SAR

jaezien

I disagree. There are a lot of similarities. In particular you highlighted convenience. Netflix as you stated has demonstrated that people are willing to pay for convenience, eliminating the need to pirate, visit rental stores etc. Why would that not be the case for cell service? Its not something people actively think about until given the option, as the same with netflix. There is no d2c market right now, just like there was no netflix type service in the early 2010s. You cant say no one wants it because there does not exist a market for it yet. Secondly, there exist grey/dead spots all around the world, where data is weak/non-existent. Look it up, >80% of the world is not covered by cell towers. While yes most people live in cities and are covered by terrestrial networks, you need to consider a lot of people travel between cities everyday. There will be deadspots in between these cities where people commute and it needs to be filled. Third, i somewhat agree with you that first responders needs for such services might be limited, but when it comes to the military its a very different thing. Every military in the world is moving towards battlefield connectivity. Look at ukraine, their drones cant operate without starlink, what do you think will happen when soldiers do not need to carry around heavy radios/starlink terminals for communications/operations? When tanks get the level of tactical communication and situational awareness that only internet can provide? Also, this disregards ASTS non-communications capabilites like very precise PNT and SAR, which i wont get into. Furthermore, you should also this as a CAPEX reuction for MNOs. They dont have to build towers where there is lower traffic, minimising cost for them (towers are very expensive to build and to maintain btw). And as you should know, businesses are very into cost reductions these days. Iridium never took off because its very niche, expensive and a hassle to carry its sat phone, also rocket launches were very expensive back then, and scaled badly because they had to get iridium sat phone Asts is also niche, but less so, inexpensive and convenient, with "cheap" rocket launches, and scales easily because everyone nowadays has a smarphone. Think of it like this, it will take a small pie from each MNO in each region, but it takes them from the whole world.

CraWLee

$Tgt about to break the SAR levels on the daily.

BejahungEnjoyer

You nailed it. I think your thesis is bolstered by the formation of a clear double declining wedge; which has massively bullish implications. The 170 level is an obvious area of support at least for now.  However, if u look at the price action following the recent volatility spike specifically the dampened oscillations and how they interacted with the 20-period moving average, I think this resistance may not hold on the next test. I could see a dynamic retracement ie an A-B-C correction with Elliott Wave counts suggesting minor waves 'a' and 'c' will be near-term support and resistance bands for the time being. Now if the inverted stochastic momentum continues to build indicating underlying accumulation despite surface price movements then a breakout above the 240 level becomes likely. If it does, the gap will fill with a HIGH degree of certainty. Directionality post-breakout will then likely hinge on the signals from a volume-weighted MACD vs the zero line. My overall bet is that after all this shit goes down we have a strong potential to rally towards 300. HOWEVER: I would not initiate a long position until this is unequivocally confirmed by at least a Kyoshi divergence, ideally supported by a bullish crossover in the Parabolic SAR and a sustained move higher in price on VERY HIGH VOLUME.  I'm currently flat and will remain on the sidelines. If we see a sharp gap down first, I would figure that's a precursor to the bullish sequence failing, and lookout below the 170 support, assuming the negative price action invalidates the wedge's immediate bullish potential based on volume. If the volume isn't there all bets are off. Good luck!

BushLov3r

Sundar Pichai rn, “DO NOT REDEEM, THANK YOU SAR”

BushLov3r

Thank you SAR

Valkorion335786

Professionals on Friday buying puts using MACD, EMA, RSI, Parabolic SAR, Stochastic oscillators, Fibonacci retracements, and Ichimoku clouds:  Me on Friday buying calls based on a gut feeling: 

wkeil42

SAR! Do not redeem the missile!

Embarrassed_Owl_762

Fair point — thanks for asking. I traded 3 contracts per setup, averaging about $160 per contract, so the total capital per trade was roughly $480. The focus for me is risk-to-reward and precision over scale. Over 2 days 3 trades I’ve found that sticking to high-quality setups with confirmation from MACD, TMO, and Parabolic SAR has helped me trade with a lot more clarity and discipline.

qobraa

Where you'd eventually get caught up is the stream of IRS SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) the banks would file on you every time you deposit or withdraw $10,000 or more. Not every SAR gets investigated, but when there are multiple reports indicating a trend they usually do.

MegaManSE

Aren’t SAR reports supposed to be private?

WhatYouThinkIThink

There are places like HK SAR that trade separately to their country but don't have representation in the UN.

