EW

Own-Philosophy-5356

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ROBO/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL90lhMuK1TAXlZAPmX5s34xJLQN56_wu3wcsDdOTOTVyjZuCtxgGklcwKRw2j0f89p-25f5lS1rjX1SpejvjZF-08om8ZW-l-RYp6aHEhNk-YzkgJVJcCVeZua0PEG73ffxZFV2hYIR9uyKeB-M86IQbqxr4sun9EW59naxoiAf

nigel_pow

I read something about some Ukrainian drones that used AI so they didn't need input from the pilot or if the Russians used EW to try and jam it, the drone would try and slam itself into anything the model interpreted as Russian.

Confident-Cell-2549

$MOB is showing signs of becoming an embedded cybersecurity drone subsystem supplier across allied defense markets… not just a one-off U.S. defense drone component vendor. Its activity now spans the U.S., Israel, India, UAE, and the European Union, with visibility into Romania and NATO defense channels. This is a drone, robotics, hardware, software, and cybersecurity company founded by two former Israeli special forces veterans with deep expertise in cyber technology. The market may still be treating $MOB like a tiny speculative drone stock. But the evidence suggests something more interesting: a trusted, embedded supplier moving into the Western defense-drone stack at exactly the right time. U.S. trusted-drone clearance. Production orders tied to a U.S. defense Program of Record. Israeli defense experience. International design wins. Cybersecure datalinks, autonomy software, and EW-resistant communications. This looks like a company that is already proving itself before the market has fully recognized what it may become. High risk, yes. But if $MOB keeps converting defense validation into production revenue, this could be one of the more asymmetric small-cap defense stories in the market.

Confident-Cell-2549

$MOB is showing signs of becoming an embedded cybersecurity drone subsystem supplier across allied defense markets… not just a one-off U.S. defense drone component vendor. Its activity now spans the U.S., Israel, India, UAE, and the European Union, with visibility into Romania and NATO defense channels. This is a drone, robotics, hardware, software, and cybersecurity company founded by two former Israeli special forces veterans with deep expertise in cyber technology. The market may still be treating $MOB like a tiny speculative drone stock. But the evidence suggests something more interesting: a trusted, embedded supplier moving into the Western defense-drone stack at exactly the right time. U.S. trusted-drone clearance. Production orders tied to a U.S. defense Program of Record. Israeli defense experience. International design wins. Cybersecure datalinks, autonomy software, and EW-resistant communications. This looks like a company that is already proving itself before the market has fully recognized what it may become. High risk, yes. But if $MOB keeps converting defense validation into production revenue, this could be one of the more asymmetric small-cap defense stories in the market.

BrodyTrail60

The sulfuric acid export restrictions are actually a bigger deal than most retail traders probably realize.SX-EW copper production relies heavily on sulfuric acid availability, especially in places like Chile. If acid logistics tighten while ore grades continue declining, supply bottlenecks can appear even before actual ore depletion becomes the main issue.

powerboner

Found mens Adidas Gazelle shoes in my size for $30/pair but ofc shipping is $13… EW

IsabellaHughes527

No. It matters most for acid-intensive leach and SX-EW operations. Many BC copper-gold porphyry projects are often more flotation-based if they are sulfide systems. The broader point is that local industrial chemistry and supply chains still matter.

Designer_Respect4285

Margins are solid, 39 gross basically every year, 17 net this year. Their contract wins have been very strong. They are a serial acquirer in terms of capital allocation which is a big yellow flag, but they have a good track record with it and have been genuinely forward looking as indicated by their involvement in the trends I mentioned. In terms of how much of that demand actually shows up, these sectors all have an estimated 10-30% cagr, and this lines up with what I'm seeing from genuine experts and policy wonks. And as I said, I think some of those estimates are conservative such as the one for AUVs. In terms of how much revenue they realize, that is always the question. What I can say is right now, their tech seems genuinely differentiated based on their margins, contract wins, expert reports etc. I can't pretend to have an informed opinion though on if they will maintain that lead. I'm counting on passed execution and supplying the sectors with the likely largest tailwinds for the next five years. I don't think the valuation fully assumes the story for the reasons I outlined, AUVs and EW for instance are not fully appreciated.

