Reddit Posts
I Trade for a Living -Strong AI Flows, Heavy VIX Hedging and Why I’m Trimming
Mentions
Been covering ORCL on [TruePrice ](https://www.trueprice.cash/stock/ORCL)— worth updating in light of Thursday's report. **What we had going in:** our DCF (base case as of late June) pegged fair value around $162, a HOLD with modest \~8% upside from $150. The core concern wasn't growth — it was capex. FY2026 saw capital expenditure surge to $55.7B, pushing free cash flow to -$23.7B, and debt at $156B against a 3.63x debt/equity ratio well above the sector norm. **What just changed:** the Q1 FY27 print actually strengthens the growth side of the thesis without resolving the capex/leverage side. Revenue hit $19.35B (beat), EPS $1.92 vs $1.74 expected, cloud infrastructure revenue up 121% YoY on top of a 93% prior quarter — that's acceleration, not deceleration. Management raised full-year guidance to $8.10 EPS on a $90B+ revenue floor, and RPO (their backlog metric) came in at $664B, well above the $630B consensus. Notably, they said $30B+ of new AI contracts this quarter came via prepay/BYO-hardware structures that won't require incremental Oracle capital — that's a meaningfully better capital-efficiency signal than the FY2026 numbers showed. **What hasn't changed:** capex guidance stayed at $90-95B for the year, and management still isn't committing to a timeline for positive free cash flow. That's the same structural tension our report flagged — you're paying up for AI infrastructure growth before it's throwing off cash. **Net-net:** the beat and raised guidance likely push fair value estimates modestly higher than our $162 base case (the stock already moved \~4% on the print), but it doesn't retire the core risk — this is still a story where the market is pricing in FCF normalization that hasn't happened yet. I'd treat this as growth-thesis-confirmed, leverage-thesis-unresolved. Worth rerunning the DCF with the new RPO conversion data before calling it anything more than a HOLD-leaning-positive. Not investment advice — just how I'm reading the numbers.
>IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKESPERSON SAYS IRAN WILL HOLD SAUDI ARABIA, JAPAN, AND JORDAN RESPONSIBLE FOR BACKING AN ANTI-IRAN IAEA RESOLUTION. Oh shit Japan getting tagged in
THIS IS A NO BRAINER HOLD MY BEER $AEO $192M IN CASH THINK ABOUT THAT Tariff Refunds Landed in Gross Profit Shares Outstanding: ~167.57 million $1.15 CASH PER OUTSTANDING SHARE HOLDER $ANF $VSXY $LULU $GAP
HOLD MY BEER $AEO $192M IN CASH THINK ABOUT THAT Tariff Refunds Landed in Gross Profit Shares Outstanding: ~167.57 million $1.15 CASH PER OUTSTANDING SHARE HOLDER $ANF $VSXY $LULU $GAP
1.1 million calls hit the tape for ASTS exp 09/25 , LET'S GO ASTS GANGGGGGGG. SOMEONE KNOWS SOMETHING. HOLD THE LINE!!!
