SAR

Majestic-Falcon-9580

**Stay away from ExpertOption.** This platform can financially destroy people, just like it did to me. They trap people very easily and make them believe they can recover their money. My ExpertOption ID is **422697591**. Not even a single withdrawal was processed in my case. Depositing money is never a problem, but when it comes to withdrawal, they create issues. Because of this situation, I am now under huge financial pressure. I may even face serious legal problems because I cannot pay back my loan. I don’t want other people to make the same mistake I made. I have already filed a complaint with **VFSC**, but I have not received any response yet. I also reported the matter to the police, but they said the platform is not regulated and asked why I invested there. I tried very hard to recover my losses, but my withdrawal was never processed and my trades kept ending in losses. My total loss is around **SAR 200,000**, which is a huge amount for me. I strongly believe governments should ban this platform worldwide so that innocent people are not trapped like this. Please stay away from this platform and do proper research before investing your money. This company keeps making excuses and stories. Sometimes they say your account is not verified. But if my account was not verified, then how was I able to make more than **10,000 withdrawals totaling around SAR 200,000** before without verification? Another thing they claim is **“withdrawal priority for Platinum customers.”** If that is true, then why was my withdrawal not processed even though I am a **Platinum customer**? I have answers and proof for every excuse this company makes.

falken2023

Parabolic SAR.

Gom_KBull

When i was in the Navy, my Chief said his old job as SAR swimmer was training the dolphin assigned to him. He and his partner both loved that dolphin like a brother. Super chill and fun. All they did was practice some swims, play and feed. He said compared to the shitshow we were in (working on our ship), that old job was paradise. Sorry, just kindled some old navy memories

roguemedic62

Ryan Grim was not entirely truthful in his X post about the Iranian ship sunk in the Indian Ocean—he made several materially false or misleading claims that exaggerate or misrepresent key facts. Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) posted something very close to this (widely quoted and reposted across platforms like X, Instagram, Threads, and Facebook): "An unarmed Iranian ship was invited, along with the U.S., to be part of an Indian Naval exercise, and its sailors paraded on land before the president. The U.S. at the last minute pulled out of the exercise and instead attacked the Iranian ship with a torpedo. Breaking with all norms of civilization and warfare, we then refused to rescue the drowning survivors. The Sri Lanka Navy was left to pull the dead bodies from the water. I am hard pressed to think of any other nation throughout..." This refers to the sinking of the IRIS Dena (a Moudge-class frigate of the Iranian Navy) by a US submarine torpedo on March 4, 2026, in international waters ~40 miles off Sri Lanka's coast. Here's a breakdown of the accuracy: Unarmed? → False/misleading. The IRIS Dena was a commissioned warship (frigate) equipped with missiles (including surface-to-air and anti-ship), a 76mm gun, torpedoes, and other armaments. Photos and descriptions from its participation in India's MILAN 2026 naval exercise show it with loaded launchers. While it may not have been actively combat-loaded for the exercise transit home, calling it "unarmed" is inaccurate for a naval combatant. Multiple sources (e.g., military analysts, AP reports, RedState coverage) describe it as Iran's "prize ship" and a fully capable warship—not a civilian or disarmed vessel. Invited/participating in exercise? → Partially true. Yes, the Dena participated in India's MILAN 2026 multinational naval exercise (hosted in Visakhapatnam, with a fleet review/parade involving sailors from various nations, including Iran). The US was also invited/participated in MILAN events broadly, but reports do not confirm the US "pulled out at the last minute" specifically to target this ship—rather, the attack occurred days later during its return transit amid the active US-Iran conflict escalation. US refused to rescue survivors/breaking norms? → Misleading/false. The US submarine (standard procedure in submarine warfare) transmitted the distress position to international rescue authorities after the sinking. International law (Geneva Conventions, UNCLOS, naval protocols) does not require a submarine to surface and recover survivors if it risks its own safety or mission (submarines are vulnerable when surfaced). Sri Lanka's navy handled SAR (rescuing 32, recovering 87 bodies) as it fell in their designated search-and-rescue zone—no evidence supports a deliberate US refusal or war crime in abandoning survivors. Claims of a Geneva Convention breach here have been called out as disinformation in discussions (e.g., on X and Reddit). Overall, Grim's framing presents the incident as an outrageous peacetime betrayal of an innocent, disarmed guest vessel with barbaric abandonment—when it was actually the deliberate wartime targeting (first sub torpedo sinking of an enemy warship since WWII) of an armed Iranian naval asset during open hostilities. While the sinking itself is factual and controversial, his post contains significant inaccuracies that align with anti-US/anti-war narratives but don't hold up to reported details from defense sources, AP, and naval experts. (Note: Grim is an investigative journalist often critical of US foreign policy; this post drew pushback from military accounts calling it propaganda or exaggeration.)

