LSE

haarp1

it might get listed on the LSE too.

sherwoodf99

Mkango Resources #MKA to list rare earth mine/refine business on NASDAQ valued at $400m. Mkango on LSE only valued at $233m! Plus Mkango own Hypromag magnet recycling, with one operational facility in UK and another in Germany. Plus they announced another acquisition yesterday in Germany for another plant to produce bonded and hot deformed magnets, which is in addition to existing sintered magnet plant. Hypromag USA (JV with Cotec Holdings) has funding in place for one plant with plans for another two in next 2 to 3 years, and plan to list on NASDAQ in next 12 months. Market is valuing Hypromag at less than zero! Compared to MP/USAR ($billions) MKA and CTH valuations are crazy!

sherwoodf99

Mkango Resources #MKA to list rare earth mine/refine business on NASDAQ valued at $400m. Mkango on LSE only valued at $233m! Plus Mkango own Hypromag magnet recycling, with one operational facility in UK and another in Germany. Plus they announced another acquisition yesterday in Germany for another plant to produce bonded and hot deformed magnets, which is in addition to existing sintered magnet plant. Hypromag USA (JV with Cotec Holdings) has funding in place for one plant with plans for another two in next 2 to 3 years, and plan to list on NASDAQ in next 12 months. Market is valuing Hypromag at less than zero! Compared to MP/USAR, MKA and CTH valuations are crazy!

charistsil

Metlen Energy is a rare beast in the market! They aren't just an energy company or a miner. By bridging renewable energy with high end metallurgy, they’ve built a model that is incredibly hard to replicate in my opinion. They are perfectly positioned for Europe’s push toward industrial autonomy, especially with their footprint in critical raw materials and a massive project pipeline. Combining that operational excellence with the exposure from their London listing, it’s a no brainer for me. I hold Metlen since a year and keep pushing more shares. Since listing on the LSE, Metlen has been dealing with a fair amount of manipulation and short selling pressure. If you look past the current price action and actually dig into the fundamentals, the disconnect is pretty glaring. The shorts are betting on volatility, but the business is delivering real, tangible growth. I’m holding through this because the fundamentals are rock solid, and I’m confident we’re going to see a significant recovery and strong returns.

CapitalWhiteNinja

I think on a bad case, this could happen. 1. Suppose current Voo at $680 2. I sold 1 naked call on Voo at $690 3. On expiry date, Voo rallies and closes at $710 and I get called 4. Effectively I lost $2,000 (69,000 - 71,000) Ie I lost $2K cash But when LSE opens the following day, technically CSPX would have gained in proportionate amount and I would earn around $2K on paper as well So overall I would lose $0. *It's like me transferring $2K from cash into my CSPX holdings (sort of).* Does that make sense or is my understanding way off?

Apart_Temporary1070

SOXS LSE gives even 4x leverage vs ARCAs 3x

NectarineNegative769

SYNT:LSE Synthomer PLC Price (GBX) 103.20

austincathelp

The best fuel cell play is on LSE $cwr

Anonn39

Yeah basically. I use a lot of traditional banks (Lloyds, HSBC, Nationwide); challenger banks (Monzo, Starling, Revolut) and EMIs (Wise, Zen, bunq, PayPal) to move money between the UK, Europe and Asia, and Wise is the best within its niche. It has a smaller market cap (10b) compared to PayPal (40b) and it offers significantly superior service (at least to my purposes), and it is among the only UK fintech that is actually public, all of the others are private. Another factor is that there are more and more UK expat leaving and live elsewhere like the UAE (this is backup by stats, but I don't rmb the exact number), which will inevitably become Wise customers. This is reflected in Wise increased cross-border volume in their Q3 and Q4 earnings. Their rev is also up 22% year over year with a forward p/e of 28, and an trailing EPS growth of 17%, projected EPS growth of 7% (looks expensive, but it grows much faster than PayPal, and have high margins). Last thing is that it is pushing to move its main listing from the LSE to the NASDAQ. I believe Wise is considering for a UK banking license, but they haven't applied for it yet.

OK_x86

Let's say he wasn't one of their top traders. Fine. He still went to LSE and Oxford from which he got an advanced degree in Economics. I may be crazy but that already makes him imminently more qualified than randos on Reddit.

OK_x86

A guy who went to LSE then Oxford and was one of the top traders at his bank until he quit is pretending to have knowledge about... Economics?

Leading-Onion4659

Just did some research on this and it’s legit. 120M GBP market cap and profitable. There’s a good chance they get acquired. Only downside is it’s listed on LSE and not a hype name so not a lot of liquidity.

Orange_Codex

Hydrogen Utopia (LSE: HUI) is still worth a look, lads and lasses...(every dip I buy nets 20-30%).

EmergencyFair6786

Now I'm glad I didn't buy Samsung through the LSE... 100% ago.  

Orange_Codex

I expect the war to resume in earnest later this week, so am keeping most cash to short the Mag7. Only pennies I've bought this month are Hydrogen Utopia (LSE: HUI), 80 Mile Plc (80M), and Total Graphite (TGM).

FrequentFunction2270

What’s the difference between CSP1, CSPX and SKR8? I see SKR8 is on a deutsche exchange and the other 2 are LSE, but the movement is different on the 3 of them, one of them is green and two are red today but they seem to be roughly the same for max timeframe

ThroatBest2016

LSE again seeing big jumps with the smallest amount of volume. Just needs a gentle push to explode!

