Reddit Posts
Laurion Mineral Exploration LME LMEFF - A Buffett Worthy Investment
Can I make a post? I want to get eyes onto $GBR.
LMEFF/LME.V Report & Update - Potential buyout & 1,000-1,750% return
LMEFF Report & Update - Potential Buyout & 1,000-1,750% Return
LMEFF/LME.V - Laurion Mineral Exploration - Due Diligence & Buyout Target
LME.V - Laurion Mineral Exploration - Due Diligence & Buyout Target
HUGE 252m 20% magnesium drill hole in BC, MINE.V only $10mil market cap. Going to run to $50mil by next week
HUGE 252m 20% magnesium drill hole in BC, MINE.V only $10mil market cap. Going to run to $50mil by next week
HUGE 252m 20% magnesium drill hole in BC, MINE.V only $10mil market cap. Going to run to $50mil by next week
HUGE 252m 20% magnesium drill hole in BC, MINE.V only $10mil market cap. Going to run to $50mil by next week
GBR setting up on deck / oil play with FTDs / 3m float
GBR 1000% RUN UP AGAIN??? (NEW SOUTH AFRICAN DELTA VARIANT)
GBR 1000% RUN UP AGAIN?? (NEW south africa variant)
GBR - If you missed out on EFOI today, check out GBR! Trying to break and run.
New concept energy $GBR - higher gas prices doing any good?
GBR round 2? Soliciting wisdom of apes
PFFOF - A lithium,gold and copper mining company.OTCQB. Portofino Receives Encouraging Phase 2 SGH Gold-in-Soil Anomalies at the South of Otter, Red Lake Property
Mentions
Eyes on GBR here. No position yet.
ayy FUCK the buffalos! one of my favorite life moments ever was being at the game Nebraska mahandled Colorado so bad that Shadeur went to the lockerroom with four minutes left in the 4th 😂 (sorry just had to talk some shit love you nothing personal GBR sorry get fucked sorry)
Hoo-boy, this one's complicated. I bought GBR.V for something like 1.08 CAD way back, that ran to $29, before it was bought out. I think shareholders ended up going for a split of something like $26 and 0.3 K.TO shares per GBR.V share. So that alone was 2300% gains over about 3 years? But in 2020, royalty shares were issued, at a ratio of 4:1, which were bought outright by Royal gold for $6.65 per share. At that point Kinross shares were valued at $7 at that time, and ran to $47~ in 2025, I dumped 3/4 of mine at $43~.so that's another 500+% assumed return in 3 years. And on top of that, shareholders of Great bear resources were issued contingent value rights to even more shares if the project is up and running by 2032 and producing X amount. Opening up the possibility of even greater returns. That one $6000 purchase gave me a return I am actually too stupid to calculate correctly and will never see again in my lifetime. Actual dream scenario.
China's GDP-Debt is at 88% while the US is 121% Source: [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG\_DEBT\_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA)
$GBR and $BRN are no debt BATL sympathy plays, microcaps, low float, no dillution risk.
GBR- I still think this will be one of the top oil gainers this week. float is getting locked, no dilution risks and shorts will likely cover into market close.
GBR is setting up for a multi day squeeze. Cleanest oil play with no debt or dilution. They own mineral leases and oil and gas wells in Texas.
$GBR looks like algos want to squeeze this at market open. Big bids flowing in. Top oiler that has some catching up to do
(GBR) looking good one of the cleanest oil plays. No dilution risk and $1.15 break can see $2+ easily. A lot of shorts trapped now.
I’ve been watching the oilers move too and there’s definitely a lot of FOMO coming in. GBR looks interesting at this price, but the volume is still small. If hype picks up it could spike hard, but be ready for massive volatility.
$GBR looking like the next Oil play to squeeze, no dilution to kill the momentum with shorts running out of shares to borrow.
$GBR 5m float oiler with no dilution lagging behind the rest..could easily run bigwith more volume.
Bullshit. 1. States have budgets, no state can afford to just ignore a huge reduction of tax revenue. This is an issue with the Netherlands previous tax system, not the welfare state. 2. Looking at wealth distribution and tax collection, we still have a system where the rich get richer while lower incomes get poorer. The problem is not preventing that, i.e. not taxing the rich enough. (That assessment is not related to the current tax law changes mentioned in this article, but neither was your comment.) 3. Looking at GDP to debt (https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA), it seems the USA is much worse off than the EU countries.