VeganTurkishBaklava

0dte on qqq. I was upto $500 in my first trade, then another all in qqq puts next day made it to $3000. Mainly puts where the money to be made at. Try parabolic SAR intraday when 5 mins and 15 mins same direction, than get in

stockist420

OSINT Sentinel-1 SAR imagery is publicly available from ESA. the InSAR processing is my own work but anyone can download the same data from Copernicus

stockist420

thanks! for vessel tracking specifically MarineTraffic and VesselFinder have free tiers but limited historical. for the serious stuff I use Sentinel-1 SAR since it sees through clouds and works at night. AIS data from Spire or Kple is the gold standard if you want to pay. the trick is cross-referencing AIS gaps (ships going dark) with SAR imagery

stockist420

Great point you're absolutely right that Sentinel-1 IW mode at 5x20m isn't going to resolve individual vehicles. That's a real limitation worth calling out. What CCD does well though is pick up aggregate change across resolution cells so things like vehicle staging areas, earthworks, or equipment marshalling tend to show up as coherence drops across pixel clusters even at that resolution. I am looking at more of has anything meaningfully changed here vs what specific thing moved. I thought for this analysis that was enough to answer the question, but you're spot on that higher res commercial SAR (like Capella or ICEYE) would give a much much sharper picture. Appreciate the feedback and agree that its always good to have the limitations front and center.

Emilio___Molestevez

why was $NFLX ever included in FAANG in the first place? fucking Bollywood TV channel YOU NOT ON THE TEAM SAR

kaapooj

exchange usd for saudi riyal 400k usd = 1500k SAR

ShittyUsernane1222

My prediction. Taiwan announces peaceful reunification with China renames itself "Taiwan SAR". NVDA and TSMC get sold to china and move know-how and HQ to Shanghai. All of that because 🥭 fucked up a press conference and military planning.

Simple-Software3

Sure hope so. Curious on how they will handle this with the q3 2025 deadline coming up. Also...won't a not-timely 10q filed Monday the 17th have our answer as it will contain the following question for them to check? The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, Form 11-K, Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; **or the subject quarterly report or transition report on Form 10-Q or subject distribution report on Form 10-D, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date**

Impossible_Notice204

Some dude on youtube crying cuz schwab is closing all his accounts and giving him a client exit with a perma ban Bro claimed he was making too much money - the reality? He triggered the filing of a SAR in their KYC risk model, some human reviewed it and pushed it along for escalation, the escalation is a cleint exit and an investigation by law enforcement. He doesn't know it yet but his ass is cooked

lococommotion

Guys my port is red but I also pulled the new charizard SAR

InterimOccupancy

RSI, Parabolic SAR, MACD

zynbobguey

i am still 400% up on my 3 shares SAR

dvdmovie1

"SpaceX launch rival Rocket Lab (RKLB) on Tuesday announced it signed another multi-launch deal with Japan-based satellite manufacturer, Institute for Q-shu Pioneers of Space (iQPS). The deal makes Rocket Lab the primary launch provider to deploy iQPS' commercial Earth-imaging constellation. The contract includes three missions for Rocket Lab's Electron rocket, which will launch no earlier than 2026 from the company's Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand. Each is expected to deploy a single synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite from Rocket Lab's Motorized Lightband separation system. Rocket Lab says the missions will demonstrate its vertical integration across launch and space systems, which "improves reliability and streamlines the launch process for customers." iQPS previously booked four Electron missions, bringing its total number of upcoming Rocket Lab launches to seven. The company successfully deployed four satellites with Rocket Lab already this year, iQPS CEO Dr. Shunsuke Onishi said." https://www.investors.com/news/rocket-lab-rklb-stock-launch-contract-ast-spacemobile-verizon-asts-stock-spacex/ Not long, sold it recently - just found the above via Google news.

Imprezeda

What happened to SAR

chainerection

Muh Inferno X booster boxes finna arrive from Mangaland soon. Please give me a Charizard SAR like Lisa gave me tendies. anthony_adams_rubbing_hands

Sean_VasDeferens

Governments fund research that benefits war. You thought that NASA was about science? No, it's about ICBMs, spy satellites, etc. It just pretends to be about science, sometimes. Corporations drive the best research because they are motivated by capitalism. I worked for the group that invented both LIDAR and SAR which is now used for self driving cars, archeology, etc the original intent was to find a replacement for Agent O r ii n g e and to spy on Nicaraguan Rebels and cocaine operations hiding in the jungles.

Sean_VasDeferens

Governments fund research that benefits war. You thought that NASA was about science? No, it's about ICBMs, spy satellites, etc. It just pretends to be about science, sometimes. Corporations drive the best research because they are motivated by capitalism. I worked for the group that invented both LIDAR and SAR which is now used for self driving cars, archeology, etc the original intent was to find a replacement for Agent Orange and to spy on Nicaraguan Rebels and cocaine operations hiding in the jungles.

No-DD-Just-Vibes

Price has gapped up on a parabolic SAR reversal. This is a V-shaped recovery forming the perfect cup and handle breakout. We're seeing a triple exponential moving average cross with a bullish engulfing candle and golden pockets from the last leg down. A confirmed inverted head and shoulders just broke its neckline, with a massive MACD crossover to boot. The brief consolidation was merely a bullish flag for the next leg up. Shorts are officially trapped. Not a mere squeeze but a fundamental reset of the beta. We're in blue sky territory, and the only resistance is gravity. *Swallows more Tylenol*

1234golf1234

SAR.

