LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
200.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
Apparently Fidelity and CSW will let you trade directly in international markets and exchanges, like LSE
i want to be able to trade natural gas on the LSE. This is bullshit Robinhood. Shitty app
Thank you, I see at 12:04 when my stop loss was sold, the price on LSE dropped to 15 for few minutes which would have triggered it… that sucks. Im not sure anything i can do here. Is there anything i can do?
Fwiw - while OP was probably snipped if the order was sitting on the exchange order book - but it is unlikely to be related to payment for order flow. OP is not US based and has mentioned that they believe it was LSE based order. Trades on the LSE is regulated by the FCA. And FCA rules effectively ban pfof in the UK. In the US - stop orders are not supposed to be eligible for execution in extended hours so the unless it's a illiquid instrument with few liquidity providers, the common theory that executions can be manipulated outside the nbbo is also highly unlikely.
The LSE order book supports stop loss orders according to their documentation. By exchange facility - I'm referring to whether the order book at the exchange can accepts stop orders. So if someone places a stop order - that order goes to the exchange. And it sits on the exchange's order book until it's executed per the exchange rules. Some brokers (not sure if it's still a common practice) will synthetically support the stop orders. That means that the broker holds the stop order on the broker's internal order book. And the broker may introduce safeguards in case the spreads are wide or if there is volatility - although - not sure if that's a feature implemented today. There are pros/cons with synthetic stop orders. I don't use stop orders for because of the nuances - so tend to have mental stop losses when I trade. Or sometimes - I bake that into an algo if that's important to me. Can you please share the outcome of your conversation with your broker? I would be curious what happened.
ANIC Used AI to summarise my case as I cba to keep bigging it up… Agronomics Limited (LSE: ANIC) is a London-listed venture capital firm offering a "picks and shovels" play on cellular agriculture… basically think lab-grown meat, dairy, and sustainable materials.
Asian regard at work, trading on the LSE while watching the US premarket
bought a whole bunch of these back when they were single digits and I've been having a good time. if you want to get deep in the technical a guy called AGEOS on the LSE board for this stock has made a lot of long and detailed posts about it.
#TLDR --- Ticker: IQE.L (LSE) / IQEPY (US OTC) Direction: Up Prognosis: Buy Shares Catalyst: Buyout bids on the table and a strategic sell-off of their slow business units. Why the market is regarded: IQE has double the revenue of its main competitor (LandMark), yet trades at a $300M market cap (1.0x P/S) while the competitor trades at a $4.1B market cap (60x P/S). OP's Conviction Level: 370,000 shares deep into the "boring plumbing" of AI data centers.
Fjord Defence Group (DFENS.OL) is the dullest stock I've ever called out. Phenomenal potential to supply Scandinavian naval build-up and crack the much bigger UK market, but it's price just does not move. Slowly entering the red on Hydrogen Utopia (LSE:HUI). That's what you get for buying in the middle of a news battery. I was also 40% down on my first PLSR before it ran. No new contracts can be signed during the Iran showdown, so will be steadily accumulating.
I'm excited to put my cash into VUAG/VWRP ETFs when they're down, so this will all have bounced up by the time the LSE opens
>Stocks and investing have been part of American culture for years with a rich history This isn't really true for your typical "Main Street" retail investor. 401k plans are only about 50 years old. Large corporations adopted it quickly but took some time for smaller companies. Investing in stocks was inaccessible for most retail until mid to late 1990's due to emergence of online/electronic brokerages. Before that, you'd have to phone your broker and fees were quite high, because there weren't any other options. Also, back then you had to buy a full block of (100) shares. There were no odd lots (something less than 100 shares), never mind fractionals. If a broker has a client investing in chucnks of $25k, $50k or $100k or $250k, do you think they will take any calls from people investing $200/500/1000/5000 at a time? Maybe, but you are last in line, assuming that amount can even buy a full lot. You also have to consider inflation. Some share prices might seem low back then, but dollars were not as common. The house I grew up in cost $50k USD in 1980. Today the same house is $900k. You could buy a can of soda at the vending machine for $0.20 or $0.25 in 1980; today maybe $1.50-2.50 depending on location. When all the online brokerages started, they'd all undercut the commissions per trade. It used to be $25, then $20, then $13.... $10, $5... to point they all became free. That's right, I used to pay $8-15 every time I bought or sold a stock. It's less than 10 years since those fees went to zero everywhere. As I live in the US, I am less familar LSE DAX CAC - but they are substantially smaller than the US markets, so probably less push to market services. But here in the US, it's just constant flow of IPO's since mid-late 70's. There is so much money flow and potential to market services.