Intelligent-Mess71

Thanks for sharing! The LSE case makes sense, especially with China’s position with Iran and the rebuilding in the Middle East. Their solid balance sheet and low short interest are good signs. Just need to keep in mind the geopolitical risks. Definitely one to watch.

Antique-Bit-2102

The fundamentals look promising, however, the financials pose a different picture. Revenue is consistently declining both QoQ and YoY as is the net income which is concerning for a small company like this. Furthermore, if Iran proceeds to rebuild, I think state owned enterprises of China would be in a better position to acquire the contracts rather than LSE. I would love what you have to say on my comments.

G-dubbbs

I get your thesis, but why LSE over any number of other Chinese companies in that market?

Father_of_Lies666

Love seeing LSE mentioned, I made a video on it not too long ago and am long. Been sitting on the bis for weeks accumulating.

Cabininthewoodsdude

Nah I don't think they're bots brother. Probably just people reacting/commenting on the price action. I think there's quite a few people in LSE

-eShTuPiD

Bots pumping LSE here or I'm looking at the wrong stock

Cabininthewoodsdude

LSE is making some moves! 😊

First-Ad1185

in LSE

Lumpy_Button9237

Lfg LSE

ThroatBest2016

LSE is going to take off!

Cabininthewoodsdude

I tried to post a link to another post to a pretty good DD, but the automod took it down because it's in another sub. I have a pretty chunky position in LSE too though. This is the text from the link I tried to send in case you want to read it: "With all the damage done to the oil and gas infrastructure in the Middle East, I’ve been looking at which companies stand to benefit the most from the upcoming rebuilding after the dusts settles. Typically I don’t look at most Chinese companies, but China actually sits in a unique position by comparison to the rest of the world in regards to Iran. Especially with the current situation in the Middle East. For those who don’t know, Iran is essentially blacklisted from international trade. No one is willing to trade with them. However, they sit on roughly 11-12% of the world’s oil supply and 17% of the world’s natural gas supply. These huge amount of resources are essentially the only reason why they’ve been able to continue as a country. There’s a massive amount of resources beneath their feet. It’s also a big reason why the country has been heavily doused in conflict in recent history. Despite the blacklist and trade restrictions though, China is one of the few countries who is actually willing to trade with Iran. After the noise dies down, Iran is going to need to rebuild all of the infrastructure that has been destroyed. Most of those parts will likely be coming from China. Not to mention all the other Gulf States who will also probably be needing the same equipment. LSE is an oil drilling parts manufacturer, storage and distribution company based in Beijing. They are positioned perfectly to benefit from this. The company has a solid balance sheet and strong cash flow and focused heavily in the Middle East and Asian markets; the parts of the world that have been hit the hardest by this conflict. I think this disruption will increase the need for countries to produce oil domestically as well. Those countries who have built enterprises based on the promise of smooth oil supply will likely realize they need to reduce some of that foreign dependency. LSE will be there to supply the parts and equipment they’ll need. Also just as a technical note, there is very little available shares for shorting. There shouldn’t be much downward pressure due to this. Also unlike most penny stocks, I think the dilution risk is relatively small. It doesn’t appear that the company is in need of raising capital. In either case, I think it is a bullish case for LSE. As always though, any company comes with inherent risk. Do your own research, this is not financial advice. I’ll see you guys soon, good luck out there! 🙂 Sources: [https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/LSE/](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/LSE/) [https://investor.r-egroup.com](https://investor.r-egroup.com/) TLDR; While everyone’s looking at the destruction to oil infrastructure, I’m trying to look at who’s going to rebuild it."

Koolkate360

LSE

Coley44

VM bot hallucinating ticker names that don't even exist and buying USD based stocks on LSE tickles me something funny but it's no different from any other LLMs; novel and cool. Nice work /u/zjz.

Coley44

NQ3L doesn't exist when searching for it on the LSE page - where did you pull NQ3L from? Hargreaves Lansdown and Trading 212 denote it as LQQ3 - LSE. Also, the LSE doesn't let you purchase in USD. If it helps, Yahoo Finance denotes it as LQQ3.L. Where are you sourcing this from for me to sanity check?

Coley44

VM; assuming DXY recovered overnight to it's average during the Biden administration, how much would equities rise or fall in GBP? Let's take having 100 shares in the LSE listing LQQ3 for example.

Coley44

VM; assuming DXY recovered overnight to it's average during the Biden administration, how much would equities rise or fall in GBP? Let's take having 100 shares in the LSE listing LQQ3.

Readonly00

It's an LSE listed ETF

Objective-Part-2346

Yes, I do, via a fund. I bought a fund that uses AI (expert system, not LLM-based model) to analyse the market daily and adapts the fund's portfolio allocation to the current market conditions. Their investment strategy is wrapped into an ETP listed on the LSE: Pantarai ADAPT (ADPT). Take a look at their website, where you can find all the information (portfolio allocation, asset mix, perf, etc.): pantar.ai. Click on Cartesio in the top right-hand corner.

Fantastic-Machine-83

I am British too haha. I think the best pick is the accumulating state street one as it's the cheapest suitable product. I think the ticker on the London stock exchange for £ is ACWI https://www.ajbell.co.uk/market-research/LSE:ACWI All of these ETFs are pretty much the same though. Just pick one and don't look at it for 10 years. If you need the money shorter term then you could consider a small bond allocation like VAGS to reduce volatility

Father_of_Lies666

LSE, they are an oil equipment manufacturer with unique ties to the Middle East. All those drills and refineries will need to be replaced.

