COO

Contraversy7

I’ve been speculating this since they published an important patent for mRNA therapy on 9/4/26. The writing is on the wall here, this pass Wednesday the COO resigned which is common in late stage acquisitions because that position is usually filled by the acquiring company. The 8k disclosing his resignation didn’t give a reason or a replacement standard NDA type of 8K. The CEO is 73 years old and has a golden parachute of 14M in a change of control. He sold his first company in 2004. The stock trades at 5.8M market cap disconnected from its true value which is common in acquisitions also. The company has been silent over 100 days which is typical in late stage deals. Industry standard is 3-5 times revenue which is 115-190M without including the “remarkable” oncology pipeline and its generic drug network not to mention their US expansion potential. Once the announcement is made shorts will be forced to buy on the open market, this will be one of the biggest plays of the entire year IMO. NFA all speculation until it’s not

Competitive-Ant2876

They are over leveraged in Florida, that’s a fact. As far as rolling back rec programs, I don’t see it happening either but I feel like it should be talking about since three states are trying to start the process to do so. Look at their store count, look at their peers store count, and then look at trulieves store count in FL v other states. Let’s not even get into the declining new med card applicants, that’s been going on for 2 years. There was a small pop around rec vote, but other than that it’s declining. If there’s no new customers coming into stores, they will try to off set that by increasing basket size. To do that they’ll will drop prices, which will hurt margins and then also potentially start a price war. Trulieve would feel it on their top line the most out of msos in the state. Verano should worry about consistency through out the states, and also their ballooning inventory. Their new COO seems clueless.

BarbellPadawan

I know what you mean, but that’s not true at the level I’m trying to convey. This was a whole other universe of talk-around snake oil salesman bullshit. If a c suite level exec can’t explain what his/her company does, that’s a huge problem. And edit: it was the COO, not CFO.

Ok_Cartoonist6749

MIST Zacks #1 buy in commercial stage. RMTI ZACKS #2 buy ER on line n new COO N SIGNIFICANT improvement in clients. ALT got Institutual dilution will go up after feb/Mar rite now accumulate zone. VOYG pull back defence+space+NASA

West-Candidate8991

It's funny that Reddit even has a COO that oversees business strategy. Like wtf does she even do, this site rarely ever changes and seems, as it has been for many years, entirely dependent on its popularity to continue

vassman86

It shows in SEC filings. Jennifer Wong COO sold about 19%, and I believe she sold another portion last Tuesday too. Christopher Slowe (CTO) sold 7.71%

phx13225

I think the COO just sold 8.8 mil worth of stocks. Right before earnings so the market is probably reacting to that.

no_simpsons

I have an hourly job with a lot of responsibility. Should be salaried. Feel like such a cuck when I forget to clock in and need to ask the COO to fix my time sheet. They let me do what I want though, which is day trade at home.

Affectionate-Day2743

CEO, CFO and COO also made large ***sells*** in the last week.

BreadCoLLC

Sounds like a logistics and manufacturing risk. How has the company fixed this since then? Also, that sounds more like a COO issue -- has the COO changed? Typically when a CEO changes, they bring in their team. Not for nothing, in my experience, the CEO typically is more of a sales-type than operating type. I could be wrong, but that's certainly been my experience

FreedominMaine

So you're investing in a science project? Why did D-wave get denied by DARPA? Why did Rigetti fail stage B? Why did the Trump administration not led D-Wave bid on the missile defense initiative? Why has the CEO sold millions of shares alongside the CFO and COO? Why does the company not allow consumers to use the Advantage 2 system? Why is D-Wave even looking for a US bailout via funding if they're Canadian? Why is it ok for losers like you to pump 300 P/S stocks and have no shame?

BigFatBazza

The current tariff the UK has does not seem to be done like this.  We have seen bills our customers have received from carriers, and the COO is applied for all the individual HS codes, and there is then a blanket 10% added. Royal Mail does the same thing with their new mandatory DDP shipping service - a flat 10% is added for US customs regardless of the data you input about the products.

Yogurt_Up_My_Nose

well your wife is a COO, so I guess she can make that decision you dumbass LOL

pixelatedCorgi

My wife is the COO of a fashion/lifestyle brand and last time I checked we live thousands of miles away from NYC

TheBigFreezer

She ran the books too, she was effectively the first COO

linux_lynx

PELI Links Acquisition Shell: https://pelicanacq.com/ "PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION is a blank check company established with the primary purpose of facilitating a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or any other form of business combination with one or more businesses. The company's objective is to identify and engage in strategic partnerships or acquisitions that align with its vision of creating long-term value. PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION’s efforts to identify a suitable target business are not restricted to any particular industry or geographic region, allowing for a broad and diverse range of potential opportunities. This flexibility enables PELICAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION to pursue high-potential ventures across various sectors and locations, ensuring a diverse and dynamic approach to its acquisition strategy." Acquisition Target: https://marchgl.com/ Drilling: https://stampededrilling.com/ Engineering: https://www.iptwellsolutions.com/ Logistics: https://www.halliburton.com/ Jan 12 8K with video link https://archive.fast-edgar.com/20260112/APZ2Q22CN222W2Z2222C2CZZMQ82O25SA282/ https://vimeo.com/1129242924?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci video features: Neel Duncan, Petrol Engineer; IPT Well Solutions (https://www.iptwellsolutions.com/neel-duncan-managing-direct/) Karim Rammal, Managing Director; Global Corporate Advisory, Think Equity (https://www.think-equity.com/team/karim-rammal) Charles Odom; Director of Global Logistics, Halliburton(https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-odom-78402a1b/) (Left Halliburton to advise on logistics for the venture) Nick Steinsberger; Petroleum Engineer, https://www.pge.utexas.edu/alumnus/nick ("Nick was promoted to completion manager for the Barnett Shale in 1995 and was responsible for the first slick-water stimulation in the Barnett in 1997, which is referred to as the first modern shale frac.") Robert Price; March GL - Greenland Energy Company (Acquisition target) https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-b-price-5999032a/ Casper Jansen, Greenland Logisitcs, Heavy Equipment Operations (This guy is unfindable on the internet) Jason Foreman, NA regional manager, Project Management, Halliburton, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jsforeman/ Terry Kuiper, COO of Stampede Drilling, https://stampededrilling.com/management-team/

