LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
0.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
You got your PEG Ratios and valuation issues right here, Dr Squeaker The Motley Fool Prediction: in 2026 the red-hot Rolls-Royce share price could turn £20,000 into… Jan 8th The Rolls-Royce (LSE:RR) share price has more than doubled over the past year. That would have turned £20,000 into almost £44,000. That’s the investing dream. However, this is very unlikely to happen again in 2026. It’s simply a valuation issue. It’s a great company with a lot to be positive about, but a lot of that optimism is already priced in. Let’s explore why. **Valuation is key** Rolls-Royce’s operational recovery is impressive, but the valuation leaves limited scope for further upside. Based on the figures provided, the shares trade on a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 44.1 times for 2025 and 38.2 times for 2026, using normalised earnings per share of 28.2p and 32.6p, respectively. Crucially, growth does not appear sufficient to justify this rating. Normalised earnings are expected to grow by roughly 16% between 2025 and 2026, which results in a price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio of around 2.8. A ratio at this level typically indicates that growth expectations are already fully reflected in the share price. Revenue growth remains modest, with a compound annual growth rate of just 2.7% over this year and the next, even as operating margins expand above 20%. **Analysts concur** Honestly, institutional analysts aren’t always the best stock pickers. One of our peer sites actually indicates that Wall Street analysts have underperformed the S&P 500 by around 30% over the past three years. However, the consensus of their opinions often tells a useful story. Here, the 16 analysts covering the stock have a share price target that’s 4% below the current share price. In other words, they’re suggesting the stock is overvalued. **It’s not all bad** While I actually don’t believe Rolls-Royce is overvalued, I simply don’t see much room for the share price to appreciate unless we get some more good news about the business. That’s certainly possible, but it’s nothing to bank on. In fact, it makes the investment speculative, unless you know something about the business that isn’t publicly available.
Can anyone please provide the link as to how companies like Amazon, Goldman Sachs, Google, Catepillar, Eli Lilly underperform the equities listed in Europe long term? Europe still has serious issues, demographic decline, low growth, high debt and the worst part... basically no tech or growth companies. Top 20 companies in the world by market cap, none are European. No1 is wanting to IPO on the LSE. Greenland is front page news, but ultimately a nothing burger when comparing it to how crazy history has been. So I don't know, I'm not selling American exceptionalism for Novo Nordisk and Nestlé.
For your information, when Germany & France released the news retaliation just now, on the LSE S&P599 went down .05% lol
EQQQ, (the European version of QQQ that trades on the LSE), is down 1.9% currently
Yea lol we operate with small volume, like LSE has about 1/50 of what NYSE works with, in all S&P trackers combined. Even worse on other markets. But imho NYSE gonna go in same direction. liberation day again.
Was looking LSE vs NYSE volumes today. 1/50 and that's being generous
problem is that's where all the fun companies IPO. TSX has Aritzia and Shopify, the LSE has Astrazeneca and Uniliver, the DAX has Siemens and Airbus. NASDAQ and the NYSE got ARM, RDDT, Micron, and soon SpaceX, OpenAI, and Discord.
They're in the London stock exchange, LSE.
"FanDuel, the premier online gaming company in North America, part of Flutter Entertainment (NYSE: FLUT, LSE: FLTR), and CME Group (NASDAQ: CME), the world's leading derivatives marketplace, unveiled that they will launch prediction markets through the new FanDuel Predicts app that will expand access to financial markets for millions of customers in the United States." \-> are they delayed? Cant find anything about that on the website. Source: [https://flutter.com/news-media/press-releases/fanduel-and-cme-group-unveil-new-prediction-markets-platform-to-launch-in-december/](https://flutter.com/news-media/press-releases/fanduel-and-cme-group-unveil-new-prediction-markets-platform-to-launch-in-december/)
Yes, it is. The second one you listed above (LSEETF) is VUAA.L. (Yahoo just uses the .L extension for the LSE (London exchange). I can't buy it, though, since I'm in the US.
After all, on Yahoo, right above the fund name, it says "LSE" :D Otherwise, IMHO, SPYL is a better choice. Significantly lower price per share (€14.7), TER 0.03%.
