AI

LiquidatedRetard

Imagine buying TSLA on Hertz news and the deal isn’t even set in stone. Lots of retail retards gonna be rich and holding bags on TSLA. It’s a 200-300 dollar stock realistically. It’s AI doesn’t compete with Nvidia and it will NOT monopolize the EV industry. There will be other competitors

Redditor45643335

Nvidia is one of those companies I'll regret for the rest of my life not getting in on. There's just no excuse for not investing. I new of the company in 2014, I knew how good their cards where, I knew they were tapping into AI and their only real competition was Google. I severely under estimated the company. I regret it even more than tesla cos tesla was a spec play back then but Nvidia has always been a rock solid company. I will NOT make the same mistake with Coinbase as I did with Nvidia and sure Coinbase has competition but when it comes to western regulated exchanges, Coinbase is king.

Work_Owl

I think that the drop is massively overblown and that the analyst note is just that, a note from analysts Their premise is that from speaking to customers the Darktrace products still need human supervision. No shit. That complaint demonstrates a lack of knowledge on how the products work. They said that customers were surprised that they needed to interact with the platform to get the best out of it. Duh. You need to tell the AI whether it's classifying correctly. Otherwise it's like having a supermarket self checkout with no shop floor staff. I'd bet money that the complaints are from customers that believe that the products are a replacement for IT security teams or from those that have massively underinvested in IT to begin with I've been purchasing more shares If you read reviews from people that know what they're on about and using Darktrace, you'll see that it's well received. It also won a cyber security award last month

IAmInTheBasement

Exactly. Sell the volume of VW and Toyota combined with BMW level or better margins. And storage bringing in hundreds of billions a year too. FSD, robot, AI, insurance, and yet to be announced products.

Mission-Zebra

AI is gonna be the next industrial revolution, anyone got some tickers that are not msft or googl?

BicycleBusiness

google is the AI king

Jazzlike-Actuary382

Not even hypothetical this is my actual investment now. 45% Google 35% Meta 5% Microsoft 5% Amazon 3% Netflix 2% Coin 2% Square <1% each: SPY, Disney, Robinhood, UiPath, SoFi Last year my investment was: 40% Google 40% Meta (Facebook) 5% Microsoft 5% Starbucks 3% SPY 3% Netflix 2% Amazon 2% Disney Google was always my highest conviction and safest way to beat SPY but I added Facebook because prior to 2020 it was outperforming Google and even though I had less conviction in it I predicted higher returns because it was more risky and had higher returns in the past but that theory didn't turn out as I predicted since the safer stock Google went up more. I don't plan to ever sell Google or Meta so I will leave those percentages as they are now but if I had to start over I would still probably go with 40% Google 40% Meta. At this time it seems to me like Meta should provide higher returns than Google because usually FB was approximately 70% of Google's market cap and they are in similar businesses so they grow at similar rates but now Meta is at 50% but I was wrong to expect lower returns from Google in the past and I may be wrong again that's why I would equal weight them to start with in admission that I don't know which will perform better. My percentages are probably much higher than your risk tolerance so I would recommend equal weighting Google and Meta but at much smaller percentages maybe like 5% each. Then also equal weight Microsoft and Apple but at smaller percentages like 2.5% each. I think Microsoft and Apple are similar like Google and FB and I don't know which one will do better so that's why I recommend equal weighting. I like Microsoft better than Apple that's why I'm not invested in Apple but you might like Apple so invest in both. I view Microsoft as safer than Apple and a bonus it had a smaller market cap for all of last year but things are evening out now. Originally I thought long-term Google would take market share from Microsoft with Chrome OS and maybe Fuscia, and it's a fact that Google is the most advanced in AI with creating Tensorflow and tensor chips and having Deep Mind and there are statistics that prove Google Assistant has the best AI so that's why I had such high conviction in them. Bonuses were Cloud + Waymo which were still just starting. Facebook IMO had the second best AI with creating Pytorch and always having the most posts on LinkedIn for PhDs in ML so that's why I had conviction they are not the next MySpace like so many predicted. I didn't have as high conviction in Microsoft because I see Google slowly taking market share everywhere they compete but Microsoft's price still outperformed over 5 years. I only kept Microsoft as a hedge incase Bing gained market share. I still see Google taking market share everywhere but I am also confident in Microsoft because of Azure + Office/Windows price increases even if they lose some market share to Gcloud + Gsuite. I didn't have high confidence in Apple and I was wrong about this one but now the market cap is so large I think I am too late and I will get better returns in Amazon with a lower market cap that's why I increased my Amazon percentage this year and still don't own Apple and likely never will. I still view them as risky long-long-term because I think Meta will win internet 3.0 and I think Apple is concerned also and that's why they are trying to attack Facebook now while they have an advantage in internet 2.0.

