself included it sounds like). We’ve since created a new delivery protocol for rollovers that have to be sent via check and have had 100% success with this new delivery approach. Very annoying and frustrating situation for both us and the impacted members. Lastly, worth mentioning that we don’t control how a rollover can be conducted. That is driven by your prior employer and 401k company. I am equally appalled that so many companies/platforms still require physical checks when the electronic approaches work so well. It’s just another way that they try to keep your money on platform (and keep earning $$ from you). Feel free to shout with any questions. DMs open!

TherealCarbunc

Financials. Current debt to income is high, revenue has been slow to get started, then establishing pipelines and commercialization and scaling up. The FINALE pivotal trial for FemBloc's FDA clearance isn't estimated to be completed until 2031 which is still a ways out and that reduces the growth speed of the revenue by quite a bit. About 700k tubal ligations are performed annually in the U.S. alone. Another comment on this post has a link about the COO retiring, his trades with vested shares will be tracked via SEC filings. If he doesn't sell them that is a bullish signal. At the bottom of the same article it mentions how FemBloc has already had a 400k placed from Spain which is a very good sign. Another video linked from another commentor is about 3 months old has an interview with the CEO. She talks about revenue starting to ramp up which is also a bullish sign. ****But ultimately the company has to show steady growth in revenue and reduction in debt, with consistent revenue streams**** Personally, come Monday morning, I'll be re-establishing my full position if it continues to hang around .6 at market open with the expectation that it could drop in value until the numbers improve. I expect further surges like we experienced this week and I'll just have to evaluate on a case by case bases if I want to sell those surges and attempt to buy back in lower. I've become increasingly bullish and have actually recommended this to friends which is something I absolutely have never done. I still gave them the caveat that this is a high risk investment and they should only spend what they are willing to lose. My ex (childs mother) actually took the clinical trial # from me on hearing about FemBloc as we have a trial location within a 5 hour drive.

No-Veterinarian2681

FEMY Posted this somewhere else, but wanted to share future catalysts, and my thoughts.  FEMY is 💯 long term hold. Thursdays catalyst was an unexpected Trump news fluke, but it def put the stock on the radar of more people which is good. I think any good investor who does DD can read the SEC filings and look at the company fundamentals  understands the long term value and potential.  Next catalyst is week of Nov 6 (earnings call). I expect them to report on how European market is going and it will be positive resulting in a bump from here, but not for it to maintain the high point (maybe set a new floor .7-.8) and it will probably consolidate again. Good time to sell what you have (assuming you didn’t enter at its high 1.1-1.8) and then buy in lower. It could hit that and higher after earnings. Oct 17 SEC filed their COO is retiring (Dec last day). This gives another potential catalyst at some point in next few months to name his replacement.  I think the stock price will be volatile until next year, but thinking between Trump, strong fundamentals, strong company insider support, outside institutional support, multiple patents and products, and being at commercialization stage already it is a winner. I bought back in and I’m holding long term, while taking profits a long the way. I have been watching this company for awhile, and I think it will do big things. Just depends on what type of investing you are doing (short or long). Both at play here. Not to sound cliche, but timing (entry CPS) is everything when short…but time in the market is the big win here. 

kidcrumb

Is this a company I use every day? Either directly or indirectly? (Indirectly as in I use it and don't even know it). Who is the CEO, CFO, COO, and the rest of their board members? What percentage of the company is owned by the people who know it best? (The board members). I look at a LOT of things before I ever look at the income statement or balance sheet.

TherealCarbunc

Thanks for calling it out, I hadn't seen it. I'm not sure how the market will react, I haven't actively seen price action on news like this. But this seems like a good thing: [https://www.investing.com/news/sec-filings/femasys-chief-operating-officer-daniel-currie-to-retire-in-december-93CH-4295668](https://www.investing.com/news/sec-filings/femasys-chief-operating-officer-daniel-currie-to-retire-in-december-93CH-4295668) His retirement package included shares that were unvested becoming vested. I'm pretty sure it means he's now a bagholder while in retirement. If he holds he has confidence in the company's growth. If he sells he's most likely not excited about it's long term prospects, I doubt he'd need the cash immediately but it does cite health reason so who knows. The bottom of this article is also bullish and shows new information i hadn't found: Femasys has already received a 400k order for FemBloc. I'd like to know how many units that is and what the profit margin is between that order and cost to manufacturer and deliver. This linked article is bullish in my view. We still have to see the answer to longer term growth and profits but it's good news, I'm going to be getting in ASAP monday morning unless premarket surges and it looks like a downtrend is due. <----NFA advice. make your own decisions and don't follow me blindly, i still consider FEMY higher risk due to their current finances. We need to know how consistently they can generate revenue and if it outpaces cost. **Search on "why wouldn't a COO's unvested shares become vested"** A Chief Operating Officer's (COO's) unvested shares generally do not become vested because they have **failed to meet the specific conditions** outlined in their employment agreement or stock grant plan, with the most common reason being the **termination of their employment** before the end of the required service period.  Key reasons for a COO's unvested shares not becoming vested include: * **Voluntary Resignation:** If the COO quits their job before the vesting schedule is complete, they typically forfeit all unvested shares. * **Termination "For Cause":** If the COO is fired for reasons specified in the contract (e.g., poor performance, misconduct, violation of company policy, or breach of fiduciary duty), the company has the right to reclaim the unvested shares, and sometimes even claw back certain vested shares. * **Failure to Meet Performance Milestones:** Some executive compensation plans include performance-based vesting conditions (e.g., hitting specific revenue targets, achieving certain operational goals) in addition to or instead of time-based vesting. If these milestones are not met by the specified deadline, the shares will not vest. * **Specific Plan Expiration Dates:** If an award has an expiration date and the vesting conditions (such as a liquidity event in the case of some private company RSUs) are not met by then, the award may expire worthless. * **Acquisition/Change of Control Terms:** In a merger or acquisition, the terms of the deal may dictate what happens to unvested shares. While some agreements include "accelerated vesting" clauses, others may provide for the unvested shares to be cancelled without payout, especially if the company's value is "underwater" or the acquiring company doesn't need to retain the executive. * **Violation of Post-Employment Obligations:** In some cases, even after leaving the company, if the COO violates certain clauses like a non-compete agreement, the company may be able to reclaim shares, depending on the specific terms and local laws.  In essence, unvested shares are a tool for retention and incentivizing long-term commitment, and failure to meet the agreed-upon conditions means the COO has not yet earned the full right to their ownership. The specific terms governing this are always detailed in the formal stock plan and grant agreements. 