Space4Time

https://youtu.be/EW_jo2JnVVM

__VisionX__

Do a full Technical Analysis: Elliott Wave/New EW, Indicators, SMC, look for Orderblocks etc

Deathstroke5289

[It is open if you discount the fact that ships that passed through will be bombed](https://youtube.com/shorts/8EW46adTzMs?si=WPD3dJpCitUP5ErY)

Brokenandburnt

The Saudis sign a defense investment agreement with Ukraine, causing Russia to spaz out and put out a statement that they would start supplying "lethal aid" to Iran.\ According to intelligence sources at least the first few shipment will be Russia's vastly improved version of Shaheds. Those are more resistant to EW, more precise in targeting and with data links for target updating in flight. I'd wager that they'll also supply FPV drones. On Iran's eastern flank, there's a borderline shared by Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. Living smack dab stop those 3 borders are the Baloch. They don't recognize the borders as legitimate, fair enough since they were arbitrarily drawn by UK, and seek independence. Iran and Pakistan has suppressed them together, while Afghanistan has supported them. With Iran distracted the Baloch are causing havoc, at the same time the Pakistani Taliban are taking advantage and causing havoc. And on Pakistans east border there's yet another insurgency faction. China has invested **a lot** into Pakistani infrastructure, to expand their trade routes that are not contingent on ships that can be blockaded.\ This of course means that China might also have to get involved. The Saudis signing an agreement to invest in the Ukrainian defense sector moved them closer to the western bloc, which means that Russia and China are pissed at them. At the same time it pisses of Iran something fierce, which means that Iran _might_ start to consider Saudi energy infrastructure a legitimate target. What's holding them back is probably Iran being wary of inviting retaliation against their own export capacity. Oh, the Houthis has officially entered the conflict. They have only sent some missiles against Israel so far, but I'm guessing they'll close Bab el Mandab soon. That means that the Saudi pipeline, which has _just_ spun up to it's 7M/bpd max can't load it on VLCC's, leaving them limited to Suezmax which will severely limit their export volume. It also adds ~20 days if they want to  get that oil to Asia. The Houthis can of course attack the oil terminals in Yabun, or simply blow the pipelines. But other than this, it's business as usual.

dagroup

Yes. I am a cash only account, thus very restricted. I trade 0DTE & 1 week options. I trade with a directional bias using EW & Fib levels (concurrence, projection, retracement), and price momentum defined by candles. I buy only OTM and look for a delta around 30. This keeps initial cost acceptable, even with a total loss. If the market doesn't go my way I hold until the next fib levels, still doesn't hold I am wrong and try to exit, When it goes my way, I exit at fib levels. I keep narrowing it down to what security I trade as many of the MMs don't really make a market anymore. I don't look at a tape, volume, or other greeks as it wastes my time. I trade size based on conviction. If you want to know how they work, I just posted a problem with Schwab in free market stocks channel. Schwab did correct after notification. u/adamantiumtrader is correct that most lose money, but the same can be said of all traders when it comes to long term as stats show over 95% lose. I won't disclose numbers or percentages but March has been my best month ever on trading options, but typical month trading forex. I've been trading for many years. hope this helps

icydragon_12

I've worked on wall street. I'll let you in on a secret: price targets don't mean anything at all. SNAP last reported in February, we can only change price targets when the company reports news, or we publish a large sector report. That means there's usually only \~8 opportunities/ year for an analyst to change the price target. The stock just fell a lot since the last quarterly. Analysts are required to have a certain percentage of underweight, equal weight, and overweight stocks within their coverage (ideally \~30% in each bucket, but in practice.. more OW than UW). The implied upside (target price/current price) has to match these buckets on a relative basis. When snapchat's ave price target was $7.9 in Feb, that is just analysts choosing a price target that would fit these criteria. They weren't saying that they thought the stock was worth that. They are almost never saying that. What's far more important to pay attention to than the price target, is analyst ratings. UW means this is trash. EW means this is trash. OW means buy.

Gullible_Ad3785

Sure, at the end of the day you still have to kill the meat. Drone operators are needed in the field because of EW countermeasures, and are usually the priority kills.

Fun-Age-5749

EW, meta

jakmes84

Israel and the USA probably carried out hundreds of sorties over Iran and the stealth bombers, F-22 and F-35 have been employed in the most defended and contested areas. Israel has been using the F-35 over Iranian skies since more than one year and I'm not aware of a single F-35 loss before this plane got hit, and despite everything they managed to reach the base. Stealth aircrafts are less detectable but still you need to use them with caution, like avoiding the same routes over and over. Unfortunately, as of now, the European industries have nothing that gets even close to what the F-35 can do. I love the Eurofighter, the Rafale and the Gripen, but until the new EW evolutions and the next gen radars are adopted they are too far performance wise, their only upside is that being developed in house we're sure there's no kill switch or some other surprise we're not aware of.

DepartureAnxious5115

If you do and like any TA its in the golden retracement zone of an EW. If it closes here its likely to bounce and start moving up, a break below 70 and it likely drops lower. But your in WSB so we dont do that here so buy that shiny shit cause it looks cool af.