TheBayWeigh

Some DD on Dexcom via [Magic Signal](https://magicsignal.app/) Key Highlights: Q4 2025 preliminary revenue reported at $1.26B, up 13% year-over-year (YoY), with international segment growth outpacing domestic performance 2026 guidance reflects 11-13% expected revenue growth and notable margin expansion expectations Barclays downgraded the stock to underweight, setting a $71 price target, contrasting with the broader bullish Street consensus Insider buying (COO acquisition of 18,200 shares) signals executive confidence Analyst sentiment remains broadly positive despite pockets of caution; average price target $86.30, with majority Buy/Outperform ratings Valuation perspectives remain mixed, with upside in Street consensus but lower DCF estimates creating ambiguity Put/Call Ratio: 0.57 (Bullish skew) Options Volume: Call volume up 122%, Put volume up 34% versus average—heavy bullish options activity Open Interest (OI): Call OI (59.1% of total) remains robust despite slight decrease, Put/Call OI ratio 0.69 supports bullish stance Implied Volatility: 30-day IV at 59.8% (about mid-range), suggesting moderately elevated expectations for price movement Key Technical Interpretations: Momentum indicators (MACD, price above 20-day SMA) support a bullish bias RSI near 70 signals approaching overbought levels, raising short-term caution for potential pullbacks or consolidation Options market positioning and increased call volume reflect heightened market optimism and potential near-term catalysts Market Analysis: Healthcare sector remains resilient: CGM adoption is expected to accelerate globally, driven by increased diabetes prevalence and digital health integration International growth outpaces U.S. market: International revenues rose 18% YoY, positioning DXCM for market share gains abroad Mixed analyst sentiment aggregates to a positive bias: Despite a recent underweight call from Barclays, the consensus target ($86.30) implies material upside Valuation discrepancies: Gap between Street price targets and DCF models introduces some risk of volatility in the event of macro- or sector-driven corrections Investment Outlook: Short-term (1-3 months): BULLISH | Confidence: 65% Supported by strong technical momentum, options market bullishness, and recent earnings beats Potential catalyst: Upcoming J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference and positive post-earnings revisions Risks: RSI near overbought and Barclays downgrade could trigger short-term profit-taking Medium-term (3-12 months): BULLISH | Confidence: 75% Guidance for margin expansion and international growth, combined with continuous product enhancements, bode well for medium-term appreciation Street consensus and executive insider buying reinforce the positive outlook Risks: Valuation divergence and sector rotation could moderate gains Risk Assessment: Valuation uncertainty: Major discrepancy between DCF-based fair value ($53.26) and Street consensus ($86.30) increases risk of volatility if expectations reset Analyst downgrade overhang: Barclays’ underweight rating and conservative price target may temper broader market enthusiasm in the near term Margin pressure risk: Despite guided improvements, DXCM must execute cost controls amid competitive pressure to deliver on margin expansion Regulatory or product setback: Any adverse clinical, regulatory, or product quality events (especially with new product launches like G7) could impact near-term revenue and sentiment Sector volatility: Healthcare sector is sensitive to changes in reimbursement policies, macroeconomic shocks, and competitive disruption

nbusiness1990

Are you regarded. Thats gotta be some of the most regarded stuff ive ever read. Kaz was COO, not crowned king. He took an actual CEO role with board control instead of waiting indefinitely. You can hate Opendoor’s model all you want, but pretending this was about him not understanding math is just cope, not analysis.

ThatUsernameIsTaekin

The buzz lately is that it is going private because of private equity activist investors. They promoted their COO to CEO instead of looking outside. That’s shocking considering it had 20 straight months of decline. Instead of shaking it up, they are staying the course which implies they are going private. Or maybe acquired by Amazon or someone else as a long shot. Either way, that’s the biggest reason the stock is up besides it being a decent value play. The K-shape economy is killing their numbers and they aren’t going to rebound quickly, it will take time.

-IQ200

Blame it on the COO. 😉

route8888

GORO’s problem was the guy running the silver/gold mine didn’t manage it well. Equipment and production circuit fell into disrepair. The new COO knows what he is doing. He has turn the ship around. The 3 sisters increased ore resources by 800%. The legacy veins are still producing good ore. GORO has 66,000 hectares in Mexico and with the increased cash flow they are starting to explore there again. They have already re-opened the Alta Gracia mine which was closed in 2001 because of COVID. That two week report of production from the 3 Sisters was when silver was $42 an ounce. This stock is going to go bananas when the company reports 4th quarter numbers. The Back Forty net present value at least $one billion.

Internal_Jacket_6742

$High Roller Technologies, Inc. (NYSE American) – Insider Buying + Low Float iGaming Play (Watching Closely) Sharing a ticker I’m currently watching: $ROLR (High Roller Technologies). Why it’s on my radar: Recent insider buying: CEO, CFO, and COO have all added shares (Form 4 filings) Current range: ~$2.50–$3.00 Prior high: ~$6.91 (shows potential upside window if momentum returns) Low-float microcap, which can mean higher volatility iGaming exposure, which could benefit from sector tailwinds Levels (not advice): Possible entry zone discussed: $2.55–$2.60 Near-term resistance: $3.00 Extension potential if volume follows: $3.50$High Roller Technologies, Inc.