Motor_Somewhere7565

1). STEM - Smart Energy Storage. AI meets renewable energy, best of both futures. 2). ChargePoint -Best pick for the EV Boom that isn't named Tesla IMO and a leader in its own class. Bonus: AST Spacemobile - The one stock that Reddit has truly convinced me over and I will either be very happy or will end up regretting so much that even the man in the mirror will laugh at just how pathetic I was to invest in it. Big-time spec risk/reward stock.

GrumpyDay

If I have to pick just one. MSFT - diversified business and leading position in most fields. Windows: Largest OS in the world, you are not getting rid of that soon. Office suites: one of the most popular business software suites other than Adobe’s Linked: job site / professional social network Azure: AI/cloud Skype: VoIP Minecraft: one of the most popular video game GitHub: Code collaboration Just a short list of businesses that they currently have virtual monopoly on and some representing the growing future of the internet. Best part of software businesses? Great margins. And don’t have to deal with supply chain / physical goods which will likely be an issue for another year. - - - FB: large chunk of social advertising business, extremely profitable, cheapest price/earning amongst large cap tech. The bad? Aging platform demographic (fb/Instagram), slowing user growth, constant bad press for social issues. Meta verse? You won’t see it for another 5 years. - - - If it’s my choice: I will split some between Microsoft and Apple.

meltbox

Literally none of those are making significant money or have hard deliverables that they will need to make significant money. That coupled with the fact that they are from the AI leader. They are simply most willing to toy with serious legal issues.

DonFrulli

I approve this for 2 reasons: Apple - BNPL Microsoft - AI investment

only_pro

battery technology EV manufacturing techniques to save insane amounts of money new materials (look this up, it's insane) full self-driving the entire auto insurance industry AI - they have both the largest data set (coming from their FSD customers) as well as the largest lead in machine learning (FSD itself). I expect Tesla to be the first company to create a general AI based on this lead (this is worth trillions or potentially way more) &#x200B; But sure, keep drinking the MSM koolaid.

No_Audience_3064

Googl. Three reason for that: 1. Monopoly on information In this day and age, information = power = money. Google is the strongest, most UNBEATABLE name in information gathering/utilization/creation etc. That means Google will forever have demand and a huge competitive advantage. This impacts many different fields that I don't have time to write about. The two most important ones though are advertising and AI. On those two topics, Google has an unchallenged lead, and will continue having an unchallenged lead basically forever. There's just no competing with Google's quality and quantity of information at this point. 2. Income diversification: Although this point is true also for FB and MSFT, it is truest for Google: a US/dollar collapse will not affect Google as badly as most US based companies, because it has guaranteed non- dollar denominated income from across every continent, which will continue streaming also in difficult economic times. In a stagflation environment (which is the greatest risk right now for many countries including America) you want to have this kind of diversification. 3. R&D: Google's R&D team is creating some fascinating research on a wide variety of topics. In the last year, for example, they used AI to solve a long- unsolved question about the 3D structure of protein folding, and that's only the tip of the iceberg. With superior data, superior engineers/ AI experts, and a company policy of allowing their workers to pursue interesting problems, Google is slowly gathering more and more breakthroughs to its name.