Brokenandburnt

The US isn't running escorts because they aren't prepared or ready, they simply lack the ability.\ Their Navy procurement managed to fuck up 3 ship designs in a row, the LCS, the Zumwalt and now the Constellation. There hasn't been a ship designed in the US since the early 80's, the Arleigh Burkes. Now, they are good ships, but old and unable to be upgraded further. Not enough hull space nor power generation. The problem is that it isn't WW2 anymore, or even the 80's. Navy ships rely on overlapping AA bubbles and the ability to maneuver to stop/avoid incoming attacks, that's why the Navy has stayed out of range. The strait is only 21 miles wide at the choke, with the safely navigable channel for deep draft vessels being 2 miles, although that is with a big security margin. So, there's no room for several destroyers, at least not enough to get a decent overlap. The mountain range starts only 30 miles inland, so it's not as easy as securing the shoreline. The short range to the mountains means the Burkes radar won't pick up any drones or cruise missiles coming in low. This will probably mean that the escorts will need to be constantly at GQ, and probably weapons on auto. If they have to do that, air support goes out the window. There's so much EW going on in the area that the risk for friendly fire would be unacceptable. Besides, the US Navy only has 74 of them. And like all military units they are meant to be on rotation of 1/3 at sea, 1/3 for refit/resupply crew rotation and 1/3 in drydock for heavy maintenance. The problem is that the Navy has run an insane OP tempo, and every single ship is way, way overdue for maintenance. And then something that few consider. Missiles are fired from a VLS cells. A cell can contain a tomahawk, or a various amount of AA missiles, with the smallest being 4 to 1 cell. The Burkes has 96 VLS cells, the Ticonderogas has 126. But they can't reload at sea, the cells are between 5.3m to 7.7m, need cranes. In other words, the ships will be hideously vulnerable to oversaturation. They can track up to a 100 targets or so, but they can only illuminate 3 at a time for the older missiles. The newest SM6/SM2 can aquire targets on their own, kinda, so perhaps 12 targets at once can be engaged. So, if 40 drones, 10 speedboats, 5 USV and a couple of ballistic missiles show up... See the problem?

not_my_monkeys_

If it males you feel any better, the current war might actually be reducing the risk of a Chinese invasion attempt this decade. Iran uses a lot of radars and anti-air systems imported from China, and the US-Iran war is currently demonstrating that those systems can neither detect nor shoot down US military 4th and 5th gen aircraft as they have claimed. Plus reports are that US EW is extremely effective at neutralizing Chinese-made military systems. Xi now knows that the US has substantial technological overmatch and the 7th Fleet could likely annihilate his invasion force at sea.

Weak-Equal-9084

I just cheched my portfólió after 3 months and EW, what happened to microsoft

maglite_to_the_balls

Bingo. Nobody with any maturity or sense thinks Iran competes in a meaningful way when it comes to a conventional war with the US, including the Iranians. Which is why these smaller countries like Iran and NK excel at EW, cyber warfare and economic warfare. Forest, trees

Petit_Nicolas1964

So far they were specialized in Electronic Warfare (EW)—using radio frequency jamming and high-power microwaves to "soft-kill" drones. The systems are expensive upfront but they market them as more cost-effective as they have a close to zero cost per shot. They have started partnering with other companies to integrate kinetic interceptors. They are field-proven (extensively in Ukraine) and Nato-certified and ramping up their production capacity quickly. They have assembly hubs in the US and in Europe and keep inventory to fulfill emergency orders for Ukraine.

drew-gen-x

Check options on the $EW ETF's. Do you think the DXY short squeeze is over and Trump will cave on Crude Oil prices? That's the trade. I might lose my shorts figuratively if the DXY breaks above 100. If you think the DXY & Crude Oil is going higher than buy $IGV. For some reason software has been an inflation hedge & moving higher on a strong DXY and lower on a weak DXY. It's proyly just correlation and not causation, but that's what the charts are showing me.

drew-gen-x

You watch the $DXY. Half of the gains in all the EW ETF or emergency markets was a bet against a strong dollar. The other half is gains was the move higher in the home indices such as Nikkei etc. Notice how all these EW ETF's like $EWY and $EWJ are now moving higher since we have seen a short term peak in Crude Oil and DXY is now below 89??

Kaymish_

Russian EW hardened antennas have been found on drones fired by Iran,vso they have provided at least some upgrades for Iran's drone fleet.

Weak-Equal-9084

EW

Lazerys

A bit of EW and GPS jamming and those drones are worthless. Iran reportedly does not have fiber optic ones either, not to mention that you won't sink a ship with a grenade.

dagroup

I'll differentiate between charting & trading platforms. For my simple stock charting (EW & Fib) I prefer ChartIQ from CME on Yahoo. For forex, I prefer MT4 w/StoneX. For placing option / stock orders currently with Schwab & simply login & trade thru the web. Recently learned that Tasty Trade offers their desktop on Linux which I'll be testing on Zorin OS as a possible replacement for schwab as a broker. fwiw.. if you see my lack of studies / indicators on a chart you would most likely laugh.