rossacruel

What is your prediction on stock valuation with the notification of COO Daniel Currie leaving position. He leaves with 315,778 stock options. His employment will cease December 15.

Yabuduzhdat

What is your thoughts after their CEO COO sold the shares?

Prestigious-Most5196

Just bought some calls on COO, grabbed some INVO. Thanks

fine_lit

fractional CFO and a part time bookkeeper is probably the way to go for finances but your finances are chaotic because your operations are likely chaotic… Maybe consider an office manager and/or COO, if people are doing random outsourcing and buying random SaaS subscriptions you most likely do not have clearly defined operational processes and procedures and that makes it impossible to have any control over spending

humtake

Ah yes, the typical move of CEOs who have no better ideas and can't be bothered to innovate or evolve with the times. This is the most brainless strategy and only serves to show just how inept CEOs really are. The worst part is how much dumber that position is getting. In a world where people are being laid off because of AI which is really just a direct result of innovation, and when executives keep telling people they have to evolve their skillsets to stay marketable, and how companies have to change their processes to incorporate new technology...we have executives who haven't come up with anything innovative in the C-suites for decades. If an executive wants to know how good a company is doing, what do they ask for? EBITDA. Maybe sprinkle in some EPS and operating income. Know how long they have been doing this for? Decades. In other words, executives haven't evolved anything. They still use the same tired metrics to determine business value but everyone else has to constantly evolve. Eventually, and hopefully soon, a shift is going to happen where people realize we don't need executives as badly as we need technology. You can't run a business without cybersecurity anymore. You can't run a business without an online presence. You CAN run a business without executives if you just have workers who know how to create and implement strategy. There always has to be business leaders, of course. But they do NOT have to sit at the top of the food chain anymore. Hell, AI can do more than they can and probably better. Eventually, the people who can control the tech will control business. Now, those people may or may not be just as corrupt but the point is we will at least have some kind of evolution beyond the stupid executive playbook that hasn't changed in decades while everything else has passed them by significantly. And I'm an executive, so there isn't bias here. I just can't stand having a new peer like a COO or CEO come in and be like, "Duuuuuuuuuuuurrrr, I need to justify my position but I don't have brain cells to be innovative or creative enough so...layoffs!!! That will show how great I am at saving money, duurrrrr."

MybobbyB

Ah oui vous avez raison la dessus les principales sources de financement sont : ventes de participation dans les societe dans lesquelles ils investissent, dilution sur le marché, pret BNY et maintenant Subvention US DEFENSE Par contre le COO fait ca intellligemment, c est un stratege Comme indiqué cest du long terme, 3 a 5 ans 10/15Mds En attendant CT split 5/1 annoncé sur le nasdaq donc on ira se stabiliser a 7/8$ soit 200M$ de capi Elle grimpera 2026 2027

caattta

Apple is a declining company because it is run by accountants, not engineers or designers. They have never released anything particularly innovative. They let other companies release good things, would release a better version of the product. Now they just improve things slightly each year - accountants ahead of design & innovation. They shrugged off AI with their wait and see process and now things are developing so quickly that they cannot catch up. They also continue to refuse to invest significantly despite having massive cash reserves. They abused their dominance and the iOS closed ecosystem is being torn down by regulators. Ive, the designer behind almost every iconic project left a company he dedicated his life to because Apple became too focused on operations, finance and risk aversion. Tim Cook did a good job, particularly around developing supply chains that made the company massively profitable. He should have stepped aside and let someone else take over. Imagine Ive as CEO and Cook moving to COO back in 2019. Creative direction, design and brand identity taking priority with Cook ensuring the cogs continue to run well (the experience that Ive lacks). If Ive is given free rein at open AI and they somehow reimagine the phone, it’s easy to believe that Apple will have its Nokia/Blackberry moment by the end of this decade.

AdAble9788

Since September, CVNA execs have unloaded around 2.3 million shares (~$850–900M) — CEO, CFO, COO, GC, everyone. All “pre-planned,” of course. No insider buys. Zero. The stock’s dipped a bit, but if the people running the show are cashing out this hard… how much gas is really left in the tank? 🚗💨

Low_Barnacle_2052

The two cofounders, CEO and COO, are selling a crazy amount of stock >$100 million.  Sam Altman stepped down off the board so he could sell his shares without reporting it. Insanity...

