ASTS

Ok-Antelope493

The point is at a $30 billion dollar valuation, as high as $40 billion recently, the, there's very little room for ASTS to grow. Unless you're just counting on the market acting as irrationally with it as it has with Tesla or even a pure meme and even then ... ASTS offers none of the stability of a more established company and none of the growth potential of a real moonshot anymore. It's not going to do another 10x obviously, and you can go buy something boring with a fraction of the risk and double or triple your money fairly reliably if you're just patient. There's just no meat there anymore unfortunately.

Cold_Hyena_6251

ASTS boom tomorrow

Bravadette

ASTS is gonna dip on the 20th and should be jumping between then and the 27th, apparently.

WeissMISFIT

Or ASTS which made sense

dtn8

I bought ASTS calls just before dilution. I bought APLD calls before close today. Can't catch a fucking break.

Gamer6322

ASTS and RKLB moon soon

machinepeen

ASTS is back on the menu boys

happy123z

I'm sitting out the big cap stuff but those guys have been chilling for a year except Google. Might be a chill mountaintop until AI proves something or the next big jump happens. What's that? Self driving cars? ASTS giving you 5G youtube on a desert island? Damn that sounds nice actually. Solar and cell.

_JupitersCock_

My sweet summer children, service is coming… ASTS to $150…

FuckleUp

Hey precious and appreciated stockholders thanks for your support as a show of appreciation we are diluting and you just lost a lot of money 💋 thank you, don’t sell! SNDK ASTS PYPL

Prestigious_Age5422

Are you the one who has a ton of ASTS from early days?

matthias_lee

time for ASTS to rise again?

cryptopolymath

Looks like we're going to space this week $ASTS, $UFP, $RKLB

Throw_Away_TrdJrnl

It's been almost five years in the market and I've had about four lucky position that I've let slip through my fingers. I think the universe was trying desperately to make me a millionaire and I was too retarded to capitalize on it. Literally started trading at the end of 2021 and bought 100k dogecoin for under a cent apiece. Sold out at basically breakeven because of the GME hype and wanted to be in that and by the time I had looked back at doge Elon tweeted about it and it was already from under a cent to 10¢. Topped at like 77¢. Held a 70x+bagger but let it slip through the cracks. If I had held my ASTS I'd be up around 50k but I sold that for a small loss. Had a shit ton of JOBY at $4.5 and told at $8 should have held for $20. I had a shit ton of UUUU at 6.50 sold at 8.50 should have held. Had shit tons of DNN at $2 sold at $2.50 should have held. Should probably just cash out my portfolio go on a vacation and never invest again. Everytime I decide to hold for longer because I think of all the companies I didn't hold long enough they end up never recovering 😪

Bravadette

ASTS bottom might be 82.30ish until the 27th ? Depending if volumes spike after 3:30pm? https://www.marketbeat.com/stock-ideas/these-3-stocks-just-graduated-to-the-msci-world-index/

Bravadette

Damn. Didn't realize both Coherent and ASTS added to MSCI.

Historical_Stage2622

ASTS above 100 when?

KarlLachsfeld

Oh yeah I'm gonna switch from ASTS to Bonds. Sure buddy, that makes sense.

Creative-Package6213

lol ASTS down bigly pre market...I called this shit a day ago.

No-Albatross-781

!banbet ASTS $100 14D

No-Albatross-781

!banner ASTS 100 14d

Rabitai_Trades

Comparing ASTS/RKLB market caps to median S&P names is a useful sanity check, even if it’s not a perfect apples-to-apples (different TAM, capital intensity, and maturity).

KeythKatz

I'm in ASTS and not RKLB because RKLB is full of dumb memes and hopium while ASTS is DD. The catalysts, pathway to profitability, and future potential are clearly explained for ASTS time and time again. RKLB fanboys just keep trying to convince everyone that failed production articles were meant to fail anyway, ignoring the years of delay and budget overrun that has made RKLB look more like conservative and expensive old space.

