COST

19Black

Have you seen the pe for companies like KO, COST, WMT, etc?

ANGELeffEr

Confidently hold for 5 years… JPM-dividends COST-as close to recession-proof as it gets Any one of the steadfast utilities like: ENB Brookfield Infrastructure DUKE And to throw out a speculative tech micro cap DUOT Backlogs, recent contracts, completion of pivot out of rail inspection biz & into Modular Edge Data Center/GPU colocation By NVDA. 5 year $500M Deal with Axe Computers gives them a revenue stream 18X 2025 revs, 12X 2026 revs, and a update to 2027 revenue guidance to $170M As well as a non dilutive SPV model to ensure that future capital requirements do not demand shareholder dilution. So that’s 4 instead of one…the top 2, any 1 of the utilities out of the middle, plus the higher risk higher reward growth stock of DUOT. Oh, and how can we forget MRNA, based on the recent price action they’ve apparently cured Cancer…or have they??

3point21

I’m getting a law degree at $COST

HystericalSail

People keep saying a P/E north of 40 is justified for Wal-mart (and COST). I keep not buying. So far so good.

Huffnpuff9

They were at ATH around May 27th with a p/e of >45...as they posted a bad quarter and weak guidance, with a new catalyst of oil. That's crazy. That's when I sold all my WMT and COST. Moved it over to MSFT and Semiconductors since their p/e was <30. Don't blame the market, the good plays are right in front of you sometimes.

EarlyBird001

As I said earlier nobody knows what the future holds. But I do see that both WMT and COST seem to be over valued at the moment. I expect both of these stocks to trade at premium in their segment due to their track record and performance overall. But you'll need to decide what that premium is. Eventually it's the market which decides but ask yourself if you had to choose one stock in the retail segment, which one is the most attractive? And how much premium are you willing to pay for that company? Personally looking at current levels if I have to pick a stock (which I don't for the most part), I would prefer something like TGT or Dollar Tree. Walmart would look attractive of their forward PE comes down to mid 20s, or high 20s at most.

EarlyBird001

Doesn't matter they crashed from ATH. What matters is currently trading at less than half the valuation of WMT in a similar sector. Unless there's a red flag why their evaluation is so low, it would mean TGT is a better buy at the moment than WMT. Maybe also check the average forward PE for retail sector. I expect WMT to trade at a premium based on their track record and being leaders in their sector. But say the average forward PE for retail sector is around 20, would you be willing to pay such a large premium for them? Did some more digging and looked at Kroger, Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Home Depot etc. and found out all of them are trading at forward PE ranging from 16 to 22 with Kroger at 10! This shows WMT and COST are trading at a significant premium at the moment, which is more than double the industry standard. So I doubt WMT is being punished based on the numbers I'm seeing.

ThisKarmaLimitSucks

WMT and COST may be the biggest pieces of trash in this entire market. They have the growth potential of a utility and the multiple of an AI company.

EarlyBird001

Nobody knows the future. What I'm saying is that currently WMT and COST are trading at valuations of growth stocks when they clearly are not. Ask yourself what's the upside in WMT to justify such a high evaluation? E.g. are they getting i to cloud business? Are they exploring other ventures which will open a new revenue stream? Coz for a retailer whose business model is based on thin margins the current valuation is not sustainable. By the way valuation and what the market is willing to pay for the stock may not align, e.g., TSLA or SPCX.

EarlyBird001

WMT and COST are way over valued. They have forwarded PE of 38 and 44, which makes no sense for a retailer operating on thin margins. They're trading like growth stocks when they are not. Compare to AMZN for example. AMZN has a forward PE of 28 and are likely to grow at a much faster pace. Even after WMT pullback their current valuation is not justified.

Kantmzk

The safety premium definitely applies to WMT/COST. I would always prefer Costco.

zoomin1098

COST prob next.

mrmrmrj

Given this report, should COST really trade at 45x? For the 30 years prior to COVID, it traded at 25x.

IvoryTowerResident

probably getting cooked cus WMT COST all cooked

1098duc_w_the_termi

WMT missing guidance estimates really tells you how bad the K shaped economy is. If COST goes (top k), so does the economy lmao.

Vlisa

So many people ran to WMT/AAPL/COST to avoid AI getting their ass blownout. Not trying to call them out, but everyone trying to jump on the same life raft gonna sink it inevitably.

captainstrange94

Seriously though, why is that RDDT deserves a worse valuation than commodity stocks like COST, WMT and even fucking Colgate.