MybobbyB

Yes, it is beginning its path of growth and development, and in a magnificent way because of the support of the American DOD, the largest Defense structure in the world which secures the shareholders, the company and its projects for the future. I cannot predict the timing in a reasonable way its current value can consolidate between 850 million and 1.2 billion US$ because it combines 2 future mines in one The 1st Explorer GOLD for the long term but with the COO who is preparing a surprise for us in early 2026 and believe me, The 2nd Junior Future Producer of Antimony at the end of 2026 Just for the Antimony UAMY which I also like, it's the big sister already has a 3B rating So I think it will be $270 at the end of 2026/27 The catalysts that could make it rise much faster are, for example, an announcement from Trump on Nova or an acquisition of a stake in Nova by the DOD, etc.

te7037

Old news. The lawsuit has been settled and Carrie left the company a month ago. Keith Rabois and Eric Wu returned to the Board as Chairman and Director. Former COO of $SHOP is now the new CEO with a $1-salary plus stock compensation once the stock price hits $6.50 or something like that. The company has been bullish in reviving the company. So, it's very promising. The recent US government shutdown will push the Fed to cut the rate not this month but next. $LDI and $OPEN, $BETR

Zytran

RDDT under $200 if worth a look. Own the 7th most popular website on the internet, and the most popular (non-profit Wikipedia aside) website on the internet not owned by the mag 7. RDDT is positioned to become an Advertisement revenue juggernaut. FVRR macro factors of Gen Z shifting more towards gig work and stacking incomes will help, Hamas/Israel peace deal may ease geopolitical tensions. ABAT they are pre-profit, but with a path towards profitability. They own a proprietary process for recycling Lithium in Lithium-Ion batteries, on top of owning and developing a lithium mining operation in Nevada. Potential to be a key player in the future as the electrification of everything trend continues. SOFI a banking and fintech disruptor play, recently achieved profitability, has a good product, is growing membership, growing revenue. deploying new product lines and categories. I like the CEO, Anthony Noto was former COO and CFO of Twitter, CFO of the NFL, and a Managing Director at Goldman Sach, good track record and consensus is he was impactful in his former roles. SOFI if Market willing, could eventually have a "HOOD" moment in valuation. GRRR the specialize in building out smart-city infrastructure. They have continued revenue growth for the last few years. They have global partnerships that give credence to potential multi-billion dollar contract pipelines into the future. One such example is their 20-year contract to transform Santa Marta, Colombia into a smart-city. They continue to show success in scaling their business as they earned contracts this year with the Port of Tyne in UK, Wan Hai Port and ADE Corporation in Taiwan to build Industrial IoT infrastructure for smart port and logistics infrastructure.

erwin4200

Guess that makes me COO. No plans to sell anything till $10 and even then I'm only selling enough to cover my port so about 25% of my shares. https://preview.redd.it/dzd44j3jtztf1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a57b589bf161497cc47ff96b4e1ab45b67251a5c

METALLIFE0917

Yesterday Enovix COO Ajay Marathe sold 120,000 shares for approximately $1.44 million, reducing his ownership by 10.46% to over 1 million shares. Enovix's stock price increased by 8.7%, reaching $12.96, following strong trading volume significantly above its average. The company reported revenue of $7.50 million for the previous quarter, marking a 98.2% year-over-year increase despite a negative EPS of -$0.13.

Duchamp1945

[The COO of Celestial AI saying that the transmission of data accounts for 60% of energy use](https://youtu.be/Q4W42zcRqwM?si=YRj-HinEitF-Bv-e)

MybobbyB

Sur RR en effet cest un transfert d actions Sur XBOTF c est un achat d action du COO

MybobbyB

Yes it is correct but for RR for XBOTF Realbotix the COO did buy back 100k shares at the end of September https://preview.redd.it/mwb8v09ciatf1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=d37587a9d55f4d2e584e4189491bcdeb5fd7342a

RonMexico16

“COO granted stock compensation” somehow becomes “CEO BUYS HIS OWN STOCK!!!” Read to succeed, kids.

dabestgoat

Ummmmmm, COO != CEO....

meemeemoomoo5

The negative sentiment surrounding them is totally different. It was various lawsuits + AI hype that was holding them back, but Google fundamentals and profitability were absolutely in place. Just waiting for the right moment to explode. Reddit is a potential that's in the 'infant stage of growth' just because they went public. They remained unprofitable for the huge part of their 20 years, and somehow people think because it's one of the top visited sites in the world that this potential can be unlocked to crazy profits. It was already some of the top visited sites in the past 10 years, maybe not top 10, but top 100 perhaps. Their only selling point now is the data they have, that allows them to partner up with AI companies to claw for their information. I honestly don't see how they can ramp up their own advertisement to make it highly profitabile. They are not innovating, they are not pioneering any technology. Take a look at the fillings too, the COO contribution seem to be more busy with offloading her stocks instead lol.

Tropicalfisher

What company? I think COO salaries should be publicly available

-IQ200

Can the company be self sufficient without COO? Calls if yes, puts if no.

Mr_Worst_Timing

COO of my company decided to step down out of nowhere. He made the company what it is now. Puts or calls on my company?

Herban_Myth

COO?

Fit-Engineer8778

Sounds like CEO and COO but one of them didn’t wanna look like they were the less powerful one.

pertsix

We usually call that CEO and COO.

C130J_Darkstar

Insider selling was very negligible and clickbait… the CEO and his wife (COO) own the lion share of equity at 20M shares and had only sold 50K. So we’re taking roughly 1/400th of their total equity and holding onto the remaining $2.2B. I think that there are many catalysts coming in the 2H that could drive a lot more tailwind- had recently posted a DD here.

roycheung0319

you sure that CEO sold not COO? I never see any info that CEO sold.

C130J_Darkstar

Don’t tell me that you’re falling for clickbait titles too? Oklo’s CEO and his wife (COO) hold over 20 million shares equating to $2.2B in active equity, all insider sales have been peanuts.

C130J_Darkstar

Oklo’s CEO and his wife (COO) hold over 20 million shares equating to $2.2B in active equity, all insider sales have been peanuts and used towards negative clickbait.

