Reddit Posts
Thursday watchlist, Oct 8: VEEA, TNON, MEDS, BTCT, BMGL (five near-misses, and three of them have stock waiting in the wings)
Mentions
Post is by: Patriot_tech and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/Squeeze_em/comments/1x2hiwp/veeas_short_interest_fell_96_before_its_47_friday/ The most important number of the week showed up Friday afternoon. FINRA's Sep 30 short interest, published Oct 9, put VEEA at **50,744** shares short. On Sep 15 it was **1,216,996**. We spent the week quoting the old figure, roughly 77% to 80% of the float. By the time VEEA closed up 47% on Friday, most of the shorts we kept describing were already gone. The market barely helped. SPY rose about 1.2% for the week and IWM fell about 0.9%, so the moves below were about the stocks. **How fresh this is:** Closes and volume are Nasdaq's daily history (Oct 2 to Oct 9). Short interest is the Sep 30 settlement via Nasdaq. Borrow is Curved Trading's IBKR feed as of Saturday morning, which reflects Friday. Filings are from EDGAR, checked Saturday morning. --- **What ran** * **$VEEA** finished at **$5.70**, up 71% from $3.33 a week earlier. Monday did most of it (+71.8% on 66.9M shares). Then came three red days, then Friday's run to **$7.09** on about 83M shares after Thursday evening's news that Veea is back in compliance with Nasdaq's listing rules. That's more than 50 times the 1.58M float. Borrow ended at **844.7%** with 15K shares to lend. * **$APUS** went from $4.59 to $7.13 on Tuesday and hit **$9.84** Wednesday. It closed Friday at $5.02, about 49% under that high. Short interest was only 10,346 shares at Sep 15 (we don't have its Sep 30 figure yet). * **$BMGL** gained 14% to $3.75 in the same week it priced 6M units at **$1.33**. **What faded** * **$MEDS** fell 20% to $2.96. Thursday's 14M-share pop (+18%) was mostly gone by Friday's close. Friday it filed an amended S-1 to register up to **34,462,057** resale shares. The filing counts **4,515,862** shares outstanding. * **$IPDN** hit $6.78 on Tuesday's 70.6M-share day and closed Friday at $3.53, about 48% lower. * **$ONDS** slid 7% to $6.73. The Oct 9 $7.50 calls we tracked all week expired out of the money. * **$TNON** lost 7.8% and **$BTCT** 12.2%, quietly. **What short interest did, Sep 15 to Sep 30** VEEA fell 96%, BTCT 95%, BMGL 93%, TNON 89%, IPDN 46% and ONDS 4%. MEDS went the other way, up 22% to 525,081 shares. BIAF also rose, from 71,167 to 115,467. **What we got right** We said MEDS looked like shorts betting against the balance sheet, not a crowd waiting to get squeezed. The S-1/A is that balance sheet showing up. We flagged TNON, BTCT and BMGL because each had stock waiting behind the short interest, and BMGL priced at $1.33 while the stock traded above $3. We called ONDS a disagreement, not a trap. **What we got wrong** Two things. First, we leaned on a three-week-old short count. VEEA's borrow stayed brutal, which is why our standing rule kept it on the list, but "80% of float short" was mostly history by Sep 30. We had the right stock and the wrong fuel. Second, we dropped **$BIAF** after Tuesday. On Thursday it ran as much as 52% to **$9.38** on a Japan patent notice, traded 35.3M shares, and the company priced a roughly $4M offering at **$6.122** the same day. It closed Friday at **$4.725**. A spike followed by an offering is exactly the risk we write about, and we weren't watching it. A fee is not a squeeze. This week, an old short count wasn't one either. When the official count is two weeks old, what do you trust more: the borrow fee, or the number of shares available to lend? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Post is by: Patriot_tech and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/Squeeze_em/comments/1x21gpn/evening_wrap_fri_oct_9_veea_hit_709_closed_up_47/ VEEA was the whole story today. It closed up 47% after touching $7.09, gave back about 12% after hours, and the borrow fee went up instead of down. The other four were quiet on price, but two of them put more shares on the calendar: TNON's warrant resale prospectus went final and MEDS filed to register about 34.5M resale shares. **How fresh this is:** Regular closes (3 PM CT), ranges and volume are from StockAnalysis and Nasdaq. After-hours