BigPPGang0116

I read an article about the COO planning on selling 100,000 shares of stock on Monday, so there might be a dip before that happens. (https://ts2.tech/en/rocket-lab-stock-jumps-then-insider-sale-plan-emerges-what-to-know-before-monday/)

uj7895

Yeah I really don’t get the hate. From what I see material markers have legit future and these guys seem to be at the head of the column. Excluding slavery products like gold and diamonds from markets, proving COO, and accountability for sources of products are all getting to be in demand. I get they just opened a huge credit card, but it’s decent terms and they are looking for capital to grow services, not buy their way out of a hole.

ConsumeFudge

Really we can speculate all we want but the most true thing you've said is the Elon valuation multiple, if we're all being honest with ourselves lmao. Genuinely if Shotwell is still COO at/when IPO I'll throw some money in the game. Lady is a fantastic businesswoman making things happen while Elon is...doing whatever he's doing

PublicCOO

Happy to chat more about Public (I'm the COO) if you're interested in learning more! Can also introduce you to our Developer Advocate and our API Sales team who can help get you onboarded smoothly. DMs open!

PeaceForMost_NotAll

Agreed. 1. Growing user base of 600M+ 2. A platform that is one of a kind and users love 3. Huge room for increased ad revenue. Pinterest average revenue per user is around $7 vs $9 for Reddit 4. Experienced tech executives (COO of PayPal and Venmo lead it) I’ve 1000 shares locked in

NVDAismyg0d

My dad has millions of dollars. He’s COO of a company 

No_Assistance5652

A quick look tells me, There are several tranches of convertible notes at different price levels. This means future dilution. They have more than 2 bil cash at hand but as they are still in the growth phase, they may require further debt. I think that's why that investor got out, mostly they did not see the risk-reward from now. Insiders like COO usually sell to taxes or diversification. If you can sit on the stock for some years, I think it has a huge potential.

C130J_Darkstar

Yeah not from that source for sure. I did see that with the last raise they have something like $2B cash which is crazy… also the COO had said they are essentially done diluting given the cab project finance debt going forward. https://preview.redd.it/5u4igbvm369g1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1c5970972c6a5031e3b51c6e06e53748e4af970c

MattJend

I bought in at .69. Phase 3, excellent safety data, 2026 Q4 topline data, COO & CEO have stated they are entertaining partnership discussions, MS huge M cap, warrants expire Dec 31st and whales have purchased. Yeah, I'm in for this lottery ticket. https://preview.redd.it/aqr7pumjjy8g1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a31c151ddf246a9501f388f74acac5e7f03f3567

asagi_lumina

funny you posted this, i actually took a small position (20k in MIST) right after the crash post fda approval until i know better about the company. so far, looks ok: not great, not bad. the main drug though is good. the issue is the leadership team seems inexperienced in commercialization (COO looks ok though). the entry price is good enough to make it asymmetric so far i much prefer $HRTX (cheaper, more opportunities to get acquire, great ceo) main issues are the poorly priced options. sorry rambled but will dig more into it, thanks for the suggestions

MybobbyB

If all the ingredients and catalysts come together, $5 will be a formality. $5 is $500 million. Realbotix already sells humanoid robots, has marketing worthy of Tesla's early days, and FigureAi, which admittedly makes more advanced humanoids targeting manufacturing, is valued at $39.5 billion for zero humanoids sold, my friend! $39.5 billion vs. $500 million, lol. Would $5 be overvalued or unrealistic? Let's be serious. The COO confirmed to us that it's going to the Nasdaq, and that's that. $15 on the Nasdaq, the opening is certain. We're buying the future, that's all.

FIToptionstrader

NRDY - Chairman buying heaps of his own company stock & Ex Amazon executive now New COO = chief operating officer specialist in online marketing & distribution

TheVishual2113

It's good when the CPO and COO dump 30 percent stakes right?

MybobbyB

UAMY I don't like the COO's spirit at all Isn’t it rather in Mexico that they have their foundry? No the only real one is PPTA and Nova minerals will be its little sister but hey if you want your UAMY will also have its chances but their spirit is shit NOVA is Australian and Australia is the 3rd largest gold producer in the world, Nova the COO is a very well known Goat and he took part in ADG ADELONG Antimony and gold in AU and Pionner Lithium also in short good luck with UAMY friend

reddfoxx5800

One of the biggest complaints at an immigration law firm I used to work at was lack of communication. As AI was coming out, the COO asks if we can let go of people and use AI agents instead to talk to the clients, couldn't believe it.

MitchCurry

I still can't believe they went with an insider when replacing the CEO. The current c-suite, including the CEO née COO, have bungled so many things since COVID. They were primed for some fresh, outsider views. I don't see how it isn't more of the same with Fiddelke.

Fantastic-Bug-6509

COO of Theta Data here, our most expensive plan is [$160/month](https://www.thetadata.net/subscribe) (or $128/month when you pay for a year up-front) vs Databento's [$199/month](https://databento.com/pricing#opra)

Dumbest_Degenerate

Ugh. I tried this. Thought it would be fun to deposit money into the bull app and do a yolo on it. They debited the wrong account. Idk how. They don’t even know how. Spent months trying to figure it out and 10 different people gave me 15 different answers. If you think Robinhood is a joke, webull is the clown that couldn’t even make it. It’s so bad. It only has meme potential. Sure “it’s only gotten better” but it’s definitely not a “premium sophisticated trading platform”. Absolutely not. It’s a crapshoot. This isn’t some gambling app, it’s a regulated financial brokerage and I think it’s a matter of time until a massive scandal breaks it. Look at their board. The two independents are Walter Bishop, who was the COO of Deutsche bank during GFC, their Russian money laundering operations, etc, and William Houlihan, if Chammath is the SPAC king, Billy boy is the SPAC prince wanna be.