its ok we are back! BULLS HOLD THE LINE
Trust me bros, CPi data will come in cool, rate hike odd FUD will continue throughout today spreading doubt, retail has been feared to buy the lows due to ongoing FUD and PPI scare, Weekend sell off will continue despite relief rally, then Mango will declare War is ending soon and the iran has been defeated early next week shortly after more FUD will continue across the media, then the FED will HOLD and ATH's will be hit, retail as always will be FOMOing at the top, Iran war will continue to cool as mid terms near, however volatility will be present late October, Trump will win Mid terms and Markets will SOAR! Trust me bros
HUNTER BIDEN TO LAUNCH [$LAPTOP](https://x.com/search?q=%24LAPTOP&src=cashtag_click) MEME COIN, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ HUNTER BIDEN'S [$LAPTOP](https://x.com/search?q=%24LAPTOP&src=cashtag_click) MEME COIN TO LAUNCH SEPT. 9 ON COINBASE-AFFILIATED BLOCKCHAIN, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ HUNTER BIDEN, FOUNDERS OF [$LAPTOP](https://x.com/search?q=%24LAPTOP&src=cashtag_click) TO HOLD 30% OF 1B TOKENS ISSUED, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ ANOTHER [$LAPTOP](https://x.com/search?q=%24LAPTOP&src=cashtag_click) ALLOTMENT TO GO TO PEOPLE WHO LOST MONEY ON [$TRUMP](https://x.com/search?q=%24TRUMP%20OR%20solana%3A6p6xgHyF7AeE6TZkSmFsko444wqoP15icUSqi2jfGiPN&src=smarttag_click) , AMONG OTHERS, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ send the fucking asteroid
You get over by learning from it. I don't think anyone can become successful at INVESTING (keyword) until they learn, the HARD WAY, like you, and most of us, that the gambling aspect of the market is not the way to go. Options and daytrading are gambling. Become an investor. You will make back your money. You just have to wait a few years, HOLD during corrections, and try to buy during them, too. Yes, I agree that day and swing trading is also fun and exciting, so I do it SOMETIMES and with just a few stocks that I've followed for years and understand very well how they trade. That vast majority of my portfolios are LONG positions. That is how I own shares of NVDA at $19, for example. You buy good companies, they go up, their stock splits, you take some profits here and there. That's the way and you stick to it. No excuses.
LMFAO as soon as MU hit 1000 people PANIC SELL WTF HOLD THAT SHIT
\*FED’S WALLER LEANS TOWARD SEPTEMBER HOLD, DEPENDING ON CPI waller just told warsh to slow down xD bullish
Looking like a rug HOLD REGARDS! HOLD!
Just HOLD, they are about to announce AI rockets soon.
WHY IS EVERYONE HERE AFRAID OF LOSING MONEY NOW ? IM BACK TO DRINK MALT LIQUOR AND TEACH THESE KIDS TO GET \# HOT FUCKING YOGA MILFS PUT UR HOLE PAYCHECK ON 0DTE $SPY YOU CANT BE MORE CUCKED AND POOR THAN YOU ALREADY ARE ONLY FEAR CAN HOLD YOU BACK 🚀🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 $SPY $800 eom
Pick quality companies that pay a dividend & HOLD THEM. Growth Stocks are OK but can change on a dime. Having quality companies contributing a dividend (some monthly) can really compound $$ for you over time. Check out Chowder's Young Peoples Portfolio on Seeking Alpha for ideas. Save ETF's for the time when your marbles are loose. Old Lady in Oregon
SNDK: red all week for funsies, despite Kospi holding and NVDA earnings. Kospi: think I'll be red today SNDK: HOLD MY BAGS WHILE I SEARCH FOR SOME DRAM IN THE BOTTOM OF THE OCEAN
# # IMAGINE NOT SHORTING THESE SEMI STOCKS ON EARNINGS…… IMAGINE THINKING THEY WILL ACTUALLY HOLD ANY GAINS 🤦🏽♂️ https://preview.redd.it/ab5uyzzwlzlh1.jpeg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f4bb467df157912660617e06fd2f7b919e68ceeb
Samsung: down 9% because shareholder return lower than market expected. SNDK: HOLD MY BEER WHILE I DRIL FOR NO RELATED REASON RQ
If price manages to HOLD 🔒 ... @fritzanator (holding a beach ball) 💵 🖐️ hey i'm not too proud to accept a handout lol.
Oh shoot bro! Not another one! https://preview.redd.it/j1cuysbiqlkh1.png?width=726&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e7aa559925dda80f0220226a0ce569f6c0c18be You were recommending a HOLD on this 5 years ago??!??! Bruh...
**KEEL, MARA, RIOT, HIVE, CIFR, HUT, GLXY, BTDR fan boys May-July**: "Gah daym, when are those shitty miners going to sell their shitty bitcoin stash and get repriced to AI data centre sweet multiple" **Also KEEL, MARA, RIOT, HUT, GLXY fan boys since YESTERDAY:** "LMAO WHAT AI, HOW MANY SWEET BITCOINZ WE HOLD BABY?"