Paul_Robert_

Calls on COST

bdh2067

I’ve held shares of COST for a decade. I’ll never sell. But I’m not buying more here now. I would buy more below 900 maybe.

visionarymind

Into a small 🥣: 1 small organic jalapeño from 🇲🇽, chopped with seeds 1 clove organic 🧄 from California 2 large organic pasture-raised 🥚🥚 from COST🌭 5 turns of freshly ground organic coarse black pepper from the pepper mill 1/4 tsp 🧂 Airate together with whisk Cook over medium heat in 🥓 grease for 1-2 minutes Next, Lightly two slices of organic sourdough bread from local bakery that uses stone-milled grains Slather both slices with organic Harissa Mayonnaise from Whole Paycheck grouch store Place cooked egg scramble on one piece of toast Add a layer of organic wild arugula Add 2-3 thin slices of organic Cherokee Purple heirloom 🍅 purchased from Farmer’s Market Add half of an organic 🥑 Complete sammje with the second toasted slice slathered with Harissa Mayonnaise Thank you for your attention to this matter❗️‼️

xTheatreTechie

You're going to want to open a Robinhood account, Robin hood gives you a free 1% bonus for everything you throw into your Roth IRA. Which sounds like the account you want to open. From there you set your Roth it's to automatically draw the 10 dollars a week/month whatever you're comfortable with.  You're probably going to want to set it to invest in VOO. which is the USA sp500 mirror. Its nearly identical in terms of the sp500 but 1/3 the cost. "WAIT WHAT COST?" All ETFs will charge you like a percentage of whatever you invest so that they manage your fund. It's pennies. I believe it's 0.03%, so not even 3 percent, a percent of a percent.  Let it do its thing, when you go to retire you get that amount tax free. 

visionarymind

Why do people consume 🍕 @ COST🌭❓

visionarymind

I’d probably be a millionaire already if I didn’t live in SoCal $150 to leave your 🏚️ here $400 if you’re brave & visit COST🌭

bearhunter429

Reverend Bearhunter: “Brothers and sisters, we gather today in the green pasture of the S&P 500. We reject the false prophets of recession. We renounce the evil spirit of short selling. And we place our faith in growth.” Congregation: “AMEN!” 🙌 “Now turn to your neighbor and say: What’s your cost basis?” Congregation: “WHAT’S YOUR COST BASIS?” 📈📈📈 #LMAO🤌

creemeeseason

Buying GOOG for pixel phones is like buying COST for it's cheap hotdogs.

Excellent_Fix_4360

What's happening with $COST stock?

nai-ba

Auch $AAPL ** - APPLE MAY ABSORB IPHONE 18 PRO COST SURGE** Apple may limit price hikes for the iPhone 18 Pro despite component costs expected to jump 38%, according to TrendForce. Soaring memory prices are the main driver, with memory projected to exceed 40% of component costs by early 2027, up from just 10% a year earlier. To protect demand, Apple could accept lower profit margins—or raise prices on older iPhones to offset the added costs.

qroshan

Patrick Boyle is a normie that lacks imagination. He is a perfect guy to analyze IBM, WMT, COST. Unfit to value SPCX, OpenAI and Anthropic, Meta because he already has a pre-bias against them (just like all redditors). All final analysts should show their returns even if it's traded on fake money, else they are useless. Buffett has his returns. Even Leo has his returns. Where the fuck is Patrick's returns?

imustbegthequestion

French Onion Soup from a 3-day French Technique Consommé made out of a $COST rotisserie chicken. I survive in the #ChaTown704 on 2000 USD a month for 15 years. What's my net worth Metatron?

EagleAquila420

i wnat 50% gains IM GREEDY AND I WILL HAVE MY GREED AT ANY COST. NO ONE CAN STOP ME. OR CANNOT STOP ME I GUESS.

SpecialistTutor4451

8-12 max. I’d keep MA, V, KO, Google, COST, LMT, CVX, LLY.