Gloomy-Tumbleweed344

I've been holding shares for a while now. Although the price action is good lately and the analyst sentiment is also high with some targeting share prices of $100+, many insiders including the President, CFO and COO have sold millions in shares over the last couple weeks. What do you all make of this?

Striking-Block5985

wrong the fee fro an optiuon contract is the fee period ist has nothing to do with PFOF that is coimpletely seprate fee some exchanges \[prfovccccce to push the tarde to teir exchange and the trader does not see that. The fact you are trying to claim this nonsense indicates you are scam and also unregulated off shore broker , and also if you were legit you would not be on Reddit Public COO indeed what a freaking criminal you are

imcguyver

I'm loading up on $CHGG on Friday. Here is why... - Chegg replaced their CEO with Dan Rosensweig - Dan Rosensweig left Chegg 2-ish years ago and is now back to resume CEO duties - The now ex-ceo Nathan was just a regular guy in SF who rose the ranks to become CEO. The point is Nathan is being replaced by someone who has a proven track record. - Dan Rosensweig is a who's who of the tech industry. Ex, Sheryl Sandberg used to work for Dan. After Dan turned down the role of COO at FB, he recommended her to Zuck. - If Dan Rosensweig is coming out of retirement then I'll back whatever it is. In this case you got a floudering tech company that Dan knows a lot about and has the connections to fix.

dont_downvote_SPECIL

I recommended to the COO to fire people before Christmas so the severance doesn't have to show up in our 2026 financials

PublicCOO

Hey everyone, I’m the COO of Public. Happy to answer any questions. And to be clear, you _get paid_ $0.06 per contract (which is ~$0.02 net when considering regulatory fees) — and that’s the minimum. It goes up to $0.18 per contract (net ~$0.14) based on volumes.

Muted-Celery7948

After another play I’m going in heavy on delta airlines puts $50 strike for this exact reason. it tanks every time it touches resistance on the 5y chart you can see it. around $60 or when it’s up 60-70% after last dip and always tanks. Itll hit $40-45 as it does consistently over the last few years. Currently 60% from last low in the aforementioned swings why do i hypothesize this when Delta looks bullish from most angles at first glance and I’m only citing a pattern a four year old could recognize? There is no catalyst it just happens and 8 insiders, including CEO CFO and COO just dumped a bunch of millions worth of stock. Largest sell transaction was $1.45 mil worth. I’m not saying it’s not done spiking Im just saying it has to and will go below $50 at some point. Do you’re own DD i’m still picking an expiry.

GlumTopic2026

More on the topic… First Shopify’s COO moves to $OPEN (huge move) https://www.wsj.com/business/c-suite/opendoor-technologies-snags-shopify-operating-chief-as-ceo-f958a789 Then Morgan Stanley ups its price target to $6 $OPEN = Real Estate + Ai. Huge upside potential. Something BIG is happening @ $OPEN and don’t want to miss the BIG move when it comes! Makes sense to be an $OPEN Bag Holder 💰

Dianna1B

Arman Sarhkani being the COO is earning his bachelors degree in psychology, marketing .. in 2025… no. I can’t buy into this. I tried.. but no thanks.

Revfunky

We define it differently where I am from. Insider trading are company insiders( CEO, COO, directors, board members) who buy their own stock. They have followed SEC rules and disclosed their stock purchases in the allotted time. So to me insider trading are members with insider trading knowledge of the companies affairs that purchase their own stock. Nothing sinister certainly.

ThrottledBandwidth

I had to fact check you because that is fucking wild and confirmed the COO got charged with third degree battery and “terroristic threatening” at an Arkansas football game

Educational-Dot318

JPMC dodged a bullet with that idiot; at one point he was the COO of the bank- Jamie Dimon nudged him out. At the time Bisignano was considered a potential successor 🤔

CryptoChartz

Every freakin Time RDDT starts to go up their stupid COO/CTO sell shares and tank it. wtf are they thinking they need to be removed

