TR

maicii

That’s fair, I google the ticket, shouldn’t have been to lazy to assume it would have dividends reinvested. (I will still never know why TR aren’t included in those) any case, still significantly less

SirGlass

Ok , I have noticed in some structured notes it uses something like the S&P500 index what is only a price appreciation index vs S&P500 Total Return What means if the S&P500 is up 10% , that is their benchmark when really something like VOO would return 11% due to dividends. So by using the non TR index they already under perform a basic index fund by sometimes a few %

yahooms

# SO, THE CHILDREN FUND OF AMERICA (AKA TRṳmp ACCOUNT) BOUGHT AT TOP TOO??? ...LOL **THESE KIDS ARE GONNA BE POOR 🤲**

071790

Hell...if everyone wants to go on about food stocks why not pump up $TR.

PraiseTheWLAN

Wish it was available on TR, I would have jumped on it

seanws30

Just ordered the personalized plates for my Lambo. BCN8TR

Susy_Joi

I bought as soon as available on TR and there wasn't a day it went up, what a joke

Prudent-Corgi3793

I calculate not only my returns against the S&P TR, but I also calculate the beta, volatility, Sharpe, Sortino, etc. over the relevant time period and over rolling time windows. And I do it with other benchmarks like the CRSP Total US Market TR, Large Growth TR, MSCI ACWI TR, etc. to justify my decision to continue picking individual stocks to make sure I’m not only beating these benchmarks, but beating them on a risk-adjusted basis.

FistMyPeenHole

TR is Tootsie Roll

Diligent-Act-6405

Fuck me been playing with knockout options aswell on TR so far -5K 🔥

Zuitsdg

Maybe your got some 20€ share or so for joining TR212? Highest offers I encountered so far where like 100€ for opening an ING account, or up to 5000€ for moving >1 million in assets to comdirect. Just check your investment and brokerage account, you could seethe values. Unless you bought some SpaceX Calls with 10x leverage or so, you did not earn 240% with those investments today :D But enjoy your signing bonus and happy investing career!

Qluot

The regular SPX index only tracks the raw prices, whereas the total returns version of the index takes dividend payments and adds that back into the running sum, reinvested. just search up SP500TR

flapjackbandit00

Did you account for SP500 dividends too? Ticker SP500TR shows the true return including dividends. Probably makes it even more humbling.

Hampster90

Ibkr operates the shares just fine in Europe. TR is just a bit new / gimmicky. Perhaps just transfer that one line for now to speed it up?

Silmidil

Yeah it sucks but I will still hang around here to see how it goes (and watch the thread lol) and hopefully TR fixes this mess over the week-end

Silmidil

Im was on trade republic but im switching to Interactive Broker but the transfer of portfiolio takes some time so for now my LFVN shares are still on TR and I fear the squeeze might happen before I can control my shares again

Bred_Slippy

Why would you exclude dividends? Try using the total return (TR) version of the indices. 

DutyCompetitive1328

Might be worth checking out beforehand https://www.reddit.com/r/insiderbets/s/5TR4Kny1pc

wthja

Are these derivatives then? I believe TR doesn't support options

Puzzleheaded-Bonus25

Maybe add a 10 cents per month saving plan (free of comission on TR!) to the ETF to dollar cost average out your risk a bit.