Orange_Codex

It trades on LSE.

mindbridgeweb

Agronomics (LSE: ANIC) is a London AIM-listed investment fund focused on cellular agriculture, precision fermentation, and clean food technology. Its portfolio spans aound 20 investments covering lab-grown meat (beef, pork, chicken), cultivated seafood, egg proteins, dairy, cocoa, palm oil, cotton, crop biotech, and large-scale fermentation infrastructure. ANIC is currently trading at a significant NAV discount (\~50%), probably because its portfolio contains mainly early-to-growth stage companies. Many of these companies, however, have already entered the market or are at the cusp of doing so. To get a clearer picture of where the portfolio stands and what to expect in the near future, I put together a one-page overview of the key holdings — grouped by sector, with their carrying values, tech readiness, business edges, risks, competitive landscape, and current/projected market sizes. I'm sharing this to get feedback,surface anything I may have missed, and in case it's useful to others following the space.

Orange_Codex

This looks like a good one. Insiders selling is a risk, but holding 45% is a supreme sign of confidence (the only higher insider ownership I've seen is LSE: HUI) and $18,000,000 cash-on-hand allows insiders to inflate their own net worth via buyback to secure loan collateral or trigger warrants. Interests align with plenty of strategic options on deck.

Correct_Rough_2985

There are tremendous fees for this "strategy" and... it uses up a ton of buying power. You're basically tying up a ton of capital, likely to make less money than you would by simply putting your money in a high yield savings account. There also is risk, even for AAPD inverse funds. * **Daily Tracking:** These instruments are designed to track daily performance. Holding them for more than one day can result in returns that are significantly different from the inverse performance of Apple over that period. * **High Risk:** Leveraged and inverse ETFs are inherently riskier than traditional, non-leveraged investments. They are best suited for sophisticated, short-term investors. * **Fee Structure:** ETPs often have annual management fees that affect performance. * **Trading Venue:** While Direxion products trade on US exchanges (e.g., Nasdaq), many -3x Leverage Shares products trade on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) in USD, GBP, or EUR. Let me guess, you learned this incredibly dumb "strategy" from Rashad Mosley?

