Reddit Posts
KUDOE (GameFi) Token Launch Party and Airdrop Giveaway at 4:00pm Eastern | 9:00pm UTC
Dogs of Elon Fairlaunch Pancakeswap - Bearer Good Fortune is a Meme Token on The Bsc Network With Multichain Swap
Dogs of Elon Fairlaunch Pancakeswap - Bearer Good Fortune is a Meme Token on The Bsc Network With Multichain Swap
US lawmakers ask about EPA, DOE monitoring of crypto mining emissions, energy consumption
DOE Issues Two LNG Export Authorizations $LNG #Bullish
Mentions
https://thedebrief.org/newtons-law-of-universal-gravitation-is-challenged-by-controversial-new-astrophysics-discovery/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-rewrite-a-quantum-rule-that-clashes-with-our-universe-20220926/ Here are these two things that challenge very basic physics concepts that I pulled off Google. I’m not at my work computer to see what DOE had sent recently
I agree there are always going to be Pros and Cons and even though I work for the Majority in the House we are preparing solutions that will essentially codify (legislation that gives them Congressional permission) their basic regulatory features. ​ I think that this is just good legislation in the first place because in this instance it would have prevented this lawsuit by giving the EPA official abilities to do essentially what they did! Moves like this have bipartisan support as well which can be seen with H.R. 1713 which has passed through the Science, Space, and Technology Committee as well as H.R. 1715 as well as a DOE/NASA one that I cannot recall the bill number of!
I thought that was the gay DOE Nuclear Commissioner that was stealing women’s clothes from airports at first.
Hahahhaha. Sucks to be you. I WORK for the DOE you tool , and that does not prove your henny-penny talking point. Let's talk about lithium cobalt batteries. Go spread your marxist disinformation somewhere else!!!!
> I was looking for a coin that I could possibly get rich off within the next 2-5 years. I stumbled on this dog of Elon coin. I want to purchase atleast 1 million worth of count. 1 million DOE is only worth 47$, you want to become rich-off investing only 47dollars that too in a shitcoin?
Hey guys! I'm looking for advice. Please bear with me as I share my experience with you. I had 150 BTC, which I had purchased in 2011 for about $2,000. I never sold them and had them with me for years, just waiting for the right moment to sell. During the 2017 rally, I was tempted to sell it, but I didn't. However, I ended up selling them for $45k each last year and made a massive profit of over $6.7M. I immediately began looking into alternative investments to boost my portfolio, believing that it was the time to enter the market for altcoins and other crypto investments, as bitcoin was pumping. I ended up investing over $400k in Zionodes miners for hosted mining as a long-term investment. I bought 6500 BNB for approximately $3M and waited for it to grow. While I was growing impatient, I invested in other shitcoins such as DOE, and squandered a couple of million dollars. I also invested in other projects that I thought would do well at the time, such as ADA, and used up all of the profit from my initial sale. To store all of my tokens, I used a decentralized wallet (Trustwallet & Metamask). After the November dump, my portfolio began to crash, and all of my holdings were halved, and I panicked and sold off everything. I had about $3M left at the time, which could have been less if I hadn't withdrawn it all at the right time. Then there was the LUNA crash. When it reached $20, I saw it as an opportunity to invest and recover all of my losses, and I was willing to wait long term and was content with a 40-50% profit for the long term, so I invested $2.5M at the time. When I pulled out my investment, it was only worth $50. I won't lie, this broke me. I was depressed for a few days, went off social media for a couple of months, and didn't want to socialize with anyone. With time, I realized how important it is to appreciate what you have and work toward creating something for yourself and those around you, WITHOUT BEING GREEDY. Fortunately, my long-term investment in hosted mining paid off, and my initial capital expenditure of $400k was also covered a few months ago (mainly due to the rally last year where my profit per day increased dramatically). I now make about $300 per day from all of my miners, which is pure profit for me and something I don't intend to sell anytime soon because I don't want to be greedy. When my one year with zionodes was up, I had the option of selling my miners for a substantial profit or continuing mining for pure profit per day as an income, and I chose to mine. I don't want to be greedy any longer, and I don't want quick or easy money. My mining operations already provide me with a revenue stream. I still have $450k to invest in something promising, but I don't want to make another mistake. I don't mind waiting and I'm not afraid to be patient with my investment. Please let me know if you have any ideas in crypto (or otherwise) where I could invest this amount. Also, please explain why you believe this investment will be profitable. Thank you for reading my story patiently; I appreciate it. PS: I'd prefer something in cryptocurrency because I'd have to pay a lot of taxes on this money if I transferred it to my bank account. Thank you very much.