MethylphenidateMan

I never said that replacing the operator with AI would make the drone immune to all countermeasures but keeping the signal coherent between the target and the sensor is much easier than keeping it coherent between the drone and the operator because it put the onus of emitting an electromagnetic wave strong enough to do its thing on the target. I'm no EW expert but I'm pretty sure it's more feasible to disrupt long-range signals in a general area than to equip every potential target with a system of emitters that blast sensor-blinding radiation in every possible direction.

baconography

One of my best non-options performers...wish I had bought more. EWY -- and some of the European EW\* ETFs have been fantastic vs. SPX over the last year+. Another thing to note; on Friday, there was some bullish flow on EWY options which rolled in late in the day, and it was noteworthy to me, because I hadn't seen that ticker pop up on my scanner before.

dagroup

It's interesting to note that different perspectives come to similar views. I am strictly technical (EW & Fib) and long term it has reached a possible (38%) turning point and a wkly indecision bar just closed. I would step in slowly until it proves itself, then get aggressive. hope this helps!

dagroup

I'll try to answer your questions as I use EW. Background; I read Elliott's book several times and like most thought it was BS, until I got some serious training. Volatility is not an issue with wave count. EW let's you drill down on each time frame and KNOW not guess where you are because of the rules. yes, I still get my count wrong sometimes, but it is becoming less. The most humbling thing is going to bars to quickly visualize. ie: someone in another thread today mentioned CRSR and was received poorly. I didn't know but looked at it with monthly bars and quickly realized it had most likely completed an ABC or was very close. As to Fib; I use the golden ratios, and confluence or measured moves areas to consider a trade. I step in typically around 50% partially. On expansion I find 138% area is noteworthy. 162% not so much. Recently, I've noticed that "A" correction waves in strong momentum moves are around 16% not the 23% or 27% some talk about. Hope that answers the questions.

ThanklessWaterHeater

Thanks for asking! :-) I think there are so many small, speculative companies in the space, and the barriers to launching a successful pharmaceutical are so high for them, it’s difficult to pick winners there. But you can assume that if something really great is discovered by one of the small players, it will be bought up by one of the large players before it becones profitable. So in my view investing in the large players is a fairly safe bet on the future of the whole sector. I’m very long on LLY, AMGN, REGN, and EW.

baconography

Compare most of the country ETFs (EW\*) vs. SPY over 2025, and you'll clearly see that it has already been going on. 2026 will be more of the same.

baconography

I loaded up 20k on the better-performing EW* ETFs on Friday. Almost all of them beat the S&P500 by a wide margin in 2025, and the flow out of the U.S. will continue in 2026.

ThanklessWaterHeater

Well, first, it was a fairly small investment. I try not to put more than about 1% of my worth into one company, and at that time $28k was about 1% of my assets. But to answer your question, I buy well-run companies with growing businesses and hold them, hoping they’ll grow 10x over a decade or two. Once in a while one will exceed that expectation causing me to reexamine it. Sometimes I think it’s fine and will continue to hold (like LLY and EW). With MU—and LRCX which I also have kind of a lot of—I’m happy with the current growth, but think it’s unhealthy and unsustainable, so I’m taking some profits out to reinvest in more sustainable growth for the next decade.

Left-Raspberry-9250

last one for today Quick update on GameStop: My EW model projects a downside target in the **$59 – $66** range. That’s the zone I’m watching.

ponkychonkhenry

Please stuff your “EW model” up your ass

Left-Raspberry-9250

Quick update on PayPal: My EW model projects a target in the **$99 – $108** range. That’s the zone I’m watching.

Left-Raspberry-9250

Quick update on AMC: My EW model projects a target in the **$2.30 – $2.72** range. That’s the zone I’m watching.

Appropriate_Mixer

GPS support for their targeting system on their weapons along with pretty much all their air defense as well as their EW defense

gmdmd

Thanks, bookmarking this thread when i get done with this stretch of shifts at work, will look into implementing elliott wave analysis. Right now we use the basics: RSI, volume, MACD, SMA 20,50,200 and Bollinger bands to do technical analysis on daily chart. If EW doesn't require any additional special indicators maybe I can have gemini just do an additional round of analysis at the end for EW... if I get it working I'll reach out to you again.

Artifexx

I have yet to find a good indicator inside trading view or anywhere else for that matter. There is a website that attempts to do it at [hubb.com](http://hubb.com), however i use that more as a guide to deep dive into a stock my own way. The thing with EW is that its just a theory that follows a set of rules based on trader psychology. I know it sounds like "astrology for bros" but its honestly something that only AI would excel at compared to human brain.

gmdmd

Oh very interesting... what indicators do you need to do EW Analysis? I've been paying for an API (chart-img) to automate getting screenshots from TradingView then passing that via API into gemini. If our site ever takes off or reaches ramen profitability it seems like it wouldn't be too difficult to add EW analysis, although that would effectively double our LLM costs to run a separate EW analysis on top of our standard TA...