Playful_Landscape884

Weekly MACD trending downwards. Parabolic SAR changed to downwards. NVDA actually in correction mode. Then everything pumped? Dafuq?

Fit-Doubt4251

Thank you SAR 🫡

Fit-Doubt4251

Thank you SAR

Just2Scroll

Yeah, OG entry was right after dilution (marked in red). Green was my actual entry, and I rode the SAR (shaft average ratio) up to my strike. Noticed a consolaheadtion pattern starting to form. If the technicals stay aligned, I see a limp period approaching. I’ve placed puts now with a $160 target, but it could come further… not fully sure yet.

Due-Sea4841

Public REITS are Dead Money dividend yield TRAPS....Their NAV and share prices keep dropping due to constant dilution to raise cash, coupled with high interest rates, one may break even but collect a measly 5%-7% divided. BDC's are better plays for dividends, with a modest stock growth. CSWC, TRIN, SAR, MAIN **Good luck........;+)**

Fit-Doubt4251

We have that SAR I can get you a big bun SAR

Fit-Doubt4251

Source SAR?

skimtvernon

Are you effing joking? Dimon directed JPMC quants to engineer a way to dupe rating agencies into rating baskets of subprime mortgages as AAA. He is one of the main drivers of the 2008 crisis. He also looked the other way, (the bank never filed a single SAR) as Madoff ran his Ponzi scheme while using JPMC as his primary bank.

crabman484

As a somewhat casual observer. I think the most likely path is that Taiwan accepts an SAR type deal with China - but more special/autonomy. 1. Taiwanese autonomy is dependent on US backing. The Taiwanese know this. They're looking at the situation in Ukraine and probably don't like what they're seeing with the on again off again support - and we're just sending them our leftover close to expiration date equipment. If push came to shove US forces are going to have to intervene and from what I've read we're expected to lose 2-4 aircraft carriers in the opening salvos of a hypothetical conflict. That's over 5000 lives each ship. We lost 2500 lives over 20 years in Afghanistan. How long is the American public going to stomach those kinds of losses? If you're the Taiwanese government how many young Taiwanese lives are you willing to bet on our ability to sacrifice the lives of our young people? 2. The region will likely place immense pressure on Taiwan to accept a deal with the Chinese. Again looking at what's going on in Ukraine one of the things we're likely going to do is block the Chinese from SWIFT. The public outcry would be immense if the government DIDN'T do this after the Chinese messes with our boats. What is Japan, ASEAN, Korea - the entire Asia-Pacific region going to do when they can't pay or get paid by their largest trading partner? Even the PM of Singapore has publicly stated that a sort of Chinese Commonwealth would be his ideal solution.

CaineInKungFu

Taiwan is far more likely to become a SAR without a shot fired.

sh1tler

#SAR I TOLD you not to REDEEEM

PapaCharlie9

> I get employee stock given at a 15% discount. This question is quite a bit beyond the scope of this sub, since the tax handling and holding period requirements for equity compensation are extremely complex. For example, what kind of "stock"? ESPP? RSU? SAR? Preferred? Something else? Those details *matter*, a lot. I'm not asking you to tell me those details because I'm not a tax professional. That is who you should be consulting, not Reddit.

Consistent_Fall_3403

ETH is going to hit its SAR at 3536 on the monthly then start plummeting. Yes this is astrology, but atleast I can gamble on it.

M-O-O-N_SPELLS

SAR

FalcorDD

You committed fraud. Besides 100% breaking both RHs TOS and your bank/credit unions customer/membership agreement, you actually are guilty of committing “larceny by trick” and “structuring”. At least one institution if not both has flagged your account, are in the middle of filing a SAR against you, and will notify FinCEN of what you did. The worst thing you did to yourself was submit proof of who you were in the midst of committing a crime. They now have you dead to rights. Stop doing dumb shit for 1%, cause you definitely just got added to a watch list at best. BTW, to answer your question, you are entitled to your funds once the investigation is complete.

SunsetNYC

I have seen contracts for SAR/hyperspectral, and to be honest, I do not contest the importance and need for SAR/hyperspectral imagery. But to claim that optical imagery is on the decline is outlandish and simply not true.  Yes, winning contracts is a sign they may become profitable. Because without those contracts it is certain they will remain unprofitable. 

csureja

Have you seen contracts for hyperspectral and SAR? Is winning contracts a sign that they will become profitable?

csureja

Yes, I get the idea of using those sats for planet data. But foes it stipulate in the contract that Japan will only use payload over Japan? Most of the times countries use satellite to collect data about other countries and are not limited to use the satellite only over japan. Hence in first place they sign a deal like this or planet still offer image as a service. For people planning not to use payload that much. My concern is only that planet will not make in the current remote sensing market with optical. They will need to start scaling for SAR, IR, hyperspectral. As in current state company doesn't seem to plan to do that just means that lot of people relaying on optical will move to better solutions in future. So in short without any innovation there future is looking bleak

csureja

Or maybe they are this high as investors are seeing the SAR demand such as companies in SAR UMBRA and ICEYE already passed over 300M combined likely in just span of last 4 to 5 yrs while in optical companies has seen there market share dropped

csureja

Blacksky would be a better bet but still there are bigger players in SAR which provide higher res than 35 cm with better revist rates. Such has ICEYE and UMBRA, however ICEYE is private but plans for ipo with estimated revenue over 200M and rumors are they are already profitable. I would just ride RKLB if you want to invest in a space companies. Even ASTS has some regulatory stuff needed and they are still expanding the fleet.