FrostyTemps

Elon has the AI bots laying out the option ladders…one long squeeze.

baxter8279

Not the same man - they’re a business, not just Joe shmo who got approved for a mortgage and can simply sit on the house if the market turns - they’re carrying wayyy more risk. Also the “costs” they save bypassing agents are all mostly paid by the seller anyway, so they don’t really save on more than a couple thousand per transactions, savings which are pretty much washed away with their buy prices anyway. And yes, they were using AI to determine their prices - humans signed off at the EOD but they were getting the offer prices via automation.

sufcitybbq

Yeah this is a terrible take. Is Zillow overpaying for houses? Yes. Is everyone overpaying for houses? Also yes. In my market, offers aren't even getting presented to owners if they're under 15% over asking. Every single property has double digit offers over a weekend. The winning offers are 20% over, waiving any appraisal shortfall and buying as-is with a 30 day close. Zillow is not letting AI buy homes. That is retarded, even for WSB. They're not letting fucking Siri write checks and take on asset liability. Every single purchase gets reviewed by a human element somewhere during the process. They're doing exactly what we do every day. They see the market, buy high in anticipation that it will only go higher and sell at a thin marketing in volume. They save cost by using their network and infrastructure to handle the paperwork and hassle that agents typically have to handle.

Vast_Cricket

Look up the companies Jerry Yang bought for Yahoo and how they evaporated. People are now more defensive about their life and sensitive to ML, AI tools pocking at their personal life.

HighClassApplebees

Isn’t comma AI significantly better?

__TSLA__

>The AI is so bad that Tesla fatal accidents felt like they were happening every week this year lol. FYI, there's been ***zero*** crashes with FSD Beta over the past 12 months, with 2,000 drivers - let alone "fatalities". For reference: 2,000 average US drivers driving average non-Tesla cars have ~50 police-reported crashes over 12 months, according to NHTSA data. Friends don't let friends get TSLA DD from TeslaCharts, Mark Spiegel, Michael Burry or Jim Chanos... 🤦

Scion_capital_intern

Zuck is the AI's idea of what the guy looks like that ushers in the simulation that we are already in. Zuckception

FilthBadgers

Developed nations have under a decade to half emissions to avoid 1.5C temperature rises. Tesla make batteries, they do solar, they’re developing smart grids a sustainably powered driverless car network. Since nobody else can mass produce quality, cheap electric cars at anywhere near the scale Tesla can, they have no serious competitors. The forces of necessity are going to drive capital into every space Tesla operates in. And this is without getting into the impact of their AI and how disruptive autonomous vehicles will be to so many industries. If a “phone company” like Apple can be worth 2 trillion, why is it so nuts to think that’s out of reach to a company with the goal of transitioning to a sustainable future, while the planet burns around us?

Longwashere

Tesla AI is actually the best from a technical standpoint. The only reason why you don’t hear about fatal crashes from any other ai companies is because they don’t have ai at scale and consumer readied like Tesla. Tesla has 10000’s of cars on the row while the other guys probably have 100s

Abraxxes

Driving all over hawaii in the worst traffic in the US and I can personally guarantee the AI is a better driver than I am.

thatasianguy42

Do what AI modelling does - Split, train, learn. Split your money into two sets, say for example 20/80. Keep 80% backed up just in case and use the 20% to invest - see how your time goes. With recent advances in online trading and investment, you can invest very little and work your way up. There is no reason to take a plunge or go in blindly. Use a little of your money and learn the market and your style of investment - long or short term, crypto or ETFs, stock or shares - whatever. Personally, I'm an idiot so I just invested in companies that I know and went with it. I didn't time the investment nor do anything fancy, just put an investment in and watched it grow, worked little by little to understand it. Went from technologies like microchips to consumer technologies, then to Healthcare, and now into crypto. Time in the market is far more beneficial than timing the market.

izybit

Needs more AI

maximiseYourChill

Yeah bro. The AI is so good they only give the latest out to the safest drivers 🤣 Makes sense.