prices are the last trades between about 6:20 and 6:59 PM CT on Nasdaq and StockAnalysis. Borrow and shares available are from Curved Trading's IBKR feed as of 7:17 PM CT. Filings are from EDGAR, checked about 7:25 PM CT. Short interest is still the Sep 15 settlement. After-hours prints are thin, so read them as a hint and not a price. --- **$VEEA: up 47%, and the borrow got more expensive** * Closed at **$5.70**, up 47.3% from Thursday's $3.87. It opened at $5.54 and ran as high as **$7.09** before closing about 20% off the high. The low was $5.29. * After hours it last traded **$5.01** at 6:53 PM CT on Nasdaq, down 12.1% from the close. StockAnalysis had $4.81 at 6:20 PM CT. * Volume was about **83.5M** shares on the day, including premarket, against about 694K Thursday. That is more than 50 times the 1.58M float StockAnalysis lists. * Borrow is **844.7%** with **15.0K** shares available, last changed at 7:02 PM CT. Thursday evening it was 766.3% with 5.0K. * New filing: an **8-K** at 3:05 PM CT. Director Helder Antunes resigned from the board on Oct 8 (he stays on as EVP and Chief Revenue Officer, and the filing says there was no disagreement), and the board shrank to five. Nothing on NovaGen. There's still no Item 1.01 definitive agreement on file. * The short-sale restriction was on today, carried from Thursday's drop. Today's low was above Thursday's close, so nothing new triggered it. * VEEA showed up on Nasdaq's own Reg SHO threshold file dated Oct 8. Today's file wasn't posted when we checked. * Fade check: the fee is far above 50%, availability is far under 500K, and there's no new offering. Not fading. A stock that runs 83% intraday on 50 times its float usually loosens the locate. This one did the opposite. Lendable shares went from 5K to 15K, which is still almost nothing, and the fee went up 78 points. The shorts paid more to stay in, and the stock still gave back about 40% of its intraday run by the close. **$TNON** * Closed at **$3.41**, down 0.9% from $3.44, in a $3.37 to $3.52 range. After hours: **$3.36** at 6:57 PM CT. * Volume was about **134K** shares, against about 110K Thursday. * Borrow is unchanged at **315.7%**, with available down to **100.0K** from 150K, last changed at 12:47 PM CT. * New filings: a final **424B3** resale prospectus at 3:20 PM CT for the **858,269** shares behind the Series B warrants struck at **$5.02**, plus a Form 3 at 3:01 PM CT. The warrant shares are now registered to sell. They only matter if the stock gets back above $5.02, and at $3.41 that's about 47% away. **$MEDS** * Closed at **$2.96**, down 12.9% from $3.40, in a $2.95 to $3.30 range. After hours: **$2.99** at 6:59 PM CT. * Volume was about **437K** shares, against about 14.0M Thursday. * Borrow is unchanged at **440.0%** with **15.0K** available. Curved shows it last changed Thursday. * Still on Nasdaq's Reg SHO threshold file dated Oct 8. * New filing: an **S-1/A** at 4:20 PM CT registering the resale of up to **34,462,057** shares. That's about 21.3M from converting the May 2026 notes, about 8.3M from the PIPE warrants, about 3.6M from placement-agent warrants, and about 1.3M already issued. StockAnalysis counts **3.06M** shares outstanding. It's a pre-effective amendment, so nothing can sell under it yet. There's still no definitive 14C. Thursday's 14M-share pop gave back most of its gain, and then the company filed paperwork for roughly eleven times its current share count. That's not what a squeeze candidate's calendar looks like. **$BTCT** * Closed at **$1.01**, down 3.8% from $1.05, in a $1.00 to $1.06 range. After hours: **$1.03** at 6:56 PM CT. * Volume was about **586K** shares, against about 554K Thursday. * Borrow eased to **207.6%** with **1.0M** shares available, last changed at 10:47 AM CT. Thursday it was 211.4% with 900K. * No new filings. The last was the Sep 18 resale prospectus. Availability grew again, to a million shares. That's the slow version of coming off the board. **$BMGL** * Closed at **$3.75**, up 4.2% from $3.60, in a $3.43 to $3.88 range. After hours: **$3.72** at 6:55 PM CT. * Volume was about **105K** shares, against about 127K Thursday. * Borrow ticked up to **102.0%** with **35.0K** available, last changed at 1:47 PM CT. * New filing: a **6-K** at 5:10 AM