csureja

Would you consider a optical satellite which needs weather to be to near perfect for you to get the time critical data? Or would you invest in a SAR satellite that doesn't really care about the weather and is guaranteed to provide you with the defense data exactly on time? You will have your answer yourself

csureja

It's relatively very simple, lot of universities build a optical payload satellite. I work in remote sensing. We basically build IR payload with no R&D only with commercial components that can be brought by anyone. Planet is a dead, as in space industry they don't really have a patented tech such as a SAR payload or smth. Optical is heavily dependent on weather think about if you live in London. How many cloudy days does London have? Puts its into perspective that imaging with optical payload is much harder. On top companies like ICEYE and UMBRA don't care if it's cloudy or not and can image and in 99% cases they provide more remote sensing data over optical payload

csureja

Yeah planet labs have got no innovative tech, Maritime surveillance is nightmare with optical payloads. You need to have virtually no cloud coverage to deliver your product. On other hand companies like ICEYE and UMBRA can do it without any regards to cloud coverages as they operate outside the optical waves. Optical payloads are obsolete, remote sensing tech has moved to different bands like SAR, MWIR, hyperspectral. On top optical payloads operators are losing the contracts from insurance companies for Flood, vessel, defense monitoring to other provider who can deliver product without any regards to clouds Why would you bet on a tech that is clearly far behind there peers ?

csureja

I work in space industry let me give you my few cents. Planet labs has constellation in optical waves. In EO optical imaging demands has been falling. You might ask why? In EO, there more sophisticated ways to get the remote sensing data of what you need. Take for example military data, mostly you need object, vessel identification data. This all can be done by optical waves but there is a big factor of clouds. So if there is decent cloud coverage over the region you want data then you are kinds toast with optical. Better option -> SAR data it doesn't really care about clouds. Iceye has been doing for few years. Hence if you look at there history od contracts majority of it is military. You might ask maybe remote sensing data for agriculture. Then optical is mostly useless as you need different bands to give you information about vegetation and water data. In my opinion after attending several remote sensing conferences, the need for optical data is declining. On top pair it with huge operating costs of this companies makes it very hard to be profitable. So I would stay away from planet labs

Bacardiownd

Competition is both good and bad. I wish planet had a SAR line. Blackskys cameras can see through clouds, planets cannot. However planets business model and leadership imo is wayyyy better. I wasn’t invested into them but I didn’t appreciate blacksky reverse splitting then immediately issuing out a shit ton of shares. Kind of fucked the investors. At the same time, their costs have dramatically went up. I see them issuing out shares within the next month(may be wrong but they are only sitting on maybe 4-5 quarters worth of cash compared to their losses. Planet has about 4-5 YEARS of cash so I don’t see them issuing out shares.

WhileNotLurking

It’s not reported to the bank. The bank is reporting you to the treasury. There is nothing wrong with a SAR being filed. It’s just procedure. Now if you have trends, patterns, or activities that don’t have an explanation (gift, income, etc) it might raise some eyebrows and an investigation. But for legit use cases like you described it won’t be an issue.

jaezien

I disagree. There are a lot of similarities. In particular you highlighted convenience. Netflix as you stated has demonstrated that people are willing to pay for convenience, eliminating the need to pirate, visit rental stores etc. Why would that not be the case for cell service? Its not something people actively think about until given the option, as the same with netflix. There is no d2c market right now, just like there was no netflix type service in the early 2010s. You cant say no one wants it because there does not exist a market for it yet. Secondly, there exist grey/dead spots all around the world, where data is weak/non-existent. Look it up, >80% of the world is not covered by cell towers. While yes most people live in cities and are covered by terrestrial networks, you need to consider a lot of people travel between cities everyday. There will be deadspots in between these cities where people commute and it needs to be filled. Third, i somewhat agree with you that first responders needs for such services might be limited, but when it comes to the military its a very different thing. Every military in the world is moving towards battlefield connectivity. Look at ukraine, their drones cant operate without starlink, what do you think will happen when soldiers do not need to carry around heavy radios/starlink terminals for communications/operations? When tanks get the level of tactical communication and situational awareness that only internet can provide? Also, this disregards ASTS non-communications capabilites like very precise PNT and SAR, which i wont get into. Furthermore, you should also this as a CAPEX reuction for MNOs. They dont have to build towers where there is lower traffic, minimising cost for them (towers are very expensive to build and to maintain btw). And as you should know, businesses are very into cost reductions these days. Iridium never took off because its very niche, expensive and a hassle to carry its sat phone, also rocket launches were very expensive back then, and scaled badly because they had to get iridium sat phone Asts is also niche, but less so, inexpensive and convenient, with "cheap" rocket launches, and scales easily because everyone nowadays has a smarphone. Think of it like this, it will take a small pie from each MNO in each region, but it takes them from the whole world.