Oil will be hot tomorrow with new sanctions/tariffs talks news. Stocks like GBR or BANL (vessel refueling) worth a look. There are many more on the list too.
Couldn't read past *"Their debt to GDP ratio is now beyond the EU and US"*. You have no idea what you're talking about, so you're making stuff up to sound knowledgeable. China's debt to GDP is a little over 90% ([up from 88% in 2024](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD)) vs. 124% for the US, 113% for France and 135% for Italy.
It wasn't. It wasn't significantly worse either though, and it did drop lower than most in the US by 2023. 2020-2022 inflation in the US was slightly higher than most other developed countries. I think the more reasonable point was that this happened everywhere, it wasn't just the US, and the US did ultimately manage it well. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/inflation-of-consumer-prices?tab=chart&time=2019..latest&country=DEU~GBR~USA~JPN~AUS~CAN~KOR~FRA~OWID_EU27&focus=~USA
It wasn't. It wasn't significantly worse either though, and it did drop lower in the US in 2023. 2020, 2021, 2022 inflation in the US was higher than most other developed countries. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/inflation-of-consumer-prices?tab=chart&time=2019..latest&country=DEU~GBR~USA~JPN~AUS~CAN~KOR~FRA~OWID_EU27&focus=~USA
SADS (suddenly adult death syndrome) increased by around 98 percent between 2020 and 2021 for some reason🤔Chat GPT said that 12k deaths are attributed to the COVID vaccines Excess Deaths https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline?country=USA~GBR~AUS~CAN~IRL~NZL Cancers, heart attacks and strokes are all up
It’s more useful to think about GDP/debt, then it’s Apples to apples for countries of different size Here’s a map: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD Basically if you made $270,000 a year gross (GDP), and you bought a $370,000 house. Could you pay that off over time? (Yes) It’s why taxes on billionaires are needed (your mortgage payment)
GBR has volume pouring in. Could spike at the bell
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD/AUS/CHN/BRA/IND/IDN/KOR/RUS/TUR How about using the G20 as a definition of major economies rather than a selection of cherry picked countries.
[https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG\_DEBT\_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD)
wouldn't the ratio of interest paid on public debt to GDP be a better indicator than the total debt-to-GDP ratio to evaluate japans financial health? in which case it really isn't that bad? [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/ie@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/ie@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND)
I'm finding that government expenditure is \~35% of our GDP, which when compared to a majority of other developed nations we are actually on the lower end...so i'm not sure why that's a bad thing. Source on your 2.5% and 25% would be appreciated My source: [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND) Also I'll believe anew 'higher' bracket for the rich when it gets to his desk and signed. Until then its a worthless platitude and means nothing coming from him. He says one thing, while congress is figuring out what tax credits they can cut and what social services they can remove all the while increasing our military and homeland security spending.