GhostsinGlass

# India Wants a US Trade Deal With an ‘Urgency’ Not Seen Before SAR SAR PLEASE

Nez-182

Fuckin shit I SAR at SPY around +4% and still recover 2/3 of loss 

1bizzyone

forgot the logarithmic parabolic SAR

Capable_Wait09

Way ahead of you. Been reallocating funds into Evolving Skies ($ES) and Fusion Strike ($FS) and going to Japan soon to stock up on mint condition cards, and will buy as much sealed product as possible. PSA is pausing international submissions so there will be a huge glut of mint cards sitting on shelves in Japan at a huge discount relative to US prices outside of Akihabara that I can get graded in the US for a fat profit and finally complete my SV AR/SAR Japanese collection.

Rare-Hawk-8936

Sucks that you've served your time and be prevented from getting parts of your life back. My guess is that it's a combo of the MJ and ML. Look at fincen FIN-2014-G001. Your account generates a "Marijuana Priority" SAR, probably because Your tax id is on a list somewhere that indicates your source of funds was illegal cannabis trafficking. If you can show that your current source of funds is legit, a financial institution could accept you as a customer, but it's probably more work in the documentation than it's worth to the brokerage.

Mirinmyself247

This guy's ^ is on the right track. I use to work for a brokerage. What's happening to you is due to a number of rules but I believe the main one is KYV (know your client). This is mostly based off of all the stuff they ask you when you sign up for your account. but my understand is that they would also cross-reference that info with available public info to verify you are who you say you are. Brokerages are self regulated. That means each brokerage is going to look at you differently. You are a giant red flag. With that in mind, are you currently working? If NOT, you already being a red flag and then also depositing 10k is another massive red flag and would generate a SAR . If you are but it's a low paying job or maybe part time that could also be another red flag. Solution. Well, you tried Robinhood. They use to take anyone a few years ago around GME but that has changed. Best bet would be a newish brokerage that is trying to just get clients. They probably will be much more relaxed on KYC because they haven't experienced massive fines yet over it. Good luck!

Chance-Storage-8252

IV is doubled. Vol/OI says bear. Trend says bear. SAR/ADX say bear. But yeah it’s like that sometimes.

Valkorion335786

Investors using MACD, EMA, RSI, Parabolic SAR, Stochastic oscillators, Fibonacci retracements, and Ichimoku clouds before buying:  Me buying the dip based on gut feeling: 

Baumwolli

Japanese 201 SAR Charizard from 151 ! Love it!

Remarkable_Capital25

2 things. A CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORT is required for cash transactions over 10k A SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORT is required for somewhat nebulous activity the bank deems “suspicious” Thing 2: a CTR is no big deal. An SAR is ABSOLUTELY a big deal. Rack up a few of them, and your accounts could be frozen by the FBI while they investigate. I do frequent large cash transactions with my bank. Before i started, i talked to the branch manager, told him where the money was coming from, showed him some paperwork, told him if he ever had any questions, just to let me know and i’d be happy to answer them. Theyve never hassled me when i drop of $xx,xxx

samy974

operating margin is high and top line too..thats how they managed the SAR expense

falken2023

Feel pretty confident that TSLA is going to disappoint on one or more metrics tomorrow. Their promise of a new 30k car and/or bad numbers. On the one day chart Parabolic SAR just flipped from support to resistance. That on top of a lot of other bad chart indicators, probably be elevator down for TSLA tomorrow after close.

Classic_Society6696

Puts puts puts... SAR (stop and reverse) is it a rule in this community to simply hold your contracts to 0?

nycqpu

I’m just worried about the SAR expensive 😂

UNCOMMON__CENTS

To add: Don Jr is also the 2nd largest shareholder. If we ignore the financials and fact that they will inevitably be issuing stock (a lot to ignore, I know), there is a high risk, high reward investment thesis: 1. Several U.S. states have begun banning the use using state funds on Chinese drones (and almost all drones states and municipalities use these days are DJI). States like FL and TN that have done this are getting pushback from police, universities, SAR, farmers, etc because there are no domestic alternatives at reasonable prices... Yet. 2. The war in Ukraine:      A. Completely remapped DoD perspective on modern warfare     B. Ukraine is almost entirely using Chinese DJI drones.    C. Put 2 and 2 together on how this could open up govt provided funds for the domestic U.S. drone industry that is nearly non-existent and very uncompetitive. 3. The 2nd largest shareholder is the next POTUS' son. A POTUS that is not shy about directing govt funds to companies of people he likes. 4. The move to onshore and foster (with govt funds) a domestic drone industry for defense reasons is at a critical crossroads that is about to absolutely explode... An industry that basically doesn't exist yet and will have some outsized winners  TL;DR It'll be a volatile stock and they WILL be issuing shares to raise money (especially at these share prices), but in the next few years UMAC has some astonishing potential due to a unique confluence of variables.

ifitpleasesthecrown

I forget he's even still around. I just said it because it seems like a good excuse to deploy the SAR networked stuff. If I had an excuse to play with those, I would.