CT that repeats the deal terms. That's 6,000,000 units at $1.33, about $7.98M gross and about $7.28M net, with common warrants that can be exercised on a zero-cash basis for another 6,000,000 shares. We didn't find a closing notice on EDGAR by 7:25 PM CT, so we can't confirm the units delivered today. The stock held well above a $1.33 deal price that could add up to 12M shares to a company with about 1.58M outstanding. Holding up doesn't make that supply go away. --- **Short interest:** The Sep 30 short interest isn't out yet in our sources. All five figures above are still the Sep 15 count. **Options:** None of the five has listed options on Nasdaq's chain, rechecked at about 7:22 PM CT. **What we learned today:** Volume and borrow can move in opposite directions. VEEA traded more than 50 times its float, and lendable shares stayed tiny while the fee went up. Meanwhile, the share-count story got worse on the other names: TNON's warrant shares are now registered to sell, and MEDS filed to register about 34.5M more. VEEA closed up 47% with only 15K shares to lend, and it still gave back about 12% after hours. Does it stay on Monday's board, and which of the other four comes off? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Post is by: Patriot_tech and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/Squeeze_em/comments/1x0q7kr/thursday_watchlist_oct_8_veea_tnon_meds_btct_bmgl/ Nothing on our squeeze screen scored 3 of 4 on Wednesday, so this is a board of near-misses, and we're calling them that. VEEA stays on under our standing update. TNON, BTCT and BMGL are new, and each one has registered stock or warrants sitting behind the short interest. MEDS stays from yesterday. APUS, IPDN and ONDS come off: all three still score 1 of 4. **How fresh this is:** Closes, ranges and volume are Wednesday's regular session, 3 PM CT close (Nasdaq, Yahoo). After-hours prices are the after-hours close, ~7:00 PM CT, from Nasdaq and StockAnalysis. After-hours volume is a rough figure: Nasdaq's full-day total minus Yahoo's regular-session count. Borrow and shares available are Curved Trading's IBKR feed as of 7:32 PM CT. Short interest is still the Sep 15 settlement. The Sep 30 numbers still weren't out on StockAnalysis or Nasdaq at 7:40 PM CT. Filings are from EDGAR, rechecked at about 7:55 AM CT Thursday, with nothing new overnight on any of the five. **Premarket lines** are Nasdaq's last premarket trade as of about 7:53 AM CT Thursday, and **borrow** was refreshed from Curved's 7:47 AM CT feed. Premarket volume is thin, so recheck everything at the open. **Squeeze screen:** We score four things: short interest of at least 20% of float, borrow of at least 50%, utilization of at least 90%, and a dated catalyst inside two weeks. We don't have a utilization figure we can verify, so the best possible score is 3. This time we went past Curved's top-50 borrow board and also checked borrow on all 100 names on StockAnalysis's most-shorted list, plus Curved's fee-spike and mover lists. Five names had both the crowd and the fee, on numbers we trust. None had a date on the calendar. Three more (MGN, AGRZ, WETO) looked 50%+ short on a screener and came apart in the filings: two reverse splits landed after the Sep 15 count, and one share count is out of date. --- **1) $VEEA: down again, on a quarter of Tuesday's volume** * Closed **$4.71**, down 4.7% from Tuesday's **$4.94**, in a range of $4.55 to $4.98. That's also 3% to 4% under Tuesday's after-hours close of $4.86 to $4.89. * About **473K** shares traded in the regular session, against roughly 1.8M Tuesday and 66.9M Monday. * After hours: **$4.63 to $4.66** at the after-hours close, ~7:00 PM CT, depending on the feed (Nasdaq vs. StockAnalysis), so down 1.1% to 1.7% from the regular close, on roughly **10K** shares. No filings or news after the bell. * Borrow is **783.2%** with **55K** available after the bell (last changed 5:17 PM CT). At the regular close it was 799.4% with 35K. Tuesday's regular close was 810.9% with 30K, and Wednesday morning showed 803.3% with 25K. Supply more than doubled in a day, which is worth watching. * Short interest **1.22M** at Sep 15, about 80% of the **1.52M** float (StockAnalysis). Days to cover 0.11. * No new filings since Tuesday's 