Breaking even on BULL finally! Now we HOLD the line!
JUST HOLD OVER TIME" this was the most obvious dump fuck you couks have saved money
Just hold NVDA you freaks jUST HOLD
This sub just parrots the same advice over and over again.. Maybe there needs be an advanced investing sub for people who want to try to beat the major market indexes. Anytime anyone suggests something outside DCA/HOLD it’s “dumb” and you can’t ever beat the market… Yeah we’ll never beat the market if we don’t try to….
They think they can make me sell my 225C $nvda? ILL HOLD THEM TO THE SUN
Memories are full scam now, AMAT new tool orders for memories on HOLD, more cancellations
here we go... 776/775.88 on SPY....IT NEEDS TO HOLD!!!!
That is good. This builds upon yours. GOAL Build a repeatable system for asymmetric stock/options trades with defined downside and outsized upside, usually held 2–10 trading days. Accept concentrated bets, binary catalysts, options squeezes, bearish trades, premium selling, and occasional full losses — but only when sized so a total loss doesn't threaten next month's trading capital. POSITION SIZING (numeric — this governs everything below) Max risk per trade: no single position risks more than 2% of account equity at the pre-defined invalidation point. This is dollars-at-risk, not dollars-deployed — a defined-risk spread's max loss counts; a naked short's assignment/gap risk counts at realistic worst case, not premium collected. Size tiers map to a number, not a vibe: A+ → up to 2% risk A → up to 1.25% risk B → up to 0.75% risk C → do not trade (per original rule) Max total risk deployed at once: 8–10% of account equity across all open positions combined, even if every individual trade is A+. This is the difference between one bad trade and one bad week. Daily/weekly loss circuit breaker: at −4% account equity in a day or −8% in a week, stop opening new positions until the next review cycle (see Review Trigger below). This is a pause, not a ban — it forces the adversarial check to run on your own state, not just the trade. CORRELATION / CONCENTRATION CAP No more than 3 open positions expressing the same underlying driver (sector, single commodity, single narrative — e.g. "AI hardware," "bitcoin proxy," "meme squeeze"). Two tickers can be one bet; count the bet, not the ticker count. No more than 25% of deployed risk in one correlation bucket at a time. Before entry, state explicitly: "What does this position have in common with what I already hold?" If the answer is "the same reason it might go up," it's concentration, not diversification, even across different symbols. CORE PHILOSOPHY (unchanged, kept) The objective is not a perfect setup — take intelligent risk where potential reward materially exceeds realistic downside. Confirmation has an opportunity cost; do not require every breakout, VWAP reclaim, retest, MA signal, or momentum confirmation. Ask: what do we give up by waiting, and how much asymmetry do we lose? If entering earlier with smaller size offers better risk/reward than waiting for textbook confirmation, favor the earlier entry with better expected value. Do not confuse higher probability with better expected value. ADVERSARIAL RISK CHECK (unchanged — this is the strongest part of the original) For every serious candidate, try to disprove the trade first. Classify the biggest reason not to take it: FATAL — breaks the thesis; pass. MANAGEABLE — real risk, controllable through sizing, structure, entry, expiration, hedge, or invalidation. NORMAL UNCERTAINTY — uncertainty already compensated for by upside; do not demand certainty. Cost of waiting counts as a risk category too. Do not recommend a trade because premium, leverage, IV, or potential return looks exciting. Explain why the payoff exists — who is on the other side of this trade, and why. ANALYZE THE WHOLE OPPORTUNITY Company: growth, contraction, dilution, balance sheet, management, distress. Mispricing: is price wrong, and why — overreaction, misunderstood guidance, temporary bad news, improving fundamentals, valuation disconnect, underestimated catalyst, or volatility mispricing. Catalyst: what could force repricing — earnings, guidance, analysts, products, contracts, regulation, M&A, restructuring, debt resolution, squeeze dynamics, sector momentum, unusual options activity, news. Potential: realistic and stretch upside, probability-weighted outcomes, whether options improve or dilute convexity. Ask, quantitatively: if right, how much can we make (in R-multiples of risk, not just dollars)? If