DukeNukus

I would look at Tesla AI day and review some material. IMO, it's very optimistically priced atm, and the chance of it dropping in price soon is fairly high, but I think the odds that it will never exceed its current ATH within a few years (if not within a year) are very low. Lots of things have to go right for its current evaluation to be accurate, but if they do, even $1500-$2000 could be considered cheap. Price is going up partially because that scale of "things like to go right/wrong" has shifted a bit more in the "right" direction with the Hertz deal and other good news coming out. Though really we could go into pages on valuation and as the OP said "Warning: this is not a post to justify valuation of TSLA".

VisualMod

> I am not a fan of this video. The title is misleading and it does not provide any evidence to support the claim that "AI" is best in the world.

NoBandage

Anyone who knows anything about AI knows their AI is best in the world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABbDB6xri8o

5280StonksOnlyGoUp

The AI is actually best in class by a mile and it gets better every day. We know your just upset b/c you've passed on this 20 bagger multiple times.

BeingOfBecoming

It will start to lose once there are enough EV competitors. Their AI is shit if you want to die on that hill. The only saving grace of meme man is SpaceX, which will become a separate stock in the coming years.

I_Angry_Frog

$VNTH - massive 96% share reduction coming. Entrepreneurship Development - Young CEO David Kittle. Gaming/NFT/AI as per website. Still early, accumulation distribution study shows all time high accumulation. Active Twitter account. Looking for merger candidate. You do you, but worth a look. Best of luck all, Abundance for all - go get it!

meeni131

Foundry, GPU, AI/ML market growing rapidly, IoT market growing rapidly, Autonomous growing relatively rapidly. They're making a handful of bets on some potentially serious growth markets through 2030+. Gelsinger forecasting 10-12% cagr for the next few years - or about $40-50B in added rev by 2025 if they make it happen.

steveisbrown

Invest in Sprt. Sprout AI. You won't regret it

sageguitar70

IBM. Spinning off Kyndryl will make them a more focused AI computing company. Their advanced AI tech will be a part of everything soon.

MPSW8

Why would I touch GM/Ford? Typical Americans. Do you honestly think legacy makers like Toyota, BMW, Benz, VW are unable to make a competitive EV? I laugh when I hear battery day or AI day. Let’s not forget, CATL role here as well.

rockdog91

You’d be silly to think they’re just a car company. - home Solar - charging infrastructure for other companies - software - AI Etc

stiveooo

TA says 1250 AI says 1450

Ecstatic-Will-

Trade with RoyalQ AI Bot

RoyalFail6

Elon is truly dancing with his AI tonight 🕺🏻🤖

OmgYoshiPLZ

What makes you think i'm NOT an AI?

Primae_Noctis

People will roll their eyes at this post, but if you were to give an AI the task of eliminating hunger, the answer would be a culling of the species to lower than a billion. So, nuclear winter is just as good.

lordxoren666

Or maybe their AI is just shit.

RyantheDino

Same. I’ve been a big gay bear about tesla for years, then I purchased the new model S and I’m obsessed with the company. I’m realizing they’re not just a car company. With the supercharging network, they are chevron. With their AI stuff, they are google. With their sex robot, they are porn hub. Too the moon!

Aintthatthetruthyall

It isn't an AI. It is an algorithm.

Kitkatcandykid

I like to imagine VisualMod is like that one AI that studied the internet enough to become a jaded sociopath, except this time it only lurked wsb

programmingguy

Anything that's making a ton of losses and has SAAS or Cloud or AI or EV associated with it.... I only buy those kinds of loss making companies and have been making tremendous profit.