Ambitious-Poem9191

!banbet ASTS $60 1 week

2CommaNoob

I feel you OP. I had ASTS 95 Puts and sold them for a loss ONE day before they decided to dilute everyone. Missed out on +300%..

havntmadeityet

I’m half ASTS/AMPX half VTI. Am I retarded?

discussionandrespect

ASTS

Due-University8711

The chart for ASTS shows a clear uptrend over the past 6 months, indicating strong underlying momentum. The recent pullback from its highs around the 120-130 range, as per ChartScanner.AI analysis, represents a potential buying opportunity within the broader bullish trend. This pattern suggests that after a period of consolidation or minor correction, the stock is likely to resume its upward trajectory. Traders should expect a retest of previous resistance levels if the current support holds. The company's significant revenue growth, despite an EPS miss, supports the long-term bullish outlook for this emerging technology company.

Soy_tu_papi_

Have your heard about ASTS or NBIS?

Nofanta

Why do you think happens once a few more ASTS satellites are up?

TheBestGhost

As someone who has been in the wireless industry for over 30++ years I have studied ASTS and their Sat-to-Device model, what I don't think many retail personal investors quite yet understand is that ASTS will transmit directly to a standard, unmodified smartphones using a combination of terrestrial, dedicated , & partner MNO spectrum - this is a game changer. .

averysmallbeing

ASTS profit margin is expected to be in the 80s or 90s.

Arabian_Goggles_

From a quick look it looks like Starlink is targeting 60% operating profit margins, so yeah assuming 10% for ASTS is crazy.

No_Privacy_Anymore

I'm quite confident that I know how many people are oblivious. As a very long term investor in $ASTS I'm obsessed with the company and it is my largest investment by far. Cheers.

rabblerabbles

Bro, you have NO idea how many ppl are oblivious to how behind in tech and capabilities Starlink is compared to ASTS. The fact the US Government/Military/Emergency Services are basically looking at ASTS very closely because they're aware how good their satellites are.

Brilliant_Plan9413

ASTS, full send my entire portfolio.

Creative-Package6213

Mmmm ASTS gonna crater tomorrow.

Gamer6322

RKLB nad ASTS moon

No_Privacy_Anymore

For the people who have studied the details of $ASTS's satellite design and business model, it is pretty clear that SpaceX is substantially behind. SpaceX didn't do a first principle's based design for their Direct to Cell satellites and it shows. They needed to shift to a very low earth orbit to increase their link budget and even then they have substantially worse performance. In addition, SpaceX is a direct threat to the wireless operators while AST has a wholesale only model. If anyone is trying to value AST based on current revenues they simply don't understand this market opportunity and how large the revenue and earnings potential really is. They see the price chart (with the crazy volatility) and think its just a meme stock. For those who know, we simply want to accumulate more shares. This is a generational company.

RamoneBolivarSanchez

Interesting. I hold the UFO etf and primary exposure is to ASTS and RKLB. Back when SpaceX announced the IPO it sent RKLB flying. My thoughts are as IPO gets closer more people will want to find cheap(er) proxies for exposure. You’ll have the bulls selling their RKLB and ASTS to have free cash for SpaceX IPO, but also a lot of shifting *into* RKLB and ASTS because they want to “invest in space” but they either A) think it’s too expensive at IPO valuation or B) don’t like Elon Musk but still want exposure to the sector’s potential

connorman83169

Ive already done my DD if you think SpaceX is the only big player in the game you are thinking far too small my friend. (Besides ASTS will not be able to compete with SpaceX anyway lol)