JakeCahi11

I prefer to use NTM (Next 12 months) P/E as this provides a forward looking ratio and as we know markets are a forward looking mechanism, not backward like trailing ratios do. WM is currently 26.5x NTM P/E and COST is 43.5 (data from Tikr.com) – both below their mean NTM P/E over the last three years. Stepping away from the ratio point and stripping away the title "Defensive" as titles can be misleading and wrongly used. Ask yourself, what do these stocks do when the overall market corrects, especially tech? Where does money flow when it flows out of tech that is perceived to be overvalued at a given time? Where does money flow when the economy tightens or fear from whatever today's headline is? It flows to these names. Check the charts if you'd like. In my opinion, this inherently makes them defensive by nature, regardless of their P/E. Yes, valuation absolutely matters I agree with you wholeheartedly.

Alternative-Cat613

Out of curiosity, how does your **ai financial analyst** module filter out noise? When your **ai stock picker** flags something like TSM or COST (from your screenshot), is it reacting to real-time news data or strictly technical breakdowns?

vandalizethethief

Let your winners run and set a trailing stop loss on Schwab (ToS) once your principal is secured plus whatever % you were looking at for the trade. You win at trading by keeping losses small and letting winners run. I almost dumped Amazon in AH after ER bc they really are doing just okay & their earnings were about the same as Google and Microsoft. Honestly, their low margin business in logistics & being the largest online retailer in the world with $716 billion in sales capturing 41% of the US market. What stood out to me is the logistics business is no longer just for getting Amazon vendors goods to your door. It now includes Tik-Tok and others but they still have too much volume. No store has cheaper prices while not having to drive somewhere. It’s $AMZN & $COST for me and that’s it these days plus some smaller businesses on $SHOP when they have a sale or am sick of wading through Amazons garbage UI and bloated website. They have \~60,000 EVs on the road doing last mile. That saves a ton in fuel in the current geopolitical environment. UPS finally dumped them for higher margin business but Amazon is the largest parcel delivery company in the US having surpassed FedEx and UPS a while ago they finally caught USPS in 2025 with 5.7 billion parcels delivered. It has only gone up from there and now they are looking to take freight business from FedEx & UPS. The profit margin on the whole thing is only 10% but since they have AWS they don’t need to pay someone else to host all their delivery data. The warehouses are newer, the drivers aren’t even Amazon employees and they just shut down a packaging plant near me to modernize it with more robots etc… I mainly make money from trading but I needed healthcare and I can’t afford $1200/month so I joined up and it’s horrible on your body, the pay sucks but I get to monitor my trades & since I’m now a reliable driver they leave me alone. I listen to podcasts, WSJ, Barron’s and the Economist articles so I’m aware of what’s going on. Also, the volume finally started to drop on packages but there is still so much it’s insane. The EVs were made to fix last mile w/o getting larger step vans like the competition.

