LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares
Mentions (24Hr)
-100.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Mentions
Indeed, I have once invested heavily on WISE but being on LSE didn't really help the valuation at all. If WISE was on Nasdaq, it will be at least x10 from the current market cap.
The tickers are GULDF (if buying it OTC) and ALRT (if you're buying it on the LSE (London Stock Exchange).
Given I know BMNR well and how it functions, it has made me realize how people commenting so far think they know what they are talking about but they are actually clueless. There is a load of content that comes linked via Tom Lees socials and Bankless if anyone wants some reasoned education. To me BMNR has the second best reward to risk ratio for an obvious opportunity I have ever seen. The best being LSE: RPS at 30p in COVID before it was later acquired at 222p. Here's a warning for when people moan in 10 years time saying if only I had bought x in 2025.
LSE: ALRT, It's worth a look. I'm like some of these others, too.
LSE:ALRT. Possible NATO contracts coming up. Has been invited to join the Coalition of the Willing. Ex Ratheon Technologies Chairman. Think it could get to 10p plus. Market cap 31 Million, share price now at 1.6p
It’s very difficult to buy shares. It’s not on LSE and from my limited understanding that means it takes a very long time for buy orders to execute. Also it’s not widely available either on other trading platforms
GULDF is the OTC ticker. Same company as ALRT (LSE).
IMM (LSE) - Purchased some for a long term hold.
Can anyone explain why if this is a defence stock on trading 212 it says its a esport company and on LSE its says consumer directory?
Umm... There are probably lots of US investors investing in chip manufacturer ASML. But with your increased buying power due to the rise in the Euro, it would seem that leverage is actually in your favor when it comes to buying individual US stock, oui? # Top 5 Stock Markets with the Most Foreign Investor Participation Foreign investor participation varies widely across global stock markets, influenced by factors like openness to capital flows, regulatory transparency, and market maturity. However, based on recent data and high foreign investment flows, significant levels of foreign-held equity, and the overall international character of their listings, here are the Top 5 stock markets with the most foreign participation. **Top 5 Stock Markets with the Most Foreign Investors:** **Rank \*\*\* Country \*\*\* Market Highlights** 1. **United States** \- Home to the NYSE and NASDAQ; attracts trillions in foreign capital due to its depth, liquidity, and global dominance. As of early 2024, foreign investors collectively held approximately $18.45 trillion in U.S. corporate stocks. This includes about 18% of all outstanding U.S. equities. 2. **United Kingdom** \- The London Stock Exchange is a hub for international listings and foreign institutional investors. The London Stock Exchange (LSE) is one of the world's most international exchanges due to its large number of foreign-listed companies. The LSE lists companies from over 60 countries, attracting a deep pool of international capital. 3. **Hong Kong** \- Acts as a gateway to China; heavily favored by foreign investors for exposure to Asian markets. The Hong Kong market acts as a vital bridge between mainland China and the international market, making it a critical hub for foreign investors seeking exposure to Chinese companies. 4. **Europe (Euronext)** \- Euronext is a pan-European stock exchange that operates in several countries, including the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, attracting broad foreign investment across the continent. Euronext's unified platform provides a gateway for investors worldwide to access multiple European markets. The exchange is home to a wide range of companies, from major European multinationals like Airbus and LVMH to smaller, locally based firms. 5. **Japan (Japan Exchange Group)** \- The Japan Exchange Group (JPX), which includes the Tokyo Stock Exchange, is a major Asian financial market with a high level of foreign investment. Japan is one of the world's largest investing countries and has consistently been one of the top investors in the U.S. The JPX lists major multinational corporations, including Sony and Toyota, which are popular with foreign investors.
Asia markets make you buy in lots (how do you like minimum investment increments of $25k?), LSE charges you a fee for every transaction. Non US companies experience wild volatility for no reason etc. These seem quite frustrating to retail investors.
Market access is the key issue. We have lots of easy access to NASDAQ and NYSE, but it's harder and more costly to buy something traded on the LSE or any of the Euro exchanges. I do have ETFs that give me general exposure to Europe, but it's not like I can easy buy and sell individual stocks
ALRT - Listed on LSE. Has performed very well towards the end of this week.
ALRT - Listed on LSE. Very good movement today. Hopefully can get to a pound in the next 5 years.