Icy-Business-8954

**Trump CANNOT make a deal with Iran even if he wanted one either because he cannot lift sanctions:** **1- Iran will at a minimum demand lifting sanctions permanently** **2- Only Congress can lift sanctions permanently. While US Presidents can temporarily suspend some sanctions, the most significant sanctions on Iran are imposed by Congress and only Congress can lift them** **3- Prior deals fell apart precisely for this reason including Obama's JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran, which started to fray from the start under Obama before Trump was even elected to his first term (when he tore up the deal) - Since the US was not able to abide by its own obligations under the JCPOA, by the time Trump was in office the deal had already failed despite Iran's compliance and reduction of enriched uranium.** Under the US Constitution only Congress is in charge of economic relations with other nations (Art 1 Sec 8) And with AIPAC's influence in Congress there is no way they'll agree to lift sanctions This is why the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran that Obama negotiated started to fall apart from the get-go, long before Trump tore up the deal: "if the situation is not appreciably better soon, it will be impossible for the US and its partners to argue credibly that they are not in breach of the JCPOA" \-THE IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS: ONE YEAR ON - Sir Richard Dalton [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896) And the Iranians had already started to complain too: Top Iranian official says U.S. and EU have not fulfilled nuclear deal - POLITICO [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029](https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029) Had Trump not torn up the JCPOA deal it would have fallen apart by itself And yes, Trump can pretend to make a deal with Iran in which he claims sanctions are lifted but nobody - certainly not Iran or companies facing potential sanctions violations fines - will take that seriously because they know that he can't lift sanctions only Congress can. Obama and Kerry similarly tried to rally foreign companies to do business with Iran under the terms of the JCPOA despite the fact that Congress still imposed sanctions on anyone who did business with Iran -- and so the foreign businesses simply ignored Kerry and Obama John Kerry's Awkward Push For Investment In Iran : Parallels : NPR [https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran](https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran) See the US sanctions on Iran are MEANT to be obstacles to deals -- this is one way how lobbyists influence US foreign policy. The US has maintained sanctions on Cuba for decades after Communism and Castro died because the Cuban exile lobby in Congress has similarly passed laws that block deals with Cuba : Cuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations - [EveryCRSReport.com](http://EveryCRSReport.com) [https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R43888.html](https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R43888.html) And the sanctions on Iran - by law - cannot be lifted even if Iran completely gives up her nuclear program Are Sanctions a Fatwa on Iran? - The National Interest [https://nationalinterest.org/feature/are-sanctions-fatwa-iran-6363](https://nationalinterest.org/feature/are-sanctions-fatwa-iran-6363) And decades of polls show Iranians support their nuclear program, resent sanctions, distrust the US and think Iran should get nukes A majority of Iranians now favor possessing nuclear weapons. Their leaders take note. - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/](https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/) Analysis of Multiple Polls Finds Little Evidence Iranian Public Sees Government as Illegitimate – [WorldPublicOpinion.org](http://WorldPublicOpinion.org) [https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/](https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/) What Do Iranians Think? A Survey of Attitudes on the United States, the Nuclear Program, and the Economy | RAND [https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical\_reports/TR910.html](https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR910.html) Iranian Public Opinion under 'Maximum Pressure' | Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland [https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure](https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure)

Icy-Business-8954

Actually, Trump CANNOT make a deal with Iran even if he wanted one either: 1- Iran will at a minimum demand lifting sanctions \*permanently\* 2- Only Congress can lift sanctions permanently. While US Presidents can temporarily suspend some sanctions \*temporarily\*, the most significant sanctions on Iran are imposed by Congress and only Congress can lift them. Under the US Constitution only Congress is in charge of economic relations with other nations (Art 1 Sec 8) and with AIPAC's influence in Congress there is no way they'll agree to lift sanctions 3- Prior deals fell apart precisely for this reason including Obama's JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran, which started to fray from the start under Obama before Trump was even elected to his first term (when he tore up the deal) - Since the US was not able to abide by its own obligations under the JCPOA, by the time Trump was in office the deal had already failed despite Iran's compliance and reduction of enriched uranium. This is why the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran that Obama negotiated started to fall apart from the get-go, long before Trump tore up the deal: "if the situation is not appreciably better soon, it will be impossible for the US and its partners to argue credibly that they are not in breach of the JCPOA" \-THE IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS: ONE YEAR ON - Sir Richard Dalton [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896) And the Iranians had already started to complain too: Top Iranian official says U.S. and EU have not fulfilled nuclear deal - POLITICO [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029](https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029) Had Trump not torn up the JCPOA deal, it would have fallen apart by itself. And yes, Trump can pretend to make a deal with Iran in which he claims sanctions are lifted but nobody - certainly not Iran or companies facing potential sanctions violations fines - will take that seriously because they know that he can't lift sanctions only Congress can. Obama and Kerry similarly tried to rally foreign companies to do business with Iran under the terms of the JCPOA despite the fact that Congress still imposed sanctions on anyone who did business with Iran -- and so the foreign businesses simply ignored Kerry and Obama John Kerry's Awkward Push For Investment In Iran : Parallels : NPR [https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran](https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran) And decades of polls show Iranians support their nuclear program, resent sanctions, distrust the US and think Iran should get nukes A majority of Iranians now favor possessing nuclear weapons. Their leaders take note. - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/](https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/) Analysis of Multiple Polls Finds Little Evidence Iranian Public Sees Government as Illegitimate – [WorldPublicOpinion.org](http://WorldPublicOpinion.org) [https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/](https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/) What Do Iranians Think? A Survey of Attitudes on the United States, the Nuclear Program, and the Economy | RAND [https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical\_reports/TR910.html](https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR910.html) Iranian Public Opinion under 'Maximum Pressure' | Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland [https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure](https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure)