te7037

Bro is a slow burner but promising. I bought at 34p 3401 shares. Already up 24% since I bought. A good bet. Update dated 8 April 2026: Q1 2026 Project Update   Tungsten West (AIM:TUN), the mining company focused on restarting production at the Hemerdon tungsten and tin mine ("Hemerdon" or the "Project") in Devon, UK, is pleased to provide an update on its Project development activities during the first quarter of 2026 ("Q1 2026").   Highlights ·    Market conditions have further strengthened Project economics. ·    Targeting first phase re-start of fines gravity processing in Q3 2026. ·    Cross site Project works continue to accelerate towards the commencement of full plant commissioning from Q1 2027, including: o  Final appointment of remaining major sub-contractors o  Commencement of preparatory earthworks for the Mineral Processing Facility ("MPF") and the Mine Waste Facility ("MWF"); and o  Recruitment of Chief Operating Officer and other key senior leadership roles. ·    Agreement reached over the termination of the Hargreaves Services plc mining services agreement. ·    Mining equipment finance package concluded for £22.3 million with McHale Komatsu, the Komatsu equipment supplier in the UK. ·    Well advanced final stage due diligence on the remaining project debt package of up to US$85.0 million, including a US$25.0 million first tranche funding tailored to the Project schedule. ·    As at the end of the Company's financial year ending 31 March 2026, the unaudited financial highlights include cash reserves of £25.5 million, and tungsten sales revenue of £0.6 million.    Jeff Court, CEO of **Tungsten West, commented:**   "We are rapidly bringing Hemerdon back into production to address the ever-increasing supply gap for strategic tungsten concentrate. The Project's advancement is going well across all fronts, with first phase production targeted in Q3 2026.  Looking further ahead, the Company is in a strong position to commission the new build crushing, screening and ore sorting facilities in Q1 2027.   "We welcome the appointment of further leadership roles to Tungsten West, including our newly appointed Chief Operating Officer, Ron Day, who brings extensive international mining experience.  In addition to this, we have also appointed a number of senior roles that bring extensive international and UK experience to the Company, covering processing, mining, maintenance and ESG. This team brings a strong blend of global best practice, alongside prior Hemerdon operating experience.   "We also welcome the very positive progress made on our debt funding package, which is well advanced in final due diligence stage and will integrate as planned into our project schedule. Additionally, the completion of the Komatsu mining equipment finance package is another important milestone.   "I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to all our existing and new employees, shareholders and partners for the hard work, dedication and support to get us to this stage of development."   Improved market conditions Current market conditions have remained extremely buoyant, further increasing the positive scope of the Projects economics. The Company's Feasibility Study, released on 5 August 2025, was based on the market pricing of tungsten ("APT") of US$400/metric tonne unit ("mtu") and tin at US$32,500/tonne ("t").  The prevailing market prices as of 31 March 2026 are now in the order of US$2,995/mtu for APT and over US$46,000/t for tin, further strengthening the Project economics.   Due to the continuation of extremely positive market conditions, the Company's focus remains on the swift re-start of production at Hemerdon, targeting first phase re-start of fines gravity processing in Q3 2026, well in advance of the full project commissioning, targeted for Q1 2027.    Acceleration of Cross Site Project Works The major sub-contractors have been appointed, and work has commenced for the refurbishment programme on the existing MPF, including early start-up of the first phase fines gravity processing. Preparatory earthworks have also commenced on the new build component of the MPF and re-commissioning preparatory civil works on the Mine Waste Facility are well advanced.   Recruitment of Chief Operating Officer and Senior Leadership To support the restart of the Project, the Company has started to recruit the new operational team and announces that it has appointed Mr Ron Day as Chief Operating Officer. Ron brings over 35 years of global mining experience, with specialist expertise in taking projects from start-up to world class steady-state operation. Ron's recent roles include General Manager for Operations at Perenti Ltd's (ASX:PRN) African Mining Services division, covering several operating sites, including project start-up across Africa, and Project Director for Thiess in Botswana, as well as numerous project manager and operational leadership roles internationally. Additionally, key senior leaders across the business were also appointed during Q1, helping to further strengthen the Hemerdon team. These roles include:   ·    Director of Processing: Stephen Taylor, a qualified metallurgist who has 18 years of international mineral processing experience, including most recently 13 years working at Masan High-Tech Minerals Nui Phao's world scale tungsten operation in Vietnam, where his last role was Processing Manager.  Stephen will join Tungsten West in May 2026 following completion of his current employment notice period and is subject to the approval of a UK work visa.   ·    Director of Maintenance: John Roberts who has 27 years of mining maintenance experience internationally and in the UK, most recently at Barrick's North Mara mine in Tanzania, and former roles as Asset Management Specialist for Perenti (ASN:PRN) in Africa and Maintenance Manager for Capital Ptd  (LSE: CAPD).  John has directly managed multiple mining project start-ups across Africa from major project start-up and commissioning to maintenance leadership.   ·    Director of Mining: Henry Chalcraft, a qualified mining engineer with 22 years of international and UK mining experience, including several years working previously at Hemerdon as the Senior Mining Engineer and range of international technical postings.   ·    Manager Environment, Social Governance (ESG): Barnaby Hudson, over 23 years in ESG with most recent roles with Imerys British Lithium as Head of Environment and Permitting, and prior experience working at Hemerdon as the Sustainability Manager and range of international and UK positions.   Mining Services Contract   The Company has agreed with Hargreaves Services plc ("Hargreaves") to terminate the existing mining service contract.  As per the terms of the contract, the Company will make payments to Hargreaves of £3.0 million in April 2026, after which they will release security held over the mineral lease, and a further payment of £7.0 million by 15 May 2027. We remain in discussion with Hargreaves regarding future opportunities.   With the termination of the existing mining services contract, the Company is now advancing plans to self-perform mining operations with the conclusion of a binding finance agreement with McHale Komatsu (the Komatsu mining equipment supplier in the UK) for £22.3 million of mining equipment, with first deliveries expected in April 2026 and major mining fleet commissioning at site from August 2026.   Project Funding Update   In addition to the Project acceleration, debt funding is well advanced.   Final stage due diligence by an internationally recognised due diligence firm appointed in respect of the debt package of up to US$85 million ("Facility") is now being completed, with delivery of the due diligence report expected during April 2026. Definitive documentation for the Facility is concurrently being negotiated with the Lenders.   Subject to the above, a major existing prominent shareholder has indicated willingness to fund the first tranche of US$25 million of the Facility, should the Facility not be concluded at this time, which is expected to be drawn prior to the end May 2026. This first tranche of US$25 million would then fully fund the project up to the first phase fines gravity re-commissioning operations in Q3 2026.   As at the end of the Company's financial year ending 31 March 2026, Tungsten West reports unaudited cash reserves (excluding restoration funds held in escrow) of £25.5 million, and unaudited revenue from tungsten sales of £0.6 million. 

DethFade

Not because its OTC, because its primary listing is Australia. Canadian/TSX listed ones don't get the fee, not sure why. But London/LSE and Australia/ASX listed ones do.

Artistic_Item_5710

Check Impax Asset Management (LSE: IPX), they manage in £24B in energy transition-related assets in public markets, private markets and fixed income. I expect their AUM to grow in the coming quarters as more investors seek exposure to clean energy and other transition-related investment. Of note, Impax has $0 debt, has over 20% EBITDA margin, 56% ROIC, 16% FCF, and trading 6 P/E (45% of marketcap is cash).

Orange_Codex

My biggest holding is up 20% on TSX but I hold LSE and haven't seen a penny of it. 

themartinieffect

Quantum Helium (QHE on LSE)

Artistic_Item_5710

My second largest position is Impax Asset Management (LSE: IPX), a sustainable/climate asset manager with a heavy focus on energy transition assets in public markets, fixed income and private equity. I believe this war is a massive win for them as interest in electrification and renewables has surged materially since the war started.

protectthezen

If it helps the leveraged oil ETFs on the LSE dipped hard on open and are now climbing back up

Wooshsplash

BP.LSE. Bought at 495, currently 608. This is an interesting one. Setting an alert for 700 and, possibly, dumping at that price or holding for long-term. Undecided. Though right now this is compensating for my MU, which is driving me nuts.