CraWLee

$Tgt about to break the SAR levels on the daily.

BejahungEnjoyer

You nailed it. I think your thesis is bolstered by the formation of a clear double declining wedge; which has massively bullish implications. The 170 level is an obvious area of support at least for now.  However, if u look at the price action following the recent volatility spike specifically the dampened oscillations and how they interacted with the 20-period moving average, I think this resistance may not hold on the next test. I could see a dynamic retracement ie an A-B-C correction with Elliott Wave counts suggesting minor waves 'a' and 'c' will be near-term support and resistance bands for the time being. Now if the inverted stochastic momentum continues to build indicating underlying accumulation despite surface price movements then a breakout above the 240 level becomes likely. If it does, the gap will fill with a HIGH degree of certainty. Directionality post-breakout will then likely hinge on the signals from a volume-weighted MACD vs the zero line. My overall bet is that after all this shit goes down we have a strong potential to rally towards 300. HOWEVER: I would not initiate a long position until this is unequivocally confirmed by at least a Kyoshi divergence, ideally supported by a bullish crossover in the Parabolic SAR and a sustained move higher in price on VERY HIGH VOLUME.  I'm currently flat and will remain on the sidelines. If we see a sharp gap down first, I would figure that's a precursor to the bullish sequence failing, and lookout below the 170 support, assuming the negative price action invalidates the wedge's immediate bullish potential based on volume. If the volume isn't there all bets are off. Good luck!

BushLov3r

Sundar Pichai rn, “DO NOT REDEEM, THANK YOU SAR”

BushLov3r

Thank you SAR

Valkorion335786

Professionals on Friday buying puts using MACD, EMA, RSI, Parabolic SAR, Stochastic oscillators, Fibonacci retracements, and Ichimoku clouds:  Me on Friday buying calls based on a gut feeling: 

wkeil42

SAR! Do not redeem the missile!

Embarrassed_Owl_762

Fair point — thanks for asking. I traded 3 contracts per setup, averaging about $160 per contract, so the total capital per trade was roughly $480. The focus for me is risk-to-reward and precision over scale. Over 2 days 3 trades I’ve found that sticking to high-quality setups with confirmation from MACD, TMO, and Parabolic SAR has helped me trade with a lot more clarity and discipline.

qobraa

Where you'd eventually get caught up is the stream of IRS SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) the banks would file on you every time you deposit or withdraw $10,000 or more. Not every SAR gets investigated, but when there are multiple reports indicating a trend they usually do.

MegaManSE

Aren’t SAR reports supposed to be private?

WhatYouThinkIThink

There are places like HK SAR that trade separately to their country but don't have representation in the UN.

GhostsinGlass

# India Wants a US Trade Deal With an ‘Urgency’ Not Seen Before SAR SAR PLEASE

Nez-182

Fuckin shit I SAR at SPY around +4% and still recover 2/3 of loss 

1bizzyone

forgot the logarithmic parabolic SAR

Capable_Wait09

Way ahead of you. Been reallocating funds into Evolving Skies ($ES) and Fusion Strike ($FS) and going to Japan soon to stock up on mint condition cards, and will buy as much sealed product as possible. PSA is pausing international submissions so there will be a huge glut of mint cards sitting on shelves in Japan at a huge discount relative to US prices outside of Akihabara that I can get graded in the US for a fat profit and finally complete my SV AR/SAR Japanese collection.

Rare-Hawk-8936

Sucks that you've served your time and be prevented from getting parts of your life back. My guess is that it's a combo of the MJ and ML. Look at fincen FIN-2014-G001. Your account generates a "Marijuana Priority" SAR, probably because Your tax id is on a list somewhere that indicates your source of funds was illegal cannabis trafficking. If you can show that your current source of funds is legit, a financial institution could accept you as a customer, but it's probably more work in the documentation than it's worth to the brokerage.

Mirinmyself247

This guy's ^ is on the right track. I use to work for a brokerage. What's happening to you is due to a number of rules but I believe the main one is KYV (know your client). This is mostly based off of all the stuff they ask you when you sign up for your account. but my understand is that they would also cross-reference that info with available public info to verify you are who you say you are. Brokerages are self regulated. That means each brokerage is going to look at you differently. You are a giant red flag. With that in mind, are you currently working? If NOT, you already being a red flag and then also depositing 10k is another massive red flag and would generate a SAR . If you are but it's a low paying job or maybe part time that could also be another red flag. Solution. Well, you tried Robinhood. They use to take anyone a few years ago around GME but that has changed. Best bet would be a newish brokerage that is trying to just get clients. They probably will be much more relaxed on KYC because they haven't experienced massive fines yet over it. Good luck!

Chance-Storage-8252

IV is doubled. Vol/OI says bear. Trend says bear. SAR/ADX say bear. But yeah it’s like that sometimes.

Valkorion335786

Investors using MACD, EMA, RSI, Parabolic SAR, Stochastic oscillators, Fibonacci retracements, and Ichimoku clouds before buying:  Me buying the dip based on gut feeling: 

Baumwolli

Japanese 201 SAR Charizard from 151 ! Love it!

