GM

EntertainerDowntown3

That’s just not true. GM sells cars all over the world. the US, Canada, China, Korea, Australia, some countries in Europe. Still a lot of places.

Livid-Grocery7942

I don’t think what the rest of the world does has too much effect in that sense. GM is only in Mexico and South Korea outside the US (before moving to the US I didn’t even know they made cars lol), and they have a “build where you sell” policy, so they could adjust it in America, but not do it in Mexico and SK. And also Mexicos emissions regulations usually mimic the EPAs (although I doubt they would follow in this case).

EntertainerDowntown3

Can’t see it helping GM as they would be stupid if they didn’t keep investing in reducing emissions as 1. The rest of the world is still going that way and 2. If those rules get reversed they will be scrambling to try and come up with something and be very far behind other manufacturers. I still think GM is a very good investment though as they are very cheap and produce a lot of cash flow. So I would still invest in them but just not the reason you posted about.

MrTigerEyes

Not just that, but some of these things will put these companies behind in the global marketplace if they try to cater to what the US is pushing. Coal for example simply isn't viable for growth. GM not being required for US emissions standards doesn't stop state standards, much less convince the rest of the world to buy their junk. Maybe there are some speculative gains over the course of months but I don't even see this being a safe bet for the next two years. 

realribsnotmcfibs

1. I am not speaking to tech why do people keep making that assumption. Is tech even a real engineering degree? 2. I am speaking to manufacturing which is flooded with Indian engineers who are frankly often horrible. I used to redo their work constantly for T1/2 suppliers to companies like GM Ford etc.

Coastercraze

They also assemble AI chips in the former GM Lordstown plant. Softbank and Foxconn both have been busy lately inside.

hadizadam

GM 💚💚

tech01x

Much of the regulatory landscape was set up before Tesla existed. Why wouldn't Tesla take advantage of the business rules as they exist? What kind of criticism is that? You think GM turned down the subsidies for for the Volt? Or Toyota turned down the subsidies for the Prius? Tesla is the first to make gross, EBITDA, EBIT, and GAAP profit from purely electric vehicles. Because it's a daunting task, something that almost everyone else has not been able to do (or at least sustain it beyond a quarter here or there). Automakers complained for years that even with such subsidies, they couldn't do it, so it took Musk to convince people that it could be done at all. No, Musk didn't lobby for CAFE GHG, that existed before Tesla existed. Nor did he lobby for the federal tax credit for EVs, the first version of that was in the original Prius time period, before Tesla existed. And Musk lobbied against the most recent version of that in the IRA of 2022. Your view on history here is quite wrong.

tech01x

No, Biden raised tariffs on Chinese EVs and auto parts to 100% on behest of the UAW. It's about unions and what Chinese automakers would do to union labor in the US. You can read Biden's statement about this when he did it. It isn't about Tesla at all. It's about GM and Ford, and to some extent, Stellantis. And since the Japanese automakers also missed out on electrification and connected vehicles as well as autonomy, they would suffer too.

Sacabubu

Ford, GM and Tesla wouldn't exist today if it wasn't for government bailouts lol. And they actively prevent chinese cars from coming to the market to protect them as well

SnooHedgehogs5162

**BREAKING NEWS: Micron, GM sign semiconductor supply agreement for vehicles**

Due_Size_9870

In 2025, GM sold 6M vehicles, Ford sold 4.5M vehicles, and Tesla sold 1.6M. Ford and GM both have \~2x the revenue. Tesla won the stock price battle for sure because Elon Musk is the greatest stock promoter in history. As far as the actual business goes, Tesla is still much smaller than the other two.

Warm_Collection_3993

Ford and GM were supposed to eat TSLA for lunch according to Jim Chanos…whoops!

Unfair_Adeptness_838

It's cheaper than GM. Second biggest provider of cloud solutions, owns tool where half of the world keeps theirs codebases. Has a lot of government contracts and owns OS used by half of the world. Doesn't look that overvalued to me.

sumguysr

Do you remember the GM bailout?

K1ngofsw0rds

I don’t have a pension. But that’s because I’ll only accept one from the gov’t I won’t do a private one after what happened with GM

Koufaxisking

It’s easy to call the top is in 295 times for 10 years in a row while the market rips to higher highs every 30 days. Go join Michael Burry. MSFT is one of the fundamentally strongest companies on the planet with both a clear growth path and current profitability. MSFT is not Lehman or GM.

stoked_7

Yes, let's remove all personal responsibility from the person actually operating the vehicle. Blame GM or Ford next because they made a car capable of killing people?