falken2023

On a semi-brighter note, it looks like LUNR has had a great day today among all the other blood in the streets. On the day chart LUNR looks to be heading towards crossing the upper MACD buy signal soon and flipping to parabolic SAR support. Worth keeping an eye on.

jhenryscott

We are getting SAR COV 9/11

falken2023

It sounds like you’ve done your homework for the most part. But I have to ask, do you completely know how to read charts? I can’t stress enough that if you can’t understand the data on charts you are doomed to failure. Also when choosing what you want to go invest in, carefully study the stock in question for a few weeks. Watch how much it moves around, look for the support and resistance levels. Do not chase stocks that are already mooning bigly unless you know for a fact it’s going to continue for a while. Take a look at a weeks view of the stock in question. Find an entry point near one of the bottoms, set your limit order and let it be. If you pick a stock with a fair amount of volatility this strategy can work well. Try to abide by the old rule not to trade after 10am depending on time zone. Save it for the last hour of the day. Don’t trade low volume times unless you are specifically after a certain price. Make sure you know how to use RSI, MACD, Accumulation/Distribution and Parabolic SAR. Some of the basics in case you weren’t already doing so.

Low_Amoeba633

Use a PAR SAR indicator on a daily time frame to set a stop loss price, and continue to adjust it upward as/if the price continues upward. PAR SAR tends to be low enough to avoid slight retracement and will trigger you out of positions with plenty of profit.

manolo44

It’s true that sar was pioneered decades ago, but modern sar systems like MDA’s CHORUS constellation are leaps ahead in terms of capability and application. Older SAR systems provided coarse imaging compared to the high-resolution imaging capabilities of CHORUS. Today’s systems can capture finer details, making them valuable for applications like infrastructure monitoring, agriculture, and disaster response. CHORUS uses advanced SAR bands (e.g., C-band and X-band) to deliver tailored solutions for different industries, a level of flexibility that earlier sar systems didn’t have. You mentiond nuclear vs solar. Yessome older satellites like the Soviet Union's RORSATs had onboard nuclear reactors, but that doesn’t mean they were "better." In fact, nuclear-powered satellites posed serious risks. Many nuclear satellites, like RORSATs, fell out of orbit, releasing radioactive material. The infamous Cosmos 954 crash in Canada led to widespread contamination and a costly cleanup. Modern solar panels have improved efficiency and are safer and more sustainable for commercial and government customers. MDA’s satellites are built with state-of-the-art solar technology that aligns with today's priorities for low-risk, long-term solutions. Nuclear power was a workaround for energy-hungry systems in the absence of modern solar technology—it’s not a mark of superiority.

DarkVoid42

that its still 1960s technology. [SAR sats have been able to image day or night, regardless of weather conditions, with daily access of up to 100% of the coverage area](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-A). and the older ones have nuclear reactors - no old solar power required unlike mda.

DarkVoid42

yeah there last innovation was a knockoff kuka robot in space and an earth observation satellite. big whoop. 1960s called and wants their SAR satellite back.

DarkVoid42

buddy do you really think anyone is going to allow a fully autonomous robot arm unmonitored by humans in space...ever ? they dont even do that on earth. SAR and robotics is old school. even the chinese do it. the aurora class is great on paper -- i havent seen one live yet. youve drunk a lot of marketing cool aid on this old ass company.

manolo44

Canadarm3 is far more than just "point-to-point hard-wired robotics." It’s being developed as a fully autonomous robotic system capable of operating in space for years without human intervention. That requires sophisticated software, advanced AI, and real-time communication systems—not exactly "stodgy." In satellites, their Aurora-class platform uses fully digital architectures designed for modern demands like LEO constellations, high throughput, and flexible operations. These aren't yesterday’s satellites. MDA’s focus on SAR and robotics isn’t just "old tech." It’s where the market is expanding rapidly—Earth observation, defense, and multi-orbit constellations. They’re delivering in these areas while also modernizing their satellite capabilities. If MDA is just "old stodgy satellite engineers," who are the "hipster" space companies doing what MDA does but better? Is there another company delivering high-volume, fully digital satellites while also leading in robotics and SAR? \-SpaceX focuses on launches and Starlink. \-Rocket Lab has smallsat capabilities but doesn’t compete with MDA on robotics or SAR. \-Planet Labs focuses exclusively on optical Earth observation—no SAR, no satellites for other clients, no robotics. If we’re comparing apples to apples, MDA has carved out a unique niche that makes them indispensable to their customers. They don’t need to be "hipsters" to succeed—they need to deliver, and so far, they’re doing exactly that.