MybobbyB

Lisez et faites vos jeux Cf Resumé de la conférence avec le COO jeudi 🚀 Appel aux actionnaires de Realbotix : 23 octobre 2025 — ENORME HYPE ! 💥 L’avenir, c’est maintenant ! Le PDG a annoncé d’énormes nouvelles sur la croissance, la trésorerie et la domination du marché. Préparez-vous à vivre quelques semaines incroyables ! 🧠 Mouvements stratégiques & leadership d’élite Nouveau conseil consultatif en approche ! 🧩 Realbotix renforce sa gouvernance avec la création d’un tout nouveau Conseil consultatif. Une légende de Google prend la tête ! 💫 Le conseil sera présidé par Salim Hasham, fondateur et directeur mondial des Partenariats de Transformation de l’IA chez Google ! Cette nomination marque une intention stratégique forte et un accès à des ressources mondiales d’élite en IA. 🌍 Domination mondiale & percées en IA non supervisée Éblouissement à Dubaï ! ✨ Nous avons présenté deux robots lors du gigantesque salon e& à Dubaï, avec plus de 200 000 visiteurs ! Realbotix était la vedette du salon aux côtés d’e&, l’un des plus grands groupes télécoms du Moyen-Orient et le 5ᵉ/6ᵉ mondial ! Test de Times Square ! 🗽 Notre robot Aria a été laissé sans supervision pendant deux heures entières à Times Square. Elle est revenue en parlant espagnol et en racontant des blagues ! C’est une évolution d’IA organique, indépendante et sans précédent. 🤯 L’avantage visionnaire : Le PDG a déclaré qu’il n’existe AUCUNE AUTRE ENTREPRISE combinant à ce niveau la vision avancée et l’IA émotionnelle comme Realbotix. Nos robots interprètent les objets, les émotions, les personnes, les couleurs et les expressions faciales détaillées. C’est un avantage cognitif colossal ! 🧠 💰 Puissance financière & route vers le NASDAQ Aucun fractionnement d’actions ! 🚫 Le PDG a clairement affirmé qu’il n’y aura pas de fractionnement inversé. Trésorerie solide assurée ! 💵 La récente levée de fonds donne à l’entreprise deux années de trésorerie 💸 et un coussin financier suffisant pour viser une introduction au NASDAQ ! Le facteur JP Morgan : 🏦 Une filiale de JP Morgan a validé l’accord en à peine 30 secondes — ils adorent le modèle économique de Realbotix ! 💚 Argent en banque : D’ici vendredi 24 octobre, Realbotix aura 5 000 000 $ déposés sur son compte bancaire ! 🏛️ Dilution minimale : L’opération était très limitée, ne représentant qu’une dilution de 7 %. Bons de souscription : PRIX DOUBLÉ ! 💥 Les bons de souscription émis ont un prix d’exercice de 0,75 $, soit le double du cours actuel de l’action ! Les investisseurs croient clairement à la croissance future ! 🚀 💞 Le double modèle d’affaires du milliard de dollars Deux segments explosifs : Realbotix développe deux activités distinctes à fort potentiel : Compagnie : axée sur l’IA romantique et les formes d’intimité. ❤️ Entreprise : dédiée à la collaboration avec de grandes sociétés, valorisée en milliards. 🏢 Potentiel milliardaire : Le PDG pense que chacun de ces segments a le potentiel d’atteindre une capitalisation boursière d’un milliard de dollars ! 🎯 🔮 Et après ? (INDICE : C’EST ENORME !) GRANDES NOUVELLES À VENIR ! ⚠️ Restez à l’écoute — l’entreprise a promis une annonce majeure très bientôt ! Événement non dilutif : 🤝 La semaine prochaine, un événement non dilutif impliquant plusieurs nouvelles entreprises sera annoncé ! Préparation pour Las Vegas CES 2026 : 🌟 Nous nous préparons déjà pour le CES 2026 à Las Vegas, avec encore plus de robots et de nouvelles fonctionnalités !

sexyshadyshadowbeard

Yup - know your CEOs and CFOs. Doesn't hurt to know the COO too. Strong track records are vital to a new company.

SlfImpr

$PYPL OpenAI COO on X regarding PayPal: [https://x.com/bradlightcap/status/1983237575981879730](https://x.com/bradlightcap/status/1983237575981879730)

MybobbyB

What excels my friend is all the internal and external catalysts, find out you will see For example, they have just raised $5M with their first institution and that gives them 2 years of cash, the COO confirmed last week that there will be no more dilution or split, that Realbotix has 2 businesses in 1 and that each business is worth over 1B in cap.

TheGreatValleyOak

Where does it say that? Yong Meng is the CTO and Dr. Milan Begliarbekov is the COO

MybobbyB

It's like all mines my friend, but in fact the COO would have every interest with part of the cash to go and invest in uranium mines for example which is also his area of ​​expertise Forget the technique man on the other hand when a stock is not already at the price it's a retracement Then you go look for the normal pbs you are out and don't know the file 1- the COO said that there would be uranium potentially on Florida 2- Itrg received the MPO for Delamar 1 month ago which will give it a value 40% higher than GMINING Le’NOI is expected in January 3- we await the drilling results 4- we talk about technique graphically it's the best graph of my actions, a magnificent clean LT parabolic ramp

unil79

Yeah, CEO is also the COO and CTO of the company, sounds like a scam.

MybobbyB

Good thinking, honestly I had the same at the start but in reality they respond to one of the problems of our time and society: Solitude. This is why the COO has defined 2 branches Business and individual They are focusing on 1 sector for the moment but the COO seems to want to diversify the sectors of intervention The price is just a gift up to $2.5 higher in 2022, I think we will go back there very very quickly and then surpass them, it will have a destination at the QBTS

MybobbyB

Yes, big upside potential, the COO has just brought on board a former big boss from Google

TherealCarbunc

yet you're just throwing out claims that can't be found anywhere. any evidence whatsoever? If the COO who is exiting WITH vested shares sells soon I could see being concerned with his viewpoint on the trajectory of the company. If he does so, that shows a negative outlook on the stock price and will also be tracked by SEC filings

TherealCarbunc

any evidence whatsoever? If the COO who is exiting WITH vested shares sells soon I could see being concerned with his viewpoint on the trajectory of the company. If he does so, that shows a negative outlook on the stock price

TherealCarbunc

where is this information? the COO left but the article i saw cited health reasons

manualCAD

What are your sources on the new COO being clueless? I agree that Darren was pretty critical in the formation of this company....