Molten-Helldiver

At least COST is refunding its members in credits

StandardObject91

I got banned from another SpaceX forum for posting the truth about SpaceX. I am the bearer of bad news. SpaceX is the biggest financial crime in history. The S-1 is the most shocking document I've read, and I have read hundreds of IPO filings over a 30 year period, and drafted a dozen or so Reg.D pvt. placement offering docs as a lawyer. I'll skip the details of the document and go straight to the facts. The S-1 claims that SpaceX is 3 businesses with a TAM of 27 trillion. 1-AI (Grok) is supposed to represent 23TRILLION of that. All 11 founders of Grok have left the building. NONE are left. [https://thenextweb.com/news/xai-all-cofounders-departed-musk-spacex-rebuild](https://thenextweb.com/news/xai-all-cofounders-departed-musk-spacex-rebuild) No developer uses it. They literally have no meaningful AI and they compete against 3 of the wealthiest companies in the world who have a 5 year head start on them. Literally 80 pct or so of the TAM in the S-1 does not even exist. 2-Launch. Last year there were a TOTAL of 36 non-Gov't launches. The total (non Starlink) revenue was less than 5 billion. Unless you believe the fantasy of data centers in space, the cold reality is that there is no "space" business other than what's already up there - a mature Communications and defense business. That's it. We are never going to Mars or mine the moon in an investable time frame. Accept that. 3-Starlink. The S-1 claims that Starlink "earned" something like 4B. BUT we can never really know whether that is true because Launch only charges Starlink "cost" for lift services. But there is no way to determine whether that "cost" is accurate. It's an inter-company transfer - an arbitrarily determined accounting device. But let's assume it IS true. What does that mean? It means, by definition, that Launch can NEVER earn a profit on Starlink lift services because - duh - they are provided at COST. Any earnings from Launch will have to come from gov't and commercial launches (tot revs of 5B last year) Quick take. Starlink is an INTERNET service not a phone service (we will get to that later) Now let's take a look at Starlink's technology. They use Phased Array. The physics are brutal. v1 and v2 satellite Phased array satelites can only serve around a few hundred fixed terminals 100–300 per Starlink service cell, How big is a "cell?" Roughly **15 sq miles** 15x24Km. Redundancy increases capacity a bit. Neverthelss, what this means is that Starlink can NEVER be competitive in urban markets (where the people live). Musk himself admits that. Thus the TAM for Starlink is about 400-800mm RURAL dwellers worldwide, most of them in Africa. It's a niche business. Finally lets look at Starlinks aspiration to provide mobile phone services. Guess what? You can already do that. For $8 dollars a month T-Mobile gives you direct to cell from Starlink. How much of that does Starlink get? I dunno but it doesn't make any difference because nobody uses it anyway- unless you need to call your mom from Antarctica or the top of K-2 you don't need it. T-Mobile's direct-to-device satellite service with Starlink, called **T-Satellite**, accounts for roughly 0.0002% to 0.0003% of total network traffic. (3 calls in a million) While the initial free beta attracted about 1.8 million sign-ups, actual utilization remains minimal because T-Mobile's terrestrial ground network covers the vast majority of consumer needs. So why pay 8 bucks a month? Lastly let's turn to the "non-Business" of leasing compute. First of all it's not mentioned in the S-1. That's a go to jail misrepresentation to exclude data and associated risks if they are actually in that business, But not to worry, Musk himself has said "we're not in the leasing business," which is ironic because that "non-business" will represent the vast majority of their revenue next year, that is, if Goog and Anthropic don't cancel after 90 days. Sorry to piss in the punch bowl but that's the reality you're looking at.

cageslutjoanna

I bought UNH after the drop not because i liked the stock but because I really like how they treat their customers. (I'm not american) Jokes aside, whenever these systemically-important, cash-rich dividend-monster quasi-monopolies have a huge drop, like COST / UNH / ASML recently did, it's a signal to buy the dip. They will always bounce back long term - if they don't, it's because something has fundamentally changed about how the economy they operate in. V and MA have nowhere else to go, they have no organic growth left - credit is becoming more expensive as we are in a cycle of rate increases. Fundamentally - any lending company will have decreased profits when rates increase. When rates increase, consumers spend less because they have to spend more on their mortgage. It costs the lender more to borrow money, and people watch out more for fees. Payments companies thrive in rate cutting environments because people can see that their money is better spent now than later. So if you're buying them you are expecting them to either find a way to nickle and dime customers more, or you are betting on them finding a way to increase their offerings via integration with stablecoins. Some of the smaller payments companies have a long way to grow. If you're in V/MA it's because youve been in them a long time and like your tasty dividends.

Spy300

>MIAMI'S COST OF LIVING SURPASSES NYC FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER Soooo... rent freezes then?

Doneeb

COST & WMT kept on chuggin'. Bless consumerism.

NecroticNecron473

Current portfolio (\~$250): GOOGL - $74.79 V - $48.41 INTU - $33.37 MELI - $33.09 COST - $22.41 COKE - $21.84 TOST - $17.1

Brawmethius

I REPEAT SCHIZO POSTING WONT SAVE YOUR PORT NEXT TIME SPEND YOUR $10 ON HOT N SPICY McCHICKEN THATS PROBABLY WHAT THEY COST NOW, IDK I DONT EAT WITH YOU POORS. TYFYATTM

visionarymind

I spent $500 @ a festival Sunday $163 @ COST🌭 yesterday $112 today because I splurged on Halo, a foaming exfoliating cleanser, & chapstick 😵‍💫

SignificantStuff5446

MU: 5.3 FPE. SNDK 5.3 FPE. SKHY: 4 FPE. COST: 43 FPE. T: 8 FPE. SPY: 20 FPE. So yes, they can and should, but will they and when? That's the rub. :)

spilledonwhite

But for real should I full port WMT/COST/SCHD

spilledonwhite

LOL bro they are getting CRUSHED. Absolutely biblical. I only have 2% in chips but a little heavy on momentum ETFs that hold chips. My current august price target for all chips is PE of 1. WMT and COST are going to 200 PE for sure, easy 4x. I'm not opposed to shorting the chips. I still want to hear an actual thesis like "AI wont be profitable and demand for datacenters and chips will plumet," or "circular lending is a house of cards that will collapse on itself." Simple profit taking only goes so far... Saying "it went up so it must come down" you might as well agree that SNDK went down 1000 so next it must go up 1000.