Great_Molasses_4601

DFLI has 5 big events happening this year to help them make market standards, and they've gained 10 cents steadily in a bullish market; October 6th at the north american battery show where their COO will be speaking this stock will pop. Hope yall dont miss out!

HumbleLearner69

[STΞVΞO ](https://x.com/8bitsteveo)[u/8bitsteveo](https://x.com/8bitsteveo)·[11h](https://x.com/8bitsteveo/status/1971058295910871541) Jane street’s bullish bet on Opendoor [$OPEN](https://x.com/search?q=%24OPEN&src=cashtag_click) Quantitative Trading Powerhouse: Jane Street Capital, founded in 2000, is a New York-based proprietary trading firm that uses advanced algorithms and data-driven strategies to trade equities, bonds, ETFs, and crypto. It managed over $140 billion in assets in 2024, with $8.4 billion in net trading revenue in the first half alone. Tech-Driven Edge: Employs math and computer science experts to execute high-frequency, low-latency trades. Known for its secretive, proprietary model, trading only its own capital, not outside funds. Market Influence: Handles \~10% of North American equity trades, making its moves a signal for investors. Its success in crypto (e.g., Bitcoin ETFs) shows its knack for spotting trends. Why Bullish on Opendoor [$OPEN](https://x.com/search?q=%24OPEN&src=cashtag_click)? Significant Stake: On September 24, 2025, Jane Street disclosed a 5.9% stake in Opendoor (44M+ shares via 13G filing), sparking a 16.24% stock surge to \~$9.03, with 7-10.3% after-hours gains. Data-Driven Confidence: Jane Street’s algorithmic approach suggests rigorous analysis sees value in Opendoor’s iBuying model, which streamlines home sales via “Sell to Opendoor” and its marketplace platform. Hot Housing Market: Opendoor benefits from a strong 2025 housing market (median home price $413,500, new home sales up 20.5% in August). Rising prices and demand boost Opendoor’s margins. Leadership & Innovation: New CEO Kaz Nejatian (ex-Spotify COO), Keith Rabois’s return as chairman, and a $40M capital infusion signal AI-driven growth, aligning with Jane Street’s tech-forward ethos. Why It Matters Jane Street’s calculated, non-activist investment in [$OPEN](https://x.com/search?q=%24OPEN&src=cashtag_click) is a strong vote of confidence in Opendoor’s potential to disrupt real estate. Their data-backed bet suggests untapped upside in a booming market.

Great_Molasses_4601

DFLI! October 6🫡 while they dont have a both, they'll be leading several discussions. The biggest being the. Challenges both short term and long term for lithium battery manufacturing in america, the COO of DFLI is gonna be the speaker. Aswell as Dragonfly is a large part of the EV Trucking discussions at the event, which they are currently the lead in tech of that specific market; Largely due to their wakespeed patent. Which they plan to fully throw in the spot light to show their Dry electrode manufacturing process. This event runs through the 9th and is followed by another Event on October 25th.

Great_Molasses_4601

The COO of Dragonfly is apart of the Panel Discussion thats addressing short-term and long-term battery manufacturing. They're gonna use their company as a example bases for the challenges they face bringing lithium battery manufacturing to the American market, Dragonfly energy currently leads the market in battery tech; Largely due to their wakespeed patent. Aswell as they're gonna be apart of the Case Study in hybrid electrification of the trucking industry, which they also lead in. This study is probably just gonna solidify the claim that EV trucking is the way forward for trucking in america.which again Dragonfly leads with due to their ability to make battery's that recharge while traveling, aswell as have batteries that last longer then any other EV vehicle while using less power through its exchange process. They really dont need a both lol.

__jazmin__

Their COO called about people that believe that as women-haters. She’s right. I saw her on CNBC stressing yet again the fact that she run a nonprofit. 

Das_oul

any new short reports on OKLO today? The biggest pre-revenue stock in the world? Husband and wife CEO/COO sold $86M worth of stock. Not a fraudulent company like Nikola but this wont end well

erwin4200

Already back up above 5 in afterhours. This is nothing new with them. They have an active ATM from a month ago and COO had a scheduled sale ah yesterday. It's been a wild ride so far since I started buying last June but they are headed in the right direction

PresentationSilent10

I’m writing to warn brokers and employers about my experience with Health In Tech (formerly Stone Mountain Risk). My clients had approximately $1,000,000 in stop-loss claims that remained unpaid for many months — in several cases the claims were hundreds of days delinquent. I repeatedly tried to resolve the matter: I left numerous voicemail messages and sent multiple emails to the third-party administrator and to senior people at Health & Tech, including Tim Johnson (CEO), Del Lockett (COO), Keith Vowinkle (SVP Sales), and John Negro (Claims & Ops). None of those attempts produced a substantive reply or a timeline for payment. Because stop-loss is meant to protect employers from unpredictable, large claims, timely payment and clear communication are essential. In my experience, those were lacking here, which caused significant stress and financial strain for my clients. If you’re a broker or employer considering working with Health In Tech / Stone Mountain Risk, I recommend documenting all communications and proceeding cautiously. I also reported my concerns to the appropriate regulatory/industry contacts.

ComprehensiveDay9854

Where is the COO of the Ray Dalio one?