you can find them listed in various European exchanges like LSE, different tickers for different currency counter, but interchangeable
IQE UK LSE (up 150% in last week). Uk semiconductor play, possible takeover imminent. Lots of IP, historically not the best managed company but imo penny stock with actual potential given current market.
New longs (5-10yrs) I'm entering this month: **Yellow Cake** (LSE: YCA): A triuranium octoxide treasury. Triuranium octoxide (yellowcake) is both the most stable storage form for nuclear fuel potential and the immediate precursor to fuel refinement. **Fjord Defence Group** (OSLO: DFENS): A Norwegian niche defence scaler with significant interests in ballistics protection and naval armour. Portfolio aligns with Norwegian-Denmark-UK defence review aims amid substantial spending increases, especially on the GIUK gap. Probably not as good as Kongsberg for likelihood of return but growth potential is exceptional. **Terrestrial Energy** (NASDAQ: ISMR): The only publicly-traded producer of molten salt reactors for long-term nuclear energy storage. Molten salt is also used for solar power storage, but private operators (including DuBois) seem to have the market locked down. I'm not too confident in this one in itself, but take a 'rising tide lifts all boats' approach to the MS / MSR sector overall.
Surface Transforms (LSE: SCE) just lost a General Motors contract providing 84% of its revenue. Total stock collapse. But contracts had been diversifying as recently as a Dec 2025 investor publication, so I think there's scope for a hard rebound by next quarter. Extremely low price offsets the float size.
The LSE S&P is down nearly 1%, four hours before the US has even opened.
They got apathetic. The £ was hit after Brexit and LSE has lost something like 20% of its listings, much through acquisition by larger international companies. Europeans in general seem committed to self-destruction.
My LSE ETF opened and I'm getting COOKED
ALRT on the LSE- Think Palantir, but a UK version. Its chairman is the former field marshal for the British army and sits in the house of lords, so can basically get a meeting with anyone in the defence sector. They're already working with the Ministry of Defence on a project and are close to finalising their first contract. They also have another project with a UK police force which if successful will be rolled out to all police forces across the UK
Highest-conviction pick is PLSR. Insane quantities of helium, including the ultra-rare helium-3 (vital for cryogenics, which is foundational to most next-gen space, computing, transport, and engineering technology). Second-highest is ASX:EOS. It's doubled my investment twice. Long-term play for counter-drone warfare, directed energy weapons, autonomous firing platforms, and astronautical laser technology. Third-highest is LSE:HUI. Green hydrogen has the highest CAGR of any industry on Earth right now, and HUI has taken a novel approach to obtaining it (partnering with Middle Eastern petrochemical and construction giants to break down their refuse). Still early days, but all necessary licenses are secured an one lunch with a Saudi Aramco exec's cousin will send it stratospheric.
Remember war is bullish. The second world war launched a major bull cycle for LSE. The lowest point was when nazi's were bombing London and people had to trade stocks in the LSE basement. https://preview.redd.it/1piyqnnoygmg1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d981ce989ab2ebd8f439a28c0111ac4518de13b
\-7.3% down this month, 22% up YTD, and 78% up since last June (when I first took stocks seriously). I used to take small positions in runners (e.g. IXHL, BTAI), but they were inconsistent and needed too much attention. Now I build big positions in stocks with legs (e.g. PLSR, SLS, ABOS, ASX:EOS, LSE:HUI). Had three losses. One (PLBY) was just daft; initial lateness made me hungry for bigger gains, so +20% turned into -5% (and dropping). A second (INTS) required risky dip-buying to return to profit. I took the profit percentage to buy more when it's diluted, but am determined to *never* leave that stock.