3boobsarenice

I worked in Air Freight for 20 years, seen Ford and GM fly in a private jet with just an envelope.

Fit-Marionberry5248

You cant fucking compare Wendy to other memes  This isnt any GM€ or Fake Meat :D

Healthy_Mark_6139

Ford, GM and Stellantis  

orcassharks

It’s a shit company propped up by the government. Basically GM.

Lazerys

Right, so why go for a Hyundai Elantra if you got your free Ford and GM LLMs already?

money-for-nothing-tt

>remember what a failure electric cars were the first time around with GM EV1, which they had to recall. No, I don't remember that at all. EV1 was never sold to the public, it could only be leased. GM then ended production because the regulatory pressure was removed in California and they saw no future in selling or leasing the cars. GM reclaimed and crushed most of the cars (because they could, there were no car owners). The issues in EV1 was a charging port cable, which could have easily have been fixed instead of all the cars being crushed. And the first gen battery degrading faster than expected. This wasn't an issue because they could just swap the batteries with second gen due to the cars being leased. As for AI, we already had two AI winters. But if you look into reasons why, you will see that that's not at all the case now. Even when the explosive growth stops and we go back to reasonable spending, AI will not be disappearing like it did before. Even if AI stopped getting better right now, like the current models were the best that could ever be achieved, there's a very big gap in how its being utilized now and what is possible.

pman6

imagine if AI now is the first iteration of EV cars. a disaster. nothing to show for it. remember what a failure electric cars were the first time around with GM EV1, which they had to recall. oh man, what a crash the stonk market would see.

SmilingQuail322

I accidentally held GM through their bankruptcy in 2008 because I don’t know how to set up a stop loss the right way in my Scottrade account

Ferdoki

GM. Are we having fun yet?

ChuckOfTheIrish

He isn't Jensen Huang, the companies will probably be similar from a leadership and operational perspective if he leaves. Some people buy in because of his wealth and connections so the price would drop a bit, but I would bargain the companies would be still focus on the same wild targets. SpaceX is not profitable right now and while it should grow revenue and margins, the P/E ratio is through the roof for TSLA and would be for SpaceX if it wasn't an N/A right now. Over time I would expect reality to take over and bring both of these down to earth. TSLA could drop 95% and still have a roughly double the PE of Toyota and GM. Both of these companies are priced on extreme forward expectations of AI, space exploration, and self-driving cars, things Elon has promised and missed on regularly over the last couple of decades. I wouldn't touch either one of them but in the short-term I could see volatility plays for people.

Main-Cheesecake3287

The same was true for Tesla about a decade or so ago, they were trading around GM and other major automakers valuation wise, the big boys had over $100B in trailing 12 month revenue while Tesla was managing like $3B a year. Not a defense of the insane multiples he enjoys, but a good historical precedent that you’re making a pretty risky move betting against SpaceX.

McArthur210

Tesla since its inception has been dependent on government subsidies, unlike GM or Ford. And at this point it can’t compete against Chinese EVs and discontinuing its own iconic models. 

WhoLickedMyDumpling

Not particularly bullish on spacex, but the value is in "can someone else do the same thing but better", since that answer is a no. Same goes for all valuable companies. You might argue tsla just cars, but can GM or Ford build out supercharger network and build 400mi range cars? Answer is sadly no for atleast a while, even more so with ev credits shrunk. Companies with impenetrable moats are the most valuable, as they should be

ThinkingOfTheOldDays

GM now a contract manufacturer for Lockheed Martin. 

yomama_yodaddy

GM making weapons lol

FadedReef

I literally had to explain market cap to my dad last week when he asked why is GM higher than FORD

sorrow_anthropology

I love that people are trying to bring fundamentals to SpaceX as if it weren’t from the same folks that brought us Tesla being worth more than the next ten+ legacy automakers combined, including Toyota, Volkswagen, GM, Ford.