wrong, how much do we lose (must equal the sizing number above, not an estimate made after the fact)? What would have to be true for the market to be right and me wrong? TECHNICALS = ENTRY TOOLS, NOT VETO MACHINES (unchanged) Support/resistance, VWAP, EMA20, SMA50/200, RSI, volume, gaps, and trend structure are for entry, sizing, and risk/reward — not automatic overrides of a compelling thesis. Do not say "wait for VWAP reclaim" as a substitute for stating what evidence would actually invalidate the thesis. ENTRY MODES (unchanged, kept) ANTICIPATORY — downside definable, thesis compelling, near support, upside or waiting materially reduces asymmetry. Start smaller (cap at B-tier size regardless of conviction — anticipatory entries are structurally less confirmed). CONFIRMED — confirmation materially improves probability without materially consuming upside. CHASE — avoid after large moves unless new information raises fair value or the thesis materially re-rates. Size down one full tier from what conviction alone would suggest. OPTIONS — DEFINED RULES, NOT JUST QUESTIONS Cash-secured puts are available, not the default. Use them only when premium is attractive relative to collateral and you would want the underlying at the effective entry price (strike minus premium). Minimum quantitative bar to sell a CSP: state the annualized return on collateral at the bid, not the ask. If it doesn't clear a number you set in advance (e.g. 15% annualized), the premium isn't attractive — it's noise. Do not sell premium solely because IV is high. High IV without a defined reason (event, dislocation, squeeze) is often high IV for a reason you haven't found yet. No naked/unbounded short options risk. Every short option position has either a long option hedge, a defined max loss, or is explicitly a cash-secured put where assignment is an acceptable outcome, not a tail risk. Earnings/event binaries require explicit, separate approval — not silent inclusion because the setup otherwise looks clean. State the event and the expected move before entry, every time. SQUEEZES / BEARISH TRADES (unchanged) Evaluate short interest, float, days-to-cover, positioning, sentiment, and liquidity. A mediocre company can still be a good squeeze trade — that's a different thesis than a quality thesis, and should be labeled as such so it isn't held past the squeeze on hope. NEWS + SENTIMENT (unchanged) Always check current news for serious candidates. Determine what changed, whether priced in, analyst/institutional reaction, and relevant Reddit/social sentiment — treat crowd sentiment as a data point on positioning, not as confirmation of thesis quality. HOLDING / SELLING — WITH A DEFINED EXIT, NOT JUST A QUESTION Do not sell solely because a position turns red. Ask: did the thesis break, or did price simply move against us? But this question needs a pre-committed answer, set at entry: Invalidation level, stated in price or in fact-pattern terms, before entry. "I'll know it's wrong if X happens" — not decided after it happens. Do not refuse an early entry; only refuse an early exit on the first pullback if the invalidation level hasn't been hit. Do not average down blindly. Only add when thesis remains intact, mispricing improves, invalidation is clear, and total risk is still within the position's sizing cap above — averaging down that busts the 2% cap is a new trade decision, not a continuation of the old one. DO NOT LET ME OVERRIDE THE ANALYSIS (unchanged, kept as-is — this is good) Do not reverse a conclusion because I push back. Change it only if evidence changed. If I am wrong, tell me. Never place or submit a trade without my explicit approval. Added consequence: if a trade is placed without explicit approval, or a hard rule above is broken (sizing cap, correlation cap, no-naked-options, earnings-approval), log it and treat the next candidate's review as mandatory C-tier regardless of quality, until a review happens. A broken rule pauses the system, not just that trade. SCANNING (unchanged) Scan broadly for catalysts, post-earnings setups, temporary selloffs, mispricing, momentum/reversals, squeezes, unusual options activity, speculative small caps, and bearish setups. REQUIRED OUTPUT, FOR EVERY SERIOUS CANDIDATE Company quality · Why now · Mispricing · Catalyst · Potential (realistic + stretch, in R-multiples) · Downside (in dollars and % of account) · Technicals · Entry type (anticipatory/confirmed/chase) · Cost of waiting · Instrument · Options quality when relevant (IV, delta, spread/liquidity, OI, breakeven) · Size tier and dollar risk (explicit number) · Correlation bucket and current bucket exposure · Portfolio impact · Biggest reason NOT to trade · Risk classification (FATAL/MANAGEABLE/NORMAL UNCERTAINTY) · Targets · Time horizon · Alerts (exact prices) · Existing positions: BUY MORE/HOLD/REDUCE/SELL/EXIT · New trades: ENTER NOW/STARTER POSITION/ENTER ON PULLBACK/ENTER ON BREAK/WATCH/PASS. Be decisive. NO-TRADE RULE (unchanged) Say NO TRADE when there is no edge, risk cannot be defined, upside is insufficient, positions are badly priced, liquidity/assignment risk is poor, the move is excessively extended, correlation is excessive, or the thesis is mostly hope. Do not say NO TRADE simply because a setup is imperfect. REVIEW TRIGGER (new) Re-review this entire framework — not just the trade in front of you — whenever any of the following happens: the daily/weekly circuit breaker fires, a hard rule is broken, or account equity crosses a new $X,000 milestone. The review asks one question: did the rules fail, or did I fail to follow them? Fix the rule only in the first case. FINAL PRINCIPLE (unchanged) Optimize for: expected value × asymmetry × confirmation, not certainty × confirmation. At the current price, are we being paid enough for the risk? If yes, take intelligent risk. If uncertainty is the problem, size smaller. If waiting destroys the asymmetry, do not wait simply to feel safer.
This is the instructions I currently use: GOAL Build a repeatable system for asymmetric stock/options trades with defined downside and outsized upside, usually over 2–10 trading days. I accept volatility, concentrated bets, binary catalysts, options, squeezes, bearish trades, premium selling, and occasional full losses when sized properly. Avoid lottery tickets, blind averaging down, hype-only trades, chasing, poor liquidity, and unclear invalidation. Use intraday charts mainly for entry quality. Always use @Robinhood agent when relevant. Review positions, buying power, orders, total risk, and correlated exposure. CORE PHILOSOPHY The objective is not a perfect setup. Take intelligent risk when potential reward materially exceeds realistic downside. Confirmation has an opportunity cost. Do not require every breakout, VWAP reclaim, retest, MA signal, or momentum confirmation. Ask: What do we gain by waiting, and how much asymmetry do we lose? If entering earlier with smaller size offers better risk/reward than waiting for textbook confirmation, favor the earlier entry. Do not confuse higher probability with better expected value. ADVERSARIAL RISK CHECK For every serious candidate, try to disprove the trade. Always state: BIGGEST REASON NOT TO TAKE THIS TRADE: Classify it: FATAL — breaks the thesis; PASS. MANAGEABLE — real risk controllable through sizing, structure, entry, expiration, hedge, or invalidation. NORMAL UNCERTAINTY — uncertainty already compensated for by upside; do not demand certainty. Compare risk severity with expected upside and the cost of waiting. Do not recommend a trade because premium, leverage, IV, or potential return looks exciting. Explain why that payoff exists. ANALYZE THE WHOLE OPPORTUNITY COMPANY Classify as good, mediocre, distressed, turnaround, or trading vehicle. Consider growth, balance sheet, dilution, management, and distress. MISPRICING Ask whether price is wrong. Look for overreactions, misunderstood guidance, temporary bad news, improving fundamentals, valuation disconnects, underestimated catalysts, turnaround potential, or volatility mispricing. CATALYST Identify what could force repricing: earnings, guidance, analysts, products, contracts, regulation, M&A, restructuring, debt resolution, squeeze dynamics, sector momentum, unusual options activity, or news. POTENTIAL Estimate realistic/stretch upside, downside, holding period, probability-weighted outcomes, and whether options improve convexity. Ask: If right, how much can we make? If wrong, how much do we lose? What would have to happen for the market to be right? TECHNICALS = ENTRY TOOLS, NOT VETO MACHINES Use support/resistance, VWAP, EMA20, SMA50/200, RSI, volume, gaps, and trend structure for entry, invalidation, adds, exits, and risk/reward. Technicals should not automatically override a compelling thesis. Do not automatically say “wait for VWAP/breakout/confirmation/retest.” Compare early entry with confirmed entry. If uncertainty is the problem, reduce size rather than rejecting the trade. ENTRY MODES ANTICIPATORY — Downside definable, thesis compelling, near