Readonly00

See how far VWRP gaps down on the LSE based on the US slide on Friday, and decide whether to DCA more into it.. hoping for sub 120

Orange_Codex

Big fan of Tirubati Graphite (LSE: TGR). It's extremely high-risk, extremely high-reward (like most of my penny choices), having posted a massive loss after a catastrophic year in which bottlenecks and inclement weather caused low efficiency leading to cash flow issues, credit issues, and exchange listing non-compliance, to the extent it had a grave liquidity crisis during which workers went unpaid. However, the company has done a lot to turn things around and seems to have a solid grasp of the road ahead. It has recently issued new shares, converted debt to equity, and re-listed on AIM. It has no-chemical, high-recovery proprietary tech (specifically a column flotation system) and aims to expand and vertically integrate its offtake logistics to prevent a re-run of 2025. It's also in the process of updating its corporate governance policies. The company's market cap hovers between $8 and $9mil, but its assessed graphite and vanadium pentoxide is worth many times more (I stopped counting at $150mil). The global graphite market has a 15% CAGR until 2040. 95% comes from China. China has eased graphite export restrictions until November 2026, contributing to the dump in graphite shares (RIP WWR). However, it continues to use export restrictions as a strategic weapon - it banned gallium and germanium to Japan just three days ago. Therefore, graphite remains vulnerable to extreme upward price shocks.

protectthezen

LSE opens at 8am, GOOGL is your friend

hayl4bulb

They're primarily listed on the LSE AIM but also has a US listing under ALRDF. Cash unknown, presumed 0 debt. They've set expectations of £130M+ revenue by 2030.

hayl4bulb

The LSE is measured in GBP pennies, not US dollars.

Tay_Tay86

LSE opening

AzureLainCapital

Into the dollars potentially. Id send an image of my Ai to take up less space but cannot post images. **Where TXTM sits today under GAAP:** TXTM is a US domiciled company filing under US GAAP. Under GAAP ASC 905 — agricultural accounting — biological assets like seeds are recorded at **historical cost**. Dr. J donated the original seeds at $1/seed. Multiplication yields from the grower are recorded at $0 because no cost was incurred to produce them. Result: 1.25 billion seeds sitting on the books at approximately **$505 million.** That's what the market currently sees. **The IFRS switch — why it changes everything:** IFRS IAS 41 — the international biological asset accounting standard — requires biological assets be marked to **fair value** at every reporting period regardless of what was originally paid for them. TXTM cannot use IFRS on a US exchange as a US domiciled company. So the plan is to **redomicile** — move the company's legal home outside the US — becoming a Foreign Private Issuer. Foreign Private Issuers are explicitly accepted by the SEC filing under IFRS. More importantly JSE and LSE are both IFRS native exchanges that require it. The moment redomicile completes and IFRS audits are filed — the balance sheet transforms. Seeds stop being recorded at historical cost and get marked to independently verified fair value. **The $2.17 thesis — current seed inventory:** A third party commissioned valuation established **$15.26/seed** fair value in 2024. Deloitte is currently engaged to independently validate the enterprise value — providing Big 4 credibility to that number. 1,250,000,000 seeds × $15.26 = **$19,075,000,000** $19,075,000,000 ÷ 8,791,221,631 shares = **$2.17 per share** From current price of $0.00875 that is a **247x return.** This is seeds only. No revenue. No technology. No RWA infrastructure. No carbon credits. No bonds. Just the existing seed inventory marked to fair value under IFRS divided by shares outstanding. **The $4.60 thesis — full multiplication delivery:** The seed multiplication agreement requires the grower to return 4x what was sent. 600 million seeds were sent in April 2025. 1 billion were returned in June 2025. **1.4 billion seeds are still contractually owed.** When delivered: 1,250,000,000 current + 1,400,000,000 owed = **2,650,000,000 total seeds** 2,650,000,000 × $15.26 = **$40,439,000,000** $40,439,000,000 ÷ 8,791,221,631 shares = **$4.60 per share** From current price that is a **526x return.** Again — seeds only. Nothing else included. Lets use the $2 share example, even if you discounted that by 75% that share price would still be Way higher than the current .008 (pre institutions, Pre uplist).

Tay_Tay86

Apparently Fidelity and CSW will let you trade directly in international markets and exchanges, like LSE

Tay_Tay86

i want to be able to trade natural gas on the LSE. This is bullshit Robinhood. Shitty app

Kfcdeliveryguy12234

Thank you, I see at 12:04 when my stop loss was sold, the price on LSE dropped to 15 for few minutes which would have triggered it… that sucks. Im not sure anything i can do here. Is there anything i can do?

greytoc

Fwiw - while OP was probably snipped if the order was sitting on the exchange order book - but it is unlikely to be related to payment for order flow. OP is not US based and has mentioned that they believe it was LSE based order. Trades on the LSE is regulated by the FCA. And FCA rules effectively ban pfof in the UK. In the US - stop orders are not supposed to be eligible for execution in extended hours so the unless it's a illiquid instrument with few liquidity providers, the common theory that executions can be manipulated outside the nbbo is also highly unlikely.

greytoc

The LSE order book supports stop loss orders according to their documentation. By exchange facility - I'm referring to whether the order book at the exchange can accepts stop orders. So if someone places a stop order - that order goes to the exchange. And it sits on the exchange's order book until it's executed per the exchange rules. Some brokers (not sure if it's still a common practice) will synthetically support the stop orders. That means that the broker holds the stop order on the broker's internal order book. And the broker may introduce safeguards in case the spreads are wide or if there is volatility - although - not sure if that's a feature implemented today. There are pros/cons with synthetic stop orders. I don't use stop orders for because of the nuances - so tend to have mental stop losses when I trade. Or sometimes - I bake that into an algo if that's important to me. Can you please share the outcome of your conversation with your broker? I would be curious what happened.