OuuuYuh

I am heavily invested in space stocks and could pull out for some massive gains, but the industry is still on the launch pad (ha, ha). While ASTS and RKLB having had amazing runs, the sector I am insanely bullish on is observation satellites. This is a game changing industry for defense, agriculture, the environment, and some other commercial sectors. Planet Labs is the big one that is incredibly well positioned and is just starting to become profitable. They beat EPS at 0.0 last earnings and has a FULL BACKLOG OF BUSINESS and 10% ownership by GOOGLE! They have an archive of historical images of the earth, 100% coverage of the planet, and are now developing more specific satellites for individual clients. Satellelogic is up next. They do something similar but with incredibly powerful satellites on a smaller scale that can tell whether a quarter on the ground is heads or tails. Huge for the defense industry and for monitoring smaller areas at very high resolution. I don't see how these two go anywhere but up...

conradical30

If ASTS can execute and get the sats in the sky, there’s no reason it shouldn’t be $160 by EOY.

Shdwrptr

Please elaborate. If you’re angling towards “SpaceX will have won by then” you’re already too far gone. ASTS is the #1 player in the game and SpaceX’s satellites aren’t even close to as good. Their v3 version was just patented, isn’t close to production, and is still not close to ASTS’ current version. ASTS has also locked in more than half of the world’s major MNO’s with partnerships

connorman83169

ASTS is fucked either way

TheBestGhost

Agree, also IMO even if ASTS were to be the # 2 player behind SpaceX, that’s still a great place to be.

Quick_Location

Been in ASTS since $10 Bought more when it was $2 Will buy more tomorrow

Spirited-Muffin-8104

Both, but mostly it'll pump RKLB and ASTS stock prices. If SpaceX IPO, and RKLB and ASTS do well this year, then I conservatively expect a 30-40% increase in stock price in 2026.

ToSeeAgainAgainAgain

If ASTS captures only 20% of India's population, that's still many Billions a year. The cool thing is that, when you do the numbers and look at the MNOs they already are doing business with, they are looking to capture like 10% of the addressable global market. That'll take them somewhere around 1/3 to 1/2 of a T in a matter of 3-4 years

WhatEvil

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1nbtvmh/is_asts_cooked/ ASTS was at $40 when this was posted. It's been up to $130 recently and now in the 80s.

Shdwrptr

It’s definitely a given that service will start this year but even ASTS doesn’t project full service until 2027. They only need to have a handful of sats up for partial service and the next few launches after the Blue Origin this month will be batches of satellites instead of one per launch.

partypantsdiscorock

ASTS has more long term growth potential. I think RKLB is expected to turn profitable sooner, but also has a lower ceiling than ASTS, which I think is why ASTS is more volatile - more potential while having a bit of a longer runway.

RamoneBolivarSanchez

Do you think SpaceX IPO will pull money from RKLB and ASTS, or actually pump them by proxy?

1ess_than_zer0

All I have to say for $ASTS is GLOBAL TAM as soon as it turns on. This company will be in business books in 10 yrs about how scalability explodes revenue instantly.

Arabian_Goggles_

Man I’m long ASTS but is it even a given service launches this year outside of select beta tests? We were supposed to have 5 total launches by end of Q1 and we’re likely only going to have 2 (including December one). Hopefully we get a batch shipment PR soon lol

INVEST-ASTS

Your numbers are not even correct, for example ASTS has reported (IIRC) $71M in revenue. I will not bother to dissect all the others. Yes they are not generating profit yet as they are in the early manufacturing and infrastructure stage of their growth, however they are very financially sound as in the case of ASTS they are soon a $4B war chest which will build out a substantial portion of the needed infrastructure. This is how experienced and well informed investors make thousand of % ROI, because they don’t invest based on the recent QoQ financials, they invest on the forward looking DD analysis & projections that tells them where the company will be in 1year, 5years, & 10years. Buying some of these companies now is like buying Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, et al for $1/share 20 years ago. The other positive is that “some” of these space stocks will “ramp up” their revenue much faster than the aforementioned companies were able to do because the infrastructure of the Internet and related data processing & transfer demand is already built out. The current and future demand, and varied applications for these technologies is incomprehensible. I have held these positions for ~3 years and am +2000% - 3000% and have zero intention of selling anything for at least 3-5 years, and I am confident the current ROI will double, triple , and quadruple, again from here. The emotional & irrational short term machinations of the market are irrelevant.