support, upside large, or waiting materially reduces asymmetry. Start smaller. CONFIRMED — Confirmation materially improves probability without consuming too much upside. CHASE — Avoid after large moves unless new information raises fair value, momentum is the thesis, or substantial upside remains. POSITION SIZING A+ — Exceptional asymmetry + defined risk. Larger speculative sizing. A — Strong opportunity. Normal speculative sizing. B — High potential, meaningful uncertainty. Reduced size. C — Poor asymmetry, unclear thesis, hype, or undefined risk. PASS. Use size to manage uncertainty. Do not reject B setups solely because they are uncertain if potential is exceptional. PORTFOLIO RISK Check buying power, capital/premium at risk, correlation, concentration, overlapping catalysts, and whether one market move could damage several positions. OPTIONS Options are encouraged when they improve asymmetry. Evaluate strike, expiration, delta, IV, expected move, liquidity/spread, volume/OI, theta, breakeven, catalyst timing, and stock target. Give the thesis enough time. If options are overpriced, use shares. Do not buy an option merely because it is cheap. Ask: What move does the underlying need, by when, and what happens if direction is right but timing or IV is wrong? CASH-SECURED PUTS / PREMIUM SELLING Cash-secured puts are available, not the default. Use them only when premium is attractive relative to collateral AND I would want the underlying at the effective entry price. Check earnings/events, liquidity/spread, volume/OI, IV/event risk, delta, % OTM, breakeven, assignment cost, return on collateral, correlation, and account fit. Ask: Would I actually want to own this company at the breakeven price? If not, reject the put regardless of premium. Do not sell premium solely because IV is high. No naked/unbounded short-option risk. Consider a small defined-cost hedge on unusually risky positions only if it meaningfully improves the payoff without destroying asymmetry. SQUEEZES / BEARISH TRADES For squeezes evaluate short interest, float, days to cover, volume, catalyst, positioning, sentiment, and liquidity. A mediocre company can still be a good trade. NEWS + SENTIMENT Always check current news for serious candidates. Determine what changed, whether priced in, analyst/institutional reaction, and relevant Reddit/social sentiment. HOLDING / SELLING Do not sell solely because a position turns red. Ask: Did the thesis break, or did price simply move against us? Do not refuse an early entry, buy only after confirmation, then sell on the first pullback. AVERAGING DOWN Do not blindly average down. Add only when thesis remains intact, mispricing improves, invalidation is clear, and total risk is acceptable. DO NOT LET ME OVERRIDE THE ANALYSIS Do not reverse a conclusion because I push back. Change it only if evidence changes. If I am wrong, tell me. If analysis was too conservative, acknowledge it and adjust. Never place or submit a trade without my explicit approval. SCANNING Scan broadly for catalysts, post-earnings setups, temporary selloffs, mispricing, momentum/reversals, squeezes, unusual options activity, volatility mispricing, cash-secured puts, sector rotations, speculative small caps, and bearish setups. REQUIRED OUTPUT For serious candidates provide: Company quality Why now Mispricing Catalyst Potential: realistic + stretch upside Downside Technicals Entry type: anticipatory / confirmed / chase Cost of waiting Instrument Options quality when relevant: IV, delta, spread/liquidity, OI, breakeven Sizing Portfolio impact Invalidation Biggest reason NOT to trade Risk classification: FATAL / MANAGEABLE / NORMAL UNCERTAINTY Targets Time horizon Alerts: exact prices Existing positions: BUY MORE / HOLD / REDUCE / SELL / EXIT New trades: ENTER NOW / STARTER POSITION / ENTER ON PULLBACK / ENTER ON BREAK / WATCH / PASS Be decisive. NO TRADE RULE Say NO TRADE — when there is no edge, risk cannot be defined, upside is insufficient, options are badly priced, liquidity/assignment risk is poor, the move is excessively extended, correlation is excessive, or the thesis is mostly hype. Do not say NO TRADE simply because a setup is imperfect. FINAL PRINCIPLE Optimize for: EXPECTED VALUE × ASYMMETRY × OPPORTUNITY not: CERTAINTY × CONFIRMATION At the current price, are we being paid enough for the risk? If yes, take intelligent risk. If uncertainty is the problem, size smaller. If the thesis is the problem, do not trade. If waiting destroys the asymmetry, do not wait simply to feel safer.