RR is the ticker on LSE so I usually use it, I believe on the US exchange it's RYCEY
Years ago I bought a stock off the LSE called Genedrive PLC and now I am seeing a corporate action on this stock with a new "ticker" or something showing on my positions page. I am generally knowledgeable in stocks and such, but I don't understand this. Can anyone offer clarity on what this means?
RE the exchange stuff, can Americans not easily access the LSE? It's available there
Buddy, I studied at LSE and was a US Senator’s policy director. Biden caused the inflation, and it spread across the world. There were zero inflationary pressures when he took office despite the same “supply chain disruptions” existing under Trump. Then, US inflation spiked about 6 months before spreading to the EU. It’s the same thing that happened in 2008 with the US housing crisis, where contagion from the US takes some time to spread to the EU, then other markets. Unless you have a different, specific, and data-backed theory for why a US housing crisis turned into a global sovereign debt crisis, then just trust me. But let’s start with Biden promising everyone $2,000 in relief money during the campaign. He gets into office wanting to follow-through, after the US has already had 2 rounds of stimulus checks. The first rounds of checks had the desired effect, but the second round had a ~50% diminished effect according to collected bank data. But Biden plowed forward with the third round of stimulus checks despite Obama’s Secretary of Treasury Larry Summers (among others) writing a very notable op-ed in the Washington Post saying, in essence, “another round of stimulus checks will create the most inflationary pressure since the 1970s.” Then, Biden does it anyway. And while there had been few if any inflationary indicators up to that point, guess what happens 2 weeks after the first set of third-round stimulus checks hit bank accounts. That’s right—inflation jumps more than 2% in *one month!* Then look at the open border policy. It’s pretty well established that every 1 million people added to the US population will increase housing prices (and rents) by about 1%. So once they just open the border and allow roughly 17 million people into the country in four years, that corresponds pretty well to an 18% increase in rents nationwide. But why didn’t companies build more housing or apartments? Because Biden picked the dumbest time to steal Trump’s first term idea for an infrastructure bill. Trump proposed it when interest rates were low and commodity prices were stable; Biden picked when commodity prices were high and interest rates were high—brilliant! So the government was competing for building materials when there was more demand for affordable housing than ever, driving up scarcity and building costs. Fucking brilliant! Lastly, you may be wondering “what about the so-called Inflation Reduction Act”? Well, keep in mind that was actually a green energy investment bill that was scored to have a -0.25% impact on inflation over 5 years according to the CBO.
> clown country 😂 no one will ever take the US seriously every again Yup. Trump is a Russian asset and this is the objective. They need to break trust in the US Dollar and treasury market. I was looking into mining companies like Rio Tinto and ran across this great example of the problem: > Rio Tinto is structured as a dual-listed company, with listings on both the London Stock Exchange (symbol: RIO), under the name "Rio Tinto Plc",[3] and the Australian Securities Exchange (symbol: RIO) in Sydney, under the name "Rio Tinto Limited".[108] The dual-listed company structure grants shareholders of the two companies the same proportional economic interests and ownership rights in the consolidated Rio Tinto, in such a way as to be equivalent to all shareholders of the two companies actually being shareholders in a single, unified entity. This structure was implemented to avoid adverse tax consequences and regulatory burdens. **To eliminate currency exchange issues, the company's accounts are kept, and dividends paid, in United States dollars.[18]** Emphasis mine. But that is exactly the problem. Listed on the LSE and ASE, what accounts do they use? American accounts in US Dollars lol Half the world operates like that which gives the US incredible influence.
