See More CryptosHome

IPX

Tachyon Protocol

Show Trading View Graph

Mentions (24Hr)

0

0.00% Today

Reddit Posts

r/CryptoMoonShotsSee Post

Interest protocol , the next generation of Decentralizatlon of Finance | Dex is Live | Free Stablecoin Loans | First and early community members will be awarded | 2nd Community call today on official TG channel

r/CryptoMoonShotsSee Post

Interest protocol is the future of Decentralized Finance | Dex Is Live (Test Net) | 0% Loans | Early community members will get rewards | 2nd Community call tomorrow on Telegram

r/CryptoMoonShotsSee Post

$IPX Tachyon dVPN coin moonshot incoming

Mentions

r/BitcoinSee Comment

People can put their money where ever they want. Shitcoin scammers are kind of tragic though, of course we feel bad for people fleeced by such obvious scams. Shitcoiners are selling the IPX/SPX of digital money. Sure, some of the people pushing that tech were dumb enough to truly believe in it, just like some altcoiners are today. Those with common sense saw the writing on the wall quite early, and knew the TCP/IP was inevitable. They knew netware pushing an alternative was basically stealing money from schools and charities and small businesses. Same kind of tragedy.

Mentions:#IPX#SPX#TCP

This is a weird argument. It would be like me saying bitcoin should be compared to IPX, token ring, or appletalk and therefore, it will fail.

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

The internet did not go "mainstream" simply because people went around preaching it in public. It went mainstream gradually when it started to serve people's needs with **actual utility**. Right now, there's two broad categories of utility I see: 1) Investment and trading, and 2) Limited value store and in turn, payment with value store. Internet went mainstream more with actual utility beyond its underlying tech. Email and FTP rest on RFC 1939 and 354 but users don't need to talk abt how great these RFCs are or how TCP/IP is superior to IPX or X.25. Researchers and academics would have their discussion on BBS and UNIX / VAX forums but they didn't go around evangelising to normal folks on the street. Instead, they just build up the underlying tech, coming up with newer and newer applications until someone come along and bridge product with tech. Early web sites were fancy upgrades of BBS. Many basically were ports of BBS from text to html. Then we started having email providers like [postone.com](https://postone.com), [hotmail.com](https://hotmail.com), and directory/search services like Alta Vista and Yahoo!. IRC, ICQ, Instant Messengers came along while Real Audio and then Real Audio, gave voice and video to the internet. Users did not really TALK about the internet, they just used these applications because they provided some kind of utility to them. If crypto users go around talking in public to people about crypto without something more tangible beyond the above two utility categories, we would really sound like Christian evangelist or mormons, preaching for the sake of preaching. Christianity and love God as an end in itself. And it fucking turns people off, both for crypto and Christianity or any religion for that matter. So, we need to keep the "talking" and "preaching" in check, and focus on building tech and applications for devs, and using the applications for users.

r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

MySpace is not the right analogy, the correct one would be IPX/SPX. Which may have been a superior protocol stack, unfortunately it was too centralized.

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

IPX protocol was very popular in the 80s-90s. Almost all LAN connected games used it, for example. Do you know where it is now? Yes, exactly there.

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

Yeah so legendary. After debuting on the scene by programming some (very) minor tools in Unix, Eric Schmidt somehow jockeyed himself into becoming CEO of Novell in 1997, essentially betting against the Internet. Back in 1997, Novell NetWare did not even natively support TCP/IP: that was considered a rival technology stack to IPX. Can you think of a stupider time to jump aboard Novell as a communications platform than in the mid '90s, when it was still positioning itself against TCP/IP? Where is Novell NetWare today? Same place as every other service that positioned itself against TCP/IP. The only communication services that have survived that weren't monopolies have been those that adopted TCP/IP insightfully early. Novell was not among them. Then this pre-Internet bizknob somehow also jockeyed himself into the CEO position at Google, where he helped pound their founding 'Don't be evil' ethic out of existence and made its ethics and business practices resemble Novell's exactly. 'Don't be evil' would never do for a Novell executive. Yep, Eric Schmidt is truly 'legendary'.