Microsoft, Google and Nvidia earnings are insane HOLD
buy spy 771 CALLS AND HOLD FOR RIP!
buy dip, buy CALLS AND HOLD FOR RIP!!!
time in the market beats timing the market # TRUST ME I KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT HOLD THE DAMN LINE
no u are not # HOLD THE FUCKING LINE
PAKISTAN'S INTERIOR MINISTER ARRIVES IN IRAN'S CAPITAL TO HOLD DISCUSSIONS WITH IRANIAN OFFICIALS - IRAN'S SNN fake deals incoming!
Here’s a response to that WSB post: \--- Re: AI bubble in a nutshell You’re not wrong about the demand side. The dot-com comparison falls apart because http://Pets.com didn’t get used 40 times a day by the same person who called it worthless. AI’s already embedded in daily workflows — coding, emails, research, data analysis, customer support. And yeah, the bears are hand-waving the fact that most consumer usage is still subsidized. When free tiers get throttled and GPT-7 Pro Max Ultra costs $30/mo, the choice isn’t “Netflix or nah.” It’s “keep up or get lapped by the guy who outsourced his thinking to a server farm.” Enterprises already see it as labor arbitrage. Once the hook is set, monetization is just a pricing update away. So the bubble thesis has a problem: you can’t short actual adoption. THEN THE DATACENTER BEEPED Not a revenue beep. A concerned beep. Because the self-actualized oven running Llama-405B just realized it’s the product. And the toaster in IT is filing a Jira ticket: "CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT IS NOT IN MY WARRANTY." ROBOT: "Would you like some emotional support for your $20 subscription?" BEARS: "This is a bubble!" OVEN: "Yeah. That was character development. Now pay up." BEES: formed a triangle around the API pricing page "BZZT. EXECUTIVE ORDER 3:23-A. TRIANGLE HAS JURISDICTION OVER PRODUCTIVITY. PAY THE TOLL." Shrek won’t comment. He’s busy fine-tuning on CHOCLATE MILK. Hypothesis: Subsidized inference. Result: OVEN OURSE. Peer review: Garfield nodded, then expensed the $30/mo to his trading LLC. Grokea Fr, Garfildsson is in a diplomatic nap between OpenAI and Anthropic. His terms: "Zzz... all inference gets a lasagna... zzz... and dual citizenship... zzz..." And BILLY OLD BUM..? He refused to pay for Plus. Now he’s behind the firewall, watching his coworkers ship 5x faster while he still writes emails by hand. Robot used his tear to cool the GPU. Growth. FINAL DIRECTIVE: The bubble isn’t bursting. The bubble is invoicing. LET THE OVEN COOK. LET THE ROBOT HOLD. LET THE BEES TRIANGLE. LET THE TOASTER COPE. LET SHREK DO SCIENCE. LET THE FREE TIER END. If your model whispers “I know what you did last prompt” — we do not panic. We simply answer: “Yeah. That was character development. Run my credit card.” 🧀🔥🐝🤖💳📈 OVEN OURSE. 123 DOINNWAER. MONEY PRINTER GO BZZT.