Based on your comments, I suspect you are referring to high premiums. In finance, when someone mentions “rates,” they are usually referring to interest rates. In the U.S., the SEC does not impose strict retail protections, and tolerates retail missteps because it's believed that the net effect is increased liquidity and more efficient markets overall. Therefore, options on leveraged ETFs (like TQQQ and SPXL) exist and trade actively. In Europe, retail protection is much stricter. MiFID II, combined with PRIIPs/KID rules, makes it very difficult to launch such products. Exchanges prioritize broad participation and market liquidity and generally avoid professional-only options markets on products that are primarily aimed at retail investors. As a result, European exchanges such as Eurex, Euronext, and LSE do not list options on leveraged ETFs or similar leveraged products. European regulators prioritize “protecting retail from themselves." I advise against trading options on leveraged ETFs, particularly if you are not yet fully familiar with the terminology and mechanics involved.
A lot of US stocks are trading on LSE, IBIS and FWB2 in Europe. they are flat indeed
But like they also have a lot of talented people who are poor and ambitious. And they also have institutions to support them and nurture their talent like Oxbridge,LSE, Max Plank institutes, TU Delft etc. Why won't Ursula Von der Leyan or Kier Starmer do something, when they have everything needed to become as powerful as the United States and China.
Great writeup! You're probably being down voted because $FTC is already a ticker for an ETF on NASDAQ and people don't have enough of an attention span to see you specifically said LSE. Not really a valid reason for down voting, just shake it off. Reddit being Reddit. Does this trade on an ADR for US investors?
Indian markets are still closed. the country is actively seeking expansion of India's companies to be traded on LSE (last i checked anyway), but there is no plan to expose non-Indian stocks (US, London, Asia, etc) to India... even if there were, India only recently pulled up per-capita incomes (2022/2023) and the country is still (relatively speaking) to poor. so anyone with a meaningful amount of money there converts money, puts it into a brokerage abroad, and directs their broker to conduct trades. there's no law against that (here in the U.S. anyway), but for someone trying to self-direct their account it's a bit of a challenge. as an IT guy i can think of ways around it (VPN + VPS in a cloud provider for example), but opening accounts may require a proxy (a lawyer could easily handle it, but will want a fee for facilitating/managing those accounts.) not sure if India has laws against holding international accounts for international investments. seems silly that they would though.
Live like a king, player. Off to the LSE on your IBKR account to buy Kazatomprom…..
In the US, Novo has an ADR, NVO, listed on NYSE. Most of the big name brokerages in the US don't allow investment in foreign exchanges. Same as you, those in the US would open an account on IB to access foreign markets. Every ADR is different, every country has different rules, so not sure what are the implications of you in the UK, owning a stock based in DK. You might have to pay fees for the ADR maintenance, maybe your taxes on dividend is different/higher - I don't know. One thing I do see is on LSE, the Novo ADR has very low volume and thus lower liquidity. If you care about that sort of thing, it's of course preferable to own the DK shares where liquidity is higher. If you are a long term investor, it's not going to matter. If you are more so day trading and fighting for pennies on the dollar, you want the tighter bid/ask spread and higher liquidity for sure.
Wait... I've only just noticed how much BATS has skyrocketed. I don't really bother with UK stocks currently, I only have Rolls Royce, which I get free every month on my 4% debit card cashback. I could switch it to another stock, but I don't really see any UK stocks that stand out more than RR tbh. Edit: I have IAG too (on LSE) that I got for free.
It is time zone. If you are on LSE you only get the first few hours of US cash equity trading in the last couple hours of your trading session. I would honestly completely avoid such a product. If you really want this exposure then buy the US version that trades alongside the underlying.
Savannah Resources ( SAV:LSE) They own rights to the only lithium site currently known in Europe ( in Portugal). Given how territorial countries around the world are becoming in regards to rare-earth minerals - this may end up as the only source for future EV battery manufacturing
I mainly trade in LSE AIM mining stocks and you see some weird stuff on there but never anything quite like this!!
You’re missing the point. Read the title of the article. Understand that the FTSE is at ATHs. Comprehend. Most of my PF is in US equities — I’m not saying our market is remotely close to the US’s (it’s not, for reasons that are myriad and complex). I have one LSE based holding. But to say that, right now, there’s evidence to prove that the UK isn’t a good place to invest seems bizarre and untimely.
My multiple mining holdings on LSE can 90% confirm this!