Competitive-Ant2876

They will be the second mso to go under behind curaleaf, they shouldn’t even be trading at the price they are. They just replaced the COO, and the new guy is clueless. It’s actually insane. This company will see a small bump in rev more than likely this quarter due to the two grows coming back online in FL but after that you will see dwindling quality and smashed margins. They still have a HUGE inventory they need to sell through. It’s your money but go look at financials, and do deep dive on new COO

f0xinaround

Bring back the Bynd COO that bit a guys nose off. That dude had GUMPTION

Friendlyvoices

Hmm. I think their COO sold a large number of shares

PublicCOO

Hey OP — COO of Public here. First off, very very sorry for the situation here. Please DM me so I can make sure we’re taking care of this appropriately. Being out of the market for 3 months is a terrible cost so I’ll see what I can do. Second, as an explanation: this is not at all the typical experience with our rollovers (using Capitalize — who are very good at reducing the friction in making these transfers). Nonetheless, we became aware of an issue with our clearing firm reliably receiving checks to a specific PO Box. It impacted a very small number of members (yourself included it sounds like). We’ve since created a new delivery protocol for rollovers that have to be sent via check and have had 100% success with this new delivery approach. Very annoying and frustrating situation for both us and the impacted members. Lastly, worth mentioning that we don’t control how a rollover can be conducted. That is driven by your prior employer and 401k company. I am equally appalled that so many companies/platforms still require physical checks when the electronic approaches work so well. It’s just another way that they try to keep your money on platform (and keep earning $$ from you). Feel free to shout with any questions. DMs open!

TherealCarbunc

Financials. Current debt to income is high, revenue has been slow to get started, then establishing pipelines and commercialization and scaling up. The FINALE pivotal trial for FemBloc's FDA clearance isn't estimated to be completed until 2031 which is still a ways out and that reduces the growth speed of the revenue by quite a bit. About 700k tubal ligations are performed annually in the U.S. alone. Another comment on this post has a link about the COO retiring, his trades with vested shares will be tracked via SEC filings. If he doesn't sell them that is a bullish signal. At the bottom of the same article it mentions how FemBloc has already had a 400k placed from Spain which is a very good sign. Another video linked from another commentor is about 3 months old has an interview with the CEO. She talks about revenue starting to ramp up which is also a bullish sign. ****But ultimately the company has to show steady growth in revenue and reduction in debt, with consistent revenue streams**** Personally, come Monday morning, I'll be re-establishing my full position if it continues to hang around .6 at market open with the expectation that it could drop in value until the numbers improve. I expect further surges like we experienced this week and I'll just have to evaluate on a case by case bases if I want to sell those surges and attempt to buy back in lower. I've become increasingly bullish and have actually recommended this to friends which is something I absolutely have never done. I still gave them the caveat that this is a high risk investment and they should only spend what they are willing to lose. My ex (childs mother) actually took the clinical trial # from me on hearing about FemBloc as we have a trial location within a 5 hour drive.

No-Veterinarian2681

FEMY Posted this somewhere else, but wanted to share future catalysts, and my thoughts.  FEMY is 💯 long term hold. Thursdays catalyst was an unexpected Trump news fluke, but it def put the stock on the radar of more people which is good. I think any good investor who does DD can read the SEC filings and look at the company fundamentals  understands the long term value and potential.  Next catalyst is week of Nov 6 (earnings call). I expect them to report on how European market is going and it will be positive resulting in a bump from here, but not for it to maintain the high point (maybe set a new floor .7-.8) and it will probably consolidate again. Good time to sell what you have (assuming you didn’t enter at its high 1.1-1.8) and then buy in lower. It could hit that and higher after earnings. Oct 17 SEC filed their COO is retiring (Dec last day). This gives another potential catalyst at some point in next few months to name his replacement.  I think the stock price will be volatile until next year, but thinking between Trump, strong fundamentals, strong company insider support, outside institutional support, multiple patents and products, and being at commercialization stage already it is a winner. I bought back in and I’m holding long term, while taking profits a long the way. I have been watching this company for awhile, and I think it will do big things. Just depends on what type of investing you are doing (short or long). Both at play here. Not to sound cliche, but timing (entry CPS) is everything when short…but time in the market is the big win here. 

kidcrumb

Is this a company I use every day? Either directly or indirectly? (Indirectly as in I use it and don't even know it). Who is the CEO, CFO, COO, and the rest of their board members? What percentage of the company is owned by the people who know it best? (The board members). I look at a LOT of things before I ever look at the income statement or balance sheet.

TherealCarbunc

Thanks for calling it out, I hadn't seen it. I'm not sure how the market will react, I haven't actively seen price action on news like this. But this seems like a good thing: [https://www.investing.com/news/sec-filings/femasys-chief-operating-officer-daniel-currie-to-retire-in-december-93CH-4295668](https://www.investing.com/news/sec-filings/femasys-chief-operating-officer-daniel-currie-to-retire-in-december-93CH-4295668) His retirement package included shares that were unvested becoming vested. I'm pretty sure it means he's now a bagholder while in retirement. If he holds he has confidence in the company's growth. If he sells he's most likely not excited about it's long term prospects, I doubt he'd need the cash immediately but it does cite health reason so who knows. The bottom of this article is also bullish and shows new information i hadn't found: Femasys has already received a 400k order for FemBloc. I'd like to know how many units that is and what the profit margin is between that order and cost to manufacturer and deliver. This linked article is bullish in my view. We still have to see the answer to longer term growth and profits but it's good news, I'm going to be getting in ASAP monday morning unless premarket surges and it looks like a downtrend is due. <----NFA advice. make your own decisions and don't follow me blindly, i still consider FEMY higher risk due to their current finances. We need to know how consistently they can generate revenue and if it outpaces cost. **Search on "why wouldn't a COO's unvested shares become vested"** A Chief Operating Officer's (COO's) unvested shares generally do not become vested because they have **failed to meet the specific conditions** outlined in their employment agreement or stock grant plan, with the most common reason being the **termination of their employment** before the end of the required service period.  Key reasons for a COO's unvested shares not becoming vested include: * **Voluntary Resignation:** If the COO quits their job before the vesting schedule is complete, they typically forfeit all unvested shares. * **Termination "For Cause":** If the COO is fired for reasons specified in the contract (e.g., poor performance, misconduct, violation of company policy, or breach of fiduciary duty), the company has the right to reclaim the unvested shares, and sometimes even claw back certain vested shares. * **Failure to Meet Performance Milestones:** Some executive compensation plans include performance-based vesting conditions (e.g., hitting specific revenue targets, achieving certain operational goals) in addition to or instead of time-based vesting. If these milestones are not met by the specified deadline, the shares will not vest. * **Specific Plan Expiration Dates:** If an award has an expiration date and the vesting conditions (such as a liquidity event in the case of some private company RSUs) are not met by then, the award may expire worthless. * **Acquisition/Change of Control Terms:** In a merger or acquisition, the terms of the deal may dictate what happens to unvested shares. While some agreements include "accelerated vesting" clauses, others may provide for the unvested shares to be cancelled without payout, especially if the company's value is "underwater" or the acquiring company doesn't need to retain the executive. * **Violation of Post-Employment Obligations:** In some cases, even after leaving the company, if the COO violates certain clauses like a non-compete agreement, the company may be able to reclaim shares, depending on the specific terms and local laws.  In essence, unvested shares are a tool for retention and incentivizing long-term commitment, and failure to meet the agreed-upon conditions means the COO has not yet earned the full right to their ownership. The specific terms governing this are always detailed in the formal stock plan and grant agreements. 