I’ve edited the body to include LSE:ARMG
You're talking about a LSE ticker without specifying it's LSE. There's a same ticker on Nasdaq that's a 2x LETF and that's why it's causing confusion. The other guy is right - the correct ticker is SHLD in US.
Based on my personal experience, if I'd JUST automatically bought Vanguard's all-world FTSE ETF every month and nothing else, I'd probably be round about where I am now. My actual approach has been a mix of sector etfs/market etfs and volatile stocks on LSE:AIM and staring at it every day hoping for a company announcement... Big waste of time I suppose, but more interesting I guess.
Same issue here with a few German stocks, thought it was just me going crazy. Google Finance has been glitchy as hell lately with international exchanges - had similar problems with LSE symbols last month that randomly fixed themselves after like a week Maybe try Yahoo Finance as a backup for now? Their XETRA data seems more stable
#TLDR --- Ticker: RPI (LSE) Direction: Up Prognosis: Buy Shares (Long) Catalyst: Viral AI "vibe-coding" & Smart Mirrors Immunity: Orange Man Tariffs (UK Listed)
#TLDR --- Ticker: RPI (LSE) Direction: Up Prognosis: Long Shares (Target >10x) Catalyst: AI Vibe-Coding & Viral Smart Mirrors Political Status: Immune to Orange Man
That’s why JP Morgan and Global X has those IE, EU or LSE listings. You get nice 8-12% yields and mostly completely tax free, but sometimes there is a 1-2% Spread because of low volume. You could also look into those swiss stocks that have 0 witholding tax in general, this should also improve your situation and it’s often a 4-5% yield you get. Holcim, EFG, U-Blox, Avolta or Clariant.
Look for an LSE, EBS or IBIS traded UTICS fund tracking the same S&P500 basket, to avoid the 15% withholding tax and the other inheritance tax. I invest in VUAA and EQAC
They are not equal. After currency exchange the ADRs are roughly half the price of the shares on the LSE. The readon is that ADRs are "coupons" for shares and are roughly 2 ADRs per 1 share.
> RR Would like to add that this is most likely Richtech Robotics Inc that's listed in the NASDAQ, not Rolls Royce that's listed in the LSE. There was some confusion a month or two ago and the Redditor didn't realise people were on about Rolls Royce.
HUIPF (LSE:HUI) is settling back down after a storm of positive news. *Definitely* recommend buying. It's got a highly locked-up float (70%+ insiders) and the business plan will be obscenely lucrative if one petrochemical titan can be brought on board. I also like the CEO. She replied to an email at 11pm on a Friday and used her own shares as collateral to prevent dilution. Total dedication.
I own some shares of and made decent money on EuroNext. They continue snatching smaller european exchanges and cementing their position and are the only real alternative to LSE... or are they? I've been reading about some EU bureaucrat plans for a unified single market exchange venue but I am not see any details on what those plans actually entail? Would they try to literally replace what EuroNext has been doing and subvert their efforts or would they be buildiung on top of EuroNext or what?
Not trading today; expanding positions in PLSR and LSE:HUI instead. I know I keep ragging on about them, but they're going places.
I guess historically the LSE and European stocks just follow the s&p 500 anyway, so I'm just wondering how important brands are, compared to how more advanced the U.S market is in regards to ease that small companies can get listed, for example? The whole ease of the investment system is better in the U.S for stocks?? Or am I wrong on that?
Just measured my own tip performance. PLSR, HUI (LSE), SLS, and EOS (ASX) are up 35%, 48%, 81%, and 93% since I began mentioning them - thought SLS wasn't original. NUAI is up 35% since I recommended buying it after the short report. The clangers are AZTR, down 5%, and AVL with a big fat 0%. Some other biotech on my watchlist dipped 14%. Not sure if I mentioned it out loud or not. Oh, and FEIM is a godsend. It's my largest holding at an average of $26 and I am *cheesing* right now.