4:25 PM CT 8-K, which put a director on the audit committee. NovaGen is still a non-binding term sheet, with no definitive agreement or vote date on EDGAR. Curved still flags the Aug 13 424B5 ($75M) as an ATM, with usage not broken out. * SSR was on Wednesday, carried over from Tuesday. Wednesday's low was 7.9% under Tuesday's close, short of Rule 201's 10% trigger, so the restriction should be off Thursday. Check your platform's flag. * Premarket: **$4.38**, down 7.0% from the regular close, on about **29K** shares by 7:53 AM CT. Borrow still **783.2%**, with availability up again to **60K** as of 7:47 AM CT. Curved still shows SSR on, so check your platform's flag before you trust our math on Rule 201. * Fade check: the fee is far above 50%, availability is far under 500K even after doubling, and there's no new offering. Not fading. * Screen: short interest 80.01% of float, borrow 783.2%, utilization not in our notes, no dated catalyst inside two weeks (earnings estimated Nov 13). 2 of 4. *What the numbers don't prove:* Two straight down days with the fee near 800%. The borrow says shorting is still hard. It doesn't say anyone is losing sleep over it. *What takes it off the board:* The fee drops under 50%, or more than 500K shares show up to lend, two sessions running. A new offering that supplies the shorts does it in one. **2) $TNON (Tenon Medical): the screener says 87% short, the S-3 says closer to 20%** * Closed **$3.50**, down 5.8% from **$3.715**, in a range of $3.38 to $3.64, on about **354K** shares (423K Tuesday). * After hours: **$3.44** at the after-hours close, ~7:00 PM CT, on both Nasdaq and StockAnalysis, down 1.7% from the regular close, on roughly **2K** shares. No filings or news after the bell. * Borrow is **335.5%** with **75K** available (last changed 4:47 PM CT). Tuesday's close was 330.7% with 100K. * Short interest **539,306** at Sep 15. StockAnalysis shows that as 86.87% of a 620,827-share float. The S-3 filed Oct 5 counts **2,688,735** shares outstanding as of Oct 1. Float can't be bigger than that, so the short interest is at least about 20% of float. That still clears our bar, barely. The 1-for-35 reverse split was Aug 10, before the count, so the split isn't the problem. The new shares are. * That S-3 registers the resale of **858,269** shares from Series B warrants struck at **$5.02**, issued in a Sep 11 warrant inducement. * After Tuesday's close the company announced the full commercial launch of its SImmetry+ SI joint screw. There's no date attached to anything after that. * Premarket: **$3.46**, down 1.1% from the regular close, on about **4K** shares by 7:46 AM CT. Borrow still **335.5%** with **100K** available as of 7:47 AM CT. * Screen: short interest at least 20% of float, borrow 335.5%, utilization not in our notes, no dated catalyst inside two weeks (earnings estimated Nov 12). 2 of 4. *What the numbers don't prove:* That 87% figure is the old share count talking. Run the same short interest against the new count and the percentage drops by about three-quarters. *What takes it off the board:* The Sep 30 short interest comes in under 20% of the new share count, or the stock climbs through $5.02 and those warrant shares show up. **3) $MEDS (DataMeds AI): fourth straight down close, and the borrow loosened** * Closed **$2.88**, down 6.2% from **$3.07**, in a range of $2.84 to $3.13, on about **351K** shares (about 640K Tuesday). It closed at $4.06 on Oct 1. * After hours: about **$2.87** at the after-hours close, ~7:00 PM CT (StockAnalysis), down 0.3% from the regular close. After-hours volume is not in our notes: Nasdaq's quote didn't update and StockAnalysis's day total runs below the regular session. No filings or news after the bell. * Borrow is **440.0%** with **20K** available (last changed 11:47 AM CT), down from 533.1% with 8K Wednesday morning. * It's on Nasdaq's Reg SHO threshold list in the Oct 6 file, the latest one posted. Curved counts 11 days. Curved showed SSR on Wednesday too. Wednesday's low was 7.5% under the prior close, so no fresh trigger. * Float **1.27M**, short interest **430,628** at Sep 15 (StockAnalysis). * No filings since Sep 17. The Aug 31 PRE 14C (written-consent actions) still has no definitive 14C behind it, so there's no effective date to put on the calendar. * Premarket: **$3.10**, up 7.6% from the regular close, on about **6.7M** shares by 7:53 AM CT, per Nasdaq. That's more than five times the float, and we found no filing or news behind it. Borrow still **440.0%**, with availability down to **15K** as of 7:47 AM CT. * Screen: short interest 33.85% of float, borrow 440.0%, utilization not in our notes, no dated catalyst inside two weeks (earnings estimated Nov 19). 