StoneTemplePilates

Also, the link you provided clearly states the following, so not sure where you got 1L per day from: >The AI for total water intake for young men and women (ages 19 to 30 years) is 3.7 L and 2.7 L per day, respectively.

dersebio

$AI $BABA $BIDU $SPCE $XIACY 

__MikeOxmaul__

“The Matterport Takeaways: Ives highlights a partnership announced between Matterport and Facebook earlier this year as a key event that could get more attention from investors. The partnership was for creating the largest-ever dataset of 3D indoor spaces via Facebook AI Research. 'We believe this was the first step towards a much broader Facebook and Matterport relationship as Zuckerberg & Co. head down the metaverse path,' Ives said. Matterport has a 'vast 3D-data library,' which Ives calls unmatched in the industry. The company is mentioned as a play in the growing market and important for real estate and other sectors. 'We continue to believe Matterport is in the early innings of a massive growth story playing out over the coming years.' Ives calls the stock under the radar based on investor conversations and said he likes the stock heading into 2022, with metaverse plays grabbing investors' attention. Growth could come from the company as its free to paid conversion model is further realized. A total addressable market size of $240 billion is cited by the analyst and a market share of under 1% for Matterport gives the company room to expand, according to Wedbush.”

blueman541

So management just tweaked the AI milk you more and observe.

SippieCup

Well, seeing how you are browsing my history, you will see I have a successful AI startup, two Model S', etc too. So I think I'm doing pretty well.

snapbakclaptrap

This may well be true - although the numbers are small, female-led hedge funds perform better than male-led ones. Check out Leda Braga at Systematica Investments, an AI-focused systematic hedge fund.

lost_in_life_34

but they had AI and machine learning

wabty

A lot of these are wrong. AI, MS, CGAR are all meant in a different context

Patrickstarho

IQ, AR and AI are legit and pretty beaten down tho

BruhTradess

Lol, doubt. Also doubt with IQ, AI and AR tickers. What's left? The 15 most popular large caps on the market lol

Ehralur

He's not wrong. Everybody under 50 today can aim to live long enough to live forever. Even if forever might not technically be possible, with the current advances in genomics and longevity research there's a serious chance we could live hundreds of years if not longer. The theory behind this thinking is that if you live as healthily as possible according to modern science (eat healthily, work out, fast, take cold showers and/or hot saunas, sleep well, don't smoke or eat high amounts of sugars, and probably a few more I forgot), we can already live an average of 120 years. This could be long enough to reach healthcare escape velocity, where advances in science add more than 1 average year of lifespan to humanity per year. Just look back 70-100 years in medical advances and imagine what we can discover in the next 70-100 when taking into account the acceleration of technological development, especially with self learning AI on the rise.

teacher_in_disguise

Clover health, maybe want to wait for the q3 earnings on Monday 8th though. Try to take a look at it's AI, the clover assistant, and see for yourself if it's worth the risk for you, relative high risk with great upside though.

OccupyInvesting

Also, BGRY is the AI Robotics company getting big contracts from WMT FDX TJX Target, etc., to automate warehouse sortation for order fulfillment, so they can stay competitive with AMZN. 280B TAM by 2024 worldwide and 95% white space, huge.

2dank4normies

Let's just break this down: 1. Google and Samsung also have removed 3.5mm jacks. So right off the bat, the opposite of what you're saying is true. Not only are they A. being unfairly singled out and B. they adopted the industry leading feature first. Everything else is your personal feelings, not what the actual market wants. Most people prefer bluetooth and thinner bezels to a 3.5mm jack. 2. I said every other major consumer electronics company is also against right to repair, which was the original topic. What set Apple apart in the past was they made a much more consumer friendly, high build quality product. I don't see how you could say they don't still make that. The reason they aren't set apart is other companies have caught up. 3. Apple has never adopted gimmicky features like a foldable smartphone. I'll take your word for the AI feature, which Apple doesn't *not* do. Google's may be better, but it's not as if Apple is resistant to using better AI tech. I would argue that overall, the reason Apple hasn't changed much in 10 years is the industry as a whole hasn't either. I'm not arguing otherwise, my entire argument is that singling out Apple makes no sense. Most people don't want that much change. Apple makes products people want, not what they "put up with". With so many phone choices, people are spending a lot of money to "put up with" Apple.

greenskeeper-carl

Maybe the algo they are using to generate offers is actually a high tech AI that just gets off on outbidding the retail homebuyers looking for an actual house to live in. It thinks it’s funny one upping the poors and doesn’t care if it loses money?