Why has bro got LSE as his logo
Fermi America's (FRMI) CEO's name is Toby Neugebauer. Neugebauer is a German surname that means "new settler." Can't make this shit up. And the company did a simultaneous dual listing on the NYSE (NYC) and LSE (London), and Neugebauer talks about those two cities constantly. Such a "Toby" move.
|Ticker|Industry|Allocation| |:-|:-|:-| |ACGL|Specialty Insurance|25.25%| |DR (TSE)|Medical Services|15.00%| |MOH|Health Insurance|15.00%| |WISE (LSE)|Money Transfer|13.75%| |QFIN|Consumer Lending|10.00%| |SGOV|Short-Term Treasuries|9.00%| |CROX|World Class High Quality Footwaer|6.00%| |JD|Ecommerce Retail|3.00%| |THX|Gold Miner|3.00%|
That 'rebranding' history is just how Reverse Takeovers (RTO) work—they bought an empty shell (Cassel/Guild) to get on the LSE without all the extra hassle. The old history belongs to the shell, not the current defence tech. You're right about 'no sales' though—this is why we're waiting on the December commercial realisationmentioned in a previous statement. We are betting that they flip from 'R&D Phase' to 'Commercial Phase' this month. If the contracts land, the 'no product' argument dies instantly and the stock should get a re-rate
IES (LSE), a British vanadium battery company. Sitting at about -90%. Still believe the story of the tech - won't sell it, don't care if it goes up in smoke at this point.
B&M (BME: LSE), thought i'd caught it on the ride back up but then the announcement of dodgy accounting has left me down about 28%. I have faith in the CEO to turn it around but I suspect it will be a while until it happens.
I had a bag holding story that turned out well. Bought into LSE listed centamin in 2020 just before they crashed more than 50% after they announced that their only gold mine suffered some operational accidents and delays which halved their production. Held the bag all the way. It was bought over by Ashanti which issued its stock in place of the centamin. it also went up 4X since the salenwas finalised which means instead of -50%, I'm now up 80%. Only time bag holding actually worked out for me though. Still continuing that bag holding.
Which exchange are you looking at primarily? Seems like the LSE is its home. But it's everywhere.
Why does it always dump at LSE's close. What's wrong with the UK?
Airtel Africa (on LSE)- +166% since Jan.
My SX4S position is fuxed as LSE is closed, looks like I’m holding on to my leverage share 4x short position forever
Appreciate the work on highlighting this company thank you, I was not aware of it. You are clearly invested as you provided questions during the recent earnings Q&A. My personal view unfortunately is being only on the LSE is a drawback unfortunately I feel like floating on the LSE just does not have anywhere near the visbility and interest for investment. Do you have any thoughts on if they would want to list on the US in some form?
You were correct invest into ALK:LSE You won’t regret it
Stocks with real 50x potential: Sellas Life Sciences - GPS is the closest thing on the market to a generalised survivability solution for common cancers (est. 5 years). Hydrogen Utopia International - advanced plans to supply Middle Eastern petrochemical and construction sectors with green hydrogen and methane (est. 10 years). Pulsar Helium (LSE:PLSR) - discovered a potentially world-changing reserve of helium-3 (est. 10 years). Avalon Advanced Materials (TSE:AVL) - sitting one of the world's largest undeveloped REE reserves, with high concentrations of iridium and samarium (est. 10-15 years). Electro Optic Systems (ASX:EOS) - veterans of directed energy and astrophysics perfectly set up to dominate space warfare and domain control (est. 10-15 years).
Yes, ALRDF is the new OTC exposure. Volume there is still slow. LSE is ALRT.
at OTC market it is AGNMF On LSE AIM it is ANIC you choose
I’ve been wanting to invest in this for about a year now. Unfortunately my brokerage doesn’t have it. What brokerages in the US support LSE?
I don't normally post here but if you can trade on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) with your broker, you can buy 5QQQ.
at OTC market it is AGNMF On LSE AIM it is ANIC you choose
Read through the Beowulf (BEM) board community on [LSE.co.uk](http://LSE.co.uk) if you want to see investors more depressed than you are.