Even a fund manager won't be able to tell you now what is guaranteed for the next 20 years - as they will rebalance every now and then - unless we talk bonds (small risk) or savings (no risk). I was looking into the same direction for my nephew and then I thought that over a 20 year timespan stock-based assets should outperform conservative allocations... so why would I put all in Savings? [https://www.reddit.com/r/Investments/comments/1qc7l9b/stocks\_gave\_the\_best\_performance\_since\_1928\_in/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Investments/comments/1qc7l9b/stocks_gave_the_best_performance_since_1928_in/) I'd say define a % of the pie you are comfortable with dedicating to equity (stocks etc) and the rest set into savings or conservative bonds. Forget about rebalancing allocations etc; decide now, and stick to it with monthly contributions. For the **savings**, you can look at websites like [https://moneyfactscompare.co.uk/savings-accounts/](https://moneyfactscompare.co.uk/savings-accounts/) to choose the best interest rates and condition overall. For the **equity** part, you can buy a fund or ETF that replicates a standard index (the most common one is SP500), of course with base currency GBP and ensure it's ISA eligible, example: * SPDR® S&P® 500 UCITS ETF Acc (SPYL.L) which has the lowest yearly cost ever (0.03%) * Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP (SPXP.L) with a cost of 0.05% (alternatively something for NASDAQ, like iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX) or Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ) but in your case I wouldn't go for that) Then you can go for a **conservative bond** like: * iShares GBP Corp Bond (or iShares EUR Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF as a stable EUR version) * iShares Short Term Corp Bond ETF (LSE: STER)
Like LSE or what specifically? How?
SML on the LSE is one of my picks for this year if anyone’s interested in Cornish tungsten plays, should be a good year for them.
Speaking as a Brit, if you're living in the UK, use an ISA. All stock investment platforms offer one. It lets you put up to £20k every year (each April, when our tax-year begins) and ANY profits you make are 10000% tax free. No tax on profits, no tax on dividends*, no tax on interest. All of it is tax free, even when you withdraw. Still get access to invest in US, Canadian and EU listings too, instead of just being restricted to UK / LSE only listings. It's arguably one of the very few fantastic things about investing here, and very generous for what it is. *: we still get taxed in US owned stocks, but we're made to sign a W8-BEN form before we're allowed to buy US shares, and any taxes from dividends are automatically taken upon dividend payment, but iirc that applies to all non-US residents.
It won't amount to much more than a temporary bounce. Russia isn't the heavyweight Americans think it is (GDP is about the same as Italy's), and the prospective deal to sell oil and gas in USD is an attempt to shore up the petrodollar after Trump's Greenland antagonism accelerated its decline. In other words, it covers about a tenth of the business that would've been perfectly safe if 5D Intergalactic Backgammon hadn't opened his mouth and the global trend towards de-dollarisation continues. If it's a concern, start investing in stocks denominated in other currencies on global exchanges (e.g. LSE, Euronext, Shenzhen). You'll expose yourself to *some* currency loss (and gain), but you won't have to earn an extra 10-20% just for your purchasing power to break even because your main currency is declining. Obviously some currencies are better than others. You don't want to spend a declining currency (the USD) on stocks denominated in an absolute shitsack (the lira).
Samsung does not list their shares in the US or sponsor an ADR. There are F shares and unsponsored receipt on the OTC that you can use. But caveat emptor - if you don't understand how OTC works - it may be best to avoid using these investment vehicles. If you don't have access to the KRX - Samsung does sponsor a GDR that trades on the LSE if your broker provides access to the LSE. If you don't know what the KRX and LSE are - it may be better to avoid that method as well. SK Hynik is rumored to be exploring an ADR in the US - but I don't know the timeline. Your last option is probably the simplest. Both Samsung and SK Hynix are the major constituents of the KOSPI index. The most liquid ETF listed in the US that tracks that index is the Blackrock iShares index - EWY.
It's listed on the LSE, but it's denominated in USD. https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/VWRA.L/
WISE (LSE) already has the system. They should use it... WISE even lets banks use their system.
I went with XMWX (Global ex-US tracker) and HMEF (emerging markets) for LSE listed ETFs
Low liquidity? Have you ever traded some etf's on LSE? the s&p500 leveraged etf's on that has a few hundred trades per hour. Can take minutes for a sell to go through
I dived out of a part of a position on LSE:TUN and wanted to bury the money somewhere. Didn't feel KELLY had enough to convince me. What a twat. Haha
RNS update on Kodal Minerals LSE:KOD Revenue reports from shipments and projections for the year, looking good. https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/KOD/bougouni-lithium-project-operations-update/17447217
Down 6.4% today on the LSE. You’re really pushing this very hard for no real reason…
What’s worse is bro bought it from the LSE, so it’s going to sink like a brick when that opens and catches up.
wait was this in the LSE? I've just woken up and im not up to date? correct me but... they stopped allowing people to buy more shiny rocks?