Icy-Business-8954

Actually, Trump CANNOT make a deal with Iran even if he wanted one either: 1- Iran will at a minimum demand lifting sanctions \*permanently\* 2- Only Congress can lift sanctions permanently. While US Presidents can temporarily suspend some sanctions \*temporarily\*, the most significant sanctions on Iran are imposed by Congress and only Congress can lift them. Under the US Constitution only Congress is in charge of economic relations with other nations (Art 1 Sec 8) and with AIPAC's influence in Congress there is no way they'll agree to lift sanctions 3- Prior deals fell apart precisely for this reason including Obama's JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran, which started to fray from the start under Obama before Trump was even elected to his first term (when he tore up the deal) - Since the US was not able to abide by its own obligations under the JCPOA, by the time Trump was in office the deal had already failed despite Iran's compliance and reduction of enriched uranium. This is why the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran that Obama negotiated started to fall apart from the get-go, long before Trump tore up the deal: "if the situation is not appreciably better soon, it will be impossible for the US and its partners to argue credibly that they are not in breach of the JCPOA" \-THE IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS: ONE YEAR ON - Sir Richard Dalton [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2016.1225896) And the Iranians had already started to complain too: Top Iranian official says U.S. and EU have not fulfilled nuclear deal - POLITICO [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029](https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/iran-nuclear-deal-us-222029) Had Trump not torn up the JCPOA deal, it would have fallen apart by itself. And yes, Trump can pretend to make a deal with Iran in which he claims sanctions are lifted but nobody - certainly not Iran or companies facing potential sanctions violations fines - will take that seriously because they know that he can't lift sanctions only Congress can. Obama and Kerry similarly tried to rally foreign companies to do business with Iran under the terms of the JCPOA despite the fact that Congress still imposed sanctions on anyone who did business with Iran -- and so the foreign businesses simply ignored Kerry and Obama John Kerry's Awkward Push For Investment In Iran : Parallels : NPR [https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran](https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/25/479462791/john-kerrys-awkward-push-for-investment-in-iran) And decades of polls show Iranians support their nuclear program, resent sanctions, distrust the US and think Iran should get nukes A majority of Iranians now favor possessing nuclear weapons. Their leaders take note. - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/](https://thebulletin.org/2024/06/a-majority-of-iranians-now-favor-possessing-nuclear-weapons-their-leaders-take-note/) Analysis of Multiple Polls Finds Little Evidence Iranian Public Sees Government as Illegitimate – [WorldPublicOpinion.org](http://WorldPublicOpinion.org) [https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/](https://worldpublicopinion.net/analysis-of-multiple-polls-finds-little-evidence-iranian-public-sees-government-as-illegitimate/) What Do Iranians Think? A Survey of Attitudes on the United States, the Nuclear Program, and the Economy | RAND [https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical\_reports/TR910.html](https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR910.html) Iranian Public Opinion under 'Maximum Pressure' | Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland [https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure](https://cissm.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/iranian-public-opinion-under-maximum-pressure)