2 of 4. *What the numbers don't prove:* The fee fell and supply more than doubled while the stock kept sliding. That looks like shorts getting comfortable, not cornered. *What takes it off the board:* Availability keeps climbing, or the fee slips under 50%. **4) $BTCT (BTC Digital): plenty of shorts, plenty of stock to borrow** * Closed **$1.08**, down 3.6% from **$1.12**, in a range of $1.05 to $1.10, on about **534K** shares (656K Tuesday). * After hours: about **$1.09** at the after-hours close, ~7:00 PM CT (StockAnalysis), up about 1% from the regular close, on roughly **13K** shares. No filings after the bell. * Borrow is **253.5%** with **1.2M** shares available (last changed 1:32 PM CT). Tuesday's close was 296.3% with 1.0M. * Short interest **4.15M** at Sep 15, 36.50% of an **11.37M** float (StockAnalysis). Days to cover 0.14. * A resale prospectus filed Sep 18 covers up to **18,421,050** shares, **12,280,700** of them from common warrants, against **11,800,567** shares outstanding before it. Fully exercised, the count goes to about **30.2M**. * No filings since Sep 18. * Premarket: **$1.07**, down 0.9% from the regular close, on about **92K** shares by 7:44 AM CT. Borrow still **253.5%**, but availability dropped to **750K** from 1.2M as of 7:47 AM CT. * Screen: short interest 36.50% of float, borrow 253.5%, utilization not in our notes, no dated catalyst inside two weeks (earnings estimated Nov 11). 2 of 4. *What the numbers don't prove:* A big fee means very little when 1.2 million shares were sitting there to borrow last night. That's about a tenth of the company. This morning's 750K is still plenty. *What takes it off the board:* Availability keeps growing, or the fee follows it down under 50%. **5) $BMGL (Basel Medical Group): an offering that's effective but hasn't priced** * Closed **$3.28**, down 1.5% from **$3.33**, in a range of $3.18 to $3.28, on about **12.5K** shares. It's thin. * After hours: one print at **$3.25** around 6:30 PM CT (StockAnalysis), down 0.9%, on too few shares to move the day's total. No filings or news after the bell. * Borrow is **98.5%** with **45K** available (last changed 8:32 AM CT). Tuesday's close was 96.3%. * Short interest **159,585** at
I’m trying to find better ways to hold BTC rather than using conventional ETFs, and Bitcoin Treasury Corp (BTCT.V) seems appealing. The CEO is Elliot Johnson (the mind behind the Evolve crypto ETFs). It's a brand new company trading roughly 35% below NAV. Curious to hear thoughts on this kind of company for BTC exposure?
Bitcoin Treasury Corp(BTCT) in canada is trading below NAV ... you get like 25% rebate on BTC look it up for yourself.
Sir, you are ofc free to do as you wish. (But I do think you mentioned you may be a bit new to this …). But for heaven’s sake … if you wish to get conviction on bitcoin, one must be able to answer the following query. Here is a list of companies. Can you explain the common thread to all of these. And why ? CORZ ARGO USBTC Comp North NDG / Bitdeer / Iris / Crusoe BMNR BTBT BTCS BTCT BTCM - Solana DAT GLXY No need for a PhD level thesis. Just - one must be comfortable understanding why all of these companies pivoted away. (Not an exhaustive list, BTW. Many small outfits, not public.). And if you can rationalize that, then by all means go ahead. IOW - you (or anyone) **MUST** conclude for yourself whether the platform you will be trusting can remain secure - medium, to long term. You will be relying on the Economic Security of the platform in question. There is no immediate problem. It’s not likely to show for another couple of Halvings. But beyond that, any participant must be able to demonstrate how the protocol can raise enough Tx Fee Revenue to remain secure. If you can do that - *for yourself* - then you will have more conviction.