Skittler_On_The_Roof

Democratising the COST.  In a decade when it's actually profitable, that's when the private sector takes full charge.

redisok

Reminder that COST is still trading at a higher PE ratio than MSFT, NVDA, AAPL etc...

gopoohgo

SNDK has a lower PE than COST lol

spilledonwhite

When WMT and COST pe hits 200 in about a week

gopoohgo

COST and NVO trying to balance out the crater of red that is AMD and GLW in my port lol

spilledonwhite

WMT and COST are easily a 15x each, full port that is the future. 🙄🙄🙄

Acrobatic-Flan-5085

Again you are mistaken. Name any manufacturer producing batteries today at industrial scale, with the same verified energy density,charging speed, thermal safety and minimal degradation as CATL. There are NONE. REGARDLESS OF COST.

spilledonwhite

Sure, but their CURRENT pe could literally double and still be less than WMT and COST. Meaning their esrnings could be cut in half and still be a cheaper stock, no?

creemeeseason

The same argument is made about COST and WMT. All trade at a nosebleed valuation due to "safety" but it's really a bet on no multiple compression happening in those names at this point.

avsfan0829

*NVIDIA IN TALKS TO PROVIDE $250 BILLION FINANCIAL BACKSTOP FOR OPENAI DATA CENTER IN OHIO, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ *BACKSTOP IS PART OF OPENAI'S BID TO WORK WITH SOFTBANK ON WHAT COULD BE THE LARGEST DATA CENTER IN THE U.S., SOURCES SAY -- WSJ *NVIDIA WOULD GUARANTEE FINANCING VEHICLES FOR DATA CENTER THAT COULD COST SOME $500 BILLION IN TOTAL, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ Rip your Nvidia calls

WrexyWrex

Okay, very basic economics for this one - early bird special Cheaper compute for the same production means lower profit margins unless demand increases relative to... supply! However, one caveat in this "not so free market" Expect anticompetitive announcements on this because the profits stay the same or increase unless rivals show up! This is why we don't have antitrust laws here, because rivals lower profit distribution and COST! Which means it's impossible to be efficient This is where AI models are at right now.

John_Galtt

What are your other 7? I do something similar. RDDT, LYV, PM, COST, BROS, AMZN, GOOGL, AXON.

mp7000000000

Found the guy whose been holding $COST for the dividends thinking he's smart money

Pleasant_Knee6256

Short COST, ORCL, long AAPL

elgrandorado

To be fair to COST, they have yet to expand to many regions of the world.

dreggers

When will the real bubble of defensible stocks like WMT, COST, and AAPL burst?

sruchris

Full port into brick-and-mortar like it's 1999. TGT, WMT, COST.

IvoryTowerResident

$COST has higher PE

dreggers

SPY is propped up by overvalued "defensible" stocks. Imagine what will happen when WMT or COST actually have a bad quarter

spilledonwhite

Drones already done too. Drone warfare definitely isn't a thing anymore. I guess full port WMT, COST, FAST, much more growth potential than anything that has the 7 biggest companies in the world throwing all their money at it.

SteakEater137

They really created a perfectly unsafe market. SPY, broad market ETFs? Way too concentrated at the top, so much market cap has been focused into speculative AI that remains unprofitable and semiconductors that rely on that CapEx. Gold and silver? Already went up too much over the last few years, being sold off to pay for higher oil. Oil? Despite the disruptions, your buys can get wrecked within a minute by a shitpost so it doesnt actually go up much anymore. Consumer staples? WMY and COST are already trading in the 40s PE somehow, and their cost of goods is going up because of war and tariff disruption. Cash or bonds? Youre fucked, real inflation is 4% at the least and cutting rates is still not off the table, so it could get even worse.

dreggers

what a day where COST and WMT are the most overvalued stocks in the market

A55BAG

I love how insanely overvalued consumer stable stocks like AAPL, COST and WMT rally to keep SP500 stable as the chips bleed 🤣

spilledonwhite

I just think MU having a CURRENT PE that is literally half of WMT and COST is a bit much.