Good_Application6245

shouldve known it was the top around late 2025 oct when i was talking to complete randoms about ASTS and ONDS

Shdwrptr

ASTS raised $1b in cash at 2.5% interest and only 3% dilution to existing holders and OP thinks that its some imminent bubble that’s going to destroy investors

happy123z

I've been thinking aabout the search and rescue implications of ASTS's total worldwide constant coverage! Won't some company make a belt with a transponder in it and if your kid is wearing it they can be found even in cell dead zones like forest and ocean? Or an emergency back up battery in phones to gaurantee connection and location? I'd love to invest in or invent this company haha.

Shdwrptr

ASTS has far better catalysts this year than RKLB. Assuming RKLB is even launching Neutron this year, which is still in question, it still won’t be as big as ASTS actually launching service

zer0_chance284

In my opinion, space is undervalued right now for most companies that aren’t RKLB and ASTS. It will be a huge market in the next decade.

BouchWick

And did you look at RKLB? Because you are seriously looking at a shitty company to ASTS and comparing it to RKLB. They have made a loss of 18M. They are very close to being profitable without neutron.

Hopeful_Invite_8275

ASTS, hood, OKLO, SNDK and MU

D1rtyH1ppy

ASTS isn't really a space stock. It's a telecom stock disguised as a space stock. This is a new communication paradigm. It requires no special hardware, that people don't already have, and is going to be providing service worldwide. Even if this company get 1% of global revenue for the total revenue around the world for Internet, how much would this company be worth? Probably a lot more than it is right now.

floridamanconcealmnt

One thing I can say is the possible utility of satellite stocks is a lot easier to visualize. ASTS is hyping true satellite broadband coverage. BKSY is a sat intelligence company. The use cases are much clearer and in some cases here already whereas the benefits of AI to the general public are still questionable. The billionaires pushing it so hard makes me think we will not necessarily be along for the ride.

cbusoh66

The main opportunity in space is applications and services which is estimated at $350 billion and SpaceX has a big head start with Starlink, but... Launch market is $20 billion and stagnant. Look up SpaceX non-Starlink launches, stuck at like 30+ launches. Launch will be a commodity and a race to the bottom. Starlink growth has slowed too, they just got to 10 million customers after 6 years, and most are outside the U.S. with lower revenue per user. You're not going to get someone from Africa on $100 a month paying $50/month. Starlink is hoping to enter the D2D market but that market is also getting crowded and TAM is also limited. They forked $21 billion on spectrum because they are feeling their competitive advantage slipping. This is why Musk is spinning data centers in space and all that gibberish because he sees the writing on the wall. He needs to sell capacity on Starship like he does with F9 and Starlink. List of companies nipping at his heels, Blue Origin (launch and lunar landers), Amazon Leo (Broadband and Starlink), RKLB (launch and satellite systems), ASTS (D2D and Starlink), LUNR (Lunar comms and infrastructure), Stoke Space (launch) and not to mention the established space and defense contractors getting big Golden Dome contracts.

InternationalFly1021

You’re doing consumer staples valuation math on a nascent industry that has very realistic convexity. You’re also ignoring operating leverage, infrastructure scaling, and the subsidies/ballast that defense and national security applications will provide. This is the next frontier at the intersection of communications, computing, manufacturing, automation and defense, with commercial and sovereign use cases. Why in the hell would anyone look at revenue and P/E ratios to value companies at this stage? You look forward, not backward. Companies that are building out launch infrastructure and global satellite constellations for telecommunications backbones will have a massive TAM and tremendous moats. This is a technological step change; it only looks absurd if you can’t see the vision. Right now, uncertainty around timing, scaling and capital intensity is actually holding prices back further. That’s the exact setup when potential energy in a spring goes kinetic once uncertainty collapses. Personally, I want to benefit from that by being positioned now. It’s not uncommon for things to look irrational or bubbly before a structural change. I have confidence that in five years, today’s multiples will look cheap in hindsight. ASTS, despite being pre revenue, just raised $1B in like an hour from institutional capital, while only diluting shareholders around 3%. There’s plenty of smart money that’s not dismissing space as a meme, but instead underwriting survival and scaling. IMHO, you’re applying the wrong model and possibly inferring thst because WSB has caught onto it, it’s stupid. Thst would be a mistake.