Good Morning, Kodal Minerals KOD : LSE is worth a look. hit a recent high of P0.64 last week with news of the first 20,000 ish tonnes shipment of lithium compounds/ore delivering. another on the way arriving in a few weeks, retraced to 0.45 level, and big buy orders starting to come in as revenue is being realised. also starting to ride the Lithium futures rise in china and increased demand + price per tonne increase. search #lithium on X, or google to see the price climb.
Ahh I see. Need to look it up on LSE. I guess it makes sense US based sites only buys us listed data an can’t analyze any other listings.
Tullow Oil is the company. It’s listed on the LSE, not sure if you can access if you’re in the US. But surely on some brokers
Expecting a massive silver sell off at $100, but looks like it’s gonna happen while ameritards r sleeping & LSE isn’t open, what do?
Buy ALRT on the LSE instead
You got your PEG Ratios and valuation issues right here, Dr Squeaker The Motley Fool Prediction: in 2026 the red-hot Rolls-Royce share price could turn £20,000 into… Jan 8th The Rolls-Royce (LSE:RR) share price has more than doubled over the past year. That would have turned £20,000 into almost £44,000. That’s the investing dream. However, this is very unlikely to happen again in 2026. It’s simply a valuation issue. It’s a great company with a lot to be positive about, but a lot of that optimism is already priced in. Let’s explore why. **Valuation is key** Rolls-Royce’s operational recovery is impressive, but the valuation leaves limited scope for further upside. Based on the figures provided, the shares trade on a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 44.1 times for 2025 and 38.2 times for 2026, using normalised earnings per share of 28.2p and 32.6p, respectively. Crucially, growth does not appear sufficient to justify this rating. Normalised earnings are expected to grow by roughly 16% between 2025 and 2026, which results in a price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio of around 2.8. A ratio at this level typically indicates that growth expectations are already fully reflected in the share price. Revenue growth remains modest, with a compound annual growth rate of just 2.7% over this year and the next, even as operating margins expand above 20%. **Analysts concur** Honestly, institutional analysts aren’t always the best stock pickers. One of our peer sites actually indicates that Wall Street analysts have underperformed the S&P 500 by around 30% over the past three years. However, the consensus of their opinions often tells a useful story. Here, the 16 analysts covering the stock have a share price target that’s 4% below the current share price. In other words, they’re suggesting the stock is overvalued. **It’s not all bad** While I actually don’t believe Rolls-Royce is overvalued, I simply don’t see much room for the share price to appreciate unless we get some more good news about the business. That’s certainly possible, but it’s nothing to bank on. In fact, it makes the investment speculative, unless you know something about the business that isn’t publicly available.
Can anyone please provide the link as to how companies like Amazon, Goldman Sachs, Google, Catepillar, Eli Lilly underperform the equities listed in Europe long term? Europe still has serious issues, demographic decline, low growth, high debt and the worst part... basically no tech or growth companies. Top 20 companies in the world by market cap, none are European. No1 is wanting to IPO on the LSE. Greenland is front page news, but ultimately a nothing burger when comparing it to how crazy history has been. So I don't know, I'm not selling American exceptionalism for Novo Nordisk and Nestlé.
For your information, when Germany & France released the news retaliation just now, on the LSE S&P599 went down .05% lol
EQQQ, (the European version of QQQ that trades on the LSE), is down 1.9% currently
Yea lol we operate with small volume, like LSE has about 1/50 of what NYSE works with, in all S&P trackers combined. Even worse on other markets. But imho NYSE gonna go in same direction. liberation day again.
Was looking LSE vs NYSE volumes today. 1/50 and that's being generous
problem is that's where all the fun companies IPO. TSX has Aritzia and Shopify, the LSE has Astrazeneca and Uniliver, the DAX has Siemens and Airbus. NASDAQ and the NYSE got ARM, RDDT, Micron, and soon SpaceX, OpenAI, and Discord.
They're in the London stock exchange, LSE.