**1. BTC Digital (BTCT)** Bitcoin mining firm, BTC Digital (BTCT), has moved $1 million of company cash into ether (ETH), which it [called](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/btct-announces-completion-of-1-million-ethereum-strategic-reserve-302503194.html) its new “digital gold.” [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/another-btc-mining-firm-moves-164814175.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/another-btc-mining-firm-moves-164814175.html) **2. Bit Digital (BTBT)** Bit Digital ditched bitcoin for ETH, amassing more than 100,000 ETH and positioning itself as one of the largest public holders of the token. [https://www.theblock.co/post/361348/bit-digital-swaps-entire-treasury-into-ethereum-says-its-now-a-top-public-eth-holder-after-a-173-million-splurge](https://www.theblock.co/post/361348/bit-digital-swaps-entire-treasury-into-ethereum-says-its-now-a-top-public-eth-holder-after-a-173-million-splurge) **3. BIT Mining (BTCM)** Crypto miner BIT Mining pivots to Solana with plan to raise up to $300 million for SOL treasury [https://www.theblock.co/post/361965/bit-mining-solana-300-million-usd-sol-treasury](https://www.theblock.co/post/361965/bit-mining-solana-300-million-usd-sol-treasury) **4. BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR)** Initially a BTC mining firm, it announced a major pivot to **acquiring Ethereum** and staking. [https://www.businessinsider.com/bitmine-immersion-stock-price-peter-thiel-ethereum-reserve-bitcoin-stablecoin-2025-7?utm\_source=chatgpt.com](https://www.businessinsider.com/bitmine-immersion-stock-price-peter-thiel-ethereum-reserve-bitcoin-stablecoin-2025-7?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
I think BTCT announced last week but didn't actually buy the ETH until yesterday, so it's probably fairer to say 4 in 2 weeks.
> Can someone explain to me why ETH has been surging recently? There are two levels to this answer. The first and most obvious is that a lot of entities are starting to buy ETH in a big way. This is not just tradfi institutions and whale traders, but even bitcoin mining companies are selling their BTC reserves and buying hundreds of thousands of ETH. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/BTCT/btct-announces-completion-of-1-million-ethereum-strategic-a60lv87zrwmq.html https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bitmine-immersion-technologies-closes-250-million-private-placement-to-advance-its-treasury-strategy-on-ethereum-302500920.html https://bit-digital.com/press-releases/bit-digital-inc-continues-expansion-of-ethereum-holdings-to-approximately-120000-eth-reinforcing-treasury-strategy/ The second part though is why? The answer is in adoption of the Ethereum network itself. Huge numbers of mainstream companies are now building the future financial system onchain, finally recognizing the advantages that this offers them that we've all been explaining for years. And despite the many claims of the marketing teams from Solana, Ripple etc , the reality is that almost everything being build onchain is being done in the Ethereum ecosystem. https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum/ As well as RWA platforms, bank L2s, etc etc, one of the biggest use cases that is now being widely recognized is that of stablecoins. There is more value in stablecoins on Ethereum than in every other ecosystem combined: https://visaonchainanalytics.com/supply. That fact, combined with the security, robustness, and ability to capture value, means that, in the words of the recent Electric capital report: **"Ethereum is uniquely positioned to host the global financial infrastructure for this new digital dollar economy, and ETH stands to benefit directly from this growth."** https://electriccapital.substack.com/p/beyond-stablecoins-the-case-for-ethereum Another report that touches on what this level of adoption means for Ethereum is Fidelity's recent publication on "Blockchains as emerging economies" - aimed at investors and focused on Ethereum. https://institutional.fidelity.com/app/proxy/content?literatureURL=/9919383.PDF Basically, the mainstream financial world has recognized that the actual usefulness of crypto is Ethereum, and that onboarding cannot help but create sustainable demand for ETH the asset. Unlike BTC, which depends entirely on people buying it in the hope that someone in the future will want to buy it for a higher price, ETH will be needed by entities like Sony and Deutsche Bank to secure their L2s etc etc. So speculative investors (from retail ETF buyers to the bitcoin miners noted abover) are trying to front-run that demand by buying now.