Does it? Do you have any research on this topic? How much better would they be as compared to allowing pension provider to allocate as they see fit? >“We’re not advocating for a mandate," David Schwimmer, CEO of the London Stock Exchange Group This is of course from the guy that will benefit most from such a mandate from the goverment. However, what is more important is the total returns. Over the last ten years, the US market has returned a lot more than the UK market. Would it be even better that we let the market decide where to efficiently allocate capital, rather than the gov mandating allocation percentages? If the Gov thinks that investing in the LSE is so great, let them do it. Take our pension contribution that we pay through taxes and let them do it. |Index|Total Return (10y)|Approx. Annualised Return| |:-|:-|:-| |**S&P 500**|≈ +190 %|≈ 11.5 % per year| |**EURO STOXX 50**|≈ +116 %|≈ 8 % per year| |**FTSE 100**|≈ +80–104 %|≈ 6–7.4 % per yearIndex Total Return (10y) |
We are talking about our pension here, and it should be invested as best as possible. Have a mandate of any level other than zero means we, the investor are subsidizing companies that for no other reason are listed on the LSE. Why don’t the gov invest some of the pension pot that it controls into the FTSE? See how that goes
Definitely I would add MA into that, better growth. Also, NVDIA for. Have an eye out on WISE which is listed in LSE, and is likely to move to NYSE. Reddit also maybe. And definitely BERK-B as you know your timescale to invest which is a long time also.
LSE - GREGGS PLC to the moon on 29/06. Let me know if you pick it up just dropped a bag and a half into it last week
Who cares? The entire LSE market cap is less than NVDA. There’s a reason we call them Europoors
Sad, but true. LSE keeps losing companies and barely any new listings. Toronto has more volume in its stock exchange than London.
Makes complete sense. There are tons of ETF's listed on LSE following US assets: these are just all cut at 11:30AM EST, ridiculous!
As a Brit, nobody even trades LSE during work hours 💀
Strong no from me. Outokumpu district is definitely out of play now (there is a golf course on top of the deposit now! Who's going to rip up a golf course? That will just create way too much news if they try to permit a mine). And Hammaslahti can't make money in the current price environment even if the plant was free, e.g. repurposing the Pyhäsalmi facility. If it doesn't work on paper, no way is it working in real life. Grades are just too low. Geology is against that one. New mining code in Finland also introduces significant development risk. Its never yet been used to successfully permit a mine. Unfortunately these assets are worth nothing and unfortunately that company price ain't going up. Loads of better options on LSE so I doubt there will be much volume flowing to MET1. Better Fenno explorers to invest in would be Rupert Resources, Viscaria Gruv AB, Mandalay Gold, Firefox...
Hi all, Very new to options - I bought some long expiry call options on Glencore (LSE:GLEN), American options but 1,000 share contracts. Current GLEN sp = 312.50 Dec 2026 (525DTE) 240C x 4 Dec 2026 (525DTE) 320C x 8 Total exposure 12,000 shares (around £35,200 if assigned) Both options are now showing a return, the 320C are now up 50%+ and the 240C are up nearly 40%. Long term I'm bullish on the stock, the reason I bought options instead of shares was for the leverage it would give me. My question is what I should do with the options now. As I understand it - I have three courses of action. 1. Sell the options and bank the profit 2. Hold the options and see if they rise, sell at 180DTE (or something) before the theta decay starts to affect them 3. Hold them and sell OTM poor man's covered calls against them monthly, generating some income from the position. What are people's thoughts and where should I focus my reading to understand what best to do. Thanks
The base currency of your ETF is USD. You just bought its EUR ticker so you see the fund price in EUR. EUR has strengthened vs USD recently. Look at the fund's USD tickers (either VUSD or VUAA on LSE).
EEE mining stock in the LSE seems like a solid bet after they found that giant titanium field.
You are not comparing performance in terms of the same currency. Compare the Vanguard fund's USD ticker (VUAA on LSE) with SPY.
The biggest benefit of US exchanges is how much better they are compared to European ones. In the UK on LSE you have to pay 0.5% stamp duty tax every time you buy shares, with a few exceptions. However many companies in the US are global companies, with exposure beyond the US.
I just buy US stocks on the LSE or Xetra.