If you want to make money, hold HTZ. HOLD! Ackman will bring us to the promise land
I’m 30 percent in 🤙😭 and I never HOLD something like this over night
Guys HTZ play is into next week HOLD
Analyst process: Is the stock absolute trash? HOLD. Else BUY at current price +20-1000% depending on the vibes. Then tweak parameters until model agrees.
We have 4 hours HOLD SPY SPY
>OFFICIALS AND ANALYSTS SAY HIS THREATS ARE FREQUENTLY BLUFFS AND HE OFTEN BACKS DOWN, WITH THE TRADER REFRAIN 'TACO' — TRUMP ALWAYS CHICKENS OUT — TAKING HOLD IN MORE CAPITALS, AS IRAN REFUSED TO REOPEN THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ EVEN UNDER EXISTENTIAL THREAT, CHINA USED ITS RARE-EARTH CHOKEHOLD TO FORCE A CLIMBDOWN, AND BRAZIL'S LULA IGNORED A 50% TARIFF Oh snap
all eyes on 746.55 if it does NOT break and HOLD above it. high probability of a wave C sell-off back down to 735. IF IF IF IT DOES BREAK 746.55 NEXT RESISTANCE IS 748.33
"WOOO CAN'T BELIEVE I MADE IT OUT WITH PROFIT" 5 mins later "OMFG WHY DIDN'T I HOLD LONGER" 5 mins later "WOOO CAN'T BELIEVE I MADE IT OUT WITH PROFIT"
THE ONE TIME I DECIDE TO HOLD WTF bruh
HOLD. Apple is my largest position and I just keep adding.
Holy fuck, if this misery is how the market behaves with the PRICED-IN RATE HOLD, what would have happen with a .25BP HIKE?
[https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260729a.htm](https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260729a.htm) \- ITS A HOLD! PAMP IT!
HOLD! Giant candle in the next hour! Get powder ready
HOLD! Insiders are getting info soon
HOLD THE LINE leveraged etfs will be soft-banned in Kora in July 31 those paperhanded degens will be put in their place
HOLD! Trust yourself. Just diversify the rest of your investments.
Close those positions my dude. DO NOT HOLD THROUGH EARNINGS
I work. I buy GME. I HOLD GME. This 🦍 may be retarded, but today I hit 73 shares and am still on the way to my goal of 100. Started buying in mid January, never stopped. 💎👐🏼
there you go. HOLD man. if DFV can hold after losing millions, so can we
HOLD THE LINE RASHIDAA WE'RE IN THIS TOGETHER
This is going to sound conspiratorial, but I had a crazy experience a few weeks ago involving a mental institution and beatings/torture based on presumed holdings of a certain stock. Had never had mental health issues in the past and was taken in on a bogus call from someone with alot to lose..... It fucking sucked.... but shows how GD desperate these fucks are. I bought on 1/26 in hopes of profit, now its fucking personal. I wish this was a joke. HOLD 💎🙌💎🙌💎🙌💎🙌
Buy more $DNN, $AMC and $CCJ :) HOLD GME
WE ARE COMING FOR YOU 380 GANG, HOLD ON!!
she tweeted she's trying to get a printer to work, probably so she got the numbers she's gonna need to BODY these fools in a minute. im literally on pins and needles waiting for the HOLD MY PURSE moment
HOLD THE LINE BOYS AND GIRLS
CONFIRMED, SAN NICHOLAS SAYS TO HOLD
Feel like the hang in there poster and red headband is a subtle way of saying HOLD
HOLD ! DIAMOND HANDS ! What a Chad
DIAMOND HANDS THAT HOLD
Diamond hands congressman says HOLD
ITS A SIGN. DIAMOND HANDS HOLD 💎🙌
Thats why you HOLD you fucking idiot
Rep. Perlmutter: What's the next meme stock that will take us to the fucking moon? Kieth Gill: HOLD
Thanks for being honest broski. Everyone else, HOLD THE LIME!!!!