It's a good spot IMO! A lot of other posts seem to focus on the US exchanges, so nice to see something on the LSE (for better or for worse of the exchange). I had a look at their company site again and the general price action over the year and I just can't understand how, where the price of gold had a monumental move, their share price stayed flat enough with little volume.... Compared to almost all other miners and explorers - the latter being what it sounded like before owning the mine before 2023.... So even as an exploration company on the tailings alone it should have moved. It really looks like they just put out half year and annual accounts, so there just isn't the screaming news story..... Until the day that one does appear. Anyway, that's my thought, it's just completely off the radar. A good post IMO 👌
Look up: Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE) Look up: THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE (LSE)
|Ticker|Allocation| |:-|:-| |ACGL|24.50%| |QFIN|17.75%| |CROX|15.00%| |WISE (LSE)|12.25%| |SGOV|10.25%| |DR (TSE)|8.25%| |JD|6.00%| |MELI|3.00%| |THX (TSE)|3.00%| Recent purchases (Q2, Q3): CROX. JD, MELI, THX
Most brokers offer LSE as well.
Is there any point posting a DD on a LSE listed stock? Can you Americans trade it? I’m talking about $EEE btw
Ok - so we are getting closer to what you are asking about. Yes - the US has a tax treaty with Egypt. So you can open an account which is domiciled in the US with US brokers that will support what's known as a NRA - or non-resident alien. Ibkr would be an option. There are a few other brokers in the US that support NRA accounts - but not many. I have no comment on accounts domiciled in other countries since I trade through a US-domiciled account. I assume that perhaps English isn't your primary language. Can you please clarify what you mean by "buy stocks in with crypto"? You cannot buy stocks using crypto. When you open a brokerage account - it is in some base currency usually whatever country the account is domiciled in. This is because listed stocks trade in a specific currency. For example - if you invest in a US stock on a US exchange - that will be done in USD. If you invest in a UK stock on the LSE - that will be in GBP. And on the German bourses - would be in EUR. etc. etc. The crypto would have to be converted into the local currency first. Which I assume is your concern. There are some crypto based tokenized products. These are offered through unregulated brokerage services. So - they do not have the protections of local regulators. Also - bear in mind that these are unregulated and unprotected assets. And investing in them is not actually investing in the stock - but an unregulated derivative product. These products likely also have less liquidity and may have a higher premium/discount to the underlying. Hope that makes sense.
They were overbought. People are realising that mines and infrastructure take more than a single administration to build, and require huge dilution to fund. Though NASDAQ and ASX REE stocks are by far the worst hit. My LSE and EU buys are 10% down since the rally, and Chinese just 3-5%.
>Suppose this account has $10,000 in it. What happens when I buy $10,000 worth of stocks and ETFs in this account on margin? **Am I being charged interest** Do you mean that you have 10k in cash and you want to buy 10k worth of stocks and ETFs? If you are not borrowing - then no - you are not charged interest. >Why can't I invest in IEAC using Fidelity? It's probably because IEAC is a UCITS listed on the LSE.