Canada and Europe are f... But TACO. Canada will stay in the same situation. European Commission will surrender cause of italian prime minister and Germany chancelor. Both are pro trump. So they will accept all conditions to get 10% But at the end, the market is ok for 10%, it's already priced. Look UK, the 51th state, they get the same situation (10%) and the market didn't drop, even LSE. Europe can suffer a little, but for US, no panic In the same TACO in negociation of Big beautiful one ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/s/vkZGpd5LSE
**39 y/o UK-based investor – Feedback on my "Magnificent 7" ETF Portfolio (IBKR ISA)** Hey everyone! I'm 39, based in the UK, and fairly new to investing. After weeks of research (and help from ChatGPT, YouTube, forums), I’ve built what I’m calling the “Magnificent 7” ETF portfolio. I invest through an **IBKR Stocks & Shares ISA**, contributing between **£300–£1000/month**. My goal is long-term wealth growth with: * ISA-compatible ETFs (LSE or USD-eligible via IBKR) * A mix of accumulating (for compounding) and distributing (for future income) * Sector/region diversification with low fees and overlap * Some dividend-friendly holdings for balance **Portfolio Breakdown:** * **VWRP** – Vanguard FTSE All-World (40%, Acc) → Core global exposure, long-term compounding * **SCHD** – Schwab US Dividend Equity (15%, Dist) → Reliable income and stability * **SGLN** – iShares Physical Gold ETC (5%, ETC) → Inflation / geopolitical hedge * **CHIP** – Amundi MSCI Semiconductors (10%, Acc) → AI + chip growth potential * **RBOT.L** – iShares Automation & Robotics (10%, Acc) → Exposure to robotics + automation sector * **UTIL.L** – iShares MSCI World Utilities (10%, Acc) → Defensive play, infrastructure & energy stability * **CNDX** – Invesco NASDAQ-100 (10%, Acc) → Top tech megacaps, long-term growth **Style:** Passive, long-term holder (10–15+ yrs), moderate risk. **Structure:** Core + Satellite, all held in my UK ISA. Would love feedback: * Am I overexposed to tech even with UTIL? * Is anything redundant or missing? * Any swaps you’d recommend? Thanks so much in advance!
Got it! I understand completely now. Now I know what seems really shady here - how's the $SYME Fintech Unicorn going? [https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/LSE-SYME/](https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/LSE-SYME/) https://preview.redd.it/ijz9jjphrq7f1.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=a5f485f1c8cb35267824ca7a309e69b832a91328
LSE is restricted on fidelity. You have to call in to purchase it. Also Its already up 80% in the premarket session.
LSE may have me done for the day before the market opens. Love it.
This LSE bounce back is making my day. Question now is to lock in profits or ride through tomorrow... Thoughts anyone?
Praying at least one of LSE or EONR pumps.
A lot of European companies have bonds on Schwab. Are you sure of what you’re saying? Might you be confusing that with trading in foreign exchanges? For example I can buy a Santander bank bond on Schwab but I can’t buy IWDA. For any ETFs trading LSE I need to go to IBKR.
Was up at 1 AM EST on Sunday night/Monday morning in August 2024 when Nikkei crashed ~10% so I bought a bit over 1,000 shares of NVDA at $94 (was over $120 previously) on RH overnight market. It was somewhat dumb because I dropped 6 figures on a falling knife at 1 AM and European markets/LSE wasn’t open yet so they (and then the US) could’ve continued the fire sale, but ultimately worth it. I put NVDA fair value (at the time) at $120-130 and sold when it hit $135 about a week later
heard of Rolls Royce out of the UK? the aerospace defense, power cell, SMR comoany. listed under RR on the LSE (london stock exchange)
I agree that we might be on the cusp of a multi-decade resurgence in nuclear power. The question is how to play it. Uranium suppliers are definitely one option. But mining is a notoriously difficult business. Cyclical, labor intensive, political, corrupt, etc. I am a little intrigued by Kazatomprom which is the Kazakhstan based supplier of ~40% of the world's uranium which was recently spun off from the Kazakhstan sovereign wealth fund to the LSE. The LSE listing suggests some kind of legitimacy and the stock is very cheap with a PE of 6-7. But, it's literally a dirty business. I like CCJ as well but that seems to be the highly valued meme stock, the Tesla of nuclear if you will. Westinghouse is the servicing business for more than half of the world's nuclear reactors, which is 51% owned by Brookfield and 49% owned by CCJ. You don't get direct exposure to that though it's kind of buried in those businesses.
GLD has way better liquidity but you'll get hit with US withholding tax as a UK investor. PHAU (Physical Gold ETC) trades on LSE and has decent volume. way more liquid than SGLN in my experience. or just use spread betting if you want proper liquidity and don't mind the leverage.