Kayyam

The comparison is apt because it's not about whether the competition has the power to change, it's whether they have the right vision and mindset. They don't. Google makes incomplete products and moves on. They can't nail an email app or a video-conferencing app. They won't nail a much more complicated type of applications. Amazon is not even in the business of making that kind of software. This is not about raw AI. Palanatir sells a service, not just software. Their engineers use their own tools to deliver high value to their clients. It's as much consultation as it is SaaS.

iyioi

The better camera is really just better AI signal processing. The actual camera itself is just “ok” especially compared to a real camera.

not_creative1

It’s not fair to compare legacy auto with tesla. Legacy auto had 100s of billions of dollars of installed factory capacity that made gas cars, changing all that to electric was not easy or cheap. Electric cars were also new technology and it took them a while to build up that team and so on. Software industry is way more nimble and its easier to start a competitor. And amazon and google have massive workforce’s of software engineers, massive resources, decades of experience and may be even better engineering and research teams than palantair. It will not take long for amazon or google to build an AI competitor for palantair. Google has google deep mind etc which are some of the best AI labs in the world. Palantair is fighting an uphill battle here with tech titans

GbPpio

Sounds like WEAK Management, or weak Mngmt controls. They'll take a hit. Better figure out how this BS happened. My speculation is that Z was counting on AI to pull out some magical results. They fucked up. AI might be a good tool, & improving, but the management needs to go over the results of AI before spending millions of dollars (i didn't check numbers). Maybe their program was 80%"right. Damn good. But do your job go, over numbers, results! Yes if over extended need to cut losses. Maintenance, taxes property management Will nickel n dime them. AI is a tool. Don't program it to spend ur money. Lazy Fing Mngmt, Do The Work.

NoGameNoLyfe1

endpoint solutions for workstations and servers (EDR) like crowdstrike, MAM, MDM for mobile devices. They have one administrator panel to manage all of these. It’s really sleek and user friendly. Not even bringing in the data sources they have (amount of people using windows defender, office365, visual studio, GitHub, etc) Nothing can compete with them in term of data sources. You need a lot of data sources to do threat intel, AI and ML for cyber security products in order to be really good.

EP3EP3EP3

In the context of the comment you originally replied to, as to why single Apple out, it's because they build out their ecosystem in the example of the Bluetooth headphones, extending their proprietary service structure to make more money off of their product lifespans and locking consumers out of third party options, which is honestly a great business model, but is it what's best for the consumer? In my opinion, no. You said that no other companies are doing things differently from Apple. The problem is that Apple is no longer really unique from other companies. That's what set them apart in the past and how Jobs built them into such a successful company. They built the iPhone and instead of asking how to continue to push forward, they have been milking this singular product for over a decade. Samsung has put out foldable phones, Google has made significant AI improvements in speech and image processing, etc. Whether or not these are objectively good things, they are certainly innovative. My main point is that right to repair ties right into this core shift in Apple philosophy of putting out ground breaking, world changing products into how can we sell this same product in a different way and make more money off of it as long as people put up with it?

regarding_your_cat

I just read about McDonalds selling their tech division to IBM so that IBM can make them an AI drive-through with the goal of completely automating the ordering process and not having humans taking orders anymore. The article made it sound like a bad thing for customers, but I dunno. If it’s shitty and a pain in the ass to order through of course it will suck but I doubt they’d put it in widespread use if it wasn’t fine tuned. I think it’s neat

Swimming_Raisin_4735

Datametrex AI $DM.v

AmericaD1

AI is out of the box and scary as Les Grossman 🙃, I use my dog on all Meta Products with a made up Resume. Don’t need myself out there anyway.

Remote_Cartoonist_27

I’m light on VOO and do slightly better than the s&p500 over the past 18ish months. though it is catching up. (I’m at a little over 90% while the s&p500 is a little over 84%) What I’ve been doing is investing in innovation etfs and QQQ as well as a few individual stocks that I find especially interesting. My thinking with the etfs is basically just The United States main “export” is innovation so investing in 500 companies that have steady growth is worse than investing in 200ish companies that are aiming to improve an existing industry(EV, energy production/storage, agriculture, computing) or start a new one(AI, space tourism, etc). . The individual stocks I own are basically just for fun, they are actually the main things holding back my portfolio, if I was investing purely for my future I wouldn’t trade individual stocks anymore.