Not sure if it was on the back of your DD but I entered at 0.6 after someone posted it here. I tought I had bought around 1000 pounds but forgot it was Pennies, ibk is not very clear for LSE. After a few weeks it jumped to 4 pi, it tought I had made bank actually had just couple bucks 🤣🤣
Uh, LSE is already open
Like we said. In Europe we can’t have nice things… PBDC and PFFA and CLOZ are not in Europe. JEPQ is LSE and is available (fortunately)
Its been trading on LSE since May and doing pretty well so far. I got in at $0.02 about 2 months ago and its done pretty well so far...its still cheap for what it is.....if you research the company you see why I say it has great potential 😊
ALRDF - Defence Holdings OTC Markets Ticker. Those that aren't able to purchase from the LSE directly, can now purchase from the US Market. See [https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/ALRT/defence-holdings-us-otc-listing-oracle-ai-world-and-atm-facility-established/17272644](https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/ALRT/defence-holdings-us-otc-listing-oracle-ai-world-and-atm-facility-established/17272644)
Yeah, it’s a real shame. Terrible Whitehall policy decisions (from multiple governments), 0.5% stamp tax to buy individual stocks pushes folks to other markets, subscription fees to avoid 15 minute delays, new UK companies listing or relisting on NYSE (arm/wise etc)… it’s not a surprise IPOs list someplace else. The LSE is mainly about financials and dividend stocks. Real old world sentiment - growth stocks haven’t got any traction
Repeating some news from yesterday, for those who ask "Think the government might want to invest in my critical metals SPAC?" : Reuters updated the article about CRML , with the following quote from the White House: **"Hundreds of companies are approaching us trying to get the administration to invest in their critical minerals projects,"** a senior Trump administration official told Reuters in response to a request for comment. "There is absolutely ***nothing close*** ***with this company at this time.***" Perhaps a CRML deal will happen, perhaps not. Then yesterday after market close, the following ( non SPAC ) news: Trilogy Metals Announces Strategic Investment by US Federal Government "VANCOUVER, BC, Oct. 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - Trilogy Metals Inc. (NYSE American: TMQ) (TSX: TMQ) ("Trilogy Metals", "Trilogy" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that the Company, South32 Limited (ASX, LSE, JSE: S32; ADR: SOUHY) ("South32") and Ambler Metals LLC ("Ambler Metals") have entered into a binding letter of intent **with the U.S. Department of War ("DOW"),** led by the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions and Sustainment ("OUSD (A&S)") and the Office of Strategic Capital ("OSC"), for an investment to advance exploration and development of the Company's Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects ("UKMP"). The UKMP are held by Ambler Metals – the Company's 50/50 joint venture with South32." "The DOW intends to pay approximately $17.8 million to South32 in exchange for 8,215,570 common shares of Trilogy Metals that South32 currently holds and a 10-year call option to acquire an additional 6,161,678 shares of Trilogy Metals from South32 at a price of $0.01 per share" TMQ stock closed at $2.09 yesterday, currently around $6.75 premarket today.
From earlier today, Reuters has updated the article about CRML today, with the following quote from the White House: "[Hundreds of companies are approaching us trying to get the administration to invest](https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-administration-eyes-stake-company-developing-greenland-rare-earths-mine-2025-10-03/#:~:text=%22Hundreds%20of%20companies%20are%20approaching%20us%20trying%20to%20get%20the%20administration) in their critical minerals projects," a senior Trump administration official told Reuters in response to a request for comment. "There is absolutely nothing close ***with this company at this time***." ***Also today***: [Trilogy Metals Announces Strategic Investment by US Federal Government](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/trilogy-metals-announces-strategic-investment-by-us-federal-government-302576247.html) "VANCOUVER, BC, Oct. 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - Trilogy Metals Inc. (NYSE American: TMQ) (TSX: TMQ) ("Trilogy Metals", "Trilogy" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that the Company, South32 Limited (ASX, LSE, JSE: S32; ADR: SOUHY) ("South32") and Ambler Metals LLC ("Ambler Metals") have entered into a binding letter of intent **with the U.S. Department of War ("DOW")**, led by the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions and Sustainment ("OUSD (A&S)") and the Office of Strategic Capital ("OSC"), for an investment to advance exploration and development of the Company's Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects ("UKMP"). The UKMP are held by Ambler Metals – the Company's 50/50 joint venture with South32."
Defence Holdings PLC (LSE: ALRT), the UK's first listed software-led defence company, today announces Defence Technologies' second classified AI product build. Following the launch of Project Ixian in September, the second product is focused on edge-based analysis and identification support, one of the highest priority requirements for UK and allied forces. In simple terms, "the edge" refers to deployed environments, where data is captured and decisions are made in real time, often in austere or disconnected conditions.
The real sleeping giant here is GMET on the LSE. Will be launching on NYSE soon also, if it does anywhere close to MP etc. it has a lot of head room.
Low volume + not many selling + LSE trading limits
Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR) has risen nicely today to new highs, so I reckon RYCEY will do the same - heading for $16.5
Do those actually happen ? I remember the nickel incident in the LSE...
$AMZN, $AAPL, $AMEX, $TSLA, $SBRY (LSE) I hold 2/5 of those stocks.