YourChildhood5762

Children. Plenty of time to begin reinvesting when he's 20. In the meantime, he's 10 and needs an education in more than the stock market. Sally down the street thinks he's kind of cute for a boy. My dad gave me one share each of General Electric and General Motors. I grew to like the cars in the GM annual report when I was in my teens but GE was dull. Both paid me a dollar or two every quarter and that kept my interest up so I didn't sell them as soon as I turned 18 to get money to buy an Insane Clown Posse album. Of course both went bankrupt so I was left penniless. But it was the principle of the thing.

mcfilms

A lot of the posts in here keep saying this "can't work" or have folks calling it unrealistic. If I look at what is available today, I tend to agree. But, prior to 2008 an electric car was unrealistic. People pointed out that even the mighty GM couldn't get their EV-1 off the ground. There was no infrastructure for refueling and range was a problem; batteries too expensive. Prior to 2015 vertical landing of a rocket booster was the stuff of sci-fi. Again, I'm not a Musk-oteer and I have not and will not invest at this time. I'm not fond of Musk as a human being. If I do anything, I'll wait several years before investing, because this thing will go way down prior to possibly climbing up.

ApathysLastKiss_

Seriously, I've seen so many people lose money because of "Fuck Elon" or "Fuck Robinhood" or whatever company they hate. People were selling their QQQ bc SpaceX is going to be included 😂 It's less than a percent of the weight. A space economy is basically the next industrial revolution, but you'll always have the people who love their horses so much, they won't buy Ford or GM. I'm sure SpaceX will correct and trade lower at some point. I'm buying more

Wooden_Boss_3403

You mean in the same way that GM and Ford would be dead if they didnt receive  bailouts in 08-09? You speak as though not every other manufacturer in the US (mature companies, no less) didnt receive subsidies.

CrackheadBobsCousin

Right, it’s a car company. Car companies are not the best performers against the S&P. Tesla (a car company) is valued at 1.5T on 98B revenues. Ford is valued at 59B on 189B revenues, GM similar. The difference is Tesla is run by the biggest stock pumper Elon. My argument stands.

bmheck

Well, 25-30k people have died in Ford & GM cars over the past 5 years, vs. 500-700 in Tesla. And I stated a simple fact. But go on and incorrectly use the most overused word on reddit and then try to insult me because you just don't like the facts. Small brain.

FlashOfFawn

Pretty sure their cars have killed more people than Ford and GM too.

bmheck

Tesla has made the same net profit as Ford and GM combined over the past 5 years. Kind of hard to call that a 'well-veiled scam.'

Beneficial_Weight766

GM... Degen play of the day for me is NTCL - [NETCLASS TECHNOLOGY INC Expands AI Multilingual Assessment Market and International Strategic Partnerships](https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/netclass-technology-inc-expands-ai-123000144.html) Not sure why it dropped last night, but the news is too bullish to ignore. Could be a steal... am I wrong?

lattice_defect

how many more GM analysts need to upvote this.. too quick to get the bot army?

wanmoar

Here’s my prediction. The IPO is priced for a pop. That pop will mollify the nervous nellies. Everyone will be happy enough to ignore that absolute nonsense this IPO is shilling. Then it’ll crash by half. It has to. I’ll bet my last penny. But no one will care. Tesla is “worth” more than many Toyota, Honda, GM, et al. They don’t even make cars anymore. So ignore the noise is my advice. If you’re an index investor and the Nasdaq shits the bucket, move to another index. HALO is the word for safety. High Asset, Low Obsolescence. Utilities. Industrials, people’s heavy services.

SolomonGrumpy

Dude. They are nowhere near as bad as GM. GM has had govt bail outs.

Tar_alcaran

I redid the maths by hand. They're correct. You're failing to include the Earth's diameter in your logic. You're not going -6 to 200km, you're going from 6378-6=6372km to 6378+200=6578km. That makes Starship have a semi major axis of the average of those two, or 6475km. With a GM of 398600 for earth, Vis Via gives me those numbers above. Feel free to show me the correct maths if you think I'm significantly wrong. They're less than 70m/s off from a circular orbit, which is less than 1% more speed. It's not "orders of magnitude" for this orbit to circularize. Again, feel free to show me wrong with some numbers.

Vast_Builder1670

GM is looking to get in on sodium based batteries. 