Mammoth-Notice1661

Butterfly Network (BFLY) Analysis: Volatile Dip and Investment Thesis As of September 11, 2025, BFLY closed at $1.55, down approximately 22% from its recent high of $1.99 on August 5, 2025 (based on historical price data from Yahoo Finance and Nasdaq, reflecting a post-Q2 earnings pullback and broader medtech sector weakness). This decline was exacerbated by insider selling (e.g., Chief Business Officer Steven Cashman sold ~$214,000 worth of shares on September 9, 2025, per SEC filings), ongoing dilution concerns from a January 2025 public offering that priced shares at a discount (leading to a 15% immediate drop), and a 12.1% plunge on July 16, 2025, tied to weaker-than-expected sector news on healthcare spending cuts amid stagflation fears. Additional pressures include high short interest (9.85% of float as of August 29, 2025) and competition in portable ultrasound from players like Clarius and Mindray. Despite the volatility, analysts maintain a “Buy” consensus (from 6 firms, including TD Cowen at $3.50 and UBS at $2.25, initiated September 11, 2025), with an average 12-month price target of $3.17 (range $2.00–$4.00), implying 105% upside potential. This frames the dip as a speculative entry for high-risk investors, but with elevated volatility (beta 2.52) and execution risks in scaling AI-integrated devices amid regulatory hurdles. Below, I apply the same fundamental principles from the prior analysis to BFLY, adapting the structure for a single stock. This includes retail allocation, stock division metrics (detailed without skipping), buy order impact, macro alignment/growth/returns, investment ranking (within its sector), and alternatives. Data is sourced from the latest available metrics as of September 11, 2025 (e.g., Q2 2025 filings, Yahoo Finance, Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha), using historical proxies for forward estimates where needed. Background deep dive: Founded January 25, 2011, by Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D. (a serial biotech entrepreneur with prior successes at 454 Life Sciences, acquired by Roche for $125M in 2007, and GeneDx, which went public via SPAC in 2021), Butterfly Network pioneered chip-based ultrasound to “democratize medical imaging.” Headquartered in Burlington, MA, the company went public via SPAC merger with Longview Acquisition Corp. on August 16, 2021, raising $175M from partners like Tenet Healthcare and UPMC. Key milestones include FDA clearance for iQ+ in 2021, enterprise rollout in 2023, and AI integrations like Butterfly Garden (launched 2024, with 2 new partners in Q2 2025: iCardio and HeartFocus). Leadership includes CEO Joseph M. DeVivo (since 2022, ex-GE Healthcare, compensation $2.25M in 2024), CTO Victor Ku (appointed September 9, 2025, ex-Apple AI hardware lead), CFO Heather C. Getz ($2.64M comp), and board members like Larry Robbins (Glenview Capital founder) and Dawn Carfora (ex-COO of Hologic). Success projects: Over 145,000 devices shipped globally by Q2 2025; partnerships with University of Rochester Medical Center (deployed 500+ iQ units for emergency use since 2022), Atrium Health (fleet-wide integration in 2024, reducing diagnostic times by 40%), Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC Blueprint platform for 1,000+ clinicians since 2023), Indiana University School of Medicine (curriculum integration for 2,000 students, improving ultrasound proficiency by 25% per internal studies), and recent Sientra partnership (July 2025) for in-office plastic surgery imaging. Q2 2025 revenue hit $23.4M (9% YoY growth, 63% gross margins—company record), with 35% Q4 2024 growth to $22.4M, but net loss narrowed 59% to -$0.06 EPS. Challenges: Cumulative losses ($500M+ since inception), high R&D burn ($40M quarterly), and a January 2025 offering diluting shares by 18.4% YTD. BFLY aligns robustly with US/world futures, revolutionizing diagnostics via AI-powered portable ultrasound (iQ series: whole-body, probe-only scanner at ~$2,400/unit vs. $50K+ cart-based). In 2025’s context of cooling inflation (Fed cuts to 4.5% aiding healthcare capex) and stagflation risks (tight budgets delaying adoptions), BFLY benefits from US priorities like telehealth expansion (post-COVID, $50B market by 2030) and global health equity (WHO goals for imaging access in low-resource areas). A strong dollar eases component imports (chip tech from Taiwan), but export hurdles to EMs persist; BFLY’s 60% US revenue mitigates via domestic focus. Global trends: AI diagnostics boom (projected 25% CAGR to $200B by 2030) and aging populations (UN: 1.5B over-60 by 2050) drive demand for point-of-care tools. Not financial advice as well as AI generated to clean up my thoughts

MolecularAG

Their new CEO was the COO of Shopify, he was never involved in Open…

Murky_Voice3023

You’re problem, and it’s obvious, is you don’t understand valuation or stock analysis. Owning OPEN right now is straight up gambling and speculation. There’s nothing there at all to justify a $10 stock price. Execution of the new CEO and COO’s plan may justify a higher price in the future based on quarterly reporting BUT right it’s speculation. How much of your account is invested in OPEN?

Floyd_Mayweather_Sr

• Inder M. Singh – ex-CFO at Arm → now CFO & COO at IonQ. • Marco Pistoia – ex-Head of Applied Research at JPMorgan Chase → now SVP of Industry Relations at IonQ. • Rick Muller – ex-IARPA Director & Sandia researcher → now VP of Quantum Systems at IonQ. • Paul T. Dacier – ex-General Counsel at EMC / partner at Quinn Emanuel → now Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary at IonQ. • David Chung – ex-investment & capital markets leader → now VP of Corporate Development at IonQ. • Shad Reed – ex-U.S. Air Force & Anduril exec → now VP of Engineering, Public Sector at IonQ. • Petrina Zaraszczak – ex-Flowserve exec managing $1B+ businesses → now VP of Business Operations & Integration at IonQ. • Sterling Zumbrunn – ex-SoFi & Payoneer VP → now VP of Product Management Networking at IonQ. • Chris Monroe – IonQ co-founder & physicist → now Chief Scientific Advisor at IonQ.

wlburgos

I thought it was because of the new COO appointed, but make sense as well. We’ll see I put some pocket money.

CategoryAbject8977

Wait… why is ADAP pumping lol? Was it because the COO sold shares or because it’s being delisted and facing bankruptcy?