rossacruel

What is your prediction on stock valuation with the notification of COO Daniel Currie leaving position. He leaves with 315,778 stock options. His employment will cease December 15.

Yabuduzhdat

What is your thoughts after their CEO COO sold the shares?

Prestigious-Most5196

Just bought some calls on COO, grabbed some INVO. Thanks

fine_lit

fractional CFO and a part time bookkeeper is probably the way to go for finances but your finances are chaotic because your operations are likely chaotic… Maybe consider an office manager and/or COO, if people are doing random outsourcing and buying random SaaS subscriptions you most likely do not have clearly defined operational processes and procedures and that makes it impossible to have any control over spending

humtake

Ah yes, the typical move of CEOs who have no better ideas and can't be bothered to innovate or evolve with the times. This is the most brainless strategy and only serves to show just how inept CEOs really are. The worst part is how much dumber that position is getting. In a world where people are being laid off because of AI which is really just a direct result of innovation, and when executives keep telling people they have to evolve their skillsets to stay marketable, and how companies have to change their processes to incorporate new technology...we have executives who haven't come up with anything innovative in the C-suites for decades. If an executive wants to know how good a company is doing, what do they ask for? EBITDA. Maybe sprinkle in some EPS and operating income. Know how long they have been doing this for? Decades. In other words, executives haven't evolved anything. They still use the same tired metrics to determine business value but everyone else has to constantly evolve. Eventually, and hopefully soon, a shift is going to happen where people realize we don't need executives as badly as we need technology. You can't run a business without cybersecurity anymore. You can't run a business without an online presence. You CAN run a business without executives if you just have workers who know how to create and implement strategy. There always has to be business leaders, of course. But they do NOT have to sit at the top of the food chain anymore. Hell, AI can do more than they can and probably better. Eventually, the people who can control the tech will control business. Now, those people may or may not be just as corrupt but the point is we will at least have some kind of evolution beyond the stupid executive playbook that hasn't changed in decades while everything else has passed them by significantly. And I'm an executive, so there isn't bias here. I just can't stand having a new peer like a COO or CEO come in and be like, "Duuuuuuuuuuuurrrr, I need to justify my position but I don't have brain cells to be innovative or creative enough so...layoffs!!! That will show how great I am at saving money, duurrrrr."

MybobbyB

Ah oui vous avez raison la dessus les principales sources de financement sont : ventes de participation dans les societe dans lesquelles ils investissent, dilution sur le marché, pret BNY et maintenant Subvention US DEFENSE Par contre le COO fait ca intellligemment, c est un stratege Comme indiqué cest du long terme, 3 a 5 ans 10/15Mds En attendant CT split 5/1 annoncé sur le nasdaq donc on ira se stabiliser a 7/8$ soit 200M$ de capi Elle grimpera 2026 2027

caattta

Apple is a declining company because it is run by accountants, not engineers or designers. They have never released anything particularly innovative. They let other companies release good things, would release a better version of the product. Now they just improve things slightly each year - accountants ahead of design & innovation. They shrugged off AI with their wait and see process and now things are developing so quickly that they cannot catch up. They also continue to refuse to invest significantly despite having massive cash reserves. They abused their dominance and the iOS closed ecosystem is being torn down by regulators. Ive, the designer behind almost every iconic project left a company he dedicated his life to because Apple became too focused on operations, finance and risk aversion. Tim Cook did a good job, particularly around developing supply chains that made the company massively profitable. He should have stepped aside and let someone else take over. Imagine Ive as CEO and Cook moving to COO back in 2019. Creative direction, design and brand identity taking priority with Cook ensuring the cogs continue to run well (the experience that Ive lacks). If Ive is given free rein at open AI and they somehow reimagine the phone, it’s easy to believe that Apple will have its Nokia/Blackberry moment by the end of this decade.

AdAble9788

Since September, CVNA execs have unloaded around 2.3 million shares (~$850–900M) — CEO, CFO, COO, GC, everyone. All “pre-planned,” of course. No insider buys. Zero. The stock’s dipped a bit, but if the people running the show are cashing out this hard… how much gas is really left in the tank? 🚗💨

Low_Barnacle_2052

The two cofounders, CEO and COO, are selling a crazy amount of stock >$100 million.  Sam Altman stepped down off the board so he could sell his shares without reporting it. Insanity...