"FanDuel, the premier online gaming company in North America, part of Flutter Entertainment (NYSE: FLUT, LSE: FLTR), and CME Group (NASDAQ: CME), the world's leading derivatives marketplace, unveiled that they will launch prediction markets through the new FanDuel Predicts app that will expand access to financial markets for millions of customers in the United States." \-> are they delayed? Cant find anything about that on the website. Source: [https://flutter.com/news-media/press-releases/fanduel-and-cme-group-unveil-new-prediction-markets-platform-to-launch-in-december/](https://flutter.com/news-media/press-releases/fanduel-and-cme-group-unveil-new-prediction-markets-platform-to-launch-in-december/)
Yes, it is. The second one you listed above (LSEETF) is VUAA.L. (Yahoo just uses the .L extension for the LSE (London exchange). I can't buy it, though, since I'm in the US.
After all, on Yahoo, right above the fund name, it says "LSE" :D Otherwise, IMHO, SPYL is a better choice. Significantly lower price per share (€14.7), TER 0.03%.
I’ve edited the body to include LSE:ARMG
You're talking about a LSE ticker without specifying it's LSE. There's a same ticker on Nasdaq that's a 2x LETF and that's why it's causing confusion. The other guy is right - the correct ticker is SHLD in US.
Based on my personal experience, if I'd JUST automatically bought Vanguard's all-world FTSE ETF every month and nothing else, I'd probably be round about where I am now. My actual approach has been a mix of sector etfs/market etfs and volatile stocks on LSE:AIM and staring at it every day hoping for a company announcement... Big waste of time I suppose, but more interesting I guess.
Same issue here with a few German stocks, thought it was just me going crazy. Google Finance has been glitchy as hell lately with international exchanges - had similar problems with LSE symbols last month that randomly fixed themselves after like a week Maybe try Yahoo Finance as a backup for now? Their XETRA data seems more stable
#TLDR --- Ticker: RPI (LSE) Direction: Up Prognosis: Buy Shares (Long) Catalyst: Viral AI "vibe-coding" & Smart Mirrors Immunity: Orange Man Tariffs (UK Listed)
#TLDR --- Ticker: RPI (LSE) Direction: Up Prognosis: Long Shares (Target >10x) Catalyst: AI Vibe-Coding & Viral Smart Mirrors Political Status: Immune to Orange Man
That’s why JP Morgan and Global X has those IE, EU or LSE listings. You get nice 8-12% yields and mostly completely tax free, but sometimes there is a 1-2% Spread because of low volume. You could also look into those swiss stocks that have 0 witholding tax in general, this should also improve your situation and it’s often a 4-5% yield you get. Holcim, EFG, U-Blox, Avolta or Clariant.
Look for an LSE, EBS or IBIS traded UTICS fund tracking the same S&P500 basket, to avoid the 15% withholding tax and the other inheritance tax. I invest in VUAA and EQAC
They are not equal. After currency exchange the ADRs are roughly half the price of the shares on the LSE. The readon is that ADRs are "coupons" for shares and are roughly 2 ADRs per 1 share.
> RR Would like to add that this is most likely Richtech Robotics Inc that's listed in the NASDAQ, not Rolls Royce that's listed in the LSE. There was some confusion a month or two ago and the Redditor didn't realise people were on about Rolls Royce.
HUIPF (LSE:HUI) is settling back down after a storm of positive news. *Definitely* recommend buying. It's got a highly locked-up float (70%+ insiders) and the business plan will be obscenely lucrative if one petrochemical titan can be brought on board. I also like the CEO. She replied to an email at 11pm on a Friday and used her own shares as collateral to prevent dilution. Total dedication.
I own some shares of and made decent money on EuroNext. They continue snatching smaller european exchanges and cementing their position and are the only real alternative to LSE... or are they? I've been reading about some EU bureaucrat plans for a unified single market exchange venue but I am not see any details on what those plans actually entail? Would they try to literally replace what EuroNext has been doing and subvert their efforts or would they be buildiung on top of EuroNext or what?
Not trading today; expanding positions in PLSR and LSE:HUI instead. I know I keep ragging on about them, but they're going places.
I guess historically the LSE and European stocks just follow the s&p 500 anyway, so I'm just wondering how important brands are, compared to how more advanced the U.S market is in regards to ease that small companies can get listed, for example? The whole ease of the investment system is better in the U.S for stocks?? Or am I wrong on that?