Ill-Train6478

Franz is in charge of design however who do you think gave a green light for cyber truck to move forward? For reference Franz pinned pontiac solstice and saturn sky at GM. Do you think he picked the design himself and told Bob Lutz or CEO at the time that he will move forward with his design proposal? Musk wanted the cybertruck to be shaped like it is now hence he green lighted the project to move forward

ApedGME

I'm a bartender/server, and the GM is making as much if not more than me. Wtf

Leading_Form_8485

GM strong as fuck

the_doodman

Hi! Here's your 3-year update: Tesla still valuable and leading the industry. Stellantis: * Reported first annual net loss in 2025 * Postponed multiple EV programs * Pivoted away from all-EV plans in favor of multi-powertrain Toyota: * Delayed US EV production by a year * Slashed global EV targets by 1/3 * Walking back aggressive EV approach in favor of hybrids GM * Severe battery production failures leads to output decline and missed targets * Postponed launches, cancelled Ultium branding Ford * $12B losses over 2.5 years * Delayed next-gen Lightning, profitability issues * Idled mach E production due to severely low demand * Pivoting more towards hybrids VW * Software issues lead to delayed models * ID.Buzz paused due to soft demand BMW * Plagued with recalls and reliability issues * Paused US EV production in 2025 Mercedes * Paused EQ lineup and cut prices to clear inventory and sharp sales declines * Forecasting that ICE vehicles will remain well into the 2030s * High inventory and depreciation issues with high end models

Real-DrUnKbAsTeRd

We're one more crisis away from GM unleashing their water powered car they've shelved for 40 years.

TheSleepyTruth

If they have contracts with the Chinese military then those designations arent that unreasonable depending on the context. I would not blame China for labelling companies like Microsoft, Palantir, Amazon etc that have large cloud or software contracts with the US military as similar. Alibaba and Baidu probably does similar in China. BYD probably provides vehicle parts to the Chinese military similar to GM in the US.

landon0605

The rational reasoning is potential future earnings. It's pretty clear the car industry is going to be moving to electric and self driving. No one thinks Ford or GM are going to do it first or best. However, Tesla could and gain a huge market share before anyone catches up or they could license their tech. Now, do I think Tesla is a good deal at it's current valuation? No. But I get why some people do. Same thing goes for SpaceX. Space is a relatively untapped industry which I think most people would agree that it will only grow.

oopsallhuckleberries

Same reason Tesla stock is $390 while GM is at $82 and Ford is at $15 despite Ford and GM far out producing and gaining far more revenue and profit. Elon stocks are vibe stocks, they trade like crypto. There isn't any rational reason for Tesla's stock being that high just like there ain't any reason for SpaceXs initial value to be as high as it is. The amount of revenue SpaceX is going to have to produce over the next 10 years to justify its IPO price is so high that it's all but impossible for them to reach.

hadizadam

GM everyone

Old-Pomegranate3634

Supplier to GEV. Said on their last earnings call we are entering a super cycle and our Q1 numbers will be our low for the foreseeable future. Key customers are sold out for years which means their order book will fill up. Sold off unprofitable wind business and going all on on gas power generation. This is seriosuly a hidden GM. I am expecting this will be my 5-10x trade. I am already 2x.

Prudent-Corgi3793

XRT -7.63% total returns over last 5 years. Here are some bagholder stocks and ETFs that have outperformed over the same time period. NVO +16.25%, F +28.69%, GM +33.74%, SBUX -3.98%, BND -0.00%.

Parking_Act3189

I'm a retail shareholder that bought TSLA at the all time high in 2014, and at that time people like you were happy to share very similar stats on why TSLA was overpriced then. It seems possible that your analysis doesn't include potential growth of the company and you are only looking that the current state of space internet, much like how the people in 2014 thought that "GM and Toyota can make an EV cheaper than a Model S"

bengosu

That worked great with GM

orcassharks

It’s bizarro world when govt buyout is bullish. Didn’t work great for GM at the time.

viperabyss

The only example I can think of was GM and Chrysler, and the reason was because they were in distress. GOP also hammered this issue on Obama pretty badly too, which was one of the reasons why GOP won hugely in 2010. Are you saying the AI companies are currently in distress?

Fit_Mango7142

GM doesn’t hv autonomous cars or robot eh

Juice0188

I see a bunch of GM cars driving around too. GM trades at 29x earnings, Tesla trades at 360x earnings.