DarkVoid42

who cares what they are laser focused on ? all that matter is delivery. SAR has nothing to do with mesh networking. robotics has nothing to do with mesh networking. a high bandwidth point to point hard wired canadarm link has nothing to do with high bandwidth meshes. hipsters know how to engineer high bandwidth mesh networks. the old satellite designers dont. because they dont normally get called on to do cutting edge hipster stuff.

TingTongTingYep

But SAR it's going to 13 milly, do not redeem!

manolo44

The claim that MDA engineers ‘wouldn’t know where to begin’ with digital architecture or mesh networking misses the mark. They are laser-focused on satellite manufacturing and Earth observation technology. MDA’s Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) expertise is unparalleled—they’re building SAR-based Earth observation constellations (like CHORUS) that will deliver data governments and enterprises desperately need. They’re innovating in robotics (Canadarm3) and producing high-throughput satellites for projects like Telesat Lightspeed, which will rely on sophisticated digital architectures. MDA isn’t trying to be a "hipster-packed startup." They’re focused on leveraging decades of expertise while adapting to meet the demands of the modern satellite market.

mythrilcrafter

Taiwan's value lies both in their ability to be used as a military beachhead and FOB should a war come to past as well as (and probably more-so) Taiwanese companies like TSMC holds the supermajority of microchip production for US chip companies. ----- So why is this? because we (the universal we) recognise that forcing companies like AMD and NVIDIA to bring all manufacturing state-side (which would also require that those companies learn how to fab their own stuff because it's all actually contracted to companies like TSMC) would be an improbable task that even if achieved in vocal agreements, would be a vast multi-presidential-administrative task requiring multiple successive US presidents to all be onboard with carrying the torch of supporting building the facilities* (a level of collaboration that is functionally impossible in this day and age, not just across party lines, but even within parties as well). ----- Supposedly that's where the tariffs are meant to come into play, that is to say, making it more expensive to import computing hardware than to producing it states-side and thus supposedly encouraging the companies to foot their own bill of building the facilities states-side themselves; however, the risk that runs is that companies may instead just choose to raise prices and pay the fine rather than paying to build US homeland based infrastructure; especially with the way that the company's shareholder are concerned, the most likely thing to happen would be to use a 20% tariff to raise prices by 30% and then pocketing the extra 10% as free profits. /* That is where the US government would most likely end up getting involved because if they want US based chip fabrication that much with that much resistance from the chip companies, they would have to subsidize the construction of the facilities so such an extent that it would be unreasonable for the companies to refuse. As previously stated, chip fabs (let alone multiple fabs for multiple companies) are not constructible in a single presidential term, which means that the decision to move in that direction would require multiple presidents to all be willing to accept supporting this effort. ------ The automod won't let me post direct link, but here are a pair of videos urls (to paste at the end of youtube(.com)) showing both what the chip making machines are doing as well as demonstrating the cost of each machine: * *"I Can Die Now: Intel Fab Tour"*: /watch?v=2ehSCWoaOqQ&t=384s * *"You didn't build your PC, this machine did - ASML Cymer Tour"*: /watch?v=pfU20SAR21A&t=185s ------ With this in mind, there's also the question of financial lobbying. A single one of the lithography machines tasked with just "simply" etching the silicon into microchip dies cost anywhere from 20~50 million dollars each (not even counting the 500 million dollar machines that companies like ASML makes), and a single fab may have anywhere from 20 to 500 of those machines. So for a fab to have just it's lithography machines (not counting diffusers, polishers, dicers, etc etc) that can range anywhere from $1 Billion to $25 Billion, or up to $250 Billion if the fab is filling its space with the ASML machines; so you can bet that lobbyists from companies like Lockheed Martin or Newport News will be snapping at our politicians to get in on why they should get that and not NVIDIA or AMD, when that money can buy thousands of F-35's or hundreds of Virginia class submarines. ----- ***Which all in the end brings back to the question "so why would be bother defending Taiwan for free?" because they've already eating the political, financial, and time costs of building these fabs; and it's easier (based on the effort any US politicians wants to put in in the long term) to just defend them for free (not actually free as other commenters have mentioned) and then let the companies like NVIDIA and AMD pass on any extra import tariff related costs to the consumers.***

bonghits96

> Please note that if they add up to more than $10k in cash that you want to walk out the door with, the teller will have to fill out paperwork. The first rule of SAR Club is that you don't talk about SARs

newtownkid

glad I grabbed SAR calls at close. They were dirt cheap.

HIVnotAdeathSentence

Saar, SAR did the needful.

Kno010

Based on what I can find online it looks like you should still be able to get around 5% interest (or the Sharia-compliant equivalent of interest) paid on your SAR, right?