EmpathyFabrication

At long last SPY overtakes $TR YTD

spidLL

https://preview.redd.it/iau6o5nukj3h1.jpeg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e338691d528eac0902437e029e36c1c6c2693735 Testarossa 512 TR is still my preferred

myboywears

Iceman bangs, 2H4TR

buried_lede

Yes, but if not, i have my comfort stock, $TR. Monster beverages maybe too

raynzor12

Ne, ich hab bei TR ein Long Faktor Zertifikat seit Donnerstag

ServiceFar5283

Ing Konto eröffnen oder in die vorhandenen Derivate bei TR investieren

Jerambo-1

Ja! aber die, die bei TR sind, gucken nur wieder zu 🤮

EmpathyFabrication

Tootsie Roll $TR

Xelonima

My SO's cousin is fleeing from Iran to TR just to avoid getting drafted. The war isn't going anywhere.

Babyfat101

Well, if you’re gonna threaten, might as well bring in the “big sticks” (TR).

Fuck-Star

Well $1.4M at least. https://www.reddit.com/r/BULL_Stock/s/3FmtfUs8TR

Significant-Moose171

The best gauge is S&P TR, which is up \~20%.

Xelonima

TR is a god in human form but I doubt he'd take this as an insult 

Xelonima

Amy Lee mentions TR as an influence but who doesn't Kinda similar to earlier Halos than the later synth heavy stuff 

bubblemania2020

That’s the price you pay for growth. Otherwise just sit in TR bonds (even those aren’t safe now, lol).

garden_speech

> This is correction territory with all indications headed towards a bear market. This is paradoxical in an open market where anyone can participate... If "all indications" suggested a lower fair price than current, the price would be lower than current. > Dip buyers got crushed in ‘08 / ‘09 No, not really. If they bought ~now (when stocks were 10% off all time highs) they would have [make absolutely fucking enormous returns by holding](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5ESP500TR/), the S&P500 TR index (total return i.e. including dividends) sat around ~2200 after it's 10% dip from ATH in 2008, and it's now over 14,000. Of course all this goes out the window if you are buying individual stocks, but the data has shown that's a losing game for a very long time, so anyone still trying it is gambling.

hadizadam

This is Ben TR.

hadizadam

Ben TR is that you?

hadizadam

What was that Ben TR thing...

hadizadam

In 5 years in different dimension Guys, what is Ben TR?

Leibwatchter

I guess one of those ships is TR ship, Iran let it pass through as a gesture of peace after saying missiles exploding over Incirlik was not Iranian

SpellAccomplished541

# Performance Reality |Period|Inverse Cramer|S&P 500 TR| |:-|:-|:-| |**YTD**|\+8.3%|\+2.8%| |**1-Year**|\+15%|\+11%|

Civil_Cranberry_3476

[https://x.com/Insidetradmk/status/2032158269469249906?s=20](https://x.com/Insidetradmk/status/2032158269469249906?s=20) any thoughts this just popped up for me ? ive been following the TR stock its sales declined this year according to their filings

FUCKNOOBS

**Pedophilia** ([alternatively](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences) spelled *paedophilia*) is a [psychiatric disorder](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatric_disorder) in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive [sexual attraction](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_attraction) to [prepubescent](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prepubescent) children.[^(\[1\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-Gavin-1)[^(\[2\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-seto-2)^(: vii)  Although girls typically begin the process of [puberty](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty) at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[^(\[3\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-3) psychiatric diagnostic criteria for pedophilia often extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[^(\[4\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-DSM-5-TR-4) People with the disorder are often referred to as *pedophiles* (or *paedophiles*).

eiloop

you all know that song from the 90s? EVERYBODY LOVES TRUM .... det det ddet. EVERYBODY LOVES TR.... You got it in your ears yet?