Again with the name calling. So, what you are telling me. Is that you truly believe the grid doesn’t use safety, max capacity calculations,doesn’t spike, etc? When we even get within 20% of max capacity they send out warnings to not use certain devices etc. I just can’t with you. I didn’t want to do this but it’s obvious you don’t even google this stuff. I’m an electrical engineer for my real day job. You don’t know shit about fuck with this. What you are describing is a system that does not exist. There are movements in the government to make these systems happen, but they don’t exist: https://www.smartgrid.gov/the_smart_grid/smart_grid.html This is the system we want to move to. DOE still needs funding and this is a super long process and doesn’t exist yet. The grids we use are mostly made way the fuck back. Not last year, not 10 years ago. But in some cases all the way back to the 1800s. These mechanisms you describe do not exist. They may make sense to you, but in reality, they DO NOT exist. Our infrastructure is crumbling and we use archaic systems. Which means, we use safety and max loads to account for drawbacks in the grid used in the real world not these grids made up in your fantasy world. Rolling blackouts are a thing, and if we did it your way on our current grid system then it would fail. Simply put, you have been completely embarrassing yourself. Our transformers, grid and anything we use is legit 30+ years old on average. You can sit in your chair and say “nuh uh I don’t feel like that’s right” but I’m telling you, and showing you with sources, your understanding of the grid and the safety protocols, calculations, and expenditure are non-existent. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-does-us-power-grid-work Here’s a nice break down on how our grid works and explains to you in plain English it fucking sucks. Things like the weather will send it spiraling down. It is not this smart system you think it is and in every way it over does things to compensate for how shit it is. Which again, we are very wasteful energy wise and a 0.2% blip is accounted for 10 fold in the shitty grid we run on. You have sat here, confidently explaining a system that simply DOES NOT EXIST. All while calling me names. I am much more highly qualified to speak on these issues than you ever will be. Have a good night.
"To ensure the responsible development of digital assets, recommendations include the following actions for consideration: - Minimize GHG emissions, environmental justice impacts, and other local impacts from crypto-assets: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and other federal agencies should provide technical assistance and initiate a collaborative process with states, communities, the crypto-asset industry, and others todevelop effective, evidence-based environmental performance standards for the responsible design, development, and use of environmentally responsible crypto-asset technologies. These should include standards for very low energy intensities, low water usage, low noise generation, clean energy usage by operators, and standards that strengthen over time for additional carbon-free generation to match or exceed the additional electricity load of these facilities. Should these measures prove ineffective at reducing impacts, the Administration should explore executive actions, and Congress might consider legislation, to limit or eliminate the use of high energy intensity consensusmechanisms for crypto-asset mining. DOE and EPA should provide technical assistance to state public utility commissions, environmental protection agencies, and the crypto-asset industry to build capacity to minimize emissions, noise, water impacts, and negative economic impacts of crypto-asset mining; and to mitigate environmental injustices to overburdened communities. - Ensure energy reliability: DOE, in coordination with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and its regional entities, should conduct reliability assessments of current and projected crypto-asset mining operations on electricity system reliability and adequacy. If these reliability assessments find current or anticipated risks to the power system as a result crypto-asset mining, these entities should consider developing, updating, and enforcing reliability standards and emergency operations procedures to ensure system reliability and adequacy under the growth of crypto-asset mining. - Obtain data to understand, monitor, and mitigate impacts: The Energy Information Administration and other federal agencies should consider collecting and analyzing information from crypto-asset miners and electric utilities in a privacy-preserving manner to enable evidence-based decisions on the energy and climate implications of crypto-assets. Data should include mining energy usage and fuel mix, power purchaseagreements, environmental justice implications, and demand response participation. OSTP could establish a National Science and Technology Council subcommittee to coordinate with other relevant agencies to assess the energy use of major crypto-assets. - Advance energy efficiency standards: The Administration should consider working with Congress to enable DOE and encourage other federal regulators to promulgate and regularly update energy conservation standards for crypto-asset mining equipment, blockchains, and other operations. - Encourage transparency and improvements in environmental performance: Crypto- asset industry associations, including mining firms and equipment manufacturers, should be encouraged to publicly report crypto-asset mining locations, annual electricity usage, GHG emissions using existing protocols, and electronic waste recycling performance. - Further research to improve understanding and innovation: For improved analytical capabilities that can enhance the accuracy of electricity usage estimates and sustainability, the National Science Foundation, DOE, EPA and other relevant agencies could promote and support research and development priorities that improve the environmental sustainability of digital assets, including crypto-asset impact modeling, assessment of environmental justice impacts, and understanding beneficial uses for grid management and environmental mitigation. Research and development priorities should emphasize innovations in next-generation digital asset technologies that advance U.S. goals in security, privacy, equity, and resilience, as well as U.S. climate goals." That's the meat and potatoes folks