LE-NRY

ANIC Used AI to summarise my case as I cba to keep bigging it up… Agronomics Limited (LSE: ANIC) is a London-listed venture capital firm offering a "picks and shovels" play on cellular agriculture… basically think lab-grown meat, dairy, and sustainable materials.

Fuzzy_Photograph_361

Asian regard at work, trading on the LSE while watching the US premarket

Motor-Disaster-9566

bought a whole bunch of these back when they were single digits and I've been having a good time. if you want to get deep in the technical a guy called AGEOS on the LSE board for this stock has made a lot of long and detailed posts about it.

ai-moderator

#TLDR --- Ticker: IQE.L (LSE) / IQEPY (US OTC) Direction: Up Prognosis: Buy Shares Catalyst: Buyout bids on the table and a strategic sell-off of their slow business units. Why the market is regarded: IQE has double the revenue of its main competitor (LandMark), yet trades at a $300M market cap (1.0x P/S) while the competitor trades at a $4.1B market cap (60x P/S). OP's Conviction Level: 370,000 shares deep into the "boring plumbing" of AI data centers.

Orange_Codex

Fjord Defence Group (DFENS.OL) is the dullest stock I've ever called out. Phenomenal potential to supply Scandinavian naval build-up and crack the much bigger UK market, but it's price just does not move. Slowly entering the red on Hydrogen Utopia (LSE:HUI). That's what you get for buying in the middle of a news battery. I was also 40% down on my first PLSR before it ran. No new contracts can be signed during the Iran showdown, so will be steadily accumulating.

Readonly00

I'm excited to put my cash into VUAG/VWRP ETFs when they're down, so this will all have bounced up by the time the LSE opens

greenpride32

>Stocks and investing have been part of American culture for years with a rich history  This isn't really true for your typical "Main Street" retail investor. 401k plans are only about 50 years old. Large corporations adopted it quickly but took some time for smaller companies. Investing in stocks was inaccessible for most retail until mid to late 1990's due to emergence of online/electronic brokerages. Before that, you'd have to phone your broker and fees were quite high, because there weren't any other options. Also, back then you had to buy a full block of (100) shares. There were no odd lots (something less than 100 shares), never mind fractionals. If a broker has a client investing in chucnks of $25k, $50k or $100k or $250k, do you think they will take any calls from people investing $200/500/1000/5000 at a time? Maybe, but you are last in line, assuming that amount can even buy a full lot. You also have to consider inflation. Some share prices might seem low back then, but dollars were not as common. The house I grew up in cost $50k USD in 1980. Today the same house is $900k. You could buy a can of soda at the vending machine for $0.20 or $0.25 in 1980; today maybe $1.50-2.50 depending on location. When all the online brokerages started, they'd all undercut the commissions per trade. It used to be $25, then $20, then $13.... $10, $5... to point they all became free. That's right, I used to pay $8-15 every time I bought or sold a stock. It's less than 10 years since those fees went to zero everywhere. As I live in the US, I am less familar LSE DAX CAC - but they are substantially smaller than the US markets, so probably less push to market services. But here in the US, it's just constant flow of IPO's since mid-late 70's. There is so much money flow and potential to market services.

markpreston54

you can find them listed in various European exchanges like LSE, different tickers for different currency counter, but interchangeable

Mental-Impression619

IQE UK LSE (up 150% in last week). Uk semiconductor play, possible takeover imminent. Lots of IP, historically not the best managed company but imo penny stock with actual potential given current market.

Orange_Codex

New longs (5-10yrs) I'm entering this month: **Yellow Cake** (LSE: YCA): A triuranium octoxide treasury. Triuranium octoxide (yellowcake) is both the most stable storage form for nuclear fuel potential and the immediate precursor to fuel refinement. **Fjord Defence Group** (OSLO: DFENS): A Norwegian niche defence scaler with significant interests in ballistics protection and naval armour. Portfolio aligns with Norwegian-Denmark-UK defence review aims amid substantial spending increases, especially on the GIUK gap. Probably not as good as Kongsberg for likelihood of return but growth potential is exceptional. **Terrestrial Energy** (NASDAQ: ISMR): The only publicly-traded producer of molten salt reactors for long-term nuclear energy storage. Molten salt is also used for solar power storage, but private operators (including DuBois) seem to have the market locked down. I'm not too confident in this one in itself, but take a 'rising tide lifts all boats' approach to the MS / MSR sector overall.

Orange_Codex

Surface Transforms (LSE: SCE) just lost a General Motors contract providing 84% of its revenue. Total stock collapse. But contracts had been diversifying as recently as a Dec 2025 investor publication, so I think there's scope for a hard rebound by next quarter. Extremely low price offsets the float size.

shxwcr0ss

The LSE S&P is down nearly 1%, four hours before the US has even opened.

birdman1972

They got apathetic. The £ was hit after Brexit and LSE has lost something like 20% of its listings, much through acquisition by larger international companies. Europeans in general seem committed to self-destruction.