Remarkable_Capital25

2 things. A CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORT is required for cash transactions over 10k A SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORT is required for somewhat nebulous activity the bank deems “suspicious” Thing 2: a CTR is no big deal. An SAR is ABSOLUTELY a big deal. Rack up a few of them, and your accounts could be frozen by the FBI while they investigate. I do frequent large cash transactions with my bank. Before i started, i talked to the branch manager, told him where the money was coming from, showed him some paperwork, told him if he ever had any questions, just to let me know and i’d be happy to answer them. Theyve never hassled me when i drop of $xx,xxx

samy974

operating margin is high and top line too..thats how they managed the SAR expense

falken2023

Feel pretty confident that TSLA is going to disappoint on one or more metrics tomorrow. Their promise of a new 30k car and/or bad numbers. On the one day chart Parabolic SAR just flipped from support to resistance. That on top of a lot of other bad chart indicators, probably be elevator down for TSLA tomorrow after close.

Classic_Society6696

Puts puts puts... SAR (stop and reverse) is it a rule in this community to simply hold your contracts to 0?

nycqpu

I’m just worried about the SAR expensive 😂

UNCOMMON__CENTS

To add: Don Jr is also the 2nd largest shareholder. If we ignore the financials and fact that they will inevitably be issuing stock (a lot to ignore, I know), there is a high risk, high reward investment thesis: 1. Several U.S. states have begun banning the use using state funds on Chinese drones (and almost all drones states and municipalities use these days are DJI). States like FL and TN that have done this are getting pushback from police, universities, SAR, farmers, etc because there are no domestic alternatives at reasonable prices... Yet. 2. The war in Ukraine:      A. Completely remapped DoD perspective on modern warfare     B. Ukraine is almost entirely using Chinese DJI drones.    C. Put 2 and 2 together on how this could open up govt provided funds for the domestic U.S. drone industry that is nearly non-existent and very uncompetitive. 3. The 2nd largest shareholder is the next POTUS' son. A POTUS that is not shy about directing govt funds to companies of people he likes. 4. The move to onshore and foster (with govt funds) a domestic drone industry for defense reasons is at a critical crossroads that is about to absolutely explode... An industry that basically doesn't exist yet and will have some outsized winners  TL;DR It'll be a volatile stock and they WILL be issuing shares to raise money (especially at these share prices), but in the next few years UMAC has some astonishing potential due to a unique confluence of variables.

ifitpleasesthecrown

I forget he's even still around. I just said it because it seems like a good excuse to deploy the SAR networked stuff. If I had an excuse to play with those, I would.

falken2023

On a semi-brighter note, it looks like LUNR has had a great day today among all the other blood in the streets. On the day chart LUNR looks to be heading towards crossing the upper MACD buy signal soon and flipping to parabolic SAR support. Worth keeping an eye on.

jhenryscott

We are getting SAR COV 9/11

falken2023

It sounds like you’ve done your homework for the most part. But I have to ask, do you completely know how to read charts? I can’t stress enough that if you can’t understand the data on charts you are doomed to failure. Also when choosing what you want to go invest in, carefully study the stock in question for a few weeks. Watch how much it moves around, look for the support and resistance levels. Do not chase stocks that are already mooning bigly unless you know for a fact it’s going to continue for a while. Take a look at a weeks view of the stock in question. Find an entry point near one of the bottoms, set your limit order and let it be. If you pick a stock with a fair amount of volatility this strategy can work well. Try to abide by the old rule not to trade after 10am depending on time zone. Save it for the last hour of the day. Don’t trade low volume times unless you are specifically after a certain price. Make sure you know how to use RSI, MACD, Accumulation/Distribution and Parabolic SAR. Some of the basics in case you weren’t already doing so.

Low_Amoeba633

Use a PAR SAR indicator on a daily time frame to set a stop loss price, and continue to adjust it upward as/if the price continues upward. PAR SAR tends to be low enough to avoid slight retracement and will trigger you out of positions with plenty of profit.

manolo44

It’s true that sar was pioneered decades ago, but modern sar systems like MDA’s CHORUS constellation are leaps ahead in terms of capability and application. Older SAR systems provided coarse imaging compared to the high-resolution imaging capabilities of CHORUS. Today’s systems can capture finer details, making them valuable for applications like infrastructure monitoring, agriculture, and disaster response. CHORUS uses advanced SAR bands (e.g., C-band and X-band) to deliver tailored solutions for different industries, a level of flexibility that earlier sar systems didn’t have. You mentiond nuclear vs solar. Yessome older satellites like the Soviet Union's RORSATs had onboard nuclear reactors, but that doesn’t mean they were "better." In fact, nuclear-powered satellites posed serious risks. Many nuclear satellites, like RORSATs, fell out of orbit, releasing radioactive material. The infamous Cosmos 954 crash in Canada led to widespread contamination and a costly cleanup. Modern solar panels have improved efficiency and are safer and more sustainable for commercial and government customers. MDA’s satellites are built with state-of-the-art solar technology that aligns with today's priorities for low-risk, long-term solutions. Nuclear power was a workaround for energy-hungry systems in the absence of modern solar technology—it’s not a mark of superiority.