To ensure the responsible development of digital assets, recommendations include the following actions for consideration: • Minimize GHG emissions, environmental justice impacts, and other local impacts from crypto-assets: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and other federal agencies should provide technical assistance and initiate a collaborative process with states, communities, the crypto-asset industry, and others to develop effective, evidence-based environmental performance standards for the responsible design, development, and use of environmentally responsible crypto-asset technologies. These should include standards for very low energy intensities, low water usage, low noise generation, clean energy usage by operators, and standards that strengthen over time for additional carbon-free generation to match or exceed the additional electricity load of these facilities. Should these measures prove ineffective at reducing impacts, the Administration should explore executive actions, and Congress might consider legislation, to limit or eliminate the use of high energy intensity consensus mechanisms for crypto-asset mining. DOE and EPA should provide technical assistance to state public utility commissions, environmental protection agencies, and the crypto- asset industry to build capacity to minimize emissions, noise, water impacts, and negative economic impacts of crypto-asset mining; and to mitigate environmental injustices to overburdened communities. • Ensure energy reliability: DOE, in coordination with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and its regional entities, should conduct reliability assessments of current and projected crypto-asset mining operations on electricity system reliability and adequacy. If these reliability assessments find current or anticipated risks to the power system as a result crypto-asset mining, these entities should consider developing, updating, and enforcing reliability standards and emergency operations procedures to ensure system reliability and adequacy under the growth of crypto-asset mining. • Obtain data to understand, monitor, and mitigate impacts: The Energy Information Administration and other federal agencies should consider collecting and analyzing information from crypto-asset miners and electric utilities in a privacy-preserving manner to enable evidence-based decisions on the energy and climate implications of crypto- assets. Data should include mining energy usage and fuel mix, power purchase agreements, environmental justice implications, and demand response participation. OSTP could establish a National Science and Technology Council subcommittee to coordinate with other relevant agencies to assess the energy use of major crypto-assets. • Advance energy efficiency standards: The Administration should consider working with Congress to enable DOE and encourage other federal regulators to promulgate and regularly update energy conservation standards for crypto-asset mining equipment, blockchains, and other operations. • Encourage transparency and improvements in environmental performance: Crypto- asset industry associations, including mining firms and equipment manufacturers, should be encouraged to publicly report crypto-asset mining locations, annual electricity usage, GHG emissions using existing protocols, and electronic waste recycling performance. • Further research to improve understanding and innovation: For improved analytical capabilities that can enhance the accuracy of electricity usage estimates and sustainability, the National Science Foundation, DOE, EPA and other relevant agencies could promote and support research and development priorities that improve the environmental sustainability of digital assets, including crypto-asset impact modeling, assessment of environmental justice impacts, and understanding beneficial uses for grid management and environmental mitigation. Research and development priorities should emphasize innovations in next-generation digital asset technologies that advance U.S. goals in security, privacy, equity, and resilience, as well as U.S. climate goals
tldr; IOG CEO Charles Hoskinson has said that the EPA and the Department of Energy (DOE) are going to start talking to crypto companies to tell them to change the way their cryptocurrencies work. Hoskinson believes that Bitcoin should be banned due to its energy consumption. He added that the report accurately reflects the “massive” advantage of proof-of-useful-work (PoUW) *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; IOG CEO Charles Hoskinson has said that the EPA and the Department of Energy (DOE) are going to start talking to crypto companies to tell them to change the way their cryptocurrencies work. Hoskinson believes that Bitcoin should be banned due to its energy consumption. He added that the report accurately reflects the “massive” advantage of proof-of-useful-work (PoUW) *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
This is the full report if anyone wants to read: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/09-2022-Crypto-Assets-and-Climate-Report.pdf They are targeting a 2035 goal for the following: > To help the United States meet its climate objectives of a 50% to 52% reduction in GHGemissions by 2030, a carbon pollution-free electricity system by 2035, and a net-zero emissions economy no later than 2050, crypto-asset policy during the transition to clean energy should be focused on several objectives: reduce GHG emissions, avoid operations that will increase the cost of electricity to consumers, avoid operations that reduce the reliability of electric grids, and avoid negative impacts to equity, communities, and the local environment. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and other federal agencies should provide technical assistance and initiate a collaborative process with states, communities, the crypto-asset industry, and others to develop effective, evidence-based environmental performance standards for the responsible design, development, and use of environmentally responsible crypto-asset technologies. These should include standards for very low energy intensities, low water usage, low noise generation, clean energy usage by operators, and standards that strengthen over time for additional carbon-free generation to match or exceed the additional electricity load of these facilities. Should these measures prove ineffective at reducing impacts, the Administration should explore executive actions, and Congress might consider legislation, to limit or eliminate the use of high energy intensity consensus mechanisms for crypto-asset mining.