Mentions:#TCP#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

> Why should anyone care about M2 supply normalized prices? that like asking why anyone would care about filtering loud fart sounds our of their music. Obviously, its a lot easier to hear the signal without the noise. > like an hour of average labor or the CPI basket. The value of labor ismore certainly nor constant; workers are generally trending to be smarter, higher skill, and more productive. For example, paralegals that used to employ dozens of people now rely on far fewer people but are expect to far more work than the entire pool used to complete. Typing pools are completely obsolete and their work subsumed into other professions. Labor is very much useless as a constant. > Hence I would say relative prices of goods in BTC are well defined. If the sellers primarily denominate good in btc, and expect USD to be converted to BTC before executing a trade, then yes. That is largely not the case; the BTC price is not highly tied or involved in most goods, so its not actually carrying the value signals. Again money is a network; You could argue "what is all web browsering went over IPX/SPX instead", and do some calculations to see how it might work. But that network is not actually being used and not carrying signals so there is no point. > doesn't this mean Fiat also plays a equally small role in the market for consumer goods? Unless people are making a lot of paper mache out of fiat dollar bills, the yes, it is very seldom employed as a consumer good. > How does using the M2 normalized Fiat price help? It shows gold decline more clearly. > normalized price in terms of an hour of labor? No such thing. Labor is extremely non fungible over large periods of time. The biggest mistakes keynesians commit are summing and averaging things which are non countable. GDP is the perfect example of this; its a [magic number which has absolutely no significance](https://pics.me.me/bernanke-ill-pay-you-20-000-to-eat-that-pile-of-4866318.png), and is about as informative as abstract art.

Mentions:#CPI#BTC#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

Just like IPX was?

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

You're comparing "the first electrical computer" to modern computers and trying to make the point that blockchains are anything like that evolution. Also, blockchains have been around far longer than 2010. The theory has been around since the 80s and was developed into a product as of 1992. Bitcoin (and derivates) are just one of many attempts at making something of the blockchain. It's like saying that the IPX protocol, also available since 1983, still needs time to reign. It was developed (based on other technologies, like blockchain is just an idea based on others), had its useful lifetime and was replaced by other things. A few people might still use it in niche use cases here and there, that's it. Crypto blockchains are still hammers looking for nails.

Mentions:#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

Myspace depended on machines too. Novel create a protocol called IPX/SPX, ever hear of it? If you have you are old, if not there is a reason for that and that reason is TCP/IP.

Mentions:#IPX#TCP
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

I'm bag holding IPX to the bitter end myself.

Mentions:#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

Doom was released in 1993 and we played over IPX/SPX networks. Such an antiquated technology couldn't possibly still be playable. Except [here's](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD0L46y3IqI) someone who's gotten it running on a Macbook Pro Touch Bar. It's been run on ultrasound machines, pocket calculators... a long, weird list of things. Pretty sure as tech changes over time, we'll find it easy to use new protocols and new hardware to keep Bitcoin running - and probably make it better.