Eagerbeaver98

ASTS is an awful company with no revenue, at least rocket lab has revenue

Commercial-Hippo6284

If space is a meme then why did ASTS get a government contract deal ? You talking about bonds and yields has nothing to do with a bear market. SPY is around the corner from a ATH. 37% of spy is Tech, so yes if tech is going down it’ll drag it with it. But it’s not because every other sector is either sideways or pumping ATH. Do a little bit of research before commenting. “Space is a meme” 😂😂😂 so I guess rocket ships am satellites aren’t useful? It’s just for the meme ? 😂

Admirable_Fudge7953

Good point, i mean there's a lot of people who are critical of ASTS. Not hitting dates for launches etc I don't really buy the 'cult' label. It’s more just a community that’s actually doing the homework. If you follow it closely, you see the boring but important stuff; like government approvals and spectrum deals, MNO partnerships that prove it’s more than just hype. We all know the risks are real, but in a world where data and information is king, the potential for actual satellite broadband is just too huge.

Rabitai_Trades

Cult stock usually isn’t about the business idea, it’s about how the narrative is treated. RKLB has recurring revenue, delivered launches, and more traditional KPIs to debate. ASTS is earlier-stage and hinges on proving a technically ambitious network at scale, so discussion can skew toward belief in the vision. The longer the gap between milestones and cash flow, the more sentiment can dominate price action. RKLB can be compared to other aerospace/launch names. ASTS has fewer direct comps, so expectations vary widely. Both face dilution risk, execution risk, and macro/financing constraints. ASTS also has regulatory/technical integration uncertainty. What specific behavior makes you label ASTS 'cult (posts, price action, or fundamentals)?

greenpride32

The cycle always repeats - there are always a set of speculative stocks that come along with potential and get bid up to heights that don't make sense when compared to other valuations. At their peaks, both ASTS and RKLB were worth more than over half of the companies in the SP500 by market cap. Yep that's right, the bedrock of the US stock market, the SP500, 500 of the strongest financial companies in the US, and somehow ASTS and RKLB was worth more than 250 of them. Problem is the large majority of people buying ASTS and RKLB have no clue about that or about gaps in revenue and profit - they just see it as a "hot" stock and chase it, and the bubble is the result. IMO - If you saw ASTS and RKLB as potentially disruptive companies when their valuations were not so inflated, there's nothing wrong with taking a nibble and seeing how things pan out. But once the valuation got stretched - beyond existing companies who have already pumped out billions in profits and dividend distriubtions over time - well your risk/reward proposition is not as strong. My approach has been there is no such thing a "too late". AMZN started out as a limited online retailer and then expanded to more diverse options in the late 90's and early 2000's. Yet it wasn't until 2008 when they launched the foundation of what would become AWS - their actual bread winner (much more profitable than retail). Then over the course of the next 15+ years they'd grow both retail and AWS, and it's still growing. You'd have made the most money jumping in early - when it's not clear they would succeed. But you still could have made money many years down the line when it was more clear they were gaining traction on all fronts. AAPL was a failure in PC world and Jobs was kicked from the company, with MSFT dominating. It wasn't until the iPod that AAPL started showing some life, and then iPhone propelled them to one of the most valuable companies in the world. Again you have so many entry points over the years to make a positive return - but trading larger return for more certainty. ASTS and RKLB have reached the point where I'd rather wait and see how they pan out - I have no positions. Something to keep in mind also is just because a technology "succeeds" in the sense there are use cases for them and it generates profits, does not mean the company will explode in value - a couple of reasons could be the profit margin is not high (due to costs or competition) or anticipated demand was never met. I've been in the stock market for over 25 years - I've seen a lot come and go - history says the odds are against you on these speculative plays.