Artifexx

My current process is picking a stock I like (AMD right now), and downloading the chart data from trading view. I upload that csv file and then ask it to run an EW Analysis on it. I have it break it down from Cycle degrees down to minor degrees. I have it format it in an easy to read text file that I can save a hard copy of just in case. I then ask it to check if any rules have been violated from its labeling. Once it passes that test I then draw the elliot waves myself on trading view so I can keep visual track and make sure it looks right. My only bump in the road are complex corrections. Ai doesnt identify them until its too late. So what should be the start of a wave 3 can actually be a leading diagonal and it has burnt me. Over all I am up though and still refining the process every day.

Ok-Hornet-6819

In fact it's the opposite! Venezuela was confident in their China weapons systems which despite three years of training failed them. China now understands their radars, EW, weapons systems have no chance against US Military tech.

fuckweasel-1

EW - with their acquisition of Endotronix & Vectorious, they're positioned to make moves in the Heart Failure space

Tiny-Pomegranate7662

I don't hold any for a long time, I'll rotate out when I get a good run of 15-20% (thank you Roth for no short term tax :) ), but any of the EW ones from iShares seem to work good.

im_burning_cookies

EW and tech are green..

Rrrandomalias

Hey look we tickled 676.99 and SPY said EW get me out of here

Dramatic-Morning-100

EW.

Excellent-Mud2091

Bros raw dogging a turkey? EW butterball

ReadStoriesAndStuff

Thanks for posting this. You are correct. I relooked at this deeper. Going even further back in the most days of the 500, before there were actual EW funds I can find, EW did handily outperform (58-16). That said, the Mag-7 run since 2017 is the performance that you chop down using EW. I don’t think that can be discounted here. There does seem to be a structural difference in how the large tech companies perform. Nonetheless, it’s so close that yes, RSP is as good until very recently or better. And it’s better if you back calculate it to the late 50’s when the 500 was first instituted. Before you could buy it EW in fairness and when the market and technology was far different. So it’s a much tougher comparison than I thought. Thanks for pointing it out.

ragnaroksunset

> Selling leaders to buy laggards is selling high and buying low. It's only buying low if you think the laggards are inaccurately priced. And if you think that... I can imagine a different strategy you could employ, since you're already actively managing anyway. If you don't think that, then you're selling leaders to catch falling knives. Giving away upside to increase exposure to downside. No amount of pointing to "historical evidence" can make that into a good idea. The third option is if you have no idea whether the laggards are underpriced or not. Congratulations, you're a typical Joe Schmoe without the time or inclination to get involved in serious trading. Jumping in and out of different portfolio weightings isn't for you. Dollar-cost averaging into benchmarks is the game. What you're missing is that the comparison isn't between CW and EW. What you're also missing is that your indices will by dynamically changing their allocations as the scenarios you envision are unfolding. The correct comparison is between CW buy-and-hold vs. CW-EW and holding for the intermediate term. Each step in this weighting change risks giving away upside in exchange for increased downside, because you're switching allocations before the "correction" you envision materializes. Understand what that process looks like: At t0, you sold (part of) your CW position, which means you sold the leaders before the top, forgoing upside, and you bought more of the laggards before their bottom via the EW, embracing additional downside. Now, at t1, your imagined corrective scenario unfolds. It can do that in a couple of ways: 1. The leaders correct hard and nothing happens to the laggards. Your EW index sells the leaders *after* they correct and buys more of the laggards, which haven't moved yet. You gave up upside in exchange for ambiguity. 2. The leaders correct hard and the laggards rise. Your EW index sells the leaders *after* they correct and buys more of the laggards *after* they go up. You sold low and bought high. 3. The leaders correct hard and the laggards follow. Your EW index sells the leaders *after* they correct and whether they buy more of the laggards or not depends on whether the laggards fall less or more than the leaders did. Once again you gave up upside in exchange for ambiguity. In all three of these scenarios your strategy ultimately reduces to a play on the laggards. Since you're doing this actively, you have to compare the decision to switch from CW to EW, to an alternative decision where you sell CW to buy laggards only. Because you're not fully divesting your CW position, you might as well just do the latter, if you're going to do anything at all (which I don't think most people should). Far from avoiding an emotional toll, you're exposing yourself to an even greater one. Because after all, you have no idea when (or even if) the leaders will correct.