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

"Stablecoins increasingly are the form of cryptoassets most commonly used for transactional purposes, and as 2022 gets underway the importance of these cryptoassets will only increase. From a business and marketplace point of view the upsides and opportunities linked to stablecoins are clear, and have been reinforced over the last several years. As should be self-evident by the moniker, the primary benefit of stablecoins is the reduced price volatility that often characterizes other cryptoassets. A simple statement of fact, but one whose importance cannot be overstated. In order to achieve mainstream adoption and utilization as a medium of exchange rather than simply a speculative investment, users and consumers must have confidence in the value of whatever is being utilized for this purpose. The appetite and interest in stablecoins has been demonstrated by the billions in transactions taking place using these assets, the regulatory focus highlighted by the President’s Working Group report on the matter, and the fact that several major payment processers now allow customers to send and receive payments denominated in stablecoins. In other words, the functionality of these tools and market interest has been proven and established; the technology works and fills a need. Policy, or lack thereof, still remains a looming threat to broader adoption and utilization, and is an area that will need to be addressed as the sector continues to mature. Sign In Subscribe Jan 3, 2022, 09:02am EST Stablecoin Friendly Policies Can Help Make 2022 A Breakout Year For The Sector Sean Stein Smith Contributor Crypto & Blockchain Professor, entrepreneur, CPA, and enthusiast for everything blockchain Stablecoins increasingly are the form of cryptoassets most commonly used for transactional purposes, and as 2022 gets underway the importance of these cryptoassets will only increase. Cryptocurrency continues to gain worldwide acceptance Getty STRF/STAR MAX/IPX From a business and marketplace point of view the upsides and opportunities linked to stablecoins are clear, and have been reinforced over the last several years. As should be self-evident by the moniker, the primary benefit of stablecoins is the reduced price volatility that often characterizes other cryptoassets. A simple statement of fact, but one whose importance cannot be overstated. In order to achieve mainstream adoption and utilization as a medium of exchange rather than simply a speculative investment, users and consumers must have confidence in the value of whatever is being utilized for this purpose. The appetite and interest in stablecoins has been demonstrated by the billions in transactions taking place using these assets, the regulatory focus highlighted by the President’s Working Group report on the matter, and the fact that several major payment processers now allow customers to send and receive payments denominated in stablecoins. In other words, the functionality of these tools and market interest has been proven and established; the technology works and fills a need. Policy, or lack thereof, still remains a looming threat to broader adoption and utilization, and is an area that will need to be addressed as the sector continues to mature. Obviously the conversations linked to cryptoasset regulation is beyond the scope of any singular article. Rather, the factors listed below are explicitly connected to stablecoins, and how commonsense policies can not only help accelerate adoption of stablecoins, and also create a regulatory environment that allows for further maturation and development of the space. Let’s take a look at a few policy items that could – and hopefully will – accelerate the already rapid adoption of stablecoins. Differentiate stablecoins. This point cannot be overstated; in order to further develop and expand the opportunities for stablecoin utilization, there needs to be a differentiation between stablecoins and other cryptoassets. While it is true that the cryptoasset space at large has become much busier during the last year or so – non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized finance (DeFi), and the rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) – the importance of this singular difference is paramount. Sign In Subscribe Jan 3, 2022, 09:02am EST Stablecoin Friendly Policies Can Help Make 2022 A Breakout Year For The Sector Sean Stein Smith Contributor Crypto & Blockchain Professor, entrepreneur, CPA, and enthusiast for everything blockchain Stablecoins increasingly are the form of cryptoassets most commonly used for transactional purposes, and as 2022 gets underway the importance of these cryptoassets will only increase. Cryptocurrency continues to gain worldwide acceptance Getty STRF/STAR MAX/IPX From a business and marketplace point of view the upsides and opportunities linked to stablecoins are clear, and have been reinforced over the last several years. As should be self-evident by the moniker, the primary benefit of stablecoins is the reduced price volatility that often characterizes other cryptoassets. A simple statement of fact, but one whose importance cannot be overstated. In order to achieve mainstream adoption and utilization as a medium of exchange rather than simply a speculative investment, users and consumers must have confidence in the value of whatever is being utilized for this purpose. The appetite and interest in stablecoins has been demonstrated by the billions in transactions taking place using these assets, the regulatory focus highlighted by the President’s Working Group report on the matter, and the fact that several major payment processers now allow customers to send and receive payments denominated in stablecoins. In other words, the functionality of these tools and market interest has been proven and established; the technology works and fills a need. Policy, or lack thereof, still remains a looming threat to broader adoption and utilization, and is an area that will need to be addressed as the sector continues to mature. Obviously the conversations linked to cryptoasset regulation is beyond the scope of any singular article. Rather, the factors listed below are explicitly connected to stablecoins, and how commonsense policies can not only help accelerate adoption of stablecoins, and also create a regulatory environment that allows for further maturation and development of the space. Let’s take a look at a few policy items that could – and hopefully will – accelerate the already rapid adoption of stablecoins. Differentiate stablecoins. This point cannot be overstated; in order to further develop and expand the opportunities for stablecoin utilization, there needs to be a differentiation between stablecoins and other cryptoassets. While it is true that the cryptoasset space at large has become much busier during the last year or so – non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized finance (DeFi), and the rise of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) – the importance of this singular difference is paramount. Even now as regulators seek to implement policies to monetize and capture the benefits connected to cryptoassets, stablecoins are routinely lumped in with more volatility counterparts. This not only misses the bigger point regarding the value case of stablecoins, but muddies the water around how to best integrate cryptoassets into financial markets. Monetary competition is good. Recent comments and conversations have focused on, notably around the different CityCoin projects that have launched during the last several months, is that developing this array of options might not be the best use of resources. The thinking goes, why not instead invest these resources in developing other technologies or addressing other economic or societal issues versus introducing yet another cryptoasset? This line of thinking, as appealing as it might appear upon first review, misses the broader point. Every economic sector, be it connected to technology or not, is improved by the introduction of competitive options for consumers, investors, and users alike. Many of the same proponents of more standardized and centralized cryptoasset options, namely CBDCs, should be encouraging new and innovative stablecoin options. Lessons learned in the private sector can – and have – been integrated into the development of newer and more mainstream cryptoasset options. Competition is a good thing, and the best components of different tools will be integrated into whatever options do eventually achieve mainstream status. Simpler reporting requirements. The tax, compliance, and reporting obligations that accompany cryptoassets are a burden that have been discussed in multiple outlets, and the issues that exist are nothing new. Building on the first point mentioned above, this is also an opportunity for policymakers to demonstrate that more sophisticated public commentary is also working its way into more nuanced regulation and rule-making. One of the best ways to communicate that policy is evolving alongside the sector would be to ease the compliance burden on the issuers and users of stablecoins."