DOE website with the 2% estimate : https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/data-centers-and-servers
Alot of upvotes for alot of incorrect Information. During obamas 8 years the only significant reduction in the SPR was during 2011 where DOE, released 30 million barrels. SPr under Obama was basically flat. Under Trump the SPR was reduced by almost 60M barrels. It's true Biden has reduced the SPr by over 100M barrels but how else would you have himattempt to lower the price of gas?
In March 2020, Trump did propose purchasing 77 million barrels of oil in order to fill the SPR to its maximum capacity, according to the DOE. But Congressional Democrats blocked the measure, calling it an “estimated $3 billion bailout for big oil.”
The [full letter](https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2022.07.15%20Letter%20to%20EPA%20and%20DOE%20Re%20Cryptomining%20Environmental%20Impacts.pdf) is a good read. This was the first thing that stood out to me as well; the references are a joke.
I had to scroll way too far to find someone with the same question as me. After a quick google I found the letter dated 15th July, 2022 here: [Link straight to the PDF.](https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2022.07.15%20Letter%20to%20EPA%20and%20DOE%20Re%20Cryptomining%20Environmental%20Impacts.pdf) The letter is actually 7 pages long. 8 if you include the page with the 6 signatures. It is signed by 4 US Senators and 2 Members of Congress. **US Senators:** Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, Edward J. Markey, Jeffrey A. Merkley. **Members of Congress:** Jared Huffman, Rashida Tlaib I know that doesn't solve who authored it, but at least it provides more context.
😂 Thanks - I appreciate a great belly laugh... Also I am in the same boat as you... I wouldn't say dumb as shit necessarily, or even dumb at all- just lazy, highly unmotivated and absolutely hate having to be somewhere or do something day after day - aka WORK. Hate work. I don't mind if it's my idea on my time, but on company time, "having to" with the alternative being "get fired" type of deal- no bueno... Yet I still make it in to the office at least 4 days a week... So yeah, I mean I'm definitely not a good hire, and certainly not even close to top tier, but my DMs are to, the same as OP... Oh yeah and I don't even work in crypto or near the Blockchain-- I'm a commodities broker aka a soulless A-hole with a book of pikers that get stuffed in as many deep out of the money options as their kids college tuition can buy... Of course this year- even with the churn'em and burn'em spirit of the firm, we're making money - well I mean for our clients that is- we *ALWAYS* make money- our mission is commission and the round-trip fare is non-negotiable. But yeah, even in July $21 soybean calls losing value to time decay, instrinic value is holding water... Fucking amazing, china consumption of soybeans - 30% of the world's beans- and with the US planting 91 million acres of soybeans this year... And aside from that fact literally changing the landscape of US Soybeans - 2001-2002 we were trading at +/- $4; 2006-07 +/- $6; current spot market over there on the Chicago Merc: $16 pushing $17. The next big deal is not the meal or the bean itself but the crush; or more accurate yet, the oil itself. Bean oil was a literal joke - a laughable trade for the sake of the guy who only had $5K to get his feet wet, who then panicked when the FedEx currier arrived moments later to pick up his check as I said would happen-- so he sends the check-- its made out for 2K not 5K. So we put his ass in bean oil - get 5 turns out of his 2K before he's burnt. BUT NOW, 20years later- with the renewable diesel, superior to the former biodiesel, it's sucking up bean oil by the billions of gallons. The April 29th 2022 report from the DOE: "Renewable diesel plant capacity remained at 1.468 billion gallons per year in February, up 86% from a year ago, and is gaining on traditional biodiesel capacity of 2.232 billion gallons per year. 741 million pounds of soybean oil were used for making biofuels in February, up 34% from a year ago." Well hot diggity damn- guess what I'm doing with my clients? Anyway, soulless A-hole with clients that are actually making money too, priceless. DMs full of spamming recruiters and headhunters and yada yada- worthless... but hey, we can't all be "top tier"... FYI OPEY - I too have my master's in C.S.E. (went thru a hackers phase- I do still fuck with OffSec and Kali Linux Nethunter, Pentesting tools, and other such activities- I code for fun, hoping to accidentally make a new py script that can unlock the door to the vault at fort Knox- just to see if it's really empty inside as conspiracy theorists claim... my undergrad in business admin eas a waste of time... I didn't need a degree to pass the series 3 exam. I didn't need anything but the book and 2 weeks of studying. Same for the 7, although I took a month with the book before I went to test... I don't trade equities much, but it is good to know that I can... Anyway Sorry for the long run on sentence filled comment... I'm a commodities broker 9n the clock for another 21 mins- needed *SOMETHING* to kill the time... my dialers are all busy so I look good as I communicate with my clients via email here... ugh time to go!! drinks & blow at the company Watering hole... ✌🏾👃🏽💊💊🍻🥃🍻🥃💊💊🥃🍺
Start on a small scale and determine proof of concept first. Why do you have to go all in? It would be pretty easy to start in small scale and you are likely to not go broke. You can then build and figure out what your doing and then scale up. You are also very likely to learn your needs as well which will be very costly when you make a larger investment. DOE and Good Luck!