Skepticalpositivity9

Selling leaders to buy laggards is selling high and buying low. I’m only pointing out that historical evidence (which of course may not hold into the future) shows that following significant periods of CW outperformance and concentration, EW outperforms in the intermediate term. For a lot of people holding CW and never thinking about it may work, but for a lot of others, the large swings can be dampened by buying EW here so they avoid the emotional toll and make a rash decision in the future. Obviously CW would continue to outperform if we continue to see concentrated outperformance, but EW will outperform over the intermediate term if we see a large drawdown or a broadening out which has historically occurred after similar periods of concentration today.

ragnaroksunset

At that point you're actively managing your portfolio. Or at least, you'll need to be. If you're holding CW and sell off some of that to switch to EW, think about what you're actually doing: you're selling today's leaders to buy more of today's laggards. Now what happens if the CW over-exposure blows up? Obviously, those leaders take a hit, and you dodged some of that. Good on you. But now you're betting that the rest of the market doesn't also take a hit. If you're not paying attention (ie: actively managing your collection of indices) then you probably gave up some upside in the initial switch from CW to EW. Then, you get hit again when the rest of the market follows. Since the condition that caused you to swap from CW to EW has abated, what do you do next? Switch back and eat the loss, or hold until CW becomes expensive again? You're just doing buy-high, sell-low with extra steps.

Skepticalpositivity9

Has nothing to do with using indices. The historical evidence shows that when cap weighted concentration is this high and when the cap weighted index has outperformed the EW index by these magnitudes, EW tends to outperform over the intermediate term (1-5 years). Making small changes to a portfolio over time is different than a complete overhaul because you think you can predict what happens next in the short term.

YouFirst_ThenCharles

Sure sure EW, glad to see not everyone here is a regard.

AverageNo130

A White House official described the rescheduling process as ongoing and said that “all policy and legal requirements and implications are being considered.” Cannabis industry sources said investor optimism partly centers on Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles...She is described by multiple sources in the cannabis industry as a close friend of Trulieve CEO Kim Rivers. According to the Florida Division of Elections, Trulieve spent more than $100 million supporting a failed ballot measure to legalize recreational cannabis for adults 21 and older. The company reportedly played a key role in securing Trump’s[ backing](https://smartsafeflorida.cmail20.com/t/y-l-mdjjkdl-hlkrhtkduu-y/) for the [initiative](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-will-vote-yes-florida-ballot-measure-legalize-marijuana-rcna170197). For the presidential race, according to Federal Election Commission filings, Trulieve donated $750,000 to Trump’s inauguration committee and another $250,000 to his MAGA Inc. super PAC. Rivers attended two pre-inauguration events, including a dinner for Vice President JD Vance, and reportedly joined a $1 million-a-plate fundraiser at Trump’s New Jersey golf club in August, where she urged him to reclassify marijuana, the Wall Street Journal[ reported](https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-marijuana-federal-drug-classification-01a73b8c?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqcGhNuPnaYkCYaFAvnEDjLa_eAEGuqP2EW9Jce3OFFN_fGuI20b2E-O&gaa_ts=68f92074&gaa_sig=J0i8GTnzuJdpcmmfD_ihrSEv4j1LTSvGXdRjN-lLt3kDBqgshL6n7NpOCbGmcpzL9Bs8G5irc_zCwidhnMQeOQ%3D%3D). And my add...Truth Social is now running ads for cannabis.

julian_jakobi

I did a follow UP post that includes the latest PR. - https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/s/pqLGa6EW6B

RandomGenerator_1

Interesting for the competition: RCAT - Red Cat’s Teal Drones Black Widow™ System Approved for NATO NSPA Catalogue "Integrated Doodle Labs radio for robust, secure, long-range communications with electronic warfare (EW) https://ir.redcatholdings.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/191/red-cats-teal-drones-black-widow-system-approved-for-nato-nspa-catalogue And they've been upping the security investments lately with Lantronix.

noholdingbackaccount

Bruh, Lockheed lost out on BOTH the new fighter contracts. The have the F-35 maintenance contracts and some missile stuff, but that's already baked into the price. They also have the upcoming F-22 upgrades, but that's a small number. Northrop is where it's at. B-21 is getting going and looks primed for a good long production run with room for expansion into EW and C&C platforms. (Boeing got the new air force fighter contract, but that's balanced out by all the MAX screwups, so that's a wash.)

0K-go

Looking at EW. Okay, more than looking.

Most-Sun4067

Timing is difficult, of course. I’d say that the market could still well go up another 2-3% before finishing the 5th wave, if the EW model works out. So SP500 to 6700-6750? A correction can be shallow, like SP500 moving slightly below 6000, or deeper, in which case we might see the range of 5000-5300 again.

CalRippedken

EW

zlordbeats

dear psky plumbers? 

Parkingking33

EW. Coworker dating. https://preview.redd.it/b25g4vogxskf1.jpeg?width=390&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=20816a09b2733bf26c4e2cb4e491243271f0f86d

Beneficial-Swim843

I appreciate you even responding and I apologize too. I genuinely just wanted to give context since I used to use EW so...either way, I hope you have a great week!

Beneficial-Swim843

This is not comprehensive. I do not know EW's criteria, but it's usually the most popular and largest names that show up on their "shortlist".