It’s strange that you’re pointing to Germany because no matter how concerned you’re about Germany their stats look better Uk. Lower unemployment, lower inflation, lower debt, higher GDP https://www.worlddata.info/country-comparison.php?country1=DEU&country2=GBR
So I'll take a page from Bessents most recent talk as he's the closest thing to an adult in the room (you'll have to kind of look past the parts where he has to talk the administration's book). The big elephant in the room is that trade with China isn't really 'free' trade in that China has pretty strict capital capital controls so they can keep the Renminbi from appreciating. This permits them to "de value" their currency and support an export led economy since they don't have enough local demand to sustain all the industries being built, which in turn causes deficits (a lot of it the US) where new currency (dollars) are printed in order to buy those exports. This has in turn resulted in a hollowing out of many previously industrialized economies as you simply cannot compete with the cheaper labor. This is not a big deal in a world if you think Wars are a thing of the past, but the Covid pandemic made it very clear how integrated supply chains were and how fragile the foundation of the US's power was (where the value of the dollar is also implicitly backed by US military power). This is a big big problem in the world where you just print money to satisfy global demand, since eventually the world wakes up and realizes they don't need to take your printed money if you have no means to enforce it. This is really a clash of two super powers and everyone else is caught up in it. Now the execution? Total dogshit. [https://www.youtube.com/live/NsyNHd5Ce3c?si=bKDvAOhtUHy6eJzh](https://www.youtube.com/live/NsyNHd5Ce3c?si=bKDvAOhtUHy6eJzh) [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-currency-policy-explained/](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-currency-policy-explained/) [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/CG\_DEBT\_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/CG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA)
The wikipedia article is quoting the IMF. I found the IMF data first on theie website but wiki also had the historical data and had a more convenient presentation. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/HH_LS@GDD/CAN/GBR/USA/DEU/ITA/FRA/JPN/VNM
U.S. ranks only 13th in household debt to GDP ratio. Switzerland, Australia, S Korean, Canada, Hong Kong, UK are all higher than U.S. Canada is at 103%, while U.S. is only 73%. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/HH_LS@GDD/CAN/GBR/USA/DEU/ITA/FRA/JPN
No it’s not. It’s based on a lie. China’s national debt is lower than their GDP https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD
This is misinformation. China’s national debt is less than its GDP. Source: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD
Well I sold all my US investments, moved most of my USD capital to EUR and GBR, and am now investing for the new world order which currently includes a more self sufficient European economy that is less reliant on its former close ally the USA. As an active investor my sub r/DoubleBubbler has details on my two recent investments in SES A.S. (Euronext Paris: SESG) and EnSilica plc (AIM London: ENSI).
lol man, wear those downvotes with pride. They hate you because you speak the truth. There is a reason they are all disarmed and American is taking up the slack. Greece has no problem starting shit and sending people the bill. France spies on all of them. There is a reason why 5 Eyes only includes GBR while primary bases are in Germany. And then you have Turkey…
Ah yes, unlike strong, fiscally responsible nations, like Turkmenistan and Cambodia. *They* are secure. [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG\_DEBT\_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA)
You're not making points, just baseless claims. To be honest, it's quite tiring because it's always the same "arguments", just a different Reddit username. But sure... *"China has been in a property collapse since 2021. The entire wealth across the nation and citizens has been destroyed"* The real estate sector accounts for roughly 30% of China's GDP. So much for "The entire wealth across the nation". China could literally cover the entire valuation of their real estate market by new debt and they'll still have less debt than the US. They just prefer a long but healthier resolution over printing cash and throwing it at the economy like we did in 2008. And that's due to their political system where politicians are not under pressure to deliver before the next election, at the cost of future generations. Land sales have dropped but aren't going to disappear overnight. The Chinese have a different culture. They save a lot (45% vs 3.6% in the US) and invest mainly in real estate. Financial assets are not as common as they are in the US. The last report from early February states that land sales have stabilized. The "hidden" debt you're referring to is estimated at less than $2T, so if you add it to the 84% [reported by the IMF](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA), you're still under 100%. The US is currently at 123%. I would add that they've been on a Western-like Keynesian trend lately and that's probably not a good thing, but still in better shape than us, like being late for a trash-your-house party.
What a absolute pile of a gift-wrapped turd, spewed with ignorance kind of post is this. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/adjusted-net-savings-per-person?country=DEU~FRA~GBR~MEX~BRA~PRT~COG~DNK~USA US on the way up. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-population-in-extreme-poverty?tab=chart&time=latest&country=CHN~DNK~OWID_WRL~FIN~FRA~DEU~IRL~ITA~JPN~NLD~PRT~ESP~GBR~USA GDP great for US https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison?tab=chart&time=1980..latest&country=OWID_WRL~Western+Europe+%28MPD%29~Eastern+Europe+%28MPD%29~BEL~FIN~DEU~ISL~ISR~IRL~ITA~JPN~LUX~NOR~PRT~POL~ESP~SWE~CHE~GBR~USA GDP growth since 1950 aint amazing for US https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth-since-1950
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA/FADGDWORLD I guess same to you?
Will prices are higher, incomes are also a lot higher here. As a percent of income, we spend less. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/food-expenditure-share-gdp?tab=table&country=USA~GBR
Depending on whether this week yields some gains I will either hedge or sell off a profit. They have patents, filed and pending approval for expansions in EU. Canada and GBR by next year. I think the director was far too optimistic buying shares Q1 at $12.00 SP. Obviously things went wrong but they haven’t sold. The valuations seems conservatively priced at this point and more in line with how projections were to be reported. I am cautiously optimistic.