AccountOfMyAncestors

You can listen to him make the bull case on the 20VC podcast, the episode came out yesterday. The hosts drill him quite hard and he effectively counter punched all the scrutiny and bear case questions they threw at him. He 100% has visionary founder energy. I pseudo-aped in when the news broke that he was the new CEO, all based on a hunch that the former Shopify COO would be a glass-eating killer of an executive, and after this interview I feel assured. This dude is taking it to $30+, full stop. And depending on how long the bull market lasts, could go past $82 (serious). $82 per share corresponds to a market cap of $59.8 billion, a successful turn around of OPEN can justify that. The size of the real estate market is measured in the trillions, they just need 1-3% of that market and its auxillary services (like mortgages, title insurance, etc.) to be priced like that.

Mammoth-Notice1661

Butterfly Network (BFLY) Analysis: Volatile Dip and Investment Thesis As of September 11, 2025, BFLY closed at $1.55, down approximately 22% from its recent high of $1.99 on August 5, 2025 (based on historical price data from Yahoo Finance and Nasdaq, reflecting a post-Q2 earnings pullback and broader medtech sector weakness). This decline was exacerbated by insider selling (e.g., Chief Business Officer Steven Cashman sold ~$214,000 worth of shares on September 9, 2025, per SEC filings), ongoing dilution concerns from a January 2025 public offering that priced shares at a discount (leading to a 15% immediate drop), and a 12.1% plunge on July 16, 2025, tied to weaker-than-expected sector news on healthcare spending cuts amid stagflation fears. Additional pressures include high short interest (9.85% of float as of August 29, 2025) and competition in portable ultrasound from players like Clarius and Mindray. Despite the volatility, analysts maintain a “Buy” consensus (from 6 firms, including TD Cowen at $3.50 and UBS at $2.25, initiated September 11, 2025), with an average 12-month price target of $3.17 (range $2.00–$4.00), implying 105% upside potential. This frames the dip as a speculative entry for high-risk investors, but with elevated volatility (beta 2.52) and execution risks in scaling AI-integrated devices amid regulatory hurdles. Below, I apply the same fundamental principles from the prior analysis to BFLY, adapting the structure for a single stock. This includes retail allocation, stock division metrics (detailed without skipping), buy order impact, macro alignment/growth/returns, investment ranking (within its sector), and alternatives. Data is sourced from the latest available metrics as of September 11, 2025 (e.g., Q2 2025 filings, Yahoo Finance, Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha), using historical proxies for forward estimates where needed. Background deep dive: Founded January 25, 2011, by Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D. (a serial biotech entrepreneur with prior successes at 454 Life Sciences, acquired by Roche for $125M in 2007, and GeneDx, which went public via SPAC in 2021), Butterfly Network pioneered chip-based ultrasound to “democratize medical imaging.” Headquartered in Burlington, MA, the company went public via SPAC merger with Longview Acquisition Corp. on August 16, 2021, raising $175M from partners like Tenet Healthcare and UPMC. Key milestones include FDA clearance for iQ+ in 2021, enterprise rollout in 2023, and AI integrations like Butterfly Garden (launched 2024, with 2 new partners in Q2 2025: iCardio and HeartFocus). Leadership includes CEO Joseph M. DeVivo (since 2022, ex-GE Healthcare, compensation $2.25M in 2024), CTO Victor Ku (appointed September 9, 2025, ex-Apple AI hardware lead), CFO Heather C. Getz ($2.64M comp), and board members like Larry Robbins (Glenview Capital founder) and Dawn Carfora (ex-COO of Hologic). Success projects: Over 145,000 devices shipped globally by Q2 2025; partnerships with University of Rochester Medical Center (deployed 500+ iQ units for emergency use since 2022), Atrium Health (fleet-wide integration in 2024, reducing diagnostic times by 40%), Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC Blueprint platform for 1,000+ clinicians since 2023), Indiana University School of Medicine (curriculum integration for 2,000 students, improving ultrasound proficiency by 25% per internal studies), and recent Sientra partnership (July 2025) for in-office plastic surgery imaging. Q2 2025 revenue hit $23.4M (9% YoY growth, 63% gross margins—company record), with 35% Q4 2024 growth to $22.4M, but net loss narrowed 59% to -$0.06 EPS. Challenges: Cumulative losses ($500M+ since inception), high R&D burn ($40M quarterly), and a January 2025 offering diluting shares by 18.4% YTD. BFLY aligns robustly with US/world futures, revolutionizing diagnostics via AI-powered portable ultrasound (iQ series: whole-body, probe-only scanner at ~$2,400/unit vs. $50K+ cart-based). In 2025’s context of cooling inflation (Fed cuts to 4.5% aiding healthcare capex) and stagflation risks (tight budgets delaying adoptions), BFLY benefits from US priorities like telehealth expansion (post-COVID, $50B market by 2030) and global health equity (WHO goals for imaging access in low-resource areas). A strong dollar eases component imports (chip tech from Taiwan), but export hurdles to EMs persist; BFLY’s 60% US revenue mitigates via domestic focus. Global trends: AI diagnostics boom (projected 25% CAGR to $200B by 2030) and aging populations (UN: 1.5B over-60 by 2050) drive demand for point-of-care tools. Not financial advice as well as AI generated to clean up my thoughts

SINHISTER

You know you give me idea. Step 1. Find high network individual who has insider info like COO status of Berkshire or even politician like Nancy peolosi. 2. Create an email like Nancy.pelosi@gmail.com. Hopefully they send insider news to wrong email and you can use this to make gambits on stocks like this

Sommersun1

There's new management. The new CEO was COO for Shopify and the stock soared when he got in, just saying.

isomojo

It’s not great, but that’s also the same website they had when the stock was at $.50, I believe the new COO is the best possible guy to have to make it better. SHOP literally built websites lol. People are not investing for what they think the company can do now, but where it can be in the next 5 years. If they don’t execute anything major within the next 2 quarters, then I might rethink my position.