Nalotaib

SAR

Nalotaib

SAR

VIRGO_SUPERCLUSTERZ

According to Fitch, Saudis need oil at $90-96/barrel just to balance their budget because they're pouring cash into massive projects like NEOM and Vision 2030, plus they're propping up public sector wages and defense spending​. For 2024, Saudi Arabia's public spending budget is projected to be SAR 1.251 trillion (approximately USD 333 billion), with revenues expected at SAR 1.172 trillion (around USD 312.5 billion), resulting in a modest deficit of SAR 79 billion (USD 21 billion)​. If Saudi Arabia cuts production too much, they risk reducing their revenue because they’re selling less oil, even if the price per barrel goes up. Plus, cutting production too aggressively could lead to losing market share to other major producers like the U.S., Canada, and Brazil, who can ramp up their own production. So, while they need higher prices to balance their budget, they can’t afford to cut too much or they end up hurting their own long-term position in the global oil market​.

Nervous_Inflation_90

Apple will crash in the next 2 years, they are offering trade in on the iPhone 12, this is the model banned in France due to being above legal radiation (SAR) levels. I think there has been something in the background, like a suspected cancer case that means they are trying to get them off the streets before a mega class action is filled. It was my first thought when they said the trade in yesterday and I’m surprised I’m the only one to find it strange.

technoexplorer

SAR training

kmullinax77

Sure! Scriptable? Meaning writing and adjusting indicators in such a way as to remove a lot of the noise and alert you when potential plays pop up? If that's what you mean, then yes - with many caveats. SPY is as manic as it gets... overbought one minute, oversold the next. The market makers love to tank or spike the price just before a move in the opposite direction to give all their cronies time to hop on before the move. If you are aware of that, you can use it to your advantage and hop on right after they do, but it feels risky because it's trading against the price action. If you're unaware of that, then the pullbacks can completely mess up a nice chart pattern and make you stop out just before the move you want happens. So for me, indicators are just that... indicators that there is a probability of a move. I don't tend to buy or sell based solely on them, but they influence my feelings about a trade. Also, indicators on a 1m chart might be completely correct for the next 3 mins but not for that 4th minute when SPY reverses wildly for some reason. My main indicator is one I wrote to automatically place lines of support and resistance based on HOD, LOD and COD from yesterday as well premarket high and low and of course today's opening price. I base most of my trading decisions based on gut reaction watching the action play off these SAR lines. Otherwise, I use a modified MACD crossover and a modified RSI moving average crossover to help filter out the noise and a momentum indicator to help me feel better about when I think a move is topping or bottoming out. Those three indicators I have set up to alert me when they are all in agreement after a reversal. It's not 100% (nothing is) but when I get the alert and I wait to buy in after a pullback, it's right almost all the time. The challenge is in always being ready to sell the one time it's not. It happens, and that's when I lose $$$ if I'm not careful. That said, I would NEVER (and never recommend) auto-trading based on any indicators when it comes to this kind of daytrading. SPY will destroy you and blow right through your orders and stops. And it's way way too risky to ever do market orders with SPY options. Over the past 7 years I have written probably 100 indicators, testing out all kinds of theories, crazy ideas, etc. But I always come back to: support and resistance & VWAP, then strength and momentum oscillators for confirmation. Keep it simple.

OoopsWhoopsie

WWR - great moat around domestic graphite production in the US that has been enacted into law via tariffs on Chinese graphite. Owner of one of the largest graphite deposits in the US. Price increase is dependent on the processing plant starting operations. EVTL - huge potential for low emissions aerospace. I'm doubtful that their plane will address the targeted demographic but am more hopeful about its impact for SAR and Medivac. Both companies are in early growth stages, so who knows.

respecteverybody

The bullish engulfing candlestick pattern on the Ichimoku cloud indicates a possible golden cross with the parabolic SAR.

GPTRex

Parabolic SAR. Literally one of the only indicators that has some statistical significance that you can apply to trading. Idk why the fuck OP posted jn this subreddit

HemetValleyMall1982

8am fifteen minute candle, with volume and SAR. Sometimes it can indicate where the stock is gonna go for the day. Sometimes not.

Wall-Street-Wizzard

On all charts I initially use the ichimoko cloud automatically. Based on what I see there I use various tools. These tools include (in order of frequency) either a linear regression or a Fibonacci retracement tool or both. Sometimes I use a parabolic SAR. Depending on what I see I may use a few other tools. Underneath the chart I use RSI. I usually ignore volume unless it is extremely high or extremely low. I never use Brolenger bands.

moosewhippets

Idk man. We had plenty of Marines and AF lateral over to our branch, but I never met a single Coastie that lateraled to any other branch. I also never did time on a cutter so I have no idea what life was like on them. I would assume the Pac fleet would be fairly boring - lots of boarding fishing and crab vessels to inspect them, and the occasional SAR. I've always imagined the Gulf fleet is very, very busy and interesting with their interdictions and migrant work all the time. But being a Coxswain and crew at a SAR Surf station? Doing what I did - both LE investigations and environmental protection? Mass disaster response and management? Interdicting cocaine loaded go fasts and subs? Nah, that shit is interesting as fuck especially when it's 24/7/365. Sorry you didn't get to be attached to be part of that stuff.