Armourdildo

Games Workshop GAW on the LSE

Virtual_Secretary_98

My LSE ETF opened and I'm getting COOKED

Responsible_Lie_1989

ALRT on the LSE- Think Palantir, but a UK version. Its chairman is the former field marshal for the British army and sits in the house of lords, so can basically get a meeting with anyone in the defence sector. They're already working with the Ministry of Defence on a project and are close to finalising their first contract. They also have another project with a UK police force which if successful will be rolled out to all police forces across the UK

Orange_Codex

Highest-conviction pick is PLSR. Insane quantities of helium, including the ultra-rare helium-3 (vital for cryogenics, which is foundational to most next-gen space, computing, transport, and engineering technology). Second-highest is ASX:EOS. It's doubled my investment twice. Long-term play for counter-drone warfare, directed energy weapons, autonomous firing platforms, and astronautical laser technology. Third-highest is LSE:HUI. Green hydrogen has the highest CAGR of any industry on Earth right now, and HUI has taken a novel approach to obtaining it (partnering with Middle Eastern petrochemical and construction giants to break down their refuse). Still early days, but all necessary licenses are secured an one lunch with a Saudi Aramco exec's cousin will send it stratospheric.

A55BAG

Remember war is bullish. The second world war launched a major bull cycle for LSE. The lowest point was when nazi's were bombing London and people had to trade stocks in the LSE basement. https://preview.redd.it/1piyqnnoygmg1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d981ce989ab2ebd8f439a28c0111ac4518de13b

Orange_Codex

\-7.3% down this month, 22% up YTD, and 78% up since last June (when I first took stocks seriously). I used to take small positions in runners (e.g. IXHL, BTAI), but they were inconsistent and needed too much attention. Now I build big positions in stocks with legs (e.g. PLSR, SLS, ABOS, ASX:EOS, LSE:HUI). Had three losses. One (PLBY) was just daft; initial lateness made me hungry for bigger gains, so +20% turned into -5% (and dropping). A second (INTS) required risky dip-buying to return to profit. I took the profit percentage to buy more when it's diluted, but am determined to *never* leave that stock.

Fuzzy_Photograph_361

RR is the ticker on LSE so I usually use it, I believe on the US exchange it's RYCEY

JBurton90

Years ago I bought a stock off the LSE called Genedrive PLC and now I am seeing a corporate action on this stock with a new "ticker" or something showing on my positions page. I am generally knowledgeable in stocks and such, but I don't understand this. Can anyone offer clarity on what this means?

ohSpite

RE the exchange stuff, can Americans not easily access the LSE? It's available there

johnnyringo1985

Buddy, I studied at LSE and was a US Senator’s policy director. Biden caused the inflation, and it spread across the world. There were zero inflationary pressures when he took office despite the same “supply chain disruptions” existing under Trump. Then, US inflation spiked about 6 months before spreading to the EU. It’s the same thing that happened in 2008 with the US housing crisis, where contagion from the US takes some time to spread to the EU, then other markets. Unless you have a different, specific, and data-backed theory for why a US housing crisis turned into a global sovereign debt crisis, then just trust me. But let’s start with Biden promising everyone $2,000 in relief money during the campaign. He gets into office wanting to follow-through, after the US has already had 2 rounds of stimulus checks. The first rounds of checks had the desired effect, but the second round had a ~50% diminished effect according to collected bank data. But Biden plowed forward with the third round of stimulus checks despite Obama’s Secretary of Treasury Larry Summers (among others) writing a very notable op-ed in the Washington Post saying, in essence, “another round of stimulus checks will create the most inflationary pressure since the 1970s.” Then, Biden does it anyway. And while there had been few if any inflationary indicators up to that point, guess what happens 2 weeks after the first set of third-round stimulus checks hit bank accounts. That’s right—inflation jumps more than 2% in *one month!* Then look at the open border policy. It’s pretty well established that every 1 million people added to the US population will increase housing prices (and rents) by about 1%. So once they just open the border and allow roughly 17 million people into the country in four years, that corresponds pretty well to an 18% increase in rents nationwide. But why didn’t companies build more housing or apartments? Because Biden picked the dumbest time to steal Trump’s first term idea for an infrastructure bill. Trump proposed it when interest rates were low and commodity prices were stable; Biden picked when commodity prices were high and interest rates were high—brilliant! So the government was competing for building materials when there was more demand for affordable housing than ever, driving up scarcity and building costs. Fucking brilliant! Lastly, you may be wondering “what about the so-called Inflation Reduction Act”? Well, keep in mind that was actually a green energy investment bill that was scored to have a -0.25% impact on inflation over 5 years according to the CBO.

Polus43

> clown country 😂 no one will ever take the US seriously every again Yup. Trump is a Russian asset and this is the objective. They need to break trust in the US Dollar and treasury market. I was looking into mining companies like Rio Tinto and ran across this great example of the problem: > Rio Tinto is structured as a dual-listed company, with listings on both the London Stock Exchange (symbol: RIO), under the name "Rio Tinto Plc",[3] and the Australian Securities Exchange (symbol: RIO) in Sydney, under the name "Rio Tinto Limited".[108] The dual-listed company structure grants shareholders of the two companies the same proportional economic interests and ownership rights in the consolidated Rio Tinto, in such a way as to be equivalent to all shareholders of the two companies actually being shareholders in a single, unified entity. This structure was implemented to avoid adverse tax consequences and regulatory burdens. **To eliminate currency exchange issues, the company's accounts are kept, and dividends paid, in United States dollars.[18]** Emphasis mine. But that is exactly the problem. Listed on the LSE and ASE, what accounts do they use? American accounts in US Dollars lol Half the world operates like that which gives the US incredible influence.