OmegaX3D

EU in general no? I mean I’m from EU most people either use TR or eToro. What app do you use suggest using?

Traditional_Page_75

Kamala is very smart. I’m not saying groundbreaking scholar or thinker of the age by any means(the founders weren’t, maybe with the exception of Franklin; Lincoln was one of the smartest men in the country at the time, undoubtedly. TR read books in less than an hour by scanning the pages- literally, flips a page, then flips the page again, every 5-10 seconds, with 100% comprehension. He was insanely gifted. And he only became president because the Republican Party made him vice president to stifle his political aspirations when McKinley got shot. Every other president barely passed the bar. Ronnie? Kamala is way smarter than him. Meet an intelligent woman in administration and they act exactly like her. Trump is also smart. If you watch him in early campaigns in 2016 with Hillary, whenever she used larger words to explain things, he would snap back his answers using college educated words too. I would argue he’s actually very smart since he knows dumbing down his everyday speech increases his appeal.

tightlipssorenips

shorting tootsie roll. TR had a big run now its time to land

TrainingLazy7879

TR is a shithole

mcflinty_1

TR’s buns are the cats ass

Civil_Cranberry_3476

Thinking of a heavy short on /TR tootsie roll - they no longer innovate, are getting hit hard with cocoa imports, have no leadership since longtime CEO died recently, and spend more on lawyers for bullsh lawsuits than they do R&D and marketing See Tootsie v. tootsie impex a company thats been around since 1989 and tootsie v. Rollashoe for naming a shoe footzyroll. all they do now is protect a dying IP and no innovation. thoughts ?

ReputationNo1203

How do I start? I am 18 and use TR

EmpathyFabrication

$TR

Timely_Beat4637

My TR watchlist is completely green; it contains 35 companies. However, it only includes the MSCI World index. ...

ragmuc

For TR users, this information can also be found under news provided. Stock is now down by 14,74% / week

garden_speech

> The average S&P500 dividend yield is 1.7% from 2000 to 2013. The average annual CPI is 2.5%. Oooookay, but that doesn't make the claim "*Inflation was nearly double dividend yields, so the dividend yields have no impact on real value.*" logically coherent. The dividends compound and yields are highest during recessions, they went over 4% during the 2009 crash... S&P500TR closed at 1,919 for the month of 1/2000 and 2,634 for the month of 1/2013, for a total return of 37% over that time period, meanwhile if you only looked at the share price, you saw 9% return. I do not think you understand how large the impact of dividends was during the so-called lost-decade. The difference between 9% total nominal return over those 13 years and 37%... Cannot *conceivably* be argued to "have no impact on real value". > This was the purpose of my comment to begin with, that cherry picking specific data points can skew any opinion on an asset. The original comment picked the peak of the gold price No, you are not understanding what's being said, again. Picking a time period where you literally could not even own gold legally at all is not "cherry picking" it's just making up an impossible investment position. That's mechanistically different from pointing out "hey, actual real investors who owned gold had to wait 44 years to see positive returns in this time period". Again, looking at **real** tail risk events when you're investing is not cherry picking.

garden_speech

> "Well actually", you are wrong. The TR measures nominal value, Yeah, you said "break even", normally that refers to nominal value, at least in my (brief) stint in finance. > Inflation was nearly double dividend yields, so the dividend yields have no impact on real value. Wait, what time period were you talking about? I thought the "13 years to break even" was referring to the common 2000-2013 example. > Secondly, it is cherry picked and you aren't even educated enough to know why my cherry picked data is bad. You couldn't legally own gold in 1970 at $35/oz, which makes all of my numbers a misrepresentation of fact. Lol bruh I quoted the part of the comment I was responding to, not this bait of yours. > I intentionally did that to prove my point that cherry picking data isn't meaningful. All you did with that bait was """prove""" that picking an impossible or irrelevant piece of data isn't meaningful. On the other hand, looking at tail risk (i.e. *what has actually happened to real investors in the market*) is very valid and is not cherry-picking unless the conclusion being drawn from that data is "this *will* happen to you"