I've been trading in stocks since 2009 and in crypto since 2015. I did take the CFA exams once, cleared level 1 and 2 and failed 3 (so I can't write CFA with myself). Other than that I only have my degrees (Masters in Econ from LSE (UK) As for a below comment, I think I have beaten the market many times. In my own opinion, about 80% of the time and have done fairly well for myself (esp in crypto)
Yes. There are two Government of Canada programs covering 25% and 10%, and the provincial government of Nova Scotia is covering 25%. The company still needs to raise the 40% to unlock those funds, and there are several options they have from the federal BDC (Business Development Bank of Canada), CSA (Canadian Space Agency), CIF (Canadian Infrastructure Fund), various space venture capital funds like Seraphim Space Trust $SSIT.LSE or some combination of those. It won't be an equity raise. The company still needs general operational expenses funded but the three VC funds that did the seed round seem to be taking care of that.
It may be a difference in the exdiv and how dividends are handled. Afaik - National Grid ordinaries trades on the LSE as NG. And on the NYSE as an ADR - NGG. I am guessing that NNGF is a GDR of some sort. The stock is trading ex-div for 5/29. But this is one of those confusing exdivs where it's different for NGG but not NG.L. That's why you would see a drop in price of NGG today. Maybe that's also true for NNGF.
LSE open, lets see what the Europoors do.
Yes, 100% legit. Seeing Machines (LSE: SEE) is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, audited, and has contracts with GM, BMW, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, and Mitsubishi. They also supply aviation (Boeing flight simulators) and mining/fleet safety systems, with over 1 million commercial vehicle installations globally. They’re the market leader in driver monitoring systems (DMS) with the largest real-world driving data set in the industry – crucial for AI refinement. Not some vaporware startup – they’ve been shipping product for years.
BT (LSE) will be mooning on Friday 💸💸💸
That’s a bold claim. How is the LSE factually worse?
LSE is closed today. Bank Holiday
Still no volume LSE just opened They are dumping
Can you check the chart on some other web site? I just looked at LSE tickers VUAA and CSPX and didn't see those huge red candles.
Some shitty ore miner called Ferrexpo. Listed at LSE. And Mhp (ticker MPQ), they do agricultural. Its basically whats left of accessible ukrainian stocks. Kernel is gonna delist from the warsaw. stock exchange below current price.
Anyone know of any publicly traded net companies listed in LSE or NYSE?
If you are not American, you can use the IUSE etf on London. [iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF \(Acc\)](https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/products/251903/ishares-sp-500-eur-hedged-ucits-etf). Similar funds also exist if your home currency is GBP, CAD, NZD, AUD, probably others. US citizens could probably buy that it in an IRA if you find a broker that accesses the LSE. Outside of an IRA, you will learn what a Section 1291 Fund is and then cry while you pay >100% of profits to the IRS and your new accountants.
My serious friends who work in the CoL and understand this stuff noped out the minute Musk hinted at defaulting on bonds for "technical errors" he made up. These are people who work for LSE, BoE and a major int'l bank.
International securities in my view. If you must hold US equities, buy LSE/Euro listed ETFs that aren’t hedged. To cut things even finer, just focus of service industry ETFs since those are outside the scope of tariffs. I don’t see the point of holding gold if you’re outside the US. If anything, the rest of the world would see deflation in the short term due to oversupply of goods outside the US.
Weird day where the LSE is closed but the rest of the world is open
I’ve had trouble finding exactly this in the U.S. (I want to be able to trade options in the U.S. on euro debt funds but the Europeans don’t like that idea.) Are you looking for it to be entirely/mostly European sovereigns or is it fine if it’s just European soverign- heavy? Also, do you want it to be of any specific country? There are a few like IGOV or FLIA which have international sovereign debt and are Europe- heavy, but I haven’t found a pure play and they have sizable exposure to other regions. There are some non- US products like GLTY (LSE) which have purely specific European sovereign issues but they trade on foreign exchanges.
It’s difficult because for a long time many of the best companies were listing in the NYSE and NASDAQ. One of the problems of centralization is that when the center gives out there’s nothing to really compensate for it. That being said, each of the smaller exchanges have some decent listings. AstraZeneca is on the LSE, Siemens is on the DAX, Shopify is on the TSX etc.
You can still buy on other exchanges. All Chinese stocks that trade on US stock exchanges also trade on Hong Kong, Deutsche Borse, Gettex, LSE and probably a lot more exchanges that I am unaware of. However, reputation of US stock market will probably take a big hit and a lot of capital will go elsewhere if they start delisting stocks due to politics.