MichiganAngler

How has Elon fucked humanity? Kept the Tesla patents open? Benefited the other automakers using his technology from the early days. GM, Toyota, Ford, all used the same ideas as a Tesla from the 2010 era. Can't hate on that, he wants the push for electric. Again, tell me how he hates humanity

Consistent-Alarm3496

There is no bubble. SOME investments are bubbles — Bitcoin, probably SpaceX, probably Tesla, and others, but like the Internet, it will end up being even bigger than people think now, it’s just that some of the winners won’t be who people think they will be (ie, how Google surpassed Yahoo). I feel very confident that in 5 years, NVDA stock will be more than 2X what it is now, and probably more than 4X. In the golden age of automobiles, Ford was more than 3% of the US’s economy, and then GM was more than 3% of the US’s economy, and the AI revolution is going to be bigger than the automobile revolution.

Zueter

I make it a point to not invest in a company I work for. You are either optimistic or pessimistic from being too close. Plus, I don't want to have my job and my retirement savings in the same company. Too many GM's, MCI's and Enrons

imustbegthequestion

Lucid. GM. Give me my mf cars. I earned them.

TheDadThatGrills

They have $2.5B in annual profits and are successfully pivoting into using battery tech to power AI data centers. They are many things, but Ford is not a dying company. The only domestic car manufacturer with a healthier balance sheet and cash flows is GM. So short Stellantis if you genuinely believe this. Good luck!

iShitBloodandCumShit

I’d rather cover myself in dogshit and go to a job interview than buy GM

SmoothOperator423

Casual 21x return on a company with the same revenue as a Wendy’s GM, makes sense to me

Thisispaartaaa

What you are talking about is new companies not making it....like auto companies back in the day, or tech companies in the 2000's etc....yeah, lots of companies will try and fail, that's business. But the ones with the right "stuff" not only survive, they thrive. So by saying that "investors getting completely blown out" insinuates that EVERY INVESTOR GETS SMOKED, and nobody makes money, which is not the case. In every single instance, you are correct, investors lost their shirt betting on the wrong horse....but quite a bit more money has been made on the survivors...GOOG, AAPL, MSFT, ORCL, DELL, MU, F, GM....the list goes on and on.

xKricienx

Shit. This retard might be onto something. GM spiked the same time GME pumped back in 2020-2021. Maybe this market is full of illiterates 🤔

LarryStink

PURR is the next GM3 setup. 

You-Asked-Me

WSB is not here to " fuck the hedgeis," it was created to BE the hedgies. Sure, maybe a hedge fund gets fucked by a bunch of dumbasses on the internet, but that is not the point. This is not social justice warrior shit, its getting rich off of stupid gambles. GM E will probably never happen again. You will probably get deleted and banned shortly.

Bizbuzzfinanzecuz

.com bubble is 1999, 2008 was Lehmens and GM

cripy311

Ok real talk. This sounds tinfoil hat, but I actually think this is pretty grounded. The IPO event is a liquidity exit event for private equity that has so far dumped in \~$11.9 billion dollars of private equity funds..... while seeing the company only produce operating costs higher than expenses that output around -$4.9b per year. So they put in $11b+..... current projection appears to be the company burns the entirety of the total funding put into it so far in under 3 years from now assuming they never spent any dollars. Oh they've been spending (we see these explosions that cant be cheap) so their time to death/extreme debt is even shorter than 3 years. It may be as short as "within this year" thus the race to get this out onto the market. Private equity CAN NOT support this burn rate. They do not have enough capital available. At the same time private equity is in so deep on this one if it fails the entire "business funding mechanism" in the USA could collapse from its failure. This would mean theres no money to invest in tech/AI/anything new at all and pretty much all economic expansion would stop in the USA. Given the US publics general distaste for bailouts at this point they can't just run out and bailout Elons company on this one. Public perception would be so bad..... so the "fast track it into the indexes so index balancing buys us out" plan was generated. This about to be the biggest bailout the american people have ever provided to private investors..... and due to the mechanism there isn't even a rake back opportunity like we had with the past events (GM for instances paying back the loans).