spilledonwhite

Yeah the PE of WMT and COST compared to chip stocks makes total sense 🙄

Sandvicheater

Ya'll can argue which ever AI company is gonna win, which semi producer will be king, etc. But I don't think there a single soul here that's bearish on COST

Mr-Cheek-Clapper

The $COST app is ass PUTS

Altruistic-Put-1899

tbh I’ve been kinda tired of the whole tech/AI noise. Healthcare, staples, even some boring industrial names feel more interesting right now just because they’re less crowded and you’re actually looking at cash flows instead of storylines. I keep coming back to stuff like COST and JPM on the more steady compounding side. SN also stood out a bit in consumer because they’ve been slowly moving into more product categories. I saw their revenue breakdown on moomoo. still mostly appliances, but the mix has been shifting a bit compared to a few years ago, which was interesting to see.

Vlisa

New Costco chicken tenders are mid, buying puts on COST

ihopethisworksfornow

The oil industry: “If oil stays elevated it could be devastating to the economy” Bulls: “NO. OIL WILL NOT STAY UP. IRAN WILL BE WAVING AMERICAN FLAGS IN TWO WEEKS. AI IS GOING TO MAKE EVERY COMPANY MAKE A TRILLION DOLLARS A WEEK AT ZERO COST BUT ALSO THE AI COMPANIES WILL PRINT SO HARD YOU WONT EVEN BELIEVE IT. THE WAR IS *OVER. USA USA USA BUY BUY BUY STOCKS ONLY GO UP”* *\*4 months later\** News: The Iran war stretches into its 4th month as the ceasefire collapses and Iran missile strikes ships and oil infrastructure across the gulf Oil: Goes up again

_freckles__

46x for COST? do people think cost will survive 46 years lol

ListerineInMyPeehole

MSFT 23x trailing PE, vs. 37x for AAPL and 46x for COST Imagine looking at PE?

I_am_Nerman

WMT & COST are safe havens

AMX_revue

!banbet COST 950 6d

jason8585

Why did COST have such a shit year?

Dude_HaHa

$COST to 500

Happy-Champion1661

WMT is a tech company now, it's even on the nasdaq. COST is loved by people so it trades higher (I wish I was able to give you better reasoning, but that's literally it)

BarbellPadawan

Why is PE ratio on companies like WMT and COST higher than tech growth stocks?

youstillhavehope

COST. Nice people, good hot dogs, America's go-to "I'm afraid for my port" stock and this week will be a shitshow, but not from the orange monkey, from Iran. It wants the Straight, it will keep this on-again, off-again thing going while the monkey's mid-term theta drives it home. APPL might be a nice back-up but their problems are piling up.

AMX_revue

!banbet COST 950 10d

Particular_Rice9607

$COST back to $950 eow

Agreeable_Bear6812

If I were only invested in AI, or tech I would be gambling not investing. The small portion of my portfolio that remains in individual stocks is not all concentrated there. I also own COST, WM, TJX, and AXP because I think they are high-quality companies with sound business plans and upside potential.

Particular_Rice9607

$COST is where it's at [https://www.reddit.com/r/orlando/s/PJ4iPPkSVX](https://www.reddit.com/r/orlando/s/PJ4iPPkSVX)

Flat-Focus7966

Costco(COST).......if you want to play safe

youstillhavehope

COST looking cheap. Why is this a bad idea?

Particular_Rice9607

$COST is printing\~!

jacksonvstheworld

I bought some COST today and noted that I felt the same dopamine rush as a parlay lol

scrigglybiggly

I own 25 shares od COST in my portfolio. Look that one up today. I just laugh. You're good, don't stress, or give it to someone else to manage.

Particular_Rice9607

Gonna collect some div off of $ORCL, $GIS, $T, $VZ and chill, also loading up so much $COST that my kids kids can retire

johns2289

Everyone here making money and I’m sitting here like spiderman bag holding COST

Particular_Rice9607

$COST is on sale today...

Busy_Dingo_5744

$COST calls

Burtonwurton

Oh lord...JPM cuts COST price target from $1,110 to $1100. $10 fucking dollars and this shit drops almost 5%. I have no stake but that is retarded.

Rich-Badger-7601

COST is getting murdered out there

Molten-Helldiver

Why the fuck did COST dump a bit afterhours..useless POS