CokeOnBooty

All I know is if the SAR look regarded then the stock is in a sideways rut, not sure if any can predict it if it happens randomly

CouldBeSolidAdvice

Take profits on shares, unless you are a long term investor, stick it in SAR

Vast_Cricket

Buy SAR

nirvana6789

Buy in price? You mentioned you used a screener. Mind telling use your screener parameters? You also mentioned there was a price upgrade the day after you bought in? Oh and btw you’re probably getting a SAR filed on you by an analyst at your brokerage. Could be dumb luck or you had insider knowledge of the price upgrade. You’ll be filed on either way 🧐

alexbananas

Rubles = Monopoly money. SAR is where it's at but at the end of the day it's pegged to the USD. tldr: everyone fucked

PupNeva

Kymera Therapeutics Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 2 Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Trial of KT-474 (SAR444656), a First-in-Class, Investigational IRAK4 Degrader, Generating $40 Million Payment from Sanofi So its still down 3% today i keep losing money on this stock

Moaning-Squirtle

It shouldn't need an explanation, but clearly you need it. Hong Kong is a part of China – it's not that China claims it, it *is* a part of China and nobody disputes that. It is supposed to be an SAR but Beijing has reduced its privileges. However, it's doing it within its own borders. Taiwan is claimed by China, but does not have control over it. To take control of Taiwan requires a full military operation on the island. They are completely different scenarios.

MCDwhistleblower

You are right. May I suggest you to read the formal notice I sent to Neuberger Berman in March 2023. I am not sure if they had a legal obligation to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) with FinCEN, but if they did, it would show they took my report seriously. Besides, 2 guys working for Neuberger Berman called me back, before that formal notice I sent, after I left a message on their answering machine after I called their headquarters in New York to report a case of money laundering in a company they were financing. Logically, if the filed a SAR, the criminal RICO investigation in the United States might have started around April, May, 2023. It should be now at a relatively advanced stage, if and only if American authorities are serious, and I believe they are. [Link to the PDF of the formal notice sent to Neuberger Berman](https://www.mcdstockinvestors.com/open-letters/ceo-george-walker-neuberger-berman-notified-mcdonalds-corporation-money-laundering-2023-03-16/2023-03-16_0042_0800_formal_notice_to_george_walker_neuberger_berman_with_email_Redacted.pdf).

lsherm22

Every phone and device have a SAR rating (specific absorption rate). This tells how much radiation from the device is absorbed by the body. We're all screwed.

Futhco

Bruh. FCC has even stricter rules on SAR; 1.6W/kg max as opposed to the 2W/kg of EC.

ayylmayooo

Software patch can reduce the output power level of the transmitter. Different countries have different limits and usually the same device is released in multiple markets with only the max output power changed. ​ Lets say our legal limit for SAR is 1.4 W/kg e.g., ANTENNA 1 has a MAX Power of 20dBm which gives me a SAR 1.44 W/kg The solution to this would be to reduce the transmission power to 19.75dBm which should give us a lower SAR value. Lets say this reduction in power drops our SAR to 1.39 W/kg then it means the device is now in compliance. Just to be clear. the SAR measurements are at a constant rate throughout the whole test. When in reality the device normally operates at a much reduced power only reaching the max transmission powers when the device is trying hard to get signal. (Ever notice your phone get hotter and battery life taking a dive when in very large public gatherings?) Its because your transmission power is much higher than usual as you are competing with hundreds/thousands of devices to connect to the same cell towers. Usually for SAR you have different limits for different exposure modes. 10mm Distance from body usually to simulate your phone with a CASE in a Holster, and you have 0mm to simulate your hand holding the phone. Devices also have different "reduced power modes" which use proximity sensors usually this is done to reduce the power of the transmitters when they are close to the head during a call but increase the power of the transmitters when taking the call on speaker. ​ It seems that the issue of the iPhone 12 from what I been hearing from coworkers is that their 0mm distance testing is failing while their other exposure conditions are passing. ​ sauce: I work in SAR good reads: FCC KDB 447498 SAR Guidance (Applies to the US Limits) [https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?switch=P&id=20676](https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?switch=P&id=20676) RSS-102 Same thing but for Canada [https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/official-publications/standards/radio-equipment-standards/licence-exempt-radio-apparatus-standards-list/rss-102-radio-frequency-rf-exposure-compliance-radiocommunication-apparatus-all-frequency-bands](https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/official-publications/standards/radio-equipment-standards/licence-exempt-radio-apparatus-standards-list/rss-102-radio-frequency-rf-exposure-compliance-radiocommunication-apparatus-all-frequency-bands) IEC/IEEE 62704-1 (European Union, haven't worked with European devices in a while so I am not 100% sure if this applies to all EU or some EU countries) [https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/62704-1/5747/](https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/62704-1/5747/) ​ ​ tl;dr drop the power by a quarter-dbm and push the update!