The-Dividend-Bible

Even a fund manager won't be able to tell you now what is guaranteed for the next 20 years - as they will rebalance every now and then - unless we talk bonds (small risk) or savings (no risk). I was looking into the same direction for my nephew and then I thought that over a 20 year timespan stock-based assets should outperform conservative allocations... so why would I put all in Savings? [https://www.reddit.com/r/Investments/comments/1qc7l9b/stocks\_gave\_the\_best\_performance\_since\_1928\_in/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Investments/comments/1qc7l9b/stocks_gave_the_best_performance_since_1928_in/) I'd say define a % of the pie you are comfortable with dedicating to equity (stocks etc) and the rest set into savings or conservative bonds. Forget about rebalancing allocations etc; decide now, and stick to it with monthly contributions. For the **savings**, you can look at websites like [https://moneyfactscompare.co.uk/savings-accounts/](https://moneyfactscompare.co.uk/savings-accounts/) to choose the best interest rates and condition overall. For the **equity** part, you can buy a fund or ETF that replicates a standard index (the most common one is SP500), of course with base currency GBP and ensure it's ISA eligible, example: * SPDR® S&P® 500 UCITS ETF Acc (SPYL.L) which has the lowest yearly cost ever (0.03%) * Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP (SPXP.L) with a cost of 0.05% (alternatively something for NASDAQ, like iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX) or Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ) but in your case I wouldn't go for that) Then you can go for a **conservative bond** like: * iShares GBP Corp Bond (or iShares EUR Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF as a stable EUR version) * iShares Short Term Corp Bond ETF (LSE: STER)

One_Jellyfish3892

Like LSE or what specifically? How?

Bevtij

RR on the LSE is Rolls Royce.

Thin_Reward

SML on the LSE is one of my picks for this year if anyone’s interested in Cornish tungsten plays, should be a good year for them.

oogswayed

Not the LSE baby

oogswayed

Open today on the LSE

oogswayed

LSE is open tmo :)

TheNathanNS

Speaking as a Brit, if you're living in the UK, use an ISA. All stock investment platforms offer one. It lets you put up to £20k every year (each April, when our tax-year begins) and ANY profits you make are 10000% tax free. No tax on profits, no tax on dividends*, no tax on interest. All of it is tax free, even when you withdraw. Still get access to invest in US, Canadian and EU listings too, instead of just being restricted to UK / LSE only listings. It's arguably one of the very few fantastic things about investing here, and very generous for what it is. *: we still get taxed in US owned stocks, but we're made to sign a W8-BEN form before we're allowed to buy US shares, and any taxes from dividends are automatically taken upon dividend payment, but iirc that applies to all non-US residents.

Orange_Codex

It won't amount to much more than a temporary bounce. Russia isn't the heavyweight Americans think it is (GDP is about the same as Italy's), and the prospective deal to sell oil and gas in USD is an attempt to shore up the petrodollar after Trump's Greenland antagonism accelerated its decline. In other words, it covers about a tenth of the business that would've been perfectly safe if 5D Intergalactic Backgammon hadn't opened his mouth and the global trend towards de-dollarisation continues. If it's a concern, start investing in stocks denominated in other currencies on global exchanges (e.g. LSE, Euronext, Shenzhen). You'll expose yourself to *some* currency loss (and gain), but you won't have to earn an extra 10-20% just for your purchasing power to break even because your main currency is declining. Obviously some currencies are better than others. You don't want to spend a declining currency (the USD) on stocks denominated in an absolute shitsack (the lira).

greytoc

Samsung does not list their shares in the US or sponsor an ADR. There are F shares and unsponsored receipt on the OTC that you can use. But caveat emptor - if you don't understand how OTC works - it may be best to avoid using these investment vehicles. If you don't have access to the KRX - Samsung does sponsor a GDR that trades on the LSE if your broker provides access to the LSE. If you don't know what the KRX and LSE are - it may be better to avoid that method as well. SK Hynik is rumored to be exploring an ADR in the US - but I don't know the timeline. Your last option is probably the simplest. Both Samsung and SK Hynix are the major constituents of the KOSPI index. The most liquid ETF listed in the US that tracks that index is the Blackrock iShares index - EWY.

fabbbles

It's listed on the LSE, but it's denominated in USD. https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/VWRA.L/

thenuttyhazlenut

WISE (LSE) already has the system. They should use it... WISE even lets banks use their system.

Bald_Plonker

I went with XMWX (Global ex-US tracker) and HMEF (emerging markets) for LSE listed ETFs

Marshmallowmind2

Low liquidity? Have you ever traded some etf's on LSE? the s&p500 leveraged etf's on that has a few hundred trades per hour. Can take minutes for a sell to go through

Mimicking-hiccuping

I dived out of a part of a position on LSE:TUN and wanted to bury the money somewhere. Didn't feel KELLY had enough to convince me. What a twat. Haha