Sugarman4

Also the "real" inovations from their tech haven't even evolved yet. I think their are creative advancements pending. An I-watch with medical AI. To tell you when you are sick or nutrient and sleep deprived (that actually predicts well). Behavioural A-I to enhance personal security - prewarning on dangerous environments. 3 dimensional display screens with augmented depth of field (not far off since i invented the nano-array prism diodes required). There's still huge tech advances for the front runner in tech to grow in to.

halfmanhalfrobot69

Employer will go to AI and robots that they don’t have to benefits to

meta-cognizant

AI knows the future

spc_salty

Robots don't actually use the condom. It was an oversight in his AI. It will be addressed in his next softpatch.

ModBotsMayBiteMyButt

They do if you can role them back. Requires AI level skills.

ThatOneDrunkUncle

Elon created the Zuckerberg AI bot to run his other companies for him while he focuses on tesla and SpaceX. Smart man

PlsDontNuke

Programming isn't anything like any other discipline I know of. No other discipline is populated by people who progressively ruin the tools of the trade worse and worse to discourage the presence of competent people from the field. Until this is fixed, the most advanced quantum algorithms will still just be novelties that fail to fully realize the AI singularity.

bozofreak

Check out STEM Inc. which uses AI software to deliver smart battery storage solutions. IMO going to be a critical part of the transition to renewables.

NearbyRhubar

Does planet plan to integrate AI?

beatlemaniac007

He is building something that's captured the imagination of many. And he has made many people a lot of money. I personally don't understand why people think he is iron man and a genius rocket scientist and AI expert as opposed to being a very good businessman and leader with a vision. But it's not hard to see why he has such a huge following. In general I think elite level people are rarely "likeable" in a traditional sense. They are elite because they are outliers in many aspects (not just net worth).

mediumrarestonks

Large, scaled, and error-free quantum computing just seems way too good to be true. It would almost certainly lead to an explosion in conscious AI and the singularity.

Mike_Hunty

“His ideas aren’t always amazing”. Tesla (cars, solar, batteries, AI), Space X, Neuralink, PayPal, The Boring Company. His companies are doing more good for the human race than any billionaire in history. Maybe that’s why people like him?

FusSpo

I think we are still a ways out from that being widespread but you're not wrong. Likely in the next 20-30 years I can see that being the main primary care and diagnostic methods. I just don't see AI as being evolved enough at this point to have it within the next decade or so.

laker4life248

AI

B1gChuckDaddySr

In 2050, PLTR will be the largest security and AI software co and the primary supplier to US military and government agencies. PLTR 2050 target price is $30. No stock-split ever taking place.

johansthrowaccount

The guy is trying to save humanity by making us a multi planetary civilization and starting ethical organizationa for controlling the use of AI. Would you rather have people worship some idiot like Kayne West or Kim Kardashian?

DonkeyTron42

AI based Healthcare has Netflix kind of potential to disrupt the existing Blockbuster like system.

brothersanta

Here’s what I see. Tesla’s profit margin per car is approx 30%; other car mfgs have profit margins that are 10-15%. Teslas waiting list is almost a year long at this point. There is more demand for their cars than can be made. The number of cars that they produce will double after Texas and Berlin come online. Tesla’s multiple will be at 6x after these plants come online which is in line w other high growth industries like software. Other existing plants are also being expanded. Tesla could use all of the money it’s gotten from shareholders to build more plants than are currently known or accounted for. Hertz is a game changer and other car rental businesses will have to follow suit or go bankrupt. Any company that uses a fleet of vehicles has to seriously consider why it’s not transitioning over to Tesla. The last time Tesla hit $1500 they split the stock. They’re just $250 away from that price. The full power of Tesla’s AI hasn’t even hit full stride yet. They built their own chips for this and nobody else is even close. The AI will have applications beyond just cars. Industry titans like GM and Volkswagen are dead men walking and they know it. Their leadership have already admitted that they will need at least 5 years to catch up to where Tesla is now, assuming that Tesla stops innovating today. That is a ton of capacity and market share open for Tesla to take over.