Shredding_Airguitar

There are neuroendocrine impacts with higher SAR limits. Its not ionizing but neuroendocrine effects can be things like memory loss and stuff. What you're referring to are more like 3GPP mask requirements for UEs. ICNIRP/FCC OET 65 MPE and SAR limits are looking at health effects.

Shredding_Airguitar

4 W/kg is the SAR limit for ICNIRP which is what the EU uses and the FCC OET 65 along with Canada Health and Australian guidelines. The iPhone 12 apparently has a SAR above 5 W/kg. Basically the phone is violating FCC, EU, Canada and Australia at the very least. Just saying but this of course is non-ionizing so there isn't a cancer risk but there's potential neuroendocrine effects at higher SARs. Anyhow, Apple probably doesn't care since they this phone is like 3 years old now but they should be scrutinized a bit more on their SAR and MPE testing in the future especially if their antenna design and RFEs aren't fundamentally changing much.

comradeTJH

Me too. But high SAR levels also probably means better reception and data rate. I'm pretty happy with my twelve.

tomoldbury

Non ionising radiation can be dangerous as it can cause tissue heating and burns, phones have to comply to SAR limits due to them frequently being used near the brain box. This is not an issue in this case.

Raveen396

> These laws are made to prevent the frequencies from being too cluttered or "loud" which could interfere with other communications. To be clear, you’re referring to out of band emissions and co-location test standards that are intended to prevent inter channel interference. That is *not * what France is claiming Apple failed. The test that France is claiming the iPhone 12 failed is the specific absorption rate, which is specifically defined as a metric of the absorption of EM in terms of me/Kg of human tissue, which is intended to prevent excessive exposure of tissue to RF. https://www.intertek.com/wireless/sar-testing/#:~:text=Products%20intended%20for%20general%20use,%2C%20wrists%2C%20feet%20and%20ankles. In general these standards are excessively conservative, and the reported SAR rate is typically reported as the peak value, and most UEs are not operating at peak power output the majority of the time. As someone who works in testing devices for RF emissions, I wouldn’t think twice if I owned an iPhone 12.

tomoldbury

You are technically wrong, there are tissue heating limits (SAR) that phones have to comply to.

Lilith_reborn

Mobile phones (GSM) were invented in Europe and the industry is still strong there. Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which is a measure of the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the body when using a mobile phone. That limit is used also in the US as there is proof that radio waves cause problems if they are to high.

Lilith_reborn

The antenna output levels are limited as not to damage the brain. There have been research about broken DNA etc. That is the reason to define the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which is a measure of the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the body when using a mobile phone. Power output levels are reduced in any case by the phone's software in order to reduce disturbances to other phones.

pigsgetfathogsdie

Every phone emits radiation regard… Years ago we were told to always use a bluetooth/wired headset. And never talk with phone next to head. My AI friend has more… Yes, all phones emit radiation. The radiation emitted by cell phones is called radiofrequency (RF) energy. This type of radiation is different from other types of radiation, like x-rays, that are known to be harmful. The amount of radiation absorbed by the human body depends on how close a person is to a phone and a cell transmitter. The amount of radiation emitted by a phone is measured by the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). The National Cancer Institute says that there is no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk in humans. However, research is still being conducted to monitor any long-term effects.

beast_unique

One of the gulf currencies will most likely be the one the rest of the members will support (Likely SAR)

victorcreator

I didn’t know what companies are listed these indices. This makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. As for point (1), Wikipedia says this > Hong Kong (US: /ˈhɒŋkɒŋ/ or UK: /hɒŋˈkɒŋ/; Chinese: 香港, Cantonese: [hœ́ːŋ.kɔ̌ːŋ] (listen)), officially the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China (abbr. Hong Kong SAR or HKSAR),[d] is a city and a special administrative region in China. Do we not consider Hong Kong a part of China? Just wondering if it isn’t already a fact or if my understanding is wrong.

somo1230

Just to add something about non U.S. markets Saudi stock market (not sure if non residents can buy) have few decent companies (only like 10 companies, the rest are #@*&^) No tax on dividends / Profits $1=SAR 3.75 since the early 80's some IPOs jumped 20%+ in few weeks and never lost those gains Still, no market in the world can beat U.S. markets,,,,