Beneficial-Swim843

This is not comprehensive. I do not know EW's criteria, but it's usually the most popular and largest names that show up on their "shortlist".

Beneficial-Swim843

This is not comprehensive. I do not know EW's criteria, but it's usually the most popular and largest names that show up on their "shortlist".

Beneficial-Swim843

This is not comprehensive. I do not know EW's criteria, but it's usually the most popular and largest names that show up on their "shortlist".

mmoney20

Hey all. I built this app [stonksreport.com](http://stonksreport.com) for this community as some of the folks expressed some early interest. It's been in the works a while and I just released in less than a week ago and there's been some usage. Some quick basics about it: it mirrors Earnings Whisper's calendar (I'm trying to improve upon it by adding other stocks as well that aren't on EW's list but usually tracked by the sub - recent IPOs, meme stocks, etc). It polls live stock data (daily price, % change since last closed, pre-earnings report) and recently added economic data release like CPI, PPI for corresponding dates as well as reddit comments from the latest earnings thread at the bottom. I'm currently working on and on my list * add post earnings data as part of stock info * adding stock performance post earnings showing which ones gone up or down after reporting earnings. * sentiment analysis as far as earnings predictions, positions, etc. based this earnings thread * weekly leaderboard (based on this info) * and more... I appreciate any feedback in it's current state and if the features above (or think I should add different features and functions the sub continually asks for) would be helpful for this community in using this tool. If it is helpful now and with the features above, and you guys see value in it, I will continue to invest my time to building it (BTW, I am a noob software developer). If not, I will move on. You can reply to this comment, DM me for feedback or send any feedback to [thestonksreport@gmail.com](mailto:thestonksreport@gmail.com) Thanks.

Treewishbone

the way he says EU sounds like EW

big_balls_doge

80 yr olds dont give a FUCK. They walk around, dick with a ballsack like a parachute 🪂 EW FUCK

potato111a

Ima need DXY to keep rising.. got a trip to Yapan this September and the EW U in January

OilBull

FIX, EW, and VRSN for an easy earnings beat play

Yogurt_Up_My_Nose

we were at a crab boil, and sometimes I like sucking the juices out of the heads of the craw fish. anyway I did that and this girl screamed EW really loud. it made me feel bad.

Venice_LA

Pew Pew? more like EW EW 🤮

Busy-Block-1603

I would be cautious here. First of all it's nothing super new, Ukraine and Russia have been using drones extensively since 2 years ago already. On the Russian side we see now production of fpv drones somewhere in mid six figures and moving to 1 million per year eventually, latest by 2026. These drones are pretty much built from components manufactured in China with a total cost per unit of 500-1000 USD. As for the longer range drones, think Russian Geran, production is now at roughly 30k per year, and will likely be somewhere 50-100k per year by 2026. Again most components are likely made in China, then assembled in Russia I guess, with the total cost of 30-100k USD per unit, depending on configuration (e.g. ML chips, jet engine, etc). Key innovations/challenges that need to be addressed are: range, resistance to EW, navigation over satellite (think of a concept of mother drone having Starlink and child FPV drones detaching from it using radio receiver to the mother drone). I may be mistaken, but the US doesn't have currently any manufacturing at scale for FPV nor can it produce it at comparable reasonable cost. I also don't think Ukraine would need to/want to buy these from the US since it would be far more expensive than produced inside the Ukraine and would obviously hurt interests of domestic producers/manufacturers who are obviously extremely close with the government there. Besides that Ukraine doesn't seem to have big difficulties producing these at scale. And for any other conflict I don't think there is a huge demand. I think with the US companies the main focus would be on longer range/higher precision drones (think like Russian Geran, but more premium, more stealth, better polished tech stack with more powerful integrations over all). The only company that I think is currently doing something like that is Anduril and they are private.

JAG_NG

China has already started amassing assets for this. Our intelligence indicates it’s probable, not just possible, that China will launch some sort of combined arms (land/sea/air/EW) operation on Taiwan by 2027. First there will likely be a massive EW event, so markets may have seconds (or days) to react

short-premium

Here's the comparison. both trades are 41 days out selling a $10 wide spread in spx for $120 41 selling a 25 point wide /es spread for $137.5 yes comms are slightly higher in futures options but you pay less to initiate the trade. and other commods and int rates futures options are usually 3 to 1. meaning i would have paid $350 to initiate those. lmk if any questions |Order Description|SELL -1 VERTICAL SPX 100 15 AUG 25 \[AM\] 5920/5910 PUT @1.20|SELL -1 VERTICAL /ESU25 1/50 AUG 25 (Wk3) /EW3Q25 5900/5875 PUT @2.75| |:-|:-|:-| |Break Even Stock Prices|5918.8|5897.25| |Max Profit|$120.00|$137.50| |Max Loss|$880.00 (not including possible dividend risk)|$1,112.50 (not including possible dividend risk)| |Cost of Trade including commissions + fees|credit $120.00 - $1.30 - $1.28 = credit $117.42|credit $137.50 - $4.50 - $1.14 = credit $131.86| |Buying Power Effect|($881.30)|($526.43)|

RandomGenerator_1

Cyber, Electronic Warfare Key to Winning Future Fights, DARPA Official Says https://www.airandspaceforces.com/cyber-ew-in-future-wars-darpa/ BURU to acquire Tekne, an expert company in Cyber and EW.