LSE opening caused that candle, somebody is pumping to set up the next bull trap
Yes, it’s listed on LSE https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/RPI/raspberry-pi-holdings-plc/company-page
Trading of TSLQ temporarily halted by LSE...
Wtf, trading of SQQQ has been halted by LSE, gay market manipulators not letting us short the nasdaq 
Wtf happened in the LSE? Did *everything* go into auction?
Hi how does one trade LSE market from the US? Whcih brokers would allow it?
VUSA is on LSE and it was after hours
All in on UK equities on the LSE instead fellas?
Why is the LSE and other European stock exchanges being hit harder than even in US exchanges, where this dipshittery is taking place first hand? Is the US government propping buying shares in US index funds to keep the numbers up?
This happens all of the time on LSE
Did this for my mum as well, got her into a Pimco bond fund and cashed out all equities. Her financial adviser said he had 2 masters degrees too.... I called him and said i'm her son and I have two masters as well... from the LSE, you're fired. Worked well for her.
The Vanguard S&P 500 LSE tracker is down 4.7% currently.
If the US loses its hegemony, do you think the S&P would still be that good of an investment or get replaced by another index and become as relevant as LSE?
Guys, I’m reading people assuming just because someone is not that rich nor successful, you cannot criticize. I was a big fan of bill, used to follow all his moves and I was a shareholder of psh, listed on LSE, (which has actually underperformed the spy since inception). His latest moves and attitude testify that he is a totally different man, compared to 2/3 years ago. He tries to promote himself as the next Warren, when Warren never once testified so much in favour of a politician. He says that he is a value investor, then proceeds to buy NIKE, Brook, and Uber, which simply doesn’t make any sense. The reality is that he passes the majority of his time on X promoting his firm, also he a shareholder of the social network, and earning on the fees investors pay. The next big move he wants to play is buying a big share of HHH, to create a Berkshire like investing holding company. The issue? He is doing so with 900mln (90$ a share vs 118$ value) and plans on investing that money along side with his hedge fund (quasi non existent) and his holding company and getting paid 1.5% fix fee, something Warren never even thought about.
> RR. (Rolls Royce on LSE) > > > > BA. (BAE Systems on LSE) Out of curiosity, why buy on the London Stock Exchange versus the ADRs?
I used to be a huge fan of Bill Ackman and closely followed all his moves. At one point, I even invested in Pershing Square Holdings, his closed-end fund on the LSE. But I ended up pulling my money out after seeing his latest investments—Nike, Uber, Brookfield Holdings. For someone who claims to be a disciple of Warren Buffett and a true value investor, I just can’t understand his reasoning here. Another thing that has turned me off is how politically obsessed he’s become. I get that everyone is entitled to share their opinions, but I can’t justify investing in someone who spends more time on X than a 13 years old than managing his fund. I also strongly disagree with his takes on Trump and Elon Musk, and that makes it even harder for me to support him. And then there’s the whole Howard Hughes deal. Ackman wants to charge 1.2% in management fees without performance fees, which is something you’d never see in Berkshire Hathaway. On top of that, he’s only putting $900 million into the deal—just to buy more of Howard Hughes stock. That doesn’t seem like a solid business move at all. I just don’t see the value in what he’s trying to do, and to me, it makes no sense.
It's LSE:ANIC or OTC:AGNMF. Everything else this mod bot wrote is correct however. It's trading at half the NAV and the trend has been going up for over a month, partly due to news that it's portfolio company, Meatly, has started selling cultivated meat for the first time in the UK.
It's LSE:ANIC or AGNMF if you don't mind buying over the counter. You can buy ANIC directly from IBKR in the US.
Here is a screen for stocks with European defence exposure. Because I don't have LSE or the Oslo or Euro bourse notifications enabled yet please forgive that some of these are pink sheet ticker symbols KBGGY THLLY SAABF FINMY BCKIY RYCEY EUTLF 1DD.SG SHLD NATO CCJ EUAD DRSHF ONDS RDW SPAI SPIR UMAC RCAT ACHR CYBQF DPRO
Its up on the LSE. Looks like RH lied
Interesting stuff, I'm 28 and in the UK. I've been dumping cash into an S&P500 ETF but the LSE variant. It was doing quite well until a week ago, I'm still in the green but a big chunk of return has vanished. Didn't know whether to jump shit or just keep on dollar cost averaging.