DarkVoid42

that its still 1960s technology. [SAR sats have been able to image day or night, regardless of weather conditions, with daily access of up to 100% of the coverage area](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-A). and the older ones have nuclear reactors - no old solar power required unlike mda.

DarkVoid42

yeah there last innovation was a knockoff kuka robot in space and an earth observation satellite. big whoop. 1960s called and wants their SAR satellite back.

DarkVoid42

buddy do you really think anyone is going to allow a fully autonomous robot arm unmonitored by humans in space...ever ? they dont even do that on earth. SAR and robotics is old school. even the chinese do it. the aurora class is great on paper -- i havent seen one live yet. youve drunk a lot of marketing cool aid on this old ass company.

manolo44

Canadarm3 is far more than just "point-to-point hard-wired robotics." It’s being developed as a fully autonomous robotic system capable of operating in space for years without human intervention. That requires sophisticated software, advanced AI, and real-time communication systems—not exactly "stodgy." In satellites, their Aurora-class platform uses fully digital architectures designed for modern demands like LEO constellations, high throughput, and flexible operations. These aren't yesterday’s satellites. MDA’s focus on SAR and robotics isn’t just "old tech." It’s where the market is expanding rapidly—Earth observation, defense, and multi-orbit constellations. They’re delivering in these areas while also modernizing their satellite capabilities. If MDA is just "old stodgy satellite engineers," who are the "hipster" space companies doing what MDA does but better? Is there another company delivering high-volume, fully digital satellites while also leading in robotics and SAR? \-SpaceX focuses on launches and Starlink. \-Rocket Lab has smallsat capabilities but doesn’t compete with MDA on robotics or SAR. \-Planet Labs focuses exclusively on optical Earth observation—no SAR, no satellites for other clients, no robotics. If we’re comparing apples to apples, MDA has carved out a unique niche that makes them indispensable to their customers. They don’t need to be "hipsters" to succeed—they need to deliver, and so far, they’re doing exactly that.

DarkVoid42

who cares what they are laser focused on ? all that matter is delivery. SAR has nothing to do with mesh networking. robotics has nothing to do with mesh networking. a high bandwidth point to point hard wired canadarm link has nothing to do with high bandwidth meshes. hipsters know how to engineer high bandwidth mesh networks. the old satellite designers dont. because they dont normally get called on to do cutting edge hipster stuff.

TingTongTingYep

But SAR it's going to 13 milly, do not redeem!

manolo44

The claim that MDA engineers ‘wouldn’t know where to begin’ with digital architecture or mesh networking misses the mark. They are laser-focused on satellite manufacturing and Earth observation technology. MDA’s Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) expertise is unparalleled—they’re building SAR-based Earth observation constellations (like CHORUS) that will deliver data governments and enterprises desperately need. They’re innovating in robotics (Canadarm3) and producing high-throughput satellites for projects like Telesat Lightspeed, which will rely on sophisticated digital architectures. MDA isn’t trying to be a "hipster-packed startup." They’re focused on leveraging decades of expertise while adapting to meet the demands of the modern satellite market.

mythrilcrafter

Taiwan's value lies both in their ability to be used as a military beachhead and FOB should a war come to past as well as (and probably more-so) Taiwanese companies like TSMC holds the supermajority of microchip production for US chip companies. ----- So why is this? because we (the universal we) recognise that forcing companies like AMD and NVIDIA to bring all manufacturing state-side (which would also require that those companies learn how to fab their own stuff because it's all actually contracted to companies like TSMC) would be an improbable task that even if achieved in vocal agreements, would be a vast multi-presidential-administrative task requiring multiple successive US presidents to all be onboard with carrying the torch of supporting building the facilities* (a level of collaboration that is functionally impossible in this day and age, not just across party lines, but even within parties as well). ----- Supposedly that's where the tariffs are meant to come into play, that is to say, making it more expensive to import computing hardware than to producing it states-side and thus supposedly encouraging the companies to foot their own bill of building the facilities states-side themselves; however, the risk that runs is that companies may instead just choose to raise prices and pay the fine rather than paying to build US homeland based infrastructure; especially with the way that the company's shareholder are concerned, the most likely thing to happen would be to use a 20% tariff to raise prices by 30% and then pocketing the extra 10% as free profits. /* That is where the US government would most likely end up getting involved because if they want US based chip fabrication that much with that much resistance from the chip companies, they would have to subsidize the construction of the facilities so such an extent that it would be unreasonable for the companies to refuse. As previously stated, chip fabs (let alone multiple fabs for multiple companies) are not constructible in a single presidential term, which means that the decision to move in that direction would require multiple presidents to all be willing to accept supporting this effort. ------ The automod won't let me post direct link, but here are a pair of videos urls (to paste at the end of youtube(.com)) showing both what the chip making machines are doing as well as demonstrating the cost of each machine: * *"I Can Die Now: Intel Fab Tour"*: /watch?v=2ehSCWoaOqQ&t=384s * *"You didn't build your PC, this machine did - ASML Cymer Tour"*: /watch?v=pfU20SAR21A&t=185s ------ With this in mind, there's also the question of financial lobbying. A single one of the lithography machines tasked with just "simply" etching the silicon into microchip dies cost anywhere from 20~50 million dollars each (not even counting the 500 million dollar machines that companies like ASML makes), and a single fab may have anywhere from 20 to 500 of those machines. So for a fab to have just it's lithography machines (not counting diffusers, polishers, dicers, etc etc) that can range anywhere from $1 Billion to $25 Billion, or up to $250 Billion if the fab is filling its space with the ASML machines; so you can bet that lobbyists from companies like Lockheed Martin or Newport News will be snapping at our politicians to get in on why they should get that and not NVIDIA or AMD, when that money can buy thousands of F-35's or hundreds of Virginia class submarines. ----- ***Which all in the end brings back to the question "so why would be bother defending Taiwan for free?" because they've already eating the political, financial, and time costs of building these fabs; and it's easier (based on the effort any US politicians wants to put in in the long term) to just defend them for free (not actually free as other commenters have mentioned) and then let the companies like NVIDIA and AMD pass on any extra import tariff related costs to the consumers.***