Just measured my own tip performance. PLSR, HUI (LSE), SLS, and EOS (ASX) are up 35%, 48%, 81%, and 93% since I began mentioning them - thought SLS wasn't original. NUAI is up 35% since I recommended buying it after the short report. The clangers are AZTR, down 5%, and AVL with a big fat 0%. Some other biotech on my watchlist dipped 14%. Not sure if I mentioned it out loud or not. Oh, and FEIM is a godsend. It's my largest holding at an average of $26 and I am *cheesing* right now.
Why has bro got LSE as his logo
Fermi America's (FRMI) CEO's name is Toby Neugebauer. Neugebauer is a German surname that means "new settler." Can't make this shit up. And the company did a simultaneous dual listing on the NYSE (NYC) and LSE (London), and Neugebauer talks about those two cities constantly. Such a "Toby" move.
|Ticker|Industry|Allocation| |:-|:-|:-| |ACGL|Specialty Insurance|25.25%| |DR (TSE)|Medical Services|15.00%| |MOH|Health Insurance|15.00%| |WISE (LSE)|Money Transfer|13.75%| |QFIN|Consumer Lending|10.00%| |SGOV|Short-Term Treasuries|9.00%| |CROX|World Class High Quality Footwaer|6.00%| |JD|Ecommerce Retail|3.00%| |THX|Gold Miner|3.00%|
That 'rebranding' history is just how Reverse Takeovers (RTO) work—they bought an empty shell (Cassel/Guild) to get on the LSE without all the extra hassle. The old history belongs to the shell, not the current defence tech. You're right about 'no sales' though—this is why we're waiting on the December commercial realisationmentioned in a previous statement. We are betting that they flip from 'R&D Phase' to 'Commercial Phase' this month. If the contracts land, the 'no product' argument dies instantly and the stock should get a re-rate
IES (LSE), a British vanadium battery company. Sitting at about -90%. Still believe the story of the tech - won't sell it, don't care if it goes up in smoke at this point.
B&M (BME: LSE), thought i'd caught it on the ride back up but then the announcement of dodgy accounting has left me down about 28%. I have faith in the CEO to turn it around but I suspect it will be a while until it happens.
I had a bag holding story that turned out well. Bought into LSE listed centamin in 2020 just before they crashed more than 50% after they announced that their only gold mine suffered some operational accidents and delays which halved their production. Held the bag all the way. It was bought over by Ashanti which issued its stock in place of the centamin. it also went up 4X since the salenwas finalised which means instead of -50%, I'm now up 80%. Only time bag holding actually worked out for me though. Still continuing that bag holding.
Which exchange are you looking at primarily? Seems like the LSE is its home. But it's everywhere.
Why does it always dump at LSE's close. What's wrong with the UK?
Airtel Africa (on LSE)- +166% since Jan.
My SX4S position is fuxed as LSE is closed, looks like I’m holding on to my leverage share 4x short position forever
Appreciate the work on highlighting this company thank you, I was not aware of it. You are clearly invested as you provided questions during the recent earnings Q&A. My personal view unfortunately is being only on the LSE is a drawback unfortunately I feel like floating on the LSE just does not have anywhere near the visbility and interest for investment. Do you have any thoughts on if they would want to list on the US in some form?
You were correct invest into ALK:LSE You won’t regret it
Stocks with real 50x potential: Sellas Life Sciences - GPS is the closest thing on the market to a generalised survivability solution for common cancers (est. 5 years). Hydrogen Utopia International - advanced plans to supply Middle Eastern petrochemical and construction sectors with green hydrogen and methane (est. 10 years). Pulsar Helium (LSE:PLSR) - discovered a potentially world-changing reserve of helium-3 (est. 10 years). Avalon Advanced Materials (TSE:AVL) - sitting one of the world's largest undeveloped REE reserves, with high concentrations of iridium and samarium (est. 10-15 years). Electro Optic Systems (ASX:EOS) - veterans of directed energy and astrophysics perfectly set up to dominate space warfare and domain control (est. 10-15 years).