Easik

"Well actually", you are wrong. The TR measures nominal value, not real valuation. Inflation was nearly double dividend yields, so the dividend yields have no impact on real value. Secondly, it is cherry picked and you aren't even educated enough to know why my cherry picked data is bad. You couldn't legally own gold in 1970 at $35/oz, which makes all of my numbers a misrepresentation of fact. I intentionally did that to prove my point that cherry picking data isn't meaningful. Finally, the comment I responded to is mostly accurate, but I take issue with the data points they picked. I don't necessarily disagree with their logic, but to disregard the macro environment in the data is a mistake. In both assets, there are long periods of holding to breakeven, it's mostly a waste of time debating which asset is superior because they both have different purposes.

garden_speech

> Just remember, if you bought the S&P at the peak it took 13 years to break even. See how pointless it is to cherry pick data? Actually this is not true and is often repeated by people who, for some inexplicable reason, are not counting dividends in the return calculation for stocks. If you look at [S&P 500 TR indices](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5ESP500TR/?) you will see that the 2000-2001 price levels were reached within 5 years again, at ~2100. Secondly, "cherry picking" the longest amount of time you may have to wait to get your money back is the whole point here. How likely is it that someone buys at the literal peak? Well not very. But the fact that even with the *worst* timing in recent history you'd only be waiting several years to get your money back in the S&P, versus having to wait over four decades with gold, is the entire point.

Franic510

Why can’t i buy this on TR?

ifuckedyourdaddytoo

Assuming the 8-year period ending this month, if he'd just dump it in an S&P 500 index fund, he could have had around $19200. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5ESP500TR/

Goma1407

Good that TR is a serious platform

SelbstMorty

Can anyone recommend a broker, currently using TR, which doesn’t have everything I want thanks

horstiiiii

I have the same issue using TR :D

Cookie_dev99

From what I have heard, IBKR has the most complexe one. For now it hasn't been very complicated to get used to it but I'm still using the demo version as someone who is coming from TR the plate-forme is less intuitive and less user friendly (but maybe it's only the case of the demo version)

cardinal1742

I think Northrop Grumman is teasing the release of the TR-3B… I’m thinking about buying now

jannickBhxld

are yall just all in on silver now? i mean the 3x leverage stock on TR did 70% in a week and 150 in a month, but im always hesitant on dumping like that

SprinklesMany2038

Look for s&p 500 or total us stock market (VANG INST 500 IDX TR) Put 60% or 70% there. Then find total international (VANG TOT INT STK IDX) put 40% or 30% there.  Both funds should be low fee/expense ratio. Less than .015% use morningstar for help researching. Congrats on having vanguard as investing choices. You may have to rebalance every few years to get back to your %'s. And add bonds as you get closer to retierment. VANG TOTAL BOND MKT

Grouchy_Spare1850

Sorry they don't even rank in the top 20. And the devastating spread of TR4 in the Philippines and its alarming presence in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and Peru had caused further production losses as well as financial strain from the substantial costs associated with disease prevention. Can we say sabotage by the Chinese government ?

james-1926

Trade republic. I have also accounts at IBKR and etoro for risk management but my first and main account is at Trade Republic. In case you need referral links for TR and etoro, please send me. It's a good period with nice offers.

landon912

Not true at all. High performance is subjective and you never know what happens in TR. An enormous amount of politics are involved.

EmpathyFabrication

$TR

Traditional_Page_75

Hot take. If Powell pulls a stud, he belongs on Mount Rushmore next to Jefferson and TR. rate hike is the last hope for free people of this earth

EmpathyFabrication

$TR tootsie roll

FreeUnicorn4u

TR is what?

Usual-Collection5360

Unfortunately not tradable on TR.