bonghits96

> Please note that if they add up to more than $10k in cash that you want to walk out the door with, the teller will have to fill out paperwork. The first rule of SAR Club is that you don't talk about SARs

newtownkid

glad I grabbed SAR calls at close. They were dirt cheap.

HIVnotAdeathSentence

Saar, SAR did the needful.

Kno010

Based on what I can find online it looks like you should still be able to get around 5% interest (or the Sharia-compliant equivalent of interest) paid on your SAR, right?

Nalotaib

SAR

Nalotaib

SAR

VIRGO_SUPERCLUSTERZ

According to Fitch, Saudis need oil at $90-96/barrel just to balance their budget because they're pouring cash into massive projects like NEOM and Vision 2030, plus they're propping up public sector wages and defense spending​. For 2024, Saudi Arabia's public spending budget is projected to be SAR 1.251 trillion (approximately USD 333 billion), with revenues expected at SAR 1.172 trillion (around USD 312.5 billion), resulting in a modest deficit of SAR 79 billion (USD 21 billion)​. If Saudi Arabia cuts production too much, they risk reducing their revenue because they’re selling less oil, even if the price per barrel goes up. Plus, cutting production too aggressively could lead to losing market share to other major producers like the U.S., Canada, and Brazil, who can ramp up their own production. So, while they need higher prices to balance their budget, they can’t afford to cut too much or they end up hurting their own long-term position in the global oil market​.

Nervous_Inflation_90

Apple will crash in the next 2 years, they are offering trade in on the iPhone 12, this is the model banned in France due to being above legal radiation (SAR) levels. I think there has been something in the background, like a suspected cancer case that means they are trying to get them off the streets before a mega class action is filled. It was my first thought when they said the trade in yesterday and I’m surprised I’m the only one to find it strange.

technoexplorer

SAR training

kmullinax77

Sure! Scriptable? Meaning writing and adjusting indicators in such a way as to remove a lot of the noise and alert you when potential plays pop up? If that's what you mean, then yes - with many caveats. SPY is as manic as it gets... overbought one minute, oversold the next. The market makers love to tank or spike the price just before a move in the opposite direction to give all their cronies time to hop on before the move. If you are aware of that, you can use it to your advantage and hop on right after they do, but it feels risky because it's trading against the price action. If you're unaware of that, then the pullbacks can completely mess up a nice chart pattern and make you stop out just before the move you want happens. So for me, indicators are just that... indicators that there is a probability of a move. I don't tend to buy or sell based solely on them, but they influence my feelings about a trade. Also, indicators on a 1m chart might be completely correct for the next 3 mins but not for that 4th minute when SPY reverses wildly for some reason. My main indicator is one I wrote to automatically place lines of support and resistance based on HOD, LOD and COD from yesterday as well premarket high and low and of course today's opening price. I base most of my trading decisions based on gut reaction watching the action play off these SAR lines. Otherwise, I use a modified MACD crossover and a modified RSI moving average crossover to help filter out the noise and a momentum indicator to help me feel better about when I think a move is topping or bottoming out. Those three indicators I have set up to alert me when they are all in agreement after a reversal. It's not 100% (nothing is) but when I get the alert and I wait to buy in after a pullback, it's right almost all the time. The challenge is in always being ready to sell the one time it's not. It happens, and that's when I lose $$$ if I'm not careful. That said, I would NEVER (and never recommend) auto-trading based on any indicators when it comes to this kind of daytrading. SPY will destroy you and blow right through your orders and stops. And it's way way too risky to ever do market orders with SPY options. Over the past 7 years I have written probably 100 indicators, testing out all kinds of theories, crazy ideas, etc. But I always come back to: support and resistance & VWAP, then strength and momentum oscillators for confirmation. Keep it simple.

OoopsWhoopsie

WWR - great moat around domestic graphite production in the US that has been enacted into law via tariffs on Chinese graphite. Owner of one of the largest graphite deposits in the US. Price increase is dependent on the processing plant starting operations. EVTL - huge potential for low emissions aerospace. I'm doubtful that their plane will address the targeted demographic but am more hopeful about its impact for SAR and Medivac. Both companies are in early growth stages, so who knows.