The Gdp to debt ratio is way more important. As far as that goes, ours is a little high, but does anyone truly know the best gdp to debt ratio for growth and productivity? https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CAN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA Japan seems fucked tho lol
When was the GBP 1.48 ? Many moons ago the GBR was the EUD. I know what happened here. In theory your hypothesis should still be validating, only your margin on return has been increased to 21200% 2032JulyUSF. I would change your time horizon… live chart no candles when trading forex. kagi setting and use a ichimoku cloud. Also use accumulation momentum rather than RSI. #MoneyTalk
“The Fund also singled out the high debt levels in China and the United States, saying loose fiscal policy in the latter puts pressure on rates and the dollar” While I agree that US fiscal policy and government spending are too high, they remain the lowest among the G7 countries as a percentage of GDP. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND
It'd be peak if Biden launched a $GBR Go Brandon stock. He'd be able to get investment from MAGA tards.
#Lel, there’s not even data for 2023 yet & less than a fiscal quarter into FY24, emergency funding resolutions, GDP means nothing 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 > https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND
Covid is still killing us at the same rate as it always was. This is a cover up and systemic risk. FRANCE >https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&country=~JPN&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=new_cases_per_million&Metric=Excess+mortality+%28estimates%29&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=false&Color+by+test+positivity=false JAPAN >https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&country=~JPN&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=new_cases_per_million&Metric=Excess+mortality+%28estimates%29&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=false&Color+by+test+positivity=false UK >https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&country=~GBR&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=new_cases_per_million&Metric=Excess+mortality+%28estimates%29&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=false&Color+by+test+positivity=false WORLD (its the top line) >https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&country=~OWID_WRL&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=new_cases_per_million&Metric=Excess+mortality+%28estimates%29&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=false&Color+by+test+positivity=false LLY 2000
As a percent of GDP, US Debt has been going down during Biden. Went up a lot during the pandemic. And it's not the highest among the g level countries. [https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/CG\_DEBT\_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/CG_DEBT_GDP@GDD/CHN/FRA/DEU/ITA/JPN/GBR/USA)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBR_h30bQAAtNuc?format=jpg&name=medium https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMU0tzLwhbE
What about investment trusts? Company set up to replicate an index fund. Traded as a stock [JAM](https://tools.morningstar.co.uk/uk/cefreport/default.aspx?SecurityToken=E0GBR01ABF%5D2%5D0%5DFCGBR%24%24ALL)
If that were the case one would expect inflation to be a gradient with the USA as the source most directly impacted and close trading partners US consumers buy products from the next highest and so on. Instead you see USA having one of the lowest inflation rates out of developed countries with capitalist economies. Our monetary policy can’t simultaneously be the source of the entire world’s inflation and yet have the lowest level of inflation. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PCPIPCH@WEO/WEOWORLD/USA/GBR/RUS/MEX/FRA/CAN/DNK/DEU/IRL/SWE/ITA
>Cars windows are all electric, [Electrically adjustable windows front with function auto up/down, mechanical adjustable windows rear](https://www.skoda.co.uk/apps/stock/carDetail/GBR2805903721752023?CarType=N&Model=BIAJ&Pins=210-28059&Sort=DATE_OFFER&SortDirection=DESC)
Back on dat four loco. Goal is three today w/o passing out. GBR!!!
The mods keep silencing me!!! Back on dat four loco. And soon some *** beer. I know we’re gonna get annihilated but oh well, GBR!!!
The mods keep silencing me!!! Back on dat four loco. And soon some CBD beer. I know we’re gonna get annihilated but oh well, GBR!!!
The mods keep silencing me!!! Back on dat four loco. And soon some CBD beer. I know we’re gonna get annihilated but oh well, GBR!!!
Back on dat four loco, and soon some CBD beer. I know where gonna get annihilated but oh well. GBR!!!
Back on dat four loco and this time some CBD beer soon. My team is a gonna get annihilated but oh well. GBR!!!!