MybobbyB

Yes, it is beginning its path of growth and development, and in a magnificent way because of the support of the American DOD, the largest Defense structure in the world which secures the shareholders, the company and its projects for the future. I cannot predict the timing in a reasonable way its current value can consolidate between 850 million and 1.2 billion US$ because it combines 2 future mines in one The 1st Explorer GOLD for the long term but with the COO who is preparing a surprise for us in early 2026 and believe me, The 2nd Junior Future Producer of Antimony at the end of 2026 Just for the Antimony UAMY which I also like, it's the big sister already has a 3B rating So I think it will be $270 at the end of 2026/27 The catalysts that could make it rise much faster are, for example, an announcement from Trump on Nova or an acquisition of a stake in Nova by the DOD, etc.

te7037

Old news. The lawsuit has been settled and Carrie left the company a month ago. Keith Rabois and Eric Wu returned to the Board as Chairman and Director. Former COO of $SHOP is now the new CEO with a $1-salary plus stock compensation once the stock price hits $6.50 or something like that. The company has been bullish in reviving the company. So, it's very promising. The recent US government shutdown will push the Fed to cut the rate not this month but next. $LDI and $OPEN, $BETR

Zytran

RDDT under $200 if worth a look. Own the 7th most popular website on the internet, and the most popular (non-profit Wikipedia aside) website on the internet not owned by the mag 7. RDDT is positioned to become an Advertisement revenue juggernaut. FVRR macro factors of Gen Z shifting more towards gig work and stacking incomes will help, Hamas/Israel peace deal may ease geopolitical tensions. ABAT they are pre-profit, but with a path towards profitability. They own a proprietary process for recycling Lithium in Lithium-Ion batteries, on top of owning and developing a lithium mining operation in Nevada. Potential to be a key player in the future as the electrification of everything trend continues. SOFI a banking and fintech disruptor play, recently achieved profitability, has a good product, is growing membership, growing revenue. deploying new product lines and categories. I like the CEO, Anthony Noto was former COO and CFO of Twitter, CFO of the NFL, and a Managing Director at Goldman Sach, good track record and consensus is he was impactful in his former roles. SOFI if Market willing, could eventually have a "HOOD" moment in valuation. GRRR the specialize in building out smart-city infrastructure. They have continued revenue growth for the last few years. They have global partnerships that give credence to potential multi-billion dollar contract pipelines into the future. One such example is their 20-year contract to transform Santa Marta, Colombia into a smart-city. They continue to show success in scaling their business as they earned contracts this year with the Port of Tyne in UK, Wan Hai Port and ADE Corporation in Taiwan to build Industrial IoT infrastructure for smart port and logistics infrastructure.

erwin4200

Guess that makes me COO. No plans to sell anything till $10 and even then I'm only selling enough to cover my port so about 25% of my shares. https://preview.redd.it/dzd44j3jtztf1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a57b589bf161497cc47ff96b4e1ab45b67251a5c

METALLIFE0917

Yesterday Enovix COO Ajay Marathe sold 120,000 shares for approximately $1.44 million, reducing his ownership by 10.46% to over 1 million shares. Enovix's stock price increased by 8.7%, reaching $12.96, following strong trading volume significantly above its average. The company reported revenue of $7.50 million for the previous quarter, marking a 98.2% year-over-year increase despite a negative EPS of -$0.13.

Duchamp1945

[The COO of Celestial AI saying that the transmission of data accounts for 60% of energy use](https://youtu.be/Q4W42zcRqwM?si=YRj-HinEitF-Bv-e)

MybobbyB

Sur RR en effet cest un transfert d actions Sur XBOTF c est un achat d action du COO

MybobbyB

Yes it is correct but for RR for XBOTF Realbotix the COO did buy back 100k shares at the end of September https://preview.redd.it/mwb8v09ciatf1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=d37587a9d55f4d2e584e4189491bcdeb5fd7342a

RonMexico16

“COO granted stock compensation” somehow becomes “CEO BUYS HIS OWN STOCK!!!” Read to succeed, kids.

dabestgoat

Ummmmmm, COO != CEO....

meemeemoomoo5

The negative sentiment surrounding them is totally different. It was various lawsuits + AI hype that was holding them back, but Google fundamentals and profitability were absolutely in place. Just waiting for the right moment to explode. Reddit is a potential that's in the 'infant stage of growth' just because they went public. They remained unprofitable for the huge part of their 20 years, and somehow people think because it's one of the top visited sites in the world that this potential can be unlocked to crazy profits. It was already some of the top visited sites in the past 10 years, maybe not top 10, but top 100 perhaps. Their only selling point now is the data they have, that allows them to partner up with AI companies to claw for their information. I honestly don't see how they can ramp up their own advertisement to make it highly profitabile. They are not innovating, they are not pioneering any technology. Take a look at the fillings too, the COO contribution seem to be more busy with offloading her stocks instead lol.

Tropicalfisher

What company? I think COO salaries should be publicly available

-IQ200

Can the company be self sufficient without COO? Calls if yes, puts if no.

Mr_Worst_Timing

COO of my company decided to step down out of nowhere. He made the company what it is now. Puts or calls on my company?

Herban_Myth

COO?

Fit-Engineer8778

Sounds like CEO and COO but one of them didn’t wanna look like they were the less powerful one.

pertsix

We usually call that CEO and COO.

C130J_Darkstar

Insider selling was very negligible and clickbait… the CEO and his wife (COO) own the lion share of equity at 20M shares and had only sold 50K. So we’re taking roughly 1/400th of their total equity and holding onto the remaining $2.2B. I think that there are many catalysts coming in the 2H that could drive a lot more tailwind- had recently posted a DD here.