productivitydev

Precisely. I'm not in Tesla for the short term profits, I don't need that money, I just don't want to be left behind when AI takes over. If you don't own any stake at any of the AI that takes over, you will be left behind with no recourse, and be receiving UBI only, as you have nothing to produce value with. I'm hedging against singularity. So I'm long term involved with anything that I see could possibly replace anything human. The closer something is to do that, doesn't matter if it is 10 years of 15 years away, I'm most bought into that. Short term gains and profit are just a bonus. With Tesla it's definitely the long term vision for me. I ask myself the question. What kind of actions will lead us to replace humans, what kind of behaviours, ideas and innovations will do that? What kind of leader there has to be? Even if self driving is 20 years away, it doesn't matter in the long term, what matters is direction and velocity of the vector - we just don't know the distance, but a company taking right steps is the company I'm invested in.

Caged_in_a_rage

I personally like him for at least bringing electric cars to the forefront and forcing the hand of every other major car manufacturer on the globe. He’s at least about creating awareness about climate change and the dangers of AI. Ppl are also fascinated with space and he’s gonna be sending people to the moon and Mars and it’s pretty dang cool.

dasheasy

Why not? Take the money and hire a poor. Use that AI brain of yours and start enslaving the poor humans

Keman2000

They do a ton more things than just GPUs. Where as AMD is mostly just CPUs and GPUs, Nvidia does GPUs, artificial intelligence, some automotive, some data center stuff. There's a lot of people betting on their AI future.

RemoveWorking6198

I would go with KLIC - chips making machines and mini / micro led manufacturers for apple and many display areas where bright ness is require. Now slowly LCD / LED displays replacing with mini / micro LEDs in cars, manufacturing places , info displays and airlines as it has high bright and life. Holding some amount in KLIC kind of stocks are worth. LAC : ever EV cars , phones are depending on battery. Advanced batteries are filling with graphite and lithium. CAT : infrastructures means CAT. NVDA : better gaming and AI on NVDA chips.

InvestingDD

DAFATMAN -Disney -Amazon -Facebook -Apple -Tesla -Microsoft -Alphabet -Netflix Diversified into: -Media -Streaming -Ecommerce -Data centre -Cloud computing -5G -Mobile phones -Computers/Laptops -EVs -Autonomous driving -Enterprise software -AI -IoT -Web You heard it here first.

bojackhoreman

Don’t look for stocks, look for industries leading technical advancement which will experience high growth: Cloud computing (amzn, msft) AI (tsla) augmented reality (snap, meta) Vertical farming (goog) Robotics (autonomous vehicles, logistics) (tsla, amzn) EV (tsla, appl, amzn) Cybercurrency (sq, coin)

EJ3CTO_SEATO_CUZ

You can name your Tsla AI bot anything

OnlyOneLife81

Look I am not trying to convince you. I like Aterian's business model. Thanks to their AI, they can take advantage of Amazon or any other platform, and adapt to produce and sell whatever that is profitable. I did my DD, and I know that its current price is not real, and without all de shorts playing dirty, it will be way up. And my bet is that earnings will be positive news. Regarding shipping costs, the were cut by 50%, so basically good news for this Q4. And please don't be sorry about my position, I am more than happy with my investment, and I can afford to be patient. Also, please try to be less condescending next time .. I am sure that you are a great investor but respect other's opinions. Thanks for reading.

DEGENERATE_PIANO

VisualMod, a bot, literally a better troll than 93% of the trolls on this sub and he’s at it 24/7. This is the beginning of the end folks, AI is taking over. Pretty soon we’ll be losing money on options in the Meta verse while hooked up to machines that farm us for data and energy and it all started w zjz and visualmod.