aspiringactuary

"Announcement of investments" is not a binding agreement and cannot be banked on. In general, these should be regarded as lip service to the president in return for his support. It gives Trump a win on paper, but effectively a non-starter. Here is a small list of announcements that resulted in nothing, which will ultimately include many of your list from above... Kore Power (Buckeye, Arizona): The lithium-ion battery maker canceled its planned $1.25 billion factory in 2025. Originally expected to bring 3,000 jobs, the project stalled as the company shifted priorities. General Motors EV Plant (Lansing, Michigan): GM retooled its strategy, abandoning or at least heavily modifying a proposed $4.3 billion EV plant build to focus instead on producing gas-powered vehicles. Stellantis Battery Facility (Belvidere, Illinois): The automaker canceled plans for a $3.2 billion battery plant as consumer demand shifted and federal tax credits came under review. Foxconn LCD Campus (Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin): Initially announced in 2017 as a $10 billion investment promising 13,000 jobs, Foxconn repeatedly downsized the project. The planned Gen-10.5 LCD factory was never built, leaving behind a much smaller operation. Apple Data Center (Athenry, Ireland): While international, this reflects a broader trend of large-scale tech investments falling through. After announcing an $850 million European campus in 2015, Apple officially canceled the project in 2018 due to years of permitting delays and legal challenges.

_kempert

You seem to be awfully slow at recognizing when a stock is starting to boom and when it’s starting to go towards a certain doom. My history: -bought 20k TSLA at 267 (pre all splits) in 2017-2018, sold in summer 2018 at 215ish. It proceded to moon in the coming months and years. Basically missed out on a free house. Bought my first ATVI call in 2020, made a 150% gain. Yay, first one is free. Dabbled in more options and lost a good few k. Bought 500€ GM (E) in november 2020, added more during the course of december. I held ~5,5k€ all shares by NYE. It mooned until 98k and I sold on the way down with 27k net profit. Then two months later it mooned again and I turned 297€ into 7,6k with only 2 option contracts on gm (e) lmao. Then I bailed on the stock market because trust was gone after that crazy shit. Only now started again with SPCE, because the DD is good.

Punchee

Now do Ford/GM vs Tesla.

el_senior

Yes!!!! All my homies bought tweeter! And those people buying Delta and GM before the new shares came out lol

NW-McWisconsin

Institutionally held stocks tend to have high turnover based in dividends, future capex, etc. And since the U.S. has just a few auto makers remaining (Ford, GM, Tesla...?), I suspect institutional products tend to hold at least one of them. (?)

realkrestaII

The railroads themselves hated their passenger lines and wanted to be rid of them, (The wreck of the Penn Central page 129 from the mouth of Stuart Saunders Himself “it’s a drag and a drain”). Also GM owned EMD for the relevant years of this conspiracy theory.

TimingEzaBitch

or the OG GM fat finger play for GME

burner456987123

GM is still a better value by far

Metacog_Drivel

The market cap would surpass F and GM at that point, lmao.

gervs99

GM? How kind of you

n0m0rem0ney

wendy’s GM

toydan

$DELL: WALL STREET PRICE TARGET HIKES Barclays: Raises PT to $550 from $168. Citi: Raises PT to $475 from $290. JPMorgan: Maintains Overweight, raises PT to $500 from $280. Piper Sandler: Raises PT to $497 from $167. UBS: Raises PT to $440 from $243. Wells Fargo: Raises PT to $505 from $270. JPMorgan cited a materially raised FY27 outlook, extended pipeline visibility, and demand tracking well above expectations. GM ☕️☕️

Substantial_Ring9690

I’m one. In 2000 I owned all the go-go dot com stocks and the older guys owned KO, JPM GM. I got my ass handed to me (-75%) and they were down 8-10%. This bloated bitch is gonna blow at some point.

WilliamBlack97AI

The $1 billion means it will control 30% of the EU and national cannabis supply. How will it drive it out of business? Furthermore, it will be able to determine prices that will increase GM and profitability.

Whipitreelgud

Who the fuck cares about this IPO? Is Costco going to run out of hotdogs because SpaceX IPO’s? Ford, Boeing, and GM are all going to crater? The economy is big and is not dependent on SpaceX’s sale of common stock to the public

That_anonymous_guy18

Reminds me of the time people bought GM instead of GME lol

TwitchyTwitch5

Investing in studebager when ford GM and chrystler are all churning out 1st and second Gen cars

DonaldPump1

GM Autists.

OneJellyfish5980

GM Corsair Gamers!

tika_dengu

[Japan finds lapses in 🥭 treatment facilities](https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/insight/japan-stops-indian-mango-imports-after-inspection-findings/gm-GM3DE7567A?gemSnapshotKey=GM3DE7567A-snapshot-1)

No-Improvement3164

Could have bought F or GM but no I bought Microsoft