Admirable_Fudge7953

Why is ASTS just a cult stock and RKLB isn't? Both have a huge following for what they have planned in the future.

certifiedintelligent

To your question: yes, but there’s more. ASTS is still basically pre-revenue. That 15mil was from pre-service agreements and government capability demos. The service likely promises billions in revenues once active. RKLB is one of very few players in a critical sector. They’re basically guaranteed income from the government as well as companies that want to get on the space wagon. SpaceX can’t launch everything. SpaceX is a different beast, they’re the largest launch provider in the world and a wildly profitable global internet service provider. If starship becomes reliable, then they’ll also have the largest and cheapest capability by a good margin. Remember that prices/valuations are forward-looking to an extent and it’s not irrational to be at these levels.

cbusoh66

RKLB $596 million this year, $734 million next year. Still outrageous valuation but get your numbers straight. They will not break even let alone generate a healthy profit for years. ASTS is a cult, they will never make the projected revenue because everyone has been lying about their total addressable market. SpaceX may debut at $1 trillion or whatever, but will take a nose dive to below $300 billion in 6 months, there's nothing special about them anymore as everyone is nipping at their heels. Outside of those names, most everything else in space is still (somewhat) reasonably priced.

f0king

ASTS to the moon tmrw?

JackWagon1990

And no, why would the “goal” be to just recover losses? That’s of course asinine. The goal is to make calculated, strategic investments in something you have conviction could be the next Amazon or TSLA or NVDA. Tell me why ASTS couldn’t be that? They seem to be pretty legitimate. Unless they’ve just been making AI videos of their satellite launches and straight up lying about contracts with the major cell phone service providers.

InternationalFly1021

ASTS and RKLB are the two main plays for convexity at this point, and recent declines mean prices now look very good. RDW has picks and shovels potential but right now is a mostly incoherent mashup of acquisitions led by inconsistent management without a clear vision. PL and BKSY are, IMO, the most at risk of commoditization. PL has a moat with its library of earth imaging for reference and AI training, but the barriers to launch imaging sats into orbit will continue to drop. FLY and LUNR are interesting opportunities. FLY landed its vehicle upright on the moon but its rockets keep blowing up. LUNR has landed its lunar vehicles on their sides twice in a row, but their acquisitions and leadership seem to have the credibility and coherence that RDW lacks. All that said, RKLB will be the fully integrated space company to own. ASTS will be the satellite company to own. Both have upcoming catalysts that will further collapse uncertainty that’s keeping their stock prices weighted down today. RKLB must have a successful Neutron launch. ASTS must get its constellation of sats launched and delivering demonstrably on its technology at scale. Both will be multi-baggers over years if this happens in a reasonable timeline. More so once defense applications scale as a “can’t fail” subsidy. The risk is that timing slips markedly or capital becomes a problem. Neither seems likely at this point, but it’s a non-zero probability. It will be interesting to see who in the robotics and automation space will benefit from this or other developments. In space, the prime defense companies like Lockheed and Raytheon obviously stand to benefit from industry growth, but they’re so big that the effects will be massively diluted. If I had to guess, I’d say the analogs to that in robotics and automation would be names like Honeywell, Rockwell, Caterpillar, Teradyne, ABB, etc. Off the top of my head, Symbotic would represent a decent option in warehouse automation, but I’ve done no actual research on them.