Mentions:#STAR#MAX#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

Hey buddy, you still see people using the IPX protocol over TCP/IP? No. You don’t. Bitcoin, and all the other coins are protocols. There is room only for one internet of money. These aren’t websites. They are the base layer for a new internet. The most secure decentralized system will win. And thats Bitcoin. The shitcoins have already lost.

Mentions:#IPX#TCP
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

The price of eip is already in Doesnt change that finalizing is still 7 tps Side chains and L2s etc do not infinitely scale. At some point they have to phone home Sharding over uncertain geo and hardware is also a race to the bottom Imagine trying to run Amazon over IPX. That is Ethereum still in 2022

Mentions:#IPX
r/BitcoinSee Comment

There is one protocol for the internet, which is TCP/IP. And yes, there were others. Just read it yourself on wikipedia: X.25 (ITU-T), IPX/SPX (Novell), AppleTalk (Apple) oder NetBEUI (Microsoft Windows) All the shitcoins, I mean alt-protocols I mean other protocols, got REKT.

Mentions:#TCP#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

No you did not have to "mess with your operating system", especially for a personal computer. Modems didn't use drivers, communication was handled via a rs232, a serial port, which the bios managed. A modem, especially external, was connected via the serial port. Whatever software you used then would be told which interrupts to use to access the serial port. The software didn't know, necessary, that there was an analog modem on the port. It could have just as well been another pc. Raw bytes were sent, possibly ANSI coding, or some other protocol like IPX to establish communications with the host. Using TCP/IP was nothing but a different formulation of the data stream on the same hardware. In the early days there were no ISPs, but some networks, such as university's, could establish an IP address for you. Though this was very rare for the general public. Connecting to the internet certainly couldn't "fry" your computer unless you had physically damaged your hardware in some manner, and again this has nothing to do with being online.

Mentions:#IPX#TCP
r/BitcoinSee Comment

Hello from Netware! IPX sends its regards!

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

My unpopular opinion is: Lightning/Bitcoin is like TCP/IP, Polygon/Ethereum is like IPX/SPX and Cardano is the OSI model

Mentions:#TCP#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

> I ask if I suffer from confirmation bias every day. That's the best a man can do. Not going to argue with that. For the record, while I am bullish in the long run for decentralized finance, which seems like a similar technological step to the use of double-entry bookkeeping, I'm not sure that means any of the current blockchains will be the ultimately adopted solution. In the short term, of a few years, I wouldn't be at all surprised if prices of crypto collapse, like they have done before. Because of that I think it's valuable to have voices like yours in the community urging caution to investors and countering some of the excessive hype. I've got to acknowledge my own biases as well, I want a future where the world's financial system is decentralized. Distributed ledgers, taken to the logical extreme would for example be an incredible tool against corruption, the idea that you could check a politician's wallet address and see any donations from corporations, foreign nationals etc is very appealing. Similarly, the idea that everyone has access to the same tools and applications, with the same potential for financial gains and risk mitigation just seems a more fair system. Above all, from a physicist's perspective the whole DeFi concept just seems more elegant than the legacy system we have now. Because I think that future is better then it's always useful to hear the counter-arguments to it. If you really are wanting to research an alternative narrative to challenge your view on centralization then the history of the printing press and how it decentralized control of information would be interesting to you. I mentioned the internet earlier too, with obvious connotations, but in particular an example of how a decentralized solution won over proprietary tech was TCP/IP. There were alternatives created by IBM (SNA) and Novell (IPX/SPX) which, had they been adopted, could have resulted in a much more centralized network than we have today. Anyway, good luck with your silver and thanks for the interesting discussion.