Proper random company to be buying as a first stock on LSE. Any particular reason?
I actually bought 100 shares of it like weeks ago back at 1.6 imagine my shock and confusion why wasnt charged 160 pounds but way lower After that I went to googled and realized its in pence! Geez that was confusing for a non Brit and first time purchase on LSE
LSE and CSU becoming intriguing to me, need to dig in more
Similar industry but I'm really like TUN (on the LSE) at the moment. Currently at a support level so good time to enter.
One key aspect that I think will be necessary to achieve that valuation (assuming they are not acquired) is for EnSilica to move from London’s junior AIM segment to the main market or, as I prefer, obtain a dual U.S. listing. Right now, as I have pointed out to EnSilica’s management recently, there is too much friction for retail investors such as the stock effectively trading like an OTC stock in the U.S. which means people may have to call their broker to invest. I also think AIM listed stocks are subject to the opaque off-book dealings of the market maker(s), whereas on London’s main market or the NYSE more trades should be automatic, and on the LSE’s or NYSE’s systems where visibility is far better in my opinion.
Thank you. One key aspect that I think will be necessary to achieve that valuation (assuming they are not acquired) is for EnSilica to move from London’s junior AIM segment to the main market or, as I prefer, obtain a dual U.S. listing. Right now, as I have pointed out to EnSilica’s management recently, there is too much friction for retail investors such as the stock effectively trading like an OTC stock in the U.S. which means people may have to call their broker to invest. I also think AIM listed stocks are subject to the opaque off-book dealings of the market maker(s), whereas on London’s main market or the NYSE more trades should be automatic, and on the LSE’s or NYSE’s systems where visibility is far better in my opinion.
Indeed, I have once invested heavily on WISE but being on LSE didn't really help the valuation at all. If WISE was on Nasdaq, it will be at least x10 from the current market cap.
The tickers are GULDF (if buying it OTC) and ALRT (if you're buying it on the LSE (London Stock Exchange).
Given I know BMNR well and how it functions, it has made me realize how people commenting so far think they know what they are talking about but they are actually clueless. There is a load of content that comes linked via Tom Lees socials and Bankless if anyone wants some reasoned education. To me BMNR has the second best reward to risk ratio for an obvious opportunity I have ever seen. The best being LSE: RPS at 30p in COVID before it was later acquired at 222p. Here's a warning for when people moan in 10 years time saying if only I had bought x in 2025.
LSE: ALRT, It's worth a look. I'm like some of these others, too.
LSE:ALRT. Possible NATO contracts coming up. Has been invited to join the Coalition of the Willing. Ex Ratheon Technologies Chairman. Think it could get to 10p plus. Market cap 31 Million, share price now at 1.6p
It’s very difficult to buy shares. It’s not on LSE and from my limited understanding that means it takes a very long time for buy orders to execute. Also it’s not widely available either on other trading platforms
GULDF is the OTC ticker. Same company as ALRT (LSE).
IMM (LSE) - Purchased some for a long term hold.
Can anyone explain why if this is a defence stock on trading 212 it says its a esport company and on LSE its says consumer directory?