It's mainly a problem in the USA, Canada and the UK https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/HH_LS@GDD/CAN/GBR/USA/DEU/ITA/FRA/JPN/BEL
You may want to read this Pimco explanation on bonds. It's one of the better explanations available from a well-known fixed income investment manager - [https://www.pimco.com/en-us/resources/education/everything-you-need-to-know-about-bonds](https://www.pimco.com/en-us/resources/education/everything-you-need-to-know-about-bonds) A bond fund typically will have some target duration which is continuous. Because a target duration fund is continuous and does not mature where you get the face value back at maturity, as yields increase, the bond fund price will reflect it. So - you have to look at it from a total return and dividend reinvestment perspective when the fund's effective duration is reached from the time you originally acquired the fund. The duration and maturity of the fund is usually published - your broker likely provides that information. I did find a tear sheet on Morningstar here - [https://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/funds/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?id=F0GBR06I9B](https://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/funds/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?id=F0GBR06I9B)
So to countries that also engaged in sanctions lol? So Eur goes to 25%, AUD to 5%, and GBR the economy suffering the most in Europe to 5%. That’s till leave the US well above 50% share. That’s giving the Euro a 25% jump and the other two a 100% jump.
Every stock will have its peaks and its troughs, as they go through market cycles. I could probably name a few that I have seen go from pennies to multi dollar like $GBR.V (canadian ticker). More recently I bought $MDMA at 0.045 In January and its already hit 0.25 this past Friday. Thats about a 500% gain. If she goes to 1$ i’ll make 2000%
Do british ppl really play baseball? I'm watching this USA GBR game.
A quick google search answers all your questions . So lets take the ETF "Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF 1C" This site list the full holdings https://etf.dws.com/en-gb/IE00BGV5VN51-artificial-intelligence-big-data-ucits-etf-1c/ > We only get to see the 10 biggest components, You can find the entire holdings here https://etf.dws.com/etfdata/export/GBR/ENG/excel/product/constituent/IE00BGV5VN51 >they do not explain the reasons why they choose some stocks over the others Once again the ETF is an index fund, you have to look at the index what can be found here https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/nasdaq-yewno-global-artificial-intelligence-and-big-data-index-2021-09-15 from the methodology NYGBIG’s constituents are selected from the Nasdaq Yewno Global Disruptive Technology Benchmark Index (NYDTB). All securities must have a minimum market cap of $500 million and a minimum six-month average daily dollar trading volume of $2 million. Additionally, 20% of each company’s shares outstanding must be available to Foreign Institutional Investors (FII). Securities are selected for inclusion in NYGBIG according to Yewno’s Pure and Contribution Score method, which considers several sub-themes within the overarching theme of AI & Big Data and, to that end, assigns each security two scores based on patent filing activity. The Pure Score is a measure of how intensely a company is engaged in a theme, relative to all other themes for which it has recorded recent patent activity. The Contribution Score represents a company’s share of overall patents recently filed by all other companies relating to the same theme (e.g., Natural Language Processing). So essentially they base the weight on patents filed related to AI or big data to gauge how much of the business is in AI; So its hold bank of america because apparently it has filed patents related to AI or big data, so it explains it looking at patent filing activity
I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, GBR. The market cap of GBR is **22016000** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.
Hey /u/Worldly-Travel-2466 - I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. We don't allow discussion of low market cap (less than 500mm) tickers to prevent pump & dump spam and scammers.
Hey /u/Worldly-Travel-2466 - I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. We don't allow discussion of low market cap (less than 500mm) tickers to prevent pump & dump spam and scammers.