Mentions:#TCP#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

Look at some of these names haha NameSymbolAdded[Meow Token](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x9d3f3d0fde655a498cea9b36a647eaf86547e685)MEOW2021-05-01[Peanut Butter](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0xc007438f995015f083a2c084a36e7bb0ee39303f)PEANUT2021-05-01[makiswap.com](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x745c386ddc3a316a777cb83b952d1c944f898a47)MAKI2021-05-01[Don-Key.finance](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x71102805056b2384156c547d53da39b6aa78b7a8)DON2021-05-01[CrossPad](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0xf200c3b82b4f5baaca8898549ec3f3d7aa8f85af)CROSS2021-05-01[NFTify.Network](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x30b5120455a91a6c336785daa2356a98d3365f2f)NFTIFY2021-05-01[Dojecoin](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x4658220e8f802af416ad723d09361c99a9bf9d45)DOJE2021-04-30[Moon Fox Community](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x70866e623c1dea2e83089178269da8f998ccd983)MFOX2021-04-30[IPX](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x2dbafe66850f52e6f2a7716a0dec6e02ccc1ae54)TACHYON2021-04-30[DOGE PARTY](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x654aeb61c3bb2f5d0e5e61ec058cfd774a49206a)DPARTY2021-04-30[LamboToken](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x1fc07b66fbe05b14eb7e408ccba1d88537fce1d0)LAMBO2021-04-30[ELONSTAR](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x291a786bf72997dbbc9cc6a3fa16d642cb6667b2)ELONSTAR2021-04-30[Horse Protocol](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x88cc09a52d7396af9cb75722995d35094c80a53b)HRS2021-04-30[Media Network](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x862060f17151162aa140f19382ef7405f528f176)MEDIA2021-04-30[NAOS Finance](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x61d15893308aab5005ab0611b0f0accd30ebefb3)NAOS2021-04-30[EasterEgg](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0x57099011a4cb4cb0e6584c7e3f7aaa0e7fb164da)EASTEREGG2021-04-29[Covalent](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0xd53dc349df9c52bc5eb3cf07bf90dfaee768d0e5)CQT2021-04-29[Miraculous🐞🐈](https://tokensniffer.com/token/0xf215371953a87cf071d420a991700fae68e26359)MIRA2021-04-29

r/BitcoinSee Comment

IPX/SPX is better dead

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

So you just said you made money. And you're upset that the instant news cycle vacuum sucked people in trying to...make money like you did ![gif](giphy|EhhCOk4IPX8oU)

Mentions:#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

Yeah and the exact same thing is happening with Orchid. The coin just mooned even though their app and product is far from ready yet. On the other hand Tachyon VPN (IPX) is still low and didn't moon, but their product is ready to use, their app has great UX and a lot of people use it! It also helped bypass censorship in Belarus in the past. That's when I realized the coins that moon aren't always the great projects and sometimes the smaller (and better) competitor get no attention while the other one pumps... A similar thing is happening with Cardano (ADA) and Algorand (ALGO) right now in my opinion.

Mentions:#IPX#ADA#ALGO
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

But TCP was not born the winner. For instance Mac OS [did not support TCP until 1988 and it was a $2,500 addon at that time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacTCP). Any blockchain protocol you point to today could just as easily be the next AppleTalk or IPX as it could TCP.

Mentions:#TCP#IPX
r/CryptoCurrencySee Comment

I don't know if superior in every way, RFC 1149, IPX/SPX, DECnet, IPsec/IP, UDP/IP, QUIC etc.

Mentions:#IPX