Umm... There are probably lots of US investors investing in chip manufacturer ASML. But with your increased buying power due to the rise in the Euro, it would seem that leverage is actually in your favor when it comes to buying individual US stock, oui? # Top 5 Stock Markets with the Most Foreign Investor Participation Foreign investor participation varies widely across global stock markets, influenced by factors like openness to capital flows, regulatory transparency, and market maturity. However, based on recent data and high foreign investment flows, significant levels of foreign-held equity, and the overall international character of their listings, here are the Top 5 stock markets with the most foreign participation. **Top 5 Stock Markets with the Most Foreign Investors:** **Rank \*\*\* Country \*\*\* Market Highlights** 1. **United States** \- Home to the NYSE and NASDAQ; attracts trillions in foreign capital due to its depth, liquidity, and global dominance. As of early 2024, foreign investors collectively held approximately $18.45 trillion in U.S. corporate stocks. This includes about 18% of all outstanding U.S. equities. 2. **United Kingdom** \- The London Stock Exchange is a hub for international listings and foreign institutional investors. The London Stock Exchange (LSE) is one of the world's most international exchanges due to its large number of foreign-listed companies. The LSE lists companies from over 60 countries, attracting a deep pool of international capital. 3. **Hong Kong** \- Acts as a gateway to China; heavily favored by foreign investors for exposure to Asian markets. The Hong Kong market acts as a vital bridge between mainland China and the international market, making it a critical hub for foreign investors seeking exposure to Chinese companies. 4. **Europe (Euronext)** \- Euronext is a pan-European stock exchange that operates in several countries, including the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, attracting broad foreign investment across the continent. Euronext's unified platform provides a gateway for investors worldwide to access multiple European markets. The exchange is home to a wide range of companies, from major European multinationals like Airbus and LVMH to smaller, locally based firms. 5. **Japan (Japan Exchange Group)** \- The Japan Exchange Group (JPX), which includes the Tokyo Stock Exchange, is a major Asian financial market with a high level of foreign investment. Japan is one of the world's largest investing countries and has consistently been one of the top investors in the U.S. The JPX lists major multinational corporations, including Sony and Toyota, which are popular with foreign investors.
Asia markets make you buy in lots (how do you like minimum investment increments of $25k?), LSE charges you a fee for every transaction. Non US companies experience wild volatility for no reason etc. These seem quite frustrating to retail investors.
Market access is the key issue. We have lots of easy access to NASDAQ and NYSE, but it's harder and more costly to buy something traded on the LSE or any of the Euro exchanges. I do have ETFs that give me general exposure to Europe, but it's not like I can easy buy and sell individual stocks
ALRT - Listed on LSE. Has performed very well towards the end of this week.
ALRT - Listed on LSE. Very good movement today. Hopefully can get to a pound in the next 5 years.
Based on your comments, I suspect you are referring to high premiums. In finance, when someone mentions “rates,” they are usually referring to interest rates. In the U.S., the SEC does not impose strict retail protections, and tolerates retail missteps because it's believed that the net effect is increased liquidity and more efficient markets overall. Therefore, options on leveraged ETFs (like TQQQ and SPXL) exist and trade actively. In Europe, retail protection is much stricter. MiFID II, combined with PRIIPs/KID rules, makes it very difficult to launch such products. Exchanges prioritize broad participation and market liquidity and generally avoid professional-only options markets on products that are primarily aimed at retail investors. As a result, European exchanges such as Eurex, Euronext, and LSE do not list options on leveraged ETFs or similar leveraged products. European regulators prioritize “protecting retail from themselves." I advise against trading options on leveraged ETFs, particularly if you are not yet fully familiar with the terminology and mechanics involved.
A lot of US stocks are trading on LSE, IBIS and FWB2 in Europe. they are flat indeed
But like they also have a lot of talented people who are poor and ambitious. And they also have institutions to support them and nurture their talent like Oxbridge,LSE, Max Plank institutes, TU Delft etc. Why won't Ursula Von der Leyan or Kier Starmer do something, when they have everything needed to become as powerful as the United States and China.
Great writeup! You're probably being down voted because $FTC is already a ticker for an ETF on NASDAQ and people don't have enough of an attention span to see you specifically said LSE. Not really a valid reason for down voting, just shake it off. Reddit being Reddit. Does this trade on an ADR for US investors?
Indian markets are still closed. the country is actively seeking expansion of India's companies to be traded on LSE (last i checked anyway), but there is no plan to expose non-Indian stocks (US, London, Asia, etc) to India... even if there were, India only recently pulled up per-capita incomes (2022/2023) and the country is still (relatively speaking) to poor. so anyone with a meaningful amount of money there converts money, puts it into a brokerage abroad, and directs their broker to conduct trades. there's no law against that (here in the U.S. anyway), but for someone trying to self-direct their account it's a bit of a challenge. as an IT guy i can think of ways around it (VPN + VPS in a cloud provider for example), but opening accounts may require a proxy (a lawyer could easily handle it, but will want a fee for facilitating/managing those accounts.) not sure if India has laws against holding international accounts for international investments. seems silly that they would though.