GoodCommission8304

Guys what do you think about "Quebec rare earth Elements"? But for daytrading. Its not like I know much about daytrading or trading at all but i kept an eye in tgat stock an the pattern was pretty easy: If it starts the day with loss or only minor(3 or less%) profit -> its gonna rise big at 10am and/or( it depends idk how tgat works out yet) at 3PM german time. And if it ends the day with loss its gonna start the next one with profit. What I just described is pretty accurat, at least dor the past 6 weeks. And I use Traderepublic btw where the Stock is somehow different as you see it on other sites/apps And if you dont recommend TR, what would you recommend?

AfraidAnalyst

TR beating SPY this year so far makes me laugh

garden_speech

This is just plain false. Here is the S&P 500 [total return index](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5ESP500TR/) (which accounts for dividends instead of just index price) No part of the 90s had flat returns. Only the 2000-2010 decade did, and that’s only if you invested at the 2000 peak, and it’s also only because of the literal greatest financial crisis the country has seen in 100 years. So it’s massive hyperbole to say what the original commenter said. No, there aren’t “decades” where this happens, there’s one decade, singular, in the country’s last 100 years of existence

Albertpm95

Sadly can't find this stock from TR/T212MyI :(

CaptainPrestigious74

Make they could become a savant and figure out the future of M$TR

EmpathyFabrication

TR pumping from Oct low. Bullish on this classic American treat beating Bitcoin and S&P

Cookie_dev99

Thank you, I think I’ll do that. To be honest, it’s really frustrating to see opportunities pass by just because they aren’t available on TR. I’ve been thinking about starting with Interactive Brokers, but the fees and calculating the transaction taxes we have to pay here in Belgium have been a barrier. Paper trading could be a good way to get used to the platform and learn more for a while before starting for real.

AutoModerator

# DO NOT IGNORE THIS COMMENT Hello R3TR0-GH02T, your comment has been removed because your account has low karma. We have this filter in place to help protect against bots, trolls, and spammers. We might approve your post if you were not spamming/trolling/etc in some time if your post is of significant quality. Please message the mods of r/shortsqueeze using [this link](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/Shortsqueeze&subject=Content+Approval+Because+of+Low+Karma) if you believe this is in error and you DO fit the requirements. You will not be approved for telling us you are not a bot. (Please note -- It will not be approved sooner if you message us 5 minutes after it gets removed or if you message multiple times). Also, messaging us to say that you are not a bot is not qualification for this post to be approved. Please do not message us unless you have over the approved karma limit (25). If you do not know what karma is, or how to get it, check our r/newtoreddit *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Shortsqueeze) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Elibroftw

The stock market is still poised to return more than 10 year treasury yields according to TR CAPE.  https://blog.elijahlopez.ca/posts/gold-vs-sp500-returns/

EmpathyFabrication

Institutional money flocking to TR Tootsie Roll. Beating S&P YTD

hug0bug

I think TR only gives warrants

AgitatedHorror1769

Is that an actual option or a warrant? I can only trade warrants on TR ffs.

UrbanDancingSystems_

Ooh shit ur right. I just saw the warning. So wait, you can buy it on TR but not sell it?? Because the purchase button is still there lol

drndr21

TR is a piece of shit, you should only use it for boomer style VOO and chill, otherwise useless and bad spreads

pepe_____-

Ok real question, trade republic or interactive brokers? I feel like TR is super easy to use, but sometime it’s TOO easy and basic While IBKR seems lowkey old school but way more complete, idk about fees tho What y’all europoors think?

BrandonLeeOfficial

Tootsie Rolls are disgusting, trade under TR and have $3 billion market cap. Assuming the same geriatric degenerates are also keeping Arby’s afloat.

Next-Dust4424

TR doesn’t have it

MarketAlive6455

TR still going in Germany. Don’t sell the rest of the world is going strong!

SikkMate

Anyone Else Having problems with buying at TR?

Icy_Masterpiece1923

My Tootsie Roll Indicator has been flashing warning signs. TR went up during covid crash.

No-Consequence-8768

Why doesn't my Math work out to Doubling? Best you could be at is 68.87% TR. since Nov '23 low