OG_K1NGDOM

I run the exact same strategy in both my traditional and Roth IRA. I would consider +15% target after a large 2 week run up, but I've been in since $7 and have done a lot of analysis on ASTS over the past year. The problem is, what happens when a huge announcement happens and it runs 40%? Chances are it goes back down, but 1. You've been assigned and 2. You are likely going to wait until the SP is break even which could take weeks. Considering a 0-7 day CC nets 1-2% portfolio value, and ive yet to not be able to net a sale per week, I consider that a huge win for minimal risk to get assigned.

havntmadeityet

Why are my ASTS and AMPX dumping if it’s a software sell off

InternationalFly1021

I’m not well versed enough to say anything intelligent on robotics specifically, but I will say that the communications advancements that are coming with direct-to-device (D2D) via satellite constellations (e.g., ASTS) could revolutionize not just the types of connected devices and sensors we see in the future, but also - and especially - where those devices and sensors can be placed and used reliably outdoors and/or in remote locations. In my mind, this could be 1) field inspection monitoring of facilities, pipelines, infrastructure, etc., 2) public safety, search and rescue, damage assessment applications, 3) agriculture, oil/gas, mining and construction, 4) just about anything marine and coastal that requires connection but isn’t served well by existing satcom.

TRUMPARUSKI

Buy ASTS you say?

JamesSt-Patrick

It’s not even that a hype cycle is playing out it’s that there are a variety of market conditions that are causing volatility and high beta names are having wild swings. I actually need to learn about the space sector, I don’t even know enough to have a definitive opinion on names like ASTS yet. Looking into it ahead of the SpaceX IPO

FREDRS7

Well I bought my ASTS at $2.6 per share then it reached $115 per share so I'm not sure who the dunce is here. Maybe I should sell them all because Op thinks it will blow up...

JackWagon1990

Tbh, young kids should be investing in high risk, high reward stocks like ASTS. They have a 35ish year runway to recover any losses. Of course they should have some money in savings and not gamble away their entire life savings on risky investments but this is the time for them to take risks and learn. -from a late 30s investor who wished I didn’t listen to OP’s bs when I sold TSLA 4 years ago

Origania

ASTS really rented out to VZ and T?

Overall_Option_8883

Both beat down recently. Seems like ASTS technically is legit if they can launch enough satellites 

Microceratops

Sold ASTS at 4 dollars here.. can I win the loser game?

Practical_Ad_5875

If Reddit tells you to buy a stock that’s hit ATH do not buy it yet. I saw people telling investors to buy ASTS at 120+ when I said wait for a pull back I got downvoted. 120+ might not matter long term but a better entry saves a lot of money and feels a lot less stressful.

Ok_Refrigerator_9197

ASTS calls expiring feb 20th

RanDumbPlay

Average ASTS investor.

g____19

My wife bought ASTS at $3 because “space is cool”

EnthusiasmSea850

Please dont buy ASTS because I am holding it. Thanks bro

Top_Category_2526

I sold META at $98 and then Google at $165, bought Microsoft, then crashed, bought NFLX then crashed, bought Amazon then crashed, and ASTS has been sitting on my watchlist for about 8 months Everything i hold crash and everything i don't hold goes to the moon

DennisDemori

• MAG 7 • ASTS (space) • HOOD (Fintech) • IREN (data center) • URA (Uranium) • Maybe REMX too (rare earths) Everything else is a swing trade for me

Internal_Field5970

Who bought ASTS at 122?  🤣 

teh_herper

ASTS, RKLB, NBIS, DRTS, PL, RCAT take your pick or maybe the TSMCs will still be the next tsmc you never know

thetaFAANG

Not really, they only sell to cellular providers who pass the capability down to your bill Existing mobile subscribers pay ASTS, huge revenue opportunity as all major us carriers are already signed and just waiting for ASTS to turn it on

Ok_Wealth_3433

Just wondering if any of the regards that were claiming they would buy ASTS and RKLB on a dip are buying. I know I did

sleepygarner

Since you say you're looking for serious advice, if your goal is to retire old, then 401k, ETF only, consistent contribution every pay check. If your goal is to retire young, then honestly playing pure stocks with some of the stock picks on wsb with mid caps like ASTS and RKLB, etc. can be a good play.