The question isn't when have conservatives sabotaged renewable technologies, but when haven't they? Republican Congressional members are not interested in policy measures that would incentivize transition: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/heres-what-congressional-republicans-are-thinking-on-climate-following-the-election Trump had a well known irrational hatred of wind turbines https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-s-windmill-hatred-worry-booming-industry-n1060206 The Bush Energy policy was written by Dick Cheney, a Halliburton exec, and his report was written with the help of hundreds of OnG officials and zero renewable energy industry input. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/planetpolicy/2016/07/07/when-bush-and-cheney-doubled-down-on-fossil-fuels-a-fateful-choice-for-the-climate/ It even extends to petty, idiotic shit like blaming Texas' power grid failure last winter on frozen wind turbines when it was primarily the failure to winterize natural gas supplies; like the Reagan administration immediately removing solar panels installed on the white house during the Carter administration; like widespread outrage at the phase out of incandescent bulbs Trump DOE appointees also canceled research into improving national power grid connectivity. It would have saved consumers "about $2.50 or more for every $1 invested in transmission," and could help prevent mass power grid failures like Texas'. But it would make coal less useful and wind and solar more viable so Conservatives shut it down and forced the researcher to depart for private industry https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/08/how-trump-appointees-short-circuited-grid-modernization/615433/ The Reagan administration rolled back MPG standards and the Bush administration blocked efforts to increase standards: https://www.politico.com/story/2010/04/wh-finalizes-strict-fuel-standards-035299 The Bush administration sandbagged state efforts to increase MPG standards: "California and 13 other states set their own state-specific vehicle standards — rules that were effectively blocked by a refusal of the Bush administration to grant California a waiver from the Clean Air Act." https://www.politico.com/story/2010/04/wh-finalizes-strict-fuel-standards-035299 The Trump administration rolled back Obama era CAFE increases: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/490318-trump-administration-rolls-back-obama-era-fuel-efficiency-standards/ Frankly, I personally don't have an issue with nuclear as long as costs aren't cut on safety since the consequences of failure are so high. But the reality is Nuclear isn't cost effective anymore and takes years to build. Solar and wind are now on the threshold of cheapest LCOE for new construction even without subsidies: https://www.smart-energy.com/renewable-energy/solar-and-wind-are-the-cheapest-new-sources-of-energy-says-bnef/ And grid level battery storage is a proven cost effective solution: https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-big-battery-hornsdale-australia-cost-savings/
The DOE forced them to turn off all their gas turbines and let wind power provide electricity. Of course, the wind died, so when they finally agreed to let the real power plants run they had frozen over. Basical, green energy idiots caused it.
What does it tells me if no one here knows about it ? DOE to the moon !
There's one ongoing called Dogs of Elon or DOE. Q
Quick question : How much $ worth of DOE does this Binance address hold?
Wow... look what I found on Etherscan. Dogs of Elon (DOE) - check out the #6, #7 and #8 holders. Especially the #8 holder - Binance. Guessing it's about to get listed? https://etherscan.io/token/0xf8e9f10c22840b613cda05a0c5fdb59a4d6cd7ef#balances
so u mean like every other dog named coin on CmC? hahaha. Dogs Of Elon = DOE.. no need to be mistaken for other coins 😂
Got some dogs of elon (DOE) seems like a trustworthy project with a great future /s
I saw that $DOE the other day and I think short term may be a good option
Kinda loving Dogs of Elon (DOE). Just launching and looking good. Check it on Hotbit or Uniswap.
I’m considering buying a small amount of Floki, DOE, VRA, and maybe a couple others potential moonshots small caps. Anyone else?
ETH, DG, KKO, and DOE. Still holding all of them
Don’t miss out on dogs of Elon. DOE