https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/GBR
It's a bit more complicated than that. I am not an economist and only have a cursory understanding of central bank operations. In developed countries, a central bank like the BoE is an independent public entity. Central banks like the BoE and Fed do not get any funding from the government. So when a central bank is buying or selling - those funds are not coming from the government. The Bank of England is one of the oldest banks in the world. And it's charter can be found here - [https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/about/legislation/boe-charter.pdf](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/about/legislation/boe-charter.pdf) A central banks charter is meant to conduct monetary policy to manage stable inflation in the country. Good explanation here at the IMF - [https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/08/01/16/20/Monetary-Policy-and-Central-Banking](https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/08/01/16/20/Monetary-Policy-and-Central-Banking) What effectively is happening is that the new UK government unveiled a fiscal plan which cause a crisis of confidence for the UK economy. This caused the pound to fall and gilts (UK sovereign debt) to be sold off. In an attempt to counter-act a self-inflicted crisis caused by Downing Street, the BoE intervene to temporarily stabilize the gilt. I doubt that the BoE agrees with Downing Street's mini-budget if you read between the lines of the BoE release on gilt market operations which you can find here : [https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/september/bank-of-england-announces-gilt-market-operation](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/september/bank-of-england-announces-gilt-market-operation) Market notice here - [https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/market-notices/2022/september/market-notice-28-september-2022-gilt-market-operations](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/market-notices/2022/september/market-notice-28-september-2022-gilt-market-operations) The IMF issued a rebuke as well regarding fiscal package introduced by the UK government. You can find that here - [https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/GBR](https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/GBR)
No. The UK's government mini-budget plan was to cut taxes unilaterally and place energy caps. This caused the pound to fall and gilt to be sell off since the announcement. This caused a liquidity crisis and the BoE had to intervene. Inflation already high in the UK and this will not help. Read the actual BoE announcement - [https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/september/bank-of-england-announces-gilt-market-operation](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/september/bank-of-england-announces-gilt-market-operation) The IMF even released a warning to the UK. [https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/GBR](https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/GBR)
First of all…GBR. Second of all…buy.
I'm going to leave a comment here about information literacy and then be done with this thread. ​ Your first "Source" isn't a scholarly publication by Nature, its a magazine. The magazine's "source" is a environmental "think tank". That think tank's source is another article by that same think tank with a broken link. If I look for the actual article, it doesn't actually have a source with data. So...to be clear, the sources you linked do not actually explain what a fossil fuel subsidy is, or how they add up and count those subsidies. They are a source of nothing. ​ If I dig into the second "Source", and actually look at the things they are calling "direct subsidies", it becomes obvious that they are just making up numbers. The IMF doesn't actually list a source for where their data is coming from, include a methodology, or really give any clue as to how they are calculating "explicit subsidies". ​ If you look at the IMFs "database" (which is it's "source data") its full of nonsense. Let's look at the US for example: [https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Topics/Environment/energy-subsidies/fuel-subsidies-template-2022.ashx](https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Topics/Environment/energy-subsidies/fuel-subsidies-template-2022.ashx) ​ For the US, the IMF is saying that the US has an implicit subsidy on Gasoline. They come up with that because there is a difference between the average cost of gasoline and an arbitrary "Efficient Price" that they have determined. However, they have US gasoline taxes actually omitted from their calculations. Additionally, the IMF is just making up the "Efficient Price" number. How the IMF comes up with that "Efficient Price" is never stated, but it is lower for countries that don't appear to be subsidizing fuel explicitly and higher for countries that are. This "Efficient Price" appears to be punishing countries who are better at producing oil and refining petroleum products cheaply. If this were published in an actual journal in this manner it would be rejected as data manipulation as the methodology is never listed, linked, or explained. ​ For the US, the IMF was not able to find a dollar value for any actual specific subsidies for Gasoline, Diesel, Kerosene, Coal, or Electricity (they list the subsidy a whopping $0.00). If you actually were to list the explicity subsidies, they would be huge negative numbers because of gasoline taxes. However, that "0$" is somehow turned into a 3% GDP expenditure on subsidies through the magic of making things up. Let's forget for a second that the ​ Let's look at a more reputable source that actually came up with numbers for subsides based on what country's tax codes say. The OECD did that: [https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=FFS\_GBR](https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=FFS_GBR) ​ Let's pick on the UK here. In the UK the PRT is a special extra tax (most countries call them royalties) on the production of oil and gas. However, the first little bit of oil produced by a well didn't used to be taxed extra with the PRT. After the first few barrels were produced, the tax kicked in. Even though this "subsidy" expired in 2016, the OECD still lists it as a subsidy for oil production. To be clear, lack of a punishing extra tax is not generally considered to be a subsidy in economics or buisness. However, this lack of an additional tax is still considered to be a "subsidy" by the OECD even though it has been expired for 8 years. ​ The biggest "Subsidy" that the UK has on fuel is that they do not charge a additional "Climate Change Levy" on fuel that isn't used with in the UK. ​ Let me be clear about what this means for your argument. To claim that fossil fuels are "subsidized" we make a logic leap that says that because taxes could be higher in theory, they are therefore subsidized. Moreover, the extra tax burden placed on fossil fuels is considered to be a subsidy because that tax burden is sometimes lowered for some types of activity. **IN NO OTHER INDUSTY IS AN ADDITIONAL TAX ON AN INDUSTY'S BUISNESS ACTIVY CONSIDERED TO BE A SUBSIDY.** If you apply this logic to every other industry, the "Subsidies" you come up with are greater then the entire wealth of all the nations.