RandomGenerator_1

"While NUBURU does not support or promote conflict of any kind, we recognize that recent developments in the Middle East are driving a significant increase in global demand for advanced defense technologies. Our pending acquisition of @TekneGroup positions NUBURU to contribute meaningfully in this evolving landscape:  Heightened demand for tactical vehicles, EW systems, and battlefield innovation  Accelerated defense R&D in AI, autonomy, and cyber systems  Strategic alignment with NATO-aligned capabilities through Tekne’s $309M+ backlog. We continue to work through the Golden Power approval process in Italy and remain committed to transparency with our shareholders. Further updates to follow." - june 13th Nuburu

RandomGenerator_1

"While NUBURU does not support or promote conflict of any kind, we recognize that recent developments in the Middle East are driving a significant increase in global demand for advanced defense technologies. Our pending acquisition of @TekneGroup positions NUBURU to contribute meaningfully in this evolving landscape:  Heightened demand for tactical vehicles, EW systems, and battlefield innovation  Accelerated defense R&D in AI, autonomy, and cyber systems  Strategic alignment with NATO-aligned capabilities through Tekne’s $309M+ backlog. We continue to work through the Golden Power approval process in Italy and remain committed to transparency with our shareholders. Further updates to follow." - communication today by Nuburu

Fantastic-Job-144

It’s actually pretty simple math. Here in the USA we learned it in the 6th grade. Just curious where are you from? You can either use your iPhone calculator by just typing in 176.80 X 883,875% = 1.56 million. Or if you don’t trust the calculator, just do it on paper like we learned in math class covering decimals and percentage. Percent increase → \frac{883,876.46}{100} = 8,838.7646 Step 2: Multiply by initial amount 176.80 \times 8,838.7646 = 1,562,095.28 Step 3: Add the original amount back Since this is an increase, you add the original value: 1,562,095.28 + 176.80 = \boxed{\$1,562,272.08} And if you still don’t believe me. Read this. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0547647212?ref_=cm_sw_r_ffobk_cso_cp_apin_dp_NABMFAKK1VK6KFKYQ4EW&bestFormat=true&titleSource=avft-a

Gulliblenibba68

Does your race begin with J and end with EW?

ex2h

Original (in Russian) https://www.instagram.com/p/CbLCydJs7EW/?igsh=MXBqb29sa3FzYXJxMg==

lullckkillers

EW VICTORIA

OmegaThree3

EW sends very detailed emails out with everything you need... for free

Oldmanyoungmoney

EW. Dead media company that isn’t quite dead? So dying?

EconomyDoctor3287

It's not a backdoor per se, just the EW and interconnection that routes through US military servers and this they can shutdown. Heck, the US blocked the EW capabilities of the Ukrainian F-16, when the orange felon has a full diaper, requiring Ukraine to fly their F-16 way behind the front lines, since the early warning systems, etc. weren't operating. 

Nekogiga

Cheap stocks, I can get behind. tRumps buddy? *EW EW EW EW EW EW EW* I have standards. I'd compare him to garbage, but I don't want to insult actual garbage.

EmergencyRace7158

Keep it simple. GLD is a hedge against currency wars given central bank buying. BNDX invests in non US fixed income which should keep things fairly stable outside of the embedded USD short and foreign yield curve exposure. I'd also recommend moving into non US equity markets because they're reasonably valued and look set to outperform US markets going forward as foreign capital flows into US stocks reverse. VEU is Vanguards monster ex US etf and there are country specific funds as well (EW\*, EP\*) if you're more advanced. At the exotic end you have long/short funds with material global exposure like QLENX and BDMAX which offer a beta neutral actively managed way to get global exposure.

saintmitchy

EW pesky bull

Visible_Yam_1983

yup, reason for the fiber optic connection is so EW cant jam it. needs to be attached to you. Best way to be in the rear is have bone spurs.

Backhandslap88

EW. Hitting on a minor. 

TheBooneyBunes

Which are…not the important ones, like the stealth coating, and the radar, and the EW

TheBooneyBunes

…yeah dude, the ejection seat is British, that’s some real game changing tech There’s a reason F35 needs American permission to buy and not British The radar? American, EW? American, the missiles? Yeah they’re American Also just because parts are licensed to countries that were a part of JSF doesn’t mean it’s not American