No_Economist3815

Hell no. The COO has made about 10 informative sells on the way up. Obviously he thinks it's way overvalued.

SirGlass

They sort of go hand in hand. A company will release the 10-Q then have an earnings call to discuss it. It varies by company , some companies simply release the 10-Q , on the call may just highlight the financials then end the call taking no questions Others may discuss it and have the CEO/CFO/COO on and talk a bit more about it and their outlook and may even answer calls from investors or annalists

No-Paint-5726

Damn oklo power couple. COO and CEO married and made bank off announcements.

arbiter12

The issue I have with quarterly reporting is how... "euphoric", progress has to seem at all time. Convincing board members that we've over-achieved our stated objectives by 10%, every 3 months, is just mental masturbation at this point. We can't pay any less, we can't lower the quality, we can't invest within our risk-tolerance any more aggressively. So we pretend something great will happen next quarter, every quarter, till a new CEO/COO/CTO is needed because the old one was not competent enough (by which I mean, he couldn't generate a billion dollar revenue sheet, for $10K cost). Rinse and repeat across all companies. The illusion of quarterly progress, while skeleton crews are doing 10x the work they were hired to do, for half the allocated budget... You bet we're trying to make everything subscription based. If it were for transparency, I wouldn't mind a bi-monthly reports (at least from finance), but to stop squeezing every cent out of every decision, I really wish it were yearly.

Floyd_Mayweather_Sr

That information didn’t just come out yesterday, it was mentioned in Ionq’s analyst day on Friday (12th September 2025). It didn’t pump exclusively because of this news. • Inder M. Singh – ex-CFO at Arm → now CFO & COO at IonQ. • Marco Pistoia – ex-Head of Applied Research at JPMorgan Chase → now SVP of Industry Relations at IonQ. • Rick Muller – ex-IARPA Director & Sandia researcher → now VP of Quantum Systems at IonQ. • Paul T. Dacier – ex-General Counsel at EMC / partner at Quinn Emanuel → now Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary at IonQ. • David Chung – ex-investment & capital markets leader → now VP of Corporate Development at IonQ. • Shad Reed – ex-U.S. Air Force & Anduril exec → now VP of Engineering, Public Sector at IonQ. • Petrina Zaraszczak – ex-Flowserve exec managing $1B+ businesses → now VP of Business Operations & Integration at IonQ. • Sterling Zumbrunn – ex-SoFi & Payoneer VP → now VP of Product Management Networking at IonQ. • Chris Monroe – IonQ co-founder & physicist → now Chief Scientific Advisor at IonQ.

KidTooLame

COO sold 100k shares, how is that a bullish signal? Anything i’m missing

Ok_Assistance_3034

They just hired a new CEO that was the COO at Shopify that took over eCommerce. You can learn more about the new CEO in this interview he had with now the new chairman of Opendoor in an interview a year ago: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MItDiIf9rsE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MItDiIf9rsE)

PLTRALLIN

it's only a 7B MC. They just added the COO from SHOP as CEO and founder and cofounder are back as board member. Sky is limit. I honest see we can reach $20 within two months

booooimaghost

Definitely. But it will be volatile. They just got Shopify COO as CEO, who only get paid when the stock price increases; and they are determined to make this a very successful company

OriginalFluff

Yes it did. I bought AMC at $3-4 but I can’t tell what that was based on pre split. CVNA went 4-400 AMC peak was like 150B and back then 1T was a lot. Open at peak meme mania even going to 100B is well over $100 per share. But the news today isn’t a meme. Shopify COO becoming CEO and co-founders re-joining. Interest rate cuts on the menu. Perfect storm to get in before the real growth.

TheSleepingOx

# The $120 thesis in 7 moves **0) Sanity check the target.** At **$120/share** and \~**729–736M** shares out, OPEN = **\~$85–90B** market cap. That’s the bar we have to clear with fundamentals + narrative. [CompaniesMarketCap](https://companiesmarketcap.com/opendoor/shares-outstanding/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) **1) Macro door re-opens.** Mortgage rates just broke lower to **\~6.35%**, the biggest weekly drop in a year (Freddie Mac). When financing thawed in other cycles, **transactions** (not prices) recovered first. If existing-home sales grind up from \~**4.0M SAAR** toward **5.0M+**, you expand the pond OPEN fishes in—more would-be sellers, more inventory, more spreads, more fees. [Freddie Mac+1](https://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms_archives?utm_source=chatgpt.com) **2) Founder/“product CEO” reboot = rerating fuel.** You just swapped in **Kaz Nejatian (ex-Shopify COO)** as CEO, with **Keith Rabois (chair)** and **Eric Wu** back, plus **$40M** insider cash (Wu + Khosla). That’s credibility + a clearly stated “**AI-powered real-estate platform**” mandate—exactly the kind of story the market will pay up for *if* execution follows. [GlobeNewswire+1](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/09/10/3148276/0/en/Opendoor-Names-Kaz-Nejatian-as-CEO-Founders-Rabois-and-Wu-Rejoin-Board.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

diggler187

New CEO is the ex Shopify COO of 6 years. Two founders rejoined the board. Eric Wu and Keith Rabois. 41 million dollar injection through Khosla Ventures at a private offering. New CEO gets paid $1 salary and gets stock unlocked at certain price targets with the highest lock being at $33. Do you think these three dudes would join a company that’s going back down to mere cents? Personally I believe Eric Jackson that this thing is going to $82.