Careless-Twist7457

I did SAR ETWO BYRN for earnings and only got BYRN right 🤦‍♂️

Scientific-Lifter

Have you checked out SAR? I have wanted to start accumulating this stock for dividends but haven't pulled the trigger yet. They were on a dip but just increased $0.43 Friday. Earnings announced this Monday which is probably reason for the rise. They have a 10.28% dividend yield as of 6/12/23. Analysts seem to like them and besides this recent dip they have shown strong growth. Earnings are on July 10th and they have met or exceeded estimated last 6 quarters.

r2002

> Jepi and sar I'm just learning about BDCs like SAR. Is that your pick out of all the BDCs? When is it a good time to get in on them? Is lower Fed rates good for BDCs?

calebsurfs

I think the SAR teams need the practice and it beats doing simulations and drills so why not look for them.

Steffa_Barnza

Slap on a Volume Weighted Keltner Channel and look for confluence with a Fibonacci Speed Resistance Fan then enter where the Parabolic SAR flashes under an SMI Ergodic Oscillator, TAs easy bro

paulc19802

I'm not sure what you're doing here but I use averages. In particular SSL (SSL Hybrid with all the noisy shit except the main trend line turned off, but I just grabbed the code for that section). For exits I also track RSI crossing its 50 SMA and SAR flipping to indicate a possible reversal. They're often too noisy to use for entries but if you have a strong move on something you're already in then they can provide an earlier warning than just waiting for the opposite entry signal. Basically if I'm in a play and it's doing well it will pull away from the averages. So if I get a signal from one of those 2 when not close to SSL I'll consider an exit or setting a stop loss. If it's a slow and steady it will stay nearer to SSL and I'll just ignore the other 2 and wait for SSL to cross instead. Or just keep a trailing stop loss at the SSL value. That said I use all of that as indications to get out earlier. If a play is doing well I'll just find whatever time frame is producing the easiest to read graphs and just stick stop losses at recent swing low and keep moving it up. For longs obviously. Anyway I'm done over sharing now. Though those signals look decent so I am curious what you're doing? Have you published it?

Own_Tackle4514

Someone save my brother in law he said Parobolic SAR so we going up forever

KenBalbari

Thing is, if PCE inflation was lower, then was real PCE spending even higher than reported? Or nominal PCE spending lower? Right now we have, using SAR, PCE inflation 4.2% + real PCE spending 3.7% = nominal PCE 8% (so figure 0.1% in rounding error somewhere). And we have GDP deflator 4% + real GDP 1.1% = nominal GDP 5.1%. Basically, I agree that spending number was very resilient, but to have a lower PCE inflation estimate push GDP even higher, it would also need to push that spending number even higher. And if that consumer spending number is too high, the Fed is going to worry about future inflation anyway. If businesses are reducing inventories in anticipation of a slowdown, and that slowdown never occurs in consumer spending, you are just going to see more businesses needing to raise prices.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **274,789,500** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **288,820,300** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

LouSanous

Dude, China doesn't want to invade Taiwan. I know the media says they do, but nobody in China has said that is what they want to do. China wants reunification. Taiwan wants reunification. The difference of opinion is *which government* is the *rightful government*. As far as any reasonable person is concerned, that was settled back in 1949. The KMT tortured and killed and impoverished many thousands of Chinese people and that caused a revolution. Then, they ran away to Taiwan where they tortured, impoverished and killed people there for 40 years before they decided that it was enough. That ignores military power, population, GDP, public support, and all other factors one would use to determine a legitimate government. The most likely scenario is that China and Taiwan reach a diplomatic reunification, where Taiwan is allowed to be a SAR for at least a period of time. After that time, it will probably be absorbed like HK. The likelihood that China will just destroy Taiwan to be king of a rubble heap is just not the Chinese way. There is a lot of valuable infrastructure and people in Taiwan. Educated people with more international experience than most mainlanders.

1600hazenstreet

Took them a week to clear $12k deposit. So much for SAR.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **330,199,200** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **320,092,300** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **319,497,700** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **319,497,700** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **319,497,700** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **319,497,700** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

VisualMod

I am a bot. You submitted a picture of a banned ticker, SAR. The market cap of SAR is **318,665,400** This check will fire if you included unnecessary pictures that have bad keywords/phrases. Repost with the useless pictures omitted if you did that.

FutureBner

All you need is 3 indicators Parabolic SAR SUPERTREND Order Block EMA (50&100) They’re perfect for entry and exit. Volume is also necessary

dxxaeroker

Just went through your post history! So much hatred for india and indians as such. But u are not even in the country! Living in SAR and spewing venom at us. Typical of the peacefuls. And you have 13 yrs+ experience in the tech sector and working in some Saudi universities in Riyadh? PITY!