Most junior miners are waiting for a catalysts that hasn't come. Once in awhile you get a Great Bear $GBR or Silvercrest $SIL that'd gone from $0.20 to $10 plus....
Nebraska options were mooning in the 90s bro, Should've sold in '97. Jk, GBR.
Because their goal is a buyout, not to mine it. They are an exploration company and before they move into mining the area with open pit, they need to complete their drilling campaign and work towards a 43-101. However it’s not necessary for a 43-101 to get acquired by a major. The LME team objective is BO so drilling and proving the resources in the area is their focus. Look at GBR. Great example and they got a 8 mil GEO buyout of 1.8 Billion. Aquired by kinross gold.
Because their goal is a buyout not to mine it. They are an exploration company and before they move into mining the area with open pit, they need to complete their drilling campaign and work towards a 43-101. However it’s not necessary for a 43-101 to get acquired by a major. The LME team objective is BO so drilling and proving the resources in the area is their focus. Look at GBR. Great example and they got a 8 mil GEO buyout of 1.8 Billion. Squired by kinross gold.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: LMEFF GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 500 million-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
Because, genius, people who were actually ill were in ICU wards on oxygen. If there had not been a lockdown there would have been more cases and no magical new nurses or ICU beds Here's the data. Massive spikes that only dropped after lockdowns https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?facet=none&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+Population=true&Color+by+test+positivity=false&country=GBR~USA
Straws are bad for the GBR but so are the spoons so bring your own titanium spork
So I had a look, and according to the [International Labour Organization's 2017 data](https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer48/?lang=en&segment=indicator&id=PSE_TPSE_GOV_NB_A&ref_area=AUT+CZE+DNK+EST+DEU+GRC+HUN+ICE+IRL+LVA+LTU+LUX+NOR+POL+PRT+SVK+SVN+ESP+SWE+CHE+GBR+USA&classif1=GOV_LVL_PSE+GOV_LVL_GG+GOV_LVL_GGCENTRAL+GOV_LVL_GGREGION+GOV_LVL_GGLOCAL+GOV_LVL_GGSS+GOV_LVL_PUBCORP+GOV_LVL_PRV+GOV_LVL_X+GOV_LVL_TOTAL&timefrom=2017&timeto=2017) Spain had slightly over 3 million people working in the public sector. Spain's population at that time was about 46.6 million (https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/spain-population/); so not far off what you quoted. That means about 6.5% of the Spanish population is employed by the government. > Name some European countries with a higher proportion. How about Austria (8.5%), Czechia (9.7%), Denmark (15.3%), Greece (7.6%), Ireland (8.3%), Norway (15.8%), Switzerland (9.0%), or Sweden (14.6%)? Ok, but they are all quite a bit smaller than Spain, what some of the other large countries in Europe? Well, the UK had a public sector workforce of 5.5 million from a population of 66.7 million (8.2%). Germany's public sector was 6.3 million from a population of 82.7 million (7.6%). Poland's was nearly 3.4 million from a population of about 38 million (8.9%). In fact, of all 21 European countries I looked at, Spain had the lowest proportion of the population working in the public sector; the only country that came close was Portugal, at about 6.9%. For those interested, the US data for 2017 was about 24.7 million employed in the public sector, from a population of about 325 million; so about 7.6%. So wherever this idea that Spain has a large public workforce comes from, it is not grounded in fact.