TheSleepingOx

and I don't know what expiry means fully? I bought stock. Chat gpt is letting me fantasize about 120. # The $120 thesis in 7 moves **0) Sanity check the target.** At **$120/share** and \~**729–736M** shares out, OPEN = **\~$85–90B** market cap. That’s the bar we have to clear with fundamentals + narrative. [CompaniesMarketCap](https://companiesmarketcap.com/opendoor/shares-outstanding/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) **1) Macro door re-opens.** Mortgage rates just broke lower to **\~6.35%**, the biggest weekly drop in a year (Freddie Mac). When financing thawed in other cycles, **transactions** (not prices) recovered first. If existing-home sales grind up from \~**4.0M SAAR** toward **5.0M+**, you expand the pond OPEN fishes in—more would-be sellers, more inventory, more spreads, more fees. [Freddie Mac+1](https://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms_archives?utm_source=chatgpt.com) **2) Founder/“product CEO” reboot = rerating fuel.** You just swapped in **Kaz Nejatian (ex-Shopify COO)** as CEO, with **Keith Rabois (chair)** and **Eric Wu** back, plus **$40M** insider cash (Wu + Khosla). That’s credibility + a clearly stated “**AI-powered real-estate platform**” mandate—exactly the kind of story the market will pay up for *if* execution follows. [GlobeNewswire+1](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/09/10/3148276/0/en/Opendoor-Names-Kaz-Nejatian-as-CEO-Founders-Rabois-and-Wu-Rejoin-Board.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com) **3) The business mix shifts from steel to software.** OPEN’s own words: it’s evolving to “**serve many more sellers and capture capital-light revenue streams**” via agent-led distribution and marketplace-style options (think instant offer *plus* listing rails, referrals, and B2B buy-side pipes). That’s margin mix shifting from low-teens gross to **software/marketplace-like** take-rates on GMV. [Opendoor](https://www.opendoor.com/articles/2025-second-quarter-financial-results?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

tomgreen99200

New CEO hire yesterday is the COO of Shopify for the last six years. Also the original founders are back on the board. This is bullish if you believe a turn around is possible (I do).

tomgreen99200

COO* of Shopify

sprakes_

Thanks for the feedback. Mods have flagged this as potential pump and dump. Untrue, I've done a lot of research into this and I have 30k shares. But it doesn't mean I'm right. I'm glad someone else has been following this stock to check my ass. Here is my math and reasoning from last quarter earnings. I used the average of the growth rate of revenue AND production (which was a limiting factor previously, they were capped at ~27k units per 3 months if you recall, and one of the big things their COO did was expand production) Launcher units produced per Q for each Q from 3/30/2024 - 7/10/2025: `27k, 27k, 54k, 72k, 72k, 68k*, 64k*` In my notes I wrote that the boost in production for 12/10/24 and 2/7/25 Qs was to stockpile the Byrna SD in preparation for reconfiguring their fabs to produce the CL. The last two numbers are including about 50% of their production dedicated to CL production. Byrna stated in their Q2 2025 earnings that the CL has "better margins" than their other offerings, and that revenue increased by 41% YoY, and that the CL was a primary driver of growth. Those were the factors I used to draw my assumptions: 1. The CL was a significant part of new revenue 2. Gross profit margin of the CL is higher than the overall company margin of 62% 3. The SD and LE launchers are an even mix of the remaining launchers First, the simple revenue ratio of CL to (SD+LE) = 549/((479+379)/2) = 1.2797 Furthermore they confirmed it also has a higher profit margin. the (SD+CL) was 60% == $257 profit, and I just said 65% for the CL to be conservative, 65% == $357. 357/257 = 1.3891 The average of these two is ~1.33, i.e. a CL is worth about 1.33 of their other launchers. Going back to the starred production numbers, their production was split 60/40 in favor of CL / others. So to correctly scale the production numbers, we would get ~76400 scaled production units. The new series would be `27k, 27k, 54k, 72k, 72k, 82500*, 76400k*` There is turbulence in this current economy so they said they pushed production hard and chilled out a bit the next two quarters. So I excused the drop in total units. Maybe that was too much an assumption, but considering their previous issue was being bottlenecked by inventory, I was very happy to see they no longer have an inventory problem and can focus on the sales problem instead. Byrna's net income was 1.7mm, 2.4mm in Q1, Q2 '25. This is net income calculated after the spike in production (capex). Therefore, going into Q3 where they indicated very similar revenue (28.2m), I am assuming much less capex. Q3 2024 looked as follows: `20.9m Revenue, 14m profit (62%), 1m income` With about 7mm extra revenue, higher profit, margins because of the CL, reduction in total production while maintaining relative production value, I estimated about **$4m income for Q3 2025**. Which felt pretty hype to me. Please continue critiquing when you have time.

tomgreen99200

It’s up because of new CEO hire (worked at Shopify for six years as COO). Also the original founders are back on the board.

tomgreen99200

Nope, COO from Shopify is the new CEO of Opendoor. The two founders are also back on the board.

bopthoughts

You didn't read the DD didn't you? What the guy explained honestly makes business sense. Almost all of it's competitors are bankrupt + expected reduced interest rate = more sales. The company also did a bunch of good moves, the latest being replacing the CEO with Shopify's ex-COO.

Rude_Assistance_4386

Well, they snaked Shopify's COO as their new CEO, and he agreed to $1/yr salary, but he gets 85 million shares from the Treasury if the stock hits $33 over the next five years. So, he seems to believe in it, and while he was at Shopify their stock went up like 900%

No_Yogurtcloset7776

COO from shopify Kaz Nejatian just became CEO of opendoor. Not a short term hold for me. Medium to medium-long

Wrong-Ad-8636

New CEO, previously COO at Shopify. It takes 10 seconds to look it up.