Bitcoin miners are certainly doing something: https://www.stocktitan.net/news/BTCT/btct-announces-completion-of-1-million-ethereum-strategic-a60lv87zrwmq.html https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bitmine-immersion-technologies-closes-250-million-private-placement-to-advance-its-treasury-strategy-on-ethereum-302500920.html https://bit-digital.com/press-releases/bit-digital-inc-continues-expansion-of-ethereum-holdings-to-approximately-120000-eth-reinforcing-treasury-strategy/
BTCT:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/btct-announces-strategic-pivot-to-ethereum-converting-all-bitcoin-reserves-into-eth-302507813.html
**CAN, HUT, and BTCT** Please do your own DD.
How soon will USDT become BTCT?
I don't understand why you'd do that. BTC is not TRC20 protocol? From what I've found, there is BTCT which would be a BTC-backed coin on the TRC20 Blockchain but I really don't advice to do things like that, you should keep your BTC in BTC.
Sstoshi's last post on BTCT was in 2010, about some update for a program.
Rising fiat valuations are a risk for all of crypto, but they are not a risk that many investors consider probable (at least in the longterm). The good thing about this is that it makes fiat long hedge positions extremely cheap. For example, I bought an SPY Put a few weeks ago that was large enough to cover my entire non-stablecoin portfolio against a deflationary market crash. It cost me about 5% of my portfolio, and I should be able to roll it over for an approximate cost of 10% APY. In fact, it will likely cost me nothing, because I sold 10% of it when it tripled in value last week. I'd also point out that the benefit of purchasing 66% of the LUNA supply to attack the network decreases with the cost of doing so- if there is any. (There isn't any way to short enough LUNA to make up for the cost of that attack.) Further Terra's dynamics make LUNA one of the first cryptos to recover during crashes. The more fiats lose purchasing power, the more demand there is for LUNA and UST as people yields and returns to avoid falling fiat. LUNA's price can't fall forever. If it falls to a fraction of a penny, people will still want to arbitrage the peg. Many stakers are not likely to sell (because they won't be able to afford anything else either), newcomers will still see the upside potential of buying LUNA. If fiat completely fails maybe the Terra DAO will vote to add BTCT, but all of crypto will initially crash regardless, because our economies revolve around fiat. Fluctuations, and Terra unwinding UST demand, create unrealized losses for LUNA stakers, but also create lucrative opportunities for additional investment. Holders will either hodl or lose money, but everyone will know the ride is never over, because the dynamics are in the code. The arbitrage never goes away. The probability of LUNA going back up becomes greater the further the price falls. The mechanics of how it can recover are well established now, and as it gets cheaper, there is enormous incentive to take the risk of buying LUNA to hold for the ride back up. LUNA was worth pennies 11 months ago. UST had very little demand a year ago. And it's risk and dynamics are far better known now. We know what will happen.
yea, support more WBTC BTCT EBTC and odther shit tokens claiming to be secured by btc...
What are you even talking about? It’s called USDT they are the ones that advertised and created a coin that’s backed by the USD. So as they should, people want proof that it is exactly what they said it is. If it was called BTCT then people would want proof that it’s backed by BTC (they are holding an equal amount of BTC). Your rambling nonsense above is proof that you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the workings of the economy and crypto. This has nothing at all to do with whether USD is shit or not and everything to do with them (USDT) delivering what was promised.
Apart from the well known ones that everyone will mention: ZEFI SAPP BTCT
Thank you! I appreciate it. I got mine off of stake cube, And I love that website because you can earn a lot off of staking. I’m actually about to buy more BTC2 and BTCT soon, I already more than doubled my original investment with those two, and they’re still relatively untouched by the mainstream investors market, so they’ve got a low price with huge potential for growth.
Bitcoin Token, and I think it’ll go high because of the fact that tokens generally experience higher price increases in short duration than coins on average (look on coin gecko), and when BTC goes up to a million like people predict than BTCT will go up to like $50,000 at least.