I'm glad you're back in the green! There's only been a short period of time where the stock was trading between $1.07 and $1.15. I know there's people holding shares at those prices, and I would encourage them to keep them as I have a sneaking suspicion we won't be seeing sub $1.00 prices in the future. As to your question of a buyout at what price... even if the company misses by 50% on the resource component and we get a deal like GBR, that's still $4.00/share, which is 4X your current money. I'm thinking they'll hit or exceed the resource component and get more than $200/oz.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
Dude take a look at the ARKK chart: [https://www.tradingview.com/x/GBR38mpu](https://www.tradingview.com/x/GBR38mpu) Now compare to the textbook bubble chart: [https://images.app.goo.gl/2CHn36PpdCmoeKPZ6](https://images.app.goo.gl/2CHn36PpdCmoeKPZ6) Fucking IDENTICAL 
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: GBR. Message /u/zjz if they're above 1.5 billion-ish market cap and not related to crypto/pennies/OTC.
$MINE.V , Inomin Mines ! I'm literally all in on this one. It reminds me of GBR.V back in the days.
Results they announced yesterday is similar to GBR.V back in the days. Other than that, not much DD from me but I will for sure work on it tomorrow.
Oh ok I guess as a non-American Ill only accept USD for all my sales then, because they are the biggest country with the biggest guns. I wont accept GBR anymore. Lol
kinda surprised the low floats aren’t moving crazy yet with this big crude move and sanctions. GBR, MXC, etc. only thing really following is INDO atm.
What is going on with GBR today? 20% jump
[This is now a pandemic of the unvaccinated.](https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination) We'll accept that they're wrong [when the data stops saying that it's working.](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&uniformYAxis=0&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Vaccine+doses%2C+cases%2C+ICU+patients%2C+and+deaths&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+Population=true&Color+by+test+positivity=false&country=USA~GBR) The death rate and case rate have become completely detached as a result of vaccinations - a year ago we had much higher deaths for a much lower case load. Are people still getting sick? Absolutely, everyone's probably going to get Omicron at this rate, but it appears that the peak has passed. Stop being such a fucking pussy, it's just a widdle needle. My toddler cried less about the vaccines she got than you are.
Subsequently, it was determined that modafinil binds to the same site on the DAT as cocaine, but in a different manner.\[72\]\[73\] In accordance, modafinil increases locomotor activity and extracellular dopamine concentrations in animals in a manner similar to the selective DRI vanoxerine (GBR-12909),\[74\] and also inhibits methamphetamine-induced dopamine release (a common property of DRIs, since DAT transport facilitates methamphetamine's access to its intracellular targets). As such, "modafinil is an exceptionally weak, but apparently very selective, \[DAT\] inhibitor \#ZiNGggGGgGg
Not quite my friend, happy to try again but please don't put words in my mouth As above, natural immunity is key as cell-mediated immunity develops to all the components of the virus including core proteins which can be recognised on MHC-I of infected cells by T-cells -we also get IgA production This way even when the spike mutates infection is still relatively quickly recognised even if antibodies are less effective at preventing it taking hold There will also be multiple antibodies to different sections of spike so again older vaccine isn't usually completely useless Omicron \*but\* when you combine the spike change with the fact that vaccine doesn't really produce much IgA or any core immunity we get exactly the picture we're seeing -huge Omicron infection rates but little severe illness Look to Sweden to see how amazing herd+vaccine is vs lockdown+vaccine alone -frankly it has been a bloodbath in Europe [European ICU Occupancy](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&minPopulationFilter=1000000&time=2021-07-01..latest&facet=none&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=ICU+patients&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=EuropeanUnion~SWE~DNK~NOR~FIN~GBR~ISL~IRL~PRT~ESP~BEL~DEU~AUT~CZE)
Ever heard of natural immunity? It is vital to compare countries to have a decent assessment of actual vaccine efficacy. https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&facet=none&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&hideControls=true&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=GBR~SWE~DEU As you can see, the countries have very varying degrees of death due to covid now, with Sweden being the best despite basically the same vaccine uptake. However, no lockdowns and no closed schools could provide a decent amount of immunity to non-vulnerable demographics providing way better curb of spread than these leaky vaccines can. As you can see, the toll is paid now in Germany. It could be worse without vaccines, but at the same time in Sweden basically the same result would be probable even without them.
That's just not true. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/current-covid-hospitalizations-per-million?country=GBR~USA~ISR